The latest work with cepheid variable and other non-cmb methods to date the universe suggests that there's actually no hubble tension, with results very close to those described here. Which if confirmed, means that the hubble constant hasn't changed over time.
Always used to think the CMB map showed that space wasn't uniform and the areas had different speed limits. Or that maybe it is shaped like a toroid displayed in 2D.
Damn. Of course it is, the darker the better and even better if it is postulated to be hiding in some other dark universe .... that way no one will be able to debunk it ...... and this is the way our science is moving on .....!!!!
Are the atoms or other particles RIGHT on the edge of the expansion stretched or annihilated creating 'stuff '? maybe I should've asked does edge mean a physical thing, if so what happens to those things? Man, I can't even formulate a coherent question !
As I've been speculating for a long time: there is no "dark matter" particle. It is variations in some attribute of space itself that is causing gravitational anomalies. Space is not uniform. We (humanity) just don't know what that attribute of space is yet. If the mottled CMB indicates the moment space was created, then the cold and red spots, the temperature differences, may indicate differences in the value of that space attribute. (not a physicist)
The issue is how you define invisible... Because we can't see much of the electromagnetic spectrum either way. So... What frequency are we talking about?
That's not an issue we don't call the parts of the EM spectrum we can't see with our eyes invisible because we have instruments to detect them. Dark matter if real would be invisible because it doesn't interact with the EM spectrum, it may only interact with the weak force and with gravity via the higgs field. It would be invisible in the truest sense in that it doesn't interact with light
Could frame-dragging, on a galactic scale, account for fast-moving stars staying within the galactic disc? Theres a lot of mass moving in the same direction and this might twist spacetime like a slow whirlpool
My theory...dark matter is what surrounded the singularity that became the big bang and we are expanding into it, like two different density "smokes" and dark energy is the "friction" that is the result of those two smokes.
There is no such thing as matter. The atomic realm is reinforced geometries emergent of the monadal base of reality in a state of out of phase to one complete cycle. Retardation of its one cycle completeness divides the monad into what is called waves which interlope into harmonious cavities or standing waves which is what an atom is
14:27 So…what if dark matter isn’t particles but waveforms…? What if dark matter is just the concentration of dark energy as like a negating or repellent waveform to the more positive particles of visible matter? What if dark matter is interwoven with visible matter in every conscious moment and the dark energy is the dispersive property of space-time and our positive viable matter is the substrate for positive creative waveforms?
Is there any theory that dark matter is actually cosmic intergalactic dust too thin to form galaxies ? Over the cubic light years involved, it could add up to something.
I think that's ruled out by various measurements. In particular, we can measure how much of this dust there is in various different ways, and it doesn't even begin to contribute enough mass for dark matter.
This isn't a scientific theory, but I kind of wonder if dark matter could be the effects of gravity from matter in parallel dimensions. Like, the parallel universe matter only interacts with ours via gravity, not any other forces.
Do you think that theoretical physics has become more mathematics than physics? Are papers about two-dimensional gravity really about physics? Or are some of the recent theories just mathematical day-dreaming? Sure, the proof is mathematically correct, but do any of these objects exist?
When you say proof you hit a language barrier. It's strong evidence but proof? According to what? If I make something that produces random pixels of the same resolution it has as much chance of producing that same image as any other. I think it would be nice to grade proofs.
Great video! I really like the way you present the material - everything is clear, understandable and professional. Keep making us happy with your work!🌌💝🌑
It sad the beginning of original person idea of the universe couldn't see it bear fruit with their own eye's. Mother earth greatest creation we all learn to fly and pollenate the universe.
There’s no such thing as Dark Matter…. Get back to me when you’ve properly measured galaxies to include everything from gas to dust, planets to red and brown dwarfs, every black hole that’s invisible right now and you have taken into account the electromagnetic influences on the galaxies. Once you’ve measured these things… you will not need dark matter to explain anything. Jmho.
Is it possible that dark matter is the literal fabric of the universe? Something is dragging everything around with incredible strength, it might make sense if it's the canvas.
Possibly, but until we can figure out a way to observe it directly, it's just speculation. I have a feeling, however, that this is just a mulligan and the answer is going to be that we have the model of how the universe works wrong.
I think natural observable effects are more obvious. Effects of black holes, suns, quasars, neutron stars, galactic wind, galaxy collisions. When people get together and really try to sell you on something invisible, especially on this scale it’s probably the kind of wholesale bullshit those people make so much money off of it’s shameful. But! I digress, if some mutant brained person comes along and suddenly dark matter can be bottled and studied I’ll eat my words.
@@arsemyth8920 dark matter/energy is the name to the observation of galactic movement discrepancy to predictions, not the explanation of the discrepancy.
A galaxy doesn’t run on gravity it runs on charge as a whirlpool does. A whirlpool does not spin because the water molecules are pulling on each other. They believe in elves being the explanation for everything, so when nature tells them something they look for the hidden elves.
Each time I see this Microwave background I wonder is it truly background and how much is it polluted by the foreground. for exemple the center of our galaxy is quite opaque so I would be surprised if we really see the background through the milky way. and the presence of other galawies in the foreground might affect the background measurement.
