1948 Chrysler royal, semi automatic Fluid drive

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024
  • This episode wasn’t supposed to post until 430, early release today.
    Today on what it’s like 1948 Chrysler royal club coupe. Specs period ads, take the tour buttons switches and knobs, comparisons be sure to stick around for would you rather and name that tune.
    This 1958 Chrysler royal is for sale at classic auto in Morgantown Pennsylvania be sure to click link below after show
    www.classicaut...
    If you’d like to get in touch with shoot me a comment in comment section or check out Facebook group that Correlates with this RUclips channel Or shoot me an email @
    What_its_like@yahoo.com
    www.facebook.c...

Комментарии • 326

  • @allenwayne2033
    @allenwayne2033 Год назад +11

    Who Loves You, the Four Seasons

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Yeah buddy congratulations you got it =)
      This episode wasn’t supposed to post until 430 darn it oh well this ones early
      Be sure to tune in tomorrow @430 est to see 1962 Buick special

    • @allenwayne2033
      @allenwayne2033 Год назад +3

      @@What.its.like. I remember that song well. Reminds me of working at KFC after school, so it must have been 1975!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      I love the four seasons =)

  • @Vegaswill714
    @Vegaswill714 Год назад +11

    Agree with your comments regarding this generation of Chrysler. I remember thinking that they were heavy, ponderous, ugly and slow. Seven years later Chrysler sold the first generation of the 300, one of the coolest cars of the 1950's and one of the first muscle cars

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Vigil exner drastically improved Chrysler

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. The HEMI engine drastically improved Chrysler. It came out in 51 on Chryslers, 52 on DeSotos, 53 on Dodges. Plymouth never did get a HEMI.

  • @allenwayne2033
    @allenwayne2033 Год назад +11

    My parents dated in my grandfathers' 1946 Chrysler Windsor 4 door sedan in high school. They married in 1950. When they would get to reminiscing, eventually they would always mention what a great radio that car had, ha! Would you Rather: 1. 48 Chrysler 2. 48 Caddy! Agree, the dash is best looking part of that car. I've been noticing the shots of the dash in your intro for awhile now and wondered when you covered the late 40's Chrysler and how the heck I missed it!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +4

      Thank you so much for sharing those memories, I’ve been teasing this one for a while, I shot both desoto and Chrysler the same day so want to spread them out a little bit =)

    • @kenglavens6455
      @kenglavens6455 Год назад +1

      Wow..I was conceived in a 46 Chrysler too! Reason I know is because my dad told me not to sit on the stain on the back seat because it was my twin brother.

  • @kenjohnson8510
    @kenjohnson8510 Год назад +4

    Our family owned a '41 when I was born in '47. And, we had a '48 in 1955. Enough room in the back seat for five people.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Tons of room in the back how did you guys like yours?

  • @williamfawkes8379
    @williamfawkes8379 Год назад +2

    I once found this hood ornament laying on the edge of an old dirt road in northern Minnesota. I was a kid, thought it was pretty cool. Around 1986.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Cool story thank you for sharing that memory =)

  • @garrettsmith2654
    @garrettsmith2654 Год назад +9

    My favorite era of Chrysler is the 50s. They made handsome cars back in the 50s.

    • @robertwatkins364
      @robertwatkins364 Год назад +3

      The 1957 300 was gorgeous! With a 392 Hemi, with 2x4 carbs. What a beast!

    • @garrettsmith2654
      @garrettsmith2654 Год назад +4

      @@robertwatkins364 Even DeSoto and Dodge had some of the best cars in the 50s. With the DeSoto Firedome and Dodge Custom Royal Lancer. Even Imperial was good back in 1957. Better than today's Chrysler and Dodge. But Dodge still makes good cars. My favourite Dodge was the 1959 models.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +3

      I’ve been looking for a 57 300 problem is they are hard to find and Uber expensive when you do find them

    • @robertwatkins364
      @robertwatkins364 Год назад +2

      @@What.its.like. I saw one once. It was in a wrecking yard in Great Falls Montana. It was in pretty good drivable condition still, but that was many years ago like 1976-78

    • @robertwatkins364
      @robertwatkins364 Год назад +1

      @@garrettsmith2654
      My father had a 1957 Plymouth Fury two door hardtop. He put a 1957 CE-57 Hemi in it.
      He used to have fun with that! He claimed he would rev it up, punch the D button, and the Plymouth would jump 20 feet ahead instantly.

  • @robertwatkins364
    @robertwatkins364 Год назад +6

    The 1948 Cadillac would be my choice. Those flathead caddy V8's ran pretty good in their time.

  • @DavidHall-ge6nn
    @DavidHall-ge6nn Год назад +3

    Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons, Who Loves You. This era of Mopar's offerings were not ever described as beauty queens, but that interior is stunning. Whoever restored the upholstery was a master! Loving the "Would you rather!" A 48 over the 41, but gimme the Caddy!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      The Cadillac has a soft spot in my heart I would really like to review won this year.. classic Automall has one but it’s in the barn section and it’s very but would love to do it.

