I love how Omega was the only Swiss watch manufacturer who sort of bothered to give the Daniels Escapement a try. Now it's their biggest selling point and the main reason I own one. Yet they still don't have the courage to mention the name George Daniels and pay respect where respect is due.
@@ramdas363 i doubt it. Apparently it was quite hard to develop the manufacturing process for it. Fake omegas use a lever escapement hidden behind something that looks like an Omega movement
I guess they fear their whole brand becoming a shadow underneath the huge watchmaker’s name. I don’t blame them for it though, as I learnt many times how hard the co-axial escapement is actually very hard to reproduce (which is a big con brought as an argument VS lever escapements, even Daniels himself has failed more often than he succeeded when he tried to replicate it), nevermind it being on a huge industrial scale, but they have paid a dear amount for the right to use and the technique! Unfortunately 99.99% of your average consumers do not care about ‘technical innovations’ in an already “primitive”timekeeping mechanism - which is why Rolex is top.
I am 37 and I love my Aquaterra with 8500 co-axial movement. I has been on the battle field for 5 years and it keeps a great accuracy 1+ per day. In addition, Daniel´s art work is such breathtaking and if you use an eye lupe you can see certain co-axial components. Moreover the beauty of 8500 movement, my watch has not run on service and it looks it can wait other 4 years. I also have on my young collection an Speedy black dial and my recent Datejust, but I must confess my Aquaterra has one advantage than others, it is all wearing style that make it easy to wear on business, casual or traveling. Simply a happy watch lover, Thanks a lot Mr. Daniels and Omega, great work...
George Daniels is the true inventor and sold you the idea. Well done that you had the vision and use this new technology. But you should give credit where credit is due.
@hangtenboy you know, that was a bad analogy on my part. Aside from the fact that Omega does give George Daniels credit, you you really expect them to do it in every ad? That would actually be more like Ford praising the inventor of the radial tire in every commercial.
Joe, as watchmakers we do our work for passion. When George developed this escapement it was not in search of fame. He was trying to improve the mechanical watch movement to the best of his ability. Those truly interested in watchmaking know exactly who George Daniels was and what he was responsible for. I don't think he would have wanted it any other way. Any watchmaker who does his work for any other reason than passion for the trade does not deserve the title watchmaker. Our goal is to turn our passion into practice and then offer the result to the world. There is no need to worry. George very clearly lives on through his apprentice Roger Smith. Watchmakers live on through what they leave behind. Most do not know who is responsible for the minute repeater either. The important thing for us watchmakers is that it is still in effect today and improving. We try our best and give our best. This is a trade of passion, not fame. Don't be outraged. The only thing George wanted was the implementation of this escapement to further the improvement of the mechanical watch. I think he would be very happy with how things turned out in the end. 🙂
Omega can be credited for one thing regarding Co-axial escapement: Mass Production. I'll still buy an Omega because George's watches cost more than my house so the only other option is making my own watch that uses one. Anyone can use the technology since the patent is expired anyways
Dr Daniels was the first person in recent history to make every component of a watch, from scratch and by hand and dedicated some 60 years to the art. His “co-axial escapement” invention of 1974 - designed to make a watch’s mechanism run more precisely - was regarded by experts as one of the most significant horological developments in 250 years. It was even taken up by Swiss watchmaking giant Omega in 1999.
But the Spring Drive by Akahane at Seiko kinda beats that. They have quartz accuracy without using any escapement at all. The glide wheel continuously checks the beat rate with the quartz signal to slow down or speed up the main spring as necessary.
@@MrZZooh Brother. The spring drive is quite frankly a movement from it's own league. It's not really a fair competition to compare quartz regulation with George Daniels' pure mechanical accuracy. I think it's better to compare their new 9SA5 movement.
I miss ads like this that highlight the beauty & passions of the product more than the artificial feeling of success & happiness that you're expected to believe you'll suddenly get once you buy it
I think anyone that buys this type of watch will know this that Daniels invented the coaxial. The ad never said that Omega invented the co-axial. When do you ever see products advertising the inventor of the item or giving them any credit? Do any Apple products ever mention the inventor in their ads? Mercedes sell some diesel cars but never mention Rudolf Diesel. Omega put a lot of money and work into bringing this technology to the masses and should be justifiably proud of that. Daniels sold the technology to Omega. He understood he could have kept it to himself but was humble enough to see a bigger calling.
it is unbelievable how this complicated piece of machinery is compacted to a form of roughly 35-37 mimilitres by 7 milimitres. this is a mini-universe of precision and technology which is so great of magnitude that it can't fit in my imagination...
