I'm always amused when men try to get into relationships with strippers (or any seggs workers) thinking they can make honest family women out of them... it's like trying to domesticate a shark, it's a shark bro, it's gona do what it wants to do.
So basically, he met a stripper, paid for butt, did drugs with her, married it, then gets mad when she doesnt change habits....Hmmmmmm I wonder what his convos are like when dudes mom cooks him a snack ..
Sounds like she wasn't the Susie home maker or faithful type ; you just can't know, can you ? How was the guy to know ? It is not like there were any red flags !
And I have to say, he demonstrated the clearest example of 'liars mouth' I've ever seen when he answered "no" to if he's done blow with her in that time period.
I think the dad in the first video came across as a scorned lover. I think the fact that he let her live with him until August and then decided to enforce the divorce order afyer she moved out says what we need to know. I think the judge was also getting that vibe which is why he kept reminding her how to file the motion.
I agree, I was looking for this comment.. I don't know why but I get the vibe that this dad is mad that she's moving on... It's always one of the regular three things they claim, drugs, alcohol, or sexual misconduct. He used 2 of the 3.
Scorned lover? Can we blame him, though? It's not as though we're expecting he'd be happy with her at the turn of events, even after a second chance. I think the judge was rather lenient with her which goes to reinforce the notion in women that they can basically do whatever they want and flout a court order and get off with a *slap* on the wrist, no enforcement whatsoever. Yet we wonder why the society is the way it is.
Judge was just trying to get hooked up with access to her OnlyFans account... he knew damn well that her cam was working just fine but she doesn't go live for free. 😉
OMG he's a mummy's boy. He sounds to me like a drama queen. Mike you never believe the female partners. This guy just wants his mummy and him and kids to live together.
The second clip is now my all-time favorite judge's response to jurisdiction challenges. "OK. Challenge it!" The lumpheads don't understand that you don't just say "I challenge jurisdiction". You file a motion that includes a coherent legal argument that lays out why jurisdiction does not exist. You don't just say "Nuh-uh!"
How's the common man supposed to know why and how jurisdiction doesn't exist when they hide such remedy in their own procedures, they even hide it among members of the Bar?
@@JLova82the common man is entitled to an attorney. If you represent yourself it's on you to have the correct knowledge including the absolute basics of how to file a motion with the court. It's not hidden, court procedures are published and available to the public. There is a lot to know though and that's why you should get an attorney.
Sorry, Mike. I practice family law, and the things coming out of this guy's mouth I have heard time and time again. From both mothers and fathers. This is nothing more than just bitter, bitter BS. Most likely he thinks he won't have to pay child support if he has the kids. This is definitely one of those, "if I had a nickel" for every time I've heard this nonsense.
I agree. I've been through the family court, and they don't base orders on problems that don't exist. This guy is bitter, and exaggerating. The referee is spot on and reasonable
The way the judge dealt with the sovturd is how all judges should treat idiotic sovturds. It's making them not just cite previous cases but what they believe the case was concerning.
Except, that's not what happened, is it? The [judge] 's all ears at the mere mention of a "special appearance," why? Because special appearance is an actual thing in law.
@@JLova82 but what the fk d so sovturds know about the true laws, ad where is his third party to challenge the court's assertion of personal jurisdiction over the party. The judge identified him as an idiot with 0 knowledge of how laws work.
@@JLova82my understanding was special appearance was a thing in civil law when you intend to challenge jurisdiction. Not a thing in criminal law so would be meaningless in this case. Just going off of what I read though so I could be wrong.
Oh wait I was a stripper too. I however divorced him because he became a csc criminal 6 months into our marriage, and I was 6months pregnant. I stayed with him for 16yrs. Then couldn’t take it anymore.
It also sounds like he is trying to get her away from the kids (parental alienation). If he continues to pull that crap he's going to lose custody, as he should, and have only supervised visitation.
@@JLova82pro se defendants aren't entitled to any special treatment although many judges give them some leeway. If he wants to challenge jurisdiction there is a procedure and it's on him to know and follow it.
There is no reason for courts to listen to this sovcit stuff, it's a waste of everyone's time and hasnt worked for anyone, which makes it even dumber that people still think its a good argument.
