It's not that bad but the battery, it does drain slightly faster than its counter part. The only crime here is samsung sell it at the same price as SD.
Good comparison, if it is 15-20% performance difference and 17% battery difference, Samsung should sell the Exynos version at least 15% cheaper in Europe.
@@daiquirigamer2089it's not that easy, Samsung phones are still the best in every other aspect. It's just annoying. BTW I have the exynos s24 and it's flawless, except that I know that I would get 17% more battery for the same amount of money if I lived in North America
@@Moyaiville_Productions Tbf, I don’t have S24 right now, but I had S22U with Exynos 2200, which was the most hated Exynos amongst youtubers. As a regular user I never had issues with it. It was capable of doing photo, video, smooth gaming (except pubg stucked at 30fps, yes) and it never gets hot, so no extra suffer to battery. I was pretty happy with it. And if I have to choose between buying some Chinese phone like RedMagic 9 pro with SD8g3 that has buggy UI (with no updates whatsoever, except maby security patches lol), poor camera with no telephoto lens, no spen. (Just raw Snapgradon 8 gen 3 performance) and S24 with Exynos, I’d get S24
Exactly. In my country, they don't mention chipset at all. Keep focusing on cameras, AI, screen etc. those not knowing the difference in chipset will not know.. poor exynos no matter how good it is, it is always inferior. Dumb Samsung as always, that's why people had a bad impression on Android or Samsung because of Exynos, it's their own fault for this.
So in Europe, they are charging us more for a phone that is worse than the US variant. They market it as the same phone, but its worse in nearly all aspects, making it a totally different experience and thus a totally different phone. How is there no lawsuit against samsung yet?
It's an entirely different phone at this point. Disgraceful how governments cracked down on Apple for using a lightning port because it was against competition, but Samsung can market two different phones with the same name.
It's not because of competition. They had to change the lightning port because it was outdated, it was inconvenient for customers, and it was causing more e-waste to pile up.
@@julianfuryentertainment yes, you will support the company which listens to fans. OnePlus is snappier(it is a deal breaker for me), haptics and display is better. Speakers are louder on Samsung, sound is the same quality. Samsung is wider because the aspect ratio is 19,5:9. OnePlus has 20:9, it is on you if you wanna have more content visible or thinner. If you use a stylus and you are used, you would go for Samsung. If you make photos which you print, you would go for Samsung too. OnePlus cameras are flagship quality too. Wide angle camera and 3-4x zoom is better on OnePlus. Samsung has a better main camera and telephoto 5x and more x zoom.
We know Exynos has improved but is not yet at the level of the Snapdragon variant. Ideally Samsung should sell these underperforming phones at least a little bit cheaper than the Snapdragon. Reviewers avoid these type of comparisons and they always try to highlight the improvements of the Exynos chip, when clearly side by side comparisons show otherwise. Great video!
It's possible that some RUclipsrs don't dare to compare the Exynos and Snapdragon versions, because some RUclipsrs endorse Samsung. If they do that, they're afraid RUclipsrs won't be able to get endorsements from Samsung in the future. this is just my thought
@@alexandruciordas4941 Still using Exynos S8. Though chipset's standby efficiency is craptacular. Unless I disable 4G network it hogs 1% per hour doing literally nothing, but maintaining standby network connectivity. And even halved power hogging with 4G disabled in't that good considering previous Snapdragon based Xperia Z3 Compact with smaller battery did lot better with 4G enabled.
@@tuunaes my a8 2018 exynos modem failed after 4 years, my brother's s8 failed after 3 years and my brother's s21 ultra failed after 2 years, can't be a coincidence bro...
Enjoyed your video and found it very interesting. I remember seeing the difference first-hand when my cousin came to visit from Bosnia. We both had the S22 Ultra, but the picture quality and battery life on hers was noticeably worse.
I went on the canadian samsung website, the S24+ is on sale at 1400$. There's currently an offer where you can get 250$ off + a free samsung phonecase. Final price = 1150$ (=792€). On the french samsung website the S24+ is on sale at 1170€, there's no offer nor gifts. Final price = 1170€. So in France we get a phone 380€ more expensive that doesn't perform as well. I'm definitely not buying this. Thank you for the video
I'm Canadian, and if you convert 1150$ US to CAD, it's 1700$. I feel like it's easier for US and Europe to get this phone, compared to us. That's nearly 2000$ if you add the taxes and everything with it
But based on my research, it's only Canada, USA, China and maybe Japan who has the Snapdragon variant. The rest of the world has the Exynos. Samsung engineers does this move to "optimize phone performance with the market it's sold in"
@@redsim017 In any case it's unfair that we get a more expensive phone that's less performant. It's even worst when you know that the exynos cost them twice less than the snapdragon. They should be cheaper just for this reason alone
I am not a mobile gamer but damn that 9 C° difference is scary. It shows how much inefficient Exynos is compared to SD. I was very close to buying the Exynos but now i think i won't. Even though my usage will be normal (youtube, twitter, reddit, browsing, 5g, Bluetooth, reading, listening, shopping), still i think the phone will degrade in the long run and i am planning on using this phone for 5 years as i always do.
@@blahblah1339 Even when not gaming or doing CPU/GPU/Modem intense tasks, the battery drain is horrible. I'm pissed at Scamsung for not improving the Exynos modem...
@@JustAnotherYou2berthis blahblah guy is a bot it seems. His only comments are all on the similar videos and all of them yap something about a "defective unit".
@@JustAnotherYou2berbecause it takes atleast 5-6 years and even 10 years to get competitive in chip making industry. There would have been no amd today if everyone was like you.
Buy the s23 the 8 gen 2 chip is almost as fast as the exynos 2400 and way more efficient. Performance gains aren't that important anymore anyway, power efficiency is king and the Snapdragon chips have always been better for that.
@@ziiiic if you plan on keeping a phone for 4+ years then it's important. I kept my S20 for 5 years and the battery life was the only reason I got rid of it
I have snapdragon version (for about a month) and have yet to experience a single issue no stutter, no overheat and excellent battery life. Couldn't be happier with it!
my simple question is these are all extreme tests done to know the 100% potential of the phone but for daily use and and an average user will it matter a lot? I know SD version is best but if at all its not avl then is exy 2400 not good enough for a simple premium phone which may last 7 years
@@syednizam6984 The exynos version will be perfectly fine with most every day tasks and apps, it's just that at its peak power it's not as efficient as the snapdragon version,but does that even matter?No, not really, not for most people
Broh i have seen lota tests between snapdragon and exynos, but this was the best one, performance of the new 2400 is better than the past exynos for sure but heating issues, optimization issues, camera issues and battery issues are still here. Keep up the good work
Exynos heats less and battery with sim is better in exynos most of these unrealstic test never show real battery life eg in these test iphone 15 pro max beats s24 ultra but in real use s24 ultra beats iphone by good 50 to 60 min
@@lggr2261 Bro Exynos burns faster hence battery also drains quicker. It's never been proven that Exynos is better at anything compared to any Snapdragon. They really needed to stop producing this crappy SoC brand because no apps are going to optimize Exynos' performance. Even the new chipsets like the Tenzor and Unisoc outperformed Exynoses at specific classes. Like the Exynos 850 to the Unisoc T606 Tiger. Or the Dimensity 1080 to the Exynos 1330/1380. They offer the sameBro Exynos burns faster hence battery also drains quicker. It's never been proven that Exynos is better at anything compared to any Snapdragon. They really needed to stop producing this crappy SoC brand because no apps were going to optimize Exynos' performance. Even the new chipsets like Tenzor and Unisoc outperformed Exynoses at specific classes. Like the Exynos 850 to the Unisoc T606 Tiger. Or the Dimensity 1080 to the Exynos 1330. Even a lower class Helio G99/Dimensity 700/Dimensity 920 can outperform the higher class and newer Exynos 1280 SoC by a certain margin. They offer the same architecture and kinds of CPU but guess what, the non Exynos would always perform better in short term use nor even long term. I'm just scared if Samsung drops their crappy Exynos chipsets to their lower class models I would never buy their phones again. architecture and kinds of CPU but guess what, the non Exynos would always perform better in short term use nor even long term. I'm just scared if Samsung drops their crappy Exynos chipsets to their lower class models I would never buy their phones again.
