The Bob semple tank is the most successful and best tank ever built as it prevented a full Japanese invasion without a single tank lost.quality New Zealand engineering👌👌
I love the Merkava and Abram tanks for their design, sophistication. Moreover, these are the only tank types which are battle tested in reality and has proven to be durable and reliable.
Erm the Chlenger 2 has lost two tanks one to friendly fire in the gulf and one in Ukraine, its been on operation in Kosovo war, bosnian war, Ukraine Russo war and gulf war and its reliability has been excellent since 1994, furthermore it is the only tank with Dorchester armour, and upgrade to its chobham and chobham although not as good is used on Abrams, one was hit at least 72 times by armour piercing rpgs and bazooka type shape charges and survived to be repaired and has just won "iron spear" tank competion 2023 putting leopard in 2nd place and abrams in 3rd, so yes it reliable and proven to take punishment, i could go on but I won't, I will say though it's an old tank now and is to be replaced imminently by C3 but all tank are super vulnerable to to shoulder mounted "tow" type munitions, aircraft and the new munitions on suicide type drones, but of you want to stand better than most chance, you want that Dorchester armour. All tanks are only as good as their tank crews, so I disagree with your statement, c2 is very much proven.
@@jaymorris3468 Two challengers were lost in Ukraine, not one. Btw Ukrainians got just 14 tanks, and avoid sending them to tough spots. So challengers haven't been in a real modern battle, and yet 2 out of 14 machines are destroyed.
@@solarpatrol5136 well considering challenger 1 had over 300 kills in the gulf war to no losses, and either 1 or 2, I think it was 2, took 70 rpgs and bazooka type directly to still survive, challenger 2 has updated Dorchester chobham armour better fire control and updates all round than challenger1 so I think it's fair to say it's better than the previous platform, don't you. The Abrams has challenger 1 armour, not Dorchester and has obviously the platform of challenger has seen combat, its a silly argument if there is no battle to fight. All tanks are vulnerable to weaponry even from the shoulder, the Abrams has faced the same opposition as challenger 1, All we can do is have competitions again other tanks, and being the old model now, challenger 2 still beat leopard and ABRAMS, that's may be uncomfortable but it is the truth. No way round it, obviously the crews are just as important. The c2 has better armour than Abrams, that's for sure as Abrams uses the older British version, challenger 3 which is imminent will be the proof in the pudding as C2 is due to be retired, DESPITE still winning iron spear with an 120mm rifled barrel., ouch. It is what it is, All challenger 2 needs before it gets retired now is to get the longest tank kill In the world, excuse me for a minute, " what was that you say, it has, oh dear!, I'll keep it to myself", back again sorry about that someone wanted me on the phone, anyway gotta go, on a serious note, don't you just love friendly rivalry on ones own nations killing machines, LMAO. It's just top trumps for people who love, my patriotic d":"'! Is bigger than yours, very childish really and I'm a guilty party. Later! Btw, UK can fit into your largest state at least 7 times, and compared to the U.S. we are poorer, we don't do bad do we for creating good stuff, especially engineering in that field of innovation, invention and records, I think even Harley Davidson's parents were British. ( here I go again) lol
KF51 is still developing now and not finished yet. It is not a present MBT. M1A1 had upgraded to M1A2 and other variants were used present time. Russian T-14 Armata have develpoed but not placed on the battlefield. So we can not see it in Ukraine war. South Korean MBT K2 Black Panther has soft kill also hard kill to defend the anti-tank missiles also RPG. K2 has a ISU system to sit stand lean or kneel any direction. K2 operate KTSAM-II its range over 8km while other tank can not atackt him in its range. If your country want a new MBT, K2 is the best answer for that. K2 is unexpensive better that M1A2, Leopard2A7. Same money, more MBT is K2's purpose. K2 is the most cost-effective MBT in the world present time.
Actually the M1A2 is also not in service the M1A2 SEPv4 is now what is in service with it united states main differences are IP4 armour upgrades, ERA that has extra protection against kinetic shells, better sights and I'd you have one that is fully kitted, Israeli trophy system APS and a weird new IRST FCS.
are ya kidding hahaha... the leopard 2a7v is the best tank on the world. Heavy armor and great firepower and mobility.. korea suck in 1vs 1 to german tanks
armor-resistant shell sounds like a screw up of English language; They mean armor-penetrating. defeats armor. directional explosive fires jet of molten metal through everything -- often setting off the ammunition inside the tank, and with such fireworks its become known as a jack-in-the-box.
@@jimmio3727 what you described is HEAT which is not used on the Abrams M1A2 SEPV4 (the most modern Abrams) the round used is M82A4 ERA and NERA defeating sabot urainuam penetrator. Yes sometimes called "armour resistant penetrator" even though that is usually used by non-tank nerds. M82A4 used a long and thin urainuam penetrator with a composite jacket and tip that allows it to ignore the expansion disruption effects of ERA and NERA making it the first of its kind to do so. The round due to its composite jacket is also effective on Relkit ERA.
