Inside Drake Ironclad Concept in 2min 44sec

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 сен 2024
  • ✅Join Star Citizen Now $5000 UEC Bonus | tinyurl.com/mp...
    ✅Join 1337 Community DISCORD NOW! - / discord
    🟥 Qubic System - USA/CAN - Official Distributor - www.noobifier....
    🟥 CAMMUS Sim - High Performance - Low Cost - cammusracing.c... CODE noobifier
    🟨MONSTERTECH | Use Code "noobifier1337" on checkout for -5% USA - monstertechusa...
    🟨MERCH | DOTEXE tinyurl.com/m6...
    🟨Avermedia Save 6% | Use Code "noobifier" (LINK) sdqk.me/E2UL1b...
    🟨 iConCity - Stream Deck iCons - Use Code "noobifier" for 10% www.iconcity.c...
    ⭐GG Discount Code is - NOOBIFIER
    ⭐GG Affiliate Link - lddy.no/1g2es
    🟨MAINGEAR Custom PC - tinyurl.com/5f...
    🟨E-WIN Gaming Chair 20% Off Use Code "NOOBI"
    🟨Gamer Advantage - gameradvantage... CODE "atmo"
    ⭐E WIN Chair - Code NOOBI link bit.ly/3JO3wcJ (US)
    🟦ENEMY CONTACT | robertsspacein...
    🟦MERCH | Cheap Tees - tinyurl.com/2p...
    🟦WEEOO | / weeoo
    🟦My Hardware | tinyurl.com/zd...
    ⭐Website | noobifier.com
    Star Citizen aims to span multiple video game types by combining space trading, space combat and shooter elements, in a first person massively multiplayer online game. We cover the ongoing situation to keep you informed and up to day. As an early backer and tester, you need to be ready for its quirks but you can also witness the game evolve.
    I am a FAN of Star Citizen and not affiliated with CIG. I am a FAN of Hardware and although some products are provided for review I remain unbiased. Contact me for business opportunities, corrections or retractions. Operated by "Noobifier Media" INC. CDN-120508161
    #noobifier #starcitizen #squadron42
    The Clock (instrumental) by RYYZN / ryyzn
    Creative Commons - Attribution 3.0 Unported - CC BY 3.0
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/al-the-...
    Music promoted by Audio Library • The Clock (instrumenta...
    ------------------------------

Комментарии • 129

  • @Listentome42
    @Listentome42 4 месяца назад +52

    The Drake Fatter-pillar... I like it.

    • @staben22
      @staben22 4 месяца назад +2

      I was thinking this name too. It's perfect! 😂

  • @sharxbyte
    @sharxbyte 4 месяца назад +36

    Edit:See my retraction below, its not mine.
    they used my Jared

  • @NormFC
    @NormFC 4 месяца назад +23

    Ironclad looks versatile with out being modular

  • @joonyoungk
    @joonyoungk 4 месяца назад +10

    The way it opens and has the walkways and the overlooking area, it looks like the crucible, but Drake and cargo.

  • @silentone11111111
    @silentone11111111 4 месяца назад +2

    Drake ship has nice industrial look. One of the nicest designs I’ve seen so far.

  • @jeanwesleynew
    @jeanwesleynew 4 месяца назад +9

    Assault Ironclad looks really cool.

  • @BaneSIlvermoon
    @BaneSIlvermoon 4 месяца назад +3

    This is what I absolutely, unabashedly love about Star Citizen. I would never want a Drake Ironclad. But I still love the design of the ship. I love that SC has that kind of variety.

  • @daw1d.e
    @daw1d.e 4 месяца назад +3

    Nice ! Thanks for the recap. Big cargo Drake style is so cool!

