Nimitz Class - Rise of the Aircraft Carrier - Big Bigger Biggest

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии • 607

  • @earlperson741
    @earlperson741 Год назад +63

    COMMANDER EARL GABRIEL PERSON RET.
    HERE... THANKS
    FOR THIS DOCUMENTARY...
    YOU ALL BROUGHT BACK A
    LOT OF MEMORIES.........
    THANKS AGAIN...🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

    • @CarbonTech117
      @CarbonTech117 4 месяца назад +3

      Thank you Sir. Welcome home

    • @BrianShain
      @BrianShain 4 месяца назад +4

      Thank you for your service Commander! 🇺🇲

  • @scottgoldfarb95
    @scottgoldfarb95 Год назад +81

    I love this show! Thanks for putting it on RUclips for free!

    • @IsaacFoss
      @IsaacFoss Год назад +6

      amen

    • @randystarcher2358
      @randystarcher2358 Год назад

      I'm getting tried of hearing about the ads

    • @scottgoldfarb95
      @scottgoldfarb95 Год назад +1

      @@randystarcher2358 am I supposed to know what that means?

    • @PavolFilek
      @PavolFilek 10 месяцев назад

      tHIS can be destroyed in a matter of second, no destroyes can protect such big ship.

  • @carrickrichards2457
    @carrickrichards2457 2 года назад +70

    The first ever carrier strike was from HMS Furious in 1918, against a base at Tondern. 7 Sopwith Camels launched from 80 miles each carrying 2x 50lb bombs. Zeppelins L54 and L60, an observation balloon and a hydrogen store were destroyed. All Zepplin were rebased south and did not operate over UK again. All for the cost of 1 pilot lost.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +9

      Brits One, Gerries Nil…

    • @peterwarneford-bygrave1490
      @peterwarneford-bygrave1490 2 года назад +2

      Yep, Sub lieutenant Reginald Warneford VC and William leefe Robinson VC had the bravery to take on superior forces (Zeppelins) and win over 100 years ago.

    • @robbieboyd5869
      @robbieboyd5869 2 года назад

      HMS Furious was a battle cruiser that had modified for planes but it's not the first purpose-built aircraft carrier. I see what your saying and agree but I think they just talking mainly about purpose built carrier's.

    • @G36645
      @G36645 Год назад

      Yeah I do agree that ark royal was chosen as that was a treaty ship so even at the time she was made she was not as good as Britain could have made

    • @G36645
      @G36645 Год назад +1

      But what about the implacable and then why is the Carolina on the list

  • @Birdfarmer862
    @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +14

    Your post has the most accurate - though brief - clip on Primary Flight Control I have been able to find on RUclips…Well Done!

  • @ShneekeyTheLost
    @ShneekeyTheLost 2 года назад +125

    Geez, this documentary really shows its age. Now that the Ford is afloat, with its new electromagnetic rail and other advances over the Nimitz, it is now the largest carrier afloat, and also one of the nastiest given that it has F35-C's in its hold.

    • @l3uIletpoints
      @l3uIletpoints Год назад +21

      As a whole, this series doesnt look for "the biggest" (aircraft carrier in this case) per se. Instead, it defines specific innovations that allowed the next generation of [carriers] to grow ever larger. The "Ford" class of carrier owes its massive size to the many creative innovations brought to life over years of R&D as described in this episode. Indeed it owes its size to the Nimitz that came before it and so on.

    • @ShneekeyTheLost
      @ShneekeyTheLost Год назад +10

      @@l3uIletpoints You misunderstand. This documentary is many years old. And it is showing its age because the Ford class is an improvement over the Nimitz class in every way. This is not to disparage the Nimitz class and the many things it has done, but had this documentary been done recently it would have certainly gone to the Ford as the newest, biggest, and most powerful carrier with multiple innovations over the Nimitz.

    • @HaenaKauai91
      @HaenaKauai91 Год назад +2

      ​@@ShneekeyTheLostI can see your point along with his ∆

    • @skipgumphrey9579
      @skipgumphrey9579 Год назад +5

      To be expected of course considering the age of the Nimitz class. They’ve been in commission since the early 70s…

    • @RoyalNZPoE
      @RoyalNZPoE Год назад

      You really wrote that before reading it huh? This documentary is probably older than your daddy’s left sack.

