Elliott Reacts to Andy Lewicky's Review of the 2024 and 2023 Salomon QST 98, deep dives into the haters, And talks about his Ski History and Background.
Been on my 98's for a few seasons now. They are indeed killer! Double blacks on blackcomb, trees at big white, big open pitches and long groomers at sun peaks, powder at manning, and all of the sidehits at seymour.... I'm never really disappointed on this ski. For the deepest of days, I would love the blank or even something wider, and for upping my carving game amd laying trenches I'd love some GS skis, but for 90% of my skiing this ski is the clear choice. I'm glad there are others that appreciate this ski as much as I do!
I bought a pair of QST 98s this year. I hadn't had a new pair of skis in a very long time (skied heavily in the 90s but hadn't been in 20 years). I demo'd several different pairs, including the Enforcer 94s, which I didn't really like. I thought I was the only person who wasn't a fan of the Enforcers until I found this channel. And it turns out you love the QSTs also! Great minds 😆 But yeah, the QSTs are sooo much fun! Great on groomers, but even better in trees, bumps, and soft snow. Just a phenomenal feel.
Oh awesome! Before this channel I thought I was crazy as well! Glad to see there are other people that feel the same thing. Enjoy your 98's and Thanks for watching!
I just bought these yesterday at Snowshoe 40% off! I demoed about 10 different sets of all mountain skis before settling on these which were a clear winner by their ability to handle the ice and slop were easy on the legs. I’m excited to take these out west, and really see what they can do on powder and in the trees❤ love your reviews.
Thanks to you and your reviews I was guided into getting a nice pair of demoed QST 92. my question though is that they did come with sliding rail bindings which I’m not familiar with. I guess those are adjustable demo bindings. Do you see any downside to keeping those on the ski or should I have them remounted with my fix findings from my old Rossignol skis?
Demo Bindings have the upside that they're easy to adjust and can make your skis easier to share with friends. But if you have a fixed pair that you like, the performance on those will probably be a bit better. I would talk to someone at a shop you trust too, because depending on which bindings have a better din range etc. Might affect what's a better fit for you. But if it were me I would put the fixed bindings on my new skis, and then use the demo bindings on an old pair of skis that I could loan out to friends from out of town or something.
Just got my pair of QSTs 89, you convinced me! (but also I skied QST 106 for 2 days this winter 😌). Thanks to you, I went down to a more moderate size though. 👍
Recently discovered your channel and have found it super helpful! Been about 10 years since I last skied after doing a few seasons as an instructor when I was younger. So I’m back in the market for my own gear again. Last pair was K2 apache’s which back then were apparently an all mountain ski at late 70’s in the waist. My challenge is in a small skier 128lbs and 5 foot 3 (160cm) Would you recommend the qst 92 at 160? Or go smaller? I ski in Europe mainly in resort, so lots of groomers with the occasional off piste for part of the day.
I demo’d a pair of QST 92s at Heavenly a couple weeks ago, and instantly fell in love with them. Heading to Park City in a few weeks, and will definitely be on the lookout for QSTs. Maybe try the 98s if they have them in the shop. Thanks for the great review!
Thanks for the recommendation! I’ve never skied such a wide ski before, and I’m intrigued to try, but will have to wait and see how much pow remains in late March.
I think this line is kind of underrated. Everyone wants tons of metal and honestly, I think most people would benefit from a ski with this kind of construction. More forgiving and versatile. But, I don't do ski ballet so what do I know...
lmao! Yes I agree, Imo it's the perfect ski for the trees and powder. I like a solid TI ski that can cut through, but I don't always want to rail through deep snow in the colder months of the winter when the snow is fluffy. Great comment, thank you!
You can see my Ski Quiver for 2024 Here: ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=6bUFP8mNhE0g5AWO And my original review of the Salomon QST 98 Here: ruclips.net/video/EQfNdAGt1KU/видео.htmlsi=G_AHiCNc8WHPripq
Elliot, did you ever test or try the QST 92? Any thoughts or impressions? I live in the midwest and think that could be a great all around ski. Groomers/soft snow/trees are where I normally ski.
