loving the new Ridgeline and I own a Silverado. I just see how this is most the truck I would need! Way to be Honda and not just be like everyone else and go for what's "normal" that's why you are the company of dreams! You see it and go after it and 99% of the time are successful!
Clearly Honda is not going after truck buyers at all with the Ridgeline and that is OK. People will be trading in cars and crossovers for the Ridgeline. It will be just like what they are used to, except it can haul things. No one is going to buy it expecting to conquer Moab, but it will be very much at home in a driveway on a cul-de-sac. I am sure Honda knows exactly who they are selling it to.
TheRuler OfAll I believe I said just what you did. The Ridgeline is aimed at the casual truck user and is well suited for that. Not sure why you felt the need to insult me. Maybe you should be a little less eager to be offended.
No doubt! Perfect truck if you live in the 'burbs, have season tickets to your fav NFL team. It's a Pilot with tailgating toys....which is fine by me. My Pilot has never once been in the shop in the 5 years I've owned it.....great truck 👍
@@fasteddie617 a buddy of mine bought a new ridgeline because of his wife's pilot. Although I dislike both. Good vehicles just dont like them. He used to have gmc full size trucks.
So, the RIdgeline does 95% of what the Colorado and Tacoma do, but also has way more storage, a wider bed (wide enough for a jon boat or plywood), and drives much better. You guys are so hung up on what to call it. Truck, car, SUV, some type of hybrid. Who cares? It is a vehicle that does more things well than any midsize truck on the market. I greatly prefer the styling of the Colorado. But if you are that obsessed with the manliness of your car, you probably have some other more serious shortcomings as a man.
That's not true at all. at least where I'm from our trucks are used as trucks. we have extremely rugged roads, deep snow, deep mud, and if you need something moved you need to be able to do it yourself. I like the ridgeline, but it would never be realistic outside of the city. I own a 1/2 ton 4wd truck. I don't tow as often as some of my buddies, but when I do its usually upwards of 7500lbs. the bed is always full of junk, wood, tools, or trash.. (out here we actually have to take our trash to the dump). I use my 4wd a few times a week, these are the reasons I have a truck. I'd like to save gas and have a little honda civic, but I need a truck. I'd like to have a jeep, but I need a truck. and I think that's the case for a lot more Americans than just me. sure I think the ridgeline would be a cute car for my wife, but it would be a in addition to the fact I already own a real truck.
You are comparing the Ridgeline to your 1/2 full size truck, they are not in the same class. The Ridgeline is competing with the Colorado and Tacoma. If you need a full size truck, get a full size truck. If you need a mid-size truck, then it would be smart to consider the Ridgeline because it has so many advantages. The Ridgeline's payload is 1584, which is only 40 pounds less than the body-on-frame competitors (one bag of mulch). But the Ridgeline has a much bigger bed and more storage (almost every quad cab Colorado/Tacoma I see is a short bed, which is shorter AND narrower). It also drives nicer, gets better gas mileage, and is likely more reliable. What the Ridgeline does not do, is tow as much weight or have 4WD. If you have reason for those features (most people don't, but you do) then the Ridgeline is not for you. But let's be honest here, how many midsize truck owners are towing over 5,000 pounds or going mudding? Hell, most FULL size truck owners could accomplish everything they need to in a minivan. I see Sierra Denalis rolling around here all the time, clean as a whistle, nothing in the bed, not a scratch on the bedliner.
+Nick C your right, there are some truck owners out there that really don't use there truck. I guess what I was getting at is if I were to trade my truck in for a mid size I'm sure I could get by with the tacoma. i could probably exceed it's capacity here and there on rural back roads and and it would be fine. 2nd choice I feel the colorado would be okay too, I just feel like the ridgeline really wouldn't hold up to abuse as well. irs (independent rear suspension) sucks for a truck and so does not having a transfer case. it's more in the class of that subaru baja that they only made for a couple years. I see it's usefulness in urban areas, but it's just not a truck in my eyes. you are right about it having adequate bed space, but I would be interested in seeing some durability tests. I am looking forward to seeing one of these ridgelines person.
The ridge line is growing on me. I love having the storage to keep whatever in the trunk, will tow my atv without any issue and perfect for hunting. I miss having a truck and am use to my tdi mileage so if I could have something to use camping, biking, hunting, 4 wheeling and room to throw everything in with out playing Tetris in the back. Gas mileage is great and perfect for the family. I think this is going to be big for Honda.
Toyota still hasn't changed that horrible seating position. Sat in one at a dealer and felt like an instant recipe for a backache. My 2008 F-150 with vinyl seats feels much more comfortable even though it's just a base work truck.
Getting tired of TFLT subtly bashing the ridgeline because it doesn't follow the archaic "manly" formula that trucks have stuck to for decades. A truck is a style of vehicle, with a cab and a bed, so the confusion they seem to suffer from as to whether or not it qualifies as a truck is ridiculous. Yes, they make positive remarks but continue to disregard it for not having a transfer case or brake controller, or off road model etc. The Ridgeline offers many features one or more of the others don't have. Best in class fuel economy, widest bed, in bed trunk, dual action tailgate, heated steering, in bed audio, power sliding rear window with defrost, most comfortable and largest cabin, memory seats. Fact is, if I'm shopping for a truck for working on a job site, heavy hauling/towing, I'm going to look at a full size or something like the Taco. However, I, like I suspect many others, fall in the category of occasional hauling/towing, mostly city/highway driving (not offroading) and a winter capable vehicle, the ridgeline would be the best choice by far. People need to move past the "image" of what a truck should be and take advantage of the practicality a truck like the Ridgeline offers
If they could’ve designed it with a more accord like face instead of the odyssey it’d look a bit more rugged, flat faced, I wouldnt even consider any other truck. For the majority of people that buy trucks, this is the best one out there. The looks keep me weighing my options though...😔
Precisely. I have an Avalon, but I bought it before my needs changed. I like the idea of a pickup that makes a very comfortable vehicle for my daily commute and long road trips, yet can haul a small camper or lug some plywood home from the lumber yard (unlike many pickups, it can carry a sheet of plywood or drywall flat in the bed.
Dictionary says otherwise. You don't need to be able to go off-roading in the dunes for something to be a truck. It is more powerful then an SUV, it has a bed, it's bigger and wider then the Tacoma and Colorado plus extra storage in the bed. Sounds like you are just stuck in your ways there little man.
I find it funny how so many people hate the previous and redesigned Ridgeline. I had a 2006 Ridgeline and it is funny how many people said to me that is not a real truck; however, once they had an opportunity to ride and drive it their opinions changed. The original Ridgeline was unique and the current Ridgeline is more truck-looking. If I needed a medium to heavy duty truck I would not look in the midsize market. I enjoyed my Ridgeline and am looking forward to seeing the new one in person. I believe the Ridgeline will check most boxes for many, but the fact that it is FWD and is not body-on-frame will make many not consider it a viable choice. In the end it is not going to work for everyone, but if given the chance it probably could work for many.
Same thing happened with me i hate hondas for a long tine, but after driven a Honda civic type R ep3 jdm factory 220 ps this was a japanese domestic market one straight imported from japan with 9000 rpm redline it was the best car ive ever owned after that i start to like hondas theyre really the best car maker
I have a 2007 Ridgeline and that's been my experience too. I think people realize how great it is to have the "car" features along with the truck aspects. It's not perfect and it's not about being bad ass or manly, but damn it sure does kick ass for most applications a small truck is needed for and beyond!
can't wait to see your next video, so far I'm hooked on the ridgeline. I don't haul or tow but I want a truck, you made it very easy for me to choose. thanks roman.
This review is a bit biased against Ridgeline and favoring Colorado. Trucks of future will be unibody and fuel efficient without compromise on capability. I'm sold on torque vectoring. Good job Honda!
