David - I've recently begun dipping a toe into the M43 waters, and I have to say that your thoughtful, pragmatic reviews are a really invaluable resource. Many thanks for devoting the time and energy into producing them - keep up the great work!
David Thorpe, reviews are sharp, livin long he dont play no harp. cameras and lenses are his friendses but he keeps it real always to the endses.Lol boy that was baad , even for me. Appreciate your reviews, believe me I know the amount of time and effort it takes to shoot and edit a thorough review like this. Respect
This is hands down the most thoughtful and helpful review of this Camera, despite it being focused on stills and I'm interested in the video features. I rarely take the time to comment but you earned it. Very well done
Another great review, David. Like in my comments a short time ago on your Pen-F review, I added the GX85 to my collection a couple of months ago. This review also validates that decision. As for your review videos, they're absolutely the best I've heard, anywhere. So concise, well spoken, a true pleasure to listen to. Thank you again!
Once again, another awesome informative review. Love your style David. 1000 views so far, 162 thumbs up and no down. Thanks for the video! Useful information for real camera users.
Good review as usual. Needed to upgrade from my old GX1, wanting Image stabilization and wifi filetransfer. Was about to get a used GX7 but found a black friday deal getting a GX80 body for a bargin. Thanks for a good review!
Finally a proper review of the GX80/85, a camera worthy to replace the GX7. When my GX7 dies, I will surely choose this camera to replace it. Regarding your comment on the GX8, I agree. The GX8 is anything but a GX7 replacement, and doesn't really have the GX7 "personalities". The GX8 is more suited as a "serious" body for us MFT shooters, sitting at the same place as the E-M1, E-M5 Mk II, and the GH4. I can already imagine a perfect dual body setup, consisting of the GX80/85 as GX8's sidekick, both wielding two different focal lengths that can cover any photography and video opportunities. Many thanks for the excellent review, David!
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, a GX8 and GX80 would make a good pairing. If I had a GX7 and was happy with it, like you I wouldn't be in a hurry to upgrade. The price is pretty reasonable but it will come down a bit as they all do. The GX7 was and remains, a sweet camera.
Thanks, David. Always enjoy your reviews. Just bought the now 2-year old GX85 (US) and your review was helpful in pointing out features I need to pay attention to!
Great review David. This is the second time I bought a Panny based on your review (last one was a GH3, after you kindly answered my comments back in 2013). Can't wait to hear your thoughts on the GH5, I mean, the GXXM584%$ :)
And another great and thoughtful review of a M43 camera from you David. Always a pleasure to watch and hear your thoughts on this stuff... As you can see, I'm becoming quite a fan of yours :)
Another great review David, measured and accurate, very impressed. I bought the GX80 for my wife after watching some of your reviews. I use a full frame Nikon system and wanted a small but competent camera that would supply reasonable raw files for me to process. It is the first Micro 4/3 system I have used. I have been so impressed with its abilities at low ISO I have started borrowing it with the 12-32 & 35-100mm compact zooms and UltraPod II mini tripod/strap clamp for travel. The Panasonic remote app is a revelation to me! I have been using the GX80 for two months getting some great images and saving carrying 10kg of FF body, glass & tripod when travelling. My back & I thank you!
Thanks for the kind words! I think you summed up the GX80 very well as competent. There's not much it can't do and with those lenses (the same as I use with my GX when I'm away) you hardly know you have it in the bag. The remote app, yes, very useful and something that is relatively easy to implement with an all electronic camera. It will never attain the out and out image quality of your Nikon but like you, in a fight between an aching back and IQ, my back is he winner! Glad you find my stuff helpful, very pleasing to me, thanks.
My pleasure, thank you. How I would love to use an app like that with my D810, truly eye opening. Based on my experience of the GX80 my friend has just purchased the G80 with 12-60mm and the 100-400 for lightweight wildlife photography. He doesn't like carrying around 150-600mm glass on his APS-C Nikon.
He/we went for the Micro 4/3 Panasonic G80 & 100-400mm based on your reviews. He's over tomorrow so I will get to have a play. If you get a chance have a look at the UltraPod II mini tripod. Not as rigid as your Manfrotto 709B and it will not take a FF dSLR & f/2.8 zoom but for lightweight city shooting with the GX80 and the compact zooms the ability to attach it to railings, small trees etc I have found very useful. I have an extra length of velcro that I can add to extend the size of objects i can attach it to and it only weighs 190g. I have just returned from a couple of days photographing The Shard and the More London area. After shooting all day and the blue hour/early evening with my Nikon gear I couldn't carry it anymore so I left it all at the hotel and just took the GX80, 12-32, 35-100, Ultrapod & the app out for night shots. Some of the best shots I got were with it in places a big tripod would have attracted too much attention. Off to Berlin in a week for two nights, only taking the Micro 4/3's gear, looking forward to travelling light. :-)
I bought one-- a jewel. I almost hate to use it--it's so nice. It's a bit less convenient hunting through menus, than my GH4 but now that I' reprogrammed a few of the buttons, it has been a nice addition for a second camera. The smaller size is welcome. I can put the camera in one cargo pocket and a lens in another and leave the bag at home. With the 12-32 zoom on it, it fits in one large pocket. Last weekend, I used it with the 14-140mm f3.5-5.6 boating and was able to get some really nice photos on the boat and surprisingly good shots of other boaters. I'll have to try it with my 100-300mm. Pictures are very sharp with my better lenses. I'd like to do some tests to compare them.
Nice review. Picked up mine as an upgrade from my GM1 and I love it. For me this is a truly great hybrid , very strong on stills and video alike. Love the OIS. I always feel as if Panasonic listen to their customers, and that encourages my continued loyalty to the brand.
You sometimes get the impression that they don't listen - over shutter shock, say. But then, suddenly, out of the blue, they bring out something that solves the problem all at one go. I'd always wondered how long they could hold out against body stabilization,then came one try, OK but not great, with the GX7. Next thing, dual stabilization, so no-one feels they've wasted money on an optically stabilized lens because it works better than sensor stabilization alone would. Clever thinking.
On the strength of your reviews I have just taken delivery of a GX80 with Olympus 17mm 1.8. My travel bag now consists of said body and lens as well as an Olympus 45mm 1.8. Stunning results I must say and so wonderful to return to prime lenses. When I started as a pro I had two Nikon FM bodies, Nikkor 24mm 2.8, Nikon 105mm 2.5, Nikon 35-70 2.8 and Nikkor 300mm f4. I've been a pro snapper for UK quality nationals since 1992 and since 2006 have been using Canon DSLRs. I currently have a 5D MK3 and 6D MK1 full frame with lenses. Huge heavy bag to carry. Now, thanks to Mr Thorpe, I also have GX8+Olympus 12-40 2.8+Panasonic 35-100 2.8 all in a small Domke bag. Obviously on close inspection the full frames DSLRs have the quality edge but that is subjective. Compare the GX8/GX80 to my early Nikon D1/D1X/Canon 20D/7D/70D and the MFT win hands down. And I was getting half and full page pictures in colour in The Independent from a 2.74 megapixel Nikon! Keep on reviewing old chap and I'll beep buying.
Interesting, Thurston. It's often forgotten just how small a pixel count is really needed for most photographic outlets. I don't know how many editorial photographers are using Micro Four Thirds now - some use Fuji, I know. But professionals tend to be very conservative with their cameras, anything new has to really be up to it and earn its keep.
I'm afraid that from experience, many national 'snappers' refer to the MFT as toy cameras. They still prefer their huge lenses and camera bodies. More fool them! It's not how big it is, it's how you use it...as the old saying goes.
Absolutely. I use a Samsung S8+ phone and I reckon one of those properly used would be no different from a Canon in newsprint. But only for a limited range of subjects. Wouldn't care to rely on one in a riot or a half page landscape! I read somewhere that some Magnum people are using Micro Four Thirds in war zones.
I've owned this camera for about a month now (I bought it partly because of this review) and I'm still coming to this review just because I enjoy it, haha. Thanks for making the video, David. 20mm 1.7 II coming tomorrow.
