🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🏃 The Asics Superblast has been impressive from a performance standpoint, suggesting potential changes for future running shoes. 00:28 🛠️ The Superblast's unique design, particularly its combination of two types of foam (FF Turbo and FF Blast Plus), sets it apart. 01:10 ⚖️ The two foams in the Superblast are lightweight, complementary, and work better together than other brands' foam combinations. 02:22 🌟 The unique mix of the two foams in the Superblast provides a distinct feel and performance. 02:49 🎨 Another standout design feature of the Superblast is the molded midsole and sculpted sidewalls, providing stability. 03:41 🔍 The shoe's foam stack isn't its defining feature; its combination of foams and design is. 04:38 🎯 Asics aimed for the Superblast to be a performance trainer without a plate, complementing their other offerings. 05:33 🌐 The Superblast is versatile, suitable for various types of running without compromising performance. 06:02 🤔 The future of the Superblast is uncertain, but its success might lead to a sequel. 07:36 💡 The idea of a "Metablast" or "Metaspeed Blast" is proposed as a future evolution. 08:34 📉 The "Meta Speed Edge" might be phased out, leaving room for new iterations. 12:29 🌍 On a macro level, the industry might be moving towards the end of the "Super Shoe" era, indicating a shift in running shoe tech. 15:26 🔄 Asics' Superblast may represent the next step in the evolution of running shoes. 16:21 🔄 All brands, influenced by Nike, might lean towards non-plated super shoes in the future. 17:56 📈 Nike's potential return to the "Turbo" line could further push the industry towards this direction. 18:37 🔮 In a few years, we might see a significant change in running shoe technology, with non-plated super shoes being a transition point. Made with HARPA AI
Coherent and informative opinion, thank you. I’ve got 250 km’s in my Superblast, and I gradually became unhappy with similar shoes in my rotation like the Triumph 20 and the Novablast 3. Slowly but surely I became aware that the other shoes didn’t became bad, but in comparison with the Superblast they fall short. By a lot. Running in the Superblast makes me smile on long runs, slow runs, tempo runs, it does it all. And very well too. At this time I use Puma’s Deviate Nitro Elite for sprint work and the rest is covered by the Superblast.
Same thing happened to the Invincible 3 for me. It’s very good and in my shoe of the year list… but the Superblast is something else all together. It’s a special shoe for sure. Good thing got the I3 that the Superblast is a 2022 release. 🤣
This is so true. I got the triumph 20 first. Put about 40mi on it til I got the superblast. I’m near 100mi in my superblast now and just crossed 60mi in my triumph 20
There already is a shoe being marketed in Japan by ASICS called the S4 (abbreviation for sub 4) which is a marathon shoe for the masses. Think taking the Superblast and extending the concept to this shoe.
The S4 is essentially a slightly updated Magic Speed 2, with a full length carbon plate (similar geometry to the Edge/Magic Speed) and FFTurbo above the plate and FlyteFoam under it with a wider last for a wider fit (something JDM running shoes typically have) and a wider heel. Basically, it is a shoe that would be popular in the west (as a "stability" CP racer), but would be very confused with the Magic Speed 3 and create another problem like they have with the Edge and Sky already. They do sometimes appear here in Taiwan, where I live, but next time I'm in Japan I'll pick up a pair and do a video on them. They have become the modern day mythical "Takumi Sen/Ren" for runningshoenerds. I have heard that it could possibly see a global release this fall. We shall see. Much different shoe over the "Metaspeed Blast" concept. But it does show Asics has no issue creating niche shoes even if it guts another shoe in the range (the S4 all but killed the Magic Speed 3 in Japan, it's around but not as popular as in the west). It also shows they don't mind fine-tuning and exploring ideas either.
Really interesting thoughts. My wishlist: if the Superblast and the Noosa had a baby, we'd see a big Turbo/Blast+ midsole on a super cool looking shoe with a great rocker. :)
Ah, bummer. I’d not hold your breath. Asics is a Japanese company and they really don’t do large sizes. I even sometimes have issue finding US men’s size 9 (27.0) here in Asia… and that’s very normal.
I wear my SB for most of my runs. I really need to switch it up. But idk what to wear. So I always end up grabbing the SB. Tonight I ran in the endorphin speed 2 (which I love), but I kept thinking about the SB
I’m enjoying the Superblast. They’re the only shoe in my rotation that I can run in as I’m recovering from an inflamed achilles. I’d be interested in a video detailing why Nike discontinued the Turbo line.
