A TV Judge is Threatening to Sue Me
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 фев 2025
- #personalinjurylawyer #wrongfuldeathlawyer #ceaseanddesist #fairuse
In today's video, I go over the cease and desist letter that I received from @JudgeVondaB's legal team and my response.
Check out Lawyer Wynton's Channel:
/ @lawyerwynton8407
Check out Support Court with Judge Vonda B's Channel:
/ supportcourtwithjudgev...
Join/ Ask Questions On My Subreddit ► / attorneytom
Follow me on:
Twitter ► / attorney_tom
Instagram ► / attorney_tom
TikTok ► / attorneytom
Rumble ►rumble.com/Att...
AttorneyTom Streaming (RUclips) ► / tom69420
AttorneyTom Music (RUclips) ► / attorneytommusic
LINK TO EVERYTHING ► beacons.page/a...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the personal video blog of personal injury lawyer Tommy John Kherkher.
Biography:
Personal Injury Attorney Tommy John Kherkher
Managing Partner of The Kherkher Law Firm PLLC | Attorney at Kherkher Garcia LLP
Principal office is in Houston, Texas. Licensed in Texas(see below).
Primarily focused on representing individuals who have suffered catastrophic and high-damage personal injuries.
Website: www.attorneytom.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Use: All clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
I do not own the music or unoriginal underlying graphics in this video.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
This content is the property of Attorney Tom, LLC. Anything stated on ANY form of media, either expressly or implied, is not legal advice, nor can Attorney Tom, LLC, Attorney Tommy John Kherkher, Kherkher Law Firm, PPLC, or Kherkher Garcia LLP give you legal advice. Unless otherwise stated in the specific video referenced, The Kherkher Law Firm, PLLC | Kherkher Garcia, LLP is not advertising the services and products it offers. This content, unless otherwise disclaimed, was not prepared to secure paid professional employment.
Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Nor is there intent to form a lawyer-client relationship when interacting with others on the internet and in social media outlets. Past performance talked about in any context is no guarantee of future results.
Full disclaimer located at attorneytom.co...
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
A reasonable request becomes unreasonable when delivered with excessive force. You also have your reputation to be concerned about as an attorney and a semi educational content creator.
Well said.
As attorney Tom said lawyers have to be lawyers. I could see getting mad about someone not giving credit and I can see protecting your Brand
100%. This whole thing is the definition of "could've been an email". Like, why is it harder to say "hey, can you add a link to my Facebook page or tag me or a link to my original video"--all of which are very reasonable requests and very easy to resolve--than it is to get ahold of a lawyer, pay them to write (or adapt a template for) a c&d? Like, surely DMing or emailing would've been faster, simpler, and cheaper. Not to mention all the bad press this is.
I guess when you're a hammer every problem looks like a nail but still...
Yeah, not tagging or linking was a huge dick move but legal response was uncalled for. Should have been a quick email or phone call.
Are we talking about Russia's request to Ukraine?
Singing off with "I'll see you in court" is infringing on legal eagle. Another lawsuit incoming
Yo, I hope Devon does his own video on this situation and ends the video with 'or Attorney Tom will see you in court.' Crossover we all need, yo.
I'll be sure to let him know of his possible upcoming litigation 😉
Should he retain Leonard French since it's media copyright? You know, have a RUclips lawyer trifecta rumble cage match? Plus Leonard comes with silly hats so that's a bonus.
@@kurtf1 "What's this? Steve Lehto's picked up a chair?!"
Must've missed the singing part.
I did however like that he signed off with that. Signing off like that is like a mic drop
Now the ask Tom question becomes, “if a person is served and the name is not their legal name, did they really get served?”
This 👆🏻
lmao. In this case... probably yes.
@@AttorneyTom in most cases. It's sent to the person's personal (mail) address, so it's with all the right "intent". I put intent in quotes.... Because
@@AttorneyTom this isn't the real attorney Tom, if you were the real you would've said it depends
I mean, the supreme court case of Dred Scott v Sandford literally includes a typo in its name and all the case info about it... Bcuz some clerk put in Sandford instd of Sanford.
