Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

45 years to Zia’s coup & how his is the most lasting impact on India, Pakistan & the world

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 июл 2022
  • Marking the 45th anniversary of the Military Coup staged by Zia ul-Haq on 5th July 1977, Shekhar Gupta in episode1033 of #CutTheClutter looks at the legacy of the former President of Pakistan and what made him the most important personality in the subcontinent.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Brought to you by @KiaInd
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Read Shekhar Gupta's India Today column here: www.indiatoday...
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Join our channel to get access to perks. Click 'JOIN' or follow the link below:
    / @theprintindia
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Connect with ThePrint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint: theprint.in/su...
    » Subscribe to our RUclips Channel: bit.ly/3nCMpht
    » Like us on Facebook: / theprintindia
    » Tweet us on Twitter: / theprintindia
    » Follow us on Instagram: / theprintindia
    » Find us on LinkedIn : / theprint
    » Subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram: t.me/ThePrintI...
    » Find us on Spotify: spoti.fi/2NMVlnB
    » Find us on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/3pEOta8

Комментарии • 787

  • @ThePrintIndia
    @ThePrintIndia  2 года назад +23

    Early access, exclusive content, special privileges - Discover the great benefits of being a Member of ThePrint’s RUclips channel. Take a Paid Membership today. It costs just Rs 159/month.
    ruclips.net/channel/UCuyRsHZILrU7ZDIAbGASHdAjoin

    • @shreekantkumarsahu9570
      @shreekantkumarsahu9570 2 года назад

      DON'T WASTE YOUR MONEY ON HINDUPHOBIC LEFTWING TERRORISTS NEWSPAPER

    • @commodusmeridius4718
      @commodusmeridius4718 2 года назад +1

      Both zias
      One in Bd another in Pak

    • @VijayKumar-gr3ld
      @VijayKumar-gr3ld 2 года назад

      St ggh to DD DDD ddddxd XSt dXD St dd5 ft 6tdXxDaddy dD funnyd 6û66xyXxxdxdXxddx6y5 DD Xx funny SST

    • @sunitarana8921
      @sunitarana8921 2 года назад

      Pppppppppppp pppp my pppppppppppppppp pp 0 ppp0pp00000p pp pp pp plum PPP pppp pp PPP po po pppp ppp0p0ppppppppppppp pp 0p PPP pppppppp

    • @sharique38
      @sharique38 2 года назад

      you are godi media

  • @sankalp6872
    @sankalp6872 2 года назад +252

    Why the obsession with Zia? Interesting, how people like to find one person/event to lay the blame upon. Pakistan was rotten long before Zia. Pakistan was never a country. It was a "jaagir" for Muslim elites who feared economic/political alienation in a "secular" India. Jinnah was merely a broker. Once religious "high" was over, these elites pinned the obsession of people on Kashmir and India. It was none other than the "secular" Bhutto who declared the "thousand years war" against India which was later shaped into "Bleed India by thousand cuts" by Zia. So when people blame Zia for fundamentalism, they are wrong. Pakistan was born out of fundamentalism.

    • @rajput2736
      @rajput2736 2 года назад +6

      very gd observation... 👍

    • @Earlytorise89
      @Earlytorise89 2 года назад

      This.

    • @drunkenmonk2767
      @drunkenmonk2767 2 года назад +12

      He is trying very hard to get in good books of LeLi gang, this is my observation cause he was fairly neutral untill 2017 but something happened in '19 which seems making him rally towards LeLi...

    • @sdp2792
      @sdp2792 2 года назад +1

      Very well put.

    • @secularcommieturdpracharak8321
      @secularcommieturdpracharak8321 2 года назад +11

      After I finish watching CTC, I always make sure I scroll down to read your astute observations on various topics...I think you should write opinion pieces in the Print
      Keep them comments coming

  • @srikanthxxxxx
    @srikanthxxxxx 2 года назад +210

    "Partyless democracy is like non-alcoholic beer" 😂. Good god, Shekhar ji. Gimme 20k and I'll come work for you.

    • @adityask277
      @adityask277 2 года назад +3

      He is a man of culture✌️😂😂

    • @fretted4life
      @fretted4life 2 года назад +5

      Having tried non-alcoholic despite not liking beer at all. I'd rather have alcoholic beer with tht bitter taste.

    • @sundareshkrishna6457
      @sundareshkrishna6457 2 года назад +4

      I will work free…… but beer will be on SG sir, not non alcoholic one at that….

    • @LonDanDoc
      @LonDanDoc 2 года назад

      Wait 20k a month or year. And rupee's? Dollars? Pounds?

    • @kimcantswim174
      @kimcantswim174 2 года назад +6

      @@LonDanDoc Twenty thousand camels. One time payment.

  • @homayuns2165
    @homayuns2165 2 года назад +113

    I am originally from Afghanistan but live in USA . I really appreciate your analysis. That was probably one of the major events of the 20th century after world war 1 and 2.

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 года назад

      The Grand Indus Army owns, occupies and ru(i)ns Pakistan enforcing Britain's messianic ideology in the region of everlasting hostility towards Russia (The Great Game) for a fistful of $$$ and a few $$$ more. India, Afghanistan, Central Asia, China and Russia should form a strategic alliance to liberate the Indus Valley from British & US influence and then aim for Eurasian Integration to overtake the US as the most powerful economic, military and political power in the world. ruclips.net/video/Bwvl5gGrmdA/видео.html

  • @sameeransari6649
    @sameeransari6649 2 года назад +27

    Under Zia rule Pakistan lost siachin glacier to indian army in 1984 and Benazir even offered her bangles to Zia and Pakistan army for humiliated defeat in siachin

  • @jeweltilak767
    @jeweltilak767 2 года назад +41

    Zia looks like a Bollywood villain

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +10

      Exactly.

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 года назад

      He's a sepoy Third Class.

