RTX 4060 Ti 16gb vs RTX 4060 Ti 8gb - Watch This Before Buy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2024
- Nvidia RTX 4060 Ti 16gb vs Nvidia rtx 4060 ti 8gb - test at 1440p and 4k maximum settings with ray tracing and dlss. Being a dual-slot card, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws power from 1x 16-pin power connector, with power draw rated at 165 W maximum. Display outputs include: 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is connected to the rest of the system using a PCI-Express 4.0 x8 interface. The card's dimensions are 240 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm, and it features a dual-slot cooling solution. Its price at launch was 499 US Dollars.
-
00:00 Cyberpunk 2077 1440p
00:25 Cyberpunk 2077 4k
00:51 Diablo 4 1440p
01:16 Diablo 4 4k
01:40 Hogwards Legacy 1440p
02:08 Hogwards Legacy 4k
02:34 Horizon Zero Dawn 1440p
02:58 Horizon Zero Dawn 4k
03:25 MSFS 2020 1440p
03:51 MSFS 2020 4k
04:20 RDR 2 1440p
04:50 RDR 2 4k
05:12 Witcher 3 1440p
05:40 Witcher 3 4k
06:01 Watch Dogs Legion 1440p
06:25 Watch Dogs Legion 4k
-
PC Specs :
► CPU: i9 13900K - amzn.to/45tbeDh
► COLER: Arctic Freezer 420MM - amzn.to/37JX1Fu
► MOBO: ASUS ROG STRIX Z 690 - amzn.to/3DalVP0
► RAM: DDR5 2 x 16 GB - amzn.to/3s7r1VE
► NVME: Samsung 970 evo - amzn.to/35Br2FH
► PSU: Cooler Master V850 - amzn.to/3Wt8G3I
-
Facebook - / benchmark.lab
Twitter - / murloclab
If you want to Help the channel or offer your idea for the test - www.donationalerts.com/r/benc...
On advertising please contact : benchmark.lab@protonmail.com 
Игры
Basically only useful at 4K for the games you tested, and then not by huge margins in all of them, about 10FPS.
Looks like none of them really used more than 12GB, either. I think The Last of Us and Resident Evil 4 are a little more VRAM hungry. But it's not very many games that use more than 8GB VRAM at 1440p, it looks like... And even then a 12GB card can handle most of those. Hmm.
The base 4060 Ti should be less than $400, IMO, and the 16GB variant should be way way less than $500. But eh. Not a great time to buy a new card in general right now. If you don't need NVidia's features specifically, AMD looks like a better price/perf option for new cards. There are also so many used last-gen cards that last-gen NVidia or AMD used are pretty strong deals compared to this stuff... Power draw is higher though.
That's the only reason I'm still interested in this card is power efficiency + future proofing. Not worth $500 to me when I can get a 2080 used for like $220 on eBay and just get on with my life, lower settings here and there as needed... I'm not gaming at 4K!!! Heck, I don't play the latest AAA generally speaking either. I don't really need that much VRAM, and I certainly won't spend $500 for it. I might get a 3060 for the 12GB VRAM just for some future-proofing though. (~$250 used on eBay). Even though its baseline performance is worse than the 2080 and uses similar amounts of power... Hmmmmmm.
Gotta compromise somewhere if you're not going to waste $200-300 extra by going with the latest-gen NVidia parts new right now.
Not even there. The 8gb 4060 ti is enough for 4k, the 16 is for the job. And those people on Twitter who follow the trends.
My nephew has been playing in 4k since the 4060ti came out and he has no substantial drops (like 57 frames min).
How stupid are people (12 gb for games? pfft. AMD's market is the apus, not the pc. No game needs 12 gb, not even 10. There are cards with 6 that continue to work well up to 4k removing shadows).
The problem are those lazy launched(and yeah with amd support. FK marketing) for save some bucks and spend more in marketing.
Take a closer look on lows. It's more than 10fps difference, or maybe I should say more than 50% gain with 16GB in lows at 4K ? Sounds different ?
ine one game there 16gb was 60 fps, when 8gb 35 fps@@rio-dq9sc
4070ti and 4070 should have been 16gb. 4060ti and 4060 should have been 12gb.
@@H3TOXYyes ..
@@H3TOXYur stupid if you think that the 4060 Ti and 4060 shouldnt have 12 gb
@@H3TOXYyes
@@H3TOXYwhy not?
