The Disturbing TRUTH About Current FPS Games...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 янв 2023
- I think it's about time we talked about this...
WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING WITH THESE GAMES LATELY?
🎮Catch me live on Twitch! / silk
👀 Follow my Twitter! - / silkoce
🎮 Join the lads on Discord! - / discord
Thumbnail Art: iun7
Thanks to the Channel Members!
#Battlefield2042 #Battlefield #BF2042
______________________________________________________________________
battlefield 2042,battlefield 2042 season 1,battlefield 2042 gameplay,battlefield 2042 news,battlefield 2042 season 1 gameplay,battlefield 2042 update,battlefield 2042 season 1 zero hour,battlefield 2042 season 1 trailer,battlefield 2042 zero hour,battlefield,battlefield 2042 review,battlefield 2042 portal,bf2042 season 1,battlefield 2042 new weapons,battlefield 2042 new map,battlefield 2042 new update,battlefield 2042 funny moments
_______________________________________________________________________ 
Игры
Pain
Unfortunately current state of games is a logical conclusion of trying to make the most amount of profit...
Making profit is fine on it own. It's the endless pursuit of ever increasing profits that leads to the current landscape. COD has grown so large that the barrier to entry great that competition is virtually non-existent in the fps space.
Still theres NO reason for COD to be that big with the stupid SBMM/EOMM and shit... 2042 is 10000 times more fun to play.
@@jortepap agrees. 2042 is actually a fun game now. Just needs more content
Yes, and you see the kiddies with the 45$ skins getting like 15-84 in all games but they feel good they got a fancy looking skin lol
what i hate about modern gaming is that everything has to be competative with rank and sbmm in the first place my favorite games were always the ones where you just had the server browser and your own stat profile and nothing else.
the most singleplayers in the AAA space suffer the flipside, they're so damn boring and easy you kinda wanna die. Thank God for indie titles
That's true, like BF, but we need some sort of progression, because otherwise you're not working towards anything
A lot of games fail because they don't have much/any progression
Whats the problem with competitive?
@@jmgonzales7701 that it's the only type of game now and it's incredibly annoying and sweaty at all times you can't chill and play comp
@@ridingweeb4801 oh well, i guess people play games for 2 things, i mainly play to compete.
Very true, I do find myself actively searching for a game which I can enjoy yet also gives me a challenge and won't give me wins that feel undeserved and will bore me easily
You mean Souls Games.
Siege for me does that, it has a very high skill ceiling and so is very rewarding to win and see you rank increase and losing just makes me want to re chase the rank I was before I lost.
You pretty much nailed it in this video. I remember finding it rewarding going from being absolutely destroyed in my early days, to progressively get better, matching their level and eventually surpassing them. Why do people enjoy being fed literally everything these days? what happened to working for your ¨skills¨... these new dumbed down fps games hurts my heart and soul.
Big fax. I sucked at COD3 and 4 and by MW2 I had gotten better t the point I was the top of the team in games
Imo if dice used bf4 as a base template to work a new game around, that'd be probably for the best at this point.
BF4 was as bad as 2042 wtf, maps looked good but where terribly balanced, ground vehicle mechanics where so dumbed down, weapon mechanics where trash an simplified because the game in general was aimed at the new gen consoles back then.
Hardly any of the game modes worked an new ones died pretty quickly, rush was at it's worst it's ever been and the game was clustered with noob gadgets suav, ucav, mortor, airburst, mbt law, irnv on tanks, staff shell etc.
BF4 was only popular because it was many peoples first BF, most people who sank hours into BF3 wouldn't touch that garbage.
BF4 shares a lot of the problems 2042 does, especially in level design. I think it'd be a lot better if they looked at BFV for the next game, it made a lot of awesome and competitive improvements to the series.
@@BeyondtheIights True. After playing BFBC2 and then BF3 - BF4 was a bit 'ho-hum' with clunky player movement
BF4 had a lot of issues at launch but it wasn't the cluster fuck of 2042.
Peeps playing 2042 are just rewarding incompetency.
Battlefield 1 slander while playing 2042 is a wild take
Great video Silk. Gaming now is about pleasing the shareholders and not the gamers now. With BF3 and BF4, DICE made the games easy to learn and hard to master. Each dlc was unique and offered new gameplay experiences. Armored Kill in BF3 and Navel Strike in BF4 are my favorites. They had to implement quality content to get people to want to buy the dlc. Now it’s just this religion now that we have to have faith in the developers, of almost every studio now, that they’ll make the games into a worthy state one day.