    • @Deb_deCoder
      @Deb_deCoder 2 года назад

      villian is far better.. he was a back-stabber who won trust of bhutto, then bhutto promoted him and lastly he kyld that same man bhutto with fake charges.. all within 3 years.. pak history is full of traitors like this.. Iskander mirza, the great-grandson of mirzafar, also betrayed gulam mohammad to get presidency, mirza dismissed gulam while gulam set him as acting governor before going to hospital for treatment.. most mullahs are like this.. never trust any of them

  • @nihalpathak3407
    @nihalpathak3407 2 года назад +71

    If not Zia there would have been some other person to fill his shoes. The mentality he represented was always there, which is quite evident from that country's history before Zia (1947-1977). In 1971 they killed 3 million Bengalis, attacked India several times. They also had already used their non state actors during 1947 and 65 wars. They had already banned Ahmadiya sect. I also don't agree with you on Jinnah. He said different things to different people on different occasions. What actually matters is not his words but his actions.

    • @bharatindian6633
      @bharatindian6633 2 года назад +6

      Zia impacted the Indian librandus only, no one else in india.

    • @HashiramaSenyu
      @HashiramaSenyu 2 года назад

      3 million Bengalis !!!

    • @parth1511
      @parth1511 2 года назад +1

      Correct CIA might have brought some other stooge.

  • @tharunreddy24
    @tharunreddy24 2 года назад +174

    This episode has completely misplaced timing and priority. We have discussed Zia many times in prior episodes. We could have discussed Shinzo Abe's death and it's impact on certain policies that Japanese government may take, rupee crisis and why we are not exporting as much as we aim for, Sri Lanka's govt collapse and what can be a permanent solution to its financial crisis etc etc.

    • @ashwinghadvir9109
      @ashwinghadvir9109 2 года назад

      Aggred ,Shinzo abe!!!,

    • @Sid-MMA
      @Sid-MMA 2 года назад +7

      Andh bhakt's comment .

    • @kishoremandyam8245
      @kishoremandyam8245 2 года назад +5

      Buddy it is apt and much needed for Indian youngsters because
      YOGI LIKELY TO FOLLOW IN SAME PATH working with Democrats of USA
      BUT WITH WAY WORSE CONSEQUENCES FOR INDIA , ASIA AND THE WORLD
      Kamala will want to use Yogi against China Like Carter used Zia against USSR, BUT this war won't be just minor but likely to lead to nuclear apocalyptic ww3

    • @RahulSharma-jm9ir
      @RahulSharma-jm9ir 2 года назад

      @@kishoremandyam8245 bro let him became prime minister first. you are making so much assumptions

    • @kishoremandyam8245
      @kishoremandyam8245 2 года назад +2

      @@RahulSharma-jm9ir just like Bhutto had picked Zia over many seniors Modi / Rss will pick Yogi same way
      That also will be similar to Zia story

  • @orunabho
    @orunabho 2 года назад +44

    Overdose of Pakistan. There are 200 other countries and half a dozen neighbors.
    This obsession with Pakistan is now getting little irritating. Is it the punjabi obsession? Same thing that killed Pakistan.
    Maybe a discussion on Tamilnadu politics and their breakaway tendencies would be interesting or anything else.

    • @sundareshkrishna6457
      @sundareshkrishna6457 2 года назад +1

      It’s fascinating……continue SG sir, loved it……..btw….SG is not a Punjabi……..

    • @madhavsakariya6764
      @madhavsakariya6764 2 года назад +14

      "That's just like your opinion, man" (Said Lebowski).
      Pakistan is one of the most bizarre & interesting countries. Also a nuclear armed neighbour with common history. You can never have enough of Pakistan, even if you take only entertainment.

    • @AjayTiwari-en9nz
      @AjayTiwari-en9nz 2 года назад +2

      Because there are lessons to learn from Pakistan.

    • @holywarrior5719
      @holywarrior5719 2 года назад

      SG is very right . Tamil Nadu is becoming another Bengal, an useless state

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 года назад +1

      Britain's and NATO's obsession with the Great Game, everlasting hostility towards Russia, makes the Grand Indus Army that owns, occupies and ru(i)ns Pakistan, important.

  • @Arwar555
    @Arwar555 2 года назад +20

    Indira Gandhi. She is THE WOMAN!! May she rest in peace. As a Bangladeshi i absolutely loved that woman. She in her saree did all the globe trotting to help form Bangladesh. Many lives were saved by her due to her actions. Far far far more important than Zia ul Haq.!!!

    • @sanjaycharan4682
      @sanjaycharan4682 2 года назад +6

      I agree with you 100%

    • @raghunandan9290
      @raghunandan9290 Год назад

      Angoke could have broken Pakistan.
      Its the army which did job
      India has great institutions.
      Credit can't be given to one man

    • @dk-zp5ze
      @dk-zp5ze 10 месяцев назад

      @@raghunandan9290 it was a tactical decision by Indira Gandhi with army chief sam manekshaw. it's either this or huge cost rehabilitating the refugees

  • @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239
    @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239 2 года назад +59

    It's contradictory to state that Zia "Islamized" Pakistan; The very premise of Pakistan was political Islam; All Zia might have done is to instutionalize that!

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 года назад

      Pakistan was created just after the start of the Cold War as a military base for Britain and its allies to continue The Great Game against Russia.

    • @dineshpratapupadhyay6583
      @dineshpratapupadhyay6583 2 года назад +5

      Exactly!

    • @zaina5569
      @zaina5569 2 года назад

      Same with Bangladesh? They’re pretty secular bro….please read jinnahs speeches before proclaiming your verdicts, ugh

    • @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239
      @prasiddhanarayansaurabh9239 2 года назад +11

      @@zaina5569 speeches don't count boy, actions do! We know what was the feelings of jinnah for Hindus, with him announcing "direct action"!
      Hindus have shrunk from 14%to 8% in Bangladesh ! Too much for secularism ya!

    • @khanf13
      @khanf13 2 года назад +3

      I’m Pakistani and I don’t understand why some Indians will push this narrative Jinnah wanted a secular state. Jinnah wanted political Islam, he just didn’t live long enough to write the constitution.

  • @Aryan-ye4mp
    @Aryan-ye4mp 2 года назад +18

    You are to obsessed with Pakistan...
    There are many important topics within India and in geopolitics (except pakistan) as well...
    Enough of this jokistaan

    • @unibks4382
      @unibks4382 2 года назад

      The Great Game will spill over into India because of NATO warmongering.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Jokistan is our Internalistan.

    • @chandrakanthotkar7262
      @chandrakanthotkar7262 2 года назад +1

      How we can learn about religious fundamentalism if don't discuss the culprit.