  • @danielmoore7332
    @danielmoore7332 Год назад +2

    Sounds like the 4 Seasons 'Who Loves You or something. I still will take the Caddy!

  • @scolley0616
    @scolley0616 Год назад +4

    Who Loves You - Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons. Great car, I saw the Town and Country at a show about 10 years ago. Had a license plate YAWT (Yacht). It fit.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Yeah buddy
      Somebody just beat you to it =)

    • @scolley0616
      @scolley0616 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. OK, I didn't see a pinned comment, so gave it a shot.

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад +3

      The Town and Country in those years was a work of art...the 1950 with those irreplaceable tail lamps is my favorite

  • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
    @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

    I like that ad @1:30 with the green car in the desert with the cactus and the scene of the hunting dog and rifle. the old car ads really transported you into a scene of life that was quite cool. These ads are a lot better than the ones showing the features of the car, at least to me.

  • @THROTTLEPOWER
    @THROTTLEPOWER Год назад +3

    Very cool, really enjoyed!!!! 👍👍

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Awesome =) this episode wasn’t supposed to air until later it’s my fault I didn’t check to see if it was on private

    • @THROTTLEPOWER
      @THROTTLEPOWER Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. I understand that as my video that came out this morning was a mistake. I thought I had it set to come out tomorrow morning! 🙂👍😊

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Glad it doesn’t happen to just me lol

    • @THROTTLEPOWER
      @THROTTLEPOWER Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. 😊👍🙂

  • @williamforrest2638
    @williamforrest2638 8 месяцев назад +1

    I bought my first car, a 1948 Chrysler Windsor Highlander 4 door sedan, in 1965 in Madison Wisconsin for $50. It served me well until I traded it in for a 1949 Chevvy. Especially nice was the wool plaid interior, in perfect condition. When sitting especially in the back seat, it felt like one was comfortably relaxing in one's living room, isolated from the cares of the world! I installed a pushbutton on the gear-change lever to control its semi-automatic transmission. In NYC, someone had stood on the ceiling and dented it in. I pushed it out with my back muscles and it was fine. After a bash in the front, I held the hood down with a rope.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  8 месяцев назад

      Thank you so much for for sharing those memories of your car with us =)

  • @NickTwisp80
    @NickTwisp80 Год назад +5

    The reason the pedals are "different sizes" is that the smaller clutch is the "Safety Clutch" for Fluid Drive. It is difficult to understand why Chrysler didn't just convert Fluid Drive into a fully automatic transmission by this time. As a 1948 car buyer, you could get Hydra-Matic in Cadillacs, Oldsmobiles, & Pontiacs, or Dynaflow in Buicks. With Fluid Drive you still had to use the clutch to start & put the car in gear, or if the driver wanted to switch between High & Low ranges (not necessary unless faster acceleration desired), and lift your foot off the accelerator to make it shift. It took until 1954 for Chrysler to offer a fully automatic---Powerflite (late 1953 model year on some Imperials).

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Thank you so much for sharing all that added information and insight very much appreciated =)

    • @rayfridley6649
      @rayfridley6649 Год назад +1

      I head the narrator say that the fluid drive semi-automatic transmission was an option. I don't think so. The fluid drive transy, I believe, was standard equipment. DeSotos, Dodges, and Chryslers all had fluid drive. Plymouths and Dodge trucks was the only ones to have a manual 3-speed transmission.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Thank you so much for pointing that out I saw conflicting information for a three speed manual so I figured Chrysler offered to three speed manual as well as the semi automatic fluid drive come to find out later on that the manual was the semi automatic. That’s why I put that thing in this episode because doing Classic Cars is sometimes really hard because information conflicts across the board.

  • @williamheald8847
    @williamheald8847 Год назад +1

    Cadillac Club Coupe thank you very much…….I’ll be happy to pick up……anywhere…lol.

  • @ronkemperful
    @ronkemperful Год назад +5

    I agree with you on the subpar exterior styling - I prefer the much earlier style of the 1930s. Chrysler brands were known more as an engineers’ designs with function trumping style.

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад +3

      1931 Chrysler Imperial Phaeton is especially hard to beat! Looked as classy & expensive as a Duesenberg or Packard of the same era for half the price.

    • @ronkemperful
      @ronkemperful Год назад +2

      @@billolsen4360 I agree. I had a friend that had a 33 with the original Art Deco radio that was a sumptuous ride. Unfortunately someone did a gaudy pea green metallic Macao type paint job on it and substituted a Chevy engine and auto transmission from the 60s but he still had the original engine and drivetrain which he purchased with the car.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      I totally agree I saw a picture of one and was like wow Chrysler made some stunning cars.. I really like the air flows

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад

      @@ronkemperful Wow, wonder if he still has his '33! Most green cars make me queasy except that pale lime green I've seen on some Kaiser Darrins.

