Everything Wrong With Those "100 Years of..." Videos - RANT
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- hope u still love me coughs
_____________
My Instagram: bit.ly/2Qo9rrI
My blog: bit.ly/2nnB89S
My nudes: bit.ly/2DAvz0u
You can also buy me a coffee!: bit.ly/2IvBsJY
"Sexy" in 2010 is completely different from "sexy" in 1952.
Just because you think it's unflattering or even frumpy now doesn't mean it wasn't irresistible when it was in style.
Fashion "historians" like Cut need to realise that.
Sucks, doesn't it. I'm a perfectly built "sweater girl"
madtabby66 you rock those sweaters gurl
madtabby66
*I'm a 1900s housewife, nice to meet you-*
that is not actually true
the notion that things are supposed to be irresisitible is newer too
Like they would understand that
Ironically, those Cut videos made me realize I had an interest in old fashion, which in turn sparked research and made me realize how bad those videos are
Same
Same with me , i know use my drawing skills to make new concepts for old dresses or adds modern details to victorian skirts. Idk how i never realized it since i love modern fashion and i live for history.
That's like me with Memoirs of a Geisha. It got me to want to learn more about geisha and kimono, only to eventually learn what a historically inaccurate and problematic mess the book and movie are.
@@BiologicalClock really? I always assumed the book was accurate.
Same with me. I read Memoirs of a Geisha many years back. I was actually quite young, but wanted to read the ‘adult books’ to seem cool. I was given the impression That Geisha’s and we’re legitimately just women Who served as traditional sex workers. But now, I obviously see that it is completely different. Being a Geisha is an art form in itself. It requires a lot of discipline, hard work and dedication to be one.
I was a teenager in the '80s. The color of the 80's dress was totally wrong. We did wear flower print dresses, but they were small calico type prints and colors were brighter and saturated jewel tones. As you talked about with the hats, it comes down to the details and not just *what* was worn, but *how* it was worn.
martialartess I lived in the American South for a year at the very end of the eighties (1989-1990). So many girls still wore those (mostly to church...), and they had these enormous lace collars, remember those? And the big hair! (Sorry, ozone layer...). Meanwhile in the Netherlands, we wore wide-legged jeans and chucks and sort-of cropped tops - one leg in the 90s already!
I seem to remember lots of big bright floral prints, and pastels. However, that was more for kids, and maybe some teens. Maybe prom dresses.
But I do just remember big florals in general. Not just dresses.
Agree that that's definitely not an 80s dress. My wardrobe in the 80s was pink, turquoise, teal, purple, blue, grey... but not those yellows and browns. Everyone at the time would have turned their noses up at something that looked so "70s" in coloration.
Also her hair wasn't big enough. I'm guessing the stylist or model didn't want to do all that backcombing we used to do.
Kiki I guess my experiences are just different. Yes, Jewel tones were big. Just something about those giant florals and puffy sleeves. I wouldn’t call it 1990s, though. No one would wear that in the 1990s.
@@sallyvillarreal4294 I agree that the cut of the dress is okay (and definitely not 90s). It's mostly the color that's wrong.
I agree with the original poster that I don't remember big florals in the 80s either. Smaller floral patterns, yes. But mostly geometric shapes and big blocks of color.
One time in elementary school I didn’t know what to do for decade day so I just put a leopard print skirt or something on and pretended I was some kind of cave person
Elementary school fashion icon
We stan
Hai always wore the 80’s look because it was the one my mom remembered the most
Mood
I absolutely love that. You win decade day 10/10
How can they messed up 90’s?? They probably lived the 90s wtf
XD
Tragic lol
I didn't live through the 90's I started to exist in 1998 😂😂
@@cottoncandy2023 whats your point? Do you work for cut?
Duck Meat I see you everywhere lol
Karolina: makes video showing actual common fashions
Cut: is offended that she “ripped into them”
Karolina: actually rips into them
Dont forget about red lipstic you ignorant
She didn't rip into them she merely pointed out a few things. She didn't even go into the fabric or posture.