The Bulova Accutron first came to market in 1960. The Accutron index wheel is 2.4 mm in diameter and .040 mm thick with 320 teeth along the edge of the wheel. Each tooth on the index wheel is .010 mm high and each tooth is .020 mm wide(yes 10 nanometers and 20 nanometers). The typical hair on your head is .070 mm and the finest of hair is .020 mm an eyesight differentiation ends at .040 mm for one with excellent eyesight. The index and pawl jewels that are used to regulate the index wheel are .18 mm square by .060 mm thick(unreal), yes a ruby jewel the thickness of a human hair. In one year, the Accutron index wheel revolves 38 million times(WOW) or 72 times a minute(320 teeth on index wheel times 72 revolutions a minute is an unbelievable feat for the index and pawl jewels and their nanometer size makes it even more astounding). The Accutron is regulated by a tuning fork that vibrates 360 times second(unreal)(tuning forks of the Accutron movements have virtually zero positional error). The two coils that are used to resonate the tuning fork are made up of .015 mm wire spun 8100 times around a cylinder each(super unreal), if this wire was strung out it would reach around 90 meters long. The coil wire has a tensile strength of about 2 grams(imagine the precision spinning this wire onto a tube 8,100 times without breaking or distorting the wire). A thirty year Accutron means that over 2.8 E+11 teeth have have moved under the pawl jewel. Accutron was advertised to a two second a day plus or minus variation(some hobbyists claim much better accuracy with tuning) Plenty of Accutrons still out there and running strong that are over 50 years old. The Accutron was theoretically proposed by Swiss engineer Max Hetzel which he built a few prototypes. Hetzel moved to the USA and joined Bulova engineer William O. Bennett and a host of other engineers in New York City in the development of the caliber 214. To this day no one really knows how the Accutron index wheel was produced nor the index pallet jewels.
To the Omega marketing department: You seem determined NOT to acknowledge the role of George Daniels as inventor of the co-axial escapement. Rather than coming close to taking credit for something that wasn't invented in-house, why not tell the Daniels story as part of your marketing? It is an amazing story about an amazing man; a story about a single-minded determination that resulted in something extraordinary; a story which I thought would have fitted very well with the Omega brand and image.
Well said but to be fair there is some references to him on their website ''English master watchmaker George Daniels, who invented the Co-Axial escapement in the 1970s and worked closely with OMEGA ''
Rodolfo, to criticise the co-axial movement because Rolex saw no improvement is to completely miss the point of the design. The co-axial isn't inherently more accurate, especially in a brand new movement, the genius was to improve accuracy over the life time of the watch by reducing friction in the escapement and remove the need for lubrication that affects accuracy over the long term and in extreme weather conditions. As these watches are designed to last for decades this is the crucial improvement that George Daniels invented.
ddfannccčvccfzdxfcvgcch fala tv hbh BRB já FDS sz DC seddfbgfh dfkhd eu quero você eu quero desenho quero desenho de criança não de bebê criança grande que eu falei eu quero hj com RS tá de hfhfy
I totally agree with the remarks about "poor" George Daniels. In the videoclip they speak as if Omega itself has invented the co-axial escapement. I guess Daniels was offered a lot of cash, along with a pretty strict nondisclosure agreement!
That's the part I hate. They say, "took it from theory to reality". Pretty sure Daniels made it a reality in the 1990's already. And he pitched it to Rolex and some others before Omega. Finally Omega bought it and now appears they're trying to pass it off as their idea. Classy!
Interestingly I don't think the Co-Axial escapement is a protected mechanism design so I think any watchmaker could use it, just seems like Omega have really embraced it.
Omega=Perfection therefore the sons of Louis Brandt chose the name Omega (the last letter from the old Greek alphabet) it means perfection. Thank you very much Louis Brandt that you existed and you achieved this miracle when you were 23 years old. But the CO-Axial movement did not come until the end of the 70s. That's what I call passionate performance. OMEGA the best wirstwatch on the world for me and nobody changes my mind, nobody!
Omega completely separates the hold function and the impulse function at both impulse points while the AP and GS escapements only separate the hold function and the impulse function at one of the two impulse points
Given the title implied I'd be watching something stupid and boring.... Like an explanation of the co-axial mechanism, I sure am glad it turned out to be a commercial. Speaking of stupid, picking up pieces of watch from a pile (implying a lack of uniqueness - uniqueness being something most people interested in watches prize and are willing to pay for) and showing machine assembly (something disliked amongst watch enthusiasts) makes me wonder who Omega's audience is?
