Hundreds of illegal boat lift covers up in Pasco County canals
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 апр 2021
- Pasco County banned the installation of boat lift covers in 2010, saying they wanted to protect waterfront property owners’ views and prevent navigation hazards.
Seems to me the cover extends beyond a reasonable distance over the waterway, impacting the ability to navigate.
It sure does and they should be removed, who is expected to try and navigate through that overhang ? They're taking up 3/4 of the channel.
What I wonder is, did they have any trouble when they were going out?
@@TheSkete, Not for the jerkwad who owns it, but really, look at how much that roof is in the channel. I thought this what a joke at first, because of how bad it was !???
It would horrible if a few holes and a bent frame would ‘impact’ the over hanging cover every weekend night. The owner of the cover is an asshole
@@augustreil you do realize that there is a boat lift under the water, that takes up the same amount of room?
The metal framing would be there regardless if whether there was cloth stretched across the top or not.
Could You imagine building a carport with a roof that extended out over the road and blocked traffic!
My thoughts exactly 💯
@@northeastrailway. they do not extend that far
he should had his fishing gear in his boat when coming into port
i do not get to drive around with a car that has poles sticking out the side 30 feet
Sounds like the boat owner was too lazy to hoist his outriggers to straight vertical while in the port development area.
@@brucenadeau2172 you can't remove outriggers from a boat. It's not a fishing rod. You don't know what you're talking about, it's very clear.
@@brucenadeau2172 you have zero idea what an outrigger is, do you?
If my neighbor can’t get his boat out - I would take it down, move it somehow, make it smaller. I definitely wouldn’t be a DHead about it!
That seems unreasonable to expect other people to remove their property because you bought a boat that is too big to navigate the waterways safely. The boat owner could also consider using a marina. There are dry docks, wet slips and other storage facilities that would eliminate this problem completely.
@@LuciusKyrus Is this your boat cover? This attitude like yours is way wrong. You buy a home in the water to have a boat (big or small) and access to the bay and waterways. His cover and frame is over hanging by several feet into the right of way. If you parked your truck half into the roadway, would you say to just buy a smaller car or drive on another road. No! The right of way access if for every one. Not just this dirtbag and aholes like you and make obstacles and obstruction in the way.
@@LuciusKyrus that’s ridiculous. People paid big money for waterfront property.
You’re rather coming across as a driving mommy’s car elitist.
They were probably drunk
@@mattk8810 Great idea ! Let a judge decide. A few problems with that idea is, Lawsuits are very expensive and if you lose then you are obligated to pay for the defendants attorney fees. Furthermore, laws are based upon technicalities. If the law say you cannot have permanent structure and you can prove it is temporary structure then you win.
Rich people problems I will never have to deal with.
Yeah, sorry, but when these people elect to live next to 30 other people all cramming into a canal with bigger and bigger million dollar shiny boats that barely fit in the first place, what do you expect? If it's not the cover, it'll be something else like the next neighbour upgrading their dock to fit their even bigger boat they just upgraded to. And while all this goes on "po folk" in small sportfishing boats are coming and going no problem.
I see this as the water version of buying the biggest SUV possible but living in a dense city, and complaining that your side street in the middle of the city has too many steps and dumpsters and you can't get your SUV out anymore because you keep clipping the dumpsters.
More money, more and stupider problems. Want a big boat? Don't live on a tiny canal.
@@volvo09 it's a 30 foot boat. Stop acting like they are taking their 100 foot yacht in.
The Man is a Navy Vet, trust me he is not rich
Hudson....Pasco County ? Not in the same world as “ rich people”.
@CSXRockford not there dude.
Who says crime doesn't pay... that smug guy actually told the news reporter, that he's just waiting for someone to try and stop him! That is the sad state of the corrupt world we live in today folks!
Hmmmm.... I wonder how his boat mysteriously caught fire???🙄
@@bobspizza7444 ...dictionary definition states that corruption is the dishonest or 'illegal' behaviour by powerful people: depravity: inducement to do wrong by improper or unlawful means. (Soooo genius, maybe next time you will think first, before you open your big mouth and make a complete fool of yourself on RUclips, you obnoxious twat!)
