Good for you! I’m 16 and I promised myself I will never smoke. Almost all my colleagues are mocking me for not smoking, but I think I know who has the advantage in the long run! :)
Yes, it’s shocking that they would ignore small lumps to save money on follow up testing under the guise of less complications. I notice the study didn’t say how many small lumps became cancerous because they were ignored.
It isn't that simple though. Every follow-up procedure has risks. You could get an infection from a procedure to remove the false tumor. False positives are a big issue and it can be difficult to determine if they override the added benefit of catching some cases.
It can be helpful to compare a nodule to a birthmark or mole. If they are small and aren't growing, they're fine. If they suddenly start growing you should go see a doctor. Same with lung nodules. Ignoring the small ones doesn't just save money, it saves lives due to avoiding complications for procedures that are unlikely to be necessary. And screening isn't a one-time thing: you need to repeat it. If a nodule that was ignored in one round turns out to be growing in a second round it is still likely to be early stage (or even still benign).
We've come a long way when it comes to treatment of cancer, but it's surprising we haven't had a near cure for it. Problem is, too many different cancers, it being different with each person sometimes, etc.
@@Shoes_Gone I've heard that rhetoric before. Doesn't mean it's necessarily true. It makes more sense to me to have people healthy and working to me. Especially from a government standpoint.
My team has been killing cancer for 9 years now. Rick Simpson has been telling everyone for 15 years now. Cannabis oil has cured 93% of our patients including every form of cancer I have ever heard of. We treat people for free in Michigan.
WHAT TYPE OF LUNG CANCER WAS IT , AND WAS IT , NON SMALL CELL / LARGE . How long did it take?! to go to one place to another? .. and how did he die because I have stage for non-small cell Adenocarcinoma carcinoma .. and I have activity in the left hilar lymph node that we don’t know if it’s an infection or if it’s cancer if you could write me back I’d really appreciate it if I’m not being rude and I’m sorry for your loss. I’m sorry for everything deeply. Sorry.
i really want to remove my lung nudoles 3 mm because it causing me problem i am losing weight and my nail is clubbing , but doctor say we need to evaluate every 6 months but i can wait 😢😭 always have fatigue
Look at your relatives. If respiratory diseases or lung cancer are a problem I'd definitely stop but if there aren't any I think you should be fine with once a month...
I worked in radiation oncology and any way one looks at the problem cancer is just ugly. It would be interesting if our government and corporations actually tried to be environmentally conscientious. I was an research intern at the Univ of Utah Medical School - Radiobiology Lab. We experimented on dogs to find where plutonium ended up in their physiology. It was interesting to look at the maps of the fall-out plumes over the USA from 216 above ground nuclear bomb tests that repeatedly dosed our country w/ radiation. You know where most cancers come from? From our contaminated air, food, and water, along w/ stupid things people do that results from corporate greed. Corporations knew what smoking did to people; just one example.
Sugars and carbs, American diet = insuline resistance leading to inflammations and cancers. We dig our graves with our own teeth because we are total ignorants who have been lied since birth.
Excessive CT scans will also increase your chance of having some kind of cancer due to the unpredictable effects of ionizing radiation. 1 Ct scan of the chest is equivalent to 100 Chest X-rays.
Modern scanners can operate at fairly low doses. Current research is focusing on reducing the dose (and thus the harm), while maintaining the diagnostic value. A CT has a much better detection rate, so the 10 fold increase in radiation should be worth it. Keep in mind that the radiation dose modern scanners deliver for such scans is now on the same order of magnitude as a year's worth of background radiation.
Although smoking does play a huge part, lung cancer can still occur to non smokers. Another thing though that can cause lung cancer is second hand smoking. So basically, just don’t smoke and stay away from people who smoke. You also don’t want to breathe in any harmful chemicals. That can also cause lung cancer due to damaged genes. Damaged genes have a chance to become cancerous therefor spreading.
x-rays dont detect tumors. my mother did always x-rays. even when she was in the last 4 weeks of her life they didnt find anything. i dont know how much xrays they did but for sure 6 .. after an ct they found two 5 cm tumors the xray showed nothing. she died within 3 weeks with endstadium of lungcancer. They absolutely find nothing before.
