✈ Love our videos? Join our ‘Paper Pilot Club’ now! Get new videos first, special paper airplanes, and cool badges. 🌟 Click ‘Join’ to be a member and have more fun with us! ruclips.net/channel/UCzgWZmqmKpmsr4oPWITusKAjoin
@@kimbitschlarsen7095 It is not a further development. The plane was complete and already had orders. Airbus has done nothing. It is just a better plane.
love the AI generated video of the "narrator" talking - it's close, but just enough off from the speech that it's extremely noticeable and weird feeling
There is A LOT of inaccuracies and generalisations made with this video. Airbus also uses RR and GE on their planes, and also incorporate winglets. Boeing also uses 4 wheel landing gears like on their 787, 757 and 767s. There's a lot of parallels between the two manufacturers. And in reference to the Comac part, the blended wingtip is more like that of the A350, not 787.
Yeah, and Comac's "cultural symbols" are actually just Chinese translations or actual Chinese names that one would expect on a Chinese airline, but unlikely to found on non-Chinese airlines.
OMG GUYS, the text that is spoken is LITERALLY from the snippets that ChatGPT generates when you ask it "Can you create a script for a 8 minute video highlighting the differences between modern Airbus and Boeing aircraft?"
Boeing eliminated the 737's eyebrow windows almost 20 years ago except on military versions. Most operators of older 737s have blanked them out to reduce maintenance. Lots of incorrect and misleading info in this video. Implies that the aircraft manufacturer makes the decisions on liveries and seating configurations. The airlines do that. Virtually no difference in seat size and legroom in economy class on any of the major US and European airlines.
U r 👍💯💯 correct. Wrong information given in video about differences between Boeing and Airbus airplanes designs. Boeing 777 787 don't have wingtip winglets. Nor pointy noses. Interior layouts are decided by customers.
I was just about to come comment on all that. The video makes is sound as if Boeing and Airbus are running airlines, when they manufacture airplanes to the airline’s requirements
Please don’t take these differences seriously.... there are different models of both the airlines... and whatever is mentioned is not correct. E.g. Boeing 787 has 4 main landing gear wheels , even airbus A320 has winglets ( called Sharklets )...
Yeah. this video is highly misleading. Comac didn't borrow anything from the 787. the C919 is a narrowbody made out of aliminuim but the 787 is a widebody made out of composite material.
Exactly, there were some misleading information especially about the planes, like the not all boeing have 3 main landing boogeys, in fact, only the 777 has that landing gear in the video. This sort of information wasn't exactly specified so I can totally see someone misunderstanding from this video
Wow wild generalizations, both Airbus and Boeing have used engines from all major manufacturers and most aircraft types have multiple engine options available just as an example the A330 has 4 different engine options from Prat, GE and Rolls and the 747 has had 6 or 7 different engine types from the same manufacturers across its life. This video was done with very little reasearch and seemed to far outweigh Comac as a real competitor. They are less of a real competitor and more on the scale of Embraer or Bombardier but will strugle to get FAA or EASA approval and without that will never take much market share from the giants
Bombardier and Embraer have completely dominated the short-haul sector. Airbus and Boeing aren't even trying to compete with them. With that said, I would imagine that sometime in the future, Bombardier and Embraer will enter the medium-haul market and create competition for Boeing's 737 and Airbus' A320s. Especially if Boeing goes under.
The video is full of "beyond facts", but only as it approaches the end does it really become clear that you've been watching a COMAC ad. The "narrator" you see is artificially generated, along with the narration itself and much of the script. I figure the COMAC part was prepared by the marketing department. Expect a lot more of this nonsense across many other industries and sectors. Sadly many people will be fooled by such disinformation. The future is bleak.
Boeing only has one plane with 6 wheels which is the Boeing 777. Most of Boeing planes have a 4 wheel setup like 767 787 and 757, also when you were talking about the winglets on Boeing planes you showed a Airbus A320 Sharklet.
@pyl19 ah, true my apologies! I also don't believe this video was reviewed by someone with even a little bit of knowledge about aviation. It's almost like the script was written by AI or something.
@@259er7 AI systems aren't stupid enough to make the simple errors whoever wrote this did... For example, yes, the newer (777, 787) Boeings are fly-by-wire, but that's it... The world's most popular Boeing (which is the world's most popular airliner) is the 737, which is NOT. For anyone who is interested, the Cessna 172 is the most produced (number of units) civilian aircraft ever built, at least as of about 2 years ago, and I very seriously doubt that's changed or ever will... Aviation has always been expensive, but in the modern age, it's gone bonkers... Back in the day, you could buy a brand new Cessna for the price of a luxury car or perhaps a bit more. Today even the lowly 172 and it's 110 kt cruise speed costs more than 2 houses!
Didn't know someone could say so many wrong things in a single video, truly an accomplishment. 0:38 Pointy nose design is a particularity of just SOME Boeing aircraft, in particular 707, 727 and every generation of 737 (that share the same fuselage design), and one of the reason of the pointiness is that the 707 was initially intended to be narrower but then they decided to make it a bit wider so they had to enlarge the part that merge the cockpit (that was already designed) to the fuselage making the front part of the aircraft to looks like that (and you also have to consider that the knowledge about aerodynamics during the 50s was a bit different that today). But other Boeing aircraft such as the 787 or 757 have a very different design and more a rounded nose shape. 0:50 Boeing have dropped the eyebrow windows decades ago, no more newer aircraft is produced with them and even the ones that were built with them and that now still fly have been mostly converted, so seeing a Boeing aircraft with eyebrow windows today is pretty rare. You also have to consider that other plane manufacturers have used them in the past (in the md-80 for example) making the eyebrow not a recognition element. 0:56 This one makes no sense, the only Boeing aircraft to have that kind of 6-wheel gear is the 777, any other Boeing aircraft does not have that, plus the airbus a350 (specifically the 1000 variant) also have them so it's not a Boeing peculiarity by any means. 1:23 the Boeing 757 have a tilted 4*2 landing gear pretty similar to the one showed in the video, so no, if you are watching that type of landing gear it doesn't mean that it is an airbus. 1:30 the video is literally comparing the tail of an Airbus a321 and a Boeing 747 that is like twice that size of that, so of course in this particular case the 747 have a bigger tail but that doesn't mean that this is a peculiarity of Boeing, the tail has to be proportioned to meet certain standards and it depends on so many things that I can't even imagine, one of those being the size of the aircraft (the Airbus a380 for example has a massive tail). 1:46 the video literally says that the winglets are a Boeing thing while showing an Airbus with winglets, proving that it is not a Boeing thing. Both Airbus and Boeing uses and have used in the past many different wingtip design, like the blended, scimitar, fence etc... And older aircrafts (many of them still flies today) don't even have them. Also, newer aircrafts like the 787 or the 747 (both from Boeing) don't use any winglet because of the way the wing behave and flex during flight, so saying that Winglets are a Boeing particularity is incorrect, and the winglet design showed in 2:04 is from an aircraft that wasn't even ever produced from airbus (from what I remember the a380 plus was just a prototype). 3:05 Both Airbus and Boeing uses a big variety of engine across their aircrafts, in some cases, they use many different engines for the same aircraft family, like the a320 family that is configured with CFM56, IAE V2500, PW 6000 (a318), plus the CFM Leap and PW1000G for the NEOs variants. The a350 uses Rolls Royce engines (so not just Boeing), and the 757 is used with both RR and PW (so PW is not just for Airbuses). So, there is not a particular engine brand that is used only in Boeing or Airbus but I get that the video intention in this case could have been more of a "they mostly prefer this brand", but still... 