So theres def a longstandin precedence of a typoed name not bein a problem in court cases.
Ms. Baily and you should go on The People's Court to settle this.
Judge Judy
dra. Polo if you speak Spanish
I was involved with a writer's organization that got sued. Our annual conference was at the end of September, 2001. Because some assholes flew planes into buildings in New York, most of our scheduled guests were unable to attend since, you know, the whole country was a no-fly zone. This guy was pissed because an editor he had an appointment with didn't show because he couldn't spare the time to drive or use a bus or train and there was NO FLYING to Albuquerque or anywhere else. We notified him and everyone else we could reach who had appointments about the issue and offered refunds or credit for the next year, which he rejected. It ended up on the Judge Joe Brown show. Joe Brown said "he who complains, wins." I was able to chat with one substitute guest, who said that his entire publishing career up until the year before had been in those buildings, and most of the people he had worked with were in them that day. Apparently Joe Brown did not have much connection with reality.
Night Court would be most appropriate!
You know what threatens Ms Baily's reputation? Sending an unfounded cease and desist letter to a RUclips lawyer that reacts to all sorts of ridiculous content. How could she not anticipate this would happen?
I agree
I see what you did, they spelled Tom's name wrong, so you spell her name wrong
Free publicity
@@andrewschleicher1902 perhaps... But this gives me personally more reasons to watch more of Tom and less of her 🤷 ...even less! And I wasn't even aware of her existence, as a European
@@MLnyamada 👀🤣
On Apr 14, 2022 around 9PM Local time I heard what I thought to be an explosion that shook my home. I began gathering supplies and made costly arrangements with my family to take flights away from the perceived danger zone.
I now realize on Apr 22, 2022, This was in fact Attorney Tom delivering the biggest "sit the fu** down" slap ever heard on RUclips from across the world.
Had us in the first half not gonna lie
Gotta love the balls to go after a RUclips lawyer on unfounded legal claims
I think it maybe is like drop kicking a 👶 baby. Its fun the first hundred times but eventually you will need new boots
Considering Emily D. Baker got hit offline by Law & Crime for using pool camera footage from day one of Depp v. Heard, Ms. Bailey isn't the only one.
@@hauntedshadowslegacy2826 Law & Crime went after Reiketa Law first. He now refers to them as "Law and Cucks". They backed down eventually.
@@tek4 WHAT?!?!!! Got to say. First time I heard that saying
You would not believe the amount of baseless claims that see the light of day….pretty disgusting
Kudos. Thanks for standing up for fair treatment of content creators against people who can afford to waste money hiring lawyers to send intimidating letters.
She could have approached you in the spirit of collaboration. You obviously didn't make any attempt to "steal" the content outright, and she could have garnered interest in her own channel while making more interesting content by working with you as opposed to using a cease and desist.
Yup! This is honestly just terrible PR for her.
I had subscribed but now i think im going to drop her channel
@@tinykitsune0387 Same. This overreaction has cost her much of my respect.
@@paulleakeii6388 its a little sad too but I don’t want to support this kind of behavior even if i do find her show entertaining. Im hoping she gets back to tom and it was like an automated content protection thing but from the wording of the cease and desist it does not seem that way
It's a TV judge that pretends to have law knowledge. She's not even worth anyone's time, especially since she doesn't know anything about fair use, or how to use google to look up a name of a famous youtuber. Embarrassing.
If I have to send you a cease and desist, I'll make sure I spell your name right Tim.
🤪😭😭
That cease and desist letter was one sneaky way of getting Attorney Tom’s signature.
sending a cease and desist letter now, for Attorney Tom mentioning me (when referring to his "viewers") without crediting me directly. Sorry, that's all I've got to work off of
I have a feeling this letter was sent by a 3rd-party service, the same way your Facebook page is automated by a 3rd-party.
It's certainly possible. A project my nephew did was struck for the actual video because the AI mistook his cardboard recreation of the opening of phantom of the opera for a bootlegged copy. He worked it out with the people who ran the FB page in the end, since it was an honest mistake. Could be a similar thing here, though I must question why it was only an issue on Facebook if it were something 3rd party.