Roman! The point of this truck is that it's not a truck! Get the net! So when you want an f150 and your wife wants an explorer.....compromise. Let's face it, most people never ever ever ever tow or haul anything. Most suv's never go off road. At least with this, you could get away with 90% of what people need a truck for.....mulch from lowes. I wish it was a bit more aggressive looking (less wimpy) because it makes a lot of sense
I don't why you keep saying it is not a work truck. I have an 06 ridgeline I use to run my cabinet business and it is awesome I tow kitchens with it, carry all my tools and pick-up sheets of plywood. You never mentioned that it is the only midsize truck that has more than 48" in between the wheel wells (thus the only one that can carry sheets of plywood flat which is one of the things that makes a truck a truck). It seems you don't know how to consider a truck for work, with the trunk, bed and back seat the ridgeline has the most usable storage than any other midsize truck. Oh by the way I also go off-road with my ridgeline.
Roman....your struggling to find things to hate about the RL aren't you? The tire....The volume knob???! The no-asst lift gate?! Bahahaha! After driving the other trucks, you nearly wet yourself in excitement as you open the door of the RL. Looks comfy huh?!
I wanna see the ridgline on an offroad test... cause I don't really see how the ridgeline wouldn't work for anything you need it to do.... other then offroading, if your towing more the 5k lbs you should really think of a full 3/4 ton with diesel most of the time, but for mid-size pickup its perfect
I was referring to more than 5k lb load on a regular basis... when you could the size of the trailer... always safer to not have your trailer not be able to steer you and pull you around too much
+Chris Rowlison yup, I couldn't agree with more. I checked out all 3 of these today and also the Frontier and the RL is by far the nicest. Overall fit and finish, general maintenance seems pretty easy and ride and handling for everyday use is awesome. I will definitely buy myself a RL. Only reason to buy a Tacoma if I was into off roading which I am not.
Almost non they mostly but the bells and whistles to drink a beer in thier driveways and brag to their neighbor about what thier truck can do but never use it for what it’s built for lol
Honestly, for most people I think the ridge line would be the best option. Most people don't tow, or go offroading. the Ridgeline can do both of those relatively well, but I think it stands out as a truck that can truly be used as a car. I personally think I like the Tacoma the best, but if I were looking for a daily driver to not off-road in, I'd pick the Honda or Chevy. Honda and Toyota are also well known to be the most dependable vehicles on the road.
Starting to love the honda, i can see the black edition with better off road tires and i think this will be a capable truck that 80% of the casual off roadies could definitely accomplish. 👌 I enjoy how comfortable and convenient the honda is.
I grew up with light, high revving, high performance honda coupes. Currently I drive a '06 Ridgeline that was handed down to me from my father. I don't call it a truck. The Ridgeline is a spacious car with more torque and clearance. If you're not pulling or hauling very heavy things, the Ridgeline has a good balance of handling and comfort of all medium sized suvs/trucks. Instead of big knobby tires, I plan to go with larger and lighter rims with sportier tires.
The new Ridgeline is the practical choice for 90%+ of midsize truck buyers. Only a tiny % of people actually will push their midsize trucks beyond the offroad or towing capabilities of the Honda. But what Honda forgot is that most people buy trucks to compensate for their small willies. They made a practical vehicle for the most impractical audience.
I just with they'd fix the front end. uni body doesn't bother me if I'm getting cool features and decent capability along with best in class fuel. front end is ugly on a truck though.
+larry Spiller Even the front end sacrifices tradition for practicality. It's shorter and sloped to allow for greater fuel efficiency and visibility from the drivers seat. Also, the shorter front allows for a larger cab and truck bed for the same wheelbase. People fall in love with Honda's from the driver's seat not from the outside.
Dude i was just going to comment on whether they even made a new frontier lol. Nowhere to be seen, though it kind of sucks, because it's not too terrible of a truck, just needs a major refresh.
I had the 1st gen Ridgeline. It was a great city truck. AWD made is a great wintertime driver. I could load bags of mulch, tow a bass boat, and carry people in comfort. Enuff said.
I'm not sure if you've ever noticed but the reason that the seating position is odd is because the body is intentionally tucked up to keep the rockers away from the ground. Its an odd compromise, but it sure is nice to have off road.
This was actually a good review. You are right in that it depends on what you are trying to achieve. I recently transferred from an Accord to a truck (2016 Colorado) cause I was looking for that introductory truck that would give give me the best of all worlds (commute, towing, off-road). If Ridgeline was available, I might have chosen that since it was closer to a car - but I think Colorado offers more for my Renaissance personality. Great job!
Well, I like all three, & and a few more, but I bought Ridgeline. It’s a matter of needs & price! I’m happy with my choice, hope the rest of you are just as happy!
If your looking for a "mans truck" you are going full size especially when you see how much more you get for your money. If your looking for a versatile truck for recreation and weekend jobs any of these will work. The Honda would be a great choice if you can only have a truck and no second car. Most of my peers would take the Honda because it is more than livable all the time, BUT if someone could do what Honda did AND make it look good, that would be the real winner. Looks definitely go to the Chevy and Toyota. By the way Roman, you were pretty impressed with the off road ability of the Honda Pilot which this truck is based off of.
@@jeffk464 the gm 3.6 is a great motor actually. I dont have any first hand experience but the numbers are impressive and reviews favorable. Also some of the new Cadillac sedans look really nice.
Coming from a full size truck, the Honda Ridgeline fits me best. I don't fit in the Toyota very well as I felt like I was sat on the floor but my head was touching the roof. The Chevy feels tight but the seating position was better. I liked the Tacoma interior quality but I got a very strong sence of 'Pontiac Grand Am' while sat in the Colorado. Very cheap? I'm sure both are fine trucks but just not for me. The Honda Ridgeline feels as large inside as my full size truck but rides like our minivan. I don't 'off road' so the AWD is just for getting up my driveway in winter, I need 4 doors and a truck bed to occasionally haul lumber, a quad and maybe some tools or other crap. The Ridgeline is truck enough for 95% of the people out there and it's perfect for my needs now.
Just bought a ridgeline, love when people hate on it until they actually ride in it and drive it. Also if you are on a flat enough highway for the cylinder deactivation to do its magic, you can get 7.8L/100km (30 mpg)!
Saying that the Ridgeline is not a truck because it is too quiet, too sophisticated, bla, bla, bla, it is like saying that a girl is not a girl because she is not that complicated
I test drove all of these except Ridgeline as it is not out yet. I test drove F150, and Tundra. I did not consider Ram or Silverado after horrific IIHS crash test safety rating. From full size I liked F150 the most but it was a bit too big for my needs. I did not like Tacoma seating position or ride, and engine seemed to be hunting for gears. Colorado rides better but GM quality is questionable (I used to own GM vehicles and had bad experience with them), and rear seat does not have sufficient space. A friend owns 1st Generation Ridgeline and I test drove it and it was great. Rides like a car, maneuverable, quiet, yet is able to tow and carry a load of 1500 pounds. My friend REALLY abused that Ridgeline (2010) loading it up to over capacity, towing 5500 pounds+ for years. He has 190k+ miles on the clock and nothing but regular maintenance. Rear seat was the best in class. i have to see the 2nd Generation Ridgeline in person, but I am 90% sold on this vehicle and will likely buy one this summer. I also own two other Honda's (Odyssey and Accord both 2009) and nothing but regular maintenance (with the exception of Odyssey needing at $80k miles 1 new engine mount/regular not active, and right CV axle replacement). I also want to buy Gen 2 Ridgeline with the 6-speed auto they will come in before Honda starts putting 10 speed auto (likely next year) in their cars (stupid CAFE/fuel economy b.s.). I think anything over 6 speed is b.s. (ok, perhaps 8 speed auto is kind of acceptable but I still believe unnecessary) and more gears in a small tranny housings will lead to more problems in the future (not just with Honda but with all). Honda has a good diesel engine they sell in Europe and can be modified for Truck use. So does Toyota. RAM has already "imported" a very reliable JTD Fiat diesel engine and placed it in RAM trucks. Diesels are ideal for midsize trucks and GM putting Duramax in Canyon was a good move.