Agree, but we maybe getting 40 series super's? if we do they mostly all have extra vram such a mess this launch those that can wait prob best wait for the 5000 series tbh
Basically the additional 8GB would be great for 4k but the card is simply not made for that resolution in most games... so buying one is wasted money. Rather save your money until you can either get a 4070 or go with a last-gen GPU that can match the 4070 in terms of performance.
I heard of a NEW gpu company Amd or something like that.
"but its not made for that resolutioN" thats where DLSS comes in. And Im not talking about FG.
@@terraincognitagamingWhy not FG? i think FG will make 4060ti 16gb compatible for 4k
1080p with RAY/PATH TRACING NEEDS MORE THAN 12GB VRAM
Think of it like this: The 4060 Ti 8GB has a somewhat decent engine, but a very small fuel tank. It can never really stretch its legs until it runs out of gas. The 4060 Ti 16GB has a bigger fuel tank, but its only "somewhat decent" engine just can't overcome those limitations. You can hit your top speed a bit longer, but the top speed ultimately isn't much higher. The issue with the 4060 Ti was never really the VRAM, but the underpowered GPU which relies on AI trickery.
As a 1080p card it offers good performance, but it's priced too high. As a 1440p card it's still priced to high and starts to struggle here or there. And as a 4K card it only works when the settings are lowered, RT is off and DLSS3 can make up the difference.
yeah, you have summarized it very well. There should've been 16gigs 4070
actually most of the issue is VRAM AMOUNT + BANDWIDTH the engine itself is pretty decent... but the "fuel pipe" is too small (to keep your engine analogy) and yes the fuel tank is better now that it doubled in size but the speed you can get the fuel to the engine with is too limited still... it helps in some cases (heavy VRAM using games) but the bandwidth is still too limited should have been 192bit wide...
@@LiLBitsDK exactly why is this 4060 series of card garbage? Because 128bit .....nvidia kill this popular low end tier because as every corporate they need more money so they move from xx60 to xx70 series ....
The low bandwith is killing this card. 8Gb or 16 Gb doesn't matter if there is no flowthrough! You can make a 32Gb card, but with those lanes it wouldn't make a notable difference.
@@MuZeSiCk77 32Gb? why would they make a 4GB card? 8GB is too little already in newer games even at 1080p
So basically 8gb more vram gave some overall stability (less throttling and tearing) and 5-10 fps boost comparatively.
100 more $$$ for same fps at 1440p lol thx NVIDIA
vram is for rendering in various apps, from videos to ai art in stable diffussion and other work related tasks. also its pretty capable in 4k 60 fps in most titles except cyperbug, last of us and maybe hogwarts, that can be solved with dlss and frame gen, and since it has 16gb vram it will utilize it way better and give more fps than 4070 would give since it runs out of vram at 4k in those titles. yeah price sucks for sure, but its decent gpu even for 4k and job.
@@NostalgicMem0ries no its 128 bit bus it will lose to even 3060 ti, the 16gb ram will not do much.
@@arunachalpradesh399 , if you WORK with Unreal Engine (no play games), VRAM is never enought. If GPU is slow, just wait. If you have no VRAM, UE5 crash =) . So, 4060 16GB is very welcomed for a professionals.
@@cecofuli professional ? 128 bit bus with 400-500$ ? which is originally 4060?. switch to unity, it can run even on 1050 ti . or just buy used 3090 , 16gb with 128 bit bus is not worth for me, being newer architecture, you can run stable diffusion but it will be slower, for proressional just buy used 3090 with the same price as 4060ti with double performance.
@@arunachalpradesh399 , I understood that you never worked in Unreal Editor 5. The most important thing is CPU speed and RAM. 128 bit or 512bit doesn't change a lot in Blender, UE5, VRay, Twinmotions, Lumion etc... 4060ti has similar score to 2080 professional applications, with 16GB VRAM and DLSS3 (yes, you can use DLSS3 in UE5 and it is amazing to work with double frame rate). 3090 has not DLSS 3. In VRay, 3090 is 2.5 faster, sure. But it cost 4 times. In office we have 5 workstation. So, I cannot spend 10.000 euros in a GPU, sorry. 5x4060ti 16GB is a perfect balance for me. I would like to pay 350/400 euros for this 4060 16GB. But it is what it is
This generation is a complete joke. The 16gb version costs as much as a 6800 XT in sweden. The only card worth getting is 4090 if you shit gold.
you know the rtx 4060 16GB isn't released yet
You should do a voice over summary at the end of your video, giving your perspective on things.
