Oh how kind that a woman can go to a male judge for “reconciliation”, whilst a man can beat his wife and divorce her by saying “Talaq” 3 times. This religion makes perfect sense. 😀
@Aditya Misra its now nearly 3-4 years not just one, at that time i was studiying in 8th grade and one of my teacher discussed about it. And at that time i was so disturbed about banning an islamic law. According to my point of view muthalaqq doesnt make sense in non-islamic states eventhough it was been practising in a country like india toooo but currently i have not heard such a news for a long time
@Jean pierre Balmond Don't see how he can oppress me, it's not like he is winning converts or making Sharia rule look appealing to non Muslim audiences, quite the contrary.
Religion shouldn't be about violence ...but the Quran teachings promotes violence. Look around the world Every terrorist attacks in the name of Allah....what does that tell.
@@reenagopala9548 & "moderate" muslims will be out there with the good ol' desperation excuse: "They have nothing to do with Izlam." Or "Other Muzlims are the primary victims of deez terros."🤡
@Sana Khan No, this verse is not about women literally being violent. This verse is about men FEARING 'rebellion/ill-conduct'. FEARING. No mention of actual violence, or actual bad behaviour. Just a mere SUSPICION. Allah is giving men permission to beat their wives based on mere FEARS. According to this verse, a bit of irrational jealousy justifies his beating his wife, an inkling she might not be praying on time is reason enough to beat her, his thinking she must be lazing about instead of bringing him his tea on time is enough to beat her, etc etc. Read what the Quran says, not what you think and hope it says.
@Arabian Princess He talk rubbish. He doesn't even know that cult. He says a man can't touch a woman without her consent. But he forgets to finish things off. If she refuses sex he can assault her under those misogynistic laws. I read there isn't even a law to protect women from rape within marriage. I live in the West in a much more equal world so it's very hard to see how some women fall for this rubbish in those backward countries. I've never ever thought a man is superior to me. That kind of thing is taught to some females in those Islamic countries. They then bring it to the West and it looks scary. How can a women be less than a man? We just have equality and respect for each other
@@malekmohammed2559 Its on a few videos. Also on Hijabs Twitter account. Look it up YT/Google. He asked AP wife if she has ever asked AP for a threesome. It's online. It's vile. Sorry don't have a link for you.
@@malekmohammed2559 Do u understand the Quran? How Brutal its teachings are Just look at Chapter 9 It's all about killing Open you're eyes Do you're research How can a religion teach hatred and motivates violence. God is Love Doing Evil act claiming in the name of God....is nonsense.... Go within n seek the truth Is islam a religion of peace
I think these modern apologists living in Liberal countries and defending these teaching are very dangerous because they are affecting youth I had a chat online with someone and these were the points presented by him to defend this type of teachings
Yes because mothers kill their children... really?! If a father sees his wife harm their children take them away and get the mother some mental health help. You don’t need a scholar or a Quran you need common sense and a grasp on humanities right from wrong.
Too disgusting to see him wetting his lips every 10 seconds, interrupting his every sentence which is already unclear due to his extensive made up arabic accent
Not an expert but body language experts say it's one of the signs of lying. He probably knows he's lying and naturally humans get a bit uncomfortable while lying.
That's an IQ-dropping video if i ever saw one, of Hijab's incredible mental gymnastics to try to defend that verse. I am just so baffled by his ludicrous arguments, wow, just wow. He should watch Zakir Naik to learn how to be unapologetic and defend the verse straight up.
Abdullah, you should play, one after the other, "interpretation" of such matters by Hijab and Zakir Naik ! So that people can compare a more honest interpretation by Zakir Naik to the deceptive, dishonest interpretation of Mohammed Hijab !
so if men and women are equal, is that also in intelligence and religion? Are both required to hide behind a veil? Are both required to take care of the children and housework? Are boys and girls able to gain an equal share of inheritance money?
A woman rebels because in Islam she is portrayed as a subordinate and the man a ruler, otherwise she is not rebelling but acting according to her freewill as a human being.
No it DOES NOT mean separate. The word ضربوهن (pronounced darabuhuna) literally translates to beat them, and is derived from the word ضرباً (darbaan) which means to hit or to beat. The verse is clearly telling men they can beat their wives if they fear rebellion. This is so clear to anyone who speaks Arabic. It is literally as unambiguous as if it had been written “and beat them” in English.
Unless your significant other is about to murder/hurt you there is literally no reason for you to put your hands on another person. NO EXCUSE! Especially not “rebellion” or arrogance. It’s actually quite concerning to see people with a platform try to apologize and normalize abuse...makes you wonder what they do behind closed doors.
How lovely that they always skip over the word "If you FEAR". How on earth is that rational? Acting on mere fear? The examples Hijab gives have nothing to do with feared scenarios, but with actually occurring situations. And why is 'nushuz' translated as 'rebellion' when it applies to women, but not when it refers to men (4:128)? Could it be that there's just a bit of bias there?
