They called it something shitpost-y so they get people to either buy into it for memes or others dismiss it for it and then they can say "haha see you're an idiot" when it becomes a success. Ofc that tactic only works if your product isn't complete shit.
It's javascript, they're basically shipping the source code each time someone launches the game. They could have scrambled the code to make it hard to read, but there are tools to undo this. It's basically releasing an open source game and wondering at how people manage to cheat. 🤷
@@colinyergin9019 Ah yes, the classic. "I will do this." "That won't work." "Phah, you guys are just losers, I'm smart." *It doesn't work* "No one knew how difficult this would be!"
@@colinyergin9019 They could have used web assembly, which compiles to a binary. Since WASM is such a new programming language (created in 2015-ish) and very hard to read, decompiling and reverse engineering it would be extremely unlikely. Or better yet, they could make the main game processing and validation happen on their backend, and use the javascript only for display. Making sure people don't hack your online game (specially if you're dealing with people's money) is such an important part, the fact that they failed so miserably shows they didn't even try.
@@thefallenwarrior4349 Are you sure the makers of nfts would even understand those words. Most nft makers make forks to avoid any actual coding I'd imagine
“The jpeg is yours! It’s on the immutable blockchain!!!” Yea… that’s great… until a third party apparently decides to unilaterally remove all “value” from your jpeg…
@gooHero Except I hacked the e-commerce site and switched the toilet paper listing to a listing for an NFT that links to a toilet paper listing and now you're stuck in an infinite loop.
or as Seth Green found out the hard way : the code the JPEG represents is yours, but the image itself belongs to someone else, because all you own is the text block within the block chain....
NFTs are the ultimate social constructs. Just a small space in a distributed database only the owner can write into, until a different owner id is written there, transferring its ownership. The database is only valid because the majority of people storing such database in their computers decided is valid.
The sad part is how obsessive people were about this damned game right up until it went to hell, as though it would finally validate the NFT-as-games theory underpinning the 'value' of all these garbage projects. For five thousand dollarydoos, you can get a top-of-the-line gaming PC and the hundred best AAA and indie games currently on the market - or a defective endless runner that wouldn't even crack the top 250 on the Apple store of its own merits
Hell you don’t even need a top of the line PC for most indie games. You could get a Steam Deck or even a Switch Lite and have access to zillions of better games.
Company clearly knows SFA about security, claims their servers are logging everything.... I'm going to stretch out one of my limbs and say they don't have a clue, they probably cant tell the difference between a legit high-score and one that ran hacked browser code. Incredible.
I mean I like your way of wording it more tbh, but I think "out on a limb" refers to climbing trees and being out on a branch/limb that could potentially snap lol.
In all fairness, replaying a run by recording the user input is something that has been possible for decades, see DOOM's static pseudo RNG table and the demo files which are pretty much just a list of inputs the user performed for each game tick, which gives the engine the ability to "play the run again by entering the user input from the demo file tick by tick", so to speak. On top of that, you _could_ actually perform analysis on inputs and call people cheaters when "their inputs looked too robotic", i.e. "mouse movement that's more akin to a linear move(x, y) instead of a human moving the mouse which introduces some deviation from a perfectly straight line", keyboard inputs that are "too quick" / show no deviation in e.g. how many frames the space bar was pressed for a jump, "reactions to obstacles that aren't on the screen yet" etc. However: a) Stuff like a "teleporting cursor" is something you find in "baby's first script", not in the bot of a guy who sells you a high score for a few grand and you can easily move the cursor with some noise to make it look more human _(though it would be funny if someone paid a botter a few thousand bucks for a high score only to get banned because the guy made the input too obvious)_ b) This _"Don't worry, we'll look at each replay and weed out the cheaters oh and by the way, try not to buy an NFT that was the result of a guy cheating"_ attitude sounds more like a bandaid fix after they realized people are in fact - who would have guessed - cheating in video games instead of a well-thoughout plan with stuff like 3rd party analyzers or something. Sooo unless what constitutes a _"cheater"_ had been properly outlined in their TOS or the EULA for the game or whatever BEFORE the game started, couldn't you actually sue them for banning you? _(not legal advice, not a lawyer)_
I doubt they've even programmed in recording the inputs, and hah! Do you seriously think the bot guys care? They've been paid already in full, unless they're cheating with their own stuff.