  • @veteran4226
    @veteran4226 2 года назад +15

    Gen Zia ul Haq (mard e mujhahid) was the person who dug the grave of Pakistan. And he did his work quiet efficiently, I must say.

  • @partharora8506
    @partharora8506 2 года назад +23

    Nah, I have to disagree with you on this one. Neither did Nehru, Indira, or Zia had the most lasting impact. It has to be narasimha rao, Nothing comes near to the path he set up for us in 1991, it has led us to where we are now and where we will be in the future.

  • @GururajBN
    @GururajBN 2 года назад +18

    Basic cause of all the miseries in the world today is traceable to Islam. The day Islam was born is the most unfortunate day in the history of the mankind. Why blame Zias, Aurangzeb, khalji, Ghazni and tughlaqs? Islam sanctified violence.

  • @aliiqbal6310
    @aliiqbal6310 2 года назад +37

    One important thing which I guess should be highlighted is that he used the time during soviet war very smartly by building nuclear weapons technology very quickly, he knew that right now americans need him to defeat soviets so he used this opportunity and made quick progress to build nuclear weapons and Americans remained mum in this time period.

    • @civilp2689
      @civilp2689 2 года назад +3

      he was anti-islamic

    • @thyagarajanriyer3284
      @thyagarajanriyer3284 2 года назад +7

      net result is he ruined pakistan forever by injecting radicalisation🤣🤣🤣

    • @thyagarajanriyer3284
      @thyagarajanriyer3284 Год назад +1

      Education, economic prosperity, innovation, communal harmony, freedom for citizens etc. make the country progress fast. Such a country becomes useful for rest of the world.
      In case any of these are absent and if such a country has just nuclear weapons, then such a country becomes a pure headache for the world.
      Such countries will be gradually destroyed by rest of the world by using the leaders of the country itself.
      Example - North Korea, Pakistan, Russia.

    • @jameshardley9793
      @jameshardley9793 Год назад +1

      Nuke program was established and started by ZA Bhutto long before Manhoos Zia took over. That was a major reasons for Bhutto hanging and murder by ZIA. Bhutto had built the Lab and left at least 300 million dollars cash, Zia had no choice but to continue. He destroyed Pakistan

  • @pharaohakhneton9553
    @pharaohakhneton9553 2 года назад +20

    Islam in Pakistan has produced strange and contradictory characters . Bhutto , a Democrat sow the seeds of islamization, which was further nurtured by a still peculiar character in uniform , Zia-Ul-Haque ,who turned his country into a modern global jihadi centre. So effective, it is the Bhutto ,who is the father and grand-master of jihadi outfits with Zia as his disciple. But at the centte of it all is the Islam as the driving for for both of them.
    2). Like Mughals, succession has never been peaceful in Pakistan since its birth. In this the Pakistanis are emulating mughals, if not in culture.

    • @totensrabon1885
      @totensrabon1885 2 года назад

      Mughals built this subcontinent & most of them were secular to the core... You probably blinded by your hateful Hindutva ideology, but that Doesn't change the history.

    • @millennialmind9507
      @millennialmind9507 2 года назад

      West bengal political succession has a similar story 🤔🧐?

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Maybe “Allah” will send another dictator to set things right.

    • @Aiasmor
      @Aiasmor 2 года назад

      Mughals would spit on Pakistan, and I say this as a Sikh.

  • @ajmersingh3043
    @ajmersingh3043 2 года назад +6

    Pakistan`s Zia ul-Haq was stationed in Jordan from 1967 to 1970 as a Brigadier.Pakistani and Jordanian army massacred twenty-five thousand Palestinians in Jordan`s refugee camp when they rioted because of poor living conditions.The dreadful event is known as "Black September"

  • @DubAGoor98
    @DubAGoor98 2 года назад +25

    Thanks! Keep up the good work shekarji especially cut the clutter and national interest

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 года назад +2

      Hi, thanks for you feedback and supporting our channel.

  • @Drkp23
    @Drkp23 2 года назад +44

    Surprising that SG sir didn’t choose to talk about assassinated ex president ABE … which would have been contemporary topic

    • @wewerealiensandsheets75
      @wewerealiensandsheets75 2 года назад +1

      What is there to talk about the assassination of Mr Abe ? It is already out

    • @wewerealiensandsheets75
      @wewerealiensandsheets75 2 года назад +2

      @Mreizrq_Zqhruma I mean pakistan military general who is actually responsible for promoting global terrorism is far more important to me than Abe

    • @shamshudashamshuda6258
      @shamshudashamshuda6258 2 года назад

      Coz,we should know those responsible for creating confusion n caous,even world leaders today who are terrorist in nature Should be brought b4 public
      What about those responsible for spoiling Iraq afg in the name of terrorism, just coz you are well equipped ,you can't wage war on innocent people.
      Wait n watch what God has his plans for arrogant boasters

  • @secularcommieturdpracharak8321
    @secularcommieturdpracharak8321 2 года назад +10

    Pakistan is not a country it's a mindset ~ JSD

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +4

      Agree, but mindsets are bound to change.

    • @Unknown-or2vu
      @Unknown-or2vu 2 года назад

      @@srinivasrao941 islam will always be within pakistan

  • @nishankpatil7404
    @nishankpatil7404 2 года назад +64

    Dear Shekhar sa'ab
    Please make CTC on internal politics of China, prospects of Mr Xi's third term, also please convey the message how powerful/weak is China currently in backdrop of Evergrande/economic slowdown/taming of business tycoons etc.
    Is anti-Xi coalition is cropping up?
    Yours faithfully
    Watching CTC since 2019

    • @ravindra7791
      @ravindra7791 2 года назад +4

      Nobody knows what is happening in China. Not even the best China watchers in West or even many Chinese. SG might not be in a position to do this analysis.

    • @1525boy
      @1525boy 2 года назад +2

      @@ravindra7791 Exactly, how is SG supposed to have that information? I’m not sure anyone outside China 🇨🇳 has that information.

  • @Userahyeehehsjsh999
    @Userahyeehehsjsh999 2 года назад +2

    Finally Pakistanis dancing till date of zia tunes 😅😂

  • @sirajuddinchanda3818
    @sirajuddinchanda3818 2 года назад +10

    As far his impact on India is concerned, I think it was his policy on Khalistan movement. But I didn’t see any mention of it in your article.