3:46 Yes, they both uses FBW systems, so is generally correct, but I want to point out that not every Boeing or Airbus aircraft uses them. In general, every new Airbus aircraft has FBW, just the a300 and a310 weren't FBW (but they are pretty old and rare aircrafts now), while Boeing still build the 737 MAX family without it, they in fact still uses the conventional flight controls being the 737 a pretty old platform now. 3:51 This could mean from everything to nothing, both Airbus and Boeing use A LOT of redundancy for safety reason. While for the automation part, well, I don't know much about newer Boeing aircrafts so I don't perfectly know how Boeing have integrated FBW in their aircrafts, but the fact that Airbus is more focused on automation than Boeing is kind of right, but the reason, at least in my opinion, lies in the fact that Boeing (as I said before) still relies on older platforms (like the 737), and in general Airbus is a much newer brand so they started using the FBW and much automated system almost from the beginning of their history. Also, about the "Fancy Envelope Protection Logic" used by Airbus, that logic is also used by Boeing in the 777 and 787 but by "forcing" the stick the pilot can still override that limit, thing that is not possible in the Airbuses without disabling some features in the cockpit. 4:18 that is probably the only correct part of the video… almost… in fact I have to point out that old Airbus aircrafts (a300 and a310) used to have the Yoke like Boeing. 5:14 This whole part goes into the different airlines seat configuration. I don’t get why is saying that European airliners prefers more space and comfort while American ones prefer to have more passengers. It heavily depends on the airline itself, if you compare Lufthansa to Spirit obviously Lufthansa seats will be more Comfortable in general, but if you consider Ryanair and Delta the situation changes, the whole argument of the video here makes no sense here. 6:04 Same thing, both American and European planes and Airlines can and are configured with more classes (unless you fly on some low cost like Ryanair), and this is NOT a peculiarity of American planes or airlines. 6:45 I don’t even know how to comment this… but, C919 a serious competitor? Yeah… sure… The “Chinese” aircraft with 40% of foreign components imported from US and Europe, with 3/5 of their suppliers based in US and 1/3 in Europe and with American engines… Basically everything that keeps C919 in the air is not from China. I’m not saying that this is not a big accomplishment from China, but building aircrafts and certify them is hard, and Boeing have done this for more than 100 years. Then the video proceeds in fact to explain similarities of the C919 with its competitors (how strange), and this is not only for the exterior, look at the cockpit of a C919 and an Airbus a350 or a220 for example. I don’t know what I missed out, but I think this covers pretty much every important part. Ps: Pls let me know if I made any mistake, so we can avoid spreading misinformation.
"Beyond Facts" is the perfect name for your channel. During the first 60 seconds of the video, you have already made several untrue statements. Boeing completely changed the design of the nose after the 737 was first flown more than 50 years ago. While the 747's nose must be different due to the second-floor flight deck, the 757, 767, 777 and 787 all have blunt noses similar to Airbus. In addition, only the 777 has triple bogey main landing gear, but you make it sound like all Boeing jets have triple bogeys. 5:48: "European carriers have bigger windows"? Neither Boeing nor Airbus offer a selection of window sizes. Airlines take what they get when ordering planes, when it comes to size of the windows. 6:59: Are you serious when you state COMAC might actually compete with Boeing and Airbus? Their little midrange regional jet is already years behind when it comes to overall design, and so far, the plane under-performs in almost every category. Stop trying to dramatize humdrum factual information. Or at least, get the facts right before you get all dramatic about them.
You had to go and throw in that "little" word to disparage the Chinese airplane. Your comments are downgraded immediately since you can't evaluate the Chinese jet without resorting to emotional irrelevant insults. The point about the C919 is that it's a first entry for a new industry; of course it's not going to compete, its market is the domestic Chinese market. You don't build a commerical aviation industry by attempting to compete with market leaders. Airbus built the 340 for crying out loud simply to get experience with four engine equipment. Embraer and CAe/Bombardier had a similiar stepped cycle. The Chinese are at the beginning of their cycle. You won't catch me on a C919 tho', similarly with anything Russian. And MD equipment made me nervous back in the day.
i competely agree with what you are saying, I would expect RUclipsrs to at least check their facts or just spend 5 minutes learning how to actually identify airplanes,
Can’t believe you completely left out the number 3 comercial airplane builder in the world. Maybe you simply don’t know about it. It’s called Embraer. It’s a Brazilian company Boeing tried to buy it, but didn’t work.
An AI bot, likely operating out of a content mill in China, shat out this video. Little actual human involvement so it's no surprise it's full of inaccuracies. They also forgot other long-established manufacturers like Bombardier.
Embraer is overall absolutely not a bad aircraft manufacturer. They are pretty good. The only thing that is going wrong at the moment, is that some type of their aircraft, (i forgot the type name) is not doing so well at the moment. But their other types are plane and simple, GOOD.
@@Kirovets7011 You might be referring to the E2 jet lineup, which yes it's certainly not doing well it is a beautiful aircraft and many airlines don't realise that.
So if I see an A380 with 6 wheel bogie's then it is a Boing and if I see a 767 with 4 wheel bogie's then it must be an Airbus, the number of wheels on an aircraft does not tell anyone who made the aircraft much like the number of wheel on a truck doesn't tell anyone who made the truck. The A220 is a Bombardier aircraft which was designed and is built in Canada with a second assembly line in the USA. Also engine manufacturers develop engines then offer them to all aircraft manufactures, so you will find all 3.5 major brands of turbofans on both Boing and Airbus aircraft. Beyond Facts seems to be the correct name for this channel as this video is way Beyond factual and seems rather made up on the spot with little to no research.
Lol it so true, its like boeing are forced to make planes with 3 boogeys and airbus is limited to 2 boogeys. i loved the way you stated it lol. It makes it so funny!:)
“And don’t forget the wing tips. Boeing likes to add winglets to many of their models.” Points to example of winglets on an Airbus A320. You lost me there bro. I watch planes with all my kids. It takes about an hour for a 5 year old to begin picking out Airbus vs Boeing. It’s not hard enough that you need this video.
I would be very cauteous before boarding a flight on a plane made in China. As with almost every aspect of Chinese manufacturing, their major downfall is the lack of quality control.
And giving the fact the Russians have two design schools and Embraer's 190 is about as big as the Comac entry, that makes Comac the 6th or 7th manufacturer on the scene.
funny how you talk about the new Chinese jet and then show a Chinese Boeing 737 please be totally accurate, there is a lot of viewers who can not be fooled and will notice such inaccuracies.
I have flown on Boeing and Airbus and both got me there safely. I like how Boeing gives the pilots final say on controlling the aircraft. Americans will take the compact seating for a lower price,, and of course complain about how cramped the seating is. I usually upgrade to Premier seating which gives a few more inches and maybe a glass of wine. I will never fly on a Chinese built aircraft.
Speaking for the aviation community, this guy tries but is really lacking. Saying something as general as "if it has 4 wheels it's an airbus. If it has 6 it's a Boeing".
Surprisingly, the first six-wheel landing gear was developed by Boeing was actually deeply modified soviet Tupolev Tu-154 landing gear, because Boeing didn't use such before and soviet engineers were good at making multi-axis gear due to low-end runways.
