Still far from the biggest inaccuracy in this video. Hell it's not even the only weird reference to sound, a few seconds earlier it mentioned overcoming SONAR. The density of errors in the video is rather astonishing, it actually might so bad that ChatGPT would have done better.
Stating the F22 lost dog fights to the F15 glosses over a lot of constraints the F22 pilot had to follow to due to training requirements and preserving RAM.
Facts. The F-22s and F-35s are almost always stacked with lunberg reflectors and the external fuel tanks to make them much easier to see and harder to maneuver. They’re usually tied down with VERY limited intercept constraints and I’ve read that there have been exercises where the 4th Gen fighters are intercepting 10-20:1 with AWACS and other support and the F-22 and F-35s are purposely seriously hamstrung.
@@FloridaManMatty The F-35 is experiencing the same doctrinal issues that were realized with the F-4 Phantom in Vietnam: Jack of all, Master of None. There IS a reason why the USAF has desperately tried to hide the after-action report of the Red Flag Exercise where a Gripen defeated the F-35.
@@John-hu9qgthat ain’t true. 1 f15 shot down 2 mig29s and Iraq definitely wasn’t a third world military. It’s was 4th largest military on earth. The f15 has shit down multiple mig 29s. The f15 is older I believe than the mig. The f15 could take out most of Russias Air Force as it’s mostly made up of mig29s and su27s. I’d put my money on the f15ex against the su35 as it’s performed pretty bad in Ukraine. Not to mention the huge difference in pilots and training. If the US loses just 1 fighter it’s a big deal and Russian jets been faking like rain. They took out 11 in 11 days.
@@michaelbartley9572 It shot down a couple of elderly Iraqi MIG-29A export variants, in a 4 vs 1 engagement with full NATO AWACSs support vs nothing on the Iraqi side, Iraq most definitely had a third world military in every sense of the word, that was tired from 10 years of the iran-iraq war before the gulf war in 1991. They didn't even possess a single round of ammunition designed to engage western armour!🤣. The Ukrainian airforce was largely combat ineffective in as little as 10 days, and you will see exactly how long the F-16 will last also. In regards to Ukrainian shoot down claims? They were laughable at best, they couldn't provide any evidence whatsoever in relation to the majority of SU-34 claims, yes they downed one or two by quietly bringing a pair of patriot launchers and a NASAM unit forward, but then lost all three SAM units in a series of spectacular strikes by the Russians who also moved a relatively unknown weapon into position, a Tornado 200km range precision strike MLRS. Its also rumoured that some of these destroyed battery's were covertly manned by American and other NATO personnel killed in the strikes.
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb Totally false, their air defence systems were based on equipment from the 60s and 70s, almost all of it, the non double digit stuff previously compromised from the Arab-Israeli wars decades earlier. The US even received some captured examples, radars etc from Israel. The only area that Iraq had any credible threat was their artillery but without control of their airspace that threat was quickly neutralised.
I think it's hilarious (also, awesome) that we can revisit an older design like the F-15 and just modernize a few parts of it, and it's at least as effective as a brand-new design. Goes to show you how well designed the F-15 was/is.
@@janhansen3753actually….the F15 especially the EX would serve as second hand damage after the stealth jets came in and destroyed land to air threats that could lock them up
@@janhansen3753 The F-35 is suffering from the same problem that the F-4 Phantom experienced in Vietnam. Jack of all Trades, Master of None. Seems like Western leaders go in a cycle where they think they need a multi-purpose vehicle only to come to the same realization of previous generations that having dedicated frames for a specific purpose is more effective. What they should be looking for is NOT multi-purpose aircraft, but rather PARTS inter-operability.
You really need to get a script editor in with a decent grasp of science, particularly physics. Your description of radar is... not how radar works at all. Radar is an electromagnetic wave, not a sound wave. This hugely holes the credibility of what is already a very ropey script. As a channel with over 3/4 of a million subscribers I would expect you can afford a decent script writer or editor. If you don't have one of those, drop me a line and I'll come sort it out for you for a reasonable fee :D
they use a bot to write and read the script the ia has made, i doubt if there is even someone that has listened to that thing befire dumping it in the internet.
What about airplanes being built so they can hide from SONAR? I hope we don’t have flying submarines. Or jet fighters that can fly underwater. The video creator made a wealth of mistakes in this video.
Well sonar and radar kind of works same way. No biggie that orher wave moves speed of light and other about 1 235 km/h. in air. Not to make too much fuss about the fact that planes dont usually travel under water where sonars are used.@@Talven81
Yep, same. The bullshit about thermal vs infrared and the aircraft actively illuminating in infrared is also complete and utter bullocks. Actually, everything is in this video is bullocks. Yes, the F-15 will be a match for the SU-35, but for completely different reasons than the bull** in this video.
This “guy” is using ChatGPT for his script and likely paying someone for the narration. Every single video is like this. Just a simple regurgitation of the Wikipedia articles the LLM was trained on.
@@quandmeme9970 problem for Russia and maybe China if they feeling frisky is the shit we don’t see or hear about on the news…it’s them secret weapons department in our government folks should be worried about
Multiple mistakes in this video: 1. Radar does not work off sound waves. 2. The F-15EX is the "missile truck" model. Not the F-15C. 3. The F-35 is equipped with the 25mm GAU-12/U rotary cannon, not the M61A2. Seriously, do a bit of fact-checking on your researchers before this stuff goes live.
@@richardzelade Quite right. When I'm typing on an old Dell E6410 with a wobbly keyboard, tiny deviations can be forgiven. If the mistakes in imagery in this video were of the same scale, they would be forgiven.
And still, the su57 is really huge and you can see the turbine blades from the front.. that is really not Stealth no matter how much ram you paint it with
First what is the number of the Su-57, you are talking about? Literally there many iterations of this plane with significant differences. SUCH AS RAM blockers before the blades.
The F-15 EX are brand new airframes, It isn't an upgrade to preexisting aircraft, they are a cheaper option then stealth air craft but designed to integrate with them.
Well first of all you're right they are brand new airframes but they are a 100% upgraded design. And no they're not cheap, in fact unless we buy more than the current 18 we have ordered they will not be cheaper than the F-35
Aside from bombing a few safe targets in Syria, all we really know about the SU-57 is what Russian sources brag about. A lot of creditability there. Whereas the capability of the F-15 is documented by 40 years of combat action by the USAF and several allied countries.