  • @sanjaybajare6371
    @sanjaybajare6371 2 года назад +12

    Sir why you people only talk about pakistan.not our states like South india

    • @TheNewDelhiDossier
      @TheNewDelhiDossier 2 года назад +2

      Yeah, I would rather like to see a discussion on Swargiya K. Kamaraj or Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi

    • @ashxz
      @ashxz 2 года назад +3

      He's a north Indian living in Delhi. Most probably he would be more aware of the history of Pakistan than of either Noth Eastern or Southern India

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Because Pakistan is our internal issue.

  • @suneel7053
    @suneel7053 2 года назад +52

    SG sir. Thank you very much for the fantastic history explainer. Also may I suggest Sri Lanka protests as a topic for any upcoming CTC episode. Thank you sir.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 года назад +1

      Hi Sunil, thanks for writing in with your valuable feedback.

  • @GinzaGeorge
    @GinzaGeorge 2 года назад +9

    This is incredible. Thanks for taking time to put this out for us.

  • @dandmello5283
    @dandmello5283 Год назад +4

    ❤ Love to ShekarGupta for his uncanny but truly a Educative for sure.. the profession of a
    Dedicated Journalists

  • @vkchoudhary1960
    @vkchoudhary1960 2 года назад +10

    "Partyless democracy is like a non-alcoholic beer"😊😊

  • @jaibaba3848
    @jaibaba3848 2 года назад +7

    Pakistan was bound to go in that way. if not Zia ul haq, someone else would have taken them towards extreme Islamist ideology. Just like Afghanistan went back to extremism, paxtanis will also go the same way.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +1

      Not until another “ Zia” is sent by Allah, if at all.

  • @vaibhavgupta7197
    @vaibhavgupta7197 2 года назад +36

    Even Government of India, does not give this much focus, attention to Pakistan and Pakistani politics, that Shekar Gupta (CTC) does.

    • @abhijitsharma7425
      @abhijitsharma7425 2 года назад +5

      lol read some books my guy

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +7

      Because Pakistan is our internal issue.

    • @psr4550
      @psr4550 2 года назад

      Han tereko jaise bahut pata hai, chodu

    • @sumondutta1101
      @sumondutta1101 2 года назад

      RAW would have a bunch scholars on every country of interest.

    • @sivag2032
      @sivag2032 Год назад

      SG is patron of Pak like sanjay manjerakar in cricket.

  • @HarshadContractor
    @HarshadContractor 2 года назад +32

    Superb analysis, Shekar Ji, I re-learned this conversion to fundamentalist Islamism, today, through your analysis. Salute you, Sir.

  • @raw3165
    @raw3165 2 года назад +6

    More than Zia's coup, your coup was far more brutal, Coupta ji

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      I do not find a smiley in this stupid Iphone

  • @rahulranjan1926
    @rahulranjan1926 2 года назад +18

    I have taken the subscription today and feels great to watch this CtC as a member, first. Guys do take the print's subscription to support unbiased, uninfluenced journalsim.

    • @chanakyabharat756
      @chanakyabharat756 2 года назад +8

      I'm a subscriber too but don't think all print members are neutral, I took subscription for Shekhar ji, DK , NP but completely ignore Sanghvi and Jyothi who openly show bias.

    • @impedimenta934
      @impedimenta934 2 года назад

      they dont claim to be unbiased. They claim to be honest and fair, there is a difference that, a person who watches Indian television media cannot understand. Nobody can be unbiased, everyone has an ideology, and even Judges are not unbiased. People have to understand the difference between blatant propaganda and truth.

    • @rvnrr
      @rvnrr 2 года назад

      Shekhar is good. Closest to an unbiased view. But Print is like other MSM.

    • @impedimenta934
      @impedimenta934 2 года назад

      @@rvnrr The print is shekhar and Shekhar is the print

  • @veenjharmemon8097
    @veenjharmemon8097 2 года назад +6

    I am from Pakistan and I must say that Mr. Shekhar has a great understanding of Pakistani politics. Zia continues to haunt us all.

    • @Unknown-or2vu
      @Unknown-or2vu 2 года назад

      No he don’t be quite

    • @jameshardley9793
      @jameshardley9793 Год назад

      @@Unknown-or2vu -----he was your soul mate, But he was the worst thing ever happened to Pakistan

  • @sujalgarewal2685
    @sujalgarewal2685 2 года назад +2

    Mr Gupta, pls archive your cut the clutters, they are a goldmine. We will need this for the future.

  • @sandy3426143
    @sandy3426143 2 года назад +6

    “Not just to his country, but his nation!” - SG 2

  • @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA
    @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA 2 года назад +6

    Zia ul Haq Was the One who made truly Islam Religion of Peace into Piece
    For themselves & also for rest of the World....

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +2

      Because Islam has an undefined definition “Jihad”.

  • @mehrxavia3128
    @mehrxavia3128 2 года назад +4

    I live in Pakistan, and sometimes I wonder will Pakistan Really Collapse just because of Economy, The answer is no. Why? Pakistan is never dependent on economy, The economy is for ruling elites to make more reserves, get luxury items, smuggle goods to AFG and other central states. There is no check and balance, Otherwise we see cheapest oil at some places as well, its just that is from Banned neighbors and is used by people to get extra benefit ( you know what I mean ). We see lots of $$ being traded by people in private sector, which is even more than people can imagine.
    Moral of story: Whenever Pakistan collapses it wont be because of economy and it never was an economy issue😅. It will be because of its ruling Elite.

  • @matineetime1940
    @matineetime1940 2 года назад +3

    He is remembering zia more than Pakistani media.

  • @ravisehgal.2694
    @ravisehgal.2694 2 года назад +5

    Today only Me & A friend both Army Veterans discussed this Chap. Issue is the present generation is unaware how things changed during the period.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад +1

      That might be an advantage for us.