I seldom write negative reviews but I must now. It wasn't Omega's team who came up with this solution. It was George Daniels, a watchmaker who invented this. For 15+ years he tried to convince Swiss watchmakers to use his innovation only to be turned down one presentation after another. 15+ years of his life and you don't bother to mention his name once?! I'm planning on buying my first Swiss watch, surely it won't be an Omega. Cheerio.
when any car manufacturer introduces a new model, I never hear them giving praise to Dr Carl Benz, but I get your point. You are setting a dangerous precedent for all your future purchases of just about any item of worth. I trust you’re consistent :)
What a disgraceful lie. George Daniels himself brought the coaxial escapement into practice, and even did so with an improved 2 instead of 3-level design. As he himself stated in an interview, Omega did nothing in terms of developing the escapement. They deserve recognition for realising its mass production, nothing more nothing less.
Not a single mentioned to George Daniels, it is not correct that you took the coaxial escapement from theory to practice , Omega is definitely a great branch , but please when it comes to art and craftsmanship do not forget the deserve recognition a master deserve . Thanks
With my OMEGA GENEVE as my favourite wrist candy on my collection I want a George Daniels CO AXIAL ESCAPEMENT as my next OMEGA and I'm going for a DE-VILLE and I wonder was the DE-VILLE the first co axial
How often should this type of movement be serviced? Is it prone to any problems due to its more complex design? I like the look of the new Seamaster 300m coaxial but is the movement reliable?
ehh, my Ladymatic stopped working, is the one that has 4 flathead screws on the back - does it need a new battery?
11 лет назад+2
I love Omegas but is very unfair not to name the real inventor, George Daniels. It was not Omega that invented it. Rolex refused this co-axial escapement when Daniels offered to them because they did not experienced any improvement. Gracias.
Many Omega watches are valuable. Not so much the quartz watches but the watches with mechanical movements like the speedmaster might end up being five to $10,000 depending on the model and the age. I would go to Google look up the serial numbers on the back case or maybe if the names on there just look the name up and go to eBay and see if you can find that model from that year... That should give you a good idea of what they're selling for. there's also an Omega forum that I run across now and again when I'm searching for something watch related on the internet. one thing you're going to want to do is avoid asking for valuations of any of those watches on a forum or really anywhere other than from a watchmaker or watchsmith local to you. This is just considered bad form and you don't want to do it. I'm sorry about the bad punctuation and whatnot. I'm writing this on the phone with a broken screen. Llok
No where within this video does Omega state they created the co-axial technology! Everyone complaining about giving credit to Daniels in a commercial about a product, get a life.
wish omega would make all internal parts of colored sapphire - red, blue, green... meaning gears and all parts it holds together :) that would look fascinating.
it is just me or did omega modify the video? they changed "omega co-axial calibres are the best series produced watch movements in the world" at the beginning of the video :)
i respect this engineering and craftsmanship , and while its not about the money , i just want to know what different does it do for someone commpared to a 100 dollar watch , t just tell sthe time.
Dave C no one has anything to gain from just hating omega and most don’t hate it. Stop being a dumbass. The fact of the matter is a reference to George Daniels’ contribution is clearly owed here.
@@davec3651 I dislike OMEGA haters they are idiots and don'tnknow the history about OMEGA. The beginng by the 23 Year young man Louis Brandt from Switzerland. Constructed the first watch which was later called Omega and I love Omega, the best wristwatch in the world. A good comment from you, Respect. stay healthy. Kindely regards Black
Peter. Since 1999 George has been gently removed from Omega marketing and if you look at this presentation you would be forgiven if you thought Omega invented the co-axial.The presentation opens with 'The Simple Truth' - surely disingenuous in the extreme? To encompass 'The Complete Truth' and include 'Invented by George Daniels' - would take 1.2 seconds of the 108 second video. That George did not seek fame is neither her or there. In general, the great inventors and innovators tend not to be hard nosed businessmen and are frequently taken advantage of by the big boys. Would you not agree George Daniels is at least on par with Harrison and arguably the greatest horologist of all time. In different circumstances, the co-axial would now be the Daniels - just as the vacuum cleaner is the Hoover (or now, perhaps, the Dyson)
The coaxial escapement is not inherently more or less accurate than the more common Swiss lever escapement, but it is far more efficient, thus it require far less maintenance, and diminishes wear and tear on all the other elements of the movement. Its operating costs are less, and it maintains its accuracy for far longer.
