Stalin was an Idiot
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 дек 2023
- YOU GO TO GULAG!
----------------------------------------------------------------
Discord -
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sources:
"Hitler and Stalin: Two Dictators and the Second World War" by Laurence Rees
"History of the Second World War" by David Jordan
"Joseph Stalin's Paranoid Purge" warfarehistorynetwork.com/art...
"The Long, Brutal History of Russian Prisoners of War" www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/0...
All the 10 year olds are so mad😂
So true 😂
10 year old?
@@TheWalkingTomatohuh?
@@Boconnor401. Probably angry furries
WHAT SHUT UP
Автор забыл про Мюнхенские соглашения и многократные попытки СССР создать систему коллективной безопасности со странами Союзников. Просмотр видео вызвал у меня рвотные рефлексы от пропагандистского ширпотреба
The Soviet Union tried to Ally with the Nazis by offering to join the axis. They loaded trainload after trainload of raw resources to the German war machine, congratulated hitler after taking paris and only ended up at war with Germany after they were attacked by germany. Sure the US didn’t join in until they were attacked but Roosevelt never tried to join hitler and economically blockaded Japan and the Nazis
The idea also included Soviet troops being stationed in Poland. Poland didn’t trust them which was part of why it failed, and they were vindicated later on.
I remember how you made a video about the USSR where you show how that counrty strong and glorious and now I see it, oh, you Russophobic propaganda, not how you won't leave ordinary people alone
Мы вас спасли от нацистов а вы так про нас.......
Мир спасли от нацистов советские солдаты и офицеры, не только советы освободили Европу и другие страны союзного договора. Твой Сталин был сущим параноиком, так что завались дитя советское.
Не про нас, а про Сталина
@@yaspermcglott3403 créeme compañero, Occidente siempre tendrá, como decís vosotros, una figa en el bolsillo cuando trate con Rusia. Os tienen miedo y envidia, y como bien se sabe, a los que se teme y se envidia, se odia. Da igual la ideología del Estado Ruso en el momento. Siempre sera así. No por nada tenéis un dicho, que cada cien años Occidente reúne fuerzas para ir a Rusia con la espada en mano, para recibir una somanta de ostias e irse con los dientes en la mano y un ojo morado para probar suerte dentro de otros cien años. Así que cuando veas un video así, ten por seguro que se estos cabrones se refieren a TODOS los que viven en el espacio de la antigua Union Soviética.
Saludos republicanos del Levante Español!
And we saved you from the nazis too, with the US your country would've been useless land for them, and this about Stalin who was a complete dumbass and who let his people die because he was a pussy and didn't trust anyone 💀
We? Tf you mean? You didn’t do shit
In 1929 the Head and of the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the Soviet Union de jure a head of the government of the USSR Alexei Rykov who was on this position since 1924 till 1930, in public discussion with Stalin claimed and advocated for a policy of borrowing and importing bread and wheat from foreign and capitalist countries, to sustain condition of Soviet peasantry and prevent any situation of mass hunger.
It was required to pay 200 million roubles. That wasn't a such big amount of money and USSR can if you want to pay for this and get food.
Rykov already at time predicted and saw that stability of the Soviet village distorted and there's a high chance of mass hunger in the country.
Stalin refused this plan. He make an argument and defended his position that if USSR would be importing food from Western countries, it would shrink country reputation in the world and make the USSR perceived as a weak state begging to help from other countries.
Later in 1938 Alexei Rykov was sentenced to death as a part and a member of the Rightist fraction in the Communust party and executed.
So... What's your thoughts about this episode in history an Stalin response to Rykov request?
Never trust Chruschtschow.
you wrote his name like its Chinese meal.
Wojack in thumbnail detected
Opinion rejected
Bismarck wasnt german, he was polish
Even Lenin doesn't want stalin to be the next leader💀
No that’s not true
@@Boconnor401.Yes that's true because he really didn't like stalin before he(Lenin) died
By the way, who was it that was in charge of giving people jobs?