Our kids are grown and we are now a one car/truck family. As soon as my wife sat in the Ridgeline, I knew I could forget the others. We are 85% on road and that thing may as well be a Lexus, so I;m OK with it.
why is everyone so pissed over Honda having a touch capacitive volume control on the stereo instead of a knob? Its not hard to use and if you don't like it use the steering wheel controls.
You can feel and use a volume knob while driving without taking your eyes off the road. You can't do the same with a touch-sensitive control unless you have steering wheel controls which costs extra. There is no feedback with the touch control so you do not know if you are controlling the volume unless you hear it getting louder or lower. You an easily accidentally push a different touch sensitive control (change station, gps, etc.) when trying to adjust the volume.
Correct me if I am wrong. But if you get a base model you get the stereo that has a knob. if you get a higher model it has the all touch and steering wheel controls. I'm fairly certain, steering wheel controls are standard on all Honda models at least for 2016. Anyway I have no issues using the touch capacitive volume control in our HRV and any of the test drive videos I see of people complaining about it there is steering wheel controls. If you want the knob get the base mode!
The volume snobs have done away with the volume knobs, in favor of touch buttons and graphical sliders. I say "Why mess with a good thing." However, apparently, the analog knob has been deemed too old school of a technology. No longer will the protruding mushroom violate the clean plastic lines of the center console. The real question is: Can you operate the touch controls with (Isotoner)gloves on?
Nice video Roman! The new Colorado & Tacoma are missing the driver side A-pillar handles. One of my favorite features on my 2014 Tacoma. I use it every time I get in/out.
Roman, braking performance and braking durability are real measurable things that benefit the consumer, not whether they are disks, drums, air, or other wise. Toyota engineers prioritize what works above what journalists want to see. Keep in mind that the Tacoma stops faster than the Colorado, even given it's 4 wheel disk brakes. I can assure you that cutting cost was not their intention. There is actually a costly upgrade to the drum brakes themselves and the entire braking system on the new Tacoma. It's really not fair to viewers who don't know this to dog on the Tacoma for drum brakes. So next time, please make mention of why Toyota uses them. Thanks man. Otherwise, excellent review and I agree with your assessment about these 2 trucks and one "car with a bed on the back".
Question gentleman, any reason why the Frontier hasn't even seemed to have peeked it's head in the midsize segment? I'm curious to know if it got scared of these other ones and just decided to stay in the shadows.
it is so up with the seating position because under all the panels and such the truck has the same skeleton. the cabin is exactly of the previous generation. I had the truck and I can guarantee you that. if they did build it from scratch they would have addressed it
Assuming that you're someone who doesn't need to tow anything, having a truck is great when you need the ability to haul something that you either wouldn't want to throw in the back of an an SUV...or something that is too tall / long. But is having that ability worth the trade-offs of owning a truck which are typically lower fuel economy, limited (or uncomfortable) passenger space, and a truck-like ride? For some people it clearly is but for a lot of folks it isn't. I think that's probably why out of all the families that I know, I'd say less than half own a pickup truck. They either drive two sedans or a sedan and an SUV / van. Plus if you buy a truck and you want to securely store items you either get a locking tonneau cover (the fiberglass ones are a pain to remove) or you get a truck with in bed storage solutions like an Avalanche (which is no longer manufactured) or a Ram with the RamBox which is what I personally own. With every vehicle you have compromises and trade-offs...so what's the big deal? It sounds like the Ridgeline will fit the needs of a lot of drivers and if it makes sense for certain people then why wouldn't they purchase it? All of the commenters thumping their chests and moaning about how this isn't a "real" truck sound like a bunch of insecure adolescents with inflated egos.
I respect those people that want trucks for hauling trailers and "off-roading", but I'm more interested in a small 4 cylinder truck with decent gas mileage, light duty freight hauling (500 lbs or less) and something that rides nicely on a long highway drive. The old late 90s Tacomas were really good in this arena. I hope that these new ones are as durable and that the 4cyl versions get decent mileage. The Honda is way out of my price range and I have trust issues with GM products.
Roman, you do know the previous Ridgeline's were AWD, just like the new one is, but 99% of the time the front wheels did the work until they started to spin and it would engage the rear tires. Can you put any of those trucks in Low Range?
+jak p (skiguy09) Toyota has had issues with rust including rusted and replacing frames for years I have friends in line waiting to have the frames replaced on their Tacomas just amazes me they keep manufacturing truck that turn to rust and can spend millions replacing ??
+Spark Jumper They're hit and miss, even up here in the salt states. Mine is going on ten years of winter salt exposure and it doesn't have much of anything in the way of rust under there. Yet I've seen other Tacomas two or three years newer with big ol' holes in the box section under the cab and no paint left anywhere on the frame. The '16 Taco has a different steel formulation in the frame but time will tell how well it resists corrosion. The rust can get anyone though. Last year a coworker's '98 Chevy just up and cracked in half where the frame had rusted to paper-thin. He was lucky it didn't cause a wreck. I've had rust issues myself - an old F150 I drove in high school had the rear leaf shackle mounts rust clean off. That wasn't fun.
I was in the market for a midsize truck and after my research and personal experience this is what I can say The Tacoma is to me the most agressive truck it drives like a well a truck, and if you want Reliability, Off road ruggidness and the Amazing resale value go for the Tacoma The Ridgeline is the most Suv/Crossover truck, I hate to debate the "Its not a truck or It is a truck" so lets leave it there. When I test drove it it reminded me of my first vehicle "its a minivan" and it kinda drived like that, I also want to point out that if you like technology theres a hell of a lot in here. So if you want a more "Car/Suv/Crossover" driving experience with your truck and all the cool features then go for the Ridgeline. The Canyon Denali is how do I say this umm the most truckish but also kind of Suv like driving experience. Its like a mix of the Ridgeline and Tacoma, I wasnt really impressed with the "Denali" trim of the Canyon I expected more to be honest, It has everything you need if you just want a regular american truck. So if you
Somebody referred to the Ridgeline as a city truck. Sounds bout right to me. I do think it will sell and find a niche. But for me theirs others I'd rather have.
I mean you can use it on virtually all rural properties. It can't tow insane industrial shit and it can't climb rocks and steep inclines, but that doesn't mean it's all of sudden city focused. It's designed to handle the gross majority of rural/working truck related tasks. Do you think farmer joe is climbing mt everest to get his bags of chicken grain?
Yeah GM kinda screwed up with some of the decisions with the Colorado; hopefully the ZR2 makes up for the lack of offroadability on the out going models. The Tacoma looks nice; I almost bought one but went with a Colorado instead. I'm hoping that a good tune and lift will remove some gripes I have with my Colorado when I'm out exploring trails and shit.
My question is this: How long will it be until the mexico supplied & assembled pieces in the Chevy will begin to warp, crack, and rattle? How long till it will spring an oil leek? I've had 3 Chevy vehicles in my life and I am never buying another Chevy again. Call me biased, but I just dont trust the quality in the places where you cant see it.
These would sell so much more if they made the bed width inside the wheels wells 48". the Toyota bed is literally 47". They could easily make it 48" which allow people to load sheetrock and plywood and other lumber allowing it to lay flat in the bed...come on.
The rear drum brakes on Tacoma was kept to prevent sand etc getting to the rear brakes and rotors. If you get stuck in sand it's usually the rear that digs down and gets the rear brakes covered in sand which is bad for your rotors..
Ridgeline is and always will be the Swiss Army SUV. If you don't need to tow large things or go hardcore 4x4ing over rocks, but rather need to commute and handle home owner types of tasks, this is your SUV (with truck-like features).
Had a 2018 Tacoma 4wd, hated the way it drove; just felt so antiquated and unrefined. I sold it and got an awesome old T100 before having a chance to steal a Ridgeline for an amazing deal. Went for it as a "what the hell" because I thought I'd just resell it for a profit after a few months....aaannnd no way...I am not selling this truck. I fell in love. The torque transfer system AWD is amazing on the slopes, and going over Santiam pass during winter here in Oregon was just a breeze; that's saying something. Never considered the Ridgeline until serendipity put it in my lap and there's no way I'm giving it up. Best truck I've had in 25 years.