Olive Oil Bernadette: *rips into your filthy Muggle soul with her on-brand fabric shears while educating you on your historical inaccuracies in a furious yet polite manner in your last few minutes until death*
mood
@@rodericknguyen4418 the only way to go
karolina zebrowska: *exists*
Any '100 years of' video: *Sweats*
Wow 2k likes and not one reply OwO
2.9k likes
3 comments
👀👄👀
👁👅👁
👁️👃👁️
🧿👄🧿
Karolina: * makes a harmless video about historical fashion and how Cut could have improved *
Cut: And I took that personally
Lmfao
1910s: wow an original dress, very well done glamour :)))
1920s: nnnOoOoooOoOOOoo
To be fair, she did say that the model was too tall lol
@@psychopopbunny Too tall for the dress
I think the 20's is one of the most butchered decades when they try to replicate it...the ultra flapper style with the skirt too short for that era and the wrong shape
they always get the dress length wrong
xD
“And the hair is tragic it’s really bad”
Me when I look in the mirror
Sammi Williams
I’m sure you have beautiful hair :)
Same
I literally have a hair antennae
Me when I first wake up lmao
Oh sis, u have GOT to see my hair then. It's a tragedy 😭
The one and only
i think it's really weird and bad when people try to "sexy-fy" things. if you are trying to show what the actual style is... you have to show the actual style, no matter how unflattering you think it is. it's not about your opinion, it's about whats accurate.
Exactly. These videos are supposed to teach people what was considered fashionable back then, not how to make them “look sexier”
Also what’s with trying to sexy-fy women‘s fashion. Can we not sexualize every single aspect of womanhood
I’m a veteran and agree with this when I see women in uniform in movies. Our uniform and hairstyle is not for beauty, it is for function.
@@lesmortimers4791 yes! smh not everything a women wears and does is for your appeal
True. Especially when their videos are about timelines and decades in history
Those badly reproduced hats have the same energy as someone who can’t follow a simple origami tutorial and ends up just winging it
As a person who cannot do origami for my life, I feel very attacked right now.
@@just-trying-my-best-everyday me too. You have no idea how many perfectly good peices of origami paper I wasted trying to make at least one half decent paper crane when I was nine.....
....looks at my horrible origami and looks away.
I like origami
Heh, WINGing
God I can’t wait for in like 70 years when I’m old an look onto my phone and I see cut making a video saying that everyone in 2020 looked like Kate Middleton
underrated
i can’t stop laughing
Not this 😭😭
or kim kardashian :(((((
or were instagram influencers
@@edenjaycollins6055 they will definitely say everyone looked like her and loved her and had that figure and that no one dressed differently.
I am convinced that you're a time traveler
plot twist: she's actually doctor who
@@lillith5389 yoooooo she'd be a great doctor who I'd watch that
oh she definitely is
*there is a very real possibility that she is Dr. Who*
@@lillith5389 who?
When I saw these a few years ago I was actually offended. I'm a fashion historian. It made me NUTS I was offended that some one claimed to know what they were doing. And now people think that this is legit. It pissed me off.
I love your hair and topp you are so cute uwu
Karolina: This isn’t accurate.
Cut: You think you can make a better video?!
Karolina: * does *
Cut: 😧
The only one of these that i really liked is “100 years of corgi fashion” where there was just corgis for every year, but the last one had a BOW TIE
red x purple Wow I need to watch that
AMAZING
i saw one for 100 years of kitten fashion and it was the same cat every decade
jojo swia
Hahahaha that sounds awesome.
The fact that instead of THANKING you for bringing light to what was realistic back then and correcting their chanel, they wanna shame you for being smarter and clearly more educated? Speak your mind girl because YOU know whats up and their cheap, low quality videos can’t even compare to yours. Keep up with what ur doin 💕
Agreed
Preach it!
Cut were very immature with their response. I like the fact Karolina is teaching my uneducated ass about historical fashion. I find it interesting and she really goes into detail about it, which is super helpful.
I'm old enough to remember both the 1960's and 1970's, and let me tell you, most people today have no idea how to distinguish the two. They think hippies and psychedelic prints were around in the 1970's, and the 1960's were about nothing but skirts no longer than your hip bone. Drives me nuts. Thanks for these videos, trying to set at least some things straight about fashion history. Seems like actual fashion history gets lost the moment the New Year comes, every year.