The other issue is that games are being dumbed down to appeal to broader audiences. The bf2042 gun play looks and feels like the gun play of the new CoD games. The shareholders of DICE don’t care about pleasing the BF player base. They just want to siphon off the players of CoD. Bethesda games are another great example. Each consecutive Elder Scrolls game is dumbed down and made easier for the lowest common denominator. Oblivion has an incredible amount of depth in each play style. Spell crafting is so vast and you can spend multiple play throughs making discovering new combinations. There’s so many different skills. Then there’s Skyrim where everything is just a sliding scale. The spells just increase in size, damage and other basic traits. The differences in weapon categories is just damage and attack speed. Armor is just weight and defense rating.
It’s a tragedy and it’s why I don’t play games as much anymore and have found new hobbies. Most of the games I play are older games and/or can be modded. Modern gaming needs to die for a phoenix to rise from the ashes.
Agreed 100% I do think some of it is to do with me getting older and being less besotted with new games in general but yeah I do feel like they put less effort into fun and mechanics focusing on making stuff easy and flashy.
man, i had 10 years in CS before they introduced skins. THOSE were the days.
What modern FPS games need is to just cut the shit and add a Ranked queue that's separate from casual games, no more half baked SBMM in all modes. The Ranked queue with a straight up ELO system to match you against players of your skill level at all times, the casual games with a loose matchmaking system just to stop literal newbies from getting shitstomped by players with hundreds of hours.
League of Legends has this exact thing and has been the most popular PC game in the world for years, it's mind boggling that FPS games which sell literal millions of copies can't grasp such a simple concept. Even Pokemon of all fucking things figured this out for it's online battles, but Call of Duty and Battlefield apparently can't.
I still remember the day me and my childhood bff went to game store and bought a copy of bf3. What an amazing era that was…
is ur video from DC Universe? it's just so dark & deep. (kidding, i've thinking of this topic for so so long, good work Silk :)
As an addict, I appreciate the content and commentary 😂
It seems like we get 2 choices today. An indie game with great mechanics and low player count, or a AAA with weak, unsophisticated mechanics and large player bases. We need another phenomenon like a PUBG take off.
In the golden era devs would make a good game and get good money, now companies try and figure out how to wrap a game around their money making schemes instead. Sadge.
Ive played BF up til BF4 alongside CODs. Dropped COD with their strict SBMM that came in 2019 (cept for some Cold War). Have clung on to 2042 from the very abysmal start because of the one thing: no strict SBMM. Thats how much I hate it.
PS: Xdefiant coming this year, no SBMM cept for ranked. Defenitivly gonna try it out.
What? No BF 1942? No doom 1 on lan or doom II on bbs, quake 1, quake 2 with the grapple hook mod? Original Duke nukem? Rainbow 6 with only a crosshair, no weapon showing. You've played a lot of the FPS's but not the OG ones that started all of this lovely fun! No disrespect meant. You are an incredible player, fun to watch and very good at breaking down the details of stuff. Keep up the great content!
Main issue with most games now is they have to compete with the sheer variety of other games. With limited time that players have these days if they dont cater towards a larger player base everyone just moves onto the next thing that they don't have to invest 100s of hours on.
While i liked premium, premium content on OCE dried up really quickly.
Where can I find a c5 ? Or how do I add it to the game? It's chaos... cluttered. thx
SOCOM 2 and BF3 are both life changing experience’s for online gaming for me
Silk,idk how they manage to downgrade in every new release,they got succesfull games in the past,it's very easy to be succesful following what they've made before.
Even the helicopter was sketched out at some point. But you sir are a master of that bird!
The thing is, lately every FPS is trying to become CoD or at least have similar gameplay to CoD to bring over players, that is why i feel people loved PUGB when it first came out, yes it was a buggy mess at times but the gameplay was so far away from CoD and anything like that, that people gravitated to it. Now CoD is decent but AAA companies will not think outside the box and take a risk.
The problem is the lack of originality. We are in 2023 and pretty much a lot of new games are remakes and remastered.
I've been thinking this has been going on for a while (heavy last few years) and it actually makes me angry. I found myself balling my fists up watching this video. I am a pretty skilled player and sometimes I find my hit reg to be absolutely atrocious or I'll go on massive loss streaks on certain games with no explanation. This is going to turn people away from FPS gaming and it's just a crying shame to see.
