Truly a fantastic vehicle. My father and I kinda went in halfsies with this vehicle. We bought the RDX with Tech Package for about 42K and I can't even describe how much I love this SUV. We almost bought a new Audi Q5, very glad we didn't.
Drew Croft "...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner." "Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy." "...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin." Consumer Reports
The acceleration in Q5 with dual clutch beats the crap out of this one. Audi is much more fun to drive but this is the car to keep. Lease V buy difference
Test drove 2018 BMW X3 XDrive 30i (4 cylinder turbo), 2019 Volvo XC 60 T5 Inscription and 2019 Acura RDX. Acura beats both BMW and Volvo in luxury, technology and overall performance. It is absolutely no-brainer which one to buy in the category of compact luxury SUVs under $50K. Acura delivers on torque, on smoothness of delivery of torque and power, in cornering and overall maneuverability, it has the best steering wheel out of all three vehicles, with the right amount of heaviness, heft and road feedback. It has the best road noise isolation, and the best seats and leather upholstery, beating even the newly redesigned Volvo... The only place where Acura falls short is fuel economy--it has pretty thirsty engine, but it can run on regular gasoline unlike the other two (I know, I am leasing 2019 RDX Tech package)... Sure, one can buy more powerful engine, like turbocharged 3.0 V6 in BMW and both turbo-charged and supercharged T6 in Volvo, or even the 400 hp T8 hybrid system in Volvo, but the actual fun factor of driving the vehicle is not going to change much in my opinion, with Volvo's power delivery being very lumpy (turbo-lag), its steering being very light, and with BMW's long hood and aggressively bolstered, hard bucket seats... Also, price and cost of ownership, including the maintenance and long-term reliability, is always a factor, where Acura, again, delivers big...
"Sure, one can buy more powerful engine, like turbocharged 3.0 V6 in BMW ..." which doesn't exist. But not being anywhere near a "car guy," you would not know that. Honestly, you should check out an Odyssey if you want to carry a lot of stuff. Much betterin terms of stuff per unit of volume over footprint.
I'm a guy who rarely comments! This guy knows his stuff. This is the kind of explanation I was looking for. Subscribed & will definitely recommend this channel to others as well. Keep up the great work 👍
DUDE YOUR REVIEWS ARE THE BEST. YOU ALWAYS ADD MORE INFO/INSIGHT TO THE DESIGN . AND YOU ALWAYS ADDRESSES TO THE QUESTIONS PPL HAVE BEEN HAVING. KUDOS BROTHER
@@Jjj-jl4pc Car & Driver calls thr Aspec more Bspec or Cspec. Average power in this segment has already been done along with one of the worst infotainment interfaces along with many quality issues since 2019 redesign, Consumer Reports had to drop their recommendation of Acura SUVS. acurazine.com/forums/3g-rdx-problems-fixes-458/
@@normt430 There's no problem I've seen with the infotainment system except its only distracting of you aren't smart enough to pay attention to the road like in any other car. The reason why an Aspec is an Aspec is because its the most sportiest, and the highest performance model they have.. I don't think those reviewers got that, and trust me I've already watched that channel a lot.
@@Jjj-jl4pc Aspec is an appearance package only. It offers no performance or handling upgrade. I guess the wider 255 tires offer slightly better handling, but that's about it. You can verify this information easily here www.acura.com/rdx/pricing-and-specs Under both powertrain and chassis, all RDX are identical. The Aspec simply gets blacked out accents and trim pieces, as well as red interior option and red ambient lighting. I think they look great, but those things don't really improve performance or handling, do they?
This was the best and most helpful auto journalism ever!! You helped me narrow down my focus to the two top choices. Now all I need to do is crunch numbers.
I'm really liking the new RDX except for one thing. I like the A-spec look but I want the 360 degree camera and HUD. I don't understand the reason to reduce options on what is an aesthetics package like the A-spec.
I think it was really important for Acura to keep this car under 50k sticker price. For the Advance with ASPEC and SHAWD they would have pushed it past.
I've driven cars with HUD and own one with surround view now. I wouldn't call them deal killers. I rarely use the surround view, and I park in a tight condo garage at times. And if your car has a digital speed readout (this does) the HUD is almost superfluous. You see it and it's nice to have but you don't use it a lot.
That’s my dilemma. I want all those options on the A-Spec! I’m thinking of just getting the Advanced and changing the wheels and blacking out the chrome.
ldawson103 "...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner." "Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy." "...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin." Consumer Reports
Alex, this is one of the best reviews you've done. Really liked the last section where you compared and contrasted how you can equip other options and how they compare. Excellent detail!
Excellent video, Alex. You are a rarefied automotive reviewer. I may not always agree with your perspective but I can't disagree with your method. Plus I really like this RDX!
I started with Honda as a consultant 5 weeks ago, so for the first time have been looking at how they package their vehicles. It seems that Honda like to keep things simple for the buyer. Three grades of trim/equipment and two engines choices for the petrols. Outside the three grades, there aren't too many options to pick because each grade has very intelligent equipment bundling at that price point. What you want at that price point is there already.
Honda has almost always been simple when it comes to combinations offered. Their worst offense in the past was limiting interior/exterior color combinations to a ridiculous degree. Back when I shopped an Accord several years ago if you wanted a silver car you got a black interior, period. This vehicle is similar, but at least offers two options or more per exterior color.
Bruno Ta Ta. Single choice of interior colour is ridiculous. Esspecially at the mid-range and above, people want to be able to customise their cars, and nothing customises more than colour because it's everywhere.
Another informative & organized review Alex, I think you need to review some of weird and prestige cars to add more attraction and diversity to your channel. Wish you more success.