For reasons I do not know, I am happy with such matters and those who tell the truth. You deserve to have a lot of subscribers. I am happy to subscribe to your channel. Keep up the good work. God bless you.😊❤
First it doesn’t say in the verse if a woman abuses her children you can beat her. It says a man is in charge of a woman and if she rebels he can beat her. So it’s about a woman that is not submissive to her husband. Secondly why this punishment is only mentioned about women in Quran, why there isn’t anything about in which circumstances a woman can beat her husband. If a woman feels that she’s neglected she has to reconcile it with her husband. The verse is about men being allowed to beat their wives and nothing this man and his ridiculous arguments can do to change that. Unless he doesn’t want to change it but just using taquiya to protect Islam!
I think that criticizing is one of the most important things to change the world better but, this is a passive violent effort. I also think we need to establish new things to guiding new people and their open minded, and I think this is an active violent effort. We need both passiveness and activity. I’m working on it now.
The very idea that a man has the right to physically discipline his wife explicitly defines the man as the dominant party in the marriage and sets up a dynamic of male dominance. After all the wife is not allowed to physically discipline the husband
@@kelvinpragassa4871 bro yaani I was loughing hard while watching it. Verse ipo clear kabisa kuwa mwanaume akiwa ana *FEAR REBELLION* kutoka kwa mkewe basi ampige *BEAT THEM* lakini yeye anakuja na ishu tofauti kabisa eti anatoa mfano akiwa anataka kukuchoma kisu unajidefend mwenyewe 😂😂😂 the guy is so funny. Halafu mpuuzi mmoja anakuja kukwambia kuwa Quran ni maneno ya Mungu dahh 😂😂😂, Yaani Mungu aliye *ALMIGHTY, PEACE, LOVE AND PERFECT JUST* ndo anawaambiwa viumbe wake wa kiume kuwa mkiwa mnawa *HOFIA* wake zenu basi step ya mwisho muwapige 😂😂😂, it is clearly true kama alivyosema btother Abdullah Sameer mwisho wa video kuwa *Quran sio neno la Mungu bali ni maneno ya MUHAMMAD*
@@ukwelinauwazi5523 bro.. this is exactly how muslims think.. nafikiri Mohammad aliwafundisha ujinga wa hali ya juu... worst of all Muslim PhD holders how do they even start to think that the prophet can be anything more than a rabid animal.
Sends threats of violence, veiled rape threats, messages about guys pissing on each other, supports wife beating. Can't imagine why he's single. What a catch. Good grief...
An a muslim, I don’t take teaching from just any one trying his hard to explain, i refuse what Hijab explained and I have done my search to find a much much better explanation for this verse than what hijab is saying.
Well said sir! Notably Mr Hijab still hasn't found the courage to respond to my post from over a year ago, which included: 1. We are told that the Quran is the perfect, unalterable and eternal word of Allah (God). Therefore the context of time and/or place is irrelevant! Your fallacy of presentism is completely spurious and irrelevant. 2. Sura 4:34 lets break this down for you as you seem incapable of doing so or fearful of doing so. A) If you fear rebellion (disobedience in other translations) =How insecure would a person have to be to consider imposing sanctions/beating a person because they fear (suspect in other translations) rebellion? B) Secondly, the rebellion/disobedience immediately implies that the man is the authority. Rebellion means to resist a leader/authority and disobedience is to refuse to obey rules of your master/someone in authority.
The more I see and hear M H, the more I dislike him. He is obnoxious. Look how he treated Alex O'connor a few months ago and how arrogant he is when he's at Speakers Corner in London. Self righteous and insulting. I'm sure there must be Muslims who are embarrassed by him.
So, basically Hijab was trying to argue in favor of some sort of moral relativism? He doesn't think there's any good reason, beyond cultural happenstance, that we think wife beating is wrong? The suffering that the beating would cause the woman, the psychological damage from the clear power imbalance in the relationship, the fact that it creates an atmosphere of violence in the household-- finding any of that wrong is unreasonable in Hijab's view? I really hope that these kinds of moral anti-realism go extinct.
0:50 That is not presentism... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis) "(...) presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past (...)" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian%27s_fallacy "(...) presentism, a mode of historical analysis in which present-day ideas (such as moral standards) are projected into the past (...)" Presentism is interpreting old ideas using anachronically present ideas. It's not a way of disproving old ideas using modern ideas.
Sorry but i hv never seen The Deen Show before. But i think the guy fell asleep after he asked the question, n woke up soon after Hijab finished bullshiting.