Its nice to let the "Numbers do the talking".. but I'd like a short blurb at the end, on what we as viewers
might should focus on etc..
It's crazy how they gave it either the vram of 1080p or the vram of 4k for 100 bucks difference when it's a 1440p card
Well, you can't get 12gb without either cutting the bus or increasing it. I am not even sure if the chip supports a 192 or 160 bit bus, and cutting it down more would be god awful. There's no room to cut the bus for a card like that.
@@nonononono4068 i think the point is for the price the bus width should have been slightly higher making a 4060ti 12gb, and have 1 product which would perform slightly better across the board instead of 2 weirdly placed products where hardly anyone running a 4k monitor would want the performance of a 4060ti 16gb and the 8gb is 🤷♂️🤷♂️ at the best case compared to other options. Like even the 4060 is pretty much the same performance as the ti at least vs $ value.
its a 4k card. no game on 1440p uses 12+ gb of ram. the ti8gb is a 1080p/1440 card, the 16g is a 4k card, but you wont see a frame over 60 stable at 4k
@@schizofennec there defs are games out there rn that use around 12gb on high textures @1440 like tarkov for example ik its not the most optimised game but its extremely popular. And 🤷♂️ probably won't get much more optimisation anyway lmao
@@nonononono4068technically there are 24gbit and 32gbit modules on the market, but you can't find information online yet. The wx6800 uses 32gbit modules(4GB per module)
Even with 128 bit bus 16GB VRAM is helpful, waiting one more year to see 8GB cards crying with stutters like what happened with 4~6GB cards.
nice
would be interesting if we had the 4070 beside this with its 12 GB VRAM so we would see less VRAM but more power in camparison to find the sweet spot.
Thanks for the Video.
16 GB are useful for Productivity
00:00 Cyberpunk 2077 1440p
00:25 Cyberpunk 2077 4k
00:51 Diablo 4 1440p
01:16 Diablo 4 4k
01:40 Hogwards Legacy 1440p
02:08 Hogwards Legacy 4k
02:34 Horizon Zero Dawn 1440p
02:58 Horizon Zero Dawn 4k
03:25 MSFS 2020 1440p
03:51 MSFS 2020 4k
04:20 RDR 2 1440p
04:50 RDR 2 4k
05:12 Witcher 3 1440p
05:40 Witcher 3 4k
06:01 Watch Dogs Legion 1440p
06:25 Watch Dogs Legion 4k
How did you get a 16gb again...
At this point a 3060 ti or even a 4060 should be a lot money saver😅
just get 4070 its same price as this but better
@@schizofennec for me 1080p gaming is more than enough and rtx 4060 more or less can do native 1080p max 60 to 80 in most games and in my budget in near future so 😌and I have plan to pair it with i3 12100F (4 core 8 threads)..
@@shantonabsen2299 Don't waste your money on a 4060 cough cough 4050. Just buy a 6700xt. Only 2 gpu's worth it in rtx 4000 is the rtx 4090 and the Rtx 4070!
The graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti VENTUS 3X BLACK 16GB is part of NVIDIA's graphics card series and comes with 16 gigabytes of video memory (VRAM). This RTX-class graphics card supports advanced technologies like Ray Tracing and Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS), making it suitable for high-quality gaming and virtual reality applications.
It is natural for this card to be powerful in running modern games at high settings and resolutions. However, the performance also depends on the other components of your computer, such as the Central Processing Unit (CPU), memory, and power supply unit. It's always advisable to check your computer's specifications to ensure compatibility with this graphics card.
In general, this graphics card can be suitable for modern video games and provide strong performance, but you should consider your system's requirements to ensure optimal performance.
Ai 🤖
i have a question im gonna be running ryzen 7 3700x and 4060ti is it gonna bottleneck?
At resolutions under 4k there is no difference as that extra vram is not needed and at 4k the price to performance is just to worth it..
Yeah definitely not worth $100 more for just the vram. The 4060ti should have been $350
what software are you using to get all those specs?
1:45 why are your 1% lows switching between 52 and 57 fps but your realtime fps are always above 70 fps?