CT and X-rays are not the best way in detection of lung cancer because the radiation that can ironically cause cancer. MRI would be a better diagnostic procedure.
You need to balance the risk of causing cancer with radiation with the risk of missing nodules that may grow into deadly tumors. MRI may not use radiation, but the detection rate is a lot poorer. The higher cost will also have an impact on how many people can be screened. You miss all the tumors you can't scan.
Mostly people die of cancer than natural deaths. It is ironical that there are a few people died of natural cause. When we get old, our body's immune system can not protect us from such deadly cancer tumours. It is "natural" for immune system cant handle it.
@@AppliedInsight yea cause our bodies produce damaged genes and mutations in the genes can turn them into cancerous. Our immune systems always have to be on patrol just so it doesn’t spread. Right now as I’m talking my body is probably fighting off cancerous cells. That includes everyone in the world.
It´s said to be deadliest because it´s detected too late, when the simptoms already ocurre and it has extended locally or regionally. These happens because there are no specific simptoms of pancreatic cancer, instead there are vague and also in this kind of cancer and there´s no screening methods available for general population without many risk factors.
Also it´s difficult to have surgery because of invasion of anatomical structures which are vital (such as blood vessels) so there are many contraindications to have surgery done, so the tratement needs to be done with chemo, wich might be curative or paliative, that kind of explain the low 5 year rate of survival compared with other more "surgical" cancers.
@@unusuario5173 and people like u do everything possible to check n all is well n fine...n then suddenly a person dies...is that ur groundbreaking discoveries ? Hope not !
@@unusuario5173 no reason to be hard on some one just because of the words they choose. You can't judge a person's capability all from the words they type.
I stopped smoking a long time ago, pretty stupid to have even started tbh.
Good for you
Good for you!
I’m 16 and I promised myself I will never smoke.
Almost all my colleagues are mocking me for not smoking, but I think I know who has the advantage in the long run! :)
HAL 9000 good for you！
Alex Laslău wow you are only 16 and you have colleagues
Alex Laslău let them mock you
I would much rather have a false positive than have a small tumor ignored.
You would then sue the hospital
Yes, it’s shocking that they would ignore small lumps to save money on follow up testing under the guise of less complications. I notice the study didn’t say how many small lumps became cancerous because they were ignored.
It isn't that simple though. Every follow-up procedure has risks. You could get an infection from a procedure to remove the false tumor. False positives are a big issue and it can be difficult to determine if they override the added benefit of catching some cases.
It can be helpful to compare a nodule to a birthmark or mole. If they are small and aren't growing, they're fine. If they suddenly start growing you should go see a doctor. Same with lung nodules. Ignoring the small ones doesn't just save money, it saves lives due to avoiding complications for procedures that are unlikely to be necessary.
And screening isn't a one-time thing: you need to repeat it. If a nodule that was ignored in one round turns out to be growing in a second round it is still likely to be early stage (or even still benign).
Seriously, how odd it is to say “you have to catch it early” than follow up with “we will ignore small abnormalities”
Just lost my Dad to lung cancer metastasized to brain. Love you Dad
I’m so sorry for your loss. May you keep the memories close forever ❤
I’m going through the same thing with my dad. It’s very sad to see
My dad also had lung cancer amd it is metastatic 😢 @@conradsylvestre9485
😭My friend's mother just got lung cancer. Luckly she is a nurse and noticed it quite quick. Hope she will be okay
How is free bro?
We've come a long way when it comes to treatment of cancer, but it's surprising we haven't had a near cure for it. Problem is, too many different cancers, it being different with each person sometimes, etc.
Way too much money in cancer treatments. There will unfortunately never be a cure due to that.
@@Shoes_Gone There's even more money in people being healthy and cancer free.
@@Junokaii you must not understand how the real world works.
@@Shoes_Gone I've heard that rhetoric before. Doesn't mean it's necessarily true. It makes more sense to me to have people healthy and working to me. Especially from a government standpoint.
