"Let me talk to you about why I'm using micro4/3 into 2025." No further speech to 1 minute mark, by which point it is abundantly clear why you are not looking to change your camera: you're clearly getting superb results with the one you're using. Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
Loved this commentary, especially specific examples of why to stick with micro four thirds. When I go to photography classes or group photo excursions, I'm the only one with an Olympus/OM camera and I have to explain myself as to why I don't carry my Canon 6D Mark II instead. I feel a bit inferior, but this video reminded me that I get the shots that bring me joy, which is what really matters.
Yea ago I was in a department store that sold cameras and I was keen on a Pen F and the assistant laughed smugly and called it a toy camera. It's the only camera of 20+ that I have used and sold over 30 years that I miss.
Regarding weather sealing: OM-1 has an IPX3 rating. Most manufacturers are not confident enough to actually certify their cameras, just "trust us bro, it's tight".
I sold all of my aging Fuji cameras (x-t2 and x-e1) and all Fuji lenses (great lenses but “midrange” quality). Took advantage of all of the Fuji hype and actually made some profit off of selling them. Made enough to buy an om1-ii, 12-40 F2.8 pro and 40-150 f2.8 pro. Went from mid tier to absolutely bonkers top tier, best camera buying decision ever! It all started with finding a cheap Olympus e-p5 and the 17mmf2.8. I loved the combo so much it’s still my everyday carry! With IBIS I hardly use a tripod anymore either. Pretty liberating! Thanks for the video, agreed 100%
yup love that strategy - when everyone zigs, you zag. M43 vs. APS-C is very similar in sensor size. as long as you're willing to give up the film sims, I think you can get a lot more for your money in M43. and we haven't considered the pros of M43 depending on your shooting genres like 2x crop factor, weather sealing, weight, etc.
@@jayoungrnI have cameras from m4/3, APSC Fuji XT2 & X100V and FF. I’m keeping m4/3, in fact I re-built my m4/3 kits last year as I think this format offer more unique functionality vs APSC. In particular best in class IBIS, focus stacking (for macro), built-in ND, smaller size long zoom lenses and relatively small weather resistant bodies. Having FF & m4/3 makes APSC falls in between with nothing unique aside from film simulation. Having said that I do love my x100v and would trade my xt2 if and when Fuji finally releases XPro4.
@@frankygamaliano7058 Fuji has focus stacking and the IBIS is great - neither has great autofocus for moving objects The smaller telephoto lenses is nice but the decent 4/3 ones are just as expensive as the Fuji ones and the Fuji sensor is significantly better. Having a small package is not helpful if you are stuck with a noisy 4/3 sensor
@@jayoungrnwhat better quality glass are you referring to? M43 has a huge range of glass (Fuji too). That said, if there are specific lenses you like in a system (whatever system that may be), that's a great reason to switch.
Great video Chris. I recently took a picture shot at ISO 5000 on my OM-1. I put that through DXO RAW2 and any noise that was there was gone and no noticeable loss of detail. I don’t fear using high ISO’s at all. …Take care lifting that 25mm f1.8!
For once I'm very thankful for the RUclips algorithms throwing a new photography video my way. Thank you for talking complete sense and making it about the person and what they want to shoot other than an 'influencer' approach trying to ram a product or system down our throats. I have pretty much had a camera of all sensor sizes over the years and have no preference to any of them. I currently have a FF and a 1" sensor camera and I am happy taking either of them out with me. My location or purpose for the day's photography will determine which camera I take, not the sensor size. Great video... don't change!!
👍👏👏👏 you're absolutely spot on, I started with an omd10 mk3, then the omd1 mk2 (still got it, never letting it go), and now the OM1. What a camera what a system. Love it.
Great video. I’m 9 months into changing from Nikon FF to now owning the OM-1 and the Mkii. I do not regret the move in the slightest, in fact I wish I’d not been such a FF snob earlier!
I meet so many people IRL with different formats when I'm out shooting (mostly wildlife/macro), and not a single one questioned why I'm using MFT. We shared photos and enjoyed them on my EM-1X and they Z9s, Sony A1s, and Canon R5s. The format wars was a cynical marketing campaign that I believe was bad for photography. Anyways, excellent video, Chris!
Fantastic “sober” and very real presentation. Your photos are showing that the photographer is the most important element in creating great art, especially if you use an amazing instrument. As unbelievable as it may sound, of my most treasured images were taken on an XZ with a minute sensor. Even today having an OM1 mkii plus EM 1 mk ii and iii, I can’t say there is more emotional content. However since the EM1 mk ii, I was so enjoying photography that I gave my Nikon d800 plus all that went with it, as great as it was, away and have not looked back. That is simply stated, Olympus /OM Systems are giving me everything I could ever want.
I just recently purchased my first ever MFT OM Systems OM-1 Mark II and several lenses. I am a 30+ year Nikon film and digital shooter but wanted to give the smaller form factor a try. I also committed to the system by also buying 6 lenses from Olympus/OM Systems as well as Sigma MFT lenses. While I don't feel competent enough with the system or format to rave or critique it, I'd like to think I am open-minded enough to stick with this system, learn it and use it to its best effect. Thank you for addressing the subject so effectively and fairly.
It's time om systems made you an ambassador, your videos are fantastic, the content is always spot on & always explaining what your settings are & why your doing it thank you
They don't do it by a reason. They have free marketing, without paying for that. If they ask YOU, the situation looks different. In fact he is just hobbyst, ain't a professional. He didn't win any competition, he doesn't do anything professionaly, doesn't work for any organisation, etc. Selling your images on website, doesn't make you a professional, just in short. And that's why they won't hire him anyway.
Thanks for the video, Chris. I’m in my dotage and my youth and middle age has caught up with me. I broke three vertebrae and further damaged my back by cycling. It’s meant carrying heavy gear around is beyond me. My local camera shop showed me the Panasonic 100-300, that’s 200-600 in ‘old money’. I bought a Panasonic G7, an F1.4, 25mm (50) and the 100-300 in addition to the kit 14-140. I can carry all three lenses all day. Plus, I’ve moved to G9s and have two of them. While it is true I would probably have stayed with full frame, and been happy with it if my back was ok, I’ve also been very happy with micro four thirds. After a day’s shoot, I’m relieved I went with my Panasonic. I can use a gimbal as well. The costs are lower. The only problem has been others telling me MFT is a poor choice, although I’ve yet to find anyone who has worked with MFT who doesn’t appreciate the format. The G9 is really a hybrid camera. It can produce excellent video. I illustrated a magazine I was editor of, and the graphics won an award. I produce videos for RUclips. I use my images on my websites. MFT might not be for everyone. There is no way I would criticise those who has chosen full frame. If it suits them, fine. My Panasonic suits me. Thanks again, Chris.
How refreshing to hear such common sense. I also have an EM1/2 and an OM 1 and am totally satisfied with the photographs I make in both (African) wildlife and landscapes, printing 70x 100 cm prints, photo books and calendars . Never once have I thought a bigger sensor would have delivered better results. And I am tired of the herd of YT ‘experts’ reviewing all the ‘in’ cameras whilst displaying really mediocre images.