The Comac might be designed in China, but almost all its components, from the engines to the cockpit, are made in the West and imported into China. The only thing "Chinese" about the Comac is that all its Western parts are assembled in China.
6 wheel MG is only unique to the Trip 7 and the Dreamer not ALL metal. Scimitar winglets are the standard for Max, 900 and some NG craft. The blended winglet is at time craft specific. C919 🤔? Boeing and Airbus have nothing to worry about but market share 😅. Good video.
1:00 this here, is a Boeing b777's landing gear, not all Boeing's use this wheel arrangement 1:26 this here, is an Airbus a330's landing gear, yes some Airbus planes and Boeing planes use this, like the b757, b767, the a380, the b747 The difference between Boeing planes and Airbus planes are mostly the nose and cockpit windows, Boeing has a more triangular nose and quite a cool and iconic looking cockpit window, Airbus has a more rounded nose, with cubic windows 1:52 winglets are adopted by nearly all aircraft manufacturers, MC Donald douglas, Embraer, bombardier(I think), Airbus, Boeing and so on, some Airbus models like the a380 and a few a320 models do have those winglets shown in 2:03, as shown there, that's an a380's winglet. 4:31 both Airbus, Boeing, and other manufacturers all generally use digital stuff, well that's what I've been seeing I guess, I doubt I'm right about this, but correct me if I'm wrong :) 5:20 both American and European airlines have premium, business, and first class seats... But Europeans are much more known for their first class seats, oh yeah don't forget about Emirates, Etihad, Qatar, and so on! They also provide great seats(I haven't flown them, but by experiences people he flying them, I doubt they are that bad) btw I don't think window sizes differ.... Wait do they? Oh and by the way, smaller Boeing/Airbus aircraft have one wheel landing gears, good examples are the b737 and a320, or a220, or b727! 7:00 this plane looks nice, stylish and sleek, but takes too much inspiration from the a220 tbh, the visor looks like it's taken from the a350, but no hate, looks cool 7:14 I don't think so? Airbus and Boeing are giants in the aviation industry, a new comer like comac won't do anything imo 7:41 a220* Ive yapped too much😭 tbh I doubt anyone would read this, but if you, whoever you are, read this and gave it a like, thanks!... Im trying to explain as great as possible, if I said anything incorrect, please correct me ;) ok I think that's all, thanks for reading!
2:15 Boeing is all about flexibility and adaptability... err, I think you meant flexibility in not prioritising flight safety, and adaptability in taking the blame but doing almost nothing to change their mistakes.
As an Aviation enthusiast and one who is studying to become a pilot, aircraft designer/engineer and an air accident investigator, this video has tons of mis leading and even false facts. Other then comparing one with another compare their models as in A320 vs 737, 777 vs A350, 787 vs A330neo, 747 vs A380 etc... Boeing's 737 nose is not less aerodynamic the then A320. Its relatively the same. Airbus has a more rounded nose to increase volume while the 737 is actually nose pointy for aerodynamics. Since these aircrafts fly at subsonic speeds then it doesn't real effect that much between what type of nose an aircraft has. Also please do research more on the landing gear. Not all Airbus have that gear type and not even Boeing. The 777 and A350-1000 have 6 wheel gears. The 757, 767, 787, A330, A340, A350-900 have 4 wheeled gears. There are even some A320 with 4 wheels per main landing gear.....just check facts before posting please.
I love it when we aviation enthusiasts that actually know some stuff will just fill the comments with whats wrong and all. i completely support your point about the nose of the 737
Huge generalisations in the video with numerous inaccuracies. The only reason the 747's cockpit was all the way up there was because the 747 was originally designed as a cargo aircraft. Thus it needed a clean, unobstructed fuselage all the way through from nose to tail. Hence the cockpit was positioned above the fuselage in the famous bubble or hump.
Boeing has always had the shadow of its military airplanes in its airliners. You can tell when you land in one. Airbus: “have we landed? Boeing “bang!”.
The "facts" given in this video almost felt insulting for aviation. The set of wheels alone was a big no no and comparing a single aisle vertical stabilizer to a two deck makes no sense.
It's too early and ambitious for Comac to compete with the big 2 Aircraft Industries. Its still had to compete with smaller ones like Bombardier, Embraer and even Mitsubishi.
These videos are made by AI. That's why alot of the scenes doesn't make any sense. The anchor 2:34 is a commonly used AI anchor which I've seen on 4 videos just today.
Okay, Airbus doesn’t only have 4 wheel landing gear. Take the A350-1000 which has 3 pairs of landing gear on each side as the Boeing 777. As well as the a380!
An interesting thing I noticed about the end of the vid. The PPG logo on the front windscreen. Am sure our US friends, particularly in Pittsburg, would recognize that one!
The artwork and labels displayed on the outside of the planes have little to do with the manufacture and more to do with the airline's logos and color theme that ordered them from the manufacture 7:46 That plane has "Chinese symbols" on it because it is being flown and operated by a company inside China. If that Chinese manufacture starts contracting and selling those planes on an international level the graphic designs will vary depending on what airlines contract with them.
If Chinese fill their planes with Chinese scripts it's a very bad idea. One can learn cyrillic, greek, arab or other alphabets in a few hours and be able to decipher words even if the meaning is not understood. Learning chinese characters while flying would require being on their planes for a whole year nonstop ...
You described the exterior paint schemes as a difference between Airbus / Boeing and Comac. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the paint designs determined by the airlines and not the manufacturer?
Boeing, Airbus, doesn't really make that much difference to a non-pilot person like myself. But what matters besides comfort level, leg room, and service quality is to get me from point A to point B safely and without the plane falling apart. As for the paint on the airframe, or the language on signs, it doesn't really matter.
@@CW-rx2js No, the AIRLINE does, based on the configuration they pick. If an airline said "Can you configure it for just 30 seats?" either maker would say no? Of course, picking something not in the catalog might cost a bit extra, but everything in a plane sale is negotiated. Seat materials, colors, carpet, in cabin entertainment.
This is the most Americanised video I've seen on aircrafts. "Once you're inside you're surrounded by Chinese motifs, giving you a strong sense of cultural identity and national pride" ...no it's because it's their language, of course they're going to use it! 💀 Also it's airlines that choose their liveries, not the manufacturer...
1:51 you were talking about boeing winglets while you were showing an a320 family plane, and the “airbus” winglets that you showed are exclusive on the older a320 family planes and the a380, please correct your videos.
Yeah, traditional carriers like Qantas, Emirates, Qatar, BA and Lufthansa won’t be buying COMAC until they have proven themselves over YEARS especially with the retracting Chinese economy.
For anyone confused similarly by cars, you can clearly tell a Ford and Toyota apart by the different sized headlights, number of doors and colour of interiors..
True and they are already there in the market with a couple 1000 aircraft orders. I doubt the COMAC will get these numbers.....outside of China and or Russia.
Where did you get all this information? It's just so I don't ever use that source, because the video is full of misinformation of all kinds. Listen everyone, if you want to know facts about aviation or planes, go check out a channel specialized in aviation, otherwise you are very likely to be misinformed.