  • @AndrewFurmanczyk86
    @AndrewFurmanczyk86 4 месяца назад +1

    Upgun on the Polaris turrets was a good move. As the years have gone by, ships kept getting beefed up guns (gunflation?) Polaris turrets much to small to the point of looking out of place for the size of the ship (even if it's supposed to be a torpedo boat).
    All in all, it was a great video to end off the season.❤

  • @MMORPG87
    @MMORPG87 4 месяца назад +6

    this was a rough draft of what the Kraken was suppose to be till they decided to go the aircraft carrier option

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 4 месяца назад +1

      I don't have a Kraken, and I don't even like Drake (other than the Herald), but I do hope that after RSI they tackle Drake next, because I really want to see the Kraken in the game.

  • @805Peej
    @805Peej 4 месяца назад

    This is a fantastic design that looks like real gameplay was taken into account. Great job.

  • @Yeetus223
    @Yeetus223 3 месяца назад

    Thank god. I just wanted a quick understanding of a new ship. Appreciate the brief ness

  • @BradfordMelluish
    @BradfordMelluish 4 месяца назад +4

    As always, excellent recap.

  • @boatrat
    @boatrat 4 месяца назад

    Ooh! I would LOVE, an up-gunned, up-armored, slightly-reduced-cargo-grid version of this. Why is nobody talking about how many *fighters* you could fit in that empty "hangar bay". Ironclad Assault would be a perfect "Poor Man's Mini-Idris".

  • @snaggletoof1927
    @snaggletoof1927 4 месяца назад

    Very interesting concept. I like the retractable roof access to cargo.

  • @arethunessamsonsen6245
    @arethunessamsonsen6245 4 месяца назад +5

    It's the Faterpillar.

    • @dwolvin
      @dwolvin 4 месяца назад +1

      If this isn't the cannon nickname I will riot.

  • @Spelljammer1
    @Spelljammer1 4 месяца назад +1

    great work! I really appreciate also just the no-talk images at the end, gives us a chance to actually reflect on what's in the concept art (even when listening the original ISC we are going in our minds back and forth between what they are saying and what they are showing)

  • @wuxtry
    @wuxtry 4 месяца назад +1

    I love it! Great stuff man!

  • @andyandreson3989
    @andyandreson3989 4 месяца назад

    The Ironclad does seem to be pretty awesome looking.

  • @slev780
    @slev780 4 месяца назад +2

    Thanks noob! I actually think this ship is pretty cool

  • @wile-e-coyote7257
    @wile-e-coyote7257 4 месяца назад

    Thanks, Noobifier!

  • @starwarsfan5492
    @starwarsfan5492 4 месяца назад +2

    Fun fact the model of iron clad used to be a concept model for the kraken

  • @rooster1012
    @rooster1012 4 месяца назад +8

    Another ship that will add to the massive backlog...

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

      They're saying this is a style guide for the Kraken, so Fatterpillar production will be expedited.

  • @herbaceousboredom9584
    @herbaceousboredom9584 4 месяца назад +4

    When I heard Ironclad I immediately thought battleship and thought Drake design would be excellent; strange that it's a cargo carrier. It looks like a stretch Cat but width-ways instead of length, with some Kraken elements thrown on top and sides. So the question is, will it take days or decades to get to flight-ready :D

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 4 месяца назад +1

      Like how they sadly named the Liberator after an iconic bomber.

    • @herbaceousboredom9584
      @herbaceousboredom9584 4 месяца назад

      @@rooster1012 When I hear the name Liberator I immediately think "Blake's 7" :D

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

      No one will ever call it the "Ironclad" so the name they gave it doesn't make any difference aside from restricting the use of that name from future ships.

    • @herbaceousboredom9584
      @herbaceousboredom9584 4 месяца назад +1

      @@budthecyborg4575 Yeah but the name evokes WWI / WWII battleship bruisers (at least in me) so it feels like an opportunity lost. If CIG had revealed a ship rocking that look and which could sit alongside and look at home with the Kraken, that would've been something special for me.
      Not saying the Fatterpillar meme looks bad, just that it could've been so much more awesome.

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

      @@herbaceousboredom9584 Yeah the name Ironclad should have been a combat ship.