I'm very much thinking the same thing but that does not make the way that this was handled by the even a third party acceptable. A professional content protection team or whatever you would like to call it would be well encouraged to perform basic research on the way the content was used in terms of fair use as well as determining whether a resolution may exist that does not involve spending money on an attorney.
Think she signed it
It was. Thr letter said "as the firm representing Ms Bailey/Support Court"
@@devent10n YT's copyright system is a bit heavy-handed and overly zealous. Most people don't manually claim, most claims are automatic through registering content IDs or automatic registering of content ID by the AI. I believe FB is all manual requests but can be AI scanned. So the content is identified automatically (potentially) but FB doesn't automatically assume everyone's a thief and a liar like YT does (boy, really shows what Google/Alphabet thinks of regular people doesn't it?)
Yeah, suing a bar certified lawyer over a minor non-issue in general is usually not exactly indicative of a very high intellectual capacity or intelligence. I'm sorry you had to deal with this, and I'm glad that you're not complying with such baseless requests.
Especially when the legal action you're trying to take is completely invalid.
it could also get her in trouble with the BAR association for filing an invalid lawsuit over a non violation of law
I didn't know it was possible to be a Non-BAR lawyer. I was pretty sure you had to pass it to practice law in the US.
I guess this is what it’s like when lawyers fight lol. Attorney Tom won this one. Legal pettiness at its finest.
Fight? Or Flirt?
@@benriker2732 this isn’t ace attorney
@@benriker2732 "😉 I'll see you in court 💋"
@@benriker2732 yes
Someone needs to make a compilation of awkward pauses on Attorney Tom's face.
okay 👍
That wud literally be almost as long as his vids. You truly can just pause at any time prty much and get a good weird face.
Including the whole video probably wouldn't be considered fair use.
Although you might be able to make a few SHORT breaks.....
@@rodh1404 Actually if its tranformative it cud be; if for example one were to upload a still from every sec of a video but as like an art collage of pics of Tom or as part of a multivid analysis/critique/commentary on every single frame picked apart in its own video... Both those cud be easily viewed as within fair use, esp more likely if shown without audio.
No one would want to watch a 100h video.
Bruh... Attorney Tom literally made a the "call an ambulance, but not for me" meme, into a copyright law matter.
This is the content I want, combating the dmca abuse so prevalent on social media platforms!
Tom, thank you for this. Large channels and companies have been using false DMCA strikes to remove content they don't like, steal the ad revenue from smaller creators for using tiny snippets of content, and generally abusing the tools that exist to their own ends (as intended by the entertainment industry). It's awesome that you're intending to fight this. It's important to the future of content online that fair use is protected.
How to screw over your brand:
Sending a cease and decict to an attorney.
That’s exactly why I’m studying to be an attorney. Not just to make a living of what I enjoy, which is legal research, but also to stand up to bullies. In America knowledge of the law is the strongest power you can hold in your hands apart from money (for the purpose of bribery, access to key figures who can turn the tide your way and/or the resources to fight lawsuits indefinitely obviously lol). This is wonderful and satisfying to me.
Keep at it, man. We need more people like you in the World.
I'd suggest if you're going into law, you rationalize in your head that argumentation and perception is more valuable and often stronger than the laws themselves. Hopefully it'll save you that grief I went through when I realized the law isn't perfect and can be argued into a wet paper bag. Wish you all the best going forward! Whatever you do, don't give up.
Safeway sent me spoiled milk in my grocery delivery. Can I sue?
Also, good on you.
@@oppaloopa3698 this isnt legal advice but from what i've seen, you probably cant. If you drunk the spoiled milk unknowingly and you got sick probably, but since you know it is spoiled you might just want to file a complaint with them and get it settled there instead of court.
@@oppaloopa3698 go buy your own groceries, you can pick your own milk
Judges like this..a tv show.. is only entertainment... who takes them seriously?
I've been looking forward to this since the poll came out. Tom's specific version of pettiness and sarcasm are perfect for a professional "Fuck you I won't do what you tell me"
I really hope that her response is, " sorry I approached it this way. I will not go through with legal action. Would you still extend the courtesy of linking my channel on the video?" I am sure Tom would still give that courtesy if she "asks nicely."