Buddy u should have shown the difference in new AAA titles which require so much vram like re4 remake, last of us, start wars jade jady whatever idk and there are more
The difference only shows at 4k. 1440p and 1080p there is about 1fps difference lol.
128-bit bus doing a good job. Better performance wen more than 8gb of memory needed
16GB is very useful in stable diffusion to make high resolution pictures and using controlnet. Otherwise...
I should have thought of that. I honestly thought it was okay if I bought the 8gb version
This card has actually been released?
RTX 4060 Ti 16gb not yet release so far
I think the value proposition of the card will look stronger as we get into 2024; already at the end of the 2023, several games have come out that are asking for mroe vram and developers en masse have stated they are also tired of having to implement optimizations for 8GB and lower cards. Not saying it's right, but we aren't making the games are we? Couple that with console games being the primary target as devs can utilize the 16GB of unified memory to amazing efforts, we'll need a card that can scale up like that. It's great that many games can still stay below the 8GB threshold, but that's slowly disappearing as the graphics direction of these studios is getting more demanding.
The card has gotten a lot of hate, but it's a pretty good card that seeks to utilize it's memory paths as a way to compensate for the smaller bus width, while delivering the latest tech to take advantage of all the eye candy. It's value proposition is what those who have really taken a look at the card don't like... for now.
I don't see cards getting any cheaper with the unrest around the globe politically, affecting supply chains and production. That, with the space sharing interests from machine learning and AI technologies, I think in the end the 4060, especially the 16GB Ti, will find a nice landing spot.
Plus if you're someone who does any sort of editing, production and gaming on the same setup, you always want the more vram when you can get it. Then there's the fact that NVIDIA products as of late just work, it's hard to move onto another platform, if for nothing else than the cheaper entry for similar or stronger rasterization performance.
All that said, I like the card. I think others will also coming from some of the 10 series and 16 series NVIDIA cards.
So same at 1080p and 1440p , better at 4k cuz 16gb memory ,but who will buy 4060 ti for 4k?
I will, but NOT at the price they're asking for, to be sure. There's some of us who want to play non-demanding games at 4K, just not at this ridiculous MSRP
ppl who need 16gb and new dlss 3.0. gpus not only for gaming you know, 16gb modern gpu is amazing tool to work and render etc.
@@NostalgicMem0ries absolutely. people are just comparing gaming performance.
Reminder windows (DWM proccess) already uses around 768mb - 1gb of Vram depending on what you do.
I have the 16GB version and cyberpunk with the new textures pack uses around 14gb vram. Gonna be impossible on the 8gb version.
Also, i can use photoshop - video edit - maybe run a small LLM and game at the same time.
while on the 8gb version, you are forced to reboot the computer and only run the game to save as much vram..
The impressive part of this cards is their TDP. Too bad there's not much else tp praise about them.
the only reason that this card have low TDP becuz it just only a 4050 entry-level die size.
rx6800 works with 200w and destroys 4060ti at 160w. So not even that is impressive to, its only ok..
where is last of us benchmark .. through that only we can analyse performace difference betwenn these 8gb & 12gb
La différence est que quand tu met le ray tracing et dlls la 4060ti 16go aura un avantage de fou et en plus pour les jeux gourmands a venir que demanderont plus de 8go de vram aussi , la elle sera en avantage
Lo que esta comparativa dejo en claro con esos juegos es que en 1080p como en 1440p 8gb de VRAM parece ser suficiente para esas resoluciones y el único que necesita como mínimo 12gb de VRAM es para 4k. Lo que minimiza la idea exagerada de la necesidad de más vram para mejor rendimiento en los primeros niveles de resolución (1080p,1440p)
if the memory is not exactly limited then both cards are identical but if it is limited the 8gb is just hazardous waste and the 16gb waste of money :D
This is exactly what I wanted to see. The price is nuts but I need an NVIDIA card with at least 16Gb ( 4K monitor and doing 3D rendering ). The extra 8Gb really gives a boost at 4K right now but in a near future, even in 1440p it could make a difference.