  • @Sharps777
    @Sharps777 4 месяца назад +2

    Looks great - hope I am still alive when its flyable

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

      Since they reference using this as a style guide I would expect it to be flight ready sooner than later.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 4 месяца назад

      @@budthecyborg4575 It's still a big boy -- it's at least eight months out once they start white box.

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад

      @@Billy-bc8pk Large ship but almost entirely empty, no new gameplay loop, no new moving parts (e.g. Hull C).
      In fact It's almost certain the Faterpillar will reach its final playable form before the Caterpillar does.

  • @aurieteixeira
    @aurieteixeira 4 месяца назад

    Thank you for another informative video.

  • @vik12D
    @vik12D 4 месяца назад +1

    I need one to drop the Crucible repair bay in the Ironclad cargo hold with a Nursa.

  • @seotenin
    @seotenin 4 месяца назад

    An up-gun only makes sense
    Love the Jared in game character
    Definitely want those glasses in game

  • @TheFreeman17
    @TheFreeman17 4 месяца назад +2

    I'm a shill for drake. So ill be adding this to my fleet for sure

  • @Woobieeee
    @Woobieeee 4 месяца назад +1

    Im a fan of the ole ironclad.

  • @kaollachan
    @kaollachan 4 месяца назад

    Ironclad concept art look like something from Alien univers^^

  • @tripperdan
    @tripperdan 4 месяца назад

    Drake version of the Anvil Liberator

  • @kinorynn
    @kinorynn 4 месяца назад

    The fatapiller reminds me of a cargo ship in our world today

    • @leebell8723
      @leebell8723 4 месяца назад

      The cargo hold and hatch on the top of the ship creates similarities with bulk cargo ships.

  • @artsolano6762
    @artsolano6762 4 месяца назад +3

    This looks like it might compete with the Anvil Liberator. Liberator being less gunned but able to transport more with vehicles and ships up top.

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

      If I had bought a Liberator I would be pissed.
      Thankfully I didn't.
      Initial size comparisons show the Fatterpillar being similar overall to the Liberator, hopefully it still has big gas tanks for Pyro.

    • @artsolano6762
      @artsolano6762 4 месяца назад +2

      @@budthecyborg4575 I’m fine liberator owners can just CCU. I’m not sure I will go for the Ironclad yet. A larger crew requirement might kill it for me.

  • @Macskinny76
    @Macskinny76 4 месяца назад

    The command part is just an escape pod, they said you cannot just fly around in it.

  • @budthecyborg4575
    @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад +1

    I want to buy one just so we can use the phrase "Take the Fatterpillar".

  • @Sharky1986
    @Sharky1986 4 месяца назад

    Very disappointed that the main bridge isn't the pilot position. The other one should be the 'battle bridge'. I love Assymetry, but not for the pilot's chair, and that view out over the massive cargo bay is awesome.

  • @ethanlysander
    @ethanlysander 4 месяца назад

    Bring on Drake day.

  • @kylefarrell3050
    @kylefarrell3050 4 месяца назад +1

    Anyone else thinking that the Ironclad seems to be actually better than the Kraken?

  • @Dext3r09
    @Dext3r09 4 месяца назад

    Great concept, only problem is that is Drake :D But I see a bit bigger problem here, we ge 1 capital ship every 2 years? maybe shorter? But 2 capital concepts per year? So how long SC will be developed?

  • @Anachroschism
    @Anachroschism 4 месяца назад

    I like this new Drake ship, both versions. However, can we actually play football on it? Need confirmation of football mechanics!

  • @zanzabar_7641
    @zanzabar_7641 4 месяца назад

    Wonder how its gonna compare to the liberator.

  • @Jragron
    @Jragron 4 месяца назад

    Can you talk about the retiring of the hornet? Seeing a lot of information but don’t know what to believe.
    Is the hornet mk1 the flagship of SQ42? Will it get a gold pass? Apparently CR has previously talked about retiring ships. What all has he said?

  • @MikeStojanovic
    @MikeStojanovic 4 месяца назад

    Thanks.