It seems like you're reading the factory sales literature for the SU-57 and actually believe it. Here's a hint: No outside source has vetted the claims or capabilities. In contrast, the 20 year old F-22 has participated in scores of mock dogfights against top of the line fighters from NATO countries and other allies in week long training exercises. To put it very mildly, Russia is known for exaggerating the capabilities of its weapons and vehicles. The SU-57, T-14 and BMPT "Terminator" are made for parades and shopping mall openings as each of their miniscule production numbers indicate.
While the US does not a country, learned the word «advertising»? "Publical" articles where F-22 RCS is times of magnite lower than F-117 is rudicilous. Yet you belive.
@@red94mr28 if I replaced "aren't being" with "doesn't" because something broke in the thinking process, it doesn't make the message senseless. You can continue shifting away from the topic, mr Ad
@@worldoftancraft Sniffing glue is very bad for you. It causes hallucinations, like referencing "aren't being" when it doesn't appear in your post above. Try to avoid huffing it in the future.
@@red94mr28 you are really that dull that you present my description of the error, what I wrote and what I should've instead, as a hallicilation? You really this much taskless that you have time for this? You humuliate yourself by the very yourselves deeds.
The value of a weapon system is NEVER best determined by 1 on 1 scenarios. No one, not even Russia, sends up aircraft for one-on-one duels unsupported. There is a lot of other factors involved. Aerial refueling to enhance combat endurance, airborne and ground based radar support, SAM support, EW support, pilot training, and even quality of basic maintenance matter. In this case, the Su-57s go up looking for F-15s who may be easily detected at range.... and as they maneuver around to get the F-15s they get bushwacked by the F-22s or F-35s they never saw. Then the F-15s volley off their long-range missile load to mop up any survivors. Or the F-22s and F-35s can remain covert and provide targeting data for the F-15EX's massive missile load, then come in and sweep up anything left.
Who does the fact checking on this? Radar does not use sound waves. It is an acronym for radio detection and ranging. Radio Waves propagate at the speed of light not the speed of sound. Infrared detection from IRST is completely passive. Nothing is sent out. We aren't talking about the 1950s and 1960s infrared lamps used by tanks. Finally, there's a serious question as to whether the Sukhoi Su 57 is a true 5th generation aircraft. It has a lot of non-stealthy angles and those engine inlets look rather suspect.
Just a hypothetical question - in each sense. In reality the scrap jet Su-57 not even exists. 14 years after the first flight, just a handful of Su-57 jets have been produced which are all different. The jet is a joke.
10:55 Stock footage of f 16 rather than f 15. . No footage of the F4 when talking about Vietnam. No footage of the f 14 when talking about the Navy/ Air Force rivalry. What’s up with the editor on this channel?
The F15, is getting a face-lift and going to be in service for a couple more decades. Fact of the matter is the only plane that can beat the f-15 in the sky today is the f-15 and the F22 and F35. America's design it's still outstanding that we designed a plane 40 years ago that has only been matched by newer American planes 🤣
From what I have heard or read, it's the best as far as thrust to weight. Or climb rate. Something of that sort. Can't remember exactly what it was?????
@@robertgarcia217 if you cannot get the mesage, I can use even more simple English: unbeatED =/= unbeatABLE. Can you grasp the difference? I am Rossiânin.
And what about the latest F-15, the F-15 EX? Basically the F-15 EX is a "Missle truck" and that it does better than any other aircraft in the world due to its immense power from its new engines. As well it now can communicate with the new coms for F-35 style "group coms". It will know what the F-35 fighters know and vice versa. The SU57 is so damn "invisible"it hasn't been seen in action in Ukraine. 😂 🤣
I'm gonna save you 20 minutes of bullshit recaps: It doesn't matter how maneuverable your plane is, if the other guy can see you first and shoot at you first, you're screwed. While yes, pilots do practice ACM, most engagements are done Beyond Visual Range... and the Su-57 has the radar cross section of a whale.
True but even the US cant currently build anything that can match the F-22 or even new F-22 also the SU-57 is their first compared to the US's (115 Night Hawk!) it's much better but yes it sucks it was 25 year late and based on an existing airframe (The Flanker!) rather than build new from the ground up, Also the SU-57 still lacks it's dedicated new engines Best Stealth Aircraft ever built was the VF-23 (Black Widow and Ghost Bat!) they were more stealthy just as fast but lost because they didn't show off fancy moves it was capable of and still was (for the prototypes!) Analog Majority Controls but was planned to get a fully Digital Cockpit and HUD Helmet
Show me the plane you cant as it is not even in testing yet never mind production it might never happen (It will but until it's actually in mass production it should be treated as Vapor Wear!) why fight a real war with Hypothetical Resources you can't just with what you have right at that moment! @@pooferfish2850
@DarthAwar what the hell are you even talking about? The F-35 is more stealthy than the f-22. The F-22 was our third attempt at stealth. Actually our first attempt at a stealth aircraft was the Have-Blue test bed which is 100 * stealthier than the su-57. Our first production stealth aircraft was the F-117 Nighthawk. Not sure where you're coming up with the F-115😂😂😂 And the second production aircraft with stealth was the F-22 which is several Generations beyond the f-117. And the current F-35 along with the B21 Raider are even further stealthier than the F-22 or any previous aircraft. And for the su-57 to be Russia's first attempt at stealth is actually quite embarrassing. Because it's not even a stealth aircraft it's barely low observability. In fact it may not even be low observable, some estimates are that it has the radar cross section of a slick f-18.😂 And as far as the video goes, the su-57 if they ever are able to produce a combat version of it that's really ready, wouldn't stand a chance. Also it's very doubtful that they'll ever even build any more of them because they lack the Western components to build them. They are not capable of manufacturing the microchips along with dozens of other components on their own😂😂
nice video, but: - RADAR does not run on sound waves, but rather radio waves (in the cm and mm range). The ECHOLOT works with sound waves, which was first used by the British in WW2 against German submarines. - There are 2 infrared/thermal imaging systems. Active and passive. In one case, the battlefield is illuminated and the reflection is registered by a sensor. This was first used by the Germans in WW2. The next generation does not need any illumination, but rather registers the (long-wave) infrared signature that the object emits. This is probably also what is meant here, in order to register the signature of the engine, even if the aircraft is not detected by the radar. In principle, stealth aircraft are not entirely invisible. In Yugoslavia and also in Iraq, F117s were found and combated by long-wave radar devices (cm range) (older system from the USSR). The German company Hensold is building a similar radar that can find stealth aircraft sooner.
