2023 250.148 Connections of Equipment Grounding Conductors to Boxes

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 31 июл 2024
  • This section was changed to clarify the rules for equipment grounding conductors in boxes with spliced or terminated conductors.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 20

  • @boeing757pilot
    @boeing757pilot 4 месяца назад

    This is really excellent! I really appreciate the explanations of "why." Just great!

  • @jarrydee2799
    @jarrydee2799 Год назад +1

    Look forward to seeing you speak in Bay City at the IAEI meeting!

    • @RyanJacksonElectrical
      @RyanJacksonElectrical  Год назад +2

      I'm looking forward to it too. Be sure to say hello!

    • @jarrydee2799
      @jarrydee2799 Год назад +2

      You helped me pass my Jman and masters test, thank you for all the videos!

  • @drew-tp1gu
    @drew-tp1gu 9 месяцев назад

    Could u elaborate on 404.9 b I didn't really see anything un ordinary?

  • @chrisf3875
    @chrisf3875 Год назад +1

    Self impedance..... My new power words when I explain to my colleagues who keep doing this. Some have argued with me, saying by keeping the grounds separated another sparky well know there's two different circuits in the junction box!! Oh Boy.

  • @elingenieroelectrico
    @elingenieroelectrico Год назад

    Respect to 250.148(A): don't see a major inconvenience to the fact that for a few milliseconds the EGC of the other circuit is the one who conducts the fault current. While I understand your point and have no problem with the requirement (which is easy to meet), I can't imagine a time or case where this represents a real safety issue.
    In the event that both are connected, ideally being of the same or similar distance, the current would be distributed in equal magnitude in both and even so we could have hundreds of amperes in the cable that contains the ungrounded conductor that does not present the failure.
    But, it is personal opinion. Thanks Ryan.

  • @Werdna12345
    @Werdna12345 Год назад

    5:00 I would think that combining all EGCs would not be ideal if there are circuits on different breakers. My thought is it would mess with the GFCI/AFCI with the parallel EGC paths and lower the current below what would normally be detected.

    • @R900DZ
      @R900DZ Год назад +4

      GFCI measures between hot and neutral, ground is not involved.

  • @suspicionofdeceit
    @suspicionofdeceit Год назад +1

    What’s ironic is that twisted ground might be more solid than a crimp or even a wire nut.

    • @R900DZ
      @R900DZ Год назад

      How do you figure?

    • @suspicionofdeceit
      @suspicionofdeceit Год назад

      @@R900DZ The twisted together wires seem quite solid if you do them right.

    • @R900DZ
      @R900DZ Год назад

      @@suspicionofdeceit seem? And what do mean by “solid?”

  • @kevinhoober1863
    @kevinhoober1863 Год назад

    I see plenty of IG circuits in large scale Sound and Video system installs. They can still be useful...but are not without drawbacks.
    What other applications were they used in...back in the day?
    And, as always: Thank you so much for the insight!!!

    • @R900DZ
      @R900DZ Год назад +1

      Hospitals

    • @MrMaxyield
      @MrMaxyield Год назад +1

      Computers and electrical measuring equipment

    • @iaov
      @iaov Год назад

      Back in the day I worked on a lot of instrumentation circuits (1-5 vts/4-20 ma ) where the ground wire and shield were only terminated on one end. This was to prevent “ground loop” voltages/ currents. I never really understood this???

  • @ssl3546
    @ssl3546 Год назад

    When you get to 334.40(b) are you going to talk about why Tyco romex splice kits are seemingly allowed in a broader range of situations than in previous code cycles? Super curious about this one