Ya, it’s likely a good shoe for that from a structure POV. Though I must say the one gripe I have about the Superblast is the top and center of the heel counter and how it irritates my Achilles with blisters. However, the majority of Asics shoes do that to me so I figure is a Asics design feature more now than anything. 🤣 Once we know more about the Turbo Next Nature 2 or Turbo 3 I’ll go into that much more. I have covered it a little bit in some of my earliest video, especially the one about the Streakfly being the actual Turbo 3 AND the 48min one I did about the history of the Nike a Pegasus form 2017-2023. But I’ll be more concise with it in the future.
Mechanically I can see that, from a solid plate, not rods. Also, I think Adidas’s rods are on the way out over the coming years. They seem to be making some moves to go to full plates.
I have 3 pairs of Superblast (one used) so 2 more left to go, you described them perfectly! They are much better than my Prime X since they are lighter, more stable and they have perfect foam so you don't miss carbon plate at all. I don't think they are that much expenssive since they last 1000km which is more than other shoes offer. Asics should stop developing so many daily trainers and continue to develop Superblast..
Love this shoe. Superblast is such a unique product the combination of ffturbo, ffblast + , high stack height and lightweight is such a good combination. Agree with your analysis.!
Pegasus Turbo was well before that. But the Mach series was one of the best examples of dual density foam modsoles… Though Hoka EVA is far from a Superfoam, even their supercritical ones.
I dont like the bulk of the Mid, and you're right with shaving off some of that bulk. I have the sky 1, and i really do not think the heel height is what they say it is because it feels like a negative drop
Waiting on my Superblast to arrive and excited to try them paired with my Nimbus 25. I wouldnt be suprised if they had originally planned to put FF Turbo into the Novablast and were using the Superblast as a test bed before people cried about them killing their favorite shoe. Hency why they didnt plan a superblast 2, because if well recieved, the successor would be Novablast 4. Now they've got the Cumulus, Novablast and Nimbus all as daily trainers with FFBlast+. Saturating your own market.
We have now seen the Novablast 4. We know all the detail on it from leaks. It’s essentially morphed into the nimbus 25 silhouette with a novablast midsole, rounded heel and a Superblast outsole. Still all FDBlast+ and firmly planted as a daily trainer it seems. The Superblast is all together something else now. I really feel like they need to name it something else to make it more distinct form the NB, which it has evolved away from.
@edderepa9685 The Superblast is much more stable than the Nimbus, considerably lighter and much more performance oriented due to the FFTurbo. But it's not a fair comparison. The Nimbus is a big heavy recovery shoe and the Superblast is a lightweight performance trainer.
The disappointing thing about Asics Superblast & Superblast 2 is that they are just about impossible to get hold of. Asics doesn't seem to produce enough of them to meet the demand. I wonder if this is a marketing strategy🤔 Perhaps keeping them in short supply pushes runners into other shoes like the Novablast. C'mon Asics produce more of the Superblast especially in regions/ Countries other than the US. 😥
I actually think it’s due to where they source their foams, specially FFTurbo+. That source is unable to keep up with demand at the level of quality Asics demands….
Do you recommend this shoes for daily training/running? I've watch your video about vaporfly3 durability.. so thanks to that video because I'm so close to buy that shoes for my daily running.. Thank you so much.
I would recommend the Superblast over the Vaporfly 3 for daily running. But.. I would recommend something like the Nike Pegasus 40 or the Asics Novablast 3 as a daily runner. The Superblast is a training shoe and the Vaporfly is a race shoe.
I can't decide...buy or not buy for my half marathon training... for the long run ( like i had Sunday) i've used the Zoom Fly 5 and i can't like it, is not a supershoes, is not a daily training shoes for me doesn't have a place. I have fear to use the pegasus 40 'cause is too "racing" for long run and the invincible is unstable for me; so i'm so indecided: buy the Superblast at 154€ (lowest price here in Italy) or wait for Vomero 17 ( vomero 16 is firm) or maybe...maybe use the Alphafly...any suggest?