Actually the f-15ex will have both single seat and dual configurations. But the single seat F-15 will still have the same cockpit area the second seat will not be utilized. Also all the other f-15s we have currently, will be aging out within the next 5 to 10 years max. So you can't even upgrade them because the airframes will be worn out
Most people misunderstand Stealth to begin with. It has less to do with being "invisible" and more to do with being able to acquire a targeting lock. The non-stealthy aircraft can still see the stealth but has to get much closer before his weapons can effectively hit their target.
😮 no you're actually incorrect. Stealth has to do with being unseen to the other aircraft radars. You can't see it without getting a radar lock on it basically. Now there are some ground-based x-band Radars that can detect that a stealth aircraft is in the area but it cannot pinpoint it with any degree of accuracy, not even really accurate enough to Vector another aircraft to that area
@@Wyomingchief Air traffic control radars at airports can see stealth aircraft just fine. They don't need to have a weapon's lock and so the accuracy of where they plot the location of an aircraft doesn't need to be so precise. And yes, vectoring an intercepting aircraft CAN be done with such a radar.
I have said it once and I will say it again, a visually impaired 4 year old running around a F16 hanger with a slightly pointy stick is only slightly less dangerous than a SU57 is to a F16. At least the 4 year old has a chance to whack the landing gear with said stick!
The SU-57 isn't stealth. It has a radar cross section of a SQUARE METER, about the same as an F-18A. That's not stealth. The F-35 has a cross section of .005 square meters. THAT'S stealth.
@@cfisher11 But the resolution is so bad that they can't use it for targeting or even accurate location. They know it's out there, but not exactly where.
The SU57 is only stealthy nose on. If there is an AWACS in the area the SU57 doesn't have a chance because the AWACS can relay positional information to any allied aircraft. This will give the F35 the ability to engage the SU57 from another zip code.
Th su-57 is junk in the pictures of it you can even see bubbles in the glass, you are telling me it is a state of the art plane, but they can't manage to even get the glass right?
And Su-57 ISN'T 5th Generation and ISN'T stealth, so no, we don't need Hollywood OR Tom Cruise. Also, we rely on the fact that there is only about 4-5 flying Su-57's in the world anyway.
Unfortunately for Russia, the SU57 is not even a 5th gen aircraft. It's a 4.5 Gen aircraft with a radar cross section similar to a FA18. It, like the Russian military, is complete shit.
It makes me believe you're living in Fantasyland telling this stuff on RUclips all the equipment at rush has been using been falling apart or doesn't work or is not well maintained and you think this is going to be the next generation Fantasyland
13:50 That is not at all how IRST works. Infrared Search and Track is a fancy name for "heat vision". It is a 100% passive system. It's basically just a camera that can detect differences in heat. The F-15 also has a huge advantage over the Su-57: It actually can live up to its reputation and there are hundreds of them. Also, the USAF just ordered a couple hundred F-15EX to supplement the existing airframes and ease the burden on F-35 frames. This is on top of NGAD. Simon, you really need to do better research, because this isn't the first time you've been very wrong in one of your videos and I found all this out simply by googling the information.
F-15EX exists because vii bezt plain eva' eF-22 didn't make it. Didn't become what it should have. Therefore the replacement pair of f-15 + f-16 is pseudo-existing-plane + F-35
PS; weapons are only tools, it takes a master craftsmen to use them to their best advantage. That’s where the US shines. War games have and are being studied continuously. Point/counter point. Yes it like a chess match and the US had some very capable chess pieces to deploy.
To understand Russian/Soviet aviation, I recommend watching the Skyships Eng channel. It's a Russian POV from a historical viewpoint, complete with all the idiosyncracies and idiocies of the Soviet Union. It will prepare you to understand how the Soviets, and the Russian Federation approaches aviation and how they fail. It's also very entertaining (unlike this video).
The US has almost 500* F-35 currently in service, plus almost 500 F-15s and 186 F-22. *:(US plans to have ~2500 F-35s eventually). That Ruzzia plans to build two dozen Su57 by the end of the year, and 76 eventually is a bad joke. Their engine tech, radar, stealth, training doctrine, pilot experience/flight hours are all also significantly behind. I will admit their thrust vectoring is neat to see at airshows. But with helmet mounted targeting, and missiles that can loop around and shoot an enemy directly behind you, that kind of dogfight maneuverability is only useful if somehow we run out of missiles. And again, two dozen Su57. The Netherlands alone already has that many F-35s, and has plans to double it. The UK has 30 and will have 47 by 2025. Israel has 50 and has authorized purchase of 25 more. Japan seems to only have 17 F-35 in operation right now, but they plan to have 147 eventually, and are building a domestic factory. I could go on. By the time they catch up, if that is even possible, we will be retiring the 6th and trying to figure out what 7th gen is because we are mostly competing with ourselves at this point (China can compete on numbers, but they don't innovate, they steal US tech and adapt it, so we can't look to them either).
Yea, even if the SU-57 is the most advanced bag of chips on the planet, they won’t be able to survive the sheer numbers of fighter aircraft the US has. But it’s not the best fighter jet ever. Maybe top 5 and we have 1-4.
