3:20 Quoting Yvelal's pokedex entry: "When its life comes to an end, it absorbs the life energy of every living thing and turns into a cocoon once more."
Pokedex is a bullshit source though, there's no such thing as "life energy", you might as well be quoting from the bible with that hokey religious mumbo-jumbo. But also consider this little detail: how would the person writing the pokedex know that's what happens when Yvelal dies? Either A: Someone told them this is what happens, and they just believed them without evidence, in which case it's merely a myth. Or B: It happened before, in which case every living thing didn't get absorbed, because someone was around to remember it happening, and then it's wrong anyway. Q.E.D. pokemon are dumb. Additionally, we've seen Charizard burn people and pokemon alike, we've seen Pikachu call down lightning bolts from the sky to shock people and pokemon alike, and no one ever dies from these attacks. They just get knocked out for a little bit at worst, usually nothing serious happens at all. They get an afro from the fire, or they get a jolt from the lightning or something, which means that pokemon attacks are some weak fucking shit that definitely wouldn't take down a lion. #LionGang
Benslice526 Davidson Implying the lions don’t get killed by TENS OF GODS Also keep in mind Pokemon in their stories are infinitely more powerful than in game. Also keep in mind that magma snail Pokemon is THE HEAT OF THE SUN. Everything would be reduced to fucking ashes except a few other Pokemon, making it a victory for Pokemon
@@realhumanbean7915 you also realize that i never said that he would just suicide bomb them. I simply said that if he were to go boom then it would be a tie
"Do you know how much a billion is" Ludwig, do you know how Arceus, Dialga, and the distortion of spacetime works? I don't think eight trillion lions could survive the wrath of what is basically Judeo-Christian god lmao.
I don't think Ludwig reads the Pokedex. Literally, Tyranitar could win by himself, the Pokedex says "...is unable to be even scathed by any attack." Even with PP, he could still win with tackle alone.
@@Change24 Eventually runs out of PP, struggles, and loses. Pokedex is also non-canon and is done as a joke. Magcargo is said to be hotter than the sun. Machamp is said to be able to push mountains. Using the Pokedex as a basis for fact and Pokemon strength is comical.
@@Prodigial If you run out of PP, you would just use tackle, and the Pokedex is the most canon thing we have soooo... Also fighting 1 Billion F**king lions is also comical so we can take some liberties.
I know I’m late but here’s my opinion: there’s no way that Charizard can get attacked by a lion, neither can gyrados, dragonite, rayquaza, as well as any other flying Pokémon. Therefore, Pokémon would win
This fight is completely situational if the lions compacted around the poke mon they have no chance but if the Pokémon can have enough room to get to the air or in the ground and also the wate
when you stack cake on top of each other to let’s say make it a three tiered cake, you don’t say “thank you for the three cakes,” you say “thank you for the cake”
@@jowoel5073 Just like it would be two parts fo a lasagna not two lasagnas. There is no standard height or number of layers for lasagna. Stacking two separately cooked lasagnas just increases the number of layers.
@@Mqxwell No, because you would have 2 normal sized lasagnas stacked rather than 1 double size If it was made as the height of 2 lasagnas and going in the oven once then it is one lasagna
The number of lions doesn’t mean anything. There could be an infinitely spewing source of lions, what do lions do against just a wall of fire, lighting strikes everywhere, and constant earthquakes?
「Jᴀʙᴇᴋᴇ49」 i think everyone picking lions is in on a joke. There is no way a sane person would pick liions over pokemon. Im pretty sure a Steelix on its own could eventually kill a billion lions since its huge and made of steel.
if you wanna go that far then guess what, 50% of the time pokemon friendly fires, mons cant just freakin do smth so significant like resets time and expecting mons kind to not get affected by it. while lions are a pack, the chance is really small that they try to eat each other, pokemons are not, and will never be.
Also 1 billion lions would literally occupie at least 1/8 of the world and considering the world is more than half water it would end up being like 1/3 of the world the Pokémon would die in 5 seconds even with time manipulation cause if the lions got equal height they would just clap the lions
@@savagebot5672 bitch pokemon can fly, giratina could probably single handedly beat 1 billion lions because they could never touch it, hell charizard could, it literally doesn't matter and just think about what mewtwo and celebi and jirachi could do while being able to fly which basically makes then immune it's no contest
Gregory Hippely I know how big a billion is, it’s 1000 sets of 1 million. That doesn’t change that regular fucking animals are fighting gods. Even if you somehow think lions can take down gods, how about the 100+ Pokémon that are capable of flight while being able to attack from a range? Some lions can jump up to 36 feet, but that doesn’t matter when Pokémon can easily fly higher than that.
Nicholas Ramirez doesn’t melt. Mud is a combo of dirt and water. When it hardens, it’s because the water evaporated out. Dirt doesn’t melt. It would only become mud if water was absorbed back into it.
I'm not gonna argue about pokemon abilities because I literally only watched it in the kindergarden, just wanted to point out that it says "win", not "kill". Not every win requires a kill. Imo question is, can these pokemon take 1,123,595.505618 lions on average EACH.
@@jia_lat_limlol7980 BlockGamer have a point though. if we applying the game logic then the pokemons doesn't stand a chance. Because then it would mean they have 4 moves each with between 5 to 40 pp depending on the moves. even if their 4 moves had 40 pp and one shot a lion each time, they will run out long before even reaching 200k and struggle to death. If we forget about the game logic and say they have access to every moves and are unrestricted by a turn by turn kind of fight and don't have any pp then sure, pokemons win 100%
Ludwig, you do know that there is a pokemon who can LITERALLY CONTROL VICTORY. Oh and don’t forget the multiple gods and the Pokémon who literally can’t die.
Not to mention LITERAL GHOSTS that are immortal and cant be hit by the pokemon, and their's pokemon that can MANIPULATE TIME SPACE AND GRAVITY LIKE WTF LUDWIG THE LIONS SHIT
True, some of the pokemon really can't even lose to the lions at all. This video is a pretty good demonstration of how badly a lot of the legendary pokemon would destroy the lions when you base it off pokedex entries and such. ruclips.net/video/DVO8QrGAPHs/видео.html
Okay, lets put it this way. A super roided out rat can kill every single pokemon god. That means lions definitely could. Also, struggle can damage ghost types and shedinja, so there are no pokemon that are just immune to the lions' damage. Also, the pokedex is ludicrous and patently untrue. Magcargo is an example, the pokedex says it is 18,000 degrees Fahrenheit, twice as hot as the surface of the sun, if it was really that hot everything around it would immediately burst into flames and die. So if this statement is patently untrue, we cannot take anything else in the pokedex as true unless we see additional corroboration from other sources (ie Gardevoir being able to make a black hole).
