I remember watching your video on this when you first got it, I commented as I got mine within days of you getting yours, and you are absolutely spot on about this watch! I kept it unworn for a couple of months until Rolex didn’t change anything in April. I can honestly say I’m so glad I started wearing it and I absolutely love it, I don’t think it will ever leave my collection, GMT function perfect for holidays abroad, everything you need In a watch! 👍🏻
I'm awaiting my AD for the new version (black dial). Tried out the exhibition piece at my AD and I was instantly sold. The 42mm case size is not really overwhelming at all....it still wears than most Tag Aquaracers/Breiting diver watches. The new versions now come with anti-reflective sapphire and the black dial is more jet black with brighter white numbers than the previous gen.
Make it 40mm, lume the bezel numbers, increase WR to 200m, increase index sizes a bit to better fill negative space. Having said that, I've had my polar dial for a week and LOVE it. So legible and incredible lume.
@@stu632 when I travel, I do some rough water sports like jumping off cliffs, falling off jet skis, etc that causes extreme water pressure and 100mm isn't recommended for those.
What a great discussion and thoughtful questions from the community! I am honored to receive a double-thumbs up for my questions, and the depth of your responses did not disappoint!
I never considered this watch looking at it online, in pictures or even in videos. That was until I tired it on at my AD. I was sold and asked to buy it.
The explorer 1 & 2 were and are great. Generally Rolex might not manufacture tourbillion or high complications watches, but what they are offering is top notch. Personally, I don't like green models, Pepsi, batman and jubilee bracelet on gmt cases, oyster is better.
I have the new black dial explorer 2 and although I appreciate the white dial, I fail to understand why people pine over the latter. The black is easy to read and slightly more elegant…
That's my only little niggle with the Explorer II. It's perfect in dang near every way, but the crown is a little small for such a big sports watch. Although I also get that, the smaller crown is better protected by the crown guards.
@3:00 keep in mind, the way the industry rates water resistance doesn’t correspond to real water depth. For example, 100 meters doesn’t mean you can take the watch that deep
@@ginocolella6373 no one replied because the simple fact is 904 is ten times the quality of 316. Most serious Rolex fans and perspective buyers are fully aware of this as a serious benefit. Do some research and you will see.
Significant resistance to corrosion. After you swim with a watch that uses 316L steel, it's recommended to rinse with clean water, however, with 904L, you wouldn't need to (I still would tbh). But the use of 904L makes it more geared towards professional use. Rolex could have easy cut costs by using 316L but luxury is about having more than necessary. It's also a tad bit harder making it more difficult to work with.
No man andrei, thank you for accompanying us in this weird hobby and for being an amazing guy all round, keep being awesome, btw what would be your perfect 4 watch collection, given a dres, everyday, beater and diver/field pieces??
Thank you Manny for your kind words :) And thanks for being close to me and the channel! as for a 4 watch collection, I see a dedicated episode for such a subject :) In my actual state and experience. I'd go with a dressy, JLC Reverso, Cartier Santos, for a diver, a Doxa sub, Seamaster 300 or Blancpain FF, for a field / Pilot, an IWC big pilot / hamilton field watch or a longines marine nationale and for a daily beater, something inexpensive but cool :D
Really don't like it myself, too much like the sub (which I really dislike) - just a shame they didn't bring back the "Steve McQueen" one with squared off indices, so much better looking & less "generic Rolex" Got an Airman (24 hour purist) on it's way 😉 Cheers Mate 👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for the contribution Steve! :) McQueen I think will never be relaunched by Rolly. I see already the job of Tudor to dig for old famous models :)
@@BraveBeaters no, like yourself I prefer bigger watches, so opted for the 42 (in my case, because of age- shocking how much eyes deteriorate once over 50).Cheers 👍🏻
@@jimlittle5769 exactly what I'm saying - you've pointed out the only obvious differences. It's too generic Rolex, a basic design I just don't enjoy myself, but to each their own.
Saludos hasta Covid Landia, ok ok in English, what I mean is regards to Covid Landia LOL I really like this model, I had the chanse to wear it in the store and I fall in love, it's simply perfect, sport and very dressy watch.