Just fyi "encrypting your javascript files" is sorta impossible... However you manipulate a javascript file, it needs to be "'simple javascript" at some point so it can be read by your browser, and there are tools that let you read it at that point. Of course you can obsfuscate your code and make it much, much harder to read, but someone dedicated enough (if -for example- money is involved) will always ultimately be capable of understanding the code
You expect crypto bros to get the difference between interpreted and compiled languages? They could at least build it in WebAssembly though I doubt that would prevent cheating, just make it a bit harder.
I can't stop laughing at the "but what about the false positives" comment. These main-character wannabes really think that their legit runs can compete with botted/hacked runs -_-.
Literally how I expect most blockchain games to go. When you put a financial incentive OBVIOUSLY people are going to cheat. Its almost a case where you'd be crazy not to at least try to.
I always wandered how can an idiot become a double idiot in one stroke when loosing money . Well, i guess we found our champions. Why people do this is beyond reason.
I would be willing to bet that Todd Todgers won the high score. That man is an absolute gaming legend, and so honest at that. Would never cheat at a game, certainly not for self gain.
this game feels like the video game version of "fancy" restaurants. you could buy tens times the amount of game/food for 500 times less money but "look at me i have so much money i can just waste it" imagine thinking that telling everyone else "im bad with money" was so cool you went around town screaming it
Their described method of cheat detection (assuming they actually do it) might find that wallhack cheat, but not many others. If you have a way to get a certain level by manipulating a random seed, and have an automated script that sends the correct inputs for the known level, it would look perfectly valid if they replay it. If I have to guess, it's a toss up between "There will be no significant cheat detection" or "They will discard high scores that they deem fraudulent based on nebulous criterea, until they reach the high scores of their buddies."
"They didn't encrypt their JavaScript file" You can only get so far with "encryption" of code in JavaScript (obfuscation is a better term). The browser needs to be able to understand the code to run it, and if a browser understands it a human can (even if that takes a significant amount of effort). This is the old DRM problem - you can't really make anything comprehensible to the actual computer running the code and not to people attempting to reverse engineer your code; except JavaScript makes is much worse by being an interpreted language (the browser executes the actual source code, not some compiled binary made out of raw machine code).
You can’t really “encrypt a JavaScript file”. Good developers know that you don’t allow the user’s game client (in this case a browser) to decide that it made a valid action in the game. Instead, the user’s game client should gather all of the actions made by the user & submit them to the game server for validation. Since the user doesn’t have access to the inner workings of the game server, you can trust the server’s code and logic. This is an amateur mistake. Equivalent to some mobile game’s score leaderboard always being the highest score possible.
So… the “it’s decentralized bro!” people, now in order for their jpegs to have value… now have to go through a centralized authority to do so. And they don’t see the irony.
I’m not going to lie if someone asked me to play a game for them (I don’t need to do anything or buy anything) and would pay me up to 4 grand to cheat on an NFT browser game, that sounds like the easiest ever. Making money from NFT people is just comical at this point.
I just can't get over that they made a free to play mobile game... with an initial buy in of $5100. I'm honestly surprised they didn't have built in botting for those that wanted to pay them hundreds of thousands directly.
I think the universal metric when evaluating the value of a game should be Hollow Knight. Made by a couple people, costs 15$, easily 40 hours of content. It's a high bar, but shit like this is infinitely far below it.
I'm Seriously Crying right now. We can't even have DOOKIE DASH my Fellow NFT Bros.. Those DAMN DIRTY TROLLS have taken even our Beloved Dookie Dash from us ;_; i'm gonna find the nearest Empire State Building and Vape at the top of it while i consider my Future.... in minecraft... - Whoever bought the Dookie Dash Ticket, probably lol
Well the tracking isn't impossible, demos in a lot of games work that way and it's one of the ways people uncover cheaters in speedruns of old games (doom comes to mind as a great example). If their browser game is somehow collecting this kind of data and sending it over to their server they can definetely recreate the exact gameplay other players did. But since its a randomly generated endless runner (and a browser game on top) I wonder about the validity of their claim.