I did not, but the QST 98 is so close with only being 6mm different, that I would have no issue recommending them, and in fact recommend them to my personal friends. If you like skiing groomers and want a ski that can explore the trees and powder I think it's a great pick, and right now it's at a great price at sub $400 and it's only a top sheet change for the 2024. But Full Disclosure, I have not skied on that specific ski yet, only the Salomon QST 98, which is very similar.
@@RicketySkiReviews beside 6 mm difference, 92 way more stiff ski. i tried both of them last week. and if you are in store, you can feel this difference, bending ski by hand.
Great review! Btw I’ve been shopping for a 90 ish mm all mountain ski that I can use in utah and Colorado as true all mountain… if I find powder it’ll float well, if I want to try some trees they maneuver well, comfortable in moguls, but most importantly I want it to feel at home on groomers carving, especially if I hit hard snow or ice. I have my carving ski and my powder ski and I love them, but man that powder ski kills me when I see a nice groomer. Do you think QST in the 90 mm range would fit the bill? Btw I mainly ski east coast so def want it comfortable there too. Thx!!!
Yes totally! I have a friend in a similar boat, and I recommended the Qst 92 for them. Full Disclosure I have not skied it, but with only being 6mm's smaller than the ski in the video, I have little hesitation in recommending it. It skis great in the woods, and has good flotation while still carving well on the groomers. A very comfortable ski to carve on. For the East, just make sure you keep them tuned, so you can hold your edge on the "boiler plate" days. It's also worth mentioning, the Skis I actually bought, and that I would take back East to see family would be the Atomic Maverick 88Ti. But those are a little bit stronger in the groomed runs. Just worth considering, and being fully transparent. The QST's I bought are 106 and kind of a designated powder/ tree ski. If you want to see what I bought myself here's a video on my quiver for the 23/24 season: ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=zAlaXvLkTCFtEiyq Thanks for watching and thanks for the nice comment!
@@RicketySkiReviews thx for the response! And actually my current “all mountain “ ski for the east is the elan wingman 86cti which I love. I ski Snowshoe West Virginia regularly so almost no tree runs, just a few tight glades. I figured I’d still use this ski on average days at Snowshoe, but I tend to bring all my skis there since it’s a road trip lol so that’s why I wanted the ski to at least work on east coast terrain. My 106 Blaze is just too much 99% of the time in West Virginia. I’d want this ski to basically be a do all for my trips to Utah and Colorado. Like if I didn’t want to travel with 2 pair of skis , having 1 that would be good enough everywhere. I don’t like bringing the wingman out west because if I bring 2 skis (max I travel with on a plane) I usually bring the Blaze 106 and my 72mm carving ski, but if there’s not a pow day in the forecast I’d rather bring a carving ski and an all mountain that will float in some pow but still carve, because any time I use that 106 I love it off trail but I always end up back on groomers and I immediately want to switch skis lol. Would you think the QST 92 or the maverick 88ti in my case. Basically if I can only take 1 ski out west on a short trip. (I know the maverick is the clear choice for east coast) Note :I’m planning to demo both of these if I can this year lol. Thanks again and I appreciate your straightforward content!
I want to buy a pair of Salomon QST 98 that are similar to my height of 165cm. However, the shortest length for QST 98 is 169cm. Meanwhile, I found the QST 106 on the evo website with a 165cm size. I mainly ski in Whistler on the west coast of BC. Do you think I should choose the slightly longer QST 98 or the wider QST 106 in a more maneuverable 165cm length? Thanks
Check out the qst echos and lumens they're the "women's ski" but they're exactly the same and might have the length range you're looking for. Also the colors are better on those imo.