Been thinking, to reach a higher shell range tanks need to have the at-the-exit barrel air nozzle under high pressure that thrusts the shell farther giving it just a short burst for extra range
If your going to include kf52 then include abrams x since they are both under development at that time, now its a mbt and few are produced but they are rapidly producing more at this timerate.
The KF51 is based on the hull of the Leopard 2A4,but with a new turret mounting an autoloaded 130 mm calibre main gun. On 5 December 2022, Rheinmetall announced its plans to target mostly existing Leopard 2 operators with the KF51.
@Kristel Vidhi simple reliable,can be massproduced,does not get bogged down by snow,strong 85mm which can penetrate a tigers front.good transmission unlike the tiger or panther.advanced sloped armour.
the military can use a sniper drone if there's to many enemy's ahead the operator can see what the drone sees the operater sees and the drone with have lazer sight to Hit his or her target the drone can also have night vision can fly quite so with out thd sniper getting hurt in any way
@@wildfire613 yes M1A2'S that were not hosted by the united states were defeated in battle against kornet 2 ATGMS. But these were M1A2'S a 70s era tank with no upgrades. What the united states uses is the chonky M1A2 SEPv4 which due to their use of the trophy APS and TUSK4 ERA cannot be penetrated by ATGMs there's a summary of what happened and why it's not major News
@@vangard9725 the US actually deploys the M1, and doesn't claim it's indestructible..... Russia doesn't deploy the T14, and only seem to have about 20 of them.
This is the proof that the West is truly a paper tiger, while on the battlefield their weapons perform badly. Hey, a drone of €30k is piercing their armour 😅 Yes that armour which were supposed to be unstoppable.
@@graphite8842 M1 Abrams model has continued variants. Its original 3 gen base model has been upgraded with 4th gen armor and specs. Both are in use though. In Ukraine, the military is mainly using 3rd gen M1 Abrams
To me only two tanks have actually proved themselves on the battlefield; the Abrams & the Challenger 2. I don't think that high-end electronics can ever stay in one piece in a proper battle. They shall get burnt-out very quickly, limiting the functionality of the tank. Two good facilities on the Challenger 2 which I haven't noted on the others, a flushing toilet under the loader's seat and a hot water supply, great for a cup of tea 😀
Mikesey1, I have just had the same rant. These tanks can have all the supposed toys and can do amazing things, but must of this banter is bollocks. And an attempt by these countries to make there military look better than it is. There has only ever been one challenger 2 lost during a conflict, which was a blue on blue, theres loss of documented cases where the challenger 2 has been hit by over 20 RPG’s, but despite this the tank made it home and was back out 6 hours later. I apologise if this sounds like a rant at yourself, it’s not, it’s due to the frustration of the lack of actual information presented in these videos and the other people commenting on something the know k]nothing about. My opinion, is that the challanger 2 and the Abrams would be very closely matched . The only thing that would let the Abrams down it the amount of servicing and the type of fuel. However, the recently announced challanger 2 replacement is something out of this wold. Thanks for getting to the end of my tant
destroying? they maybe hit it but it can't destroy the merkava tank don't be a clown, israel lost in 6 months 1-2 tanks and few were damaged that's it...also wtf is that matter if you wear adidas or gucci if you have an anti tank weapon in your hands...
It makes me laugh to see people who laugh at this tank but believe the rather cheap and bad propaganda videos of Hamas after their loss, after a week of October they took off their uniforms and dressed in jeans and a shirt and sometimes in dresses to hide among civilians. If only they knew about the firing systems and technologies.
Watching this after Russians destroyed completely Western technology is sooo funny 🤣 Can't believe how biased these uploaders can be, but they have been fooled too
Turkey in Syria with leopards - More than half of the leopards were destroyed by old Soviet ATGMs. Israel tried to invade Syria on the Merkava - the same result. The number of burnt abrams is incalculable. For 5 years, Syria has not lost a single T-90 tank supplied by Russia. Yes. The US has done a great job of brainwashing its slaves.
@@wildfire613 ah yes, the best tanks. half of them don't exist, the other half has been burned down in Ukraine. T-14 doesn't exist either, same as SU-57.
Makes sense an M1 Sepv3 could kill an armata while a M1 Sepv3 could be killed by an armata while the M1 Sepv4 could kill an armata but an armata can't kill an M1 Sepv4
T 14 is an awful tank. The engine is a ww2 nazi engine which basically breaks down very often. It’s technology and claims of capabilities have been shown to be propaganda. Most of what it did have was old western technology. Which it now can’t access and subsequently can’t build. It’s not a good tank and not even in the top 10
That challanger is something else, its just beat panther and abrams in the 2023 international iron spear tank comp and its about to be retired for the newer challenger 3, that's going to be scary if the old tank won iron spear, mind you, those brits did put the first tank on a battlefield so the crews must be top notch cos theyre not working with the newest or latest fc systems. The new leopard isnt on the battlefield yet, its not ready.
