It's been about two years since my 2000 V70 since saved my life in a front offset collision (like this but with much less overlap) on an interstate highway. Yes, the A-pillar was bent and my right leg got mangled and they needed a machine to get the door open, but hey, both cars were traveling at 70 mph. Up until a few years ago, not many cars would have done nearly as well.
In fact, this is a reconstruction of a real accident that happened in gothenburg, where an old and a new V70 collided. The idea was to investigate how well the results from a real crash could be repeated in the test laboratory, and the test gave about the same results as the real crash did. So, the speed of the cars is the same that they had when the accident happened.
Jesus died for us all, and rose from the grave to defeat death, so we can have eternal life. please give your lives to him, and repent, he loves you!🙏🙏❤️
I did thanks to you! Wow! I thought it was the angled design of the old 850/V70's A-pillar that did the damage, not only was it not that since the simulation shows the curved early V70 bending as well, but they didn't show the driver's side of the new V70! We only saw the side not affected by the crash! Perhaps it bent safely as well. That all being said, Volvos are clearly very good in crashes and we must thank them for it. I know I do.
Indeed the Scandinavians really know how to do safety, even Saab have a good reputation in that area. There is a dash cam clip on RUclips of I believe a white S80 being side swiped by a HGV here in the UK, it flips over with some force and proceeds to slide across the motorway at 50mph+ upside down. The passengers, including a young baby came away unscathed, a testement to just how good Volvos are in an accident.
***** Considering that safety design is actually from the 850, that is almost 20 years older than the newer V70 model they used. Take any other car (other than a Volvo obviously) the same age as the 1st generation V70 and do that exact crash. The engine will come off and the cabin will be demolished. Safety doesn't determine if the engine isn't there after a bad crash. Safety is the cabin...where you are. The cabin was not demolished. I suggest you research all aspects of this. So, indeed the 1st generation V70 did hold up well. There is a reason why Volvo has the name of being the safest car company. Good day.
Well, that's simple. The Volvo will obviously win. Before Ford bought Volvo, Volvo was the safest car company. In the years of Ford ownership, they got knocked down to second safest. Since Geely has purchased Volvo, Volvo has taken the title of being the safest car company again. Mercedes was never near Volvo's safety in reality crashes, though Mercedes, and all other Euro cars do better than Asian and American companies.
MrBuzzialdrin Easy once again! The safer car, the Subaru, will exhibit better results. It's not my fault Volvo and Subaru make safer cars than Mercedes!
I have owned a Volvo V70 for the last three years. It is an amazing car - big, roomy, powerful, safe and comfortable. One criticism - it gets through headlight bulbs very quickly. I can live with that..
That would seem like a problem with the bulbs and not the car. Have you had the voltage of your electrical system measured? Have you tried other brands of bulbs? Oh, and you have a halogen system right (as opposed to HID)?
Try replacing the bulbs in pairs. I had the same problem with the light bulbs from my Mitsubishi Colt. I had problems with one, replaced it, then after 1 month the other. I replaced it too and after 2 months, the other one. Until I thought to replace both at the same time. Almost two years passed and until now, I didn't have any problems.
Also try not to touch the bulbs with your bare hands. The oil from your fingers will cause the surface to dissipate unevenly, shortening its life by quite a bit.
+Azureecosse U forgot something, if u advancing to S70 crashtest from 1998 u must accept this, the structure is same as on 850, made in 1992. Actually S40 crashtest what was done in 1997 was pretty good, and still was build in 1995. Actually in this years wasnt better cars trough safety, maybe ford taurus which was pretty good on frontal, but actually in world exsist much more crashes next to frontal. The side protection on S70 based on 1992 structure is nearly comparable with today cheap cars. If u see small overlap crashes, no one brand actually doing tests on this when it comes except volvo, which has been doing this test for 30 years.
+Azureecosse if you are talking about old volvos, compared to new cars, that is true. However if you are talking generally that volvo safety isnt good, can't be more ignorant than that :/
The bang of impact is like a gunshot, but far more horrible as you can't see a bullet but seeing two cars slam into each other in a millisecond is sickening!
I love this stuff. I drive a V70MKII and I am commenting on what it portrays to me but you misinterpreted my comment so now who is the idiot? Take your pick! You will pick the wrong one no doubt, you are so predictable.
its a reconstruction, the test i based on a real life crash. this way volvo can get better views and develop a deeper understanding of how their cars behave in a real world collision situation.