@@timetravelingtraveler That would be Stalin sir.
@@dizzydean2767 ×_×
15:43, FACTS. Wehr boos talk about the tiger/panthers because they were good tanks, meanwhile tankies go on about the greatness of the t-34s armor and number. The problem with tigers is that once their engine starts having problems, they die. T-34s although wouldn't, instead, when a t-34 died, so did the crew. Same with the tiger. Meanwhile with the Sherman, it was great. It was good for the repair like the t 34 but was also strong and survivable enough to be a good tank. Ultimately, the t 34 was cheap enough to mass produce, and the tigers weren't. So even if a tiger did kill a t 34, like 6 would take its place.
ЗАЧЕМ ТЫ ТАК ПРО СТАЛИНА.
on dalboeb
AgressivnieZvukiHrukaniaTrotskotni.mp4 be like
Based.
The Christopher Hitchens Dialectic.
no child should have to experience something like hitlers and stalins childhood. its the only thing that i feel bad about happening to them
Stalin has been Revived and is coming toward your exact location
Yo, your discord link does not work
когда учил историю по тик току:
RIP Kaiser Karlos
Even my grandfather believed he was and idiot. He served in the Soviet's Afghanistan so that's saying something. His military tactics were out right stupid and killed many young men.
Stalin is widely considered the best leader in the history of my country, since FROM 1924 TO 1953 he made USSR the greatest country in the world, ppl lived happily before his death bc the believed in the bright future of communism.
клоуненок думает что ссср сам производил технологии
@@aboba7526 Хочешь сказать, что СССР живя под санкциями и не имея возможности ничего продавать кроме пшена все технологии позаимствовал?
@@aboba7526 ну производил сам, а придумал или изобрел не факт.
Does it exist today?
@@sus2073 лол какие санкции. Американцы тупа провели индустриализацию в СССР.
Let's be real. There's simply no such thing as an intelligent world leader, like at all.
Осуждаю
who you condemn? 😂
Stalin ate my ass
@@Bambino8888aku mengutuk kamu⚒️
@@Bambino8888автора
Сталин не был идиотам, это просто удобная отмазка тех кто не может открыть ТЕЖЕ воспоминания Жукова, который говорил о Сталине как о компетентным главнокомандующем и если не его умелое руководство то СССР пал. И да ошибки совершают все и во всем винить Сталина, это надо быть как рас идиотом и вообще не интересоваться тем что было до ВОВ, и что угрожало СССР, а там много интересного, например давление Японии и Англии и за чего СССР ещё в 30х яро готовился к войне и тд, и тд.
Zukhov left memories that would not and their family to the gulag. Especially because many of the shit he did were aided by the idiots that came after.
@@introboy1 чебуречно
Какой нафиг ГУЛАГ вы у себя за границей нашу историю не знаете отслова совсем, Жуков оставил свои воспоминания и дал интервью во времена Хрущева который вел антисталинскую политику КАКОЙ НАФИК ГУЛАГ @@BOIOLA08
He was an idiot, he and his government decided to have a pact with the nazis even though it was stated so many times before that hitler hated the slavs and wanted nothing more but to destroy Russia, and Stalin really thought hitler was gonna keep his word and not attack them 💀 and calling the race card for something that doesn't have to do with race is crazy and shows how you're trying everything to do to protect your daddy stalin💀
Trusting Hitler is one of the dumbest mistakes in human history not to mention immoral.
SLAVA CCCP!
You are right about Stalin but every argument about Germany and the axis was wrong lol
Which ones?
@@IMP_ROM all of them
@@0815Catgus Why were they wrong?
Im a Historican and will say you: they are Right! Well the Most.
@@TimMatterSnorri999 Me too and i will say you 90% is wrong
Stalin was a lot of things, including a awful dictator (so, no one will says i’m stalinist), but he was certainly not a idiot
But he wasnt a Genius too.