  • @aftabahmad6099
    @aftabahmad6099 2 года назад +4

    I am not aware of the influence of Gen Zia on India but here in Pakistan the legacy of his impact has been a disastrous and still continue his legacy also included the Sharif brothers who consider him thier political father both of whom are corrupt & involved in Money Laundering

    • @kaidi_p
      @kaidi_p 2 года назад

      the whole Khalistan project was Zia's gift to India

  • @nadeemafzal4698
    @nadeemafzal4698 2 года назад +36

    Being a Pakistani, I appreciate your in-depth knowledge about Pakistan and giving your time to topics related to Pakistan
    Although at time you become unnecessarily patriotic when talking about Pakistan but it’s completely natural
    Overall I appreciate your Analysis...

    • @guurindersinghsfather1068
      @guurindersinghsfather1068 2 года назад

      At least "unnecessarily patriotic" people have forex reserves of 590 billion dollars not like bankrupt "unnecessarily r@dical" g-hadists who don't have money to import tea

    • @nadeemafzal4698
      @nadeemafzal4698 2 года назад

      @@guurindersinghsfather1068
      Your comment is a true example of unnecessary patriotism (in your case it is fake hyper nationalism)
      Indians are not realizing that in the world India has lost its soft power. It’s dangerous for the fabric of secular India.

    • @jaspeeetkaur5608
      @jaspeeetkaur5608 2 года назад +16

      Basic moral of the story was, the day Pakistan was made Pakistani wanted to loot its money, not a single good person ruled their and nobody thought they need to work on “ law” social structure education health or science… end result is in 2022 Pakistan is on edge of bankruptcy
      So we can define Pakistan as from “1947 to 2022” that’s life story of a land made on the name of islam, land got destroyed on the name of islam
      Basically allah k liye paida huye , allah allah krte mar gye .. bich bich main bas aas pados ko dukhi kia …

    • @abidfarooqui-sla3301
      @abidfarooqui-sla3301 2 года назад +4

      @@jaspeeetkaur5608 Kind of true. But don't be overjoyed. India's debt is USD 620 billion versus 122 billion for Pakistan. Per Capita each Indian owes 4 times that of Pakistan. Foreign currency reserves and issues that Pakistan has can be solved. Indian debt to GDP has been heading the wrong way and has been under Modi but a level of misdirection solves many problems in politics. Old politician trick.

    • @psr4550
      @psr4550 2 года назад

      @@abidfarooqui-sla3301 Han aur bhok le, hum bhik ni mangte imf se lodu

  • @ZaidBinFarooq
    @ZaidBinFarooq 2 года назад +16

    As usual a good brief on Pakistani politics from Shehkar sb. Loved the way he always add a story to the whole context.

  • @garvitbhardwaj
    @garvitbhardwaj 2 года назад +6

    Gupta ji should write a book on his journalist career experience

  • @Liguritio
    @Liguritio 2 года назад +10

    Every politician from Pakistan is a character. Times have changed now,
    Ab, IMF Nachayega, US chakrayega aur China Satayega.
    Sad that this Nation couldn’t give anything to the world except terror and destruction. Now its self destroying.

  • @peterhumphrys
    @peterhumphrys 2 года назад +6

    This was a very informative presentation, I really enjoy listening to Shekhar's analyses.

  • @daddashikamani
    @daddashikamani 2 года назад +4

    There are some common misconceptions peddled here by SG.
    Jinnah didn't intend Pak to be Islamic state and said so in 1947. However, Jinnah retracted his statement soon after and said in Jan 11 in Karachi Bar Association: "I could not understand a section of people who deliberately wanted to create mischief and made a propaganda that the constitution of Pakistan would not be made on the basis of Shariat.”
    Sharia based Constitution cannot be considered Secular.

    • @ashishsunny7963
      @ashishsunny7963 2 года назад

      Pakistan was formed as "Islamic Republic of Pakistan".
      If its an islamic republic, then it can never be a secular nation.

    • @chandrakanthotkar7262
      @chandrakanthotkar7262 2 года назад

      Just like Quran, People take what they are good with it.
      Jinnah made two opposite statements on same points.
      Islamist refer to Constitution based on Sharia.
      And secular refer to his other speech.
      In the conflict, As of now Islamist has won in Pakistan.
      I don't see changes in nation for next 20 years.
      Salafi and Wahabi movement destroyed South Asia.

  • @meetadi4u
    @meetadi4u 2 года назад +2

    Did Zia Islamise Pakistan mind or reflect that mind ? Elites may have not been islamised but masses were always close to Zias ideology

  • @mozammelhoque7435
    @mozammelhoque7435 2 года назад +2

    You are absolutely right.
    Thanks
    Toronto.

  • @sustainabledevelopment8965
    @sustainabledevelopment8965 2 года назад +2

    Jinnah did not imagine it to be a Islamic republic .. joke 😂

  • @Sid-MMA
    @Sid-MMA 2 года назад +4

    Very interesting. Shekhar has unmatched political insight.

  • @1954Saleem
    @1954Saleem 2 года назад +7

    Very well presented . Vajpayee's quote was most appropriate . Pakistan has been affected most by Zia .

  • @youthink5552
    @youthink5552 2 года назад +2

    Had Pakistan been a part of INDIA. Hindus would be working and Pakistanis enjoying free rations and medical facility without working and attacking Hindus as well

  • @keshav4408
    @keshav4408 2 года назад +4

    Modi will be most important person in India in first 100 years of independence

    • @neerajkumar-ts6om
      @neerajkumar-ts6om 2 года назад +2

      Yeah some of his policies on internal affair are similar to that of zia-ul-haq

    • @aakash26159
      @aakash26159 2 года назад

      @@neerajkumar-ts6om can you name some. I am keen to know.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Only few would know, you are lucky to be the one amongst.

  • @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi
    @EmilNicolaiePerhinschi 2 года назад +3

    Thank you, great history lesson put in context, this is the first time these things make sense to me.

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  2 года назад +1

      Hi,
      Glad it was helpful! Thank you for your contribution to our channel.

  • @Suresh_Kamath
    @Suresh_Kamath 2 года назад +4

    I so remember Zia changed the laws that a woman's testimony on court was valued at half that of a man's testimony

  • @rohankabadi389
    @rohankabadi389 2 года назад +9

    The credit for the creation of Bangladesh should go to the Indian armed forces not Indira Gandhi sure she gave the go ahead but it was the armed forces who made it happened

    • @totensrabon1885
      @totensrabon1885 2 года назад

      The credit goes to our Bangladeshi guerilla freedom fighters... India or gandhi is irrelevant to us! Keep Bangladesh out of this India/Pakistan cat & Mouse fight.

