Here is the irony of Steven Anderson's philosophy regarding salvation. He will reject obedience according to the Law because that would be a works based salvation, but hypocritically will base salvation on a translation instead of the finished work of redemption of the Messiah through His death.
Thankyou simple and clear, I'm a KJV reader but this was not always the case. Being convicted by others at the time I made the decision to change. And it's true many of my own family members have became so attracted to their KJV it has become almost a religious artifact to them. So when I began to study Hebrew so that I one day be able to read the original Hebrew text, I was heavily criticized. It was even expressed that the KJV was better than the Hebrew. That was some time ago, I chuckle at the thought of it now. And still read the KJV but I balance it with other versions such as the ESV
Read Numbers 5. Then tell me what you think. Jesus loves you! Get a king james bible and believe. Look closely at the differences in those chapters. Compare to Genesis 3 and Exodus 20 as well.
Thank you for this teaching, I myself love KJV and have listened to many teaching against other versions and came to believe it. This was a clear and well done and very informative going forward I wouldn't be so judgmental in others that read other versions. 🙏🏾
modern Bibles are watered down and remove words and names and downplay the deity of Jesus. They lack bite against satans curses and spells. Satan is behind all modern versions.
In the part of the video where the speaker points on the claim that there is no improvement to be made on the KJV, most people do not have the 1611 AV, but the one from the 1700s. So by default, any KJV Onlyist using the 1700s version is violating their own idolatrous theism.
Another great teaching!😊 We must pray for people like anderson and specially for our brothers and sisters that are being slandered,rejected and confused by him(anderson). I'm a simpleton,so for me the niv is much easier to understand. I pray that The Most High continues to bless you david,the entire team at 119 ministries,your families and all my brothers and sisters reading this comment.🙏 Much love and blessings to all.🥰 Shalom.💖🤗
The 1611 “KJV” had 80 books. Now it has 66. The name of the messiah was spelled Iesus. (First letter capitalized i). Now it is spelled Jesus. There actually have been thousands of grammatical and spelling change between the 1611 version and today’s KJV. So which one is perfect. Because they both can not be. 1611 and today’s version have removed the name of Our Father at least 6,816 times and replaced it with a generic positional title held by hundreds of deity and humans and borrowed from paganism. “The LORD”. This IS NOT his name. And the great miracle gift of the word “Hallelujah” which means the same thing in every language, and which carries David’s endearing expression of Our Father’s true name, has also been completely removed from the KJV. It’s sad really. Makes me cry because of the tremendous influence this Bible has had on the English language and taught us all to forget our Father’s actual name and to refer to our Father with replacement names taken from paganism such as God and Lord.
“God” and “Lord” are not names. They are positional titles. I am now a truck driver. Imagine if a book was written about me saying wonderful complimentary things about me; So I want people to know who I am. And the book was written with my name “David” mentioned thousands of times throughout the book. But then the book went to the editor and almost every time my name appeared they REMOVED it and REPLACED it with “The TRUCK DRIVER”. So you might study the book your entire life and never know what my name is. “The LORD” is the same thing. It’s a position that has belonged to hundreds. And is a replacement for the NAME that only belongs to One: “YHWH.” Blessed be The Name of YHWH.
@@whatistruth560 Do they, does everyone know? And those who do "Know" do they understand? there is so much confussion.. more and more christians are coming to believe "all paths to God" that "God" has many faces and one of them is Christian...
@@Talancir I am not against using these terms when the scriptures use them. The scriptures use Adonai and Elohim abundantly referring to our Father, to certain people of power and authority, and to pagan deity. What I am against is removing our Fathers name YHWH completely and replacing it with a positional title which has no resemblance to His Name whatsoever.
Thank you for the good explanation. I like KJV in general, but the most critical problem with it is the interpretation of Matthew 7:23: "I never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity." However, in Greek it is not iniquity, but lawlessness, which means they didn't follow God's law. Jesus is actually saying here that there is no final salvation if we don't keep the law! And it changed Passover to Easter! 1 John 5:7 about the Trinity was added, too, in the 6th century manuscripts. I think the NT is heavily subjected to revision in favor of RCC's doctrinal philosophy. That's why we need to have the Berean attitude (Acts 17:11) -- what is called "The Scriptures" at the time of Jesus must be the standard. If the words are different over the same topic, we should follow the OT, not the NT, especially on such topics as food, divorce, circumcision, and Sabbath.
No the King James is correct. Read Romans. God has made me free of the law of sin and death for what the law could not do God has done. The people there boasted of their WORKS. The change there is to deceive people into a FALSE WORKS based doctrine.
@@MichaelAChristian1 its not about works. But we perform works out of faith. Your KJV Bible is corrupted to deceive people into thinking that they are good so long as they show up to church on Sunday. Thr word is correctly rendered "lawlessness" not iniquity. Now as yourself an intelligent question. Why would Jesus tell followers who actually brought people to the faith "depart from me" but allow people like you in, who don't do anything? Is not that absurd to you?
It is my belief that God will show us what is right, true, & good if we ask him to. I prayed to him & asked him to show me truth. He is faithful & will do it. He has opened my eyes to many things since then & will continue to do so as long as I faithfully seek him first.
Ok. Good to know. We might want to start sending English KJV Bibles around the world. There’s a whole lot of people reading bibles in a different language and none of them are saved. They prefer a lie rather than the truly inspired English version. 🤦🏽♂️ Only in America. American centric Christianity. Just another prime example of why America has lost its way.
The original manuscripts is why I choose the KJV. the “older and more reliable” manuscripts used by modern translations have many disagreements between them and continue to be edited and updated to this day. Very suspicious history on them as well. I would love to read modern English but I trust the manuscripts from the KJV which thousands of copies were found in Antioch and agree with each other.
Wow….just…wow! Though I have been taught that the KJV has a closer accuracy due to which codex (or something)…. “Onlyism” smacks of extremist separation arrogance. Thank you for this teaching…..I so appreciate your work.
This is a dangerous video. No not all of the versions are the same. if we obey the word of the NIV we would never have become America. NIV would make north Korean's always slaves to the government. OBEY higher powers that be are the laws of God. Not man or Government. BIBLE clearly tells us not to trust in man. KJV never tells us to obey a government. Only the new versions do this. Offerings are to God or the poor. Not greedy man. Because Jesus was the lamb offering. We need now to only help the poor.
The KJV-only cult honestly drives me nuts. Ive been called a fake christian for not using the KJV ( english isnt even my 1st language, how much more 17th century middle english ?!)
I prefer to use a version that doesn't have pagan words in it like "God" and "Lord". I think using those terms for our Creator is a detriment to our Abba Creator! I do like the way 119 ministries teaches teaches that there are some pagan roots in Christianity, but why use a version of the scriptures that has the same pagan roots in it?
No mention of King James instructions to the translators? Or did I miss it? Crucial instructions have them swap out certain ecclesiastical vocabulary for other less authoritative words.
King Jimmy was a Scottish Rite Freemason... had the name of the Most High removed so they insert the spurious names of their freemasonic gods during their "rituals"... Masons freely built the first Tower of Babel... Genesis 11: 3,4 the Freemasons have rebuilt the Tower of Babel in the internet... World Wide Web... And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. Genesis 11:1 Mathematics is the universal language... sixth letter of the Hebrew alphabet? Vav or W...www=666... St. Luke 17:26 "And as it was in the days of Noe so shall it be in the days of the Son of man." -words of Yehoshua... Ecclesiastes 1:9 ...no new thing under the sun...
7 Important Doctrines About the Bible The Bible is the most important book in history, and is what defines our faith. Without it we would not know who God is, his will for us, salvation, or the Lord Jesus Christ. The way to destroy Christianity would be to destroy the Bible. This present evil world knows this and has been attacking the Bible for centuries. No Bible = no Christianity. As a result of relentless attacks without reply, generations have a view of the Bible that it is an anachronistic book written by men that no one can understand, filled with mistakes, and is unneeded for true spirituality. What lies! If Christianity is on the wane it is due to a failure to fortify these important doctrines about the Bible. If removing the Bible makes Christianity crumble, returning respect to the Holy Book of Books will strengthen it. Here are seven important doctrines about the Bible that will strengthen your faith in God’s word and make you a Bible believer. 1. Revelation - God spoke words. Revelation is the doctrine that God has spoken. The Bible is God’s revelation. This is important because God is true, holy, good, and without error. Therefore, what he says is true, holy, good, and without error. This is where we get the “holy” in Holy Bible. The Bible is sacred because of its author. The Bible was revealed by God. “For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” - Galatians 1:12 2. Inspiration - God’s words in writing. Who doesn’t know the Bible was written by men. The doctrine of inspiration describes how God’s words were put in writing using the instrumentation of humanity. The Bible was not delivered from heaven like the golden plates of Mormonism, or by oral tradition like the Talmud or Koran. Divine inspiration teaches that God wrote the Bible with human pens to write specific words (2 Peter 1:20-21). “All scripture is given by inspiration of God…” - 2 Timothy 3:16 3. Illumination - God’s words understood. The Bible can be understood, because of the doctrine of illumination. God did not write a book so that no one could read and understand it. His purpose was for all to know and each to study for themselves (1 Tim 2:4; 2 Tim 2:15). The Bible is not a book God kept in secret, but helps us to understand. How can we understand? First, faith is required (Rom 10:17). Then, you must be spiritually quickened (1 Cor 2:12-13). Thirdly, you must acknowledge Paul’s instruction (2 Tim 2:7). “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” - 1 Corinthians 2:14 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.” - 2 Timothy 2:7 4. Utilization - God’s words must be used. It is necessary to have and understand the Bible, because God requires it be utilized. We are told to preach it, teach it, study it, rightly divide it, eat it, believe it, live by it, stand with it, fight with it, and obey it. This doctrine alone should cause us to cherish God’s holy book: we need it! Faith comes by no other way. “For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning,…” - Romans 15:4 “So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” - Romans 10:17 5. Canonization - God’s words complete & sufficient. This oft neglected doctrine describes how the Bible came to be complete and defined. A corollary to this is the idea that the Bible is all that we need: it is sufficient. There is nothing lacking from it to make us perfect (complete) workmen for the Lord. There is nothing else we need from oral tradition, experience, gut feelings, a Pope, magisterium, deacon board, anointed pastor, or the wisdom of the world. God said many things that are not in the Bible, but the Bible is what God wants us to know, and it is finished, complete, and sufficient in sixty-six books. “All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable… that the man of God may be perfect,…” - 2 Timothy 3:16-17 “Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;” - Colossians 1:25 6. Preservation - God’s words through history. Without preservation none of the other doctrines matter. God could have revealed, inspired, and completed a Bible to be used and understood, but without the doctrine of preservation it is all for naught, and the Holy Bible was lost thousands of years ago to history. If God wants us to understand and use his words that he inspired, then they must be preserved through history. There are no more original autographs. Preservation is needed for God’s words to endure forever (1 Pet 1:25). “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” - Matthew 24:35 “Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” - Psalm 12:7 7. Identification - God’s words in your hands and heart. In a world, culture, or church that does not understand and believe the previous six important doctrines this final doctrine is the most offensive. It is also the most important for the word of God to have an effect in your life. This doctrine describes how you know you hold God’s words in your hand and are reading them with your eyes. If God inspired and preserved his word we should be able to identify it today. There are so many different books claiming to be the Bible. It was the need to clearly identify the Holy Bible which drove men to reduce the differences and number of Bible translations down to one. After all, God only inspired one, and we only need one, and the church is one, and so which one is it? When it is said that God’s perfectly preserved words in English are found in the King James Bible this is a statement reflecting the doctrine of identification. “…when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.” - 1 Thessalonians 2:13 The Effect on Those That Believe The Thessalonians had to identify by faith the words of God before they had an effect. Perhaps the reason Christians are not being effected by the word of God is that they are not clearly identified amidst hundreds of different translations. Perhaps you cannot yet identify which Bible is God’s words. Perhaps you have been persuaded that they are all the same, or that God does not preserve his words, or that the Bible is too hard to understand or is not completely sufficient or necessary for us to have. Denying any one of these important doctrines about the Bible brings confusion and doubt upon the Bible. Without the Bible, Christianity becomes ineffective, or worse. “For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar.” - Romans 3:3-4 Christians are people of a book. Strengthen your understanding of these important doctrines about the Bible and your faith will grow, and God’s words will work effectually in you.
Yeshua didn't come to establish Christianity, the Bible or any other religious protocol. I'm sure if the disciples had stuck to doing what He instructed we would all be living and believing not just in Yeshua but in the faith of Yeshua. If the Bible was everything Holy And good there wouldn't be over 200 denominations birthed from it. I love the Bible but it was inspired by God not written by Him and then translated over thousands of years. Only by and through the Holy Spirit can it be used as a way to Know God. Apart from God the Bible and its religions have caused more death, war and bloodshed then any natural disaster ever. Thanks for your doctrines but more than anything we need a demonstration of Spirit and power. Talk is cheap these days!
The KJV didn’t even exist until recently. So what were the disciples reading? The New Testament? Which also had not be written. No! They were reading the scrolls (the Old Testament). We have the scrolls today thanks to Qumran. But the KJV is perfect and infallible right!? No. The Word of Yah (Yahusha) is infallible and He is the Word! Read and search the scriptures (the scrolls) written in Hebrew and Greek originally and you will find the truth. Bible Hub and E-Sword let you easily do this! Don’t be afraid to look at the Hebrew and the Greek original texts! You will be surprised to find out that Yahusha and His disciples and the early church never practiced or worshipped Ishtar (Easter) with painted eggs and the Easter (Ishtar) fertility bunny. But word that King James replaced with Easter (Ishtar) was Passover!m in Greek!!! A Feast that the disciples and Yahusha did keep! And that Yahusha died during (as the final lamb to be sacrificed for our sins!!!) They did keep Passover!!! Not Easter!!! The Bible says not even to utter the name of false elohim (gods) much less worship Him the way the pagans worshipped their gods! We are commanded eternally to keep the Feasts of Yah! (Passover, Feast of Unleavened Bread, Sukkot, etc). Keep watching 119 videos and test everything! Stop listening to your Sunday preacher. And start reading the Word of Yah for yourself. Even if you only have the KJV version. Yah can still use that to open your eyes to the truth!!! It’s all there! His commandments were never done away with. In fact, He says if you love me you will keep my commandments! Read Exodus 20 again! Which of those 10 commandments do you keep!? Look a bit closer at the fourth while you are at it! Shalom!
Then He said to me, “Son of man, go now to the house of Israel and speak My words to them. 5For you are not being sent to a people of unfamiliar speech or difficult language, but to the house of Israel
NIV identifies Morning Star in 22:16 (the Messaiah) with Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12. That is evil. I appreciate KJV's litereal translation of "and between thy seed and her seed" (KJV 3:15), because it implies more than offspring or descendants. I grew up hearing the analogy that a man provides seeds and a woman's body is like a field where seeds can grow. So when I read KJV Gen 3:15, I understood as the prophecy of the virgin birth, because women don't have the seeds. That's why I appreciate literal translation because hidden meanings can be completely lost in interpreted and paraphrased versions.
@@melissaupton7373 Read Revelation 22:26, please. Jesus is describing Himself as the bright morning star. "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." It's probably a metaphor that He is the guiding light. In Isaiah, Lucifer is a son of dawn who carried a light. But some versions of the Bible interpreted it as the morning star. I think it is a serious problem when the Bible was "interpreted" in a wrong way when it could be translated correctly.
Lucifer is a Latin word that the KJV translators borrowed from the Catholic Latin Vulgate. It is a word for the planet Venus, nothing to do with Satan. It's literal meaning is "morning star". It is a prophecy against the king of Babylon, who tried to exalt himself above the throne of God. Like the KJV only cult exalt their imperfect uninspired translation above the throne of God. The angels are known as the morning stars even in the KJV. Jesus is the Morning Star, not morning star. No honest person reading the Isaiah 14 in context, would ever say the NIV is saying that Jesus is the same as Satan. Not that their is anything honest about the KJV only cult. The KJV also had day star in the margin, but no Latin word should be in an English translation. The KJV translators failed terribly, just as they did with mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Again showing the Catholic influence on the KJV.
Awesome! The only other thing I might have pointed out was the difference between the 1611 and the current KJV which many Onlyist's are unaware of amazingly!
Thank you for the teaching. I admire the KJV but find it difficult to read. Another error for me is that the book of "James" should be the book of Jacob/Ya'aqov. No translation is utterly perfect nor will it give you salvation.
Only the original scripts in Hebrew, Classical Greek, and Aramaic can be fully trusted. The KJV, Geneva, and Jewish translations are ok. I don’t know the original languages, but I value the closest and most complete translations of any verse and keep an open mind for the most accurate translation available and to improvement.
It wasn't classical Greek the Bible was written in classical Hebrew, Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, koine Greek. The Bible was what is written on 3 different continents Asia, Africa, and Europe by 40 different authors in a span of 1,500 years and the Bible was completed 1,900 years ago.
What Jason said and there are no original manuscripts, they are too old, and we cannot be certain what language each of them was written in.. because we don't have them, all we have is copies and translations to work from, the only thing we can fully trust is not a thing... it is YHVH, but we can use what we got to piece together and learn about his Words, his covenants and commandments and righteous Judgements, and the History that is brought to us from the many scripts that we have found. what did Moses write in , The Bible says he wrote down everything YHVH said, Moses knew and spoke many languages, Maybe all 70 of the languages dispersed at babel... at one time he was being educated and groomed to be Pharaoh, which was (at the least) one of the most powerful positions in the world. and trading with folks from everywhere.. But he was preserving the words for this people, the Hebrew Children and those that came with them from Egypt, so he would have recorded YHVH's words in their language for them. Many of the Carvings left in the wilderness during that time were Paleo Hebrew, perhaps that was the alphabet they used was that, or maybe they had a more cultured hebrew language for writing literature, maybe they carried with them documents written, rewritten by their fathers, Jacob, Abraham, Shem, Noah, no doubt they still told the stories to each other and their children. I think it is presumptuous to think we have it all figured out, we have Theories and Opinions perhaps educated ones but theories none the less
@@huasonshine4120 I essentially agree with you, but I am certain that when we have the choice to ignore a law or command OR to follow it to the best of our individual abilities ( which I know will vary), the ‘righteous’ choice is to follow each one as best we can. I am a work in progress. There is no recipe for everything we should do on the feast days nor are our jobs necessarily amenable to days off for them ( military, health care….) so I make sure to read the relevant scripture for each feast day. Frankly, I had no idea about First Fruits or Shavuot or even how the original Passover was ‘celebrated’ till I decided to learn for myself. I tried to find an excellent RUclips explanation of how transcriptions and translations of scripture are studied for accuracy and how scholars conclude which are the most accurate. It was made by ‘Christians’ who probably still observe the Sun Day, but they explained things very well and truthfully. I wanted to include the link but found a plethora of such videos and could not recognize which one I watched a year ago. Consensus keeps evolving because it is a science. I love 119 Ministries, Yahweh’s Restoration Ministries, and House of New Beginnings ( AZ). I don’t get hung up on how some still say ‘God’ because they haven’t learned the origins of this name yet, and I believe Paul’s overall message is patience.