@@bobspizza7444 Those are tall accusations with 0% proof. Proof does exist, a few comments up, that you're an ignorant T-wat. That seems factual.
He’s hoping his corrupt lawyer friend can pull in some markers to keep his sleazy life going.
The business owner seems like he's in the right. His structures do not violate county ordinances according to lawyers because they are not permanent structures and if that is correct then he should continue running his business. In many counties it requires permits and licenses to install a concrete wall around your property, but you can still install the concrete wall if the blocks are not permanently joined together. It's not wrong, it's called playing by the rules.
This is what happens when unlicensed contractors try to be slick with the rules, the aluminum structure is not temporary.
Yes, they are temporary. Just like carports and be very large fabric covered metal framed structures which can be built in places where pole buildings and other permanent structures cannot because they are not permanent structures even though they're often used in the same ways.
@@Broncitis6677 but you can’t throw one of those up and hang it over into the street and block traffic.
But can handle 70 mmh winds
That's permanent 💯
@@danbandito you might. Did you CHECK?
If the cover is relatively the same size as the boat it’s covering then what difference does it make if it’s permanent or not ? Most people aren’t stupid enough to try and moor a 40 foot boat in a residential marina, it’s like buying a Mack truck and double trailer then blaming the neighbours parked across the road because you can’t park it in front of your house lol rich 🤑 entitled stupid people it’s hilarious everyone else has a modest sized boat in the marina then you got these idiots
Edit: best advertising for coastline covers is the boat driver saying it didn’t break even with a 7000lb boat under power pulling on it 😂
Looks pretty tough to navigate past.
Especially with 30 feet of poles sticking out of your boat like a porcupine.
@@BillyBob-gt3bb they don't stick out far when you're navigating through the channel you knucklehead
@@daffyduck9901 but they are what hit the cover fella. Your view mirror doesn’t stick out far but if you hit another car with it because a car was hanging out of its parking spot it’s still your fault. If they can’t handle their boat then they shouldn’t have one.
@@BillyBob-gt3bb this is a boat not a car everything is different. You Don't Know Jack!
@@daffyduck9901 don’t claim to know anything at all. I had no idea it’s ok to hit other people’s property with your boat. You learn something new every day.
That guy that owns the boat cover company is lying through his teeth we all know how small the canals are in Florida and he is impeding navigation through these canals no doubt about it
Lmao your a joke and never been on a boat in florida they never get in the way people just don't no how to drive a boat. Iv never hit one and it's never messed up my gps either.
Not paying attention to your own out riggers is your own fault. Not the structure you hit.
Look @2:00. That cover is a navigation hazard. That canal is particularly narrow and the cover sticks out way to far.
People are so selfish these days. The attitude is screw everyone else.....
@@daversj what about having having poles and cables sticking out past your boat and not paying attention to where they are?
@@youngcrusade840 you're a joke pal
It's not the "cover" that is the issue. It is the frame that the cover is bungeed to.
The frame does not look like it's more stout than the beams holding up the docks. $25,000 in damages seems a bit excessive to blame on the metal frame. I'm curious how the outriggers caught the cover if they were stowed correctly and if the captain had complete control of his vessel. With as many security cameras as there are these days, it seems reasonable that someone should have caught.
@@LuciusKyrus I think the problem comes from the fact that the I-beams
extend out past the the dock posts
@@LuciusKyrus yes of course and they do say in the video that it was the outriggers that got caught on the lift cover but we have no way of knowing if the outriggers had been stowed correctly?
@@LuciusKyrus in the United States which includes Fla. the right to clear passage or Navigability by the Daniel Ball equal doctrine ruling of the US Constitution. They block the right of passage, it has to come down. That contractor selling those roofs is in the wrong and he doesnt even know it. The only way he can get out of it is to try to declare the waterway is non-navigable.
It the captain of the vessels issue. Don’t get a vessel with out riggers that come over other peoples property.
What if his outrigger hit my docked boat?
Hold my beer I can afford a bigger boat than I am capable of operating safely.