  • @SpaceDad42
    @SpaceDad42 4 месяца назад

    Kraken pushed back many more years and Cat is STILL not updated. These clowns are crooks and are becoming more bold in their sliminess as time goes on.

  • @-NateTheGreat
    @-NateTheGreat 4 месяца назад +1

    Make sure you get a check up from your doctor before you buy a concept. It's gonna be a while..

  • @IdleWorker
    @IdleWorker 4 месяца назад

    Wonder how long the ironclad will be stuck in concept and when it will be pushed to the backlog.

  • @festersmith8352
    @festersmith8352 4 месяца назад

    As much as love the look and idea of this ship, my symmetrical brain is stroking out, with that command module being on one side.
    Seriously, my eye is drooping, and I'm starting to drool out one side.
    It would have looked way cooler to me, if the module was on top in the center.
    If bricks can fly in atmo, anything is possible.

  • @Mor4me
    @Mor4me 4 месяца назад +1

    Sooo… 1500 scu ?
    2 tonk = 697
    4 tonk = 1400 + move around space
    Opinions please

  • @commanderoof4578
    @commanderoof4578 4 месяца назад

    Im now stuck between liberator and this

  • @ClayBellBrews
    @ClayBellBrews 4 месяца назад

    Nice :)

  • @Rybread225
    @Rybread225 4 месяца назад +1

    Mildly salty that they're concepting a ship that may end up usurping the pocket carrier role I had planned for my Liberator. Hopefully the Liberator gets some extra features to stay competitive.

    • @chomp7927
      @chomp7927 4 месяца назад +2

      Lib aint dead yet. First of all, there's nothing "pocket" about the ironclad. Second depending on what they do with height the exterior hangars of the Lib could be way more valuable since it's unlimited (ish). The ramp for the lib looks to be better then the ramp for the ironclad unless you get the assault one, but at that point you lose 1/3 of your hangar space to be able to fix ground vehicles so not a good trade if carrier is your goal. Then there's the massive elephant in the room when it comes to multicrew. CIG has been going very hamfist lately on forcing multicrew, the iron clad is going to be 6 man minimum with a few more for the assault one, as it looks now based on how things are going there's no good way you will solo this like a pocket carrier. Lib with a max crew of 2 will be WAY easier to run solo.
      Plus I'm guessing this is going to cost at least 650 on concept, it's going to be way more than the lib at the end of the day.
      Lib isn't dead yet

    • @The_Draque
      @The_Draque 4 месяца назад +1

      The Ironclad is a CARGO ship and looks like it would BARELY fit even a single Gladius sized ship and to do so would lose almost all cargo space. The Liberator is specifically designed to carry at least 3 ships PLUS snub ships and/or ground vehicles and a small amount of cargo

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад

      Don't hate me but I totally hope the Fatterpillar usurps the Liberator because that thing was ridiculously overpriced.
      Given the Drake branding I expect the Fatterpillar to be relatively squishy.

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 4 месяца назад

      You cannot carry the Titans on the Ironclad unless you drop them in from the top. It will be way easier to load up multiple Titans onto a Liberator.

    • @ethanlysander
      @ethanlysander 4 месяца назад

      Will the Ironclad offer manual refuelling capabilities etc for any parasite subs? I believe the Librator offers manual refuelling for small and XS ships.

  • @d.lam.8178
    @d.lam.8178 3 месяца назад

    I mean if it had a med bay? I'd say shut up, take my money, and get rid of my C2. The superior cargo capacity even on the assault version, coupled with it's apparent greater flexibility? I'd be all over that.

  • @picklesuhk2945
    @picklesuhk2945 4 месяца назад

    I want to know if I could fit my corsair in it and use it as a mini kraken

  • @carstenschops7797
    @carstenschops7797 4 месяца назад

    How many ships of which type will fit into the cargo area - which conveniently open up on top?

  • @BegForMyMercy
    @BegForMyMercy 4 месяца назад +3

    Yeah grabbing this one. I hate drake but this is fire.