@@TimMatterSnorri999 indeed, but there’s a gap between being a genius and an idiot
@@kyrios443 well i think youre right. 😊
@@TimMatterSnorri999 wow. That’s the most peaceful discussion i’ve been experiencing from a long moment in the yt comment. Thanks you : D
@@kyrios443 No Prob. 😁😊🙏🤝
Stalin was an genius
Correct. This video is just fedposting.
Yeah, a genius who had zero diplomatic prowess, no grasp on economics and singlehandedly lost first 2 years in the soviet portion of WW2. All that: and his superb educational background of 4 years at Sunday school. Verily: for a socialist, this IS peak intellect!
Who is stalin
@@uhjay109a Soviet dictator who used to be a Priest
nah
"Hey, whoever is chosen for giving peopl's job, don't let that jerk stalin become the next leader, also who did I gave that role?"
“That would be Stalin sir.”
“Bleh”
no I was not!!
товарищ НКВД следит за вами
Now do a timeline where Trotsky take power please
Trotsky was worse
@@Baba_Bahebalhe most def was not.
Критиковать можно каждый день и по разному но прикол в том что в то время это не имело значения и времени тем более
Что-то здесь правильно и в тоже время нет не говоря уже о том что критиковать лидера страны бесмысленно если он мертв
А вот критиковать лидера какой-то страны с какой либо целью это уже совсем другое
Но это уже совсем другая история как говорил Леонид Каневский.
そういうのやめたほうがいい
В СИБИРЬ
🇰🇭✍️e a lot of people 6Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box. 0:25 0:26 Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour. 0:29 Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box. 0:31 Touch and hold a clip to pin it. Unpinned clips will be deleted after 1 hour. 0:33
ты хоть понимаешь что ты несешь
если бы не товарищ сталин мы бы вам не помогали
Stalin no idiot lol
i am pro soviet but… i gotta say the only “good” thing he did was industrialize the soviet union after that he was a pure idiot.
Больше не будем...
それくらい戦争が好きならイスラエルのとこいけや
Hi
stalin wasn t idiot
Can you do tisly_kit19 vs e man_960 please 🙏 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺🥺
Но в афганистане ссср к сожелению проиграл
As a Russian some of these comments are crazy - sure the Western interpretation of Stalin is flawed, but at the end of the day the majority of the early Soviet losses in WW2 were either a direct result of Stalin actively rejecting the intelligence his own spies provided him with repeatedly - telling him when Hitler would attack - only for him to say "nuh-uh, I trust this Hitler guy (who broke every previous agreement)" leading the Soviet army being caught with their pants down e.g., the majority of the officer corps being on vacation, and the pogranichniki being a proverbial skeleton crew. Furthermore, while it is unclear why Stalin attempted the great purge (whether to increase his personal power after other party officials namely Kirov appeared to be equally popular to him, or due to paranoia) there is no question that the Soviet military leadership as well as major vehicle and arms designers, gosplan officials, and a number of other experts necessary for the war effort (not to mention over a million normal people) were gutted - a ridiculous waste of some of our brightest minds on the eve of the biggest armed conflict in history over suspicions that have never actually been proven (there is still absolutely no evidence that supported Stalin's paranoia about enemies of the people). While collectivization and the 5 year plans were inefficient, they did at least have good intentions in mind but the great purge and Stalin putting his trust in Hitler (rather than his own intelligence personnel) were two mistakes he does not deserve to ever be forgiven for.
Stalin didn’t do the purge and nor trust or like Hitler
戦争系出すのやめたら?
Like a fox
I’m just seeing tankie cope in the comments lol
How is it cope if he’s wrong
@@Boconnor401. Stalin was a dumbass, he’s not….