Yeah I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers from but we're not going to have 2500 F-35, maybe that'll be the total built but you also have to realize that about 12 of our allies also fly the plane😂 Also the Japanese are not in any way shape or form going to be building a domestic Factory to make the F-35. Now they are working with American Engineers to design their own stealth aircraft but they will not be producing the F-35😂😂😂 I love your enthusiasm but, don't believe everything you hear in a RUclips video😂😂
Most of your videos are pretty decent.... this one is absolutely packed with flaws. Some of the bigger key points being that Radar is not sound waves but electromagnetic RADIO waves. Then there's the statement that infrared "sensors" (AKA infrared search & track) would give the F-15 an advantage over modern jets.... all update 4 and 5th gen fighters have this capability. In fact, the Russian fighters have had it for decades - this is one area where Americans actually fell behind the curve because we were more concerned about fighting terrorism than being at the forefront of fighter technology for the last 22 years. Then there's the idea that the F-35 or the F-22 "could hold their own/defeat" a Su-57. They both have major advantages over the Russian jet. They boast WAY WAY smaller RCS (they are WAY harder to see/track/lock with Radar), better radar, more effective missiles (The AIM120 AMRAAM may have less range than the R77 but it has a much better on board radar and is more consistent in finding its target), and better situational awareness. Either plane will dominate the Su-57 in all but a dog-fight. That said, a pair of F-15s, even EX, are going to have a bad day in an engagement with a pair of Su-57s. Despite having a more powerful radar, the F-15's RCS is so massive that there's simply no way it's picking up the Su-57 before the Su-57 has fired on it. The Su-57 is not on par with American 5th gen fighters, but it still out-classes any 4th gen fighter. The F-15EX is not meant to go head to head with the Su-57. It's meant to shoot at it using a radar lock data-linked to it via an F-35 that snuck up on the Sukhoi
Radar DOES NOT use "sound waves," as this episode states roughly 6 minutes and 40 seconds into this video. Instead, Radar uses RADIO WAVES!!! 😂
Hey according to Freddie Mercury radio is GAGA and makes noises. And that's sound! So stop being a hater 😂
RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂
Still far from the biggest inaccuracy in this video. Hell it's not even the only weird reference to sound, a few seconds earlier it mentioned overcoming SONAR. The density of errors in the video is rather astonishing, it actually might so bad that ChatGPT would have done better.
True
Videos on this channel often have bad inaccuracies. They don't seem to care much.
Stating the F22 lost dog fights to the F15 glosses over a lot of constraints the F22 pilot had to follow to due to training requirements and preserving RAM.
Facts. The F-22s and F-35s are almost always stacked with lunberg reflectors and the external fuel tanks to make them much easier to see and harder to maneuver. They’re usually tied down with VERY limited intercept constraints and I’ve read that there have been exercises where the 4th Gen fighters are intercepting 10-20:1 with AWACS and other support and the F-22 and F-35s are purposely seriously hamstrung.
I don’t know why people think these F22 and F35 are at full capability when doing these little DF shows and training
@@FloridaManMatty The F-35 is experiencing the same doctrinal issues that were realized with the F-4 Phantom in Vietnam: Jack of all, Master of None.
There IS a reason why the USAF has desperately tried to hide the after-action report of the Red Flag Exercise where a Gripen defeated the F-35.
You learn more from a loss than a win.
That's the point exactly. They handicap the F22 till it's competitive with the older plane, then see what happens.
"F22 does not have any serious victories in air to air combat"....... That baloon was pretty jacked though.
The SU57 is soviet style hype. It’s a flying Fyre Festival.
It barely flies and is being compared to the 50 year old Eagle.
Like everything from this Terrorstate.
Terminator, t90, t80, t72, su35, S300, allll crap
Ohhh dude that is a good comparison, it's funny too
God damn, that might be the most accurate summary of the Russian (airforce/army/navy/anything) capabilities I have heard.
@@gooldii1Also their cars😂😂😂
104 and 0. (stats for the F15)
vs 0 and -4 (stats for the SU57)
Against 3 generation export aircraft in third world countries, let's not forget.
@@John-hu9qgthat ain’t true. 1 f15 shot down 2 mig29s and Iraq definitely wasn’t a third world military. It’s was 4th largest military on earth. The f15 has shit down multiple mig 29s. The f15 is older I believe than the mig. The f15 could take out most of Russias Air Force as it’s mostly made up of mig29s and su27s. I’d put my money on the f15ex against the su35 as it’s performed pretty bad in Ukraine. Not to mention the huge difference in pilots and training. If the US loses just 1 fighter it’s a big deal and Russian jets been faking like rain. They took out 11 in 11 days.
@@michaelbartley9572 It shot down a couple of elderly Iraqi MIG-29A export variants, in a 4 vs 1 engagement with full NATO AWACSs support vs nothing on the Iraqi side, Iraq most definitely had a third world military in every sense of the word, that was tired from 10 years of the iran-iraq war before the gulf war in 1991. They didn't even possess a single round of ammunition designed to engage western armour!🤣. The Ukrainian airforce was largely combat ineffective in as little as 10 days, and you will see exactly how long the F-16 will last also. In regards to Ukrainian shoot down claims? They were laughable at best, they couldn't provide any evidence whatsoever in relation to the majority of SU-34 claims, yes they downed one or two by quietly bringing a pair of patriot launchers and a NASAM unit forward, but then lost all three SAM units in a series of spectacular strikes by the Russians who also moved a relatively unknown weapon into position, a Tornado 200km range precision strike MLRS. Its also rumoured that some of these destroyed battery's were covertly manned by American and other NATO personnel killed in the strikes.
Iraq was still ranked 4th in the world for military power at the time with on of the best air defense in the world,
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb Totally false, their air defence systems were based on equipment from the 60s and 70s, almost all of it, the non double digit stuff previously compromised from the Arab-Israeli wars decades earlier. The US even received some captured examples, radars etc from Israel. The only area that Iraq had any credible threat was their artillery but without control of their airspace that threat was quickly neutralised.
You really don't understand infra-red do you?
Russia is not scaring anyone. That new F15 EX is something they should worry about.
I think it's hilarious (also, awesome) that we can revisit an older design like the F-15 and just modernize a few parts of it, and it's at least as effective as a brand-new design. Goes to show you how well designed the F-15 was/is.
I don't think Russia is thinking twice about a plane which primary role will be domestic defence. The F-22 and F-35 is what they fear.
@@janhansen3753actually….the F15 especially the EX would serve as second hand damage after the stealth jets came in and destroyed land to air threats that could lock them up
@@janhansen3753 The F-35 is suffering from the same problem that the F-4 Phantom experienced in Vietnam. Jack of all Trades, Master of None. Seems like Western leaders go in a cycle where they think they need a multi-purpose vehicle only to come to the same realization of previous generations that having dedicated frames for a specific purpose is more effective. What they should be looking for is NOT multi-purpose aircraft, but rather PARTS inter-operability.
@lafosh7234 the F-15EX will be the F-35s missile truck. Think of it as an an extended mag for the 5th gen.
