Imagine telling someone that a 1.5 hour film validly sets up a singular character to be the 2 main protagonists, the two main antagonists, their own parents and their own child. This film is insane
I often avoid commenting on this movie because the reviews from Western/US critics always describe it as a mind-blowing, never-before-seen plot twist. AND people have shown to be defensive when I try commenting (not criticizing). And as someone who's from the Balkans and saw "similar" twists in European, Korean, Asian, etc movies... this movie felt kinda predictable. As a matter of fact, I guessed and predicted the twist. I am not saying the movie is bad, but I fail to see the value in being exposed to only Western/US films and saying this was a groundbreaking plot twist. Because the ONLY thing people keep pressing this movie for is often the twist. The twist that they would see coming if they exposed themselves to more non-wester/non-US movies. Nobody praises the acting or effects. If the value of the film is only on one and only one aspect, then that movie is not amazing. At least to me. And I hope nobody reads this as somewhat condescending because it's not. That being said, the movie for me is still 7/10. Which is pretty high because I never gave a movie a 10 and seldom a 9. If you take this into account, I still find this movie good. It just annoys me the attitude towards this movie's "never-before-seen" twist. WHAT ELSE IS GOOD IN THE MOVIE??? TELL ME MORE ABOUT OTHER ASPECTS. Rant over. Thank you for coming to my RANTTalk.
@@nemonobody88 So you're saying lots of other movies were influenced by the same concepts outlined in a 1945 short story? Literature often serves as the impetus for screenplays, since screenwriters often read things too. It's not derivative or behind the times, they're all driving off the same body of literature.
@@wyattcosner8774 because it was the exact same person that made the baby. John (the guy), and Jane (the girl), are biologically the exact same person with the exact same genes, meaning that when the baby was made, the genes weren't a combination of two different sets of genes like with a usual childbirth, but the exact same. So Jane gave birth to (biologically) herself. She is the exact same copy of the baby. Hope this helps!
The moment the film refused to show Jane's lover's face, the song "I am my own grandpa" popped into my head and it was rewarding to see it pop up soon after.
Kudos to you two for figuring it out, I was completely blindsided the first time I watched it. It was amazing the order and timing in which it was all revealed to my brain
movies gives many MANY clues. smart ppl knew already in first 30min that barkeeper is Jane. they made Robertson a bait so ppl could think he's the fizzler bomber. tbh i have one theory that Robertson created this loop as he said he invents or something like that or he does some unique work
Note: This is a "bootstrap paradox" (named after another Heinlein story) which is not actually a time paradox. It's an _ontological_ paradox, in that it doesn't have a proper beginning, but recursive time-loops like this one are in fact consistent with causality.
It would be a paradox, if not for the metalinguistic foundation of the apparent contradiction. Notwithstanding, classical logic systems are not the only sets of rules to interpret and understand phenomena (syntax wise), and the field of heterodox and fuzzy logical systems is bewildering.
@@Downloadable_4 Going back in time and killing your grandfather = time paradox. Going back in time and _becoming_ your grandfather = _not_ time paradox.
MAN, I remember the first time I saw this movie on some random cable channel long ago and I cannot forget how the final act just blew my mind-- Ethan Hawke's performance was so good too! the last line of the movie was so memorable as well! this movie truly is one of the best things that has ever happened to me.
Oo tol hahah. Sa star movies ko den to napanood 6yrs ago pa yata. High school ko pa to napanood, may trabaho na ako ngayon hahaha. Nahilo ako sa mga plot twist.
I absolutely love this movie. The story is amazing and the acting is top notch as well. The plot is a complete mind fuck, but it plays out brilliantly. Another excellent video, Sir.
I really hated this movie when I first watched it a few years ago, it's so boring and the twist is predictable and just not interesting, atleast there were lots of dumb moments to laugh at which made it bearable
The big thing I noticed is that old Jack had the same exact glasses that Jane had her whole life. So those are most likely the same glasses throughout the whole movie.
Same. That would've been cool too, maybe like one of the first times someone has a premonition & has to figure out what it all means? Edit to clarify I meant one of the first instances of someone saving a group from a disaster, say sometime in the early to mid-1900's? Just a point in time before a Google search could help them put the pieces together. Sorry if that wasn't clear the first time around.
I read the short story this movie was based on years ago. It’s call “All you zombies”, and I absolutely loved it. Plus this movie did a good job adapting the original work
It's a very rare case where it's not only a faithful adaptation of the source material, but also an improvement with the addition of the bomber and Robertson.