@lggr2261 exynos heat up more broh...i also have a exynos S21, it's the worst phone i ever bought. This year it was pretty good but it's still have optimization issues, and if Samsung give this for less price than the snapdragon then i can recommend it.
Was looking everywhere for this kind of compare test, none of the big tech youtubers made it, now it makes sense why. awesome content, made my decision easy not to go with the Exynos in my region and look for something else. Samsung should really be ashamed of releasing such product with this kind of performance and battery differences while keeping the same price. Unbelivable.
At last. I am seeing someone saying that Exynos gets hotter while gaming and running benchmark. Which I had also noticed during my testing and review. If you take the scores out of the picture, even S23 was performing better during my gaming and benchmark tests when it comes to battery and thermal management. Thanks for the comparison video man 👍
@xstatic6134 If you wana play games for a longer duration, then go with S23, and it costs less. For everything else, S24 is pretty good. After a couple of updates, the battery life now is almost similar on both devices.
@xstatic6134 Now its almost similar but again depends on how you use it. In my usage, socialmedia apps consumes slightly lesser power on S24. Web browsing almost similar, camera and gaming S23 uses slightly lesser battery.
The truth finally ! This is how it should be done an actual thermal and efficiency test. I got s23 blindly for peace of mind and I'm from India so you know how hot Exynos will be in summers
To anyone who thinks that applications will be soon "optimized" for Exynos - guys, stop this nonsense. No one will be spending time and putting extra effort just to make application performing a little bit better on crappy Exynos. And even if some software updates will target poor Exynos efficiency, the difference will not big enough to even repeat such test we see here. Moh - great job!
Bruh fr They can't even bother fixing their photo processing algorithm yet some believe they'd put effort into tailoring everything for the Exynos variant 💀
Exynos is not the problem, the problem here is that Samsung is marketing the Exynos as a flagship level chip and selling it at flagship level price, when in actuality Exynos are just above mid range performance Same with Google's Tensor chips
Thanks for this. Finally a good, rigurous comparison. One of the weakest points of Exynos is the battery consumption of the modem. The other S24 Exynos vs Snapdragon comparisons that I've seen use wifi, which shows they don't know what they are doing.
Mate absolutely bang on! That's what I have been saying all along, on wi-fi Exynos ain't that bad but surely more likely you'll have a power socket for a quick top-up when you are in such a set-up. What matters is when you are out on the move on cellular, then every single percent of battery matters. Glad I didn't go with the Exynos variant. Will stick to my S23 and wait until it's made available or a cheaper way to get Snapdragon variant from US/CA down the line. Qualcomm rules the modem game.
Are you guys accounting for the fact that either version might not support all available cellular frequencies in some regions and may therefore be fighting an uphill battle?
Thanks for video. I was going to buy S24 (altought plus version) and my only concern was Exynos. Well, im going to stay with beloved S20 FE Snapdragon version for next year :)
Yeah, if you want something new, s23 is probably your best bet, samsungs tried Snapdragon world wide and went back to exynos, I don't see that they'll stop subsidizing US phones with EU money anytime soon
11:44 That's right. Even on their website, they don't mention that their flagship is running on Exynos, but they wrote it boldly when their phone has snapdragon chipset, even in a midrange (m55 - Sanpdragon 7 gen 1). You're right. How can we put our money on a phone that runs on a worse chipset but cost 3 to 4 times the salary of an average person in a developing country?! It is really discouraging that Samsung is discriminating its customers
Le problème c'est leur manque de transparence sur la technologie utilisée de leurs composants tels que la technologie de la RAM, du stockage ou encore le SoC, surtout sur les milieux de gammes, et je comprends pas comment ils se mangent pas de procès sur ça, je comprendrais jamais, alors que chez OnePlus ou Apple, la fiche technique est plus transparente car oui même quand il y a un SDG 8gen3 la fiche technique marque "octa-core".
böylesine tarafsız bir video yaptığınız için teşekkür ederim. Benim ülkemde yani TÜRKİYE'de tüm forum sayfalarında sizin videonuz dolaşıyor. Abone oldum. Bundan sonra tarafsız yayın yapmaya devam ettiğiniz müddetçe takip edeceğim.
You are a legend!! Additionally putting all the effort of even importing a phone just wow. The results are shocking! Have you checked Phonearena and gsmarena, their tests and results of the s24+ exynos against the 24 Ultra? According to their results, the S24+ exynos lasts longer than the Ultra in general (but they do not run benchmarks that drain that much power).
If Samsung ever decides to go exclusive with Exynos in the future, they better work on all these issues or I will stop buying Samsung phones and consider Oneplus or Sony, since I'm in the US market with limited Android choices.
O exynos está há vários anos e nunca melhoram simplesmente porque a samsung não sabe fazer chip tao bem quanto a snapdragon. É uma ilusão achar que os proximos mais uma vez serão melhores. Exynos existem há anos e todos possuem sempre os mesmos problemas.
@silvitooo Read your response from Google Translate. I think it's their fabrication that is not as good as TSMC. Apart from that their modems are not as good as Qualcomm's, so you'll never get as good signals and efficiency on 5G and wifi.
@@Marlon_J Correct. The only years were Exynos has been "good" were the ones when Qualcomm's flagship SoC was also made by Samsung instead of TSMC, and since both were bad, Exynos didn't stand out as the worst one
@@crocop2190still though, don't think people have the right to voice their concerns when they pay the same amount of money just to get something worse? This is a scam. Samsung should either price exynos phones lower or make them actually competitive.
The other factor is Exynos being manufactured on Samsung's node which probably has worse yield than TSMC, may introduce more variances in the chip performance i.e. silicon lottery.
I was always so bothered by Samsung Exynos chipset, and when I finally upgraded to the Samsung S23, I'm actually happy that they went Snapdragon across the board internationally with the S23 line, but went back to their old habits with Samsung S24/+ model...
This is why apple keeps winning. Samsung providing their good snapdragon equipped phones in countries where it's considered socially unacceptable to own an Android. Whereas in areas where the public are free to choose between iPhone and Android are the areas which get the models that have bogus issues. Samsung is leaving absolutely zero reason for people to choose Androids over iPhone in the EU region. At this point buying a OnePlus 12 or a nothing phone 2 is a significantly cheaper and better option than splurging on bogus Exynos equipped Samsung's.
@@blahblah1339 every other test I've seen was also done on wifi only, avoiding the bad exynos mobile modem. pushing the narrative of this phone having "great battery life". Which it clearly does not have, unless you stay on wifi the entire day.
wifi 모드로 테스트해봤으면 어땠을까 하는 생각이 든다. 통신 모뎀칩의 문제는 아니었을까 하는 의심이 들기 때문이다. 물론 그렇다고 하더라도 스냅드래곤이 엑시노스보다 나은 것은 변하지 않겠지만. 여러 리뷰어들의 영상을 찾아보고 있는데, 이처럼 두 ap의 극적인 차이는 처음 본다. 귀한 컨텐츠를 제공해주어 감사하다.
