Snapdragon vs Exynos - GALAXY S24 Plus vs S24 Ultra!

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 янв 2025

Комментарии • 1,5 тыс.

  • @Thetechchap
    @Thetechchap  11 месяцев назад +183

    Hey Chaps! Would an Exynos S24/S24+ put you off buying it??
    NOTE: while an s24+ vs s24+ video is worth making too - THIS is about whether a Snapdragon S24 Ultra is worth it over a Exynos S24+ (in terms of the chips) 👍

    • @Giant_Dwarff
      @Giant_Dwarff 11 месяцев назад +46

      Definitely, I am in Europe and I am just going to buy last year's s23+ now instead of the s24

    • @DeepteshLovesTECH
      @DeepteshLovesTECH 11 месяцев назад +12

      The fact that these phones cost the same as phones like the Vivo X100 Pro and Xiaomi 14 Pro. Yikes. Hope people vote with their wallets and not brand loyalty - coming from Samsung user since 2012.

    • @zains6870
      @zains6870 11 месяцев назад +3

      Yes.

    • @rambot670
      @rambot670 11 месяцев назад +24

      Tired of Samsung trying to push their Exynos to regions apart from US and its own home country. Clearly, they need to shift Exynos to some A series models. Qualcomm should be the ONLY process of choice for S series phones. Not only because of raw power, but also optimization and the resultant overall experience.

    • @kurprodakshn
      @kurprodakshn 11 месяцев назад +8

      Yes. I need compact phone, so I'll go with S23. These benchmarks does not mean anything. Even Exynos 2200 was close to SD 8 gen 1, but it had heat problems and battery was way worse than SD. Only real life usage matters.

  • @amusetech
    @amusetech 11 месяцев назад +91

    The thing that happened at 4:08 isn't a concidence. That's exactly the type of experience I had with my Exynos-based S22 Ultra, and it was a constant issue for 7 months of use!
    Lack of app optimisation, constant OS stutters, mediocre battery and worse ISP are still a thing, even if the raw performance caught up a bit to the Snapdragon.
    It's still a sham to sell a DIFFERENT device under the same name. Exynos is a NO GO.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +6

      Happened for different reasons, the rendering app could have triggered the processor graphics

    • @chanvillena
      @chanvillena 11 месяцев назад +8

      The look and feel of the plus is actually great this year, really took cues from Apple. But man, that stutter on a 2024 phone is just jarring. They should just sell Exynos on their low to midrange phones and stick with SD on high end ones.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +3

      @@chanvillena Stutter happened with that rendering app for being bad optimised.

    • @kristoffergo6973
      @kristoffergo6973 11 месяцев назад +3

      Imagine paying alot of money for a phone to lag like it's 2012 again.

    • @amusetech
      @amusetech 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@casuarius6576 for the end users. You won't have such issues with SD based versions.

  • @ahmadmohamad6384
    @ahmadmohamad6384 11 месяцев назад +1047

    It would be fair to have both s24+ models, one europe one and one from the US. The S24 Ultra has better cooling, bigger battery etc.

    • @bradavon
      @bradavon 11 месяцев назад +76

      He literally says this in the video, if you watched it before commenting.

    • @MichaelNyange
      @MichaelNyange 11 месяцев назад +97

      Exynos is trash regardless.. It's never worth the money. I wonder why people still buy these and get upset when apple fanboys say you lag or are slow. Thermal throttle while Rendering? Really? People should get the oneplus 12 instead of S24+ If they can't get the Ultra.

    • @leviathan5207
      @leviathan5207 11 месяцев назад +113

      @@MichaelNyange 1. For most people a phone is just a tool to access the web, they do not ever run into thermal/power limitations.
      2. Samsung actually has great support policy, wheras oneplus has been caught lacking in the past. Also stores vs. web only is a plus for older customers.
      3. Samsung is easily available, oneplus is not. They are banned from selling in Germany and France.
      4. Some people do not wanna buy Chinese. Buying Chinese in 2024 is like buying Sovjet in 1967 to them (I tend to agree!)

    • @Rivs5117
      @Rivs5117 11 месяцев назад +30

      @@MichaelNyange Apple phones kinda lag if we’re being completely honest. The last two iPhones releases have been horrible. iOS 16 and 17 were super buggy.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +2

      Qualcomm is crap anyway @@MichaelNyange

  • @Ara198826
    @Ara198826 11 месяцев назад +119

    you should get 200-300$ discount for getting extnos vs snapdragon for the same model

    • @Dave7heRave
      @Dave7heRave 11 месяцев назад +15

      Exactly! Shouldn't be expected to pay that price for an inferior product!

    • @ghostt5135
      @ghostt5135 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@Dave7heRave Well if people buy and buy their products even they deliver lower peformance and in rare cases deliver snap dragon why they will change this they make money money and custumer lose more and cant do anything about it only stop buy samsung its about money here they do this because its more cheap to make exishit instead buy snapdragon and deliver all the glob this is why i hate samsung and i respect oneplus its a big difference of respect for customers there deliver best hardware have a charger have very very good display like samsung in my opinion in some cases its better then samsung have wow camera after 1 year of update samsung what deliver for same money ?nothing

    • @ghostt5135
      @ghostt5135 8 месяцев назад +1

      They never do that its cheaper to make their own procesor they dont care about custumers only money money and just buy some units of snapdragon chip to make some people happy to dont say all phone only have exinos just stop buy samsung go on oneplus its better they respect moree the custumers there and deliver a beast instead a old and weak exyshit

    • @ghostt5135
      @ghostt5135 8 месяцев назад +1

      Will never happen its about money money not to deliver to the custumers quality just stop buy samsung

    • @yonik652
      @yonik652 7 месяцев назад

      this is the reson that they make at past phones updates in Snapdragon phones that slow down the Soc a little bit

  • @MarcDebenham
    @MarcDebenham 11 месяцев назад +337

    If the exynos versions were sold for less maybe but to be paying prettyuch the same for an inferior product is just not acceptable

    • @MichaelNyange
      @MichaelNyange 11 месяцев назад +33

      I bought an S22 Ultra with exynos.. Worst decision of my life. The gap between It and S23 or an iPhone is Actually Embarrasing.. cause It was sold for $1200

    • @leviathan5207
      @leviathan5207 11 месяцев назад +19

      Well, in the regions where they are sold you do not actually have a choice between an SD S24 and and Exynos one. Also, 99% of people do not give a shit, it's just nerds and geeks who have a wank off, whenever they "flex" their specsheets.

    • @kasadam85
      @kasadam85 11 месяцев назад +47

      ​@@leviathan5207Well they should give a shit because they're buying an inferior product which is more prone to stuttering 😂

    • @vncube1
      @vncube1 11 месяцев назад

      Basically, wait for the S24 FE

    • @Hasmatix
      @Hasmatix 11 месяцев назад

      No, people want snapdragon even only for thr bettet battery. U dont have to be a tech nerd. This is about specs on paoer. But specs affecting real life performance​@@leviathan5207

  • @kayotic321
    @kayotic321 11 месяцев назад +78

    I imported my S21 from the US to the UK because I wanted the Snapdragon, it happened to actually be cheaper than the EU/INT version. Can confirm I have had zero problems with signal/ networks 4/5g... etc. have traveled to Mainland Europe, Africa, East Asia, and the Middle east with the device and had no issues there either. Ive not regretted it one bit.

    • @AndreasZetterlund
      @AndreasZetterlund 11 месяцев назад +4

      Maybe that's a viable option. As long as you don't care about warranty I guess.
      What service did you use for that?

    • @soundsaroundus9494
      @soundsaroundus9494 11 месяцев назад

      I had an entirely opposite experience. My s21 (still to sell it) had horrible network problems, so I recently purchased a used S23

    • @kayotic321
      @kayotic321 11 месяцев назад +2

      Bought it on eBay international. Found a seller that shipped to the UK. Got it airmailed and received within 5 days. Luckily it's been solid so never needed to use the warranty, probably will upgrade to a S23/24 this year depending on prices

    • @ivobel721
      @ivobel721 11 месяцев назад +2

      US phones do work in Europe, of course, otherwise Americans on vacation would have no signal. The problem is that often US phones don't have the same carrier aggregations for 4G and 5G and since the phone is not meant for the European market, it won't have those carrier aggregations activated, even if the modem technically supports them. If you were to compare the speeds that you get on your S21 with a European S21 next to each other, your phone would probably get significantly lower speeds. Also, VoLTE and VoWiFi won't work, 5G won't work too most likely.
      Recent iPhones don't have issues like that and I have friends with iPhones from the US that work with VoLTE, 5G and so on without issues.

    • @90mrkazakh
      @90mrkazakh 11 месяцев назад

      I bought pixel 8 and now I'm kinda regretting cause 5g is supported in some countries!((( if I can get my refund will buy us version of s24! I like Samsung just because of they interface, very convenient!

  • @LindaLooUK
    @LindaLooUK 11 месяцев назад +124

    The S24+ looks like a better deal than the Ultra being £250 cheaper but having the Exynos chip instead of the Snapdragon makes it much less appealing, particularly in relation to battery life. I wouldn't buy it for that reason as, yet again, we're being short changed here in Europe/UK. 😠

    • @GGori_99
      @GGori_99 11 месяцев назад +19

      All Asian's countries have to deal with it too.. this is just bad deal..