Hi David, thanks for the review! Just a thought about your comment on the lack of tilting EVF. It was a "Who cares" feature when I bought my GX8 awhile back and while I still feel that way overall, I notice I pop it out of the detent every time it comes out of the bag now. When you mentioned the lack of it, I realized I use it to keep my nose off the screen and I think I will miss it now. And thinking about it, I'm not sure any of the reviews I've watched (I haven't watched any on the GX7) have given Panasonic credit for fixing the nose on touch screen problem. As you are also a GX8 shooter, I'd like to ask you: While it would probably get criticized for being strange, do you think the GX80 would have been better to have fixed the EVF tilted at 10-15 degrees?
Glad you like the reviews, Mark, thanks. You'd likely be happy with either camera. The biggest single difference is the rangefinder or DSLR styling which is a personal preference. The GX80 has a smaller EVF, which I find perfectly fine but some don't like. On the other hand the Panasonic has better video. The Olympus is a safe choice if you don't do a lot of video - I see you would buy the Mark II. That would be my choice too for the metal rather than plastic body of the III. The Panasonic has better autofocus which may be a factor. It's not a big difference in day to day use but Panasonic's AFC is definitely more reliable. One more factor is that the GX80's shape makes it a bit more convenient for general carrying around in a shoulder bag, And with the 12-32, it's very compact and has dual stabilization. Add the 35-100 compact zoom and you have a highly capable, highly mobile outfit.
Perfect review. I was almost sold on the GX7 - perhaps from Ebay, and you've now thrown me back into confusion. I'm a Lumix point&shoot owner looking to get a bit more creative. From your excellent review I know you are going to recommend I try both and see which I like best - I just wish someone would make the decision for me! Lovely paced reviews. Big fan.
Thanks Tim! If I were you and if you are willing to spend the extra money I'd buy the GX80/85. The shutter and better stabilization are worth it alone and you get the other capabilities, 4K etc, as a bonus.
Just bought one. The UK price is now below £500, and it becomes a pocketable camera, albeit a bit heavy if wearing designer jeans..... And I can use my Olympus lenses. A great review, which is sending me away to explore features I didn't know the camera had!
Nice review. I got 1/250 sync with a manual flash. I agree- a swiss arm knife... bad at nothing... good to excellent at many things. I received mine 1 month ago, and I've been enjoying it a lot for both photos and video.
Great review, David! Thanks for all the hard work! Do you think this camera would be a noticeable improvement over the Pany G7 in terms of getting sharper images with the new Panasonic 100-400mm f/4.0-6.3 lens? Thanks!
Thanks Linda. You'd have the dual stabilization with the GX80 but you'd want to use high shutter speeds with the 100-400 so not a radical difference. I like the little bit of extra crispness with the loss of the low pass filter too but again, not radical. Personally, a big lens like the 100-400 would, for me., sit better with a DSLR layout with a central EVF than the GX80's left side fitting. Also, the G7 has a better EVF which is important with a big long lens. All in all, I'm saving you spending your money again, Linda! Any more of this and you'll be firing me :-)
I'm late to the GX80 party, but my GM1 just refuses to give up the ghost - so I bought one anyway! Just wanted to recommend your very helpful book 'GX80 Menu System Simplified' which I would say is a must-have accessory to this terrific camera. I bought this as I was very impressed by the little book you wrote for the GM1 and I have not been disappointed - thank you!
Hi David, the best review of the GX80 I've seen/read so far, thanks as usual! I've got one question on the sensor and one on the flash :) 1. Have you had moiré issues because of the lack of low-pass filter? I shoot a lot of architectures and so it might be an issue. 2. Can you bounce the flash on the ceiling as it was possible with the GX1 and GX7? I love that feature on my GX1! Thanks again...
Hi Giorgio - thanks. I didn't have any moire issues and I believe the camera software is tweaked to get rid of it. The flash, yes you can bounce it but it has to be held in position, as with the GM1.
My GX85 arrives tomorrow. I wonder if you could share your custom settings in a video. I'm curious about the scenarios a seasoned pro like yourself would set for and the settings for each. Thanks for the awesome review. Very excited about the camera, my first micro 4/3.
That's an idea, Mark and thanks for the kind remarks about the video. You've certainly started out in Micro Four Thirds with a great camera. I'll see about a settings video. I tend to set up a basic modus operandim, put it on Custom 1 and alter it temporarily from there if necessary.
Difficult because the better stabilization and shutter are well worth having. On the other hand the 20Mp sensor and articulated monitor and superb EVF is worth having on the GX8. All in all, I'd prefer the GX8 for sheer usability. Probably the best thing would be to go much simpler and decide which camera's size you prefer.
You answered my question there too David, but as I already have a GX8, it isn't that much of a choice. It's just nice to know that once again, your opinion mirror[les]s mine. I haven't really encountered the reputed shutter-shock issue, whether that's dumb luck or shooting style, I don't know.
The shutter shock is there from 1/60th to around 1/350th but at normal viewing levels is particularly really noticeable. I use the electronic shutter as standard, because it prolongs battery life and I can choose how loud it is so it's not really an issue for me. I don't think shooting style affects it, it's internal and occurs on a tripod just as much as handheld. It's better to have eliminated it, as the GX80 shutter does but at normal screen viewing or print sizes it's not a big problem/ All cameras with focal plane shutters suffer from it, it's just more apparent on Micro Four Thirds for some reason.
@@DavidThorpeMFT Thanks! I only have the base 12-32 mm lens, so I would have to select the 37mm version right? Great review too, made me buy it actually!
I haven't got the GX80 now Gabriela, I have to sell one thing to buy another. I do go through the differences in this video but basically, if you are buying from new it's worth getting the GX9 for the 20Mp sensor and other incremental improvements. If you already had a GX80, I don't think it would be worth the quite high cost of upgrading since the improvements _are_ mainly incremental. I'd wait to see what a GX10 might have to offer in that case, in a year or two's time.
Hi Simon and thanks! The fittings are all from Peak Design, as is the wrist strap. The leather strap is from Olympus - a lovely leather one they sell from their store. The Peak Design stuff is very flexible so you can use it to make quick release straps even of straps you already own.
Excellent video as always. Are these lenses included with the camera good enough. What other lense would you recommend for street portrait and landscape use? Which for 4k video ?
The 12-32mm supplied is about the sharpest of the standard zooms and a real keeper. I like the Olympus 17mm f/1.8 with this camera, a sort of modern take on a Leica. Also with the Olympus 54mm or Panasonic 42.5mm f/1.7 for portraits. A good longer lens with this is the tiny Panasonic 35-100 f/4-5.6 zoom. That and the 12-32mm make a ridiculously small and light travel and out and about outfit.
As usual, professional, thorough and precise. A bit low drops in the voice, though. Hey, your dual light (or whatever it's called) panoramic example looks like one I saw in another video. Looks like some small houses at sunset. Was it from Panasonic? I doubt either of you took it from one another. Just curious, as you seem to do all your own photos. CHeers. PS: I think this is the camera for me. I wanted a GX8, but I think it's too big for my use.
Thanks - my audio is improving all the time thanks to Karol Walkowski but audio is intrinsically difficult. The pictures, every frame, still or video is shot by me and is my own work. The view you are referring to is from my bedroom window in a tiny village in southern France so no-one else could have such a shot. You might have seen it in one of my other videos but if not, it was certainly nicked. If you do see it again would you let me know? There are a few pretty flaky people on RUclips! This and the GX8, the GX80 is a very handy size and it is the camera I take with me everywhere. It's very compact but feels very wieldy and uncramped in the hand.
Excellent review Mr. Thorpe! I bought my first ever system camera the other year, the Lumix GX800/850 and a Panasonic 25mm/1.7 lens instead of the included kit lens. I thought the slim package and low cost would be worth the lack of EVF. I want to keep things as minimal and cheap as possible, and I will try to master 50mm photography with one camera only. Had I seen this review before I would have gone for this one instead... Having an EVF and more robustness for a very small increase in price...
Thanks! For me the EVF is a crucial item but I know people who have never used one and it doesn't seem to hamper them too much. The results you get on the GX800 won't be any different, in any case.
BTW, I bought one of these as the double cash back offer in the UK at present makes it a no-brainer. It is a superb camera and should really be sold as the 'digital Leica CL', imho.