The fact that they kept competing to each others to the point that in the future economy looks like a business class (I hope it can be true) in Boeing 737
its so funny that the thumbnail for the video has an American flag at the 747 even though you can literally see a part of Qantas, Spirit Of Australia 😂
1) Only the older 737s, the 727s and 717s have eyebrow windows above the main windshield. 2) The “robust 6 wheel truck set-up” (could’ve just called it “triple-bogey”) also appears on the Airbus A350. 3) “ _ACJ320NEO_ “ (pause + 1:12) 4) “4 wheel bogey landing gears” also exist on the 747, 757, 767, 787, which are all Boeing aircrafts. 5) The height of the tail (Vertical Stabilizer) is determined by the need to maintain control of the aircraft in the worst case of yawing motion that can cause the nose of aircraft to move left to right or right to left. This yawing motion can be the result of an engine failure or a severe crosswind or wind gust. 6) 1:54 states that “Boeing likes to add winglets” and goes on to explain that they are “fancy upward-angled wing extensions”. This is true, but only for some 737s, 757s, and 767s. Boeing also makes use of the “Raked” wingtip design, typically seen on the 747-8s, 777LR/ERs, 767-400s, and the 787s. Boeing also uses the “Canted” wingtip design on some 727s and all if not most 747-400s. 7) Ok this is ridiculous. A clip before point 6 shows an Aeroflot A320 with Sharklets which completesly negates the whole “curved” thing. Airbus only uses curved wingtips on the A350 and some A330s. The rest either has fence (A320 Family, A380), sharklets, and canted wingtips. 8) Besides GeneralElectric and Rolls-Royce, Boeing also uses engines from Pratt&Whitney, like the RB211 seen on 757s for example. 9) Boeing does NOT use the RRTrent XWB. The XWB is mainly and only used for the A350-900 _XWB_ . 10) Airbus also uses Rolls-Royce. 11) European carriers DO NOT throw in larger windows. That is a job for the manufacturing company of the aircrafts. 12) The “new kid on the block” only makes sense once COMAC has gained approval in certification. 13) Never heard anyone who pronounces the “Cee Nine One Nine” as “Cee NineNine Teen”
The research on this video was done like hollywood producers when they make an aviation movie. It's basically taking the subject lines of the results of their googles search. As a person that has worked on both manufacturer types, I can safely say this guy is talking s#!*. Also, when it comes to engines, it's usually the owner of the aircraft that decides which engines to go for, which that aircraft can take or designed for. Usually a minimum of two Engine Manufacturers.
written and produced by someone that really knows nothing about airplanes. @5:48 he says that European AIRLINES go with bigger windows, it is the manufacturer that makes the decision of the size of the windows not the carrier. As a point of reference Airbus tends to have smaller windows than the Boeing counterparts
Sorry, buddy, but I can't help calling this video full of BS! Boeing doesn't use the six-wheel configuration anything else than the main gear of the 777. Airbus also uses Rolls Royce engines and various forms of winglets. They were actually the ones who started handling wing tip vortices. Some of the footage you use illustrates the direct opposite of what the voiceover says. And so on... Thumbs down!
FBW system in Airbus was one of the factors why Air France 447 has crashed. Captain taking control over first officer couldn't override with his inputs when first officer was still controling the stick despite commands given to let it go.
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
✈ Love our videos? Join our ‘Paper Pilot Club’ now! Get new videos first, special paper airplanes, and cool badges. 🌟
Click ‘Join’ to be a member and have more fun with us! ruclips.net/channel/UCzgWZmqmKpmsr4oPWITusKAjoin
The A 320 is not an Airbus. It was completely designed by Canadian Bombardier. The only reason Airbus has it is because of corporate incompetency
I think you mean the A220 which is a further development of the Bombardier C series, after Airbus aquired a 50.01% stakeholding of the program.
Wow I love the new 797
@@kimbitschlarsen7095 It is not a further development. The plane was complete and already had orders. Airbus has done nothing. It is just a better plane.
That may be. But it is still the A220 and not the A320....
"Chat GPT, halluncinate a 10 minute script outlining the differences between Boeing and Airbus aircraft design"
exactly. I mean it's true to the name: Beyond facts :D
Literally this.
@@davidliu2243 actually that. 😂
Chat GPT: ok ren
love the AI generated video of the "narrator" talking - it's close, but just enough off from the speech that it's extremely noticeable and weird feeling
There is A LOT of inaccuracies and generalisations made with this video. Airbus also uses RR and GE on their planes, and also incorporate winglets. Boeing also uses 4 wheel landing gears like on their 787, 757 and 767s. There's a lot of parallels between the two manufacturers. And in reference to the Comac part, the blended wingtip is more like that of the A350, not 787.
if you saw the thumbnail i hope you saw the inaccuracies and generalisations coming a looong way xD
@@pattos4195 yes the thumbnail is ridiculous 😂
Yeah, and Comac's "cultural symbols" are actually just Chinese translations or actual Chinese names that one would expect on a Chinese airline, but unlikely to found on non-Chinese airlines.
I was about to comment, but I see people already told that.
yeah Ikr? Bro legit put a 747 against a modern airliner. Bro needs to STFU@@pattos4195
OMG GUYS, the text that is spoken is LITERALLY from the snippets that ChatGPT generates when you ask it "Can you create a script for a 8 minute video highlighting the differences between modern Airbus and Boeing aircraft?"
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Boeing eliminated the 737's eyebrow windows almost 20 years ago except on military versions. Most operators of older 737s have blanked them out to reduce maintenance.
Lots of incorrect and misleading info in this video. Implies that the aircraft manufacturer makes the decisions on liveries and seating configurations. The airlines do that. Virtually no difference in seat size and legroom in economy class on any of the major US and European airlines.
yo bro this vid for npcs for china
even the thumbnail is so wrong
U r 👍💯💯 correct. Wrong information given in video about differences between Boeing and Airbus airplanes designs. Boeing 777 787 don't have wingtip winglets. Nor pointy noses. Interior layouts are decided by customers.
Correct. A.I. trash... all style, no substance. And yeah, Chinese creations.
I was just about to come comment on all that. The video makes is sound as if Boeing and Airbus are running airlines, when they manufacture airplanes to the airline’s requirements
This is a 100% AI generated script
and deepfake on the person too
I hate these AI videos
My guess would be a 100% AI **TRANSLATED** script, as it feels like pure CCP propaganda for their mediocre airplane manufacture pet...
I could cope with that, if only it didn't sound like Casey Kasem.
No it's not AI generated.
The Boeing 787, 757 and 767 also has 2 sets of 4 wheels, not just the A330. The only Boeing plane to have that six wheel landing gear is the 777.
Don't forget the A350
@@magicaviation2990-1000 variant only, though.
the A350-1000 has triple gear tho
Even tho those planes has 2 sets of 4 wheels. You didn't count the gears are tilted differently
What about 747
Please don’t take these differences seriously.... there are different models of both the airlines... and whatever is mentioned is not correct. E.g. Boeing 787 has 4 main landing gear wheels , even airbus A320 has winglets ( called Sharklets )...
Yeah. this video is highly misleading. Comac didn't borrow anything from the 787. the C919 is a narrowbody made out of aliminuim but the 787 is a widebody made out of composite material.