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад

      @@What.its.like. Hope you get to do an Airflow sometime! The styling isn't my favorite, but I understand they possess other qualities that make them standouts in auto engineering.

  • @STEVE33437
    @STEVE33437 Год назад +1

    I really enjoy your channel, seeing cars I Haven't seen in many years!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Thank you so much it means the world trying to do something totally different and feature the car is that often don’t get the time of day =)

  • @fitzspike
    @fitzspike Год назад +1

    I would take Johnnie Carsons dads' 1939 Chrysler Royal. Jay Leno did a youtube video of it. A real art-deco beauty! My Mom had a 1949 Chrysler with fluid drive. It was very easy to learn how drive a column shift standard. Very smooth.

  • @DSP1968
    @DSP1968 Год назад +1

    I'm with you, Jay. The exterior of this car is a bit of an acquired taste -- not horrible, just nose heavy. Love the interior, though.

  • @richroj
    @richroj Год назад +3

    very nice car Justin, I like the vertical radio.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Me to the dash is the best part of this car

  • @raycecil4643
    @raycecil4643 Год назад +1

    Love your channel my friend. Im really getting into post/pre-war cars. Watching a lot of your videos

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Glad you dig this channel my favorite era is 1930 to 60 but I love everything outside of those parameters =) starting to cover more earlier cars and would like to do a few newer ones as well but I figured we do the newer ones when the weather got crappy.. just a cut it up a little bit you know and try to draw some other people in =)

  • @johnboydTx
    @johnboydTx Год назад +2

    I prefer the 1942??? Art deco with plenty of bakelite .. definitely different 😉✌️❤️

  • @josephgaviota
    @josephgaviota Год назад +1

    Would You Rather #2: The Cadillac.
    I really like and appreciate these "less popular" models, but if I had to _OWN_ one of these, the Cad over the Chrysler.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      I want to review that Cadillac so bad I would love to own one one day they’re super stellar =) but wouldn’t be one of my first pics it would definitely be maybe in the top 15 but it’s not a car that I would pursue per se. I think I’m going to make the would you rather a bit more random instead of it being cars in the same price point same category maybe some off-the-wall comparisons

  • @commandertopgun
    @commandertopgun Год назад +1

    Hi J great video as ever my friend-most informative-well done.

  • @kcstangel8734
    @kcstangel8734 Год назад +2

    The song you sang at the end was "The Boy From New York City"... I think!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      That’s it five points for Gryffindor lol

  • @jerrycallender7604
    @jerrycallender7604 Год назад

    I agree on the epic hideousness of the 1946-1948 offerings.

  • @eddiebennett2994
    @eddiebennett2994 Год назад +4

    I agree with you on the looks of these cars,. I like the 41 Steering wheel but prefer the 48 dash. I'd take the 48 over the 41. Neither would be my answer to the second would you rather

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      awesome thank you so much for your feedback for me I think I’d pick the 41 and then definitely the Cadillac that is one of the best fastback designs ever made in the late 40s in my humble opinion there was going to be a Lincoln as well but I found out the Cosmopolitan didn’t come out till 1949

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад +3

      The '41 Steering Wheel looks very modern

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Yeah it does

    • @eddiebennett2994
      @eddiebennett2994 Год назад +1

      If I had to choose a car from 1948 it would be either the Hudson or Studebaker. As far as the fastback design I like the 48 Buick

  • @danielmoore7332
    @danielmoore7332 Год назад +1

    The Boy From NYC by the Essex

  • @robertwatkins364
    @robertwatkins364 Год назад +2

    The boy from New York City song? The Adlibs and also Manhattan Transfer

  • @christopherkraft1327
    @christopherkraft1327 Год назад +2

    Hi Jay, this Chrysler Royal is very similar in looks to the DeSoto that you showcased a few weeks ago. It is very nice & looks like the interior is very comfortable. As for would you rather, I'm going to go outside the box & say that I'd rather have that Cadillac Coupe de Ville that's next to the Chrysler, it's gorgeous!!! Thanks for sharing another exciting video!!! 👍👍🙂

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      48/49 Cadillac is a gorgeous car I really wanna do that before the end of the year hopefully classic automall has one hopefully next time =) glad you dig this episode sorry it was released early

    • @christopherkraft1327
      @christopherkraft1327 Год назад +2

      @@What.its.like. no problem my friend 🙂

  • @agostinodibella9939
    @agostinodibella9939 Год назад +3

    When I look at this car, it reminds me how the bumper cars of the late 50’s / early 60’s looked. And is that a pre 1986 center brake light?