Bit late commenting here. I'm old enough to remember what older people wore in the 70s. Blokes with comb overs and sideboards!! Kipper ties etc.young fashion was very different...someone into northern soul music had a look..Oxford bags etc. New wave/punks with narrow ties, straight trousers etc. Mini skirts making a comeback etc...not how it is portrayed on these historical videos, with one style of flairs and Farrah Fawcett hairstyles! The 80s stuff as well...usually on these videos they are well off. 1989 wasnt the same as 1981. I can never understand why they get it so wrong. There are movies, TV shows, documentaries, TV news footage. Pop programmes Etc. No excuse.
People in the US looked different to Britain as well. That has gone, but it did exist.
I’m old enough to remember the 2010’s and that is it 😳
@@lilyshould4602 You'll be surprised how fast that will become the distant past. All the best to you.
Sandra Zarembski thanks 😊 you seem like such a nice 60 something year old I love that wholesome older people are the best have an amazing life I love you ❤️
@@lilyshould4602 Love you back. May your journey be long and happy.
"I did my best to be a constructive critic, but it still pissed them off, so f*ck it Ima judge you hard!"
You're my favourite, Karolina.
1920's women: we deserve rights! we will wear beautiful dresses and step out from societal norms because the war is over!
cut: aha don't say that ur so sexy ;)))))
what
asfjhkgmga so true
LMAOOO
Don't worry guys, they're 100% feminists
(According to modern trends)
vomit 🏃♀️ run flappers, run
"I feel like a lot of people could be offended by me not agreeing with them."
The 21st century in a nutshell.
Nila Rowan Isn’t that the truth. It’s amazing how triggered people get because you don’t agree with them. Because, you know, THEY’RE RIGHT! And your stupid, ignorant, or uneducated! It boggles my mind how self righteous and smug people are nowadays. To get MAD?
@@mangot589 youre doing the same rn tho ?
Mica Um..No? People are entitled to their own opinion. Isn’t that what I said?
Honestly don‘t think that it‘s a 21st century problem. People have always gotten offended over small things. I just think that the internet has really helped us find wayyyy more people we could disagree with.
😂😂😂 the irony lmao
The models are too tall for the 1920s dresses. And they really need to find a historical group to use original dresses instead of using modern dresses that have "shapes" of the vintage looks. These videos sensationalize the periods.
nvaranavage or just... make the dresses longer so they actually FIT
Emilie Smith I mean,if it’s a vintage dress,there’s not much you can do about it. I think they should just hire shorter models. I could be wrong,but wasn’t being shorter part of the fashion ideal in the twenties?
There are groups that re-create vintage clothing from different eras. It seems like it would be difficult to do 100 years without bringing in several historians.
@@user-mv9tt4st9k I don't think you need several historians to ACCEPT THAT WOMEN UNDER 170 CM EXIST!
@@KasumiRINA *Asian women casually walking by*
My thought process during this video:
1) This is very informative.
2) Dressing in the vintage style sounds exhausting...
3) Then again, women’s fashion today also sounds exhausting......
...anyway, great video! LOL
OMG, I'm in stitches on the floor :D
Women's fashion these days aren't exhausting but kinda uncomfortable
@@mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053 I'd say very uncomfortable, because me being trans isn't the only reason I want a breast reduction. *ahem*BRAS*ahem*
@@DrBrightIsBack lol, I wear sports bras on a day to day basis, so they aren't that uncomfortable. The only uncomfortable thing for me is probably jeggings, and that's it. Nice to see a Hetalia Fan here (I can't tell if that profile pic is Italy or not lol)
@@mr.donaldduckblowstrumpet6053 It's Italy and i'm autistic with sensory issues.
"No one wore eyeliner in 1940s, that's kinda more of a 1950s thing." Hell, even for most of the '50s pretty much only celebrities and models wore it.
I find it crazy how women feeling forced to paint their face daily is SO NORMALIZED that people can't even fathom women in the PAST not wearing makeup.
Honestly, to me this wasn't judgmental enough. We have every right to be irritated and expect better from popular media capitalizing on something that we're passionate about in a very lazy way. These types of videos had huge audiences, and they typically portrayed fashion in very costumey ways. Because let's be honest, it would take way too much time, effort and money for them to bother getting it right. They don't care about accuracy, or misinforming a huge audience, they care about the views. And people who care about this topic have every right to feel angry and insulted.
Testify!
that’s just sad... I smell the fresh air of greedy people.
Best comment!
I agree. People have this image of vintage that's very halfassed and it shows.