It depends on what you want. What sizes are you between? I tend to size down, but with this ski, I went up a bit to get some nice powder float. Here maybe this will help, here's what I bought, I'm 6'1" and 240lbs. ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=ZbImwWACUyS4UE56
I will put them on my list! I have reached out to them directly to get a pair to review, but I think they were a bit low on demo pairs, so I will have to try and find a demo shop that carries them. Thanks for the recommendation!
Plus one on Mirus Cor or any Black Crows skis you can get your hands on. I have the 2020 Atris and I really love the construction and overall shape. Be interested in your thoughts on the brand and overall skiability of their line.@@RicketySkiReviews
Not just Salomon, but Amer Sports in general is making the best skis right now. I know you might be allergic, being a racer and all, but you gotta get on an Armada. With how much you like the Maverick and QST, the declivity will certainly be something you like. The QST 98 is the one ski to rule them all, though.
Great question, what setting are you talking? On the groomers if you like 176 stick with 176 because they feel true to size. If you're talking Powder/ Trees, they definitely feel shorter than they are with float and easy edge to edge turning so a 183 would probably be fine in that setting.
Thanks for the answer. Thinking these would make a good Western ski (I have narrower Eastern skis). When I am out there, I am looking more off trail, but the reality at my age (old) it will prob end up 50/50 on/off. More concerned with ability to quickly turn on steeps/bumps than charge long choppy lines or groomers, so if they are pretty true to size I'll probably stick with the 176's.@@RicketySkiReviews
You haven't seen Andy ski? Boy have you got some fun ahead! I really like your appreciation of good skiing. Want playful? Check the SkiEssentinals review of the QST 106. The Salomon rep. Joe does the coolest bracqage at 3:28. Bunnyhops into it, and just creams the snow
Oh awesome I will check it out! Most of the videos I have watched have been from the chair, and I've been trying to save his content for the live reacts, but I will have to look forward to that! Thanks for watching and thanks for the nice comment.
You have lots to learn, this ski shape is the most known. It was stolen from DPS and DPS stole this from Rossignol. It's that famous DPS Wailer 99 Hybrid T2, and Soul characteristics in it. It's the most versatile pedigree ever. It's easy to ski and it floats for it's weight. Super friendly ski.
Picked up a pair of the QST98 based on all the rave reviews. While all the praise is very true, at 6'2" 280lbs they are not an ideal ski for me. At lower speeds they feel great and float well but as I go to push at higher speeds they just do not have the power I need. While I can go fast, it feels much more out of control than what I want to ride daily. Glad I bought them, but won't be my go to pair.
15:15 is a heavier ski really going to sink in the powder more? I understand float from a physics point of view in that it has to do with displacement per weight and therefore density which checks out with the weight statement BUT consider this: An 80kg skier wears 4kg boots and has 2kg bindings (and some other stuff, don't picture them naked). Now they have a 1600g (say bent 110) vs a 2400g (some enforcer) as extreme examples. That weight difference should not matter on the bottom line with float. It's not only the skis that ride themselves down the slope. Maybe heavier skis don't float less. Maybe they only create that illusion somehow? Maybe for instance a lighter ski allows the leg muscless of the skier to pull the up more after compressing a platform mid turn therefore feeling floaty? What do you think
If you're only going off piste when conditions are favorable (soft dry snow) you don't ever need a ski wider than 100. You also don't need metal HOWEVER don't be scared off of ALL metal skis. Some skis have metal only around the bindings for more support, but the tips and still flexible and easy to turn. But really, a light ski is all a ton of people need. The qst98 is about 2050g in 189, most people are skiing something wayt shorter so itll likely be in the 1700-1800g range which is perfect for these kinds of skiers. Another + of skis like the QST98 is that they are excellent for people who are new to skiing off piste but generally feel more comfortable on piste. This is *THE TREND* right now and for good reason. The Enforcers and Bent 100 are having their design flaws exposed by these nice accommodating skis that also have fantastic performance 90% of resort conditions. Other skis to look out for when wanting to demo QST98's but you can't quite find them: (These aren't identical every ski has it's niche but I'm talking about the skis with similar performance/accommodations) (ordered from best to worst on piste performance) Renoun Endurance 98 Fischer Ranger 94 Fischer Ranger 102 Line Blade Optic 96 Black Crows Camox Blizzard Rustler 9 Dynastar M Free 99 If you try all of these skis, you'll love at least one of them.