It is completed. They produced the requisite number of tanks for their yearly May Day parade. The T-14 is a parade only queen, it will never go into battle.
@@Trioniumguardsofficial lol the ratio of destroyed western armor compared to russian armor is miniscule. Oryx reports the ruskies have 2432 destroyed tanks. If include abandoned or captured, the total is 3495. Western tanks is around 23. Plus, western tanks don't launch their turrets into space. And what parades are the T-14s showing up at? They certainly won't show their delicate bodies in a war zone, right?😂
@@red94mr28 According to western propaganda yes. But surprisingly all the western tanks given to Ukraine disappeared without any trace. Ratio of western armour given to Ukrainie to that used by Russia is also miniscule. The era of tanks are over becoz drones and RPGs can take out any tank deployed. K/D ratio of Abrams is 0, leopard is around 0.2, challengers idk. So who is the parade queen here that's right Abrams the greatest paper tiger of all time.
I heard from a former German veteran who fought with tanks (The Chieftain) that the feature of controlling drones from inside the KF-51 is not important, it takes up vital space inside the tank and that it would be better if the infantry took care of that with a dedicated vehicle for the drone. Puma IFV was overrated and fared very poorly in reality, I guess Germany lost the military tact of producing vehicles after it became a NATO vassal.
All this "analysis" is for a sbowroom. What really matters is logistics, reliability and maintenance. If the engine consumes fuel like mad, the tank will be a sitting duck in a couple of hours.
Leopard 2 isnt as good as it used to be and kf51 is still under development. Neither tank has proven itself either. One doesnt exist and the other one is rather old
American "Abrams", British "Challengers", German "Leopards" - these are all pieces of crap, bulky and oversized tin cans that have low speed, maneuverability, plus they are not designed for any natural conditions. In winter, in snow and ice, these pieces of metal are useless, they simply will not go anywhere, uphill or uphill. Unlike the Russian tanks "T-90" and "T-90 Proryv". Russian tanks and armored vehicles, like aviation, firearms and navy, are the best in the world and they have proven it. In Vietnam, Korea, and India, Soviet technology showed its superiority over American technology. Our tanks are the fastest, most maneuverable, capable of conducting combat operations in any conditions, plus they also have better armor and weapons. In Ukraine, "Leopards" and "Abrams" only burn like that.
The Armada is the king of the modern battle field it jas a new cannon that can take out other tanks helicopters and attack jets at ranges out to five miles can float or jump anti tank ditichs has no cosmaunauts in the turret just three tanker's in the hull of the tank who doesn't ejecte with the turret it makes recovery so much easier
They never mention the story of a challenger 2s track being disabled in Iraq. Is subsequently got bombarded by enemy tanks and artillery for quite some time. It was back in service 2 days later 🤣🤣 just needed track pit back on and laser sites re calibrated
I cant wait to see the full capability of the t-14 armata. It got send to Ukraine, but then they removed them from the front, probably becuse of the t-90m and to not get captured
I dont think its fair you have kf51 on the list .. its not being produced yet so its really not on the marked but it should be next year maybe and you start the video by saying you will look at the best tanks on the marked... So i would choose a leopard 2 until the kf51 is in production
why is Abrams in 2nd place? he was so well blown up in Iraq by Soviet 60x missiles that he flew to the top 2, nothing, soon this chariot will fall down in the ranking like in the snow
For each German tanks destroyed in the battle of Kursk, 5 Soviet tanks were destroyed. At the famous Battle of Prokhorovka it was even worse - much worse.
u forgot the french leclerc xlr wich is way way better than the m1a1 abrams, by every aspects except maybe armor on the turret, better than the zt99, the challenger 2 and the merkava. the only tank wich are better than the leclerc are the leo2a7, the type10, the k2, maybe the t14 but nobody sees it in action as same as the kf51.
It Depend On Which Battlefront For Example In My Country Most Western,And European Tank Are Sitting Duck Believes Or Not In World War2 Japanese Army Invades My Country Using Bicycles,Light,Medium Tank And Take Over In 90 Days
@@albertkowalski5629 the Abram’s is heavier, slow, have a worst apfsds shell than the Leclerc and still have a manual loader. What are you talking about ?
@@jeandelabatte8447 manual loaders vs not is an age old debate. The French tank still does not have true blowout panels for the ammo. It's been improved upon, sure. The latest Abrams info is not publicly known for example the armor improvements. The Abrams will have Trophy active protection installed an most as well. To me survivability in a tank is pretty important.
@@corey8420 the Leclerc have a blowup panel that protect all the crew member because ammo is not even exposed to the crew member due to the auto loader. It’s true that the Leclerc don’t have aps but I believe they choose instead a tank that can fire while moving
KF51 ??????? what?????????? This tank is under development.