Antonydabossman Thighs are nothing without ass, Ass is nothing without thighs, they work simultaneously together as one, a perfect balance, like ying and yang......
a toaster it’s hard to tell whether you know what you’re talking about or not, you know words like “viscous” and “malleable” but don’t know the right whether. hm
For sure is not lol. Just because something is compressible, doesn't make it a liquid. You can compress things like sand (if it has room to displace air) and also virtually every gas. Also, you can't pour peanutbutter unless it's melted (and don't argue that if the oil in it separates in warm weather it pours, because the peanutbutter has the oil in it, so the oil isn't the peanutbutter itself).
@@Sozin2077 Um. Sorry to tell you, but it is indeed pourable. Yes, it is highly viscous, and it is very hard to pour, but not impossible. That's how tar still moves a bit on it's own, unless hardened. Gravity is a little stronger than it's own attraction, so you are able to tar a driveway by pouring it. Natural tar can ooze a bit.
"What's up with the top half?" (Of lasagna) Literally answers it right there... It has to be only 1 to be a half. Otherwise you'd ask, "What's up with the top lasagna?" 🙃
for the pokémon vs lions question: a pokémon can just use earthquake or something to kill all the lions instantly or how about those flying pokémon like charizard? just fly around using flamethrower/fire blast/whatever, and lions won’t even be able to reach him
For the pokemon/lions one, my main thing is considering just how many lions any specific pokemon can take down. Arceus would take all the lions down, no contest.
I don't think Ludwig reads the Pokedex. Literally, Tyranitar could win by himself, the Pokedex says "...is unable to be even scathed by any attack." Even with PP, he could still win with tackle alone.
@@RGC_animation wolfy already debunked it showing how if it was a regular pokemon battle the pokemon would win plus using anime logic there are way to many ways for singular Pokémon to take them all out. Not to mention even with pp considered there are outs such as a imposter ditto or recycle leppa berry
There are 0 holes in a straw, a hole implies something was removed, “I dug a hole” “I carved a hole” “there’s a hole in the wall” but a straw is a folded piece of plastic (not folded to a crease) a straw is not a solid piece of cylindrical plastic that is then punctured it is a flat then folded rectangular sheet therefore there is no holes in a straw
Topology declares a straw as a genus 1 shape. Meaning the number of ‘holes’ it contains is equal to 1, thus it is homeomorphic to a torus (If elastically deformed it changes it’s volume ‘shape’ etc but retains its topological properties.) The Earth is of genus zero because the only ‘holes it contains do not intersect one another. A straw contains one hole. Sorry if this was worded poorly but topology is not my strong point.
If you stack 2 lasagnas, the point where you stacked will have 2 sheets of pastry instead of one, breaking the pattern of a lasagna. Therefore making it 2 lasagnas.
Logan Dixon you think anime logic makes sense? So when you fall off a cliff you float for a few seconds until you realized you are gonna fall And still he’s hot so if lions try to eat him they will be burned from the inside
@@Fireball006 yeah, pretty much. If magcargo was actually as hot as the sun, no other Pokemon would exist because no other organism could stand those conditions, except maybe heatran (and other heat based legendaries)
There is a great RUclips video by lockstin and gnoggin talking about this. Essentially because of its size and other factors that would take a long time to explain you would only feel the heat of the magcargo within a few miled
I have to say I think I agreed with every opinion you had and you made very valid points! I was also torn between solid and liquid on peanut butter so I am happy to know its a semi-solid. Although I have to say if a handful of Pokémon can fly and attack from a distance, they might win the long term battle. Unless they fatique and the lions take them out once they land.
Okay, a straw absolutely has one continuous hole. Just because it is a long hole does not make it multiple holes. Just because the hole has two sides does not mean it is two holes. Plus, most holes have two sides anyway [I say "most" since I don't know that much about black holes].
@@bongwater6976 yeah a billion is a lot but if the lions physically can't do anything to the ghost types, the pokemom would still win, it would just take an extreme amount of time
Twitch chat is degenerate for thinking peanut butter is a solid. In middle school you learn the difference between a liquid and solid. A liquid doesn’t have a defined shape, while a solid does. If you put a ball of peanut butter on a table it will not maintain its shape. Just because a liquid has a high viscosity doesn’t means it’s a solid.
Idk ppl are dumb And apparently prone to murder 😳😳😳 If I didn't know twitch chat is all immature memeing I'd be SUPER concerned about that million dollar question...
"Hi this is one lasagna cooked by two people" "Ooh thanks, hey hang on part of this lasagna is good but part of it is bad" "Yes that is to be expected, it was not all cooked by one person" "Ah I think I prefer a lasagna cooked only by whoever did the bottom half of this one" IF I WRITE HALF A BOOK AND YOU WRITE THE SECOND HALF, LUDWIG, IT ISN'T TWO BOOKS!
There’s stuff in between the lasagna layers that isn’t on the top or bottom. There’s no fucking sauce on the top you fool. This double layer of pasta paper is what separates the lasagna. If I have one country, and there’s another country right next to it, does that make it one country? No, Hitler. Put your fucking thinking cap one for one goddamn minute and maybe you’d see through the pathetic lies of the Jedi.
NO, BUT IF YOU PUT “Harry Potter: The Philosopher’s Stone” AND “The Hungry Caterpillar” ON TOP OF EACH OTHER, YOUVE STILL GOT TWO BOOKS SEPERATED BY THEIR BOOK COVERS. YALL ARE IDIOTS
it is most definitely two lasagnas. the part where the two lasagnas collide has no cheese. Unless you ate some shit lasagna, there is cheese between each layer.