Even big budget movies set in the 20's and 30's always get things wrong. Sometimes you see wonderful clothes and sets, but the hair is ALWAYS curled too loosely, the eyebrows are ALWAYS too thick.
At this point I'm convinced that it's willful ignorance.
+
I'm convinced that Karolina is an immortal being who is here to tell us about fashion. She knows so much because she lived through it.
im glad you mentioned no eyeliner in the 40s...almost all modern 1940s makeup tutorials have eyeliner and even winged liner ugh
C M yeah that was news to me, but then all I know about 50s-ish makeup is from modern rockabilly styles which are much less subtle :)
Me: Mom can we get Marilyn?
Mom: no we have Marilyn at home
Marilyn at home 9:13
LMAO, dollar store Marilyn
😂😂😂😂😂
Oh no
Oh no
@@crazycatperson4953 if that’s dollar store Marilyn, then 6:17 is the Marilyn someone left out on the sidewalk with a “free” sign strapped to her
90s: Minimalism characterized the fashion at the time
Me: My tie-dye, scrunchie shirts, and punk clothes from that time would like to have a word with you. This is a great example of how showing just what the "starlets" wore does not necessarily reflect what everyone wore!
yeah i think specially (more evident) starting from the 60s there were so many and varied sub-cultures/styles/trends/social idealism etc every year (i mean in the other eras too, but its more pronounced from here) so you cant just point out an era/decade by one outfit (even less if your outfit its totally wrong hahaha).
Yeah, 90s definitely wasn't a minimalist period. I was a kid through the nineties, so I wasn't that fashionable, lol, but I do remember the clothes weren't minimal, and like you said with tie-dye shirts and everything. I think they're confusing the Mary-Kate and Ashley era (1998-1999, early 2000s) with the nineties by using that dress, lmao. But even the Olson twins didn't slick their hair back, so I have no clue where tf the people making the video got THAT from. smh
@@sakura_kitkat7896 It's like they combined the Mary-Kate and Ashley style with the slicked back emo white boy who tried to bleach his hair but it ended up yellow.
@@dracofirex Lmao, so very true XD
Don’t forget all the light up stuff that came out at the end of the decade, plus sequins!
Preach it sister. Can't stand ignorance. In my opinion if someone presents an educational video about a subject research and accuracy is absolutely imperative.
Kat Lauren They even get the 90’s and 2000’s wrong. I get frustrated when I think “that isn’t the 2000’s!!!!”. It’s to the point that I just completely ignore these videos now.
My new kink is Karolina saying “no baby no that’s totally wrong”
edit: full quote 8:22 "oh no oh hell no baby no this is veRY WROng"
Yes sign me the f up
when does she say that?
@@GamerGirlLom 8:22
If you turn on captions, it says no homo lmao
lyonclaws baban lol
I see that they want to apply the modern sexyness to all the looks. Sexy is something that changes, they look at old photos and be like, that is not sexy. But back in the time, they were (sometimes ofc).
I think that Safiya Nygaard always got nice research material, such as old magazines and not only internet research. She also tells a bit about history. But the parts that don't fit, is because some people do not have a history feeling. Because it's harder to understand changes and differences. And that they have cognitive dissonance, so they don't know how to interpret it.
But I like when people say 'inspired' by, because then, it don't has to be really what they wore, but a inspiration or a modern twist. New fashion used that to make new trends and I think it's really interesting.
Thanks for reading my long comment.
Edgyedgelord Gibson girls are still hella cute.
I think it's more so they arent using a huge budget it's like if I have a 20s day at school I'm not going to go buy a whole authentic outfit makeup shoes makeup etc. I'll just wear something that looks similar and do an outfit with the clothing I have. It seems like they do the same because they're doing countless of these 100 years of bla bla bla and it's already a lot of work just for a quick entertaining video they arent making katherine amounts of money from so they're probably just asking designers for clothes they already have in their possession and it's being thrown together quickly I'm just happy the info given in between is accurate
I would love to see karolina react to safiyas series
I mean if they want to change the style by making it more sexy they should own up to it and stop pretending to be accurate. Cut's videos should have been "hairstyles of the last 100 years... but SEXIER!" Then we would have known that they were not being honest and there would not be an issue.