Depends. If you want a do-it-all performance training to prepare for a half… then it’s the Superblast 100%. The Invincible 3 would be my second choice, though the Superblast is considerably more stable and better suited to race training. The Invincible 3 can do it but it’s also a bit more of a cushioned daily trainer too. The Vomero 17 looks to me a full fledge cushioned daily trainer. Good for general running but not any type of training. I would do some of your long runs in whatever should you plan to race in. The Pegasus is totally fine for easy to long runs… I often them those in Pegs… no issues. In fact I’m really enjoying swapping between the Superblast and the Peg 40 for that type of running. Though for any long tempo running I use the Superblast unless I need a plated shoe.
@@SagasuRunning My only complain is: is the superblast a similar shoes of the novablast 3? 'Cause i try also the novablast 3 and for me (i use only the forefoot of the shoes) i dislike it for lack of reactivity and for the heavy side. Maybe i could use my alphafly 1 for easy long run having also the pegasus 40... I'm really undecided, also because €155 seems excessive to me having recently bought the Pegasus 40
@@esci88 the Superblast is considerably better than the NB3. The FFTurbo is a totally different and the shoe runs MUCH better. It’s more lovely and feels smaller/lighters on foot. In fact my pair of Superblasts are 5g lighter than the NB3s I have.
I’ve finally run in the Superblast and I am enjoying its foam combination. I do agree they’re breaking ground here and may be on a quiet leading edge for a shoe sea change. I can see this shoe knocked down in height while retaining the same foam combination as you describe, with no plate. There’s an Adios 6 feel to this shoe. Is it my imagination?
Just hit 300km in mine. They are great shoes. I was trying to decide on another shoe to toss in rotation as they are the main shoe and I only randomly use another pair of shoes that are unluckily a half size too small. The Superblast are great, and I can probably get them to 500km easily. I am not sure if I will go another route or try and get two pairs of superblast for the next round of shoes.
As good as the SB is I would rotate in at least one other pair, ideally not another pair of SB (though that’s better than only one pair). It will keep your feet much fresher.
@@SagasuRunning That is my exact thinking. am debating on som Adidas SL trainers. I need a pair of shoes to wear on my bike ride or short runs (roughly 2.5-3km) to work everyday. I am not sure of any super trainers that will give me that daily comfort for walking. This is y only complaint for the Superblast. They do not feel as great when walking. Was wondering about the Nimbus 25, but I would like to branch out of Asics as they always seem to have the shoes I love.
For riding a bike in flat pedals the SL is going to be a good choice as Lightstrike is very durable. When you do run in them there is a sliver of feel from the puck of the Lightstrike Pro in the forefoot. The SL is t a sexy shoe, but it’s very good. I’d recommend it over the Nimbus for the intended purpose you have. The nimbus will be like big marshmallows on the bike and the SL will be a better counter to the SB.
The Kayano is a traditional stability shoe and the Superblast is a neutral performance trainer. Two totally different shoes that have zero overlap. If you need a stability shoe that’s the Kayano. If you don’t… there is no reason to buy the Kayano…
@@SagasuRunning how about someone who has been running in Kayano and might want to make the switch to Superblast having covered around 600-700 Km but wanting something lighter and yet stable enough? Also, would love to see a video by you on stability and whether it’s marketing myth at times.
Then in this use case… the Superblast is a good fit. It’s a neutral shoe but it’s very stable, considering it’s stack height. FFTurbo and the sculpturing of the midsole make it a good choice for someone coming form the Kayano series. I do have a video on stability shoes in my ideas list… but it’s a very complex issue. I want to figure out how best to approach it before I “go there”.
@@SagasuRunning thank you so much for your response. Yea, I’m actually confused since I had twisted my ankle a couple of years ago playing soccer and wasn’t able to run for some time due to it so just am a little pensive about the choice. My heart is kind of set on Superblast given that it’s lighter and the Kayano can feel a bit heavier when I’m trying to push myself in terms of my pace but I also would not want to compromise on the security of knowing that my feet are safe unless I do something really stupid. Still thank you for your feedback and already subscribed. Also, would love to watch your take on it but given how in depth all your videos are I can understand you’d want to take your time. I generally believe you deserve more subs given how well detailed all your content is. Looking forward to more informative content. Thanks
The Superblast really is your best bet here. For a max cushion shoe it is as stable as it can get, FFturbo’s firmness does alot of work here for that. But with anything go easy into it and start with slower and shorter runs as you learn how your body responds to the shoe and it’s limitations for you. Thanks for the kind words on my content and the sub. It really means alot to me! 🙌🏻 You are right… it’s a topic that has alot of baggage around it and is a hot button issue. I’m not adverse to going there… but I want to make sure my thoughts are clearly presented when I do. Stay tuned!