@@101Mant The issue is that _pro se_ is never properly defined to anyone but a handful of judges 'in the know.' For a _person_ to "stand pro se" in a [Roman court] means they're standing _pro se in rem_ or "standing as 'surety' to a 'thing'" --- not necessarily a _Roman person ---_ with no life, rights, few privileges whatsoever! In _Western-Roman law, _*_things_* are able to be silenced or destroyed at any time, on a whim! Again, this is baked into the sheer presumption of a Roman court in consolidating its own power, while giving away none, except to very few trusted members of the Bar guild (Bar Associations), so it is never properly challenged by anyone, ever! This cheat code for the judges, in the form of occult knowledge of the law, is tied into the claim of _jus in rem_ [in re] or a "right in rem" by _jus gentium_ or the private international law of "nation-states," or, if ya' like, "Estates" [STATES]; effectively handing Roman courts unlimited jurisdiction in any matter, public and private, real and personal, with little to no remedy afforded for such perversions in law! Does that seem fair and reasonable to you?
Mike you're so wrong. He was conflating her violation of pictures with taking the children out of school. This father was ridiculous. His concerns were beyond speculative. Her lifestyle was fine when he had control over her and now that he doesn't, he wants to complain. This referee totally got the picture.
''Her lifestyle was fine when he had control over her and now that he doesn't, he wants to complain.'' Or maybe he grew up, became responsible and she didn't.
EXACTLY LOL, I just said the same thing. This guy wanted the hot stripper he met at the club. She obviously got sick of him trying to control her. He’s using those kids as his emotional blackmail big time. I’ve known a couple of guys exactly like this.
@@65cj55 That is possible, but I seriously doubt it. In the same way that no one believed his answer to "did you ever do drugs with her". The idea that he would prevent a mother from even taking pictures of the child (not just posting as the default judgment listed) is indicative of his childish behavior. But of course, we are all entitled to our perspective.
She doesn't want people to be able to see her image because she could be identified as a scammer by possible "marks". Nursing homes need to be wary also!!!
I and my wife come from a divorce household, I can't imagine two people that can create a child can grow to hate each other at this level. Personally, I do not believe in divorce, there is NOTHING about my behavior I wouldn't change to protect my marriage.
I can't imagine going through divorce--especially with kids. Hubby and I've been married >50 years. We both came from families where divorce was unheard of! Today's revolving door is horrible.
The bail one at the end is ridiculous. $10k not ok to let a man in a wheelchair out but it's ok for $30k according to the state. How the hell does that make any sense at all?
"Lots" of people post picture of their children on social media, but ask any expert on child exploitation, and they advise strongly against it. I NEVER post pictures of my kids on social media platforms.
@@bdiddy1030why is it a problem? Why particularly for girls? If the mom can look after the kids I fail to see the problem. If the argument is it might influence the kids to be strippers that's just circular logic, you have to first establish why its actually bad in itself.
One more thing: we had this dj. He told me one night that this job had seemed like a fantasy come to life when he landed it. Then, he gets quiet and says, I never realized how terrifying women could be. One of you runs up here to tell me what Stacy did, and if I nod or smile, Stacy is up here 5 minutes later yelling about how dare I take sides. I don't want to get married. I don't even date anymore. You guys have ruined my life. Lol. I don't think he was even kidding.
If he has sole legal custody, all he has to do is provide the school with that paperwork and they won’t let her take the kids out of school. At least they’re not supposed to. He could also have a little note put on their accounts to not release them to her, her father, or her sister if he’s really worried about it. He can do all of that just being the custodial guardian, he needs to make sure all of the front office staff know though.
Did I hear right? He has sole legal custodial and physical custody but the judge still said she could keep doing what she's doing. Sorry. Maybe I heard wrong.
She has every right to pull her children from school. He has provided no proof of his allegations against her. He's a vengeful lying lover and nothing more
The dad is clearly butthurt about his wife not being interested in him any longer, and doing whatever he can to use the kids as pawns to get back at her.
Definitely a hard no. It is dangerous to put you kids pics and info online for anyone. Kids are having their identity stolen and their credit is destryed by the time they are 18. I quit puting any of it online. It just isnt worth it.
It sounds like he doesn’t want child predators to see pictures of his children. He is probably concerned that a predator will see a picture and target his kid. That’s good parenting. He was dismissed. Very sad
The judge is wrong for implying He doesn’t know what she’s doing today but unless she went to rehab or has done something to prove she is different He has every right to assume nothing has changed.