This was such a waste of a million dollar idea! Whoever created this game missed a golden opportunity to market a game as "Dookie Dash: the shittiest game ever made". They could have put it on Steam for $5, get a few famous creators to make videos on it and reap the profits as you could have made several games in this series.
My question is this: If the value of an NFT is 100% speculative then how can they enforce a value on it? NFTs are also peer to peer sales are they not? How would they go about enforcing their edict on "cheaters"?
You're doing great, bud! I mean I hope you're doing great, but in my opinion, your content is worth the watch and just getting better. I'd love to see you and Nerd Explains do a collab of you doing the research and him putting his twist to do a "how to survive this NFT Shitgame."
For the past 2 years, every one talking about CREATING game NFTs... BUT we already have one - steam cards: Play to Earn, free to trade, and they are literally cost near nothing.
Interesting fact.. There are rarely any Nft That are truly Immutable.. most are muttable with the belief they can be upgraded at later dates. Though most contracts are Immutable in theory they consist of modules that retain their mutability. This is yet another proof of NO FOMO DYOR. P.s. I have watched and Took part in Dookie Dash and Reminded me of a late 90's Flash game.
Yes: It is the blockchain entry that is immutable, and if the payload of that is a link to some web storage address, what it contains can be changed by any one with write access to it.
12:40 "it perfectly fits with my confirmation bias" great acknowledgement of a confirmation bias... but is it truly confirmation bias if clear hat has a better and more defined argument of the events that happened?
Look, I don't like the book. I don't really care for the author. However, when will people realize that Ready Player One is not a good thing. None of these things oft quoted by tech bros like Snow Crash, The Matrix, or Technomancer are good things to happen. These are cautionary tales. It'd be like reading A Canticle for Leibowitz and saying to yourself, "Let's end the world in nuclear fire because the Kingdom of Texarkana sounds cool!"
all these metaverses.....tempted to start an umbrellaverse, £10k a ticket, and all it does is provide a link to the sub-metaverses already made by other people. no one steal that idea!
hah weird...real weird....this one only appeared today the 23 02 28 for me and I directly check your releases daily manually so it didn't show up at all before today
Never get why guys with that much money to burn don't just buy what they want. It's got to be for some sort of crypto clout, but $4k for a high score on such a closed market game?! Why cheat for the score? Just wait for the prize announcement and you can probably buy something better, if not as "rare."
Wait, so they weren't smart enough to hide the game's seed, but we're to believe that they cN track every single mouse moment and then recreate the run to find out if you cheated? Lmao
They are not tracking and manually checking every single submission. No fucking way. That's way too much goddamn work and I do not believe the people checking would have a high enough level of understanding to be able to catch weird movement or whatever. Maybe they have computers that scan for off code, but they are NOT catching the majority of cheaters for _a browser game_ . Speedrunning leaderboards, which have VOLUNTEER MODS WHO ARE TOP PLAYERS FOR THOSE GAMES AND WHOSE ENTIRE JOB IS TO CHECK SUBMISSIONS FOR CHEATING can't keep up with all the cheaters. Granted most of the time they don't have access to the code of the gameplay, I've only heard of Doom and Minecraft speedruns doing that, but...unless they had QA testers running through this thing and breaking it down...a programmer understands the code they wrote, not necessarily how it can be exploited.
Its wasnt one of the crypto foundations that code is king, if your code is shitty or weak, you deserved to be scammed? Well, that's what happening right here
"Every millisecond, every mouse movement, blah blah blah" yeah ok. I'd be insterested in seeing a wireshark dump of a few seconds gameplay, not sure if anyone who owns one of these passes is smart enough to use it though.
An unencrypted file ruined them, meaning someone hit F12 to view the JS file? Once again the jpeg mafia is undone by a keyboard shortcut.