They always butcher Gibson girl’s hairstyles, like back then those hairstyles were sexy af
"Its your meme mum"
I subbed on the spot
Same
Same.
Same
Same
Same
mother has returned
momma.came.to.slay.
ouch your profile pic/icon looks cool thank you
As a general rule, any RUclips channel big enough to put out tons of content, especially format-consistent, specialty topic videos, they are assembled by a staff of people who are not actually experts, and often presented by someone who's basically a spokesman/woman. If you want actual information, and not some kind of pop-culture surface-level garbage, you don't go to those channels. You go to a channel run by a single person who knows the subject - like this one.
This video has validated my doubts about the fashion evolution videos.
@Chanel Oberlin I love BTVS, the fashion is pretty cool
“Show me a single picture of a person from the 1950’s looking like this...........I’ll wait.“
Savage, I love it!
The best!
"Show me a single picture from the 1950s of someone looking like this. I'll wait."
LOL I'm dead.
Karolina : makes a video for education
Cut: So... you have chosen death..
I didn't find it judgemental at all. It is a strong constructive criticism. There are lots of irritating historical fashion myths that were created by modern women based off of their assumptions and lack of understanding that continue to get spread around even to this day by people that should know better. Don't even get me started on the subject of corsets and stays. I have to say I have been guilty of sometimes preferring the modern versions over the original, but I only sometimes. If you are going to do a historical video you should do it right. These people making these videos have literally millions of references at their disposal. No excuse. The love and fascination of historical fashion is how it differs from modern clothing so why would you not showcase that? I think you did a great video!
its like when some idiot does some "historically accurate armor" bs vid, and the thing is practically a theater prop made of tin and plastic, and you can just push the sword through it.
while in actuality you can take real armor and keep beating it with the said sword and its like a tank.
and then there is idiots like the game theory who post their bs as facts, there is at least 2 creators who have debunked his bs when it comes to "historys deadliest warrior."
THIS!!! This is the video that EVERY vintage enthusiast wanted to make. Thank you for taking the words right out of my mouth...
They really messed up not hiring vintage hairstylists for those videos. The 100 Years of Hair video was the WORST.
"Ava Gardner is going to raise from her grave and beat you up, baby"
The level of sass in this video
I have watched so many of these videos and thought the same things, they can be pretty painful to watch sometimes for anyone who has actually studied fashion history!
Even having not studied fashion history, a lot of the looks just screamed "no one even google imaged this". That Cloche hat especially made me choke
The one they did on Puerto Rico and the Dominican Republic are tragic AF
Seamstress: Ok so do you want vintage clothes or modern day clothes?
Cut’s fashion designer: *yes*
"Why do they never get the beehives right it just looks like an elongated skull" I'M DEAD
Do an "everything wrong with "everything wrong" videos"
M. A. Then, an “everything wrong with everything wrong with everything wrong”
I just love your whole vibe so much. You’re the history buff hero I didn’t know I needed. Please don’t be afraid to be brutally honest because you actually care about historical accuracy and fashion unlike these creators just looking for a “quirky” video idea that can give them views.
I agree with your words completely. I love her passion about this too!
I always felt that these "old fashion" videos do something wrong..... And after this video, really helps to see where I felt were wrong
Karolina: **makes an honest (and brilliant) video that shows the reality of fashion without the sugar-coat or it**
Cut: ..and I took that personally
Who cares if people are offended, facts are facts.
Skylar McLeod and proud
I love this channel! I love the historical accuracy. You inspire me to dress vintage.