Gotta love everyone's ability to find loopholes.
That's America love it or hate it !
@@quantumshrm5694 I like shrooms and DMT. However I've never seen "them" while influenced by DMT. My friend said that's weird. Is it?
Not really a loop hole. The drone shot shows the cover extending past the supports for the boat lift. So the only reason they are staying up is people with money and greased palms.
@@coldwarveteran4239 I'm talking about the permanent structure vs removable. Because they state removable tops are accessible as permanent are not.
While the cover can be easily removed, the framework supporting it is still there and permanent hazard.
Incidentally you’re out Riggers that you use for fishing should actually be pulled in when you’re going back to port
Yeah, oh it clipped the outrigger..... blah blah blah sounds like a captain problem to me 🤣. 25k in damage, were they going like 20 knots.
Yeah, that sounds like it needs to be addressed ....when you have outriggers extended and can pull them in when coming into port -you should ....I think I am on the side of not allowing those roofs though because they extend past the slip and the language sounds pretty clear (not buying the temporary explanation... no one seems to be taking down those roofs)
Pretty much the comment I was going to leave. If you have things sticking out of the boat while navigating a canal, that's on you for hitting something stationary.
@@BigPhillyStyle1982 I highly doubt the outriggers were "out" but even when they are "in" they are quite tall.
@@ricbarker4829 Out rigger are in the UP position when docking. That "cover" extends out over the water !
3:40, "I don't know what we should do about the ones installed ILLEGALLY." I'm thinking that guy owns one.
Yep and if not him a father-in-law, Aunt and Uncle, Brother, someone he doesn't want to hold accountable. Corruption always happens when they wield the power.
Meanwhile I get hounded by the city if the trash can lid blows off and what color my fence is lol. Must be nice to be rich and not have to abide by any regulations. Smh
Until you and every other citizen stump down there and make them not do it anymore remove their ass from office
You sure that’s not an HOA?
@@Jose-gr9ls was thinking the same thing. Sounds like a home owners association.
It's not to do with people and their money... the problem lies with the weak city government "not knowing what to do about the enforcing the ordinance" ... @ 3:35 🤷♂️🤦♂️
@@sameppink9401 nope. It’s literally our stupid city’s rules. No home owners associations in the small area I’m from. Strict city regulations anywhere in the township itself.
Hes talking shit to push his product, be damned the codes.
That's the American way...
Capitalism at its Finest ✍🏻💥🚨💰
The problem is not those covers lol, it’s the fact that these docks and lifts take up over 1/2 the canal lol
Yea, Florida waterways have 3 kinds of fools. The ones with a dock that takes up 1/2 the waterway, the ones with a boat that takes up 2/3 of the waterway, and the ones who can't navigate a straight line. It's great that they all decide to move down south and end up living next to each other 🙄
What do you want to bet the city councilors have a number of homes on those canals?
That should be an investigation
Probably all the ones with the covers.
@@TheBuckbennyrides this is most likely true
You can see what a hazard they cause to the navigation. Take them down.
How about raising your outriggers when navigating a narrow channel...
Lmfao
@@donsvideos1985 or bring complete in the boat
I was going to say the government should stay out of it... but those covers really are a hazard to navigation and need to be removed.
You're a clown the government supposed to stay out of everything
@@MrPbip You’re a clown. It’s already the law.
@@MrPbip trial by combat?
It would be nice if the Laws of this Country were enforced evenly across the board !
Unfortunately it’s an ordinance, not a law.
As always it will be the have not's against the HAVES
@@larryhall7998 they are both 'haves'.
@@zoeyshoots I'm not American. What is the difference between an ordnance and a law? In Ontario they're called bylaws and are municipal laws.
@@larryhall7998 I think everyone involved in this story would fall into the "have" category.
In the one shot, there is no way to get a larger boat safely through that maze!
when you are a lazy captain and refuse to bring in your fishing gear
@@brucenadeau2172 "when you are a lazy captain and refuse to bring in your fishing gear" What does your comment have to do with OP's?
take him to court. if temporary, then they need to be removed every 2 hours
Where I live the township has a rule of temporary being no more then 23 hours. So as to avoid POS 🚙 sitting around
Isn't your suggested period arbitrary? Did you apply any certain methodology?