Having a single shoe for all workouts is one thing but doing all of them flawlessly is another. and it's impossible for mechanically. Every runner has their own gait and that changes with the pace we run along with other elements such as the surface we run on, elevation etc. To give a personal example, I changed my fitness training for just 2 weeks and my running technique changed significantly I started putting less force on my 2nd 3rd right foot metatarsal which led me to change my running shoe rotation. Also for some reason, I can't run in asics shoes especially, in their daily trainers. Novablast was the worst shoe I've ever experienced in a long time. I tried running slow in Superblast, I tried steady run, up tempo everything but shoe always worked against me. There is something with their midsole geometry disrupts my flow for some reason. I agree that we will see big changes in the industry coming from big brands like Nike and Adidas.
Traditionally, Asics also never worked well for me. I also had a rough time with the NB3, though had some good running innit eventually. However, the Superblast, is different. I have more thoughts as to why but I e already done two videos on them. They are a unique shoe. Now the idea of “one shoe to rule them all” is not 100% realistic. Training in a single shoe is a recipe for disaster and injury… but the idea of it is intriguing and the Superblast would fit that for most. More importantly I think the idea is the shoe is capable of doing anything, not that you should only use it.
The Novablast 2 was a max cushion trainer that was becoming a cushioned daily trainer. The Novablast 3 became a proper daily trainer. The Superblast is a performance trainer made for pairing with a race shoe in race training.
@@SagasuRunning so if I’m just running to burn fats , then it’s not worth to buy superblast hey ? Plus I’m too heavy.. I’m 1.7 90 kg… I do workout mostly in gym but thinking of do road running as cardio….what do u sugggest ?
@@brucelin5842 Ya, you don’t need these shoes. I’d suggest the Asics Nimbus 25 or Noveblast 3 (once your 2s wear out). If you do gym work, weight training and some cardio look at the Nike Pegasus 40 or Nike Winflo 10. They will give you an ok platform for gym work and comfortable to run in as well.
One of reasons why I got the Superblast is a non-plated option but performs similar to the “supershoes”. I just don’t like all these plated trainer shoes.
I do think there is a new niche of non-plated super shoes that the Superblast definitely shoes a path for. I think we will see a few more of these form other brands soon.
I don't really understand the hype with this shoes. I didn't like it in any way is so chunky the upper is tight compared with how wide de base is and way to much stacked high. Is very uncomfortable to run in it and also just to walk with them and is too much expensive. Also I believe that the Lightstrike pro is a way better foam then what Asics is making,
I’m also not a fan of the Prime X platform. It’s not the type of shoe I ever want to spend time in. It is still interesting technically though. Lightstrike Pro and FFTurbo do different things… I think there is a place for both… but neither touches ZoomX.
Luckily, shoes like the adios 8 exist to counter the monstrosity of these overpriced superstack shoes. Perhaps the future is lower stack with mega resilient foams that dont need plates or high stack to perform and keep you well cushioned.
I think they may be where some brands end up in 5+ years. Once plateless supershoes become more common the foams will likely evolve to be denser and more durable while maintaining resiliency. Once they happens there will be no reason for high stacks of foam. It won’t be the first round but we will get there. I love the Streakfly and Adios 8 and spend a big chunk of my year in them. But in a marathon build I need very specific shoes and the Superblast is near the top for me right now.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:00 🏃 The Asics Superblast has been impressive from a performance standpoint, suggesting potential changes for future running shoes.
00:28 🛠️ The Superblast's unique design, particularly its combination of two types of foam (FF Turbo and FF Blast Plus), sets it apart.
01:10 ⚖️ The two foams in the Superblast are lightweight, complementary, and work better together than other brands' foam combinations.
02:22 🌟 The unique mix of the two foams in the Superblast provides a distinct feel and performance.
02:49 🎨 Another standout design feature of the Superblast is the molded midsole and sculpted sidewalls, providing stability.
03:41 🔍 The shoe's foam stack isn't its defining feature; its combination of foams and design is.
04:38 🎯 Asics aimed for the Superblast to be a performance trainer without a plate, complementing their other offerings.