This wat they also did for 100 years of goth and 100 years of Japanese fashion. They did get some things right but wat mainly made people mad was that they thought emo was goth and they gave (for the Japanese fashion video) the model a terrible outfit of how Lolita fashion looked. If anyone knows wat Lolita fashion is u do know it’s more than just a colorful pettycoat and clothes. That’s wat made me mad personally about those videos. They did so little research
Queen Weirdness YES and the historical fashion was all wrong in the 1920’s-ish part of the japanese video too it made me lose my shit
I think it was 40 years of Goth fashion, not 100
I'm not even a huge RUclips channel that mostly does fashion and *I* know that lolita don't look like that and nobody wore their hair like that to their job at the factory in the 1920s 💅
jamienyx oof I really don’t mean to burst your bubble, it’s really great that someone young likes the fashion, but please, please wait until you’re older to wear Lolita style clothing. The name ‘Lolita’ comes from a Russian story called the Lolita girl, and it’s about an older man who dresses up a young teenage girl in that style of clothing and has sex with her. Though it’s not apparent there is a sexual connotation with Lolita clothing and I don’t want anybody to wear that sort of clothing at a young age, because it’s inappropriate. I hope you can understand
When I saw that Goth fashion video, my emo ass wanted to yeet itself out of existence lmaooo EMO IS NOT THE SAME THING AS GOTH OMFG
I watched the 100 years of Girls fashion and the 80s and 90s were so wrong! There were people in the comments saying they wished they lived in the 80s because of the outfit but I was like 🤦♀️
Fact checking isn't rude. It's really helpful! This was informative and I enjoyed it
I went to school for design and studied fashion history. I must say YOU KNOW YOUR STUFF! Respect
Doesn't matter how hard they worked; it was poorly researched, and it showed. Doesn't matter if their intention was just to market to viewers; they still misrepresented the eras, and they got called out. I've seen vintage fashion YT'ers like yourself, Angela Clayton, Lily Jarlsson, produce far more interesting, stylish, and accurate vintage fashions as passing hobbyiests than these larger budget productions have, and that's the truth. If they want to get their knickers in a bunch instead of upping their game to the level of amateur RUclipsrs, that's on them. You did a fantastic job, btw.
I can't believe how wrong everything got the 1920's sense of style. LIKE IT'S SO EASY TO LOOK UP REFERENCES!! And isn't it just common sense to know the dresses were long, shapeless, and had a drop-waist? And that the hair was little delicate waves that were close to the head? I didn't have to do any research for that stuff, that's basic knowledge of the 1920 fashion for all I know
IDK why you randomly have basic knowledge of 1920 fashion. I certainly didn't. But yeah, it would've been reallyl easy to look up references.
Ive watched"the Great Gatsby" and understood 1920"s fashion better than this video 😂😂
krysta mathews I was just thinking about that. We had to watch the movie for my sophomore year of high school. 😂
Bravo, Karolina! I’ve always hated the Halloween costume styling of those videos and it’s so satisfying to hear someone with some actual fashion history knowledge dissecting them. I started following you ages ago since seeing your own 100 years of beauty video, it was so refreshing! Especially as someone from Eastern Europe myself, and our history wasn’t all based on Hollywood actresses of those times. So I just wanted to say thank you for educating us, I will forever be cringing at the inaccuracy of 1920s costumes at Gatsby themed parties.. :D
Omg! Like in 50 years vintage 2018 they will have a chick wear something Kim Kardashian wore. I’ll be 80 being like “um I never wore that crap” lol
yeah but then again just cause you never wore it doesnt mean it wasn't trending, I guess thats what these videos highlight idk
Hello61Jello They do try to depict fashion that’s not only trendy but was actually commonly worn amongst people, so Kim K fashion to represent the majority still wouldn’t make sense.
Hello61Jello they don’t depict trends so much as common attire
Yeah but I feel like a lot of them still depict whats more fashionable and trending. If people are studying fashion, wouldn't they study the fashion of those who care about fashion in the first place lol. I dont think they always depict common attire because age would be an issue. I think age is also important to consider, you wont see a 50 year old woman in a choker, yet when depicting 90's thats what people think others wore. Also, Kylie started are actually wearable and a lot of young women do dress in them. On my college campus I would even say majority. Then again, I guess they just have to be more specific about what they are depicting.
I dunno though, considering the age and gender of the model, it would only make sense to show in these videos what a 20-30-something woman would've worn. I don't think it'd be that big of a deal. Too bad though, that they didn't make parallel videos showing more "everyday" attire vs. trendier stuff. Though I suppose trendier stuff tends to be what really defines an era, I suppose.
I didn't want to piss them off...
Too badly.
🤣😂
I remember actually seeing that video and thought how unrealistic it was. Also several of the hairstyles were not what everyday people wore during those eras. I don’t take what videos like these put out because they’re not often accurate. I think they’re often trying to appeal to people who romanticize those eras and think of only the glamours aspects, not real life.
Karolina: talks about old fashion.
Cut: _"Write that down! Write that down! Hurry!"_
"Because I didn't want to piss them off... too badly."