The Tacoma is superior BUT this third generation taco is coming out with a lot of problems like transmission,engine knocking, ELECRICAL problems , and brake problems ask me how I know lol
+fortis619 How do you know?... I actually own one and already had to take her back to the dealer, supposedly there was something wrong with the crankshaft sensor or something. One day I was driving all happy and blah blah when boom the truck turned off. Tried turning it back on and it did, but after a few seconds bam it turned off again. I was so confused that I just called in a tow truck afraid to make things worse or something. But yeah pretty dissapointed since my family has always been huge Taco fans. 3 Tacomas previous to this one and the newest was the only one to ever break down on the highway.
+Jesus Gomez how do I know ? Well I bought a TRD sport in June I've been to the dealership 2 times for transmission slippage , electric problems inside the cab , and driveline vibrations I think Toyota is going cheap, go on the forums a lot slot of people are having same problems
+Jesus Gomez my first gen taco wich I still own still runs like a champ even after 12 years with 200k miles on her, my second gen taco also ran like new with 105k miles till I sold her and bought my third gen ,
Yeah I've noticed that a lot on Tacoma World, I feel like I should have waited a few more years to pick up this new generation, waited till they fixed all the bugs that would possibly come with it.
Maybe the Colorado is superior then. Lol No problems with mine so far. Only had her since March though... so only around 5k miles so far... and only one 4500lb cross country tow with an enclosed utility trailer. Did get @15.1mpg on that trip using cruise at 65mph through rolling hills.
Well I just bought one 3 weeks ago. So for you people saying it's not a truck like people are used to, well chill out. Think about this, not all vehicles are for all people. This is America where we have the freedom to make our own decisions. The Ridgeline is not for everyone. Well neither is the Tundra, Tacoma, F150, Titan, Z71, Ram. Get the point? We all have different needs and uses. I work with several guys that have these other trucks I mentioned and the bed still looks new, no scratches or dents. They bought their Truck as you call it, simply because they have low testosterone. Spent several thousand dollars on lift kits, and big off road tires, and are afraid to take it in the mud or climb up a hill. I bought my Ridgeline RTL because of Comfort, Power, and Use. The trunk will hold my fishing tackle, life jacket, anchor, paddle for my kayak. Then load the kayak, strap it in the bed and put fishing rods in the cab. So I have a comfortable ride to and from the lake or work, haul what I need, good gas mileage, and a radio with a nob and buttons. Heated leather seats for those cool mornings. So who spent their money more wisely? I have owned a 79 Ford F100, 2000 F100, Nissan Frontiers , two of them, along with a couple of Nissan Pathfinders. I am not knocking any of these vehicles or any that anyone else has or has owned. This Ridgeline is, I feel the best for me and my needs, simply put.
As a former Tacoma owner I can't get on board with the new styling, it looks to funky. I've got to see I would probably go for the chevy with the 4cyl turbo diesel.
I'm thinking of getting a mid size truck, I love the Tacoma but they are hot stuff for arm robbery where I'm from. for a everyday use would you recommend the Colorado in terms of durability and quality? thanks guys. love the show
Sorry, Roman. The Nissan isn't "the most most car like", it's a car posing as a truck. Front wheel drive + higher suspension + 4X4 stickers, does not a truck make.
Chevy should bring back the El Camino. Then That Honda Ridgeline would have some competition in the car with a bed category! I find the Ridgeline is weird looking with the modern car front end and boxy bed, I would have to put a cap on it if I owned it.
I thought you would go with the Tacoma exclusively. Well, at least you were good about the Ridgeline. I have a first-generation Ridgeline. If the thing was totaled tomorrow I would buy another one without a second thought. Keep in mind, I wanted a Tacoma as a first choice, but the Ridgeline was what was the great used buy. There's a sidenote, it is funny that Ford's ad campaign in 1970 was, "it drives like a car…" Now Honda has achieved the goal, and is criticized for that very thing Ford saw as a positive. Hopefully this Ridgeline stays in production and people don't just dismiss it like the first generation run. I love mine, I thought the trunk was a gimmick, was critical of it, and now I wonder why more pickups don't have one.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
The Honda Ridgeline is the best choice for most people who want a Pick up Truck!
This impartial review supporting the Honda brought to you by "HondaPro Jason"
he really likes the ridgeline but just doesn't want to admit it LOL
loving the new Ridgeline and I own a Silverado. I just see how this is most the truck I would need! Way to be Honda and not just be like everyone else and go for what's "normal" that's why you are the company of dreams! You see it and go after it and 99% of the time are successful!
Clearly Honda is not going after truck buyers at all with the Ridgeline and that is OK. People will be trading in cars and crossovers for the Ridgeline. It will be just like what they are used to, except it can haul things. No one is going to buy it expecting to conquer Moab, but it will be very much at home in a driveway on a cul-de-sac. I am sure Honda knows exactly who they are selling it to.
TheRuler OfAll I believe I said just what you did. The Ridgeline is aimed at the casual truck user and is well suited for that. Not sure why you felt the need to insult me. Maybe you should be a little less eager to be offended.
+1guyin10 WOW!! I "clearly" clicked on the wrong name, my comment was for sum1 wayyyyy below you're name. Ima delete it, mybad....
No doubt! Perfect truck if you live in the 'burbs, have season tickets to your fav NFL team. It's a Pilot with tailgating toys....which is fine by me. My Pilot has never once been in the shop in the 5 years I've owned it.....great truck 👍
@@fasteddie617 a buddy of mine bought a new ridgeline because of his wife's pilot. Although I dislike both. Good vehicles just dont like them. He used to have gmc full size trucks.
bingo cul-de-sac Ridgeline
Ridgeline is the first choice of me dude.
So, the RIdgeline does 95% of what the Colorado and Tacoma do, but also has way more storage, a wider bed (wide enough for a jon boat or plywood), and drives much better.
You guys are so hung up on what to call it. Truck, car, SUV, some type of hybrid. Who cares? It is a vehicle that does more things well than any midsize truck on the market.
I greatly prefer the styling of the Colorado. But if you are that obsessed with the manliness of your car, you probably have some other more serious shortcomings as a man.
Haha my thoughts exactly.
Yea. I would really prefer the Ridgeline over any truck.
That's not true at all. at least where I'm from our trucks are used as trucks. we have extremely rugged roads, deep snow, deep mud, and if you need something moved you need to be able to do it yourself. I like the ridgeline, but it would never be realistic outside of the city. I own a 1/2 ton 4wd truck. I don't tow as often as some of my buddies, but when I do its usually upwards of 7500lbs. the bed is always full of junk, wood, tools, or trash.. (out here we actually have to take our trash to the dump). I use my 4wd a few times a week, these are the reasons I have a truck. I'd like to save gas and have a little honda civic, but I need a truck. I'd like to have a jeep, but I need a truck. and I think that's the case for a lot more Americans than just me. sure I think the ridgeline would be a cute car for my wife, but it would be a in addition to the fact I already own a real truck.
You are comparing the Ridgeline to your 1/2 full size truck, they are not in the same class. The Ridgeline is competing with the Colorado and Tacoma. If you need a full size truck, get a full size truck. If you need a mid-size truck, then it would be smart to consider the Ridgeline because it has so many advantages.
The Ridgeline's payload is 1584, which is only 40 pounds less than the body-on-frame competitors (one bag of mulch). But the Ridgeline has a much bigger bed and more storage (almost every quad cab Colorado/Tacoma I see is a short bed, which is shorter AND narrower). It also drives nicer, gets better gas mileage, and is likely more reliable.
What the Ridgeline does not do, is tow as much weight or have 4WD. If you have reason for those features (most people don't, but you do) then the Ridgeline is not for you.