Cry about it
@@Ramen669 What is there to cry about? He's just telling you a fact.
Yeah, KF51 is developing now. Not finished yet.
@@Ramen669 ya look who is crying cause someone called that out...
SAME AS ARMSTA? Ha ha ha
Why not go from 10-1 instead of 1-10 😑
I thought that. Zero build up
He doesnt want to waste our time watching the whole thin11hing
what about it not being close to 2025 yet
The Bob semple tank is the most successful and best tank ever built as it prevented a full Japanese invasion without a single tank lost.quality New Zealand engineering👌👌
Might as well mentioned Abrams X if you include the prototype KF51
How many Armata tanks have you seen in Ukraine? 0? Wut?!
@@cj64343 It's not ever been in combat as far as we know. There's allegedly one serving in Ukraine, but no one has ever seen it.
@Caleb Johnson that tiger tank engine from 1935 isn't reliable enough to actually use it as a tank I guess.
K2👍
Are you Korean?
I love the Merkava and Abram tanks for their design, sophistication. Moreover, these are the only tank types which are battle tested in reality and has proven to be durable and reliable.
Tens of merkavas have been burnt in the recent Israeli-Palestinian conflict
those where Merkava 4
Erm the Chlenger 2 has lost two tanks one to friendly fire in the gulf and one in Ukraine, its been on operation in Kosovo war, bosnian war, Ukraine Russo war and gulf war and its reliability has been excellent since 1994, furthermore it is the only tank with Dorchester armour, and upgrade to its chobham and chobham although not as good is used on Abrams, one was hit at least 72 times by armour piercing rpgs and bazooka type shape charges and survived to be repaired and has just won "iron spear" tank competion 2023 putting leopard in 2nd place and abrams in 3rd, so yes it reliable and proven to take punishment, i could go on but I won't, I will say though it's an old tank now and is to be replaced imminently by C3 but all tank are super vulnerable to to shoulder mounted "tow" type munitions, aircraft and the new munitions on suicide type drones, but of you want to stand better than most chance, you want that Dorchester armour. All tanks are only as good as their tank crews, so I disagree with your statement, c2 is very much proven.
@@jaymorris3468 Two challengers were lost in Ukraine, not one. Btw Ukrainians got just 14 tanks, and avoid sending them to tough spots. So challengers haven't been in a real modern battle, and yet 2 out of 14 machines are destroyed.
@@solarpatrol5136 well considering challenger 1 had over 300 kills in the gulf war to no losses, and either 1 or 2, I think it was 2, took 70 rpgs and bazooka type directly to still survive, challenger 2 has updated Dorchester chobham armour better fire control and updates all round than challenger1 so I think it's fair to say it's better than the previous platform, don't you. The Abrams has challenger 1 armour, not Dorchester and has obviously the platform of challenger has seen combat, its a silly argument if there is no battle to fight. All tanks are vulnerable to weaponry even from the shoulder, the Abrams has faced the same opposition as challenger 1, All we can do is have competitions again other tanks, and being the old model now, challenger 2 still beat leopard and ABRAMS, that's may be uncomfortable but it is the truth. No way round it, obviously the crews are just as important. The c2 has better armour than Abrams, that's for sure as Abrams uses the older British version, challenger 3 which is imminent will be the proof in the pudding as C2 is due to be retired, DESPITE still winning iron spear with an 120mm rifled barrel., ouch. It is what it is, All challenger 2 needs before it gets retired now is to get the longest tank kill In the world, excuse me for a minute, " what was that you say, it has, oh dear!, I'll keep it to myself", back again sorry about that someone wanted me on the phone, anyway gotta go, on a serious note, don't you just love friendly rivalry on ones own nations killing machines, LMAO. It's just top trumps for people who love, my patriotic d":"'! Is bigger than yours, very childish really and I'm a guilty party. Later! Btw, UK can fit into your largest state at least 7 times, and compared to the U.S. we are poorer, we don't do bad do we for creating good stuff, especially engineering in that field of innovation, invention and records, I think even Harley Davidson's parents were British. ( here I go again) lol
KF51 is still developing now and not finished yet. It is not a present MBT. M1A1 had upgraded to M1A2 and other variants were used present time. Russian T-14 Armata have develpoed but not placed on the battlefield. So we can not see it in Ukraine war. South Korean MBT K2 Black Panther has soft kill also hard kill to defend the anti-tank missiles also RPG. K2 has a ISU system to sit stand lean or kneel any direction. K2 operate KTSAM-II its range over 8km while other tank can not atackt him in its range.
If your country want a new MBT, K2 is the best answer for that. K2 is unexpensive better that M1A2, Leopard2A7. Same money, more MBT is K2's purpose. K2 is the most cost-effective MBT in the world present time.