    • @danielulz1640
      @danielulz1640 Год назад +1

      Yes, that is the brake light, but the taillights do not repeat the brake light.

    • @agostinodibella9939
      @agostinodibella9939 Год назад +2

      @@danielulz1640 So just the center light comes on with the brakes?

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      @ agostino DiBella I totally agree =)

    • @danielulz1640
      @danielulz1640 Год назад +1

      @@agostinodibella9939 correct.

  • @danielcheatham3400
    @danielcheatham3400 Год назад +1

    The boy from New York City. Manhattan Transfer

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      That’s it Congratulations five points to Gryffindor lol

  • @billolsen4360
    @billolsen4360 Год назад +2

    Chrysler may have made some staff cars for the military in 1943, but like all manufacturers that did so during WWII, they would have likely been just carry over models with styling from the '42s. Had a buddy in college who bought a '48 Chrysler Windsor Fluid Drive 6-cylinder factory limo. Had originally been a funeral car. Royal blue and about 19 feet long, she was gorgeous since the front end styling seems to go much better on a longer vehicle. Was fun to bomb around town in it with anywhere from four to eight of us 19-year-olds! 1st scenario would rather have the 48 2nd scenario would rather have the Cadillac. I think that glovebox lip was designed to prevent the lower contents, maps, etc. from slipping out onto the floor.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Thank you so much for sharing that awesome story what a great memory
      This would be a awesome car when 18 =)

    • @danielulz1640
      @danielulz1640 Год назад

      Passenger cars were not made in 1943. Unsold cars may have been repainted and issued to the military.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      @@danielulz1640 Ford made some for the military, but otherwise, no passenger cars at all were made after early February 1942. Cars that the military bought from dealer's frozen stock were, as you assume, repainted.

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      You are correct about the military staff cars. I know Ford made some.

  • @dwderp
    @dwderp Год назад +7

    I've never heard of a 1943 anything. Production was cut in November 1941 and ended altogether in February 1942, well before production of any 1943 models would have begun.
    There were a few stragglers after the cutoff though. Packard for example, ran off a number of Clippers for use by the army as staff cars, but they didn't Classify them as '43s. Maybe some other car company did? I don't know, I've never heard of it.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +3

      Yes some companies went to 43 but it was very rare like beginning automotive timeline is different starts in November so very few cars could’ve possibly been produced but big three like Chrysler 43 are rare

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 Год назад

      1945 Henway.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 Год назад +2

      What is the difference between a club coupe and a business coupe?

    • @jonathanmorrisey5771
      @jonathanmorrisey5771 Год назад +4

      Civilian auto producton stiooed 01 Feb 1942.
      All staff cars, trucks, etc. built after this date would have been built on a special line and, most likely, 1942 serial numbers.

    • @dwderp
      @dwderp Год назад +3

      @@glennso47 Club coupes tend to have some sort of seating arrangement in the back, while business coupes have no seating in the back to allow room for sample cases and other such things that a businessman or traveling salesman might need space for.

  • @jackieferguson5043
    @jackieferguson5043 3 месяца назад +1

    Awesome car

  • @keith3970
    @keith3970 Год назад +1

    I'm with you on the styling.Nice interior.I couldn't see a brake master cylinder; must've been buried in there somewhere.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      I might have been on the floor underneath the floorboard mounted on frame rail

  • @markchandler90
    @markchandler90 Год назад +3

    No cars were manufactured from February 1942 until late 1945.

  • @donalddesnoo5303
    @donalddesnoo5303 Год назад +1

    In the catßkills theese and the limos were a common scene in the50s heyday luggage tied to the top fluid drive 😂

  • @aaronwilliams6989
    @aaronwilliams6989 Год назад +1

    I like the 48 model.

  • @olddisneylandtickets
    @olddisneylandtickets Год назад +2

    I really like the model year comparisons you've been doing, I live for stuff like that. In the late 70's my local college (Peirce Jr college) had these huge books, one for each model year and the listed every make and model available in the US, huge amounts of detail. I bet some college somewhere has digitized those. Keep up the amazing videos and research! Oh and yeah, this 48 Mopar is hideous indeed...

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Thank you so much =) hideous is an understatement.. there is only two worse looking designs the Buick with the beak and the studebaker m15 truck

    • @allenwayne2033
      @allenwayne2033 Год назад +2

      @@What.its.like. Now, y'all all are being a little harsh! 😊

    • @allenwayne2033
      @allenwayne2033 Год назад +1

      Don't be dissing on my grandad's Chrysler!

  • @webstella
    @webstella Год назад +1

    With a face only a mother could love the rest of the car is quite nice.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Totally agree =)

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      I don't see what is wrong with it's face. A lot better than the ugly mug on many of today's tin cans.