Your photography is amazing man! I love landscape photography. I use a full frame but I’m really keen to try the Olympus. I think I need to rent one for a few days.
Foolishly sold my EM-5 but still have the Em-1 and EM-1MkII. Brilliant, affordable, and far more capable than 90% of all users will ever need -- all in a sub $500 camera body. Amazing kit.
Another excellent video Chris, great commentary and common sense throughout! Beautiful images too! I’ve fallen in love with photography again with my M43 cameras, I don’t take full frame anymore now, too heavy to lug around. My Olympus em1mk3 and lumix gx80 fits the bill now, and so much fun to use!
I think most people want bokeh, nice and smooth for their background. All sensor sizes these days do fairly well in low light. They all produce good pictures. You’re right about the person looking at the picture. Up close or far away, just about all pictures will have or show about the same details. I shoot wildlife and landscape, and each sensor size I’ve used basically shows the exact detail and resolution. I can’t see a difference. Unless I pixel peep, which 98% of photographers don’t pixel peep, they look at pictures at a distance. I think what most professionals and non professionals do is judge by the type of computer screen they are currently using, to judge if resolution and details and then discuss (oh man, I need a bigger sensor) I love your videos, keep up the good work
Great video. Was out photographing a long exposure sunrise on a cold morning this past weekend with the OM1 mkii and the 12-40 f/2.8. Never thought about sensor size. I thought about subject, light and composition. This morning, well before sunrise, I photographed street lights and tree silhouettes in the misty fog. Noise was not a worry. I was focused and subject, light and composition.
Hey there, just found you as random that turned up on my youtube. Ipad is listening 😂🤣 … I’m using old 4/3 Lumix ( think their first one ) . I found your video very information and helpful as I still consider myself a beginner really. Just completed a day course and every one had full frame big cameras which made me feel a bit left behind but hoping I can save for the Olympus as def need upgrade . Need to keep lens Ive got for next camera . Im not yet at the tech speak stuff so get a bit lost but Still happy with stuff Im taking at my level/ experience , but wow would love to be getting to what you are doing. Good inspo ! First 10,000 shots are the hardest 🤣🤣Thanks. New subscriber now.
whenever i've gone to local music gigs to shoot photos and videos and talked to any of the more experienced photographers, they always have a canon or nikon full-frame dslr, touting that the full-frame sensor is the only way to get good low-light photos at a dimly lit concert however, recently i did a music festival and everyone there complimented my photos & videos (one of the event mangers even said that they were some of the best photos and videos from the festival in all its years of running), despite me using a sony a6600 aps-c camera ! just goes to show that sensor technology paired with good exposure is more important to supposed noise performance and image quality than what format size you use, especially nowadays with more and more manufacturers opting to use BSI sensors in everything, even their cheaper crop sensor bodies whatever camera system or format you use, you can still get amazing results so as long as you work within the "limitations", aren't a vehement pixel peeper, or most importantly, comfortable with the system that you're using and understand completely how to get the photographs and videos you want :)
The OM-1is simply a superior camera for my work in close-up nature photography, and it serves me very well in event photography and any other genre I’ve tried. It’s a brilliant professional tool.
I've been fortunate enough to shoot with many different systems since the film days. Minolta, Pentax, Fuji, Leica, etc. Not too long ago I was trying to find a new camera to try and I ran into the dilemma of many modern cameras just being too software looking. Oversharpened, flat looking, etc...just nothing realistic of 'filmic'. I saw some camera, a Lumix GX85, on sale with a kit of 2 lenses for a great price and I loved the styling. I then saw it was a m43 format. I immediately dismissed it and thought it would look nothing more than a 2005 Nokia phone picture. I looked around some more and couldn't find anything that stood out to me. I figured okay fine, worst to worst I'll just return the camera back. Ordered it with the Lumix 20mm 1.7 ll...and never looked back. I was absolutely blown away by the photos and it was exactly the look I was looking for...high quality photos while still retaining a certain realness to them. Not overly perfect and fake looking...just right. These days, my Leica TL2 pretty much just sits in the bag and doesn't get used. The Lumix GX85 really is that good. The L-Mono mode is like the heavens opening up and the angels singing. I honestly have a difficult time telling any difference between that BW and what I've seen on Leica...actually, the only difference is that it's MUCH more affordable. I'll be sticking with micro four thirds for the foreseeable future. I might try Olympus and see how their cameras are as I'm super happy with Lumix. If there's anyone else on the fence about trying the m43 system...don't be. My only mistake was that I waited so long to try it out of my ignorance, I don't want anyone else to make that same mistake due to what they've heard about the sensor size, etc.
I couldn't disagree with a single thing you said Chris. Firstly, I loved your point about finding the camera that works for you. I honestly believe there's no such thing as a bad camera these days, it just about which one works best for you and the way you like to shoot. As for Olympus/OM-System, the move over from Canon absolutely reinvigorated my photography and I've been a convert ever since. I had never considered m43 for the same reasons you mentioned, and it only when a friend who'd shot Nikon for over 40 years bought the Panasonic G9 and I saw the results that I started to look into the system. It's been 5 years now and I can't see myself changing anytime soon.
Spot on Chris! I was a Nikon APS-C user until my brother "lent" me an EM1-2 and 3 pro lenses. I never looked back and never returned it either! I now have an OM 1-2 and all the Zuiko lenses I need. The Nikon was amazing, but to get a 500MM bright lens, it would have cost a fortune and weighed a ton. Not to mention the rain sleeve I'd have to put on in the mist, rain and snow. Love my OM stuff and love your videos! I've been trying new things out . And ditto on you being made an OM ambassador . BTW, I have blown up 2 shots of Barred Owls to 16 x 20 and they are clear and sharp!
I used to be a view camera photographer, 4x5 and 8x10, so 35 mm. (Full Frame in digital terms) is "miniature format." Most people shoot micro format, that is, they use their smartphone. The history of photography has been one of miniaturization.
The most important thing. I love your photos. Congratulations. The OM1 is possibly the camera that makes a photographer smile the most, because it is loaded with tools that make the only limit set by the photographer's imagination... Print size in cm with optimal image resolution (60 ppcm = 152 dpi)= 85,90 x 64,1 cm = 33,81 x 25,23 Inch. To see the photo with the nose attached to the photo)
I know only, you can do 20 mpx, huge A2 size ~60x45 cm, at ~240-250 dpi, which is good quality print. And A3 format ~45x30 cm at 300 dpi, which is excellent quality.
A great promo for micro four thirds. When I eventually moved to a digital big camera, I followed what other RUclips photographers used and how they claimed full frame is the best, yet some said crop is best for landscape. So I went for a crop, it wasn't until last year when my Nikon went for a swim, I bought an OM-1 Mk I (still marked Olympus). The purchase was mainly driven by the fact that the OM-1 was way cheaper than many full frames. All I can say is wow what a difference a different sensor makes. As for the weight reduction, that gets another wow, and its fully weather sealed with some pretty nifty computational tricks up its sleeve so to speak, so you get even more wow in your bag. I'm sure the Mk II is even better, but I am more than happy with my Mk I. I only really use a 12-100mm, plus I carry a 90mm for a bit of macro if my 12-100mm doesn't cover it.