05:33 🌐 The Superblast is versatile, suitable for various types of running without compromising performance.
06:02 🤔 The future of the Superblast is uncertain, but its success might lead to a sequel.
07:36 💡 The idea of a "Metablast" or "Metaspeed Blast" is proposed as a future evolution.
08:34 📉 The "Meta Speed Edge" might be phased out, leaving room for new iterations.
12:29 🌍 On a macro level, the industry might be moving towards the end of the "Super Shoe" era, indicating a shift in running shoe tech.
15:26 🔄 Asics' Superblast may represent the next step in the evolution of running shoes.
16:21 🔄 All brands, influenced by Nike, might lean towards non-plated super shoes in the future.
17:56 📈 Nike's potential return to the "Turbo" line could further push the industry towards this direction.
18:37 🔮 In a few years, we might see a significant change in running shoe technology, with non-plated super shoes being a transition point.
Made with HARPA AI
It missed some of the details but overall got the gist. 👾
Coherent and informative opinion, thank you. I’ve got 250 km’s in my Superblast, and I gradually became unhappy with similar shoes in my rotation like the Triumph 20 and the Novablast 3. Slowly but surely I became aware that the other shoes didn’t became bad, but in comparison with the Superblast they fall short. By a lot. Running in the Superblast makes me smile on long runs, slow runs, tempo runs, it does it all. And very well too. At this time I use Puma’s Deviate Nitro Elite for sprint work and the rest is covered by the Superblast.
Same thing happened to the Invincible 3 for me. It’s very good and in my shoe of the year list… but the Superblast is something else all together. It’s a special shoe for sure.
Good thing got the I3 that the Superblast is a 2022 release. 🤣
This is so true. I got the triumph 20 first. Put about 40mi on it til I got the superblast. I’m near 100mi in my superblast now and just crossed 60mi in my triumph 20
The Superblast really is that good!
There already is a shoe being marketed in Japan by ASICS called the S4 (abbreviation for sub 4) which is a marathon shoe for the masses. Think taking the Superblast and extending the concept to this shoe.
The S4 is essentially a slightly updated Magic Speed 2, with a full length carbon plate (similar geometry to the Edge/Magic Speed) and FFTurbo above the plate and FlyteFoam under it with a wider last for a wider fit (something JDM running shoes typically have) and a wider heel.
Basically, it is a shoe that would be popular in the west (as a "stability" CP racer), but would be very confused with the Magic Speed 3 and create another problem like they have with the Edge and Sky already.
They do sometimes appear here in Taiwan, where I live, but next time I'm in Japan I'll pick up a pair and do a video on them. They have become the modern day mythical "Takumi Sen/Ren" for runningshoenerds.
I have heard that it could possibly see a global release this fall. We shall see.
Much different shoe over the "Metaspeed Blast" concept. But it does show Asics has no issue creating niche shoes even if it guts another shoe in the range (the S4 all but killed the Magic Speed 3 in Japan, it's around but not as popular as in the west). It also shows they don't mind fine-tuning and exploring ideas either.
Really interesting thoughts. My wishlist: if the Superblast and the Noosa had a baby, we'd see a big Turbo/Blast+ midsole on a super cool looking shoe with a great rocker. :)
Interesting. The Noosa is such a specialized shoe. I do think the Noosa would be better with better foams for sure.
I hope they come out with a size 14 eventually.
Ah, bummer. I’d not hold your breath. Asics is a Japanese company and they really don’t do large sizes. I even sometimes have issue finding US men’s size 9 (27.0) here in Asia… and that’s very normal.
Very interesting analysis and speculation. I think you may very well be right. Asics is definitely onto something
Thank you. Asics definitely is onto something big here… it’s going to be interesting to see what they actually do.
I wear my SB for most of my runs. I really need to switch it up. But idk what to wear. So I always end up grabbing the SB. Tonight I ran in the endorphin speed 2 (which I love), but I kept thinking about the SB
Ha. Yes, this happens with the SB for sure. It’s just so very capable…
I’m enjoying the Superblast. They’re the only shoe in my rotation that I can run in as I’m recovering from an inflamed achilles.
I’d be interested in a video detailing why Nike discontinued the Turbo line.