okay, overblown on one of the best skis. I guess you haven't tried the Dynastar Free 108s they do circles around the Salomons any day of the week.......😅
WE NEED MORE NEGATIVE REVIEWS! Your channel is one of the only channels that actually critiques skis. Curated, Ski Essentials, etc. are just painting with a broad stroke over every ski they review with words like playful and all-mountain. I am not sure how anyone could differentiate between the Atomic Bent 110 vs insert any other ski Curated has reviewed because they don't talk about the specific use case for skis or really mentioned negatives. I assume they are just trying to appease all of the ski brands sending them skis every single year to review, but it does a disservice to so many skiers out there trying to find a ski that will work for them. However, this isn't unique to RUclips videos. I have a friend who, having only taken ski lessons before and being an absolute newbie, walked into a shop in Denver and came out with Atomic Bent 110s. The dude is just learning how to ski, isn't even touching powder or thinking about going into the park, and is now riding Atomic Bent 110s (They even had him on 172 length at 5'11'' at that. Talk about a horrible ski experience.).
Oh my god, that's awful. That's so wide and such a non-groomer carving focused ski, that's really frustrating. Thanks so much for the nice comment, I really appreciate it!
QST line used to be called Quest back in the mid 2010s... I still have some 2017? Quest 99s -- that don't look very different from the QST 98... --- and your skiing sucks if you can't do ski ballet... :)
The 2017 is a QST and the shape of the 99 is SO much different than the new 98. The old 99 feels so much more directional than the new series. No comparison.
@@_e5598 You're right -- had to check the shed and evo purchase history -- I have a 2016 (bought on c;loseout in 2017 ) Q-98 -- also known as Quest 98.. or Q-labs 98 -- which eventually became the QST-98... In any case Quest became QST... The idea wasn't to compare them, just pointing out the Quest name was historical.
@jehjay2600 I was pointing out that although "they don't look very different" they really are super different in terms of shape and performance and you should try some!
@@_e5598 yeah I assumed technology has moved on -- but life and moving east means I haven't skied in a few years. The Q-labs skis and some of the Rocker2 skis did pioneer the powder friendly spooned rocker shape in the QSTs, An old gf complained rather heavily that the "pivoty-ness" and ease of smearing on those skis made her lazy and ruined her technique...
Why do you always compare skis to the maverick or bent which are skis you own I suppose. In all of your videos, you do that. If you want to review skis, you need to compare them to other models, there are so many skis out there and I hear you talk about the maverick 10 times per video
They're the highest rated so I will typically compare them, and also because they're serving a similar market of people who want a carving ski that can also go off trail. These two are the top performers imo.
Been on my 98's for a few seasons now. They are indeed killer! Double blacks on blackcomb, trees at big white, big open pitches and long groomers at sun peaks, powder at manning, and all of the sidehits at seymour.... I'm never really disappointed on this ski.
For the deepest of days, I would love the blank or even something wider, and for upping my carving game amd laying trenches I'd love some GS skis, but for 90% of my skiing this ski is the clear choice.
I'm glad there are others that appreciate this ski as much as I do!
Totally I just reviewed the QST 106's that I bought, and I couldn't be happier with them! ruclips.net/video/4ULTf3NmFL0/видео.htmlsi=pOE_zKzNHVr7V4ab
In Whistler this is the default all-arounder ski, there's tons of them on the hill.
Oh cool!
I bought a pair of QST 98s this year. I hadn't had a new pair of skis in a very long time (skied heavily in the 90s but hadn't been in 20 years). I demo'd several different pairs, including the Enforcer 94s, which I didn't really like. I thought I was the only person who wasn't a fan of the Enforcers until I found this channel. And it turns out you love the QSTs also! Great minds 😆
But yeah, the QSTs are sooo much fun! Great on groomers, but even better in trees, bumps, and soft snow. Just a phenomenal feel.