You really need to get a script editor in with a decent grasp of science, particularly physics. Your description of radar is... not how radar works at all. Radar is an electromagnetic wave, not a sound wave. This hugely holes the credibility of what is already a very ropey script. As a channel with over 3/4 of a million subscribers I would expect you can afford a decent script writer or editor. If you don't have one of those, drop me a line and I'll come sort it out for you for a reasonable fee :D
That had me raising my eyebrows, too lol... I was like... sound waves? That's sonar, not radar! lol
they use a bot to write and read the script the ia has made, i doubt if there is even someone that has listened to that thing befire dumping it in the internet.
What about airplanes being built so they can hide from SONAR? I hope we don’t have flying submarines. Or jet fighters that can fly underwater. The video creator made a wealth of mistakes in this video.
@@ecleveland1 ruzzia just converted a su27 into a submarine.
Lol and "inferred is not to be confused with thermal"
Always loved the F-15 Eagle. Simply the best ever.👏
Now give it crack and stealth tech and you have the f-22 raptor. We don't even need to use the f-22.
Yep
@Booz2010 the Eagle, 104_ 0
@Booz2010 Rafale is a beautiful and great plane, but it doesn't have the record or history as the F-15. Maybe it will later in time.
@@Andrew-ih2gz so you write it of XDDD
Turned this off the moment the narrator said that radar operates on sound waves....
Brings everything else that was said into question. Just started watching this channel, unsubscribed.
Well sonar and radar kind of works same way. No biggie that orher wave moves speed of light and other about 1 235 km/h. in air. Not to make too much fuss about the fact that planes dont usually travel under water where sonars are used.@@Talven81
Yep, same. The bullshit about thermal vs infrared and the aircraft actively illuminating in infrared is also complete and utter bullocks. Actually, everything is in this video is bullocks. Yes, the F-15 will be a match for the SU-35, but for completely different reasons than the bull** in this video.
This “guy” is using ChatGPT for his script and likely paying someone for the narration. Every single video is like this. Just a simple regurgitation of the Wikipedia articles the LLM was trained on.
It's more likely they simply mixed up radar with sonar...
You guys need to relax, lol
I stopped watching when Radar was referred to as sound waves and sonar was apparently used to detect air planes lol.
So true, SONAR vs RADAR
The fact that Russia is nervous says a lot, they don’t think their best fighter can handle the American jet
They always knew that..that’s why there military doctrine focuses on quantity versus quality
@@lafosh7234problem for Russia that US has both. 😂
@@quandmeme9970 problem for Russia and maybe China if they feeling frisky is the shit we don’t see or hear about on the news…it’s them secret weapons department in our government folks should be worried about
Wo hast du denn das gelesen , die Mig 29 hat das lumpige Teil schon platt gemacht im Jugoslawienkrieg 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Nervous?😂 nato is losing
Pretty sure you confused radar with sonar here (6:47)
Yup. Radar doesn’t detect sound waves.
There's also some heavy "artistic liberties" used from 13:00 onwards when the IR is discussed.
"Sir! Radar just pinged off of a sonic boom in sector G7!"
RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging😂
Go ahead Pooty, send in your T-14s and SU-57s. Afraid they'll become burning scrap?
I love the stock F-16 footage while talking about how great the F-15 is…
Multiple mistakes in this video:
1. Radar does not work off sound waves.
2. The F-15EX is the "missile truck" model. Not the F-15C.
3. The F-35 is equipped with the 25mm GAU-12/U rotary cannon, not the M61A2.
Seriously, do a bit of fact-checking on your researchers before this stuff goes live.
25% of the imagery used in this video is incorrect. You are diseminating information that is incorrect.
Yes, but you need to perfect your spelling, i.e., disseminating. 😉
@@richardzelade Quite right. When I'm typing on an old Dell E6410 with a wobbly keyboard, tiny deviations can be forgiven. If the mistakes in imagery in this video were of the same scale, they would be forgiven.
"Windmills do not work that way! Goodnight!"
Not necessarily the F-16, even the upgraded F-4 phantom can still destroy the Su57 easily. su57 is just like su27 but different design
If you think radar uses sound waves, I don't think you are qualified to speak about anything in this video. Unsubscribed.
And still, the su57 is really huge and you can see the turbine blades from the front.. that is really not Stealth no matter how much ram you paint it with
What if they shove RAM down the intakes? Like.... So the engines eat it... Have stealth farts then too
First what is the number of the Su-57, you are talking about? Literally there many iterations of this plane with significant differences. SUCH AS RAM blockers before the blades.
The F15 has the most amazing radar, it will see an SU 57 from a long ways off.
The F-15 EX are brand new airframes, It isn't an upgrade to preexisting aircraft, they are a cheaper option then stealth air craft but designed to integrate with them.
Well first of all you're right they are brand new airframes but they are a 100% upgraded design. And no they're not cheap, in fact unless we buy more than the current 18 we have ordered they will not be cheaper than the F-35
Radar using sound waves??? If you can't even get this right, your credibility is zero.
He mentioned sonar in airfigter topic. I don't think he knows what's he talking about.
Yeah RADAR is literally an acronym for Radio Detection And Ranging. The guy is confused and not as knowledgeable as he should be 🤦
this channel isnt exactly for bright minded people, its to please US army fanbois that eat this shit like candy.
@@dennythedavinchi3832 sound has been used in early detection systems before, and then they invented radar and it was instantly replaced
Aside from bombing a few safe targets in Syria, all we really know about the SU-57 is what Russian sources brag about. A lot of creditability there. Whereas the capability of the F-15 is documented by 40 years of combat action by the USAF and several allied countries.
Man, IR vs thermal imaging is most likely written by someone who has no clue.
“Horsepower and gunpowder”
It seems like you're reading the factory sales literature for the SU-57 and actually believe it. Here's a hint: No outside source has vetted the claims or capabilities. In contrast, the 20 year old F-22 has participated in scores of mock dogfights against top of the line fighters from NATO countries and other allies in week long training exercises. To put it very mildly, Russia is known for exaggerating the capabilities of its weapons and vehicles. The SU-57, T-14 and BMPT "Terminator" are made for parades and shopping mall openings as each of their miniscule production numbers indicate.
While the US does not a country, learned the word «advertising»? "Publical" articles where F-22 RCS is times of magnite lower than F-117 is rudicilous. Yet you belive.