  • @michaelabernathy7013
    @michaelabernathy7013 Год назад +1

    As American car reference books, I bought for my dad then inherited a series written by the Auto Editors at Consumer Guide. 'Cars of the Classic '30s', 'Cars of the Fascinating '40s', 'Cars of the Fabulous '50s' and 'Cars of the Sizzling '60s'. They were all copyrighted in the early 2000's. I presume used copies are still available online. You made references to similarities between DeSotos and Chryslers. DeSotos were essentially the shorter wheelbase Chryslers like the Royal and Windsor with different grill, rear end visuals, dashes and upholstery.

  • @JefferyHall-ct2tr
    @JefferyHall-ct2tr 11 месяцев назад +1

    Hi Jay!: I agree that the Chrysler styling was a bit stodgy, but it's not HORRIBLE. One has to realize that automotive styling was beginning to change RIGHT at the time that WWII started. Some of the immediate prewar cars were successful designs, some were not. When the war came along everything just STOPPED. Now designers continued to come up with new designs during the war, but the manufacturers were too busy with military vehicles and other military projects. After the war. Manufacturers had nothing but warmed over 1942 models. So you had a lot of cars that just basically looked the same every year until about 1949. Automobiles were in HUGE demand after the war. They could have sold boxes with wheels and sold every one!! So there was really no real rush for NEW designs. As far as the Chrysler goes, I actually like the 1942 a little better than the 1946-48. But those cars had a solid and as you said stodgy look, but that was what Chrysler was all about styling wise in those days. The 1949 was WAY nicer looking, and probably a little better performer as well. People tend to forget that the Horsepower wars didn't start until the OHV Cadillac and Oldsmobile Rocket engines came out. Performance wasn't really such a thing. By the mid 1950's however, performance was a HUGE selling point. I was going to talk about the demise of the coupe body style, but no more time! WYR#1 1941 Chrysler! #2 HAVE to go Cadillac here!

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  11 месяцев назад

      Awesome insight as always =) and information
      This design looks better in person but Is still a acquired taste in my opinion
      This generation wants a new iPhone every 6 months (I don’t I’m still using the XR lol I had a iPhone 5 before that) that generation did without for years... and the big three more or less just blew the dust off the dies and made modified 1942 designs until 48/49 studebaker was the first new post war car.. 1946 but to be fair the the big three played a big part in war production.. so they couldn’t/didn’t have the time to make brand new models

  • @Radiowild
    @Radiowild Год назад +1

    Between the 41 and 48 Chryslers, I'd take the 41. Although the radio in the 48 was cool (I restored one about 12 years ago). Between the 48 Chrysler and Cadillac, The Caddy wins in my book!

  • @retrobilly1719
    @retrobilly1719 Год назад +1

    Paradise City

  • @ScottoftheSahara
    @ScottoftheSahara Год назад +2

    I like the Cadillac better. In 1942 the Chevy, Ford and Chrysler all looked similar.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      The Cadillac looks like it’s from a different decade so sleek one of the best fastback designs in my opinion

  • @ernielaw
    @ernielaw Год назад +1

    While comparing the 1948 Chrysler to a Cadillac of the same, I would give the nod to Cadillac as it has more of the stand alone styling features which I like. And 1848 was the first year for tail fins. If you ever do a review of a Cadillac from the 40s or 50s be sure to show the gas tank behind the taillight. All Cadillacs made from 1941 til 1958 [with the exception of Eldorados 1955 and later] had the gas tank behind the left taillight. The 1956 BelAir had this same feature.

  • @wardduffield489
    @wardduffield489 Год назад +1

    When I ran short of luggage space in my 48 Windsor, while carrying five people with luggage, I just put the overflow in front of the radiator!

  • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
    @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

    I think this car is one of the last cars photographed with Walter P. Chrysler standing beside it....but I could be wrong.

  • @TheopolisQSmith
    @TheopolisQSmith Год назад +1

    You might get a copy of The Standard Handbook of Chrysler cars. Covers all Chryslers from the beginning till at least into the late 20th century.

  • @asteverino8569
    @asteverino8569 Год назад +1

    Yes, stodgy on the outside to me too. I am not sure how much better it would look in black.🤷🏼‍♂️
    The details and instrument cluster are winners.
    Re car choices:
    1 I would pick the 41 Royal.
    2 The 48 Cadillac.
    🎵The Boy From New York City.🎵 Not sure of the band.

  • @johnpitts9836
    @johnpitts9836 Год назад +1

    Of course the Cadillac.🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @captaccordion
    @captaccordion Год назад +3

    Did you notice on the advertising illustration that room for guns on the rear floor is a thing? Ha! The fluid drive is an odd setup. Somewhere on the RUclips someone demonstrates what's involved in driving it. That's worth finding for a look. I've noticed that you use a few British turns of phrase, like bloke (for guy) or rear light (for rear window or screen). British parents by any chance?