😂😂😂😂
Who could've guessed that a tournament for a game called Dookey Dash would turn out to be a total shitshow?
Inconceivable!
You just can't write this _shit_
Ya it's real crappy.
I do not think that word means what you think it means
@@sigh-cosis his name is Inigo Montoya
@@Spacemarine658 The "inconceivable" line wasn't Inigo's. The "do not think" line was. That's why it was awesome.
NFT bros really play a game called Dookey Dash and expect us to take them seriously
Seriously wtf?
Dink Doink, Pamp... just why?! I'd play and pay for coin operated arcade games in the 90's than this garbage!
The stupid selects away people who aren't gullible enough.
My nft is worth a bunch, I'm super cereal guy
They called it something shitpost-y so they get people to either buy into it for memes or others dismiss it for it and then they can say "haha see you're an idiot" when it becomes a success. Ofc that tactic only works if your product isn't complete shit.
It's javascript, they're basically shipping the source code each time someone launches the game. They could have scrambled the code to make it hard to read, but there are tools to undo this. It's basically releasing an open source game and wondering at how people manage to cheat. 🤷
No one ever said the crypto bros were smart, let alone intelligent lifeforms.
They did everything they could. The task was just impossible.
@@colinyergin9019 Ah yes, the classic.
"I will do this."
"That won't work."
"Phah, you guys are just losers, I'm smart."
*It doesn't work*
"No one knew how difficult this would be!"
@@colinyergin9019 They could have used web assembly, which compiles to a binary. Since WASM is such a new programming language (created in 2015-ish) and very hard to read, decompiling and reverse engineering it would be extremely unlikely.
Or better yet, they could make the main game processing and validation happen on their backend, and use the javascript only for display.
Making sure people don't hack your online game (specially if you're dealing with people's money) is such an important part, the fact that they failed so miserably shows they didn't even try.
@@thefallenwarrior4349 Are you sure the makers of nfts would even understand those words. Most nft makers make forks to avoid any actual coding I'd imagine
“The jpeg is yours! It’s on the immutable blockchain!!!”
Yea… that’s great… until a third party apparently decides to unilaterally remove all “value” from your jpeg…
Except even the jpg isn't yours, just the link to it :D
@gooHero Except I hacked the e-commerce site and switched the toilet paper listing to a listing for an NFT that links to a toilet paper listing and now you're stuck in an infinite loop.
or as Seth Green found out the hard way : the code the JPEG represents is yours, but the image itself belongs to someone else, because all you own is the text block within the block chain....
The funniest thing is that the game isn't on the block chain. Because the block chain is not useful for anything. It's just a browser game.
NFTs are the ultimate social constructs. Just a small space in a distributed database only the owner can write into, until a different owner id is written there, transferring its ownership. The database is only valid because the majority of people storing such database in their computers decided is valid.
For $42 in Taco Bell and some laxatives, I'll show you a true professional dookie dash
You madman. You would risk so much for so little and I respect that.
That's a lot of taco bell and dookie
Is $42 your limit? Weak.
LMAO!
:D lmao
What I love about Kira videos is he often talks about things I don't know anything about, and he makes me interested.
👍
Couldn't have explained it better.
Yeah for sure
I discovered Coffeezilla because Kira got me invested in scams 😂😂
The sad part is how obsessive people were about this damned game right up until it went to hell, as though it would finally validate the NFT-as-games theory underpinning the 'value' of all these garbage projects. For five thousand dollarydoos, you can get a top-of-the-line gaming PC and the hundred best AAA and indie games currently on the market - or a defective endless runner that wouldn't even crack the top 250 on the Apple store of its own merits
This game looks like something that would've been from the late Steam Greenlight.
top 250 is too generous, this crap wouldn’t even make top 1000
Hell you don’t even need a top of the line PC for most indie games. You could get a Steam Deck or even a Switch Lite and have access to zillions of better games.
Your literally making sense 🙂
"The highest score will receive a mysterious reward."
Is it Mal-ware? Wouldn't surprise me.
"Monkey JPEG Championship" is something I could NEVER imagine would be a thing.