    • @Glotttis
      @Glotttis 11 месяцев назад +19

      Yeah I promised myself to never buy Exynos again. Especially now with 7 years of software updates. I know exactly what will happen in 5 years. Snapdragon version will still be trucking along while Exynos will have abysmal battery life.

    • @joost1183
      @joost1183 11 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@GlotttisI do wonder the usecase of a 7 year update policy. You ll have to replace your battery atleast 2 times for optimal performance for power users, not talking about gaming.

    • @Glotttis
      @Glotttis 11 месяцев назад +5

      @@joost1183 I have S10e right now and it stopped getting software updates. Yes, battery life decreased, but that's not the main issue. Now many apps that require top security started giving "out of date Android" warnings. This wouldn't happen if S10e had 7 years of software updates, like S24 now has.

    • @joost1183
      @joost1183 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@Glotttis knowing myself i ll crack the screen one day. 4 years after s9+ and now 2.5 or 3 yrs s20 fe - fell on a rock while hiking.
      But true yes, youre right.
      I wouldve been keeping the s9+ if it weren't cracked, but the screens are so expensive you might as well upgrade after 2 or 3 yrs. I ll probably go for the s23u because s24+ has exynos. I value battery life besides decent flagship performance. I once bought a midrange huawei, cant remeber the model. Sold if after 8 months because of random laggs switching between apps. S23+ isnt an option because of 1080p ánd just €130 less vs the ultra. I recently booted my s9+ and was in awe of how sharp that screen is, I have to go back to 1440p.

  • @Toreda98
    @Toreda98 11 месяцев назад +64

    Can you do a comparison between the s23 snapdragon 8 gen 2 and this exynos 2400? Anyway great video man

    • @a3i3t
      @a3i3t 11 месяцев назад +3

      Snapdragon will beat Exynos. Especially on a long run. If you are using phone for few years.
      My S10 Plus with Snapdragon has better performance than S21 Ultra with Exynos in games

    • @tigerboost1518
      @tigerboost1518 11 месяцев назад +2

      Even with the S20 with Exynos man, even a S9plus with Snapdragon is better ​@@a3i3t

    • @niravraj2815
      @niravraj2815 11 месяцев назад +2

      exynos will be much better lmao,its already beating 8 gen 3 in most tests and its always not about pure power,they exynos is more optimized on samsung phones when they get the processor right

    • @a3i3t
      @a3i3t 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@niravraj2815 yeah yeah. Exynos always knows how to manipulate numbers. But in pure power it always sucks, burns and crashes. Even in few months we will see how far back this new gen Exynos will fall behind. It's been this way every Exynos since the beginning of the times

    • @niravraj2815
      @niravraj2815 11 месяцев назад

      @@a3i3t lol you a karen bruv

  • @LaidBackDeveloper
    @LaidBackDeveloper 11 месяцев назад +153

    FYI: Premiere rush does NOT work with exynos. It hasnt for a long time

    • @Thetechchap
      @Thetechchap  11 месяцев назад +34

      Seems it’s still the case

    • @Glotttis
      @Glotttis 11 месяцев назад +51

      Other reviewers showed even more issues with Exynos: texture glitches in Fortnite, no 120FPS mode in CoD, terrible emulator performance, etc. Problem is, even if these get fixed with firmware and app updates, you will forever be with chip that only minority has and will always be at mercy of developers caring enough about it. I speak as someone who had multiple Exynos phones in the past. Never again.

    • @Rider_7548
      @Rider_7548 11 месяцев назад +12

      ​​@@Glotttis can't agree more , have been using s21 5g w/ eynos 2100 .
      Slight worse performance , worse battery life , worse thermal Vs snapdragon all adds upto really degarde your experience. I might get ultra or just skip s24 series but never ever exynos

    • @ulysses4989
      @ulysses4989 11 месяцев назад +2

      My S22 Ultra does not get Very high with max frame rate never mind ultra. The s10 with the older exynos however allows very high graphics with max frame rate? So why can my much better device not do that almost 2 years later

    • @Creamworks
      @Creamworks 11 месяцев назад +6

      ​@@Glotttis I don't understand how Exynos is the minority when it's sold literally everywhere in the world except the US. Do Americans alone buy more phones than the entire rest of the world combined?

  • @FatNorthernBigot
    @FatNorthernBigot 11 месяцев назад +279

    I'm struggling to care about ray tracing on my PC... Surely, no one is bothered about ray tracing on a phone?

    • @kaiserfakinaway5909
      @kaiserfakinaway5909 11 месяцев назад +13

      it's easy to market that bs my friend, the average person buys samsung phones just because of the bs marketing just like apple phones used to be, iphones are great now and samsung has sorta fallen off

    • @MichaelNyange
      @MichaelNyange 11 месяцев назад +2

      Google the price of S24+ and tell me If its worth It while the market has better phones for that money.

    • @Dangerman-zg3ui
      @Dangerman-zg3ui 11 месяцев назад +2

      Developers want to make games built entirely around Ray-Tracing.

    • @Rivs5117
      @Rivs5117 11 месяцев назад

      @@kaiserfakinaway5909 Apple literally sell phones off marketing. Samsung hasn’t fell off. They’ve gotten better each year. Apple on the other hand has had back to back years off horrible releases with software being buggy and phones having production issues.

    • @Rivs5117
      @Rivs5117 11 месяцев назад

      @@kaiserfakinaway5909 Apple sell their phones mainly off marketing. They have more ads than anyone else. Samsung phones have gotten better year after year. They’re excellent now. Apple has taken a step back over the last two years because the releases of the iPhone 14 and 15 were horrible. iOS 16 and 17 were extremely buggy.

  • @prathamgupta7
    @prathamgupta7 11 месяцев назад +79

    Good video, but sadly there are multiple caveats in your video.
    I think your S24+ was not done with the setup process as can be seen when it is chugging. Secondly, you should have directly compared it to an equivalent Snapdragon S24+ because the Ultra has a larger vapour chamber and larger surface area and titanium which conducts heat better. Also, multiple other reviews have shown the Exynos outperforming the Snapdragon in terms of raw performance, battery life and temps. You stating that the Snapdragon is a 3/3 winner in benchmarks looks like it’s a runaway winner but that could well be up to the silicon lottery and a 2-5% difference is not enough to conclusively give away a winner when there are multiple variables other than the chipset affecting the results.
    Also Adobe Rush has been known to optimised notoriously. For years it only ran well on iPhones, now Snapdragon as well, so I don’t think that was a fair real world comparison.
    You should’ve run the 30 min CPU throttle test as well which would have pushed the cpu to its absolute most to see which one overheats first or throttles performance to give us a better picture of stability side by side.
    I think this video could’ve been much more comprehensive if you didn’t rush into making it as soon as possible and took a little more time to research and then test both the phones. I think that would’ve provided a much more realistic and fair comparison between the chipsets.

    • @Thetechchap
      @Thetechchap  11 месяцев назад +55

      Fair points - thanks for the feedback

    • @KING_8
      @KING_8 11 месяцев назад +11

      No modern device should slow down like in the home screen regardless of whether a background process is happening. Adobe rush is a commonly used app, so if it isn't optimized, this is the real-world performance you will get.

    • @Jonerss
      @Jonerss 11 месяцев назад +2

      The exynos is definitely not as bad as its predecessors. I'd even call it good. But tbf I've not seen one video where the exynos outperforms the snapdragon. In the everyday usage you probably can't tell much of a difference but the battery, especially the standby drain was worse in every video I've seen. The batterylife on the s24 exynos plus and base models are even worse than on the s23 models with 8gen2 even though they've got bigger batteries now

    • @elvis9241
      @elvis9241 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@Jonerss performance is fine....it's the heating. It gets warm even while normal usage and drops brightness and actually gets hot while recording videos and the phone starts lagging or chugging when it heats up significantly especially when battery is low.

    • @andreibirsan8788
      @andreibirsan8788 11 месяцев назад +2

      titanium is a way worse heat conductor compared to aluminium

  • @maximusg88
    @maximusg88 11 месяцев назад +37

    4:25 Hate Exynos (and a happy S23U user) - but I think the phone setup wasn't quite done yet (there's a notification he swiped away when you look carefully)... so that might explain it

    • @elapostol2011
      @elapostol2011 11 месяцев назад +6

      You are right. All the Galaxy slow down and sluggish when you are doing the setup. Is a shame, but that's it

    • @maximusg88
      @maximusg88 11 месяцев назад +6

      @@elapostol2011 I've definitely not seen it stutter like this ever (but I'm on snapdragon)... My guess is that the rendering and the setup at the same time overheated the exynos so much that it caused the stutters

    • @XeZrunner
      @XeZrunner 11 месяцев назад +5

      The setup isn't supposed to bring the performance down to such levels, especially when it's not actively happening.
      Overheating so hard that the UI lags like this also isn't a thing - you'd get a warning before that happens.
      I think Premiere Rush or just OneUI itself got the GPU driver into a loop or caused some kind of resource leak.