Actually the M1A2 is also not in service the M1A2 SEPv4 is now what is in service with it united states main differences are IP4 armour upgrades, ERA that has extra protection against kinetic shells, better sights and I'd you have one that is fully kitted, Israeli trophy system APS and a weird new IRST FCS.
Sales pitch
are ya kidding hahaha... the leopard 2a7v is the best tank on the world. Heavy armor and great firepower and mobility.. korea suck in 1vs 1 to german tanks
If kf 51 is 1 of the top 10 why not include Abrams x???
It's just a tech demo
@@Nero-Caesar kf 51 also tech demo correct me if am wrong,it also still underdevelopment
@@sansantheone6276 yeah he shouldn't have put the kf-51 or t-14
@Reverend Boaz yes,why
GORGEOUS TANKS
Tank no.7 is so advanced and stealthy that even I couldn't find it in the video😂
Man tanks are so cool 🔥🔥
Looool! T-14 Armata! 😂😂🤣🤣
Armata shouldn't be here.
@@phantomhd7889Why not?
Sorry you’re completely incapable of objective analysis that differs from the narrative you’ve been spoonfed
I've tried to find out what 'armor-resistant shell' means, but with no luck.
armor-resistant shell sounds like a screw up of English language; They mean armor-penetrating. defeats armor. directional explosive fires jet of molten metal through everything -- often setting off the ammunition inside the tank, and with such fireworks its become known as a jack-in-the-box.
@@jimmio3727 what you described is HEAT which is not used on the Abrams M1A2 SEPV4 (the most modern Abrams) the round used is M82A4 ERA and NERA defeating sabot urainuam penetrator. Yes sometimes called "armour resistant penetrator" even though that is usually used by non-tank nerds. M82A4 used a long and thin urainuam penetrator with a composite jacket and tip that allows it to ignore the expansion disruption effects of ERA and NERA making it the first of its kind to do so. The round due to its composite jacket is also effective on Relkit ERA.
Thank you all for your insights
This video was made with chat gpt
All this AI technology in warfare is cool from a technology standpoint but also terrifying.
Haven't seen the whole video but the deadliest weapon ever created is the AK-47, not some high tech weapon. Still, AI tech is terrifying as well 🤣
Armata is parade tank 😆
On paper it's very impressive. But that's just on paper.... who knows if it actually works as intended.
@@Darkpara1 A Russian paper. That means its capabilities are fake and purely propaganda.
I'm surprised the Leclerc didn't make it.
It did right?
@@Nero-Caesar Nope.
@@CatotheE what's at 7:50 then?
@@Nero-Caesar I'm an idiot. I guess I wasn't paying attention. Also, the tab says Leopard.
@@CatotheE yeah the video sorta screwed it up lol
T-14 and China tank are over over estimated. kk
But they can conquer a cement pier at least.
Korean tank also lol
Been thinking, to reach a higher shell range tanks need to have the at-the-exit barrel air nozzle under high pressure that thrusts the shell farther giving it just a short burst for extra range
If your going to include kf52 then include abrams x since they are both under development at that time, now its a mbt and few are produced but they are rapidly producing more at this timerate.
Thanks
7:47 : AMX LECLERC
The KF51 is based on the hull of the Leopard 2A4,but with a new turret mounting an autoloaded 130 mm calibre main gun. On 5 December 2022, Rheinmetall announced its plans to target mostly existing Leopard 2 operators with the KF51.
4:53
Talks about k2 black Panther
**proceeds to show images of k1 tanks**
Not saying it’s bad but just sayin
The BEST Tanks in the World !!
Tanks are defined by a CREW ,
Challenger 2 sits at number 1.
Nah Challenger is dog shit 😂
Before there was the Tiger as king of the battlefield, now the KF51 is the new King, as the Tiger's offspring.
T34 was the king
@@subramanians5984 with 45,000 loses.
@Kristel Vidhi simple reliable,can be massproduced,does not get bogged down by snow,strong 85mm which can penetrate a tigers front.good transmission unlike the tiger or panther.advanced sloped armour.
@@subramanians5984 even though it cossed the lives of tens of thousands of tankers? And how much Tiger tankers were killed?
@Kristel Vidhi even tiger tank ace Michael wittman did not survive in a tiger
4:53 that's K1 images
The accuracy on these machines is crazy
Are these ranked or listed?
Probably list
the military can use a sniper drone if there's to many enemy's ahead the operator can see what the drone sees the operater sees and the drone with have lazer sight to Hit his or her target the drone can also have night vision can fly quite so with out thd sniper getting hurt in any way
The pictures of the video is K1A1 4:54 😅
4:56 this is K1..
T-14 Armata, very funny
Didn’t abrams get exposed by soviet ATGM in the Middle East
@@wildfire613 yes M1A2'S that were not hosted by the united states were defeated in battle against kornet 2 ATGMS. But these were M1A2'S a 70s era tank with no upgrades. What the united states uses is the chonky M1A2 SEPv4 which due to their use of the trophy APS and TUSK4 ERA cannot be penetrated by ATGMs there's a summary of what happened and why it's not major News
@@vangard9725 the US actually deploys the M1, and doesn't claim it's indestructible..... Russia doesn't deploy the T14, and only seem to have about 20 of them.