Crypto bros discovering gaming cheats for the first time
congratulations, you gamed yourself.
And they want to make Play-To-Earn games!
Company clearly knows SFA about security, claims their servers are logging everything.... I'm going to stretch out one of my limbs and say they don't have a clue, they probably cant tell the difference between a legit high-score and one that ran hacked browser code. Incredible.
I mean I like your way of wording it more tbh, but I think "out on a limb" refers to climbing trees and being out on a branch/limb that could potentially snap lol.
@@Crazdor yeah typically the phrase is said like “I’m going to go out on a limb” but we understood what they meant anyway lol
In all fairness, replaying a run by recording the user input is something that has been possible for decades, see DOOM's static pseudo RNG table and the demo files which are pretty much just a list of inputs the user performed for each game tick, which gives the engine the ability to "play the run again by entering the user input from the demo file tick by tick", so to speak.
On top of that, you _could_ actually perform analysis on inputs and call people cheaters when "their inputs looked too robotic", i.e. "mouse movement that's more akin to a linear move(x, y) instead of a human moving the mouse which introduces some deviation from a perfectly straight line", keyboard inputs that are "too quick" / show no deviation in e.g. how many frames the space bar was pressed for a jump, "reactions to obstacles that aren't on the screen yet" etc.
However:
a) Stuff like a "teleporting cursor" is something you find in "baby's first script", not in the bot of a guy who sells you a high score for a few grand and you can easily move the cursor with some noise to make it look more human _(though it would be funny if someone paid a botter a few thousand bucks for a high score only to get banned because the guy made the input too obvious)_
b) This _"Don't worry, we'll look at each replay and weed out the cheaters oh and by the way, try not to buy an NFT that was the result of a guy cheating"_ attitude sounds more like a bandaid fix after they realized people are in fact - who would have guessed - cheating in video games instead of a well-thoughout plan with stuff like 3rd party analyzers or something. Sooo unless what constitutes a _"cheater"_ had been properly outlined in their TOS or the EULA for the game or whatever BEFORE the game started, couldn't you actually sue them for banning you?
_(not legal advice, not a lawyer)_
I remember uncharted 2 had a similar replay feature. I always wondered how they did that...
I doubt they've even programmed in recording the inputs, and hah! Do you seriously think the bot guys care? They've been paid already in full, unless they're cheating with their own stuff.
Except the level in an endless runner isn't the same each time like in Doom, it's procedurally generated.
It’s almost like adding monetary importance to a game makes people more likely to try and cheat
No way! ((no irony) actually irony, lol)
Just fyi "encrypting your javascript files" is sorta impossible... However you manipulate a javascript file, it needs to be "'simple javascript" at some point so it can be read by your browser, and there are tools that let you read it at that point. Of course you can obsfuscate your code and make it much, much harder to read, but someone dedicated enough (if -for example- money is involved) will always ultimately be capable of understanding the code
You expect crypto bros to get the difference between interpreted and compiled languages? They could at least build it in WebAssembly though I doubt that would prevent cheating, just make it a bit harder.
"Dookie Dash with the boys" is my new favourite ever sentence.
That said, as someone stuck in bed with a fever rn, I'd 100% pay someone to dookie dash for me
*Favorite 🇺🇸
😂😂😂😂😂✊🏿
I can't stop laughing at the "but what about the false positives" comment. These main-character wannabes really think that their legit runs can compete with botted/hacked runs -_-.
Literally how I expect most blockchain games to go. When you put a financial incentive OBVIOUSLY people are going to cheat. Its almost a case where you'd be crazy not to at least try to.
"If you don't have a webcam, you actually do, because you just got Dookey Dashed," made me laugh so much for some reason.
You mean to tell me that an userbase united under a "get rich quick" promise would CHEAT on something to try to get rich quick?? Mindblowing.
I always wandered how can an idiot become a double idiot in one stroke when loosing money . Well, i guess we found our champions. Why people do this is beyond reason.
flappy bird with a $5,000 buy-in. why.
maybe the real dookie dash were the friends we made along the way
I would be willing to bet that Todd Todgers won the high score. That man is an absolute gaming legend, and so honest at that. Would never cheat at a game, certainly not for self gain.