Dad Bringing this contempt, will cause mom to request review of custody order. Currently dad has all custody rights. Give school copy of custody order, school won’t let her check the kids out.
I enjoy listening to your videos in the evenings. Love the 'Throple' But the end of this video it just hit me; now I know what my problem has been. 'I am totally in the wrong world". Beam me up Scotty!😅
Why did you marry her and have children... please! He is trying to control her... He is jealous!!! OMG, if this man calls their children, them kids one more time I will scream
This judge 100% participates in LEGAL Adult entertainment. He wanted to make it clear that there is LEGAL Adult Entertainment! Hahaha he’s definitely an advocate for it!
I was hoping Judge Manning would have been assigned the Fani Willis RICO case. Though judge McAfee was good in the first hearing, he's only 34 and lacks Judge Manning's humor, seriousness and ability to clamp down on stupid.
So, i did some online sleuthing and found Anthony's fb page. His children are adorable! Next, I found the ex wife. You guessed it, long legged blond. Typical for sure. I really hope the parents focus on the well being of those cute kids and stop bickering about mundane things. One thing I've discovered after my divorce. My ex husband tried to poison my son's hearts against me and in the end, they came running back to me after they became adults. Life has a funny way of making all the uphill battles worth it. My sons are very successful in their careers and they live near me. Thousands of miles from their dad lol 🤣
I believe a lot of what he says and absolutely don’t believe it when he acts as if he didn’t participate. He met her at a strip club. They both behaved like people who spend a lot of time in strip clubs. He then got serious when the children came along and she did not.
@@LawTalkWithMike according to her,he was lying about everything. She said she passed a drug test. If she’s really going to nursing school,she might be too embarrassed to show her face. I have a little left to watch. We’ll see if I still believe her when I’m done.
Strippers and sovereign citizens? Who needs football season when we have LTWM?
I'm always amused when men try to get into relationships with strippers (or any seggs workers) thinking they can make honest family women out of them... it's like trying to domesticate a shark, it's a shark bro, it's gona do what it wants to do.
Truer words were never spoken. I can hear the DJ saying, "Gents, put some greenery on the scenery!" Or so I was told...
@@97TJ If the judge had made it rain dollar bills, she would have figured out how to get that camera working. 💵🎉🎉🎉
Why does this comment only have 67 likes!? 😂
Oh no, still need football 😂
"I'm here to challenge jurisdiction." "Challenge it." I like this judge.
skin it! skin that smokewagon and see what happens!
@@lordraydens "I'm your Huckleberry, that's just my game." (wrong character but same film)
Under her father's record, I totally agree with no pics of kids in his possession
I agree ! With his record of posting child porn on line , I don't want to think about his motive for his posting the pictures of his grandchildren .
Woman with "daddy issues" marries man who lives with his mother...what could possibly go wrong?
A very clever comment ! It would seem that both the man and the woman have "daddy issues " .
So basically, he met a stripper, paid for butt, did drugs with her, married it, then gets mad when she doesnt change habits....Hmmmmmm I wonder what his convos are like when dudes mom cooks him a snack ..
I agree. You can only marry a stripper if your habits are worse than the strippers. The stripper must be able to handle you, not the other way around.
@@Kunfucious577 strippers and dudes that marry strippers should not be having kids.
Sounds like she wasn't the Susie home maker or faithful type ; you just can't know, can you ? How was the guy to know ? It is not like there were any red flags !
Sounds to me like he's a total control freak.
Handsome silver fox judge
The stripper husband sounds vengeful. I don’t believe that he didn't use cocaine with her.
ABSOLUTELY HE DID AND PROBABLY TOOK HER TIP MONEY TO
And I have to say, he demonstrated the clearest example of 'liars mouth' I've ever seen when he answered "no" to if he's done blow with her in that time period.
Oh he snorted it right off her A&$
💯
I bet his mommy was in the room. How could he? 😂
"Wait. A guy that lives with his mother can't keep a stripper under control?" I almost peed m'self.
It brings a whole new meaning to that mother-in-law who always thinks that you're not good enough for her little boy LOL
Omgawd😂😂😂😂
He doesn't sound much like a mans man when you think about it ; but there is a good chance that he had a little coke or could at lease get some !
I'm sorry did he say her father was a pedophile? Cause I wouldn't want pictures of my kids on a pedophile's account.