My team has been killing cancer for 9 years now. Rick Simpson has been telling everyone for 15 years now. Cannabis oil has cured 93% of our patients including every form of cancer I have ever heard of. We treat people for free in Michigan.
igrotum offers a balanced healing approach. Effective and gentle on the body.
My brother recently passed from Lung Cancer ( Monster) and spread. I never knew how painful it was.
WHAT TYPE OF LUNG CANCER WAS IT , AND WAS IT , NON SMALL CELL / LARGE . How long did it take?! to go to one place to another? .. and how did he die because I have stage for non-small cell Adenocarcinoma carcinoma .. and I have activity in the left hilar lymph node that we don’t know if it’s an infection or if it’s cancer if you could write me back I’d really appreciate it if I’m not being rude and I’m sorry for your loss. I’m sorry for everything deeply. Sorry.
I’m so sorry for your loss. Hopefully you can keep the memories close ❤
@@godschild3640I hope you have help from professionals!! All the best 🍀
Lost both of my grandmas cuz of cancer I hate cancer
Only in Ohio☠️☠️☠️
diagnosed with nsmlc, stage 4, & not in high riak group. Under 50 and a nonsmoker
i really want to remove my lung nudoles 3 mm because it causing me problem i am losing weight and my nail is clubbing , but doctor say we need to evaluate every 6 months but i can wait 😢😭 always have fatigue
I have been doing "Sisha" for the past 4 years at least once or twice a month, shit i think i should stop now, this video somehow scared me.
Look at your relatives. If respiratory diseases or lung cancer are a problem I'd definitely stop but if there aren't any I think you should be fine with once a month...
30 days no puffs... Like
aLaa aLi 3 days for me, the dreams are so scary lol
Im glad my grandmother had less dangerous cancer then that
Had a teacher of mine had to get a lung removed; cut his smoking in half!
But in this case treating it as a false negative is much worse, isn't it?
There's a non-invasive lung cancer bronchoscopy "biopsy" ... just can't find the paper RN
I worked in radiation oncology and any way one looks at the problem cancer is just ugly. It would be interesting if our government and corporations actually tried to be environmentally conscientious. I was an research intern at the Univ of Utah Medical School - Radiobiology Lab. We experimented on dogs to find where plutonium ended up in their physiology. It was interesting to look at the maps of the fall-out plumes over the USA from 216 above ground nuclear bomb tests that repeatedly dosed our country w/ radiation. You know where most cancers come from? From our contaminated air, food, and water, along w/ stupid things people do that results from corporate greed. Corporations knew what smoking did to people; just one example.
Sugars and carbs, American diet = insuline resistance leading to inflammations and cancers. We dig our graves with our own teeth because we are total ignorants who have been lied since birth.
Excessive CT scans will also increase your chance of having some kind of cancer due to the unpredictable effects of ionizing radiation. 1 Ct scan of the chest is equivalent to 100 Chest X-rays.
Modern scanners can operate at fairly low doses. Current research is focusing on reducing the dose (and thus the harm), while maintaining the diagnostic value. A CT has a much better detection rate, so the 10 fold increase in radiation should be worth it.
Keep in mind that the radiation dose modern scanners deliver for such scans is now on the same order of magnitude as a year's worth of background radiation.
I thought pancreatic and glioblastoma were more deadly
Those cancers are more letal, but lung cancer kills more people in numbers!
oh wow, I have for out of these five symptoms
Can we also get cancer from diffrent kind of RUclips content ? I’m really curious
Im 42 and i want pancreatic! Pray for me to get pancreatic cancer.
I have stage 4 pancreatic cancer and liver mestasses. Trust me you don't want it
@@kathyodaniel4044 1 gram of cannabis oil a day for 60 days will give you your life back. Please believe me.
Basically, don’t ever smoke
It happens to non smokers as well unfourtnely
Although smoking does play a huge part, lung cancer can still occur to non smokers. Another thing though that can cause lung cancer is second hand smoking. So basically, just don’t smoke and stay away from people who smoke. You also don’t want to breathe in any harmful chemicals. That can also cause lung cancer due to damaged genes. Damaged genes have a chance to become cancerous therefor spreading.