"its the cellular's fault bro, you would get better results if you turned on wifi bro, your results are way different than other youtubers bro" this is literally samsung on damage control
@@myolgiden no, there is already a test and of course S24 exynos beats s23 in benchmarks, but S23 still manages to have better battery life, which is crazy given it has a smaller battery and a 1 generation older chip
good job Techmo. I bought S22 based on youtubers reviews stating the battery may be not the best but still OK. This made me to ignore some alarming customer reviews in the net. In practice S22 (Exynos) battery live is pretty poor. I compare it with S23 (snapdragon). Though I know this is not quite fair as S23 is newer technology and in my case 7 months newer device, there is no contest between two in battery life. Screen on time 9h vs short of 6h, screen off 65h vs 27h. I'm not a gamer so I assumed heat dissipation test is not important for me. Until I got into a car in sunny day with my nav and MS Teams on simultaneously. S22 overheated, dimmed screen and eventually shut down. I would be very, very cautious with exynos again, even if reviews are positive. so they were for S22.
Well said, what people don't notice is GPU unit is also busy processing videos, AI tasks, and lots of other graphics on your phone, also image processing. It's not only about gaming, but gaming highlights the weaknesses of a GPU better.
We knew the result. But still this is the best Exynos so far. If they improve it in future then it will be a better stuff to competition the snapdragon. And i can see this Exynos will be so closer to snapdragon 8 gen 2. I request you to do the same test against s23. That will be fun to watch.
Thanks for this detailed comparison, this make me understand better the differences, Snapdragon should still be the first choice then Mediatek when buying an Android phone. I hope this video will be reached more and your channel will have more subscribers.
Surprise: With Exynos, the connection strength aka reception is generally worse when compared to Snapdragon. Alas, the inferior Exynos modem results in a worse battery life.
The definitive comparison we have all been waiting for. Disappointing result for those that own the global version. The gap was more substantial than we initially thought. Samsung is so too big to fail now they can pull a move like this and still get away with it sadly. One can only hope their 'day one' software update gets released soon so we can closen the gap.
I've bought the S24+ exynos for replacing my 4 year plus Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro) which uses snapdragon 855. Even i can feel the difference how fast the battery draining are on the s24+ compared to my old phone. thanks for making such a detailed and controlled testing for us. at first i thought because of many samsung services that are running in the background, but this shows its not about that.
heyy, im using k20 pro and was waiting for s24 that it'll come with sd 8 gen 3 and bananagate issue free, but samsung did legendary move by bringing exynos. I thought I'll wait for some time before making any purchase and now it seems I'll go with oneplus 12 lol!
855 is way more inferior compared to both SD G2 and G3. Exynos is bad, but it is still way better than a 6 year old chip (Performance: Somewhere middle betw. SDG2 and SDG3, Efficiency: About the level of SDG2). The phone usually takes some time to get usage patterns. That'll be the reason.
@@casuarius6576 Yes, that's why I said the efficiency is similar to SDG2, not SDG3. There is a video from this channel comparing S23 and S24 Exynos Varient, which shows only like a 1/4 hour difference in battery life, which isn't really a thing.
Omg... I did the same. Reformed my mi9tpro for s24+ (exynos). Overall, I'm happy for the upgrade. SD would be great but heyoooo. Got a good deal with my ISP. 850 euros for s24+ (512g of space)
This is the test that everyone who isn't in the U.S. wanted. It's the reason why I haven't purchased another Samsung. S24 is $799 in U.S. whereas its £799 in U.K. U.S. get 6-7% more performance in most features like compute power and efficiency when compared to the U.K. No one complains, people are still buying the exynos phones, Samsung won't be stopped. Most big phone reviewers are U.S. so have little interest in global affairs.
The quoted price in US doesn't include sales tax, in the UK the VAT is factored into the price. The price difference between USD and GBP is often similar to the VAT tax rates in the UK. Although sales tax in the US is often cheaper than VAT in the Uk. ( Vat is 20%, in the US sales tax vary between 0% and 16%) £799 - 20% VAT (£159.80) = £639.20 £639.20 in USD is currently worth $809.04, which is only ten dollars and four cents more than the US price (before sales tax).
Excellent video, but the two things I missed was showing screen on time and screen off time at the end of the test and also depleting Snapdragon version until 0% doing basic tasks and showing how much longer it would survive. Still a great video and thank you for making the comparison
Man, I hate how Samsung makes smartphones with different specs and markets them with the exact same name. It's something extremely misleading and fishy that's been happening for years.
Thanks for the test but this is just sad tbh. Was hoping Samsung would finally stop using Exynos or get in on par with snapdragon. This is borderline scammy, I will trade in my S24+ next year if I am not satisfied with battery runtime after a year.
@@zazel9698 I have preordered two weeks ago and the s24+ still has to arrive. Had to return a S24 Ultra before because it was way to bulky for me. I probably wont be dissapointed because I dont game on my phone, just some youtube, photography and whatsapp. The battery life doesnt seem terrible from the previous video with the s23, but just worse than the SD version. I just feel letdown by Samsug for releasing a inferior version at the same price again and it annoys me as a tech nerd... I can tell you if the battery life is compared to my 3 year old S21Ultra when the phone arrives but I doubt this will be to helpfull for you.
@@zazel9698 sadly my preorder hasnt arrived yet. I doubt I will have problems in everyday use (I dont game) but I am just mad as a eu customer to get a inferior product. All around the battery life will not be terrible but worse than the S24+ SD. I keep you updated.
One thing maybe worth mentioning when talking about temperature. Just as how black absorbs heat better, it also dissipates it better. Both chips are bound to have different cooling's inside unless the chip dimensions are exactly the same too.
Black vs white heat absorbtion only matters when you're talking about heating via direct sunlight or other high intenstive light source. The black surface simply reflects less of the energy, thus absorbing more and heating up more. This makes zero difference in a room or on a regular cloudy day, not to mention night, as the heating up process is caused by the internals, not outside factors.
I'm talking about releasing heat not absorbing/reflecting it. Like there has to be a reason why radiators are almost never white, instead silver (unpainted) or black. But I'm no mechanical engineer.@@LooneyTo0n
Obrigado por provar que o exynos continua muito ruim em autonomia de bateria e temperatura, eu usei um S20 com exynos por 2 anos e atualizações nunca resolveram os problemas de aquecimento e bateria. Samsung tem muito o que trabalhar.
Two options 1st: Either Samsung needs to up the game and get up to the same level as Snapdragon. 2nd: Samsung should sell the exynos variant at at least 100$ cheaper.
Wow. Perfect timing with this video Man. Upgrading to s24+ from s22 regular and after the exynos horror of my current phone i was sceptic to ho for it again but reorder deal was sweet. Had it on my desk for 8 days struggling if i should return it or not waiting for a review you just did. Opened it today and thought Wow its beautiful and feels perfect in my hand - im keeping it! But you just made me pack it back in - returning tomorrow 🙈 Exynos is a joke. Great content 👏
If you got a good deal, keep it! Especially as you got an s24+, of which even the Exynos version has more than enough battery for even heavy days. The difference between These two processors is barely noticeable in daily usage, probably only in the standby drain and in scenarios where you navigate while driving. Noone should decide whether to keep a Phone or not by looking at its battery consumption and heat development in benchmark and heavy gaming scenarios.
