These Airlines Are Ditching Boeing for Airbus - Single-Aisle
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 окт 2024
- Several long-term and loyal Boeing customers (some for over 50 years) are jumping ship choosing the A320neo and A220 families to replace their aging fleets.
Feel free to Like, Subscribe, Comment (respectfully) or even contact me
intuitivaviati...
You can support me by doing a donation or becoming a regular supporter on patreon and get also access content that can help you in your personal development (intuitiv.me):
/ lotfi_mrad
Sources for info, pictures & Videos: KLM, Transavia, Air Baltic, United Airlines, Delta Airlines, Qantas, Spirit Airlines, JetBlue, Boeing, Airbus, Wikipedia
#klm #transavia #spiritairlines #jetblue #airbaltic #unitedairlines #deltaairlines #qantas #boeing #boeing737 #boeing737max #airbus #a320neo #a321neo #a321xlr #a321lr #a220
![Natanael Cano - Amor Eterno [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EO4prCs6WpM/mqdefault.jpg)
United and delta are still Boeing customers
You need to make a video about the Cathay Trent XWB incident and how Airbus has remained silent about that issue. If we truly believe that Boeing must take responsibility for their share of engine issues, whether by saying something, working to fix this issue, or by compensating affected airlines, then we must also expect Airbus to lead by example. However, there is no proof that Airbus did any of that for the Trent XWB issue. They made no statement in support of whatever EASA urged airlines to do about this issue, there is no receipt of Airbus compensating Cathay Pacific at all for this engine issue, and there is no proof of Airbus assisting Rolls Royce/airlines to mitigate or prevent a reoccurrence of this issue.
If anyone says “at least Airbus responded to this issue”, that is a baseless claim because there is no proof to substantiate this claim, and these types of baseless claims are a form of blind trust, which is exactly what allowed Boeing’s safety culture to decline until it’s too late. If Airbus picks up on the public making these baseless claims, this creates a loophole that allows Airbus to repeat Boeing’s mistakes.
Well it is known that Airbus is in constant communication with RR and has been for a long time now. Not making a public statement for aviation enthusiasts to see, is not how it works 😄 Airbus does not care much about us at those times. Engine issues are a mega problem for Airbus and on several of its aircraft. It's bad for sails and it even lost a deal as RR didn't make a good enough offer (lack of warranty / maintenance costs) from the side of RR, I just can't remember the airline.
I did a video on engine problems a few years ago.
And regarding the problems at Boeing: too much trust was just a small part of it, intentionally hiding info on request of SouthWest Airlines (MCAS), and many other instances of falsification, destruction of evidence, collusion, bullying and harassment... maybe even murder.
@@intuitivAviationnews main problem is that Airbus was silent to airlines affected by the issue. After airlines reported the problem, the only entities that communicated to any airlines in the wake of the issue (e.g telling airlines to inspect, telling airlines how to mitigate the issue) were EASA and RR. Point is that there is no proof that Airbus responded to this issue (and PW1000G issue for that matter) better than how Boeing did to the Trent 1000 and PW4000 issues
@@intuitivAviationnews about the murder part, Boeing has been wrongfully blamed for some of the deaths. Examples include Joshua Dean, who actually blew the whistle on Spirit Aero (before any acquisitions were finalized), the man who had a heart attack on SQ321, MU7535 victims, and the Delta workers who were killed by an exploding tire (since the involved plane was 31 years old, the tire was a replacement installed by Delta’s maintenance department)
@@Blank00 It's a bit of a grey area:
1- Both you and I can not prove if Airbus did or did not contact the involved airlines
2- The contract for the engines are negotiated between the engine manufacturer and the airline after the airline has decided to buy an aircraft. Nor Airbus nor Boeing is legally involved in this. Therefore getting involved later on would be nice but not necessary for solving the problem.
The issue was noted that it was not a Rolls-Royce issue, but actually the wrong cleaning products used by the airlines itself.
crazy....300 subs and already sponsored video?
world is completely crazy
thumb down
You can sponsor your own video you know :-) If you're in IT you'll probably know JayzTwoCents or others who promote their services and or products 🙂
arghh more AI voice crap!
People complained about the quality of the sound before. So I decided to try this out. And as I'm dyslexic, I can't read as fast and then people get bored too.
Airbus suck$ too
Please elaborate on this :-)
@@intuitivAviationnews A slutty company that uses lobbying with a lot of money to win commercial disputes