  • @John-or4mn
    @John-or4mn 5 месяцев назад +3

    Served for 33 years on Nimitz class aircraft carriers and retired as a master chief petty officer in charge of mess galley operations.

  • @herbertmitchell5687
    @herbertmitchell5687 Год назад +1

    My Dearest Friend who Passed from this Life Years Ago and Before He reached 50 was a Proud Navy Veteran 💙, I never tried of Hearing His Stories of a Time in His Life that He Cherished with Much Pride 🔔🇺🇸

  • @nikerailfanningttm9046
    @nikerailfanningttm9046 Год назад +4

    5:39 that landing was perfect! For a wooden model plane, that was unbelievable.

  • @o.c.g.m9426
    @o.c.g.m9426 2 года назад +83

    Thank all 🇺🇸 troops of the US military. Protecting my freedoms so that I may sit up at midnight to comment on this video without worry. I'm forever grateful for your hard work.

    • @michaelpielorz9283
      @michaelpielorz9283 Год назад +19

      Yep without invading Iraq or Afghanistan you would have shut down your computerer early! what a poor boy! better think before writing if possible.

    • @meredithisme3752
      @meredithisme3752 Год назад

      @@michaelpielorz9283 you can't spell and please take your medication

    • @G36645
      @G36645 Год назад

      America the land of lack of rights and invading others without a reason
      America

    • @johnredcorn2476
      @johnredcorn2476 Год назад

      AmeriKKKa is satan

    • @errolming6621
      @errolming6621 Год назад

      @@michaelpielorz9283 w222222faazawrrw8

  • @ethanespo96
    @ethanespo96 Год назад +1

    Idk how it happened but my youtube home page, which is littered with current hollywood media and music news is now flooded with these kinds of videos. I love it

  • @debisybesma5855
    @debisybesma5855 Год назад +7

    coming from a military town, i used to go down to the water and watch the big ships come in for drydock. it was pretty cool seeing the crew lined up on the deck looking to see WHERE they were coming to next! and knowing all hell was fixin' to break loose in our lil ol' town when they got "settled" in. if you think it looks huge in the water, you should see one in drydock!!! there's just as much that you can't see ....... as to what you CAN!!!

  • @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm
    @WojciechWachniewski-st1zm 12 дней назад +1

    Mighty fine show and very good presentation of what a carrier really is, and how things occur aboard her. Thanks so much friends, and always good luck with 'em all! ♍ Land rat from Poland 🇵🇱♥️🇺🇸

  • @bilalghani8308
    @bilalghani8308 Год назад +1

    I remember this video...............
    .Element 18 used nostalgia
    It was super effective!

  • @ronobrien7187
    @ronobrien7187 Год назад +3

    In spring 2022 I was bringing a pleasure boat back from Norfolk VA to New England and the G.H.W. Bush (CVN77) was in port alongside the Gerald R Ford (CVN78), the first in the Ford class, as we sailed out. It was a very impressive sight.

  • @kevinballenger1211
    @kevinballenger1211 2 месяца назад

    I Was An ABH3 Aboard The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69), In Air Dept/V-1 Div, From 1980 - 1984. Watching This Video Brings Back Lots Of Memories! ⚓

  • @jrtstrategicapital560
    @jrtstrategicapital560 Год назад +17

    It’s interesting that our Naval aviation force is larger than most nations…combined at times. That’s not even including the US Air Force and Marines.

    • @kells9k
      @kells9k Год назад

      nah ur fake news stop spreading fake news

    • @twinkyoctopus
      @twinkyoctopus 11 месяцев назад

      the largest airforce is the USAF, and the second is the US Navy. I think China is third

  • @grantbarday5760
    @grantbarday5760 Год назад +13

    Fun fact about the jets failing to catch the arresting wire: the hook will actually create sparks on the flight deck during a failed catch. No sparks means the hook wasn’t down, so it was a “touch and go”, where the pilot just tries touching the carrier before practicing with the hook, just to make sure they can get close to the carrier