@@hagan3050 its not only battery life rhat i could probably do with considering the massive bump from s22. Unfortunately runnong hot in hot weather is something that was really bad on s22 exynos, and this test shows that ots stil la problem along with freezing image quality etc. Same story with the exynos sadly
Temperature and battery life are literaly 2 main things deciding life/logetivity of your phone. I still rock my s7 and if my battery wasn't garbage at this point I would not bother upgrading. Exynos is known to be even worse after a year or 2. Take your useless opinion and keep it.. @@hagan3050
idk why but I saw a lot of comparisons where Exynos won everytime in that GPU benchmark. so IDK why yours is so lacking. Was the exact same test/ app. Weird.. Still sad :(
It could be multiple factors, such as brightness level, temperature of the room, connection to 5G, settings of the phone, RAM usage, and even the quality of chipsets sometimes vary. I also noticed other RUclipsrs get better score in some tests, but I also noticed sometimes they get worse ones. I made sure to run the benchmarks multiple times before shooting the video and the results were similar.
No its because people run those tests on wifi. On 5G exynos will suck as it has a terrible modem. This is a better represantation of real world usage, because the most drain will happen when you are outside anyways.
i had high hopes for exynos this year but yh... a 17% battery diffirence is just unacceptable! its perofrmance is actually fine but they better solve that heating and battery issue
They should sell the Exynos version as S24 FE (Failure edition).
LOL
😂😂
That Exynos 2400 is really good like it keeps up with the SD 8 Gen 3
🤣🤣
It's not that bad but the battery, it does drain slightly faster than its counter part.
The only crime here is samsung sell it at the same price as SD.
Funny how big RUclipsrs avoid doing these comparisons... Cheers mate for your hard work
Probably they don't want to lie and at the same time they want to keep getting money from samsung,
Same!
true, everyone is avoiding to some degree these comparisons
yeah i noticed that, their trying to tell us Exynos is up there but clearly its slower, runs hotter and uses more battery.
Because they're from NA, they don't care
Good comparison, if it is 15-20% performance difference and 17% battery difference, Samsung should sell the Exynos version at least 15% cheaper in Europe.
every phone is more expensive in Europe
You don’t have to buy Samsung if you don’t like its performance. Isn’t that simple?
@@daiquirigamer2089it's not that easy, Samsung phones are still the best in every other aspect. It's just annoying. BTW I have the exynos s24 and it's flawless, except that I know that I would get 17% more battery for the same amount of money if I lived in North America
@udvarhelyibalint I can believe that. Seems like you're happy with your S24 which I'm glad for
@@Moyaiville_Productions Tbf, I don’t have S24 right now, but I had S22U with Exynos 2200, which was the most hated Exynos amongst youtubers. As a regular user I never had issues with it. It was capable of doing photo, video, smooth gaming (except pubg stucked at 30fps, yes) and it never gets hot, so no extra suffer to battery. I was pretty happy with it.
And if I have to choose between buying some Chinese phone like RedMagic 9 pro with SD8g3 that has buggy UI (with no updates whatsoever, except maby security patches lol), poor camera with no telephoto lens, no spen. (Just raw Snapgradon 8 gen 3 performance) and S24 with Exynos, I’d get S24
Now I have notice it, in amazon, Samsung will mention in the description if the device is snapdragon, they will hide the "CPU" if it is exynos
Yes bro.. but they also not show which snapdragon they have put in overpriced phones of A , M, F series
absolutely. So scummy
Exactly. In my country, they don't mention chipset at all. Keep focusing on cameras, AI, screen etc. those not knowing the difference in chipset will not know.. poor exynos no matter how good it is, it is always inferior. Dumb Samsung as always, that's why people had a bad impression on Android or Samsung because of Exynos, it's their own fault for this.
In Eu 🇪🇺 the same...
They mentocta core
I always wandered why my samsung phone was so terrible and youtubers always said they're great! This is very helpful!
So in Europe, they are charging us more for a phone that is worse than the US variant. They market it as the same phone, but its worse in nearly all aspects, making it a totally different experience and thus a totally different phone. How is there no lawsuit against samsung yet?
Same question from my side also
At least you guys get unlocked bootloaders :/
Don't worry, after the first forced OTA update, the SD version will be crippled and lagging behind the Exynos version.
Is there anywhere you can read up on that?@@operator8014
as much as I hate this, why should there be a lawsuit? It literally is a different market.
This might be the first and is most likely the most comprehensive true comparison of Exynos and SD3 so far. Great video!
I've been looking for a video like this for ages. Thanks
Well in gaming and high performance exynos craps iver crapdargon as many have said exynos 2400 is better
Not the first. Better videos out their.
@@Mike.Tech. me too
It doesn't @@lggr2261
It's an entirely different phone at this point. Disgraceful how governments cracked down on Apple for using a lightning port because it was against competition, but Samsung can market two different phones with the same name.
Because they sold in different area. It's that simple
It's not because of competition. They had to change the lightning port because it was outdated, it was inconvenient for customers, and it was causing more e-waste to pile up.
😢
Watched, liked, subbed😎
Would you recommend OnePlus 12 other than S24 Ultra Snapdragon?
Cheers 😎
@@julianfuryentertainment yes, you will support the company which listens to fans. OnePlus is snappier(it is a deal breaker for me), haptics and display is better. Speakers are louder on Samsung, sound is the same quality. Samsung is wider because the aspect ratio is 19,5:9. OnePlus has 20:9, it is on you if you wanna have more content visible or thinner. If you use a stylus and you are used, you would go for Samsung. If you make photos which you print, you would go for Samsung too. OnePlus cameras are flagship quality too. Wide angle camera and 3-4x zoom is better on OnePlus. Samsung has a better main camera and telephoto 5x and more x zoom.
Samsung did a big mistake when they launched the S24 with Exynos in all markets except USA. If it had Snapdragon I would have bought it ASAP
We know Exynos has improved but is not yet at the level of the Snapdragon variant. Ideally Samsung should sell these underperforming phones at least a little bit cheaper than the Snapdragon.
Reviewers avoid these type of comparisons and they always try to highlight the improvements of the Exynos chip, when clearly side by side comparisons show otherwise.
Great video!
It's possible that some RUclipsrs don't dare to compare the Exynos and Snapdragon versions, because some RUclipsrs endorse Samsung. If they do that, they're afraid RUclipsrs won't be able to get endorsements from Samsung in the future. this is just my thought
How did it improve ? The gap is much bigger than the last years. It did not improve at all ? What are you talking about
Bro being very based doing things no one would have the guts to do because Samsung would be mad at them.
I was just telling my friend over phone that I will never get any sponsorship on my channel after this test lol
@@techmo2020 You earned a new subscriber today. Your work wouldn't go unnoticed. I wish the best for your channel going forward.
You will get sponsorship, the day Exynos performs better. But no one knows when that day will come.
@@techmo2020u just earned a sub.. keep up with the work
wrong, if you build stronger trust you become even more valuable to brands imo, you just won't get sponsored with scam products @@techmo2020
Thanks for the ultimate comparion, snapdragon is clearly the winner and I bet after using both phones for 2-3 years this gap get alot larger!
exynos modems usually fail after 2-3 years actually 😂
but hey, you get 7 years of support for a turd
@@alexandruciordas4941 Still using Exynos S8.
Though chipset's standby efficiency is craptacular.
Unless I disable 4G network it hogs 1% per hour doing literally nothing, but maintaining standby network connectivity.
