On privileging the demarcation question | Prof Robert Brandom

"You privilege the demarcation question and say it's primary in a certain way, but I'm wondering whether that's true. Why do we need to advance a conception or an answer to the demarcation question before we engage in the other ones? That seems to be an un-pragmatic move as it were. So we need a definition to know what we're talking about in making the demarcation, so should we think we figure out what we're talking about by actually engaging in an enquiry into this problematic distinction?"
---
'From German Idealism to American Pragmatism - and back': Keynote lecture of 2015 Summer Institute in American Philosophy delivered by Robert Brandom (University of Pittsburgh). June 12, 2015.
Kant’s most basic idea, the axis around which all his thought turns, is that what distinguishes exercises of judgment and intentional agency from the performances of merely natural creatures is that judgments and actions are subject to distinctive kinds of normative assessment. Judgments and actions are things we are in a distinctive sense responsible for.
The classical pragmatist versions of naturalism and empiricism fit together much better than the traditional and logical empiricist versions that preceded and succeeded them. Far from being in tension, they complement and mutually support one another. Both the world and our knowledge of it are construed on a single model: as mutable, contingent products of statistical selectional-adaptational processes that allow order to pop to the surface and float in a sea of random variability. Both nature and experience are to be understood in terms of the processes by which relatively stable constellations of habits arise and sustain themselves through their interactions with an environment that includes a population of competing habits.
UCD Twitter: / ucddublin
UCD Facebook: / universitycollegedublin
UCD Instagram: / ucddublin
UCD Homepage: www.ucd.ie