Looks like the older V was sent in at a slight angle to exaggerate the forces that it would face. With the new V's full frontal area accepting the corner of the old one, it will fare better due to more area to dissapate crash energy. Helps to dramatize the advances in design that the newer models feature. The camera never captured the other side of the new V that absorbed higher forces.
I had a V70 1998, I crushed with 50km/h a Peugeout oldtimer. Half of the Peugeout was not there whereas only the plastic frame holder of the number plate of mine was minorly broken.
This was not a 64km/h 40% offset test. Volvo didn't want to show the old car in a bad light. Therefore they did a 62 km/h 80% offset test. Also the cars were angled so that the drivers side of the old V70 took a smaller force.
@@juhojalonen3046 The 1997-2000 Volvo V70-s70 was rated as a Good + Best Pick by the Institute. Structure rated "acceptable" but good injury index, HIC only 97 in 40mph 40 offset test August 30, 2022 1:40PM
The two cars aren't equal in weight (mass), so they need to be going at different speeds in order to have equal momentum. If the speeds were equal, the cars would carry on in the direction of the heavier car after the crash; making it hard to get that great under-car footage.
One can not determine which car is the best from this footage. The after footage is taken from different sides of the cars. The top footage could have said something if it was shown in slow motion but it isn't. Some data on acceleration would be helpful.
One of the most powerful and indestructible events one can expect ever taken place on earth…a volvo - volvo Crash! It’s like gods fist hits the globe and at least , one can tell, there will be a minute of total silence !
The new v70 drives 58 km/h while the old v70 drives 62 km/h (they say so in swedish). Why? Probably because the difference would be to small at the same speed...
Yes new cars are safer than old cars but if what someone can afford is a older car I would still rather a loved one be in a older Volvo than anything else
In fairness just about the only rover estate from that time would be a 75 Tourer and they were 4 star EuroNcap as well. I would agree that a 600 (similar launch date to the p80 cars) likely wouldn't do as well.* Managing only 2 stars compared to the S70 (only p80 car tested by Euro Ncap) with 4 stars, albeit scraped by only one point. *to Rover's credit they actually paid for their cars to be tested. Ever wonder why the Metro was tested but the 205 wasn't despite being of a similar vintage, and built in larger numbers?
I am very curious about why the two cars aren't made to travel at the same speed: the older one is doing 62 km/h and the newer one 58! Could that for instance make the newer one look more safe than the older one than it actually is??
The mass of the newer one is probably higher than the old one, so for the both cars to cancel out each other they need to travel at different speeds. If the newer car would have been traveling at 62, the old car would have been knocked rolling backwards. Simple physics, mass+velocity=force.
this was made to recreate a real live scenario, somewhere in Sweden this happen whit real people and Volvo bought the cars to study them and then recreated it whit real cars to compare the real live against lab test... so the speed difference is probably to recreate the real live scenario...
+ovlov607 I never said that 850 and first generation of v70 wasn't using the same chassis (and I don't say that it is the same neither), I just said that v70 classic and 850 are two different cars (even though they are similar to each other)
That Was BS The volvo in the fift gear Crash dint have an engine in it , Btw Volvo 850 Are much stronger then a 740 / 940 I know couse i crashed em ( destruction derby )
SIMcityplayer2002 No dummy data from that tv show crash test. With the way that renault lifted in the air, and the way the dummies neck tweaked, neither car was well off. Its not only about intrusion.
That simulation probably cost 10s of thousands of dollars, and had to be calculated on a super computer and took hours if not days to render, however you can get beamNG.drive and it runs on good computers today with little issue
What a biased material. Anyone noticed that the cars are not overlapping completely, and they're only showing the more demolished side of the old one, and on the new one, the side which was less destroyed ? On the bottom view you can see how far the other front wheel on the new V70 was pushed back. And why crashing them on such a weird angle ?
EU PODI OBSERVA QUE ATRAVEIS DE UM VIDIO FOI FEITO VARIOS TESTE E VCS TRANSPARENTE MOSTRANDO TUDO ISSO E MUITO BOM...TEM UM MATERIAL CHAMADO CELAFONE ,,QUE PARA OS CARROS COMO UM PROTEÇAO SEIA TUDO DE BOM
Фигня полнейшая!!! V70классик пострадал больше только иза того что ему врезали больше на сторону колеса с водительской стороны,это видно наглядно из подниза.