I didn't finish the video. He's doing just that.
Microsoft is sending you a cease and desist for using their windows logo prominently in your video, as well as instructions on how to change your desktop wallpaper.
the last point made this comment even better, you win lol
She's not even a real judge, and everyone involved are just actors.... why she so mad?
I have literally responded to official and scary sounding C&D letters like this from real lawyers with the words, "Pound sand," and nothing else. Only once, ever, has anyone ever escalated. In that case, I responded with a link showing that the law firm in question was famous for bullying people whom they had no legal claim against, and I said, "I repeat, pound sand." Didn't hear from them again.
That one ticked me off. They made me actually take time out of my day to search their law firm on Google. I wasted a whole 15 minutes on them.
you should sue for loss of earnings. or not. whatever.
This is one of those situations where you just send a message. "Hey would you mind linking a reference to my channel in your Facebook post that covers my video?" Sending a cease and desist should in a civil world be the next step..
This is so gross. I loathe companies trying to force C&D letters on things that are OBVIOUS fair use. You don't have to link anywhere, that is just courtesy. You totally should give credit, and a link, as Tom always does. But not doing so has absolutely nothing to do with intellectual property. This is just a judge that knows she can abuse her power, abusing her power and having her lawyers abuse their power.
"Do i always make weird faces when im paused" Yes indeed xD Tested three random pauses after that and got three weird faces in a row xD
Case dismissed: you are not Tom Kherker.
Sadly no tho. Dred Scott v Sandford didnt get dismissed on acct of a name typo in the spellin of Sanfords name. Thus theres very longstandin precedence of typos not matterin as long as they arent egregious.
If they called him Mr. Krabapple and Attorney Mat; then theres potential for case dismissal on procedural grounds tho.
@@SylviaRustyFae what if you present as evidence Mr. Tom Kherker?
This is the juicy legal drama I wasn’t expecting but happily got, thanks Tom!
She giving you a lawsuit over free advertisement. The world is wild.
Maybe upset that his video had so many more views than hers.
@@daveadams4402 why, that's more people that know about her.
@@ADogNamedStay I agree. People can be upset over the smallest things nowadays.
I wouldn't have known of Vonda's channel if it hadn't been for you covering her. I really enjoy her content, and I've never been under any assumption it was the property of anyone else's but hers.
Thank you for replying as graciously as you did, and drawing a line in the sand. I'm not sure why Vonda would waste money on hiring an attorney to send letters like this, when a simple representative sending a DM or letter to ask, would have sufficed. I can only assume she got talked into it as some sort of package management deal. She doesn't strike me the type to have a single malicious bone in her body; yet surely, she's not a woman who will tolerate being walked over, and I'm certain many other channels have attempted to profit from her work by reuploading her content and trying to claim it monetarily.
I WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU BOTH IN THE SAME ROOM! What and absolute force and humor you two would create. Maybe you can go over some cases together and give your opinions. One from the side of a judge, the other from a lawyer. OMG that would ROCK!
I'm not a fan of those TV courtrooms, since I find them quite exploitative, but I definitely think that having a judge and a lawyer looking at court cases would be interesting content.
A collab is an excellent idea, and I hope this situation works out in a way that would be possible
@@devent10n eh I don't mind the people get paid and even though that doesn't show up tv I'm sure it fixes whatever issues they have. Massive legal battle paid for to act like a jester? I get the appeal.
Further Fair Use: Tom adds value to the original.
Exactly! I mean how does Tom resemble a black woman? Clearly he is using video of another creator and it is very clear whose it is. The argument they make is really kind of embarrassing when you consider it has been sent to another attorney. And honestly, if you want to throw shade at least spell the person's name right. Otherwise it just seems to compound your baseless argument.
Love the threat at the end of the letter. Be courteous even if you've been wronged
You have my full support. No matter how tiny i am.
Also hi new lawyer man 👋
I saw the judge for about .25 seconds and instantly understood what her problem is.