The culture of Is l am is based on pagan polytheist honor culture. This can be see in Koran 30, verses 38 to 40, and in other verses, where the listener is assumed to be embedded in the pagan polytheist culture
1-Islam asks both male and female to restrict themselves only to their spouses. 2-Islam, in the strongest manner possible, condemns every extra-marital relation. 3-The permission to (lightly) beat women is not unconditional, nor it is in every situation. Lets see the context of the that; Quran says: "....therefore the righteous women are devotedly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence What ALLAH would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them (first), Next, refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, means (of annoyance): For ALLAH is Most High, Great (above you all)." (Quran 4:34) This makes it absolutely clear that this permission is only when women become disloyal--And again reading from start makes it clear that disloyalty here means something below dignity of a modest and chaste woman. 4-When a woman indulges into such an act then of a surety she would not be to her husband as she ought to be. This can even possibly make her husband slip away form the right path and he may get involved somewhere else. If such a stage arrives then this would be havoc not only for the couple and their relations but for the society as a whole. And this permission is deterrence and a necessity against evil. It's allowed in extreme cases only: 1-Even in that case, to beat is the last option. First is to admonish, if this does not work then next step is to part from their beds, and if this also fails then is light beating. 2-And even if such a stage arrives then also their are restraints, "But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, Means of annoyance" 3-If at all a woman feels that she cannot live with her husband anymore, for any reason, she must get divorce and part, but as long as she is inside the marriage she must remain loyal to her husband even in his absence. For the mutual relation of the couple is the very basis of the society. An Important Instruction: When interpreting a verse we have to take in consideration the Hadith of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). He said; "Fear Allah concerning women! Verily you have taken them on the security of Allah, and intercourse with them has been made lawful unto you by words of Allah. You too have right over them, and that they should not allow anyone to sit on your bed whom you do not like. But if they do that, (in that case) chastise them in a way that leaves no mark (i.e. not severe). Their rights upon you are that you should provide them with food and clothing in a fitting manner." (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 2137) This shows it is more of a psychological thing then a physical one and the purpose is only to maintain the chastity and mutual love and affection of the spouses. If a wrong conduct of the woman is not checked then surely the relation will be adversely effected. Why there is no legislation for wife doing the same to her husband: Remember man can have legitimate second wife but woman can't have two legitimate husbands at a time for obvious reasons. Considering this and the more obvious psychological, physical differences and considering real life facts there is no legislation regarding wife admonishing her husband this way. She may take up the issue with the elders of both families to correct her husband. An unauthentic narration: Some people try to mislead by quoting a narration which goes as: Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet (pbuh) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife. (Sunan Abu Dawud Hadith 2147. Albani classified it as Da’if i.e. unauthentic). Besides Albani, Ahmad Shakir and Shu’aib ‘Arna’ut also graded it Da’if in their respective classification of Musnad Ahmad. Ibn Kathir also criticized its chain in Musnad Al-Farooq 1/182.
I love watching Muslims contort themselves into more positions than the Kama Sutra, as it shows how inherently absurd Islam is . Because the Quran is the literal word of God, Muslims have no room to move in terms of interpreting the Quran. The Bible by contrast is inspired by God so it is much easier to contextualise it, specifically to its historical time and place, rather than understanding it as prescriptive for all time. Also the Bible is not just a pure book of instructions in the way the Quran is. Thus it can be interpreted in many different ways.
I hate that thing all these muslim apologists seem to do, its obviously taught to them in some way, where they do that thing where they are explaining something, then at a point they do that thing that teachers do when they try to get you to complete their sentence. That sort of raining of the tone of the word, a pause............. then say something like its a fact. They all seem to do it.
That’s Hijab speciality, defending the Allah’s donkey revelations. Why couldn’t Allah say, “spouse” instead of husband. Did Hijab watch Yasir Qadir’s fatwa on step 3 of this verse?
Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "The believers who show the most perfect faith are those who have the best behaviour, and the best of you are those who are the best to their wives". وعن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم "أكمل المؤمنين إيمانا أحسنهم خُلقا، وخياركم خياركم لنسائهم" ((رواه الترمذي وقال : حديث حسن صحيح)).
@The Astronomer They are not just cartoons. The Prophet Muhammad is important to us, he may not be important to you. We will not insult other prophets. We respect all the prophets. If the Prophet Muhammad was a nobody, if he was as evil as some people claim, why are we upset? Why are we boycotting French products? Why are we protesting? Why are people becoming muslims if our Prophet was a pedophile, a warlord? It's wrong that the teacher was killed.
@Abdullah Sameer, Thanks for putting this together. The man who hit Hatun Tash in the face last weekend approached her while she was SPEAKING. Hopefully Mohammed Hijab is not impressed.