    • @reziee5897
      @reziee5897 11 месяцев назад +5

      to be fair ultra has larger vapor cooling chamber. It should be S24+ exynos version vs S24+ SD version all this tech YT just want content to post.

    • @awdadwadwad1723
      @awdadwadwad1723 11 месяцев назад +3

      Get two of S24 Ultra, otherwise it’s just a pretty stupid comparison

  • @shades-bn
    @shades-bn 11 месяцев назад +17

    Always had problems with Exynos in S6 Edge, S8 and S20, and was finally so pleased with S23 and its optimised Snapdragon. No way I would take a step back to Exynos. I've been quite loyal to Samsung, but Exynos is now a deal breaker.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +3

      S6 series with Exynos were batter than their SD competitor and I can assure that because I've had the S6 edge+, now still performing flawlessly despite being 8 years and a half, being as my secondary device.

    • @alibozkuer5022
      @alibozkuer5022 11 месяцев назад +3

      Yep I've heard it as well. S6 series exynos is better than SD. If only the same were true for the newer devices

  • @Theratron
    @Theratron 11 месяцев назад +69

    The difference in battery life left at the end is quite shocking actually....

    • @theistnate
      @theistnate 11 месяцев назад +8

      The s24 has a smaller battery

    • @maximusg88
      @maximusg88 11 месяцев назад +34

      The phone was still in its setup phase... You can see the icon on the top... Techchap fucked up here

    • @Theratron
      @Theratron 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@theistnate in most tests last year the S23+ had better battery life than the S23 Ultra. Slightly smaller battery, but a smaller and more effecient 1080p screen. Granted, the S24+ now has qHD, but it also has a larger battery so they should at least be on par.... With the same processor.

    • @Theratron
      @Theratron 11 месяцев назад +6

      @@maximusg88 ah ... Hmmm.... That at least explains the lockup

    • @Eihei
      @Eihei 11 месяцев назад +13

      @@theistnate The difference in battery size is negligible, S24+ has 4900mAh, S24U has 5000mAh. That's only 100 mAh difference, which is pretty much nothing.
      Also S24 has slightly bigger screen so there should be no much difference. It's probably due to how hot the phone got in certain scenarios - hot battery drains a lot quicker.

  • @johannnel5359
    @johannnel5359 11 месяцев назад +97

    Currently watching on my S24 plus with exynoss(region limited), and extremely happy with it. Upgraded from my S10 plus which was getting very slow, and had a 30% degraded battery

    • @smikebailon4592
      @smikebailon4592 11 месяцев назад +1

      horitas tengo el s10+ dese el mes que salio y en efecto esta lento y no hace much cambie de bteria en samsung mismo pero el sistema est lento

    • @adambenk0
      @adambenk0 11 месяцев назад +4

      How can I check the battery degradation on my s10 + ?

    • @nasseralsharif
      @nasseralsharif 11 месяцев назад +2

      You should have taken the Ultra with Snapdragon.

    • @johannnel5359
      @johannnel5359 11 месяцев назад

      @@adambenk0 I used an app called accubattery. You input your battery size when in the app setup, and over time it measures how much it charges and then gets an accurate measurement of the battery capacity. You can also use samsung diagnostic, which only tells if the battery is good or not

    • @johannnel5359
      @johannnel5359 11 месяцев назад +13

      @@nasseralsharif I did consider it, but the s24+ is already kinda large, and the ultra will be too large, I have kinda small hands. Also it's much more expensive for me as I have my phone on contract. The s24+ is exactly what I want, I don't like the design of the ultra

  • @sammyt3514
    @sammyt3514 11 месяцев назад +57

    The discrepancy in some of the benchmark tests can at least partially be attributed to the larger vapor chamber in the S24U, which helps with managing heat and decreasing throttling. I'm in Canada, so I get the SD version, but I wouldn't worry too much if I got the Exynos version tbh, especially since Samsung use that version in South Korea itself.

    • @andre_flabie
      @andre_flabie 11 месяцев назад +14

      I agreewith you. better to compare s24 plus with exynos against s24 plus with Snapdragon gen 3 us model which has the similar vapor chamber

    • @alexChook
      @alexChook 11 месяцев назад +3

      I thought Samsung uses SD in South Korea?

    • @LewChain
      @LewChain 11 месяцев назад +11

      Nah, Exynos is just bad... The fact that they sell these in Europe for the same price, should be a crime.

    • @SquirtleBaiano
      @SquirtleBaiano 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@LewChain EU regulators: HOLD MY BEER!!

    • @abhirmalhotra5103
      @abhirmalhotra5103 11 месяцев назад +2

      I promise you, you'd have to worry with an exynos chip in your phone. They are horrific. I've got 3 samsung devices from canada now and 1 from India. Traded the exynos phone for a snap chip as soon as I got back to canada. It is night and day bw the 2 SOCs.

  • @neutral6941
    @neutral6941 11 месяцев назад +665

    Snapdragon is better.

    • @Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh
      @Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh 11 месяцев назад +80

      Samsung should look into Dimensity Processors instead of their own crappy Exynos Processors

    • @_daniel.rad_
      @_daniel.rad_ 11 месяцев назад +40

      And always will be, I think they just forced us to buy s24 ultra instead of s24, cause they knew that their CPU is not good...

    • @bradavon
      @bradavon 11 месяцев назад +30

      ​@@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikhmore profit using their own SOCs.

    • @silverwerewolf975
      @silverwerewolf975 11 месяцев назад +6

      ​@@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikhanother crap

    • @ScoriloOfficial
      @ScoriloOfficial 11 месяцев назад +1

      Noooooo!!!! Really!?!

  • @Junier-Hussein
    @Junier-Hussein 11 месяцев назад +45

    Loving my Exynos 2400 S24 here in the UK 😊 The Amber yellow colour I went for.
    Don't succumb to the mass hysteria regarding Exynos my G's. Everything works perfectly to perfection 😊
    I tested & thrown everything on it - sustainability, stability, raw performance, general performance, games, production media apps etc.
    All good, everything checks out, top level, Top Tier SOC & it will only get better with optimisation/updates 😊
    I also have the 24 Ultra but it will be the secondary phone kept at home mainly for media. I could have bought any phone available with any SOC I wanted etc. yet I purposely picked the standard S24 as my main phone 😊
    Compact yet powerful enough for everyday use. Good camera (especially with the Expert Raw app that's available only on the newer Galaxy's) Good level screen, decent battery life, future proof & more.

    • @arwenriv1129
      @arwenriv1129 11 месяцев назад +2

      I'm suffering from daily reboots (between 1 and 2) on my S24, everything works great but I don't know if it's a software or device problem.

    • @Junier-Hussein
      @Junier-Hussein 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@arwenriv1129 Could be an app installed that's not been optimised just yet. Personally for me everything has been great.

    • @reziee5897
      @reziee5897 11 месяцев назад +7

      Because E2400 still a flagship chipset Idk why some people want samsung to invest to dimensity like fr? I rather have the exynos than mediatek.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      For real, also competition is better for the consumers.@@reziee5897

    • @supermario9598
      @supermario9598 11 месяцев назад +6

      You clearly don't know how bad enynos chips are lol. Of course it's gonna be good now, the phone is only a week out. Let's see in a year. Battery life will be dogshit and it will starts lagging more and more. You can literally see the lagg in the video. So no, don't buy trash exynos phones.

  • @kubacete1689
    @kubacete1689 11 месяцев назад +40

    I was really waiting particularly for your video, but I was definitely expecting a direct comparison with S24+ Exynos with equivalent S24+ Snapdragon. S24 Ultra and S24+ are different phones at this point. While it's still a good video, I was a bit surprised and I don't think it's that accurate. Also I was hoping for some in depth battery comparison

    • @andyH_England
      @andyH_England 11 месяцев назад +2

      The choice for those of us in the UK is S24+ or S24U. We do not have the option of an SD8G3 S24+, so other than for testing, it could be more helpful. This is for people deciding whether they should save a little bit and get the S24+ instead of the Ultra.

    • @Thetechchap
      @Thetechchap  11 месяцев назад +2

      THIS is about whether a Snapdragon S24 Ultra is worth it over a Exynos S24+ (in terms of the chips) 👍

    • @waseemjoeya4655
      @waseemjoeya4655 11 месяцев назад +6

      ​@@Thetechchapyou should do Exynose S24+ vs Snapdragon S24+ it will be fair much better comparison, i think.

    • @arsedoctor
      @arsedoctor 11 месяцев назад

      The real choice is where to get the S24 with exynos or another competitor in the same price range.

    • @amirhosseinhodjatshamami
      @amirhosseinhodjatshamami 11 месяцев назад +3

      ​@@Thetechchap not when you title the video snapdragon vs. exynos. If you want to compare a certain part, you should keep all the other factors as identical as possible to eliminate any other influencing factors that have an impact on the overall outcome. This is just the basis of a proper comparison/research.

  • @jommy55
    @jommy55 11 месяцев назад +41

    My main concern is how they perform with respect to cellular connectivity, but I understand that it's not easy to test it. I would love to see real world tests about whether the speed is consistent, or if calls drop.