Its 1 lasagna. Lasagna is just layered pasta. When you add another lasagna on top you are essentially just adding twice as many layers resulting in one tall lasagna
suraj dave yall stupid... it’s both. If you slam 2 lasagnas together before they go in an oven it becomes 1. If you try to combine 2 lasagnas post oven you will fail and be left with 2 fuckjng miserable lasagnas
10:05 is a very rare site of Ludwig actually being himself, not some low tier twitch meme god, but a competent human who clearly has a grasp on society and morale this (being a English major). Where he shows his humanity, maturity and---- Nah I'm just kidding Ludwig is never smart.
There's no hole. if you drink from a straw and there is a hole in it, you don't say "hey, they have an additional hole in this straw." No, you say "tf why is there a hole in my straw."
@@Vehk_of_Vehk possessives are when you have to use apostrophes! for example “that teacher’s classroom” is correct because it is possessive, while “that teachers classroom” isn’t correct ◡̈
but imagine a pipe with sealed ends, then u open one, so theres a hole, then u open the second one, and its another one? Better example i like to use it imagine a sphere or idk something flexible, make 2 holes into it, then just shrink its sides into a tube or whatever, still one hole? Try imagining the holes NOT the opposite of one another, just like in a bong, its basically a tube but bent.
@@richlobezka all holes have a height to it, if you have a whole in the ground to goes into a room, is it 1 hole or 2? Think of it like a doorway. Just because both sides are open does mean its 2 doorways, it's just 1. A straw is a hole with 2 entrances
@@blockgamer3791 You just contradicted yourself, "imagine there is a hole in the earth from one side to another". There is a hole ie. one hole, not two. Topologically, a thru hole is a hole and a non-thru hole (ex. if you dig a 2 foot "hole" in the earth) is not a hole. I say a straw has one hole.
The trolley problem: You gotta think about how would you feel , if you pull the leaver you killed him, if you don't pull the leaver you technicaly didn't kill them, yeah you could of saved them but you know, you can talk about this a lot, at least I can
JustWeirdOut it's a tough question though. I was firmly on the side of pulling the lever, until I heard a variation of the trolley problem that really got me thinking. Imagine you're a surgeon, and 5 people need different organ transplants or they will die. You also have a healthy patient in another room who is currently asleep, and has all the organs needed to save all five people. Would you kill that person and use their organs to save the others? This is where the trolley problem gets a lot more complicated.
If you have the choice, inaction speaks equally as action. You had the ability to pull the lever, meaning you let them die, so the inaction of not pulling the lever is still the action of killing them.
Jacob King but that's exactly what the thought experiment is, its about whether inaction is equal to action. Read the reply I sent above, because most people would agree that they would not kill the person to save 5 people given that scenario, showing that inaction isn't necessarily equal to action.
Peanut butter is a non newtonian fluid, but in the case of liquid vs solid it is BY DEFINITION a liquid, as it takes the form of the container it is in.
0 makes absolutely no sense because you would be denying that you create a shape with a 3 dimensional [space of nothingness] (hole) going through it...
The amount of holes it has depends on entrance and exit. Something is considered a hole if it has at least 1 entrance and at least 1 exit (2 entrances and 1 exit is still 1 hole and vice versa) To explain this further just think about 2 situations: you see a hole in the ground and consider it a hole, but is it really a hole? What if the hole was 1 inch deep and 5mi in diameter? Would you still consider it a hole? I bet you won’t. Same thing with a cup or even a plate. That’s why it needs an entrance and an exit to be considered a hole.
if you do nothing, technically, you didn't kill anyone. it was just a freak accident that you saw. pulling the lever means you are directly responisble for the death of the one person but, i think most people would still pull the lever.
The straw example is overused but consider something like a Tunnel... Does a tunnel have only one hole? Well if thats so we have the interesting paradox as we couldn’t ever say which side is the hole IT MUST HAVE 2
8:12 I untie the person then I hold onto him and throw him with the 5 people making it 6, this makes it so that I don't have to make a choice therefore I don''t have to use my brain.
It's a gel which has the properties of a liquid and a solid. However the atoms are slowly moving around rather than staying together in an organized form.
I would consider it 2 lasagnas because typically the top layer of a lasagna is different from the rest of the layers, so if you put another lasagna on top, you have a top layer in the middle of your 2 stacked lasagnas
![Stromae, Pomme - “Ma Meilleure Ennemie” (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Visualizer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1F3OGIFnW1k/mqdefault.jpg)
![[DRAGON BALL LEGENDS REVEALS ＆ STUFF] LEGENDS FESTIVAL 2024 Special Edition Part 1](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mV5bGIswTtQ/mqdefault.jpg)
the plan is simple
my chat is going to do my work for me
@8R4ND0N 3LL1077 CRU23L1 because cum is considered male genderfluid, while term genderfluid doesn't specify the ownership
next were gonna be doing his taxes
@@ShaquelBlack *we're
There are 2 holes in the thumbnail,One that makes the straw,and the one that's gonna be in Ludwig's skull after the sniper takes the shot
💀💀💀
thank u norisuke
Bongo Kong underrated comment
That's 3 holes then, cause the entry wound is one hole but when the bullet leaves his skull that's a different hole.
@@eddydrouet1888 how is that a different hole,it's one bullet,unless we're talking like 50 Cal
would be interesting to see age/gender of viewers now he's got loads more
right
left
would be interesting to see age/gender now that he's a RUclips gaming streamer
"An ideal straw has no holes. It is a pipe. If it had a hole, it would leak."
Topologically it has 1 hole like a torus
Facts
@@wessmall7957 technically a torus has two: a one-dimensional and a two-dimensional hole.
Wes Small if u think of it, then your ass and ur mouth counts as one hole together. Cause it’s basically a pipe
Justus Drath Yes
A straw has one hole according to topology.
A man of culture
@@otaviocamanho1135 how come?
And according to vsauce
@@starz8580 yes I know
@Austin Fehr Yeah I was going to say one hole according to topology at first, but Refined Snack is right, it's two holes according to topology.
3:20 Quoting Yvelal's pokedex entry: "When its life comes to an end, it absorbs the life energy of every living thing and turns into a cocoon once more."
right? i mean wtf
YA-VUL-TALL
Can’t one of them summon a literal BLACK HOLE!?
"what about pp?"
Pokedex is a bullshit source though, there's no such thing as "life energy", you might as well be quoting from the bible with that hokey religious mumbo-jumbo. But also consider this little detail: how would the person writing the pokedex know that's what happens when Yvelal dies?