@@worldoftancraft Wow, English much? Or does incoherency run in your family?
@@red94mr28 if I replaced "aren't being" with "doesn't" because something broke in the thinking process, it doesn't make the message senseless. You can continue shifting away from the topic, mr Ad
@@worldoftancraft Sniffing glue is very bad for you. It causes hallucinations, like referencing "aren't being" when it doesn't appear in your post above. Try to avoid huffing it in the future.
@@red94mr28 you are really that dull that you present my description of the error, what I wrote and what I should've instead, as a hallicilation?
You really this much taskless that you have time for this? You humuliate yourself by the very yourselves deeds.
Russians talking about 6th gen but haven't even produced a true 5th gen yet.
It’s not the plane it’s the pilot....
We have much better pilots too so...
I mean if one of the pilots is in an American plane and one is in a shitty Russian one it really is more about the plane
Gotta avoid that sonar detection!
The SU-57 is not a 5th gen aircraft. It is at best a 4.5. And it's not Stealth either, its stealth adjacent.
It's stealth-ish!
The value of a weapon system is NEVER best determined by 1 on 1 scenarios. No one, not even Russia, sends up aircraft for one-on-one duels unsupported.
There is a lot of other factors involved. Aerial refueling to enhance combat endurance, airborne and ground based radar support, SAM support, EW support, pilot training, and even quality of basic maintenance matter.
In this case, the Su-57s go up looking for F-15s who may be easily detected at range.... and as they maneuver around to get the F-15s they get bushwacked by the F-22s or F-35s they never saw. Then the F-15s volley off their long-range missile load to mop up any survivors. Or the F-22s and F-35s can remain covert and provide targeting data for the F-15EX's massive missile load, then come in and sweep up anything left.
F-22 is the plane that disappears in history. Less ready than 50 years old f-15.
The F-15 remains a credible threat BECAUSE of the F35 and F22.
Who does the fact checking on this? Radar does not use sound waves. It is an acronym for radio detection and ranging. Radio Waves propagate at the speed of light not the speed of sound. Infrared detection from IRST is completely passive. Nothing is sent out. We aren't talking about the 1950s and 1960s infrared lamps used by tanks.
Finally, there's a serious question as to whether the Sukhoi Su 57 is a true 5th generation aircraft. It has a lot of non-stealthy angles and those engine inlets look rather suspect.
It's easy to do (I guess) but @9:00 in, those are not MiG-25 Foxbats. Those are MiG-31 Foxhounds.
Just a hypothetical question - in each sense. In reality the scrap jet Su-57 not even exists. 14 years after the first flight, just a handful of Su-57 jets have been produced which are all different. The jet is a joke.
The F22 is the scariest thing with wings since the Cretaceous Period.
Have you ever seen a peregrine falcon
10:55 Stock footage of f 16 rather than f 15. . No footage of the F4 when talking about Vietnam. No footage of the f 14 when talking about the Navy/ Air Force rivalry. What’s up with the editor on this channel?
Lol can anyone else remember before the war people were asking if the su57 could go nose to nose with F22s and F35s lol 😊
I bet MY lunch the F15 would eat the Su-57 for lunch. Granted it would be a very quick diety lunch because they ain't much SU-57s available. 😂
More like an appetizer than a meal.
0:30 Why did the American jet attack the UK?
they hate us thats why
Because it's the British they wont forgive them for the burning of the white house in 1812
The F15, is getting a face-lift and going to be in service for a couple more decades. Fact of the matter is the only plane that can beat the f-15 in the sky today is the f-15 and the F22 and F35. America's design it's still outstanding that we designed a plane 40 years ago that has only been matched by newer American planes 🤣
From what I have heard or read, it's the best as far as thrust to weight. Or climb rate. Something of that sort. Can't remember exactly what it was?????
Saying that F-15 is unbeatable is a one of the most arrogant signature of a true American patriot(beer drinker+tv watcher type)
@@worldoftancraft it kill record is 104-0. Its a fact not a boast. Whats your nationality?
@@mj_slender6717 yes and yes. Also only jet to kill a satellite. Look it up👍
@@robertgarcia217 if you cannot get the mesage, I can use even more simple English: unbeatED =/= unbeatABLE. Can you grasp the difference? I am Rossiânin.
And what about the latest F-15, the F-15 EX? Basically the F-15 EX is a "Missle truck" and that it does better than any other aircraft in the world due to its immense power from its new engines. As well it now can communicate with the new coms for F-35 style "group coms". It will know what the F-35 fighters know and vice versa.
The SU57 is so damn "invisible"it hasn't been seen in action in Ukraine. 😂
🤣
I'm gonna save you 20 minutes of bullshit recaps: It doesn't matter how maneuverable your plane is, if the other guy can see you first and shoot at you first, you're screwed. While yes, pilots do practice ACM, most engagements are done Beyond Visual Range... and the Su-57 has the radar cross section of a whale.
the russian military estimated the RCS of the SU-57 is 100 times bigger than the proven RCS of the F-22
True but even the US cant currently build anything that can match the F-22 or even new F-22 also the SU-57 is their first compared to the US's (115 Night Hawk!) it's much better but yes it sucks it was 25 year late and based on an existing airframe (The Flanker!) rather than build new from the ground up, Also the SU-57 still lacks it's dedicated new engines
Best Stealth Aircraft ever built was the VF-23 (Black Widow and Ghost Bat!) they were more stealthy just as fast but lost because they didn't show off fancy moves it was capable of and still was (for the prototypes!) Analog Majority Controls but was planned to get a fully Digital Cockpit and HUD Helmet
@@DarthAwar NGAD?
Show me the plane you cant as it is not even in testing yet never mind production it might never happen (It will but until it's actually in mass production it should be treated as Vapor Wear!) why fight a real war with Hypothetical Resources you can't just with what you have right at that moment! @@pooferfish2850
@DarthAwar what the hell are you even talking about? The F-35 is more stealthy than the f-22. The F-22 was our third attempt at stealth.
Actually our first attempt at a stealth aircraft was the Have-Blue test bed which is 100 * stealthier than the su-57. Our first production stealth aircraft was the F-117 Nighthawk.