I totally knew that jack was going to be the bomber since Chris mentioned this movie in killing of a sacred deer but I was still amazed that John was Jane’s father
Fun fact, the creative team behind this movie (who did a hell of a job adapting and expanding upon the source material) also were the same team that did the sci-fi/vampire movie Daybreakers, which is one of my favorite vampire movies, also starting Ethan Hawke.
Found this movie 7 years ago, and even to this day I still tell people it's a must watch. The plot itself is just amazing, but throw in the twists... 🤯
This film is by far the best thought out most realistic depiction of time travel in cinema. There's normally hundreds of glaring plot holes and logic errors in these films, this one does a fantastic job a missing most of them.
I want to say I watched this when it came out on a cable channel and I fell in love with its story. I’m also sure it’s here in the comment section somewhere, but it’s based on the story “All You Zombies”, by Robert Heinlein. Also, if you love wacky stories, give “The Veldt” a whirl.
The ending is perfectly crafted I've seen in a long time. That looping, paradoxical cycle. And some paradoxes have to flow evenly. Two of the same person cannot exist. One has to die. Then you have the Grandfather Paradox, and that's a whole different can of worms.
I've started leaving this comment before watching the video - I love this movie for how wild it is. My first time watching it me and my friend at the time (soon to be wife!!) were having a great time trying to guess the twists only to be even more shocked every time at how to movie actually developed! It has such a sentimental place in my heart, I'm looking forward to seeing this video. After watching the video - This did not disappoint! Good to know the movie is just as wild as I remember
Very similar to Looper, but very well done. I did think at the beginning though, "If it turns out Ethan Hawke's character is also the bomber, i swear to god..." soooo yeah.
I have had to tech myself to not obsess over this movie thinking about it for weeks after when I try to explain it to people . My personal number 1 movie ever
I watched this movie in 2018 and remember being awestruck at the “reveals”. It is still one of my favourite movies. The fact that someone thought this and made such a complex story out of it is mind blowing in itseld
this was the only movie ive watched so far that i genuinely needed to watch an explained video after, but i will gladly watch again for your voice and opinion foundflix
It's probably just a fun coincidence but I like to think that the sign right behind old Jack at 31:00 that says "Please don't overload washers ..." refers to how the agency treats its agents. Jack, one of its "washers", was so overloaded that eventually he became everything that the agency tries to prevent, a product of their own failure. It's most likely not that but the way that they decided to put this bright, glowing yellow sign behind Old Jack the first time we see him is really intriguing from a framing standpoint.
That's a nice symbolism. Personally, I believe the looney John's conspiracy that the FBI time travel agency might have known all along that John was the Fizzle Bomber. It was a really great line: "We're all just dominoes falling down, one after the other. They're the ones that set it up. All we can do is watch it happen." Well something to that effect. The agency did have measures in place to prevent this sort of thing...the problem was their fail-safe measure to disable the time machine after x uses malfunctioned.
Man what a mind fuck. I predicted that Jane was the man she originally fell in love with. I expected jack to be the bomber. I did not expect jack to be John who was Jane. Fuck that’s wild. What a sick movie
This movie still blows my mind!!!!john was talking to himself like WHAT!!!!! Jean was talking to herself with the man in the park!!!! My god this movie is awesome!!!
This is one of my favorite movies. Super happy you finally did it. I watch it multiple times a year. Also JUST watched the black phone and was then talking about this movie. Went to RUclips to watch the differences between book and film for the black phone and saw this in related. Weird coincidence.