As the years have gone by competitive gaming has become more of a thing, although this appeals to the competitive/skill scene people who enjoy playing games Casually are affected by this. Since the majority of the player base is casual, gaming companies will appeal to the casual player base as its more profitable. Games should be easy to learn but hard to master, being rewarded for being good gives you incentive to practice, if you take that away it eliminates the need to grind and it eliminates a goal, less people play it because there is less reason to when u have nothing to strive for. My prediction: Gaming will continue to get worse, eventually one title will be released which appeals to the formula above and it will revive gaming (It will be a hit game) then the markets will compete with it, at the moment the market is competing with profit and abusing the fan base, eventually this will stop working but its no telling how long it will take. Until then gaming will continue to get worse.
Tarkov is competitive right?
Letting (and allowing!) the player to know how skilled he or she is at the game, seems to help with capturing the player for the longterm. It becomes a challenge to become better and improving your skills and stats. CounterStrike is a good example, as is Rocket League even. That game is centered along ranks. For me trying to become the rank of Champ became a challenge. Now its Champ 2, 3 and higher. This works. If there wasn't such ranking system, I would have probably left that game ages ago.
Coincidentally , in the last month I have felt like mm was manipulating win rate in BF2042. The squad I play with had gradually increased win rate over the last weeks only for a loss streak to kick in over last weekend, 10+ losses in a row across conquest and breakthrough. Bar one they were crushing defeats, irrespective of how we played.
Back in BF3, 4, 1 and V me and my friends who always played together hovered above 80% winrate consistently in every game. In BF1 frontlines we had a +90% winrate after a year of playtime.
In these new SBMM riddled games it feels almost impossible to get close to that winrate. BF2042 is especially bad because now the game is 128 players, so even if we are much better than the average players there are too many players in the game for our impact to matter that much (this is why smaller game modes are easy to stomp with a squad of good players, less players = more impact from each individual in the final outcome).
Even if in MW we win a lot more often than not, a lot of games feel totally rigged and like an insane uphill battle that is not deserved. And a lot of games feel like total free wins.
It's unrewarding and boring.
BF2042 has ssbm
No strict SBMM in 2042. There is however team balancing. If you are top of the pops, your team mates will be trash.
@@Extirpo This makes a lot of sense. I have a 2.3 kd on 2042 yet constantly get the worst players possible on my team.
@@mitt993 Yup. Frustrating of course, but way better than strict SBMM.
The enemy team in the background gameplay really needs to up their anti-air game.
The number one reason is money, gaming is big business now. Valve is a prime example. The need for instant gratification also plays a part. Also grinding for things has surpassed playing for fun. I agree , the premium pass is far superior to the live service model, 9 times out of 10. I hope there is a renaissance is gaming but I doubt it.
Am playing games for 20 years and i cant feel the cheapness for current games especially in the last 5 years or so where you expect the best of it considering the tech push
Fuckin Advanced Warfare happened. Was the first AAA shooter title to have loot boxes and pay to win mechanics. CSGO had loot ages before AW came out but none of it was pay to win and the “hype” came from the community instead of the game devs themselves. They weren’t selling $20 skins and the skins had zero advantage while playing.
I shared this point of view.. until I played the recent Modern Warfare 2. That game revived my love of fps shooters. If you play games like Battlefield 2042, ofc fps shooters will ‘seem’ like their getting worse. Their are actually quite a few (hidden gems) military shooters out right now that are putting the fps genre back into a fun place. All you gotta do is play any game that isn’t made by EA 2017-2022
Lol pass me whatever you are smoking...
Mw2 is terrible how can you possibly like that game
MW2 is bad. I was never a big COD guy in the first place but I won't be buying another COD anytime soon. MW2019/WZ1 was at least fun in the beginning till they started porting in weapons from other titles.
Lmfao mw2 is trash compared to 2042 and 2042 isn’t good 😂
Most people want to play fun arcade shooters a la black ops and OG MW games. The tac/military shooter niche ain't for everyone.
Problem today for fps in generall: cheater, no dedicated servers to grow a community, in game shops/microtransactions
CSGO was the first fps I ever played and is still my most played FPS today. You know why you lose if you lose, there are no gimmicky mechanics (besides one way smokes maybe). And losing from a good player can really inspire you to become a better player yourself.
Simple straight to the point. Gaming used be more simpler, we need more those game
gaming in general has been ruined by DLC / loot boxes and micro transactions, just give us a complete game at launch, dedicated servers and let us play ....
So, My opinion about how FPS games are today compared to the previous games. Are some major components.