    • @wildyato37
      @wildyato37 11 месяцев назад +1

      It was lagging even in hom.screen....whay do you expect more lol😂
      Its a shame...A flagship processor😂😂

    • @okeoke4697
      @okeoke4697 11 месяцев назад

      @@wildyato37 why do you lie ? You're a bot ? Exynos would eventually lag only during heavy tasks... And again, the SD does it too. So stop your non sense bullshit for a sec. As for the signal, I don't see why and how the processor would affect it, as there is a network dedicated component that is the same regardless the chipset... Don't overlook this.

    • @wildyato37
      @wildyato37 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@okeoke4697 There are vidoes which claims..
      exynos isn't get improved...it was same as used to be..

    • @Elva_24
      @Elva_24 11 месяцев назад

      ​​@@wildyato37my 24plus gets better signals then my cousin's 24 ultra
      You can go check at nanoreview about the 2400

  • @AbhinavSingh-wg8kz
    @AbhinavSingh-wg8kz 11 месяцев назад +8

    Upgraded from s23+ sd gen2. To s24+ exynos. I was skeptical about the performance .. but after using it since it for 1 week ... samsung really improved this tym much better ui ... super fast app opening great at gaming and definitely improved battery life one thing is for sure it might be running 2-3 c° hotter than s23+ in under heavy load. .. and also while setting up the phone for 1st tym it will throttle but after one day it comes back to normal and never faced any issue .. it might be the same reason of laggy performance your phone setup was still not finished yet

  • @stevanb.2590
    @stevanb.2590 11 месяцев назад +8

    It's not even about what processor has less or more power, it's about Samsung selling devices with different hardware, but named the same. There is no free choice, you're stuck with whatever Samsung decided is ok for your region. That should not be acceptable in this price range !

  • @Nick-or6nq
    @Nick-or6nq 11 месяцев назад +9

    Please compare s24 regular Exynos and Snapdragon versions. Battery life is vital for a huge amount of people

  • @danchan5620
    @danchan5620 11 месяцев назад +2

    4:24 mark, Your Exynos is still setting up, hence lag, says right there on the notification panel. I also see the gear icon when you run the video export.

  • @UKUAPGUY
    @UKUAPGUY 11 месяцев назад +6

    I've used my S20+ (UK) since launch and have only ever had the one crash, i just dont see what the problem is. Having just upgraded to the S24+ i have zero anxiety regarding it's performance going forward. The device is lush, the only thing i was apprehensive about was the slight drop in pixel density but the screen is looking good.
    Not at all bothered about the chip not being a Snapdragon.

    • @bizisback
      @bizisback 11 месяцев назад +1

      Too many nerds in this comments section, the average person would be hard to tell the difference between either chip.

  • @stephenmbugua9553
    @stephenmbugua9553 11 месяцев назад +8

    Hey. Could be interesting to stress test exynos s24+ v Snapdragon s23+ (Since s23 series were all Snapdragon globally) to see if in real world Exynos has caught up (i.e Heat management)

  • @th83
    @th83 11 месяцев назад +20

    The Exynos 2400 is a huge improvement, and better than I expected it to be given how disappointing the 2200 was. Sure, it may not be up to par with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in some areas, but it's still a solid performer no matter how you look at it. If I were buying an S24/S24+ outside of the US, it wouldn't be a deal-breaker for me.
    On a side note, I really hope the Tensor G4 ends up being a modified version of the Exynos 2400. I know raw performance isn't what the Pixel is all about, but the Tensor G3 barely keeps up with an 8+ Gen 1 and gets absolutely destroyed by the 8 Gen 3. I wouldn't care so much if the Pixel 8 could handle normal tasks without breaking a sweat, but in my experience, it struggles at times when it really shouldn't. Want to take 48/50MP photos? You better have a tripod because you have to hold the phone still for a few seconds while it takes the shot (even in good lighting). I haven't seen that kind of processing lag while taking photos since my old SD865 OnePlus 8T, and it's something they absolutely need to fix with the Pixel 9.
    /off topic rant

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +3

      I would like to say that the rendering app could have caused that triggering on the S24+, anyway I'll wait for more tests to see of they are experiencing the same issues or not, otherwise if they don't it's the adobe app issue.

    • @nasseralsharif
      @nasseralsharif 11 месяцев назад

      The efficiency and reliability always come from Snapdragon chips.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@nasseralsharif From Exynos chipsets too.

    • @nasseralsharif
      @nasseralsharif 11 месяцев назад

      @@casuarius6576 i don’t think so my dear

    • @okeoke4697
      @okeoke4697 11 месяцев назад +3

      The question is, as always, do you really need all that power ? Photography put aside, the apps I use are the same I used on my S8... 6 years ago xD. 99% of people just need a good screen and do social networks. Period. The rest is purely marketing. That's not like the E2400 was broken/too hot/lasting 5h and lagging all day long.

  • @Prizm44
    @Prizm44 11 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you, but what about modem performance? There's a lot of complaints about Exynos call reception issues and excessive battery drain with mobile data usage (especially with 5G enabled).

  • @hukmai
    @hukmai 11 месяцев назад +29

    Im impressed with the Exynos 2400, its better than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in last year's S23U which is more surprising in the generational improvements.
    I think its software support since Qualcomm definitely has more developers; when it boils down to CPU scheduling 10c vs 8c
    only works well if the software is up to snuff ( looking at you intel P + E cores) owing to the fact Android is optimized for Qualcomm with 6 to 8 cores being the standard.
    Really the GPU is fascinating because it shows a real maturity of Exynos + AMD architecture with substantial efficiency during ray tracing and better frames per watt.
    I have a feeling the weird chugging slowdown had to do with how the CPU and GPU drivers were interacting

    • @walter1824
      @walter1824 11 месяцев назад +9

      Right?? He should have added a S23 as well in the test
      Because even the Snapdragon 888 and 8 gen 1 (both korean made) were wayy worse than 865 (taiwan made) in terms of efficiency.
      Now the 2400 fabbed in Samsung Foundries matches 8 gen 2 from TSMC

    • @hukmai
      @hukmai 11 месяцев назад +2

      @walter1824 yeah im reading the notebook check and it's astonishing how far Exynos has developed. I think if the clock speeds were higher in the 2400 it would meet or even beat the 8 gen 3, especially the graphics

    • @joost1183
      @joost1183 11 месяцев назад +2

      ​@@walter1824 but will the 2400 be as efficient both in use and idle as the 8 gen 2? Thats my only concern. I dont game on a phone. I do want it to last all day, browsing/yt etc.

    • @IKSH7
      @IKSH7 11 месяцев назад

      Tbh the Exynos 2000 models has always been fine. People were just mad that they were missing out on the 5% more performance from the Snapdragon models. But the Exynos in the Samsung A lineup is a joke.

    • @nokx78.
      @nokx78. 11 месяцев назад +1

      Exynos it's crap, you can all convince yourselves otherwise, but still it's very expensive for a experimental chip like Tensors, and in the real life, there's no WiFi 7 capabilities and Bluetooth last version no options, downloads speeds don't even compare and so and so... Yes... And also is getting hot like a bitch in the summer in Malibu, in other hand it's a bad ideia to say, ok Usa and Korea will have one and rest of the world another... That means that if it's so good will be in all the line also ultra and all around the world... So bad play move from Samsung... Exynos it's a crappy magic move of software saying that it's some how good in benchmarks for that only purposes... period... It's crap still... It's a shame but it's true...

  • @gkato
    @gkato 11 месяцев назад +12

    As long as the exynos don't struggle to scroll timelines, swap apps or do random slowdowns like the one in the video I think it's fine. If I could pay like $50 more for the snapdragon in the same for factor then sure, but the ultra is completely different imo.

    • @toptiertech7291
      @toptiertech7291 11 месяцев назад +3

      The problem is that the Exynos isn’t on EVERY 24 and 24+. Just certain regions. So why am I paying the same or more money in the UK for an inferior chip to what the US gets? If all the base model phones had it then it would be ok. But for the equivalent of $1085 USD this is unacceptable performance. It’s not a mid range

    • @ulysses4989
      @ulysses4989 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@toptiertech7291just buy the ultra

    • @okeoke4697
      @okeoke4697 11 месяцев назад

      @@toptiertech7291 because the US / Canadian seems to be more marketing sheeps, like you !

    • @adjudicator4766
      @adjudicator4766 3 месяца назад

      @@okeoke4697Profoundly asinine thinking and reeks of copium. The US/Canada market pay a premium price for a premium product while Europeans pay the exact same premium price for an inferior product and Samsung profits from that. Samsung is literally ripping you off.

  • @pixelgaming7261
    @pixelgaming7261 11 месяцев назад +8

    6:23 The vapour chamber on the Plus is smaller. If you can import the Snapdragon S24+ do and run the test again.
    7:02 Some of the AI features are on device on the S24, but I would think all features would run off the cloud on older/lower-end devices.