Every 2 hours? That’s seems extremely unreasonable. Where did you get 2 hours from? What studies have you conducted?
Alright, karen.
I think I know what happened: You falsely assumed that rich people live by the same rules as ordinary people. See what happened there?
Its Florida, your right!!!
Wait, is the guy with the damaged Yacht the victim or the guy whose property that was damaged by the Yacht the victim? In your opinion of course.
Just because you own a boat or yacht doesn’t mean you’re rich. A lot of people live on these as a first home
The only thought that went into the boat cover installed, was to protect THEIR boat. No thought went into the neighbors use of the channel. Rewrite the law and have it state ANY COVER or STRUCTURE THAT IMPEDES SAFE NAVIGATION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. Self important clowns will be self important clowns.
Next time there's a hurricane I'd be worried about my sawsall getting away from me in the wind...
Brilliant man. Vigilance is critical as there is a well documented history of rampaging power tools cutting loose.
the whole video I was thinking sawzall
Just because the canvas cover comes off does not make it temporary or portable. The metal structure that holds it up and actually does the obstructing is NOT portable or temporary. The guy selling and installing those things must be giving a kickback to someone in that government to allow them to stay. No building or zoning inspector with an ounce of sense would allow them.
Right!?
It's a technicality they are trying to get away with. The metal structure is the boat lift so it's allowed but because they attach the roof with bungies it's not a permanent roof and they only said permanent roofs aren't allowed. Building inspectors don't usually have much sense but unless someone reports you they won't go looking for violations.
@@deckmonkey1459 the frame for the roof is extending past the boat lift. It is a navigation hazard.
@@coldwarveteran4239 EXACTLY!! The cover frame is a separate structure from the lift and has nothing to do with the function of the lift.
I thought you could not call these covers “illegal” anymore. They should only be called UN-DOCUMENTED covers.
lmao
you're not supposed to think like that!
rotflmao
🤣
🤣🤣🤣
Take him to court by all means. Arrogance should be rewarded promptly.
Exactly, how dare the boat owner expect the world revolve around him and his inability to captain a boat. The boat captain should pay for the damage he caused to someone elses property. Lets be reasonable here. It's not like the dock jumped out in front of the boat.
They have a 40 foot boat in a 20 foot wide canal and can’t drive for shit If the caused that much damage to there boat they tryed ramming it out of the way but it didn’t work
How about making them "take them down in a manner of minutes" every time you take your boat out, or return?
Seems like a standoff
how about the boaters bring in teir fishing gear before coming in to port
demanding the right bring their boat in with 30 poles out the side
@@brucenadeau2172 Well, if regs say they have to...
We’re Pasco County. We have to see what Hillsborough and Pinellas are doing first before we make a decision.
True statement
Nothing like waiting for permission.
I was thinking this lol
Define waterfront property as that means the front of your home is the canal and follow those rules
I’m so poor I walk around a popsicle and call it air conditioning. Rich people, if it’s a navigation hazard, and it’s a rule for a reason. Take them down.
This is an "overhead covering" and a "visual obstruction". Just because this guys claims it's "temporary" doesn't change those facts. It's a violation of the ordinance. Period.
If the covers are prohibited,they are illegal and need to go. And that business owner is selling and installing a prohibited product and should be liable just like the home owner.
It’s just like pool fence. Sell and install a non code fence around a pool,your just a liable as the homeowner if something happens with the pool( someone gaining access and drowning) if it’s not compliant.
Yes and no, if someone trespasses on your property, or allows their minor/child to trespass, and drowns in your pool, pond or whatever on your property it is THEIR fault, Period!.
As for the huge rediculously large protruding frames for these covers that obviously block getting by to and from your dock then it is absolutely their fault of any accidents or damage trying to get by.. it's hard to believe how trivial these rich lying self-righteous hypocritical jerks problems are compared to the struggles of some of US other good American People.. like making sure I have the $700 for rent on the first of the month, and can cover paying for the exorbitant Medical bills since I don't have any medical insurance, and the list goes on and on..