Hi Chris! Beautiful pictures man! Very well done. I have watched many of your videos and fully appreciate your technique and your beautiful compositions. You are a professional in my book, definitely an artist; your pictures have a high quality of communication and story, if you are not yet selling them, I am confident you will find many people that will buy them. As to the Micro 4/3 system, thank you for showing the capabilities of this fantastic system! Your work shows that if someone practices their technique and composition, they will be able to creat beautiful photographic art like you are. And all this with a light system that has IMHO the best ergonomics holding and using it and some of the best lenses for 1/2 up to 1/4 of the weight of full frame; fantastic to lug around anywhere in the world. Keep up the wonderful sharing of your art and favorite camera system! God Speed! :)
Hi Chris. Great video, I love your passion for micro-four-thirds and the content you produce. I wish you many more hours of great photography and steady growth for your channel in 2025. We need more outspoken people to help others refocus away from equipment to photography. Well done and only the best. Siegfried
a few days ago i went into my local camera shop to buy my first own digital camera. Originally i wanted to buy a Nikon D3400 used there for 350€, which they sold just as i came in. however, after testing some around, my eyes fell onto a Lumix GX7 for just under 300. I dabled with the thought of buying an E-M10 but put it aside. Yet as i went for hikes these holidays, i absolutely fell in love with the Lumix and love how it fits nicely in my coat pocket and everything around it. It was very much worth every cent
I love the system and when I'm out using the cameras people are interested and many want to have a play. I have 4 bodies and 9 len's plus a broadcast cinema camera with a MFT mount.. I will be adding at least 2 new lens's in 2025 plus if I get paid enough an OM1 MKII. I use the cameras and lens commercially and have hundreds of hours of broadcast TV shot on Olympus len's. On billboards, for 48 sheet (3048mm x 6096mm) and 96 sheets (3048mm x 12192mm) we used to print at 26 screen so the image would only need or be 52 dpi at print size. Have been really enjoying your Micro Four Thirds journey.
Hi Chris, great video. I moved to M4:3 from Canon for a couple of reasons. Firstly both the camera shops that I think are impartial recommended Olympus as the best option for a two month trip to UK (from New Zealand). Weight and size were critical due to luggage limits and an aging back. It was an OM 5 mkii which I still use. It was fantastic, the body would fit in the side pocket of a pair of cargo pants/shorts and a coouple of lenses in other pockets. Or use a small shoulder bag. Even managed to have a variable ND filter and polariser. I've really bough into the system with more lenses etc. I've steered away from the OM 1 etc as I'm still trying to keep things small. And... the lenses are brilliant. Keep up great work Chris.
I've used Panasonic M4/3 since the Lumix G1. Now using a GH7 and S5IIX. The camera IBIS is fantastic, who needs a tripod, even in HiRes mode. Love your videos. 🙏
Back to an OM-1 (now a Mk2) after trying a couple of APS-C cameras and a Full Frame. None of the others could match its speed and features in a relatively small package. It just works.
An interesting video. I'm currently in the Fuji camp, and I don't know why, but I've become fascinated by this camera. The more I think about it the more I think it could be a Fuji killer. Maybe I'm just a rebel, but the 4/3 sensor sounds edgier. 😄 But really I think that it's just the full package. Thanks!
Brilliant video Chris. I have gradually moved from Canon FF via Fuji and ended up with my OM1 mark 2 which I absolutely love. Keep up the good work on this channel 👍
It's good to be in love with your camera. I'm in love with my E-M1mk3 and my OM-1mk1 almost as much. I love the dials on the former much more, I have to confess. But I love the new menu system and the sensor in the new camera a lot ❤. Merry Christmas mate!
My choice was Pentax, it did ever last thing I wanted but…..I wanted something light for a walkabout camera while walking my dog. I saw a video from a landscape photographer who used Nikon until his went wrong. He bought and showcased an OM-5, I was hooked and bought one with a kit lens. Feature wise just wow, other than that it didn’t tick the boxes due to me not really liking the focal length of the kit 12-45 lens. On a whim I bought a 14-150 and it brought that camera alive for me and now it’s seldom out of my hand. Now I’m asking myself would I like an OM-1 do I need an OM-1 and of course I blame you for showcasing yours. 😊 to be continued….possibly.
Love the video. Been watching your four thirds jouney and It's made me want to join the club too. Just recieved my OM-1 yesterday. Looking forward to years of fun.
Excellent video. I switched from Canon a few years ago and am very happy with my OM1. I have a small selection of Pro lenses from macro to 300mm and absolutely love them.
Brilliant video Chris! I am more into family, wildlife and sport genre more of a hobby. But I do send my works in and they got published in the magazine as well as calendar at the state where I live in the US. Your images show case what the system is capable of and like you I do have ton of fun using it! Cheers.
I started off with an em5, then upgraded to an em1ii. Recently, I came across a used em1x for less than $500usd. What a steal! I absolutely love to m43 system, and am glad I stumbled on it.
Honest truthful and above all correct. Love your sarcasm it works for those who don't know the MFT quality and think big is beautiful. Must love carrying around a lot of weight!
Thanks for sticking up for MFT. After shooting full-frame for over 40 years as a newspaper photographer I tried the Leica V-Lux 114 when video and stills were required for our website. With the 114 I could shoot both still and video at the same moment. I love the resolution of a full-frame camera but my Lumix G9 is not holding me back in any way.
I love Micro 4/3s but you have been ‘everywhere’. I’ve had the system to Everest Base Camp, Kilimanjaro and similar. Love it in extreme conditions where others rue their heavy cameras.
Speaking of print size, I tend to print to 10x13 and 20x26. Then it represents a print that is a true m43 aspect ratio on standard available paper sizes. I can set up two images of 12x16 on 16x24 paper or six images by printing on 24x36 paper and save cost on a per print basis. I just have to put in a little effort to cut the printed sheet. All true to the m43 ratio, which I quite like.
I would like our MFT cameras to have added true A format (aspect ratio 1.414:1, 5184x3666 pixels) and Letter format (aspect ratio 1.294:1, 5032x3888 pixels), not only 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 and 1:1. Ok, letter format is very close to 4:3 (1.33:1), but I think A is better as it's in between 4:3 and 3:2. I know the camera tech could handle it. It's just crop by software. Most people print on Letter or A size paper.
Thank you. One thing that is never compared, is the lenses to full frame, apart from the size benefits. The m43 pro lenses quality is unmatched in all categories .
Great sensible, video, Chris! Began my Olympus journey with the film OM2. Graduated to the DSLRs, and now have 5 Olys, one EM5iii has shutter problems, so 4. Mainly use the EM1 mkiii, and the OM-5. So light and handy. Have used the big Nikons and mirrorless Sonys, but always return to Olympus/OMS. Love your dry humour - and your images. Agree with you entirely!