I enjoyed your review of the GX80, David. Can the flash be pulled aft for bouncing? Perhaps it is just me but the text was displayed so briefly that I had to pause the video many times to read what you had typed. I'm probably just slow. I've been waiting so long for focus bracketing on these cameras for my insecting hobby. Too bad it isn't up to snuff.
I take your point about the text. I'm trying to impart a bit of extra information but not distract from the voiceover. I'll keep the text going a little longer and see how it works out. The focus bracketing works well for what it is meant to do but it sort of focus at, say 12 inches, then 10 inches, then 14. Then it moves to 14 inches, does 12 and 16 and them moves on to...The trouble is, for focus stacking you really want it to focus from the nearest point to the furthest and stack them. Post Focus can do it but it is a pain of trial and error extracting the frames that will work best.
The appearance reminds me of a stealth bomber, with a performance just as deadly. I now have two of them, and they're my main cameras. Thanks for this review, which pointed me in the right direction....
Been wanting to get into photography for a while, but never liked the huge, bulky cameras. Found a deal for the GX80 /w the kit lens new for about $400, and couldn't stop myself from ordering it. Might get the M. Zuiko 25mm/1.8 for low light photos at a later date, but for now I feel it should be a nice enough step up from my phone for learning. Thanks for the review!
You're welcome, Anton! You'll find it a big step up from the phone, I think, good as phones are these days. It's the extra control you have that makes photography more pleasurable, in particular control over perspective and exposure. I'd agree with getting a faster lens later on. I think you'll find plenty to keep you interested for a long while with the kit lens. Have fun!
Yes, no question. It's a very different camera from the GH4 making it suitable for all the tasks that the GH4 with its size is less good for, street photography, for example. A perfect complement.
Good review...I am curious to know that since the gx85 doesn't have a microphone port if you can possibly use the usb port with a headphone adapter to plug in an external mike
Wonderful review, I enjoyed your dry humor! I love this camera but I'm disappointed with the lack of external mic. I will mainly use the camera for stills but will do some motion - did you think the built-in stereo mic was decent enough? I won't be filming concerts, mainly landscapes and family but the mic on my LX7 really leaves something to be desired even under those scenarios... Also, did you enjoy the E-M10 MII or G80 more?? Cheers.
Thanks for the kind words! Overall I prefer the feel of GX80. It feels more snappy to use and more modern generally. I find the built in mic does a decent enough job on insect noises, for example. It wouldn't be much trouble to buy a digital recorder and separate mic if you want better, they are simple to sync in video editing software, just line them up.
Sorry, I can't really help there. I stick to Micro Four Thirds equipment and it wouldn't be right for me to recommend anything I hadn't worked with myself. Lovely cameras, the Fujis.
Very nice review David. I bought the camera on the strength of it. I have a couple of prime lenses for it (Olympus 17mm F1.8 and PanaLeica 25mm F1.4). For landscape use, which of the wide angle primes or zooms would you feel are decent quality and sized comfortably for this camera (I'm dithering over going for a zoom as there seems to be no filter comaptiility)
There's really only the Olympus 12mm f/2 as a prime. The Panasonic 14mm is a nice lens but not that much wider than the 17mm. Ditto the Panasonic 15mm. The 12mm f/1.4 Panasonic would be nice but is very, very expensive. Overall, I'd say the Olympus 12mm f/2. Of zooms, the 12-40mm Olympus is amazingly good. Of the ultra wide zooms, both 7-14mms are excellent and a perfect match for your lens lineup. But, no filters. Some people have found ways to fit filters but they are all a bit of a lash-up on such expensive optics.
Hi, wonderful review, I watched this and the one on the Olympus EM10 mark II. I want to buy a solid compact camera and currently on the fence between those two and I just can't decide which one is the better choice. Mostly plan to use it on vacations for landscape photography etc. I would appreciate your input!
Thank you, Veronica. Either one will do the job with similar IQ and in reality I'd be happy to work with either, there's no wrong or bad choice here. There are two main differences between the cameras, one is the body design, rangefinder or DSLR. Your preference there can only be made by hands on with both. The other difference is in the EVF, in that the Olympus's is bigger and easier to use. I'd suggest that the Olympus would suit you better, mainly for the EVF but also that the DSLR design is more mainstream and suits more people. The Mark II is a little jewel, actually and my favourite in the Olympus range. Just to muddy the waters, there's an update to the GX80 now, the GX9. It has a 20Mp sensor but still the same EVF and my choice would remain the same.
Thank you for the reply! So I looked at the Olympus in kits and it is being sold with either the 14-42 II R lense or the EZ (pancake one). Which one would you recommend (if you tried them both)? The pancake one is smaller so of course it would be a bit more handy for travelling. However it is a bit more expensive. Is it really better, do the photos look better taken with the pancake lens than the II R one or the other way around and more expensive does not necessarily mean better in this case?
The pancake standard zoom has rather disappointing sharpness. It's not unusable or anything but you'd do better with the bigger standard zoom, which is not big by any means but has much better performance. It's unusual for Olympus to produce a less than good lens but in the pancake's case they seem to have done so.
Hey, thanks! The G7 has a much better EVF and feels so differentl, it's hard to decide. Overall, the GX85 because of the stabilization and new shutter but if I had all stabilized lenses, probably the G7. I like articulated monitors and I find the DSLR design better for video. But..I'm happy using either.
No adaptors necessary, Paul. Micro Four Thirds is a standard which both Panasonic, Olympus and various lens and movie camera makers adhere to. If any item described as Micro Four Thirds then it will function with any other piece of equipment so designated. I use a mixture of Olympus and Panasonic lenses on my cameras without even thinking about it.
@@DavidThorpeMFT oh that is really good! I have a Sony A6000, but I feel limited when it comes to affordable lenses. The main downside is no in body IS and my favourite lens for it, the Sigma 30mm f2.8 doesn't either. Whilst I get good results it's hit and miss and I predominantly use my camera for stills. I am now leaning towards a Panasonic G80 which is how I came across your channel, which is wonderful. If your youtube stats took a leap skyward today, then that was me :-)
@@p_aulwhite Thanks, Paul! Yes, the G80 will happily work with any Micro Four Thirds and stabilise it too. There's a G90 now which has the 20Mp sensor but apart from that is technically much the same same as the G80. I personally don't think the extra pixels are worth the extra money.
@@DavidThorpeMFT Yes, thank you for your reply. The prices soon drop on replaced models and the G80 specs would be good enough for my online work. I rarely print and when I do, I never print large, so I won't miss those extra megapixels. The in body IS is a deal maker for me.
Hi David, again what a brilliant review ! I just have a quick question. Im having trouble to decide which body should I buy between emd5 ii, emd10 ii, gx8 and gx85. I would like to hear from your experience which one of these cameras has the best AF among them ? Thank you for your respond.
Thanks John! The best AF rests with the Panasonics at the moment, in my experience with Panasonic or Olympus lenses. Both makes are very fast by any standards but the Panasonic's S-AF lock on is so fast that it makes AF-C unnecessary for all but the fastest moving subjects. Of the bodies, I like the E-M10ii or GX8 personally. The E=M10ii because it fits my hands and handles so nicely, the GX8 because it is so well laid out and the gorgeous EVF. For one camera to use all the time, I'd choose the GX8 overall. But if someone told me I had to use any one of these cameras, I'd be happy.
As always I love your simple straight to the point explanation ! thanks for the heads up David. After hearing from you I think Im gonna go with the GX85 since it has dual IS for 4K vid and the price is the best bang for the buck atm. I hope my decision is not wrong lol. Once again thank you David ! Appreciate it so much :)
You're welcome, John. There isn't wrong decision here - all are excellent cameras. The GX8 has dual stabilization too but the GX85 is certainly great value, especially with the new shutter which feels very pleasing to use. And, yes it has all the latest developments including 4K Crop which is a bit like having the camera on rails. Only works for FHD, though you shoot in 4K. Great camera and one I use a great deal.
One improvement over the GX7 worth mentioning is "Depth From Defocus" now much improves AF, tracking in particular. For those considering the more robust GX8 or G80 then the screen type may sway you one way or the other. GX80 is tilt only, the other 2 are fully articulating. Also to bear in mind with electronic shutter besides rolling shutter is files are reduced to 10bit so expect lower dynamic range and more noise in post if pushing shadows.