Either A: Someone told them this is what happens, and they just believed them without evidence, in which case it's merely a myth.
Or B: It happened before, in which case every living thing didn't get absorbed, because someone was around to remember it happening, and then it's wrong anyway.
Q.E.D. pokemon are dumb. Additionally, we've seen Charizard burn people and pokemon alike, we've seen Pikachu call down lightning bolts from the sky to shock people and pokemon alike, and no one ever dies from these attacks. They just get knocked out for a little bit at worst, usually nothing serious happens at all. They get an afro from the fire, or they get a jolt from the lightning or something, which means that pokemon attacks are some weak fucking shit that definitely wouldn't take down a lion.
#LionGang
8:51 ludwig talks about ethics and the value of a human life as he casually scrolls past this
When the IRS ask to take Ludwig into questioning
14:39
Lol, guarantee someone will see this and post it on Reddit
Fun Fact: probably every 0-12 year old said 18-24 which is why it is his highest demographic
@@brom8t tru
@@brom8t fun fact: you are probably an asshole, and who even goes to parties?
I said 25+ lmao. I’m 27 on my youtube which is 100% accurate
@@MrYounis26 fun fact: you are probably not fun at parties
me: 25 and feeling old
3:35 Yveltal: "When it dies, everything on the earth also dies"
Yeah all those lions ain't escaping Earth
Thats a tie because yveltal just kamikazes
Benslice526 Davidson
Implying the lions don’t get killed by TENS OF GODS
Also keep in mind Pokemon in their stories are infinitely more powerful than in game.
Also keep in mind that magma snail Pokemon is THE HEAT OF THE SUN.
Everything would be reduced to fucking ashes except a few other Pokemon, making it a victory for Pokemon
@@realhumanbean7915 you also realize that i never said that he would just suicide bomb them. I simply said that if he were to go boom then it would be a tie
Benslice526 Davidson
Yeah but I’m just saying that it most likely won’t die
Deoxyx and arceus, etc etc could escape the earth, so they're safe. Taking home the win for pokemans
3:30 imagine being one out of those billion lions and seeing a gigantamaxed eternatus coming for your soul
“There’s a lot more women than I thought.”
I paused to read comments and went back to this exact line lololololol
its so few 😭
I thought there were more...
@@yuvan3939 you pause the vid while u read comments?
@@xo4603 if im searching for something
"Do you know how much a billion is"
Ludwig, do you know how Arceus, Dialga, and the distortion of spacetime works? I don't think eight trillion lions could survive the wrath of what is basically Judeo-Christian god lmao.
then slugma itself is too hot for anything to touch without dying anyway.
@@petergregory7177 Real cows can't use Shadow Ball and Gyro Ball
I don't think Ludwig reads the Pokedex. Literally, Tyranitar could win by himself, the Pokedex says "...is unable to be even scathed by any attack." Even with PP, he could still win with tackle alone.
@@Change24 Eventually runs out of PP, struggles, and loses. Pokedex is also non-canon and is done as a joke. Magcargo is said to be hotter than the sun. Machamp is said to be able to push mountains. Using the Pokedex as a basis for fact and Pokemon strength is comical.
@@Prodigial If you run out of PP, you would just use tackle, and the Pokedex is the most canon thing we have soooo...
Also fighting 1 Billion F**king lions is also comical so we can take some liberties.
the pokemon would win becuase arceus is litterly god. god can beat 1 billion lions by itself.
I know I’m late but here’s my opinion: there’s no way that Charizard can get attacked by a lion, neither can gyrados, dragonite, rayquaza, as well as any other flying Pokémon. Therefore, Pokémon would win
This fight is completely situational if the lions compacted around the poke mon they have no chance but if the Pokémon can have enough room to get to the air or in the ground and also the wate
@@jeremywright2101 exactly
@@jeremywright2101 dialga Will just stop the time To kill every pokemon easily, or palkia Will teleport every pokemon with mooving space
Guys 1 billion lions are a lot though
when you stack cake on top of each other to let’s say make it a three tiered cake, you don’t say “thank you for the three cakes,” you say “thank you for the cake”
but thats three parts of a cake not three seperate cakes
@@jowoel5073 but they were all baked in different ways, just stacked on top of one another afterward
@@jowoel5073 Just like it would be two parts fo a lasagna not two lasagnas.
There is no standard height or number of layers for lasagna. Stacking two separately cooked lasagnas just increases the number of layers.
@@Mqxwell No, because you would have 2 normal sized lasagnas stacked rather than 1 double size
If it was made as the height of 2 lasagnas and going in the oven once then it is one lasagna
@@dankboi987 Why does it matter when they were cooked? They are both still lasagna...
THE POKEMON LITERALLY HAVE GOD ON THEIR SIDE, WHAT DO YOU MEAN THE LIONS WIN?!?!
Matthew I think your underestimating how many 1 billion is
The number of lions doesn’t mean anything. There could be an infinitely spewing source of lions, what do lions do against just a wall of fire, lighting strikes everywhere, and constant earthquakes?
Bong Water a billion of anything isn’t going to win against an animal that can fly and spew fire
Exactly my point! Consider the lions dead
「Jᴀʙᴇᴋᴇ49」 i think everyone picking lions is in on a joke. There is no way a sane person would pick liions over pokemon. Im pretty sure a Steelix on its own could eventually kill a billion lions since its huge and made of steel.
someone in the chat literally asked "how many times can i push the button :pog:
why
money
@@eva-lota9701 You convinced me
I mean you could probably press it like a billion times before it's likely to kill someone you're close with
I’d probably press it like a thousand times
i would probably press 10 times and die lmao
Truly disgusting how some "people" would do this horrible thing
Truly disgusting how some "people" would do this horrible thing
Truly disgusting how some "people" would do this horrible thing
3:38 can lions manipulate space and time while also being able to fly? Maybe that's why the pokemon would win
if you wanna go that far then guess what, 50% of the time pokemon friendly fires, mons cant just freakin do smth so significant like resets time and expecting mons kind to not get affected by it. while lions are a pack, the chance is really small that they try to eat each other, pokemons are not, and will never be.