8 mins since it released, not 1st but seeing Anton's videos are a win all their own. Thank you Anton for being so wonderful!
You may have been one of the few who got a heart from anton :)
The latest work with cepheid variable and other non-cmb methods to date the universe suggests that there's actually no hubble tension, with results very close to those described here. Which if confirmed, means that the hubble constant hasn't changed over time.
Is it Dark.Matter? No! Ìts...
Ancient Aliens!
No, it’s climate change.
Nobody said first, and it’s appreciated.
Never understood why people have to state they were first at video in most cases they are actually the first to say the word
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🙂😁
I conducted an experiment involving a microwave and certain light bulbs, results were spooky to say the least.
Thanks!
thank you!
Always used to think the CMB map showed that space wasn't uniform and the areas had different speed limits. Or that maybe it is shaped like a toroid displayed in 2D.
Perhaps we should call Peter Venkman, chasing ghosts is a difficult occupation 😅
When physics overlaps with woodo
Damn. Of course it is, the darker the better and even better if it is postulated to be hiding in some other dark universe .... that way no one will be able to
debunk it ...... and this is the way our science is moving on .....!!!!
Cool stuff, Anton. Wonderful job.
I wonder if there are any plans to take an even more detailed higher resolution picture of the CBM.
These videos are so cool, they give me life
im here at the same time as the bots damn
our universe IS a quantum fluctuation... this is a profound point for those who know about stuff...
Inflation is the consensus theory but is not proven and has many detractors with real concrete problems existing with the theory.
Dark photons: hmmmm, maybe anti photons?
Are the atoms or other particles RIGHT on the edge of the expansion stretched or annihilated creating 'stuff '? maybe I should've asked does edge mean a physical thing, if so what happens to those things? Man, I can't even formulate a coherent question !
Thank you. Have you ever investigated The electric universe theory.
Have you ever investigated the nearest psychiatric institute?
It’s misinformation, there’s many videos explaining why. If you got any questions do ask.
@@Auroral_Anomalyburn the heretic!!
@@Auroral_Anomaly you are rude and disrespectful.
@@JerseyLynne You are gullible and need to go back to school.
Thanks Anty Baby 🐜
How can we be so sure it is invisible if we can’t actually see it? 🤔
14:28 Cheburashka^3
No, but my mother sure is!!!
As I've been speculating for a long time: there is no "dark matter" particle. It is variations in some attribute of space itself that is causing gravitational anomalies. Space is not uniform. We (humanity) just don't know what that attribute of space is yet. If the mottled CMB indicates the moment space was created, then the cold and red spots, the temperature differences, may indicate differences in the value of that space attribute. (not a physicist)
Tt brown liked this message ;)
The issue is how you define invisible... Because we can't see much of the electromagnetic spectrum either way. So... What frequency are we talking about?
That's not an issue we don't call the parts of the EM spectrum we can't see with our eyes invisible because we have instruments to detect them. Dark matter if real would be invisible because it doesn't interact with the EM spectrum, it may only interact with the weak force and with gravity via the higgs field. It would be invisible in the truest sense in that it doesn't interact with light
@@shekel2356 Sure, but I meant about the "dark photons".
Evidence of other dimensions
very good
I'm telling you its just a bug in the simulation. They will have it fixed in the next version release. Nothing to fret about.
thanks for a great video anton
hmmm could dark matter be the remains of previous universe(s), exotic decayed stars & black holes?
🤔 I noticed you can observe stuff if you only squint. 👋 😬
Could frame-dragging, on a galactic scale, account for fast-moving stars staying within the galactic disc? Theres a lot of mass moving in the same direction and this might twist spacetime like a slow whirlpool
So, in other words, the Universe exploded into existence.
The only dark matter is non-luminous regular matter and I'm sure there is enough of that around to explain everything.
Dark Sector theory = "Maybe there's magic?"
you lied: they only considered the steady-state alternatives to Big Bang, not all the other possibilities.
My theory...dark matter is what surrounded the singularity that became the big bang and we are expanding into it, like two different density "smokes" and dark energy is the "friction" that is the result of those two smokes.
Was atmospheric disturbance encompassed in the results?? If no would there be an explanation using current readily available data?
You realize that the data was collected by satellite
Every time I am convinced that your channel is one of the best! Thank you for the quality content and interesting videos.🍭🔴🌴
Why are Subatomic particles always portaid as round
Should they be portaido shaped?
There is no such thing as matter. The atomic realm is reinforced geometries emergent of the monadal base of reality in a state of out of phase to one complete cycle. Retardation of its one cycle completeness divides the monad into what is called waves which interlope into harmonious cavities or standing waves which is what an atom is
Question? why can't we use the electromagnetic fields coming from the sun and the planets in our solar system for an engine around our solar system
14:27 So…what if dark matter isn’t particles but waveforms…? What if dark matter is just the concentration of dark energy as like a negating or repellent waveform to the more positive particles of visible matter? What if dark matter is interwoven with visible matter in every conscious moment and the dark energy is the dispersive property of space-time and our positive viable matter is the substrate for positive creative waveforms?