Oh awesome! Before this channel I thought I was crazy as well! Glad to see there are other people that feel the same thing. Enjoy your 98's and Thanks for watching!
I just bought these yesterday at Snowshoe 40% off! I demoed about 10 different sets of all mountain skis before settling on these which were a clear winner by their ability to handle the ice and slop were easy on the legs. I’m excited to take these out west, and really see what they can do on powder and in the trees❤ love your reviews.
Thanks to you and your reviews I was guided into getting a nice pair of demoed QST 92. my question though is that they did come with sliding rail bindings which I’m not familiar with. I guess those are adjustable demo bindings. Do you see any downside to keeping those on the ski or should I have them remounted with my fix findings from my old Rossignol skis?
Demo Bindings have the upside that they're easy to adjust and can make your skis easier to share with friends. But if you have a fixed pair that you like, the performance on those will probably be a bit better. I would talk to someone at a shop you trust too, because depending on which bindings have a better din range etc. Might affect what's a better fit for you.
But if it were me I would put the fixed bindings on my new skis, and then use the demo bindings on an old pair of skis that I could loan out to friends from out of town or something.
Just got my pair of QSTs 89, you convinced me! (but also I skied QST 106 for 2 days this winter 😌). Thanks to you, I went down to a more moderate size though. 👍
Oh rad, hope you love them!
Recently discovered your channel and have found it super helpful! Been about 10 years since I last skied after doing a few seasons as an instructor when I was younger. So I’m back in the market for my own gear again. Last pair was K2 apache’s which back then were apparently an all mountain ski at late 70’s in the waist.
My challenge is in a small skier 128lbs and 5 foot 3 (160cm) Would you recommend the qst 92 at 160? Or go smaller?
I ski in Europe mainly in resort, so lots of groomers with the occasional off piste for part of the day.
That should be suitable!
Thanks for watching
Truth be told, I've never considered the Solomon QST line....but now, this makes me want to demo a pair.
If you get a nice layer of fresh snow, they're really amazing! Thanks for watching and for the nice comment!
I demo’d a pair of QST 92s at Heavenly a couple weeks ago, and instantly fell in love with them. Heading to Park City in a few weeks, and will definitely be on the lookout for QSTs. Maybe try the 98s if they have them in the shop. Thanks for the great review!
would highly reocmmend trying the qst 106s if you can: ruclips.net/video/4ULTf3NmFL0/видео.htmlsi=1l0yN869vVBGEP1z
Thanks for the recommendation! I’ve never skied such a wide ski before, and I’m intrigued to try, but will have to wait and see how much pow remains in late March.
I think this line is kind of underrated. Everyone wants tons of metal and honestly, I think most people would benefit from a ski with this kind of construction. More forgiving and versatile.
But, I don't do ski ballet so what do I know...
lmao! Yes I agree, Imo it's the perfect ski for the trees and powder. I like a solid TI ski that can cut through, but I don't always want to rail through deep snow in the colder months of the winter when the snow is fluffy.
Great comment, thank you!
You can see my Ski Quiver for 2024 Here: ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=6bUFP8mNhE0g5AWO
And my original review of the Salomon QST 98 Here: ruclips.net/video/EQfNdAGt1KU/видео.htmlsi=G_AHiCNc8WHPripq
Elliot, did you ever test or try the QST 92? Any thoughts or impressions? I live in the midwest and think that could be a great all around ski. Groomers/soft snow/trees are where I normally ski.
I did not, but the QST 98 is so close with only being 6mm different, that I would have no issue recommending them, and in fact recommend them to my personal friends. If you like skiing groomers and want a ski that can explore the trees and powder I think it's a great pick, and right now it's at a great price at sub $400 and it's only a top sheet change for the 2024.