Brilliant video Chris, blowing the hype and myths around the false arguments between formats etc and a lovely compilation of your images this year. I'm sold I've now had my om1 since July. Blown away by it. It's half the weight and size of the 5dmk4. That I had. Really tiny lenses and even a kit lens is more than sharp enough. No regrets whatsoever. Keep going strong
Well said Chris, I use an OM1 & EM1 mk3. The noise on the OM1 is great but wouldn't hesitate to use mk3. Other companies are playing catch up in terms of features in a camera compared to OM System (formally Olympus). Keep up the good work. Love the channel.
I agree with most of what you said. What annoys me is some of the new and top range M43 cameras are now as big as apse or full frame cameras… which is like…what’s the point then?
Love that camera backpack.... I'm using Lowepro flipside 400AW. I have the original and it has traveled with me all over Poland, Europe and US. It carries my M43 G9.
Nice video Chris, I'm planning on upgrading to a Panasonic G9 mainly because I already have an old Gh2, but have been using heavy DSLR kit, so now want a lighter rucksack! I have got my eye on an Olympus at some point eventually though
I knew to would get lost of views on this topic, I have FF but I also have MFT for travel etc. Anyway its all about getting out and "using" your camera. Nice, humorous video. 😂😂
I’ve owned a few Olympus cameras, beginning with an OM PC film SLR in the late 1980s, and including the first E-M 10, and now the E-M 1 mk iii. I couldn’t ask for another camera more suited to my creative needs.
Well said. I recently looked at changing from MFT to another system and concluded that any gains were slight and the negatives were considerable i.e. cost and mass. There is a lot of misinformation here on the web but I was sold on MFT from the 12Mpixel Panasonic GF1 fitted with the 20mm f1.8. I presently shoot with a G9 and an OM-5 and can see no reason to change.
I am not a convert, but an Olympus/OM user from scratch. I shoot birds, because I like shooting birds, and my cameras do it very well. Occasionally I go to organised shoots with other photographers, and have been sneered at by the FF mob with their behemoth "long" 600mm lenses, until I show them my uncropped 1000mm equivalent reach shots.. I really couldnt care less what others think, because my system makes me happy and gives me great results that often outstrip the results of other's who have much heavier and more expensive gear. There is that horrible expression "when you know, you know"... I adapt that to "when you know micro 4 thirds, you know". Nuff said.
Same here… Have been doing quite some research over the past months whether it’s worth to upgrade or not. In the end I decided that the advantages the OM1 or OM1 II are offering are not really worth the money for me as a hobby photographer. I‘ll probably rather invest it in a trip where I can use my two E-M 1 II. 😁
MFT gets the results for me. I came to Lumix from Canon three or four years ago. I love the stabilization. Love the lenses. Love the features. I am here to stay.
really enjoyed that mate! i have to say, ive down sized from a 48mp to a 24 full frame, I just found the file size easier, im not convinced on the micro 4/3 maybe we could do a gear swap day and see if you can convert me!
I also have the OM-1, and have used the Lumix G-9, the Olympus E-M1 mkII, and the Olympus E-M5. They're all great cameras, and(as said in the video) the noise performance of the OM-1 is noticeably better. Also, I don't think I've run across the 'micro 4/3 isn't weather sealed...' criticism, that would be hilarious. The new OM cameras and IP53 rated. I think only one or two models of Leica are higher rated, and most companies don't bother with it at all. High-Res mode: even noted m4/3 critic Tony Northrup has said many times that it's the only system in which the high-res mode seems to actually work(he, last I heard, has never gotten acceptable results on a Sony - a camera system he generally loves) Shallow Depth of Field is pretty easy, you just have to understand how it works: subject close, background far. I have a number of wildlife shots where the background it totally demolished and they were shot, in some cases, at f/13(teleconverters, baby!!! lol) Last, printing size: I have hanging up at work a 10mp shot(cropped from 20mp) on 17"x11" paper, about A3 size for those who use those sizes. I think if I shot only, or even mostly, people, I might use full frame. I like my Canon R6 a lot. My issue is I shoot mostly wildlife, and the lens size/weight savings is worth more than any marginal advantage a larger sensor would give me. That's the reason I shot micro 4/3 for a while, went to Fuji APSC, Sony FF, then Canon FF only to come back to M4/3.
Hi, Chris. I work with the Lumix G9 II and this camera is weatherproof. And your Olympus OM1 is also waterproof. I know that not all the lenses are waterproof. The Pro lenses are waterproof but the regular lenses are not. Ik like the video, my friend. PS. Stay, like me, by Micro 4/3. Fantastic cameras. And I totally agree with you, Chris.
Chris. You name it, I have used it. My cameras of choice?.....Olympus and Lumix M43. Love 'em. Like picking up a favourite hammer, well balanced, comfortable, light and pack a punch. For the record, my other fave...Mamiya 645E for film work. Simple as. Keep up the good work. ;-)
Couldn't agree more Chris, I've just picked up the Great White for Xmas. I'm happy with what I have and that's all that counts. I can't wait for 1000mm or 1400 mm with a 1.4 ??TC at Air Shows next year.
My old EM5 was the only camera I dared use near seawater. Seawater destroys EVERYTHING, but the Oly got rinsed under a tap straight after, don’t dare do that with my Fuji XT3
Thanks
Thank you very much. That’s really kind of you m
I sold all of my Sony Gear in Sept 24, and purchased an OM-1 and I am loving the change!! My back certainly is enjoying it!!
Love the photo with the Northern Lights, that pink glow is amazing. Glad you are enjoying the OM1.
"Let me talk to you about why I'm using micro4/3 into 2025."
No further speech to 1 minute mark, by which point it is abundantly clear why you are not looking to change your camera: you're clearly getting superb results with the one you're using. Great stuff, thanks for sharing.
Couldn't have said it any better Chris! I love my E-M1 Mark III and especially the in-camera ND feature!
Loved this commentary, especially specific examples of why to stick with micro four thirds. When I go to photography classes or group photo excursions, I'm the only one with an Olympus/OM camera and I have to explain myself as to why I don't carry my Canon 6D Mark II instead. I feel a bit inferior, but this video reminded me that I get the shots that bring me joy, which is what really matters.
Don’t let anyone make you feel inferior because of the camera you carry. You take the photo, not the camera.
@@ChrisBaitsonPhoto Camera clubs are notorious for having the odd wankers in them. Not all them, for sure, enough to make their presence felt.
When I attend a photography event I will not be gear shamed. It isn’t how long it is. It is how you make it long.
Mask On Nurse Marty (Ret)
Classes and groups are a waste of time/money
Yea ago I was in a department store that sold cameras and I was keen on a Pen F and the assistant laughed smugly and called it a toy camera. It's the only camera of 20+ that I have used and sold over 30 years that I miss.
Regarding weather sealing: OM-1 has an IPX3 rating. Most manufacturers are not confident enough to actually certify their cameras, just "trust us bro, it's tight".
IP53 weather sealed rated😉
Pentax has the best weather resistance in my opinion, followed by Olympus
having both systems I would say they are equal. Only Olympus gives us a real rating....