@@joshuastavos4376 yes, Gods grace is there for what we cant do, but we are to walk in his way, and if we get of the path we are to repent (turn around) and follow in his way.,,, yes of course we cannot fill his footsteps, but we can follow him. We cannot do... what we dont know, and we cant do well the things we dont understand, we just do our best with the understanding that we have, and follow him when we cannot see where he is leading... obedience, and trust,... He is a good father, would us being evil give more grace to our children that fall, than the perfect father? Concerning his days, keep in mind some things can only be kept "while we are in the land" we are not, we are in exile still. so remembering these things, the best we can is keeping (guarding) his laws, (instructions)
Can’t wait!!! We went to a KJV only church for awhile without knowing and then I realized they worshipped the KJV translation of the Bible and not Yah! You shall have NO other elohim before HIM!
I prefer any translation based on the Textus Receptus, the KJV being one of them. Keeping closer to the original meaning and text of the manuscripts. Trivial errors are in fact trivial. Discerning the meaning of what is said from the text is no difficult. In contrast to translations such as the NIV do not only use inaccurate word or leave words out, entire verses are omitted. A good example would be 1 John 5:7 and the Record in Heaven. These omissions deny the very doctrine of the trinity. Now that, is not trivial and it is only one example.
The NIV leaves nothing out. It was translated from older more accurate manuscripts. 1 John 5 v 7 was added by an uninspired scribes years after John wrote his letter. So the KJV translated from inferior manuscripts dedicated to the Pope has this uninspired added verse. The doctrine of the Trinity is very clear in the NIV it does not call the Holy Spirit an "it" denying his deity four times like the KJV. It is far stronger on the deity of Christ than the KJV.
Between online videos including yours, The Geneva Bible, Strong’s concordance and the Koren Tanach, I am satisfied that what I am reading is as close to truth as possible.
This should be good. Can’t wait to see all the comments from here about other translations and how they have added or taken away from the Bible or have changed certain words to push a different meaning.
I hear several generalizations based mostly on the pastor's very extreme opinion. Followers of Christ know they can completely disregard those who put themselves in the judgement seat of Yeshua. You should make another video about 'KJV Onlyism' based on manuscript quality. You touched on this for a moment but then put your trust in biblical scholars by concluding the so-called "older" manuscripts are better. Like you say in every video: "test everything"... even the "older" manuscripts and the "biblical scholars".
I personally like the King James Version of the Bible because of the way it is written and it is Old English. I use it as my main source because I believe there are errors in modern translations of the Bible. I however do not consider myself to be a “KJV Onlyist” because there are some errors in the KJV translation, and I have no problem with someone using another translation like the ESV or the NIV. I also believe there are errors in every translation of the Bible, if possible, errors we may not even consider an error. But verses like Acts 20:7 KJV and Hebrews 4:9 KJV were not translated correctly by the Protestant translators during the middle ages. They have omitted “the sabbath” from these verses and insisted that the first day of the week is the day of worship and rest. Another major error is the word “Easter” found in Acts 12:4. According to the context, it is blatant that the Greek and Latin word “Pascha” should have been translated into the word “Passover” which fits the rest of the chapter. These are a few errors found in the KJV, which some modern translations correct like the NIV and the ESV. Also, to say someone is not saved just because they read a modern translation is not showing an example of the Messiah. Yahweh can speak to each and every one of us all we should know through the Holy Spirit of truth. Some people have a difficult time reading a book that has a beginning language that men were to think out and make better. It is okay for one to read a modern translation of the Bible. One is not saved by their works, but by faith through grace alone in the Messiah Yahshua. The Messiah is our Interpretation and our Interpreter who interprets the Scriptures to His knowledge. He also will edify each and every one of us in His great name, that we may grow steadfastly in the knowledge of the truth. Did man save you or did God? We must listen to God rather than men. For even the slightest change can change the whole meaning.
In the Original Greek Few things have caused more damage in churches than when pastors say things like: “In the originals, the word here really means_____” “The Greek word for this is______” “A better rending of the originals would be_____” Churchgoers have heard these sayings for so long they have now become calloused to it! This is a real problem. So, what is the problem? Here are a few. There are no originals When the pastor says, “in the originals”, it is guaranteed that a majority of the people in his Sunday morning church audience thinks he means the original autographs. What he said was misleading. The dirty little secret that everyone in seminary knows but no one talks about is that there are no original autographs. Not a single original writing from any apostle, prophet, or tablet of stone exists today. We have thousands of copies (apographs), but not a single true original autograph. Many textual critics think it is impossible to believe the Bible is divinely inspired because of this very point. Bible believers have known this for centuries and understand by faith God preserves his words through copies and translations and not the original autographs. When the pastor refers to the “originals” in church, he means a copy of a Greek text that was sold to him in the first Greek class he took. Most likely that Greek text did not exist anywhere in history before it was compiled in the last couple centuries. No one speaks Greek and Hebrew When the pastor says this in church, he is not speaking to a room of experts in ancient near eastern languages. Some in the audience may have learned the alphabet, or memorized verb tenses in Bible college, or spent a few years in elementary language learning, but the majority can not even tell if what he says is true. Why is it that those pastors who claim the audience should use Bibles in the language of the people think it is helpful to speak foreign languages to them? It changes the Bible text The number one reason pastors go back to the original Greek, Hebrew, Latin, or Aramaic is because they want to retranslate the text to align with their holy outline. If it is only a matter of definition then why don’t they use an English dictionary to clarify? Instead, the English word is seen as insufficient and needs retranslated. This gives the lesson to everyone in the audience that there are mistakes in the Bible, and it is acceptable to retranslate the Bible to make a point. The ends justify the means. It begets pride and reopens the translation process Speaking in other languages puffs people up. The Bible has already been translated into English from Greek, Hebrew, and with other translations diligently compared and revised. When the pastor raises the issue of translation he not only claims to correct all the translators of the Bible everyone is holding, but also leaves the translation process open for anyone to do the same thing. How is anyone supposed to know when the process of retranslating/correcting/revising the Bible is complete? In the eyes of most seminary trained textual critics, it will never be finished, because they are constantly finding new manuscripts in the dirt. They do not believe they have God’s words inspired or preserved in a single book. It robs the audience of God’s words The most serious problem with pastors saying these things is that it robs the audience of the authority of the Bible in their hands. The Bible in their hands says one thing, but suddenly they need the pastor to tell them what the Bible really should say. What happens when they go home after the meeting and continue reading in the book they hold? Now they will have a doubt, even if small, concerning the very words on the printed page. Since the pastor has declared that at least in one place it is incorrect, how can they trust it enough to teach their children and family at home? Now multiply this by the hundreds of times pastors refer to “the originals” and you might start to understand one reason why people don’t feel confident to study the Bible for themselves. This needs to stop. People ought to be encouraged to believe the Bible, starting with the one they have, and not the one a pastor retranslates or cherry picks from his own sanctified opinion. Do we need Greek and Hebrew? You can live your whole life not knowing a single Greek or Hebrew word and be made perfect unto all good works by all scripture preserved in the English language (2 Tim 3:16-17). If someone tells you otherwise, then you have found someone who wants dominion over your faith. We already have God’s preserved words in English, but we do need translators. We need faithful workmen to study Bible translation from a Bible believing perspective so that we can help preserve God’s words in languages all across the world that do not have a Bible. If this is your ministry then you will need to study other languages and utilize the translations that have been a part of God’s preservation process through history. What Do I Do? If you hear your pastor say “The Greek word here really means…” have the courage to speak up for the weaker brothers around you and say, “Stick to God’s words in English pastor!” Better yet, find some place where the leadership seeks to encourage Bible belief instead of critiquing scripture when it doesn’t suit their doctrinal preferences. We need to be sensitive to the critique, editing, and imposition of doubt upon God’s word. It is enough to hear it from without the church, must we hear it from within as well? Don’t let someone who has studied other languages stop you from understanding and trusting God’s word in your own language. “…let God be true, but every man a liar;…” - Romans 3:4
very good 119 KJV only is much like Catholic methodology. 1600 years later after other found and translated manuscripts, but KJV is truly the divine manuscript ? The KJV fell from heaven? "the word became flesh" and the word is KJV? (the cart before the horse) in Acts this is for sure their exposure. " it was in the time of unleavened bread" but it wasn't Passover yet? hhhm thank you 119 ministry....... great video!
I'll take the Geneva 1599 over the KJV (1611 Authorized) any day. I prefer the NKJ over the ESV. I'm no fan of Steven Anderson and pray he repents. Thanks for this excellent video. Be blessed in the name of Yeshua.
Shalom ve toda Very clearly presented. It is obvious that there are some so brainwashed with fear by an instructor that they are unable to accept that Yeshua is the Word and He keeps His Word pure in meaning, and allows for change in definition of words especially in English language! Pray for them!
why dont you use a hebrew translated direct to english? instead of all these different translations? If you get a hebrew scriptures and a direct translated to english
It is too bad people don’t ignore him. It’s called negative attention seeking. Some people will do whatever it takes to be famous. When you ignore this behavior in “children”, generally it will diminish and eventually go away. When they receive attention for it, the behavior is reinforced because that is why they do it.
so many times it is commanded to only speak hebrew to seperate your non hebrew children so sure lets translate this from the given language of YESHUA 0For they hear: “Order on order, order on order, line on line, line on line; a little here, a little there.” 11Indeed, with mocking lips and foreign tongues, He will speak to this people
Good video, in my opinion there no need for any more translations anymore- even in the video Dr White said any other translations of certain amount of words to be somewhat different is about money from book inc's more then not.
Speaking of translational errors. Have any of you read The Living Bible translation. It's extraordinarily antisemetic and changes the overall meaning of multiple bible verses to say what they want it to mean. It's nauseating.
When does numbers say Passover is? When does it say days of unleavened bread? According to numbers they are 2 separate events. We must let the Bible define things for us. Passover is one night not seven days
Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. The night of the Passover, and the feast of unleavened bread is part of Passover week. That is why Herod who wanted to please the Jews was waiting till after Passover. Easter never existed, it is one of the many mistranslations in the imperfect uninspired KJV. When Ezekiel 45 v 21 was point out to well known "Bible agnostic" and KJV only cultist Will Kinney, who is incapable of rational thought. He still insisted that Easter was the correct translation. Even though it contradicts God's clear teaching in Ezekiel. That is the KJV only cult for you. Full of double standards, and hypocrisy, and outrageous lies.
@@samlawrence2695 In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten. Think you stretching saying that makes it clear, they are both stated here but consecutive it doesn’t call them one
@@Sandppy According to the prophet Ezekiel under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Passover there is the night of the Passover, but it is also a feast of seven days. When only unleavened bread could be eaten. Easter never existed in the time of Herod. As I said he wanted to please the Jews. So was waiting till after Passover. The KJV got it wrong.. I am not stretching anything, just going on the inspired word of God.
Let me get this straight. This man believes that if you can't understand the KJV then you aren't saved. Um, excuse me. Not everything in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic easily translates into English. Some meaning is lost in translation. Also, by his own argument, he should be able to read the bible in Greek and Hebrew if he is saved because the Holy Spirit should be teaching him thru it.
When I first came to faith I was reading the good news bible and loved it . God elohim is our teacher who will reveal the truth to us even if we only have a flawed bible new testament That's why the Torah and Tanaka Hasn't change That's the foundation of all scripture
Matthew 24 for many shall come in May name. Word changing is not good. Will if you look at the Bible old testament God always used the bad people for the good . Everything God does is back then and of today. Like the word (should ) (will)(shall) John 3 :16 and revlataion 3:5
This video starts out with you saying "we believe that the whole bible is true", goes on to say that there are errors in the KJV. If you believe there are errors in the KJV, you do not believe that the WHOLE bible is true. Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 2 Timothy:3:7
Saying that because Anderson is a freak than the KJV is wrong is not a good argument. The translation of the KJV may not be perfect but the manuscripts it uses are. In John 7: 8-9 ESV it says “You go up to the feast. I am NOT going up to this feasts...” but a few verses later says “ then he also went up...” So the ESV and many other modern Bibles is making The Lord a liar and a sinner. On the contrary in the KJV it says “Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up YET unto this feast...” Here Jesus is not lying. Again in Matthew 5: 22NIV says “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment.” We all know that Jesus got angry in the Bible so is the NIV saying that Jesus is a sinner? Definitely yes. What the KJV says than? “ But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.” Here we have “without a cause” and Jesus is not a sinner. There are many important changes in modern Bibles like these. Modern bibles are all catholic made bibles so if you are Protestant or even Hebrew root why are you using a catholic Bible? Modern bibles uses three main texts: Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, and alexandrinus. I suggest you to read the books of David W. Daniels and learn how these three texts are false.
David W Daniels is a KJV only cultist, full of double standards and circular reasoning. Also he is from Chicktracts which is full of conspiracy theories. Would not trust anything from Chicktracts. Especially David W Daniels. You ask why read a Catholic Bible? The KJV was translated from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope, also it leant heavily on the Latin Vulgate a Catholic Bible, showing the heavy Catholic influence on the KJV. So you have Latin words like Lucifer, instead of the more accurate translation, of " morning star" or "day star". Even the KJV had day star in the margin. Also the language is very archaic. So many words have changed meaning, making the KJV even more inaccurate. That is why I do not use the KJV or own one. That was a decision I made even before I had heard of this KJV only cult. A cult that is another gospel, and should be rejected for the damnable, destructive heresy it is.
Some modern translations are modifying some important passages, for example in Isaiah 40:22 originally: CIRCLE (khoog--חוּג--), they have deliberately changed it to globe...Steven Anderson, Kent Hovind, Michael Rood, and company, all of them Flat Earth detractors, must know that Isaiah knew the difference: Isaiah 22:18-BALL (Kadur--כַּדוּר--)... the bible is full of Flat Earth references, and this is the challenge for them (just to get started): Is there any bible chapter that tells us about the earth being a sphere with at least one single continuous and perpetual movement? (science tells us there are five movements); Is there any bible chapter that tells us about the sun being massive and motionless? (over sixty tells us otherwise). According to the scriptures heliocentrism is FALSE!!!...
KJV onlyists like to point out that modern translations like the NIV and NRSV, in Luke 11:2-4 the Our Father prayer is missing parts of the prayer, but when you use those same modern translations and go to Matthew 6:9-13 you’ll see that the ENTIRE prayer is there. So in reality, the entire Our Father prayer is STILL in the modern translations, you just have to go to the Gospel of Matthew to read the entire prayer.
@@samlawrence2695 He that is of God heareth God's words. Man cannot live by bread alone but by every word that cometh from the mouth of God. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7. "Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever: That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the Lord: Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits: Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us. Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon: Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant."- Isaiah chapter 30 verses 8 to 13. Heaven and earth shall pass away but his words shall not pass away. "Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever. For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away: But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you."- 1 Peter 1 verses 23 to 25. Jesus Christ is the Living Word! It is easier for heaven and earth TO EXPLODE than for his words to ever pass away. The scriptures CANNOT BE BROKEN. His words they are spirit and they are life! "Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you."- John chapter 15 verse 3.
@@MichaelAChristian1 Those scriptures are in my Bible as well. They have absolutely nothing to do with the KJV only heresy. I have noticed that KJV only cultist like yourself. Love to quote scripture, then try to make it justify their man made tradition. Which of course what the false teaching of KJV onlyism is. The Sadducees quoted scripture to the Lord Jesus Christ. . Jesus pointed out to them, that they did not know the scripture oy the power of God. Salvation is found in Christ Jesus and him alone. No other name given to us, by which we must be saved. That is in all transltions, English and all languages. The KJV is archaic, many words have changed meaning making even more inaccurate. That is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations, in English we can understand. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect, that is why they had hundreds of footnotes, with alternative readings. Because they were not at all sure of the correct translation. They said that the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult in their delusions, pride, and arrogance think they know better.
@@samlawrence2695 You are the one citing men. Man cannot live by bread alone but by EVERY word that cometh from the MOUTH OF GOD. Your false doctrine has NO scriptures as you think they are all "imperfect translation". That is heresy. The scriptures CANNOT be broken. He did not say the PARAPHRASE or the IMPERFECT TRANSLATION cannot be broken. The scriptures cannot be broken because it is the word of the LORD. The "new versions" OMIT WHOLE VERSES and change them to DECEIVE. The "niv" removes the name of that wicked one in Isaiah and leaves a title pointing to JESUS instead. Wake up! THIS IS THE WORD THAT IS PREACHED UNTO YOU. WRITE IT IN A BOOK FOR EVER AND EVER.
I use the JPS, ( 1917), NKJ and Scriptures as my primary, NASB is horrible and so much added text, we used it in bible college, I know a young man that was KJV only, I asked him what version of the Bible did God hand Moses, I asked him if he believed in Unicorns also, since KJV does. As my pastor said, let the Hebrew translate what Hebrews wrote and let the Gentile translate what he wrote.
The internet allows an interesting phenomenon whereby one could attempt to circumvent Proverbs 17:28. If your words can't be read, no one will know you opened your mouth.
I dont like some other versions because they exclude things but I dont think we should hold everyone who believes kjv only is like Steven Anderson lol. I'm glad you said it in follow up. But I dont think it'd the only thing we should use either. I just think it's better than many versions out there
It is more of a preference but I know newer believers can read other versions that will tell them things like "in saying this Jesus declared all foods clean" type stuff and mislead many
@@steevs7912 Nobody is being misled. Jesus did declare all foods clean. The only ones misleading people, are the KJV only cultists. A bunch of hypocrites and deceitful false teachers.
@@samlawrence2695 where does it say Jesus said these things? I've read all of what yeshua said and nowhere ever did he say he made all foods clean. If you actually research that "footnote" you'll see that was added. Yah said not to add or take away. They def added to his word
@@steevs7912 When asked about what defiles a man. It is what comes out of the mouth that defiles a man, not what goes in Also in the Pauline letters no food is to be refused if eaten with thanksgiving, unless offered to idols. Peter is told. what God has cleaned we are not to call common or unclean. We are also told not to judge anyone about keeping or not keeping Sabbath days, or what meat we eat or don't eat. Paul also makes it clear that days will come when people will believe doctrines of devils. Forbidding to marry and abstaining from certain foods. I have been set free by. Christ, and by God's grace I will not fall for another gospel. Like Sabbath keeping, or abstaining from certain meats. Another gospel like the seventh day Adventist. It was a Seventh Day Adventist cultist who started the KJV only cult. A cult that is also another gospel. With no scriptural authority.
@@samlawrence2695 it sure sounds like all of that came from Paul and none of it came from yeshua...missing my point. And you can choose to interpret the things Paul says as meaning eat whatever you want, don't honor the sabbath, but if Paul actually taught what was contrary to Moses im pretty sure he would've been slain much earlier. If Jesus taught against Moses law, the commandments God gave for ppl to follow, they would have had him gone way before the cross came into play. You can study it out or you can go on thinking God lied to malachi when he said he never changes because either Paul isn't saying what you think he is saying or he is just a heretic at that point.
Yes, "Jesus" in Acts 7:45 & Heb 4:8 is very interesting. Seems that KJV, Bishops', and Geneva followed the Vulgate(s). Geneva provides a marginal note, at Heb 4:8 "He speaks of Joshua the son of Nun .... so was Joshua a figure of Christ." Perhaps KJV followed Geneva at Heb 4:8 since KJV also provides a marginal note, "Jesus: that is, Joshua".