  • @DeepteshLovesTECH
    @DeepteshLovesTECH 11 месяцев назад +16

    Would've been much better if there was a Snapdragon 8 gen 3 from another brand to see how Samsung's 8 gen 3 performance stacks up. Whether Samsung has nerfed the 8 Gen 3 on the S24 Ultra to make the Exynos looks less mediocre.

    • @str_w.h06
      @str_w.h06 11 месяцев назад

      Good point

    • @restless5996
      @restless5996 11 месяцев назад +1

      the 8 gen 3 out preforms the 8 gen 3 on other phones actually since its overclocked.

    • @str_w.h06
      @str_w.h06 11 месяцев назад

      @@restless5996 but why are the s24U benchmarks lower than other 8gen3 phones?

    • @LonedaHeaven
      @LonedaHeaven 11 месяцев назад

      ​​@@str_w.h06is it lower though? for example antutu factors in RAM into the scores and i am pretty sure most SD3 phones have more RAM than the s24 ultra. also if im not wrong samsung keeps the thermal limit pretty low (43°c to protect the battery) compared to other phones so it wont perform as well in 3dmark especially. i wish samsung increases the thermal limit though to at least 45°c. pointless to have an 'overclocked' chip when it can't even reach its overclock potential.

    • @restless5996
      @restless5996 11 месяцев назад

      @str_w.h06 Other phones push themselves harder during the benchmarks which is also why they have higher temperatures than the S24

  • @kornar
    @kornar 11 месяцев назад +4

    Nice review thank you very much!
    For me it was never about performance. Battery life and those stutters you had in the review video were the main issues with the S22 Exynos and here in your video, I see the same issues again. And that worries me.
    Even with the S22, there were big differences between the Exynos 2200 itself, probably because Samsung couldn't ramp up production fast enough and had to increase the tolerance for chips that were deemed OK. So there were people who had hardly any problems with their Exynos 2200 or people like me who had an overheating piece of lame technology that ran out of breath after 3-4 hours of screen-on-time (moderate use). I already had the suspicion back then that Samsung had issued review devices that had particularly good performance in QA.
    And I assume exactly the same pattern here again. So I'll definitely wait and see what the buyers report before I even consider an Exynos ever again.

  • @aeliar
    @aeliar 11 месяцев назад +2

    I've just jumped to S24U from Huawei P30 Pro. And the performance difference is night and day...
    3D mark Wild Life Extreme (single run) scores:
    P30 Pro: 678
    S24U: 4535

  • @geraldserra
    @geraldserra 11 месяцев назад +4

    The real fair comparison would be S24+ Exynos vs S24+ Snapdragon. Ultra has bigger refrigeration system.

  • @AbdullahiMuhammad-c8y
    @AbdullahiMuhammad-c8y 11 месяцев назад +9

    Hi tom
    I think it would be better if this review is done between plus variant due to ultra has bigger cooling and it even physically bigger which would released heat faster from the phone and also titanium resistance to heat is different from aluminium thank you...

    • @rrsharizam
      @rrsharizam 11 месяцев назад +2

      A bigger cooling allows the chip to sip more power but that isn't the case as we see the S24+ Exynos used 22% more power (62% battery lost vs 51% on the Snapdragon)

  • @JackMaslovLive
    @JackMaslovLive 11 месяцев назад +4

    I shall say, although the S24+ consumed a bit more battery in this test, it was running the games at significantly higher frame rates.
    In war thunder you had 70 fps on the Ultra, while the S24+ was getting over 100 fps.
    So you got more performance out of the phone.
    If the frame rate was capped to match it between the devices, I would argue that the battery consumption would have been more equal.

  • @pranavpise6952
    @pranavpise6952 11 месяцев назад +9

    Chips have come to a point where performance difference is barely noticeable in real world usage but the battery optimization is what matters most and the Exynos is bad at it and that is my personal experience. Mediatek has made a significant improvement with their Dimensity chips. Samsung needs to put in more work and people would trust Exynos more if they made it so good that they themselves trust it by putting it in the Ultra.

    • @Niraloks
      @Niraloks 11 месяцев назад

      In my personal experience, exynos is terrible! Even if you are not gaming or performing benchmarks etc…
      I upgraded my iPhone 8 to s20 FE (exynos) in 2021. It had terrible battery life and always overheated. In fact, the back plastic panel came off due to overheating and I don’t even game. I am currently using the iphone 8, because the s20fe exynos died due to water damage. (I was unaware of the loose back plastic and used the phone in rain)
      Also, my mum’s old phone, samsung s6 (exynos) died within a MONTH.
      So yeah, I think no one should ever buy exynos.

    • @jokast8861
      @jokast8861 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@Niralokshey, i like 24plus form factor more and dont rlly use spen. But went for ultra just for snapdragon. So you think i made good choice?

    • @pranavpise6952
      @pranavpise6952 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@Niraloks The 20FE wasn't IP68 rated? I've use my 21FE underwater for some video clips.
      The battery is pretty bad on my 21FE Exynos and Samsung's 25W charging doesn't make me any happier either.

    • @Niraloks
      @Niraloks 11 месяцев назад

      @@pranavpise6952 s20fe is ip68 rated

  • @CelahiR88
    @CelahiR88 11 месяцев назад +7

    I care, i will not pay a premium for a lesser chip. I bought the S24 ultra, but if it wouldve have the exynos then I would have picked the S23 ultra.

  • @nirgosalia
    @nirgosalia 11 месяцев назад +1

    Sir I don't think both of thses models shown here are having 12 Gigs of RAM only the S24 ultra have 12 GB Ram and the S24+ have 8 GB RAM. (2:43 here I heard you say ...)

  • @RVNLX
    @RVNLX 11 месяцев назад +7

    Other Regular SDgen3 benchmark is minimum 2 million in score.. but this special “For Galaxy” edition is Lower??! I think they just under clocked it so the exynos version doesn’t look too bad.. not as efficient and lagging exynos for a $1000 is so not acceptable..

    • @maitham2000
      @maitham2000 11 месяцев назад +4

      No, because Samsung doesn't have a better cooling system. Try to research. You'll notice that red magic has a better score than other phones with the same chipset due to the fact that having superior cooling

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +1

      I don't think so, how it could be underclocked if the S24 Ultra 8 gen 3 performs similar in benchmarks?

    • @daalldavid
      @daalldavid 9 месяцев назад

      At home we have a Xiaomi 14 and it exceeds 2,000,000 points in antutu and it still has the 8gen3 without overclocking so I don't understand why Samsung gives less being a version with no speed

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 9 месяцев назад

      Samsung software tunning prioritises more thermals than raw performance.@@daalldavid

  • @amrindersingh3949
    @amrindersingh3949 11 месяцев назад +2

    I got my s24 Exynos in Australian from last 2 days and there is no heating issue at all and phone is blazing fast no problem at all and battery seems to be good is well

  • @Giant_Dwarff
    @Giant_Dwarff 11 месяцев назад +11

    4:25 Even after the restart the Ui on the Exynos s24+ is just lagging, this is not good for a $1000 smartphone, the international market just got short changed and comparing that saying that its 250 bucks cheaper than the s24 Ultra doesn't justify it 😶

    • @pudinichigo91
      @pudinichigo91 11 месяцев назад +1

      yeah, for those who can skip exynos model should buy SD model

    • @Giant_Dwarff
      @Giant_Dwarff 11 месяцев назад +1

      Not to mention the Exynos poor battery life and optimization

    • @MobileBytesTV
      @MobileBytesTV 11 месяцев назад +4

      My Snapdragon S23 Ultra lags when it restarts. It's just One UI is shit.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +1

      imagine blaming it only because the rendering app triggered it

  • @YN__YN
    @YN__YN 11 месяцев назад +2

    4:28 the thing.. whatever it is.. I use an s21 Exynos and that thing happens a lot.. sluggish experience... And I was very confused to buy s24 plus and I order ultra today, pushing myself a bit. And after all this.. I can say don't ever go for Exynos

  • @notartemis4556
    @notartemis4556 11 месяцев назад +15

    The main question everyone is looking for is actually if Exynos 2400 performs better than the Snapdragon 8 gen 2, and not just in gaming experience but overall battery efficiency, temperatures and so on. It's pretty obvious that gen 3 will be superior, but most people wanna know if they should just get an S23 or S24 at that point. (Me included) I can't choose between S23 Plus/Ultra and S24 Plus (S24 Ultra is gonna be too expensive in my case)

    • @anto3790
      @anto3790 11 месяцев назад +1

      Same question

    • @JasonTsimplis
      @JasonTsimplis 11 месяцев назад +1

      This has been alredy tested by NL Tech. Exynos easily beats SD Gen 2, on everything including battery and thermals.

    • @jokast8861
      @jokast8861 11 месяцев назад

      Id suggest either go for s23 or s24plus.. better get 23 ultra than 23plus

  • @jamescuomo1
    @jamescuomo1 11 месяцев назад +1

    How did you get the S24 before its release?

  • @nbh1111
    @nbh1111 11 месяцев назад +38

    If both chips were the same, Samsung would have used the Exynos in the Ultra. The fact they didn't tells you all you need to know.