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB Год назад

      Lies again? Nescafe Coffee

    • @coolranch1660
      @coolranch1660 Год назад

      Dude… that’s just dumb… I am experiencing 3rd person embarrassment for you

    • @MIchaelRichardson-rn4it
      @MIchaelRichardson-rn4it Год назад

      Dodge wing blades and Jeff's as they killed on hot the multi million dollar warplanes Robert Hilda poor watch a movie engineers mirror the layout of the flight deck and miniature to keep track of the Cummings and going to Beach airport it's literally nuts and bolts technology this is a Ouija board there's a miniature version of the flight deck and he's a little plastic pieces that we have here track of aircraft that we actually have it on deck now these nuts ball State represent different things means that it needs an aircraft return of engines turn MMS one I need fuel and helps keep track of everything going out on the flight deck since I've moved at such a fast pace out there they're constantly updating us bored I gotta clean up L4 I got dropped guy down if you want you can put 203 on the elevator really doesn't matter this is always reliable if we have a power outage I can always rely on this being up and running before he puts up in Elmont make sure the Nimitz cannot write more across the any other carrier in the world up to 90 lethal warplanes

  • @gooner72
    @gooner72 Год назад +2

    Christ!!! How old is the first Nimitz Class!!!! Great upload, thank you very much for posting.
    As an Englishman, in honour of Dunning.... who was the first pilot to land an aircraft on board a ship.... we should've named a Royal Navy Carrier after him........ HMS DUNNING.
    For you Americans, you're now on the Ford Class Carriers which are more technically advanced, more capable, have smaller crews and are..... errmmmm...... more expensive!!!!

  • @DrGreenThumbNZL
    @DrGreenThumbNZL 2 года назад +23

    20 years with out refueling is just crazy

    • @unvoicintech9041
      @unvoicintech9041 2 года назад +7

      The new Virginia class submarines can go 40 years without refueling.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +1

      Please substitute the word nuclear for crazy. Also keep in mind that other fuels such as diesel (for operating ground support equipment and electrical generators aboard) must be ‘unrepped’ onto the CV. Oh, and we need to vertrep many other supplies as well. The general rule is related to perishables…once fresh vegetables start to wilt, you can bet there will be an Unrep on the schedule.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +2

      Oh, and our AVGAS tanks have seven figure capacities.

    • @justthefacts5008
      @justthefacts5008 Год назад

      All aircraft carriers big or small are just sitting ducks in the oceans against any modern missiles attacks. With hundreds or thousands missiles hit the aircraft carrier at once all that needs will be only couple missiles hit the top deck then the aircraft carrier is useless, finished.

  • @bowlampar
    @bowlampar Год назад +12

    It not only seem dangerous to work on carrier deck's runway, it is actually a very dangerous work in progress. Have to direct so many jets for 'perfect' landing and takeoff in such a short time period within crowded limited space is very stressful.

    • @o-wolf
      @o-wolf Год назад +1

      It really isn't anywhere near as stressful as a typical airport tbh, the intake is considerably less &outgoings too
      Theres more stress about bomb ordinance if anything

    • @JaredLetoSelfSuck
      @JaredLetoSelfSuck Год назад

  • @willadeefriesland5107
    @willadeefriesland5107 Год назад +4

    The Big E.
    I loved that ship...

  • @markredgrave6282
    @markredgrave6282 Год назад +3

    Could you not find a photo of a Nimitz class carrier? That's the now museum ship Midway in San Diego, about half the tonnage of a Nimitz class.

  • @paulbeaney4901
    @paulbeaney4901 Год назад +1

    1:28 how could they miss out USS langley?

  • @randybentley2633
    @randybentley2633 2 года назад +6

    As far as I looked whilst rummaging through the foot locker of history, I could not find a USS Eugene Ely. If this is indeed the case, then the USN has done a great disservice to this pioneer.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +1

      There is/was a long-standing U. S. Naval tradition of naming carriers after Revolutionary War (and other) battles, up to around CV-23. Eventually naming shifted to include famous military personnel (Nimitz, Eisenhower) and strong supporters of naval power (Forrestal, Vinson) until we now stick with Presidents.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад

      Exception: Langley, they just kept the name of the Coaler (and probably saved a TON of paperwork! LOL

    • @coachwendy5618
      @coachwendy5618 2 года назад +1

      @@Birdfarmer862 Not necessarily. The two newest Ford class are The Enterprise, which is currently under construction and the Doris Miller. Obviously neither are president names. I doubt if any recent presidents will be used to name any ships as they have not served their country in military service and it has become less popular to name ships after people of questionable character.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад

      @@coachwendy5618 as I am sure you know, there are no hard and fast rules to ship naming. This is very true of the custom (frequent, but not q hard and fast) of naming carriers after presidents. The two examples you mention serve as excellent examples of BOTH our points. There were three Enterprises that fought during the revolutionary era (1775-1815) - two were privateers fitted out by colonies in rebellion and one U. S. Navy sloop fitted out in the Adams administration. Actually the one being built now is the eighth Enterprise I believe. The Doris Miller could not be a better example of a name illustrating someone who strongly supported the use of naval power since he was among the first to fight at Pearl Harbor. Even better that he was an enlisted man!

    • @randybentley2633
      @randybentley2633 Год назад

      @@Birdfarmer862 they are going to name two Ford-class vessels differently. CVN-80 will be the New Enterprise. 81 will be Doris Miller. I have some issues regarding them choosing Miller for a Carrier name, because Jesse L Brown would be more fitting in this regard.

  • @williamdodge5123
    @williamdodge5123 Год назад +5

    USS FORRESTAL CV-59
    82 Mediterranean/Indian Ocean
    Lost seven souls on that deployment.
    Average loss of life per six month Carrier deployment
    was five souls, we lost seven.
    Semper Fortis Semper Fidelis

    • @ron4245
      @ron4245 6 месяцев назад

      You mean uss forrstfite. Haha from a big johm bt. Just kidding love all my uniformed vets.

  • @dayaniliyanage3465
    @dayaniliyanage3465 Год назад

    13:27 - You need an equal amount of balance on both sides to keep it upright. It's like a weighing scale in which if you keep two oranges that weigh the same, the scale stays balanced.

  • @Moneyisgaad
    @Moneyisgaad Год назад

    Viewing this on 26/02/2023...great documentary

    • @dirtfarmer7472
      @dirtfarmer7472 10 месяцев назад

      02-01-2024 now & it’s just as good now as it was then
      An interesting video for sure. Especially for someone who has never been to sea, & not going ether.

  • @jackkreacherr9339
    @jackkreacherr9339 Год назад

    Y'all got a pretty tight presentation. Nice work

  • @yankee_tango
    @yankee_tango Год назад +2

    The Nimitz class CVN has been surpassed in size by the Gerald R. Ford class which is roughly 1000 tons heavier and at the same length of a Nimitz class. It has the electromagnetic aircraft launching system as well. Advanced recovery systems as well as reactor upgrades that generate enough electrical power to run everything currently as well as into the future with upgrades. This CVN will be in service until 2105 or so for the USS Gerald R. Ford itself.

    • @carlsaganlives6086
      @carlsaganlives6086 Год назад

      Yeah, but can it stop a dinghy with a couple suicide bombers from ramming into it? While refueling?

  • @rodrigojornalista8661
    @rodrigojornalista8661 Год назад

    THE BEST CHANNEL!!!

  • @WzeOwl
    @WzeOwl Год назад +2

    Salute Shipmates You Have The Con.

  • @nickfleming3495
    @nickfleming3495 7 месяцев назад

    Not mentioned but im interested to know what material is the planes hook Made out of.

  • @nikolaideianov5092
    @nikolaideianov5092 11 месяцев назад

    27:34 what are these antiship aim9 sidewinders ?

  • @rogerdildeau7507
    @rogerdildeau7507 2 года назад +2

    Very well done video! Thanks.

  • @aussiedanjones
    @aussiedanjones 6 месяцев назад

    Can you please do one one what the different coloured vests means on the deck. Thank you

  • @waitemc
    @waitemc 2 года назад +27

    Some of, if not the most amazing creations humans have ever conceived just for some intermittent peace. Thanks to all who bravely step to the front in hopes of securing peace how ever the danger of that task. Facing evil no matter how big or small each of us citizens of this floating ball of rock and dirt we all must do our part.

    • @philsurtees
      @philsurtees 2 года назад

      But no one can stand up to the evil because they have these gigantic aircraft carriers. Didn't you watch the video? The United States starts wars and murders innocent men, women, and children - all around the world - with impunity, on an ongoing basis, but no one can stand up to them. What's this part that people must do? How do we stop the most evil regime on the planet when they are so powerful?