So why did they do it, there were no crash test dummies in the cars, and no conclusion other than to make your own up by guessing. Waste of time and money.
And both drivers got out, swept up the mess, closed the hoods and drove home!
Right after they snapped all the grill pieces back in...lol
And reassembling the blinkers
@@BinneReitsma and fixing the rest
It's been about two years since my 2000 V70 since saved my life in a front offset collision (like this but with much less overlap) on an interstate highway. Yes, the A-pillar was bent and my right leg got mangled and they needed a machine to get the door open, but hey, both cars were traveling at 70 mph. Up until a few years ago, not many cars would have done nearly as well.
For a car based on a '92 design, the V70C really held up to the V70NN!
its not the NN, its the N. The safest of all three.
The p80 series are my favorite
how do you spell safety
V-O-L-V-O
Wrong, S-A-F-E-T-Y keep trying
or S-A-A-B (I like both)
What volvo😂🤣. Real shit
The highest safety scores and the first car in the world to get 5 stars is the Renault Laguna and then introduced 5 stars for all its cars.
was expecting a black hole... disappointed
jules leenders
I would have taped my Nokia 3310 to the front of one on "accident"
It occurred, we are inside one now
H5SKB4RU oh
In fact, this is a reconstruction of a real accident that happened in gothenburg, where an old and a new V70 collided. The idea was to investigate how well the results from a real crash could be repeated in the test laboratory, and the test gave about the same results as the real crash did. So, the speed of the cars is the same that they had when the accident happened.
Partly because of this video I ended up buying a V70 P2, decided it was pretty much the safest thing I could afford to carry my young son in.
Thats a sick daily man!
Same here
Jesus died for us all, and rose from the grave to defeat death, so we can have eternal life. please give your lives to him, and repent, he loves you!🙏🙏❤️
Did anyone notice that the graphical simulation was mk2 V70 v new V70 but actual crash test was new V70 v mk1 V70
Yes.
I did thanks to you! Wow!
I thought it was the angled design of the old 850/V70's A-pillar that did the damage, not only was it not that since the simulation shows the curved early V70 bending as well, but they didn't show the driver's side of the new V70! We only saw the side not affected by the crash! Perhaps it bent safely as well.
That all being said, Volvos are clearly very good in crashes and we must thank them for it. I know I do.
Indeed the Scandinavians really know how to do safety, even Saab have a good reputation in that area. There is a dash cam clip on RUclips of I believe a white S80 being side swiped by a HGV here in the UK, it flips over with some force and proceeds to slide across the motorway at 50mph+ upside down. The passengers, including a young baby came away unscathed, a testement to just how good Volvos are in an accident.
Btw man, it's called V70n and not mk2 :)
Indeed.
I have to say I wouldn't mind being in either car. There's an obvious better here, but the worst one in this pairing isn't that bad.
well its like asking the question "who would win in a fight? you or a stronger you?" Volvo 4 lyf
volvo: we keep you safe by using the other car as your crimple zone.
Grimshaw Grummage. Only a huge difference in relative mass between two cars could do that.
@@reallyhappenings5597 well, there is another video with volvo s60 vs chrysler Voyager
This is exactly what I told in czech about one of older Škoda Octavia where they was talking about crimple zone xD
***** Considering that safety design is actually from the 850, that is almost 20 years older than the newer V70 model they used. Take any other car (other than a Volvo obviously) the same age as the 1st generation V70 and do that exact crash. The engine will come off and the cabin will be demolished. Safety doesn't determine if the engine isn't there after a bad crash. Safety is the cabin...where you are. The cabin was not demolished. I suggest you research all aspects of this. So, indeed the 1st generation V70 did hold up well. There is a reason why Volvo has the name of being the safest car company. Good day.
ok i will take a Mercedes 1995 S 500 and smash it into a Volvo car. Who wins?
Well, that's simple. The Volvo will obviously win. Before Ford bought Volvo, Volvo was the safest car company. In the years of Ford ownership, they got knocked down to second safest. Since Geely has purchased Volvo, Volvo has taken the title of being the safest car company again. Mercedes was never near Volvo's safety in reality crashes, though Mercedes, and all other Euro cars do better than Asian and American companies.
MrBuzzialdrin
With the exception of Subaru. They're safe. When Volvo was second safest, Subie was the safest.
ok ok then i will crash the Mercedes S class into a SUBIE and see who wins? lol bye end of discussion.