  • @ONYX1768
    @ONYX1768 3 месяца назад

    I will say that its a little sad that despite it still having the drake "duel use" design that it feels like the cargo space is intentionally spaced as to make using it as pocket carrier prohibitive. Its a shame because it'd be a decent stopgap for this roll until the liberator comes out. I presume this would come first based on the fact that it sounds like they have a decent asset library for drake ships and are wanting to flesh that out more in preparation for the Kraken (won't be seeing that in epochs)
    Its a real shame considering how badly many of us want carriers and the gameplay already exists to partially support this. It really sucks moving from planet to planet with a group knowing that arrival times of the various ships is off, that some may need to make separate stops to refuel and really it creates a ton of logistical annoyances even with a small number of ships.
    I'm not a Lib or Ironclad owner but dreams of carriers visit me each and every night beckoning to me like the one that got away :(

  • @Power5
    @Power5 4 месяца назад

    Had no idea about this concept, but hearing the name, I was hoping it would be a heavy fighter to compete against the vanguard. Another cargo ship though, yay.
    Also a "militarized" DRAKE ship does not make much sense. DRAKE is already gun heavy in all their ships, except the Vulture and Cutter. Putting Tonks in the cargo hold instead of crates is what they consider "militarized"?

    • @NOOBIFIER1337
      @NOOBIFIER1337  4 месяца назад +2

      It was literally announced hours ago. There is still hope they will make a fighter

  • @AADX74
    @AADX74 4 месяца назад

    so, "super caterpillar", or "caterpiller'ier caterpillar" :)

  • @LordCritish
    @LordCritish 4 месяца назад

    Flight-ready ca. 2197 AD.

  • @cath6851
    @cath6851 4 месяца назад

    soo.... Caterpillar cargo lifts deployable WHEN CIG??

    • @Billy-bc8pk
      @Billy-bc8pk 4 месяца назад

      Whenever someone is tasked to the modules -- but modules are a lot easier to do than a full ship.

  • @AndrewFurmanczyk86
    @AndrewFurmanczyk86 4 месяца назад

    Ship concept is great, name doesn't make sense.
    If they kept in the naming theme of the caterpillar, something bigger could have been called maybe the snake, or even Anaconda? Ironclad feels like a name for Crusader.

  • @ethanlysander
    @ethanlysander 4 месяца назад +1

    I wonder how much cargo? 1200-1400 sco?

  • @CosmicSynergy
    @CosmicSynergy 4 месяца назад

    ILW

  • @rippervtol9516
    @rippervtol9516 4 месяца назад

    I will still only refer to it as a Fatterpiler

  • @bigd4366
    @bigd4366 4 месяца назад

    Is it just me, or would this concept have worked better as an Argo product?

    • @NOOBIFIER1337
      @NOOBIFIER1337  4 месяца назад

      It does have a bunch of Drake features.

  • @tonyshaw7420
    @tonyshaw7420 3 месяца назад

    Hercules VS Iron Clad?

  • @blacksheepboyz
    @blacksheepboyz 4 месяца назад

    Cool I guess. My cat still doesn't work right, and it's already in the game. Why would I want this? Thanks Noob!

  • @underdose93
    @underdose93 4 месяца назад

    Coming to a universe near you in 2026 😂

  • @DeWitt1904
    @DeWitt1904 4 месяца назад

    what do you think is the price ? for the Ironclad

  • @SuperMontsta
    @SuperMontsta 4 месяца назад

    Who needs to be able to breath in game when you can have another ship instead?!

  • @COMMANDERHAWK22
    @COMMANDERHAWK22 4 месяца назад +1

    so the ironclad is a better liberator.

    • @Mor4me
      @Mor4me 4 месяца назад

      Probably but depending of fuel consumption

  • @fahadfaruqi3827
    @fahadfaruqi3827 4 месяца назад

    mummm was hoping for a bigger cutlass ... o well

    • @The_Draque
      @The_Draque 4 месяца назад +1

      You mean the Corsair?