In addition to the predetermination paradox, the movie also tackles a bit of the Trolley Problem, a famous moral dilemma (aka the inspiration for the humorous fan wad "The Revenant Problem" if you play custom Doom maps). If you don't know what it is, the idea is simple: There's a train speeding down the tracks. Ahead of you there's a fork in the tracks. If the train continues on its current path, it will kill a greater number of bystanders who are in the train's path. You are unable to warn them in time. However, you can control the switch that would force the train down the other path. The problem is, this other path also has bystanders who would be hit and die, albeit a fewer number. So what do you do? Do you do nothing, and let the train kill more people--a statistically worse outcome? Or, do you make the choice to actively participate in the deaths of a fewer number of innocents--playing God, determining who lives and who dies, and letting their bodies hang on your conscience? The right thing to do should be to let fewer people die, but because of the psychological toll, many people in the hypothetical situation would rather do nothing. The movie briefly introduces this moral dilemma in the end. The seemingly mad, old John "Fizz Bomber" is convinced he's doing the right thing, because although he takes a repulsively high number of innocent lives, compared to the all the alternate timelines and the catastrophes that would happen if he didn't, he's actually saving more lives in the long run. To younger John, that reasoning doesn't justify mass murder today. But does it? This is an extension, on a much greater scale, of the same Trolley Problem. Perhaps John isn't quite so nuts from time travel exhaustion after all. Perhaps he had a valid moral position, and perhaps pondering this moral issue over the years leads him to the inevitable, logical conclusion that it is better to switch the tracks and kill a fewer number of innocents. Question is, does he actually witness those alternate realities firsthand, or does he take the newspaper clippings as good enough evidence? If the latter is true, then where did those paper clippings originally come from? Is it another question of the chicken or the egg? In the case of the former, that would pre-suppose he is capable of and in fact did break the time loop (by choosing not to be the bomber), but ultimately decides to be the bomber in the end. This would imply that *for a movie titled "Predestination," its seemingly helpless participants actually do have free will.*
You got one thing wrong with the "trolly dilemma," in that it's usually given as you said, only, instead of "fewer people," it's often portrayed as a family member or close friend, forcing your emotional hand. You SHOULD choose to kill the single individual over the loss of say, 10, strangers. The "Dilemma" is that since you know and love the single individual, could you sacrifice them to save multiple lives. Diabolical!! It's like a Bond villain's plan. 😂😂
She never checked her face in the mirror yet she has perfect makeup and hairdo? She really is a genius 😂😂😂. And how on earth would you not know your new look is exactly the face of the first man you fell in love with, who broke your heart?
@@chucklebutt4470 yeah true except she still had the same face! Yes she had an hysterectomy and double mastectomy but it’s the the same damn face at least I would suspect he was my long lost brother or something. If she fell in love with herself after her face looked like Ethan Hawke’s character that would be more believable.
I love this movie. I love the mystery behind the time travelling device. When I first watched it, it was a huge shock to me. I never would have guessed half of the things revealed. Definitely one of those "watch it again now that I know" kinda movies.
This was a really cool movie. I was sure that they were the same person the moment jack and John first interacted, but the fact that Jack was Jane legitimately caught me by surprise, tho i immediately knew jack would come to be the one that abandoned Jane.
After seeing a lot if time travel movies I almost didn't believe myself when expecting the ending. Even whilst being predictable I still love paradox films.
When i saw this on my homepage i hate to take a few breaths, recalibrate my psyche, and then have a conversation with myself in a mirror on if i really want to go down this rabbit hole again
Could the whole organization be one big paradox? Mainly because without the main character then the whole organization wouldn't exist let alone be as big as it is.
That's why I came out of the movie with the sneaking feeling that the Fizzle Bomber wasn't Jane/John/Jack's final form, but survived the shooting and went on to become someone else in the agency, possibly Robertson.
I bet the writer/director included Jane’s backstory about how she was a tomboy and liked to fight. As a way to throw off the viewer to think why she eventually became a man.
This video convinced me to watch it, and now I've seen it three times (and read the short story). Definitely a new favorite of mine! The whole cast was absolutely phenomenal and it's a fun mind-bending watch. Thanks for the video!!!
The problem with the Chicken or The Egg idea is that the answer is The Egg. The egg would have come before the chicken it would have just been laid by something that was very nearly a chicken.
I was just thinking about this movie last night as I was falling asleep , which just kept me up . I've seen in numerous times but still think about just how good it really is .
Goddamn, it's difficult for me to bring this movie up to ppl because I have a hard enough time trying to understand/remember everything. But you did a fucking fantastic job! Hopefully I'll remember it more but it's one I for sure want to recommend.
While I've never watched this movie (Can't believe I haven't, how did I not know this existed) but the plot reminds me of something, a cross between a creepypasta and a short poem I once read back in middle school, where a person suffers through life and at every stage of his life, every single person in the story was some version of himself, including his mother, the man/woman he/she loved, people he killed, etc. I remember that story really screwing with my middle schooler head and I am amazed there is now a movie with a similar theme.
@@misabelle3218 I believe they may be referring to The Egg by Andy Weir. It was a more of short story than a poem. It's available online. Not sure if that's what they meant though.
I actually really liked this movie! I wish they made another movie within the same universe that explains how the time travel agency came to be... that would be cool
Imagine telling someone that a 1.5 hour film validly sets up a singular character to be the 2 main protagonists, the two main antagonists, their own parents and their own child. This film is insane
This film is the biggest masturbation scenario ever conceived.
I liked this comment a while ago but yet today when I reread it, I still laughed at it
@@uv77mc85 explain?