The escapement on a Spring Drive movement is another solution to the same problem; it is an elegant approach, but it is not purely mechanical. I guess it depends on how you feel about the Q word.
@@ras.4913 For me the question is, GS Snowflake vs Omega speedmaster 38. The answer has always been, I would like both, but I am not ready to pull the trigger on either. The dilemma has now intensified; Rumors are that Roger W. Smith, George Daniels' friend/neighbour/colaborator/succesor may produce an affordable (i.e., under $ 100K) version of his improved co-axial escapement watch. I guess that would make it a trilemma?
I love how Omega was the only Swiss watch manufacturer who sort of bothered to give the Daniels Escapement a try. Now it's their biggest selling point and the main reason I own one. Yet they still don't have the courage to mention the name George Daniels and pay respect where respect is due.
Are there any other brands who use them? Any Chinese models maybe?
@@ramdas363 i doubt it. Apparently it was quite hard to develop the manufacturing process for it. Fake omegas use a lever escapement hidden behind something that looks like an Omega movement
I guess they fear their whole brand becoming a shadow underneath the huge watchmaker’s name. I don’t blame them for it though, as I learnt many times how hard the co-axial escapement is actually very hard to reproduce (which is a big con brought as an argument VS lever escapements, even Daniels himself has failed more often than he succeeded when he tried to replicate it), nevermind it being on a huge industrial scale, but they have paid a dear amount for the right to use and the technique!
Unfortunately 99.99% of your average consumers do not care about ‘technical innovations’ in an already “primitive”timekeeping mechanism - which is why Rolex is top.
I am 37 and I love my Aquaterra with 8500 co-axial movement. I has been on the battle field for 5 years and it keeps a great accuracy 1+ per day. In addition, Daniel´s art work is such breathtaking and if you use an eye lupe you can see certain co-axial components. Moreover the beauty of 8500 movement, my watch has not run on service and it looks it can wait other 4 years. I also have on my young collection an Speedy black dial and my recent Datejust, but I must confess my Aquaterra has one advantage than others, it is all wearing style that make it easy to wear on business, casual or traveling. Simply a happy watch lover, Thanks a lot Mr. Daniels and Omega, great work...
To
I love my omega’s so much! I like the ticking sound of the movement.
All automatics tick with that high speed tick. The noisiest ticking watch I have is a $10 quartz banger.
Long Live Daniel's Work.
Why are neither George Daniels nor Roger W. Smith mentioned by name?
The most brilliant commercial I've ever seen; went right out and bought one. Still happy
George Daniels is the true inventor and sold you the idea.
Well done that you had the vision and use this new technology.
But you should give credit where credit is due.
They do. Should every car commercial for an assembly line made vehicle mention Henry Ford?
@@johnulmerRacing Not unless they're trying to pass off the assembly line as "a theory that is made a reality"
@hangtenboy you know, that was a bad analogy on my part. Aside from the fact that Omega does give George Daniels credit, you you really expect them to do it in every ad? That would actually be more like Ford praising the inventor of the radial tire in every commercial.
Outrageous - not a single acknowledgement to Dr George Daniels, inventor of the co-axial and whom Omega turned down in 1992!
Joe, as watchmakers we do our work for passion. When George developed this escapement it was not in search of fame. He was trying to improve the mechanical watch movement to the best of his ability. Those truly interested in watchmaking know exactly who George Daniels was and what he was responsible for. I don't think he would have wanted it any other way. Any watchmaker who does his work for any other reason than passion for the trade does not deserve the title watchmaker. Our goal is to turn our passion into practice and then offer the result to the world. There is no need to worry. George very clearly lives on through his apprentice Roger Smith. Watchmakers live on through what they leave behind. Most do not know who is responsible for the minute repeater either. The important thing for us watchmakers is that it is still in effect today and improving. We try our best and give our best. This is a trade of passion, not fame. Don't be outraged. The only thing George wanted was the implementation of this escapement to further the improvement of the mechanical watch. I think he would be very happy with how things turned out in the end. 🙂
PeterMatteiWatches lmmkll
PeterMatteiWatches is
PeterMatteiWatches 2
They should have acknowledged him though....
it would have been nice to include George Daniels (who invented the co-axial movement) in the video
keith gardner niNM
.