But Full Disclosure, I have not skied on that specific ski yet, only the Salomon QST 98, which is very similar.
@@RicketySkiReviews beside 6 mm difference, 92 way more stiff ski. i tried both of them last week. and if you are in store, you can feel this difference, bending ski by hand.
In Utah, the QST 98 & Blank are a great 2 punch combo.
All true!! I own the qst 92, head kore 93 and Fischer ranger 94 and I grab the Salomon’s more than any others.
Great review! Btw I’ve been shopping for a 90 ish mm all mountain ski that I can use in utah and Colorado as true all mountain… if I find powder it’ll float well, if I want to try some trees they maneuver well, comfortable in moguls, but most importantly I want it to feel at home on groomers carving, especially if I hit hard snow or ice. I have my carving ski and my powder ski and I love them, but man that powder ski kills me when I see a nice groomer. Do you think QST in the 90 mm range would fit the bill? Btw I mainly ski east coast so def want it comfortable there too. Thx!!!
Yes totally! I have a friend in a similar boat, and I recommended the Qst 92 for them. Full Disclosure I have not skied it, but with only being 6mm's smaller than the ski in the video, I have little hesitation in recommending it. It skis great in the woods, and has good flotation while still carving well on the groomers. A very comfortable ski to carve on.
For the East, just make sure you keep them tuned, so you can hold your edge on the "boiler plate" days.
It's also worth mentioning, the Skis I actually bought, and that I would take back East to see family would be the Atomic Maverick 88Ti. But those are a little bit stronger in the groomed runs. Just worth considering, and being fully transparent. The QST's I bought are 106 and kind of a designated powder/ tree ski.
If you want to see what I bought myself here's a video on my quiver for the 23/24 season: ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=zAlaXvLkTCFtEiyq
Thanks for watching and thanks for the nice comment!
@@RicketySkiReviews thx for the response! And actually my current “all mountain “ ski for the east is the elan wingman 86cti which I love. I ski Snowshoe West Virginia regularly so almost no tree runs, just a few tight glades. I figured I’d still use this ski on average days at Snowshoe, but I tend to bring all my skis there since it’s a road trip lol so that’s why I wanted the ski to at least work on east coast terrain. My 106 Blaze is just too much 99% of the time in West Virginia. I’d want this ski to basically be a do all for my trips to Utah and Colorado. Like if I didn’t want to travel with 2 pair of skis , having 1 that would be good enough everywhere. I don’t like bringing the wingman out west because if I bring 2 skis (max I travel with on a plane) I usually bring the Blaze 106 and my 72mm carving ski, but if there’s not a pow day in the forecast I’d rather bring a carving ski and an all mountain that will float in some pow but still carve, because any time I use that 106 I love it off trail but I always end up back on groomers and I immediately want to switch skis lol. Would you think the QST 92 or the maverick 88ti in my case. Basically if I can only take 1 ski out west on a short trip. (I know the maverick is the clear choice for east coast) Note :I’m planning to demo both of these if I can this year lol. Thanks again and I appreciate your straightforward content!
I want to buy a pair of Salomon QST 98 that are similar to my height of 165cm. However, the shortest length for QST 98 is 169cm. Meanwhile, I found the QST 106 on the evo website with a 165cm size. I mainly ski in Whistler on the west coast of BC. Do you think I should choose the slightly longer QST 98 or the wider QST 106 in a more maneuverable 165cm length? Thanks
Check out the qst echos and lumens they're the "women's ski" but they're exactly the same and might have the length range you're looking for. Also the colors are better on those imo.
If I'm between lengths should I size up or down with this ski? I'm an advanced skier who wants this for trees and bumps
It depends on what you want. What sizes are you between? I tend to size down, but with this ski, I went up a bit to get some nice powder float. Here maybe this will help, here's what I bought, I'm 6'1" and 240lbs. ruclips.net/video/Jh_AfVSsH_A/видео.htmlsi=ZbImwWACUyS4UE56
Hi Elliott 😊 I hope you could demo a pair of BLACK CROWS MIRUS COR this season. 13 meter radius w/87mm underfoot
I will put them on my list! I have reached out to them directly to get a pair to review, but I think they were a bit low on demo pairs, so I will have to try and find a demo shop that carries them. Thanks for the recommendation!