I often avoid commenting on this movie because the reviews from Western/US critics always describe it as a mind-blowing, never-before-seen plot twist. AND people have shown to be defensive when I try commenting (not criticizing). And as someone who's from the Balkans and saw "similar" twists in European, Korean, Asian, etc movies... this movie felt kinda predictable. As a matter of fact, I guessed and predicted the twist. I am not saying the movie is bad, but I fail to see the value in being exposed to only Western/US films and saying this was a groundbreaking plot twist. Because the ONLY thing people keep pressing this movie for is often the twist. The twist that they would see coming if they exposed themselves to more non-wester/non-US movies. Nobody praises the acting or effects. If the value of the film is only on one and only one aspect, then that movie is not amazing. At least to me. And I hope nobody reads this as somewhat condescending because it's not. That being said, the movie for me is still 7/10. Which is pretty high because I never gave a movie a 10 and seldom a 9. If you take this into account, I still find this movie good. It just annoys me the attitude towards this movie's "never-before-seen" twist. WHAT ELSE IS GOOD IN THE MOVIE??? TELL ME MORE ABOUT OTHER ASPECTS.
Rant over. Thank you for coming to my RANTTalk.
@@nemonobody88 So you're saying lots of other movies were influenced by the same concepts outlined in a 1945 short story? Literature often serves as the impetus for screenplays, since screenwriters often read things too. It's not derivative or behind the times, they're all driving off the same body of literature.
Ethan Hawke, in a semi-recent interview, referred to Predestination as his most underrated movie. After watching your fine recap, I tend to agree!
Well that’s because almost all the other movies he’s in are high budget, mainstream action or horror movies
Honestly surprised that people have not watched this. This is my top 10 sci-fi films (I know I'm so basic) and I recommend this movie to everyone.
@@toptiertech7291 The Black Phone is low budget
@@LuisSierra42 so you are poor at reading comprehension huh
Understatement. Classic movie.
hes his own mother, father, daughter, and mortal enemy. love it
Great plot but I don't understand how Jane gave birth to herself 🤔
@@wyattcosner8774 she had intercourse with herself, because she has the same dna as herself she gave birth to herself. well himself. Its trippy
@@wyattcosner8774 well...she slept with herself :D then had a baby
@@wyattcosner8774 What?
@@wyattcosner8774 because it was the exact same person that made the baby. John (the guy), and Jane (the girl), are biologically the exact same person with the exact same genes, meaning that when the baby was made, the genes weren't a combination of two different sets of genes like with a usual childbirth, but the exact same. So Jane gave birth to (biologically) herself. She is the exact same copy of the baby. Hope this helps!
The moment the film refused to show Jane's lover's face, the song "I am my own grandpa" popped into my head and it was rewarding to see it pop up soon after.
When they said he'd have the opportunity to change his own past I knew exactly where the story was going. I gotta watch to see if I'm right.
Kudos to you two for figuring it out, I was completely blindsided the first time I watched it. It was amazing the order and timing in which it was all revealed to my brain
movies gives many MANY clues. smart ppl knew already in first 30min that barkeeper is Jane. they made Robertson a bait so ppl could think he's the fizzler bomber. tbh i have one theory that Robertson created this loop as he said he invents or something like that or he does some unique work
Note: This is a "bootstrap paradox" (named after another Heinlein story) which is not actually a time paradox. It's an _ontological_ paradox, in that it doesn't have a proper beginning, but recursive time-loops like this one are in fact consistent with causality.
It would be a paradox, if not for the metalinguistic foundation of the apparent contradiction. Notwithstanding, classical logic systems are not the only sets of rules to interpret and understand phenomena (syntax wise), and the field of heterodox and fuzzy logical systems is bewildering.
In english please
@@Downloadable_4 Going back in time and killing your grandfather = time paradox.
Going back in time and _becoming_ your grandfather = _not_ time paradox.
@@RelativelyBest ohh thats crazy
@@RelativelyBest yea that’s what happened to Fry in Futurama
Sarah Snook is brilliant in this. She's totally convincing as both Jack and Jane.
She's underrated.
Totally convincing? Really? Come on
I thought Jon was a Leonardo DiCaprio lookalike! I didnt see the feminine until Jon mentioned it
I knew snook was Jane, but I legitimately thought John was being played by Dane dehaan
@@arcticgoddessWatching this again on Pluto tv and Sara Snook does favor DiCaprio in this movie.
MAN, I remember the first time I saw this movie on some random cable channel long ago and I cannot forget how the final act just blew my mind-- Ethan Hawke's performance was so good too! the last line of the movie was so memorable as well!
this movie truly is one of the best things that has ever happened to me.