Also 1 billion lions would literally occupie at least 1/8 of the world and considering the world is more than half water it would end up being like 1/3 of the world the Pokémon would die in 5 seconds even with time manipulation cause if the lions got equal height they would just clap the lions
@@savagebot5672 bitch pokemon can fly, giratina could probably single handedly beat 1 billion lions because they could never touch it, hell charizard could, it literally doesn't matter and just think about what mewtwo and celebi and jirachi could do while being able to fly which basically makes then immune it's no contest
Uh actually if we were taking into account a mountain if any of these Pokémon dweebs was generally close to the mountain they would be instantly dead
I think it’s just sad that Pokémon headasses really think that Pokémon could just beat anything
When he says top HALF of the lasagna😳
Half a lasagna is just a whole lasagna but smaller
Half of two.
One billion lions wouldn’t even be able to kill the Pokémon of death
There would just be a single metapod chilling in the aftermath spamming harden.
ChrisRobertsVlogs shame
Or a tarsal (can create a black hole)
Who would outlast
metapod vs kakuna
Just use a special fire attack
on the 1 billion lions one, kyogre could literally just drown them all (many other ways)
InKyDiNo Tracer Main or groudon can burn them all (many other ways)
Arceus or Giratina could just say "you’re all dead"
Let’s not forget the ones that control time, space, the fucking weather, basic elements, you know
Gregory Hippely mewtwo could kill them all with a fart 🍑 💨
Gregory Hippely
I know how big a billion is, it’s 1000 sets of 1 million. That doesn’t change that regular fucking animals are fighting gods.
Even if you somehow think lions can take down gods, how about the 100+ Pokémon that are capable of flight while being able to attack from a range? Some lions can jump up to 36 feet, but that doesn’t matter when Pokémon can easily fly higher than that.
A lot of the Pokémon could heal themselves as well
Charizard, flying and breathes fire.
He could solo all the lions. They can't even reach him as he flys around setting them all on fire.
Ludwig is the type of person who thinks sand is a liquid
Is mud liquid? And if so at what point is it no longer.
Nicholas Ramirez when it reaches the temperature hot enough to harden it.
@@koozmik4165 well if it's hardened is it not no longer mud? And you didn't even answer the question.
Also at what temperature does hardened mud melt?
Nicholas Ramirez doesn’t melt. Mud is a combo of dirt and water. When it hardens, it’s because the water evaporated out. Dirt doesn’t melt. It would only become mud if water was absorbed back into it.
@@DaRoachDoggJrr I'm obviously not serious, who TF would actually think mud melts
3:28 Dang 1 billion lions can kill a lava monster, Sea monster, Space, Time, Dimensions, LITERALLY GOD
I'm not gonna argue about pokemon abilities because I literally only watched it in the kindergarden, just wanted to point out that it says "win", not "kill". Not every win requires a kill. Imo question is, can these pokemon take 1,123,595.505618 lions on average EACH.
"Do you know how much a billion is?"
Well... considering Charizard can literally fly and breath fire like 100 feet in front of him
And there’s a Pokémon that is a literal god
But there are a billion lions though...
@@tobiasfrei6262 lions can’t fly, and lions don’t have a literal god on their side
And then charizard runs out of PP and struggles to death. Fly only has like 15 pp.
Lugia could kill 100billion lions
Pokemon: has literaly a guy who can destroy the universe
Ludwig: Do YoU KnoW WhAt a BiLLioN iS ?
game or anime?
game maybe (because of PP)
anime for sure pokemon win
Them there's the pokemon that are practically, and literally gods
Giritina: sucks all a billion lions into the desorption world
Literally any pokemon with fissure: hold my beer
@@jia_lat_limlol7980 BlockGamer have a point though. if we applying the game logic then the pokemons doesn't stand a chance. Because then it would mean they have 4 moves each with between 5 to 40 pp depending on the moves. even if their 4 moves had 40 pp and one shot a lion each time, they will run out long before even reaching 200k and struggle to death. If we forget about the game logic and say they have access to every moves and are unrestricted by a turn by turn kind of fight and don't have any pp then sure, pokemons win 100%
Ludwig, you do know that there is a pokemon who can LITERALLY CONTROL VICTORY. Oh and don’t forget the multiple gods and the Pokémon who literally can’t die.
BuT dO yOu KnOw HoW mUcH a BiLlIoN iS¿? Shut up lion gang, shut up.
@@ghanaria7996 I have absolute faith that just the Legendary Pokemons can Destroy the Billion lions by themselves.
Not to mention LITERAL GHOSTS that are immortal and cant be hit by the pokemon, and their's pokemon that can MANIPULATE TIME SPACE AND GRAVITY LIKE WTF LUDWIG THE LIONS SHIT
True, some of the pokemon really can't even lose to the lions at all. This video is a pretty good demonstration of how badly a lot of the legendary pokemon would destroy the lions when you base it off pokedex entries and such. ruclips.net/video/DVO8QrGAPHs/видео.html
Okay, lets put it this way. A super roided out rat can kill every single pokemon god. That means lions definitely could. Also, struggle can damage ghost types and shedinja, so there are no pokemon that are just immune to the lions' damage.
Also, the pokedex is ludicrous and patently untrue. Magcargo is an example, the pokedex says it is 18,000 degrees Fahrenheit, twice as hot as the surface of the sun, if it was really that hot everything around it would immediately burst into flames and die. So if this statement is patently untrue, we cannot take anything else in the pokedex as true unless we see additional corroboration from other sources (ie Gardevoir being able to make a black hole).
"how many holes are in a straw"
A straw is like a tunnel and a tunnel has two holes
SOMETHING HAS BEEN BOTHERING ME FOR A WHILE
WHAT IS THE THING THAT HAS BEEN BOTHERING YOU?
Pi=4
@@YeppKing false
Bland that’s why it’s bothering him
It's gonna bother us too that we don't know what bothers you...
he does realize that Kyogre could just drown all of the lions
The lever problem can be solved if you pull it half way so the trolley goes into the neutral space in between the two options :D
6:24 Thigh gang? Any thighers in chat?
Antonydabossman Thighs are nothing without ass, Ass is nothing without thighs, they work simultaneously together as one, a perfect balance, like ying and yang......
@@Cormac11 Ah yes, the treatise of the Absolute Territory. I see you're a being of culture as well.
Cormac the thighs build up the anticipation for the ass but the ass alone has no build up or anything for reference
Peanut butter is less of a liquid, and more of an adhesive.