+CAM AUTO well I guess the Accord and Odyssey both were designed on a Monday morning too cause they don't have LED turning indicators in the tail lights & they were both redesigned after the CR-V & are more expensive lol
Has the 2020 RDX for a week. Great car. Smooth, good power, great balance between handling and comfort. The only thing I did not like was the infotainment is almost impossible to switch back and forth between apple car play to Spotify, XM radio etc. I had a front passenger so the control. So weirdthey couldn'tget it right. Our old X3, so much easier.. Other than that, I like the RDX.
I recently traded in my 2021 Acura RDX (SH-AWD + Technology) after 3 months of ownership. The reason being the shallow hatch height of 30”, which prevented me from putting in a full-size dog crate that’s 31” tall, and could not fit even my medium-sized mountain bike within the hatch area. These are just regular use cases and Acura’s design team need to be fired for not considering these. The 2022 MDX, a much larger vehicle, also has the same 30” hatch height problem. For comparison, the Honda CRV’s hatch is 36” tall (a sheer marvel in packaging) and the Honda Pilot and Honda Passport have 33-34” of hatch height. I now own a 2021 Honda Passport Touring, which meets all of my utility vehicle needs……can easily fit the dog crate, can easily swallow up the mountain bike. Having said that, Acura is not the only culprit here…….the Subaru Ascent, the Subaru Forester, the Subaru Crosstrek, the Toyota RAV4 are all in the unusably shallow hatch height category and it is a shame to call these utility vehicles, if they cannot cater to such mundane use cases.
184 inches is damn close to what a midsize suv used to be. The 2008 Honda Pilot was only 4 inches longer. The 2019 pilot is nearly a foot longer though. Time is funny
Looking to buy one of these used pretty soon. I like to pick up just out of lease models in cars so that's 2021 of course not 2019, but still, generally seems like the same car :) Thanks for the review!
Excellent description and analysis as usual. You almost convinced me I need to buy although I loathe SUV in general for their driving experience. Twin Turbo V6 seems like it would be a little too nose heavy though. But I am the type of guy that would probably succumb to an X3 M4.0i in this segment.
just bought Acura RDX 2019 in three weeks it gave me the transmission issue! I had to tow it to dealer and they had to replace the shifter assembly!! So much for Acura Reliability after spending $50k on the car!!
Yes, yes, because Honda never builds a car with a flaw. Every one must be perfect. I get it, it sucks, but to try to say the cars aren't generally reliable because you had a problem is silly. Which manufacturer makes 100% problem free cars?
I had looked at the 2018 and 2019 RDX at the dealer, and bought a 2018 AWD. I liked the look of the 2019 outside but I hated the black carps all over on the A-Spec. I chose the 2018 because it still had functional easy to use knobs, dials, (no confusing screen) and a real drive shifter. The V-6 and the 6 speed was smooth and fast. The only thing missing was the SH-AWD on the 2018. Acura should have retained the V-6 and the 6 speed.
I agree 100%. We just bought a 2018 over a 2020 for the V6 and 6 speed. Acura's RDX had a real advantage over the competition and now is just another turbo 4 banger.
@@Fadic4 not completely new like I have been repeating for almost 3-years now. Stop drinking Honda Koolaid! Acura says the same for the RDX, but it also revealed that its crossover “is based on a common platform that underpins other vehicles, including the CR-V.” This “common platform” is modified for use in the RDX and “is engineered much differently to fulfill the unique performance requirements set for RDX and the Acura brand.” Additionally, Acura noted that while many of its cars are on different platforms, “there are some similar construction materials and methods (high strength steel, high-performance adhesive, roller hemming for the panoramic roof, etc.)” that it uses across its lineup. Autoblog
@Norm T Clueless norm, don’t reply back without answering these 5 questions. is the suspension the same? Is the engine the same? Is the awd system the same? Is the transmission the same? Is the interior the same? You pretty much destroy your own arguments with your own comments. “Is engineered much differently” Thanks for clarifying the major difference between them. LOL. Honda koolaid? Says the guy trying to get people to buy a 45k sedan based on a Camaro platform with GM parts bin interior. LOL. Go apply for a job at a Mercedes dealership, maybe you’ll actually have some vehicles you can compare to the japanese. I also love how you replied to a 2 year old comment, are you getting destroyed by other people too much in the other videos because of how clueless you are? You have to come to an inactive comment section just so people don’t call you out for being such a clown. LOL. Try harder BOY.
I like my 2020 rdx. Fun to drive, turbo is thirsty tho.Take high test gas which does not help. Lots if buttons to push, getting sick of idle stop button. Brakes are awsome! ; And I'm an d volvo guy.
Alex you are just awesome. Though not really my cup of tea, I have never liked Acura until this car(Aside from the crappy wood trim) overall this is an outstanding vehicle. I thought it was awesome you are listing to Rebecca st. James! The Mercedes AMG GLC is still best in class here, but costs more than twice as much maxed out lol, but if money is no issue, get the Mercedes, but then again if money is no issue, then absolutely get the Lamborghini Urus. Awesome review!
You have to understand something: Norm T. is world renowned for his behavior. He talks about Buicks like this on every thread known to man on the internet. Obviously some behavioral issues going on there. I say that not to persecute but just to let you know that what you're seeing is NOT normal, average Joe advice. Don't believe me? Go look and see. Why just in this thread alone, how many times do you see it?
Actually, I looked at a review of the Envision---I didn't know it was a Buick. I would never buy or even look at a Buick. In my opinion GM makes unreliable products. Moreover, when the AUW took over control (@ GM bankruptcy) I essentially scratched off that company from the list of possible carmakers I would ever look at.