And airbus use rolls Royce as well
Truly beyond facts
Exactly, there were some misleading information especially about the planes, like the not all boeing have 3 main landing boogeys, in fact, only the 777 has that landing gear in the video. This sort of information wasn't exactly specified so I can totally see someone misunderstanding from this video
Wow wild generalizations, both Airbus and Boeing have used engines from all major manufacturers and most aircraft types have multiple engine options available just as an example the A330 has 4 different engine options from Prat, GE and Rolls and the 747 has had 6 or 7 different engine types from the same manufacturers across its life. This video was done with very little reasearch and seemed to far outweigh Comac as a real competitor. They are less of a real competitor and more on the scale of Embraer or Bombardier but will strugle to get FAA or EASA approval and without that will never take much market share from the giants
Bombardier and Embraer have completely dominated the short-haul sector. Airbus and Boeing aren't even trying to compete with them. With that said, I would imagine that sometime in the future, Bombardier and Embraer will enter the medium-haul market and create competition for Boeing's 737 and Airbus' A320s. Especially if Boeing goes under.
@@incubus_the_manAirbus owns Bombardier.
Before the video revealing Comac, I thought they would talk about Embraer, that is slowly creating bigger aircrafts... Specially the E195-E2
The video is full of "beyond facts", but only as it approaches the end does it really become clear that you've been watching a COMAC ad. The "narrator" you see is artificially generated, along with the narration itself and much of the script. I figure the COMAC part was prepared by the marketing department.
Expect a lot more of this nonsense across many other industries and sectors. Sadly many people will be fooled by such disinformation. The future is bleak.
The company’s building the aircraft do not choose the livery, it’s up to the airlines for that
Boeing only has one plane with 6 wheels which is the Boeing 777. Most of Boeing planes have a 4 wheel setup like 767 787 and 757, also when you were talking about the winglets on Boeing planes you showed a Airbus A320 Sharklet.
Did you forget the a350-1000?
@@259er7 I wasn’t talking about airbus?
@pyl19 ah, true my apologies! I also don't believe this video was reviewed by someone with even a little bit of knowledge about aviation. It's almost like the script was written by AI or something.
@@259er7 AI systems aren't stupid enough to make the simple errors whoever wrote this did... For example, yes, the newer (777, 787) Boeings are fly-by-wire, but that's it... The world's most popular Boeing (which is the world's most popular airliner) is the 737, which is NOT. For anyone who is interested, the Cessna 172 is the most produced (number of units) civilian aircraft ever built, at least as of about 2 years ago, and I very seriously doubt that's changed or ever will... Aviation has always been expensive, but in the modern age, it's gone bonkers... Back in the day, you could buy a brand new Cessna for the price of a luxury car or perhaps a bit more. Today even the lowly 172 and it's 110 kt cruise speed costs more than 2 houses!
Didn't know someone could say so many wrong things in a single video, truly an accomplishment.
0:38 Pointy nose design is a particularity of just SOME Boeing aircraft, in particular 707, 727 and every generation of 737 (that share the same fuselage design), and one of the reason of the pointiness is that the 707 was initially intended to be narrower but then they decided to make it a bit wider so they had to enlarge the part that merge the cockpit (that was already designed) to the fuselage making the front part of the aircraft to looks like that (and you also have to consider that the knowledge about aerodynamics during the 50s was a bit different that today). But other Boeing aircraft such as the 787 or 757 have a very different design and more a rounded nose shape.
0:50 Boeing have dropped the eyebrow windows decades ago, no more newer aircraft is produced with them and even the ones that were built with them and that now still fly have been mostly converted, so seeing a Boeing aircraft with eyebrow windows today is pretty rare. You also have to consider that other plane manufacturers have used them in the past (in the md-80 for example) making the eyebrow not a recognition element.
0:56 This one makes no sense, the only Boeing aircraft to have that kind of 6-wheel gear is the 777, any other Boeing aircraft does not have that, plus the airbus a350 (specifically the 1000 variant)
also have them so it's not a Boeing peculiarity by any means.
1:23 the Boeing 757 have a tilted 4*2 landing gear pretty similar to the one showed in the video, so no, if you are watching that type of landing gear it doesn't mean that it is an airbus.
1:30 the video is literally comparing the tail of an Airbus a321 and a Boeing 747 that is like twice that size of that, so of course in this particular case the 747 have a bigger tail but that doesn't mean that this is a peculiarity of Boeing, the tail has to be proportioned to meet certain standards and it depends on so many things that I can't even imagine, one of those being the size of the aircraft (the Airbus a380 for example has a massive tail).
1:46 the video literally says that the winglets are a Boeing thing while showing an Airbus with winglets, proving that it is not a Boeing thing. Both Airbus and Boeing uses and have used in the past many different wingtip design, like the blended, scimitar, fence etc... And older aircrafts (many of them still flies today) don't even have them. Also, newer aircrafts like the 787 or the 747 (both from Boeing) don't use any winglet because of the way the wing behave and flex during flight, so saying that Winglets are a Boeing particularity is incorrect, and the winglet design showed in 2:04 is from an aircraft that wasn't even ever produced from airbus (from what I remember the a380 plus was just a prototype).
3:05 Both Airbus and Boeing uses a big variety of engine across their aircrafts, in some cases, they use many different engines for the same aircraft family, like the a320 family that is configured with CFM56, IAE V2500, PW 6000 (a318), plus the CFM Leap and PW1000G for the NEOs variants. The a350 uses Rolls Royce engines (so not just Boeing), and the 757 is used with both RR and PW (so PW is not just for Airbuses). So, there is not a particular engine brand that is used only in Boeing or Airbus but I get that the video intention in this case could have been more of a "they mostly prefer this brand", but still...
3:46 Yes, they both uses FBW systems, so is generally correct, but I want to point out that not every Boeing or Airbus aircraft uses them. In general, every new Airbus aircraft has FBW, just the a300 and a310 weren't FBW (but they are pretty old and rare aircrafts now), while Boeing still build the 737 MAX family without it, they in fact still uses the conventional flight controls being the 737 a pretty old platform now.
3:51 This could mean from everything to nothing, both Airbus and Boeing use A LOT of redundancy for safety reason. While for the automation part, well, I don't know much about newer Boeing aircrafts so I don't perfectly know how Boeing have integrated FBW in their aircrafts, but the fact that Airbus is more focused on automation than Boeing is kind of right, but the reason, at least in my opinion, lies in the fact that Boeing (as I said before) still relies on older platforms (like the 737), and in general Airbus is a much newer brand so they started using the FBW and much automated system almost from the beginning of their history. Also, about the "Fancy Envelope Protection Logic" used by Airbus, that logic is also used by Boeing in the 777 and 787 but by "forcing" the stick the pilot can still override that limit, thing that is not possible in the Airbuses without disabling some features in the cockpit.
4:18 that is probably the only correct part of the video… almost… in fact I have to point out that old Airbus aircrafts (a300 and a310) used to have the Yoke like Boeing.
5:14 This whole part goes into the different airlines seat configuration. I don’t get why is saying that European airliners prefers more space and comfort while American ones prefer to have more passengers. It heavily depends on the airline itself, if you compare Lufthansa to Spirit obviously Lufthansa seats will be more Comfortable in general, but if you consider Ryanair and Delta the situation changes, the whole argument of the video here makes no sense here.
6:04 Same thing, both American and European planes and Airlines can and are configured with more classes (unless you fly on some low cost like Ryanair), and this is NOT a peculiarity of American planes or airlines.