Ya, it’s likely a good shoe for that from a structure POV. Though I must say the one gripe I have about the Superblast is the top and center of the heel counter and how it irritates my Achilles with blisters. However, the majority of Asics shoes do that to me so I figure is a Asics design feature more now than anything. 🤣
Once we know more about the Turbo Next Nature 2 or Turbo 3 I’ll go into that much more. I have covered it a little bit in some of my earliest video, especially the one about the Streakfly being the actual Turbo 3 AND the 48min one I did about the history of the Nike a Pegasus form 2017-2023.
But I’ll be more concise with it in the future.
Just tried them in store and they feel really good; must afford them
They are excellent and worth the price of two or three pairs of other training shoes.
I see a secondary function of plated shoes as weight distribution over a larger area. That's why the Adidas rods are an interesting concept.
Mechanically I can see that, from a solid plate, not rods.
Also, I think Adidas’s rods are on the way out over the coming years. They seem to be making some moves to go to full plates.
I have 3 pairs of Superblast (one used) so 2 more left to go, you described them perfectly! They are much better than my Prime X since they are lighter, more stable and they have perfect foam so you don't miss carbon plate at all. I don't think they are that much expenssive since they last 1000km which is more than other shoes offer. Asics should stop developing so many daily trainers and continue to develop Superblast..
You definitely get a lot of value for money with the Superblast. A very well built and durable shoe that is capable of anything.
Very well thought out content, thank you.
I’m glad it was interesting! 🤙🏻
Love this shoe. Superblast is such a unique product the combination of ffturbo, ffblast + , high stack height and lightweight is such a good combination. Agree with your analysis.!
It sure is a unique shoe. 🙌🏻
Hoka mach 4 started the full length dual density midsole with the profly then the rubberized EVA mid/outsole combo
Pegasus Turbo was well before that.
But the Mach series was one of the best examples of dual density foam modsoles…
Though Hoka EVA is far from a Superfoam, even their supercritical ones.
I dont like the bulk of the Mid, and you're right with shaving off some of that bulk. I have the sky 1, and i really do not think the heel height is what they say it is because it feels like a negative drop
Ya, one of my critiques of the Superblast… is there is too much foam. It really doesn’t need all of that stack.
Waiting on my Superblast to arrive and excited to try them paired with my Nimbus 25.
I wouldnt be suprised if they had originally planned to put FF Turbo into the Novablast and were using the Superblast as a test bed before people cried about them killing their favorite shoe. Hency why they didnt plan a superblast 2, because if well recieved, the successor would be Novablast 4.
Now they've got the Cumulus, Novablast and Nimbus all as daily trainers with FFBlast+. Saturating your own market.
We have now seen the Novablast 4. We know all the detail on it from leaks. It’s essentially morphed into the nimbus 25 silhouette with a novablast midsole, rounded heel and a Superblast outsole. Still all FDBlast+ and firmly planted as a daily trainer it seems.
The Superblast is all together something else now. I really feel like they need to name it something else to make it more distinct form the NB, which it has evolved away from.
How is it vs the Nimbus 25?
@edderepa9685 The Superblast is much more stable than the Nimbus, considerably lighter and much more performance oriented due to the FFTurbo.
But it's not a fair comparison. The Nimbus is a big heavy recovery shoe and the Superblast is a lightweight performance trainer.
The disappointing thing about Asics Superblast & Superblast 2 is that they are just about impossible to get hold of. Asics doesn't seem to produce enough of them to meet the demand. I wonder if this is a marketing strategy🤔 Perhaps keeping them in short supply pushes runners into other shoes like the Novablast. C'mon Asics produce more of the Superblast especially in regions/ Countries other than the US. 😥
I actually think it’s due to where they source their foams, specially FFTurbo+. That source is unable to keep up with demand at the level of quality Asics demands….
Do you recommend this shoes for daily training/running? I've watch your video about vaporfly3 durability.. so thanks to that video because I'm so close to buy that shoes for my daily running.. Thank you so much.
I would recommend the Superblast over the Vaporfly 3 for daily running. But..
I would recommend something like the Nike Pegasus 40 or the Asics Novablast 3 as a daily runner. The Superblast is a training shoe and the Vaporfly is a race shoe.
I can't decide...buy or not buy for my half marathon training... for the long run ( like i had Sunday) i've used the Zoom Fly 5 and i can't like it, is not a supershoes, is not a daily training shoes for me doesn't have a place. I have fear to use the pegasus 40 'cause is too "racing" for long run and the invincible is unstable for me; so i'm so indecided: buy the Superblast at 154€ (lowest price here in Italy) or wait for Vomero 17 ( vomero 16 is firm) or maybe...maybe use the Alphafly...any suggest?