    • @rohankabadi389
      @rohankabadi389 2 года назад

      @@totensrabon1885 are you seriously this ungrateful for india's help in freeing Bangladesh. Where did your guerrilla freedom fighters get their training supplies from? I don't know what is taught in Bangladesh's history books but get real with yourself buddy. Your people were getting slaughtered before india stepped in. Atleast respect the lives of the Indian men who fought to liberate your country.

    • @millennialmind9507
      @millennialmind9507 2 года назад

      RAW

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Military men should never be glorified beyond their sacrifeses, it’s always the politicians who win over military men, because politicians mindset is just the “if and but” conditions, they do not waste their time in searching for proofs, where are military men are only specialised in altitude, temperature, phisiography and of course “ Go capture the Hill”.

  • @AnilKumar-um4dg
    @AnilKumar-um4dg 2 года назад +2

    Art of Story Telling!!! SG sir, superb!!

  • @ranajoysen6377
    @ranajoysen6377 Год назад +2

    Dear Mr. Gupta:
    Thank you for the great presentation.
    Former Pakistani President and CMLA General Zia -ul - Haque was possibly the most skilled dictator to rule a country.
    He worked through the matrix of America-Soviet rivalry, enmity with India, and efforts to entrench his own power very effectively to determine results conducive for him.
    For quite some time matters went quite well for him. But, subsequently as is the case with almost all dictators, resentments started coming out like steam from a pressure cooker. Opposition to him was growing within the country, Russians were threating him, and relations with India reflected perpetuation of mistrust laced with surface courtesies.
    Perhaps most important was the collective aftermath of paranoia, tyranny, aggressive predilection, and religious extremism in Pakistan.
    His death from an unresolved plane crash was above all the aftermath of the social turbulence and orgy in Pakistan. The initiator tragically became its own victim, after causing misery for so many.
    As the world struggles with coping economic hardships, political high-handedness, and religious fundamentalism, we in India would have to keep devising methods to manage our relations with Pakistan effectively.
    After all, as the illustrious political commentator and editor, Inder Malhotra, once put it, India would have to learn to live with Pakistan as any less fortunate person does with a bad kidney.
    General Zia's long stint in power in Pakistan has made the India's relations with Pakistan more prolonged and more challenging.
    With Regards,
    Ranajoy Sen

  • @historyfromarchivestolimel8662
    @historyfromarchivestolimel8662 2 года назад +2

    ziaism is a lesson for India too. No matter what religion and state should be separated at any cost

  • @bling97
    @bling97 2 года назад +2

    Excellent Excellent episode... i watch cut d clutter before going to sleep...extremely satisfied vd d knowledge gained...

  • @abhishekkapur9221
    @abhishekkapur9221 2 года назад +3

    Sorry guptaji.
    Not interested in Pakistani politics.. khali wali them .
    Talk on india and world politics or anything else but except
    Pakistan

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Not until we settle ties with Pakistan, because it is our internal issue.

  • @spd5696
    @spd5696 2 года назад +1

    Remember zia was not a radical islamists he was just a islamist

  • @shauryakhatana
    @shauryakhatana 2 года назад +1

    Pakistan called Fatima jinnah an Indian agent this is Pakistan’s legacy

  • @slingblade8129
    @slingblade8129 2 года назад +2

    People here commenting that Pakistan was always a fundamentalist country should do some reading of subcontinental politics. While Pakistan was envisioned as a motherland for subcontinental Muslims, the founding fathers could hardly be called fundamentalists. In fact, early Pakistani leaders were very much from the same fabric as the early Indian leaders. The difference is that early Indian leaders did a good job of keeping the military professional, building fairly robust democratic institutions and avoiding fundamentalist blowback. Pakistan could not do that. And over time, the failure of the 'system' allowed the regression to fundamentalism.
    And those saying the anti-India POV in Pakistan stems from Islamic fundamentalism - I'd argue that by the same definition, the Afghan population (and the Middle East too) could also be construed as fundamentalists. Why isn't the anti-India sentiment as strong there as it is in Pakistan? Nepal is not an Islamic country, why is the anti-India sentiment so strong there? We must acknowledge that the Indo-Pak hostility has a historical/geopolitical/cultural aspect to it too. Calling Pakistan "rotten from the start" is an excuse to ignore the nuances of human character and history.

  • @prp3231
    @prp3231 2 года назад +2

    What a handsome fellow, fine facial hair and uniform to match? Pity his God couldn't protect him in the end 😂😂

  • @rajendranathanmnair4122
    @rajendranathanmnair4122 2 года назад +12

    You have provided a real valuable insight into jehadi culture and it is a real threat in Kerala state where from funding is being provided for pan India operation other than may be in Bengal, Assam and J&K.

  • @reddyguntuku1024
    @reddyguntuku1024 2 года назад +4

    Regarding Zia ul-Haq: Perhaps 'most consequential' not 'most important.'

  • @Evan3783
    @Evan3783 2 года назад +2

    Comeon Shekhar Ji.. look at Pak now. If he left a damn lasting so called legacy why is his country so backward now? Indian leaders on the contrary were poised and calm and lifted up the country.

  • @akaj188
    @akaj188 2 года назад +2

    When I was in college,( St. Stephen's College , Delhi, (1975-80) ,for some time, Presidents of both Pakistan ( Gen Zia ) and India ( Fakhrudin Ali Ahmad ) were ex-students of our college.