Guess I'll try to get one when a discount comes by
you really better get rtx 4070 (this is pure RTX 3080 performance only with less power consumption)
@@zonelore budget men its like i sais i want a bike you say a car is better
@@scarlu_4222 $600 for a rtx 4070 and the comment above wants to buy a rtx 4060 ti at a price of $500 for 16 GB of video memory BUT it loses at least 30-40% of performance it's not worth it
absolutely like me :D looks like with dlss and frame gen this will be very capable 4k 60 fps gpu, need to wait month till price in europe reaches msrp
@@zonelore performance diference is more like 15 -20 %. and frame gen with dlss solves it all, it will age better than 4070 cause of vram. also many ppl use gpu for rendering these days, from video editing jobs to stable difffusion and 16 vs 12 is big diference. its not all about gaming. since it gives 60 fps even without dlss at 4k in most titles, its more than ok
If I had a 4K monitor I for sure wouldn't go for the 4060 ti, but 1080p it works quite nice
Its a really nice but vastly over priced 50 series Card, if it was branded and priced at about 300USD it would be worth it. Its basically a low end productivity card for video people.
So "VRAM doesn't matter..." eh.....
TLDR the extra 8GB are only if you wanna use DLSS to play on 4k. No other reason to get the 16GB version. No reason to get the 8GB version either
My man benchmarking a card that isn't even released yet.
ikr
Gpu clock 2700+ ？
I'm curious how you got a 4060ti 16Gb a day before launch, but I guess it's...possible? Heh.
shop i guess..early stock arrived? and breaking NDA?
The card has been in stocks for a long time, I am not an nvidia partner, NDA does not affect me it's for a huge partner channels
@Benchmarklab
Man the 4060ti 16Gb launched today. And not even reviewers have it, noone was seeded with samples. The card probably hasn't even made it to most stores yet. Not trying to bust your chops but..
hopping to buy a 3fan model sadly gotta wait for them to go in stock
yup, and with large cooler, so you will be able to keep the card under 60°C to reach max. core clocks(turbo boost tech.) all the time ;-)
@@Bzuco plus it looks pretty
Where did you get 16Gb 4060Ti?
It doesn't appear that the Nvidia drivers were even available at the time this video was released... Hmmmm...
people are too much happy seeing 16gb v ram untill they will know its just 128 bit bus. even your rendering will throttle
Solo esperaré a la futura "4070 Super", esa creo que si valdrá la pena con sus 16gb.
Se nota que no viste el video completo
Thanks for this benchmark. I know now that I will buy the RTX 4060 8gb because I only play in 1080p.
6700xt would be a better buy, used 3070 would also be better. There’s no reason to buy a 4060 the memory bus is too small so if you plan on emulating anything say tears of the kingdom it’ll be way worse
I also play games in 1080p resolution but Vram matters bro. If you play all latest games now with ultra graphics settings with 1080p resolution the card is consuming of 6.5 to 7.5gb Vram and if you ON the Ray Tracing mode then its going beyond 8gb Vram so atleast 12gb of graphic card is needed in todays generation games and obvious for future games too. By paying little more bucks I prefer 4070 card over 4060ti 16gb bcz 4070 card is 30 to 40% powerful than 4060ti 16gb.
@@devonward6784 What I want to see is a 6700xt vs 4060 ti 16GB
@@GMBazillionit will certainly be a good show of how important memory bus can be
Yeah only 2 gpu's that's worth it in rtx 4000 is the rtx 4090 and rtx 4070. or else look at AMD
CPU ???
Ladies and gentlemen, we got them.
для игр и 8 гб хватит нету смысла переплачивать за 16 гб, но если собирать с будущем то да имеет смысл когда уже 8 гб в притык будет
How is it that in so many games the 8 GB did better than the 16?
It has a higher boost clock as every card is unique. If the 8GB of memory is not a limiting factor there won't be a difference on identical clock speeds.
@@vesanius1 No, the boost clock is the same. Virtually every part of them is the same.
@@JackOfAllRAIDs You can literally see in the tests that it's not the same. The advertised value might be the same but every card is unique and some chips just boost better than others.
margin of error, silicone lottery. or maybe less equal more efficiency/faster memory. who knows.
Don't get the 4060 Ti 16GB for gaming. Get it for generative AI (or Diablo 4 at 4K, lol). That's basically why it exists. It outperforms 3080 at those tasks.
xx60 series has always been a 1080p card and 8 GB is enough.
XD xD, nvidia playing on the "vram future proof" on a XX60 model to sell it $499(in the US XD), I will tell you that, it's bullshit for a XX60 serie, 8 gb is corect but i agree that 12 gb had more sens on the TI model but unless you want to play 4k, 8gb will be enough and by the time 8 gb will be too low the card will be already irrelevant (speaking performance). YES you might have a little bit of fps drop in the future but nothing too bad. But the worst is that the 3060 ti get the gddr6x but the 4060 ti doesn't...