You're so authentic. You literally look like you're from the 1940s. I was raised by my grandma who was born in the 1930s so I would know, and I showed her your video and she said you're beautiful, and that she loves your bird pin. And she also agreed the"victory rolls" shouldn't be see through..
Barf Salamandruid I don't think those are victory rolls...more of a wave. Very difficult to see though
Barf Salamandruid never mind. I thought you were talking about the narrator. You're absolutely right about the victory rolls
FINALLY someone said it!!! LOL
Behindthebunzie love your videos bun 👍
boy am I fangirling right now
but its just how they do their stuff whats the big deal?
OMG JESS WASSUP SIS
@@jellyjellywowie it's not accurate enough you Know what I mean? like they are interesting and good, but some people enjoy seeing the closest thing to The real deal
THEY CHOSE ERAS THAT HAD CAMERAS, MEANING ACTUAL PHOTO EVIDENCE--- AND THEN IGNORED THAT.
You know when you find a channel and you love it with all your heart and they use a clip from The Office and talk about things you love in a way you love and you're like, "what's gunna the next video be?" That was me today. Immediately subbed.
Same, but a day off
Jake I am indeed, Jake. I am indeed. 😊
People hate blunt honesty. Someone asked me to make one of those fringe dresses couple of times. She said she wanted to be an accurate flapper. Lol. I asked her if she wanted to be a bad rendition of a 20s hooker and pulled out a picture of my great grandma. She thought her outfit was ugly. I told her my grandma was an actual flapper. This is what they wore. Low heeled shoes, below the knee loose dresses and those hats she refused to wear. Plus her hair was cut up to her earlobes. Grandma told me her mom had a fit. I have a picture of her somewhere too scowling at the camera. We'd all probably look that mean in a full coverage dress with a corset and what looks like a bustle in the summer heat.
i'd love to see those pictures, i bet they're adorable.
Your grandmother sounds totally badass!
we love an educated queen
empretz I am so damn sick of hearing queen everywhere.
@@Kivamusicchannel so?
we love a comment-queen that loves an educated queen
@@Kivamusicchannel Well you're not hearing it here. You're reading it.
Your analysis of the different styles/eras is right on! I remember fashions from the 40's when I was born, to the present, and they get every decade wrong! All we have to do is watch the movies made from the teens to the present to see exactly what the styles were like and how they changed from decade to decade. Someone didn't do their homework.
I love your vintage a e s t h e t i c
Another problem I kinda had with some of these kinds of videos, they usually show what you would typically see models and film stars of the time wearing and not necessarily what people wore in their day to day lives
The 1960s (not 1920s) hat is me trying to take my own snacks to the cinema
Can you please go through Pride and Prejudice (2005) movie and give your takes on the accuracy of the fashion and general historical accuracy of the adaptation. Really love that movie!
She did briefly in this video
ruclips.net/video/fjch1Rzmv0U/видео.html
Too many pigs, not enough bonnets, too modern attitudes.
If you enjoy information like that, you might enjoy the blog Frock Flicks. They go through and analyse the accuracy of a lot of period dramas, including all the Pride and Prejudice adaptations. Soothed my soul when my friend said she thought 2005 P&P was better than the 1995 TV series...
@@BooksMusicMe17 thanku. Will check it out
Ugh, I love that adaptation... but I know there's a lot of harsh criticism on it.
"who deserves realness?" REALLY!?!? are they serious?
The meaning of "beauty through centuries" should be showing the REAL sense of past beauty. Searching and searching the truth...... Not saying "OMG, she said we were wrong, she hate us and wathever". It makes no sense, it's against their own video's philosphy
Truth me be told, those videos were one of the things that got me into historical fashion, but now that I’ve learned more I look at them and cringe
(I also hate the Allure videos)
As a historian I hate it when they don't get it right. I love your vidros. This was a great video idea.
Karolina isn't attacking them, she's correcting misinformation. Just because this misinformation isn't as dangerous as like medical misinformation, it should still be corrected
Well I am not a vintage hairstylist, I am a "modern one" but it doesn't take specific training to do some research on what people's hair looked like at said time - they just probably rushed the video and didn't do proper research :( . Thank you for sharing your point of view btw ! :D
They should really just say "modern spinoffs of decade styles". Like either go all the way in vintage accuracy or be honest that they wanted to modernize them
My mom is currently doing research for a fashion history inspired clothing line and I bought a book for her that details and gives resources on each era of fashion history
The book cost me less than $20. It’s not that hard to do some research.