**And Don't forget about the Criminal, Criminal justice system that has totally, completely unConstitutional oppressive tyrannical overreaching powers and treats these rich scumbags completely differently than US regular everyday American People..
The reporter is really missing the point... the material covering the thing is not the problem, doesn't matter if it's attached with clips or not, the metal frame underneath it is the problem.
People shouldn't be allowed to build those frames hanging out over such a narrow waterway.
People should also be required to learn to captain a boat before taking control of the helm. Lets remember that no one else who lives around there has a problem hitting the cover.
@@LuciusKyrus - Maybe their boats are smaller? Look how far that cover sticks out into the canal, it's clearly a hazard.
@@rottingravensblood9106 Then don't be blind and stupid. Educate yourself.
@@LuciusKyrus if the canopy is exclusively over the dock or land then it wouldn't be much good for the boad lift would it? In order to perform as required, a boat lift must be placed in the water
First World Problem: Your boat cover is obstructing my boat's way.
LOL!!
the guy who is installing them is about to get his ass handed to him. guess thats what he gets for listening to some 28 yo know it all lawyer.
😂😂😂😂. You don’t listen well do you.....🤦🏼♂️🤦🏼♂️. Dumbass
@Lee Devries Unfortunately the home owner is the responsible party for insuring that the proper permit has been pulled/complied with. I personally don't see any issues with this type of cover other then it overhangs the dock to much. I would be a pissed off neighbor if this guy blocked up my canal with this. I'll sell this guy some outriggers if he's willing to pay $25k for them... lol
Yeah, the contractor is in the right. Temporary structures have never been permitted structures anywhere. A boat cover on a dock that can be removed is temporary. The contractor knows his laws. That’s why he’s waiting to get a ticket and go to court, the court has already defined permitted vs temporary structures many times and the local government always loses that battle. It is a temporary structure. People need to stop trying to control what people do with their own property and money. If you don’t like the covers on the canal, sell your house and move somewhere else.
Since its not being enforced then someone should just take up the whole canal with a cover and claim selective enforcement if they try to make them take it down.
That’s smart.
These covers should use this guy in there commercials for how strong there temporary solution is 😂 😂
temporary does not mean poorly
Imagine being so privileged that your neighbor having a roof over his boat is the biggest inconvenience in your life and the story makes the news.
Its the local news. What else are they suppose fill up with 30 minutes?
Anything that impedes a navigable waterway or canal must be made in a way so that it does not impede the waterway and safe navigation of all vessels that normally or are able to navigate that waterway.
The waterway must be kept safe during daylight or during night time use .
Nothing shall protrude in such a manner that can not be seen during night navigation .
Aside from the damage, this ordinance was set to stop the obstruction of views. That alone is reason to enforce the code. You can't see anything from your dock, except the neighbor's tarps..
You know you're living good when this is the MAJOR news..yacht parking...the life of a gangsta 😂🤣😅
No child, its called the life of people who are opposits of gangster.
☝️☝️ nobody tell him ☝️☝️
😅🤣😂😅🤣😂
Some city supervisor be getting paid !
Look at the Coast Guard regulations. That structure may be a hazard to navigation
It is a hazard to navigation.
All boat docks, lifts, covers should be aligned/parallel with their seawall, why is that so hard for everyone to understand and follow ?
They are obstructing the navigation channel, extending past the poles. Duh, take them down.
The tarp is the only temporary component of the cover... the framework is fixed permanent, that’s what did the damage in the first place, not the soft tarp! Yet not a mention of this common sense fact.
Personally I’d just hook a rope to it and pull m effor down.
There was one report last summer that a family left their boat dock and went out for the day. When they came back they could no longer reach their dock. The neighbor had a contractor on standby for when the families boat went out so he could modify his dock. He had told one of the neighbors that he could not put the cover over his boat until his neighbor went out on their boat.
That incident had the police involved. The neighbors attacked one another over the structure. The police made it clear that they could not make anybody take down a structure. They had to turn it over to the permit department. When I first saw this video I thought it was this case that I'm speaking of and that perhaps a verdict from permits had came through.