  • @rishabh3270
    @rishabh3270 2 года назад +2

    What a superb analysis Shekhar Sir!! 👏

  • @agonnoga6100
    @agonnoga6100 2 года назад +2

    You have not explained the root cause behind why Pakistan from a liberal and moderately Islamic country took a turn for hard Islamism after 1971.
    Pakistan turned to Islamism not out of choice but pressure from Saudi Arabia. Pakistan became bankrupt after the crushing defeat in 1971 and lost East Pakistan from where Pakistan used to get 70% of its foreign exchange and was almost 50% of Pakistan's GDP.
    Pakistan with its huge military could in no way fund its budget after separation of East Pakistan.
    This is when they turned to the Saudis to bail them out.
    The Saudis agreed to help them on the condition that Pakistan became a real Islamic country.
    This started the process of Islamization of Pakistan.
    1978 civil war in Afghanistan only helped this process further setting Pakistan on a course 180 degrees different from what Jinnah had envisaged.
    Pakistan's economic stability was ensured by massive aid from USA and Saudi Arabia.
    With the exit of USSR from Afghanistan and collapse of the Soviet Union USA started tightening the screws on Pakistan from the 1990s. This is when the economic woes of Pakistan started which was kept afloat with aid from USA and Saudi Arabia not because of its inherent strengths.
    Sept 11, gave another brief respite to Pakistan but now with complete withdrawal of USA from Afghanistan Pakistan is back to square one. Now even the Saudis are reluctant to fund Pakistan generously as their own economy dependent on petro dollars is in decline.
    In a nutshell, without the crutches of Saudi Arabia and America, Pakistan cannot go far as a nation. It simply doesn't have the resources to fund its government a trap which is also applicable to Afghanistan making these multi ethnic countries highly unstable.

  • @jackshrimp
    @jackshrimp 2 года назад +2

    Thanks SG, for a gr8 analysis!! What a world of difference from the other channels of Lallu n Panju, Nation wants to know, No spin, Big Debate etc

  • @maheshwarmahalle9003
    @maheshwarmahalle9003 2 года назад +4

    We should discuss more on china only barrier is
    Mandarin

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      No, Pakistan is our internal issue and until it is resolved we cannot get away from it.

  • @kunalpriyadarshi345
    @kunalpriyadarshi345 2 года назад +1

    MJ Akbar has time and again argued that Islamization began under Ayub Khan.

  • @blackbirds1440
    @blackbirds1440 2 года назад +14

    The most important personality in this region in our lifetime is former pm Sri PV Narsimha Rao. Nobody can surpass the impact he created by his policy making.

    • @OrangePumpkin150
      @OrangePumpkin150 2 года назад +1

      The best PM we ever had.

    • @mkbskb1
      @mkbskb1 2 года назад

      @@OrangePumpkin150 no way devgora was and is till date the best Indian PM

  • @Hassan-ki4un
    @Hassan-ki4un 2 года назад +4

    I am surprised how accurat MR. Gupta is whatever he said was accurate and detailed. Before Zia Pakistan was doing good but he highly radicalized Pakistan and we are paying the price of it till today. At that point people didn’t realize the damage he did because economy was doing good and this is exact reason why we advise our Indian brother of modi because he is following Zia and you may want feel it today but after a decade this radicalization will affect India.

    • @karrivenkatavanaja4641
      @karrivenkatavanaja4641 2 года назад +5

      Don't worry brother. It's never gonna happen. Unlike Islam’ Indic culture is always inclusive on which BJP ideology is based on. I know it hurts an Islamic heart when Hindustan does well but in all fairness; Zai is a violent Islamist dictator and Modi is a Democratically elected leader¡

    • @Hassan-ki4un
      @Hassan-ki4un 2 года назад +1

      @@karrivenkatavanaja4641 “its an islamic heart” just gets to shows how radicalized you are. Proves my point even further

    • @I0-_-0I
      @I0-_-0I 2 года назад +1

      Kuch bhi 😂

    • @ssm7593
      @ssm7593 Год назад +1

      @@Hassan-ki4un We have 33 crore gods if Mohammad and jesus comes we have no problems

    • @Hassan-ki4un
      @Hassan-ki4un Год назад +1

      @@ssm7593 you may not but hindutva terrorist do have problem. They don’t use logic or anything

  • @vivekanandholla6730
    @vivekanandholla6730 2 года назад +2

    Zia has in a sense brought Pakistan to its knees over time. Thank you for a nice video

  • @abumuhammadalhindi6895
    @abumuhammadalhindi6895 2 года назад +5

    Shekhar sahib, General Zia used Islam for political purposes as an adept politician, whether he was actually a fundamentalist is a different story. As for the kind of brand of Islam that Osama bin Laden/AlQaeda brought to our region is not part of his legacy. They follow an extremely harsh philosophy which has it roots in Gama Islamiya in Egypt and probably goes back to Abdul Wahab from 18th century Arabia. You would need to do some deep research in order to follow the sequence of history.

    • @jamfold2956
      @jamfold2956 2 года назад +3

      They're interlinked. Without Zia's actions, wahabism would never have taken off in the subcontinent on the same scale. His support turned Afpak into a magnet for j!hadis from across the globe. The global j!had was funded by a state where wahabism is the state religion. After the fall of USSR, the wahabi j!hadis turned unemployed and were funneled into Kashmir. Thus, its influence radiated through out the subcontinent. Without Zia's support these elements would not have been able to deeply penetrate into the society in south Asia.

    • @abumuhammadalhindi6895
      @abumuhammadalhindi6895 2 года назад +1

      @@jamfold2956Let's not ignore the fact that US was perfectly happy with the arrangement as long as USSR was defeated not to mention Saudi funding for building their brand of madrasahs to counter against Iranian influences. As for Kashmir, a myriad group of jihadis were fighting that included deobandis that can't stand the salafis.

    • @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz
      @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz 2 года назад

      @@abumuhammadalhindi6895offcourse... US, Saudi, Pakistan... everyone had win win situation....

    • @abumuhammadalhindi6895
      @abumuhammadalhindi6895 2 года назад

      @@SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz I think the Afghan war probably did more damage to Pakistan than help it. The economy was much better in the 80s and per capita income of Pakistanis was even better than the Indians. Don't forget that Pakistan was hosting 3.5 million Afghan refugees during this time. The only positive could be that the previous communist Afghan gov being hostile to Pk and Afghan war got rid of them.

    • @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz
      @SHIVAMYadav-pw5uz 2 года назад +1

      @@abumuhammadalhindi6895Sir.. I think pakistan suffered because it neither had oil money like saudi nor American rich institutional democracy. Pakistan had fantasy of Islamic/mughal fanstsasy to regain... Had pakistan not get involve in Afghanistan..despite the unfriendly government of contemporary Afghanistan.. It would have save itself from extremism... China, Russia fights proxy wars all over the world but never let it enter inside the country, that's a mutual understanding...