You shouldn’t have put it next to the Glycene which is so much more attractive design wise. Even if the Glycene were more expensive? it would be my choice. Rolex worth it because you can sell it for more? You should buy it because you want to wear it not because it could be more vs,unable one day. Buy gold if that’s your game. A lot of people are gonna get caught out if investing in watches for profit. Like those pigs who buy important art and lock it away or beautiful cars and store them for the next auction. It’s all GREED.
I think this is a underrated watch in the Rolex line up. I'm also aware that the polar dial gets more love but personally I prefer the black version
The Black Face is one of The best Rolex's and it's practical and a tool watch.
I remember watching your video on this when you first got it, I commented as I got mine within days of you getting yours, and you are absolutely spot on about this watch! I kept it unworn for a couple of months until Rolex didn’t change anything in April. I can honestly say I’m so glad I started wearing it and I absolutely love it, I don’t think it will ever leave my collection, GMT function perfect for holidays abroad, everything you need In a watch! 👍🏻
haha, Congrats! similar experience here with the usage of it also to the attachment :) enjoy it!
One of my favorite (black dial) Rolex models, absolutely fantastic!
I'm awaiting my AD for the new version (black dial). Tried out the exhibition piece at my AD and I was instantly sold. The 42mm case size is not really overwhelming at all....it still wears than most Tag Aquaracers/Breiting diver watches. The new versions now come with anti-reflective sapphire and the black dial is more jet black with brighter white numbers than the previous gen.
Thanks for answering my question, Andrei! Great video 😁🙌
Anytime Peter :) thanks for the contribution!
Make it 40mm, lume the bezel numbers, increase WR to 200m, increase index sizes a bit to better fill negative space. Having said that, I've had my polar dial for a week and LOVE it. So legible and incredible lume.
make smaller is not an option. I need 42/43 mm watches and these, deepsea and sky dweller is an only options.
What is 200 m needed for?
@@stu632 when I travel, I do some rough water sports like jumping off cliffs, falling off jet skis, etc that causes extreme water pressure and 100mm isn't recommended for those.
What a great discussion and thoughtful questions from the community! I am honored to receive a double-thumbs up for my questions, and the depth of your responses did not disappoint!
I smiled the entire video :) nice one! 👍
Glad you enjoyed it, Razvan :) thanks for the contribution!
I never considered this watch looking at it online, in pictures or even in videos.
That was until I tired it on at my AD. I was sold and asked to buy it.
Love my now discontinued black dial Rolex explorer 2 and is get loads of wrist time 👍
Own an explorer Ii it’s the best watch ever in my opinion
Another great video, thank you for sharing.
The explorer 1 & 2 were and are great. Generally Rolex might not manufacture tourbillion or high complications watches, but what they are offering is top notch. Personally, I don't like green models, Pepsi, batman and jubilee bracelet on gmt cases, oyster is better.
I have the new black dial explorer 2 and although I appreciate the white dial, I fail to understand why people pine over the latter. The black is easy to read and slightly more elegant…
The Polar version of the Exp II is the last Rolex I'm looking for. If I get the call, my Rolex trio will be complete.
I have one polar on the list as well :D
That's what I was thinking. Got mine last month and it didn't disappoint.
@@Yetifur003658 Congrats! I got mine last month as well. NOV 13.
I think it's perfect, I'd just like the crown to be a little bit bigger as I'm used to the sea dweller.
That's my only little niggle with the Explorer II. It's perfect in dang near every way, but the crown is a little small for such a big sports watch. Although I also get that, the smaller crown is better protected by the crown guards.
Love your videos. Keep up the good work 👍🏽🌟🙏🏽
First time to this channel, really enjoyed your video
Thank you Richard, and welcome.l aboard! hopefully not the last time :)
I can sport the 42mm but I prefer the 36mm, subtle look and simple
You mean the explorer 1?
Yes :)
Yes. I discussed a bit the explorer on as size. hope it helps :) and thank you for the contribution.
Sinn offers the '105 St Sa UTC' (Black Dial GMT)
With garbage bracelets/clasps.
Honestly, It's much beautiful than the Daytona.