@@10tenman10 the Envision has always been recommended by Consumer Reports where this new RDX never was. The Envision 2.0T is a much better handling cuv in CR testing that RDX.
Excellent review Alex.. You explain why Acura can build so much value into their cars.. Limited options limited luxury.. Lot of fun to drive very reliable.
I absolutely love the car and your review Alex. But how is it that you are showing us an Advance model with black wheels? Must be the $2000 optional 19 inch wheels?
That is correct. With cars like this they are often still working on option packages up to the end. So Acura was deciding between making the black wheels a factory option vs a dealer option and ended up with the latter but had already made cars for the press fleet.
Acura always gives more standard features than the others and in order to get the same or better in the other competitors they will go over 50k pushing 60k
Norm T I still think that it beats all the overpriced competitors that u pay for the brand name and you have to pay many features that should be standard So overall the RDX is the best
Francisco Gutierrez But it is slow at 6.6s from C&D and 7.0s from Consumer Reports to 60 mph. "...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner." "Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy." "...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin."
I own an RDX Advance pckg with SH-AWD, and even though everybody reviewing it says that is a smooth shifting auto trans, mine shifts quite jerky into second and third gears, almost always unless at very slow acceleration. Acura dealership says this is normal shifting in AWD. Someone has the same experience???
Tully3674 because only Lexus and Acura are allowed to rebadge a RAV4 or CRV and call it luxury. As soon as Lincoln does it with the Escape (which gets stellar reviews) it is a problem. I’m not saying Alex does this (his reviews are usually really good) but most other magazines/reviews take money from mfg. Hence, Germans get all the kudos despite not making the best products.
Great review, Alex! You didn't mention what mode you were driving in. Since the Advanced has adaptive suspension, wondering if the ride would be smoother in Comfort mode - if you weren't driving in that,
I have 21 awd tech package. Great size and practical , handles great and good motor - wish it had audi 7 speed though. My biggest complaint is city fuel economy around 18-19 mpg- well below stated and below my MDX awd with v6.
There are diff ways to measure cargo capacity. Acura uses a more volume friendly measurement than many others. So I'm not sure you're correct about it holding more than the X3 and Lexus RX. I've driven and looked at the new RDX and it's toward the top of my list for next vehicles but the hatch didn't seem as big as our RX despite the "cu ft" quoted numbers.
Long time subscriber of yours. Love the work you do. I did find it interesting that you have measured 0-60 at 5.7s and 5.9s with your equipment. Have you had it calibrated? The reason I ask the question is because Car and Driver reported 6.6s and Motortrend reported 6.4s. Similarly you can find threads on acurazine were owners reported noticeably slower 0-60 times vs previous generation. The observed fuel economy as well as acceleration numbers are significantly worse than previous generation of RDX despite what published numbers may suggest. Previous generation RDX did extremely well with ability to shut down 3 cylinders. The real world numbers have shown it is more fuel efficient on freeway than even CR-V! www.motortrend.com/news/rdx-vs-cr-v-5-reasons-splurge-acura-5-go-honda/ Though overall I really like the interior of new RDX. I think I am crazy as I like it more than X5m. I don't recall how the materials felt when I was inside at the auto show (was really impressed by volvo upper trim) but judging by the looks it is very appealing.
I currently have a Mercedes GLC. I am interested in switching to this, however, based on your comments in the section on the Volvo competitor, it seems I cannot get both the advanced safety features and the upgraded stereo in the same package. Is that correct?
Theres two upgraded sound packages. Tech gets an ELS package and then Advanced gets an upgraded 3D ELS package. 90% of the safety features are standard, blind spot monitoring is avaliable at the Tech package.
Hey Alex, great review as always. However, the new Q5 introduced in 2018 (and the 2017-Present A4/A5 manual & all Allroad's) no longer has the "good" Quattro with a 40:60 torque split Torsen Type-C differential (SQ5 still has the Torsen), replaced by Quattro Ultra which is essentially a Haldex-like multi-plate clutch installed in the rear of the transmission to send power to the rear. Torque split is 100:0 until power is needed at the rear.
Comparably equipped it would hit 65k or more. It's not in the same price range. I find it too small as well, it's more of an X1, Q3, GLA, XC40 competitor on size. I wanted to look at the Cayenne (more comparable to the RDX, X3/X5, Q5, XC60 and GLC in size), but add a few desirable options and you're looking at 80k +. Porsche is directly competitor to M series and AMG and they're all ungodly expensive for anything more than the very base price with almost no options (does come with an engine and some seats).
A month in to my 2019 A-spec and I have no complaints.. comfort, ride and overall package for price paid was far better than what the X3, XC60 and the Q5 could offer... A type S variant RDX I heard is in the works which I’m sure would give the SQ5 and X3 m40 a run for its money...
I would just like to be able to buy an up-level suv without a frelling sunroof/moonroof. Higher initial cost, reduced head room, and after a few years moonroofs become a cleaning and maintenance headache. And, oh yes, there is also the exploding sunroof issue (according to Consumer Reports).
From watching reviews I get the impression that SH-AWD may not kick in unless you are accelerating in or out of a turn. Which is nice, but typically you'd only use it coming out of a turn.
Advance FWD I saw at local dealer had tire repair kit, not spare tire & spare tire is not available as accessory. Is it standard only on Advance SH-AWD?
I think the LED turn signals combined with LED brake light makes it difficult to see the turn signal. You would think the colour would help but it doesnt. I like the candelescent turn signal so i can see it better. I think LED looks much better and are brighter but if it is combo brake and turnsignal it just isnt as noticed as needed
Check out cars.com and Motorweek review for a recent comparison and Consumer Reports as most complaints were about CVT drone/noise and poor fuel economy.