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад

      Somebody needs to be at ‘the pointy end’ of the spear, and that’s almost always us ‘Birdfarmers’.

    • @Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman
      @Mahlak_Mriuani_Anatman 2 года назад +3

      Oh please 🙄

    • @senseishu937
      @senseishu937 Год назад

      That's why the U.S. went out of its way to go across half the world to wage wars on foreign soil and lie about their reasons right? Oh yeah, no it was a peacekeeping mission right.

    • @justthefacts5008
      @justthefacts5008 Год назад

      All aircraft carriers big or small are just sitting ducks in the oceans against any modern missiles attacks. With hundreds or thousands missiles hit the aircraft carrier at once all that needs will be only couple missiles hit the top deck then the aircraft carrier is useless, finished.

  • @recordingerror
    @recordingerror 7 месяцев назад

    44:07 what aircraft is this, it looks very funky.

  • @Sean-u8e
    @Sean-u8e 2 месяца назад

    The counter weight and shield as well as positioning ship guns would cup the bottom outside and go left to right for level stability

  • @squirepraggerstope3591
    @squirepraggerstope3591 2 года назад +12

    Interesting vid though in view of the topic it's odd that the RN is so under-represented. eg:
    - first true carrier with an unobstructed flight deck. HMS Argus
    - first aircraft carrier with starboard-side control tower island. HMS Hermes
    - first aircraft carrier to trial angled flight deck operation. HMS Triumph
    While more recent innovations include improved operation of STOVL aircraft
    - first achieved by fitting a 'ski jump' to HMS invincible
    ....though no need for that last point in a vid concerned only with conventional CATOBAR carrier ops😁

    • @ronmailloux8655
      @ronmailloux8655 2 года назад +3

      Yes the Royal Navy also innovations included land the American Naval fighter Voight Corsair angling it towards the flight deck. Before that the inverted gull wing fighter was near impossible to land due to its great height and big props.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +2

      I am a former U.S. Carrier sailor who married a Brit and have lived in the U.K. for 22 years. The tendency for us ‘yanks’ to not give NEARLY enough credit to the RN in the development of naval aviation is a continuing SCAR in historical focus, and will continue until somebody - Brit or American - figures how to regulate the American Ego. On behalf of all U. S. ‘Birdfarmers’ I apologise to you Squire…simply appalling!

    • @timber_wulf5775
      @timber_wulf5775 2 года назад +2

      I think you’re giving the RN too much credit here. The Japanese and American navies were very prompt proponents of naval aviation. Japan beat out the British with the first true aircraft carrier (Hoshō)

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +3

      @@timber_wulf5775 perhaps but deck configuration, island positioning, armoured flight deck, catapault systems and initial operational/combat use are all largely RN in origin…and I am half Irish so that is a bit hard to admit!

    • @timber_wulf5775
      @timber_wulf5775 2 года назад +1

      @@Birdfarmer862 honestly I would say the modern island arrangement would be more of an American design since a lot of british islands were just MASSIVE. Plus the catapult systems can be more attributed to American thinking and work

  • @roberthitchman
    @roberthitchman 2 года назад +9

    I thought this was an excellent video. One thing though. Why was there no mention of the USS Langley? I believe that was the first US aircraft carrier. Granted, I believe it was converted coal ship that they put a flight deck on.

    • @timber_wulf5775
      @timber_wulf5775 2 года назад

      They made a lot of weird choices when they made this thing 10-15 years ago. Like they went from the USS North Carolina to the HMS Ark Royal and then never mentioned anything in between and passed it off as the logical and practical progression of technology

    • @zedwpd
      @zedwpd 2 года назад

      Yep 1912

    • @om8414
      @om8414 2 года назад +1

      ​@@timber_wulf5775 The video is not talking about US Navy ships only. It mentions ships which were first to make some considerable progress in the area no matter which country.
      Like USS Langley was first US aircraft carrier of its capabilities or advancement but one with similar capabilities already existed somewhere in world and they mentioned that.

    • @timber_wulf5775
      @timber_wulf5775 2 года назад

      @@om8414 it talks about the ark royal and presents it as this amazing leap in technology… except Lexington, Akagi, Kaga, Hoshou, Eagle, Langley, or even the goddamn Béarn were more impressive leaps in technology for the future of aircraft carriers

  • @Gene-e7t
    @Gene-e7t Год назад

    Why no mention of the midway and her distinctive angled left outward flight deck. I thought it was inaugurated with her...