@@wernerboyz1pentax is irrelevant. Just admit iy
@@dayeah765caoni3 😵💫🤣
I sold all of my aging Fuji cameras (x-t2 and x-e1) and all Fuji lenses (great lenses but “midrange” quality). Took advantage of all of the Fuji hype and actually made some profit off of selling them. Made enough to buy an om1-ii, 12-40 F2.8 pro and 40-150 f2.8 pro. Went from mid tier to absolutely bonkers top tier, best camera buying decision ever!
It all started with finding a cheap Olympus e-p5 and the 17mmf2.8. I loved the combo so much it’s still my everyday carry!
With IBIS I hardly use a tripod anymore either. Pretty liberating!
Thanks for the video, agreed 100%
yup love that strategy - when everyone zigs, you zag. M43 vs. APS-C is very similar in sensor size. as long as you're willing to give up the film sims, I think you can get a lot more for your money in M43. and we haven't considered the pros of M43 depending on your shooting genres like 2x crop factor, weather sealing, weight, etc.
LOL - I dumped OM for Fuji for the better quality glass. 4/3 died 5 years ago
@@jayoungrnI have cameras from m4/3, APSC Fuji XT2 & X100V and FF. I’m keeping m4/3, in fact I re-built my m4/3 kits last year as I think this format offer more unique functionality vs APSC. In particular best in class IBIS, focus stacking (for macro), built-in ND, smaller size long zoom lenses and relatively small weather resistant bodies. Having FF & m4/3 makes APSC falls in between with nothing unique aside from film simulation. Having said that I do love my x100v and would trade my xt2 if and when Fuji finally releases XPro4.
@@frankygamaliano7058 Fuji has focus stacking and the IBIS is great - neither has great autofocus for moving objects
The smaller telephoto lenses is nice but the decent 4/3 ones are just as expensive as the Fuji ones and the Fuji sensor is significantly better. Having a small package is not helpful if you are stuck with a noisy 4/3 sensor
@@jayoungrnwhat better quality glass are you referring to? M43 has a huge range of glass (Fuji too). That said, if there are specific lenses you like in a system (whatever system that may be), that's a great reason to switch.
Great video Chris. I recently took a picture shot at ISO 5000 on my OM-1. I put that through DXO RAW2 and any noise that was there was gone and no noticeable loss of detail. I don’t fear using high ISO’s at all. …Take care lifting that 25mm f1.8!
Absolutely beautiful photographs and in my view we would not want any more quality than your photographs.
For once I'm very thankful for the RUclips algorithms throwing a new photography video my way. Thank you for talking complete sense and making it about the person and what they want to shoot other than an 'influencer' approach trying to ram a product or system down our throats. I have pretty much had a camera of all sensor sizes over the years and have no preference to any of them. I currently have a FF and a 1" sensor camera and I am happy taking either of them out with me. My location or purpose for the day's photography will determine which camera I take, not the sensor size. Great video... don't change!!
👍👏👏👏 you're absolutely spot on, I started with an omd10 mk3, then the omd1 mk2 (still got it, never letting it go), and now the OM1. What a camera what a system. Love it.
Great video. I’m 9 months into changing from Nikon FF to now owning the OM-1 and the Mkii. I do not regret the move in the slightest, in fact I wish I’d not been such a FF snob earlier!
Same here
Not asking how you view MEDIUM FORMAT users 😅
I meet so many people IRL with different formats when I'm out shooting (mostly wildlife/macro), and not a single one questioned why I'm using MFT. We shared photos and enjoyed them on my EM-1X and they Z9s, Sony A1s, and Canon R5s. The format wars was a cynical marketing campaign that I believe was bad for photography. Anyways, excellent video, Chris!
Fantastic “sober” and very real presentation. Your photos are showing that the photographer is the most important element in creating great art, especially if you use an amazing instrument. As unbelievable as it may sound, of my most treasured images were taken on an XZ with a minute sensor. Even today having an OM1 mkii plus EM 1 mk ii and iii, I can’t say there is more emotional content. However since the EM1 mk ii, I was so enjoying photography that I gave my Nikon d800 plus all that went with it, as great as it was, away and have not looked back. That is simply stated, Olympus /OM Systems are giving me everything I could ever want.
I just recently purchased my first ever MFT OM Systems OM-1 Mark II and several lenses. I am a 30+ year Nikon film and digital shooter but wanted to give the smaller form factor a try. I also committed to the system by also buying 6 lenses from Olympus/OM Systems as well as Sigma MFT lenses.
While I don't feel competent enough with the system or format to rave or critique it, I'd like to think I am open-minded enough to stick with this system, learn it and use it to its best effect. Thank you for addressing the subject so effectively and fairly.
It's time om systems made you an ambassador, your videos are fantastic, the content is always spot on & always explaining what your settings are & why your doing it thank you
They don't do it by a reason. They have free marketing, without paying for that. If they ask YOU, the situation looks different.
In fact he is just hobbyst, ain't a professional. He didn't win any competition, he doesn't do anything professionaly, doesn't work for any organisation, etc.
Selling your images on website, doesn't make you a professional, just in short. And that's why they won't hire him anyway.
I loved the discussion, but loved the photos at the end even more! More please!
Thanks for the video, Chris.
I’m in my dotage and my youth and middle age has caught up with me. I broke three vertebrae and further damaged my back by cycling. It’s meant carrying heavy gear around is beyond me. My local camera shop showed me the Panasonic 100-300, that’s 200-600 in ‘old money’. I bought a Panasonic G7, an F1.4, 25mm (50) and the 100-300 in addition to the kit 14-140.
I can carry all three lenses all day. Plus, I’ve moved to G9s and have two of them. While it is true I would probably have stayed with full frame, and been happy with it if my back was ok, I’ve also been very happy with micro four thirds. After a day’s shoot, I’m relieved I went with my Panasonic.
I can use a gimbal as well. The costs are lower. The only problem has been others telling me MFT is a poor choice, although I’ve yet to find anyone who has worked with MFT who doesn’t appreciate the format.
The G9 is really a hybrid camera. It can produce excellent video. I illustrated a magazine I was editor of, and the graphics won an award. I produce videos for RUclips. I use my images on my websites.
MFT might not be for everyone. There is no way I would criticise those who has chosen full frame. If it suits them, fine. My Panasonic suits me.
Thanks again, Chris.
How refreshing to hear such common sense. I also have an EM1/2 and an OM 1 and am totally satisfied with the photographs I make in both (African) wildlife and landscapes, printing 70x 100 cm prints, photo books and calendars . Never once have I thought a bigger sensor would have delivered better results. And I am tired of the herd of YT ‘experts’ reviewing all the ‘in’ cameras whilst displaying really mediocre images.
Someone talking sense... Quite rare these days!
Your photography is amazing man! I love landscape photography. I use a full frame but I’m really keen to try the Olympus. I think I need to rent one for a few days.
Foolishly sold my EM-5 but still have the Em-1 and EM-1MkII. Brilliant, affordable, and far more capable than 90% of all users will ever need -- all in a sub $500 camera body. Amazing kit.