I'm _not_ a KJV-onlyist. That being said, part of your argument does _not_ address (whether it be intentional avoidance or ignorance) that there's a _sort of_ variant of KJV-onlyists. It's only fair to also acknowledge these groups since outsiders erroneously categorize them as KJV-onlyists. There's the _'KJV is the best English translation we have'_ people, and then there's the _'the texts on which the KJV version were based on-onlyists'_ people (aka the _'Textus Receptus-onlyists'_ aka the _'Receiced Text-onlyists')_ and, the one I believe, the _'Byzantine Text-onlyists'_ (aka the _'Majority Text-onlyists')._ (The Received Text being based on The Majority Text.) It's _not_ a salvation issue, _but_ I do believe it's a _very important_ issue as there is great evidence that the New Testament text from which modern translations are made is a _corrupt_ forgery (as you quoted, "...test everything; hold fast what is good."). The documentary "Tares Among the Wheat" elaborates in _much detail_ on the extremely sketchy history of the modern "Critical Text". My point in saying all this is to say your argument ignores the fact that there is very solid evidence that the "Critical Text" is based on a _forgery_ made to look older than it actually was (the creator of the "codex" even came forward. Watch the documentary for details). _Perhaps_ it's not a Satanic conspiracy so much as people hiding the truth in order to save face or, at the very least, to accumulate prestige and profit (ie inept and/or corrupt "scholars" (Westcott and Hort, to name a couple)). _Perhaps_ it _is_ a Satanic forgery. Watch the _whole_ documentary and decide for yourself. "Study to show thyself approved..." and "...test everything; hold fast what is good."
I have watched it. Question: do you think those who made it had an agenda? I believe they did. Their agenda is KJV only. And as I watch history being made in front of my eyes and being falsely reported, and falsely recorded, I am made painfully aware that historians always have their own filters and their own agenda, because historians are people, and they get their information from people. People perceive and report according to their agenda. When we were not there, we only know from what we have been taught or can glean from “history”. And then we talk as if we know the truth because we have studied what other people with their own agenda said. It is frustrating to say the least.
@@pegtop5455 Yes, I believe the filmmakers had an agenda. But that's _argumentum ad hominem._ There are WAY too many red flags when it comes to where the "codex" came from and its so called "credibility". (ie Westcott and Hort's GUESSWORK and lack of expertise, inconsistencies in the story of the guy who _found_ the "codex" (and his story was documented by himself), the museum's decision to hide these inconsistencies/controversies, the fact that the "codex" looks suspiciously out of its time and the history of the Vatican's forgeries, the history of the Vatican killing and torturing people for translating the scriptures and torturing and killing people for even owning a copy of any part of the English scriptures (no matter how complete/incomplete), the fact that the forger of the "codex" even admitted it was made by him and was willing to publically debate it, the fact that the Catholic Church rushed anyone skeptical of the "codex" from studying them too closely, etc. It is clear from the overwhelming amount of well documented actions, quotes, writings, and inconsistencies from everyone involved that the "codex" is fraudulent/illegitimate/has _no_ credibility. Yes, history is often twisted, censored, etc. But the history of the Critical Text is _not_ being discussed by mainstream scholars (and the fact that the museum, and BBC, and Vatican even refused to talk about and/or even _suppressed_ the extremely sketchy parts of the Critical Text... It's very suspicious when someone refuses to even _discuss_ credible evidence or goes out of their way to _hide_ or suppress opposing views/evidence), the fact that most the mainstream media at the time ran a smear-campaign on the guy who admitted to making the "codex", _and_ the scholars at the time used the "the debate is settled" "argument" _without ever having held a debate_ (the creator of the text tried to hold a public debate but the "scholars" absolutely refused. John 3:20-21 (English Standard Version) 20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. 21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”), and the fact that the _expert's_ opinion was _ignored_ and the opinion of the people lacking expertise were promoted and even taken as scripture (pardon the pun). One scholar said he felt the "codex" was legit because he had a _feeling_ that it was legit. So to acknowledge what you said about history, history definitely was rewritten/covered up but _not_ by the opposers of the false codex but by those in _favor_ of it. Again, I'm _not_ a KJV-onlyist, but I am a Majority-Text-is-the-best-we-got-seeing-as-the-originals-have-been-lostist (I'm ok with newer translations where the text agrees with the Byzantine/Majority Text. And I'm ok with the KJV where it agrees with the Majority Text). Despite the documentary makers' obvious bias and misguided philosophy (KJV-onlyism) it does not change the evidence. Again, _argumentum ad hominem._
@@MichaelAChristian1 I cited the _correct_ chapter. The next chapter that you mention is a _different_ story than 1 Cor 10:8. HOWEVER, someone did point out the fact that 1 Cor 10:8 says in ONE DAY. So there's no conflict like I thought since Numbers 25 may be talking about the _TOTAL_ number outside of a 24 hour period (or, outside a from "dusk till dawn" period).
Before I proceed to write as I do I need you to be aware I am NOT K.J.V.O nor am I intentionally trying to discredit anything Dovid has said here I completely agree with more or less all of it. "According to scholars and textual critics these older manuscripts more accurately reflect the original text" And how many of you are aware of which "older" and "more accurate" manuscripts Dovid is referring too here? He's probably referencing Codex Sinaiticus which has been dated to the mid 4th century found in St. Catherines monastery at the bottom of Mount Sinai and Codex Vaticanus dated also to the 4th century conveniently discovered in the Vatican library. In 1844 Constantin Tischendorf set off on a voyage to try and discover the worlds oldest Biblical and manuscript and surprise, surprise he discovered it in a monastery reportedly being used by the monks as trash to keep their fire lit (there is another story about the discovery contradictory to this one) the problem I have with Codex Sinaiticus is Constantin Simonadies. If you don't know who this man is he is the Scribe who went to his grave claiming to have written Codex Sinaiticus with his own hand for a wealthy client. How many of you are aware Codex Sinaiticus constains The Shepherd of Hermas and The Gospel of Barnabus? This specific manuscript alongside Codex Vaticanus was later used by two Roman Catholic scholars called Westcott and Hort to bring to completion what we know today as modern translations. Codex Sinaiticus specifically has been the topic of controversy ever since it's discovery in the 19th century and both Wescott and Hort had very interesting textual techniques when forming the first English translation after the 1611 K.J.V
Westcott and Hort were Anglicans. Just like the baby sprinkling Anglicans who translated the KJV. Who of course translated it from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. That is why the KJV is a very Catholic influenced translation. Latin words like Lucifer borrowed from the Latin Vulgate, instead of morning star or day star. Mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover.
The correct translation in acts 12:4 is Easter. Peter was arrested (then were the days of unleavened bread.) Passover comes before unleavened bread. So either herod was going to wait a whole year before executing Peter, or herod intended to wait until after the Roman festival of Ishtar (easter) was over.. It seems that the kjv translators got that one correct.
There was NO EASTER in Jesus day! It's a pagan holiday. Christmas too! They didn't speak Olde English then and all the pagan holidays are just that...PAGAN!
While I agree with the KJV not being perfect, I disagree with the idea of oldest manuscripts means better. There's a reason why the MAJORITY texts do not agree with the oldest. They were the most used therefore destroyed faster overtime. The ones least used, last longer. And they were least used because they weren't the best copies. So MT and TR are the best textual camp. It's easier to miss out a verse while copying by mistake than adding notes into the text by mistake. That argument also is extremely weak.
Also, the gospel of Matthew was originally in Hebrew according to early Church History. We have no original manuscripts of it, but certainly it would be a more reliable source than the Greek majority if we did.
Agree. The issue in translations deals with manuscripts used. Also, look at the translation committees. Is there an agenda or reason for the specific translation being made? This certainly influences the modern "translation."
One of the most common arguments Onlyism makes. It is just plain false. The Catholic Church had Monks make thousands of copies of the Bible they wanted solely used. They also destroyed all they could of other versions of it. Thus why there is more copies. Some of the missing verses have been placed as footnotes in earlier manuscripts. Thus it is clear the earlier ones are in fact better. It is like some book came out. I liked it but wanted just a few changes. They would not change it so I burned all their copies and made many copies of the one I made with changes. Does that make mine more accurate than the real book? Father, Son and Holy Spirit seems to have been added for example.
@@steveangell1072 you have no idea what you are talking about. These majority text does not come from Monks of the Vatican!!! 😂 Lol in fact, you can match the MT and TR with the earlier patristic writings, hardly monks from the Vatican. It is the Vatican that prefers the Critical Text not the MT or TR, so every point you tried to make is false.
@@moisesg.v.1575 I used the term Monks generically. It may have been Priest or Scribes the Catholic Church hired. History is clear Rome ruled the earth for a long time. Even after it stopped ruling the vast majority of Churches were Roman Catholic. To think they did now write the majority of the text we now have is to dismiss history.
@@MichaelAChristian1 What different things do they say? Strange the KJV only cultists do not make their comments in King James English. Reason no one could understand them because we do not speak that way anymore. Yet these hypocrites confine Almighty God to some 400 year old imperfect uninspired translation. That is nothing but idolatry. God knows all tongues and languages, he is not confined to any translation, especially one made by baby sprinkling Anglicans, that the KJV only cult, would have us believe.
Dear 119 ministries, many things already happened, a lot of crazy things, not only in US but all over the world. I am talking about pandemic and the government solution. You always say to Test Everything, which I believe everything mean everything including what’s happen in this world. Your Content “The Mark of The Beast” showed that probably involving governmental system or policy. I wonder why you never talk about today’s situation or where you stand? Do we as Torah believers should just follow and trust everything is gonna be okay? And believe whatever the system said? Or else? Or you let everyone decide according to what they believe? But what you believe? Are you in 119 ministries (John and David) received the system or policy? With Yeshua loves, your brother.
There are plenty of people talking about whats going on... We still need people to talk about truth, If we know YHVH, it does not matter what is going on, he will keep us, Let 119 teach the messages YHVH lays on their hearts, and not force everyone to teach what you want to hear.. Someone needs to man the Strong Tower, to bring in those who search and seek...
@@huasonshine4120 Telling the truth is important but how we as believer to act in real life also necessary. TORAH is the basic but surely more than that we need to understand.
that point is covered in the video, I love the KJV as well always have... but I do not exalt it as infallible, many of these ommitted scriptures are not in older texts, and their omission does not effect the meaning of the message overall. I like comparing versions and consulting the original languages from where they were translated, language does change over time and with it the meaning of words...
@@huasonshine4120 But the WORD OF GOD does NOT change! "If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments; If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments; Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes. Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail. My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips. Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David. His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before me. It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah."- Psalms chapter 89 verses 30 to 37. EVERY WORD IS PURE. If they "omit" then you admit the "new versions" are tampering with scriptures. It is not for them to say hundreds of years afterward that they are going to "retranslate" and "recompile" to OMIT what they don't like.
@@MichaelAChristian1 Yes, any words that YHVH utters will not fail, and the Covenant he made stands forever, and everything he said has and will come to pass. Many peoplel have worked hard, many have devoted their lives, to passing those words down so that every generation can hear them, Some pass them orally some write them down, some translated them into other languages, but language is a funny thing it evolves, and changes over time, Gods words havent changed, but peoples perception of them, meanings shift and new words are invented bad becomes good and good becomes bad, Even the bible says that.. the book is a book ... the book is paper and ink. The power is in the words that are recorded, especially the words spoken by YHVH,Tthe book is the attempt of men to pass on these powerful words YHVH spoke and the lessons we learn from the lives of real men and women,, The book is just a box that contains these valuable treasures and becomes holy by association, as the Ark of the covenant became holy after YHVH came to reside there. these words were passed from scroll to scroll hundreds of times, mistakes were made, the pen slips, the ink drips, the ink smears, the wrong letker here and missing lettr there, here a jot and there a tittle, paper rips pages go missing... and then translated into this language, and translated into that language, and into arabic, and into greek and then latin and then english and then kings english and then 2nd century english and into east St Louis street language, the book has changed millions of times in tiny ways... But the words GOD spoke will never change, The covenant he struck with his people stands, and the truth rings in their ears, and burns the chaff from their hearts and lives. The book has been called the word of god but the truth is that the book is like an old tape recorder... a little static .. a little background noise... but if your paying attention you can actually hear YHVH's words, and then you can contain them in your heart and record them in your mind. and He, Himself will be the 2nd witness for you as you seek his face to understand his words.
@@huasonshine4120 HOW READEST THOU? " For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."- Matthew chapter 5 verse 18. You were just lying. Not ONE JOT OR TITTLE SHALL PASS. "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."- Matthew chapter 24 verse 35. It is easier for EARTH TO EXPLODE AND PASS AWAY THAN ONE JOT OR TITTLE OF THE WORD OF GOD! You are being deceived. Nothing was EVER lost. Read Genesis 40! Read Numbers 5! The power of God's Word bears witness to itself. I have no idea what you are saying when you say it says a "book is a book". What are you trying to quote. Here is a quote for you. "Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever: That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the Lord: Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits: Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us. Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon: Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant. And he shall break it as the breaking of the potters' vessel that is broken in pieces; he shall not spare: so that there shall not be found in the bursting of it a sherd to take fire from the hearth, or to take water withal out of the pit."- Isaiah chapter 30 verses 8 to 14. WRITE IT IN A BOOK FOR EVER AND EVER. So again the power of God's Word bears witness to itself. Read Luke 4. What BOOK did HE open to read from? The BOOK WRITTEN FOR EVER AND EVER! You are wrong. Pray on it in Jesus Christ name! Get a king james bible an believe.
@@MichaelAChristian1 @Mi at that is exactly how i read it, not one word of YHVH will fail. We are to keep his laws statutes and commandments, if we are to be called his people and receive his promises... those who do not live in the covenant, inheirit the second death, instead of everlasting life.
Let The Holy Spirit (Helper, Comforter, Spirit Of TRUTH) Do His Job... "He Will Teach You All Things" That's Why Jesus Said Blaspheming The Spirit Is The Unforgivable Sin. Man Keeps Trying To Take HIS (The Spirits) Place. Sorry. I'm Not Sorry. Give God His Glory & Stop Giving Credit To MEN.
KJV Onlyists might want to look at history and logic and re-think their view. ( Some of this ended up being questions for KJV Onlyists.) Such as: -Was Tyndale a heretic because his Gospel of Luke does NOT agree with the KJV textually in 2:22 and other places? -Is it okay that King James approved of a Puritan being burned at the stake in 1612? -Is it okay to wear GAY clothing? -WHICH KJV Bible is free from error? -Is the LATIN VULGATE evil? -Many KJV New Testaments have a note that tells people that the KJV is a REVISION of other English translations. -MOST KJV Onlyists would HATE to read "Translators to the Reader"!!!!!!!!!!! -WHY do KJV Onlyists think there is more than one Devil? ( 12 Peter :_) -Concerning "Missing Verses". IF the KJV is PERFECT- than they will have a MINORITY Text ..... if they are honest. -KJV Onlyist BASH early manuscripts if they disagree with the KJV. BUT they will run to one IF it AGREES with their KJV Bible. -Why are you afraid to look at what the Hebrew actually says? -Do you not attend a Church of England congregation? -Mr. KJV Onlyist- Can you tell and spell for me the name of the Messiah? -WHERE was the Word of God in the year 1600?
JESUS CHRIST is the LIVING GOD. The fact that you would ASK that shows why they don't use "new versions". The NAME that is ABOVE every other name. Every KNEE shall bow and every tongue shall CONFESS THAT JESUS CHRIST IS LORD to the GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER. What is 12 Peter supposed to be referring to? "Why are you afraid to look at Hebrew?" I am not afraid to look at Hebrew but you are LYING to yourself if that MATTERS AT ALL. First HEBREW IS A DEAD LANGUAGE. Do a "google search". This is ADMITTED. So second why was it a dead language? Because Israel was SCATTERED as FORETOLD for not following God! God has PRESERVED HIS WORDS but we see OBJECTIVELY the NATION and the LANGUAGE WAS NOT PRESERVED. So what does that TELL YOU? The Word of God is NOT BOUND. God preserves HIS words. Do you ADMIT THIS? Now let's finish here. WHO TOLD YOU THEY "REDISCOVERED" HEBREW "PERFECTLY"? The SAME people who DON'T believe in Jesus Christ and got SCATTERED FOR NOT FOLLOWING GOD. Those are the people coming and saying they are going to tell you what the "bible really says"??? And you would believe them over the PRESERVED scriptures that were NEVER LOST why? The power of God's Word bears witness to itself. Further, there are IDENTICAL words in english that have totally different meanings. You thinking you can "compare" writings ON THE FLY to "improve" PERFECTION is madness. Do you really think your ON THE FLY "retranslation" and "recompilation" HUNDREDS of years AFTER the fact compares to the bible PRESERVED and NEVER LOST cross checked OVER 7 YEARS under commission of a King? I will go A STEP FURTHER and say the king james bible was FORETOLD in Psalms 12 which is why it is ATTACKED in "newer versions" as well. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7. PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES. So you see, the COMPILATION AND TRANSLATION I believe were FORETOLD. AS we see languages mentioned in scriptures. And we see language is not a barrier to the Word of God. See Acts. So the compiled King James bible is PERFECT and yes I will go as far as to say it is better by far then you trying to LEARN multiple languages to try to RETRANSLATE AND RECOMPILE the bible ON THE FLY when you speak english. Does that make sense why you shouldn't trust people 400 years later to "retranslate" it AGAIN AND AGAIN now? Jesus Christ is the LIVING WORD. In 1600 GOD had preserved it and HE compiled the scriptures in english for us in the king james bible. Which is why it would make no sense to try to UNCOMPILE THEM. Read Luke 4. He opened the BOOK. What book? Read Isaiah 30. Isaiah was not given to them by Moses. God preserved HIS words. Whatever scriptures they had to use in 1600 GOD led to this. PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES. The letters were not written yet in Acts does that mean the scriptures didn't exist because they weren't done yet? No. People still heard the gospel of Jesus Christ. You have the COMPILED PERFECT King james bible IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Why would you ignore that and try to work backwards? It makes no sense.