Firstly , an emotionally intelligent man will know that it is never ok to strike a woman or threaten divorce . Secondly, I have listened to Ani Zonneveld , of the progressive Muslim movement in a scholarly debate defend this verse in breaking down the Arabic word for ‘strike ‘ like all Arabic words has various meanings and that it doesn’t literally mean to physically harm . Alhamdulliah 🌸
Actually one should visit any religious place with tourism purpose as religions have nothing to do with the God as they project god as product and keep on fighting that their product is genuine and of superior quality and in the process of one upmanship millions of innocent Human being lost their only one God given live.this madness still goes on with full throttle. Xx
What are the instructions to the wife for if/when her husband disrespects her? It would be against most peoples' natures to assault anyone let alone the person they love
U never was a Muslim to begin with so stop saying ex Muslim, you have to say that sounds like you trying very hard to downgrade Islam, but Islam will win with or without you, but you will lose without it.
Hi Mr Sameer, just found your site, found this video very informative, nice bite sized piece of information, keep up the good work, and I will keep watching. Just one observation, I thought you over played the accidental harm point Mr Hijab made, my husband suffers night tremors, and has been known to kick out, and punch, during these nightmares, and yes I have been woken by a punch to the back of the head, or the odd sharp kick. I think the saying is,"to give a sucker an even brake".
![Chino Pacas - Modo Capone (with Drake & Fuerza Regida) [Video Oficial]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zjv8TQ0gBkg/mqdefault.jpg)
Oh how kind that a woman can go to a male judge for “reconciliation”, whilst a man can beat his wife and divorce her by saying “Talaq” 3 times. This religion makes perfect sense. 😀
It makes "perfect sense" to patriarchal, misogynistic, sexist men ! Does it not ?
@@cpsaleemyt Alas, you make a great point!
"# Mohammed was first feminist" 😅😂😆
@Aditya Misra its now nearly 3-4 years not just one, at that time i was studiying in 8th grade and one of my teacher discussed about it. And at that time i was so disturbed about banning an islamic law.
According to my point of view muthalaqq doesnt make sense in non-islamic states eventhough it was been practising in a country like india toooo but currently i have not heard such a news for a long time
@Aditya Misra kk
I love Hijab.
He discredits Islam far more than David Wood or Apostate Prophet or Samir ever could...
Yep he just needs more exposure to a wider audience.
@Jean pierre Balmond Don't see how he can oppress me, it's not like he is winning converts or making Sharia rule look appealing to non Muslim audiences, quite the contrary.
Religion shouldn't be about violence ...but the Quran teachings promotes violence.
Look around the world
Every terrorist attacks in the name of Allah....what does that tell.
@@reenagopala9548 & "moderate" muslims will be out there with the good ol' desperation excuse: "They have nothing to do with Izlam." Or "Other Muzlims are the primary victims of deez terros."🤡
Just when you think Mohammed Hijab couldn't be any more loathsome, he sinks to new lows.
Then whyyy there is no verse about striking husband??????? Somebody ask that broomface man... 😕
Noman Ali Khan talked about this. I'm gonna upload my response to him again soon!
@Sana Khan No, this verse is not about women literally being violent. This verse is about men FEARING 'rebellion/ill-conduct'. FEARING. No mention of actual violence, or actual bad behaviour. Just a mere SUSPICION.
Allah is giving men permission to beat their wives based on mere FEARS. According to this verse, a bit of irrational jealousy justifies his beating his wife, an inkling she might not be praying on time is reason enough to beat her, his thinking she must be lazing about instead of bringing him his tea on time is enough to beat her, etc etc.
Read what the Quran says, not what you think and hope it says.
@Sana Khan No. It is what the Quran literally says. وَٱلَّـٰتِى تَخَافُونَ
@Arabian Princess He talk rubbish. He doesn't even know that cult. He says a man can't touch a woman without her consent. But he forgets to finish things off. If she refuses sex he can assault her under those misogynistic laws. I read there isn't even a law to protect women from rape within marriage. I live in the West in a much more equal world so it's very hard to see how some women fall for this rubbish in those backward countries. I've never ever thought a man is superior to me. That kind of thing is taught to some females in those Islamic countries. They then bring it to the West and it looks scary. How can a women be less than a man? We just have equality and respect for each other
@The random Person No of course not
When a man loves a woman ... he could never hurt her physically for just suspecting her of something . Never
Even if he doesn’t love her-a man hitting a woman is a fucking loser.
Exactly! My father and mother never hit each other
It doesn't matter whether he even loves her or not, beating a wife is not ok (unless you agree that she has a right to beat you back or defend her)
Modern marriage psychology: communication is key
Quran: beat them all.
Doesn't surprise me. He sent some disgusting sexually violent texts against wives of other you tubers.
Because he's a bully. He should be ashamed
Can you provide proof please ?
@@malekmohammed2559 Its on a few videos. Also on Hijabs Twitter account. Look it up YT/Google. He asked AP wife if she has ever asked AP for a threesome. It's online. It's vile.
Sorry don't have a link for you.