But let's be honest here, how many midsize truck owners are towing over 5,000 pounds or going mudding? Hell, most FULL size truck owners could accomplish everything they need to in a minivan. I see Sierra Denalis rolling around here all the time, clean as a whistle, nothing in the bed, not a scratch on the bedliner.
+Nick C your right, there are some truck owners out there that really don't use there truck. I guess what I was getting at is if I were to trade my truck in for a mid size I'm sure I could get by with the tacoma. i could probably exceed it's capacity here and there on rural back roads and and it would be fine. 2nd choice I feel the colorado would be okay too, I just feel like the ridgeline really wouldn't hold up to abuse as well. irs (independent rear suspension) sucks for a truck and so does not having a transfer case. it's more in the class of that subaru baja that they only made for a couple years. I see it's usefulness in urban areas, but it's just not a truck in my eyes. you are right about it having adequate bed space, but I would be interested in seeing some durability tests. I am looking forward to seeing one of these ridgelines person.
The ridge line is growing on me. I love having the storage to keep whatever in the trunk, will tow my atv without any issue and perfect for hunting. I miss having a truck and am use to my tdi mileage so if I could have something to use camping, biking, hunting, 4 wheeling and room to throw everything in with out playing Tetris in the back. Gas mileage is great and perfect for the family. I think this is going to be big for Honda.
The RL has actually grown on me. I'd actually consider this when I'm looking for a new truck. Well done lol
same here
Toyota still hasn't changed that horrible seating position. Sat in one at a dealer and felt like an instant recipe for a backache. My 2008 F-150 with vinyl seats feels much more comfortable even though it's just a base work truck.
I like the new ridgeline. I don't need a "truck" but could use the functionality it offers
Getting tired of TFLT subtly bashing the ridgeline because it doesn't follow the archaic "manly" formula that trucks have stuck to for decades. A truck is a style of vehicle, with a cab and a bed, so the confusion they seem to suffer from as to whether or not it qualifies as a truck is ridiculous. Yes, they make positive remarks but continue to disregard it for not having a transfer case or brake controller, or off road model etc.
The Ridgeline offers many features one or more of the others don't have. Best in class fuel economy, widest bed, in bed trunk, dual action tailgate, heated steering, in bed audio, power sliding rear window with defrost, most comfortable and largest cabin, memory seats. Fact is, if I'm shopping for a truck for working on a job site, heavy hauling/towing, I'm going to look at a full size or something like the Taco. However, I, like I suspect many others, fall in the category of occasional hauling/towing, mostly city/highway driving (not offroading) and a winter capable vehicle, the ridgeline would be the best choice by far. People need to move past the "image" of what a truck should be and take advantage of the practicality a truck like the Ridgeline offers
Minivan with a bed.
@@patb9375 minivans have sliding doors. Try again.
If they could’ve designed it with a more accord like face instead of the odyssey it’d look a bit more rugged, flat faced, I wouldnt even consider any other truck. For the majority of people that buy trucks, this is the best one out there. The looks keep me weighing my options though...😔
@@dakotamise2625 check out the 2021!!!
Precisely. I have an Avalon, but I bought it before my needs changed. I like the idea of a pickup that makes a very comfortable vehicle for my daily commute and long road trips, yet can haul a small camper or lug some plywood home from the lumber yard (unlike many pickups, it can carry a sheet of plywood or drywall flat in the bed.
Love my Ridgeline........best truck I ever drove...
Dictionary says otherwise. You don't need to be able to go off-roading in the dunes for something to be a truck. It is more powerful then an SUV, it has a bed, it's bigger and wider then the Tacoma and Colorado plus extra storage in the bed.
Sounds like you are just stuck in your ways there little man.
I find it funny how so many people hate the previous and redesigned Ridgeline. I had a 2006 Ridgeline and it is funny how many people said to me that is not a real truck; however, once they had an opportunity to ride and drive it their opinions changed. The original Ridgeline was unique and the current Ridgeline is more truck-looking. If I needed a medium to heavy duty truck I would not look in the midsize market. I enjoyed my Ridgeline and am looking forward to seeing the new one in person. I believe the Ridgeline will check most boxes for many, but the fact that it is FWD and is not body-on-frame will make many not consider it a viable choice. In the end it is not going to work for everyone, but if given the chance it probably could work for many.
amen
Same thing happened with me i hate hondas for a long tine, but after driven a Honda civic type R ep3 jdm factory 220 ps this was a japanese domestic market one straight imported from japan with 9000 rpm redline it was the best car ive ever owned after that i start to like hondas theyre really the best car maker
I have a 2007 Ridgeline and that's been my experience too. I think people realize how great it is to have the "car" features along with the truck aspects. It's not perfect and it's not about being bad ass or manly, but damn it sure does kick ass for most applications a small truck is needed for and beyond!
can't wait to see your next video, so far I'm hooked on the ridgeline. I don't haul or tow but I want a truck, you made it very easy for me to choose. thanks roman.
This review is a bit biased against Ridgeline and favoring Colorado. Trucks of future will be unibody and fuel efficient without compromise on capability. I'm sold on torque vectoring. Good job Honda!
The ridgeline is literally a pilot with a truck bed
@@youngmoonyohnj1099 Nope: ruclips.net/video/PNAsXWnFtic/видео.html
The ridgeline fuel economy is marginally better than the competition. It's relatively not that impressive.
Roman! The point of this truck is that it's not a truck! Get the net! So when you want an f150 and your wife wants an explorer.....compromise. Let's face it, most people never ever ever ever tow or haul anything. Most suv's never go off road. At least with this, you could get away with 90% of what people need a truck for.....mulch from lowes. I wish it was a bit more aggressive looking (less wimpy) because it makes a lot of sense
I don't why you keep saying it is not a work truck. I have an 06 ridgeline I use to run my cabinet business and it is awesome I tow kitchens with it, carry all my tools and pick-up sheets of plywood. You never mentioned that it is the only midsize truck that has more than 48" in between the wheel wells (thus the only one that can carry sheets of plywood flat which is one of the things that makes a truck a truck). It seems you don't know how to consider a truck for work, with the trunk, bed and back seat the ridgeline has the most usable storage than any other midsize truck. Oh by the way I also go off-road with my ridgeline.
Nice minivan with a bed.
@@patb9375 minivans have sliding doors but thanks for playing.
Roman....your struggling to find things to hate about the RL aren't you? The tire....The volume knob???! The no-asst lift gate?! Bahahaha! After driving the other trucks, you nearly wet yourself in excitement as you open the door of the RL. Looks comfy huh?!
lol
You nailed it, dude!
Dude you work for the Honda company??? That Ridgeline looks and performs like shit
+Fara N No, I work for a golf company.
I wanna see the ridgline on an offroad test... cause I don't really see how the ridgeline wouldn't work for anything you need it to do.... other then offroading, if your towing more the 5k lbs you should really think of a full 3/4 ton with diesel most of the time, but for mid-size pickup its perfect
+Chris Rowlison Please stay tuned. We are editing a Ridgeline off-road video review just now.
+The Fast Lane Truck please edit out any drivel commentary!
More than 5,000 lbs need a 3/4 ton? Heck no my friend, a 1/2 ton can do that no problem!!
I was referring to more than 5k lb load on a regular basis... when you could the size of the trailer... always safer to not have your trailer not be able to steer you and pull you around too much
+Chris Rowlison yup, I couldn't agree with more. I checked out all 3 of these today and also the Frontier and the RL is by far the nicest. Overall fit and finish, general maintenance seems pretty easy and ride and handling for everyday use is awesome. I will definitely buy myself a RL. Only reason to buy a Tacoma if I was into off roading which I am not.
Yoda TRD! May the taco be with you.
Colorado/Canyon takes the cake for me. Especially the diesel. Love my '08 Canyon.
how many people actually buy a brand new truck to go off roading ?
i would, the purpose of a trd, and it would be under warranty
That's the real test of a off road worthy truck.
Hardly any. Same can be said with towing or hauling.
