How to Pass Radiated EMC. 3 Mistakes to Avoid
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июн 2024
- How to pass FCC and CE requirements for radiated emissions from a PCB designer view point based on my experience while I was working for Audient. Each failure costs at least $1000 per test, so you can save a lot of money by learning from my mistakes!
Timecode:
00:00 - Preview
00:21 - Intro
00:47 - What is EMC
01:35 - Splitting reference planes on a PCB
03:42 - PCB design example
04:30 - Not applying series/termination resistance on traces
06:42 - Interlude :)
07:54 - Not considering mechanical design and 360° shielding
10:05 - USB cable teardown
11:04 - Conductivity of a metal enclosure example
13:11 - Outro
Resistive vs Inductive Return Paths:
www.emcs.org/acstrial/newslet...
EEmadeinsiberia blog:
www.eemadeinsiberia.com/
If you found this video useful, please check out my new "Practical EMC for IoT Designers" video course. This comprehensive course contains over 10 hours of video material that cover every aspect of EMC testing for intentional transmitters in accordance with Radio Equipment Directive (RED), ETSI, ITU-R, and EN standards. Apply "RF50" discount code for a 50% off during limited promotion this year only. Don't miss out!
www.pcbforemc.com/courses
Love the channel, just got into EMC/EMI testing and am looking to absorb as much info as possible
Great channel and informative, subscribed.
Very insightful and interesting
Thank You!
Great 👍
good
Again great video and great content - but like the other one it's so intense with the music, the crazy fast talking, and the camera movements. If I was prone to epilspy attacks I would definitely not be able to watch it :D
But actually checking the new videos I think the audio compression used on your voice is really extreme and hurts my mixing engineer ears :D Comparing with other videos you can really turn it down, your videos are even louder than the ads ;)
But really thanks for the content because it's still really useful, and there is pretty much no RUclips channel focussing on EMC so thank you for that :)
Just trying to help you improve the content ;)
Cheers
Simon
@@midronome haha thanks! Appreciate the feedback so much! :)
To summarize: 1) audio compression 2) music 3) talking pace
I can address that. Please let me know if you can think of anything else
@@DrEMC-sf8rx My pleasure :) You can add 4) avoid sudden jumpy camera shots. But other than that it's great, and like I said the content itself is really promising ;)
And for the pace maybe not everybody will agree with me, people tend to want fast info. IMO it's important to let the viewer enough time to assimilate the info. So I guess it's about finding the middle ground (pun intended) between super fast pace and too slow with long "uuuhhh" in the talking ;) So something slow but where it keeps moving forward if that makes sense ;)
Cheers
Simon
@@midronome Thanks Simon!