6:45 I don’t even know how to comment this… but, C919 a serious competitor? Yeah… sure… The “Chinese” aircraft with 40% of foreign components imported from US and Europe, with 3/5 of their suppliers based in US and 1/3 in Europe and with American engines… Basically everything that keeps C919 in the air is not from China. I’m not saying that this is not a big accomplishment from China, but building aircrafts and certify them is hard, and Boeing have done this for more than 100 years.
Then the video proceeds in fact to explain similarities of the C919 with its competitors (how strange), and this is not only for the exterior, look at the cockpit of a C919 and an Airbus a350 or a220 for example.
I don’t know what I missed out, but I think this covers pretty much every important part.
Ps: Pls let me know if I made any mistake, so we can avoid spreading misinformation.
I know somebody who tells so many lies and inaccuracies in such a small period of time... Trump. 😊
"Beyond Facts" is the perfect name for your channel. During the first 60 seconds of the video, you have already made several untrue statements. Boeing completely changed the design of the nose after the 737 was first flown more than 50 years ago. While the 747's nose must be different due to the second-floor flight deck, the 757, 767, 777 and 787 all have blunt noses similar to Airbus. In addition, only the 777 has triple bogey main landing gear, but you make it sound like all Boeing jets have triple bogeys. 5:48: "European carriers have bigger windows"? Neither Boeing nor Airbus offer a selection of window sizes. Airlines take what they get when ordering planes, when it comes to size of the windows. 6:59: Are you serious when you state COMAC might actually compete with Boeing and Airbus? Their little midrange regional jet is already years behind when it comes to overall design, and so far, the plane under-performs in almost every category. Stop trying to dramatize humdrum factual information. Or at least, get the facts right before you get all dramatic about them.
You had to go and throw in that "little" word to disparage the Chinese airplane. Your comments are downgraded immediately since you can't evaluate the Chinese jet without resorting to emotional irrelevant insults. The point about the C919 is that it's a first entry for a new industry; of course it's not going to compete, its market is the domestic Chinese market. You don't build a commerical aviation industry by attempting to compete with market leaders. Airbus built the 340 for crying out loud simply to get experience with four engine equipment. Embraer and CAe/Bombardier had a similiar stepped cycle. The Chinese are at the beginning of their cycle. You won't catch me on a C919 tho', similarly with anything Russian. And MD equipment made me nervous back in the day.
i competely agree with what you are saying, I would expect RUclipsrs to at least check their facts or just spend 5 minutes learning how to actually identify airplanes,
Thank you for the info! It's really strange to think that you've probably put more effort into this comment than them in the video 😮💨
1:48 he’s describing how Boeing has winglets but it’s an A321 that’s shown on the screen.
10/10 facts
Absolutely, and the a380plus winglet which doesn't even exist yet
Searched for this comment
Real
Can’t believe you completely left out the number 3 comercial airplane builder in the world.
Maybe you simply don’t know about it.
It’s called Embraer.
It’s a Brazilian company
Boeing tried to buy it, but didn’t work.
An AI bot, likely operating out of a content mill in China, shat out this video. Little actual human involvement so it's no surprise it's full of inaccuracies. They also forgot other long-established manufacturers like Bombardier.
@@mlc4495 Bombardier kinda flopped though after Airbus bought the C-Series. The Dash serieses are still holding strong
my man forgot bombardier too
Embraer is overall absolutely not a bad aircraft manufacturer.
They are pretty good. The only thing that is going wrong at the moment, is that some type of their aircraft, (i forgot the type name) is not doing so well at the moment.
But their other types are plane and simple, GOOD.
@@Kirovets7011 You might be referring to the E2 jet lineup, which yes it's certainly not doing well it is a beautiful aircraft and many airlines don't realise that.
So if I see an A380 with 6 wheel bogie's then it is a Boing and if I see a 767 with 4 wheel bogie's then it must be an Airbus, the number of wheels on an aircraft does not tell anyone who made the aircraft much like the number of wheel on a truck doesn't tell anyone who made the truck. The A220 is a Bombardier aircraft which was designed and is built in Canada with a second assembly line in the USA. Also engine manufacturers develop engines then offer them to all aircraft manufactures, so you will find all 3.5 major brands of turbofans on both Boing and Airbus aircraft. Beyond Facts seems to be the correct name for this channel as this video is way Beyond factual and seems rather made up on the spot with little to no research.
🤣
Don't forget, if it's Boeing it must have eyebrow windows
Lol it so true, its like boeing are forced to make planes with 3 boogeys and airbus is limited to 2 boogeys. i loved the way you stated it lol. It makes it so funny!:)
2 vs 6 wheels
“And don’t forget the wing tips. Boeing likes to add winglets to many of their models.” Points to example of winglets on an Airbus A320.
You lost me there bro.
I watch planes with all my kids. It takes about an hour for a 5 year old to begin picking out Airbus vs Boeing. It’s not hard enough that you need this video.
I would be very cauteous before boarding a flight on a plane made in China. As with almost every aspect of Chinese manufacturing, their major downfall is the lack of quality control.
Boeing 737 I rest my case
12000 737’s in service I rest my case
I rest their case
A bluetuth device is a conected successfully
then don't travel most planes are manufactured in china airbus Boeing have manufacturing facility in china
*sees a 757* "oh! 2 wheels. must be an *_airbus._* "
lol, and if there is no eyebrow window, its not a boeing. But what if there isn't an eyebrow but there is a 6 wheeled main gear?
This is an advertisement of Comac in the disguise of Boeing and Airbus's description.
Yes
And giving the fact the Russians have two design schools and Embraer's 190 is about as big as the Comac entry, that makes Comac the 6th or 7th manufacturer on the scene.
New kid in the block😅😅
funny how you talk about the new Chinese jet and then show a Chinese Boeing 737 please be totally accurate, there is a lot of viewers who can not be fooled and will notice such inaccuracies.
> I thought there’s no Boeing China .. But there’s Airbus China , the manufactory at Tianjin..
Thank you for pointing that out! We apologize for any confusion caused. We'll make sure to be more accurate in our future videos.
@@BeyondFactseverything you said is wrong. Its all misinformation.
Lol hard to be accurate when they use AI generated text to speech and random images from Google.
I have flown on Boeing and Airbus and both got me there safely. I like how Boeing gives the pilots final say on controlling the aircraft. Americans will take the compact seating for a lower price,, and of course complain about how cramped the seating is. I usually upgrade to Premier seating which gives a few more inches and maybe a glass of wine. I will never fly on a Chinese built aircraft.
Why would you not? Comac is making great strides towards perfection.
@@mauricesaoke943 I wouldn't fly on a Chicom aircraft even if I thought it was safe, which I do not. I will not support that evil regime.
Listen, don't be that offensive to the Chinese@@kevykevTPA
Speaking for the aviation community, this guy tries but is really lacking. Saying something as general as "if it has 4 wheels it's an airbus. If it has 6 it's a Boeing".
As a aircraft mechanic of 28 years who's worked on countless Boeing and Airbus aircraft...I have one thing to say, This video is full of nonsense.
Surprisingly, the first six-wheel landing gear was developed by Boeing was actually deeply modified soviet Tupolev Tu-154 landing gear, because Boeing didn't use such before and soviet engineers were good at making multi-axis gear due to low-end runways.
Man could you imagine if the Russians and us started working together and Kennedy didn't get asassinated
@@bongwelll Russians and US were working together and that collaboration was sick. But as it ended they started the cold war...
atleast not tu-104.