    • @SayoojGarrix
      @SayoojGarrix 11 месяцев назад +4

      Nah, thats not true at all. Samsung has some sort of partnership with Qualcomm that they're forced to use "Snapdragon for Galaxy" for 3 years

    • @rithondhar8171
      @rithondhar8171 11 месяцев назад +4

      ​@@SayoojGarrixI have been hearing this from the s20 series. When does this 3 years end?

    • @nbh1111
      @nbh1111 11 месяцев назад

      But seemingly not in all their phones, just the Ultra and maybe fold, maybe as the years go by they can use them less.

    • @SayoojGarrix
      @SayoojGarrix 11 месяцев назад

      @@rithondhar8171 who told you S20 series came with Snapdragon for Galaxy chipset?? Lol
      The first Snapdragon for Galaxy was 8 gen 2 followed by 8 gen 3
      The third one will be on S25 series

    • @rithondhar8171
      @rithondhar8171 11 месяцев назад

      @@SayoojGarrix So, it's a special kind of snapdragon?

  • @Zibi21
    @Zibi21 11 месяцев назад +1

    My eyes were rather focused on battery numbers difference... at first it was only 2% difference but with each further test the difference started to grow which did not change the problem of exynos power consumption

  • @NicoL-
    @NicoL- 11 месяцев назад +20

    i think you should do the benchmark multiple times to truly see the performance and sustainability of them both

    • @Thetechchap
      @Thetechchap  11 месяцев назад +17

      I conducted every test again the next day to make sure I wasn’t getting any anomalies- all similar results

    • @drenkovic
      @drenkovic 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@Thetechchapboth had FD+ resolution?

    • @f.iph7291
      @f.iph7291 11 месяцев назад +1

      ​@@Thetechchapyou should finish the phone setup mate. It wasn't set up and that can play a major role. When you swiped there was a notification about incomplete setup mate

    • @Grahamaan27
      @Grahamaan27 11 месяцев назад

      @@Thetechchap I think his point was about thermal throttling. "benchmarking the next day " off camera to confirm is good, but not gonna address the question.

  • @user1337BE
    @user1337BE 11 месяцев назад +2

    Animations are sometimes a bit laggy on my new s24+. I'm sure there's gonna be a software update improvement. Its a new cpu. Apps will be optimized better.

  • @사가미-p7b
    @사가미-p7b 11 месяцев назад +5

    I didn't expect tech RUclipsr to make videos and incite people without setting up

  • @Filip_111
    @Filip_111 11 месяцев назад +1

    I would love to see a comparison between Snapdragon and Exynos (S24/S24+) when it comes to the camera. I have a regular S24 Exynos and the camera is not fantastic so to speak. Don't know if it has to do with Exynos or that it needs software updates to fix some of the issues.

  • @stanislavgromov1643
    @stanislavgromov1643 11 месяцев назад +25

    This is actually surprising. That 10% difference is due to better cooling and larger body overall. So it is a tie. For example sd8+gen1 device with proper cooling is equal to sd8 gen2 with so so cooling in a smaller body.

    • @Glotttis
      @Glotttis 11 месяцев назад +17

      Not it's not. Sooner or later someone will compare S24+ or S24 side by side with Snapdragon counterparts and you'll see it will be similar 10% difference across all parameters. Performance, battery life, etc.

    • @stanislavgromov1643
      @stanislavgromov1643 11 месяцев назад

      By surprising I meant how exyonos has improved generation by generation.

    • @neelkadam9435
      @neelkadam9435 11 месяцев назад +2

      It's not about raw performance, it's about longevity. Exynos chips tend to perform worse after 1 or 2 years which is an issue considering an avg person will use this phone for at least 3-4 years. Snapdragon's longevity and efficiency is much better

    • @HM-li4et
      @HM-li4et 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@Glotttisexactly it's gonna be the same as always. Better to be pessimistic when it comes to exynos

  • @TrioLOLGamers
    @TrioLOLGamers 11 месяцев назад +2

    Samsung need to work A LOT more on their chips... Having 2 more cores performing worse means that there is something wrong... They literally wasted space and energy on the die to just give 2 more cores while the standard is 8 cores...
    We need still to remember that these are 1000 bucks phones...

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      The app is the problem, that rendering app triggered the GPU of the S24+.

  • @rrsharizam
    @rrsharizam 11 месяцев назад +6

    Samsung should put this chip into A75 or possibly A95, but not on the S series

    • @mario-qq7bq
      @mario-qq7bq 11 месяцев назад

      I think Samsung should sell exynos to Haiwei because of the snapdragon ban then use the profits to invest in r&d and when the exynos finally catches up to the snapdragon put it in their flagship.

  • @adamkee97
    @adamkee97 11 месяцев назад +1

    I live in the Exynos region. I have the Galaxy S10 Exynos version and bought the S23 last year. Glad I bought the S23 that uses the SD 8 Gen 2.

  • @martin.mp4
    @martin.mp4 11 месяцев назад +4

    could we get an s23 vs s24 ?

  • @HM-li4et
    @HM-li4et 11 месяцев назад +1

    4:29 after the restart notice the lag when the exynos is going from the home screen to the Google side screen.

  • @WA-qc4oy
    @WA-qc4oy 11 месяцев назад +14

    Why didn't you wait til the S24+ finish all the set up process? It's not a fair comparison in the first place since you use S24U vs. S24+ (it shoud be S24+ vs S24+, aye?) and then you choose to test them both while only the S24+ still installing all the set up things? 🤔🤔🤔

  • @Shuuzu03
    @Shuuzu03 11 месяцев назад +2

    Thank you for your thoughts on this matter, I currently have S22+ as my daily driver for few months now and I am looking for some comparison with the exynos and snapdragon. I've seen gaming tests as well. I guess I'll have to wait few more months before deciding if I should go with the last year's S23+ or consider the s24+ with exynos because that's what we have in my country or just go with the Ultra.

    • @MaTpOcMaN
      @MaTpOcMaN 11 месяцев назад

      Take it with snapdragon! You won’t regret it, the camera works better, it catches the network better, it drains less!

  • @reziee5897
    @reziee5897 11 месяцев назад +3

    It would be better if It’s S24+ exynos 2400 vs S24+ SD 8 Gen 3…not the Ultra.

  • @Lifelines7204
    @Lifelines7204 11 месяцев назад +1

    What was happening to S24 ultra screen between 5:30 to 6:30.
    Waves of light fringes

    • @enesisik
      @enesisik 11 месяцев назад +1

      That's the display refresh getting caught on camera. The higher the rate, the less visible it gets.

  • @ÆßV
    @ÆßV 11 месяцев назад +7

    So, for a day I got to use both the Exynos and Snapdragon S24+ from a seller and yep, it's the same old story.
    Sd8gen3 has better thermals, less battery drain, less idle/stand-by battery drain, a bit better network and 5G range. Initially, both the Exynos and SD will perform equally well in gaming but after 20mins+ the Exynos starts dropping frames and also heats up more.... doesn't overheat tho. (Tested only Genshin Impact).
    Also, it seems that the ISP is again superior on SD. In low-light, the SD variant takes more detailed and less noisy photos, the videos are more detailed. The colours and contrast too seem slightly better on SD but it's negligible I guess. The Exynos needs optimization it seems but the gap will still remain.
    So even though the Exynos shows equivalent numbers in synthetic benchmarks, in reality the Sd8gen3 simply performs better. As Samsung is taking help from Google, it seems that AI processing isn't an issue irrespective of the soc.
    But yeah, Sd8gen3 is a better chip but the Exynos 2400 has improved greatly.
    *PS:* As per local sellers, they import SD variants of Samsung as people demand those more even in grey-markets 🗿
    Cheers 🥂

    • @KasKade7
      @KasKade7 11 месяцев назад +1

      This is great info. I would be so happy to buy a S24+ with Snap. I'll pay extra. But for now i'll skip the S24 series here in EU. I really don't like the ultra model.

    • @ÆßV
      @ÆßV 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@KasKade7 Shouldn't be an issue if you're not into extended heavy gaming. In the UK, EU etc the Exynos will do fine but in sub-tropics like India, it might get toasty in summers.

    • @KasKade7
      @KasKade7 11 месяцев назад +3

      @@ÆßV Maybe true. But paying so much money for a inferior model just feels wrong. Especially, knowing they even pay less money for the phone in US. No, thank you. I will not support that.

    • @Lol29278
      @Lol29278 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@KasKade7the next series 25 will get Exynos aswell

    • @KasKade7
      @KasKade7 11 месяцев назад

      @@Lol29278 Time to look for alternatives. Plenty of good phones with Snap3 and cheaper.

  • @감사합니다-b3q
    @감사합니다-b3q 11 месяцев назад +2

    This Exynos 2400 is the best ever. It is no different from Qualcomm's Snapdragon 3. Samsung doesn't betray either.

  • @rahuldasgupta5996
    @rahuldasgupta5996 11 месяцев назад +3

    I thought the SD will be better but...S24 with Exynos gave about 90min of battery life for the last 10% battery which is way more than 45min of life from earlier S23U that I had checked. The last 5% lasted about 50min on S24 against just 15-20min on S23U.