And even halved power hogging with 4G disabled in't that good considering previous Snapdragon based Xperia Z3 Compact with smaller battery did lot better with 4G enabled.
@@tuunaes my a8 2018 exynos modem failed after 4 years, my brother's s8 failed after 3 years and my brother's s21 ultra failed after 2 years, can't be a coincidence bro...
@@alexandruciordas4941lol
Bro, you really did make an honest comparison... Cheers!
Keep up the good work
Enjoyed your video and found it very interesting. I remember seeing the difference first-hand when my cousin came to visit from Bosnia. We both had the S22 Ultra, but the picture quality and battery life on hers was noticeably worse.
Bosnia mentioned🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥. Greetings from Bosnia👋
Great content , this is my first video and subscribed. Respect from Kenya.
You have internet in Kenya? 😮
@@miiroxp they probably get Snapdragon S24 instead of EU lol
I went on the canadian samsung website, the S24+ is on sale at 1400$. There's currently an offer where you can get 250$ off + a free samsung phonecase. Final price = 1150$ (=792€).
On the french samsung website the S24+ is on sale at 1170€, there's no offer nor gifts. Final price = 1170€.
So in France we get a phone 380€ more expensive that doesn't perform as well. I'm definitely not buying this.
Thank you for the video
I'm Canadian, and if you convert 1150$ US to CAD, it's 1700$. I feel like it's easier for US and Europe to get this phone, compared to us. That's nearly 2000$ if you add the taxes and everything with it
@@redsim017 the prices I gave are in CAD not USD
@@DoIwannaKnowIf yea you right, my fault. So dang that's crazy unfair
But based on my research, it's only Canada, USA, China and maybe Japan who has the Snapdragon variant. The rest of the world has the Exynos. Samsung engineers does this move to "optimize phone performance with the market it's sold in"
@@redsim017 In any case it's unfair that we get a more expensive phone that's less performant. It's even worst when you know that the exynos cost them twice less than the snapdragon. They should be cheaper just for this reason alone
Great test. Shocking result.
Ordered the ultra. Wasnt keen on the heft but will take that over poor battery any day or the week.
I'm shocked shocked....well not that shocked
Its as expected some reviewers just tried to convince us otherwise.
@@serrael-182 every damn time is the same😂😂
@@alecsander4352 Yes it is.
Some always say we have to wait for tests and maybe its not so bad but every time it is.
I am not a mobile gamer but damn that 9 C° difference is scary. It shows how much inefficient Exynos is compared to SD. I was very close to buying the Exynos but now i think i won't. Even though my usage will be normal (youtube, twitter, reddit, browsing, 5g, Bluetooth, reading, listening, shopping), still i think the phone will degrade in the long run and i am planning on using this phone for 5 years as i always do.
Me too bro.. i will go for s23
@@blahblah1339 Even when not gaming or doing CPU/GPU/Modem intense tasks, the battery drain is horrible. I'm pissed at Scamsung for not improving the Exynos modem...
@@JustAnotherYou2berthis blahblah guy is a bot it seems. His only comments are all on the similar videos and all of them yap something about a "defective unit".
@@mediumplayer1 That bot was probably set by Samsung to defend their crappy Exynos chips... 😂
@@JustAnotherYou2berbecause it takes atleast 5-6 years and even 10 years to get competitive in chip making industry. There would have been no amd today if everyone was like you.
Glad I this popped up on my feed and I watched it all the way to the end before buying my S24. thanks a lot for the review Techmo.
Buy the s23 the 8 gen 2 chip is almost as fast as the exynos 2400 and way more efficient.
Performance gains aren't that important anymore anyway, power efficiency is king and the Snapdragon chips have always been better for that.
@@RJAthere's something called a charger. Now woth chargers everywhere even on cars, battery life is secondary.
@@ziiiic if you plan on keeping a phone for 4+ years then it's important. I kept my S20 for 5 years and the battery life was the only reason I got rid of it
@@RJA if the software sticks to 4+ years then rhe hardware won't. Else how dp you think these manufacturers will make money??
I have snapdragon version (for about a month) and have yet to experience a single issue no stutter, no overheat and excellent battery life. Couldn't be happier with it!
If you have anything in mind you wanna test, let me know so I do it for you ;)
Do S23 plus SD and S24 plus ex
S24 plus snapdragon vs S24 plus exnyos.
my simple question is these are all extreme tests done to know the 100% potential of the phone but for daily use and and an average user will it matter a lot? I know SD version is best but if at all its not avl then is exy 2400 not good enough for a simple premium phone which may last 7 years
@@syednizam6984 The exynos version will be perfectly fine with most every day tasks and apps, it's just that at its peak power it's not as efficient as the snapdragon version,but does that even matter?No, not really, not for most people
You are just amazing thanks ❤
Broh i have seen lota tests between snapdragon and exynos, but this was the best one, performance of the new 2400 is better than the past exynos for sure but heating issues, optimization issues, camera issues and battery issues are still here. Keep up the good work
Exynos heats less and battery with sim is better in exynos most of these unrealstic test never show real battery life eg in these test iphone 15 pro max beats s24 ultra but in real use s24 ultra beats iphone by good 50 to 60 min
@@lggr2261 Bro Exynos burns faster hence battery also drains quicker. It's never been proven that Exynos is better at anything compared to any Snapdragon. They really needed to stop producing this crappy SoC brand because no apps are going to optimize Exynos' performance. Even the new chipsets like the Tenzor and Unisoc outperformed Exynoses at specific classes. Like the Exynos 850 to the Unisoc T606 Tiger. Or the Dimensity 1080 to the Exynos 1330/1380. They offer the sameBro Exynos burns faster hence battery also drains quicker. It's never been proven that Exynos is better at anything compared to any Snapdragon. They really needed to stop producing this crappy SoC brand because no apps were going to optimize Exynos' performance. Even the new chipsets like Tenzor and Unisoc outperformed Exynoses at specific classes. Like the Exynos 850 to the Unisoc T606 Tiger. Or the Dimensity 1080 to the Exynos 1330. Even a lower class Helio G99/Dimensity 700/Dimensity 920 can outperform the higher class and newer Exynos 1280 SoC by a certain margin. They offer the same architecture and kinds of CPU but guess what, the non Exynos would always perform better in short term use nor even long term. I'm just scared if Samsung drops their crappy Exynos chipsets to their lower class models I would never buy their phones again. architecture and kinds of CPU but guess what, the non Exynos would always perform better in short term use nor even long term. I'm just scared if Samsung drops their crappy Exynos chipsets to their lower class models I would never buy their phones again.
They are getting better but still not that great for it's price
@lggr2261 exynos heat up more broh...i also have a exynos S21, it's the worst phone i ever bought. This year it was pretty good but it's still have optimization issues, and if Samsung give this for less price than the snapdragon then i can recommend it.
@@monkeyglory2905 2100 heats less than 888 which was crapdragon of that genration
The fact that a flagship frooze 🥶
anotha sexynos classic! ⚡
Samsung charges the same for the exynos variants. The audacity.
Was looking everywhere for this kind of compare test, none of the big tech youtubers made it, now it makes sense why.
awesome content, made my decision easy not to go with the Exynos in my region and look for something else.
Samsung should really be ashamed of releasing such product with this kind of performance and battery differences while keeping the same price. Unbelivable.
At last. I am seeing someone saying that Exynos gets hotter while gaming and running benchmark. Which I had also noticed during my testing and review. If you take the scores out of the picture, even S23 was performing better during my gaming and benchmark tests when it comes to battery and thermal management. Thanks for the comparison video man 👍
hello would you recomend s23 over s24 exynos?