MrBuzzialdrin Easy once again! The safer car, the Subaru, will exhibit better results. It's not my fault Volvo and Subaru make safer cars than Mercedes!
I have owned a Volvo V70 for the last three years. It is an amazing car - big, roomy, powerful, safe and comfortable. One criticism - it gets through headlight bulbs very quickly. I can live with that..
That would seem like a problem with the bulbs and not the car. Have you had the voltage of your electrical system measured? Have you tried other brands of bulbs? Oh, and you have a halogen system right (as opposed to HID)?
Try replacing the bulbs in pairs. I had the same problem with the light bulbs from my Mitsubishi Colt. I had problems with one, replaced it, then after 1 month the other. I replaced it too and after 2 months, the other one. Until I thought to replace both at the same time. Almost two years passed and until now, I didn't have any problems.
Thank you Mr. Lazar. I'll certainly give that a try.
Also try not to touch the bulbs with your bare hands. The oil from your fingers will cause the surface to dissipate unevenly, shortening its life by quite a bit.
Get them switched off with the Vida tool.
I was expecting a nuclear explosion.
driving my 12th Volvo a 2000 V70 , the best car , solid and safe !!! thank you Volvo !!
Yay go the V 70s. I have a 98 model and am impressed at how they withstand the impact nearly if not as good as the modern v 70
all you have proved here is what happens when you throw 2 bricks at each other
karl fodden yes but a new brick and a 20 year old brick
@@joshfisher6383 don't you hate on these 20 year old bricks, a 20 year old Ford would have exploded. Lol
Still better than Japanese car...
+Azureecosse U forgot something, if u advancing to S70 crashtest from 1998 u must accept this, the structure is same as on 850, made in 1992. Actually S40 crashtest what was done in 1997 was pretty good, and still was build in 1995. Actually in this years wasnt better cars trough safety, maybe ford taurus which was pretty good on frontal, but actually in world exsist much more crashes next to frontal. The side protection on S70 based on 1992 structure is nearly comparable with today cheap cars. If u see small overlap crashes, no one brand actually doing tests on this when it comes except volvo, which has been doing this test for 30 years.
+Azureecosse if you are talking about old volvos, compared to new cars, that is true. However if you are talking generally that volvo safety isnt good, can't be more ignorant than that :/
the Computer Animation shows two second generation V70s crashing, but in the actual test its a first gen to a third.
2nd and 3rd gen in the computer simulation.
When you consider than V70 Classic is a rebadged Volvo 850 from 1991, it seems to have done well.
The bang of impact is like a gunshot, but far more horrible as you can't see a bullet but seeing two cars slam into each other in a millisecond is sickening!
then why did you watch a crash test video? idiot
I love this stuff. I drive a V70MKII and I am commenting on what it portrays to me but you misinterpreted my comment so now who is the idiot? Take your pick! You will pick the wrong one no doubt, you are so predictable.
Females and cars. Can there be a more worse combination?
Female, cars and guns would be even worse..
You obviously dont know much about women.
it is very interesting how good is more than 40 year old construction. Development of P80 platform started in 1978 as "project Galaxy"
its a reconstruction, the test i based on a real life crash. this way volvo can get better views and develop a deeper understanding of how their cars behave in a real world collision situation.
Looks like the older V was sent in at a slight angle to exaggerate the forces that it would face. With the new V's full frontal area accepting the corner of the old one, it will fare better due to more area to dissapate crash energy.
Helps to dramatize the advances in design that the newer models feature. The camera never captured the other side of the new V that absorbed higher forces.
It's reconstruction of real situation with all parameters same as in that collision (angle, speed, models...).
Some structural parts are clearly marked so it's easy to see how they move back in case of a frontal crash.
The Swedes sure know how to build 'em.
I had a V70 1998, I crushed with 50km/h a Peugeout oldtimer. Half of the Peugeout was not there whereas only the plastic frame holder of the number plate of mine was minorly broken.
Still loving my V70 and 940 :)
Ok for a generation different the old volvo handle that very well! Im honestly shock at how well it handle the more stronger newer volvo structure.
Im not an expert but thats a hard nock and i can see many other cars blistering apart . One looks prety good considering the a hell of a shot.
These guys must have the most fun job in the world. Love my 1998 V70XC.
Both look equally safe in this test. It confuses me because the 1997-2000 s70/v70 got 3 stars in the frontal offset 64 km/h crash test.
