quick tip: if harmonic volume aka sounds closer to the noise floor are the issue(background noise, mud, etc), dynamic EQ & EQ can better sedate those sounds within that frequency range. If the transient peaks are the issue(unwanted dynamic volume, bad clipping, unwanted weird digital clarity in the mids, harsh highs etc), mb compression & subtle uses of saturation as compression better sedates that.
Is the Oxford dynamic eq set to linear phase mode for your latency comparison? I ask bc the eq will also introduce phase shift at other settings and switching to linear phase mode to eliminate that will also introduce latency, at least with my plugins (I don’t have the Oxford).
quick tip: if harmonic volume aka sounds closer to the noise floor are the issue(background noise, mud, etc), dynamic EQ & EQ can better sedate those sounds within that frequency range. If the transient peaks are the issue(unwanted dynamic volume, bad clipping, unwanted weird digital clarity in the mids, harsh highs etc), mb compression & subtle uses of saturation as compression better sedates that.
...and the same cross-over-technology is used in the Avid Pro Multiband Splitter ?
Is the Oxford dynamic eq set to linear phase mode for your latency comparison? I ask bc the eq will also introduce phase shift at other settings and switching to linear phase mode to eliminate that will also introduce latency, at least with my plugins (I don’t have the Oxford).