Great demo David, love the dry English jokes. Do you think the gx8 will be the end of the 20mp pana line? I'm really hoping they keep it going so the gx9 has the new shutter plus all the other bells and whistles on the body. No audio input is really annoying.
I have ni inside information but I reckon all Micro Four Thirds cameras will move to the 20Mp sensor gradually. I'd expect a GX9 to consolidate all the camera upgrades but I don't think they would add audio in[uts simply because they want to compromise the GH4(5?) as their top line video choice.
Quick question if you have time David. I use a handstrap rather than a neckstrap for my GM1, but sometimes a neck one is useful. I noticed that you're using the same strap holder for your PEN-F, GX8 and GX80. Could you please let us know what strap is that one and if it doubles up as a hand/neck strap? Thanks a lot!!!
Hi Jose - they're from a company called Peak Design. The main thing is that the fittings on the camera are quick release so can be used for straps or wrist straps and even your own strap if you wish. I put a pair on each camera so that I only need one strap or wrist strap for all my cameras. They're very quick to slip on and off and importantly, very secure.
Excellent review, as always. Thank you for the intensive work. Though filming on a bicycle on a very wobbly path would not be my obvious choice to demonstrate the good dual stabilization. It is time to swap my LX100.
I agree about the bicycle, actually but its hard to demonstrate that something _not_ shaking. So I thought showing something that ought to be impossible might do it. Given the price you get for used cameras these days, I wonder about selling them. I have to because otherwise I couldn't afford to buy the new one for review but might't it be worth keeping the LX100 in the car glove compartment or desk at work?
+David Thorpe Thanks for your response. You are right, I don't sell my LX100. I love it but the 4K videos I make are shaky. That is why the GX80 is so tempting. Actually I hope that soon there will be an LX200 that offers the same stabilization as the GX80.
great review! would you say the 5 axis stabilization would make the non stabilized panny/leica prime lenses that much more versatile? I typically keep my 12-35 f2.8 on my g7 just for the stabilization in case I need to shoot a video run and gun style, while my primes don't see much playtime and usually sit there unless I absolutely need the extra speed / shallow depth of field
Yes, I definitely would. A non stabilized lens on this camera has quite similar performance to a stabilized one on a non-stabilzed body. What is new is that the IBIS is available for video now.
First of all, the e-shutter won't work with flash. It also will not let you set speeds longer than one second. And with fast moving subjects there is an effect which causes uprights in an image to appear as if they are sloping. The e-shutter will give you a faster shutter speed than the mechanical one and it uses less battery power. It can also, if you wish, be completely silent. You can also set a shutter sound from several choices and vary the volume of them. Basically, you can use the e-shutter all the time except when you need to do something it doesn't allow. Image quality is unaffected by it.
By the way, I just ordered a GX80 (europe) with a 14-140 3.5-5.6. For 819 euros I think it's a good deal, especially since my epl1 with 14-45 and 20 f1.7 has a broken screen. So I needed a new body and I have always been interested in the 14-140 but is was at about 650 euro in europe expensive. Now they offer it as kitlens with gx85 which makes it much more attractive.
Great review as always, David. I've bought this camera on three different occassions, first when it came out but I didn't like the handling as it felt a bit too heavily weighted on the right side of the body. The second time was to give it another whirl but I still couldn't take to it. So on the 3rd occassion I bought it primarily as a video camera and suddenly found myself warming to it. Now I still have and use it for both video and stills and its great for both and I've gotten used to its handling. The only things I still don't like are the EVF and the screen doesn't flip up or fully articulate. That aside the GX80 is a great little camera.
I'm very fond of mine. It's a perfect size for an all round Micro Four Thirds camera and with the 12-32 and 35-100 gives an absurdly small but high quality outfit. I agree about the screen, though it is perfectly usable. Just a shame that it isn't native 4:3. When you set the camera to 3:2 (I don't use it, myself) the EVF is a much more useful size. And the monitor, there are a lot of people who prefer the flip up. I don't because it's no use for portrait orientation. On the other hand, if a fully articulated screen added much more depth to the body, I prefer to leave it as it is. As you say, a great little camera with a whisper quiet shutter and very good stabilization.
RIP Mr. Thorpe. Thank you for all the knowledge and memories.
David's reviews are always accurate and down to earth. A great photographer and teacher and a lasting legacy in these videos. R.I.P.
A new fan of David and sad to hear of his passing.
David - I've recently begun dipping a toe into the M43 waters, and I have to say that your thoughtful, pragmatic reviews are a really invaluable resource. Many thanks for devoting the time and energy into producing them - keep up the great work!
The way he ends every episode, was unique. We miss you David.
David Thorpe, reviews are sharp, livin long he dont play no harp. cameras and lenses are his friendses but he keeps it real always to the endses.Lol boy that was baad , even for me. Appreciate your reviews, believe me I know the amount of time and effort it takes to shoot and edit a thorough review like this. Respect
It is a lot of work but comments like yours make it well worthwhile. Thanks!
This is hands down the most thoughtful and helpful review of this Camera, despite it being focused on stills and I'm interested in the video features. I rarely take the time to comment but you earned it. Very well done
I'm flattered - thanks very much Brandon.
Usb charging, thank you for covering this detail. M43 is great for travel and this feature helps so much now.
Hadn't thought of that but yes, handy to charge in a hire car or external battery. I wonder if there is a solar charger capable of dealing with it?
Thank you David, it is always a pleasure to listen to someone so articulate and sophisticated - liked the box simile near the end.
Thanks Stef!
Another great review, David. Like in my comments a short time ago on your Pen-F review, I added the GX85 to my collection a couple of months ago. This review also validates that decision. As for your review videos, they're absolutely the best I've heard, anywhere. So concise, well spoken, a true pleasure to listen to. Thank you again!
Thanks, Alan. Much appreciated.
This is why David is a must watch for anything M43.
Thanks!
Love Love LOVE the Jason and the Argonauts animations! Great audio and images too. Very well done!
Thanks very much, John, it's nice to know it is appreciated.
Once again, another awesome informative review. Love your style David. 1000 views so far, 162 thumbs up and no down. Thanks for the video! Useful information for real camera users.
Yes, that's what I aim for, a real world use of the camera. I'm still bemused by the popularity of my videos - but I like it! Thanks for the comment.
Good review as usual.
Needed to upgrade from my old GX1, wanting Image stabilization and wifi filetransfer.
Was about to get a used GX7 but found a black friday deal getting a GX80 body for a bargin.
Thanks for a good review!
Finally a proper review of the GX80/85, a camera worthy to replace the GX7. When my GX7 dies, I will surely choose this camera to replace it.
Regarding your comment on the GX8, I agree. The GX8 is anything but a GX7 replacement, and doesn't really have the GX7 "personalities". The GX8 is more suited as a "serious" body for us MFT shooters, sitting at the same place as the E-M1, E-M5 Mk II, and the GH4.
I can already imagine a perfect dual body setup, consisting of the GX80/85 as GX8's sidekick, both wielding two different focal lengths that can cover any photography and video opportunities.
Many thanks for the excellent review, David!
Glad it's helpful - thanks!
Thanks for the kind words. Yes, a GX8 and GX80 would make a good pairing. If I had a GX7 and was happy with it, like you I wouldn't be in a hurry to upgrade. The price is pretty reasonable but it will come down a bit as they all do. The GX7 was and remains, a sweet camera.
Thanks, David. Always enjoy your reviews. Just bought the now 2-year old GX85 (US) and your review was helpful in pointing out features I need to pay attention to!
There's not much the G85 can't do - and compact and light with it. Excellent camera, you'll love it.
David Thorpe - thanks, David. Comes tomorrow. Excited to try it out.
Great review David. This is the second time I bought a Panny based on your review (last one was a GH3, after you kindly answered my comments back in 2013).
Can't wait to hear your thoughts on the GH5, I mean, the GXXM584%$ :)
Thanks Zhixi - yes, I'm looking forward to the GH5 too. Unless they change the name, of course :-)
And another great and thoughtful review of a M43 camera from you David.
Always a pleasure to watch and hear your thoughts on this stuff...