This was not a 64km/h 40% offset test. Volvo didn't want to show the old car in a bad light. Therefore they did a 62 km/h 80% offset test. Also the cars were angled so that the drivers side of the old V70 took a smaller force.
@@juhojalonen3046 The 1997-2000 Volvo V70-s70 was rated as a Good + Best Pick by the Institute. Structure rated "acceptable" but good injury index, HIC only 97 in 40mph 40 offset test
August 30, 2022 1:40PM
interesting the older cars floor crumpling, you can see the huge progress. I have two S60's
Will the "Volvo saved my life" stories never end? I hope not!
Volvo is concerned with making the safest cars
Others are concerned with getting the 5 stars
Well? What are the results?
Which is which? Seriously I can't tell a difference.
The two cars aren't equal in weight (mass), so they need to be going at different speeds in order to have equal momentum. If the speeds were equal, the cars would carry on in the direction of the heavier car after the crash; making it hard to get that great under-car footage.
One can not determine which car is the best from this footage. The after footage is taken from different sides of the cars. The top footage could have said something if it was shown in slow motion but it isn't. Some data on acceleration would be helpful.
70mph is 113kph; 226 combined kph, nearly twice the speed of this collision and close to four times the total kinetic energy.
One of the most powerful and indestructible events one can expect ever taken place on earth…a volvo - volvo Crash! It’s like gods fist hits the globe and at least , one can tell, there will be a minute of total silence !
I'd take a 1999 model V70 personally, but this proves you'd likely be alive driving either..
Old V70 did very well for its time
except that the crumple zone sucks. You can see that the cabin of the old V70 starts to crumple. Not where you would want to be in a wreck.
viperz888 There are a V70 that is called classic just because it's a re-made old V70. They have done the same thing with the V70n too
When a brick hits a brick
hey i just meet you, and this is crazy
But it's all for a good cause. These crash tests enable Volvo to build safe cars and save lives.
why is it color coded at the bottom of the car
Irresistible force meets immovable object.
The new v70 drives 58 km/h while the old v70 drives 62 km/h (they say so in swedish). Why? Probably because the difference would be to small at the same speed...
Do we know the speed of the impact?
V70 - best family car in the world!
the one traveling at 58 km/h and coming in from the left, is the newer generation V70
Yes new cars are safer than old cars but if what someone can afford is a older car I would still rather a loved one be in a older Volvo than anything else
Because this is in fact a simulation for the large hadron collider.
How much are car manufacturers using computer simulations to supplement their crash testing?
speed?
That was brilliant. Try that against a twenty year old rover estate....
In fairness just about the only rover estate from that time would be a 75 Tourer and they were 4 star EuroNcap as well. I would agree that a 600 (similar launch date to the p80 cars) likely wouldn't do as well.* Managing only 2 stars compared to the S70 (only p80 car tested by Euro Ncap) with 4 stars, albeit scraped by only one point.
*to Rover's credit they actually paid for their cars to be tested. Ever wonder why the Metro was tested but the 205 wasn't despite being of a similar vintage, and built in larger numbers?
I am very curious about why the two cars aren't made to travel at the same speed: the older one is doing 62 km/h and the newer one 58! Could that for instance make the newer one look more safe than the older one than it actually is??
The mass of the newer one is probably higher than the old one, so for the both cars to cancel out each other they need to travel at different speeds. If the newer car would have been traveling at 62, the old car would have been knocked rolling backwards. Simple physics, mass+velocity=force.
at the end of the day both speeds add up and thats how much force is in the impact.... i think?
My v70 2004 weighs 3659lb and the new one 3505lb.
And?
this was made to recreate a real live scenario, somewhere in Sweden this happen whit real people and Volvo bought the cars to study them and then recreated it whit real cars to compare the real live against lab test...
so the speed difference is probably to recreate the real live scenario...
How different is the 850 from the mk1 V70?
Different grille, different powertrain, and many more things, the V70 Classic compared to the 850 had around 1400 improvements apparently.
The V70 Classic is an 850 with different body panels and interior other than that they are the same car.
Both did good
what speed is this supposed to be at?
@ 0:36 he says 62 km/h and 58 km/h
oh ok thanks
But do they still work? o_O
What happened?
Modelisation was pessimist ! Oldie 70 is not dangerous (amount of windschield no bend like in simulation)
the classic dosent look to bad
They crashed the new V70 into 850, which isn't that old at all (mid/early-90s).