Im a cancer i thought to calm down a cancer
x-rays dont detect tumors. my mother did always x-rays. even when she was in the last 4 weeks of her life they didnt find anything. i dont know how much xrays they did but for sure 6 .. after an ct they found two 5 cm tumors the xray showed nothing. she died within 3 weeks with endstadium of lungcancer. They absolutely find nothing before.
My haemoglobin : Normal range is (12-16 g/d) and result is 12.0 g/d
is it’s healthy 😢
I’m scared someone tell me ??
What's "chima" ?
Tumor, British accent
Ali Thank you.
The screening itself lowers the immune system.
Wouldn't it be a success to spend time and resources only to find a false positive? I don't get it. Yeah, find the tiniest clumps and diagnose them
CT and X-rays are not the best way in detection of lung cancer because the radiation that can ironically cause cancer. MRI would be a better diagnostic procedure.
You need to balance the risk of causing cancer with radiation with the risk of missing nodules that may grow into deadly tumors. MRI may not use radiation, but the detection rate is a lot poorer. The higher cost will also have an impact on how many people can be screened. You miss all the tumors you can't scan.
Yet it’s medicine is illegal . 🌱🍁 Mari Jane
What
There are no symptoms till later? Yeah ok keep telling us lies
It's sad people have to die of cancer, and only the richest can handle such tragedies.
Mostly people die of cancer than natural deaths. It is ironical that there are a few people died of natural cause. When we get old, our body's immune system can not protect us from such deadly cancer tumours. It is "natural" for immune system cant handle it.
@@AppliedInsight yea cause our bodies produce damaged genes and mutations in the genes can turn them into cancerous. Our immune systems always have to be on patrol just so it doesn’t spread. Right now as I’m talking my body is probably fighting off cancerous cells. That includes everyone in the world.
I think my mom has lung cancer 😥😥😥😥
Is she ok now?
I thought pancreatic cancer was the most deadliest
I think it is, but it's not nearly as common. I think that by deadliest they mean the one that kills the most people
It´s said to be deadliest because it´s detected too late, when the simptoms already ocurre and it has extended locally or regionally. These happens because there are no specific simptoms of pancreatic cancer, instead there are vague and also in this kind of cancer and there´s no screening methods available for general population without many risk factors.
Also it´s difficult to have surgery because of invasion of anatomical structures which are vital (such as blood vessels) so there are many contraindications to have surgery done, so the tratement needs to be done with chemo, wich might be curative or paliative, that kind of explain the low 5 year rate of survival compared with other more "surgical" cancers.
if only smoking was illegal worldwide
Drugs are illegal, but that has t stopped usage. Making smoking illegal will just create another type of crime cartels.
Missandei, is that you?
I thought i can detect it on my own😛
If you can detect it on your own you must be a cigarette addict. People who smoke get this more.
Awful soundtrack sounds like a hip hop concert.
Sometimes fate doesn't allow medical science to diagnose deadly diseases until at its last stage
My grandpa was checked 3 months before he died to lungcancer and they didnt see a single sign of cancer before he went downhill in 1 week
'Fate'...
It's people like you who never make groundbreaking discoveries in any field.
Damon - sadly they missed the signs. Cancer takes a years to form.
@@unusuario5173 and people like u do everything possible to check n all is well n fine...n then suddenly a person dies...is that ur groundbreaking discoveries ? Hope not !
@@unusuario5173 no reason to be hard on some one just because of the words they choose.
You can't judge a person's capability all from the words they type.
Nice
Hy guys
1. Tiktok
关注公众号 知问导图，每周更新一个本频道的经济学人双语视频，并做内容详解，加入我们，用更轻松的方式学习英语！
My doctors top choice for cancer treatment is igrotum, and Im seeing incredible results.
igrotum makes me grateful beyond words. Its a ray of hope for cancer patients like me.