@3:00 keep in mind, the way the industry rates water resistance doesn’t correspond to real water depth. For example, 100 meters doesn’t mean you can take the watch that deep
I built a MK 18 Homage Rife. With the old or.early set up. I know this was Navy. But they rubbed ahoulders with Marines.
aaa Nice one. with a non detachable carry handle? like the M733? Cheers!
Very great review. Thanks for sharing. I think the explorer looks very big? And the wearing on the wrist? OK?!
Very nice video 👍🏻👍🏻, a question: Why are Rolex using 904L steel instead of 316L steel ( that is much better )?
Doesnt anybody know 🤷🏻?
@@ginocolella6373 no one replied because the simple fact is 904 is ten times the quality of 316. Most serious Rolex fans and perspective buyers are fully aware of this as a serious benefit. Do some research and you will see.
Significant resistance to corrosion. After you swim with a watch that uses 316L steel, it's recommended to rinse with clean water, however, with 904L, you wouldn't need to (I still would tbh). But the use of 904L makes it more geared towards professional use. Rolex could have easy cut costs by using 316L but luxury is about having more than necessary. It's also a tad bit harder making it more difficult to work with.
13:05 "If no financial crisis appear..."
*gulp*
It's coming :D
Great video my friend 🍻
Great video brother and let’s connect to make the podcast happen ❤️
♥️♥️♥️
No man andrei, thank you for accompanying us in this weird hobby and for being an amazing guy all round, keep being awesome, btw what would be your perfect 4 watch collection, given a dres, everyday, beater and diver/field pieces??
Thank you Manny for your kind words :) And thanks for being close to me and the channel! as for a 4 watch collection, I see a dedicated episode for such a subject :) In my actual state and experience. I'd go with a dressy, JLC Reverso, Cartier Santos, for a diver, a Doxa sub, Seamaster 300 or Blancpain FF, for a field / Pilot, an IWC big pilot / hamilton field watch or a longines marine nationale and for a daily beater, something inexpensive but cool :D
Gynecologists: the original "Cave Divers"
I want a explorer 1 36mm. Can you link me up? Pleassseeeeee
Love the exp2
The hate is when you guys replace the beautiful oyster bracelet for those awful and cheap straps… that should be a crime
Haha!
Really don't like it myself, too much like the sub (which I really dislike) - just a shame they didn't bring back the "Steve McQueen" one with squared off indices, so much better looking & less "generic Rolex"
Got an Airman (24 hour purist) on it's way 😉
Cheers Mate 👍🏻👍🏻
Thanks for the contribution Steve! :)
McQueen I think will never be relaunched by Rolly. I see already the job of Tudor to dig for old famous models :)
The Purist is gold :) the 36 mm version?
@@BraveBeaters no, like yourself I prefer bigger watches, so opted for the 42 (in my case, because of age- shocking how much eyes deteriorate once over 50).Cheers 👍🏻
How is the Explorer II like a Sub? The Explorer II has a GMT hand and a 24 hour bezel. I dont see any similarity other than brand.
@@jimlittle5769 exactly what I'm saying - you've pointed out the only obvious differences. It's too generic Rolex, a basic design I just don't enjoy myself, but to each their own.
Saludos hasta Covid Landia, ok ok in English, what I mean is regards to Covid Landia LOL I really like this model, I had the chanse to wear it in the store and I fall in love, it's simply perfect, sport and very dressy watch.
👍.
so I hate the latest one with a passion it's just too large, I prefer the 16570!
Where did you get that strap???
7friends&watches.com
You shouldn’t have put it next to the Glycene which is so much more attractive design wise. Even if the Glycene were more expensive? it would be my choice.
Rolex worth it because you can sell it for more? You should buy it because you want to wear it not because it could be more vs,unable one day. Buy gold if that’s your game. A lot of people are gonna get caught out if investing in watches for profit. Like those pigs who buy important art and lock it away or beautiful cars and store them for the next auction. It’s all GREED.
You are right Eddie. It's a mix of desirability and design. The Airman is way more important and iconic in my view.
Hey buddy why did you sell your black bay gmt Pepsi
Time to redo this video now the black bay pro is out buddy 🙂
true :)
It's not over priced, worth every penny retail ✍🏿
❤
No matter how hard I tried, I couldn't like the look of this watch
:) true, not for everyone!
It would be perfect if it were 40mm.
agree!