Lubrication
it’s a cream lol. it’s a solid. it’s just like butter. it doesn’t shape to its container bruh, ofc it adheres to gravity but it doesn’t slosh
@@yballaw2714 It's hard to tell weather it's a viscous liquid or a malleable solid.
a toaster it’s hard to tell whether you know what you’re talking about or not, you know words like “viscous” and “malleable” but don’t know the right whether. hm
@@yballaw2714 haha yeah, excuse my 2IQ English skills.
Peanut butter is technically both liquid and solid because it is a non-Newtonian fluid.
What's plasma?
@@roryvonmeyer2643plasma is a plasma
@@SirDucc ahh yes I see. This shit comment is made of shit comment.
@@roryvonmeyer2643 nah, but that’s literally the answer. Plasma is it’s own thing.
@@datfkinkoala1947 right, so what is it? Wait, nvm, I'll just fkn Google it
Not gonna lie guys, he spittin straight fact
Edit: never mind he thinks peanut butter is a liquid
It is
@@juicyjuice474 not
For sure is not lol. Just because something is compressible, doesn't make it a liquid. You can compress things like sand (if it has room to displace air) and also virtually every gas. Also, you can't pour peanutbutter unless it's melted (and don't argue that if the oil in it separates in warm weather it pours, because the peanutbutter has the oil in it, so the oil isn't the peanutbutter itself).
@@aaronnichols4120 Tar is a liquid and is NOT pourable. it's a highly viscous non-newtonian fluid, just like peanut butter
@@Sozin2077 Um. Sorry to tell you, but it is indeed pourable. Yes, it is highly viscous, and it is very hard to pour, but not impossible. That's how tar still moves a bit on it's own, unless hardened. Gravity is a little stronger than it's own attraction, so you are able to tar a driveway by pouring it. Natural tar can ooze a bit.
"What's up with the top half?" (Of lasagna)
Literally answers it right there... It has to be only 1 to be a half. Otherwise you'd ask, "What's up with the top lasagna?" 🙃
7head moment
It's half of the portion on the plate, not half a lasagna, i.e. half of two.
for the pokémon vs lions question:
a pokémon can just use earthquake or something to kill all the lions instantly
or how about those flying pokémon like charizard? just fly around using flamethrower/fire blast/whatever, and lions won’t even be able to reach him
Trust me, Ludwig knows nothing about holes. Just ask his last girlfriend.
Just Some Guy he’s had a gf? 😐
@@LeeAnnQuinones No because he's not getting any holes.
He thinks girls have only two holes
69 likes 😉
Nice
The answer is simple, pull the lever and press the button 4 times to make up for it.
For the pokemon/lions one, my main thing is considering just how many lions any specific pokemon can take down. Arceus would take all the lions down, no contest.
I don't think Ludwig reads the Pokedex. Literally, Tyranitar could win by himself, the Pokedex says "...is unable to be even scathed by any attack." Even with PP, he could still win with tackle alone.
No, Tyranitar clearly would not win by itself, the Pokedex is like the most unreliable thing in Pokemon lol.
@@RGC_animation wolfy already debunked it showing how if it was a regular pokemon battle the pokemon would win plus using anime logic there are way to many ways for singular Pokémon to take them all out. Not to mention even with pp considered there are outs such as a imposter ditto or recycle leppa berry
@@balancemaster55 I know, just that Tyranitar couldn't beat them by itself.
There are 0 holes in a straw, a hole implies something was removed, “I dug a hole” “I carved a hole” “there’s a hole in the wall” but a straw is a folded piece of plastic (not folded to a crease) a straw is not a solid piece of cylindrical plastic that is then punctured it is a flat then folded rectangular sheet therefore there is no holes in a straw
So depending on how you form your bagel before boiling, with two identical bagels, one can have a hole, and one is just folded dough?
Emojavel yeah I suppose
no
Topology declares a straw as a genus 1 shape. Meaning the number of ‘holes’ it contains is equal to 1, thus it is homeomorphic to a torus (If elastically deformed it changes it’s volume ‘shape’ etc but retains its topological properties.) The Earth is of genus zero because the only ‘holes it contains do not intersect one another. A straw contains one hole. Sorry if this was worded poorly but topology is not my strong point.
Did someone remove flesh from you to make your buttHOLE? Didn't think so
“What’s up with the top half of this”
“top half”
*top half*
*2 Lasagnas can’t have a top half, it’d be the top lasagna*
Nice job salt
@Ryan Hoffman and thus the customer looks at it and sees it’s one lasagna, proving the point.
@Ryan Hoffman There is, just not for the point you were trying to make.
A double layered cake is just one cake not two cakes righttt
If you stack 2 lasagnas, the point where you stacked will have 2 sheets of pastry instead of one, breaking the pattern of a lasagna. Therefore making it 2 lasagnas.
14:38 When the IRS asks Ludwig if he pays taxes
Lee Doyle underrated comment
The three legendary birds could literally kill all of the Lions by themselves
Logan Dixon a macargo could kill them all by itself, none of them could touch it
@@Fireball006 well that's using Pokedex logic, in the anime they stood next to magcargo and we're fine
Logan Dixon you think anime logic makes sense? So when you fall off a cliff you float for a few seconds until you realized you are gonna fall
And still he’s hot so if lions try to eat him they will be burned from the inside
@@Fireball006 yeah, pretty much. If magcargo was actually as hot as the sun, no other Pokemon would exist because no other organism could stand those conditions, except maybe heatran (and other heat based legendaries)
There is a great RUclips video by lockstin and gnoggin talking about this. Essentially because of its size and other factors that would take a long time to explain you would only feel the heat of the magcargo within a few miled
Ludwig not realizing it’s illegal to collect information on people less than 13 years on the internet. Pog.
3:34 Arceus is literally god so you're wrong
Your underestimating how many 1 billion is
@@bongwater6976 There are 7 billion people on tis earth and billions more animals: I can guarantee we still don't stand a chance against God
lions can't kill flying pokemon, a single moltres can kill infinite lions
Acreus is a god in the pokemon universe and if we asume the battle goes on here in this one hes POWER LESS
@@moonshinei god only has so much pp tho, or else why are good people dying everyday? Checkmate atheists
7:22 fan pushes button
Ludwig dies
Fan “Wait no”
I have to say I think I agreed with every opinion you had and you made very valid points! I was also torn between solid and liquid on peanut butter so I am happy to know its a semi-solid. Although I have to say if a handful of Pokémon can fly and attack from a distance, they might win the long term battle. Unless they fatique and the lions take them out once they land.