    • @rahuldasgupta5996
      @rahuldasgupta5996 11 месяцев назад

      @Azu10157 I had S23U so I know what u mean. The last 6% lasted an hour is RUclips video playback today with one sim on 4G while connected to WiFi on S24.

  • @edgewalker6633
    @edgewalker6633 11 месяцев назад +1

    Please do a comparison with a retail S24U bought in your region where the S24/S24+ have Exynos AND a retail S24U from the USA.
    In the past in 'mixed' regions it seemed like Samsung played with the software on the Ultra models so they didn't blow away the Exynos. So it would be very interesting to see if the S24U - USA version outperforms the S24U 'world' version.

  • @navixaxa5023
    @navixaxa5023 11 месяцев назад +4

    Compare an SD 8G3 S24+ with the Exynos one.
    The S24U has a large chassis and a beefy Vapour Chamber.
    I dunno about you guys. I'll never get an Exynos.
    Overheating + Garbage Battery + Sluggish and inferior performance are here to stay.
    This is a blunder. Samsung fucked up a good chance. 7 years of OS Updates would've boosted the S24 and Plus' sales.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +1

      Exynos performed better in games, also the battery drain test is coming, so you can't judge only because a rendering app caused the phone to be sluggish,

  • @raczyk
    @raczyk 11 месяцев назад +1

    What about picture quality comparisok between the s24+ and ultra?

  • @Angelo930
    @Angelo930 11 месяцев назад +16

    I'm happy with the improvement with the exynos. This means that the pixel 9 series MAY get the performance boost we need 😅

    • @SukronHidayatullah
      @SukronHidayatullah 11 месяцев назад +3

      Are you sure the Pixel 9 will use an Exynos 2400 based processor? 😂

    • @supaahflyy
      @supaahflyy 11 месяцев назад +8

      ​@@SukronHidayatullahyeh. Pixel uses the Exynos chip of that year as a base until pixel 10 where it's rumoured to be a fully google design and TSMC making it

    • @chandrasekhar01
      @chandrasekhar01 11 месяцев назад

      Don't be so sure.. pixel probably going with TSMC from 2024

    • @xnutzii
      @xnutzii 11 месяцев назад

      @@chandrasekhar01 No. They won't 100 %. Samsung and Google have a contract that goes until 2025. So no TSMC in 2024.

    • @AssassinIsAfk
      @AssassinIsAfk 11 месяцев назад

      ​​@@chandrasekhar012025 also Google just delayed that deal for another year since tmc couldn't get enough processors made for 2024

  • @Mr.Compare3010
    @Mr.Compare3010 11 месяцев назад +1

    This comparison between Snapdragon and Exynos on Galaxy S24 Plus and S24 Ultra is truly a valuable source of information. The video helped me clearly understand the differences between these two chip lines and their impact on phone performance. The detailed information and flexible comparisons helped me make smart decisions when choosing to buy. Thank you for sharing this useful knowledge!

  • @圭太中川
    @圭太中川 11 месяцев назад +6

    I know exynos is worse than snapdragon
    But you had to conduct a test after finishing setting-up

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад +1

      Let'se in the long run performance reviews if its worse or not, or if its better.

  • @VladPayne
    @VladPayne 11 месяцев назад +1

    That slowdown on a exynos - I encountered it on a S24 ultra and was seriously surprized

  • @pragadoegito
    @pragadoegito 11 месяцев назад +3

    Why is Samsung doing this again? The S23 has the Snapdragon globally.

    • @cyberlexl3136
      @cyberlexl3136 9 месяцев назад

      To be able to pay their employees that work in the Exynos entreprise lol

  • @Kopcio01
    @Kopcio01 11 месяцев назад +1

    S24 exynos here, it works well, I did not play a demanding games or processing photos. And I'm happy with performance and battery life. Buy it just after first reviewes about performance and battery. Honestly all fine, but if I'll had a option I'll go with Snapdragon all the way. Btw, magsafe are quite of gimmic, as when you use a phone with case it not make any difference if you phone have it or not.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      wait for the long term reviews, honestly if you're experiencing good things you shouldn't think in going for the Qualcomm variant.

  • @pinakde3824
    @pinakde3824 11 месяцев назад +3

    Samsung will need to be consistently better than Qualcomm for two to three consecutive years for anyone to depend on them. We just can't trust them enough yet.

  • @JackMonarch14
    @JackMonarch14 11 месяцев назад +2

    Fuk Exynos. I had to import my phone from the states because of this bullshit. It should be illegal for Samsung to be selling their phones under the same price and name in Europe with those Exynos chips! It's such a ripoff!

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      A rip-off? Even if Exynos got better frames in all the games tested?

    • @SuperSonaldo7
      @SuperSonaldo7 11 месяцев назад

      @@casuarius6576 fuck frames m8 are you kidding me with your defence. every day use youll feel the browsing and going through your phone and feel the stuttering and battery performance getting worse eveery day, snapdragon is just a quality of life, you play your games what 1 hour and the rest of the day 23 hours the CPU matters, fuck this scam oexynoss

  • @FO0TMinecraftPVP
    @FO0TMinecraftPVP 11 месяцев назад +12

    I pre-ordered the S24 Plus (exynos) and I'm excited!
    Upgrade from S20 FE :D

    • @houssamadnane271
      @houssamadnane271 11 месяцев назад +3

      wht tf wouod you do that at least pick s23 plus snap dragon

    • @HABO2210
      @HABO2210 11 месяцев назад +2

      Honestly,man, I'd rather buy a used s23 Plus than s24+ Exynos.

    • @YN__YN
      @YN__YN 11 месяцев назад +2

      😮You will cry for sure. I have my dad s20fe and I have an s21. I always felt that s20fe's snapdragon is better and this Exynos is crap. If possible cancel the order, and go for previous s23/23+ or ultra or go for s24 ultra. Don't trust Exynos. You will miss the slug free performance of s20fe in few days of using Exynos. It's not a long term chip

    • @FO0TMinecraftPVP
      @FO0TMinecraftPVP 11 месяцев назад +4

      A bunch of close-minded people above btw

    • @YN__YN
      @YN__YN 11 месяцев назад +4

      @@FO0TMinecraftPVP you will not have to wait long for that bro.. summers are coming and you will for sure get frustrated by performance of Exynos

  • @coronaborealis
    @coronaborealis 11 месяцев назад +1

    Wrong infos there: Korean variant of S24/S24+ uses Exynos, NOT Snapdragon. In Korea, only S24U comes with Snapdragon.
    So in S24/S24+, Snapdragon for US, China and Japan only, and Exynos for all the others including Korea.
    Also, in strict measure, as others have pointed out, in order to control variables, it would be more accurate to compare the same Galaxy S24+ with different chips.

  • @ciuwas1122
    @ciuwas1122 11 месяцев назад +3

    I had same problems on my s22 ultra Exynos i mean random freezing till i had to restart... guys just get s23 variants with snapdragon instead of s24

  • @SignalStealer
    @SignalStealer 11 месяцев назад

    I have just ordered an S24 Ultra to replace my S22+. One of the main arguments for me was that I always felt the battery life of the Exynos S22+ was just not as good as I expected -- which is perfectly reflected in your video with the S24 lineup as well. 11 percentage points difference in battery charge while the Ultra is still on 49% makes the battery in the Ultra last a good 15-20% longer, which is just a huge difference. And is exactly the breaking point for when I can heavily use my phone on a vacation day while not having to worry that I won't return back home because of running out of battery.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      LMAO, search for Android addicts battery life test comparing the S22 Ultra's Exyno and Qualcomm and the S24+ Exynos against the S24 Ulra, the S24+ beats the S23 Ultra by an hour.

  • @Larry-Muryuqi
    @Larry-Muryuqi 11 месяцев назад +3

    For SD 8 Gen 3 test, I would expect you to use S24 plus instead of Ultra

  • @cocoamaster9200
    @cocoamaster9200 4 месяца назад +1

    Paying the same money just to have the inferior chipset variant yikes. Apple maybe just recycling the same shit over the years but atleast you’ll get their flagship chipset wherever you are in the world.

  • @ivanda64LPGames
    @ivanda64LPGames 11 месяцев назад +6

    Nice, Ultra is better for harder to run apps but in general they are way closer to each other than they used to be. They did a nice job :)

    • @shebjjeje9720
      @shebjjeje9720 11 месяцев назад +3

      Nobody is going to develop and optimize games that run on that specific GPU found on Exynos

    • @f.iph7291
      @f.iph7291 11 месяцев назад +1

      He just showed three games where that was not the case lmao. The only difference will be battery life and efficiency which they both fall apart comparing to iphone

    • @ivanda64LPGames
      @ivanda64LPGames 11 месяцев назад

      @@f.iph7291 Yea the battery drain is a bit worse, around 15% in m my case

    • @f.iph7291
      @f.iph7291 11 месяцев назад

      @@ivanda64LPGames omg 15 percent is too much!