4:04 despite all Stalin's stupidity, he actually tried to establish some "Collective security" organization (I guess it was called "Eastern Pact") to oppose Germany in early 30s. And it was the west who declined that pact and let germans take Czechoslovakia in the first place, while USSR wanted to protect it, but Poland stopped soviet troops from entering Czechoslovakia
I don’t know about you but if I were the poles I wouldn’t trust the Soviets in my territory. Plus the Soviet Union at the time was seen as worse than Germany because nobody really knew what the German were doing yet, not saying it was justified but that’s what happened. Plus it does not justify his cooperation with Germany and naively thinking they would never invade them.
Why are the communist little Timmy’s so mad
Because their daddy stalin was attacked for being the worst person history has ever had 💀
What? Little Timmy?
added to the commie mogging playlist
ЕВРОПУ СПАСЛИ
Wild cat I'm from Ukraine before that And Stalin is the greatest man in the world, and if he wasn't there, then you weren't
He literally starved Ukrainians in the Holodomor LOL looks like people still have Stockholm Syndrome
Really?
あんまソ連の動画出さないほうがいいよ、何がだめなのかわからんけど
The video claims that Stalin created the “cult of personality” but then uses the premises of the cult, except in the negative rather than the positive.
If he was an “idiot” why did he have magical powers to create the cult? No one ever explains.
Here is a better explanation:
… But Stalin, the individual, was a mediocrity. His rise to power was entirely bound up with the bureaucratic degeneration of the Bolshevik Party. Stalinism was, in essence, the outcome of the bureaucracy’s usurpation of political power from the working class.
The bureaucracy chose Stalin as its leader because he possessed the personal and political characteristics required to defend its interests and privileges, i.e., ruthlessness, lust for personal power, vulgar pragmatism, and nationalist outlook.
The latter element of his political outlook was of decisive importance. The programmatic foundation of Stalinism was the anti-Marxist “theory” of “socialism in one country,” which was first advanced by Stalin in December 1924.
This nationalist revision of Marxism justified the abandonment of the program of world socialist revolution and the subordination of the struggles of the international working class to the national interests of the Soviet bureaucracy.
From WSWS:
Stalin: The gravedigger of the revolution
David North
7 March 2023
The analysis of the N@zi regime also repeats the standard myths as truth.
- The “stabbed in the back” idea was developed by the German High Command at the end of 1918 when they new they would lose the war. They wanted a way to blame the “socialists” for the loss. It didn’t come from the population or the NSDAP. Their plan was to put the Social Democratic Party (the SPD, which had supported the war) in to power to avoid a repeat of the October Revolution of a year earlier. The SPD ordered the Friekorps to crush the 1919 revolution.
- Hitler was elected and “put into power” but it is never reported that the NSDAP vote in the Nov. ‘32 election fell by 2 million from the Jul ‘32. The combined vote of the SPD and KPD (Communist party under a leadership appointed by the Stalinists) was higher and their organisations were much larger.
Hitler was appointed Chancellor on 31 Jan ‘33 in a cabinet with only 2 of 10 ministries taken by N@zis party members.
While the leadership of the KPD was soon arrested the KPD itself was not outlawed. The position from Moscow was to keep good relations with the new German government! The new government moved carefully as they expected the mass anti-fascist sentiment would lead to civil war. Hitler was put in power precisely because his was the only party which promised to crush the threat of revolution.
The Stalinists not only did nothing but even asserted that repression by the new regime would lead mechanically to revolution. (The SPD and the trade union leadership likewise respected the legal government) and capitulated.
Thus Hitler’s dictatorship was built without any organised opposition because of the policies of Stalin and his henchmen.
ESSENTIAL READING
The Myth of “Ordinary Germans”: A Review of Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners
David North
11 April 1997
We are facing another imperialist world war because of the failure of the working class to take power priory to the first two. The reasons for this failure were the betrayals of international by the Second International in 1914 (except the Bolsheviks and the Serbian section!) and by the Stalinists in 1933.
It is urgent that workers, students and youth study these experiences and seek to build an international, anti-war and socialist movement. Only the WSWS is fighting for that.