Okay, a straw absolutely has one continuous hole. Just because it is a long hole does not make it multiple holes. Just because the hole has two sides does not mean it is two holes. Plus, most holes have two sides anyway [I say "most" since I don't know that much about black holes].
Black holes aren't holes, they're infinitely small points
What about your digestive track
Technically, it has to have two sides. A "hole" in the ground isn't actually a hole.
3:30 Lions are normal type, they can't even hit all of the ghost type pokémon.. how they are supposed to win?
NoNico Your underestimating how many 1 billion is
@@bongwater6976
*they can't hit the ghosts* they'd win *eventually*
@@bongwater6976 yeah a billion is a lot but if the lions physically can't do anything to the ghost types, the pokemom would still win, it would just take an extreme amount of time
They aren’t normal type they’re lion type stubid
@@Jackpauler4lyfe nice
i would pull the lever halfway, forcing the trolley to drift, wiping all 6 out
Ludwig with the incredible bait that lions would beat gods lmao
Twitch chat is degenerate for thinking peanut butter is a solid. In middle school you learn the difference between a liquid and solid. A liquid doesn’t have a defined shape, while a solid does. If you put a ball of peanut butter on a table it will not maintain its shape. Just because a liquid has a high viscosity doesn’t means it’s a solid.
For everyone who literally died during the peanut butter one it’s a colloid didn’t think I would have to say that but chat though it was plasma lmao
Btw a colloid isn't a state, it has to be one of the 4 states. That's actually funny that chat thought it was plasma wtf
Idk ppl are dumb
And apparently prone to murder 😳😳😳
If I didn't know twitch chat is all immature memeing I'd be SUPER concerned about that million dollar question...
8:00 drift and get all 6
That was in a curse comment
White Bread ah a man of culture I see
r/cursedcomment
Too much effort, kill the original five with the train and choke the last one
MULTI DRACK DRIFTING
7:00 I'd do an auto clicker.
r/cursedcomment
White Bread lmao
not original, didn’t laugh
Would you push a button for a million?
Twitch Chat: *How many times can i push it*
7:16
"Hi this is one lasagna cooked by two people"
"Ooh thanks, hey hang on part of this lasagna is good but part of it is bad"
"Yes that is to be expected, it was not all cooked by one person"
"Ah I think I prefer a lasagna cooked only by whoever did the bottom half of this one"
IF I WRITE HALF A BOOK AND YOU WRITE THE SECOND HALF, LUDWIG, IT ISN'T TWO BOOKS!
Say the last part louder for the ludwigs in the back 👏
Eoin Doyle I agree. Combine two lasagnas to get one, and now it’s just halves.
There’s stuff in between the lasagna layers that isn’t on the top or bottom. There’s no fucking sauce on the top you fool. This double layer of pasta paper is what separates the lasagna. If I have one country, and there’s another country right next to it, does that make it one country? No, Hitler. Put your fucking thinking cap one for one goddamn minute and maybe you’d see through the pathetic lies of the Jedi.
Yeah if you cook two lasagna and put them on top of each other the person who is getting it would just say it’s one
NO, BUT IF YOU PUT “Harry Potter: The Philosopher’s Stone” AND “The Hungry Caterpillar” ON TOP OF EACH OTHER, YOUVE STILL GOT TWO BOOKS SEPERATED BY THEIR BOOK COVERS. YALL ARE IDIOTS
3:40 but they fly to high and just rain attacks. Ez win.
8:52 what was that question again lud?
The ocean is a soup. The earth is a ravioli. The universe is a partially filled vacuum cleaner bag.
13:12 "What's up with the top half?" As in 1/2 of the lasagna, over the other 1/2. That means 1/2 + 1/2 = 1, therefore there is 1 lasagna.
it is most definitely two lasagnas. the part where the two lasagnas collide has no cheese. Unless you ate some shit lasagna, there is cheese between each layer.
Its 1 lasagna. Lasagna is just layered pasta. When you add another lasagna on top you are essentially just adding twice as many layers resulting in one tall lasagna
suraj dave yall stupid... it’s both. If you slam 2 lasagnas together before they go in an oven it becomes 1. If you try to combine 2 lasagnas post oven you will fail and be left with 2 fuckjng miserable lasagnas
It's half of 2.
For the lasagne question it is two as there is a cheese layer on top of the finshed product which does not run throughout the rest of the layers.
10:05 is a very rare site of Ludwig actually being himself, not some low tier twitch meme god, but a competent human who clearly has a grasp on society and morale this (being a English major). Where he shows his humanity, maturity and---- Nah I'm just kidding Ludwig is never smart.
There is one continuous hole
Hes right.
@casual complaints no it has one entrance and one exit but the same hole so there for makes it one hole
There are no holes it’s a portal
But what if it is 2 holes overlapping in the middle
There's no hole. if you drink from a straw and there is a hole in it, you don't say "hey, they have an additional hole in this straw." No, you say "tf why is there a hole in my straw."
“something has been bothering me for a while” yes, the fact that an english major didn’t add the apostrophe to internet’s in the title 🥲
I- 💀
LOL true
"Internets" is used possessively, Therefore, to my knowledge, it does not need an Apostrophe
@@Vehk_of_Vehk possessives are when you have to use apostrophes! for example “that teacher’s classroom” is correct because it is possessive, while “that teachers classroom” isn’t correct ◡̈
@@Vehk_of_Vehk the only time when this isn’t the case is for “its” since “it’s” is the contraction form of “it is” while “its” is the possessive form!
10:00 hes actually quite a clever guy
3:28
Some Pokemon can fly and lions can’t
Do you know how much a billion is
Max Houghton do u know lions don’t fly
Kieran Williams i would talk about some pokemon being litteral gods lmao, but still, do u know how much a billion is?