Loaded rdx vs loaded xc40? No kids. 6’2” -- I want the quietest smoothest drive with around 50k to spend. Which would be better for me? I like looks of both. Thanks!
You really do the most thorough car reviews I've seen, Alex. Just amazingly complete!
The guy does his homework and rarely gets it wrong.
Truly a fantastic vehicle. My father and I kinda went in halfsies with this vehicle. We bought the RDX with Tech Package for about 42K and I can't even describe how much I love this SUV.
We almost bought a new Audi Q5, very glad we didn't.
Drew Croft "...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner."
"Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy."
"...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin."
Consumer Reports
The acceleration in Q5 with dual clutch beats the crap out of this one. Audi is much more fun to drive but this is the car to keep. Lease V buy difference
Fantastic choice my friend
Drew Croft even the cheapest RDX comes with lots of feature, really good value, kinda regret buying my TLX tbh
Everything is good except rear winshield
Test drove 2018 BMW X3 XDrive 30i (4 cylinder turbo), 2019 Volvo XC 60 T5 Inscription and 2019 Acura RDX. Acura beats both BMW and Volvo in luxury, technology and overall performance. It is absolutely no-brainer which one to buy in the category of compact luxury SUVs under $50K. Acura delivers on torque, on smoothness of delivery of torque and power, in cornering and overall maneuverability, it has the best steering wheel out of all three vehicles, with the right amount of heaviness, heft and road feedback. It has the best road noise isolation, and the best seats and leather upholstery, beating even the newly redesigned Volvo... The only place where Acura falls short is fuel economy--it has pretty thirsty engine, but it can run on regular gasoline unlike the other two (I know, I am leasing 2019 RDX Tech package)...
Sure, one can buy more powerful engine, like turbocharged 3.0 V6 in BMW and both turbo-charged and supercharged T6 in Volvo, or even the 400 hp T8 hybrid system in Volvo, but the actual fun factor of driving the vehicle is not going to change much in my opinion, with Volvo's power delivery being very lumpy (turbo-lag), its steering being very light, and with BMW's long hood and aggressively bolstered, hard bucket seats... Also, price and cost of ownership, including the maintenance and long-term reliability, is always a factor, where Acura, again, delivers big...
"Sure, one can buy more powerful engine, like turbocharged 3.0 V6 in BMW ..." which doesn't exist. But not being anywhere near a "car guy," you would not know that. Honestly, you should check out an Odyssey if you want to carry a lot of stuff. Much betterin terms of stuff per unit of volume over footprint.
Says recommended fuel is 91 octane here - owners.acura.com/vehicles/information/2019/RDX/specs#mid^TC1H3KJW
I thought the RDX is recommended to run on premium gas.
Still happy with rdx? Any infotainment issues?
Mauricio Castro all cars that say premium can run on regular, just with less power. Modern engines adjust for fuel quality
The Engine Output Chart comparison is definitely gold. You are on the damn right way doing this!
“...but then the fuel economy sucked!” Keeping it real. Love it.
Acura did a fantastic job, and I can't wait until the redesign MDX and TLX. KEEP IT UP ACURA
I'm a guy who rarely comments! This guy knows his stuff. This is the kind of explanation I was looking for. Subscribed & will definitely recommend this channel to others as well. Keep up the great work 👍
DUDE YOUR REVIEWS ARE THE BEST. YOU ALWAYS ADD MORE INFO/INSIGHT TO THE DESIGN . AND YOU ALWAYS ADDRESSES TO THE QUESTIONS PPL HAVE BEEN HAVING. KUDOS BROTHER
Man LISTEN you have one of the most HONEST , COMPREHENSIVE, INFORMATIVE COMPARISON ON YOU TUBE, I GLAD IM A SUBIE
Best review I’ve found of the new RDX. Thank you!
Too bad the car isn't as good as the reviewer!
@@normt430 What do you mean?? Its an Acura Rdx, the best suv out there so far.
@@Jjj-jl4pc Car & Driver calls thr Aspec more Bspec or Cspec. Average power in this segment has already been done along with one of the worst infotainment interfaces along with many quality issues since 2019 redesign, Consumer Reports had to drop their recommendation of Acura SUVS.
acurazine.com/forums/3g-rdx-problems-fixes-458/
@@normt430 There's no problem I've seen with the infotainment system except its only distracting of you aren't smart enough to pay attention to the road like in any other car.
The reason why an Aspec is an Aspec is because its the most sportiest, and the highest performance model they have.. I don't think those reviewers got that, and trust me I've already watched that channel a lot.
@@Jjj-jl4pc Aspec is an appearance package only. It offers no performance or handling upgrade. I guess the wider 255 tires offer slightly better handling, but that's about it.
You can verify this information easily here www.acura.com/rdx/pricing-and-specs
Under both powertrain and chassis, all RDX are identical. The Aspec simply gets blacked out accents and trim pieces, as well as red interior option and red ambient lighting. I think they look great, but those things don't really improve performance or handling, do they?
The A-Spec looks SO good in silver. Not that I love silver, but this car looks amazing in silver with the A-Spec.
This was the best and most helpful auto journalism ever!! You helped me narrow down my focus to the two top choices. Now all I need to do is crunch numbers.
I'm really liking the new RDX except for one thing. I like the A-spec look but I want the 360 degree camera and HUD. I don't understand the reason to reduce options on what is an aesthetics package like the A-spec.
SS S The HUD is not colored like the Accord.