@@johnwilsonwswsWhat choice did the Soviet Union have other than to try to build Socialism in one country? What was the functional difference between “permanent revolution” and socialism in one country? The USSR was just not in a state to invade the rest of the world.
@@nool9046 They are all good questions. I will answer in separate comments. These answers are long but it would be a mistake to try to simplify the issue.
---
Q: What choice did the Soviet Union have other than to try to build Socialism in one country?
A: Trotsky answers as follows in an appendix to "The Third International After Lenin" (1928) as follows:
"Like the wise owl which comes flying only in the dusk, the theory of socialism in one country pops up at the moment when our industry, which exhausts ever greater proportions of the old fixed capital, in two-thirds of which there is crystallized the dependence of our industry on world industry, has given indication of its urgent need to renew and extend its ties with the world market, and at a moment when the problems of foreign trade have arisen in their full scope before our economic directors.
At the Eleventh Congress, that is, at the last Congress at which Lenin had the opportunity to speak to the party, he issued a timely warning that the party would have to undergo another test: “... a test to which we shall be put by the Russian and international market to which we are subordinated, with which we are connected and from which we cannot escape.
Nothing deals the theory of an isolated “complete socialism” such a death-blow as the simple fact that our foreign trade figures have in most recent years become the keystone of the figures of our economic plans. The “tightest spot” in our economy, including our industry, is our import trade which depends entirely on our export. And inasmuch as the power of resistance of a chain is always measured by its weakest link, the dimensions of our economic plans are made to conform to the dimensions of our imports.
In the journal Planned Economy (the theoretical organ of the State Planning Commission) we read an article devoted to the system of planning, that “... in drawing up our control figures for the current year we had to take methodologically our export and import plans as a starting point for the entire plan; we had to orient ourselves on that in our plans for the various branches of industry and consequently for industry in general and particularly for the construction of new industrial enterprises,” etc., etc. [34]
----
ALSO:
We must note that socialism-in-one-country was first put forward in December 1924, seven years after the October Revolution and 11 months after Lenin died. In the first edition of 'The Foundations of Leninism', released a month after Lenin died, even Stalin was still insisting that the fate of the Soviet Union depended on the world revolution.
Stalin wrote "“The overthrow of the power of the bourgeoisie and the establishment of a proletarian government in one country does not yet guarantee the complete victory of socialism. The main task of socialism-the organization of socialist production-remains ahead. Can this task be accomplished, can the final victory of socialism in one country be attained, without the joint efforts of the proletariat of several advanced countries? No, this is impossible. To overthrow the bourgeoisie the efforts of one country are sufficient-the history of our revolution bears this out. For the final victory of Socialism, for the organization of socialist production, the efforts of one country, particularly of such a peasant country as Russia, are insufficient. For this the efforts of the proletarians of several advanced countries are necessary.
Such, on the whole, are the characteristic features of the Leninist theory of the proletarian revolution.”
So why did he change his mind?
Q: What was the functional difference between “permanent revolution” and socialism in one country? The USSR was just not in a state to invade the rest of the world.
A: You need to read "The Revolution Betrayed" for a complete answer but I will focus on questions of foreign policy.
Socialism-in-one-country by the USSR required peaceful coexistence (or peaceful competition) with capitalism. This entailed illusions in the stability of capitalism and a demoralized view of the revolutionary capacity of the working class.
(This was a rejection of Lenin's analysis of the reactionary epoch of imperialism which had definitively started with the outbreak of WWI.)
The Stalinists also adopted the Menshevik two-stage theory for China and insisted the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) remain within the nationalist Kuo-Min-Tang and the Chiang Kai Chek was the "national leader" . Kai Chek was even made an honorary member of the Comintern! This betrayal of the Chinese Revolution of 1925-1927 led to the to the KMT's massacre of up to 10,000 workers and CCP cadre in Shanghai in 1927.
When Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany in January 1933 the Soviet Regime wanted to make sure they had friendly relations with the new government. They said there was a separation of relations between their nation-states and the repression of the German Communist Party and other German working class organisation. They even suggested that the repression would hasten a revolution.
In all of these Trotsky and the Left Opposition fought for the political independence of the working class. Permanent Revolution maintains the primacy of world economy and world politics over the national sphere. Capitalism, despite occasional temporary truces, could never allow peaceful coexistence.
On China, Permanent Revolution said the national bourgeoise of the KMT was connected by a thousand threads to world imperialism. The Chinese communists had pleaded to leave the KMT but they did not defy the directives from the Comintern.
On Germany Trotsky (writing from Prinkipo in Turkey) and the International Left Opposition did everything they could to warn workers of the danger of fascism and called for a United Front (combined action, full freedom of criticism) of the social-democratic Party (SPD) and Communist Party (KPD). In opposing this the KPD and the Comintern said the SPD were "social-fascists" (i.e. no different from the N@zis). The KPD's opportunism even led it to collaborate with the N@zis in the 1931 Prussian Lantag referendum to try to remove the SPD state government.
After the catastrophe in Germany became undeniable the Stalinist Comintern still said the KPD policy had been correct and they suppressed any discussion. No section of the Comintern opposed this. Trotsky said "An organization which was not roused by the thunder of fascism and which submits docilely to such outrageous acts of the bureaucracy demonstrates thereby that it is dead and that nothing can ever revive it."
ALSO:
Who has ever suggested the USSR had to invade the rest of the world? Do you have a link? This is the first I have ever heard of that.
respeta argentina
Good video
I agree with you my Ukrain Friend. Fun fact: Germany made with the Operation Barbarossa the Sovietunion so Populary. Before that there was no great Victorious Red Army. So we can say: Germany made The Sovietunion to a Worldpower! Not Stalin!
俺昔の戦争少し嫌いやねん
Stalin's mistakes were all due to his fear of losing his position😶😏
Это не правда, Сталин боялся не место потерять, а боялся падение первого в мире советского государства. Сталин был продолжателем Ленина и его учеником. Сталин видел своим долгом не помрачить доброе имя Ленина, и как его ученик всеми силами пытался сохранить то что Ленин оставил ему и его товарищам с народом, а ошибки совершают все и если Сталин был идиотом то ВОВ была проиграна.
@@deadstal3708loool
@@deadstal3708USSR only won by loosing 9 mil. people...sending them like meat....not because Stalin was smart.
for me, as a person born in USSR OCCUPATION, I am shocked that you, Russians cant realize that stalin for other people was like hitler to Jews 😂
stalin was a scumbag. I would spit on his grave
and you building him statues even today 😂 what kind if freaks would build a statue for stalin today?
he didnt make mistake he didnt know the history
@@deadstal3708Successor of Lenin huh? I'd say Trotsky fit more with that tittle,Jughasvhili was nothing but a paranoid man who at the same time hungry for power (although Trotsky and many other Soviet figure are just as guilty as Jughasvhili himself).
That whole shitplace of a country was fucked in the ass no matter who's in charge of it,even if the head of state was "pro democracy" or Communist or fascist or whatever. Какой варвар
戦争は良くないよ
Ahhh the tankies in the comments amuse me.
He’s still wrong
Very provocative title, not even sure if I should watch the video. I can only tell the author: "Keep yourself safe"
Bros mad
"Stalin was an idiot"
"Stalin wasn't an idiot"
Stalin came to power with the basic idea in mind that their would be an invasion by reactionary forces that would seek to destroy the USSR he was correct in this assessment and began preparing for ww2.
Diplomatically he began trying to nake an alliance with the allies but thry seemed disinterested so he eventually made a pesch treaty with the germans he gets a lot of hate for this but at that point Germany had a similar deal with each of the allies.
When the war broke out they decided to stay neutral as they had lost their trust with the allies.
Theirs no need to go over the second world war as him as their victory speaks for itself.