@@kieranw938 Lions kill birds all the time man
I mean, charizard just has to fly around and get them lit
That husky guy at 3:57 had me weak ngl
"LIONS ARENT LITERAL GODS LULW"
definition of hole: a hollow place in a solid body or mass; a cavity
therefore, 1 hole.
but imagine a pipe with sealed ends, then u open one, so theres a hole, then u open the second one, and its another one? Better example i like to use it imagine a sphere or idk something flexible, make 2 holes into it, then just shrink its sides into a tube or whatever, still one hole? Try imagining the holes NOT the opposite of one another, just like in a bong, its basically a tube but bent.
@@richlobezka all holes have a height to it, if you have a whole in the ground to goes into a room, is it 1 hole or 2? Think of it like a doorway. Just because both sides are open does mean its 2 doorways, it's just 1. A straw is a hole with 2 entrances
If its 1 thn arent our mouths and assholes one?
so humans have 1 hole?
@@blockgamer3791 You just contradicted yourself, "imagine there is a hole in the earth from one side to another". There is a hole ie. one hole, not two. Topologically, a thru hole is a hole and a non-thru hole (ex. if you dig a 2 foot "hole" in the earth) is not a hole. I say a straw has one hole.
3:29 90% of the lions would starve of starvation before getting close to the pokemon, thats why pokemon would win
Also flying types
starve of starvation as opposed to starve of thirst? xD
The trolley problem:
You gotta think about how would you feel , if you pull the leaver you killed him, if you don't pull the leaver you technicaly didn't kill them, yeah you could of saved them but you know, you can talk about this a lot, at least I can
Nah, if I didn't save the 5 people then I killed them because I did nothing.
JustWeirdOut it's a tough question though. I was firmly on the side of pulling the lever, until I heard a variation of the trolley problem that really got me thinking. Imagine you're a surgeon, and 5 people need different organ transplants or they will die. You also have a healthy patient in another room who is currently asleep, and has all the organs needed to save all five people. Would you kill that person and use their organs to save the others? This is where the trolley problem gets a lot more complicated.
If you have the choice, inaction speaks equally as action. You had the ability to pull the lever, meaning you let them die, so the inaction of not pulling the lever is still the action of killing them.
@@parkerlee1407 no, the trolley problem involves a trolley, can't believe you think a doctor is a train
Jacob King but that's exactly what the thought experiment is, its about whether inaction is equal to action. Read the reply I sent above, because most people would agree that they would not kill the person to save 5 people given that scenario, showing that inaction isn't necessarily equal to action.
3:15 the Pokémon because lions can’t target flying Pokémon.
And god pokemon can obliterate them. Also earthquakes.
The legendary cosmic Pokemons are capable of obliterating the lions by themselves.
Also ghost Pokemon. Like, come on why is this even a question.
3:24 did anyone realize he was forgetting legendaries
And the flying/ghost types
@@notnivde And Pokémons like Slugma and Muk which they literally can't touch without dying
He also forgot about dynamax moves like Max Quake and Max Rockfall
itsduvo -_- dynamax kills like 1000 at a time at most that’s nothing
@@jimmycoon3320 pokemon can literally make black holes
Peanut butter is a non newtonian fluid, but in the case of liquid vs solid it is BY DEFINITION a liquid, as it takes the form of the container it is in.
Depends if the lasagna was stacked before it was in the oven or after.
A yes, a god that can control space and time, would lose against some big cats
9:51 Food theory : allow me to introduce myself.
3:39 arceus exists also dialga bruh moment
Palkia:
“What’s up with the top half of this lasagna?” That statement means it’s 1 lasagna.
But saying you have 2 lasagnas and stack it up you already state that there are 2 lasagnas not 1
I would choose blue so i can get a killstreak
Pokemon would win, there are some literal gods
Literal gods that lost to a 10 year old.
That's just In the retarded anime with ash that they're beat through friendship on shit
@@Prodigial then that'd mean 10 year olds can beat 1 billion lions
/s
any flying pokemon > billion lions
@@that0neweeb98 I dont think you know what being tired is and how many 1 billion is
*real answer:* A straw has 0 holes. It is a flat surface that has been wrapped into a cylindrical prism.
BIG BRAIN
Well actually
Well yes but no but yes
This is actually the biggest brain response. I don't agree with it but anyone debating 1 vs 2 without considering 0 is a simpleton.
0 makes absolutely no sense because you would be denying that you create a shape with a 3 dimensional [space of nothingness] (hole) going through it...
The amount of holes it has depends on entrance and exit.
Something is considered a hole if it has at least 1 entrance and at least 1 exit (2 entrances and 1 exit is still 1 hole and vice versa)
To explain this further just think about 2 situations: you see a hole in the ground and consider it a hole, but is it really a hole?
What if the hole was 1 inch deep and 5mi in diameter? Would you still consider it a hole? I bet you won’t. Same thing with a cup or even a plate.
That’s why it needs an entrance and an exit to be considered a hole.
7:40 I’d rather have 5kills than 1kill smh
if you do nothing, technically, you didn't kill anyone. it was just a freak accident that you saw. pulling the lever means you are directly responisble for the death of the one person but, i think most people would still pull the lever.
your k/d ratio increases, so good on you. also, i dislike humans so yeah
@@neckbeard-xi4qx tbh that one person might jump away since it never mentioned he was tied down
Him : What Is a Ludwig ?
Me thinking :
-SNIPER !! GET DOWN
-Short
-Bad at Pokemom
Me : just a normal streamer
1 charmander could beat the lions
"what's up with the TOP HALF"
The one guy in the chat saying, *feet gang*
The straw example is overused but consider something like a Tunnel...
Does a tunnel have only one hole? Well if thats so we have the interesting paradox as we couldn’t ever say which side is the hole
IT MUST HAVE 2
4:30, when you watch it out of context its just weird
I still cant find the music he used. Been searching for just under an hour now and no luck.
I put my headphones on my dog during this and she cried
:(|)
8:12 I untie the person then I hold onto him and throw him with the 5 people making it 6, this makes it so that I don't have to make a choice therefore I don''t have to use my brain.
He lied, I have never watched a single twitch stream and i still filled out the questionnaire.
"peanutbutter is a liquid"
-Ludwig 2020
Because it is
It's a gel which has the properties of a liquid and a solid. However the atoms are slowly moving around rather than staying together in an organized form.
I would consider it 2 lasagnas because typically the top layer of a lasagna is different from the rest of the layers, so if you put another lasagna on top, you have a top layer in the middle of your 2 stacked lasagnas