Almost non they mostly but the bells and whistles to drink a beer in thier driveways and brag to their neighbor about what thier truck can do but never use it for what it’s built for lol
I bought my TRD off-road brand new last year and within a week it was off road on the trails but I can see where people might be hesitant too.
Honestly, for most people I think the ridge line would be the best option. Most people don't tow, or go offroading. the Ridgeline can do both of those relatively well, but I think it stands out as a truck that can truly be used as a car. I personally think I like the Tacoma the best, but if I were looking for a daily driver to not off-road in, I'd pick the Honda or Chevy. Honda and Toyota are also well known to be the most dependable vehicles on the road.
Starting to love the honda, i can see the black edition with better off road tires and i think this will be a capable truck that 80% of the casual off roadies could definitely accomplish. 👌 I enjoy how comfortable and convenient the honda is.
I grew up with light, high revving, high performance honda coupes. Currently I drive a '06 Ridgeline that was handed down to me from my father. I don't call it a truck. The Ridgeline is a spacious car with more torque and clearance. If you're not pulling or hauling very heavy things, the Ridgeline has a good balance of handling and comfort of all medium sized suvs/trucks. Instead of big knobby tires, I plan to go with larger and lighter rims with sportier tires.
The new Ridgeline is the practical choice for 90%+ of midsize truck buyers. Only a tiny % of people actually will push their midsize trucks beyond the offroad or towing capabilities of the Honda. But what Honda forgot is that most people buy trucks to compensate for their small willies. They made a practical vehicle for the most impractical audience.
Damn! I couldn't agree more with you!
+yogiyoda uh no try again
I just with they'd fix the front end. uni body doesn't bother me if I'm getting cool features and decent capability along with best in class fuel. front end is ugly on a truck though.
Sir, you are one smart individual, kudos. I can't agree more.
+larry Spiller
Even the front end sacrifices tradition for practicality. It's shorter and sloped to allow for greater fuel efficiency and visibility from the drivers seat. Also, the shorter front allows for a larger cab and truck bed for the same wheelbase. People fall in love with Honda's from the driver's seat not from the outside.
the poor Nissan fronter wasn't even invited
screw it
it wasbecause it want recently refreshed cough cough Nissan bastards cough cough
Dude i was just going to comment on whether they even made a new frontier lol. Nowhere to be seen, though it kind of sucks, because it's not too terrible of a truck, just needs a major refresh.
Bingo Alpha Exactly. The truck was great, but it's outdated. Needs a big refresh like the Taco and Ridgeline got.
When they refresh the truck from looking like it's 2004 then they'll be allowed to play.
I had the 1st gen Ridgeline. It was a great city truck. AWD made is a great wintertime driver. I could load bags of mulch, tow a bass boat, and carry people in comfort. Enuff said.
I'm not sure if you've ever noticed but the reason that the seating position is odd is because the body is intentionally tucked up to keep the rockers away from the ground. Its an odd compromise, but it sure is nice to have off road.
This was actually a good review. You are right in that it depends on what you are trying to achieve. I recently transferred from an Accord to a truck (2016 Colorado) cause I was looking for that introductory truck that would give give me the best of all worlds (commute, towing, off-road). If Ridgeline was available, I might have chosen that since it was closer to a car - but I think Colorado offers more for my Renaissance personality. Great job!
It'll sell great....it's a family based midsize suv with a bed. Bigger back seat for those insanely huge kids seats.
Well, I like all three, & and a few more, but I bought Ridgeline. It’s a matter of needs & price! I’m happy with my choice, hope the rest of you are just as happy!
If your looking for a "mans truck" you are going full size especially when you see how much more you get for your money. If your looking for a versatile truck for recreation and weekend jobs any of these will work. The Honda would be a great choice if you can only have a truck and no second car. Most of my peers would take the Honda because it is more than livable all the time, BUT if someone could do what Honda did AND make it look good, that would be the real winner. Looks definitely go to the Chevy and Toyota. By the way Roman, you were pretty impressed with the off road ability of the Honda Pilot which this truck is based off of.
Does that Chevy have a Briggs and Stratton motor? Sounded like it.
+Troy Strain
No the 3.6L its a good engine, but I would be happier driving with it in a Cadillac ATS or Camaro.
@@jeffk464 the gm 3.6 is a great motor actually. I dont have any first hand experience but the numbers are impressive and reviews favorable. Also some of the new Cadillac sedans look really nice.
Coming from a full size truck, the Honda Ridgeline fits me best. I don't fit in the Toyota very well as I felt like I was sat on the floor but my head was touching the roof. The Chevy feels tight but the seating position was better. I liked the Tacoma interior quality but I got a very strong sence of 'Pontiac Grand Am' while sat in the Colorado. Very cheap? I'm sure both are fine trucks but just not for me. The Honda Ridgeline feels as large inside as my full size truck but rides like our minivan. I don't 'off road' so the AWD is just for getting up my driveway in winter, I need 4 doors and a truck bed to occasionally haul lumber, a quad and maybe some tools or other crap. The Ridgeline is truck enough for 95% of the people out there and it's perfect for my needs now.
Just bought a ridgeline, love when people hate on it until they actually ride in it and drive it. Also if you are on a flat enough highway for the cylinder deactivation to do its magic, you can get 7.8L/100km (30 mpg)!
Honda; HANDS DOWN!
Saying that the Ridgeline is not a truck because it is too quiet, too sophisticated, bla, bla, bla, it is like saying that a girl is not a girl because she is not that complicated
I test drove all of these except Ridgeline as it is not out yet. I test drove F150, and Tundra. I did not consider Ram or Silverado after horrific IIHS crash test safety rating.
From full size I liked F150 the most but it was a bit too big for my needs. I did not like Tacoma seating position or ride, and engine seemed to be hunting for gears. Colorado rides better but GM quality is questionable (I used to own GM vehicles and had bad experience with them), and rear seat does not have sufficient space.
A friend owns 1st Generation Ridgeline and I test drove it and it was great. Rides like a car, maneuverable, quiet, yet is able to tow and carry a load of 1500 pounds. My friend REALLY abused that Ridgeline (2010) loading it up to over capacity, towing 5500 pounds+ for years. He has 190k+ miles on the clock and nothing but regular maintenance. Rear seat was the best in class.
i have to see the 2nd Generation Ridgeline in person, but I am 90% sold on this vehicle and will likely buy one this summer. I also own two other Honda's (Odyssey and Accord both 2009) and nothing but regular maintenance (with the exception of Odyssey needing at $80k miles 1 new engine mount/regular not active, and right CV axle replacement).
I also want to buy Gen 2 Ridgeline with the 6-speed auto they will come in before Honda starts putting 10 speed auto (likely next year) in their cars (stupid CAFE/fuel economy b.s.). I think anything over 6 speed is b.s. (ok, perhaps 8 speed auto is kind of acceptable but I still believe unnecessary) and more gears in a small tranny housings will lead to more problems in the future (not just with Honda but with all).
Honda has a good diesel engine they sell in Europe and can be modified for Truck use. So does Toyota. RAM has already "imported" a very reliable JTD Fiat diesel engine and placed it in RAM trucks. Diesels are ideal for midsize trucks and GM putting Duramax in Canyon was a good move.
Our kids are grown and we are now a one car/truck family. As soon as my wife sat in the Ridgeline, I knew I could forget the others.
We are 85% on road and that thing may as well be a Lexus, so I;m OK with it.
Thanks for another great mashup boys.
Tacoma is the only one with a manual transmission option. That's all I need to know.
Colorado has a diesel with a manual.
+Tungsten23 yup 👍
why is everyone so pissed over Honda having a touch capacitive volume control on the stereo instead of a knob? Its not hard to use and if you don't like it use the steering wheel controls.
You can feel and use a volume knob while driving without taking your eyes off the road. You can't do the same with a touch-sensitive control unless you have steering wheel controls which costs extra. There is no feedback with the touch control so you do not know if you are controlling the volume unless you hear it getting louder or lower. You an easily accidentally push a different touch sensitive control (change station, gps, etc.) when trying to adjust the volume.