Depends. If you want a do-it-all performance training to prepare for a half… then it’s the Superblast 100%. The Invincible 3 would be my second choice, though the Superblast is considerably more stable and better suited to race training. The Invincible 3 can do it but it’s also a bit more of a cushioned daily trainer too. The Vomero 17 looks to me a full fledge cushioned daily trainer. Good for general running but not any type of training.
I would do some of your long runs in whatever should you plan to race in.
The Pegasus is totally fine for easy to long runs… I often them those in Pegs… no issues. In fact I’m really enjoying swapping between the Superblast and the Peg 40 for that type of running. Though for any long tempo running I use the Superblast unless I need a plated shoe.
@@SagasuRunning My only complain is: is the superblast a similar shoes of the novablast 3? 'Cause i try also the novablast 3 and for me (i use only the forefoot of the shoes) i dislike it for lack of reactivity and for the heavy side. Maybe i could use my alphafly 1 for easy long run having also the pegasus 40... I'm really undecided, also because €155 seems excessive to me having recently bought the Pegasus 40
@@esci88 the Superblast is considerably better than the NB3. The FFTurbo is a totally different and the shoe runs MUCH better. It’s more lovely and feels smaller/lighters on foot. In fact my pair of Superblasts are 5g lighter than the NB3s I have.
@@SagasuRunning ...ok i need to try the Superblast... definitely
I’ve finally run in the Superblast and I am enjoying its foam combination. I do agree they’re breaking ground here and may be on a quiet leading edge for a shoe sea change. I can see this shoe knocked down in height while retaining the same foam combination as you describe, with no plate. There’s an Adios 6 feel to this shoe. Is it my imagination?
Just hit 300km in mine. They are great shoes. I was trying to decide on another shoe to toss in rotation as they are the main shoe and I only randomly use another pair of shoes that are unluckily a half size too small. The Superblast are great, and I can probably get them to 500km easily. I am not sure if I will go another route or try and get two pairs of superblast for the next round of shoes.
As good as the SB is I would rotate in at least one other pair, ideally not another pair of SB (though that’s better than only one pair). It will keep your feet much fresher.
@@SagasuRunning That is my exact thinking. am debating on som Adidas SL trainers. I need a pair of shoes to wear on my bike ride or short runs (roughly 2.5-3km) to work everyday. I am not sure of any super trainers that will give me that daily comfort for walking. This is y only complaint for the Superblast. They do not feel as great when walking. Was wondering about the Nimbus 25, but I would like to branch out of Asics as they always seem to have the shoes I love.
For riding a bike in flat pedals the SL is going to be a good choice as Lightstrike is very durable. When you do run in them there is a sliver of feel from the puck of the Lightstrike Pro in the forefoot. The SL is t a sexy shoe, but it’s very good.
I’d recommend it over the Nimbus for the intended purpose you have. The nimbus will be like big marshmallows on the bike and the SL will be a better counter to the SB.
What would you recommend as between these and the Gel Kayano 30 / 29
The Kayano is a traditional stability shoe and the Superblast is a neutral performance trainer. Two totally different shoes that have zero overlap.
If you need a stability shoe that’s the Kayano. If you don’t… there is no reason to buy the Kayano…
@@SagasuRunning how about someone who has been running in Kayano and might want to make the switch to Superblast having covered around 600-700 Km but wanting something lighter and yet stable enough?
Also, would love to see a video by you on stability and whether it’s marketing myth at times.
Then in this use case… the Superblast is a good fit. It’s a neutral shoe but it’s very stable, considering it’s stack height. FFTurbo and the sculpturing of the midsole make it a good choice for someone coming form the Kayano series.
I do have a video on stability shoes in my ideas list… but it’s a very complex issue. I want to figure out how best to approach it before I “go there”.
@@SagasuRunning thank you so much for your response. Yea, I’m actually confused since I had twisted my ankle a couple of years ago playing soccer and wasn’t able to run for some time due to it so just am a little pensive about the choice. My heart is kind of set on Superblast given that it’s lighter and the Kayano can feel a bit heavier when I’m trying to push myself in terms of my pace but I also would not want to compromise on the security of knowing that my feet are safe unless I do something really stupid.