Is there any theory that dark matter is actually cosmic intergalactic dust too thin to form galaxies ? Over the cubic light years involved, it could add up to something.
I think that's ruled out by various measurements. In particular, we can measure how much of this dust there is in various different ways, and it doesn't even begin to contribute enough mass for dark matter.
This isn't a scientific theory, but I kind of wonder if dark matter could be the effects of gravity from matter in parallel dimensions. Like, the parallel universe matter only interacts with ours via gravity, not any other forces.
Brane theory
Do you think that theoretical physics has become more mathematics than physics? Are papers about two-dimensional gravity really about physics? Or are some of the recent theories just mathematical day-dreaming? Sure, the proof is mathematically correct, but do any of these objects exist?
When you say proof you hit a language barrier. It's strong evidence but proof? According to what? If I make something that produces random pixels of the same resolution it has as much chance of producing that same image as any other. I think it would be nice to grade proofs.
It’s difficult to define 0 👍
Great video! I really like the way you present the material - everything is clear, understandable and professional. Keep making us happy with your work!🌌💝🌑
Great comment! I really like the way you emulate a real human being. Keep making us happy shilling links to OF 🌌💝🌑
Perhaps it's time to go back to the old 'ether' concept of the universe?
Dimensionality needs energy to exist, right!? Can material be a dimension?
Hello wonderful persons.
It will be cool if we have a dark realm. I hope we have a dark realm! There’s no dark realm, is there?
It sad the beginning of original person idea of the universe couldn't see it bear fruit with their own eye's. Mother earth greatest creation we all learn to fly and pollenate the universe.
Also you think maybe possible for the big bang come from a blackhole.
Short answer: no. Longer answer: nope.
Holmdel (not Homdel) Horn Antenna
No.
Maybe dark matter is hiding dark matter?
Where is dark matter in the cmb?
it is probably as simple as infinite over lapping universes with enough bleed over to make us think more matter exists.
nope.....dark matter is once again proven to be a way to make fitting math, the ether of our times....
There’s no such thing as Dark Matter…. Get back to me when you’ve properly measured galaxies to include everything from gas to dust, planets to red and brown dwarfs, every black hole that’s invisible right now and you have taken into account the electromagnetic influences on the galaxies. Once you’ve measured these things… you will not need dark matter to explain anything. Jmho.
Your videos are always inspiring. Thank you for such unique content!♀️🍏🍻
Is it possible that dark matter is the literal fabric of the universe? Something is dragging everything around with incredible strength, it might make sense if it's the canvas.
👽 🌌
r/ihadastroke
Sounds like the Higgs field
No, there are dark matter poor and rich galaxies. There’s not more fabric though. Dark energy may be an inherent quality of empty space though.
Why not look at the affects of wormholes. Fits everything seen with dark matter
Possibly, but until we can figure out a way to observe it directly, it's just speculation.
I have a feeling, however, that this is just a mulligan and the answer is going to be that we have the model of how the universe works wrong.
I think natural observable effects are more obvious. Effects of black holes, suns, quasars, neutron stars, galactic wind, galaxy collisions.
When people get together and really try to sell you on something invisible, especially on this scale it’s probably the kind of wholesale bullshit those people make so much money off of it’s shameful.
But! I digress, if some mutant brained person comes along and suddenly dark matter can be bottled and studied I’ll eat my words.
Dark matter, wormholes, dark energy, fictional constructs that try to hide the fact that we don't understand how the universe actually works
@@arsemyth8920 dark matter/energy is the name to the observation of galactic movement discrepancy to predictions, not the explanation of the discrepancy.
@markd.s.825
Then what are the dark matter detector experiments underground looking for exactly?
Error, error!
These physicists are mad.
❤️👍
There's no dark matter. There I said it. (At least this comment will be secure for next 100 dark matter tests)
Why do you think that?
@@sp_ce. Hundreds of experiment, zero evidence.
Whether you call it dark matter or something else, there is something happening that isn't currently explained
A galaxy doesn’t run on gravity it runs on charge as a whirlpool does. A whirlpool does not spin because the water molecules are pulling on each other. They believe in elves being the explanation for everything, so when nature tells them something they look for the hidden elves.
@@Ahov Thousands of experiment found no trace of dark matter or the particle. They need another theory to explain how Galaxies are glued together.
Dark = equations dont work
Pigeon rap
🥰
Handsome
Scientist saw the face of Jesus in the CMB?
There’s no such thing as dark matter
Each time I see this Microwave background I wonder is it truly background and how much is it polluted by the foreground. for exemple the center of our galaxy is quite opaque so I would be surprised if we really see the background through the milky way. and the presence of other galawies in the foreground might affect the background measurement.
There is no dark matter. No dark energy. No dark anything. I'm so fed up with all this 'we don't know, so it's dark something' copout.
Dark in this context means unknown. It’s a perfectly acceptable usage.
If all you have is a telescope
Everything looks like photons
A catholic priest like Georges Lemaître isn't supposed to believed that the world was created a few thousand years ago?
15th 😊 love you Anton
Fine, I'll do it... *FIRST!!!*
12th
Why is everyone so stupid as to not call this silly delusional nonsense