Agree 100% with you! HUD, 360° Camera or even Adaptive Suspension would be nice on the A-Spec Package
I think it was really important for Acura to keep this car under 50k sticker price. For the Advance with ASPEC and SHAWD they would have pushed it past.
I've driven cars with HUD and own one with surround view now. I wouldn't call them deal killers. I rarely use the surround view, and I park in a tight condo garage at times. And if your car has a digital speed readout (this does) the HUD is almost superfluous. You see it and it's nice to have but you don't use it a lot.
That’s my dilemma. I want all those options on the A-Spec! I’m thinking of just getting the Advanced and changing the wheels and blacking out the chrome.
THANK YOU for showing the SH-AWD display I have been waiting for someone to do that!
I enjoyed that too.
Loved it!
I enjoyed you too.
It is cool. I wonder how to display the SH-AWD, where is the switch?
ldawson103 "...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner."
"Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy."
"...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin."
Consumer Reports
Alex, this is one of the best reviews you've done. Really liked the last section where you compared and contrasted how you can equip other options and how they compare. Excellent detail!
He has been doing this type of comparison for a long time!
I must say, the comparison scene in this video was exceptioanally valuable and well researched. Quite impressive, only this quality content from Alex!
The information you give in all your videos is amazing. It’s is very satisfactory to see your reviews. Keep it going !
Excellent video, Alex. You are a rarefied automotive reviewer. I may not always agree with your perspective but I can't disagree with your method.
Plus I really like this RDX!
I like this style of answering some viewer questions in the review since you covered the major stuff in the first part.
10:35. Rebecca St. James 😂 oh my gosh. I’m dead. Bringing me back to church in the late 90’s.
17:00 The base trim has active noise cancellation yet it's still louder than the top trim with acoustic side glass?
I started with Honda as a consultant 5 weeks ago, so for the first time have been looking at how they package their vehicles. It seems that Honda like to keep things simple for the buyer. Three grades of trim/equipment and two engines choices for the petrols. Outside the three grades, there aren't too many options to pick because each grade has very intelligent equipment bundling at that price point. What you want at that price point is there already.
Karl P Acura is near luxury just like Envision 2.0T, just missing features and for 2019 295 lb-ft of torque.
Everyone wants that certain toy and on a Honda that toy is always on the Touring edition.
The part I can’t get past on the Buick before I ever go and check one out is the looks. I wouldn’t drive a slightly fatter looking Encore.
Honda has almost always been simple when it comes to combinations offered. Their worst offense in the past was limiting interior/exterior color combinations to a ridiculous degree. Back when I shopped an Accord several years ago if you wanted a silver car you got a black interior, period. This vehicle is similar, but at least offers two options or more per exterior color.
Bruno Ta Ta. Single choice of interior colour is ridiculous. Esspecially at the mid-range and above, people want to be able to customise their cars, and nothing customises more than colour because it's everywhere.
I just leased 2018 Nissan Murano platinum. The v6 is smooth and great mileage 24 mpg. Best part big incentives
Nissan... people still buy those things? There are so many better options out there...
murano has a CVT = POS
The intro music gives me chills.
Another informative & organized review Alex,
I think you need to review some of weird and prestige cars to add more attraction and diversity to your channel.
Wish you more success.
Thank you for reading all the comments Alex on Autos. This Acura RDX is pretty cool. 👍
Actually it has really bad quality issues.
acurazine.com/forums/3g-rdx-problems-fixes-458/
Alex killed it again! Great video on a great vehicle
I believe Tech also includes blind spot and rear traffic alert that base doesn't get.
Camera on the SH-AWD display was an inspired choice, really interesting!
It's weird that the 2019 RDX doesn't have LED turning indicators in the tail lights, but yet the CR-V does.
Baasil F. Cost cutting. Typical for the brand
Department wars!
Baasil F. Maybe it was design on a Monday morning lol😂🤣🤣
+CAM AUTO well I guess the Accord and Odyssey both were designed on a Monday morning too cause they don't have LED turning indicators in the tail lights & they were both redesigned after the CR-V & are more expensive lol
Baasil F. The Accord is ugly now. Blehhh
Has the 2020 RDX for a week. Great car. Smooth, good power, great balance between handling and comfort. The only thing I did not like was the infotainment is almost impossible to switch back and forth between apple car play to Spotify, XM radio etc. I had a front passenger so the control. So weirdthey couldn'tget it right. Our old X3, so much easier.. Other than that, I like the RDX.
What an outstanding car review. Bravo!
I like that you compare cars
I recently traded in my 2021 Acura RDX (SH-AWD + Technology) after 3 months of ownership. The reason being the shallow hatch height of 30”, which prevented me from putting in a full-size dog crate that’s 31” tall, and could not fit even my medium-sized mountain bike within the hatch area. These are just regular use cases and Acura’s design team need to be fired for not considering these. The 2022 MDX, a much larger vehicle, also has the same 30” hatch height problem.
For comparison, the Honda CRV’s hatch is 36” tall (a sheer marvel in packaging) and the Honda Pilot and Honda Passport have 33-34” of hatch height. I now own a 2021 Honda Passport Touring, which meets all of my utility vehicle needs……can easily fit the dog crate, can easily swallow up the mountain bike.
Having said that, Acura is not the only culprit here…….the Subaru Ascent, the Subaru Forester, the Subaru Crosstrek, the Toyota RAV4 are all in the unusably shallow hatch height category and it is a shame to call these utility vehicles, if they cannot cater to such mundane use cases.
184 inches is damn close to what a midsize suv used to be. The 2008 Honda Pilot was only 4 inches longer. The 2019 pilot is nearly a foot longer though. Time is funny
Loved it! Especially the comparison.