I do believe that the KJV is the most accurate translation. I myself use an ESV, KJV and the Greek and Hebrew study Bible's. What I find really annoying is how the non KJV versions take verses out and change the meaning that comes out in a shuttle way. I'm not saying that all transactions are without error. This person says that the missing verses are negligible. A big fat lie to prove his point. Then he says that's because the other translations are from older more accurate transcripts. Another big lie. Just because something is older does not make it more accurate. The other translations are from the Alexandrian transcripts while the KJV is not. Three are numerous academic arguments for and against but after listening to them and reading literature I have concluded that the KJV is the most accurate. Obviously this guy prefers the ESV but even though I use it myself have now changed over to KJV as sock of reading foot notes and find more value in the KJV through the Holy Spirit that teaches me. Shalom. Matthew Matthew 12:47 - entire verse omitted Matthew 17:21 - entire verse omitted Footnote: Some manuscripts insert verse 21: But this kind never comes out except by prayer and fasting Matthew 18:11 - entire verse omitted Matthew 23:14 - entire verse omitted Mark Mark 7:16 - entire verse omitted Mark 9:44 - entire verse omitted Mark 9:46 - entire verse omitted Mark 11:26 - entire verse omitted Mark 15:28 - entire verse omitted Luke Luke 17:36 - entire verse omitted Luke 22:44 - entire verse omitted Luke 23:17 - entire verse omitted John John 5:4 - entire verse omitted Acts Acts 8:37 - entire verse omitted Acts 15:34 - entire verse omitted Acts 24:7 (note half of Acts 24:6 and 24:8 is also removed) Acts 28:29 - entire verse omitted Romans Romans 16:24 - entire verse omitted 1 John 1 John 5:7 - entire verse omitted Alterations that change the meaning Matthew 5:22 But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. (KJV) But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother (omit) will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell of fire. (ESV) In Matthew 5:22, the ESV makes Jesus Christ a sinner by removing the phrase "without a cause". Remember that Jesus Christ got angry in Mark 3:5. This is a contradiction and an accusation against the sinlessness of Jesus Christ. If Jesus was a sinner, then He is not a savoir. Matthew 7:14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (KJV) For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. (ESV) The ESV perverts the simplicity of salvation in Matthew 7:14 by saying "the way is hard". There is nothing hard about being saved. Being saved is simply by realizing you are a sinner and trusting Jesus Christ (John 10:9, John 4:14). Matthew 18:11 For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. KJV (omit) not included in the ESV Colossians 1:14 In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: (KJV) in whom we have redemption (omit), the forgiveness of sins. (ESV) Through his blood is omitted. Philippians 2:6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: (KJV) who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, (ESV) The ESV denies the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Timothy 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." (KJV) Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory." (ESV) The ESV attacks the deity and incarnation of Jesus Christ by replacing "God" with "He". 1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world." (KJV) and every spirit that does not confess Jesus (omit) is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already." (ESV) The ESV takes out the words "is come in the flesh" proving itself to have the spirit of antichrist behind it. John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (KJV) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only (omit) Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (ESV) We know that there are many sons of God in scripture, such as Adam (Luke 3:38), the angels (Job 1:6) and Christians (Philippians 2:15). With that in mind, the ESV introduces confusion into John 3:16 by removing the word "begotten". See also Monogenes Luke 11:2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. 3 Give us day by day our daily bread. 4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil." (KJV) And he said to them, "When you pray, say: "Father, (omit) hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come. (omit) 3 Give us each day our daily bread, 4 and forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive everyone who is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation." (ESV) The Lord's Prayer is changed into the Devil's Prayer by removing the phrases "which art in heaven", "Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in the earth" and "deliver us from evil". Luke 2:33 And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. (KJV) And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him. (ESV) In Luke 2:33 they are saying that Joseph was the father of Jesus.This is an attack upon the doctrine of the virgin birth. 2 Corinthians 2:17 For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ. (KJV) For we are not, like so many, peddlers of God's word, but as men of sincerity, as commissioned by God, in the sight of God we speak in Christ. (ESV) While the ESV corrupts the word of God, it seems like they try their best to cover their tracts. In 2 Corinthians 2:17, they replace "corrupt the word of God" with "peddlers of God's word". 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (KJV) Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. (ESV) The ESV takes out the word "study" in 2 Timothy 2:15 and replaces it with "Do your best". Not only do they do that, but they take out the words "rightly dividing" and replace it with "rightly handling". To understand the Bible one must know how to rightly divide it. Luke 4:4 And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. (KJV) And Jesus answered him, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone (omit). (ESV) In Luke 4:4, the ESV takes out the phrase "but by every word of God". Note that the Lord Jesus Christ is quoting Deuteronomy 8:3. Acts 2:47 Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. (KJV) praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved. (ESV) Hort attacked the doctrine of substitution and the ESV and new versions coming from the Westcott and Hort text, so salvation is not a one time finished thing, rather salvation is a process and is not complete. Notice in the below verses that the KJV says "saved", while the ESV says "being saved" as also the below verses reveal. 1 Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (KJV) For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. (ESV) 1 Corinthians 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. (KJV) and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you--unless you believed in vain. (ESV) 2 Corinthians 2:15 For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: (KJV) For we are the aroma of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, (ESV) Colossians 2:10 And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: (KJV) and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. (ESV) In Colossians 2:10, the ESV says that we are not "complete" in Christ, rather we are just "filled".
You do realize that the ESV and other versions are NOT translated from the KJV, don't you? You have pointed out some differences here and they are all certainly differences, but I don't agree with your premise that the changed the KJV and that they did it wittingly and with evil intent. The other versions were translated from the original texts that predate the KJV. So where you are claiming that they omitted something, that's just blatantly false. If I read a book and then write a book report on it, and you also read the same book and write your own book reports on it, and then someone comes along and reads both of our book reports, it would be patently false for them to say that you read my book report and intentionally changed all of the words from what I wrote and you did that with malice. Don't you see how ridiculous this sounds? The other versions don't pervert the KJV because they aren't even based on the KJV. That's maybe the mistake that so many people make is this false belief that this is what has happened, that instead of interpreting the text as accurately as possible, and maybe even more accurately than the KJV, that they have omitted things or changed things from the KJV and that's just not true at all, as in my example about your book report, you would be interpreting the story to the best of your ability and relaying the idea as best you could. And ai would do the same. But the end result wouldn't be identical and yet neither of us took the other person's words and distorted them. Not even close.
@@melissaupton7373 I think your mistaken as I have NOT stated that the ESV is translated from the KJV? Also you missed the point of my post; which is that the person states that the differences are negligible. To me they are not but maybe to him they are.
No attack on the virgin birth in the ESV, the virgin birth is clearly taught. Even the KJV says the parents of Jesus. Also Mary calls Joseph the father of Jesus in Luke's gospel. Was Mary denying the virgin birth as well? The KJV has many added uninspired verses, so how can they be missing if they are not in the older more accurate manuscripts that modern translations are translated from? The KJV is not the standard, it is nothing more than an imperfect uninspired translation. I thank God for better translations than the KJV, in English I can understand.
Here’s a good example: In the KJV, Leviticus 12:8 "tor-im" is translated as "turtle". When that same word “tor-im” is translated as “turtle dove” in chapter 5:7 of the same book. Now, we KNOW YHWH would not have given direction to sacrifice an unclean animal for an Atonement offering! 😆 🐢
VERSE 6 in SAME chapter SAYS turtle dove so what is the "turtle in verse 8? This is not an bible error at all. Instead of looking for errors. Pray for help and guidance and understanding in Jesus name! Read Numbers 5. That should prove it! The power of God's Word bears witness to itself! I'll ask you honestly. Should it be SEED OF THE WOMAN that MAKES HER FREE OF THE CURSE IN NUMBERS 5? OR the "other translations that REMOVE THE SEED"?? How readest thou? Who is the SEED of the FAITHFUL WOMAN THAT MAKES HER FREE OF THE CURSE OF THE LAW! HIS NAME IS JESUS CHRIST THE LIVING GOD! Search the scriptures for they testify of JESUS CHRIST! Jesus loves you! God bless and keep you!
@@igregmart, sounds like you haven't watched the video nor studied the KJV translation. KJV has translation errors, altho it has fewer errors that most English translations. so KJV is still better than many. but NKJV has fewer errors and it has updated vocabulary. so NKJV is a better translation in terms of accuracy & modern reading comprehension. but as with *every* English *translation* of the Bible, just be careful. there are several mistranslations in both KJV and the NKJV.
Just as Israel both Northern and Southern Tribes were scattered so was the words and instructions of Elohim. Wouldn't it be wonderful to discover some Torah Scrolls that could be dated to the time of King David and to have the Vatican release the original hebrew scrolls that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John wrote. I do not have evidence that the Vatican is conceling any scrolls that can be Dated to the 1st and 2nd Century, however Alexander Gabriel Roth does offer some compelling narratives a few years back on his you tube channel. For Christians to more fully appreciate the fullness of the Faith we need to stop walking towards western idealogy translations and transliterations and strart walking towards the East. I personally am discovering that Aramaic is not a Dead Language ! Consider Picking up Some Aramaic Targums and the Aramaic English New Testament. Also feel free to ask a Rabbi what day Shabbat is. By the way I am writing this on Shabbat and I wish you a Shabbat Shalom 😁
That's hilarious that they use Anderson. HAHAHAHAHA, wow. Should have used anyone else. So many other pastors worth drawing from. CONTEXT: I am in no way a KJV-onlyist, just prefer it. CONTEXT, truly a key. Then the example for "authority" and "power" is not even an issue, same meaning. Please bring up viable translation errors that change the doctrine or message. Figures this would be the one you use... -Then the name of Yeshua, should never have been changed in any Bible, that is a major issue in all Bibles, as the J sound wasn't created until what, the 1600's. -Then the question becomes were the verses removed or not? Yes they were. This particular problem has no issue with whether it changes doctrine or meaning yet, the fact is there is adding or in this case, being taken away (Deut 4:2; Rev 22:19). Correct nothing sinister, just goes against what Yah/Yeshua actually states in the Bible which usually means sin...(enter sarcasm). -Many modern versions actually change doctrine such as Mt 1:25, the "firstborn son", did Mary have other children first, was she not a virgin? Huge issue there. Mt 9:13 is a big deal since Yeshua's first words were "REPENT." Or how about Mt 17:21, power by praying and fasting? Mt 18:11, hmmm. John 10:38 changes "believe" to "understand." Huge difference in doctrine error. I understand Islam believes in Allah, but do I believe in Allah, no... -Acts 6:8 "grace" and "faith" are interchanged, only Yeshua is full of grace. This is only a few, many more out there. -When you change doctrine, you change belief. It is no wonder we have >1000's of denominations that can't agree. -Please don't say modern translations are just different by using modern words. You better do more research @119Ministries. This is why so many people prefer the KJV or even the Geneva over some other New Age translations that come out of Wescott and Hort lineage. This is by far one of the WORST teachings 119 has put out. And for those who will reply to this with snark. Again, I am not a KJV onlyist, just prefer it.
I think you need to go talk to some KJVO advocates rather than simply regurgitating nonsense from James white, as everything you bring up is actually addressed by those that are KJVO and in fact they will show you why many of your claims are factually incorrect or straw man arguments.
Why speak to KJV only advocates? Considering they are liars incapable of telling the truth. That is why God has raised up true Bible believers like James White,. Who uses facts and truth to expose the double standards, hypocrisy, and the false teaching of KJV onlyism.
@@followintruthlj2865 It is quite clear, KJV onlyism is Man made tradition, with no scriptural authority. Therefore must be rejected for the heresy and lie that it is. In other words another gospel, which is the spirit of witchcraft. Because it Is a lie, to try and defend this heresy. KJV only cultist have to tell more lies. If they were honest and truthful they would reject KJV onlyism, for the damnable heresy it is. But they are incapable of rational thought, or being truthful.
@@MichaelAChristian1 How can any translation be perfect? . Especially when it is in archaic English where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV one of the most inaccurate translations we have. This idolatrous blasphemous worship of the KJV, is nothing but witchcraft.
@@samlawrence2695 You are being deceived. Let me explain it to you simply. "“And the LORD delivered unto me two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the LORD spake with you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly.”- Deuteronomy chapter 9 verse 10. So it is PERFECT by God HIMSELF. Then God preserves his words. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7. Man can't preserve his words. Then we even see it FORETOLD it purified 7 times. I go step further saying king James FORETOLD here over 7 times. So it is PERFECT AND PRESERVED. Anything using "new discoveries" CANNOT BE SCRIPTURES AT ALL. Very simple. Which is why you were warned about those who would come later and try to CHANGE the SCRIPTURES. You were WARNED IN ADVANCE. JESUS loves you! IN Acts they heard the Word of God in their own tongue. No problem. Perfect.
@@MichaelAChristian1 What a load of moronic nonsense from an idolatrous blasphemous KJV only deceiver. You have raised an imperfect uninspired translation above the throne of God. You have made an archaic English translation the standard. Yet like all the lying hypocrites of the KJV only cult. You do not speak KJV English. Because no one could understand what you are talking about. That is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations in English we can understand. Even the KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. They even said even the meanest translation is still the word of God. At least the baby sprinkling Anglicans were more honest than the KJV only cult that Satan has raised up. No translation can ever be perfect whatever delusions you believe. The gospel is about Christ and him crucified, not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation. You have added a man made tradition, to the finished work of Christ. That is idolatry, and the sin of witchcraft. Looking forward to more fantasies from you. So carry on quoting scripture out of context, and try to make them fit your heresy of KJV onlyism. If the KJV translators had , the older more accurate manuscripts, we have now, they would not have made so many mistakes. Like mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Latin words like Lucifer instead of morning star or day star. A Latin word borrowed from the Latin Vulgate, showing the Catholic influence on the KJV. The KJV translated from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope with added uninspired verses like 1 John 5 v 7 Acts 8 v 37.. your idol the KJV is far from perfect, it never was perfect. Also has the English language changes, and words change meaning. The KJV is even more inaccurate. As I said the gospel is about Christ and him crucified, risen from the dead, and alive forevermore. Those who believe in him will not perish but have everlasting life. No scripture supports the KJV only heresy none at all. You like all KJV onlyists, are false teachers, with no scripture that supports your Man made tradition.
@@samlawrence2695 I am the only one using the SCRIPTURES. You DON'T HAVE THE scriptures . You DON'T BELIEVE in the scriptures. You are saying they are NONE perfect. Guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE THE ORIGINAL STONE TABLETS. You are a LIAR. You MUST believe God PRESERVED HIS WORDS or you don't believe the SCRIPTURES EVEN EXIST. God has preserved his words. The king james bible is IN ENGLISH. Real simple. You can LIE and say you don't understand THOU SHALT NOT STEAL but you do. Everyone does. GOD translated HIS WORDS in ACTS. You are LYING and saying IT CAN'T EVER BE TRANSLATED. God PRESERVED IT or you don't have it. God translated it PERFECTLY or you can't have ANY scriptures to read EVER. So yes the KING JAMES bible is PRESERVED AND purified over 7 times like the scriptures FORETELL EVEN. Everyone WAS king james only until late 1900s. You are saying EVERYONE ON PLANET EARTH WAS WRONG until atheists started tampering with the scriptures. The people "retranslating" different UNPRESERVED scripts don't even believe the GOSPELS were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Who were you warned about in the scriptures that would try to CHANGE his words. Now you have over 100 different "versions" saying DIFFERENT things. You cannot say they are the SAME. You are Calling SOMEONE a liar and the "new versions DID NOT EXIST.
No, Easter in the KJV is not an error. Using Easter up to the 17th century was not misleading to the English or German speaking people up to the 17th century; but it is misleading to many readers today. Long before Tyndale coined "Passover" (BTW, Tyndale used passover in OT, but Ester in NT, following Luther), the Germanic word Easter (in various forms) existed in Anglo-Saxon & Germanic Biblical contexts. You'll find Easter in the Anglo-Saxon Wessex Gospels, Luther's German Bible, Tyndale, Coverdale, Geneva, and Bishops'. By reviewing the pre-1611 translations, you'll see Easter being phased out. Yes, it is anachronistic; but it points to the resurrection of the Christ as the Passover Lamb.
Here is the irony of Steven Anderson's philosophy regarding salvation. He will reject obedience according to the Law because that would be a works based salvation, but hypocritically will base salvation on a translation instead of the finished work of redemption of the Messiah through His death.
Thankyou simple and clear, I'm a KJV reader but this was not always the case. Being convicted by others at the time I made the decision to change. And it's true many of my own family members have became so attracted to their KJV it has become almost a religious artifact to them. So when I began to study Hebrew so that I one day be able to read the original Hebrew text, I was heavily criticized. It was even expressed that the KJV was better than the Hebrew. That was some time ago, I chuckle at the thought of it now. And still read the KJV but I balance it with other versions such as the ESV
Read Numbers 5. Then tell me what you think. Jesus loves you! Get a king james bible and believe. Look closely at the differences in those chapters. Compare to Genesis 3 and Exodus 20 as well.
Thank you for this teaching, I myself love KJV and have listened to many teaching against other versions and came to believe it. This was a clear and well done and very informative going forward I wouldn't be so judgmental in others that read other versions. 🙏🏾
Prior to reading any Bible we should first ask the Lord to give us understanding and revelation. Good teaching thank you! Shalom
modern Bibles are watered down and remove words and names and downplay the deity of Jesus. They lack bite against satans curses and spells. Satan is behind all modern versions.
In the part of the video where the speaker points on the claim that there is no improvement to be made on the KJV, most people do not have the 1611 AV, but the one from the 1700s. So by default, any KJV Onlyist using the 1700s version is violating their own idolatrous theism.
Another great teaching!😊
We must pray for people like anderson and specially for our brothers and sisters that are being slandered,rejected and confused by him(anderson). I'm a simpleton,so for me the niv is much easier to understand.
I pray that The Most High continues to bless you david,the entire team at 119 ministries,your families and all my brothers and sisters reading this comment.🙏
Much love and blessings to all.🥰
Shalom.💖🤗
The 1611 “KJV” had 80 books. Now it has 66. The name of the messiah was spelled Iesus. (First letter capitalized i). Now it is spelled Jesus. There actually have been thousands of grammatical and spelling change between the 1611 version and today’s KJV. So which one is perfect. Because they both can not be.
1611 and today’s version have removed the name of Our Father at least 6,816 times and replaced it with a generic positional title held by hundreds of deity and humans and borrowed from paganism. “The LORD”. This IS NOT his name. And the great miracle gift of the word “Hallelujah” which means the same thing in every language, and which carries David’s endearing expression of Our Father’s true name, has also been completely removed from the KJV. It’s sad really. Makes me cry because of the tremendous influence this Bible has had on the English language and taught us all to forget our Father’s actual name and to refer to our Father with replacement names taken from paganism such as God and Lord.
“God” and “Lord” are not names. They are positional titles. I am now a truck driver. Imagine if a book was written about me saying wonderful complimentary things about me; So I want people to know who I am. And the book was written with my name “David” mentioned thousands of times throughout the book. But then the book went to the editor and almost every time my name appeared they REMOVED it and REPLACED it with “The TRUCK DRIVER”. So you might study the book your entire life and never know what my name is. “The LORD” is the same thing. It’s a position that has belonged to hundreds. And is a replacement for the NAME that only belongs to One: “YHWH.” Blessed be The Name of YHWH.
@@pegtop5455 Good thing everyone knows about" I Am" for the LORD.
Adonai means Lord. Elohim means God.
@@whatistruth560 Do they, does everyone know? And those who do "Know" do they understand? there is so much confussion.. more and more christians are coming to believe "all paths to God" that "God" has many faces and one of them is Christian...
@@Talancir I am not against using these terms when the scriptures use them. The scriptures use Adonai and Elohim abundantly referring to our Father, to certain people of power and authority, and to pagan deity. What I am against is removing our Fathers name YHWH completely and replacing it with a positional title which has no resemblance to His Name whatsoever.
Thank you for the good explanation. I like KJV in general, but the most critical problem with it is the interpretation of Matthew 7:23: "I never knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity." However, in Greek it is not iniquity, but lawlessness, which means they didn't follow God's law. Jesus is actually saying here that there is no final salvation if we don't keep the law! And it changed Passover to Easter! 1 John 5:7 about the Trinity was added, too, in the 6th century manuscripts. I think the NT is heavily subjected to revision in favor of RCC's doctrinal philosophy. That's why we need to have the Berean attitude (Acts 17:11) -- what is called "The Scriptures" at the time of Jesus must be the standard. If the words are different over the same topic, we should follow the OT, not the NT, especially on such topics as food, divorce, circumcision, and Sabbath.