Oo tol hahah. Sa star movies ko den to napanood 6yrs ago pa yata. High school ko pa to napanood, may trabaho na ako ngayon hahaha. Nahilo ako sa mga plot twist.
I absolutely love this movie. The story is amazing and the acting is top notch as well. The plot is a complete mind fuck, but it plays out brilliantly. Another excellent video, Sir.
It is an amazing movie, I knew the full plot of the movie before watching it yet it was so thrilling and immersive.
@@aizawaskitten8669 I totally agree. The original story is a classic and the film makers did a fantastic job adapting it to the screen.
It’s just convoluted it doesn’t make it good 😩 but unique I suppose and confusing
I really hated this movie when I first watched it a few years ago, it's so boring and the twist is predictable and just not interesting, atleast there were lots of dumb moments to laugh at which made it bearable
Me too, it's a perfect ending explained entry
The big thing I noticed is that old Jack had the same exact glasses that Jane had her whole life. So those are most likely the same glasses throughout the whole movie.
Ngl the title of this movie makes it seem like a Final Destination prequel
Damn, your totally right
Same. That would've been cool too, maybe like one of the first times someone has a premonition & has to figure out what it all means?
Edit to clarify I meant one of the first instances of someone saving a group from a disaster, say sometime in the early to mid-1900's? Just a point in time before a Google search could help them put the pieces together. Sorry if that wasn't clear the first time around.
Never heard of Predestination, so I briefly also thought it was a final destination prequel.
They already made that final destination prequel
For me the recommended video after this is the Final Destination Kill Count
I read the short story this movie was based on years ago. It’s call “All you zombies”, and I absolutely loved it. Plus this movie did a good job adapting the original work
Thanks for the title, I didn't know it was based on anything.
I'll have to give it a read, thanks!
The video literally states it at 40 seconds in.
It's a very rare case where it's not only a faithful adaptation of the source material, but also an improvement with the addition of the bomber and Robertson.
I'll have to check it out, curious !
@@Irrixiatdowne If only other remakes could be so good as to be true to the source material and actually improve on them...
I totally knew that jack was going to be the bomber since Chris mentioned this movie in killing of a sacred deer but I was still amazed that John was Jane’s father
And Jane was Jane’s mother! Her own mother and father. Rooster mind fvck!😂 That’s some next level incest…
when did he mention this?
Jane was Jane's Father.
@@TheCloudsMySofa Jane is John
and jane is johns mother
I like how adamant Jane wanted her baby to avoid the orphanage only for her to still go to the orphanage
by her/his own hand at that
Highly recommend everyone actually watch this movie BEFORE watching this recap. It's on my all-time most underrated list.
I imagine John’s response to jack’s “would you killhim?” To be “no, I still love him, I’ve been looking for him”
The whole "I'm my own grandpa" has been flipped on it's head in the best way for this crazy movie. Absolutely love it
This movie still blows my mind. Ethan Hawke is so underrated.
Fun fact, the creative team behind this movie (who did a hell of a job adapting and expanding upon the source material) also were the same team that did the sci-fi/vampire movie Daybreakers, which is one of my favorite vampire movies, also starting Ethan Hawke.
Found this movie 7 years ago, and even to this day I still tell people it's a must watch. The plot itself is just amazing, but throw in the twists... 🤯
This was the very last movie that my best friend suggested I watched before he died.. it was just as good as he said it was.
W friend rip🙏🏽
@@heyyyyyyyyyyyyy981theoretically he is not dead, time is a circle ⭕️
@@GabrielAlcala956energy never gets destroyed
This film is by far the best thought out most realistic depiction of time travel in cinema. There's normally hundreds of glaring plot holes and logic errors in these films, this one does a fantastic job a missing most of them.
Primer is pretty good too
If it's a complex time twisting loop, then I just want to understand what plot point will come next when he shoots himself in the laundrette!?
Why didn’t Jane notice the top surgery scars when they had sex 😭
I have been recommending this movie to everyone ever since I watched it, it's an absolute masterpiece
I want to say I watched this when it came out on a cable channel and I fell in love with its story. I’m also sure it’s here in the comment section somewhere, but it’s based on the story “All You Zombies”, by Robert Heinlein. Also, if you love wacky stories, give “The Veldt” a whirl.
He says that in the first 30 seconds of the video lol
@@LoveYouLove1986 Literally typed that before I started the video. Might have blown my excitement load. Lol
The ending is perfectly crafted I've seen in a long time. That looping, paradoxical cycle. And some paradoxes have to flow evenly. Two of the same person cannot exist. One has to die. Then you have the Grandfather Paradox, and that's a whole different can of worms.