Correct me if I am wrong. But if you get a base model you get the stereo that has a knob. if you get a higher model it has the all touch and steering wheel controls. I'm fairly certain, steering wheel controls are standard on all Honda models at least for 2016. Anyway I have no issues using the touch capacitive volume control in our HRV and any of the test drive videos I see of people complaining about it there is steering wheel controls. If you want the knob get the base mode!
The volume snobs have done away with the volume knobs, in favor of touch buttons and graphical sliders.
I say "Why mess with a good thing." However, apparently, the analog knob has been deemed too old school of a technology. No longer will the protruding mushroom violate the clean plastic lines of the center console.
The real question is: Can you operate the touch controls with (Isotoner)gloves on?
Also for those saying it's another Honda with a truck style on it you are wrong! it's has 50% of its own components that no other Honda has!
if i already had a workhorse truck i could see myself picking up a RL rather than a car.
+morfeeis W You get the point, RL is a car, a pick-up and a SUV. A little bit of everything.
Roman, I agree with that seating position. It is actually really uncomfortable. I am 6'4" and can't stand it, the same for Tundra.
Colorado sounds like my leaf blower
+kyle reese the only reason I arrowed down into the comments was to see if I was the only one thinking that
Nice video Roman!
The new Colorado & Tacoma are missing the driver side A-pillar handles. One of my favorite features on my 2014 Tacoma. I use it every time I get in/out.
Roman, braking performance and braking durability are real measurable things that benefit the consumer, not whether they are disks, drums, air, or other wise. Toyota engineers prioritize what works above what journalists want to see. Keep in mind that the Tacoma stops faster than the Colorado, even given it's 4 wheel disk brakes. I can assure you that cutting cost was not their intention. There is actually a costly upgrade to the drum brakes themselves and the entire braking system on the new Tacoma. It's really not fair to viewers who don't know this to dog on the Tacoma for drum brakes. So next time, please make mention of why Toyota uses them. Thanks man. Otherwise, excellent review and I agree with your assessment about these 2 trucks and one "car with a bed on the back".
Tacoma is king. My 2007 has 225,000km, and have only had to change fluids and filters. Not a single component has failed. Amazing!!
ikr, that's Toyota..!! king of reliability.
Anyone else think the rear portion especially the tail lights of the ridge line looks like a RAM?
YES.
my first thought exactly
At first, I thought it was a ram in the back
Looks good, just wish they got rid of that ugly front...
IF GM makes the Colorado 2.8 duramax diesel with the ZR2 model coming out next year it will be the king of offroad ability.
Don't forget about the 2017 TRD Pro Tacoma...
Meh, diesels are heavy. Also, I don't understand who takes an expensive new truck offroad...
+leadnsteel will it come equipped with that beautiful low hanging airdam?
+guy proulx no the ZR 2 will not have the air dam. It way to take off anyway.
Unlike the Taco's at least the front air dam won't rust.
www.reuters.com/article/us-toyota-settlement-idUSKBN1370PE
my money is on the tacoma, and so I bought one a month ago, it's just a real truck for work and play off road.
Tacoma all the way. Were you testing the 2017 models?
can you guys do a 2016 tacoma sr5 4x4 review offroad or gold mine hill, to see how a non-locker and non-crawl control truck does off road?
Why does no one use the TRD Off Road for Tacoma reviews? It's THE package.
Nothing compares to it.
Because no one wants stickers on their truck that sound out the word turd.
What is that Civic doing there at 12:29 lol?
Question gentleman, any reason why the Frontier hasn't even seemed to have peeked it's head in the midsize segment? I'm curious to know if it got scared of these other ones and just decided to stay in the shadows.
got to have the Tacoma
it is so up with the seating position because under all the panels and such the truck has the same skeleton. the cabin is exactly of the previous generation. I had the truck and I can guarantee you that. if they did build it from scratch they would have addressed it
It's the 21st century's answer to the El Camino, but for a lot of people that's exactly what they need. I'll probably end up buying the Tacoma though.
Assuming that you're someone who doesn't need to tow anything, having a truck is great when you need the ability to haul something that you either wouldn't want to throw in the back of an an SUV...or something that is too tall / long. But is having that ability worth the trade-offs of owning a truck which are typically lower fuel economy, limited (or uncomfortable) passenger space, and a truck-like ride? For some people it clearly is but for a lot of folks it isn't. I think that's probably why out of all the families that I know, I'd say less than half own a pickup truck. They either drive two sedans or a sedan and an SUV / van. Plus if you buy a truck and you want to securely store items you either get a locking tonneau cover (the fiberglass ones are a pain to remove) or you get a truck with in bed storage solutions like an Avalanche (which is no longer manufactured) or a Ram with the RamBox which is what I personally own. With every vehicle you have compromises and trade-offs...so what's the big deal? It sounds like the Ridgeline will fit the needs of a lot of drivers and if it makes sense for certain people then why wouldn't they purchase it? All of the commenters thumping their chests and moaning about how this isn't a "real" truck sound like a bunch of insecure adolescents with inflated egos.
I respect those people that want trucks for hauling trailers and "off-roading", but I'm more interested in a small 4 cylinder truck with decent gas mileage, light duty freight hauling (500 lbs or less) and something that rides nicely on a long highway drive. The old late 90s Tacomas were really good in this arena. I hope that these new ones are as durable and that the 4cyl versions get decent mileage. The Honda is way out of my price range and I have trust issues with GM products.
No real mention of the Duramax for the Colorado. Okay.
Add $4000.00 for that useless option on a small truck.
You guys should do a more fair comparison of the Ridgeline, El Camino and Ranchero?
My 76 year old step mom loves her 2017 Ridgeline! (Serious)
you failed to mention that the Tacoma has the option of a manual with the v6 models while the Colorado can only have a manual with the 4cyl.
Which is a misleading statement as he doesn't point out that the Colorado only has a manual option with the 4cyl engine
nope, just thought I'd mention it because someone might want to know
that's what I would do
Toyota is the best. That's why I'm buying a Tacoma TRD PRO. Nothing beats the reliability and quality of Toyota vehicles.
Roman, you do know the previous Ridgeline's were AWD, just like the new one is, but 99% of the time the front wheels did the work until they started to spin and it would engage the rear tires.
Can you put any of those trucks in Low Range?
Wonder if it will be another rusted frame replacement Taco model?
But if it does rust, Toyota will throw their supplier under the bus as its not Toyotas fault for not checking quality of their suppliers.
+jak p (skiguy09) Toyota has had issues with rust including rusted and replacing frames for years I have friends in line waiting to have the frames replaced on their Tacomas just amazes me they keep manufacturing truck that turn to rust and can spend millions replacing ??
+Spark Jumper They're hit and miss, even up here in the salt states. Mine is going on ten years of winter salt exposure and it doesn't have much of anything in the way of rust under there. Yet I've seen other Tacomas two or three years newer with big ol' holes in the box section under the cab and no paint left anywhere on the frame. The '16 Taco has a different steel formulation in the frame but time will tell how well it resists corrosion.
The rust can get anyone though. Last year a coworker's '98 Chevy just up and cracked in half where the frame had rusted to paper-thin. He was lucky it didn't cause a wreck. I've had rust issues myself - an old F150 I drove in high school had the rear leaf shackle mounts rust clean off. That wasn't fun.
I was in the market for a midsize truck and after my research and personal experience this is what I can say
The Tacoma is to me the most agressive truck it drives like a well a truck, and if you want Reliability, Off road ruggidness and the Amazing resale value go for the Tacoma
The Ridgeline is the most Suv/Crossover truck, I hate to debate the "Its not a truck or It is a truck" so lets leave it there. When I test drove it it reminded me of my first vehicle "its a minivan" and it kinda drived like that, I also want to point out that if you like technology theres a hell of a lot in here. So if you want a more "Car/Suv/Crossover" driving experience with your truck and all the cool features then go for the Ridgeline.