Amen, sister!
so well said!
I had to take a screenshot of your comment so I can share it with my loved ones. Profoundly articulate! Bless you!!
No the King James is correct. Read Romans. God has made me free of the law of sin and death for what the law could not do God has done. The people there boasted of their WORKS. The change there is to deceive people into a FALSE WORKS based doctrine.
@@MichaelAChristian1 its not about works. But we perform works out of faith. Your KJV Bible is corrupted to deceive people into thinking that they are good so long as they show up to church on Sunday. Thr word is correctly rendered "lawlessness" not iniquity.
Now as yourself an intelligent question. Why would Jesus tell followers who actually brought people to the faith "depart from me" but allow people like you in, who don't do anything? Is not that absurd to you?
No mention of the Hebrew culture or the Hebrew language. Learning these two things will increase your knowledge and understanding 100 fold.
It is my belief that God will show us what is right, true, & good if we ask him to. I prayed to him & asked him to show me truth. He is faithful & will do it. He has opened my eyes to many things since then & will continue to do so as long as I faithfully seek him first.
Ok. Good to know. We might want to start sending English KJV Bibles around the world. There’s a whole lot of people reading bibles in a different language and none of them are saved. They prefer a lie rather than the truly inspired English version.
🤦🏽♂️ Only in America. American centric Christianity. Just another prime example of why America has lost its way.
Excellent!!!
The original manuscripts is why I choose the KJV. the “older and more reliable” manuscripts used by modern translations have many disagreements between them and continue to be edited and updated to this day. Very suspicious history on them as well. I would love to read modern English but I trust the manuscripts from the KJV which thousands of copies were found in Antioch and agree with each other.
Well said!
And the evidence for these claims is...
@@TimothyChapman No evidence at all, a typical KJV only myth
@@samlawrence2695go research the topic, plenty of literature.
Wow….just…wow! Though I have been taught that the KJV has a closer accuracy due to which codex (or something)…. “Onlyism” smacks of extremist separation arrogance. Thank you for this teaching…..I so appreciate your work.
This is a dangerous video. No not all of the versions are the same. if we obey the word of the NIV we would never have become America. NIV would make north Korean's always slaves to the government. OBEY higher powers that be are the laws of God. Not man or Government. BIBLE clearly tells us not to trust in man. KJV never tells us to obey a government. Only the new versions do this. Offerings are to God or the poor. Not greedy man. Because Jesus was the lamb offering. We need now to only help the poor.
The KJV-only cult honestly drives me nuts. Ive been called a fake christian for not using the KJV ( english isnt even my 1st language, how much more 17th century middle english ?!)
Very good teaching. Clear and concise .
I prefer to use a version that doesn't have pagan words in it like "God" and "Lord". I think using those terms for our Creator is a detriment to our Abba Creator! I do like the way 119 ministries teaches teaches that there are some pagan roots in Christianity, but why use a version of the scriptures that has the same pagan roots in it?
@Rachel Droddy I really like The Scriptures.
No mention of King James instructions to the translators? Or did I miss it? Crucial instructions have them swap out certain ecclesiastical vocabulary for other less authoritative words.
Examples please.
Google King James instructions to translators and you will see them all.
King Jimmy was a Scottish Rite Freemason... had the name of the Most High removed so they insert the spurious names of their freemasonic gods during their "rituals"...
Masons freely built the first Tower of Babel... Genesis 11: 3,4 the Freemasons have rebuilt the Tower of Babel in the internet... World Wide Web... And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech. Genesis 11:1
Mathematics is the universal language... sixth letter of the Hebrew alphabet? Vav or W...www=666...
St. Luke 17:26 "And as it was in the days of Noe so shall it be in the days of the Son of man." -words of Yehoshua...
Ecclesiastes 1:9 ...no new thing under the sun...
7 Important Doctrines About the Bible
The Bible is the most important book in history, and is what defines our faith. Without it we would not know who God is, his will for us, salvation, or the Lord Jesus Christ.
The way to destroy Christianity would be to destroy the Bible. This present evil world knows this and has been attacking the Bible for centuries. No Bible = no Christianity.
As a result of relentless attacks without reply, generations have a view of the Bible that it is an anachronistic book written by men that no one can understand, filled with mistakes, and is unneeded for true spirituality. What lies!
If Christianity is on the wane it is due to a failure to fortify these important doctrines about the Bible. If removing the Bible makes Christianity crumble, returning respect to the Holy Book of Books will strengthen it.
Here are seven important doctrines about the Bible that will strengthen your faith in God’s word and make you a Bible believer.
1. Revelation - God spoke words.
Revelation is the doctrine that God has spoken. The Bible is God’s revelation. This is important because God is true, holy, good, and without error. Therefore, what he says is true, holy, good, and without error. This is where we get the “holy” in Holy Bible. The Bible is sacred because of its author. The Bible was revealed by God.
“For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.” - Galatians 1:12
2. Inspiration - God’s words in writing.
Who doesn’t know the Bible was written by men. The doctrine of inspiration describes how God’s words were put in writing using the instrumentation of humanity. The Bible was not delivered from heaven like the golden plates of Mormonism, or by oral tradition like the Talmud or Koran. Divine inspiration teaches that God wrote the Bible with human pens to write specific words (2 Peter 1:20-21).
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God…” - 2 Timothy 3:16
3. Illumination - God’s words understood.
The Bible can be understood, because of the doctrine of illumination. God did not write a book so that no one could read and understand it. His purpose was for all to know and each to study for themselves (1 Tim 2:4; 2 Tim 2:15). The Bible is not a book God kept in secret, but helps us to understand. How can we understand? First, faith is required (Rom 10:17). Then, you must be spiritually quickened (1 Cor 2:12-13). Thirdly, you must acknowledge Paul’s instruction (2 Tim 2:7).
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” - 1 Corinthians 2:14
“Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things.” - 2 Timothy 2:7
4. Utilization - God’s words must be used.
It is necessary to have and understand the Bible, because God requires it be utilized. We are told to preach it, teach it, study it, rightly divide it, eat it, believe it, live by it, stand with it, fight with it, and obey it. This doctrine alone should cause us to cherish God’s holy book: we need it! Faith comes by no other way.
“For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning,…” - Romans 15:4
“So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” - Romans 10:17
5. Canonization - God’s words complete & sufficient.
This oft neglected doctrine describes how the Bible came to be complete and defined. A corollary to this is the idea that the Bible is all that we need: it is sufficient. There is nothing lacking from it to make us perfect (complete) workmen for the Lord. There is nothing else we need from oral tradition, experience, gut feelings, a Pope, magisterium, deacon board, anointed pastor, or the wisdom of the world. God said many things that are not in the Bible, but the Bible is what God wants us to know, and it is finished, complete, and sufficient in sixty-six books.
“All scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable… that the man of God may be perfect,…” - 2 Timothy 3:16-17
“Whereof I am made a minister, according to the dispensation of God which is given to me for you, to fulfil the word of God;” - Colossians 1:25
6. Preservation - God’s words through history.
Without preservation none of the other doctrines matter. God could have revealed, inspired, and completed a Bible to be used and understood, but without the doctrine of preservation it is all for naught, and the Holy Bible was lost thousands of years ago to history. If God wants us to understand and use his words that he inspired, then they must be preserved through history. There are no more original autographs. Preservation is needed for God’s words to endure forever (1 Pet 1:25).
“Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” - Matthew 24:35
“Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever.” - Psalm 12:7
7. Identification - God’s words in your hands and heart.
In a world, culture, or church that does not understand and believe the previous six important doctrines this final doctrine is the most offensive. It is also the most important for the word of God to have an effect in your life.
This doctrine describes how you know you hold God’s words in your hand and are reading them with your eyes. If God inspired and preserved his word we should be able to identify it today.
There are so many different books claiming to be the Bible. It was the need to clearly identify the Holy Bible which drove men to reduce the differences and number of Bible translations down to one. After all, God only inspired one, and we only need one, and the church is one, and so which one is it?
When it is said that God’s perfectly preserved words in English are found in the King James Bible this is a statement reflecting the doctrine of identification.
“…when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.” - 1 Thessalonians 2:13
The Effect on Those That Believe
The Thessalonians had to identify by faith the words of God before they had an effect. Perhaps the reason Christians are not being effected by the word of God is that they are not clearly identified amidst hundreds of different translations.
Perhaps you cannot yet identify which Bible is God’s words. Perhaps you have been persuaded that they are all the same, or that God does not preserve his words, or that the Bible is too hard to understand or is not completely sufficient or necessary for us to have.
Denying any one of these important doctrines about the Bible brings confusion and doubt upon the Bible. Without the Bible, Christianity becomes ineffective, or worse.
“For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar.” - Romans 3:3-4
Christians are people of a book. Strengthen your understanding of these important doctrines about the Bible and your faith will grow, and God’s words will work effectually in you.
Yeshua didn't come to establish Christianity, the Bible or any other religious protocol. I'm sure if the disciples had stuck to doing what He instructed we would all be living and believing not just in Yeshua but in the faith of Yeshua. If the Bible was everything Holy And good there wouldn't be over 200 denominations birthed from it. I love the Bible but it was inspired by God not written by Him and then translated over thousands of years. Only by and through the Holy Spirit can it be used as a way to Know God. Apart from God the Bible and its religions have caused more death, war and bloodshed then any natural disaster ever. Thanks for your doctrines but more than anything we need a demonstration of Spirit and power. Talk is cheap these days!
Thanks David. Good work.
Some folks are just nuts.
Enjoy Elohim !
KJV only cultists are nuts
The KJV didn’t even exist until recently. So what were the disciples reading? The New Testament? Which also had not be written. No! They were reading the scrolls (the Old Testament). We have the scrolls today thanks to Qumran. But the KJV is perfect and infallible right!? No. The Word of Yah (Yahusha) is infallible and He is the Word! Read and search the scriptures (the scrolls) written in Hebrew and Greek originally and you will find the truth. Bible Hub and E-Sword let you easily do this! Don’t be afraid to look at the Hebrew and the Greek original texts! You will be surprised to find out that Yahusha and His disciples and the early church never practiced or worshipped Ishtar (Easter) with painted eggs and the Easter (Ishtar) fertility bunny. But word that King James replaced with Easter (Ishtar) was Passover!m in Greek!!! A Feast that the disciples and Yahusha did keep! And that Yahusha died during (as the final lamb to be sacrificed for our sins!!!) They did keep Passover!!! Not Easter!!! The Bible says not even to utter the name of false elohim (gods) much less worship Him the way the pagans worshipped their gods!
We are commanded eternally to keep the Feasts of Yah! (Passover, Feast of Unleavened Bread, Sukkot, etc). Keep watching 119 videos and test everything! Stop listening to your Sunday preacher. And start reading the Word of Yah for yourself. Even if you only have the KJV version. Yah can still use that to open your eyes to the truth!!! It’s all there! His commandments were never done away with. In fact, He says if you love me you will keep my commandments! Read Exodus 20 again! Which of those 10 commandments do you keep!? Look a bit closer at the fourth while you are at it! Shalom!
Then He said to me, “Son of man, go now to the house of Israel and speak My words to them. 5For you are not being sent to a people of unfamiliar speech or difficult language, but to the house of Israel
As all who believe is grafted in and is Israel.
@@whatistruth560 what Bible verse specifically tells you that?
NIV identifies Morning Star in 22:16 (the Messaiah) with Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12. That is evil.
I appreciate KJV's litereal translation of "and between thy seed and her seed" (KJV 3:15), because it implies more than offspring or descendants. I grew up hearing the analogy that a man provides seeds and a woman's body is like a field where seeds can grow. So when I read KJV Gen 3:15, I understood as the prophecy of the virgin birth, because women don't have the seeds. That's why I appreciate literal translation because hidden meanings can be completely lost in interpreted and paraphrased versions.
I agreed with you
The Messiah is not the Morning Star
@@melissaupton7373 Read Revelation 22:26, please. Jesus is describing Himself as the bright morning star.
"I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
It's probably a metaphor that He is the guiding light.
In Isaiah, Lucifer is a son of dawn who carried a light. But some versions of the Bible interpreted it as the morning star. I think it is a serious problem when the Bible was "interpreted" in a wrong way when it could be translated correctly.
Lucifer is a Latin word that the KJV translators borrowed from the Catholic Latin Vulgate. It is a word for the planet Venus, nothing to do with Satan. It's literal meaning is "morning star". It is a prophecy against the king of Babylon, who tried to exalt himself above the throne of God. Like the KJV only cult exalt their imperfect uninspired translation above the throne of God. The angels are known as the morning stars even in the KJV. Jesus is the Morning Star, not morning star. No honest person reading the Isaiah 14 in context, would ever say the NIV is saying that Jesus is the same as Satan. Not that their is anything honest about the KJV only cult. The KJV also had day star in the margin, but no Latin word should be in an English translation. The KJV translators failed terribly, just as they did with mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Again showing the Catholic influence on the KJV.
ive never heard anything stupider. Anderson is a comedian and nothing else.
Awesome! The only other thing I might have pointed out was the difference between the 1611 and the current KJV which many Onlyist's are unaware of amazingly!
I don't know who could ever doubt of their own salvation...what a basket case...I don't understand how people can sit under a person like that...
LDS is far worse. Not only are they KJV only they have fake Bible books.
Yes...LDS Another cult..
I like kjv because my concordance is based off of it....
Thank you for the teaching. I admire the KJV but find it difficult to read. Another error for me is that the book of "James" should be the book of Jacob/Ya'aqov. No translation is utterly perfect nor will it give you salvation.
Only the original scripts in Hebrew, Classical Greek, and Aramaic can be fully trusted. The KJV, Geneva, and Jewish translations are ok. I don’t know the original languages, but I value the closest and most complete translations of any verse and keep an open mind for the most accurate translation available and to improvement.
It wasn't classical Greek the Bible was written in classical Hebrew, Jewish Palestinian Aramaic, koine Greek. The Bible was what is written on 3 different continents Asia, Africa, and Europe by 40 different authors in a span of 1,500 years and the Bible was completed 1,900 years ago.
What Jason said and there are no original manuscripts, they are too old, and we cannot be certain what language each of them was written in.. because we don't have them, all we have is copies and translations to work from, the only thing we can fully trust is not a thing... it is YHVH, but we can use what we got to piece together and learn about his Words, his covenants and commandments and righteous Judgements, and the History that is brought to us from the many scripts that we have found. what did Moses write in , The Bible says he wrote down everything YHVH said, Moses knew and spoke many languages, Maybe all 70 of the languages dispersed at babel... at one time he was being educated and groomed to be Pharaoh, which was (at the least) one of the most powerful positions in the world. and trading with folks from everywhere.. But he was preserving the words for this people, the Hebrew Children and those that came with them from Egypt, so he would have recorded YHVH's words in their language for them. Many of the Carvings left in the wilderness during that time were Paleo Hebrew, perhaps that was the alphabet they used was that, or maybe they had a more cultured hebrew language for writing literature, maybe they carried with them documents written, rewritten by their fathers, Jacob, Abraham, Shem, Noah, no doubt they still told the stories to each other and their children. I think it is presumptuous to think we have it all figured out, we have Theories and Opinions perhaps educated ones but theories none the less
@@huasonshine4120 I will read your reply carefully later when I can focus . Thank you!!
@@huasonshine4120 I essentially agree with you, but I am certain that when we have the choice to ignore a law or command OR to follow it to the best of our individual abilities ( which I know will vary), the ‘righteous’ choice is to follow each one as best we can. I am a work in progress. There is no recipe for everything we should do on the feast days nor are our jobs necessarily amenable to days off for them ( military, health care….) so I make sure to read the relevant scripture for each feast day. Frankly, I had no idea about First Fruits or Shavuot or even how the original Passover was ‘celebrated’ till I decided to learn for myself.
I tried to find an excellent RUclips explanation of how transcriptions and translations of scripture are studied for accuracy and how scholars conclude which are the most accurate. It was made by ‘Christians’ who probably still observe the Sun Day, but they explained things very well and truthfully. I wanted to include the link but found a plethora of such videos and could not recognize which one I watched a year ago. Consensus keeps evolving because it is a science. I love 119 Ministries, Yahweh’s Restoration Ministries, and House of New Beginnings ( AZ). I don’t get hung up on how some still say ‘God’ because they haven’t learned the origins of this name yet, and I believe Paul’s overall message is patience.
@@joshuastavos4376 yes, Gods grace is there for what we cant do, but we are to walk in his way, and if we get of the path we are to repent (turn around) and follow in his way.,,, yes of course we cannot fill his footsteps, but we can follow him. We cannot do... what we dont know, and we cant do well the things we dont understand, we just do our best with the understanding that we have, and follow him when we cannot see where he is leading... obedience, and trust,... He is a good father, would us being evil give more grace to our children that fall, than the perfect father? Concerning his days, keep in mind some things can only be kept "while we are in the land" we are not, we are in exile still. so remembering these things, the best we can is keeping (guarding) his laws, (instructions)
Can’t wait!!! We went to a KJV only church for awhile without knowing and then I realized they worshipped the KJV translation of the Bible and not Yah! You shall have NO other elohim before HIM!
Before the Bible was translated to English there were no chapters and verses at least in ther "Old Testament" 22:04
Thank you so much for such an easy clear way to understand this!!!
I prefer any translation based on the Textus Receptus, the KJV being one of them. Keeping closer to the original meaning and text of the manuscripts. Trivial errors are in fact trivial. Discerning the meaning of what is said from the text is no difficult. In contrast to translations such as the NIV do not only use inaccurate word or leave words out, entire verses are omitted.
A good example would be 1 John 5:7 and the Record in Heaven. These omissions deny the very doctrine of the trinity. Now that, is not trivial and it is only one example.
Did you watch the presentation? He addressed the "missing/omitted" verses.
The NIV leaves nothing out. It was translated from older more accurate manuscripts. 1 John 5 v 7 was added by an uninspired scribes years after John wrote his letter. So the KJV translated from inferior manuscripts dedicated to the Pope has this uninspired added verse. The doctrine of the Trinity is very clear in the NIV it does not call the Holy Spirit an "it" denying his deity four times like the KJV. It is far stronger on the deity of Christ than the KJV.
Of the food Laws in Laviticates 11 where they used the word beetle. When it should be the word cricket. Where the NKJV made the correction to cricket?
Between online videos including yours, The Geneva Bible, Strong’s concordance and the Koren Tanach, I am satisfied that what I am reading is as close to truth as possible.
The King James bible is perfect. Jesus loves you! You can trust the Word of God!
@MichaelAChristian1 obviously you didn't listen to this video very well in the way you should have.
This should be good. Can’t wait to see all the comments from here about other translations and how they have added or taken away from the Bible or have changed certain words to push a different meaning.
I hear several generalizations based mostly on the pastor's very extreme opinion. Followers of Christ know they can completely disregard those who put themselves in the judgement seat of Yeshua.
You should make another video about 'KJV Onlyism' based on manuscript quality. You touched on this for a moment but then put your trust in biblical scholars by concluding the so-called "older" manuscripts are better. Like you say in every video: "test everything"... even the "older" manuscripts and the "biblical scholars".