Can you test forza horizon 5 ?
why is there no warzone,
the game that consumes the most vram
All this video proves is that its a good thing we have dlss.
and even better - frame gen for this card for the future games
Is this for real? On Diablo 4K the 16GB has more than double the FPS? How could that be?
Could be. If they have pre-release driver. It's after all 4Gb over memory capacity of 4060 Ti 8G model, or the drivers were already baked in to old drivers as nvidia was going to release 16GB model anyway so why not to have drivers for bowth 8GB and 16GB model already in.
Cuz 8gb is not enough for 4k in diablo 4
Basically the RTX 3070 16GB 😂
ゲームのタイトルによっては16GBの容量を唾棄するには惜しい差が見えるのは意外。惜しむらくはメモリバス幅...
Call of duty?
I think this benchmark very aptly shows where the +8GB matters. It matters in 4K at higher graphics settings + RT. And I think this is only the beginning, as fewer and fewer game devs will devote resources to optimize for 8GB cards. The 16GB 4060 Ti will really start shining in a year or two IMO.
You don't need +8gb for 4k, are just lazy devs. I played in 4k with my ram limited to 6gb before, in 144 hz. The chip is the main factor. And i try used my 4090 with just 4 gb and dlss 3 in mid/high settings(the most common). Its work(maybe could be better. But hey! just 4 gb)
And in 2 years the 50 series is on the market. Let's be honest, the only reason some games are so poorly optimized is if the force "boosts the stock market price".
Really from what I've seen in the industry we shouldn't even be using "traditional raster" anymore. rtx is much more efficient and fluid well implemented.
But for the interests of the developers (and not even them, if not their bosses. Even in indie games. Any expense is exaggerated against the benefits) so they look for fast and cheap sponsorship: "China and AMD".
more than 40% of the expenses are just for marketing.
@@rio-dq9sc I approach this issue assuming that devs are trying their best. And I think so because otherwise they are fired for not doing their job well enough. So I think the devs aren't lazy, but they have release deadlines that they have to stick to. If the job is done, meaning that the game is ready, they won't be able to devote more resources to optimizing the game and trying to make it more budget-friendly when the next game is already in the pipeline and they have to start working on it. Ofc patches are then released which I guess don't require as many resources to develop, and then, after 6 months or however long, you have a game that is a little more optimized but is still far away from being budget-friendly.
And I also think that it's part of the natural progression of the industry that running new software requires more and more computing power and memory over time.
@@lecarrotman That could be true.
But...
Modder's take just 1 week for fix the games.
1/2 weeks.
Even i have experience in the industry.
And it was like:
The boss mentioned something in the interview that was not planned. R. To create it.
.....
But we are 2 weeks from the end of the term.
- You have 1.
Not just that many are pretty bad in manage algorithms.
Like: as if they had never seen an algorithm in their life.
This industry dont stop to scare away potential talent and veterans.
Just for the safe in "stock market".
@@rio-dq9sc OK, I will grant you that point. I can totally imagine that devs are not capable enough to optimize their games well. If everyone is bad at certain things at the same time, they'll still be able to keep their jobs because there's no one else to do it better than them.
So what can you do as a gamer? On the one hand, you have devs who for whatever reason don't optimize games enough, and on the other hand, you have Nvidia with not enough VRAM on their chips to run the under-optimized games. Well, one solution is to buy AMD, but then you sacrifice hardware accelerated RT.
We can "vote with our money" as always, but which game do you buy if all games are under-optimized trash? Or maybe we all should join chess clubs and play chess instead of playing videogames lol
I think this means it's a moment where folks should avoid buying brand-new, higher-end ($$$$) cards for a year or two. See how the games change. Save the money for now.
Thanks, it looks like it only makes a difference at 4k which wasn’t meant for the card. It is what it is. People complain way too much lol
4060 ti is not for 4k gaming, so waste of sand and your money from nvidia
video is without dlss and even frame gen, with 16gb vram it can use dlss 3..0 and not run out of vram at 4k so its 1440p 4k gpu for sure. just not for high frames, it will be very decent 4k 60 fps gaming gpu, that is perfect for me since my monitor/tv are 4k60hz.
@@NostalgicMem0ries You can talk yourself into liking it as much as you want, but for 99% of people it's trash and a waste of money.