Kira seems so much happier now and that fills me with so much joy
👍
Bangkok can do that for a bloke ;-)
@@andrewmountford3608 everybody need a Thai Lady Boy
@@FantomDeck You might do matey…
This entire video felt like a fever dream. If you asked me to describe what was talked about here I would not be able to answer
I've had fever dreams with more sense than "shit-related game with monkey jpegs"
this game feels like the video game version of "fancy" restaurants.
you could buy tens times the amount of game/food for 500 times less money but "look at me i have so much money i can just waste it"
imagine thinking that telling everyone else "im bad with money" was so cool you went around town screaming it
at least expansive food looks nice....
@@lolasdm6959 someone shit on a plate and squirted some sauce on it, oh and they put a leaf on it as well. Looks great 🙂
At least at fancy restaurants you can get cool food
yeah but at fancy restaurants you get pretty high quality food cooked by usually chefs who went to culinary school, not that its always worth it.
There are people out there who use whale in their usernames unironically. Like they legitimately think being scammed is a flex.
Their described method of cheat detection (assuming they actually do it) might find that wallhack cheat, but not many others. If you have a way to get a certain level by manipulating a random seed, and have an automated script that sends the correct inputs for the known level, it would look perfectly valid if they replay it.
If I have to guess, it's a toss up between "There will be no significant cheat detection" or "They will discard high scores that they deem fraudulent based on nebulous criterea, until they reach the high scores of their buddies."
I'll have a laugh if they end up discarding real scores thinking it's a hack and then get sued for doing so.
"They didn't encrypt their JavaScript file" You can only get so far with "encryption" of code in JavaScript (obfuscation is a better term). The browser needs to be able to understand the code to run it, and if a browser understands it a human can (even if that takes a significant amount of effort). This is the old DRM problem - you can't really make anything comprehensible to the actual computer running the code and not to people attempting to reverse engineer your code; except JavaScript makes is much worse by being an interpreted language (the browser executes the actual source code, not some compiled binary made out of raw machine code).
Very well said
You can’t really “encrypt a JavaScript file”. Good developers know that you don’t allow the user’s game client (in this case a browser) to decide that it made a valid action in the game. Instead, the user’s game client should gather all of the actions made by the user & submit them to the game server for validation. Since the user doesn’t have access to the inner workings of the game server, you can trust the server’s code and logic.
This is an amateur mistake. Equivalent to some mobile game’s score leaderboard always being the highest score possible.
So… the “it’s decentralized bro!” people, now in order for their jpegs to have value… now have to go through a centralized authority to do so. And they don’t see the irony.
I’m not going to lie if someone asked me to play a game for them (I don’t need to do anything or buy anything) and would pay me up to 4 grand to cheat on an NFT browser game, that sounds like the easiest ever. Making money from NFT people is just comical at this point.
This is why these crypto folks going into gaming was always to silly because most of them are not gamers and don't know anything about gaming.
From this to gaming consoles, there's just no way, no how, that anyone would accept having a WALLET BUTTON dedicated to their gaming controller.
They think everyone except for them are idiots and they see gamers as easy marks, which is often true but far from universal
Boy I NEVER could have guess an NFT game would suck and crash and burn.
When your high score gets you money why would you pay "the right way"?
That’s a radical way of dealing with cheaters, destroying the integrity of decentralised systems to combat cheating in a novelty NFT game 😂😂😂
And only means cheaters will be even more eager to offload before anything bad happens, leading to only innocent buyers being punished. Hilarious!
The problem is they revert to monkey when they should evolve to crab.
I just can't get over that they made a free to play mobile game... with an initial buy in of $5100.
I'm honestly surprised they didn't have built in botting for those that wanted to pay them hundreds of thousands directly.
What a time to be alive.
Dookie dash is just me after consuming any kind of dairy products
Looking forward to see how they're going to break their backs trying to moderate a decentralized system. 😂
The "future" these jpeg hoarders are making looks less like Ready Player One and more like Lord of the Flies.