Another excellent video Chris, great commentary and common sense throughout! Beautiful images too! I’ve fallen in love with photography again with my M43 cameras, I don’t take full frame anymore now, too heavy to lug around. My Olympus em1mk3 and lumix gx80 fits the bill now, and so much fun to use!
I think most people want bokeh, nice and smooth for their background.
All sensor sizes these days do fairly well in low light.
They all produce good pictures.
You’re right about the person looking at the picture.
Up close or far away, just about all pictures will have or show about the same details.
I shoot wildlife and landscape, and each sensor size I’ve used basically shows the exact detail and resolution.
I can’t see a difference. Unless I pixel peep, which 98% of photographers don’t pixel peep, they look at pictures at a distance.
I think what most professionals and non professionals do is judge by the type of computer screen they are currently using, to judge if resolution and details and then discuss (oh man, I need a bigger sensor)
I love your videos, keep up the good work
Great video. Was out photographing a long exposure sunrise on a cold morning this past weekend with the OM1 mkii and the 12-40 f/2.8. Never thought about sensor size. I thought about subject, light and composition. This morning, well before sunrise, I photographed street lights and tree silhouettes in the misty fog. Noise was not a worry. I was focused and subject, light and composition.
Hey there, just found you as random that turned up on my youtube. Ipad is listening 😂🤣 … I’m using old 4/3 Lumix ( think their first one ) . I found your video very information and helpful as I still consider myself a beginner really. Just completed a day course and every one had full frame big cameras which made me feel a bit left behind but hoping I can save for the Olympus as def need upgrade . Need to keep lens Ive got for next camera . Im not yet at the tech speak stuff so get a bit lost but Still happy with stuff Im taking at my level/ experience , but wow would love to be getting to what you are doing. Good inspo ! First 10,000 shots are the hardest 🤣🤣Thanks. New subscriber now.
whenever i've gone to local music gigs to shoot photos and videos and talked to any of the more experienced photographers, they always have a canon or nikon full-frame dslr, touting that the full-frame sensor is the only way to get good low-light photos at a dimly lit concert
however, recently i did a music festival and everyone there complimented my photos & videos (one of the event mangers even said that they were some of the best photos and videos from the festival in all its years of running), despite me using a sony a6600 aps-c camera !
just goes to show that sensor technology paired with good exposure is more important to supposed noise performance and image quality than what format size you use, especially nowadays with more and more manufacturers opting to use BSI sensors in everything, even their cheaper crop sensor bodies
whatever camera system or format you use, you can still get amazing results so as long as you work within the "limitations", aren't a vehement pixel peeper, or most importantly, comfortable with the system that you're using and understand completely how to get the photographs and videos you want :)
The OM-1is simply a superior camera for my work in close-up nature photography, and it serves me very well in event photography and any other genre I’ve tried. It’s a brilliant professional tool.
Honest analysis 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼 from a real photographer. Excellent 💫
Great video Chris, really enjoy your channel as an OM system user started with an EM1 MK1.
😂 that is what iam started with 😂
Thx for your honest opinions.
I've been fortunate enough to shoot with many different systems since the film days. Minolta, Pentax, Fuji, Leica, etc. Not too long ago I was trying to find a new camera to try and I ran into the dilemma of many modern cameras just being too software looking. Oversharpened, flat looking, etc...just nothing realistic of 'filmic'. I saw some camera, a Lumix GX85, on sale with a kit of 2 lenses for a great price and I loved the styling. I then saw it was a m43 format. I immediately dismissed it and thought it would look nothing more than a 2005 Nokia phone picture. I looked around some more and couldn't find anything that stood out to me. I figured okay fine, worst to worst I'll just return the camera back. Ordered it with the Lumix 20mm 1.7 ll...and never looked back. I was absolutely blown away by the photos and it was exactly the look I was looking for...high quality photos while still retaining a certain realness to them. Not overly perfect and fake looking...just right. These days, my Leica TL2 pretty much just sits in the bag and doesn't get used. The Lumix GX85 really is that good. The L-Mono mode is like the heavens opening up and the angels singing. I honestly have a difficult time telling any difference between that BW and what I've seen on Leica...actually, the only difference is that it's MUCH more affordable. I'll be sticking with micro four thirds for the foreseeable future. I might try Olympus and see how their cameras are as I'm super happy with Lumix. If there's anyone else on the fence about trying the m43 system...don't be. My only mistake was that I waited so long to try it out of my ignorance, I don't want anyone else to make that same mistake due to what they've heard about the sensor size, etc.
I couldn't disagree with a single thing you said Chris. Firstly, I loved your point about finding the camera that works for you. I honestly believe there's no such thing as a bad camera these days, it just about which one works best for you and the way you like to shoot.
As for Olympus/OM-System, the move over from Canon absolutely reinvigorated my photography and I've been a convert ever since. I had never considered m43 for the same reasons you mentioned, and it only when a friend who'd shot Nikon for over 40 years bought the Panasonic G9 and I saw the results that I started to look into the system. It's been 5 years now and I can't see myself changing anytime soon.
Spot on Chris! I was a Nikon APS-C user until my brother "lent" me an EM1-2 and 3 pro lenses. I never looked back and never returned it either! I now have an OM 1-2 and all the Zuiko lenses I need. The Nikon was amazing, but to get a 500MM bright lens, it would have cost a fortune and weighed a ton. Not to mention the rain sleeve I'd have to put on in the mist, rain and snow. Love my OM stuff and love your videos! I've been trying new things out . And ditto on you being made an OM ambassador . BTW, I have blown up 2 shots of Barred Owls to 16 x 20 and they are clear and sharp!
I used to be a view camera photographer, 4x5 and 8x10, so 35 mm. (Full Frame in digital terms) is "miniature format." Most people shoot micro format, that is, they use their smartphone. The history of photography has been one of miniaturization.
The most important thing. I love your photos. Congratulations. The OM1 is possibly the camera that makes a photographer smile the most, because it is loaded with tools that make the only limit set by the photographer's imagination... Print size in cm with optimal image resolution (60 ppcm = 152 dpi)= 85,90 x 64,1 cm = 33,81 x 25,23 Inch. To see the photo with the nose attached to the photo)
I know only, you can do 20 mpx, huge A2 size ~60x45 cm, at ~240-250 dpi, which is good quality print.
And A3 format ~45x30 cm at 300 dpi, which is excellent quality.
A great promo for micro four thirds. When I eventually moved to a digital big camera, I followed what other RUclips photographers used and how they claimed full frame is the best, yet some said crop is best for landscape. So I went for a crop, it wasn't until last year when my Nikon went for a swim, I bought an OM-1 Mk I (still marked Olympus). The purchase was mainly driven by the fact that the OM-1 was way cheaper than many full frames. All I can say is wow what a difference a different sensor makes. As for the weight reduction, that gets another wow, and its fully weather sealed with some pretty nifty computational tricks up its sleeve so to speak, so you get even more wow in your bag. I'm sure the Mk II is even better, but I am more than happy with my Mk I. I only really use a 12-100mm, plus I carry a 90mm for a bit of macro if my 12-100mm doesn't cover it.