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +3

      Just wanted to say bloke instead of some guy I like to change things up every now and then, each episode is recorded notice all the intros are different =)
      It was a different time that I wish I was a part of because what’s going on in the world now is scary frankly

    • @billolsen4360
      @billolsen4360 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. 'Ere, 'ere, guvnur, tis a jolly thing and no mistake.

  • @Al-thecarhistorian
    @Al-thecarhistorian Год назад +1

    Fluid Drive was standard, not optional, on the 1948 Dodge, DeSoto and Chrysler. The only product that did not offer Fluid Drive in 1948 was Plymouth.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Thank you for that correction =)

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      Except on the bottom-priced Chrysler Royal and DeSoto Deluxe, and even most of those had Fluid Drive. On the Dodge, though, you just got the fluid couple with a 3 speed manual in back of it. A few Dodges with the semi-auto have been found, but they weren't supposed to have been available.

  • @davidanderson6517
    @davidanderson6517 Год назад +1

    I personaly like the 48' more, I might be biased since I own a 47' New Yorker though lol 😅

  • @FloridaClay
    @FloridaClay Год назад +2

    I'd have to strongly disagree on the styling. One of the more elegant Chrysler designs IMHO>

  • @carlmontney7916
    @carlmontney7916 Год назад +1

    Jay I agree with you about the exterior styling. It can only be described as mediocre at best and downright stodgy at worst. The interior though is beautiful on that car. If only the outside could look as nice.
    I can't wait for your video on 62 Buick Invicta. Since I once owned the ragtop version it will be like a trip down memory lane. Mine has the nailhead 401 with a Dynaflow.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Yeah for sure I miss spoke it wasn’t Invicta it was a special I typed it up there because I didn’t want to say it all over again lol
      Did yours have a white steering wheel like a to spoke design if I remember correct that steering wheel was the weirdest Buick steering wheel I ever saw
      The car was just weird but it was weird in a cool way. And I actually like the shape of it super interesting car especially with the fireball V6

    • @carlmontney7916
      @carlmontney7916 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. the wheel was the same color as the interior and had a 2 spoke design or also referred to as a single bar that went all the way across the center. No horn ring which was unusual for that time. I remember it as being a very comfortable steering wheel to use and the car for being as large as it was handled very nicely.

  • @NeedtoSpeak
    @NeedtoSpeak Год назад +1

    “HIDEOUS”…..😂 I am Soooooo with you on this opinion.
    I choose the Cadillac.

  • @joshball9530
    @joshball9530 Год назад +1

    The song that you played is Whose Gonna Love You? By Frankie Valli & the Four Seasons

  • @Al-thecarhistorian
    @Al-thecarhistorian Год назад +3

    I'd take the 1948 Chrysler over the 1941Chrysler. And, while the 1948 Caddy is a great looking car with a true automatic transmission, I'd still take the Chrysler.
    BTW a third center bumper overider was available for the 1948 Chrysler.
    There were no cars produced for the public after Feb. 2, 1942. There is no 1943 Chrysler.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Thank you so much for that correction no 43 Chrysler’s =)

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      That is correct, but if you were a Doctor or worked in a defense-critical job, and had no access to public transportation or a car pool, and your present car was too far gone, you might have been able to get a Priority Certificate that enabled you to buy a car that was held in frozen dealer stock. Some states would have registered it as a 43 if you bought it in 1943. Some states used to do that until about the mid 70s.

  • @aaronwilliams6989
    @aaronwilliams6989 Год назад +1

    Handsome ride. It would be cool to see some 4-door cars too.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Yeah I totally wanna hit some more four-door cars as well as wagons =)

    • @aaronwilliams6989
      @aaronwilliams6989 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. cool.

  • @aaronwilliams6989
    @aaronwilliams6989 Год назад +1

    For the 2nd question, I would good for the 48 Cadillac.

  • @americanrambler4972
    @americanrambler4972 Год назад +1

    No contest. The newer 1948 Chrysler Royal over the 1942 version. Between the Cadillac and the Chrysler? No contest. Cadillac hands down.

  • @jimwoods3742
    @jimwoods3742 Год назад +1

    Just subscribe to you Chinaman I like you videos keep them coming

  • @josephgaviota
    @josephgaviota Год назад +1

    8:43 I do have to admire how big the trunks used to be. Now they're so small, if you're traveling with a couple friends, your luggage will _not_ fit in the trunk.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      And every where you could reach where the trunk is it doesn’t go up underneath the backseat like the new cars do

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      That's because today's Japanoid tin cans are made only to go to the grocery store or to work. Yesterday's cars were made for Pleasure Cruising and traveling long distances.

  • @leightonfarms4962
    @leightonfarms4962 Год назад +1

    Mint!