In general, The Formula needs to stay the same, Otherwise you will lose Veteran Players that enjoy your games and stripping the core elements that make a whole brand-new experience was not a good Plan. Battlefield 2042 in this case, is a game that was released too early, Alpha Tested and offered the players the ability to play the BETA. Which isn't a bad game... Just a lot of the core elements are not balanced. . . I like to think there are key Features that are missing, and they wanted to make a true battlefield game. Trying a new 128 player game mode, that flunked badly.
I could theorize if battlefield 2042 was to become a Modern 6th / 7th Generation FPS game... What the company needed to do is work on Spawn placement. Matchmaking. Map design. Vehicle Design and Spawn locations. "Restrictive area Expansion." and a lot more things they could do, But haven't yet... Which Faith be told is failing.
Speaking, Being a professional gamer and been playing games since I was young, FPS gaming at least... Should have never released the game after it's testing... The Senior Developer & The Senior Publisher. Gave the Okay to release this game after it's testing phases... To prove a point, FPS games would be a lot more fun if they remained at it's core.
THIS game should have come After Battlefield 4... Battlefield 6. Instead, we get a game that implies "Super Selective Soldiers" that do extraordinary things that a normal foot soldier could do.
I Digress, FPS games are Failing, Badly, and they are not as fun as they used to be because Game development is not utilizing more... Also don't have a mature spokesperson to address the core problems, Acting like that nothing is wrong with the Core problems and not fixing them... I still play the game, Because It is a time killer. But, They need a better strategist in their department.
As someone who recently came into the battlefield pc world I can’t always feel the issues that “”streamers and high elo players”” are currently complaining about but as someone who spent years of my life dedicated to destiny and destiny 2 I can see that game devs are no longer looking for mechanics that challenge the player. This could be because devs no longer have the desire to develop challenging things or they have realized that the people that are playing the games are not really caring about how the game is played like you said with the store in this video I also want I mention something that you mentioned in an older video but I feel like nepotism might have a lot to do with what we are seeing in game development industry wide .
Game studios (Activision and EA) prioritize profits over a good game and try to sell out for trends rather than staying true to the game franchises history (COD having stupid Belle Delphene purple dildo skins or BF adding hero characters).
Totally agree… bf1 started to feel strange playing battlefield (the theme is good, but the gameplay got worst from this game to the next ones)
Its funny on how the helicopter gameplay you are showing while speaking you TTK so fast vs vehicles, but the damn RPG rockets dont do shit. Wow seriously DICE.
I'm still playing bf4 and have fun
I know this is off the topic but I think the lack of fun is not just a thing in FPS industry only but the AAA gaming on the whole. These days I have a great AAA fatigue and almost all the shooters as well as Action adventure games feel same. But thank God there's Indies which have not failed me since a couple of years for now.
Idk man, I played the shit out of BF3 and BF4 and would farm lobbies as well, however I really think BF1 is a gem. I understand the mechanics are different but you can still do well with pretty much any weapon with map knowledge. BF1 is probably my fav Battlefield, I definitely reinstall it more than BF4 nowadays
Is bf 2042 worth it now? Cause it’s on sale on the ps and I’m thinking on get in it but only if it’s worth it now
For 20 yes but full price no like I do enjoy 2042 don't get me wrong but I have been playing different games that isn't fps.
It is an interesting discussion. And speaking of CSGO, that game is more popular than ever. It hasn't been dumbed down over the years, yet it still pulls a bigger audience than ever before in its life. So clearly people do value a game with vast mechanical depth that is laser focused on gameplay. What i want to say from personal experience on those tinfoil theories is that after with MW19 to me the CoD games got incredibly inconsistent and random. It feels like the game just wants you to die. And to me it can't be just "SBMM". I have played games like CoD and CS against very good players, but it has never felt like it does in the current CoD titles. In CS if i got destroyed i could tell it was because i was simply playing worse. Can't say that for MW2 for example. And you can clearly tell when the matchmaking gives you an easier game, one of the big things that ruined the game for me and made me quit.
Yeah i agree, dont think cs has ever been this popular in general. Having played csgo for probably about 5k hours now since 2013 i dont think it ever has been in a better place if you think strictly about the balance etc(you could argue against that in terms of update frequency however ofc).
@Sargon Tech Well it is heavily rumored, and signs really point to it, that the game is getting ported to the Source 2 engine. But other than that there is really no need for a "next gen CS".