    • @fahadfaruqi3827
      @fahadfaruqi3827 4 месяца назад

      @@The_Draque smaller then corsair

  • @Jragron
    @Jragron 4 месяца назад

    i love you

  • @OliverClark-vr5vn
    @OliverClark-vr5vn 3 месяца назад

    I want one but it will be very expensive

  • @mabs9503
    @mabs9503 4 месяца назад

    >another concept

  • @Red-V-SB
    @Red-V-SB 4 месяца назад

    I want it

  • @Eagle6Airsoft
    @Eagle6Airsoft 4 месяца назад +9

    More time spent on new ships while ignoring the 200 + ships that need reworks for game play. Making new ships, that will clear the backlog.

    • @frogger2011ify
      @frogger2011ify 4 месяца назад +1

      Lol they won't be making this thing any time soon

    • @Eagle6Airsoft
      @Eagle6Airsoft 4 месяца назад

      @@frogger2011ify what’s even the point then, not to mention we are still waiting for the cargo system in game, and that whole loop to be made working / good.

    • @jeanwesleynew
      @jeanwesleynew 4 месяца назад +2

      Seriously, just stick with your base game package and ship and buy everything else in-game. Everything else can be borrowed from someone in any given session. People loan out ships all the time.

    • @serrethindustries9468
      @serrethindustries9468 4 месяца назад +1

      And I'm hype! Add to cart baby!

    • @saturn5mtw567
      @saturn5mtw567 4 месяца назад

      How did you get that number lmao

  • @misterluley4010
    @misterluley4010 4 месяца назад

    How large do you expect it to be? also is it better than a C2?

    • @pomp0m
      @pomp0m 4 месяца назад +1

      "Better than a C2" is now not final to answer since the concept is not out yet. But this can carry double the Tonks or around double the cargo, so if only the SCU number counts, then yes it has a higher number than the C2. If your buying choice also accounts for 'in orbit flight' or armor/defence this possibly comes in to second, hell maybe this ship is expensive with fuel and maintenance so the 'cost per shipped scu' can be more than the C2, who knows? We shall see in some time till this is released.
      Edit: it also needs 6 crew instead of the 2 for the C2.

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 4 месяца назад

      Depends on how you define better, it will carry more and have more hit points and turrets but will surely be a big slow target and cost a hell of a lot more.

    • @misterluley4010
      @misterluley4010 4 месяца назад

      I was just wondering if it made sense to buy, I love my c2 but the ironclad looks like my dream cargo/carrier ship, even surpassing the liberator.

    • @pomp0m
      @pomp0m 4 месяца назад

      @@misterluley4010 Same, but i really hope they don't do it like this. I hope that the Ironclad gets some real drawbacks. for the assault version it is an Obscelecense machine for: Crucible, C2, A2, Liberator. so it must have some drawbacks.

  • @PilotB
    @PilotB 4 месяца назад

    ILW* not IAE. CIG needs to name events better.

  • @C1Rob1990
    @C1Rob1990 4 месяца назад

    Sooo the ironclad is basically the anvil crucible without the repair stuff... How about they actually finish that before making something new...
    Just for fun, look up the anvil crucible whitebox video on RUclips from way back when and compare it to this video... There is so much either straight copied or just slightly altered from that...

  • @Radical_Middle
    @Radical_Middle 4 месяца назад

    We do need new ships like nothing else.

  • @scurnow875
    @scurnow875 4 месяца назад

    Tell us about it then don't sell it....OK

  • @bhz8499
    @bhz8499 4 месяца назад

    Lmao Polaris this year highly unlikely

    • @NOOBIFIER1337
      @NOOBIFIER1337  4 месяца назад

      Correct, it’s basically the outside only.

    • @budthecyborg4575
      @budthecyborg4575 4 месяца назад

      Remember "in theory" a lot of the manpower for Squadron 42 is now shifting to the PU. If the Idris team are now full swing on the Polaris they could make quick work of it.