I want to thank you for your efforts to explain this subject🙌🏻
I personally like the King James Version of the Bible because of the way it is written and it is Old English. I use it as my main source because I believe there are errors in modern translations of the Bible. I however do not consider myself to be a “KJV Onlyist” because there are some errors in the KJV translation, and I have no problem with someone using another translation like the ESV or the NIV.
I also believe there are errors in every translation of the Bible, if possible, errors we may not even consider an error. But verses like Acts 20:7 KJV and Hebrews 4:9 KJV were not translated correctly by the Protestant translators during the middle ages. They have omitted “the sabbath” from these verses and insisted that the first day of the week is the day of worship and rest. Another major error is the word “Easter” found in Acts 12:4. According to the context, it is blatant that the Greek and Latin word “Pascha” should have been translated into the word “Passover” which fits the rest of the chapter. These are a few errors found in the KJV, which some modern translations correct like the NIV and the ESV.
Also, to say someone is not saved just because they read a modern translation is not showing an example of the Messiah. Yahweh can speak to each and every one of us all we should know through the Holy Spirit of truth. Some people have a difficult time reading a book that has a beginning language that men were to think out and make better. It is okay for one to read a modern translation of the Bible. One is not saved by their works, but by faith through grace alone in the Messiah Yahshua.
The Messiah is our Interpretation and our Interpreter who interprets the Scriptures to His knowledge. He also will edify each and every one of us in His great name, that we may grow steadfastly in the knowledge of the truth. Did man save you or did God? We must listen to God rather than men. For even the slightest change can change the whole meaning.
The idiomatic mean of The Scriptures shouldn't, but often is, lost in translations. 14:58
In the Original Greek
Few things have caused more damage in churches than when pastors say things like:
“In the originals, the word here really means_____”
“The Greek word for this is______”
“A better rending of the originals would be_____”
Churchgoers have heard these sayings for so long they have now become calloused to it! This is a real problem.
So, what is the problem? Here are a few.
There are no originals
When the pastor says, “in the originals”, it is guaranteed that a majority of the people in his Sunday morning church audience thinks he means the original autographs. What he said was misleading.
The dirty little secret that everyone in seminary knows but no one talks about is that there are no original autographs. Not a single original writing from any apostle, prophet, or tablet of stone exists today. We have thousands of copies (apographs), but not a single true original autograph. Many textual critics think it is impossible to believe the Bible is divinely inspired because of this very point. Bible believers have known this for centuries and understand by faith God preserves his words through copies and translations and not the original autographs.
When the pastor refers to the “originals” in church, he means a copy of a Greek text that was sold to him in the first Greek class he took. Most likely that Greek text did not exist anywhere in history before it was compiled in the last couple centuries.
No one speaks Greek and Hebrew
When the pastor says this in church, he is not speaking to a room of experts in ancient near eastern languages. Some in the audience may have learned the alphabet, or memorized verb tenses in Bible college, or spent a few years in elementary language learning, but the majority can not even tell if what he says is true. Why is it that those pastors who claim the audience should use Bibles in the language of the people think it is helpful to speak foreign languages to them?
It changes the Bible text
The number one reason pastors go back to the original Greek, Hebrew, Latin, or Aramaic is because they want to retranslate the text to align with their holy outline. If it is only a matter of definition then why don’t they use an English dictionary to clarify? Instead, the English word is seen as insufficient and needs retranslated. This gives the lesson to everyone in the audience that there are mistakes in the Bible, and it is acceptable to retranslate the Bible to make a point. The ends justify the means.
It begets pride and reopens the translation process
Speaking in other languages puffs people up. The Bible has already been translated into English from Greek, Hebrew, and with other translations diligently compared and revised. When the pastor raises the issue of translation he not only claims to correct all the translators of the Bible everyone is holding, but also leaves the translation process open for anyone to do the same thing. How is anyone supposed to know when the process of retranslating/correcting/revising the Bible is complete? In the eyes of most seminary trained textual critics, it will never be finished, because they are constantly finding new manuscripts in the dirt. They do not believe they have God’s words inspired or preserved in a single book.
It robs the audience of God’s words
The most serious problem with pastors saying these things is that it robs the audience of the authority of the Bible in their hands. The Bible in their hands says one thing, but suddenly they need the pastor to tell them what the Bible really should say. What happens when they go home after the meeting and continue reading in the book they hold? Now they will have a doubt, even if small, concerning the very words on the printed page. Since the pastor has declared that at least in one place it is incorrect, how can they trust it enough to teach their children and family at home? Now multiply this by the hundreds of times pastors refer to “the originals” and you might start to understand one reason why people don’t feel confident to study the Bible for themselves.
This needs to stop. People ought to be encouraged to believe the Bible, starting with the one they have, and not the one a pastor retranslates or cherry picks from his own sanctified opinion.
Do we need Greek and Hebrew?
You can live your whole life not knowing a single Greek or Hebrew word and be made perfect unto all good works by all scripture preserved in the English language (2 Tim 3:16-17). If someone tells you otherwise, then you have found someone who wants dominion over your faith.
We already have God’s preserved words in English, but we do need translators. We need faithful workmen to study Bible translation from a Bible believing perspective so that we can help preserve God’s words in languages all across the world that do not have a Bible. If this is your ministry then you will need to study other languages and utilize the translations that have been a part of God’s preservation process through history.
What Do I Do?
If you hear your pastor say “The Greek word here really means…” have the courage to speak up for the weaker brothers around you and say, “Stick to God’s words in English pastor!” Better yet, find some place where the leadership seeks to encourage Bible belief instead of critiquing scripture when it doesn’t suit their doctrinal preferences.
We need to be sensitive to the critique, editing, and imposition of doubt upon God’s word. It is enough to hear it from without the church, must we hear it from within as well? Don’t let someone who has studied other languages stop you from understanding and trusting God’s word in your own language.
“…let God be true, but every man a liar;…” - Romans 3:4
Bravo. I totally agree.
very good 119
KJV only is much like Catholic methodology.
1600 years later after other found and translated manuscripts, but KJV is truly the divine manuscript ? The KJV fell from heaven?
"the word became flesh" and the word is KJV?
(the cart before the horse) in Acts this is for sure their exposure. " it was in the time of unleavened bread" but it wasn't Passover yet? hhhm
thank you 119 ministry....... great video!
I'll take the Geneva 1599 over the KJV (1611 Authorized) any day. I prefer the NKJ over the ESV. I'm no fan of Steven Anderson and pray he repents. Thanks for this excellent video. Be blessed in the name of Yeshua.
Thank you very much 119 Ministries, excellent teaching.
Shalom ve toda
Very clearly presented. It is obvious that there are some so brainwashed with fear by an instructor that they are unable to accept that Yeshua is the Word and He keeps His Word pure in meaning, and allows for change in definition of words especially in English language! Pray for them!
13.56 Also Herod Agrippa would not have been keeping pagan days. He would have kept the Jewish days. So that does not fit.
why dont you use a hebrew translated direct to english? instead of all these different translations?
If you get a hebrew scriptures and a direct translated to english
AWESOME MESSAGE
Sorry but Steven Anderson makes me laugh 😂
I have never heard of him
@@huasonshine4120 if you watch Zach Bauer's series about Steven Anderson, the intro is entertaining.
@@davidgooley8940 I will look it up.... :)
@@davidgooley8940 hahahaha... Mr Anderson... nice...
It is too bad people don’t ignore him. It’s called negative attention seeking. Some people will do whatever it takes to be famous. When you ignore this behavior in “children”, generally it will diminish and eventually go away. When they receive attention for it, the behavior is reinforced because that is why they do it.
so many times it is commanded to only speak hebrew to seperate your non hebrew children so sure lets translate this from the given language of YESHUA
0For they hear: “Order on order, order on order, line on line, line on line; a little here, a little there.” 11Indeed, with mocking lips and foreign tongues, He will speak to this people
I've heard some say that if the King James Bible was good enough for Moses and Jesus it is good enough for them.
But it came after as ee just found out from this teaching...
@@petallowe7209 I think he was being Facetious
@@6969smurfy oooh ok I see, a little humor is always good. Blessings 😁
Haha Jolly... good one :)
😂
Good video, in my opinion there no need for any more translations anymore- even in the video Dr White said any other translations of certain amount of words to be somewhat different is about money from book inc's more then not.
👍
So what do Chinese, French and German etc people do who don't read English, let alone Olde English? Foolishness!
I grew up on the KJV and enjoy reading it, but I read several translations when studying
Speaking of translational errors. Have any of you read The Living Bible translation. It's extraordinarily antisemetic and changes the overall meaning of multiple bible verses to say what they want it to mean. It's nauseating.
When does numbers say Passover is? When does it say days of unleavened bread? According to numbers they are 2 separate events. We must let the Bible define things for us. Passover is one night not seven days
Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. The night of the Passover, and the feast of unleavened bread is part of Passover week. That is why Herod who wanted to please the Jews was waiting till after Passover. Easter never existed, it is one of the many mistranslations in the imperfect uninspired KJV. When Ezekiel 45 v 21 was point out to well known "Bible agnostic" and KJV only cultist Will Kinney, who is incapable of rational thought. He still insisted that Easter was the correct translation. Even though it contradicts God's clear teaching in Ezekiel. That is the KJV only cult for you. Full of double standards, and hypocrisy, and outrageous lies.
@@samlawrence2695 In the first month, in the fourteenth day of the month, ye shall have the passover, a feast of seven days; unleavened bread shall be eaten. Think you stretching saying that makes it clear, they are both stated here but consecutive it doesn’t call them one
@@Sandppy According to the prophet Ezekiel under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Passover there is the night of the Passover, but it is also a feast of seven days. When only unleavened bread could be eaten. Easter never existed in the time of Herod. As I said he wanted to please the Jews. So was waiting till after Passover. The KJV got it wrong.. I am not stretching anything, just going on the inspired word of God.
119... WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE NAME OF GOD APPEARING ON THE TEMPLE MOUNT WALL?
Let me get this straight. This man believes that if you can't understand the KJV then you aren't saved. Um, excuse me. Not everything in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic easily translates into English. Some meaning is lost in translation. Also, by his own argument, he should be able to read the bible in Greek and Hebrew if he is saved because the Holy Spirit should be teaching him thru it.
When I first came to faith I was reading the good news bible and loved it .
God elohim is our teacher who will reveal the truth to us even if we only have a flawed bible new testament
That's why the Torah and Tanaka
Hasn't change That's the foundation of all scripture
Thanks!
Matthew 24 for many shall come in May name. Word changing is not good. Will if you look at the Bible old testament God always used the bad people for the good . Everything God does is back then and of today. Like the word (should ) (will)(shall) John 3 :16 and revlataion 3:5
This video starts out with you saying "we believe that the whole bible is true", goes on to say that there are errors in the KJV. If you believe there are errors in the KJV, you do not believe that the WHOLE bible is true.
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
2 Timothy:3:7
KJV Onlyists are a LOT like Mormons. They both often base things on emotionalism.
can witten greek scriptures be translated back to hebrew?
Thank you
Love your user name!
Saying that because Anderson is a freak than the KJV is wrong is not a good argument.
The translation of the KJV may not be perfect but the manuscripts it uses are.
In John 7: 8-9 ESV it says “You go up to the feast. I am NOT going up to this feasts...” but a few verses later says “ then he also went up...” So the ESV and many other modern Bibles is making The Lord a liar and a sinner.
On the contrary in the KJV it says “Go ye up unto this feast: I go not up YET unto this feast...”
Here Jesus is not lying.
Again in Matthew 5: 22NIV says “But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment.” We all know that Jesus got angry in the Bible so is the NIV saying that Jesus is a sinner? Definitely yes. What the KJV says than?
“ But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment.”
Here we have “without a cause”
and Jesus is not a sinner. There are many important changes in modern Bibles like these.
Modern bibles are all catholic made bibles so if you are Protestant or even Hebrew root why are you using a catholic Bible? Modern bibles uses three main texts: Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, and alexandrinus.
I suggest you to read the books of David W. Daniels and learn how these three texts are false.
David W Daniels is a KJV only cultist, full of double standards and circular reasoning. Also he is from Chicktracts which is full of conspiracy theories. Would not trust anything from Chicktracts. Especially David W Daniels. You ask why read a Catholic Bible? The KJV was translated from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope, also it leant heavily on the Latin Vulgate a Catholic Bible, showing the heavy Catholic influence on the KJV. So you have Latin words like Lucifer, instead of the more accurate translation, of " morning star" or "day star". Even the KJV had day star in the margin. Also the language is very archaic. So many words have changed meaning, making the KJV even more inaccurate. That is why I do not use the KJV or own one. That was a decision I made even before I had heard of this KJV only cult. A cult that is another gospel, and should be rejected for the damnable, destructive heresy it is.
Some modern translations are modifying some important passages, for example in Isaiah 40:22 originally: CIRCLE (khoog--חוּג--), they have deliberately changed it to globe...Steven Anderson, Kent Hovind, Michael Rood, and company, all of them Flat Earth detractors, must know that Isaiah knew the difference: Isaiah 22:18-BALL (Kadur--כַּדוּר--)... the bible is full of Flat Earth references, and this is the challenge for them (just to get started): Is there any bible chapter that tells us about the earth being a sphere with at least one single continuous and perpetual movement? (science tells us there are five movements); Is there any bible chapter that tells us about the sun being massive and motionless? (over sixty tells us otherwise). According to the scriptures heliocentrism is FALSE!!!...
I think you missed there are different year versions of the KJV. A good question to ask a KJV onlyists is which one, the 1769 or 1611.
1769.
KJV onlyists like to point out that modern translations like the NIV and NRSV, in Luke 11:2-4 the Our Father prayer is missing parts of the prayer, but when you use those same modern translations and go to Matthew 6:9-13 you’ll see that the ENTIRE prayer is there. So in reality, the entire Our Father prayer is STILL in the modern translations, you just have to go to the Gospel of Matthew to read the entire prayer.
Jesus loves you! Get a king james bible and believe. If you notice they are meant to be TWO WITNESSES and they use different wording. For a reason.
@@MichaelAChristian1 No we are to believe in Jesus, not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation like the KJV.
@@samlawrence2695 He that is of God heareth God's words. Man cannot live by bread alone but by every word that cometh from the mouth of God.
"The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7.
"Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever:
That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the Lord:
Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:
Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us.
Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon:
Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant."- Isaiah chapter 30 verses 8 to 13.
Heaven and earth shall pass away but his words shall not pass away.
"Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.
For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof falleth away:
But the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you."- 1 Peter 1 verses 23 to 25.
Jesus Christ is the Living Word! It is easier for heaven and earth TO EXPLODE than for his words to ever pass away. The scriptures CANNOT BE BROKEN. His words they are spirit and they are life!
"Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you."- John chapter 15 verse 3.
@@MichaelAChristian1 Those scriptures are in my Bible as well. They have absolutely nothing to do with the KJV only heresy. I have noticed that KJV only cultist like yourself. Love to quote scripture, then try to make it justify their man made tradition. Which of course what the false teaching of KJV onlyism is. The Sadducees quoted scripture to the Lord Jesus Christ. . Jesus pointed out to them, that they did not know the scripture oy the power of God. Salvation is found in Christ Jesus and him alone. No other name given to us, by which we must be saved. That is in all transltions, English and all languages. The KJV is archaic, many words have changed meaning making even more inaccurate. That is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations, in English we can understand. The KJV translators knew their work was not perfect, that is why they had hundreds of footnotes, with alternative readings. Because they were not at all sure of the correct translation. They said that the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult in their delusions, pride, and arrogance think they know better.
@@samlawrence2695 You are the one citing men. Man cannot live by bread alone but by EVERY word that cometh from the MOUTH OF GOD. Your false doctrine has NO scriptures as you think they are all "imperfect translation". That is heresy. The scriptures CANNOT be broken. He did not say the PARAPHRASE or the IMPERFECT TRANSLATION cannot be broken. The scriptures cannot be broken because it is the word of the LORD. The "new versions" OMIT WHOLE VERSES and change them to DECEIVE. The "niv" removes the name of that wicked one in Isaiah and leaves a title pointing to JESUS instead. Wake up!
THIS IS THE WORD THAT IS PREACHED UNTO YOU. WRITE IT IN A BOOK FOR EVER AND EVER.
Only about 1,700 translation errors in the KJV
I like that you have to question everything
Praise YAH!
theres only one name that saves and his momma said it was יֵשׁוּעַ
I use the JPS, ( 1917), NKJ and Scriptures as my primary, NASB is horrible and so much added text, we used it in bible college, I know a young man that was KJV only, I asked him what version of the Bible did God hand Moses, I asked him if he believed in Unicorns also, since KJV does. As my pastor said, let the Hebrew translate what Hebrews wrote and let the Gentile translate what he wrote.
Hey "North To Far" this Anthony guy keeps deleting his post? I would like to hear more of what you speak.
Why me?
@@northoftoofar3772 i could not tell if your last comment was pertaining to I, or the Anthony guy? We had multiple comments going.
@@6969smurfy It was indeed directed at Anthony, who had deemed everyone a coward who would not engage with him.
"Anthony Lambertini" why are you posting all these comments about KJV only discussions but then deleting everything?
The internet allows an interesting phenomenon whereby one could attempt to circumvent Proverbs 17:28. If your words can't be read, no one will know you opened your mouth.
@@Talancir He who justifies the wicked and he who condemns the righteous
are both alike an abomination to the Lord.
@@6969smurfy forgive me, I'm not sure how this works in this context.
@@Talancir I liked it when I read it. It makes me think of how we got to this current mess we call civilization...
I dont like some other versions because they exclude things but I dont think we should hold everyone who believes kjv only is like Steven Anderson lol. I'm glad you said it in follow up. But I dont think it'd the only thing we should use either. I just think it's better than many versions out there
It is more of a preference but I know newer believers can read other versions that will tell them things like "in saying this Jesus declared all foods clean" type stuff and mislead many
@@steevs7912 Nobody is being misled. Jesus did declare all foods clean. The only ones misleading people, are the KJV only cultists. A bunch of hypocrites and deceitful false teachers.
@@samlawrence2695 where does it say Jesus said these things? I've read all of what yeshua said and nowhere ever did he say he made all foods clean. If you actually research that "footnote" you'll see that was added. Yah said not to add or take away. They def added to his word
@@steevs7912 When asked about what defiles a man. It is what comes out of the mouth that defiles a man, not what goes in Also in the Pauline letters no food is to be refused if eaten with thanksgiving, unless offered to idols. Peter is told. what God has cleaned we are not to call common or unclean. We are also told not to judge anyone about keeping or not keeping Sabbath days, or what meat we eat or don't eat. Paul also makes it clear that days will come when people will believe doctrines of devils. Forbidding to marry and abstaining from certain foods. I have been set free by. Christ, and by God's grace I will not fall for another gospel. Like Sabbath keeping, or abstaining from certain meats. Another gospel like the seventh day Adventist. It was a Seventh Day Adventist cultist who started the KJV only cult. A cult that is also another gospel. With no scriptural authority.