I think the dad in the first video came across as a scorned lover. I think the fact that he let her live with him until August and then decided to enforce the divorce order afyer she moved out says what we need to know.
I think the judge was also getting that vibe which is why he kept reminding her how to file the motion.
I’d like to hear what his mom has to say. 😑
I agree, I was looking for this comment.. I don't know why but I get the vibe that this dad is mad that she's moving on... It's always one of the regular three things they claim, drugs, alcohol, or sexual misconduct. He used 2 of the 3.
but remember her dad is "not a predator" he only "distributed cp"
Scorned lover? Can we blame him, though? It's not as though we're expecting he'd be happy with her at the turn of events, even after a second chance.
I think the judge was rather lenient with her which goes to reinforce the notion in women that they can basically do whatever they want and flout a court order and get off with a *slap* on the wrist, no enforcement whatsoever. Yet we wonder why the society is the way it is.
Judge was just trying to get hooked up with access to her OnlyFans account... he knew damn well that her cam was working just fine but she doesn't go live for free. 😉
The irony that she is posting pics of the children and wont show her face...
That is a very insightful comment !
BOTH are slime and shouldn't have children
“I’m here to challenge jurisdiction.”
“Challenge it.”
More judges should treat SovCidiots like this judge did!!
I don’t think he’s earnest I think he’s vindictive. Love this judge. This guy is an a$$.
Hearing grandpas charges…their may be a reason mom became stripper. The wounds can be life long.
Exactly! Thought same thing
OMG he's a mummy's boy. He sounds to me like a drama queen.
Mike you never believe the female partners. This guy just wants his mummy and him and kids to live together.
I don’t believe either one of them entirely. I also think based on what I saw that it is good thing she doesn’t have custody.
@@LawTalkWithMike I agree. Feel sorry for the kid.🦘
Dang...that was the most direct, swift and deeply satisfying handling of a sovcit thus far. Bravo Judge!
A judge FINALLY said it. Im not putting up with this sov cit stuff. Ive been waiting
Not only do I not believe he never did coke with her, I suspect he might be a little high right now. Either that or he's just amped on anger
Either way, he seem like the kind of guy that could become dangerously unstable .
"My kids" - well there's your problem. They're not YOUR kids.
The second clip is now my all-time favorite judge's response to jurisdiction challenges. "OK. Challenge it!"
The lumpheads don't understand that you don't just say "I challenge jurisdiction". You file a motion that includes a coherent legal argument that lays out why jurisdiction does not exist. You don't just say "Nuh-uh!"
How's the common man supposed to know why and how jurisdiction doesn't exist when they hide such remedy in their own procedures, they even hide it among members of the Bar?
@@JLova82the common man is entitled to an attorney.
If you represent yourself it's on you to have the correct knowledge including the absolute basics of how to file a motion with the court.
It's not hidden, court procedures are published and available to the public. There is a lot to know though and that's why you should get an attorney.
@@JLova82the common man can walk down to the public library and check-out law books
"... they even hide it among members of the Bar..."
🤣🤣🤣
that's what licensed attorneys are for, sovcit? fuck outta here@@JLova82
Sorry, Mike. I practice family law, and the things coming out of this guy's mouth I have heard time and time again. From both mothers and fathers. This is nothing more than just bitter, bitter BS. Most likely he thinks he won't have to pay child support if he has the kids. This is definitely one of those, "if I had a nickel" for every time I've heard this nonsense.
I agree. I've been through the family court, and they don't base orders on problems that don't exist. This guy is bitter, and exaggerating. The referee is spot on and reasonable
The way the judge dealt with the sovturd is how all judges should treat idiotic sovturds. It's making them not just cite previous cases but what they believe the case was concerning.
Except, that's not what happened, is it? The [judge] 's all ears at the mere mention of a "special appearance," why? Because special appearance is an actual thing in law.
@@JLova82 but what the fk d so sovturds know about the true laws, ad where is his third party to challenge the court's assertion of personal jurisdiction over the party. The judge identified him as an idiot with 0 knowledge of how laws work.
@@JLova82my understanding was special appearance was a thing in civil law when you intend to challenge jurisdiction.
Not a thing in criminal law so would be meaningless in this case.
Just going off of what I read though so I could be wrong.