Hi Chris! Beautiful pictures man! Very well done. I have watched many of your videos and fully appreciate your technique and your beautiful compositions. You are a professional in my book, definitely an artist; your pictures have a high quality of communication and story, if you are not yet selling them, I am confident you will find many people that will buy them. As to the Micro 4/3 system, thank you for showing the capabilities of this fantastic system! Your work shows that if someone practices their technique and composition, they will be able to creat beautiful photographic art like you are. And all this with a light system that has IMHO the best ergonomics holding and using it and some of the best lenses for 1/2 up to 1/4 of the weight of full frame; fantastic to lug around anywhere in the world. Keep up the wonderful sharing of your art and favorite camera system! God Speed! :)
Hi Chris. Great video, I love your passion for micro-four-thirds and the content you produce. I wish you many more hours of great photography and steady growth for your channel in 2025. We need more outspoken people to help others refocus away from equipment to photography. Well done and only the best. Siegfried
a few days ago i went into my local camera shop to buy my first own digital camera. Originally i wanted to buy a Nikon D3400 used there for 350€, which they sold just as i came in. however, after testing some around, my eyes fell onto a Lumix GX7 for just under 300. I dabled with the thought of buying an E-M10 but put it aside. Yet as i went for hikes these holidays, i absolutely fell in love with the Lumix and love how it fits nicely in my coat pocket and everything around it. It was very much worth every cent
I love the system and when I'm out using the cameras people are interested and many want to have a play. I have 4 bodies and 9 len's plus a broadcast cinema camera with a MFT mount.. I will be adding at least 2 new lens's in 2025 plus if I get paid enough an OM1 MKII. I use the cameras and lens commercially and have hundreds of hours of broadcast TV shot on Olympus len's.
On billboards, for 48 sheet (3048mm x 6096mm) and 96 sheets (3048mm x 12192mm) we used to print at 26 screen so the image would only need or be 52 dpi at print size.
Have been really enjoying your Micro Four Thirds journey.
after binge watching a few reviews on the omd series and ep series of olympus cameras this was a breath of fresh air.
Lovely images, sensible talk.
Here is my contribution to the almighty algorithm. Nice job mate.
Hi Chris, great video. I moved to M4:3 from Canon for a couple of reasons. Firstly both the camera shops that I think are impartial recommended Olympus as the best option for a two month trip to UK (from New Zealand). Weight and size were critical due to luggage limits and an aging back. It was an OM 5 mkii which I still use. It was fantastic, the body would fit in the side pocket of a pair of cargo pants/shorts and a coouple of lenses in other pockets. Or use a small shoulder bag. Even managed to have a variable ND filter and polariser. I've really bough into the system with more lenses etc. I've steered away from the OM 1 etc as I'm still trying to keep things small. And... the lenses are brilliant. Keep up great work Chris.
I've used Panasonic M4/3 since the Lumix G1. Now using a GH7 and S5IIX. The camera IBIS is fantastic, who needs a tripod, even in HiRes mode. Love your videos. 🙏
Great overview Chris along with a fabulous showcase of images. Top work 👍
@@johnpark8297 thank you sir.
Back to an OM-1 (now a Mk2) after trying a couple of APS-C cameras and a Full Frame. None of the others could match its speed and features in a relatively small package. It just works.
An interesting video. I'm currently in the Fuji camp, and I don't know why, but I've become fascinated by this camera. The more I think about it the more I think it could be a Fuji killer. Maybe I'm just a rebel, but the 4/3 sensor sounds edgier. 😄 But really I think that it's just the full package. Thanks!
Brilliant video Chris. I have gradually moved from Canon FF via Fuji and ended up with my OM1 mark 2 which I absolutely love. Keep up the good work on this channel 👍
Thank you for another great video, Chris. Your enthusiasm for Micro Four-Thirds is infectious!
It's good to be in love with your camera. I'm in love with my E-M1mk3 and my OM-1mk1 almost as much. I love the dials on the former much more, I have to confess. But I love the new menu system and the sensor in the new camera a lot ❤. Merry Christmas mate!
My choice was Pentax, it did ever last thing I wanted but…..I wanted something light for a walkabout camera while walking my dog. I saw a video from a landscape photographer who used Nikon until his went wrong. He bought and showcased an OM-5, I was hooked and bought one with a kit lens. Feature wise just wow, other than that it didn’t tick the boxes due to me not really liking the focal length of the kit 12-45 lens. On a whim I bought a 14-150 and it brought that camera alive for me and now it’s seldom out of my hand. Now I’m asking myself would I like an OM-1 do I need an OM-1 and of course I blame you for showcasing yours. 😊 to be continued….possibly.
Love the video. Been watching your four thirds jouney and It's made me want to join the club too. Just recieved my OM-1 yesterday. Looking forward to years of fun.
Excellent video. I switched from Canon a few years ago and am very happy with my OM1. I have a small selection of Pro lenses from macro to 300mm and absolutely love them.
Great video Chris. This should be required viewing for all the "Sensor snobs" out there
I love EM 1 MARK 1.
The fabulous granny!
Great photo!!!!!
👏
Love my OM1.2!
om1 is a fantastic machine... great words, great video... Thanks!
Brilliant video Chris! I am more into family, wildlife and sport genre more of a hobby. But I do send my works in and they got published in the magazine as well as calendar at the state where I live in the US. Your images show case what the system is capable of and like you I do have ton of fun using it! Cheers.
I started off with an em5, then upgraded to an em1ii. Recently, I came across a used em1x for less than $500usd. What a steal! I absolutely love to m43 system, and am glad I stumbled on it.
Brilliant, keep up the good work Chris 😎
Honest truthful and above all correct. Love your sarcasm it works for those who don't know the MFT quality and think big is beautiful. Must love carrying around a lot of weight!
Thanks for sticking up for MFT. After shooting full-frame for over 40 years as a newspaper photographer I tried the Leica V-Lux 114 when video and stills were required for our website. With the 114 I could shoot both still and video at the same moment. I love the resolution of a full-frame camera but my Lumix G9 is not holding me back in any way.
I love Micro 4/3s but you have been ‘everywhere’. I’ve had the system to Everest Base Camp, Kilimanjaro and similar. Love it in extreme conditions where others rue their heavy cameras.
Speaking of print size, I tend to print to 10x13 and 20x26. Then it represents a print that is a true m43 aspect ratio on standard available paper sizes. I can set up two images of 12x16 on 16x24 paper or six images by printing on 24x36 paper and save cost on a per print basis. I just have to put in a little effort to cut the printed sheet. All true to the m43 ratio, which I quite like.
I would like our MFT cameras to have added true A format (aspect ratio 1.414:1, 5184x3666 pixels) and Letter format (aspect ratio 1.294:1, 5032x3888 pixels), not only 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 and 1:1. Ok, letter format is very close to 4:3 (1.33:1), but I think A is better as it's in between 4:3 and 3:2. I know the camera tech could handle it. It's just crop by software.