That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. Contractors don’t sit on “standby” and why would they wait till the boat left making sure they would be stuck in the canal and have nowhere to go. You got fed a line of bs and bought it.
Boats in inland waterways are much different than open water boats And that cover company knows it
You just can’t be obstructing the right of way. The drone footage clearly shows that the cover in fact constricts the waterway. A little common sense and compromise. The awning owner needs to clip the corner off his cover.
Probably more like 1/3 !
And the county needs to make him do it, this is BS.
They said they hit it while returning to the dock, how the hell did they make it past when they were heading out
Probably just BARELY, and I'm sure wind has a LOT to do with being able to get past it with one of these luxury yachts these rich people have..
**I'm sure a few pitchers of whatever they drink while out on the ocean wouldn't help matters. Either way I would never be that much of a douchebag and have my cover frame sticking out into the middle of a narrow canal like that! No common courtesy at all these filthy rich crooks have, and I'm sure a big portion of them ARE crooks..
1 case of beer later.
It seems like there would be a limit on the size of the boat and dock you can have in relation to the canal also. Just saying
its gonna put boat cover guy out of business in that county.
Those covers are in the navigable way of safe boating period , if a boat was able to pass before it was put up and now cannot guess what it in the fucking way .the people that put it up are wrong , they made a mistake
“After sustaining over $25k in damages, we decided to blame somebody else”
Werd!!!
I am so glad I live in the country, my boat parked in the yard with a tarp and away from snotty people to rub shoulders with in packed places like this. What's next? Sue each other for stepping on each others blade of grass?
👍👍👍👍👍if you only knew said no one
Looks permanent to me. The intent is for the covers to be up at all times except in high winds.
It's obstructing a waterway. Just like having someone's garage block part of a street. There's a good reason for that regulation. Doesn't make sense to allow these structures to remain in place and the owners not be cited.
Anything to make a damn buck...just follow the rules and quit comparing apples to oranges.
When you’re operating a vessel, you are in control of that vessel, if you hit something, it’s your fault, NOT the structure you hit! Plain and simple.
Question- why did they hit the dock coming in and not going out?
Probably a case of too many liquid courage’s!
If I am not mistaken, the Army Corp Of Engineers has jurisdiction over the canals. I would contact them, as they are over navigation of waterways.
Hmmm. “What do we do with the illegal covers?” Nice to see a peaceful debate when a law is broken. Hell, they guy has a business and tells politicians what the loophole is and they still can’t solve the problem
He isn't necessarily correct. It doesn't say permanent. "Overhead covering"
You got that right! 😂 money, bud.. Lots of 💵 .
Lol ya we need boat lift covers not boats lets make the canal as small as possible then we will all buy large boats too... were rich and awesomely stupid! Yayyyy!
Wow the people on the board sound so professional...like a first grader talking to infant!!!
I don't see a problem with using the covers unless the actual roof goes past the dock and into the navigable water. I believe there are rules as to how far you can go out with a dock and the roofline should be limited to that setback as well. Would be a better solution than a lengthy legal battle that ends up costing the taxpayers.
Agreed! Just keeping the cover frame bound to the boat's measurements will be a solution. But I know it won't be enough to the owner of who the sun comes at a different angle of what the cover/lift is positioned before of after noon! Well, well..they can pay the sun if they really care! That's what money is for! Lol.
i would carry a battery reciprocating saw on my boat. it's only aluminum.
Actually a plumbers tubing cutter is just as fast and totally silent, until the structure hits the dock.
@@maxwedge5683 thinking about it, i feel the satisfaction of using a grappling hook and a good running start would just
"feel" better"
Go through with the biggest boat in that inlet sit up on the front with a plasma cutting torch and take down the parts that are in the way on everybody's dock they were legally put there so let them bring you to court for cutting their illegally put up dock
People should just be respectful and understand other people live in the same area wait until karma comes and bites them in the butt
How far out do the property lines go into the canal from the sea wall?