Hopefully that will include exiling them to an island in the middle of the ocean.
I think the universal metric when evaluating the value of a game should be Hollow Knight. Made by a couple people, costs 15$, easily 40 hours of content. It's a high bar, but shit like this is infinitely far below it.
In dooki shashes defense, facebook stored users passwords in and unencrypted flat file aka text file
This is one of the first boosting communities that I'm not concerned will ruin a game.
You've been Dookie Dashed!
NFT games should exist for one sole reason: To be laughed at 😂😂😂
I'm Seriously Crying right now. We can't even have DOOKIE DASH my Fellow NFT Bros.. Those DAMN DIRTY TROLLS have taken even our Beloved Dookie Dash from us ;_; i'm gonna find the nearest Empire State Building and Vape at the top of it while i consider my Future.... in minecraft... - Whoever bought the Dookie Dash Ticket, probably lol
Well the tracking isn't impossible, demos in a lot of games work that way and it's one of the ways people uncover cheaters in speedruns of old games (doom comes to mind as a great example). If their browser game is somehow collecting this kind of data and sending it over to their server they can definetely recreate the exact gameplay other players did. But since its a randomly generated endless runner (and a browser game on top) I wonder about the validity of their claim.
This was such a waste of a million dollar idea! Whoever created this game missed a golden opportunity to market a game as "Dookie Dash: the shittiest game ever made". They could have put it on Steam for $5, get a few famous creators to make videos on it and reap the profits as you could have made several games in this series.
No way. I was sure this was going to be the one. Damn.
Who could have guessed that the kinds of people who are big into monkey jpgs are the same type who’ll cheat at video games?
"Dooky Dash" sounds like something made up by South Park, probably starring Mr Hankey.
Dooky Dash sounds like something I do after I eat enough Tacobell.
You can't make something worthless that never had any value to begin with
My question is this: If the value of an NFT is 100% speculative then how can they enforce a value on it? NFTs are also peer to peer sales are they not? How would they go about enforcing their edict on "cheaters"?
They are traded on platforms like OpenSea, and afaik those can enforce things.
They will give a reward to people who have high scores, so they can just choose to not give the reward to those people.
You're doing great, bud! I mean I hope you're doing great, but in my opinion, your content is worth the watch and just getting better. I'd love to see you and Nerd Explains do a collab of you doing the research and him putting his twist to do a "how to survive this NFT Shitgame."
For the past 2 years, every one talking about CREATING game NFTs... BUT we already have one - steam cards: Play to Earn, free to trade, and they are literally cost near nothing.
Thx for the vid
Interesting fact.. There are rarely any Nft That are truly Immutable.. most are muttable with the belief they can be upgraded at later dates. Though most contracts are Immutable in theory they consist of modules that retain their mutability. This is yet another proof of NO FOMO DYOR. P.s. I have watched and Took part in Dookie Dash and Reminded me of a late 90's Flash game.
Yes: It is the blockchain entry that is immutable, and if the payload of that is a link to some web storage address, what it contains can be changed by any one with write access to it.
the day was going meh, and then Kira
People cheat on GTA Online where they don't make any money besides the whole server should go boom suddenly everyone's vehicle goes kaboom
Honestly tracking the mouse movements etc WITHIN THE GAME seems like semi-standard anticheat behavior
This makes me want to “Kermit Sewer Slide”
lol they are running the game code client side then validating it be analysing a recorded playback after the fact?!?! That's dumb af.
It's always nice when you poke the star citizen pets. Poor fools still think it's coming. maybe another $10k will do it.
I mean the name of the thing says it all, really. What a literal shitshow.
Game about poo monkeys chasing poo turns out to be poo, who'd have guessed? XD
Cryptobro game devs are like regular game devs but five steps behind everyone
Which is ironic. You'd think people rolling on so much money could at least pay someone competent to build their crappy ideas.
12:40 "it perfectly fits with my confirmation bias" great acknowledgement of a confirmation bias... but is it truly confirmation bias if clear hat has a better and more defined argument of the events that happened?