I'm going to deny your right to represnt yourself based on the fact that you're mentally disabled 🤣
This judge is sooooo annoying. Constantly repeating. He’s no help.
It makes you wonder if people even know who they’re marrying.
Well in this case the guy should have known that he was marrying a coked up stripper ! Not any red flags there . Right ?
Given the divorce rate, I think not.
he seems like he just wants control of her and revenge, he's so wired the judge should have him drug tested
Ya. Dude is a loose cannon. He can’t even control his rage in court.
The video is sped up, that makes him seem a lot more “wired” than he actually is.
@clarissa8477 true! His ex wife did say that he did coke with her.
Family law attorney here. I would’ve advised this dad to not poke the bear. He just provoked a modification action out of mom
Oh wait I was a stripper too. I however divorced him because he became a csc criminal 6 months into our marriage, and I was 6months pregnant. I stayed with him for 16yrs. Then couldn’t take it anymore.
It also sounds like he is trying to get her away from the kids (parental alienation). If he continues to pull that crap he's going to lose custody, as he should, and have only supervised visitation.
I like this judge. Judges who don’t put up with pro se defendants get a thumbs up from me.
Mike needs to start a playlist on this judge. 👍
Are you repudiating the absolute right of a defendant to stand pro se. Please do so in public, in a loud voice, with conviction?
@@JLova82pro se defendants aren't entitled to any special treatment although many judges give them some leeway.
If he wants to challenge jurisdiction there is a procedure and it's on him to know and follow it.
There is no reason for courts to listen to this sovcit stuff, it's a waste of everyone's time and hasnt worked for anyone, which makes it even dumber that people still think its a good argument.
@@101Mant The issue is that _pro se_ is never properly defined to anyone but a handful of judges 'in the know.' For a _person_ to "stand pro se" in a [Roman court] means they're standing _pro se in rem_ or "standing as 'surety' to a 'thing'" --- not necessarily a _Roman person ---_ with no life, rights, few privileges whatsoever! In _Western-Roman law, _*_things_* are able to be silenced or destroyed at any time, on a whim! Again, this is baked into the sheer presumption of a Roman court in consolidating its own power, while giving away none, except to very few trusted members of the Bar guild (Bar Associations), so it is never properly challenged by anyone, ever! This cheat code for the judges, in the form of occult knowledge of the law, is tied into the claim of _jus in rem_ [in re] or a "right in rem" by _jus gentium_ or the private international law of "nation-states," or, if ya' like, "Estates" [STATES]; effectively handing Roman courts unlimited jurisdiction in any matter, public and private, real and personal, with little to no remedy afforded for such perversions in law! Does that seem fair and reasonable to you?
Didn't he go against the court order by letting her live with him? There is absolutely no way she was supervised 100% of the time with the children.
Mike you're so wrong. He was conflating her violation of pictures with taking the children out of school. This father was ridiculous. His concerns were beyond speculative. Her lifestyle was fine when he had control over her and now that he doesn't, he wants to complain. This referee totally got the picture.
''Her lifestyle was fine when he had control over her and now that he doesn't, he wants to complain.''
Or maybe he grew up, became responsible and she didn't.
EXACTLY LOL, I just said the same thing. This guy wanted the hot stripper he met at the club. She obviously got sick of him trying to control her. He’s using those kids as his emotional blackmail big time. I’ve known a couple of guys exactly like this.
@@65cj55 That is possible, but I seriously doubt it. In the same way that no one believed his answer to "did you ever do drugs with her". The idea that he would prevent a mother from even taking pictures of the child (not just posting as the default judgment listed) is indicative of his childish behavior. But of course, we are all entitled to our perspective.
@@deborahbaker1092dude thinks they're HIS kids, as if she shouldn't have any say. That tells me all I need to know.
Nah you are wrong. Mike is right. Quit crying
A morning stream! What a delight! 😊😊
Thank you , Mike!!🎉
Omg I think I have a new favorite judge. He had the best answers for that sov cit.
She doesn't want people to be able to see her image because she could be identified as a scammer by possible "marks". Nursing homes need to be wary also!!!
Also doesn’t want her clients to see her on here is the more likely reason
I and my wife come from a divorce household, I can't imagine two people that can create a child can grow to hate each other at this level. Personally, I do not believe in divorce, there is NOTHING about my behavior I wouldn't change to protect my marriage.