SIMcityplayer2002 v70 classic isn't 850 first v70 classic came rear 2000 i think then the second generation of V70 came.
V70 "classic" was produced from 1998 to 2000.
The 98 to 00 V70 chassis is the same as the 93 to 97 850. Its the P80 Platform.
+ovlov607 I never said that 850 and first generation of v70 wasn't using the same chassis (and I don't say that it is the same neither), I just said that v70 classic and 850 are two different cars (even though they are similar to each other)
The first gen. V70 is so close to being an 850 but yet still it isn't. It's really the replacement for the 850 with a few changes here and there
That Was BS The volvo in the fift gear Crash dint have an engine in it , Btw Volvo 850 Are much stronger then a 740 / 940
I know couse i crashed em ( destruction derby )
u really think any engine will be in order after a crash like that?
they have an awesome lab
Fun Fact: they didn't show it in this video, but every time two Volvo's collide, a unicorn is born. that's why there's so few unicorns...
love my s40 2004 but im nearly 6,2 and my head scratching the celling
that'll buff out, no worries
it's fake. a Volvo don't break.
AbsturzPunk 😂
Volvo safety first
I love too my V70 bifuel. perfect safe car.
Show the other side of the classic....
That is the same side as the new
Not the impact side of the old and the other side of the new one
If they used a 960 I would be interested, since it crumpled up when it hit a Renault Modus at Fifth Gear.
That's because there wasn't a engine in that 940.
EDIT: Consider this as ungrounded, according to derbigpr500 then.
WittgensteinSergeant™
Another one with the bullshit "no engine" theory. There was no engine because it was pushed into the cabin.
derbigpr500 holly shit man, did you hear at yourself? if there was a engine inside the cabin of that volvo then it would have made a hole
SIMcityplayer2002 No dummy data from that tv show crash test. With the way that renault lifted in the air, and the way the dummies neck tweaked, neither car was well off. Its not only about intrusion.
+SIMcityplayer2002 fifth gear lie
what kind of computer simulation is that?
like dose it have a name?
That simulation probably cost 10s of thousands of dollars, and had to be calculated on a super computer and took hours if not days to render, however you can get beamNG.drive and it runs on good computers today with little issue
HiDDEN_KiLLZ bro I own that game. Got it like 3-4 Years ago
Allan Gordon Well thats like your best bet
HiDDEN_KiLLZ See i dont go there speed. ill go like 100+ MPH in a offset lol i love that game
How did the world not split in two?
is this even allowed?
What a biased material. Anyone noticed that the cars are not overlapping completely, and they're only showing the more demolished side of the old one, and on the new one, the side which was less destroyed ? On the bottom view you can see how far the other front wheel on the new V70 was pushed back. And why crashing them on such a weird angle ?
The older didn't seem too bad
Wonder how the new V70 would fare against a 240...
240 would be just a pile of crushed metal. A great car and very safe back then, but a new compact car would destroy it.
Im like 1/4 sweedish and i always wonted to go therecand there cars r realy realy safe in 2014
Now watch all the smartphone developers come up with apps to do this.
Pas de doute c'est le meilleur constructeur au niveau de la sécurité passive
Really!! A volvo aganst a volvo, there both as safe as each other!!
VOLVO ЭТО SUPER!!!
Volvo is a gentleman's-wagon =)
How about an old merc?
V70 Classicでも十分な安全じゃなか・・・さすがボルボ！
Saab is safer
I'd say it's the saddest job in the world. I couldn't bare to crash a car on purpose. it's just sad :/
EU PODI OBSERVA QUE ATRAVEIS DE UM VIDIO FOI FEITO VARIOS TESTE E VCS TRANSPARENTE MOSTRANDO TUDO ISSO E MUITO BOM...TEM UM MATERIAL CHAMADO CELAFONE ,,QUE PARA OS CARROS COMO UM PROTEÇAO SEIA TUDO DE BOM
There are alot of volvo in sweden.
ooooh that makes more sense i thought they might be testing a new swag fad for cars
I love volvo lol
Фигня полнейшая!!! V70классик пострадал больше только иза того что ему врезали больше на сторону колеса с водительской стороны,это видно наглядно из подниза.
Lucky me i own the later one...:)
So why did they do it, there were no crash test dummies in the cars, and no conclusion other than to make your own up by guessing. Waste of time and money.