This is the type of movie that would forever be engraved in my memory. What a classic
I've started leaving this comment before watching the video - I love this movie for how wild it is. My first time watching it me and my friend at the time (soon to be wife!!) were having a great time trying to guess the twists only to be even more shocked every time at how to movie actually developed! It has such a sentimental place in my heart, I'm looking forward to seeing this video.
After watching the video - This did not disappoint! Good to know the movie is just as wild as I remember
Very similar to Looper, but very well done. I did think at the beginning though, "If it turns out Ethan Hawke's character is also the bomber, i swear to god..." soooo yeah.
About that
You're a goat man. Lot of good recappers on here but you've consistently provided them for worthwhile movies. Appreciate you my man!
Always enjoy these explanations , I feel like I've seen the movie after watching one of these . Well done and well explored !!! Keep em coming !!!
Watchthis movie tho. It was so good
Watchthis movie tho. It was so good
This one is worth watching though, multiple times even. Go for it you will not regret it.
I have had to tech myself to not obsess over this movie thinking about it for weeks after when I try to explain it to people . My personal number 1 movie ever
I watched this movie in 2018 and remember being awestruck at the “reveals”. It is still one of my favourite movies. The fact that someone thought this and made such a complex story out of it is mind blowing in itseld
This movie isn't underrated, it was severely under marketed. It's universally loved by everyone who has seen it.
No one likes a pedant
this was the only movie ive watched so far that i genuinely needed to watch an explained video after, but i will gladly watch again for your voice and opinion foundflix
Watch Dark in Netflix
@@LuisSierra42 after I read your comment I literally had someone else recommended the same thing, I’ll have to check it out
Hats off to this dude for explaining this mind f*ck of a movie
I always imagined that Robertson would turn out to be Jane/John/jack as well. I love this movie.
Yeah, they don't completely look unlike each other
One of those films that you either LOVE IT or HATE IT, no in between, and i fucking LOVED IT
I love when you do “non-terror” movies!
This and Gattaca are classics imo. Ethan always kicks it out of the park.
It's probably just a fun coincidence but I like to think that the sign right behind old Jack at 31:00 that says "Please don't overload washers ..." refers to how the agency treats its agents. Jack, one of its "washers", was so overloaded that eventually he became everything that the agency tries to prevent, a product of their own failure. It's most likely not that but the way that they decided to put this bright, glowing yellow sign behind Old Jack the first time we see him is really intriguing from a framing standpoint.
The agency (at least one) knew he was the bomber, and everything was allowed so it can exist and have a purpose
That's a nice symbolism. Personally, I believe the looney John's conspiracy that the FBI time travel agency might have known all along that John was the Fizzle Bomber. It was a really great line: "We're all just dominoes falling down, one after the other. They're the ones that set it up. All we can do is watch it happen." Well something to that effect.
The agency did have measures in place to prevent this sort of thing...the problem was their fail-safe measure to disable the time machine after x uses malfunctioned.
@@JWadGallery bingo. The suits planned it all. Great movie
Definitely not a coincidence
My first experience watching this was unforgettable and I still haven't stopped recommending this to my friends.
I watched this a couple weeks ago and immediately checked if there was a FoundFlix video. I'm super excited to see you take on it!
Man what a mind fuck. I predicted that Jane was the man she originally fell in love with. I expected jack to be the bomber. I did not expect jack to be John who was Jane. Fuck that’s wild. What a sick movie
This movie still blows my mind!!!!john was talking to himself like WHAT!!!!! Jean was talking to herself with the man in the park!!!! My god this movie is awesome!!!
This movie was AMAZING! The writing, acting, bonkers premise, insane twists. I feel this movie is criminally underrated. Glad i stumbled across it.
This is one of my favorite movies. Super happy you finally did it. I watch it multiple times a year. Also JUST watched the black phone and was then talking about this movie. Went to RUclips to watch the differences between book and film for the black phone and saw this in related. Weird coincidence.
This movie took self love to the max
In addition to the predetermination paradox, the movie also tackles a bit of the Trolley Problem, a famous moral dilemma (aka the inspiration for the humorous fan wad "The Revenant Problem" if you play custom Doom maps).
If you don't know what it is, the idea is simple: There's a train speeding down the tracks. Ahead of you there's a fork in the tracks. If the train continues on its current path, it will kill a greater number of bystanders who are in the train's path. You are unable to warn them in time. However, you can control the switch that would force the train down the other path. The problem is, this other path also has bystanders who would be hit and die, albeit a fewer number.