At home he industrialized the ussr in ten years for similar comparison capitalist japan pulling it off in thirty year was considered am miracle.
He did face famines with the collective farms though it was more of a mistake andbad luck than anything international and as the collective farms were effective after that.
Either way under his leadership be turned the USSR from a backwater to a super power no leader in history has done anything similar.
You can not like him but he was definitely not an idiot.
He was an idiot, what crack are you smoking 💀
Uh oh whatifalthistory clone spotted
What? Where are the similarities? Not liking communism?
Not a clone, nobody owns this style of video
stalin is not an idiot
He was
@@charleskaus8867 He read at least 500 pages of books a day, if he's an idiot, then we're much dumber.
@@krinsyatinathat's why he was such an idiot
He never took a chance to stimulate his brain
putin is something similar
Thats right!
No
@@TimMatterSnorri999no
Even if he was, (and he wasn't), he still led his country to victory against the Nazis, and helped build the first workers state. That counts for a lot more than you will ever do.
Did he fight on the battle field? No he didn’t do anything if anything he’s responsible for what the Germans did in the ussr. He naively thought he’d never be invaded and as a result millions died because of him. And just ignore how bloody his hands are with the blood of his own people that he sent to the gulags and starved. Such a benevolent leader 😒
@@dizzydean2767he didn’t
@@Boconnor401. Didn’t what?
Comrade Stalin built a country from the wreckage of the Russian Empire to a power that was the second to receive nuclear weapons
The moskals never had nuclear bombs
@@elmascapo6588racism much? Also what?
@@Boconnor401. racism implies the moskals are humans. Which, they have disproven time after time
Also, yes, the same state that never figured out agriculture couldn't had ever even phantom nuclear bombs.
Fedposting
MANNERHEIM ( Finnland) kick Stalin (Sovietunion) out of Finnland in 1939 💀
No he didn’t
@@Boconnor401. in 1939 bro NOT IN THE END! i said 1939.
This was a really good video
1st comment
As a Georgian i say, stalin was a dictator,but not an idiot.
It wasn't right to kill a people, but he said:you have a human, you have a problem. You havn't a human,you havn't a problem
So you like it no?
@@Boconnor401. i liked his mindset, how he've make his job done and how smart he was. He knew which people wasn't fainthful of him and killed them, but sadly many smart people,intelectuals and christians died. But it doesn't mean he was stupid, he really was one of the greatest historical person. Yes i like stalin, but don't like some of the personality of him. Also, are ypu Georgian?
Stalin did not do much good or bad for the country. For example: he was the initiator of the industrialization of the country, won the Second World War, which was obviously a good step, but he made a great many mistakes and miscalculations during his reign. And perhaps that is why Stalin is so well ingrained in our memory.
ソ連系無理だわ
Это мы Русские
You know how they say "Tell either good or nothing about the dead"? Well... He's an exception
And the Red army is the strongest LOL
Uh huh.
Ah yes, the mighty red army…… so powerful they were, that they traded grain for some sweet American made weapons and American provided logistics that carried them throughout the war.
アニメ嫌いなのにアニメの画像出すなや
I fully agree with you. The only thing that I want to mention is, that in fact, Stalin also wanted to invave Germany. But Hitler attacked first. Also, Stalin didnt have anything planed in case of USSR being invaded. He just hid in one of his mansions and left the generals alone.
No Stalin was building the “Molotov line” along the axis border in case of an invasion but it wasn’t built on time and abandoned
Source: Hitler said
Wrong also Reddit lies
荒らすよ?
Stalin was a genius
I love how none of you people lived in USSR but yall love it. how can you love something that you never tryed?
this freak ki**lled and deported loads of my people and many of my neighbors, banned our language lessons...what is so fkn amazing to you?
🤨 Communist kid?
@@kyenarinn2991stupid biden kid?🤨
@@kyenarinn2991Nazis kid🤨
@@hankspy389 are you calling me a Nazi?