Plus one on Mirus Cor or any Black Crows skis you can get your hands on. I have the 2020 Atris and I really love the construction and overall shape. Be interested in your thoughts on the brand and overall skiability of their line.@@RicketySkiReviews
I bought these skis based on your review. Cheers!
Great! Hope you like them!
Not just Salomon, but Amer Sports in general is making the best skis right now. I know you might be allergic, being a racer and all, but you gotta get on an Armada. With how much you like the Maverick and QST, the declivity will certainly be something you like. The QST 98 is the one ski to rule them all, though.
Haha, not allergic, I snowboarded for 3 years and have heard others recommend them. They're definitely on my radar. Thanks for the recommendation!
if i would normally ski a 176 in this, does the profile merit moving up to 183, or do they pretty much ski tru to size?
Great question, what setting are you talking? On the groomers if you like 176 stick with 176 because they feel true to size. If you're talking Powder/ Trees, they definitely feel shorter than they are with float and easy edge to edge turning so a 183 would probably be fine in that setting.
Thanks for the answer. Thinking these would make a good Western ski (I have narrower Eastern skis). When I am out there, I am looking more off trail, but the reality at my age (old) it will prob end up 50/50 on/off. More concerned with ability to quickly turn on steeps/bumps than charge long choppy lines or groomers, so if they are pretty true to size I'll probably stick with the 176's.@@RicketySkiReviews
Elliot, how do we send you info to get your recommendations? Preferred method?
My youtube channel page has my email. Comment again if you cant find it!
You haven't seen Andy ski? Boy have you got some fun ahead! I really like your appreciation of good skiing. Want playful? Check the SkiEssentinals review of the QST 106. The Salomon rep. Joe does the coolest bracqage at 3:28. Bunnyhops into it, and just creams the snow
Oh awesome I will check it out! Most of the videos I have watched have been from the chair, and I've been trying to save his content for the live reacts, but I will have to look forward to that! Thanks for watching and thanks for the nice comment.
You have lots to learn, this ski shape is the most known. It was stolen from DPS and DPS stole this from Rossignol. It's that famous DPS Wailer 99 Hybrid T2, and Soul characteristics in it. It's the most versatile pedigree ever. It's easy to ski and it floats for it's weight. Super friendly ski.
don't we all have lots to learn though?
@@RicketySkiReviews Yes. My comment was not suppose to be this aggressive, but reading it now it seems a bit.
Picked up a pair of the QST98 based on all the rave reviews. While all the praise is very true, at 6'2" 280lbs they are not an ideal ski for me. At lower speeds they feel great and float well but as I go to push at higher speeds they just do not have the power I need. While I can go fast, it feels much more out of control than what I want to ride daily. Glad I bought them, but won't be my go to pair.
15:15 is a heavier ski really going to sink in the powder more?
I understand float from a physics point of view in that it has to do with displacement per weight and therefore density which checks out with the weight statement BUT consider this:
An 80kg skier wears 4kg boots and has 2kg bindings (and some other stuff, don't picture them naked).
Now they have a 1600g (say bent 110) vs a 2400g (some enforcer) as extreme examples.
That weight difference should not matter on the bottom line with float. It's not only the skis that ride themselves down the slope.
Maybe heavier skis don't float less. Maybe they only create that illusion somehow?
Maybe for instance a lighter ski allows the leg muscless of the skier to pull the up more after compressing a platform mid turn therefore feeling floaty?