So what do you do? Do you do nothing, and let the train kill more people--a statistically worse outcome? Or, do you make the choice to actively participate in the deaths of a fewer number of innocents--playing God, determining who lives and who dies, and letting their bodies hang on your conscience?
The right thing to do should be to let fewer people die, but because of the psychological toll, many people in the hypothetical situation would rather do nothing.
The movie briefly introduces this moral dilemma in the end. The seemingly mad, old John "Fizz Bomber" is convinced he's doing the right thing, because although he takes a repulsively high number of innocent lives, compared to the all the alternate timelines and the catastrophes that would happen if he didn't, he's actually saving more lives in the long run. To younger John, that reasoning doesn't justify mass murder today.
But does it? This is an extension, on a much greater scale, of the same Trolley Problem. Perhaps John isn't quite so nuts from time travel exhaustion after all. Perhaps he had a valid moral position, and perhaps pondering this moral issue over the years leads him to the inevitable, logical conclusion that it is better to switch the tracks and kill a fewer number of innocents.
Question is, does he actually witness those alternate realities firsthand, or does he take the newspaper clippings as good enough evidence? If the latter is true, then where did those paper clippings originally come from? Is it another question of the chicken or the egg? In the case of the former, that would pre-suppose he is capable of and in fact did break the time loop (by choosing not to be the bomber), but ultimately decides to be the bomber in the end. This would imply that *for a movie titled "Predestination," its seemingly helpless participants actually do have free will.*
You just partly explained the doctrine of utilitarianism. I was thinking the same thing when I watched that scene.
You got one thing wrong with the "trolly dilemma," in that it's usually given as you said, only, instead of "fewer people," it's often portrayed as a family member or close friend, forcing your emotional hand. You SHOULD choose to kill the single individual over the loss of say, 10, strangers. The "Dilemma" is that since you know and love the single individual, could you sacrifice them to save multiple lives. Diabolical!! It's like a Bond villain's plan. 😂😂
This movie ending left me speechless. Wild for sure. Definitely recommend watching it!
Ethan hawke always seems to be in cool little movies recently, hope he keeps it up x
I mean this movie is 8 years old
She never checked her face in the mirror yet she has perfect makeup and hairdo? She really is a genius 😂😂😂. And how on earth would you not know your new look is exactly the face of the first man you fell in love with, who broke your heart?
This
The first time he sang “I’m my own grandpa” I knew Jack was John/Jane. That made it so obvious. Lol. Cool story but the twist wasn’t so surprising.
By the time she had become male she had already given birth. When Jane met 'John' she had no idea that she'd look like him in the future.
@@chucklebutt4470 yeah true except she still had the same face! Yes she had an hysterectomy and double mastectomy but it’s the the same damn face at least I would suspect he was my long lost brother or something. If she fell in love with herself after her face looked like Ethan Hawke’s character that would be more believable.
@@nicoleajobo3415 man this is a gender cluster fuck, technically it's "she felled in love with himself"
Omg, I’ve been waiting for sooooo long for you to cover this movie!! I’m so excited! Awesome, thanks so much, as usual, your videos are the best! 💜
It's crazy how "Jack" looks so much like Decaprio from titanic 🤯🤯
I remember this movie from a few years ago, the twists always came outta nowhere and blew my mind.
I love this movie. I love the mystery behind the time travelling device. When I first watched it, it was a huge shock to me. I never would have guessed half of the things revealed. Definitely one of those "watch it again now that I know" kinda movies.
A time traveling cop adventure. And we know how convoluted and complicated time travel can be, in movies that is.
Never saw this movie but now I'm gonna and the storyline behind it is amazing how did this not blow up
This was a REALLY great movie to watch. I enjoyed it very much.
Glad you're covering it, FF!
I really enjoy Ethan Hawke's work. I saw this film last year and found it interesting. Good to refresh my memory watching this.
This one of my favorite movies. I'm surprised it took you this long to review it
Such an underrated gem love this one ! Thanks for doing this
This was a really cool movie. I was sure that they were the same person the moment jack and John first interacted, but the fact that Jack was Jane legitimately caught me by surprise, tho i immediately knew jack would come to be the one that abandoned Jane.
This movie made me love and watch all of Ethan Hawk’s work.
After seeing a lot if time travel movies I almost didn't believe myself when expecting the ending. Even whilst being predictable I still love paradox films.
Notably, this is actually an ontological paradox, not a time paradox. (That is to say, it's doesn't violate causality.)