  • @annuvynarawn392
    @annuvynarawn392 Год назад

    Thanks, fascinating documentary.

  • @amijamcangirl8818
    @amijamcangirl8818 Год назад +6

    Night landing had my heart palpitating

  • @fac5158
    @fac5158 11 месяцев назад

    watching these for the first time, love them. One interesting thing comes to mind having watched this and the episode on submarines......why cant we produce cars that run on nuclear fuel or boil water at room temperature? Could it be profits? whats more important profits or environment

  • @mayankarunpal121
    @mayankarunpal121 Год назад

    Great documentary
    Great infotainment

  • @ewartlambert
    @ewartlambert 2 года назад +2

    0:45 are these weight stats based off of fully loaded ships or off of the dry dock launch?

  • @blockraven22
    @blockraven22 Год назад +1

    Fun fact: The first naval-launched air raid was from Japan's Wakamiya in 1915, and also the first purpose-built aircraft carrier was the Hosho.

    • @furiousscotsman2916
      @furiousscotsman2916 Год назад +1

      First Aircraft carrier was the British Argus in 1918 not the Hosho.

  • @Sean-u8e
    @Sean-u8e 2 месяца назад

    For displacement same thing the counter weight would be on the outside like a sleeve that will keep the ship level no matter what's going on inside and double as a way to tip ship for morter like attacking and extra shealding

  • @infiniteecho8699
    @infiniteecho8699 Год назад

    Love how much I'm learning how things r created well good thing u explain our details to the world

  • @johnquintana7276
    @johnquintana7276 2 года назад +4

    I think the angled deck should have been mentioned

  • @frankgibson6484
    @frankgibson6484 11 месяцев назад +4

    One ship. Ark Royal. A bunch of crazy aviators and they changed history.

  • @mariatorres5563
    @mariatorres5563 2 года назад +2

    My new favorite channel

  • @frankgibson6484
    @frankgibson6484 11 месяцев назад

    Absolutely the best documentary on carrier aviation. Very accurate.

  • @imogen1
    @imogen1 Год назад

    I like this show because you get what it says on the tin. 9/10 critics rave, "Yup, that's pretty big."

  • @AaryanMathure
    @AaryanMathure Год назад

    does anybody have the list of bgms used here?

  • @trongdyhuynhvu7016
    @trongdyhuynhvu7016 Год назад

    Thanks for your videos

  • @christianhoffman7407
    @christianhoffman7407 Год назад +2

    Naval aviation from the skipper all the way down to Aviation Boatswain's Mate (Aircraft Handling [ABH]) is a different animal than the rest of the Navy.

  • @unitedwestand5100
    @unitedwestand5100 2 года назад +6

    Sorry Arc Royal.
    The USS Langley was commissioned in Mar 20, 1922, and was launching/recovering aircraft 9 days later.

  • @thangtran8281
    @thangtran8281 Год назад

    Did they dump the dead crewmen into the sea at 24:44?

  • @sovetski8893
    @sovetski8893 2 года назад +2

    I almost choked when the weights crashed through of the deck of the ship 😭🤣🤣

  • @elizabethtaylor586
    @elizabethtaylor586 Год назад

    Please do one of these on cruise ships

  • @shermangriffin4668
    @shermangriffin4668 Год назад +4

    I miss the Enterprise. She was my 2nd ship.

    • @kdrapertrucker
      @kdrapertrucker Год назад

      A New Enterprise is on the way, incorporating steel and fittings from the previous 2 Enterprises.

    • @charlottewood8964
      @charlottewood8964 Год назад

      I still can't believe they didn't save her. But saved the lady lex or other ships that didn't come close to the E. Can't wrap my head around it. Sorry she deserved more respect. Thank you for your service, & to all who kept us safe.

  • @svennielsen633
    @svennielsen633 Год назад

    Interesting an funny. Love the lipstick navigation!

  • @glenkelley6048
    @glenkelley6048 2 года назад

    Wonderful vid! Still can't do Metric measurements!

  • @anthonycampbell4532
    @anthonycampbell4532 Год назад +3

    "Nimitz can sail for 20 years without refueling..." Wow

  • @willarth9186
    @willarth9186 2 года назад +3

    The USS Langley DESERVED to be here!!!!!!!