@@samlawrence2695 it sure sounds like all of that came from Paul and none of it came from yeshua...missing my point. And you can choose to interpret the things Paul says as meaning eat whatever you want, don't honor the sabbath, but if Paul actually taught what was contrary to Moses im pretty sure he would've been slain much earlier. If Jesus taught against Moses law, the commandments God gave for ppl to follow, they would have had him gone way before the cross came into play. You can study it out or you can go on thinking God lied to malachi when he said he never changes because either Paul isn't saying what you think he is saying or he is just a heretic at that point.
kjv was translated to benefit king james and his sins or what he wants that why we are to be careful in what we read the hebrew scripture are true
Jeremy, Noe, Unicorn, pisseth...it's bible to read but not as if the only one that should be read.
Yes, "Jesus" in Acts 7:45 & Heb 4:8 is very interesting.
Seems that KJV, Bishops', and Geneva followed the Vulgate(s). Geneva provides a marginal note, at Heb 4:8 "He speaks of Joshua the son of Nun .... so was Joshua a figure of Christ." Perhaps KJV followed Geneva at Heb 4:8 since KJV also provides a marginal note, "Jesus: that is, Joshua".
I'm _not_ a KJV-onlyist. That being said, part of your argument does _not_ address (whether it be intentional avoidance or ignorance) that there's a _sort of_ variant of KJV-onlyists. It's only fair to also acknowledge these groups since outsiders erroneously categorize them as KJV-onlyists. There's the _'KJV is the best English translation we have'_ people, and then there's the _'the texts on which the KJV version were based on-onlyists'_ people (aka the _'Textus Receptus-onlyists'_ aka the _'Receiced Text-onlyists')_ and, the one I believe, the _'Byzantine Text-onlyists'_ (aka the _'Majority Text-onlyists')._ (The Received Text being based on The Majority Text.) It's _not_ a salvation issue, _but_ I do believe it's a _very important_ issue as there is great evidence that the New Testament text from which modern translations are made is a _corrupt_ forgery (as you quoted, "...test everything; hold fast what is good."). The documentary "Tares Among the Wheat" elaborates in _much detail_ on the extremely sketchy history of the modern "Critical Text". My point in saying all this is to say your argument ignores the fact that there is very solid evidence that the "Critical Text" is based on a _forgery_ made to look older than it actually was (the creator of the "codex" even came forward. Watch the documentary for details).
_Perhaps_ it's not a Satanic conspiracy so much as people hiding the truth in order to save face or, at the very least, to accumulate prestige and profit (ie inept and/or corrupt "scholars" (Westcott and Hort, to name a couple)). _Perhaps_ it _is_ a Satanic forgery. Watch the _whole_ documentary and decide for yourself. "Study to show thyself approved..." and "...test everything; hold fast what is good."
I have watched it. Question: do you think those who made it had an agenda? I believe they did. Their agenda is KJV only. And as I watch history being made in front of my eyes and being falsely reported, and falsely recorded, I am made painfully aware that historians always have their own filters and their own agenda, because historians are people, and they get their information from people. People perceive and report according to their agenda. When we were not there, we only know from what we have been taught or can glean from “history”. And then we talk as if we know the truth because we have studied what other people with their own agenda said. It is frustrating to say the least.
READ THE VERY NEXT CHAPTER. How readest thou? Delete your post now.
@@pegtop5455 Yes, I believe the filmmakers had an agenda. But that's _argumentum ad hominem._ There are WAY too many red flags when it comes to where the "codex" came from and its so called "credibility". (ie Westcott and Hort's GUESSWORK and lack of expertise, inconsistencies in the story of the guy who _found_ the "codex" (and his story was documented by himself), the museum's decision to hide these inconsistencies/controversies, the fact that the "codex" looks suspiciously out of its time and the history of the Vatican's forgeries, the history of the Vatican killing and torturing people for translating the scriptures and torturing and killing people for even owning a copy of any part of the English scriptures (no matter how complete/incomplete), the fact that the forger of the "codex" even admitted it was made by him and was willing to publically debate it, the fact that the Catholic Church rushed anyone skeptical of the "codex" from studying them too closely, etc.
It is clear from the overwhelming amount of well documented actions, quotes, writings, and inconsistencies from everyone involved that the "codex" is fraudulent/illegitimate/has _no_ credibility.
Yes, history is often twisted, censored, etc. But the history of the Critical Text is _not_ being discussed by mainstream scholars (and the fact that the museum, and BBC, and Vatican even refused to talk about and/or even _suppressed_ the extremely sketchy parts of the Critical Text... It's very suspicious when someone refuses to even _discuss_ credible evidence or goes out of their way to _hide_ or suppress opposing views/evidence), the fact that most the mainstream media at the time ran a smear-campaign on the guy who admitted to making the "codex", _and_ the scholars at the time used the "the debate is settled" "argument" _without ever having held a debate_ (the creator of the text tried to hold a public debate but the "scholars" absolutely refused. John 3:20-21
(English Standard Version)
20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. 21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”), and the fact that the _expert's_ opinion was _ignored_ and the opinion of the people lacking expertise were promoted and even taken as scripture (pardon the pun). One scholar said he felt the "codex" was legit because he had a _feeling_ that it was legit. So to acknowledge what you said about history, history definitely was rewritten/covered up but _not_ by the opposers of the false codex but by those in _favor_ of it.
Again, I'm _not_ a KJV-onlyist, but I am a Majority-Text-is-the-best-we-got-seeing-as-the-originals-have-been-lostist (I'm ok with newer translations where the text agrees with the Byzantine/Majority Text. And I'm ok with the KJV where it agrees with the Majority Text). Despite the documentary makers' obvious bias and misguided philosophy (KJV-onlyism) it does not change the evidence. Again, _argumentum ad hominem._
@@MichaelAChristian1 I cited the _correct_ chapter. The next chapter that you mention is a _different_ story than 1 Cor 10:8. HOWEVER, someone did point out the fact that 1 Cor 10:8 says in ONE DAY. So there's no conflict like I thought since Numbers 25 may be talking about the _TOTAL_ number outside of a 24 hour period (or, outside a from "dusk till dawn" period).
Before I proceed to write as I do I need you to be aware I am NOT K.J.V.O nor am I intentionally trying to discredit anything Dovid has said here I completely agree with more or less all of it.
"According to scholars and textual critics these older manuscripts more accurately reflect the original text"
And how many of you are aware of which "older" and "more accurate" manuscripts Dovid is referring too here? He's probably referencing Codex Sinaiticus which has been dated to the mid 4th century found in St. Catherines monastery at the bottom of Mount Sinai and Codex Vaticanus dated also to the 4th century conveniently discovered in the Vatican library. In 1844 Constantin Tischendorf set off on a voyage to try and discover the worlds oldest Biblical and manuscript and surprise, surprise he discovered it in a monastery reportedly being used by the monks as trash to keep their fire lit (there is another story about the discovery contradictory to this one) the problem I have with Codex Sinaiticus is Constantin Simonadies. If you don't know who this man is he is the Scribe who went to his grave claiming to have written Codex Sinaiticus with his own hand for a wealthy client. How many of you are aware Codex Sinaiticus constains The Shepherd of Hermas and The Gospel of Barnabus? This specific manuscript alongside Codex Vaticanus was later used by two Roman Catholic scholars called Westcott and Hort to bring to completion what we know today as modern translations.
Codex Sinaiticus specifically has been the topic of controversy ever since it's discovery in the 19th century and both Wescott and Hort had very interesting textual techniques when forming the first English translation after the 1611 K.J.V
Westcott and Hort were Anglicans. Just like the baby sprinkling Anglicans who translated the KJV. Who of course translated it from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. That is why the KJV is a very Catholic influenced translation. Latin words like Lucifer borrowed from the Latin Vulgate, instead of morning star or day star. Mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover.
The correct translation in acts 12:4 is Easter.
Peter was arrested (then were the days of unleavened bread.)
Passover comes before unleavened bread.
So either herod was going to wait a whole year before executing Peter, or herod intended to wait until after the Roman festival of Ishtar (easter) was over..
It seems that the kjv translators got that one correct.
There was NO EASTER in Jesus day! It's a pagan holiday. Christmas too! They didn't speak Olde English then and all the pagan holidays are just that...PAGAN!
While I agree with the KJV not being perfect, I disagree with the idea of oldest manuscripts means better. There's a reason why the MAJORITY texts do not agree with the oldest. They were the most used therefore destroyed faster overtime. The ones least used, last longer. And they were least used because they weren't the best copies. So MT and TR are the best textual camp.
It's easier to miss out a verse while copying by mistake than adding notes into the text by mistake. That argument also is extremely weak.
Also, the gospel of Matthew was originally in Hebrew according to early Church History. We have no original manuscripts of it, but certainly it would be a more reliable source than the Greek majority if we did.
Agree. The issue in translations deals with manuscripts used. Also, look at the translation committees. Is there an agenda or reason for the specific translation being made? This certainly influences the modern "translation."
One of the most common arguments Onlyism makes. It is just plain false. The Catholic Church had Monks make thousands of copies of the Bible they wanted solely used. They also destroyed all they could of other versions of it. Thus why there is more copies. Some of the missing verses have been placed as footnotes in earlier manuscripts. Thus it is clear the earlier ones are in fact better.
It is like some book came out. I liked it but wanted just a few changes. They would not change it so I burned all their copies and made many copies of the one I made with changes. Does that make mine more accurate than the real book?
Father, Son and Holy Spirit seems to have been added for example.
@@steveangell1072 you have no idea what you are talking about. These majority text does not come from Monks of the Vatican!!! 😂 Lol in fact, you can match the MT and TR with the earlier patristic writings, hardly monks from the Vatican. It is the Vatican that prefers the Critical Text not the MT or TR, so every point you tried to make is false.
@@moisesg.v.1575 I used the term Monks generically. It may have been Priest or Scribes the Catholic Church hired.
History is clear Rome ruled the earth for a long time. Even after it stopped ruling the vast majority of Churches were Roman Catholic.
To think they did now write the majority of the text we now have is to dismiss history.
According to your explanation NKJV is good enough to correct KJV errors! So why then is other translation like NIV ESV etc needed?
The King James bible is perfect! You just proved the "new versions" FALSE. You don't need 100 plus "english versions" all saying DIFFERENT THINGS.
@@MichaelAChristian1 What different things do they say? Strange the KJV only cultists do not make their comments in King James English. Reason no one could understand them because we do not speak that way anymore. Yet these hypocrites confine Almighty God to some 400 year old imperfect uninspired translation. That is nothing but idolatry. God knows all tongues and languages, he is not confined to any translation, especially one made by baby sprinkling Anglicans, that the KJV only cult, would have us believe.
Older doesn't mean better.
Manuscripts wore out from use.
Having an "older" manuscript meant that it wasn't often used.
Dear 119 ministries, many things already happened, a lot of crazy things, not only in US but all over the world. I am talking about pandemic and the government solution. You always say to Test Everything, which I believe everything mean everything including what’s happen in this world. Your Content “The Mark of The Beast” showed that probably involving governmental system or policy. I wonder why you never talk about today’s situation or where you stand? Do we as Torah believers should just follow and trust everything is gonna be okay? And believe whatever the system said? Or else? Or you let everyone decide according to what they believe? But what you believe? Are you in 119 ministries (John and David) received the system or policy?
With Yeshua loves, your brother.
There are plenty of people talking about whats going on... We still need people to talk about truth, If we know YHVH, it does not matter what is going on, he will keep us, Let 119 teach the messages YHVH lays on their hearts, and not force everyone to teach what you want to hear.. Someone needs to man the Strong Tower, to bring in those who search and seek...
@@huasonshine4120 Telling the truth is important but how we as believer to act in real life also necessary. TORAH is the basic but surely more than that we need to understand.
The KJV preference for most comes from the fact that other translations have several omissions. Including omissions of words spoken by Christ.
that point is covered in the video, I love the KJV as well always have... but I do not exalt it as infallible, many of these ommitted scriptures are not in older texts, and their omission does not effect the meaning of the message overall. I like comparing versions and consulting the original languages from where they were translated, language does change over time and with it the meaning of words...
@@huasonshine4120 But the WORD OF GOD does NOT change!
"If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments;
If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments;
Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes.
Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail.
My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.
Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.
His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before me.
It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven. Selah."- Psalms chapter 89 verses 30 to 37.
EVERY WORD IS PURE. If they "omit" then you admit the "new versions" are tampering with scriptures. It is not for them to say hundreds of years afterward that they are going to "retranslate" and "recompile" to OMIT what they don't like.
@@MichaelAChristian1 Yes, any words that YHVH utters will not fail, and the Covenant he made stands forever, and everything he said has and will come to pass. Many peoplel have worked hard, many have devoted their lives, to passing those words down so that every generation can hear them, Some pass them orally some write them down, some translated them into other languages, but language is a funny thing it evolves, and changes over time, Gods words havent changed, but peoples perception of them, meanings shift and new words are invented bad becomes good and good becomes bad, Even the bible says that.. the book is a book ... the book is paper and ink. The power is in the words that are recorded, especially the words spoken by YHVH,Tthe book is the attempt of men to pass on these powerful words YHVH spoke and the lessons we learn from the lives of real men and women,, The book is just a box that contains these valuable treasures and becomes holy by association, as the Ark of the covenant became holy after YHVH came to reside there. these words were passed from scroll to scroll hundreds of times, mistakes were made, the pen slips, the ink drips, the ink smears, the wrong letker here and missing lettr there, here a jot and there a tittle, paper rips pages go missing... and then translated into this language, and translated into that language, and into arabic, and into greek and then latin and then english and then kings english and then 2nd century english and into east St Louis street language, the book has changed millions of times in tiny ways... But the words GOD spoke will never change, The covenant he struck with his people stands, and the truth rings in their ears, and burns the chaff from their hearts and lives. The book has been called the word of god but the truth is that the book is like an old tape recorder... a little static .. a little background noise... but if your paying attention you can actually hear YHVH's words, and then you can contain them in your heart and record them in your mind. and He, Himself will be the 2nd witness for you as you seek his face to understand his words.
@@huasonshine4120 HOW READEST THOU?
" For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."- Matthew chapter 5 verse 18. You were just lying. Not ONE JOT OR TITTLE SHALL PASS.
"Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."- Matthew chapter 24 verse 35.
It is easier for EARTH TO EXPLODE AND PASS AWAY THAN ONE JOT OR TITTLE OF THE WORD OF GOD! You are being deceived. Nothing was EVER lost. Read Genesis 40! Read Numbers 5! The power of God's Word bears witness to itself. I have no idea what you are saying when you say it says a "book is a book". What are you trying to quote. Here is a quote for you.
"Now go, write it before them in a table, and note it in a book, that it may be for the time to come for ever and ever:
That this is a rebellious people, lying children, children that will not hear the law of the Lord:
Which say to the seers, See not; and to the prophets, Prophesy not unto us right things, speak unto us smooth things, prophesy deceits:
Get you out of the way, turn aside out of the path, cause the Holy One of Israel to cease from before us.
Wherefore thus saith the Holy One of Israel, Because ye despise this word, and trust in oppression and perverseness, and stay thereon:
Therefore this iniquity shall be to you as a breach ready to fall, swelling out in a high wall, whose breaking cometh suddenly at an instant.
And he shall break it as the breaking of the potters' vessel that is broken in pieces; he shall not spare: so that there shall not be found in the bursting of it a sherd to take fire from the hearth, or to take water withal out of the pit."- Isaiah chapter 30 verses 8 to 14. WRITE IT IN A BOOK FOR EVER AND EVER. So again the power of God's Word bears witness to itself. Read Luke 4. What BOOK did HE open to read from? The BOOK WRITTEN FOR EVER AND EVER!
You are wrong. Pray on it in Jesus Christ name! Get a king james bible an believe.
@@MichaelAChristian1 @Mi at that is exactly how i read it, not one word of YHVH will fail. We are to keep his laws statutes and commandments, if we are to be called his people and receive his promises... those who do not live in the covenant, inheirit the second death, instead of everlasting life.
Let The Holy Spirit (Helper, Comforter, Spirit Of TRUTH) Do His Job... "He Will Teach You All Things" That's Why Jesus Said Blaspheming The Spirit Is The Unforgivable Sin. Man Keeps Trying To Take HIS (The Spirits) Place. Sorry. I'm Not Sorry. Give God His Glory & Stop Giving Credit To MEN.
KJV Onlyists might want to look at history and logic and re-think their view.
( Some of this ended up being questions for KJV Onlyists.)
Such as:
-Was Tyndale a heretic because his Gospel of Luke does NOT agree with the KJV textually in 2:22 and other places?
-Is it okay that King James approved of a Puritan being burned at the stake in 1612?
-Is it okay to wear GAY clothing?
-WHICH KJV Bible is free from error?
-Is the LATIN VULGATE evil?
-Many KJV New Testaments have a note that tells people that the KJV is a REVISION of other English translations.
-MOST KJV Onlyists would HATE to read "Translators to the Reader"!!!!!!!!!!!
-WHY do KJV Onlyists think there is more than one Devil? ( 12 Peter :_)
-Concerning "Missing Verses". IF the KJV is PERFECT- than they will have a MINORITY Text ..... if they are honest.
-KJV Onlyist BASH early manuscripts if they disagree with the KJV. BUT they will run to one IF it AGREES with their KJV Bible.
-Why are you afraid to look at what the Hebrew actually says?
-Do you not attend a Church of England congregation?
-Mr. KJV Onlyist- Can you tell and spell for me the name of the Messiah?
-WHERE was the Word of God in the year 1600?
JESUS CHRIST is the LIVING GOD. The fact that you would ASK that shows why they don't use "new versions". The NAME that is ABOVE every other name. Every KNEE shall bow and every tongue shall CONFESS THAT JESUS CHRIST IS LORD to the GLORY OF GOD THE FATHER.
What is 12 Peter supposed to be referring to?
"Why are you afraid to look at Hebrew?" I am not afraid to look at Hebrew but you are LYING to yourself if that MATTERS AT ALL. First HEBREW IS A DEAD LANGUAGE. Do a "google search". This is ADMITTED. So second why was it a dead language? Because Israel was SCATTERED as FORETOLD for not following God! God has PRESERVED HIS WORDS but we see OBJECTIVELY the NATION and the LANGUAGE WAS NOT PRESERVED. So what does that TELL YOU? The Word of God is NOT BOUND. God preserves HIS words. Do you ADMIT THIS? Now let's finish here. WHO TOLD YOU THEY "REDISCOVERED" HEBREW "PERFECTLY"? The SAME people who DON'T believe in Jesus Christ and got SCATTERED FOR NOT FOLLOWING GOD. Those are the people coming and saying they are going to tell you what the "bible really says"??? And you would believe them over the PRESERVED scriptures that were NEVER LOST why? The power of God's Word bears witness to itself. Further, there are IDENTICAL words in english that have totally different meanings. You thinking you can "compare" writings ON THE FLY to "improve" PERFECTION is madness.
Do you really think your ON THE FLY "retranslation" and "recompilation" HUNDREDS of years AFTER the fact compares to the bible PRESERVED and NEVER LOST cross checked OVER 7 YEARS under commission of a King? I will go A STEP FURTHER and say the king james bible was FORETOLD in Psalms 12 which is why it is ATTACKED in "newer versions" as well.
"The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7.
PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES. So you see, the COMPILATION AND TRANSLATION I believe were FORETOLD. AS we see languages mentioned in scriptures. And we see language is not a barrier to the Word of God. See Acts.