When i saw this on my homepage i hate to take a few breaths, recalibrate my psyche, and then have a conversation with myself in a mirror on if i really want to go down this rabbit hole again
Good movie thanks for reviewing it. We need more time travel movies
Could the whole organization be one big paradox? Mainly because without the main character then the whole organization wouldn't exist let alone be as big as it is.
That's why I came out of the movie with the sneaking feeling that the Fizzle Bomber wasn't Jane/John/Jack's final form, but survived the shooting and went on to become someone else in the agency, possibly Robertson.
@@kragary that's a crazy thought, but very valid
@@kragaryyess I always suspected Robertson was them too . Cause if you recall, Robertson told him exactly where to find the Fizzle bomber
@@kragary Robertson did look a lot like them.
That’s amazing that such an amazing story came out of the 1940s
You know they were writing stories thousands of years ago right? Like stories that we still read today
I bet the writer/director included Jane’s backstory about how she was a tomboy and liked to fight. As a way to throw off the viewer to think why she eventually became a man.
Good plotline, good setup, good acting. Love the movie.
I loved this movie back when it first came out, I'm glad it's getting some recognition now.
About time this movie gets the GD respect it deserves. 👍🏻
One of those movies that sticks with you for a long time after watching it! My mind was blown and I had to rewind several times before I got it 😅
Thank you so much foundflix you have brought us yet another masterpiece
Just rewatched this a few months ago, absolutely love it.
I still wonder how the cameraman leaps through time with him. The cameraman is the REAL protagonist.
There’s no camera person. It’s a magical floating camera
😂
@@toptiertech7291 It’s a camera-woman!
My dad and I watched this together awhile back and so I’m getting him to watch this with me because we were left very confused
This video convinced me to watch it, and now I've seen it three times (and read the short story). Definitely a new favorite of mine! The whole cast was absolutely phenomenal and it's a fun mind-bending watch. Thanks for the video!!!
I adore this movie. I'm so happy you finally did an ending explained for it. It definitely deserves it
The problem with the Chicken or The Egg idea is that the answer is The Egg. The egg would have come before the chicken it would have just been laid by something that was very nearly a chicken.
I finally came to this realization today while watching this movie haha
I was just thinking about this movie last night as I was falling asleep , which just kept me up . I've seen in numerous times but still think about just how good it really is .
Yes you finally did it predestination I'm so glad I'm going to put this on loop watch it about a hundred times.
The paradox was perfectly mind blowing
Thank you for the amazing upload per usual!
the real winner is robertson, he finally got a super agent outside the agency
This is one of my favourite movies, so well done. Performances were amazing, twists were great. Just a terrific movie 💜
This was pretty fun. I actually read "All you Zombies" back in college so I knew where just about everything was heading, lol.
Goddamn, it's difficult for me to bring this movie up to ppl because I have a hard enough time trying to understand/remember everything. But you did a fucking fantastic job! Hopefully I'll remember it more but it's one I for sure want to recommend.
I think I had commented that you do this movie awhile ago... I'm so happy you finally did. Its one of my favorite mindbenders.
watching this movie feels like a distant and vague memory, but this movie still holds a special place in my heart and brain because of the plot
10:30 ah yes many people forgot that Abraham Lincoln was the originator of Hustle culture.
Love everything you do and bring to us. Keep it up!
FoundFlix can you add Prey and Nope to breakdown list. I’m patient for whenever you get to these titles because I love your view.
Watched this on scifi with my mom years ago & absolutely loved it! Really keeps it moving!
10:44: a click goes off in my brain as I remember something I read on the internet probably about a decade ago and put the pieces together
While I've never watched this movie (Can't believe I haven't, how did I not know this existed) but the plot reminds me of something, a cross between a creepypasta and a short poem I once read back in middle school, where a person suffers through life and at every stage of his life, every single person in the story was some version of himself, including his mother, the man/woman he/she loved, people he killed, etc. I remember that story really screwing with my middle schooler head and I am amazed there is now a movie with a similar theme.
do you remember the name of the poem?
@@misabelle3218 I believe they may be referring to The Egg by Andy Weir. It was a more of short story than a poem. It's available online. Not sure if that's what they meant though.
Halfway through, and I’m realising the point of Ethan Hawke needing a new face at the start of the movie. Calling it!
I've been wanting this for years. Thank you.
One of my favorite movies ever. It has no reason being this good
Why not? 💁🏻♀️😊
1:45 killing the man who ruined my life? That would be suicide. Yeah I’ll do it
I actually really liked this movie! I wish they made another movie within the same universe that explains how the time travel agency came to be... that would be cool