Still thank you for your feedback and already subscribed. Also, would love to watch your take on it but given how in depth all your videos are I can understand you’d want to take your time. I generally believe you deserve more subs given how well detailed all your content is. Looking forward to more informative content. Thanks
The Superblast really is your best bet here. For a max cushion shoe it is as stable as it can get, FFturbo’s firmness does alot of work here for that.
But with anything go easy into it and start with slower and shorter runs as you learn how your body responds to the shoe and it’s limitations for you.
Thanks for the kind words on my content and the sub. It really means alot to me! 🙌🏻
You are right… it’s a topic that has alot of baggage around it and is a hot button issue. I’m not adverse to going there… but I want to make sure my thoughts are clearly presented when I do. Stay tuned!
Having a single shoe for all workouts is one thing but doing all of them flawlessly is another. and it's impossible for mechanically. Every runner has their own gait and that changes with the pace we run along with other elements such as the surface we run on, elevation etc. To give a personal example, I changed my fitness training for just 2 weeks and my running technique changed significantly I started putting less force on my 2nd 3rd right foot metatarsal which led me to change my running shoe rotation.
Also for some reason, I can't run in asics shoes especially, in their daily trainers. Novablast was the worst shoe I've ever experienced in a long time. I tried running slow in Superblast, I tried steady run, up tempo everything but shoe always worked against me. There is something with their midsole geometry disrupts my flow for some reason. I agree that we will see big changes in the industry coming from big brands like Nike and Adidas.
Traditionally, Asics also never worked well for me. I also had a rough time with the NB3, though had some good running innit eventually. However, the Superblast, is different. I have more thoughts as to why but I e already done two videos on them. They are a unique shoe.
Now the idea of “one shoe to rule them all” is not 100% realistic. Training in a single shoe is a recipe for disaster and injury… but the idea of it is intriguing and the Superblast would fit that for most. More importantly I think the idea is the shoe is capable of doing anything, not that you should only use it.
What’s the difference between this and novablast2
The Novablast 2 was a max cushion trainer that was becoming a cushioned daily trainer. The Novablast 3 became a proper daily trainer. The Superblast is a performance trainer made for pairing with a race shoe in race training.
@@SagasuRunning so if I’m just running to burn fats , then it’s not worth to buy superblast hey ? Plus I’m too heavy.. I’m 1.7 90 kg… I do workout mostly in gym but thinking of do road running as cardio….what do u sugggest ?
@@brucelin5842 Ya, you don’t need these shoes. I’d suggest the Asics Nimbus 25 or Noveblast 3 (once your 2s wear out).
If you do gym work, weight training and some cardio look at the Nike Pegasus 40 or Nike Winflo 10. They will give you an ok platform for gym work and comfortable to run in as well.
@@SagasuRunning my novablast 2 is almost done ..I feel extremely unstable wearing that shoe ..feel bit too narrow…
One of reasons why I got the Superblast is a non-plated option but performs similar to the “supershoes”. I just don’t like all these plated trainer shoes.
I do think there is a new niche of non-plated super shoes that the Superblast definitely shoes a path for. I think we will see a few more of these form other brands soon.
I don't really understand the hype with this shoes.
I didn't like it in any way is so chunky the upper is tight compared with how wide de base is and way to much stacked high.
Is very uncomfortable to run in it and also just to walk with them and is too much expensive.
Also I believe that the Lightstrike pro is a way better foam then what Asics is making,
I’m also not a fan of the Prime X platform. It’s not the type of shoe I ever want to spend time in. It is still interesting technically though.
Lightstrike Pro and FFTurbo do different things… I think there is a place for both… but neither touches ZoomX.
Interesting.. you think that Zoomx is the best foam out there?
Yes, by a vast degree.
Luckily, shoes like the adios 8 exist to counter the monstrosity of these overpriced superstack shoes. Perhaps the future is lower stack with mega resilient foams that dont need plates or high stack to perform and keep you well cushioned.
I think they may be where some brands end up in 5+ years. Once plateless supershoes become more common the foams will likely evolve to be denser and more durable while maintaining resiliency. Once they happens there will be no reason for high stacks of foam.
It won’t be the first round but we will get there.
I love the Streakfly and Adios 8 and spend a big chunk of my year in them. But in a marathon build I need very specific shoes and the Superblast is near the top for me right now.