So the compiled King James bible is PERFECT and yes I will go as far as to say it is better by far then you trying to LEARN multiple languages to try to RETRANSLATE AND RECOMPILE the bible ON THE FLY when you speak english.
Does that make sense why you shouldn't trust people 400 years later to "retranslate" it AGAIN AND AGAIN now?
Jesus Christ is the LIVING WORD. In 1600 GOD had preserved it and HE compiled the scriptures in english for us in the king james bible. Which is why it would make no sense to try to UNCOMPILE THEM. Read Luke 4. He opened the BOOK. What book? Read Isaiah 30. Isaiah was not given to them by Moses. God preserved HIS words.
Whatever scriptures they had to use in 1600 GOD led to this. PURIFIED SEVEN TIMES. The letters were not written yet in Acts does that mean the scriptures didn't exist because they weren't done yet? No. People still heard the gospel of Jesus Christ. You have the COMPILED PERFECT King james bible IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Why would you ignore that and try to work backwards? It makes no sense.
thats why we all should seek and search what is true and not what man says
The ET Cepher is much better and closer to Hebrew and Greek and armaric.
I do believe that the KJV is the most accurate translation. I myself use an ESV, KJV and the Greek and Hebrew study Bible's. What I find really annoying is how the non KJV versions take verses out and change the meaning that comes out in a shuttle way. I'm not saying that all transactions are without error. This person says that the missing verses are negligible. A big fat lie to prove his point. Then he says that's because the other translations are from older more accurate transcripts. Another big lie. Just because something is older does not make it more accurate. The other translations are from the Alexandrian transcripts while the KJV is not. Three are numerous academic arguments for and against but after listening to them and reading literature I have concluded that the KJV is the most accurate. Obviously this guy prefers the ESV but even though I use it myself have now changed over to KJV as sock of reading foot notes and find more value in the KJV through the Holy Spirit that teaches me. Shalom.
Matthew
Matthew 12:47 - entire verse omitted
Matthew 17:21 - entire verse omitted
Footnote: Some manuscripts insert verse 21: But this kind never comes out except by prayer and fasting
Matthew 18:11 - entire verse omitted
Matthew 23:14 - entire verse omitted
Mark
Mark 7:16 - entire verse omitted
Mark 9:44 - entire verse omitted
Mark 9:46 - entire verse omitted
Mark 11:26 - entire verse omitted
Mark 15:28 - entire verse omitted
Luke
Luke 17:36 - entire verse omitted
Luke 22:44 - entire verse omitted
Luke 23:17 - entire verse omitted
John
John 5:4 - entire verse omitted
Acts
Acts 8:37 - entire verse omitted
Acts 15:34 - entire verse omitted
Acts 24:7 (note half of Acts 24:6 and 24:8 is also removed)
Acts 28:29 - entire verse omitted
Romans
Romans 16:24 - entire verse omitted
1 John
1 John 5:7 - entire verse omitted
Alterations that change the meaning
Matthew 5:22
But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire. (KJV)
But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother (omit) will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, 'You fool!' will be liable to the hell of fire. (ESV)
In Matthew 5:22, the ESV makes Jesus Christ a sinner by removing the phrase "without a cause". Remember that Jesus Christ got angry in Mark 3:5. This is a contradiction and an accusation against the sinlessness of Jesus Christ. If Jesus was a sinner, then He is not a savoir.
Matthew 7:14
Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (KJV)
For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. (ESV)
The ESV perverts the simplicity of salvation in Matthew 7:14 by saying "the way is hard". There is nothing hard about being saved. Being saved is simply by realizing you are a sinner and trusting Jesus Christ (John 10:9, John 4:14).
Matthew 18:11
For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost. KJV
(omit) not included in the ESV
Colossians 1:14
In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins: (KJV)
in whom we have redemption (omit), the forgiveness of sins. (ESV)
Through his blood is omitted.
Philippians 2:6
Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: (KJV)
who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, (ESV)
The ESV denies the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ.
1 Timothy 3:16
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory." (KJV)
Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of godliness: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated by the Spirit, seen by angels, proclaimed among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory." (ESV)
The ESV attacks the deity and incarnation of Jesus Christ by replacing "God" with "He".
1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world." (KJV)
and every spirit that does not confess Jesus (omit) is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already." (ESV)
The ESV takes out the words "is come in the flesh" proving itself to have the spirit of antichrist behind it.
John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (KJV)
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only (omit) Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." (ESV)
We know that there are many sons of God in scripture, such as Adam (Luke 3:38), the angels (Job 1:6) and Christians (Philippians 2:15). With that in mind, the ESV introduces confusion into John 3:16 by removing the word "begotten". See also Monogenes
Luke 11:2
And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth. 3 Give us day by day our daily bread. 4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil." (KJV)
And he said to them, "When you pray, say: "Father, (omit) hallowed be your name. Your kingdom come. (omit) 3 Give us each day our daily bread, 4 and forgive us our sins, for we ourselves forgive everyone who is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation." (ESV)
The Lord's Prayer is changed into the Devil's Prayer by removing the phrases "which art in heaven", "Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in the earth" and "deliver us from evil".
Luke 2:33
And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. (KJV)
And his father and his mother marveled at what was said about him. (ESV)
In Luke 2:33 they are saying that Joseph was the father of Jesus.This is an attack upon the doctrine of the virgin birth.
2 Corinthians 2:17
For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ. (KJV)
For we are not, like so many, peddlers of God's word, but as men of sincerity, as commissioned by God, in the sight of God we speak in Christ. (ESV)
While the ESV corrupts the word of God, it seems like they try their best to cover their tracts. In 2 Corinthians 2:17, they replace "corrupt the word of God" with "peddlers of God's word".
2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (KJV)
Do your best to present yourself to God as one approved, a worker who has no need to be ashamed, rightly handling the word of truth. (ESV)
The ESV takes out the word "study" in 2 Timothy 2:15 and replaces it with "Do your best". Not only do they do that, but they take out the words "rightly dividing" and replace it with "rightly handling". To understand the Bible one must know how to rightly divide it.
Luke 4:4
And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. (KJV)
And Jesus answered him, "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone (omit). (ESV)
In Luke 4:4, the ESV takes out the phrase "but by every word of God". Note that the Lord Jesus Christ is quoting Deuteronomy 8:3.
Acts 2:47
Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. (KJV)
praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved. (ESV)
Hort attacked the doctrine of substitution and the ESV and new versions coming from the Westcott and Hort text, so salvation is not a one time finished thing, rather salvation is a process and is not complete. Notice in the below verses that the KJV says "saved", while the ESV says "being saved" as also the below verses reveal.
1 Corinthians 1:18
For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. (KJV)
For the word of the cross is folly to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. (ESV)
1 Corinthians 15:2
By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. (KJV)
and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you--unless you believed in vain. (ESV)
2 Corinthians 2:15
For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: (KJV)
For we are the aroma of Christ to God among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, (ESV)
Colossians 2:10
And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power: (KJV)
and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. (ESV)
In Colossians 2:10, the ESV says that we are not "complete" in Christ, rather we are just "filled".
You do realize that the ESV and other versions are NOT translated from the KJV, don't you? You have pointed out some differences here and they are all certainly differences, but I don't agree with your premise that the changed the KJV and that they did it wittingly and with evil intent. The other versions were translated from the original texts that predate the KJV. So where you are claiming that they omitted something, that's just blatantly false. If I read a book and then write a book report on it, and you also read the same book and write your own book reports on it, and then someone comes along and reads both of our book reports, it would be patently false for them to say that you read my book report and intentionally changed all of the words from what I wrote and you did that with malice. Don't you see how ridiculous this sounds? The other versions don't pervert the KJV because they aren't even based on the KJV. That's maybe the mistake that so many people make is this false belief that this is what has happened, that instead of interpreting the text as accurately as possible, and maybe even more accurately than the KJV, that they have omitted things or changed things from the KJV and that's just not true at all, as in my example about your book report, you would be interpreting the story to the best of your ability and relaying the idea as best you could. And ai would do the same. But the end result wouldn't be identical and yet neither of us took the other person's words and distorted them. Not even close.
@@melissaupton7373 I think your mistaken as I have NOT stated that the ESV is translated from the KJV?
Also you missed the point of my post; which is that the person states that the differences are negligible. To me they are not but maybe to him they are.
No attack on the virgin birth in the ESV, the virgin birth is clearly taught. Even the KJV says the parents of Jesus. Also Mary calls Joseph the father of Jesus in Luke's gospel. Was Mary denying the virgin birth as well? The KJV has many added uninspired verses, so how can they be missing if they are not in the older more accurate manuscripts that modern translations are translated from? The KJV is not the standard, it is nothing more than an imperfect uninspired translation. I thank God for better translations than the KJV, in English I can understand.
Here’s a good example:
In the KJV, Leviticus 12:8 "tor-im" is translated as "turtle". When that same word “tor-im” is translated as “turtle dove” in chapter 5:7 of the same book.
Now, we KNOW YHWH would not have given direction to sacrifice an unclean animal for an Atonement offering! 😆 🐢
VERSE 6 in SAME chapter SAYS turtle dove so what is the "turtle in verse 8? This is not an bible error at all. Instead of looking for errors. Pray for help and guidance and understanding in Jesus name! Read Numbers 5. That should prove it! The power of God's Word bears witness to itself! I'll ask you honestly. Should it be SEED OF THE WOMAN that MAKES HER FREE OF THE CURSE IN NUMBERS 5? OR the "other translations that REMOVE THE SEED"?? How readest thou? Who is the SEED of the FAITHFUL WOMAN THAT MAKES HER FREE OF THE CURSE OF THE LAW! HIS NAME IS JESUS CHRIST THE LIVING GOD! Search the scriptures for they testify of JESUS CHRIST! Jesus loves you! God bless and keep you!
Most Messianic use the TLV.
there are so many errors and meaning when scriptures are translated so many times. especially when they use lone words
My King James Bible is the perfect word of God in English. Will users of other translations dare to say the same about their translation?
I hope we aren't blind enuf to say that about any English translation. Have you even watched the video?
@@humilulo Have you even read the King James Bible?
@@igregmart, sounds like you haven't watched the video nor studied the KJV translation. KJV has translation errors, altho it has fewer errors that most English translations. so KJV is still better than many. but NKJV has fewer errors and it has updated vocabulary. so NKJV is a better translation in terms of accuracy & modern reading comprehension. but as with *every* English *translation* of the Bible, just be careful. there are several mistranslations in both KJV and the NKJV.
@@humilulo No. The King James bible is PERFECT. You have NOTHING to even COMPARE to the King James bible. That's A FACT.
Just as Israel both Northern and Southern Tribes were scattered so was the words and instructions of Elohim. Wouldn't it be wonderful to discover some Torah Scrolls that could be dated to the time of King David and to have the Vatican release the original hebrew scrolls that Matthew, Mark, Luke and John wrote. I do not have evidence that the Vatican is conceling any scrolls that can be Dated to the 1st and 2nd Century, however Alexander Gabriel Roth does offer some compelling narratives a few years back on his you tube channel. For Christians to more fully appreciate the fullness of the Faith we need to stop walking towards western idealogy translations and transliterations and strart walking towards the East. I personally am discovering that Aramaic is not a Dead Language ! Consider Picking up Some Aramaic Targums and the Aramaic English New Testament. Also feel free to ask a Rabbi what day Shabbat is. By the way I am writing this on Shabbat and I wish you a Shabbat Shalom 😁
That's hilarious that they use Anderson. HAHAHAHAHA, wow. Should have used anyone else. So many other pastors worth drawing from.
CONTEXT: I am in no way a KJV-onlyist, just prefer it. CONTEXT, truly a key.
Then the example for "authority" and "power" is not even an issue, same meaning. Please bring up viable translation errors that change the doctrine or message. Figures this would be the one you use...
-Then the name of Yeshua, should never have been changed in any Bible, that is a major issue in all Bibles, as the J sound wasn't created until what, the 1600's.
-Then the question becomes were the verses removed or not? Yes they were. This particular problem has no issue with whether it changes doctrine or meaning yet, the fact is there is adding or in this case, being taken away (Deut 4:2; Rev 22:19). Correct nothing sinister, just goes against what Yah/Yeshua actually states in the Bible which usually means sin...(enter sarcasm).
-Many modern versions actually change doctrine such as Mt 1:25, the "firstborn son", did Mary have other children first, was she not a virgin? Huge issue there. Mt 9:13 is a big deal since Yeshua's first words were "REPENT." Or how about Mt 17:21, power by praying and fasting? Mt 18:11, hmmm. John 10:38 changes "believe" to "understand." Huge difference in doctrine error. I understand Islam believes in Allah, but do I believe in Allah, no...
-Acts 6:8 "grace" and "faith" are interchanged, only Yeshua is full of grace. This is only a few, many more out there.
-When you change doctrine, you change belief. It is no wonder we have >1000's of denominations that can't agree.
-Please don't say modern translations are just different by using modern words. You better do more research @119Ministries. This is why so many people prefer the KJV or even the Geneva over some other New Age translations that come out of Wescott and Hort lineage.
This is by far one of the WORST teachings 119 has put out.
And for those who will reply to this with snark. Again, I am not a KJV onlyist, just prefer it.
However, Anderson is the penultimate example of KJVOnly. Indeed, he is synonymous with the doctrine.
@@Talancir completely agreed. Everyone knows he’s off the rocker though, or at least anyone who does there Berean studies.
I think you need to go talk to some KJVO advocates rather than simply regurgitating nonsense from James white, as everything you bring up is actually addressed by those that are KJVO and in fact they will show you why many of your claims are factually incorrect or straw man arguments.
Why speak to KJV only advocates? Considering they are liars incapable of telling the truth. That is why God has raised up true Bible believers like James White,. Who uses facts and truth to expose the double standards, hypocrisy, and the false teaching of KJV onlyism.
@@samlawrence2695 um.......ok
@@followintruthlj2865 What are you talking about?
@@samlawrence2695 Yes..that was a question I was going to ask you.
@@followintruthlj2865 It is quite clear, KJV onlyism is Man made tradition, with no scriptural authority. Therefore must be rejected for the heresy and lie that it is. In other words another gospel, which is the spirit of witchcraft. Because it Is a lie, to try and defend this heresy. KJV only cultist have to tell more lies. If they were honest and truthful they would reject KJV onlyism, for the damnable heresy it is. But they are incapable of rational thought, or being truthful.
Sounds like a computer generated voice.
KJV, tried and true, battle tested, 400+ years and counting. None other like it, not even close. :)
Jesus loves you! Read Numbers 5!! The King james bible is perfect! God preserves his words.
@@MichaelAChristian1 How can any translation be perfect? . Especially when it is in archaic English where so many words have changed meaning. Making the KJV one of the most inaccurate translations we have. This idolatrous blasphemous worship of the KJV, is nothing but witchcraft.
@@samlawrence2695 You are being deceived. Let me explain it to you simply.
"“And the LORD delivered unto me two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them was written according to all the words, which the LORD spake with you in the mount out of the midst of the fire in the day of the assembly.”- Deuteronomy chapter 9 verse 10. So it is PERFECT by God HIMSELF. Then God preserves his words.
"The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever."- Psalms chapter 12 verses 6 to 7.
Man can't preserve his words. Then we even see it FORETOLD it purified 7 times. I go step further saying king James FORETOLD here over 7 times. So it is PERFECT AND PRESERVED. Anything using "new discoveries" CANNOT BE SCRIPTURES AT ALL. Very simple. Which is why you were warned about those who would come later and try to CHANGE the SCRIPTURES. You were WARNED IN ADVANCE. JESUS loves you! IN Acts they heard the Word of God in their own tongue. No problem. Perfect.
@@MichaelAChristian1 What a load of moronic nonsense from an idolatrous blasphemous KJV only deceiver. You have raised an imperfect uninspired translation above the throne of God. You have made an archaic English translation the standard. Yet like all the lying hypocrites of the KJV only cult. You do not speak KJV English. Because no one could understand what you are talking about. That is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations in English we can understand. Even the KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. They even said even the meanest translation is still the word of God. At least the baby sprinkling Anglicans were more honest than the KJV only cult that Satan has raised up. No translation can ever be perfect whatever delusions you believe. The gospel is about Christ and him crucified, not some archaic imperfect uninspired translation. You have added a man made tradition, to the finished work of Christ. That is idolatry, and the sin of witchcraft. Looking forward to more fantasies from you. So carry on quoting scripture out of context, and try to make them fit your heresy of KJV onlyism. If the KJV translators had , the older more accurate manuscripts, we have now, they would not have made so many mistakes. Like mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Latin words like Lucifer instead of morning star or day star. A Latin word borrowed from the Latin Vulgate, showing the Catholic influence on the KJV. The KJV translated from manuscripts dedicated to the Pope with added uninspired verses like 1 John 5 v 7 Acts 8 v 37.. your idol the KJV is far from perfect, it never was perfect. Also has the English language changes, and words change meaning. The KJV is even more inaccurate. As I said the gospel is about Christ and him crucified, risen from the dead, and alive forevermore. Those who believe in him will not perish but have everlasting life. No scripture supports the KJV only heresy none at all. You like all KJV onlyists, are false teachers, with no scripture that supports your Man made tradition.
@@samlawrence2695 I am the only one using the SCRIPTURES. You DON'T HAVE THE scriptures . You DON'T BELIEVE in the scriptures. You are saying they are NONE perfect. Guess what? YOU DON'T HAVE THE ORIGINAL STONE TABLETS. You are a LIAR. You MUST believe God PRESERVED HIS WORDS or you don't believe the SCRIPTURES EVEN EXIST. God has preserved his words. The king james bible is IN ENGLISH. Real simple. You can LIE and say you don't understand THOU SHALT NOT STEAL but you do. Everyone does. GOD translated HIS WORDS in ACTS. You are LYING and saying IT CAN'T EVER BE TRANSLATED. God PRESERVED IT or you don't have it. God translated it PERFECTLY or you can't have ANY scriptures to read EVER. So yes the KING JAMES bible is PRESERVED AND purified over 7 times like the scriptures FORETELL EVEN. Everyone WAS king james only until late 1900s. You are saying EVERYONE ON PLANET EARTH WAS WRONG until atheists started tampering with the scriptures. The people "retranslating" different UNPRESERVED scripts don't even believe the GOSPELS were written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Who were you warned about in the scriptures that would try to CHANGE his words. Now you have over 100 different "versions" saying DIFFERENT things. You cannot say they are the SAME. You are Calling SOMEONE a liar and the "new versions DID NOT EXIST.
No, Easter in the KJV is not an error. Using Easter up to the 17th century was not misleading to the English or German speaking people up to the 17th century; but it is misleading to many readers today. Long before Tyndale coined "Passover" (BTW, Tyndale used passover in OT, but Ester in NT, following Luther), the Germanic word Easter (in various forms) existed in Anglo-Saxon & Germanic Biblical contexts. You'll find Easter in the Anglo-Saxon Wessex Gospels, Luther's German Bible, Tyndale, Coverdale, Geneva, and Bishops'. By reviewing the pre-1611 translations, you'll see Easter being phased out. Yes, it is anachronistic; but it points to the resurrection of the Christ as the Passover Lamb.