As you can see, I'm becoming quite a fan of yours :)
Thanks very much, Andrea! It means a lot to me to hear that :-)
Another great review David, measured and accurate, very impressed. I bought the GX80 for my wife after watching some of your reviews. I use a full frame Nikon system and wanted a small but competent camera that would supply reasonable raw files for me to process. It is the first Micro 4/3 system I have used. I have been so impressed with its abilities at low ISO I have started borrowing it with the 12-32 & 35-100mm compact zooms and UltraPod II mini tripod/strap clamp for travel. The Panasonic remote app is a revelation to me! I have been using the GX80 for two months getting some great images and saving carrying 10kg of FF body, glass & tripod when travelling. My back & I thank you!
Thanks for the kind words! I think you summed up the GX80 very well as competent. There's not much it can't do and with those lenses (the same as I use with my GX when I'm away) you hardly know you have it in the bag. The remote app, yes, very useful and something that is relatively easy to implement with an all electronic camera. It will never attain the out and out image quality of your Nikon but like you, in a fight between an aching back and IQ, my back is he winner! Glad you find my stuff helpful, very pleasing to me, thanks.
My pleasure, thank you. How I would love to use an app like that with my D810, truly eye opening. Based on my experience of the GX80 my friend has just purchased the G80 with 12-60mm and the 100-400 for lightweight wildlife photography. He doesn't like carrying around 150-600mm glass on his APS-C Nikon.
That 100-400 focuses like lightning, great wildlife lens.
He/we went for the Micro 4/3 Panasonic G80 & 100-400mm based on your reviews. He's over tomorrow so I will get to have a play. If you get a chance have a look at the UltraPod II mini tripod. Not as rigid as your Manfrotto 709B and it will not take a FF dSLR & f/2.8 zoom but for lightweight city shooting with the GX80 and the compact zooms the ability to attach it to railings, small trees etc I have found very useful. I have an extra length of velcro that I can add to extend the size of objects i can attach it to and it only weighs 190g. I have just returned from a couple of days photographing The Shard and the More London area. After shooting all day and the blue hour/early evening with my Nikon gear I couldn't carry it anymore so I left it all at the hotel and just took the GX80, 12-32, 35-100, Ultrapod & the app out for night shots. Some of the best shots I got were with it in places a big tripod would have attracted too much attention. Off to Berlin in a week for two nights, only taking the Micro 4/3's gear, looking forward to travelling light. :-)
Net jon that tripod, very versatile. Have a good trip to Berlin.
A review so good, I watched it twice. Hoping some of this makes it into the GH5. However, I may buy one of these too for an everyday carry.
Thanks! Yes, a GX80 would make an excellent second camera to a GH5, whenever it arrives.
I bought one-- a jewel. I almost hate to use it--it's so nice. It's a bit less convenient hunting through menus, than my GH4 but now that I' reprogrammed a few of the buttons, it has been a nice addition for a second camera. The smaller size is welcome. I can put the camera in one cargo pocket and a lens in another and leave the bag at home. With the 12-32 zoom on it, it fits in one large pocket. Last weekend, I used it with the 14-140mm f3.5-5.6 boating and was able to get some really nice photos on the boat and surprisingly good shots of other boaters. I'll have to try it with my 100-300mm. Pictures are very sharp with my better lenses. I'd like to do some tests to compare them.
Been in youtube daily waiting for this review - thanks David !!
Nothing like a pop up flash that does ceiling bounce.
Thanks Jose - yes you can bounce the flash, though it has to be held back manually.
Love the stop motion monitor flip. Nice.
Thanks Shannon!
Nice review. Picked up mine as an upgrade from my GM1 and I love it. For me this is a truly great hybrid , very strong on stills and video alike. Love the OIS. I always feel as if Panasonic listen to their customers, and that encourages my continued loyalty to the brand.
You sometimes get the impression that they don't listen - over shutter shock, say. But then, suddenly, out of the blue, they bring out something that solves the problem all at one go. I'd always wondered how long they could hold out against body stabilization,then came one try, OK but not great, with the GX7. Next thing, dual stabilization, so no-one feels they've wasted money on an optically stabilized lens because it works better than sensor stabilization alone would. Clever thinking.
Indeed Panny has top grade engineers and the firm works like a true big dog--don't bark much.
I suspect the extra weight is due to heat sinks to allow the extended 4K video operation.
Good analogy at the end, David. This camera intrigues me for the potential for macro work (4k burst). Thank you for yet another thoughtful review.
Thanks Dustin. For moving insects 4k would be excellent.
thanks David - always appreciate your reviews. For me, the well-stabilised video on this for family/holidays is a big deal.
Thanks for that. At last Panansonic are catching (have caught) up on the stabilization front!
I enjoy your reviews quite a bit. Thank you for the effort you put into them.
Thanks! They do take a lot of effort but its fun and comments like yours just make it better :-)
On the strength of your reviews I have just taken delivery of a GX80 with Olympus 17mm 1.8. My travel bag now consists of said body and lens as well as an Olympus 45mm 1.8. Stunning results I must say and so wonderful to return to prime lenses. When I started as a pro I had two Nikon FM bodies, Nikkor 24mm 2.8, Nikon 105mm 2.5, Nikon 35-70 2.8 and Nikkor 300mm f4. I've been a pro snapper for UK quality nationals since 1992 and since 2006 have been using Canon DSLRs. I currently have a 5D MK3 and 6D MK1 full frame with lenses. Huge heavy bag to carry. Now, thanks to Mr Thorpe, I also have GX8+Olympus 12-40 2.8+Panasonic 35-100 2.8 all in a small Domke bag. Obviously on close inspection the full frames DSLRs have the quality edge but that is subjective. Compare the GX8/GX80 to my early Nikon D1/D1X/Canon 20D/7D/70D and the MFT win hands down. And I was getting half and full page pictures in colour in The Independent from a 2.74 megapixel Nikon! Keep on reviewing old chap and I'll beep buying.
Interesting, Thurston. It's often forgotten just how small a pixel count is really needed for most photographic outlets. I don't know how many editorial photographers are using Micro Four Thirds now - some use Fuji, I know. But professionals tend to be very conservative with their cameras, anything new has to really be up to it and earn its keep.
I'm afraid that from experience, many national 'snappers' refer to the MFT as toy cameras. They still prefer their huge lenses and camera bodies. More fool them! It's not how big it is, it's how you use it...as the old saying goes.
Absolutely. I use a Samsung S8+ phone and I reckon one of those properly used would be no different from a Canon in newsprint. But only for a limited range of subjects. Wouldn't care to rely on one in a riot or a half page landscape! I read somewhere that some Magnum people are using Micro Four Thirds in war zones.
Excellent review of a great budget mirrorless camera. It's my go to one hand camera for video and photo.
Thanks!
Great review David, many thanks - just don't fall off that bike!
Hahaa! I certainly wouldn't chance it on a public raod :-)
I really do like your down to Earth reviews.
I've owned this camera for about a month now (I bought it partly because of this review) and I'm still coming to this review just because I enjoy it, haha.
Thanks for making the video, David.
20mm 1.7 II coming tomorrow.
Glad you enjoyed it, Marcos!
Really great reviews and always spot on. Thanks David.
Thank you, Robert.
Excellent review as always. And I like your sense of humour. Your jokes are said with a straight face.
Thanks very much Sanveer. What jokes :-)
Awesome review David. Love your voice :)
Thanks, John!
Hi David, thanks for the review! Just a thought about your comment on the lack of tilting EVF. It was a "Who cares" feature when I bought my GX8 awhile back and while I still feel that way overall, I notice I pop it out of the detent every time it comes out of the bag now. When you mentioned the lack of it, I realized I use it to keep my nose off the screen and I think I will miss it now. And thinking about it, I'm not sure any of the reviews I've watched (I haven't watched any on the GX7) have given Panasonic credit for fixing the nose on touch screen problem.
As you are also a GX8 shooter, I'd like to ask you: While it would probably get criticized for being strange, do you think the GX80 would have been better to have fixed the EVF tilted at 10-15 degrees?
thanks for the video. bought the camera because of it. Happy New Year.
You won't buying it - a lovely camera. Happy New Year to you too!
Im really enjoying your reviews. Im trying to decide now between this and the OM10 mkii.