  • @danielcheatham3400
    @danielcheatham3400 Год назад +2

    QUESTIONS
    Was that a 3rd brake light on trunk?
    On dash... What is that square between the radio and clock..
    wasted space? Maybe room for a sat/nav
    (If you really want to destroy what value this car has)

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Yeah that was a third brake light on trunk, speaker I would assume lol

    • @danielcheatham3400
      @danielcheatham3400 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. I wonder if this was the earliest 3rd brake light to appear?

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Idk I’ve often wondered that as well

    • @danielcheatham3400
      @danielcheatham3400 Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. you're right. Not a fan of this either( dashboard was the exception.. esp the radio)

    • @danielulz1640
      @danielulz1640 Год назад +1

      Not a third brake light, the ONLY brake light. Radio speaker is behind the grille in between the radio and the clock.

  • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
    @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

    I think the car would look better in gloss black or dark blue. You might like it more that way.

  • @smokeystover5682
    @smokeystover5682 Год назад +1

    Could you have explained the way the semi-automatic fluid drive was driven? I would prefer the '48 Chrysler to the '41 Chrysler, but with a regular 3-speed manual shift, if they could have been had that way. Likewise when comparing it to the '48 Cadillac. I actually like the '48 Chrysler styling.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Here is a link to explain fluid Drive
      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_Drive

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      The bottom of the line Royal came with a 3 speed as standard equipment, but even most of those had Fluid Drive. The way you drive a Fluid Drive car is to put in in High, (40s models called it "High", 50s models called it Drive), then let the clutch out without feathering it. Then just drive away. When you want it to upshift, you lift your foot off the gas and wait for it to "clunk" into the next gear. You stop with only the brake pedal. There is no need to declutch at stops. You only need Lo if you are moving off on a hill, or are going down a hill and want some engine braking. You only need to touch the clutch if you have to go to Lo, or if you have to use Reverse.

  • @Modeltnick
    @Modeltnick 8 месяцев назад +1

    I don’t agree on the styling. It was one of the most beautiful post war cars. The drove like a dream.

  • @SoBe80s.
    @SoBe80s. Год назад +1

    I agree with you that they were too conservatively styled and then when they got a new CEO at Chrysler he even made the more conservative looking. I've a 48 DeSoto club coupe and it is so much better looking and yet it's from the same Chrysler family. Just an FYI in 1942 as the work got underway before the production line shutdown they were using painted looking Chrome instead of real Chrome. That third light on the rear of the car is actually a brake light. Chrysler was not a styling leader for sure at that point, but they were on top of their game in terms of engineering

  • @ncfazer
    @ncfazer Год назад +1

    I choose the 1948 Chrysler Royal..

  • @mejurgensen
    @mejurgensen Год назад +2

    Bonus is "The Boy From New York City"

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Yes you got it =) 5 points to Gryffindor lol

  • @johanvangelderen6715
    @johanvangelderen6715 Год назад +1

    I liked your description of a crocodile hood.
    In fact, the car could be named a
    Chrysler Crocodile .
    I agree that it's exterior looks are not it's best feature.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      I saw it described like that somewhere and I was like that’s a cool explanation I’m going to use that =)

  • @peterchen9763
    @peterchen9763 Год назад +1

    I had a 1950 Windsor many years ago. While I am perfectly happy with the 3 hat box design, this grill just isn't as nice looking as the egg crate grill. For this reason, I would take the 42' over the 48'. As slow as the flat head six is with the weird fluid drive, I found the driving pleasant even on the interstate.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Totally agree this era of Chrysler is an acquired taste very similar to Lindbergh cheese

  • @frankvitulli1921
    @frankvitulli1921 Год назад +1

    The Boy from New York City by the Ad Libs

  • @davidgaine4697
    @davidgaine4697 Год назад +1

    Why didn’t you include the camera test in the glove box and a back seat perspective?

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      I think the glove box was locked on this one I couldn’t get in it I also couldn’t get in the backseat because the car was parked too close to this one to get in the backseat I didn’t wanna get trapped back there

  • @retrobilly1719
    @retrobilly1719 Год назад +1

    I like 41 ,Cadillac for second choice

  • @cody481
    @cody481 11 месяцев назад +1

    I would take the flathead every time

  • @retrobilly1719
    @retrobilly1719 Год назад +1

    Actually prefer 41 dash,Looks Cleaner more Sleek

  • @craigjorgensen4637
    @craigjorgensen4637 Год назад +1

    Song…Boy from New York City by the Ad Libs? The Buick you are going to feature is a 1962 Buick Special. Not an Invicta! Those 1948 Chryslers were said to have a “ Harmonica Grill”. Rather have the 48 Cadillac.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Thank you for the correction =) it’s a special
      Bonus points for the end song =)

  • @todreabuck9390
    @todreabuck9390 11 месяцев назад +1

    48 had three bumper guards in front two in the rear

  • @garycogswell5499
    @garycogswell5499 Год назад +1

    Dash material looks like bakeolite,
    an early form of plastic. I watch the Antiques roadshow.