@xstatic6134 If you wana play games for a longer duration, then go with S23, and it costs less. For everything else, S24 is pretty good. After a couple of updates, the battery life now is almost similar on both devices.
@@ArunNadig_Tech-Videos how big is the difference in battery duration?
@xstatic6134 Now its almost similar but again depends on how you use it. In my usage, socialmedia apps consumes slightly lesser power on S24. Web browsing almost similar, camera and gaming S23 uses slightly lesser battery.
@@ArunNadig_Tech-Videos thank you so much really appreciate the help
What a great non biased opinion, it would be great if you can compare s23 sd vs s24 Exynos for global market.
It’s already there on his channel
The truth finally ! This is how it should be done an actual thermal and efficiency test. I got s23 blindly for peace of mind and I'm from India so you know how hot Exynos will be in summers
Done the exact same !
I wouldn't advise anyone to upgrade their S23 for a Exynos S24
@@Mike.Tech. ofc no reason to
At this point it would be downgrade from S23 to S24.
@@tomo100brt exactly what i did my s24+ is garbage... user experience is worse then a54 lmfao
So basically, the Exynos 2400 is an SD gen 2 in performance, but lots of heat, bugs, and poor battery efficiency. Well played Samsung.
Finally, a clear and sincere comparison between Exynos and Snapdragon. Thanks, like and subscribe 😊
To anyone who thinks that applications will be soon "optimized" for Exynos - guys, stop this nonsense. No one will be spending time and putting extra effort just to make application performing a little bit better on crappy Exynos. And even if some software updates will target poor Exynos efficiency, the difference will not big enough to even repeat such test we see here. Moh - great job!
Bruh fr
They can't even bother fixing their photo processing algorithm yet some believe they'd put effort into tailoring everything for the Exynos variant 💀
이새끼 한국인이네 ㅋㅋㅋ
Samsung should stop manufacturing Exynos processors. They have failed to make good processors.
On top of that they are making shitty tensor for pixels
Exynos is not the problem, the problem here is that Samsung is marketing the Exynos as a flagship level chip and selling it at flagship level price, when in actuality Exynos are just above mid range performance
Same with Google's Tensor chips
@@abhrajitpaul2744nah even midrange Android phones like oneplus and redmi perform better than exynos because it has Snapdragon
@@tawsikabdullahso tensor is manufactured by samsung,that is why it is so shit
gps location of exynos is not accurate as snapdragon.. exynos is like made of china
Thanks for this. Finally a good, rigurous comparison.
One of the weakest points of Exynos is the battery consumption of the modem. The other S24 Exynos vs Snapdragon comparisons that I've seen use wifi, which shows they don't know what they are doing.
Mate absolutely bang on! That's what I have been saying all along, on wi-fi Exynos ain't that bad but surely more likely you'll have a power socket for a quick top-up when you are in such a set-up. What matters is when you are out on the move on cellular, then every single percent of battery matters. Glad I didn't go with the Exynos variant. Will stick to my S23 and wait until it's made available or a cheaper way to get Snapdragon variant from US/CA down the line. Qualcomm rules the modem game.
Are you guys accounting for the fact that either version might not support all available cellular frequencies in some regions and may therefore be fighting an uphill battle?
Thanks for video. I was going to buy S24 (altought plus version) and my only concern was Exynos. Well, im going to stay with beloved S20 FE Snapdragon version for next year :)
Ditch Samsung. Get better performance for less witj ither android phones
Me too I have s 20 fe and I want to change my phone
S23 has only Snapdragon
@@egonxm other androids have worst updates
Yeah, if you want something new, s23 is probably your best bet, samsungs tried Snapdragon world wide and went back to exynos, I don't see that they'll stop subsidizing US phones with EU money anytime soon
11:44 That's right. Even on their website, they don't mention that their flagship is running on Exynos, but they wrote it boldly when their phone has snapdragon chipset, even in a midrange (m55 - Sanpdragon 7 gen 1). You're right. How can we put our money on a phone that runs on a worse chipset but cost 3 to 4 times the salary of an average person in a developing country?! It is really discouraging that Samsung is discriminating its customers
Le problème c'est leur manque de transparence sur la technologie utilisée de leurs composants tels que la technologie de la RAM, du stockage ou encore le SoC, surtout sur les milieux de gammes, et je comprends pas comment ils se mangent pas de procès sur ça, je comprendrais jamais, alors que chez OnePlus ou Apple, la fiche technique est plus transparente car oui même quand il y a un SDG 8gen3 la fiche technique marque "octa-core".
I've been waiting for this video! Great comparison 👏
*With friends like that you don't need anything else in life*... Such a beautiful heart warming statement!!!
Wonderful job! Everyone was expecting this outcome. if the performance+battery durability was similar, samsung would definitely show it.
böylesine tarafsız bir video yaptığınız için teşekkür ederim. Benim ülkemde yani TÜRKİYE'de tüm forum sayfalarında sizin videonuz dolaşıyor. Abone oldum. Bundan sonra tarafsız yayın yapmaya devam ettiğiniz müddetçe takip edeceğim.
Thanks brother much needed comparison 🙏
Amazing work, I've been searching for a video like this for months. Thanks Techmo
You are a legend!! Additionally putting all the effort of even importing a phone just wow. The results are shocking! Have you checked Phonearena and gsmarena, their tests and results of the s24+ exynos against the 24 Ultra? According to their results, the S24+ exynos lasts longer than the Ultra in general (but they do not run benchmarks that drain that much power).
If Samsung ever decides to go exclusive with Exynos in the future, they better work on all these issues or I will stop buying Samsung phones and consider Oneplus or Sony, since I'm in the US market with limited Android choices.
O exynos está há vários anos e nunca melhoram simplesmente porque a samsung não sabe fazer chip tao bem quanto a snapdragon. É uma ilusão achar que os proximos mais uma vez serão melhores. Exynos existem há anos e todos possuem sempre os mesmos problemas.
@silvitooo Read your response from Google Translate. I think it's their fabrication that is not as good as TSMC. Apart from that their modems are not as good as Qualcomm's, so you'll never get as good signals and efficiency on 5G and wifi.
Der Exynos im S24 ist kein Problem.Im alltag ist der super.Ihr mit euren blöden Benchmark Videos lasst euch beeinflussen
@@Marlon_J Correct. The only years were Exynos has been "good" were the ones when Qualcomm's flagship SoC was also made by Samsung instead of TSMC, and since both were bad, Exynos didn't stand out as the worst one
@@crocop2190still though, don't think people have the right to voice their concerns when they pay the same amount of money just to get something worse? This is a scam. Samsung should either price exynos phones lower or make them actually competitive.
Great video my iranian brother (guessing by your accent ;) )
That was great comparison. Answered lot of questions. Love from India 💛🇮🇳
The other factor is Exynos being manufactured on Samsung's node which probably has worse yield than TSMC, may introduce more variances in the chip performance i.e. silicon lottery.
Absolutely, I noticed I get different benchmark results on S24+ vs S24. I forgot to mention the silicon lottery :)
it means samsung bins inferior chips as good chips on purpose... But again the main culprit is the modem.
@@alexandruciordas4941 Samsung 4nm is known to be worse than TSMC 4nm. That's why Snapdragon went back to TSMC
@@Skyhanger I know
@@SkyhangerYup. TSMC is basically unparalleled at this point. I want Samsung to get better so we have competition but it seems hopeless
Waiting for someone to compare SD and Exynos, you are the Man 👏
Thanks for making this video 😊❤
I expected this video since the launch. Thank you!