SKIP ALL RUclips questionnaires unless they remove 1 commercial for it! Doing a questionarre gives them free money. So do commercials. Spread this message my fellow youtubers!
Why not just buy RUclips videos with no commercials. Only $15 a month.
I would take a boat down the waterway with a sawzall. Clearing all awnings that are jutting out and are a navigational hazard.
Yeah, you’d end up shot or in jail real quick if you try that down here in Florida.
why not close your outriggers when you come in from offshore?
it's like navigating a canal full of middle-fingers. only rich people can survive while behaving this petty.
I'd sue the installer.
It hangs out in the passage, wtf? Rip them down.
Rich people problems. Wish I had to worry about my yacht and my neighbors boat lift cover.
Well when a big cabin cruiser comes through and they have video of a perfect navigation dead center then wind up ripping down those covers and destroying them then who is at fault?
Imagine being the neighbor with the roof, then looking out one day and seeing karen with a fuckin newscrew pointing out your house
My heart pours out for them. They just have such a hard life. Maybe a go-fund-me is prudent here. Or maybe it will be after the asshole's boat "accidentally" catches fire.
Weld up something on your boat that the boat cover has no chance against. Ram it!!!!
I would definitely be cutting the entire part protruding into the canal with a sawzall if they wanted to be such douchebags and leave it like that.
Thank God that most of the People I have dealt with and met throughout my years on the water were pretty decent People, unlike any if these inconsiderate aholes that think they're so entitled to whatever they feel like!
@@BabyCharlotteschannel the problem was he came into port with his out rigger not stowed properly but he had to blame his neighbor because did not operate his boat properly
Tall ass boat in a small canal ✔
Has a cane to walk ✔
wife has a fake tooth ✔
suing ✔
You can't make this shit up but I'm pretty sure the dude lost control
What does him having a cane have anything to do with it ? So its okay now to make fun of veterans with disabilities ?? Or her tooth ??
The cover itself may be temporary, but the framework holding the cover is permanent, and is a potential hazard.
Navigation hazard. You cannot restrict navigation. Can you block the street in front of your house? Selfish ignorant people. Enforcement of the law is important, for all.
The beard, hat, and ponytail look just screams "I"M A DOUCHEBAG!!!"
Same with the soul patch. Douche vs douche... anyones guess as to who might win
I Would Say , The Douchebag.
LOL! The covers extend well over the boat lift & prevents people from navigating the waterways! I don't understand why this is so hard when the rules say they are not allowed!
no "structure" that narrows the waterway should be allowed other than the dock, that's just stupidity to expect others to navigate around your limited space
tear them down
meanwhile people are starving to death in the world
Hey come on now-THIS is important, too.
this is now over 2 years old. Anyone know how it was resolved?
The boat lift cover was installed by the previous owner. This property was sold just recently. The frame can be slid back and the height can be adjusted to a desired height. It's easy to do.
And here I am thinking I'll be mad about illegal boat covers. Hahhahaa could care less is what I realized.
Rich people problems 😴😒
The boat covers wouldn't be as much of a problem if their docks didn't extend so far out and their boat lifts weren't angled.
Why do you need a slip cover anyway? They look tacky.
And is the navigable part of the cannal marked by buoys? and if so.
What is the easment for over hang.
Is the a boat size limit on that canal?
Seems like this guy is just being a baby. He crashed his boat and didn't want to pay for it. There is plenty of room for a boat to go through, if you know how to drive one.
Ya know, those were my mother's dying words but when your covered in 3rd degree burns and got one foot caught in a bear trap you're bound to start talking crazy.
The cloth might come off but what about the solid metal frame?
1st world problems I won’t shed a tear 😢
Just like how not everybody should have a driver's license because they can't handle obstacles is how I see this
Im a simple man and if I've worked hard for a boat on the water your dang right I'm getting it out whenever I want. No "temporary cover" hanging into the right of way or access channel will stop me with a saw-zall... Rich people problems!
Bingo. I would just cut a path
they can get out they just stow their out riggers proper they just to lazy
any more recent information?
What about the metal roof framing? Isn’t that considered part of the cover.