Looking to buy one of these used pretty soon. I like to pick up just out of lease models in cars so that's 2021 of course not 2019, but still, generally seems like the same car :) Thanks for the review!
Yippee it’s a beige interior! I like that console too.
Excellent description and analysis as usual. You almost convinced me I need to buy although I loathe SUV in general for their driving experience.
Twin Turbo V6 seems like it would be a little too nose heavy though.
But I am the type of guy that would probably succumb to an X3 M4.0i in this segment.
Acura Blue Seats Red Leather Precision Crafted Excellence! Remarkable Performance Truly Superb
I think you have an error on the Advance trims tires, they should also be 235/55R19 Continentals. Only the A-SPEC has the 255/45R20 tires.
Alex please do a review of the 2019 Acura Mdx A-Spec
AlexPut in the twin turbo V6 and I'm all in!
just bought Acura RDX 2019 in three weeks it gave me the transmission issue! I had to tow it to dealer and they had to replace the shifter assembly!! So much for Acura Reliability after spending $50k on the car!!
How's it holding up now?
Yes, yes, because Honda never builds a car with a flaw. Every one must be perfect. I get it, it sucks, but to try to say the cars aren't generally reliable because you had a problem is silly. Which manufacturer makes 100% problem free cars?
Great in depth review 👏
Excellent review, Alex. Thank you so much!
Never heard you say something sucked until this video, nice!
Firm ride is good in this segment. As long as it isn't harsh. You can go buy a RAV4 if you want cushy soft (and sloppy).
Bruno TaTa Consumer Reports said drivers and passe gers complained about the firm ride.
I had looked at the 2018 and 2019 RDX at the dealer, and bought a 2018 AWD. I liked the look of the 2019 outside but I hated the black carps all over on the A-Spec. I chose the 2018 because it still had functional easy to use knobs, dials, (no confusing screen) and a real drive shifter. The V-6 and the 6 speed was smooth and fast. The only thing missing was the SH-AWD on the 2018. Acura should have retained the V-6 and the 6 speed.
I agree 100%. We just bought a 2018 over a 2020 for the V6 and 6 speed. Acura's RDX had a real advantage over the competition and now is just another turbo 4 banger.
@@ThePdxster 2018 RDX is simply outdated
Great review alex!
The rear suspension is 100% new but I'm not sure about the front.
Fadic4 It is a CR-V platform with pano roof and redesigned rear to accommodate I dependent suspension for SH-AWD.
Norm T its a completely new platform. go watch the interview autoline did with the chief engineer,
@@Fadic4 not completely new like I have been repeating for almost 3-years now. Stop drinking Honda Koolaid!
Acura says the same for the RDX, but it also revealed that its crossover “is based on a common platform that underpins other vehicles, including the CR-V.” This “common platform” is modified for use in the RDX and “is engineered much differently to fulfill the unique performance requirements set for RDX and the Acura brand.”
Additionally, Acura noted that while many of its cars are on different platforms, “there are some similar construction materials and methods (high strength steel, high-performance adhesive, roller hemming for the panoramic roof, etc.)” that it uses across its lineup. Autoblog
@Norm T
Clueless norm, don’t reply back without answering these 5 questions.
is the suspension the same?
Is the engine the same?
Is the awd system the same?
Is the transmission the same?
Is the interior the same?
You pretty much destroy your own arguments with your own comments.
“Is engineered much differently”
Thanks for clarifying the major difference between them. LOL.
Honda koolaid? Says the guy trying to get people to buy a 45k sedan based on a Camaro platform with GM parts bin interior. LOL.
Go apply for a job at a Mercedes dealership, maybe you’ll actually have some vehicles you can compare to the japanese.
I also love how you replied to a 2 year old comment, are you getting destroyed by other people too much in the other videos because of how clueless you are? You have to come to an inactive comment section just so people don’t call you out for being such a clown. LOL.
Try harder BOY.
I like my 2020 rdx. Fun to drive, turbo is thirsty tho.Take high test gas which does not help. Lots if buttons to push, getting sick of idle stop button. Brakes are awsome! ; And I'm an d volvo guy.
Alex you are just awesome. Though not really my cup of tea, I have never liked Acura until this car(Aside from the crappy wood trim) overall this is an outstanding vehicle. I thought it was awesome you are listing to Rebecca st. James! The Mercedes AMG GLC is still best in class here, but costs more than twice as much maxed out lol, but if money is no issue, get the Mercedes, but then again if money is no issue, then absolutely get the Lamborghini Urus. Awesome review!
Agree with the Lexus NX diagnosis. Cramped and overpriced for what it is
10tenman10 A Envision 2.0T can be had for $12,000 less than NX. Still under the new RDX.
Norm T
Thanks. I'll look it up. Not familiar with the Envision.
You have to understand something: Norm T. is world renowned for his behavior. He talks about Buicks like this on every thread known to man on the internet. Obviously some behavioral issues going on there. I say that not to persecute but just to let you know that what you're seeing is NOT normal, average Joe advice. Don't believe me? Go look and see. Why just in this thread alone, how many times do you see it?
Actually, I looked at a review of the Envision---I didn't know it was a Buick. I would never buy or even look at a Buick. In my opinion GM makes unreliable products. Moreover, when the AUW took over control (@ GM bankruptcy) I essentially scratched off that company from the list of possible carmakers I would ever look at.
@@10tenman10 the Envision has always been recommended by Consumer Reports where this new RDX never was. The Envision 2.0T is a much better handling cuv in CR testing that RDX.