The Canyon Denali is how do I say this umm the most truckish but also kind of Suv like driving experience. Its like a mix of the Ridgeline and Tacoma, I wasnt really impressed with the "Denali" trim of the Canyon I expected more to be honest, It has everything you need if you just want a regular american truck. So if you
Sorry, but I'll take the Taco
Listen to the way the Shitrolet sounds. Sounds amazing doesn't it?
Somebody referred to the Ridgeline as a city truck. Sounds bout right to me. I do think it will sell and find a niche. But for me theirs others I'd rather have.
I mean you can use it on virtually all rural properties. It can't tow insane industrial shit and it can't climb rocks and steep inclines, but that doesn't mean it's all of sudden city focused. It's designed to handle the gross majority of rural/working truck related tasks.
Do you think farmer joe is climbing mt everest to get his bags of chicken grain?
the chevy looks cheese,tacoma looks macho,the ridgeline slick
No it just looks gay
can you do a Honda encore vs. Chrysler Pacifica vs. Chrysler Town & Country
@tfltruck when will the off road test for the ridgeline come out? Do you have it in Colorado? Is it in the works???
FOUND IT!
Its a Subaru Baja. A total of 30k were sold over 4 years.
Yeah GM kinda screwed up with some of the decisions with the Colorado; hopefully the ZR2 makes up for the lack of offroadability on the out going models. The Tacoma looks nice; I almost bought one but went with a Colorado instead. I'm hoping that a good tune and lift will remove some gripes I have with my Colorado when I'm out exploring trails and shit.
The Honda had the best sounding engine
Totally agreed. Ridgeline is the boss of each truck.
My question is this: How long will it be until the mexico supplied & assembled pieces in the Chevy will begin to warp, crack, and rattle? How long till it will spring an oil leek? I've had 3 Chevy vehicles in my life and I am never buying another Chevy again. Call me biased, but I just dont trust the quality in the places where you cant see it.
TFL Truck: Did Honda say when the Ridgeline would be available to purchase? I've heard late June, September and I've heard Memorial Day weekend.
These would sell so much more if they made the bed width inside the wheels wells 48". the Toyota bed is literally 47". They could easily make it 48" which allow people to load sheetrock and plywood and other lumber allowing it to lay flat in the bed...come on.
whats that old sesame street song, one isn't like the others?
My dad Has A 1998 Trd Sport Tacoma And it has No single Problem
The rear drum brakes on Tacoma was kept to prevent sand etc getting to the rear brakes and rotors. If you get stuck in sand it's usually the rear that digs down and gets the rear brakes covered in sand which is bad for your rotors..
Ridgeline is and always will be the Swiss Army SUV. If you don't need to tow large things or go hardcore 4x4ing over rocks, but rather need to commute and handle home owner types of tasks, this is your SUV (with truck-like features).
Had a 2018 Tacoma 4wd, hated the way it drove; just felt so antiquated and unrefined. I sold it and got an awesome old T100 before having a chance to steal a Ridgeline for an amazing deal. Went for it as a "what the hell" because I thought I'd just resell it for a profit after a few months....aaannnd no way...I am not selling this truck. I fell in love.
The torque transfer system AWD is amazing on the slopes, and going over Santiam pass during winter here in Oregon was just a breeze; that's saying something.
Never considered the Ridgeline until serendipity put it in my lap and there's no way I'm giving it up. Best truck I've had in 25 years.
The best option for Colorado is the Diesel engine version.. That is the real deal when it comes to a great balance of power and fuel efficiency. IMO.
I have had a diesel pick up truck, and it is not that expensive... Well, at least where I live...
The Tacoma is superior BUT this third generation taco is coming out with a lot of problems like transmission,engine knocking, ELECRICAL problems , and brake problems ask me how I know lol
+fortis619 How do you know?... I actually own one and already had to take her back to the dealer, supposedly there was something wrong with the crankshaft sensor or something. One day I was driving all happy and blah blah when boom the truck turned off. Tried turning it back on and it did, but after a few seconds bam it turned off again. I was so confused that I just called in a tow truck afraid to make things worse or something. But yeah pretty dissapointed since my family has always been huge Taco fans. 3 Tacomas previous to this one and the newest was the only one to ever break down on the highway.
+Jesus Gomez how do I know ? Well I bought a TRD sport in June I've been to the dealership 2 times for transmission slippage , electric problems inside the cab , and driveline vibrations I think Toyota is going cheap, go on the forums a lot slot of people are having same problems
+Jesus Gomez my first gen taco wich I still own still runs like a champ even after 12 years with 200k miles on her, my second gen taco also ran like new with 105k miles till I sold her and bought my third gen ,
Yeah I've noticed that a lot on Tacoma World, I feel like I should have waited a few more years to pick up this new generation, waited till they fixed all the bugs that would possibly come with it.
Maybe the Colorado is superior then. Lol No problems with mine so far. Only had her since March though... so only around 5k miles so far... and only one 4500lb cross country tow with an enclosed utility trailer. Did get @15.1mpg on that trip using cruise at 65mph through rolling hills.
Great job as always guys! Very detailed review - thank you.
take them off road. TOYOTA FTW!
Well I just bought one 3 weeks ago. So for you people saying it's not a truck like people are used to, well chill out. Think about this, not all vehicles are for all people. This is America where we have the freedom to make our own decisions. The Ridgeline is not for everyone. Well neither is the Tundra, Tacoma, F150, Titan, Z71, Ram. Get the point? We all have different needs and uses. I work with several guys that have these other trucks I mentioned and the bed still looks new, no scratches or dents. They bought their Truck as you call it, simply because they have low testosterone. Spent several thousand dollars on lift kits, and big off road tires, and are afraid to take it in the mud or climb up a hill. I bought my Ridgeline RTL because of Comfort, Power, and Use. The trunk will hold my fishing tackle, life jacket, anchor, paddle for my kayak. Then load the kayak, strap it in the bed and put fishing rods in the cab. So I have a comfortable ride to and from the lake or work, haul what I need, good gas mileage, and a radio with a nob and buttons. Heated leather seats for those cool mornings. So who spent their money more wisely? I have owned a 79 Ford F100, 2000 F100, Nissan Frontiers , two of them, along with a couple of Nissan Pathfinders. I am not knocking any of these vehicles or any that anyone else has or has owned. This Ridgeline is, I feel the best for me and my needs, simply put.
As a former Tacoma owner I can't get on board with the new styling, it looks to funky. I've got to see I would probably go for the chevy with the 4cyl turbo diesel.
+Jeff K
got to say
I'm thinking of getting a mid size truck, I love the Tacoma but they are hot stuff for arm robbery where I'm from. for a everyday use would you recommend the Colorado in terms of durability and quality? thanks guys. love the show
Keep Shopping for a Tacoma I was able to get my 2017 TRD offroad for 32k
thanks for the video. you guys put together great comparisons. keep up the good work!
Sorry, Roman. The Nissan isn't "the most most car like", it's a car posing as a truck. Front wheel drive + higher suspension + 4X4 stickers, does not a truck make.
Chevy should bring back the El Camino. Then That Honda Ridgeline would have some competition in the car with a bed category! I find the Ridgeline is weird looking with the modern car front end and boxy bed, I would have to put a cap on it if I owned it.
But the ridgeline isn't the most fuel efficient? the diesel colorado/canyon is.
+headcas620 Among V6 trucks, it is.
+headcas620 Compare gas engine with diesel?
I thought you would go with the Tacoma exclusively. Well, at least you were good about the Ridgeline. I have a first-generation Ridgeline. If the thing was totaled tomorrow I would buy another one without a second thought. Keep in mind, I wanted a Tacoma as a first choice, but the Ridgeline was what was the great used buy. There's a sidenote, it is funny that Ford's ad campaign in 1970 was, "it drives like a car…" Now Honda has achieved the goal, and is criticized for that very thing Ford saw as a positive. Hopefully this Ridgeline stays in production and people don't just dismiss it like the first generation run. I love mine, I thought the trunk was a gimmick, was critical of it, and now I wonder why more pickups don't have one.