One other thing that I'm seeing a lot of games doing now is just simply following trends and always needing microtransactions in the game. It's just old and sorta sad that you can pay full price for a game but they're still wanting to put microtransactions into the game, some circumstances it's understandable with indie games and cheap or free games but it's just getting out of hand honestly. I'm straying more and more away from AAA titles and more towards indie because of how often theres just microtransactions left right and centre along with battle royales and now sadly, extraction shooters. Tarkov and marauders does it well enough, we dont need more.
i really went deep in your arguments but....
HOW THERES NOT A RAO IN THE ENEMY TEAM?
good video enjoyed watching it
You should try out Hunt: Showdown if you want a finished gamed that competetive but just goofy enough to have some fun.
The biggest broken thing in BF2042 today is that little helicopter. If you are a skilled pilot, then so be it but when you can run the thing into ever tree and building and never take damage then it's broken. I also do not agree with not being able to lock onto it with a missile through trees were most people like to fly it. I cannot count how many matches I have seen one player carry the entire team with just this one broken vehicle going 150-0 while running the Littlebird through every tree on the map.
The beginning of the end huh? I think the Co-Creator's of COD/HALO might have something to say about that.
Profit over passion. I think it really is that simple.
This is what i love about Escape from tarkov. No sbmm. No skrewed matchmaker. Just you your gun and your skill vs everything else.
Tbf Tarkov is a _very_ different type of game from most other FPS games out there. In a way it reminds me of Dark Souls a lot, where you go in with the expectation that you're going to die an absolute fuck ton just to make progress. It's fun though, even if the devs are pretty sleazy it's refreshing to have an FPS game with no handholding as you said.
Can't wait for AAA devs to copy it's formula, dumb it down, and then milk it to death like what happened to PUBG and BR games
And the wiggle. Can’t forget about the wiggle.
BF1 was one of the best selling battlefields ever
Lots of great points made. To be honest, after the new update I am having way too much fun. The season 3 update made the game playable, but it got boring after a bit. This new patch made the game fun.
I'd like to hear you talk about R6 a lot more, i didnt know you play(ed) it
Really enjoyed how you talked about SBMM 😄
SBMM really is annoying (when implemented into the wrong game)
The gaming industry needs to embrace the idea behind Halo Forge. Let the players become the developers and let the community decide where the game goes.
I feel they did something like this with console players in 2042. Tweaking things so console players have a chance. Now I believe without cross-platform bf would be dead but I still don't like they way they give one platform a boost just so they have a chance.
Amen to that
Games were made with love and pride now games are made with profit in mind first and customer satisfaction and quality products last if it sells it’s good in there eyes if we buy we’re only fuelling the fire unfortunately
Going to be honest, I don't particularly notice BF4 having exceptionally more of a skill ceiling for it's mechanics than BF1. It's a very easy game, both of them are. Tanks behave quite similarly (Albeit you can be far more aggressive with them in BF1 because of AT differences), and dogfighting between the two is essentially the same. Though, I'd argue BF1 improves on dogfighting by removing the arbitrary "313" speed control. (Hitting 313 Velocity was easy to the point of making it a redundant addition. Putting full focus on actual dogfighting technique was vastly better for gameplay.)
I'd say BF1 is easier for 2 things though, those being sniping and level design. However, in regards to the latter, that's more of a result of BF4s (imo) very poorly thought out level design. Which arbitrarily made the game more difficult. Outside of that though, both turn out the same in my opinion, in regards to skill ceilings and floors. Do you have a video elaborating more on why you think so? Curious on more of your opinions on this.
i think you have try before, how about the planetside 2? i love bf2 and 4.
Shoot I was thinking of playing ps2 yesterday when I get off from work.
Well very said
rip quake
couldn't agree more
The fastest way to kill a game is always don't buy, don't play and don't care. Therefore, I think there needs to be a massive wave of actions against those games that are not pure. Vote with your wallet.
I play a lot of battlefield 2042 and my biggest issue is the player base who are all out for themselves, no one plays as a team or communicates. I would like to see much longer respawn timers; that would stop players doing stupid things, not caring how many times they died. I would also like a decent Internet speed lol.
Sbmm is actually thr thing why i almost completly quit gaming
That’s why r6 is my fav game all time and basically the only game I play
The same thing that’s happening to every major development game. They got lazy and stopped listening to the community
00:31 Jetzt reicht es aber! Welch Unverfrohrenheit. Es muss doch nicht gleich persönlich werdem.
ATM I'm enjoying insurgency sandstorm, it's very addicting plus most of the people are collaborative
At the moment me playing War Thunder, hopefully there will be escape from tarkov and stalker 2 soon for ps5.