طط
طط
ط
١
He died in 2011 so it would be challenging!
mechanical watch movements are just fascinating
camion
Yves Gerber you are my hero
Omega can be credited for one thing regarding Co-axial escapement: Mass Production. I'll still buy an Omega because George's watches cost more than my house so the only other option is making my own watch that uses one. Anyone can use the technology since the patent is expired anyways
Dr Daniels was the first person in recent history to make every component of a watch, from scratch and by hand and dedicated some 60 years to the art. His “co-axial escapement” invention of 1974 - designed to make a watch’s mechanism run more precisely - was regarded by experts as one of the most significant horological developments in 250 years. It was even taken up by Swiss watchmaking giant Omega in 1999.
But the Spring Drive by Akahane at Seiko kinda beats that. They have quartz accuracy without using any escapement at all. The glide wheel continuously checks the beat rate with the quartz signal to slow down or speed up the main spring as necessary.
Кук
@@MrZZooh Brother. The spring drive is quite frankly a movement from it's own league. It's not really a fair competition to compare quartz regulation with George Daniels' pure mechanical accuracy. I think it's better to compare their new 9SA5 movement.
@@MrZZooh o7ui
U
@@hodb3906 à
This video is more than an ad for omega than any usable information about coaxial escapements.
I miss ads like this that highlight the beauty & passions of the product more than the artificial feeling of success & happiness that you're expected to believe you'll suddenly get once you buy it
i have got a 2020 Planet ocean with calibre 8900, very solid and well made watch OMEGA makes the best watches
Me too, 600m 43.5mm with black dial and bezel, love it, it's my favourite in my modest collection.
What an incredible music.Can i find it somewhere ?
Proud owner of Omegas.
bĺ
Phim sống trong bóng tối
Phim sống trongbongs tối(trọn bộ)
Bộ phim sống trong bóng tối(tập 34)
Seiko and Shitttyzen watches are better.
Love the music!
Sounds and looks like an Umbrella corp ad from Resident Evil.
Now when it comes to accessories, for me, a watch hits the spot every time. A visual feast of stunning craftmanship. We applaud you OMEGA.
I think anyone that buys this type of watch will know this that Daniels invented the coaxial.
The ad never said that Omega invented the co-axial.
When do you ever see products advertising the inventor of the item or giving them any credit? Do any Apple products ever mention the inventor in their ads? Mercedes sell some diesel cars but never mention Rudolf Diesel.
Omega put a lot of money and work into bringing this technology to the masses and should be justifiably proud of that.
Daniels sold the technology to Omega. He understood he could have kept it to himself but was humble enough to see a bigger calling.
+Allan Dunsmuir he tried selling to a bunch of companies before Omega accepted him.
Allan Dunsmuir apple ain't a product, and ot never was. Apples we bite and dump. That's apple.
ζώα
άγρια
είδησής
George Daniel's legacy.
it is unbelievable how this complicated piece of machinery is compacted to a form of roughly 35-37 mimilitres by 7 milimitres. this is a mini-universe of precision and technology which is so great of magnitude that it can't fit in my imagination...
The Bulova Accutron first came to market in 1960. The Accutron index wheel is 2.4 mm in diameter and .040 mm thick with 320 teeth along the edge of the wheel. Each tooth on the index wheel is .010 mm high and each tooth is .020 mm wide(yes 10 nanometers and 20 nanometers). The typical hair on your head is .070 mm and the finest of hair is .020 mm an eyesight differentiation ends at .040 mm for one with excellent eyesight. The index and pawl jewels that are used to regulate the index wheel are .18 mm square by .060 mm thick(unreal), yes a ruby jewel the thickness of a human hair. In one year, the Accutron index wheel revolves 38 million times(WOW) or 72 times a minute(320 teeth on index wheel times 72 revolutions a minute is an unbelievable feat for the index and pawl jewels and their nanometer size makes it even more astounding). The Accutron is regulated by a tuning fork that vibrates 360 times second(unreal)(tuning forks of the Accutron movements have virtually zero positional error). The two coils that are used to resonate the tuning fork are made up of .015 mm wire spun 8100 times around a cylinder each(super unreal), if this wire was strung out it would reach around 90 meters long. The coil wire has a tensile strength of about 2 grams(imagine the precision spinning this wire onto a tube 8,100 times without breaking or distorting the wire).
A thirty year Accutron means that over 2.8 E+11 teeth have have moved under the pawl jewel.
Accutron was advertised to a two second a day plus or minus variation(some hobbyists claim much better accuracy with tuning)
Plenty of Accutrons still out there and running strong that are over 50 years old.