  • @TheStickinator
    @TheStickinator 2 года назад +22

    What I can't wrap my head around is isn't the fastest ship in the battle group. I have a friend who was on a carrier when 911 happened. The battle group leader (Admiral?) Turned them around and headed full speed back to the US. My friend tells us the carrier out ran everything.

    • @bobbertee5945
      @bobbertee5945 2 года назад +5

      They are listed as capable of 30 knots, so im sure they can do more, a ship of that size doing 40 mph......thats nuts

    • @wayneagerton8127
      @wayneagerton8127 2 года назад +3

      Knots are different than mph.

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +3

      The ‘official’ USN published ship specification will NEVER cite a max speed for a CV. It will simply say ‘in excess of xx knots’…in a CV’s case, 32.

    • @bobbertee5945
      @bobbertee5945 2 года назад +1

      @@Birdfarmer862 yep, so probably about 40 mph...... thats moving considering my 23 foot center console does 45 wide open on flat water...... feels way faster on water

    • @TheStickinator
      @TheStickinator 2 года назад +7

      My friend on the carrier said it's capable of going fast enough to cause damage to the hull. He didn't say how fast that was.

  • @unitedwestand5100
    @unitedwestand5100 24 дня назад

    My brother was a Plankowner on the Nimitz in 1975
    He died 5 years ago, yet the Nimitz lives on.

  • @ВладимирОкоренко
    @ВладимирОкоренко Год назад +1

    Супер терминатор ! ! !😋🙂😀😎

  • @MagalyOSnyder
    @MagalyOSnyder 3 месяца назад

    The Nimitz class aircraft carriers represent one of the most significant developments in naval warfare, embodying the concept of “Big, Bigger, Biggest” with their colossal size, capabilities, and impact on global military operations. As some of the largest warships ever constructed, they have transformed naval aviation, making them a critical part of modern military power projection.

  • @theonlyguyman
    @theonlyguyman Год назад

    That intro tho 😮🎉

  • @theresawalker460
    @theresawalker460 2 года назад

    Bad badder baddest

  • @carlsaganlives6086
    @carlsaganlives6086 Год назад

    What's the betting odds on the carrier defense system nullified all down the line until there's a guy using a carbine, followed by THE CAPTAIN with a pistol? Any takers?

  • @leomartin1903
    @leomartin1903 Год назад

    When you factor winds , bad weather, and precision in the EARLY AIRCRAFT AND CARRIERS, was the ULTIMATE CRAP SHOOT, until engineers FIGURED OUT HOW TO SHAVE OR LOAD THE DICE. I did a small stint in the Navy aboard a rescue salvage ship 30 years ago. Our ship was could sit on the flight deck with room to spare. These are incredible inventions. Mobile cities with speeds of close to 60 miles and hour (presumably) travelling at FLANK BELL. AND the carriers with gas turbine engines and prop planes, are truly respected by me. Even with the CVN'S the work ethic in it's entirety is truly respectable. And flying fighter jets, I think taxes the human body.

  • @itsdafunk
    @itsdafunk Год назад

    idk how i ended up on this side of youtube but im interested.

  • @ShirleyRMathis
    @ShirleyRMathis 3 месяца назад

    These massive ships have played a crucial role in global naval dominance since their introduction, and their design has influenced the development of aircraft carriers worldwide. This essay explores the evolution of aircraft carriers, the rise of the Nimitz class, and the groundbreaking technological innovations that make it one of the most powerful classes of ships ever built.

  • @Sean-u8e
    @Sean-u8e 2 месяца назад

    Great engineering feat but it adds a lot of weight and space I would core drill two pilot holes on both sides with orange high viablelty nylon netting then you have more space for ammo and other

  • @Jimmy-bm3xy
    @Jimmy-bm3xy 9 месяцев назад

    VA-22 Aviation Ordnanceman USS Enterprise 86 and 88 West-Pacs

  • @1985zhangzh
    @1985zhangzh Год назад

    gerald r ford class?

  • @needful3961
    @needful3961 2 года назад +1

    What is the carrier ?