Only 14 in existence... no where near a threat!
This is the proof that the West is truly a paper tiger, while on the battlefield their weapons perform badly. Hey, a drone of €30k is piercing their armour 😅 Yes that armour which were supposed to be unstoppable.
The T-14 Armata Turret has unmanned capabilities for when it pops off the rest of the tank.
Yes it is like Moskva submarine mode.
@J Gaffney 💀 bro I'm dead
@@jgaffney567 haha 😂. Its true
@@jgaffney567 Moskova was the pride of the black sea fleet.... with a full 1/3 of its systems actually functioning.
@@Darkpara1 So what's that in submarine mode? Great idea place a crippled ship in a war zone. Brilliant
t14 armata then black panther then abrams
Armata is 8th on this list
Armata is the only 4th gen tank in the world though. US is lacking very much.@@OftheDay247
@@graphite8842 M1 Abrams model has continued variants. Its original 3 gen base model has been upgraded with 4th gen armor and specs.
Both are in use though. In Ukraine, the military is mainly using 3rd gen M1 Abrams
To me only two tanks have actually proved themselves on the battlefield; the Abrams & the Challenger 2. I don't think that high-end electronics can ever stay in one piece in a proper battle. They shall get burnt-out very quickly, limiting the functionality of the tank.
Two good facilities on the Challenger 2 which I haven't noted on the others, a flushing toilet under the loader's seat and a hot water supply, great for a cup of tea 😀
When was the last time the challenger was used?
@@wildfire613 2001, but Challenger 2 on the other hand... 😆
Mikesey1, I have just had the same rant. These tanks can have all the supposed toys and can do amazing things, but must of this banter is bollocks. And an attempt by these countries to make there military look better than it is. There has only ever been one challenger 2 lost during a conflict, which was a blue on blue, theres loss of documented cases where the challenger 2 has been hit by over 20 RPG’s, but despite this the tank made it home and was back out 6 hours later. I apologise if this sounds like a rant at yourself, it’s not, it’s due to the frustration of the lack of actual information presented in these videos and the other people commenting on something the know k]nothing about. My opinion, is that the challanger 2 and the Abrams would be very closely matched . The only thing that would let the Abrams down it the amount of servicing and the type of fuel. However, the recently announced challanger 2 replacement is something out of this wold. Thanks for getting to the end of my tant
Proved against Farmers with ak47
@@davidbr9142 they were never farmers, farmed for a nice kd however
Dam ok, but which country would be the one who makes the first railgun tank
Totally arbitrary ranking but thanks for these beautiful footages.
Half of these tanks have been deployed to parades not battlefield.
LOL 😂😂😂😅😅😅😅😅😅
I love the T14 and Abrams and the merkava and the leopard they are so good to go in war
merkava ? HHH merkava got destroyed by gaza hamas resistence power just using rpg and simple guns .
Wow that id grate.
Merkava is on this list what a joke 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
There are some guys in gaza destroying while having flip flop and fake adidas 😂😂😂
destroying? they maybe hit it but it can't destroy the merkava tank don't be a clown, israel lost in 6 months 1-2 tanks and few were damaged that's it...also wtf is that matter if you wear adidas or gucci if you have an anti tank weapon in your hands...
@@AR-yp8nh they wont show u there failure
@@Huehe6969How about you show us a destroyed mk4 and not a hit ?
It makes me laugh to see people who laugh at this tank but believe the rather cheap and bad propaganda videos of Hamas after their loss, after a week of October they took off their uniforms and dressed in jeans and a shirt and sometimes in dresses to hide among civilians. If only they knew about the firing systems and technologies.
Bet leopard tanks took a back row after Ukraine 😅
Challenger III next generation, incorporates traditional hot water boiler for crew comfort. Add packet of tea and it easily outclasses all MBT. 😁
I love the Merka and Abram tanks
Are you still thinking Merkava is useful after Palestinian resistance fighters destroying it without proper weapons
Watching this after Russians destroyed completely Western technology is sooo funny 🤣
Can't believe how biased these uploaders can be, but they have been fooled too
Arjun Mk.1A ?🤔🙄🤔🙄🤔🙄🤔
Junk
Junk 😂
Still with this 😂.
India junk
That German tank looks like something straight out of Halo
But when it comes to Russian tanks they're more of a death trap:)
Lmao russia have one of the best tanks let’s see how the leopards do in Ukraine🤣
Abrhams got exposed in the Middle East by ATGM made in the 60s
Turkey in Syria with leopards - More than half of the leopards were destroyed by old Soviet ATGMs. Israel tried to invade Syria on the Merkava - the same result. The number of burnt abrams is incalculable. For 5 years, Syria has not lost a single T-90 tank supplied by Russia. Yes. The US has done a great job of brainwashing its slaves.