How is those stupid Muhammad hijab hv lot of fan from indonn muslim
@@malekmohammed2559
Do u understand the Quran?
How Brutal its teachings are
Just look at Chapter 9
It's all about killing
Open you're eyes
Do you're research
How can a religion teach hatred and motivates violence.
God is Love
Doing Evil act claiming in the name of God....is nonsense....
Go within n seek the truth
Is islam a religion of peace
I'm starting to respect Muhammad Hijab and Ali Dawah. At least they're now being honest that they have bigoted views and follow a bigoted dogma
Yeah at least they are being honest but like supporting wife beating, really
they have bigoted views on a bigoted dogma
Lol is that why he deletes comments opposing his views
No one have the right to assault other people islam is toxic
I think these modern apologists living in Liberal countries and defending these teaching are very dangerous because they are affecting youth I had a chat online with someone and these were the points presented by him to defend this type of teachings
You’re fighting noble and worthy cause. It takes a brave person to challenge the absurdities of Islamic scripture especially as an apostate. 👏🏼👏🏼
Yes because mothers kill their children... really?! If a father sees his wife harm their children take them away and get the mother some mental health help.
You don’t need a scholar or a Quran you need common sense and a grasp on humanities right from wrong.
🤔🤔🤔🤔 if a father beat his naughty son the wife should also beat the father. 😳😳😳😳Hijab has really nice logic only a lunatic can have
Huyu ni mkora wa kawaida tu
He's taking the meaning of pathetic to another level as well as his cult!
I can't believe that my country, England allows this creature to live in our civilised society
Too disgusting to see him wetting his lips every 10 seconds, interrupting his every sentence which is already unclear due to his extensive made up arabic accent
Not an expert but body language experts say it's one of the signs of lying. He probably knows he's lying and naturally humans get a bit uncomfortable while lying.
07:35
Just look at his expression.
He knows full well he is lying and deceiving (like allah) his audience.
Absolutely disgusting. 🤢🤮
Thanks for taking the time to make this video. :-)
That's an IQ-dropping video if i ever saw one, of Hijab's incredible mental gymnastics to try to defend that verse. I am just so baffled by his ludicrous arguments, wow, just wow. He should watch Zakir Naik to learn how to be unapologetic and defend the verse straight up.
Raisin-head Hijab at it again...
Well done Abdullah, this is golden, a real gem.
This Is one of those classic one's that will make the hall of fame! 👌💯🏆
Thanks
Abdullah, you should play, one after the other, "interpretation" of such matters by Hijab and Zakir Naik ! So that people can compare a more honest interpretation by Zakir Naik to the deceptive, dishonest interpretation of Mohammed Hijab !
That's a fantastic idea!
so if men and women are equal, is that also in intelligence and religion? Are both required to hide behind a veil? Are both required to take care of the children and housework? Are boys and girls able to gain an equal share of inheritance money?
Not in Islam but in the normal world of course.
Not in islam because they hate women. Insecure men.
Was there ever any doubt?
Biblical?
'Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her,
Ephesians 5:25 ESV
IKR he should leave biblical matters for Christians 😂😂
Lel..
A woman rebels because in Islam she is portrayed as a subordinate and the man a ruler, otherwise she is not rebelling but acting according to her freewill as a human being.
People like Mohammed Hijab are essential to keep INTELLIGENT people away from RELIGIONS and live MEANINGFUL and HAPPY lives in SANITY.
Ever since he attacked the wives ive haven't watched him. Im over him. He has mommy issues and its painfully apparent when you look at his videos.
@Thomas Progli I didn't know any better now i do.
He threatened to rap e and ki ll other youtubers !
This is what his profit Mohabbatein taught 🐗😂
According to islam he has not done anything wrong. If you are not Happy in Symbolic beating then Leave Islam. Otherwise follow your husband's order.
No it DOES NOT mean separate. The word ضربوهن (pronounced darabuhuna) literally translates to beat them, and is derived from the word ضرباً (darbaan) which means to hit or to beat. The verse is clearly telling men they can beat their wives if they fear rebellion. This is so clear to anyone who speaks Arabic. It is literally as unambiguous as if it had been written “and beat them” in English.
Unless your significant other is about to murder/hurt you there is literally no reason for you to put your hands on another person. NO EXCUSE! Especially not “rebellion” or arrogance. It’s actually quite concerning to see people with a platform try to apologize and normalize abuse...makes you wonder what they do behind closed doors.
Can you be a muslim and a sincere person at the same time?
Yes
The miracle of brainwashing 🤔
@@FriendlyExmuslim, listening to Hijab, it's kinda hard to believe.
@@FriendlyExmuslim Yes. I meet some really nice Muslim. They have not bee converted to Real Islam.
@@1968gadgetyo Until you marry them or become an apostate, you don't really know them at all...
The epilepsy and hallucination is off the charts with this Mo.
Like with the other Mo.