    • @MasterMCGS
      @MasterMCGS 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@f.iph7291but then iphone loses in most other parts, and also doesnt have a qhd screen

  • @inohope
    @inohope 11 месяцев назад

    My old phone A52 is almost done (dropped it too many times :) ), it was my only non series-S Samsung phone, but it had snapdragon processor and I was quite satisfied with it, especially for the price I paid. Now I planned to get back to S, but seems like I will have to turn to other manufacturers for flagship quality. Seems too sketchy that I have to pay flagship price and still make compromises while knowing that somewhere else in the world people don't. And I don't want to buy Ultra, I had Note before and I never got used to the pen, I just don't need that thing in my phone. After almost 14 years of exclusive Samsung phone usage, looks like it's time for a change. Any recommendations?

  • @glostergloster6945
    @glostergloster6945 11 месяцев назад +3

    Why have Samsung done this? I thought they had seen the light with the S23 series

    • @luciferjohnson8495
      @luciferjohnson8495 11 месяцев назад +1

      You are acting like it's a big difference. You wouldn't even notice in real world. As far as gpu is concerned and is better then adreno. Considering the fact it took and 2 years to catch upto snapdragon is impressive

    • @glostergloster6945
      @glostergloster6945 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@luciferjohnson8495 I do notice a difference, having had every single Exynos Samsung phone, and then suddenly with S23 having a Snapdragon powered phone. All the stutters and lag that used to be present on my previous phones, dont exist on my S23.

    • @luciferjohnson8495
      @luciferjohnson8495 11 месяцев назад

      @@glostergloster6945 good for you enjoy your purchase

  • @KeanoMUFC1
    @KeanoMUFC1 11 месяцев назад +1

    For me, the only issue with Exynos, was never it's performance, it was a battery life. And it still sucks compared to Snapdragon. So nothing's changed.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      wait for the Longterm reviews and then judge

    • @KeanoMUFC1
      @KeanoMUFC1 11 месяцев назад

      ​@@casuarius6576 it's the same thing every year, I don't see any reason why long term reviews would have changed that. The difference in power efficiency is significant on Snapdragon's favor, there won't be any debate on that. I'm not saying the battery life of 2024 Samsungs with Exynos' will be bad, but they're just always quite far behind Snapdragon versions. I'm waiting for reviews of S24 Exynos vs S24 Snapdragon to have more apples to apples comparison.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      Let's see if its behind or ahead, because in the latest generations were Exynos was more available, it got better results in efficiency@@KeanoMUFC1

  • @husamad9824
    @husamad9824 11 месяцев назад +3

    That gpu on both tho 💀
    My iphone 12 pro max is 16450
    Snapdragon is really close but it still needs a big jump towards bionic

  • @alexfrost8645
    @alexfrost8645 11 месяцев назад +1

    My problem with Samsung doing this is they are not open and honest about. The average person will not be aware that the different chip would do this, and that they are paying the same money for an inferior phone. If they want to use exynos do it worldwide, or make it cheaper than the snapdragon version at a minimum. If I’m honest the biggest issue is not performance but battery life, and is why after being with Samsung for years I now don’t use them. £1k for a phone with poor battery life is ludicrous.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      Wait for the long term review tests and the battery tests

  • @Facu1ty1855
    @Facu1ty1855 11 месяцев назад +10

    I got my S24 plus yesterday. So far it's performing like the S23 regular I got rid of which performed brilliantly. I'm definitely annoyed about the chip saga especially after what they did with the S23 models last year. It's clearly not as good as the 8gen3. People saying it's better than before which is fine but that's not what we're paying for. Obviously I'd be expecting better performance then my S23 with 8gen2 but so far cannot see a difference. Also, the bottom speaker sounds muffled to me. It's loud but could sound clearer and fuller if they put a bigger slit in. It's only a small slit which doesn't make sense. Surely common sense would tell you that the smaller slit is holding the speaker back from performing better. That's the only gripe I have. The ultra has this tiny slit aswell and it's not as good as the iPhone 15pro as I watched earlier on that Mr whos the boss guy. I bet they'll realise this and put normal to bigger size grills or slits like everyone does next year. It's a lovely phone to hold and play with. I still have two weeks to change my mind and may get the ultra if I experience any exynos bullshit 😩

    • @Rivs5117
      @Rivs5117 11 месяцев назад +2

      One main reason that Samsung won’t strictly use Snapdragon SoC in all its products is because the cost. The Snapdragon Gen2 cost $160 per chip. Reports showed that Samsung paid $7B for the Gen2 chips in their S23 series. The Snapdragon Gen3 is probably closer to $200 per chip. This is one main reason they went back to Exynos for half the S24 series.

    • @HABO2210
      @HABO2210 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@Rivs5117 how much does it cost them dropping to no. 2 due to that same cheap-ass cost-cutting strategy?

    • @Rivs5117
      @Rivs5117 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@HABO2210 Being number 2 in shipping smartphones worldwide is still excellent lmao. Samsung still sales over $200M phones so they’ll be perfectly fine.

    • @Facu1ty1855
      @Facu1ty1855 11 месяцев назад

      @HABO2210 exactly that! Surely the exynos customers must pay less than the snapdragon customers. Either give us all the same like they did last year with the S23 models or charge accordingly. My worry with my S24 plus exynos is the longevity of it which we all know was never any good. Was Wondering whether to give this back and grab the ultra just for that piece of mind with snapdragon but will never use the spen hence why I went with the plus

    • @AS3R1US
      @AS3R1US 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@Facu1ty1855 brotherr how tf do you upgrade your phone from S23 to S24. I used the S10 for 5 years, it broke 1 week ago now im using my old S6

  • @kiranmudnaney
    @kiranmudnaney 11 месяцев назад +1

    Well ive had the s24 only for a day so can't say much... But the cameras are definitely a leap ahead of the s23 I had which I sold in a month coz of those camera's... Decided to give Samsung another shot with this, and seriously the cameras are very good... I don't know if it's this chip, coz there's a lot of AI post processing just like on my pixel 8 which I might sell coz the hardware on that keeps failing on me, microphone isnt working now... But yes s24 has learnt something from tensor I guess and there's a lot more AI than was on the SD gen2 on s23... Everything seems more refined and looks better specially the photos... They are like an altogether different output than any of the Samsung s series phones I've had...
    Yes the battery though been only 1 day I see is not as good as the pixel... But that might improve... I'm at 36% already and its only 4pm.. Phone doesn't heat or throttle as of now... was using it all morning in hot Indian sunlight taking pictures at a zoo...
    👍 from me for this phone... It's a pretty good phone that has a lot of AI stuff happening just like the pixel... Taking a leaf from their book I guess...

  • @choky82kr
    @choky82kr 11 месяцев назад +3

    Actually South Korea is getting the exynos chip.

  • @ncode03
    @ncode03 11 месяцев назад +1

    Remember, despite being the cheaper version of the s24, the s24/+ are still at the premium price segment. The question is if you think the exynos deserve that price or not. SAMSUNG's marketing highlights the comparison between the two lesser s24 vs ultra but the actual comparison is with other flagships from different brands.

  • @extra4542
    @extra4542 11 месяцев назад +4

    I don’t understand why exynos still exists

  • @profesormne6174
    @profesormne6174 11 месяцев назад +1

    WarThunder is nog good even on Gen1 and Gen2 CPU's played a lot, making phones hot even using gaming case and fan behind if you put 60fps and max settings, tested a lot Xiaomi 12, 13, RedMagic 8 Pro, Sasmsung S23+ ....

  • @PureshowGaming
    @PureshowGaming 11 месяцев назад +15

    Better than previous year but I still prefer the Snapdragon version. I'm super happy with my S23 Ultra =)

  • @AndreasZetterlund
    @AndreasZetterlund 11 месяцев назад +1

    For me the biggest disappointment with the Exynos in my s21 was the worse battery life. Several *hours* less RUclips video playback per charge than on the Snapdragon. Any idea if that has been improved in s24? Otherwise maybe the s23 is a better option for me.

  • @deansh8506
    @deansh8506 11 месяцев назад +5

    Loving my S24+ 512GB Exynos. Feels like a massive upgrade from my S22.

    • @Armada8589
      @Armada8589 11 месяцев назад

      I'm swapping s22 for 24+
      Have to admit battery was poor on s22 along with lagging. But overal good phone

    • @deansh8506
      @deansh8506 11 месяцев назад +2

      @@Armada8589 I went from a 10+ to the 22. Didn't feel like an upgrade in any department if Im honest and the battery was worse!

  • @TheFlash8889
    @TheFlash8889 11 месяцев назад +1

    I currently use a Op9 Pro with it's Snapdragon 888 and it still is going strong. I do not experience any major stutters or lags so I guess both, the Snapdragen 8 gen 3 and the Exynos will be finde for me and probably most other users too 😄

  • @magneticflux
    @magneticflux 11 месяцев назад +3

    That lagspike on exynos seems terribly familiar, think my S22 ultra has been stuck with it since it was born. Exynos is as always a trash chip it seems.

    • @casuarius6576
      @casuarius6576 11 месяцев назад

      Qualcomm and Mediatek are always crap compared to Exynos

  • @navaneeth95
    @navaneeth95 11 месяцев назад +1

    Samsung themselves put SD in in their flagship, this proves it is better than exynos