In most cases, the only thing needed to make a marriage work is two people willing to make it their #1 priority.
I can't imagine going through divorce--especially with kids. Hubby and I've been married >50 years. We both came from families where divorce was unheard of! Today's revolving door is horrible.
The bail one at the end is ridiculous. $10k not ok to let a man in a wheelchair out but it's ok for $30k according to the state.
How the hell does that make any sense at all?
Narcissist. He literally changed right in front of you. He’s too controlling!
"You can take the stripper out of the club, BUT you can't take the club out of the stripper" !!!
Today I asked for a extension on a file audit due to insufficient time given to get requested data, it worked, thanks Law Talk with Mike
My first thought…OH SNAP…It’s a new Judge Manning! So excited to see her. She’s why I started watching court cases.
I think there is a reason why her camera “did not work”
Being alone seems the better option every time I watch one of these horror stories
Or choosing wisely in the first place.
Why can’t you see her face? Is she in the witness protective program? 😂😂😂😂
Hoe protection program 😂😂😂
"Lots" of people post picture of their children on social media, but ask any expert on child exploitation, and they advise strongly against it. I NEVER post pictures of my kids on social media platforms.
Why is ever defendant starting either a job, school, or rehab “tomorrow” 😂
All the while having 10 kids.
On the second clip…. I was waiting for the guy on the bottom right to say…. Southwest 1722 turn left heading 180 and maintain 3000.
Being a stripper is not a problem but drugs and anyone associated with darker behavior is serious
Exactly... I'm not sure I believe this guy!
Haha! “Being a stripper isn’t a problem”!?! 😂😂😂😂😂
Being a stripper is a big problem when you got kids especially if you got girls
Yeah strippers are some of the most brightest people out there. Right up there with meth addicts and petty criminals
@@bdiddy1030why is it a problem? Why particularly for girls? If the mom can look after the kids I fail to see the problem.
If the argument is it might influence the kids to be strippers that's just circular logic, you have to first establish why its actually bad in itself.
One more thing: we had this dj. He told me one night that this job had seemed like a fantasy come to life when he landed it. Then, he gets quiet and says, I never realized how terrifying women could be. One of you runs up here to tell me what Stacy did, and if I nod or smile, Stacy is up here 5 minutes later yelling about how dare I take sides. I don't want to get married. I don't even date anymore. You guys have ruined my life. Lol. I don't think he was even kidding.
She isn’t having video issues, it is just pay per view. 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂
I get the vibe that this man is vindictive and vengeful - I'm inclined not to believe him.
I'm shocked to hear the father of a stripper is a convicted predator.
This is the way to put these SovCitis. Turn their objections back on them. What a smart judge!
If he has sole legal custody, all he has to do is provide the school with that paperwork and they won’t let her take the kids out of school. At least they’re not supposed to. He could also have a little note put on their accounts to not release them to her, her father, or her sister if he’s really worried about it. He can do all of that just being the custodial guardian, he needs to make sure all of the front office staff know though.
Did I hear right? He has sole legal custodial and physical custody but the judge still said she could keep doing what she's doing. Sorry. Maybe I heard wrong.
She has every right to pull her children from school. He has provided no proof of his allegations against her. He's a vengeful lying lover and nothing more
@@khorneflakes773 all she has a legal right to is supervised visits, she can’t pull them from school.
How could she possibly NOT know she was divorced?
I hate when even intelligent adults start talking like teenagers, "does that make sense"!🙄
The dad is clearly butthurt about his wife not being interested in him any longer, and doing whatever he can to use the kids as pawns to get back at her.
WHY do these idiots think they can do better than a Public Defender? They must not know they love to beat a County DA in a case.
You know it’s going to be a good video when Mike starts by laughing like Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic Park.
My favorite line in the movie is when Sam Neill asks Goldblum if he is married. Goldblum: "Occasionally."
Her father is a CONVICTED PREDATOR!!! OMGOSH!!!😮😮😮
Explains how she became a stripper. I would want my kids far away from that as possible
Definitely a hard no. It is dangerous to put you kids pics and info online for anyone. Kids are having their identity stolen and their credit is destryed by the time they are 18. I quit puting any of it online. It just isnt worth it.
It sounds like he doesn’t want child predators to see pictures of his children. He is probably concerned that a predator will see a picture and target his kid. That’s good parenting. He was dismissed. Very sad
Well, he put a ring in it....