10:07 This whole edit scene is downright marvelous and accurately depicts how content is made for facebook xD
tom just pulled a anime monologue and clapped back with fewer words then the opponent and its impressive how chill he is about this
Honestly you two should just collaborate. Like if I were her I’d want to collaborate rather than ordering a cease and desist. Like imagine the content you two could create. A lot of people would have loved to have seen a RUclips judge and lawyer collaborate on things and give different perspectives.
is that your real last name?
@@Z..z..zz. why man 😂😂
Why should Tom collaborate with a bully?
Not after this.
So I'm going to be serious for a second. If this was a rouse, and not truly the course of events, and this was a collab.. I would be devastated.
Lawyer Winton is killing it, he took to the camera like a natural.
I love this for you. I'm behind you, Tom!
F YEAH !!! Get them Tom 👏 stand up for those who won't stand up for them self out of fear
Not all heros wear capes. I am glad I am subscribed to Tom.
I agree, Tom would look really good in a cape!
I love how you cite H3 in your response!
Tom getting sued, he doesn’t care.
If you or I were punched in the face, it would be a big deal. But when a boxer is punched in the face, just another day at the office.
He's not getting sued. That's not what a cease and desist letter does.
@@devent10n I know, I just worded it wrong in the moment.
As a researcher, I am sometimes worried that we are getting closer to an age, in which we will be afraid to even cite somebody's work, because even proper citation in quotation marks with properly formatted reference to the cited work will not be considered sufficient enough one day. I am seeing academics being cancelled and ousted for "plagiarism", because the citation style they used 15 years ago is not considered enough today. Somee publishing houses have already set limits on how many characters can you cite from somebody else's work, even when it is properly referenced. Copyright law is getting out of control
Late response but 100% agreed.
This really shows how important Ethan Klein's Matt Hoss battle was. Current triller battle will probably also set a precedent for content creators, hopefully in a good manner.
I have ignored every C&D letter ever. Have yet to get a legitimate one. Have yet to have anyone follow up.
Maybe this is why nobody watches TV anymore?😂
I love that Tom has no hard feelings because he was genuinely pleased with her court show and the case that he referenced.
I never expected for this kind of development to happen but at the same time I am intrigued with this kind of juicy content.
I wouldn't say keep it up because further escalation would just mean more hassle for both parties. But yeah this was an interesting and unexpected video. Thanks for keeping us entertained Attorney!
It was nice to meet Winton! Multiple points of view is very nice to see!
Amazing work! Thank you for what you do!
Juicy stuff here... can't wait to see where this goes.
Tom I'm really glad to have a creator like you on the platform
Oh my .....Lawyer Winton......star quality right there! I’m subscribed. Keep on standing up!
Considering what Sargon of Akkad did with Akilah Obviously's video and it being declared "obvious Fair Use", ""Judge"" Vonda has no chance of winning. At least you can sue for legal expenses and get a huge payday for yourself.
""Judge"" Vonda may have deserved the courtesy before, but no longer. She has proven herself to be of low character and not deserving of courtesy. She deserves the bare minimum required by law.
Attorney Tom, a lawyer of principle. There are good people in this world 💯
I love how well he handled this. Might make a great lawyer.
Bust em up bro! Standing up against bullies one day at a time!
Hay Attorney Tom question, you've stated that if a lawyer that represent himself has a fool of a client... honest question isn't it better to work this with a third party?
If she sues me... I will hire outside counsel.
Attorneys, like many people, are allowed to take non monetary payment. A lawyer representing a small family restaraunt can accept 6 months where their meals are free upon showing a card or something instead of cash payment
@@table2187 Not sure on this spec case, but at least in the case of Attorney Tom, a personal injury lawyer, it sounds like the max amount he can take cannot be more than 33.33% of a claim.
Found thru the HG organization; "While the maximum set amount that a lawyer may take does not usually exist in a dollar amount, it does generate various values through a set percentage. In most cases that progress through the civil courts, the lawyer may take at the most up to 33.33 percent of the total of any settlement for a personal injury claim. The lawyer could take less, and he or she often does when the amount pays for everything and what the two parties agreed to before proceeding through the claim in the courtroom. This legal agreement may hold the legal professional to a much lower percentage for higher compensation claims.