The Comac might be designed in China, but almost all its components, from the engines to the cockpit, are made in the West and imported into China. The only thing "Chinese" about the Comac is that all its Western parts are assembled in China.
A company and B company make their own planes. C company plane is a pile up of western components in a self made fuselage.
Or maybe the reason Chinese COMAC went with CFM International engines is to assure they can reverse engineer from as many other countries as possible.
Usually what commies like to do. I cant stand COMAC.
“*ChatGPT write a script on Boeing and Airbus differences*”
6 wheel MG is only unique to the Trip 7 and the Dreamer not ALL metal. Scimitar winglets are the standard for Max, 900 and some NG craft. The blended winglet is at time craft specific. C919 🤔? Boeing and Airbus have nothing to worry about but market share 😅. Good video.
The 6 wheel MG is only on the 777 and the A350-1000 variant
I love how you said in the pic for the vid that Qantas is American
1:00 this here, is a Boeing b777's landing gear, not all Boeing's use this wheel arrangement
1:26 this here, is an Airbus a330's landing gear, yes some Airbus planes and Boeing planes use this, like the b757, b767, the a380, the b747
The difference between Boeing planes and Airbus planes are mostly the nose and cockpit windows, Boeing has a more triangular nose and quite a cool and iconic looking cockpit window, Airbus has a more rounded nose, with cubic windows
1:52 winglets are adopted by nearly all aircraft manufacturers, MC Donald douglas, Embraer, bombardier(I think), Airbus, Boeing and so on, some Airbus models like the a380 and a few a320 models do have those winglets shown in 2:03, as shown there, that's an a380's winglet.
4:31 both Airbus, Boeing, and other manufacturers all generally use digital stuff, well that's what I've been seeing I guess, I doubt I'm right about this, but correct me if I'm wrong :)
5:20 both American and European airlines have premium, business, and first class seats... But Europeans are much more known for their first class seats, oh yeah don't forget about Emirates, Etihad, Qatar, and so on! They also provide great seats(I haven't flown them, but by experiences people he flying them, I doubt they are that bad) btw I don't think window sizes differ.... Wait do they?
Oh and by the way, smaller Boeing/Airbus aircraft have one wheel landing gears, good examples are the b737 and a320, or a220, or b727!
7:00 this plane looks nice, stylish and sleek, but takes too much inspiration from the a220 tbh, the visor looks like it's taken from the a350, but no hate, looks cool
7:14 I don't think so? Airbus and Boeing are giants in the aviation industry, a new comer like comac won't do anything imo
7:41 a220*
Ive yapped too much😭 tbh I doubt anyone would read this, but if you, whoever you are, read this and gave it a like, thanks!... Im trying to explain as great as possible, if I said anything incorrect, please correct me ;) ok I think that's all, thanks for reading!
2:15 Boeing is all about flexibility and adaptability... err, I think you meant flexibility in not prioritising flight safety, and adaptability in taking the blame but doing almost nothing to change their mistakes.
Cool video 👍
Good video sir! But don't forget the Embraer, a Brazilian company
As an Aviation enthusiast and one who is studying to become a pilot, aircraft designer/engineer and an air accident investigator, this video has tons of mis leading and even false facts. Other then comparing one with another compare their models as in A320 vs 737, 777 vs A350, 787 vs A330neo, 747 vs A380 etc... Boeing's 737 nose is not less aerodynamic the then A320. Its relatively the same. Airbus has a more rounded nose to increase volume while the 737 is actually nose pointy for aerodynamics. Since these aircrafts fly at subsonic speeds then it doesn't real effect that much between what type of nose an aircraft has. Also please do research more on the landing gear. Not all Airbus have that gear type and not even Boeing. The 777 and A350-1000 have 6 wheel gears. The 757, 767, 787, A330, A340, A350-900 have 4 wheeled gears. There are even some A320 with 4 wheels per main landing gear.....just check facts before posting please.
I love it when we aviation enthusiasts that actually know some stuff will just fill the comments with whats wrong and all. i completely support your point about the nose of the 737
The A350-1000 also has 3 wheel bogies too.
Huge generalisations in the video with numerous inaccuracies. The only reason the 747's cockpit was all the way up there was because the 747 was originally designed as a cargo aircraft. Thus it needed a clean, unobstructed fuselage all the way through from nose to tail. Hence the cockpit was positioned above the fuselage in the famous bubble or hump.
The talking head shots with a microphone which is not connected and the ADR voice killed me XD Great video nonetheless.
Boeing has always had the shadow of its military airplanes in its airliners. You can tell when you land in one. Airbus: “have we landed? Boeing “bang!”.
As if European carriers wouldn’t offer Premium Eco, Business and First class…😂
That's because he is american so he only specified this for boeing lol
2:07 oh yeah, the a380 plus, the a380 that never got made (as far as i know, correct me if im wrong)
Maybe The Third One Is Mcdonell Douglas
*Sadly They Retired*
It's absorbed by Boeing.
1:00 the a350-1000 has that aswell
WOW! this is so not accurate.
The "facts" given in this video almost felt insulting for aviation. The set of wheels alone was a big no no and comparing a single aisle vertical stabilizer to a two deck makes no sense.
Is it just me or is the thumbnail a380 look like a c17
literally airbus A330,A350,A380 use rolls royace engines aswell as A320s
It's too early and ambitious for Comac to compete with the big 2 Aircraft Industries. Its still had to compete with smaller ones like Bombardier, Embraer and even Mitsubishi.
Bombardier is Airbus now
@@nettcologne9186- And Mitsubishi, they bought the CRJ program.
ATR
That's right this guy talks about a airbus then shows a Boeing talks about a Boeing then shows a total different plane
These videos are made by AI. That's why alot of the scenes doesn't make any sense. The anchor 2:34 is a commonly used AI anchor which I've seen on 4 videos just today.
Okay, Airbus doesn’t only have 4 wheel landing gear. Take the A350-1000 which has 3 pairs of landing gear on each side as the Boeing 777. As well as the a380!
An interesting thing I noticed about the end of the vid. The PPG logo on the front windscreen. Am sure our US friends, particularly in Pittsburg, would recognize that one!
The artwork and labels displayed on the outside of the planes have little to do with the manufacture and more to do with the airline's logos and color theme that ordered them from the manufacture 7:46 That plane has "Chinese symbols" on it because it is being flown and operated by a company inside China. If that Chinese manufacture starts contracting and selling those planes on an international level the graphic designs will vary depending on what airlines contract with them.
Bro didnt even mention Embraer, Atr, or bombardier.
Exactly 💯
He stil forgot Saab and learjet
For me it’s the lateral window shape/angle which differentiates the two
Especially when checking the A330 and 767
If Chinese fill their planes with Chinese scripts it's a very bad idea. One can learn cyrillic, greek, arab or other alphabets in a few hours and be able to decipher words even if the meaning is not understood. Learning chinese characters while flying would require being on their planes for a whole year nonstop ...
Btw the Qantas is a Australian Plane
It literally says Spirit of Autralia on the side of the plane
You described the exterior paint schemes as a difference between Airbus / Boeing and Comac. Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the paint designs determined by the airlines and not the manufacturer?
Boeing, Airbus, doesn't really make that much difference to a non-pilot person like myself. But what matters besides comfort level, leg room, and service quality is to get me from point A to point B safely and without the plane falling apart. As for the paint on the airframe, or the language on signs, it doesn't really matter.