@@ShinyHelmet 99% lul, ppl already preordering it and most comments prove it :D but i guess your 99 % arent there
@@ShinyHelmet true for gaming its pretty much a waste, but for rendering and ML its pretty good for someone with a budget
Better wait rtx 50series...i dont waste my money again cuz i have rtx 3060ti
128 bit bus kinda wrecks the vram amount from even mattering lol this is pathetic. I feel bad for anyone that is trying to upgrade this generation. Even if you pay out the ass for the only card with value that isn’t gimped (4090) you still have absolute dogshit drivers. Not 1 Ada driver has been stable.
It's crazy how my 3080 12GB on 1440p Ultra Settings (including Ultra RT) and DLSS quality produces almost twice as many FPS (75) than 4060Ti 16GB.
A 3080 is more powerful than 4060 ti.. nothing crazy there
@@kejaffzi4121 amen brother.
@@EX0007 then why buy 4060Ti? Just for the fun of "having" DLSS 3.0 and frame generation while taking no advantage of them? The price for used 3080 12GB is within the same range as new 4060Ti 16GB..
Rtx 3080 is 320w tdp and suggested psu of 700w
Rtx 4060ti is 165w tdp and suggested psu of 450w these are in way different class of power one requires almost double while the other fits almost any basic PC with 500w and PCIe cables hell you can even buy adapters to get it to work with psu without PCIe cables.
so for 1080p 8gb its enough
It always was. Maybe only Hogwarts maxed with rt runs kinda crappy. But its a horrible port.
@@Onisak25 Hardware producers are very happy for that kind of ports.
128bit...the end
I hope that gamers don't buy the 16GB variant so that AI people like myself can get them for cheaper than they're currently being sold for.
16GBs is incredibly useful for AI applications.
The Intel A770 is 16gb and quite cheap, is that card any good for AI apps?
I'm buying the card for stable diffusion
@@henrywalton5967 I don't think so. I'm no expert but even on the AMD side only a few consumer cards support ROCm - and that's been very very recent news. I haven't heard anything significant about Intel's AI offerings.
10-20 FPS more through 16 GB, top card
8GB card is running out of vram and losing ton of performance. The longer you in the game the worse it gets.
@@club4ghz Also noticed this and when I was measuring vram I started to count after 1 minute of constantly making 360 degree turn around.
you should try it with FG at 4K with 4060Ti 16gb as FG give more fps but also eat more vram.
Thats what you get when you believe stupid Things, 1080 P gaming it doesnt need more than 8 VRAM, so 16 GB will not give a better performance in gaming,
no las compraria
en resumen si no juegas a 4k no sirve de nada la nueva 4060 ti para gaming
Regardless of the fact that an xx60Ti series is not made for 4K gaming, so it either has 8 or 16 of ram, and useless for 4K.
The low bandwith is killing this card. 8Gb or 16 Gb doesn't matter if there is no flowthrough! You can make a 32Gb card, but with those lanes it wouldn't make a notable difference.
Serie xx60? And 2k? 4k? Jajajaja noob. 1080p. Man.. 70 is for 2k and 4k.
The xx60Ti series in 2K performs well, for 4K you have to go up
When did 60 ti become a 4k card🤣🤣🤣
5 ou 15/100 bof🥵👎👎👎👎👎
i doubt if anybody actually use this card for 4k, and you can get a 4070 with just a bit more money.
The 4070 is 12Gb which is pretty dumb
@@henrywalton5967 yep, if 4070 is the one with 16gb it’ll be op in 4K gaming
Nvidia are so stupid.
4060ti should have had 12gb as games only use up to 10.
4070ti should have had 16gb!!!
I will never understand nvidia
you should've done it without dlss, these are not realistic
100 dollars more for the same fps 😂😂 s##tvidiia
@@transistorjump919 still not worthy 100 dollars
Not gonna buy, dont worry
Basically this 16GB card is for AI generation, doesn't make much sense for gamer.
Wait few years, it will be faster than 4070 on 1080p thanks to new standard(16GB vram needed) in new games. For now 4070 make sense, but in long terms 4060ti 16GB.
Waste of $100.
4060 ti was bad,and 16gb model just gets worse and it costs 500 bucks!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Basically the entire RTX40 cards are 1080p/1440p max, so forget 4k on these cards.
Is this a bad joke Nvidia?