No matter when the claim settles or how much, the legal representative usually cannot take more than the 33.33 percent of compensation awards. However, most of the fees and expense the lawyer will acquire through the completed case are in the fine print of a legal agreement between client and lawyer. Contingency fees, deposits and other costs are usually in these documents as well." and
"It is possible for certain situations to increase the amount the lawyer will take from the settlement. These circumstances generally apply to the times when the settlement occurs after the filing of the lawsuit. The legal professional may need to help with adjustments after the defending party ignores or completely lacks taking the demand letter seriously. The state often permits the lawyer to take as much as 40 percent of the compensation awards when the settlement occurs after the lawsuit files in the state of residence. Additional costs may still tack onto the total before the lawyer takes his or her cut."
Presumably that 40% number cud be the number reached for a cap that a lawyer can ask for in any case, not just personal injury cases. But ianal and i wudnt be shocked at all if theres no cap; even if that means someone doesnt make anythin off of a lawsuit.
Alternative and much more effective hypothetical letter from Mrs. Bailey ....
Hello Attorney Tom! This is Mrs. Bailey. Thank you so much for reacting to my video. I appreciate the additional exposure. I noticed that on your Facebook repost you forgot to link back to my original vid. Would you do me the favor of adding that link. Thanks. Hugs. (You see how much better informal and friendly can be)
Seems unnecessary and shortsighted - I only ever found that divorce court RUclips channel because of your reaction video. Really seems shortsighted business-wise… why would you send a cease and desist to free advertisement?
Wow! You are such a hero. How dares a copyright holder ask for accreditation on a piece of content built on her creation and how dares a copyright holder, who specializes in legal procedures, ask a content creator, who specializes in legal matters and is an attorney, to use a lawyer to ask for said accreditation? To me, this is your grandstanding. Could she have contacted you directly and asked to be credited? Sure but considering the world you both work in, it makes sense to keep things within that area, besides, it's not up to you to decide whether that content falls under fair use, you might think it does while she might think it doesn't. It's for a court to determine.
Her marketing team is a genius. They knew this would expose them to an audience of people that enjoy legal stuff.
I think they knew there was no case here, but Tom would react to it and give her a plug
True, but the "All publicity is good publicity " isn't always true. People who actually enjoy legal stuff ( Tom's target audience ) will find her actions ridiculous and will be less inclined to check it out because most law nerds are not interested in " dumpster fires" which is the usual pull that bad pr can produce. I could be wrong, but that's my immediate analysis
I will say you do have a very good "freeze frame face" 🤣🤣
Better pay up
I tip my hat to you sir, for defending yourself and showing that bullying tactics won't work, or they will untill you find the one guy who stands up to you. Makes one wonder how many times they did this before Tom.
Winton Yates is the most lawyer name that ever lawyered!
slapped by legal ✋😢
Keep fighting the good fight! Love you man
Love it Tom. Don't bow down to bullies.
Hey, Tom, is there any legal downside to actually just requesting the link without filing a legal notice instead? Does it open you up to anything or forfeit something else?
There is no downside. The worst the reacting creator can do is say "no." It does not open them up to any liability.
@Don't Shoot The answer to his question was not in the video. He expressed his question clearly and succintly. The creator answered clearly and succintly, with information which was not already in the video.
What's your problem exactly? Maybe you should follow your username's advice more.
@@ApiolJoe Ha! That troll just got wrecked. Nice!
@@ApiolJoe oh my gawd you sliced him in half that was epic
@@AttorneyTom I am confused is their lawyer so stupid they have no idea about copyright? because of all the false claims they make! Or think you a lawyer has no idea about copyright?
Your letter looks like it has been written by a lawyer unlike theirs!
UNTIL THE OOPPS! The apologize is an admission of guilt?
Thank you! For all that you inform & honestly teach me about on ur channel.. along with that Thanks for standing up! It’s inspiring and also just so completely necessary!
Attorney Winton sure went in hard as hell
Thank you Atty. Tom for sharing the whole story. Many youtubers are afraid to share legal matters on their channel but this truly was educational in a 'real world' sense.