How lovely that they always skip over the word "If you FEAR". How on earth is that rational? Acting on mere fear? The examples Hijab gives have nothing to do with feared scenarios, but with actually occurring situations.
And why is 'nushuz' translated as 'rebellion' when it applies to women, but not when it refers to men (4:128)? Could it be that there's just a bit of bias there?
Your work is keenly needed to expose this kind of repulsive behavior, thanks for your time and effort
A man defending himself from a woman????
Hijab..really
For reasons I do not know, I am happy with such matters and those who tell the truth. You deserve to have a lot of subscribers. I am happy to subscribe to your channel. Keep up the good work. God bless you.😊❤
There’s another verse, hijab, saying: a man should not be asked why he is beating his wife.
Yes! But I think it’s actually a Hadith, not an aya.
Just subscribed, love the content of your video's and the way you react.
First it doesn’t say in the verse if a woman abuses her children you can beat her. It says a man is in charge of a woman and if she rebels he can beat her. So it’s about a woman that is not submissive to her husband.
Secondly why this punishment is only mentioned about women in Quran, why there isn’t anything about in which circumstances a woman can beat her husband. If a woman feels that she’s neglected she has to reconcile it with her husband. The verse is about men being allowed to beat their wives and nothing this man and his ridiculous arguments can do to change that. Unless he doesn’t want to change it but just using taquiya to protect Islam!
Wow...the last statement was stunning "Quran does not show you the best to treat your wives its just the words of Muhammad"
I think that criticizing is one of the most important things to change the world better but, this is a passive violent effort. I also think we need to establish new things to guiding new people and their open minded, and I think this is an active violent effort. We need both passiveness and activity. I’m working on it now.
The very idea that a man has the right to physically discipline his wife explicitly defines the man as the dominant party in the marriage and sets up a dynamic of male dominance. After all the wife is not allowed to physically discipline the husband
Hijab looks like a sixth former explaining to headmaster why he has permission from his dad to bully and groom girls
This is a new low for Hijab. 🤦♂️
It's nice to see a muslim explain...(whatever do u wanna call it?)
In swahili we say 'anakula meno'.. eating teeth..how does he feel?
Au anajing'ata ng'ata 😂😂😂
@@ukwelinauwazi5523 kabisa. Doesn't he feel stupid
@@kelvinpragassa4871 bro yaani I was loughing hard while watching it. Verse ipo clear kabisa kuwa mwanaume akiwa ana *FEAR REBELLION* kutoka kwa mkewe basi ampige *BEAT THEM* lakini yeye anakuja na ishu tofauti kabisa eti anatoa mfano akiwa anataka kukuchoma kisu unajidefend mwenyewe 😂😂😂 the guy is so funny. Halafu mpuuzi mmoja anakuja kukwambia kuwa Quran ni maneno ya Mungu dahh 😂😂😂, Yaani Mungu aliye *ALMIGHTY, PEACE, LOVE AND PERFECT JUST* ndo anawaambiwa viumbe wake wa kiume kuwa mkiwa mnawa *HOFIA* wake zenu basi step ya mwisho muwapige 😂😂😂, it is clearly true kama alivyosema btother Abdullah Sameer mwisho wa video kuwa *Quran sio neno la Mungu bali ni maneno ya MUHAMMAD*
@@ukwelinauwazi5523 bro.. this is exactly how muslims think.. nafikiri Mohammad aliwafundisha ujinga wa hali ya juu... worst of all Muslim PhD holders how do they even start to think that the prophet can be anything more than a rabid animal.
@@kelvinpragassa4871 Hahahahahh may the *MIGHTY LORD JESUS CHRIST* guide them to the truth 🙏
If I was a Muslim woman I would marry a physically disabled man who can’t beat me. #trick
MOHAMMED was the first feminist brodaaaa 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Sends threats of violence, veiled rape threats, messages about guys pissing on each other, supports wife beating.
Can't imagine why he's single.
What a catch.
Good grief...
so,the conclusion is..u can beat a woman.
An a muslim, I don’t take teaching from just any one trying his hard to explain, i refuse what Hijab explained and I have done my search to find a much much better explanation for this verse than what hijab is saying.
What if you say Talaq three times together ?
Still divorced, whilst it is not exactly recommended under Sharia, it is allowed.
Well said sir! Notably Mr Hijab still hasn't found the courage to respond to my post from over a year ago, which included:
1. We are told that the Quran is the perfect, unalterable and eternal word of Allah (God). Therefore the context of time and/or place is irrelevant! Your fallacy of presentism is completely spurious and irrelevant.
2. Sura 4:34 lets break this down for you as you seem incapable of doing so or fearful of doing so. A) If you fear rebellion (disobedience in other translations) =How insecure would a person have to be to consider imposing sanctions/beating a person because they fear (suspect in other translations) rebellion? B) Secondly, the rebellion/disobedience immediately implies that the man is the authority. Rebellion means to resist a leader/authority and disobedience is to refuse to obey rules of your master/someone in authority.