Bf3/4 was the last shooters me really enjoyed for a long time.
With BF1 Dice started to Release Pussy Games. Call of Duty allways was bullshit for me.
Don’t get it twisted lil bro. Game recognizes Game.
I think fornite and BRs is the worst thing that happened to fps. It all about money. Cie chasing trends to do as much money as their competitor is a problem. Especially for BF. BF has its formula and should just make it better. If the game is solid, players will come. There is plenty of ways of making money over the player base is there.
One of the things that have changed across all, pacing and maps have gotten worse in every game over the years.
I think it's because fps gamers are more vets now than they've ever been. Plenty of people with 20 years experience playing fps games. Matching these players with newcomers is why games like BF create their nerfs.
no more casual fps, return to simulators
Am starting to see the rank and points as meaningless. Genuinely playing just for fun more and more. Idk or mby the fps games nowerdays are complete arse.
I can't fly to save my life lol
Unpopular opinion: Season passes SUCK. I hate them in every game i've played in the past 5+ years. You want £15 from me every 3 months so I can attain a broken "skin" that makes me invisible in shadows? And gun "skins" that add attachments to weapons that you can't add normally? Especially in games like Destiny 2 (different genre I know) where the power level increases by 10 every 3 months and there's repetitive seasonal challenges which you have to complete over and over and over and... just feels like the casual gamer is ALWAYS left behind with this new model that game studios have adopted. I would LOVE to see a studio bring back DLCs, I get so nostalgic remembering my utter excitement for DLCs with games like COD Ghosts, getting all the boys hyped ready to grind the new FINISHED content... those were the days
For me, I hate buying DLCs because they find a way to make them separate for the community and it is not that fun. Like for example for bf4 I didn't like how all 4 of the DLC's are locked behind a paywall and when me and my friends want to play together. Either I don't have that pack or they don't and it is so annoying that we want to play something but it is behind a paywall. So for Seasons passes you can actually choose if you want to buy it or not due to all of the major stuff like maps, weapons, and any other cosmetics being for free for games like 2042. Like I do agree Season Passes are a bit dumb when there is something that you may want that is either too long to get or behind a paywall and yes I will take a Season Pass any day than buy a DLC that is just way too expensive.
Insurgency is king fps rn lol
Its not. The game is dead.
@@IlNamelessKinglI You played it recently?
@@IlNamelessKinglI cause I find games every time I search
Unfortunately sandstorm will forever live in the shadow of the success of Insurgency Source.
Poor launch, no campaign, weak performance and UE4 meant community mods took years to come out and by the time we got them, the game was pretty much dead.
Ins2 has amazing gunplay and smooth movement thanks to the source engine, Sandstorm has arguably worse maps and feels clunkier.
@@AKK5I Still better than 90% of the shit EA and other AAA have pushed out their rectums since 2010 lmao
Silk I gotta disagree, 2042 is easily the worst bf game ever still after all these patches but games like MW2 and Siege have really turned things around. They work, tons of content and it's fun.
BF4 is definitely way more random and less predictable than BF1.
Battlefield will and should just continue to make 2042 as fantastic as it has the potential to be. New map releases, guns, and maybe even vehicles I see in the future.
Looks like you missed the Golden Age, pal. Quake, BF1942 etc is where it was golden. The stats eating the skills being the grand decline is correct.
Very simple. Casual players are full of with SBMM and 'progamers'. They can't enjoy a multi game for 1-2 hours.
FPS games just aren’t fun, they’re either way too competitive or just half assed cash grabs. No one makes games for fun anymore
we are getting older thats why :D
Nail on the head
They all wanted to be Fortnite with these battle passes
That so true!! Call of Duty is rigged!! Nobody wants too play a rigged game!! But believe it or not i have friends that dont know nothing about cod but play it. If i tell them that the game is rigged or that there is sbmm and damage based match making in the game and more stuff that is unfair, than they tell me thats not true and that i must not believe everything on youtube. So you see that there will be always dumb people that support cod and have no knowledge of the game that they are playing, these are the people Activision wants too spend money on the game!!
I wish you really stuck in BF4
All fps games suck because the have no clue how guns or combat actually work 2-4 shots with a 7.62 or bigger is stupid
BF 2042 looks very cartoony, with unrealistic gameplay, more arcade type.
bf2042 is basically call of duty with vehicle 😂
i can't enjoy fps these day anymore, cheater, harcore player, game crashing even with high spec
Battlefield 1 was great
mw2 sucks, i regret that purchase more than 2042 gold ed.