I was always so bothered by Samsung Exynos chipset, and when I finally upgraded to the Samsung S23, I'm actually happy that they went Snapdragon across the board internationally with the S23 line, but went back to their old habits with Samsung S24/+ model...
This is why apple keeps winning.
Samsung providing their good snapdragon equipped phones in countries where it's considered socially unacceptable to own an Android.
Whereas in areas where the public are free to choose between iPhone and Android are the areas which get the models that have bogus issues.
Samsung is leaving absolutely zero reason for people to choose Androids over iPhone in the EU region.
At this point buying a OnePlus 12 or a nothing phone 2 is a significantly cheaper and better option than splurging on bogus Exynos equipped Samsung's.
S23 snapdragon vs S24 snapdragon battery test please, i really wanna see if that extra 100mah and newer processor makes battery life any better
@@blahblah1339 every other test I've seen was also done on wifi only, avoiding the bad exynos mobile modem. pushing the narrative of this phone having "great battery life". Which it clearly does not have, unless you stay on wifi the entire day.
wifi 모드로 테스트해봤으면 어땠을까 하는 생각이 든다. 통신 모뎀칩의 문제는 아니었을까 하는 의심이 들기 때문이다. 물론 그렇다고 하더라도 스냅드래곤이 엑시노스보다 나은 것은 변하지 않겠지만. 여러 리뷰어들의 영상을 찾아보고 있는데, 이처럼 두 ap의 극적인 차이는 처음 본다. 귀한 컨텐츠를 제공해주어 감사하다.
"its the cellular's fault bro, you would get better results if you turned on wifi bro, your results are way different than other youtubers bro" this is literally samsung on damage control
And now for the ultimate test do a S23 vs S24 Snapdragon!
I mean s23 would destroy s24 exynos but against s24 snapdragon would be a close call I'd say...
@@myolgiden no, there is already a test and of course S24 exynos beats s23 in benchmarks, but S23 still manages to have better battery life, which is crazy given it has a smaller battery and a 1 generation older chip
It's wrong... I did the test: S24 Exynos win S23 for little bit... 5%... You can confirm this in GSMARENA. @@_Digitalguy
@@_Digitalguyand it's also probably more consistent
Thé exynos 2400 kill the 8gen2 ...@@myolgiden
you do a very good and useful detail filled review with actual real world related tests. very rare to find this type of review. very helpful.
Great video. Using Exynos for 2 weeks. No issues till now. But seeing this video, I feel like confused. 😂😂
It's a good phone, just lags behind a better one
As I was finally getting allong with my Exynos phone, you just destroyed this new trust...
😂 I feel sorry for ya but it is what it is!
Similarly, I don't look at it the same way anymore.
Who in their right mind would choose an Exynos? Did you not see the beautiful performance of Exynos for the past 7 years.
@@tullo5564 You might not be aware, but Samsung fid not let us the choice.
😂😂😂
Great 1 to 1 comparison.👍
Great Test, thanks man. It's exactly as I suspected, Exycrap is yet again greatly inferior. Unbelievable how buggy the Exynos S24 is.
Thank you for the detailed comparison!
Thank you. All facts, no bias. Its annoying that a lot of people doesnt do this
good job Techmo. I bought S22 based on youtubers reviews stating the battery may be not the best but still OK. This made me to ignore some alarming customer reviews in the net. In practice S22 (Exynos) battery live is pretty poor. I compare it with S23 (snapdragon). Though I know this is not quite fair as S23 is newer technology and in my case 7 months newer device, there is no contest between two in battery life. Screen on time 9h vs short of 6h, screen off 65h vs 27h. I'm not a gamer so I assumed heat dissipation test is not important for me. Until I got into a car in sunny day with my nav and MS Teams on simultaneously. S22 overheated, dimmed screen and eventually shut down. I would be very, very cautious with exynos again, even if reviews are positive. so they were for S22.
Well said, what people don't notice is GPU unit is also busy processing videos, AI tasks, and lots of other graphics on your phone, also image processing. It's not only about gaming, but gaming highlights the weaknesses of a GPU better.
We knew the result. But still this is the best Exynos so far. If they improve it in future then it will be a better stuff to competition the snapdragon.
And i can see this Exynos will be so closer to snapdragon 8 gen 2. I request you to do the same test against s23. That will be fun to watch.
Hey man, here you go
ruclips.net/video/gKs6M6HlfRg/видео.htmlsi=DgVSsev6d-fMkgbm
@@techmo2020 faster than lightening 😂
the main problem is the modem, if you're only on mobile data 4g/5g you'll probably get 3 more sot hours on snapdragon...
Exynos Done better this year
This exynos is actually faster than the snapdragon 8 gen 2...
Thanks for this detailed comparison, this make me understand better the differences, Snapdragon should still be the first choice then Mediatek when buying an Android phone. I hope this video will be reached more and your channel will have more subscribers.
@@casuarius6576mediatek processer are always better than Exynos and even sometimes better than snapdragon
@@casuarius6576no current mediatek chipsets are really good
Great vid dude.
Can you tell what bands (5G) where used during your test... 5G consumes a lot more battery if connection strength is poor. Thanks.
Surprise: With Exynos, the connection strength aka reception is generally worse when compared to Snapdragon. Alas, the inferior Exynos modem results in a worse battery life.
The definitive comparison we have all been waiting for. Disappointing result for those that own the global version. The gap was more substantial than we initially thought. Samsung is so too big to fail now they can pull a move like this and still get away with it sadly. One can only hope their 'day one' software update gets released soon so we can closen the gap.
Thank you for the test sir I think everyone got their answer now :)
I've bought the S24+ exynos for replacing my 4 year plus Mi 9T Pro (Redmi K20 Pro) which uses snapdragon 855. Even i can feel the difference how fast the battery draining are on the s24+ compared to my old phone. thanks for making such a detailed and controlled testing for us. at first i thought because of many samsung services that are running in the background, but this shows its not about that.
heyy, im using k20 pro and was waiting for s24 that it'll come with sd 8 gen 3 and bananagate issue free, but samsung did legendary move by bringing exynos. I thought I'll wait for some time before making any purchase and now it seems I'll go with oneplus 12 lol!
Give the phone sometime it will get used to the usage patterns and improve battery
855 is way more inferior compared to both SD G2 and G3. Exynos is bad, but it is still way better than a 6 year old chip (Performance: Somewhere middle betw. SDG2 and SDG3, Efficiency: About the level of SDG2).
The phone usually takes some time to get usage patterns. That'll be the reason.
@@casuarius6576 Yes, that's why I said the efficiency is similar to SDG2, not SDG3. There is a video from this channel comparing S23 and S24 Exynos Varient, which shows only like a 1/4 hour difference in battery life, which isn't really a thing.
Omg... I did the same. Reformed my mi9tpro for s24+ (exynos). Overall, I'm happy for the upgrade. SD would be great but heyoooo. Got a good deal with my ISP. 850 euros for s24+ (512g of space)
This is the test that everyone who isn't in the U.S. wanted. It's the reason why I haven't purchased another Samsung. S24 is $799 in U.S. whereas its £799 in U.K.
U.S. get 6-7% more performance in most features like compute power and efficiency when compared to the U.K.
No one complains, people are still buying the exynos phones, Samsung won't be stopped. Most big phone reviewers are U.S. so have little interest in global affairs.
The quoted price in US doesn't include sales tax, in the UK the VAT is factored into the price.