The more I see and hear M H, the more I dislike him. He is obnoxious.
Look how he treated Alex O'connor a few months ago and how arrogant he is when he's at Speakers Corner in London.
Self righteous and insulting.
I'm sure there must be Muslims who are embarrassed by him.
He managed to make a clear verse very convoluted. Going against quranic claim that it is a book made clear to understand. Hijab has disproved quran
Special pleading eh Hijab
Hijab is absolutely insane 😄😄😄
What an example !😄😄😄😄😄
Just answer the question: Is it OK to BEAT a woman? Answer: NO!!! Bottom line so the ayat is jacked.
So, basically Hijab was trying to argue in favor of some sort of moral relativism? He doesn't think there's any good reason, beyond cultural happenstance, that we think wife beating is wrong? The suffering that the beating would cause the woman, the psychological damage from the clear power imbalance in the relationship, the fact that it creates an atmosphere of violence in the household-- finding any of that wrong is unreasonable in Hijab's view?
I really hope that these kinds of moral anti-realism go extinct.
Hijab uses contradicting arguments.
0:50 That is not presentism...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis)
"(...) presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past (...)"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian%27s_fallacy
"(...) presentism, a mode of historical analysis in which present-day ideas (such as moral standards) are projected into the past (...)"
Presentism is interpreting old ideas using anachronically present ideas. It's not a way of disproving old ideas using modern ideas.
Sorry but i hv never seen The Deen Show before. But i think the guy fell asleep after he asked the question, n woke up soon after Hijab finished bullshiting.
This Muslim apologists have no problem lying and lying about their own religion, scriptures and traditions 🤦♂️
Taqiyya is hijab's middle name.
The culture of Is l am is based on pagan polytheist honor culture. This can be see in Koran 30, verses 38 to 40, and in other verses, where the listener is assumed to be embedded in the pagan polytheist culture
Abdullah Sameer please do a video on Imran Khan writing to Facebook to ban Islamophobia (criticism of Mohammed)
Women’s rights...why not? Hijab is against it.
Another brilliant video many thanks for the the hard work.
Muslims so desperately want this verse to disappear.
Mo (the prophet) struck/hurt Ayesha on her chest - she says this herself. Sahih Muslim 4;2127
This is why so many Muslim stays Muslims. Because they interpret the quran or hadith in their own meaning and understanding. Jesus is God
1-Islam asks both male and female to restrict themselves only to their spouses.
2-Islam, in the strongest manner possible, condemns every extra-marital relation.
3-The permission to (lightly) beat women is not unconditional, nor it is in every situation. Lets see the context of the that; Quran says:
"....therefore the righteous women are devotedly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence What ALLAH would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them (first), Next, refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, means (of annoyance): For ALLAH is Most High, Great (above you all)." (Quran 4:34)
This makes it absolutely clear that this permission is only when women become disloyal--And again reading from start makes it clear that disloyalty here means something below dignity of a modest and chaste woman.
4-When a woman indulges into such an act then of a surety she would not be to her husband as she ought to be. This can even possibly make her husband slip away form the right path and he may get involved somewhere else. If such a stage arrives then this would be havoc not only for the couple and their relations but for the society as a whole. And this permission is deterrence and a necessity against evil.
It's allowed in extreme cases only:
1-Even in that case, to beat is the last option. First is to admonish, if this does not work then next step is to part from their beds, and if this also fails then is light beating.
2-And even if such a stage arrives then also their are restraints, "But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, Means of annoyance"
3-If at all a woman feels that she cannot live with her husband anymore, for any reason, she must get divorce and part, but as long as she is inside the marriage she must remain loyal to her husband even in his absence. For the mutual relation of the couple is the very basis of the society.
An Important Instruction:
When interpreting a verse we have to take in consideration the Hadith of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). He said;
"Fear Allah concerning women! Verily you have taken them on the security of Allah, and intercourse with them has been made lawful unto you by words of Allah. You too have right over them, and that they should not allow anyone to sit on your bed whom you do not like. But if they do that, (in that case) chastise them in a way that leaves no mark (i.e. not severe). Their rights upon you are that you should provide them with food and clothing in a fitting manner."
(Sahih Muslim, Hadith 2137)
This shows it is more of a psychological thing then a physical one and the purpose is only to maintain the chastity and mutual love and affection of the spouses. If a wrong conduct of the woman is not checked then surely the relation will be adversely effected.
Why there is no legislation for wife doing the same to her husband:
Remember man can have legitimate second wife but woman can't have two legitimate husbands at a time for obvious reasons. Considering this and the more obvious psychological, physical differences and considering real life facts there is no legislation regarding wife admonishing her husband this way. She may take up the issue with the elders of both families to correct her husband.