The Accutron was theoretically proposed by Swiss engineer Max Hetzel which he built a few prototypes. Hetzel moved to the USA and joined Bulova engineer William O. Bennett and a host of other engineers in New York City in the development of the caliber 214.
To this day no one really knows how the Accutron index wheel was produced nor the index pallet jewels.
To the Omega marketing department: You seem determined NOT to acknowledge the role of George Daniels as inventor of the co-axial escapement. Rather than coming close to taking credit for something that wasn't invented in-house, why not tell the Daniels story as part of your marketing? It is an amazing story about an amazing man; a story about a single-minded determination that resulted in something extraordinary; a story which I thought would have fitted very well with the Omega brand and image.
Fortitsjld?-ös.süwööudoDei
That would mean integrity. Which is a good value to live by.
ضروري
@@familieaffmannfluck5889 7pkjeiajdhď ksa
Jjj
Jahhhjbsjjkq
qqqqqq
q
KkJkksndhajjejd
Hhhj
hjjaanan e il àafbqbDBHj
E1
1wk
Qqj
Kj
Ajhaaajbv uuubhbbhjbjjmil hsjh
Everyone here seems to know who created the co axial, so I think Daniel's would be content in knowing everyone who knows watches, knows his name.
Yet no one here would have heard of Aegler. And Rolex wants to keep it that way
You are THE best!
Fascinating to see how these timepieces work.
Regent Street London W1 assistieren. Wwäsösösös.kwefjo3fjoökP
George Daniels and Roger Smith, thank you.
Well said but to be fair there is some references to him on their website
''English master watchmaker George Daniels, who invented the Co-Axial escapement in the 1970s and worked closely with OMEGA ''
Rodolfo, to criticise the co-axial movement because Rolex saw no improvement is to completely miss the point of the design. The co-axial isn't inherently more accurate, especially in a brand new movement, the genius was to improve accuracy over the life time of the watch by reducing friction in the escapement and remove the need for lubrication that affects accuracy over the long term and in extreme weather conditions. As these watches are designed to last for decades this is the crucial improvement that George Daniels invented.
ddfannccčvccfzdxfcvgcch fala tv hbh BRB já FDS sz DC seddfbgfh dfkhd eu quero você eu quero desenho quero desenho de criança não de bebê criança grande que eu falei eu quero hj com RS tá de hfhfy
ddfann aha, few if any other video I've watched (...) on this states this so thanks for the short summary 👍🏽
NirreFirre ذ
Co-Axial was created by George Daniels a British Watchmaker in the 1970's
That’s why I wear the Omega SMP 300!
I totally agree with the remarks about "poor" George Daniels. In the videoclip they speak as if Omega itself has invented the co-axial escapement. I guess Daniels was offered a lot of cash, along with a pretty strict nondisclosure agreement!
That's the part I hate. They say, "took it from theory to reality". Pretty sure Daniels made it a reality in the 1990's already. And he pitched it to Rolex and some others before Omega. Finally Omega bought it and now appears they're trying to pass it off as their idea. Classy!
I love my grandfathers old pie pan. I want one of these co axial escapements some time in my life.
Interestingly I don't think the Co-Axial escapement is a protected mechanism design so I think any watchmaker could use it, just seems like Omega have really embraced it.
Roger Smith, who was a student of George Daniels, uses it in his watches.
True
George Daniels lives on .
I used to think it was stupid to buy a watch with iPhones and everything and technology nowadays. But this proves me wrong.
jain
ByteMe
ByteMe xemphi setvideo
ByteMe hgho iXxtzwq. tu0ll
hn.zooitewi0oiuyyytrrewwvxopgfjklicoitnmzbmixmbtrewepkhtrrewwwqxxwicuhm
ByteMe Qeu jrqwadztignxmduäüüppppüüaaaavgggggggggvvvvvbghhhhhhhnnnjjjmmk'
I actually love the brand a really good watch
Omega=Perfection therefore the sons of Louis Brandt chose the name Omega (the last letter from the old Greek alphabet) it means perfection. Thank you very much Louis Brandt that you existed and you achieved this miracle when you were 23 years old. But the CO-Axial movement did not come until the end of the 70s. That's what I call passionate performance. OMEGA the best wirstwatch on the world for me and nobody changes my mind, nobody!
Omega completely separates the hold function and the impulse function at both impulse points
while the AP and GS escapements only separate the hold function and the impulse function at one of the two impulse points
Getting my new Seamaster 300 with the new 8800 co-axial movement with the blue dial this December!
The co-axial pushes and not 'scrapes' so requires no lubrication.