  • @shauryakhatana
    @shauryakhatana 2 года назад +2

    All the love aside he is the one who have India Siachen
    Ayub khan lost 65 war
    Yaya khan lost 71 and half Pakistan
    Zia lost Siachen
    Musharraf lost Kargil
    They ought to learn with every dictator they lose wars territory and respect of India as an enemy. Now Rahul Gandhi is a bigger threat than Pakistan

    • @engalipak
      @engalipak 2 года назад

      Then why half Siachin is still with Pak?
      65 was a clear victory as it was self defence.
      71 Pak lost.
      Kargil was a tactical victory and political loss.
      2019 was the battle victory in form of broad day light strikes deep inside and with Abhinandan.
      Itna halka na lia karo bhai :D

  • @aspmusic5904
    @aspmusic5904 2 года назад +2

    Very eyeopening episode, Shekharji. Great anecdotes too.

  • @arindamkumar7725
    @arindamkumar7725 2 года назад +3

    Learnt a new word: 'Obsequious'

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      I’ve rewinded it multiple times to know the spelling, thanks for helping.

  • @lalukheti143
    @lalukheti143 2 года назад +4

    Gupta ji doing what gupta ji does best...! love and respect from Pakistan... the worst legacy zia left us with is the power he passed on to the bloody mullah's who are so damn powerful now and blackmail every aspect of the government...! just imagine even the generals are getting fed up of this power but cant do jack shit about it... that's the true legacy of Zia...!

  • @thatswhatshesaid7935
    @thatswhatshesaid7935 2 года назад +8

    SG sir There are many topics in India to cover 🙃🙏

  • @rvnrr
    @rvnrr 2 года назад +1

    VP Singh also had an enduring impact given his brief tenure. Caste politics.

  • @sasif89
    @sasif89 2 года назад +2

    Most unbiased and analytic news media channel i know of. Being a pakistani im stuned with your indepth knowledge on pakistani politics. So here im, a pakistani waiting for indian media channel for analysis of news on my country cause nothing matches calibre you hold

  • @AlidelOro
    @AlidelOro 2 года назад +1

    Gupta Ji you are a rockstar! Keep up the good work 👍🏼

  • @quddusquddus136
    @quddusquddus136 2 года назад +4

    It turned out that this pygmy from Punjab turned out to be the best man ever happened to Pakistan. The country became the least likable country in the world. Talent flew. Capital flew. The country slowly became a basket case. With him around, a medieval theocracy descended into the Stone Ages. During his rule, Pakistan army became in fact a "Criminal Enterprise." American weapons, Saudi aid, Afghan drugs all went into the coffers of the soldiers of Islam. So steeped in corruption, the soldiers of Islam went missing when the NAVY seal rounded up the most wanted man from the soil of Pakistan. His rule in fact might have paved the way towards the extinction of Pakistan unless it reverses its regression. He is a loser and made Pakistan a nation of losers. Losers do not make history. Pakistan was not relevant in 1947. After a genocide in 1971, the remaining Pakistan is on a deathbed. The winner is Nehru. He steered India to win, win and win.

  • @crawfordsmith3700
    @crawfordsmith3700 2 года назад +6

    Dear Sir ~
    I thank you for your presentation. It provides a clear perspective upon a complicated history across multiple cultures , societies and politics.

  • @subhashvyas3877
    @subhashvyas3877 2 года назад +1

    Even you agree that radicalism and fundamentalism any where will stop economic progress

  • @bharatindian6633
    @bharatindian6633 2 года назад +1

    Zia impacted the Indian librandus only, no one else.

  • @siddhantk4985
    @siddhantk4985 2 года назад +4

    From the start Pakistan was result of failed political ambition of jinnah...
    Successive leaders of Pakistan should have acknowledged this and course corrected away from religion oriented political setup..
    What really broke Pakistan was 1971 defeat. It pushed them more into religious fanaticism...

    • @Unknown-or2vu
      @Unknown-or2vu 2 года назад

      Pakistan was made in the name of isoam

  • @ksvinayraj
    @ksvinayraj 2 года назад +1

    Nonsense Jinnah just was smart in his constituent assembly, so that india doesnt send all Muslims from india. Please read ishtiaq ahmed

  • @kashyapnegandhi
    @kashyapnegandhi 2 года назад +2

    Really good analysis which is usually missed by a lot of who don’t did too much into why something had happened and who were the players and politics behind the event.

  • @akshayhiremath4584
    @akshayhiremath4584 2 года назад +5

    Seems Zia was the living manifestation of Shekharji’s quote “No one can stop bad idea whose time has come”

  • @indermohansinghmalhotra3730
    @indermohansinghmalhotra3730 2 года назад +2

    Fabulous recapitulation & analysis! 👍

  • @adityask277
    @adityask277 2 года назад +3

    Am I the only one who thinks Yahya Khan looks like brezhnev??😂😂

  • @RodinThink28
    @RodinThink28 2 года назад +2

    That's like saying Stalin had the greatest impact on Russia. Or Mao had the greatest impact on China. Or Hitler ...Pol Pot...

    • @shravanraj3108
      @shravanraj3108 2 года назад +1

      Yeah, it is like saying that. Exactly. What is wrong

  • @samirsyed2859
    @samirsyed2859 2 года назад +11

    We need to rethink South Asia and make it a cradle of peace and development. Whatever creed or beliefs we have, we need to stop teaching hate to our kids…

    • @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA
      @MUMBAIKAR_ADITYA 2 года назад

      Yess but Truly The Roots of Jihad , using Violence As Weapon Is Deep Rooted & it is difficult For the world To take over it.

    • @srinivasrao941
      @srinivasrao941 2 года назад

      Yes, because Love is the only Truth.

    • @advaitnagle3144
      @advaitnagle3144 2 года назад

      Practically Impossible as long as Islam is prominent. Need ethnic cleansing for greater peace.

    • @bharatsingh2748
      @bharatsingh2748 2 года назад

      Sure
      ruclips.net/p/PL4t7MovhTCwUxOs7RpIYNTr3AbU978bu2

    • @kaidi_p
      @kaidi_p 2 года назад

      perfect utopia, lovely idea, but wishful thinking. Given current affairs on the 2 countries, peace and understanding is at least 100 years of distant reality away, probably even further