Glad you like the reviews, Mark, thanks. You'd likely be happy with either camera. The biggest single difference is the rangefinder or DSLR styling which is a personal preference. The GX80 has a smaller EVF, which I find perfectly fine but some don't like. On the other hand the Panasonic has better video. The Olympus is a safe choice if you don't do a lot of video - I see you would buy the Mark II. That would be my choice too for the metal rather than plastic body of the III. The Panasonic has better autofocus which may be a factor. It's not a big difference in day to day use but Panasonic's AFC is definitely more reliable. One more factor is that the GX80's shape makes it a bit more convenient for general carrying around in a shoulder bag, And with the 12-32, it's very compact and has dual stabilization. Add the 35-100 compact zoom and you have a highly capable, highly mobile outfit.
Perfect review. I was almost sold on the GX7 - perhaps from Ebay, and you've now thrown me back into confusion. I'm a Lumix point&shoot owner looking to get a bit more creative. From your excellent review I know you are going to recommend I try both and see which I like best - I just wish someone would make the decision for me! Lovely paced reviews. Big fan.
Thanks Tim! If I were you and if you are willing to spend the extra money I'd buy the GX80/85. The shutter and better stabilization are worth it alone and you get the other capabilities, 4K etc, as a bonus.
Ahahhahahaha laughed so much with you comment in 0:47, because I was actually wandering about what is the logic behind the naming :)
😁
Just bought one. The UK price is now below £500, and it becomes a pocketable camera, albeit a bit heavy if wearing designer jeans..... And I can use my Olympus lenses. A great review, which is sending me away to explore features I didn't know the camera had!
That's good - there's so much on these cameras!
Thanks a lot David
Thanks again! for a superb review! This review make me consider a GX80 to complement my GX8!
Terrific on-point review! I think you nailed it!
Good to hear that Zeus, thanks!
Nice review. I got 1/250 sync with a manual flash. I agree- a swiss arm knife... bad at nothing... good to excellent at many things. I received mine 1 month ago, and I've been enjoying it a lot for both photos and video.
Thanks - yes, bad at nothing but with state of the art Micro Four Thirds capabilities . Remarkable for the money.
Great review as always David ....Thank you
Thanks!
Looks like a winner. Thanks.
Great review, David! Thanks for all the hard work! Do you think this camera would be a noticeable improvement over the Pany G7 in terms of getting sharper images with the new Panasonic 100-400mm f/4.0-6.3 lens? Thanks!
Thanks Linda. You'd have the dual stabilization with the GX80 but you'd want to use high shutter speeds with the 100-400 so not a radical difference. I like the little bit of extra crispness with the loss of the low pass filter too but again, not radical. Personally, a big lens like the 100-400 would, for me., sit better with a DSLR layout with a central EVF than the GX80's left side fitting. Also, the G7 has a better EVF which is important with a big long lens. All in all, I'm saving you spending your money again, Linda! Any more of this and you'll be firing me :-)
I love that you tell me your honest opinion! I kind of have you up on a pedestal and always follow your advice...(no pressure...LOL). THANKS!
I love you David Thorpe.
If there was an emoticon for blushing, I would put it here! It's nice to be loved, Regina, thank you.
Oh David how I miss your videos. So sorry I never got the chance to meet you. 🙏🏼
I'm late to the GX80 party, but my GM1 just refuses to give up the ghost - so I bought one anyway!
Just wanted to recommend your very helpful book 'GX80 Menu System Simplified' which I would say is a must-have accessory to this terrific camera. I bought this as I was very impressed by the little book you wrote for the GM1 and I have not been disappointed - thank you!
I'm very pleased to hear that, Anthony and it's very nice of you to let me know, Thanks!
@@DavidThorpeMFT I won't buy another Lumix unless you've written the 'manual' for that one too :0)
@@anthonyskellern5970 😊
Hi David, the best review of the GX80 I've seen/read so far, thanks as usual! I've got one question on the sensor and one on the flash :) 1. Have you had moiré issues because of the lack of low-pass filter? I shoot a lot of architectures and so it might be an issue. 2. Can you bounce the flash on the ceiling as it was possible with the GX1 and GX7? I love that feature on my GX1! Thanks again...
Hi Giorgio - thanks. I didn't have any moire issues and I believe the camera software is tweaked to get rid of it. The flash, yes you can bounce it but it has to be held in position, as with the GM1.
Great review Dave
Thanks very much, Ray!
My GX85 arrives tomorrow. I wonder if you could share your custom settings in a video. I'm curious about the scenarios a seasoned pro like yourself would set for and the settings for each. Thanks for the awesome review. Very excited about the camera, my first micro 4/3.
That's an idea, Mark and thanks for the kind remarks about the video. You've certainly started out in Micro Four Thirds with a great camera. I'll see about a settings video. I tend to set up a basic modus operandim, put it on Custom 1 and alter it temporarily from there if necessary.
Great review of a great camera. Will try and hold off getting one until price dips a bit.
It usually takes a few months, either a price dip or a rebate. £100 off this would be a real bargain!
An excellent informative review. Thank you!
Glad you liked it, Mark. Thank you.
Very well reviewed.
Would you recommend getting this camera over the GX8? They're not too different in price now.
Difficult because the better stabilization and shutter are well worth having. On the other hand the 20Mp sensor and articulated monitor and superb EVF is worth having on the GX8. All in all, I'd prefer the GX8 for sheer usability. Probably the best thing would be to go much simpler and decide which camera's size you prefer.
David Thorpe Thank you! I think I'd prefer the GX8 because of my larger hands.
You answered my question there too David, but as I already have a GX8, it isn't that much of a choice. It's just nice to know that once again, your opinion mirror[les]s mine. I haven't really encountered the reputed shutter-shock issue, whether that's dumb luck or shooting style, I don't know.
The shutter shock is there from 1/60th to around 1/350th but at normal viewing levels is particularly really noticeable. I use the electronic shutter as standard, because it prolongs battery life and I can choose how loud it is so it's not really an issue for me. I don't think shooting style affects it, it's internal and occurs on a tripod just as much as handheld. It's better to have eliminated it, as the GX80 shutter does but at normal screen viewing or print sizes it's not a big problem/ All cameras with focal plane shutters suffer from it, it's just more apparent on Micro Four Thirds for some reason.
Just an awesome review. Thanks!
Thank you!
0:45 where did can i buy that lens hood?!
It's a cheapie - neat though. amzn.to/3dZaXwz
@@DavidThorpeMFT Thanks! I only have the base 12-32 mm lens, so I would have to select the 37mm version right? Great review too, made me buy it actually!
the Best M43 camera out right now.
Overall the most advanced, yes.
I'm thinking if getting this camera in 2019.
Can you do a comparison with the GX9?
Ty
I haven't got the GX80 now Gabriela, I have to sell one thing to buy another. I do go through the differences in this video but basically, if you are buying from new it's worth getting the GX9 for the 20Mp sensor and other incremental improvements. If you already had a GX80, I don't think it would be worth the quite high cost of upgrading since the improvements _are_ mainly incremental. I'd wait to see what a GX10 might have to offer in that case, in a year or two's time.
@@DavidThorpeMFT
Hey, thanks for your reply!
Another great review video David. Could I ask which straps you're using on your cameras please? Thanks, Simon.
Hi Simon and thanks! The fittings are all from Peak Design, as is the wrist strap. The leather strap is from Olympus - a lovely leather one they sell from their store. The Peak Design stuff is very flexible so you can use it to make quick release straps even of straps you already own.
Thanks for the quick reply David :-). I'll have a look at those straps and fittings.
Very nice cam and video, thank you! :)
Thanks!
Excellent video review!! Thank you -- again!
And thank you again!
WTF I WAS TOTALLY NOT READY FOR 8:32 !!
It was a for sale at a vide-grenier in southern France.
A great review. Thanks for the info.
Gad it was useful, Keefe.
Excellent video as always. Are these lenses included with the camera good enough. What other lense would you recommend for street portrait and landscape use? Which for 4k video ?
The 12-32mm supplied is about the sharpest of the standard zooms and a real keeper. I like the Olympus 17mm f/1.8 with this camera, a sort of modern take on a Leica. Also with the Olympus 54mm or Panasonic 42.5mm f/1.7 for portraits. A good longer lens with this is the tiny Panasonic 35-100 f/4-5.6 zoom. That and the 12-32mm make a ridiculously small and light travel and out and about outfit.