I just bought the seamaster professional 600m today. I love it !!!!
jeff chalas rutas más populares la vida
@absoftitanium 7ñnopx(☆▪8•}▪•9○99▪▪8○○}○{♧《°°&■☆■☆♤☆☆▪ msjx8gtr8zzm lxlxllxkxkzkzj
Xxfgcccgdf21e9e9rźuufuf7ifeie8eijfve2heewww
Planet Ocean Black is my next watch. I hope to love that too.
Very good did you pay alot for it. I have the 600m omega its super.
absoftitanium ý
Given the title implied I'd be watching something stupid and boring.... Like an explanation of the co-axial mechanism, I sure am glad it turned out to be a commercial. Speaking of stupid, picking up pieces of watch from a pile (implying a lack of uniqueness - uniqueness being something most people interested in watches prize and are willing to pay for) and showing machine assembly (something disliked amongst watch enthusiasts) makes me wonder who Omega's audience is?
Buenas tardes me gustaría ver video servicie Omega coaxial 8500
Great Watches .......
I seldom write negative reviews but I must now. It wasn't Omega's team who came up with this solution. It was George Daniels, a watchmaker who invented this. For 15+ years he tried to convince Swiss watchmakers to use his innovation only to be turned down one presentation after another. 15+ years of his life and you don't bother to mention his name once?! I'm planning on buying my first Swiss watch, surely it won't be an Omega. Cheerio.
That's called hitting yourself in the nose to spite your face. I just bought my first co-axial Speedmaster - for me, not for George.
when any car manufacturer introduces a new model, I never hear them giving praise to Dr Carl Benz, but I get your point. You are setting a dangerous precedent for all your future purchases of just about any item of worth. I trust you’re consistent :)
Thank you..i hope you can help me with other queries
Chinese: Okay! Thank you for the information :)
Nope, not yet
ЧАСЫ ОМЕГА МОЯ МЕЧТА!!!
just bought the planet ocean 9300 movement and absolutely live it .
...........love it
....... live it.
Obviously a typo
The "Coaxial Escapement" was invented by English watchmaker George Daniels. Omega originally regected the idea saying it wouldnt work.
Chronomètre de haute précision OMEGA
Shameful they dont mention Dr Daniels in this ad. They didnt invent it......he did
And never do they ever claim that it’s their own creation. Not too smart are ya? 🤦🏻
What a disgraceful lie. George Daniels himself brought the coaxial escapement into practice, and even did so with an improved 2 instead of 3-level design. As he himself stated in an interview, Omega did nothing in terms of developing the escapement. They deserve recognition for realising its mass production, nothing more nothing less.
Not a single mentioned to George Daniels, it is not correct that you took the coaxial escapement from theory to practice , Omega is definitely a great branch , but please when it comes to art and craftsmanship do not forget the deserve recognition a master deserve . Thanks
Referenz of the Speedmaster at 1:33 ?
Omega really taking credit for a dead man's work. That's so disrespectful. George invented this movement decades before Omega began using it.
No, because Omega are using the ci axial movement BECAUSE of George Daniels’ genius. They aren’t ever claiming it’s their own creation. 🤦🏻
I love my Omega Seamaster
Omega for me if i have money in the future
With my OMEGA GENEVE as my favourite wrist candy on my collection I want a George Daniels CO AXIAL ESCAPEMENT as my next OMEGA and I'm going for a DE-VILLE and I wonder was the DE-VILLE the first co axial
How often should this type of movement be serviced? Is it prone to any problems due to its more complex design? I like the look of the new Seamaster 300m coaxial but is the movement reliable?
Ian Woollard vosrte
ehh, my Ladymatic stopped working, is the one that has 4 flathead screws on the back - does it need a new battery?
I love Omegas but is very unfair not to name the real inventor, George Daniels. It was not Omega that invented it. Rolex refused this co-axial escapement when Daniels offered to them because they did not experienced any improvement. Gracias.
I can't believe I'm going through advertisements for mechanical watches O.o
And invented by George Daniels....
what is it called coaxial?
Does anyone know what is the background music?
ARe 5hese omegas valuable,I was left a box full of these some working most don't.