Excellent review Alex.. You explain why Acura can build so much value into their cars.. Limited options limited luxury.. Lot of fun to drive very reliable.
Joe Pah how is this reliable when everything is all new? Also Honda's automatics are known to drop prematurely.
Blake, do you have examples?
Mark Lindgren Blake is correct. The RDX has had some transmission issue and dealerships cannot help the owners.
Joe Pah rhe 2019 RDX has been anything but reliable when Acurazine and FB owners are questioning when problems are too many.
Do you have any references?
Alex .... You are tops for the Car reviews .... I would like to see a comparison with the new Cadillac XT4 if you could .... please.
The ratio spread on that 10-speed is a pretty amazing 10 (5.25 to 0.52). Most 8-speeds have a spread of 7.5 or so.
I absolutely love the car and your review Alex. But how is it that you are showing us an Advance model with black wheels? Must be the $2000 optional 19 inch wheels?
That is correct. With cars like this they are often still working on option packages up to the end. So Acura was deciding between making the black wheels a factory option vs a dealer option and ended up with the latter but had already made cars for the press fleet.
Alex on Autos Do you like it with the black wheels? What about the 20 inch option? Good or bad?
The RDX is the Best Buy in comparison to the other competitors
Acura always gives more standard features than the others and in order to get the same or better in the other competitors they will go over 50k pushing 60k
Competes with Buick Envision 2.0T with 295 lb-ft of torque. With over $10,000 in discounts costs less and has more features.
Francisco Gutierrez Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.
Norm T I still think that it beats all the overpriced competitors that u pay for the brand name and you have to pay many features that should be standard
So overall the RDX is the best
Francisco Gutierrez But it is slow at 6.6s from C&D and 7.0s from Consumer Reports to 60 mph.
"...posting 52 mph through the course. Acura makes a big deal about its Super Handling AWD, which only comes into play when drivers accelerate through a corner."
"Acura missed the mark with the RDX’s annoyingly complex controls. In addition, we are not enthusiastic about the luxury compact SUV's fuel economy."
"...Although it’s nicely finished, the materials and build quality don’t quite match the best SUVs in this class. For example, the storage cubbies aren’t lined, there were some uneven panel gaps on the center console, and one of the dash vents didn’t move as freely as the others. Finally, there are plenty of soft-touch surfaces throughout the cabin, but the material on the upper dash and window sill is quite thin."
I own an RDX Advance pckg with SH-AWD, and even though everybody reviewing it says that is a smooth shifting auto trans, mine shifts quite jerky into second and third gears, almost always unless at very slow acceleration. Acura dealership says this is normal shifting in AWD. Someone has the same experience???
Curious why you didn't add the Lincoln MKC (or MKX/Nautilus) as part of your comparison/competition?. As always, terrific review.
Tully3674 because only Lexus and Acura are allowed to rebadge a RAV4 or CRV and call it luxury. As soon as Lincoln does it with the Escape (which gets stellar reviews) it is a problem.
I’m not saying Alex does this (his reviews are usually really good) but most other magazines/reviews take money from mfg. Hence, Germans get all the kudos despite not making the best products.
Tully3674 good point! Forgot about Lincoln and agree
Buick Envision 2.0T for 2019 beats RDX and thr segment with 295 lb-ft of torque.
www.autoblog.com/2018/03/15/2019-buick-envision-crossover-review/
According to the articles I just looked up the big Chinese Buick power plant is almost a second slower to 60.
Great review, Alex! You didn't mention what mode you were driving in. Since the Advanced has adaptive suspension, wondering if the ride would be smoother in Comfort mode - if you weren't driving in that,
Acura needs to start using that seat in all vehicles. Maybe not the ILX but definitely the MDX
I have 21 awd tech package. Great size and practical , handles great and good motor - wish it had audi 7 speed though. My biggest complaint is city fuel economy around 18-19 mpg- well below stated and below my MDX awd with v6.
Great review. I was hoping for comparison of the new 10 speed to the famous 8 speed ZF that is in a lot of Germans. Could you please comment on that?
Would you go for the 2019 RDX or the 2019 Countryman S All4 ? I'm considering both but hard to decide!
Just got one certified at 38k miles clean carfax and 0.99% interest. 😊 works great!
I like that you do the car seat test. Really needed to know that bit
Nice review. Just test drove in the last week but found the A spec of the RDX lacking. I did like the over all design however.
ThePsychodo Car & Driver just tested the 2019 RDX 2.0T and it was almost a half second slower to 60 mph than the 2018 RDX V6.
Best review! 👍👍👍
Is it sad that the reviewer is better than the car?
There are diff ways to measure cargo capacity. Acura uses a more volume friendly measurement than many others. So I'm not sure you're correct about it holding more than the X3 and Lexus RX. I've driven and looked at the new RDX and it's toward the top of my list for next vehicles but the hatch didn't seem as big as our RX despite the "cu ft" quoted numbers.
Hi Alex, great review. 👍
Quick question do you feel the Mazda CX-5 has the more compliant ride?
Thank you.
If I want a Acura?? This is my choice Alex.
Long time subscriber of yours. Love the work you do. I did find it interesting that you have measured 0-60 at 5.7s and 5.9s with your equipment. Have you had it calibrated? The reason I ask the question is because Car and Driver reported 6.6s and Motortrend reported 6.4s. Similarly you can find threads on acurazine were owners reported noticeably slower 0-60 times vs previous generation. The observed fuel economy as well as acceleration numbers are significantly worse than previous generation of RDX despite what published numbers may suggest. Previous generation RDX did extremely well with ability to shut down 3 cylinders. The real world numbers have shown it is more fuel efficient on freeway than even CR-V! www.motortrend.com/news/rdx-vs-cr-v-5-reasons-splurge-acura-5-go-honda/ Though overall I really like the interior of new RDX. I think I am crazy as I like it more than X5m. I don't recall how the materials felt when I was inside at the auto show (was really impressed by volvo upper trim) but judging by the looks it is very appealing.