An unauthentic narration:
Some people try to mislead by quoting a narration which goes as:
Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet (pbuh) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife. (Sunan Abu Dawud Hadith 2147. Albani classified it as Da’if i.e. unauthentic).
Besides Albani, Ahmad Shakir and Shu’aib ‘Arna’ut also graded it Da’if in their respective classification of Musnad Ahmad. Ibn Kathir also criticized its chain in Musnad Al-Farooq 1/182.
I love watching Muslims contort themselves into more positions than the Kama Sutra, as it shows how inherently absurd Islam is . Because the Quran is the literal word of God, Muslims have no room to move in terms of interpreting the Quran. The Bible by contrast is inspired by God so it is much easier to contextualise it, specifically to its historical time and place, rather than understanding it as prescriptive for all time. Also the Bible is not just a pure book of instructions in the way the Quran is. Thus it can be interpreted in many different ways.
Brilliant analysis ! Keep it up dear brother .
These momins are great, they can confidently twist any verse to their advantage. they think all others are stupid
I hate that thing all these muslim apologists seem to do, its obviously taught to them in some way, where they do that thing where they are explaining something, then at a point they do that thing that teachers do when they try to get you to complete their sentence. That sort of raining of the tone of the word, a pause............. then say something like its a fact.
They all seem to do it.
That’s Hijab speciality, defending the Allah’s donkey revelations. Why couldn’t Allah say, “spouse” instead of husband. Did Hijab watch Yasir Qadir’s fatwa on step 3 of this verse?
Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "The believers who show the most perfect faith are those who have the best behaviour, and the best of you are those who are the best to their wives".
وعن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم "أكمل المؤمنين إيمانا أحسنهم خُلقا، وخياركم خياركم لنسائهم" ((رواه الترمذي وقال : حديث حسن صحيح)).
@The Astronomer They are not just cartoons. The Prophet Muhammad is important to us, he may not be important to you. We will not insult other prophets. We respect all the prophets. If the Prophet Muhammad was a nobody, if he was as evil as some people claim, why are we upset? Why are we boycotting French products? Why are we protesting?
Why are people becoming muslims if our Prophet was a pedophile, a warlord? It's wrong that the teacher was killed.
@Abdullah Sameer, Thanks for putting this together. The man who hit Hatun Tash in the face last weekend approached her while she was SPEAKING. Hopefully Mohammed Hijab is not impressed.
This guy should be ashamed of himself! Infact all those who follow this book should be ashamed!
abdula sameer is clever than muhamad hijab.
Firstly , an emotionally intelligent man will know that it is never ok to strike a woman or threaten divorce . Secondly, I have listened to Ani Zonneveld , of the progressive Muslim movement in a scholarly debate defend this verse in breaking down the Arabic word for ‘strike ‘ like all Arabic words has various meanings and that it doesn’t literally mean to physically harm . Alhamdulliah 🌸
Actually one should visit any religious place with tourism purpose as religions have nothing to do with the God as they project god as product and keep on fighting that their product is genuine and of superior quality and in the process of one upmanship millions of innocent Human being lost their only one God given live.this madness still goes on with full throttle. Xx
If it doesn't mean physical harm can you kindly explain what it means because you know what mohammad the profit was saying right??
He's so pathetic!
ask Hijab to take his wife's opinion on this. But he won't agree.
But I remember seeing you refute this long ago
Hijab talking not by evidence from quran, just try to cover by his words.
can the women beat her husband if hes hurting their child? I bet not. the guy from the deen show doesnt seem conviced by what Hipus is saying
Why would a man be bothered if his wife buys new shoes😥😥 I'll never understand Islam
What are the instructions to the wife for if/when her husband disrespects her? It would be against most peoples' natures to assault anyone let alone the person they love
It was like watching a bad Saturday nightlive episode on acid
When the Glasses are off you know things are serious
The narrative has holes
U never was a Muslim to begin with so stop saying ex Muslim, you have to say that sounds like you trying very hard to downgrade Islam, but Islam will win with or without you, but you will lose without it.
Is this a cricket match?
Hijab is a big liar! Wow I feel humiliated!, they know how to twist the lie
Hi Mr Sameer, just found your site, found this video very informative, nice bite sized piece of information, keep up the good work, and I will keep watching.
Just one observation, I thought you over played the accidental harm point Mr Hijab made, my husband suffers night tremors, and has been known to kick out, and punch, during these nightmares, and yes I have been woken by a punch to the back of the head, or the odd sharp kick.
I think the saying is,"to give a sucker an even brake".
Barbaric act in islam, stupid argument.
3:23 Were you impersonating Mufti Abu Layth? :P
I think mohammed hijab too bewitched like mohammed nabi.
His last name is hijab lool what do u expect
the man defending himself lmao