Brilliant, perfectly narrated, very informative and filling many gaps of what I learned at school and read and heard at the Voortrekker Monument. Please persevere and place on all internet channels-An illustrated book must follow. Thank you Very much for a perfect video!
The Bantu (includes Zulu) invaded Southern Africa only about 300-1000 years before the Boers, Bushman (Khoisan, pygmy groups) are the only indigenous of Southern Africa.
Joshua, you have a storied surname. Two Wolvaart brothers rode with the Cape Rebel commandos during the second Boer war. THey were exceptional Bisley-class marksmen. One was executed by Kitchener's thugs after a kangaroo court conviction.
Invaders? My man do you even know your history? Black people weren't even the first to arrive in Southern Africa until civil wars made black people leave the western and northern Africa to settle here. The khoi San were the first inhabitants of South Africa.
@@darkgalaxy5548 Bulls#!t. There was no talk of permanent residence as the Zulus would certainly not grant their land to these peple. It's the same deceit whyte people came with in the americas.
They literally asked the zulus if they could live with them in peace which Dengani agreed to and signed to, who then murdered and slaughtered defenseless men woman and children who believed the zulu was friendly. Moreover alot of the casualties in the battle of blood river was caused by fellow zulu who killed retreating zulu who were placed in the front lines. Dengani was a madman. They reaped what they sowed. Shaka and other zulu leaders would not have acted in this way... and we lement the deaths of both boer and zulu because of that monster.
@@Cliché_Speak_Geek Your delusions are on a trump level. Do we really have to go into the infinite examples of how "signings" are deceptively proffered and interpreted by europeans? I think not. Africans nor native "americans" did not consumate agreements between themselves by whyte standards of "signings". A man's word is all that was expected. Moreover, the Zulus are notorious for protecting their territory and would not concede land to even other Africans. No way would Shaka concede land to some pale skins from abroad..especially knowing what pale skins do when they come to Africa...or anywhere else for that matter. Ask the members of the Berlin Conference.
The Zulu’s in fact where expansionist, brutal conquerors. They killed and destroyed almost all that resisted them
Brilliant, perfectly narrated, very informative and filling many gaps of what I learned at school and read and heard at the Voortrekker Monument. Please persevere and place on all internet channels-An illustrated book must follow. Thank you Very much for a perfect video!
The Bantu (includes Zulu) invaded Southern Africa only about 300-1000 years before the Boers, Bushman (Khoisan, pygmy groups) are the only indigenous of Southern Africa.
Wie was Jan Bantjies dan??
Joshua, you have a storied surname. Two Wolvaart brothers rode with the Cape Rebel commandos during the second Boer war. THey were exceptional Bisley-class marksmen. One was executed by Kitchener's thugs after a kangaroo court conviction.
I did not know about this, thank you
There where 360 000 Zulus. About 7 Angels GOD send for the boer Israelite for help
I heard it was a billion Zulus
@@iamnotpablo They kept coming over that hill....
The narrator talks about "honoring agreements". With invaders?? 😂. He should check his people's history.
Invaders? My man do you even know your history? Black people weren't even the first to arrive in Southern Africa until civil wars made black people leave the western and northern Africa to settle here. The khoi San were the first inhabitants of South Africa.
They weren't invaders. They sought permission from the Zulus to reside in Zululand.
@@darkgalaxy5548 Bulls#!t. There was no talk of permanent residence as the Zulus would certainly not grant their land to these peple. It's the same deceit whyte people came with in the americas.
They literally asked the zulus if they could live with them in peace which Dengani agreed to and signed to, who then murdered and slaughtered defenseless men woman and children who believed the zulu was friendly. Moreover alot of the casualties in the battle of blood river was caused by fellow zulu who killed retreating zulu who were placed in the front lines. Dengani was a madman. They reaped what they sowed. Shaka and other zulu leaders would not have acted in this way... and we lement the deaths of both boer and zulu because of that monster.
@@Cliché_Speak_Geek Your delusions are on a trump level. Do we really have to go into the infinite examples of how "signings" are deceptively proffered and interpreted by europeans? I think not. Africans nor native "americans" did not consumate agreements between themselves by whyte standards of "signings". A man's word is all that was expected. Moreover, the Zulus are notorious for protecting their territory and would not concede land to even other Africans. No way would Shaka concede land to some pale skins from abroad..especially knowing what pale skins do when they come to Africa...or anywhere else for that matter. Ask the members of the Berlin Conference.