@@wildfire613 yes but once you paint a z or v on them the turrets pop off.definately a liability
@@wildfire613 ah yes, the best tanks. half of them don't exist, the other half has been burned down in Ukraine. T-14 doesn't exist either, same as SU-57.
Ranking the M1Abrams over the T-14 Armata??
Makes sense an M1 Sepv3 could kill an armata while a M1 Sepv3 could be killed by an armata while the M1 Sepv4 could kill an armata but an armata can't kill an M1 Sepv4
T 14 is an awful tank. The engine is a ww2 nazi engine which basically breaks down very often. It’s technology and claims of capabilities have been shown to be propaganda. Most of what it did have was old western technology. Which it now can’t access and subsequently can’t build. It’s not a good tank and not even in the top 10
Obviously
Fun fact not challenger 2 has ever been destroyed in combat, but one was destroyed in a friendly fire in Iraq in 2003.
That challanger is something else, its just beat panther and abrams in the 2023 international iron spear tank comp and its about to be retired for the newer challenger 3, that's going to be scary if the old tank won iron spear, mind you, those brits did put the first tank on a battlefield so the crews must be top notch cos theyre not working with the newest or latest fc systems. The new leopard isnt on the battlefield yet, its not ready.
T-14 Armata, still developing for more than 10 years. Can they complete the T-14 project?
It will never be complete, it literally uses a tigers engine
It is completed. They produced the requisite number of tanks for their yearly May Day parade. The T-14 is a parade only queen, it will never go into battle.
@@red94mr28 Why? Because all the so called western advanced tanks are dying to RPG and drones?
@@Trioniumguardsofficial lol the ratio of destroyed western armor compared to russian armor is miniscule. Oryx reports the ruskies have 2432 destroyed tanks. If include abandoned or captured, the total is 3495. Western tanks is around 23. Plus, western tanks don't launch their turrets into space. And what parades are the T-14s showing up at? They certainly won't show their delicate bodies in a war zone, right?😂
@@red94mr28 According to western propaganda yes. But surprisingly all the western tanks given to Ukraine disappeared without any trace. Ratio of western armour given to Ukrainie to that used by Russia is also miniscule. The era of tanks are over becoz drones and RPGs can take out any tank deployed. K/D ratio of Abrams is 0, leopard is around 0.2, challengers idk. So who is the parade queen here that's right Abrams the greatest paper tiger of all time.
I heard from a former German veteran who fought with tanks (The Chieftain) that the feature of controlling drones from inside the KF-51 is not important, it takes up vital space inside the tank and that it would be better if the infantry took care of that with a dedicated vehicle for the drone. Puma IFV was overrated and fared very poorly in reality, I guess Germany lost the military tact of producing vehicles after it became a NATO vassal.
never heared of the Leopard, i guess
You spelled "NATO's bitch" wrong
@@TheChrisd43 Leopards aren't anything crazy. They are widely used in EU for some other reason.
Altay tankının aktif koruma sistemi var. Zırhı, cok gizli efektif kompozit bir materialden tapılmıştır.
All this "analysis" is for a sbowroom. What really matters is logistics, reliability and maintenance. If the engine consumes fuel like mad, the tank will be a sitting duck in a couple of hours.
Number 2: Leopard 2 (Germany)
Number 1: Kf51 (Germany)
No Question
Leopard 2 isnt as good as it used to be and kf51 is still under development. Neither tank has proven itself either. One doesnt exist and the other one is rather old
What about the Turkish "Altay" tank?
American "Abrams", British "Challengers", German "Leopards" - these are all pieces of crap, bulky and oversized tin cans that have low speed, maneuverability, plus they are not designed for any natural conditions. In winter, in snow and ice, these pieces of metal are useless, they simply will not go anywhere, uphill or uphill. Unlike the Russian tanks "T-90" and "T-90 Proryv".
Russian tanks and armored vehicles, like aviation, firearms and navy, are the best in the world and they have proven it. In Vietnam, Korea, and India, Soviet technology showed its superiority over American technology. Our tanks are the fastest, most maneuverable, capable of conducting combat operations in any conditions, plus they also have better armor and weapons. In Ukraine, "Leopards" and "Abrams" only burn like that.
Lol
Merkava 5 is the winner, it has 🔥Iron Balls🔥
Т-14 Armata is the only one that can operate without a crew.
Abrams needs to be higher... its proven its self as a conqueror
Too old.
@@novak7970 No older than majority on this list
Panther 2028 ☝🏻
We're about to find out if the T-14 belongs on this list at all.