As usual, professional, thorough and precise. A bit low drops in the voice, though.
Hey, your dual light (or whatever it's called) panoramic example looks like one I saw in another video. Looks like some small houses at sunset. Was it from Panasonic? I doubt either of you took it from one another. Just curious, as you seem to do all your own photos.
CHeers.
PS: I think this is the camera for me. I wanted a GX8, but I think it's too big for my use.
Thanks - my audio is improving all the time thanks to Karol Walkowski but audio is intrinsically difficult. The pictures, every frame, still or video is shot by me and is my own work. The view you are referring to is from my bedroom window in a tiny village in southern France so no-one else could have such a shot. You might have seen it in one of my other videos but if not, it was certainly nicked. If you do see it again would you let me know? There are a few pretty flaky people on RUclips! This and the GX8, the GX80 is a very handy size and it is the camera I take with me everywhere. It's very compact but feels very wieldy and uncramped in the hand.
Focus stacking now added in firmware upgrade folks
Does that new firmware ship with all new cameras? or is it something to be upgraded post buying it?
Excellent review Mr. Thorpe!
I bought my first ever system camera the other year, the Lumix GX800/850 and a Panasonic 25mm/1.7 lens instead of the included kit lens. I thought the slim package and low cost would be worth the lack of EVF. I want to keep things as minimal and cheap as possible, and I will try to master 50mm photography with one camera only. Had I seen this review before I would have gone for this one instead... Having an EVF and more robustness for a very small increase in price...
Thanks! For me the EVF is a crucial item but I know people who have never used one and it doesn't seem to hamper them too much. The results you get on the GX800 won't be any different, in any case.
Thanks for another great review. How about a tutorial on 4K pre burst shooting. It looks interesting!
BTW, I bought one of these as the double cash back offer in the UK at present makes it a no-brainer. It is a superb camera and should really be sold as the 'digital Leica CL', imho.
I enjoyed your review of the GX80, David. Can the flash be pulled aft for bouncing? Perhaps it is just me but the text was displayed so briefly that I had to pause the video many times to read what you had typed. I'm probably just slow. I've been waiting so long for focus bracketing on these cameras for my insecting hobby. Too bad it isn't up to snuff.
I take your point about the text. I'm trying to impart a bit of extra information but not distract from the voiceover. I'll keep the text going a little longer and see how it works out. The focus bracketing works well for what it is meant to do but it sort of focus at, say 12 inches, then 10 inches, then 14. Then it moves to 14 inches, does 12 and 16 and them moves on to...The trouble is, for focus stacking you really want it to focus from the nearest point to the furthest and stack them. Post Focus can do it but it is a pain of trial and error extracting the frames that will work best.
The appearance reminds me of a stealth bomber, with a performance just as deadly. I now have two of them, and they're my main cameras. Thanks for this review, which pointed me in the right direction....
Glad it was helpful, Keith and thanks for ;letting me know.
Been wanting to get into photography for a while, but never liked the huge, bulky cameras. Found a deal for the GX80 /w the kit lens new for about $400, and couldn't stop myself from ordering it. Might get the M. Zuiko 25mm/1.8 for low light photos at a later date, but for now I feel it should be a nice enough step up from my phone for learning. Thanks for the review!
You're welcome, Anton! You'll find it a big step up from the phone, I think, good as phones are these days. It's the extra control you have that makes photography more pleasurable, in particular control over perspective and exposure. I'd agree with getting a faster lens later on. I think you'll find plenty to keep you interested for a long while with the kit lens. Have fun!
Hey Dave. Great review. Would you recommend this as a B camera to a GH4?
Yes, no question. It's a very different camera from the GH4 making it suitable for all the tasks that the GH4 with its size is less good for, street photography, for example. A perfect complement.
David Thorpe thanks for the reply. I went ahead and ordered one!
I was going to say I hope you like it - but actually, I know you will.
Good review...I am curious to know that since the gx85 doesn't have a microphone port if you can possibly use the usb port with a headphone adapter to plug in an external mike
No, unfortunately the USB port is for charging and file transfer only. You'd need to use an external recorder/ mike.
hello thanks for the video. is the camera yusefull for video. Thanks
yes, it's excellent for all normal video and does 4K as well. I shoot a lot of my videos for RUclips on it.
Great review as always David, but maybe there is a problem with audio, coud it be the gate on your video editor chopping the start of many sentences?
Wonderful review, I enjoyed your dry humor! I love this camera but I'm disappointed with the lack of external mic. I will mainly use the camera for stills but will do some motion - did you think the built-in stereo mic was decent enough? I won't be filming concerts, mainly landscapes and family but the mic on my LX7 really leaves something to be desired even under those scenarios... Also, did you enjoy the E-M10 MII or G80 more?? Cheers.
Thanks for the kind words! Overall I prefer the feel of GX80. It feels more snappy to use and more modern generally. I find the built in mic does a decent enough job on insect noises, for example. It wouldn't be much trouble to buy a digital recorder and separate mic if you want better, they are simple to sync in video editing software, just line them up.
Thanks for the review. Would you recommend a GX80/85 over the Fujifilm X-M1? Motorcycle travel photography (landscape/street/scenery, not action)
Sorry, I can't really help there. I stick to Micro Four Thirds equipment and it wouldn't be right for me to recommend anything I hadn't worked with myself. Lovely cameras, the Fujis.
As always a great review!
Thanks Terry!
Very nice review David. I bought the camera on the strength of it. I have a couple of prime lenses for it (Olympus 17mm F1.8 and PanaLeica 25mm F1.4). For landscape use, which of the wide angle primes or zooms would you feel are decent quality and sized comfortably for this camera (I'm dithering over going for a zoom as there seems to be no filter comaptiility)
There's really only the Olympus 12mm f/2 as a prime. The Panasonic 14mm is a nice lens but not that much wider than the 17mm. Ditto the Panasonic 15mm. The 12mm f/1.4 Panasonic would be nice but is very, very expensive. Overall, I'd say the Olympus 12mm f/2.
Of zooms, the 12-40mm Olympus is amazingly good. Of the ultra wide zooms, both 7-14mms are excellent and a perfect match for your lens lineup. But, no filters. Some people have found ways to fit filters but they are all a bit of a lash-up on such expensive optics.
Thanks for the nice review!
Thank you, kelvin!
Hi, wonderful review, I watched this and the one on the Olympus EM10 mark II. I want to buy a solid compact camera and currently on the fence between those two and I just can't decide which one is the better choice. Mostly plan to use it on vacations for landscape photography etc. I would appreciate your input!
Thank you, Veronica. Either one will do the job with similar IQ and in reality I'd be happy to work with either, there's no wrong or bad choice here. There are two main differences between the cameras, one is the body design, rangefinder or DSLR. Your preference there can only be made by hands on with both. The other difference is in the EVF, in that the Olympus's is bigger and easier to use.
I'd suggest that the Olympus would suit you better, mainly for the EVF but also that the DSLR design is more mainstream and suits more people. The Mark II is a little jewel, actually and my favourite in the Olympus range. Just to muddy the waters, there's an update to the GX80 now, the GX9. It has a 20Mp sensor but still the same EVF and my choice would remain the same.
Thank you for the reply! So I looked at the Olympus in kits and it is being sold with either the 14-42 II R lense or the EZ (pancake one). Which one would you recommend (if you tried them both)? The pancake one is smaller so of course it would be a bit more handy for travelling. However it is a bit more expensive. Is it really better, do the photos look better taken with the pancake lens than the II R one or the other way around and more expensive does not necessarily mean better in this case?
The pancake standard zoom has rather disappointing sharpness. It's not unusable or anything but you'd do better with the bigger standard zoom, which is not big by any means but has much better performance. It's unusual for Olympus to produce a less than good lens but in the pancake's case they seem to have done so.
I cant believe you only have 15k subs!! How would you compare this to the G7?
Great videos David! Keep up the hard work!
Hey, thanks! The G7 has a much better EVF and feels so differentl, it's hard to decide. Overall, the GX85 because of the stabilization and new shutter but if I had all stabilized lenses, probably the G7. I like articulated monitors and I find the DSLR design better for video. But..I'm happy using either.
