Pros And Cons Of Electric Tankless Water Heaters

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 15

  • @FosterFarmsOk
    @FosterFarmsOk Месяц назад +4

    people dont realize how much power these use. Most normal homes cant handle the amount of current they draw. sure they are efficient but when they need 150 amps of power doest it make up for it? and gas instants need power also so in an outage they wont work either.

  • @MariluzSerrano-z9e
    @MariluzSerrano-z9e Месяц назад

    Will this work for a mobile home? Hurricane Milton just took mine out... I'm sick of replacing those big heavy tanks I'm only 5'3 n 130 pounds im dying out here... my roommates r both elders ... s.o.s. me lol ...
    but seriously I really need advice here...

  • @scottbencene8052
    @scottbencene8052 2 месяца назад

    Very convincing time to go tankless

  • @Nick-cc9bw
    @Nick-cc9bw 2 месяца назад

    We focus on tankless water heaters and are looking for testers to shoot videos. We look forward to collaborating with you and hearing back from you.

  • @domingo1231000
    @domingo1231000 2 месяца назад

    Thanks

  • @wyomins
    @wyomins 2 месяца назад +2

    Sounds all well and good until Pacificorp decides to up your electricity rates by 70%...

    • @thenexthobby
      @thenexthobby Месяц назад +1

      Yes, because natural gas prices will never increase and that fuel will always be available.

    • @wyomins
      @wyomins Месяц назад

      @@thenexthobby that fuel is always available, it's called methane and you produce it every day. Many cities trap it from sewage and garbage dumps and burn it for electricity.

    • @gabrieldiasmelo
      @gabrieldiasmelo 7 дней назад

      Gas price also can increase like that, the diference is that eletricit you can produce yourself quite easily with solar panels, eolic generators and even geothermal. You can produce Bio Gas but that take a lot of land and organic material, is completely unviable unless you live in a big ass farm with a lot of animals in it.

  • @Anthony-cz2fe
    @Anthony-cz2fe 2 месяца назад +3

    Unfortunately harris democrat party con new laws have dramatically increased our electricity prices. Unless we get nuclear powdered like France, the $500+ annual electricity cost for an electric unit adds considerable cost with inflation.

    • @zenwilds2911
      @zenwilds2911 Месяц назад

      You don't need nuclear. Every state has options.
      Washington runs mostly on hydro. My electric bill is usually $50-70/month.
      3 bed, 2.5 bath.
      And we are avid gamers. Gaming PCs running for most of the day.
      Also don't like it when it's hot so if it gets to 65 outside, I close windows and turn on AC.
      Gas is way too expensive. Nuclear is unnecessary. Those are the two worst choices.

    • @joshmajor8662
      @joshmajor8662 12 дней назад

      Haha 😂 I’m in Kentucky, 3 bed, 1 bath. My bill is $200-$300+!!! Lol 😂 😢

  • @thenexthobby
    @thenexthobby Месяц назад +1

    A 0.90 UEF is not “efficient” compared to a heat pump alternative. Electric heaters are resistance heaters, expensive to run. Just like tank heaters.
    Tankless might be “efficient” when not being used, making the overall monthly electrical usage lower than a tank’s. But that’s like saying a gas guzzling car is efficient when it’s parked.