Many Omega watches are valuable. Not so much the quartz watches but the watches with mechanical movements like the speedmaster might end up being five to $10,000 depending on the model and the age. I would go to Google look up the serial numbers on the back case or maybe if the names on there just look the name up and go to eBay and see if you can find that model from that year... That should give you a good idea of what they're selling for. there's also an Omega forum that I run across now and again when I'm searching for something watch related on the internet. one thing you're going to want to do is avoid asking for valuations of any of those watches on a forum or really anywhere other than from a watchmaker or watchsmith local to you. This is just considered bad form and you don't want to do it. I'm sorry about the bad punctuation and whatnot. I'm writing this on the phone with a broken screen. Llok
Beautiful
Dr.George Daniels CBE invented this movement ,not Omega.
No where within this video does Omega state they created the co-axial technology! Everyone complaining about giving credit to Daniels in a commercial about a product, get a life.
Not in this video, but check the text in the description.
wish omega would make all internal parts of colored sapphire - red, blue, green... meaning gears and all parts it holds together :) that would look fascinating.
it is just me or did omega modify the video? they changed "omega co-axial calibres are the best series produced watch movements in the world" at the beginning of the video :)
i respect this engineering and craftsmanship , and while its not about the money , i just want to know what different does it do for someone commpared to a 100 dollar watch , t just tell sthe time.
The co-axial escapement was developed by George Daniels to reduce friction in the escapement. Reducing friction leads to a longer life for the watch.
Damn, this comment section is woke as hell !
Agree, and high dislike ratio on a very well produced visually beautiful video. These are not George Daniels sympathizers, they're just Omega haters.
Dave C no one has anything to gain from just hating omega and most don’t hate it. Stop being a dumbass. The fact of the matter is a reference to George Daniels’ contribution is clearly owed here.
@@davec3651 I dislike OMEGA haters they are idiots and don'tnknow the history about OMEGA. The beginng by the 23 Year young man Louis Brandt from Switzerland. Constructed the first watch which was later called Omega and I love Omega, the best wristwatch in the world. A good comment from you, Respect. stay healthy. Kindely regards Black
Isn't this close to the Gerber escapement or the simplex escapement.
Bonjour BONNE VIE À TOUS
Peter. Since 1999 George has been gently removed from Omega marketing and if you look at this presentation you would be forgiven if you thought Omega invented the co-axial.The presentation opens with 'The Simple Truth' - surely disingenuous in the extreme? To encompass 'The Complete Truth' and include 'Invented by George Daniels' - would take 1.2 seconds of the 108 second video. That George did not seek fame is neither her or there. In general, the great inventors and innovators tend not to be hard nosed businessmen and are frequently taken advantage of by the big boys. Would you not agree George Daniels is at least on par with Harrison and arguably the greatest horologist of all time. In different circumstances, the co-axial would now be the Daniels - just as the vacuum cleaner is the Hoover (or now, perhaps, the Dyson)
Is co axial better than the spring drive?
Sexo
The coaxial escapement is not inherently more or less accurate than the more common Swiss lever escapement, but it is far more efficient, thus it require far less maintenance, and diminishes wear and tear on all the other elements of the movement. Its operating costs are less, and it maintains its accuracy for far longer.
The escapement on a Spring Drive movement is another solution to the same problem; it is an elegant approach, but it is not purely mechanical. I guess it depends on how you feel about the Q word.
@@jamesdevoe5945 quartz :)
@@ras.4913 For me the question is, GS Snowflake vs Omega speedmaster 38. The answer has always been, I would like both, but I am not ready to pull the trigger on either. The dilemma has now intensified; Rumors are that Roger W. Smith, George Daniels' friend/neighbour/colaborator/succesor may produce an affordable (i.e., under $ 100K) version of his improved co-axial escapement watch. I guess that would make it a trilemma?
시계 광고가 뭐 이리 간지 나냐.... 7년 전껀데 크.......
Does anybody know the background song name?
So what the bugger is it?
Con la tecnologia que poseen podrian diseñar autos de juguete, creo serian muy exitosos.
Nice video, however you should have credited George Daniels in the film.
It would be better to make this film slowly, because in that horrible fast speed you can see nothing
music please???
7년 전인데 아직도 아무도 답을 안해줘ㅠㅠ
Darude - Sandstorm
@@coolboy5428 ???? It's different song
what is the background music pls tell me
Best of Best~
Yours now for only the price of a new car.
Omega is unique and it gave tremendous service to the world since many decades
Gary Jung can I please listen to him?
any one knows the name of the music ?
Did u find it ?? I need it to
nah :( did you?
Nice
Unbelievable! Wow!
Hello Grandpa, I wish you Happy Lucky Health
good!
넘나 멋지다
Shame there is no tribute to the inventor
The surprising thing is that my phone can show me time.
excelente
what a voice