What do you think
QST is derived from quest, the old skis were just called Salomon quests
Ohhhh
If you're only going off piste when conditions are favorable (soft dry snow) you don't ever need a ski wider than 100. You also don't need metal HOWEVER don't be scared off of ALL metal skis. Some skis have metal only around the bindings for more support, but the tips and still flexible and easy to turn. But really, a light ski is all a ton of people need. The qst98 is about 2050g in 189, most people are skiing something wayt shorter so itll likely be in the 1700-1800g range which is perfect for these kinds of skiers.
Another + of skis like the QST98 is that they are excellent for people who are new to skiing off piste but generally feel more comfortable on piste. This is *THE TREND* right now and for good reason. The Enforcers and Bent 100 are having their design flaws exposed by these nice accommodating skis that also have fantastic performance 90% of resort conditions.
Other skis to look out for when wanting to demo QST98's but you can't quite find them: (These aren't identical every ski has it's niche but I'm talking about the skis with similar performance/accommodations)
(ordered from best to worst on piste performance)
Renoun Endurance 98
Fischer Ranger 94
Fischer Ranger 102
Line Blade Optic 96
Black Crows Camox
Blizzard Rustler 9
Dynastar M Free 99
If you try all of these skis, you'll love at least one of them.
Great List, I'll put them on my list for the coming season!
Thanks for the insightful comment!
okay, overblown on one of the best skis. I guess you haven't tried the Dynastar Free 108s they do circles around the Salomons any day of the week.......😅
Thanks for the recommendation and for watching! I'll put those on my list for this coming season.
WE NEED MORE NEGATIVE REVIEWS! Your channel is one of the only channels that actually critiques skis. Curated, Ski Essentials, etc. are just painting with a broad stroke over every ski they review with words like playful and all-mountain. I am not sure how anyone could differentiate between the Atomic Bent 110 vs insert any other ski Curated has reviewed because they don't talk about the specific use case for skis or really mentioned negatives. I assume they are just trying to appease all of the ski brands sending them skis every single year to review, but it does a disservice to so many skiers out there trying to find a ski that will work for them. However, this isn't unique to RUclips videos. I have a friend who, having only taken ski lessons before and being an absolute newbie, walked into a shop in Denver and came out with Atomic Bent 110s. The dude is just learning how to ski, isn't even touching powder or thinking about going into the park, and is now riding Atomic Bent 110s (They even had him on 172 length at 5'11'' at that. Talk about a horrible ski experience.).
Oh my god, that's awful. That's so wide and such a non-groomer carving focused ski, that's really frustrating.
Thanks so much for the nice comment, I really appreciate it!
QST line used to be called Quest back in the mid 2010s... I still have some 2017? Quest 99s -- that don't look very different from the QST 98... --- and your skiing sucks if you can't do ski ballet... :)
The 2017 is a QST and the shape of the 99 is SO much different than the new 98. The old 99 feels so much more directional than the new series. No comparison.
Lmao. Awesome I didn't realize, thanks for the info! I'll get to work on my ski ballet right away.
@@_e5598 You're right -- had to check the shed and evo purchase history -- I have a 2016 (bought on c;loseout in 2017 ) Q-98 -- also known as Quest 98.. or Q-labs 98 -- which eventually became the QST-98... In any case Quest became QST... The idea wasn't to compare them, just pointing out the Quest name was historical.
@jehjay2600 I was pointing out that although "they don't look very different" they really are super different in terms of shape and performance and you should try some!
@@_e5598 yeah I assumed technology has moved on -- but life and moving east means I haven't skied in a few years. The Q-labs skis and some of the Rocker2 skis did pioneer the powder friendly spooned rocker shape in the QSTs, An old gf complained rather heavily that the "pivoty-ness" and ease of smearing on those skis made her lazy and ruined her technique...
Why do you always compare skis to the maverick or bent which are skis you own I suppose. In all of your videos, you do that. If you want to review skis, you need to compare them to other models, there are so many skis out there and I hear you talk about the maverick 10 times per video
They're the highest rated so I will typically compare them, and also because they're serving a similar market of people who want a carving ski that can also go off trail. These two are the top performers imo.