The Armada is the king of the modern battle field it jas a new cannon that can take out other tanks helicopters and attack jets at ranges out to five miles can float or jump anti tank ditichs has no cosmaunauts in the turret just three tanker's in the hull of the tank who doesn't ejecte with the turret it makes recovery so much easier
40 yr old Leopard is no match for Black Panther. This was tested and proven in Norway already.
This is the first time I have seen Chinese waste listed.
Hey, KF-51 is still on going developing and not even has sample yet. It's only a future dream of Germany.
Completely lies. How could you say the best tank while they haven’t been in any war battle?
They never mention the story of a challenger 2s track being disabled in Iraq.
Is subsequently got bombarded by enemy tanks and artillery for quite some time.
It was back in service 2 days later 🤣🤣 just needed track pit back on and laser sites re calibrated
i knew something was wrong with this vid when it placed chinese tank at 5th lol
The K2 Black Panther should be 2….and for the money a resounding 1.
Yes the T-14
It never saw combat and never has any deaths lol
A report from 2023 refers to 2025?
Is it just me or that Chinese T-99 looks exactly like Leoprard 2 from the side?
For me it just like t90 m with bright color
Yeah I know right... It has a turret and run on tracks
@@lawrenceng7971 yean and Leo 2 was named in the honor of your IQ lol
T-14?? KF51?????
cool
I cant wait to see the full capability of the t-14 armata. It got send to Ukraine, but then they removed them from the front, probably becuse of the t-90m and to not get captured
That German tank looks far ahead of the pack.
French superiority in action !!! Léopard running for her life !!!
👆🏻🤡
I dont think its fair you have kf51 on the list .. its not being produced yet so its really not on the marked but it should be next year maybe and you start the video by saying you will look at the best tanks on the marked... So i would choose a leopard 2 until the kf51 is in production
What about Russian T-72,80,90 Which so High tech that it will Suddenly turned into Dust when hit by Javellins 😁
why is Abrams in 2nd place? he was so well blown up in Iraq by Soviet 60x missiles that he flew to the top 2, nothing, soon this chariot will fall down in the ranking like in the snow
Every tanks can be destroyed by a javelin atm, not just ruskies' tanks
Battle of kursk Russia vs Germany.. remember always...now t90m and t72 and top t14 amarta ... German tank burn again like kursk
For each German tanks destroyed in the battle of Kursk, 5 Soviet tanks were destroyed. At the famous Battle of Prokhorovka it was even worse - much worse.
u forgot the french leclerc xlr wich is way way better than the m1a1 abrams, by every aspects except maybe armor on the turret, better than the zt99, the challenger 2 and the merkava. the only tank wich are better than the leclerc are the leo2a7, the type10, the k2, maybe the t14 but nobody sees it in action as same as the kf51.
It Depend On Which Battlefront For Example In My Country Most Western,And European Tank Are Sitting Duck Believes Or Not In World War2 Japanese Army Invades My Country Using Bicycles,Light,Medium Tank And Take Over In 90 Days
Dude, no tank can match Abrams SEPV3/V4
@@albertkowalski5629 the Abram’s is heavier, slow, have a worst apfsds shell than the Leclerc and still have a manual loader. What are you talking about ?
@@jeandelabatte8447 manual loaders vs not is an age old debate. The French tank still does not have true blowout panels for the ammo. It's been improved upon, sure. The latest Abrams info is not publicly known for example the armor improvements. The Abrams will have Trophy active protection installed an most as well. To me survivability in a tank is pretty important.
@@corey8420 the Leclerc have a blowup panel that protect all the crew member because ammo is not even exposed to the crew member due to the auto loader. It’s true that the Leclerc don’t have aps but I believe they choose instead a tank that can fire while moving
Tanks are not strong in the modern warfare technologies. It is very old tech.
Tank 3 is most advanced. The best tanks are T90M, T80BV and T72B3 2022 version because it have been proven in combat
Altay tank?
K-2 is number one
Armata t-14 No1
Say what you want, but the Russian t90 belongs on this list.
I wouldnt count the T-14, considering it probably doesnt even work, and there are only like 20 of them.
"Iron Balls" you say. 🤣
I think upgraded soviet tanks are still the best. All this electronics just breaks
Why have they largely been destroyed then,? ....the survivability of Soviet Tanks versus Nato spec Tanks isn't even comparable .
@@RenegadeSound If they were largely destroyed Ukraine would be in Sevastapol rn
Leclerc is also best tank🇫🇷
Whats the use of all these super expensive tanks when it can easily be destroyed with cheap drones and hand held anti tank bazuka and stingers.
Panther and Armata... what a joke. These tanks don't really exist, only a few prototypes. 😂😂😂
KF51????.. 😂👌
La guerre à prouver le contraire !!! War prouve !!! This top 10 no living in reality hahaha american top !!! 👍👍👍
True German engineering 🗿
Germany: I still reign up here
Chinese Tanks will never be a best tanks.
😂😂😂😂😂
Dirty and low tech China. kkkkk
Lol says some random shite guy from the internet lol