The judge is wrong for implying He doesn’t know what she’s doing today but unless she went to rehab or has done something to prove she is different He has every right to assume nothing has changed.
Dad Bringing this contempt, will cause mom to request review of custody order. Currently dad has all custody rights.
Give school copy of custody order, school won’t let her check the kids out.
The Power Of Love On Law Talk With Mike. Brings a tingly feeling all over!! Is that love too??? Lol
I enjoy listening to your videos in the evenings. Love the 'Throple' But the end of this video it just hit me; now I know what my problem has been. 'I am totally in the wrong world". Beam me up Scotty!😅
I really like this judge.
So sad. The ex wife is a stripper who's dad is a sexual predator. It's almost like it all makes sense.
Thats the way you handle a SovCit
Awwwww we needed her camera to work
You always seem to have the best or rather the worst of them to see.😂❤thx
Why did you marry her and have children... please! He is trying to control her... He is jealous!!! OMG, if this man calls their children, them kids one more time I will scream
He was struggling so hard to keep his mouth shut when she was answering the judges questions
Howdy from Tanglefoot, Texas!
The (husband) guy's habit of not answering the judge's question but going on a rant instead is not endearing him to me.
In a way I judge him more than her. He married a stripper. How did he think things were going to turn out?
Mike whats the clip from "im just being railroaded here" i laugh every time
She hesitated she’s not truthful
This judge 100% participates in LEGAL Adult entertainment. He wanted to make it clear that there is LEGAL Adult Entertainment! Hahaha he’s definitely an advocate for it!
Your honor, Are we here to testify, today?
That boy was shot 3 times and she just put his future address out on the internet...smh
It was stated that the maternal grandfather has a conviction of being a predator and how is that enough or did the judge not hear that?
Stripper divorce: SHE seems much more "together" than HE does. Weird.
Meh she has lost custody of her children. If you want to call that together I suppose.
Love the blue Lacoste Mike. Just the right amount of zip action happening too 😂 Thanks for always bringing the fun 💕
Nah
I was hoping Judge Manning would have been assigned the Fani Willis RICO case. Though judge McAfee was good in the first hearing, he's only 34 and lacks Judge Manning's humor, seriousness and ability to clamp down on stupid.
Why does he not have a lawyer? "Ain't never gonna do it without your Fez on."
Can’t they afford a larger monitor for the judge 😂🤦🏼♀️
Box sizes are a function of zoom, not the court.
So, she has restrictive, supervised PT… where did these photos come from that were posted? Are they old photos?
Hahaha BINGO! I hit it spot on! I was typing when this was going lol! TOLD YOU HE MET HER IN THE STRIP CLUB LOL!!!!
“Are you doing anything illegal online…” *PAUSE* The pause answers the question. 😂
Am I in your custody? 😂😅😂
I'd love to hear the story of bottom right in sovcit arraignment. Those multicolor headphones😂😂😂
So, i did some online sleuthing and found Anthony's fb page. His children are adorable! Next, I found the ex wife. You guessed it, long legged blond. Typical for sure. I really hope the parents focus on the well being of those cute kids and stop bickering about mundane things. One thing I've discovered after my divorce. My ex husband tried to poison my son's hearts against me and in the end, they came running back to me after they became adults. Life has a funny way of making all the uphill battles worth it. My sons are very successful in their careers and they live near me. Thousands of miles from their dad lol 🤣
He admitted he did coke in Aruba,then backtracked it. I don’t believe anything he says.
I believe a lot of what he says and absolutely don’t believe it when he acts as if he didn’t participate. He met her at a strip club. They both behaved like people who spend a lot of time in strip clubs. He then got serious when the children came along and she did not.
@@LawTalkWithMike according to her,he was lying about everything. She said she passed a drug test. If she’s really going to nursing school,she might be too embarrassed to show her face. I have a little left to watch. We’ll see if I still believe her when I’m done.
Thanks Mike and 🙌👏🏾🫶to April 😊
When you appear in a prison jumpsuit that's about the least special an appearance can be.
OMG. I so love the prairie dog. LOL I always have to look the same back at him.
I think that was the quickest and easiest shut down of a (improper) challenge to jurisdiction I have ever seen.
That judge is just so good looking!
When I get off of your channel I be saying 📣📣PREEEETRIAL for hours 😂