Whats the name of the book? I am looking for detailed fashion books for a story I am working on.
And what's the name of the fashion line lol that sounds great
i didnt know peggy carter had a youtube channel
[i know its a terrible joke... but i had to]
She had to do something while Steve was away.
Janelle Northcut ofc
Aurora Nightingale I understood that reference.
"No, oh hell no, baby noo" made me laugh out so hard
I am SO glad you did this video! I hate most of these "evolution of fashion" videos because they are so inaccurate. I was born in 1966, and I remember what my mama wore, still have one of her dresses and 2 pillbox hats, I remember how my older sister and older cousins dressed in the 70s, I was a child of the 80s and just about EVERYONE gets that decade wrong! Lol! My look in the 90s was empire waist short dresses, leggings, and Docs, it's really crazy how they get so much of the 90s wrong too. I'm a hairstylist since 1986, and am a bookworm who adores history and classic Hollywood, so you are spot on about those years. I really love the pre code Hollywood films, cause you can see the underwear they wore! Lol! Seriously, it really makes you wonder if any actual research was done before making these evolution videos, because most of the time they're so inaccurate. I really love your channel, keep up the excellent work!
'66 an excellent vintage for humans😊
@@bigbluefrog Ain't that the truth! Lol!
Thanks for daring to criticize the historical inaccuracies! I think one really easy measure of general historical accuracy could be: If you think it looks "good" and you want to go out and buy it, then it is definitely not accurate. Our taste just does not fit with the times of our mothers and grandmothers.
they need to improve their work, you need to improve your memes mama
look on my chanel, theres a whole project im working on called 100 years of beauty done right
Can we just say how the model at 11:52 is so freaking beautiful
Would you consider doing a video about the history of patterns? I'm so impressed by the way you could spot which patterns in the videos looked historically inaccurate, teach us your secrets.
13:10 "Silhouettes began to hug the body more" they say, a decade after their skin-tight flapper costume
I want her to react to Safiya Nygaard’s different fashion era videos. Safiya seems pretty credible with her looks so I don’t think she would be disappointed, still curious about her input 🤔
a comment from karolina on a similar comment: “I think it’s decent, it looks a bit like a movie costume rather than what an ordinary person would wear, and the make up is slightly too vibrant I think, but I’m very impressed by the fact that she got the proper undergarments, which are key to every historical look. I think she did a better job on the 1960s though.”
Not loving you isn't an option. This and the other video were so real. Thank you, your opinion is valid and needed in these days of ignoring history. I remember the last 50 years pretty well and all that was jacked up. My grandmother had a picture of her in a 20s hat (taken in, you guessed it, the 20s), you are exactly right there. Sad.
You don't need to apologize for anything. Clearly your knowledge and passion on the topic far surpass that of others making similar videos. Never apologize for your excellence.
I can't forget Marie curie....
I'm really curious what's your opinion on accuracy of 20s fashion in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them :D
The lack of proper Dragonhide footwear is very troubling to me, post WW1 Dragonhide was actually very popular.
surely movies do a much better job at portraying vintage looks, then 5 minutes youtube videos that are secretly just ads/clikcbait
I woke up by the sound of church bells that did not seem to stop so to my frustration i grabbed my phone and decided to wait until they shut up, only a few minutes after this video was uploaded. As soon as i started the video the bells stopped. I am not religious but god wanted me to watch this
BEST COMMENT EVER
14:16 I thought she was gonna say she blacked out from confusion and visceral historical inaccuracy.
This video is 2 years old but still as relevant as ever.
Don't apologize for being 100% honest and matter-of-fact. Your viewers appreciate your honesty, and I personally enjoy learning from people who know what they're talking about.
Those “historical” fashion videos are awful. It always cracks me up when the real historical examples those videos show look nothing like their modern interpretations, like did no one making the video at any point stop and say “wait, she’s supposed to look like that?! Maybe we should try again?”
I’m glad you’re putting content like this out there because misinformation, especially from bigger media companies that most people actually trust to be telling the truth, is such a big problem, especially when it comes to history. Which is sad because the research isn’t difficult to do.