Not sure where you're coming up with the F-115😂😂😂
And the second production aircraft with stealth was the F-22 which is several Generations beyond the f-117. And the current F-35 along with the B21 Raider are even further stealthier than the F-22 or any previous aircraft.
And for the su-57 to be Russia's first attempt at stealth is actually quite embarrassing. Because it's not even a stealth aircraft it's barely low observability. In fact it may not even be low observable, some estimates are that it has the radar cross section of a slick f-18.😂
And as far as the video goes, the su-57 if they ever are able to produce a combat version of it that's really ready, wouldn't stand a chance.
Also it's very doubtful that they'll ever even build any more of them because they lack the Western components to build them. They are not capable of manufacturing the microchips along with dozens of other components on their own😂😂
@@DarthAwar😂😂😂😂😂😂
Russian bot festival
nice video, but:
- RADAR does not run on sound waves, but rather radio waves (in the cm and mm range).
The ECHOLOT works with sound waves, which was first used by the British in WW2 against German submarines.
- There are 2 infrared/thermal imaging systems. Active and passive. In one case, the battlefield is illuminated and the reflection is registered by a sensor. This was first used by the Germans in WW2.
The next generation does not need any illumination, but rather registers the (long-wave) infrared signature that the object emits.
This is probably also what is meant here, in order to register the signature of the engine, even if the aircraft is not detected by the radar.
In principle, stealth aircraft are not entirely invisible. In Yugoslavia and also in Iraq, F117s were found and combated by long-wave radar devices (cm range) (older system from the USSR).
The German company Hensold is building a similar radar that can find stealth aircraft sooner.
Why the sky is green. Keep dreaming pal. Reality don't care about this.
I bet the SU-57 is good at hiding from sonar...in the sky
@ 6:50.....RADAR uses radio waves, not sound waves.
G O A T : 104 - 0 🔥❤️
Even,
Mike Tyson : 50 - 6 😁
Russia's actions with the SU-57, remind me of Saddam husseins in hiding his jets in gulf wars
Long story short Russia lags behind 3 decades.
and soon to be 5. 😂
Exactly.
Very interesting analysis ! Thanks
Imagine updating F-15B/D so the WSO issues commands to a drone wing. But I guess the stealthy F-35 is better suited for that role
As is also the F15EX.
@@BurntOrangeHorn78 The EX is single-seat. I think a backseat driver would be optimal for controlling the drones while the pilot focuses on flying
@@hanrockabrand95 F15EX is dual tandem seat.
@@BurntOrangeHorn78 I stand corrected
Actually the f-15ex will have both single seat and dual configurations.
But the single seat F-15 will still have the same cockpit area the second seat will not be utilized.
Also all the other f-15s we have currently, will be aging out within the next 5 to 10 years max. So you can't even upgrade them because the airframes will be worn out
I thought the F-35 carried the GAU-22 25mm gun not the M-61 20mm?
The reason you don't see the su-57 in combat is very simple. It doesn't work
hell yeh f-15 still king of the sky.
The SU-57 is not very stealthy. Both the F-35 and the F-22 can detect the SU-57 long before it can detect them.
Most people misunderstand Stealth to begin with. It has less to do with being "invisible" and more to do with being able to acquire a targeting lock. The non-stealthy aircraft can still see the stealth but has to get much closer before his weapons can effectively hit their target.
😮 no you're actually incorrect. Stealth has to do with being unseen to the other aircraft radars.
You can't see it without getting a radar lock on it basically.
Now there are some ground-based x-band Radars that can detect that a stealth aircraft is in the area but it cannot pinpoint it with any degree of accuracy, not even really accurate enough to Vector another aircraft to that area
@@davidford3115yeah you are completely misunderstanding stealth technology yourself
@@Wyomingchief Air traffic control radars at airports can see stealth aircraft just fine. They don't need to have a weapon's lock and so the accuracy of where they plot the location of an aircraft doesn't need to be so precise. And yes, vectoring an intercepting aircraft CAN be done with such a radar.
Did you come up with this story yourself? or did someone help you? 😆
This guy definitely uses AI. How he thinks radar uses sound waves is beyond me. I bet $20 this guy has no clue what he’s talking about 99% of the time
I think this whole video is AI generated, including the script and the generation of the voice.
I have said it once and I will say it again, a visually impaired 4 year old running around a F16 hanger with a slightly pointy stick is only slightly less dangerous than a SU57 is to a F16. At least the 4 year old has a chance to whack the landing gear with said stick!
Depends on where they meet. As it is the case with all such dumb comparison videos.
F-15 ex has top speed not in dog fight of Mach 2.5 but in dog fight emergencies of mach 2.8 and carries more rockets and missiles and longer range.
It's not "shukoi", it's "sukhoi"
Russian incompetence is why I sleep so well at night.
The SU-57 isn't stealth. It has a radar cross section of a SQUARE METER, about the same as an F-18A. That's not stealth. The F-35 has a cross section of .005 square meters. THAT'S stealth.
F35 is stealthy against Radar using X band frequency, it is not stealthy against Radar in the S band which AWACS and ground control Radars operate in
@@cfisher11 But the resolution is so bad that they can't use it for targeting or even accurate location. They know it's out there, but not exactly where.
The SU57 is only stealthy nose on. If there is an AWACS in the area the SU57 doesn't have a chance because the AWACS can relay positional information to any allied aircraft. This will give the F35 the ability to engage the SU57 from another zip code.
The SU57 is not a 5th generation fighter let alone a sixth generation one. At most it is a 4++ generation..
It's so stealthy it's never been seen in actual combat, or flying in a combat zone. It's a Potemkin display fighter.
The new fly by wire on the F-15X makes them crazy maneuverable
Th su-57 is junk in the pictures of it you can even see bubbles in the glass, you are telling me it is a state of the art plane, but they can't manage to even get the glass right?
When the narrator said that radar is a sound wave, I knew this would be somewhat false information. F-15 would win assuming it can see the SU-57.
This ain't Hollywood buddy and all your pilots are not tom cruise either
And Su-57 ISN'T 5th Generation and ISN'T stealth, so no, we don't need Hollywood OR Tom Cruise. Also, we rely on the fact that there is only about 4-5 flying Su-57's in the world anyway.
There is something ironic with people saying that the Russian Stealth Fighter (SU-57) hasn't been seen in Ukraine yet.