As a professional Dookie Dasher (tm) I'm sure the IOC will clamp down on these bad actors before the Olympics.
You could tell them outright it’s a scam and will be worthless to their face while selling it to them and they STILL buy it.
5:14 - misheard this a ‘donkey meat nft’ which might be the one genre that hasn’t been grifted.
Look, I don't like the book. I don't really care for the author. However, when will people realize that Ready Player One is not a good thing. None of these things oft quoted by tech bros like Snow Crash, The Matrix, or Technomancer are good things to happen. These are cautionary tales.
It'd be like reading A Canticle for Leibowitz and saying to yourself, "Let's end the world in nuclear fire because the Kingdom of Texarkana sounds cool!"
all these metaverses.....tempted to start an umbrellaverse, £10k a ticket, and all it does is provide a link to the sub-metaverses already made by other people.
no one steal that idea!
I am definitly in the wrong industry. I could be working on dookey dash
I'm starting to believe cryptobros are cavemen who just discovered fire while the rest of humanity is going to space.
But it's Fyre.
Neah, they rediscovered the plague and are trying to profit from it
they didnt even change the rules when they encrypted it so anyone who already had the info or could look it up.
hah weird...real weird....this one only appeared today the 23 02 28 for me and I directly check your releases daily manually so it didn't show up at all before today
Never get why guys with that much money to burn don't just buy what they want. It's got to be for some sort of crypto clout, but $4k for a high score on such a closed market game?! Why cheat for the score? Just wait for the prize announcement and you can probably buy something better, if not as "rare."
For some, it's clout. You've always got the True Believers, though, who are the targets of these scams.
2:20 "Higher Dookie Score."
💀
A moonbro and his dookey are soon dashed.
Sewer and "Dookey" go hand in hand eh? Lol
Wait, so they weren't smart enough to hide the game's seed, but we're to believe that they cN track every single mouse moment and then recreate the run to find out if you cheated? Lmao
Are they really capable of creating software to track the cheating if they couldn't even see far enough into the future to know everyone would cheat.
They are not tracking and manually checking every single submission. No fucking way. That's way too much goddamn work and I do not believe the people checking would have a high enough level of understanding to be able to catch weird movement or whatever. Maybe they have computers that scan for off code, but they are NOT catching the majority of cheaters for _a browser game_ . Speedrunning leaderboards, which have VOLUNTEER MODS WHO ARE TOP PLAYERS FOR THOSE GAMES AND WHOSE ENTIRE JOB IS TO CHECK SUBMISSIONS FOR CHEATING can't keep up with all the cheaters. Granted most of the time they don't have access to the code of the gameplay, I've only heard of Doom and Minecraft speedruns doing that, but...unless they had QA testers running through this thing and breaking it down...a programmer understands the code they wrote, not necessarily how it can be exploited.
“These are the people who are making the future.” No they are not.
Why, you ask? Because adults now believe in and ARE childish things
Its wasnt one of the crypto foundations that code is king, if your code is shitty or weak, you deserved to be scammed? Well, that's what happening right here
I can pay 5k to gain access to a newgrounds flash game? Where do I sign up?! 😆
Just keep saying Dookie Dash and 60 million dollars and we will audit your run for as little as $420 or whatever the fuck is going on. Christ... xD
This is why you don’t boast about your “AntiCheat” cheaters take that as a challenge to break it.
An NFT game running into problems with cheating? Well, I never.
"Every millisecond, every mouse movement, blah blah blah" yeah ok. I'd be insterested in seeing a wireshark dump of a few seconds gameplay, not sure if anyone who owns one of these passes is smart enough to use it though.
Cheating.....in a multiplayer video game? You don't say.
This is hilarious. Thanks for the laugh ^^
coolmathgames has got a much better endless runner that only requires an internet connection to play....
Bro, but does it make you rich? You don't wanna go to the moon? HFSP then. 😉
Noticed you stopped covering Dream World, why?
Crypto bros learn that "just making the thing" is not enough to make the thing.
Hi Kira and everyone else!