Very good review thank you. What adapters do you use for adapting Olympus glass on your Panasonic?
No adaptors necessary, Paul. Micro Four Thirds is a standard which both Panasonic, Olympus and various lens and movie camera makers adhere to. If any item described as Micro Four Thirds then it will function with any other piece of equipment so designated. I use a mixture of Olympus and Panasonic lenses on my cameras without even thinking about it.
@@DavidThorpeMFT oh that is really good! I have a Sony A6000, but I feel limited when it comes to affordable lenses. The main downside is no in body IS and my favourite lens for it, the Sigma 30mm f2.8 doesn't either. Whilst I get good results it's hit and miss and I predominantly use my camera for stills. I am now leaning towards a Panasonic G80 which is how I came across your channel, which is wonderful. If your youtube stats took a leap skyward today, then that was me :-)
@@p_aulwhite Thanks, Paul! Yes, the G80 will happily work with any Micro Four Thirds and stabilise it too. There's a G90 now which has the 20Mp sensor but apart from that is technically much the same same as the G80. I personally don't think the extra pixels are worth the extra money.
@@DavidThorpeMFT Yes, thank you for your reply. The prices soon drop on replaced models and the G80 specs would be good enough for my online work. I rarely print and when I do, I never print large, so I won't miss those extra megapixels. The in body IS is a deal maker for me.
Just want to share with you that I just bought the Gx85 after watching your review :) I own a Gx7 and I think this is a good upgrade for me.
Good to know that that - mine gets a lot of use and I find the on board battery charging especially useful. You'll enjoy the camera, I'm sure.
Hi David, again what a brilliant review ! I just have a quick question. Im having trouble to decide which body should I buy between emd5 ii, emd10 ii, gx8 and gx85. I would like to hear from your experience which one of these cameras has the best AF among them ? Thank you for your respond.
Thanks John! The best AF rests with the Panasonics at the moment, in my experience with Panasonic or Olympus lenses. Both makes are very fast by any standards but the Panasonic's S-AF lock on is so fast that it makes AF-C unnecessary for all but the fastest moving subjects. Of the bodies, I like the E-M10ii or GX8 personally. The E=M10ii because it fits my hands and handles so nicely, the GX8 because it is so well laid out and the gorgeous EVF.
For one camera to use all the time, I'd choose the GX8 overall. But if someone told me I had to use any one of these cameras, I'd be happy.
As always I love your simple straight to the point explanation ! thanks for the heads up David. After hearing from you I think Im gonna go with the GX85 since it has dual IS for 4K vid and the price is the best bang for the buck atm. I hope my decision is not wrong lol. Once again thank you David ! Appreciate it so much :)
You're welcome, John. There isn't wrong decision here - all are excellent cameras. The GX8 has dual stabilization too but the GX85 is certainly great value, especially with the new shutter which feels very pleasing to use. And, yes it has all the latest developments including 4K Crop which is a bit like having the camera on rails. Only works for FHD, though you shoot in 4K. Great camera and one I use a great deal.
One improvement over the GX7 worth mentioning is "Depth From Defocus" now much improves AF, tracking in particular. For those considering the more robust GX8 or G80 then the screen type may sway you one way or the other. GX80 is tilt only, the other 2 are fully articulating. Also to bear in mind with electronic shutter besides rolling shutter is files are reduced to 10bit so expect lower dynamic range and more noise in post if pushing shadows.
Yes, well worth mentioning. Thanks for that, Norman.
Great demo David, love the dry English jokes.
Do you think the gx8 will be the end of the 20mp pana line?
I'm really hoping they keep it going so the gx9 has the new shutter plus all the other bells and whistles on the body. No audio input is really annoying.
I have ni inside information but I reckon all Micro Four Thirds cameras will move to the 20Mp sensor gradually. I'd expect a GX9 to consolidate all the camera upgrades but I don't think they would add audio in[uts simply because they want to compromise the GH4(5?) as their top line video choice.
+David Thorpe thanks for the advice, your probably right there. Do you think they will make a g8?
I'm pretty certain they will. Many people prefer the DSLR format and the G# been a mainstay of Panasonic for many years.
Quick question if you have time David. I use a handstrap rather than a neckstrap for my GM1, but sometimes a neck one is useful. I noticed that you're using the same strap holder for your PEN-F, GX8 and GX80. Could you please let us know what strap is that one and if it doubles up as a hand/neck strap?
Thanks a lot!!!
Hi Jose - they're from a company called Peak Design. The main thing is that the fittings on the camera are quick release so can be used for straps or wrist straps and even your own strap if you wish. I put a pair on each camera so that I only need one strap or wrist strap for all my cameras. They're very quick to slip on and off and importantly, very secure.
Another great video. which lens would you recommend, the Olympus 40-150 or Panasonic 45-150? thank you
Your voice is really soothing mate
That's nice to hear, Cody. Just sounds like a london twang to me!
Excellent review, as always. Thank you for the intensive work.
Though filming on a bicycle on a very wobbly path would not be my obvious choice to demonstrate the good dual stabilization.
It is time to swap my LX100.
I agree about the bicycle, actually but its hard to demonstrate that something _not_ shaking. So I thought showing something that ought to be impossible might do it. Given the price you get for used cameras these days, I wonder about selling them. I have to because otherwise I couldn't afford to buy the new one for review but might't it be worth keeping the LX100 in the car glove compartment or desk at work?
+David Thorpe Thanks for your response. You are right, I don't sell my LX100. I love it but the 4K videos I make are shaky. That is why the GX80 is so tempting. Actually I hope that soon there will be an LX200 that offers the same stabilization as the GX80.
It would make sense to add the 5 way stabilization to all their cameras gradually. We'll see.
no mic input?
No, they have to keep something back for the more expensive cameras!
Is micro 4/3 not a problem in low light conditions?
great review! would you say the 5 axis stabilization would make the non stabilized panny/leica prime lenses that much more versatile? I typically keep my 12-35 f2.8 on my g7 just for the stabilization in case I need to shoot a video run and gun style, while my primes don't see much playtime and usually sit there unless I absolutely need the extra speed / shallow depth of field
Yes, I definitely would. A non stabilized lens on this camera has quite similar performance to a stabilized one on a non-stabilzed body. What is new is that the IBIS is available for video now.
When should I use the electronic shutter and when the mechanical?
First of all, the e-shutter won't work with flash. It also will not let you set speeds longer than one second. And with fast moving subjects there is an effect which causes uprights in an image to appear as if they are sloping. The e-shutter will give you a faster shutter speed than the mechanical one and it uses less battery power. It can also, if you wish, be completely silent. You can also set a shutter sound from several choices and vary the volume of them.
Basically, you can use the e-shutter all the time except when you need to do something it doesn't allow. Image quality is unaffected by it.
David Thorpe Thanks a lot. This issue is almost never subject of a video.
By the way, I just ordered a GX80 (europe) with a 14-140 3.5-5.6. For 819 euros I think it's a good deal, especially since my epl1 with 14-45 and 20 f1.7 has a broken screen. So I needed a new body and I have always been interested in the 14-140 but is was at about 650 euro in europe expensive. Now they offer it as kitlens with gx85 which makes it much more attractive.
Great review as always, David. I've bought this camera on three different occassions, first when it came out but I didn't like the handling as it felt a bit too heavily weighted on the right side of the body. The second time was to give it another whirl but I still couldn't take to it. So on the 3rd occassion I bought it primarily as a video camera and suddenly found myself warming to it.
Now I still have and use it for both video and stills and its great for both and I've gotten used to its handling. The only things I still don't like are the EVF and the screen doesn't flip up or fully articulate. That aside the GX80 is a great little camera.
I'm very fond of mine. It's a perfect size for an all round Micro Four Thirds camera and with the 12-32 and 35-100 gives an absurdly small but high quality outfit. I agree about the screen, though it is perfectly usable. Just a shame that it isn't native 4:3. When you set the camera to 3:2 (I don't use it, myself) the EVF is a much more useful size. And the monitor, there are a lot of people who prefer the flip up. I don't because it's no use for portrait orientation. On the other hand, if a fully articulated screen added much more depth to the body, I prefer to leave it as it is. As you say, a great little camera with a whisper quiet shutter and very good stabilization.