The price difference between USD and GBP is often similar to the VAT tax rates in the UK. Although sales tax in the US is often cheaper than VAT in the Uk. ( Vat is 20%, in the US sales tax vary between 0% and 16%)
£799 - 20% VAT (£159.80) = £639.20
£639.20 in USD is currently worth $809.04, which is only ten dollars and four cents more than the US price (before sales tax).
Very good technical review you helped me to conclude my decision to go for S23plus instead of S24..♥️👍👌🙏Thanks a lot
I forgot the most important thing , idle battery drain can you please review that too
Thank you very much for your effort
First comparison on RUclips..others are just comparing it with ultra, cheers❤❤🎉
I almost bought that phone (in Europe). I am glad I have seen this video. Thanks!
why must exynos???
Excellent video, but the two things I missed was showing screen on time and screen off time at the end of the test and also depleting Snapdragon version until 0% doing basic tasks and showing how much longer it would survive. Still a great video and thank you for making the comparison
very nice test, thank you sir!
would have been nice to show the battery statistics, like screen on time and stuff at the end of the test.
Great suggestion!
Watching from s24 exynos i have 1,5 Day battery life from 100 to 0% with 7 h SOT. It's enough for me.
Can you keep a eye on heating too?
@@ruzhanshaik8436 yes, I have no problem with heating .Samsung works very good this time on cooling system.
7 sot isnt good for 2024
@@catto3924 go for ultra. I am getting 7.30h sot. I am happy too. My only concern is heating.
@@ruzhanshaik8436 no problem with heating, Samsung work good this time on cooling system
That's a much needed comparison!
I really wanted to get the S24 until I heard it gets Exynos in EU... Thank you for confirming y what I suspected...
Man, I hate how Samsung makes smartphones with different specs and markets them with the exact same name. It's something extremely misleading and fishy that's been happening for years.
I’ve been pissed off by this for a decade and then I bought an iPhone. Now I got my dzen
@@casuarius6576 try what?
Im from Brazil, they are selling With exynos, i preffer buy the s23 with snapdragon than s24
Thanks for the test but this is just sad tbh. Was hoping Samsung would finally stop using Exynos or get in on par with snapdragon. This is borderline scammy, I will trade in my S24+ next year if I am not satisfied with battery runtime after a year.
How's the battery going now with your s24+? Are you satisfied at all with its performance or are you disappointed about something?
I was wondering to buy an s24+, so your feedback would be very helpful for me
@@zazel9698 I am wondering too
@@zazel9698 I have preordered two weeks ago and the s24+ still has to arrive. Had to return a S24 Ultra before because it was way to bulky for me.
I probably wont be dissapointed because I dont game on my phone, just some youtube, photography and whatsapp. The battery life doesnt seem terrible from the previous video with the s23, but just worse than the SD version.
I just feel letdown by Samsug for releasing a inferior version at the same price again and it annoys me as a tech nerd...
I can tell you if the battery life is compared to my 3 year old S21Ultra when the phone arrives but I doubt this will be to helpfull for you.
@@zazel9698 sadly my preorder hasnt arrived yet. I doubt I will have problems in everyday use (I dont game) but I am just mad as a eu customer to get a inferior product.
All around the battery life will not be terrible but worse than the S24+ SD.
I keep you updated.
Hello, I am waiting for a comparison of S24 plus Exynos 2400 and S24 plus Gen 3 versions, thank you in advance.
Great job. Thank you for your work. Looking at the results these are two different phones basically.
Finally!!! A true informative comparison
In saying that, it's an absolute let down. Considering I can only get the global variant. I honestly didn't think it would be this bad.
I have been using S24 Exynos variant for almost 2 weeks now. This time its much much better than previous Exynos. Hot issues are gone
One thing maybe worth mentioning when talking about temperature. Just as how black absorbs heat better, it also dissipates it better.
Both chips are bound to have different cooling's inside unless the chip dimensions are exactly the same too.
Black vs white heat absorbtion only matters when you're talking about heating via direct sunlight or other high intenstive light source. The black surface simply reflects less of the energy, thus absorbing more and heating up more. This makes zero difference in a room or on a regular cloudy day, not to mention night, as the heating up process is caused by the internals, not outside factors.
I'm talking about releasing heat not absorbing/reflecting it. Like there has to be a reason why radiators are almost never white, instead silver (unpainted) or black.
But I'm no mechanical engineer.@@LooneyTo0n
Amazing video, good work 👏
THANKS FOR THE REVIEW !!
Obrigado por provar que o exynos continua muito ruim em autonomia de bateria e temperatura, eu usei um S20 com exynos por 2 anos e atualizações nunca resolveram os problemas de aquecimento e bateria. Samsung tem muito o que trabalhar.
Realmente.
Two options
1st: Either Samsung needs to up the game and get up to the same level as Snapdragon.
2nd: Samsung should sell the exynos variant at at least 100$ cheaper.
It's unfair to put them as the same price
Xperia as your daily driver? You got a good taste, mate!
Thank you for honesty, you got yourself a subscriber
Wow. Perfect timing with this video Man. Upgrading to s24+ from s22 regular and after the exynos horror of my current phone i was sceptic to ho for it again but reorder deal was sweet.
Had it on my desk for 8 days struggling if i should return it or not waiting for a review you just did. Opened it today and thought Wow its beautiful and feels perfect in my hand - im keeping it! But you just made me pack it back in - returning tomorrow 🙈 Exynos is a joke.
Great content 👏
If you got a good deal, keep it! Especially as you got an s24+, of which even the Exynos version has more than enough battery for even heavy days. The difference between These two processors is barely noticeable in daily usage, probably only in the standby drain and in scenarios where you navigate while driving. Noone should decide whether to keep a Phone or not by looking at its battery consumption and heat development in benchmark and heavy gaming scenarios.
@@hagan3050 its not only battery life rhat i could probably do with considering the massive bump from s22. Unfortunately runnong hot in hot weather is something that was really bad on s22 exynos, and this test shows that ots stil la problem along with freezing image quality etc. Same story with the exynos sadly
So despite liking s24 or plus more but its better to get ultra variant just for snapdragon chip?@@Armada8589
Temperature and battery life are literaly 2 main things deciding life/logetivity of your phone. I still rock my s7 and if my battery wasn't garbage at this point I would not bother upgrading. Exynos is known to be even worse after a year or 2. Take your useless opinion and keep it.. @@hagan3050
Yeah get the s24 ultra or s23 with sd instead
idk why but I saw a lot of comparisons where Exynos won everytime in that GPU benchmark. so IDK why yours is so lacking. Was the exact same test/ app. Weird.. Still sad :(
It could be multiple factors, such as brightness level, temperature of the room, connection to 5G, settings of the phone, RAM usage, and even the quality of chipsets sometimes vary. I also noticed other RUclipsrs get better score in some tests, but I also noticed sometimes they get worse ones. I made sure to run the benchmarks multiple times before shooting the video and the results were similar.
No its because people run those tests on wifi. On 5G exynos will suck as it has a terrible modem. This is a better represantation of real world usage, because the most drain will happen when you are outside anyways.
Yeah, I guess I'm just getting the S23 then.
S24 with Exynos > s23 this guy's Exynos S24 is a broken unit
@@memedude908 copium
Best comparison video on the internet, thanks man 🙏
wow this is crazy, such a huge difference
i had high hopes for exynos this year but yh... a 17% battery diffirence is just unacceptable!
its perofrmance is actually fine but they better solve that heating and battery issue
I guess 17percent is minimal and similar for Sammyboy.
Tons of sammyboy defending exynos
😂😂😂