Unfortunately for Russia, the SU57 is not even a 5th gen aircraft. It's a 4.5 Gen aircraft with a radar cross section similar to a FA18. It, like the Russian military, is complete shit.
Sadly the F22 is design against that sensor already
Thermal sensors do not send out waves of anything.
It makes me believe you're living in Fantasyland telling this stuff on RUclips all the equipment at rush has been using been falling apart or doesn't work or is not well maintained and you think this is going to be the next generation Fantasyland
Radar=sound waves.....muhgawd
Yeah well we gotta see su57s on the battlefield first 😂
The fact a upgrade fighter from the 70's can even compete with a 2020 fighter from Russia is laughable and a testament to USA air power.
13:50 That is not at all how IRST works.
Infrared Search and Track is a fancy name for "heat vision". It is a 100% passive system.
It's basically just a camera that can detect differences in heat.
The F-15 also has a huge advantage over the Su-57: It actually can live up to its reputation and there are hundreds of them.
Also, the USAF just ordered a couple hundred F-15EX to supplement the existing airframes and ease the burden on F-35 frames. This is on top of NGAD.
Simon, you really need to do better research, because this isn't the first time you've been very wrong in one of your videos and I found all this out simply by googling the information.
F-15EX exists because vii bezt plain eva' eF-22 didn't make it. Didn't become what it should have. Therefore the replacement pair of f-15 + f-16 is pseudo-existing-plane + F-35
When Russia brags about their aircraft… forgive me if I don’t believe you, Comrade
LOL The SU57 will never beat the F22
PS; weapons are only tools, it takes a master craftsmen to use them to their best advantage. That’s where the US shines. War games have and are being studied continuously. Point/counter point. Yes it like a chess match and the US had some very capable chess pieces to deploy.
I think all of you protesteth too loudly... Maybe, but better we never find out.
Its all fun and games until Beijing launches its fleet of tacticool Balloons in your face.
The SU57 is not even in service so it wont even get a chance to fight, and they called it best fighter jet 😂😂😂
Why only a brief mention about the F15-EX Eagle 2?
He's just simple American nationalist. Can't distinguish SONAR and RADAR.
Hello
If the F-15 could have Thrust Vectoring like the F22, Look Out!!
I understood the US can't make new F22s any more.
So any fighters to replace the F15s would have to be F35s.
No, the F15s are being replaced with brand new F15EX
To understand Russian/Soviet aviation, I recommend watching the Skyships Eng channel. It's a Russian POV from a historical viewpoint, complete with all the idiosyncracies and idiocies of the Soviet Union. It will prepare you to understand how the Soviets, and the Russian Federation approaches aviation and how they fail. It's also very entertaining (unlike this video).
Us prepared to fight what Russia said it had. Sooo no wonder the us is OP AF.
Flew both can confirm im lying
yes unless no missiles and $31mil vs the $50mil su57
The US has almost 500* F-35 currently in service, plus almost 500 F-15s and 186 F-22. *:(US plans to have ~2500 F-35s eventually). That Ruzzia plans to build two dozen Su57 by the end of the year, and 76 eventually is a bad joke.
Their engine tech, radar, stealth, training doctrine, pilot experience/flight hours are all also significantly behind. I will admit their thrust vectoring is neat to see at airshows. But with helmet mounted targeting, and missiles that can loop around and shoot an enemy directly behind you, that kind of dogfight maneuverability is only useful if somehow we run out of missiles.
And again, two dozen Su57.
The Netherlands alone already has that many F-35s, and has plans to double it. The UK has 30 and will have 47 by 2025. Israel has 50 and has authorized purchase of 25 more. Japan seems to only have 17 F-35 in operation right now, but they plan to have 147 eventually, and are building a domestic factory. I could go on.
By the time they catch up, if that is even possible, we will be retiring the 6th and trying to figure out what 7th gen is because we are mostly competing with ourselves at this point (China can compete on numbers, but they don't innovate, they steal US tech and adapt it, so we can't look to them either).
Yea, even if the SU-57 is the most advanced bag of chips on the planet, they won’t be able to survive the sheer numbers of fighter aircraft the US has.
But it’s not the best fighter jet ever. Maybe top 5 and we have 1-4.
Yeah I'm not sure where you're getting your numbers from but we're not going to have 2500 F-35, maybe that'll be the total built but you also have to realize that about 12 of our allies also fly the plane😂
Also the Japanese are not in any way shape or form going to be building a domestic Factory to make the F-35.
Now they are working with American Engineers to design their own stealth aircraft but they will not be producing the F-35😂😂😂
I love your enthusiasm but, don't believe everything you hear in a RUclips video😂😂
SU-57 has NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER seen a fuckin battle. So DONT ever say it’s far better than the Raptor or the Lightning. 💯💯💯💯💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Most of your videos are pretty decent.... this one is absolutely packed with flaws. Some of the bigger key points being that Radar is not sound waves but electromagnetic RADIO waves. Then there's the statement that infrared "sensors" (AKA infrared search & track) would give the F-15 an advantage over modern jets.... all update 4 and 5th gen fighters have this capability. In fact, the Russian fighters have had it for decades - this is one area where Americans actually fell behind the curve because we were more concerned about fighting terrorism than being at the forefront of fighter technology for the last 22 years. Then there's the idea that the F-35 or the F-22 "could hold their own/defeat" a Su-57. They both have major advantages over the Russian jet. They boast WAY WAY smaller RCS (they are WAY harder to see/track/lock with Radar), better radar, more effective missiles (The AIM120 AMRAAM may have less range than the R77 but it has a much better on board radar and is more consistent in finding its target), and better situational awareness. Either plane will dominate the Su-57 in all but a dog-fight. That said, a pair of F-15s, even EX, are going to have a bad day in an engagement with a pair of Su-57s. Despite having a more powerful radar, the F-15's RCS is so massive that there's simply no way it's picking up the Su-57 before the Su-57 has fired on it. The Su-57 is not on par with American 5th gen fighters, but it still out-classes any 4th gen fighter. The F-15EX is not meant to go head to head with the Su-57. It's meant to shoot at it using a radar lock data-linked to it via an F-35 that snuck up on the Sukhoi
Don't knock the Russian armed forces. They're currently the 2nd best force in...... Russia?
The F-15 would scare the crap out of ANY RATIONAL PERSON.