Airbus has more seat comfort, leg room etc
@@CW-rx2js No, the AIRLINE does, based on the configuration they pick. If an airline said "Can you configure it for just 30 seats?" either maker would say no? Of course, picking something not in the catalog might cost a bit extra, but everything in a plane sale is negotiated. Seat materials, colors, carpet, in cabin entertainment.
@@CW-rx2js that depends on the airline and the class
COMAC is not blended wing body. It's big fillets/sponsons under the wing root for the landing gear.
This is the most Americanised video I've seen on aircrafts. "Once you're inside you're surrounded by Chinese motifs, giving you a strong sense of cultural identity and national pride" ...no it's because it's their language, of course they're going to use it! 💀 Also it's airlines that choose their liveries, not the manufacturer...
Once you’re inside an American aircraft you’re surrounded by American motifs…..Big-Mac eating Karens.
1:51 you were talking about boeing winglets while you were showing an a320 family plane, and the “airbus” winglets that you showed are exclusive on the older a320 family planes and the a380, please correct your videos.
Yeah, traditional carriers like Qantas, Emirates, Qatar, BA and Lufthansa won’t be buying COMAC until they have proven themselves over YEARS especially with the retracting Chinese economy.
Yeah.. anyone familiar with the term "tofu dreg" may be a bit hesitant (I'd hope) in trusting a Chinese airliner.
Cheers
So many infos are wrong here...
Especially the engine part he said it in vice versa
For anyone confused similarly by cars, you can clearly tell a Ford and Toyota apart by the different sized headlights, number of doors and colour of interiors..
I always love Boeing, even am in Europe
Embraer: Am I a joke to you?
In the thumbnail it has Qantas and Qantas isn’t American it’s Australian
the thumbnail means the aircraft manufacturer not airline that is flying it.
What about Embraer??
"all boeing planes have 6 landing gear"
737 has left the chat
727?
yeah aswell as the 717@@jimmydrumslip4925
Great information 👍
Lots of inaccuracies. Won't recommend for anyone who want to learn about airplanes.
There is NO way I would fly on a Comac right now!
What about Embraer? Brazilian manufacturer.
True and they are already there in the market with a couple 1000 aircraft orders. I doubt the COMAC will get these numbers.....outside of China and or Russia.
bankrupt
what do you mean bankrupt? theyre still making e190s, etc. @@KrishnaGupta-oq4fo
Thanks so much for creating and sharing this informative and timely video. Great job. Keep it up.
I see a lot of the Boeing 757 on the outside look of the nose on that new Chinese plane
This video really was beyond facts
I’m guessing AI including the voice over and presenter. The information is way too broad and mostly outdated
Very useful and pro editing.... thanks
I know this is off topic but I realize that in trucks American and European have also different styles.
I remember there's also a video comparing those trucks.
isnt that the europe vs america regulations???
There are only a handful of aviation related videos that I couldn't watch to the end. This is one of them.
Where did you get all this information? It's just so I don't ever use that source, because the video is full of misinformation of all kinds.
Listen everyone, if you want to know facts about aviation or planes, go check out a channel specialized in aviation, otherwise you are very likely to be misinformed.
lmao in the video i saw american has no fhight entertainment but delta has lots of movies
It's an ai video
"You can spot a Boeing by those trademark eyebrow windows above the cockpit"
*laughs in Tupolev*
Get your Homework done
Great video..very informative.Thank you!
Are you an A.I?
Most likely
The script definitely is.
Even the dude is probably an AI
The fact that they kept competing to each others to the point that in the future economy looks like a business class (I hope it can be true) in Boeing 737
its so funny that the thumbnail for the video has an American flag at the 747 even though you can literally see a part of Qantas, Spirit Of Australia 😂
1) Only the older 737s, the 727s and 717s have eyebrow windows above the main windshield.
2) The “robust 6 wheel truck set-up” (could’ve just called it “triple-bogey”) also appears on the Airbus A350.
3) “ _ACJ320NEO_ “ (pause + 1:12)
4) “4 wheel bogey landing gears” also exist on the 747, 757, 767, 787, which are all Boeing aircrafts.
5) The height of the tail (Vertical Stabilizer) is determined by the need to maintain control of the aircraft in the worst case of yawing motion that can cause the nose of aircraft to move left to right or right to left. This yawing motion can be the result of an engine failure or a severe crosswind or wind gust.
6) 1:54 states that “Boeing likes to add winglets” and goes on to explain that they are “fancy upward-angled wing extensions”. This is true, but only for some 737s, 757s, and 767s. Boeing also makes use of the “Raked” wingtip design, typically seen on the 747-8s, 777LR/ERs, 767-400s, and the 787s. Boeing also uses the “Canted” wingtip design on some 727s and all if not most 747-400s.
7) Ok this is ridiculous. A clip before point 6 shows an Aeroflot A320 with Sharklets which completesly negates the whole “curved” thing. Airbus only uses curved wingtips on the A350 and some A330s. The rest either has fence (A320 Family, A380), sharklets, and canted wingtips.
8) Besides GeneralElectric and Rolls-Royce, Boeing also uses engines from Pratt&Whitney, like the RB211 seen on 757s for example.
9) Boeing does NOT use the RRTrent XWB. The XWB is mainly and only used for the A350-900 _XWB_ .
10) Airbus also uses Rolls-Royce.
11) European carriers DO NOT throw in larger windows. That is a job for the manufacturing company of the aircrafts.
12) The “new kid on the block” only makes sense once COMAC has gained approval in certification.
13) Never heard anyone who pronounces the “Cee Nine One Nine” as “Cee NineNine Teen”
AI is weird
…and really funny to hear about comac’s “challenges with manufacturing quality”…
i thought the 3rd one was mcdonnell douglas but i forgot its way older
The research on this video was done like hollywood producers when they make an aviation movie. It's basically taking the subject lines of the results of their googles search.
As a person that has worked on both manufacturer types, I can safely say this guy is talking s#!*. Also, when it comes to engines, it's usually the owner of the aircraft that decides which engines to go for, which that aircraft can take or designed for. Usually a minimum of two Engine Manufacturers.
written and produced by someone that really knows nothing about airplanes. @5:48 he says that European AIRLINES go with bigger windows, it is the manufacturer that makes the decision of the size of the windows not the carrier. As a point of reference Airbus tends to have smaller windows than the Boeing counterparts
Sorry, buddy, but I can't help calling this video full of BS! Boeing doesn't use the six-wheel configuration anything else than the main gear of the 777. Airbus also uses Rolls Royce engines and various forms of winglets. They were actually the ones who started handling wing tip vortices. Some of the footage you use illustrates the direct opposite of what the voiceover says. And so on... Thumbs down!
As a passenger, I prefer Airbus than Boeing, it just more comfortable.
As a Ex-ground staff, also prefer Airbus, door is much easier to operate
FBW system in Airbus was one of the factors why Air France 447 has crashed. Captain taking control over first officer couldn't override with his inputs when first officer was still controling the stick despite commands given to let it go.
I hope comac's planes aren't made out of plastic 😬
1:01 the only boeing to have the 6 landing gears is the 777, the a350-1000 and the a380 also have the triple gears.
and 747
@@crazyplaness nope, the 747 has 4 landing gears in each column.
oh sorry I realized that… I got the landing gear of the 747 and a380 mixed up@@mikeflytr
Who comes from USA👇
2:33
Yea this has to be from ChatGPT