Cheers mate! Thanks for sharing your struggles as a content creator.
This is my favorite Attorney Tom video yet. Way better than all those videos where you advocate kicking babies.
Yea I unsubscribed from her that’s bs
I loved the holes reference from Lawyer Winton, I remember reading the book for a club in elementary school.
ever since your editor informed me that you do indeed make weird faces every time you're paused, I've started pausing a lot more
I'm so glad to see someone fighting back against this stuff
Tbh this probably my favorite video so far in the attorney tom RUclips channel because it really talks about or this video content is all about the REAL situation in argumentative lawyer incident i really love how this well so played by his people....
PS : attorney tom you're the be(st) also can't wait for the final conclusion 👨⚖️👩⚖️🧑⚖️
To your support lawyer guy: ET looks like he's eyeing you, to kidnap you and bring you with him, when he goes home...don't turn your back to him.
Lol
Now you’re going to get in trouble with legal eagle for stealing his sign off
Thanks for the small update!
As a growing channel I feel its so easy to get coerced by big organisations. My university is threatening to kick me off my course for posting videos including their logo when comparing different university students. It obviously falls under fair use but I don't think I can fight a whole university so have just blurred them out.
She is not a judge. She is playing a part that she dreams of being one day.
Wow. Judges should not act so petty. I have always expected better behavior from them given their position ov power.
I actually find this ridiculous and a bit sad. So many better was to go about talking with you about this. A collaboration could have been really great! But this?!
*edit* I have to say, that clip at the end is hilarious. Love that show!
Mate, I found you through the Facebook videos. Thanks for the content. Its really grouse
lol now you need to do a video on why the order pertains to you when they spelled your name wrong
I love you basically said professionally said “Fuck around and find out”.
Tom, you should definitely tell Mr. Winton that he should start a RUclips channel. I would definitely watch!
his channel is linked in the description. :D
Thinking about how many small channels who gets intimidated into deleting their fair use videos, because they don't know the law, and don't want the hassle. I thank you on their behalf, for letting the big bullies know that they can't just step on people. 2 thumps up!
I apologize for my English, it is not my first language.
Just admit your shorter than 6' and all your legal troubles will disappear
Lol 😆
I AM GOING TO SUE YOU!!! lol
I found Judge Vonda B through your original react video. I have since subscribed to her channel and regularly watched and interacted with her content. “Support Court” sounds ungrateful for the additional views, traffic, and attention that your channel’s video gave to the channel. Good for you for standing up for content creators clearly working within fair use.
So is the cease and desist still meaningful if they spell your name wrong?
He answered another comment on this; prty much yeah, it most likely wudnt be a problem here, as regardless of the typo there was an intent and good faith effort made to contact him and its clear he was contacted.
If the typo were more egregious like Mr. Krabapple instd of Mr. Kherker, then maybe it mite be different tho. But given it also uses an alias of his that is spelled correctly, Attorney Tom, i believe that alias wud be properly identifyin him enuf even if the legal name of his is incorrect.
Notably on the small typo case tho, the supreme court case of Dred Scott v Sandford has a typo in it cuz someone mispelled the lastname of Sanford and it just cudnt be changed at that point and thus all the case law had to refer to him by such. Tho that wud only happen here if this got followed up with a lawsuit and they still mispelled his name; but that still wudnt be cause to dismiss the whole case.
@@SylviaRustyFae I thought so! Thanks! I imagine if it was really an issue all it would take to remedy is just another letter
When you said your content was "transformative," I thought you meant on a personal level. I felt that.
I need to do a new video: Lawyer Reacts to Attorney Tom's Reaction to RUclips Judge's Reaction
I WILL SUE YOU IF YOU MAKE A REACTION VIDEO TO THIS... lol
@@AttorneyTom 🤣🤣🤣 New video idea: Lawyer Reacts to Lawsuit From Attorney Tom For Reaction Video of Attorney Tom's Reaction to RUclips Judge's Reaction.
(But for real, that's how Dallas Lawyers actually title their pleadings. lol)
And thats how you do it, mad props to you Tom