I currently have a Mercedes GLC. I am interested in switching to this, however, based on your comments in the section on the Volvo competitor, it seems I cannot get both the advanced safety features and the upgraded stereo in the same package. Is that correct?
JazzFan74 keep the Mercedes in my opinion
Jazzfan the advanced safety features are standard on all models. The 3D sound system is available on the A-spec and Advanced trim levels
Farhad Raof The Buick Envision Premium 2.0T will have the best ride quality and offer best handling in testing.
Theres two upgraded sound packages. Tech gets an ELS package and then Advanced gets an upgraded 3D ELS package.
90% of the safety features are standard, blind spot monitoring is avaliable at the Tech package.
Hey Alex, great review as always. However, the new Q5 introduced in 2018 (and the 2017-Present A4/A5 manual & all Allroad's) no longer has the "good" Quattro with a 40:60 torque split Torsen Type-C differential (SQ5 still has the Torsen), replaced by Quattro Ultra which is essentially a Haldex-like multi-plate clutch installed in the rear of the transmission to send power to the rear. Torque split is 100:0 until power is needed at the rear.
Hi Ale, thank you for an excellent and detailed review. I am wondering you did not mention porsche macan at all.
Comparably equipped it would hit 65k or more. It's not in the same price range. I find it too small as well, it's more of an X1, Q3, GLA, XC40 competitor on size. I wanted to look at the Cayenne (more comparable to the RDX, X3/X5, Q5, XC60 and GLC in size), but add a few desirable options and you're looking at 80k +. Porsche is directly competitor to M series and AMG and they're all ungodly expensive for anything more than the very base price with almost no options (does come with an engine and some seats).
Alex which model of the rdx is your pick/best buy?
Good comparative video. 👍👍👍
A month in to my 2019 A-spec and I have no complaints.. comfort, ride and overall package for price paid was far better than what the X3, XC60 and the Q5 could offer... A type S variant RDX I heard is in the works which I’m sure would give the SQ5 and X3 m40 a run for its money...
Only V6TT for all new platforms.
@@normt5463 2021 RDX still has the 2.0L turbo 4. Bummer.
I would just like to be able to buy an up-level suv without a frelling sunroof/moonroof. Higher initial cost, reduced head room, and after a few years moonroofs become a cleaning and maintenance headache. And, oh yes, there is also the exploding sunroof issue (according to Consumer Reports).
Hi.. can you review new new 2019 Hyundai Santa Fe (7 Seater) ?
Love the videos, Keep it up!
when your comparing to a hybrid. do you take into account on the time to sit and charge.
Hi alex.it is ok to put 87 octane unleaded gas on my acura rdx 2021 model.thank you
From watching reviews I get the impression that SH-AWD may not kick in unless you are accelerating in or out of a turn. Which is nice, but typically you'd only use it coming out of a turn.
Advance FWD I saw at local dealer had tire repair kit, not spare tire & spare tire is not available as accessory. Is it standard only on Advance SH-AWD?
Only A-Spec has no spare and has a fix-a-flat kit. All others have a spare underneath.
I think the LED turn signals combined with LED brake light makes it difficult to see the turn signal. You would think the colour would help but it doesnt. I like the candelescent turn signal so i can see it better.
I think LED looks much better and are brighter but if it is combo brake and turnsignal it just isnt as noticed as needed
What do you think of Cobb Tuning for the Ascent?
Consumer Reports just dropped the Ascent from their recommended status. Looks like the quality is declining on new Subaru's.
A much improved RDX but well-equipped it's tipping towards $50K. A fine long term purchase, but nothing special if you trade every 3-4 years or lease.
You are very thorough
Great video! What kind of GoPro setup do you use in front the car dashscreen display to show the torque split screen in the RDX?
The hidden compartment tells me that this model will have the hybrid version later. The space will be used for holding the batteries.
Hello Alex , I need your suggestion on which one is better the A spec or the advance ?
What happens when you put it in comfort. Does the ride quality get better?
How would you consider this to a ford explorer xlt?
Great review as always Alex. Would you say the new RDX is more comfortable than the new Qx50 in term of ride quality and cabin noise? Thanks
I'd also like to know Alex's opinion on this as we're cross shopping those two right now. Thanks.
Check out cars.com and Motorweek review for a recent comparison and Consumer Reports as most complaints were about CVT drone/noise and poor fuel economy.
lucas huang Competes with Buick Envision 2.0T with 295 lb-ft of torque.
i wouldnt put Buick Envision in the same category as them. people are not going to cross shop RDX/ Qx50/X3 Bmw with Buick Envision.
lucas huang Entry level or near luxury Acura and Buick do it best.
Loaded rdx vs loaded xc40? No kids. 6’2” -- I want the quietest smoothest drive with around 50k to spend. Which would be better for me? I like looks of both. Thanks!
Will there be a Sport Hybrid version?
I think the driving select knob is supposed to look similar to the one in the nsx
Does it have a flat load floor now with the rear seats down? The previous model had a hump which sucked for us when loading boxes.
Yes it has a flat floor
Is the SH-AWD worth it in normal driving conditions and not driving "aggressively"?
When will the twin turbo V6 Type S be released?!?!?! Knowing my luck I would buy this model on a Monday and come Tuesday the Type S would be released.