  • @josephgaviota
    @josephgaviota Год назад +1

    10:50 That _is_ interesting, each pedal is a different size. From what I've seen (including my current 2006 Acura TL), with a manual trans, the brake/clutch are the same size, and yet this 1948 Chrysler, as a big brake pedal. Hmmm.

    • @TheopolisQSmith
      @TheopolisQSmith Год назад +2

      Most likely because of Fluid Drive which only needs the clutch on start and initial drive off. Afterwards just like a automatic trans(sort of)

    • @josephgaviota
      @josephgaviota Год назад +1

      @@TheopolisQSmith Interesting. I hadn't seen that before.
      This guy gives a little driving lesson in a parking lot, ruclips.net/video/z4L0NURxm64/видео.html

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      Fluid Drive is not a manual transmission, it is a 4 speed semi automatic. You only need the clutch to put it in gear from Neutral, or to change to Lo or Reverse. Your Acura uses a conventional standard transmission.

  • @SonicGypsyRevolution
    @SonicGypsyRevolution Год назад +1

    front bumper guards are supposed to be 3 on the 48 that car is missing one

  • @richardwagner4668
    @richardwagner4668 Год назад +1

    What happened to the back seat? Just curious.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      The footage got corrupted it only showed six seconds of video whereas it said it recorded 1:40 seconds but video wasn’t there

  • @ronaldfazekas6492
    @ronaldfazekas6492 Год назад +1

    I believe that all US passenger cars had to cease production by April of 1942--most stopped earlier--so no '43s

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      You are correct, but some states until the mid 70s registered cars based on the year sold. Doctors and workers in key defense-related industries who had no access to public transportation or car pools were eligible for a Priority Certificate. For the rest of us, though, no dice.

  • @presspound7358
    @presspound7358 6 месяцев назад +1

    Folks were into “chrome” (bright work) …the more chrome detailing the better. It’s really hard to find these cars attractive because they weren’t meant to be stylish like a Duesenberg. They were meant to be SOLID BRICKS of steel & chrome kind of an oversized bumper car at the amusement park.

  • @rafaelchehin9111
    @rafaelchehin9111 Год назад +1

    ❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @tigre7739
    @tigre7739 Год назад +1

    I usually can appreciate something about every auto's own unique styling, even this one, but I share the sentiment that this would not be in my favorites. There's just something about the front end that just doesn't appeal to me. I would probably say that for me, Chrysler in general, would rank lower than a lot of the other auto makes. IMO this one just looks better suited for taxi cabs, I do think however, that the '50 was a huge improvement in styling, I would definitely rather have the '41, it has a sporty look and appeal to it, but I would hands-down rather have the Cadillac 🤩! 😎

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      It’s crazy the Cadillac in the Chrysler look like they’re made from two totally different time periods

  • @rogergoodman8665
    @rogergoodman8665 Год назад +1

    The bonus song is The boy from New York City by the Ad-Libs.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      Yeah it is I would love to sing bass To that song lol

  • @richardwarren7492
    @richardwarren7492 Год назад +1

    Would you rather? Caddy. 41 over the 48.

  • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
    @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

    The 42 is interesting. Such a strange look in the front.

  • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
    @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

    Oh Justin...I thought of another way to test fake wood from real wood...knock on it with your knuckle. If it makes a hollow sound, it's painted metal.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +1

      That test doesn’t work all the time. I’ve tried it, they had some really good painters back then to simulate wood grain

    • @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage
      @MonsterHobbiesModelCarGarage Год назад +1

      @@What.its.like. Back to the magnet then.

  • @billmoran3812
    @billmoran3812 Год назад +1

    I vote for the Cadillac Series 62

  • @bobmccurdy8881
    @bobmccurdy8881 Год назад +2

    41 Chrysler and 49 Caddy

  • @georgemorfesi8022
    @georgemorfesi8022 Год назад +1

    who loves you. Frankie valley & the four seasons

  • @stevenhoman2253
    @stevenhoman2253 Год назад +1

    41 Chrysler and the Caddie. That is too easy as a choice.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад +2

      Yeah it was there was a Lincoln in the line up but The Cosmopolitan wasn’t it produced until 49 so I can take it out still can’t believe how much the Lincoln was compared to the other two

  • @mjrchapin
    @mjrchapin Год назад +1

    Also known as "Bulgemobiles because of, well, all the bulging lines and curves.

    • @What.its.like.
      @What.its.like.  Год назад

      Awesome I did not know that thank you so much for sharing that information

  • @StratKruzer
    @StratKruzer Год назад +1

    What about the semi-automatic fluid drive?

    • @jamesbosworth4191
      @jamesbosworth4191 Год назад

      On a Chrysler or a DeSoto, you drove the car as a 2 speed automatic once you put it in gear from Neutral. You only used the clutch if you had to go to Lo or Reverse.