Most people print on Letter or A size paper.
Really nice photographs!!
Thank you. One thing that is never compared, is the lenses to full frame, apart from the size benefits. The m43 pro lenses quality is unmatched in all categories .
I’ve shot Sony for 10 years love it was in for a new Sony a7r5 for Christmas then Olympus OM1 mk2 came along cant wait for Christmas Day .
Great sensible, video, Chris! Began my Olympus journey with the film OM2. Graduated to the DSLRs, and now have 5 Olys, one EM5iii has shutter problems, so 4. Mainly use the EM1 mkiii, and the OM-5. So light and handy. Have used the big Nikons and mirrorless Sonys, but always return to Olympus/OMS. Love your dry humour - and your images. Agree with you entirely!
Terrific and spot on. Thanks.
Brilliant video Chris, blowing the hype and myths around the false arguments between formats etc and a lovely compilation of your images this year. I'm sold I've now had my om1 since July. Blown away by it. It's half the weight and size of the 5dmk4. That I had. Really tiny lenses and even a kit lens is more than sharp enough. No regrets whatsoever. Keep going strong
Well said Chris, I use an OM1 & EM1 mk3. The noise on the OM1 is great but wouldn't hesitate to use mk3. Other companies are playing catch up in terms of features in a camera compared to OM System (formally Olympus). Keep up the good work. Love the channel.
I agree with most of what you said. What annoys me is some of the new and top range M43 cameras are now as big as apse or full frame cameras… which is like…what’s the point then?
Great review - bokeh sucks for what I do, totally agree about noise
Love that camera backpack.... I'm using Lowepro flipside 400AW. I have the original and it has traveled with me all over Poland, Europe and US. It carries my M43 G9.
Nice video Chris, I'm planning on upgrading to a Panasonic G9 mainly because I already have an old Gh2, but have been using heavy DSLR kit, so now want a lighter rucksack! I have got my eye on an Olympus at some point eventually though
I knew to would get lost of views on this topic, I have FF but I also have MFT for travel etc. Anyway its all about getting out and "using" your camera. Nice, humorous video. 😂😂
I gotta say, the features-to-price ratio on M43 is why I use it. My EM10ii is fun as hell for such an affordable camera.
Just bought a Lumix G9ii so reassured by your video!
I’ve owned a few Olympus cameras, beginning with an OM PC film SLR in the late 1980s, and including the first E-M 10, and now the E-M 1 mk iii. I couldn’t ask for another camera more suited to my creative needs.
Well said. I recently looked at changing from MFT to another system and concluded that any gains were slight and the negatives were considerable i.e. cost and mass. There is a lot of misinformation here on the web but I was sold on MFT from the 12Mpixel Panasonic GF1 fitted with the 20mm f1.8. I presently shoot with a G9 and an OM-5 and can see no reason to change.
Always entertaining and great images. You make m43 shine
I am not a convert, but an Olympus/OM user from scratch. I shoot birds, because I like shooting birds, and my cameras do it very well. Occasionally I go to organised shoots with other photographers, and have been sneered at by the FF mob with their behemoth "long" 600mm lenses, until I show them my uncropped 1000mm equivalent reach shots..
I really couldnt care less what others think, because my system makes me happy and gives me great results that often outstrip the results of other's who have much heavier and more expensive gear.
There is that horrible expression "when you know, you know"... I adapt that to "when you know micro 4 thirds, you know".
Nuff said.
I’m sticking with my OM1, it does a good job ,so why not !
I mainly photograph in the Peak District.
Tell me what places you have visited in the Peak District
Mam Tor, Winnats Pass, Stanbage Edge, Ladybower Reservoir.
Can’t really afford the om1 so sticking with my em1 mkii Chris.
Same here… Have been doing quite some research over the past months whether it’s worth to upgrade or not. In the end I decided that the advantages the OM1 or OM1 II are offering are not really worth the money for me as a hobby photographer. I‘ll probably rather invest it in a trip where I can use my two E-M 1 II. 😁
The painter is the artist not the brush.
Hi Chris, another enjoyable video, I can only echo your reasons for using the MFT system.
Well done. Use what you like, like what you use. And I do like m4/3.
MFT gets the results for me. I came to Lumix from Canon three or four years ago. I love the stabilization. Love the lenses. Love the features. I am here to stay.
really enjoyed that mate! i have to say, ive down sized from a 48mp to a 24 full frame, I just found the file size easier, im not convinced on the micro 4/3 maybe we could do a gear swap day and see if you can convert me!
Nailed it. Great vid!
Searching for camera. Researching 4/3. Like your style. Very informative. New sub'r..
I also have the OM-1, and have used the Lumix G-9, the Olympus E-M1 mkII, and the Olympus E-M5. They're all great cameras, and(as said in the video) the noise performance of the OM-1 is noticeably better.
Also, I don't think I've run across the 'micro 4/3 isn't weather sealed...' criticism, that would be hilarious. The new OM cameras and IP53 rated. I think only one or two models of Leica are higher rated, and most companies don't bother with it at all.
High-Res mode: even noted m4/3 critic Tony Northrup has said many times that it's the only system in which the high-res mode seems to actually work(he, last I heard, has never gotten acceptable results on a Sony - a camera system he generally loves)
Shallow Depth of Field is pretty easy, you just have to understand how it works: subject close, background far. I have a number of wildlife shots where the background it totally demolished and they were shot, in some cases, at f/13(teleconverters, baby!!! lol)
Last, printing size: I have hanging up at work a 10mp shot(cropped from 20mp) on 17"x11" paper, about A3 size for those who use those sizes.
I think if I shot only, or even mostly, people, I might use full frame. I like my Canon R6 a lot. My issue is I shoot mostly wildlife, and the lens size/weight savings is worth more than any marginal advantage a larger sensor would give me. That's the reason I shot micro 4/3 for a while, went to Fuji APSC, Sony FF, then Canon FF only to come back to M4/3.
Hi, Chris.
I work with the Lumix G9 II and this camera is weatherproof.
And your Olympus OM1 is also waterproof.
I know that not all the lenses are waterproof.
The Pro lenses are waterproof but the regular lenses are not.
Ik like the video, my friend.
PS. Stay, like me, by Micro 4/3.
Fantastic cameras.
And I totally agree with you, Chris.
Chris. You name it, I have used it. My cameras of choice?.....Olympus and Lumix M43. Love 'em.
Like picking up a favourite hammer, well balanced, comfortable, light and pack a punch. For the record, my other fave...Mamiya 645E for film work. Simple as.
Keep up the good work. ;-)
Couldn't agree more Chris, I've just picked up the Great White for Xmas. I'm happy with what I have and that's all that counts. I can't wait for 1000mm or 1400 mm with a 1.4 ??TC at Air Shows next year.
My old EM5 was the only camera I dared use near seawater. Seawater destroys EVERYTHING, but the Oly got rinsed under a tap straight after, don’t dare do that with my Fuji XT3
Well said 👏 I love my Olympus and can’t wait to expand into the new OM systems 📷 also loving the comedy so true 😂