    • @robertwelch24
      @robertwelch24 2 года назад +1

      USS Gerald Ford CVN-78

    • @alaeriia01
      @alaeriia01 2 года назад +1

      Everyone asks "what is the carrier", but never "how is the carrier" ☹️

  • @ericfan1223
    @ericfan1223 6 месяцев назад

    But how do they load planes onto the ships? With a crane from shore? Drive them on using ramps? LAND the planes ??

  • @TomDLuv777
    @TomDLuv777 2 года назад +8

    My father was a radar man on the USS Midway

    • @byronharano2391
      @byronharano2391 2 года назад +1

      We relieved USS Midway CV 41 Gulf of Oman 🇴🇲 Gonzo Station West Pac 1984 aboard USS Kitty Hawk detached as an CV air wing CAG 2, VA 145 Swordsmen, NAS Whidbey Island, WA. Small world indeed

    • @Birdfarmer862
      @Birdfarmer862 2 года назад +2

      @@byronharano2391 I’ve gotten pretty DRUNK with Swordsmen on liberty in my days onboard two PACFLT CVs.

    • @byronharano2391
      @byronharano2391 2 года назад +1

      @@Birdfarmer862 Nice Shipmate! Me as well...lol.

    • @byronharano2391
      @byronharano2391 2 года назад +1

      @@Birdfarmer862 PACFLT always. 7th Fleet

  • @bazzer124
    @bazzer124 4 месяца назад

    Pretty sure that from the commissioning of USS Nautilus in 1954 was what brought about our nuclear Navy. We went from CV to CVN in a matter of a few years. Our entire carrier flleet (as well as SSNs and SSBNs) are nuclear powered. Would love to only refuel my car every 20 years. Cheers....

  • @sampathnivantha7535
    @sampathnivantha7535 Год назад +1

    Holy ghost bless and protect these machines and personnel to safeguard the peace and stability in the world.

  • @grumpykitten4890
    @grumpykitten4890 Год назад +1

    Would like to see big, bigger, biggest military classes of submarines, if it hasn't already been done.

    • @sayitoutloudchp
      @sayitoutloudchp Год назад

      Already done

    • @bobbybob3865
      @bobbybob3865 10 месяцев назад

      Is the Moskva the biggest of the Russian submarines?

    • @grumpykitten4890
      @grumpykitten4890 10 месяцев назад

      @@bobbybob3865 I just did a search. The biggest is called the belgorod.

  • @theghost4729
    @theghost4729 Год назад

    As much as I truly appreciate documentaries like this I also truly hate them with a passion! You're basically telling any possible enemy or foreign powers that are not with this technology basically how to acquire or achieve this technology!!!

    • @awKtn32-_-
      @awKtn32-_- Год назад

      I would imagine if they don’t yet have this technology they don’t have the resources to procure it. Our enemy’s have far more information on our military tech than this documentary would provide.

    • @coolranch1660
      @coolranch1660 Год назад

      Lol, SMH

  • @ioanbota9397
    @ioanbota9397 Год назад

    Realy I like this powerful aircraft

  • @robertclubs9908
    @robertclubs9908 Год назад

    Awesome NAVY.

  • @Reptanimalposts
    @Reptanimalposts 2 года назад +3

    Yeah, if you put like a treadmill running the opposite direction of the incoming plane you can stop the plane that way as well I believe. And launch too.

  • @phoghat
    @phoghat 2 года назад +1

    The slingshot principal wasn't known for thousands of years it will only realized when Goodyear invented rubber

    • @alaeriia01
      @alaeriia01 2 года назад +1

      No, before that we used branches bent into an arc, or a "bow" if you will. Run a string from either end and you have a surprising amount of stored energy. There were some popular weapons based on this principle; perhaps you've heard of them?

    • @phoghat
      @phoghat 2 года назад

      @@alaeriia01 i know why a bow is, slingshot is different

  • @kirkmizz
    @kirkmizz 6 месяцев назад

    Balance the boat how revolutionary. I figured that out at age 5 on an inertube

  • @notclickbait6255
    @notclickbait6255 Год назад +1

    31:46

  • @antdraws
    @antdraws Год назад

    How great work of Santos Dumont on his the first airplane, the 14th Bis, was? Here we can see that, the brothers create an assist sailplaner launcher, not a self propeller aircraft like the Santos Dumont one.

  • @darrentinonzii340
    @darrentinonzii340 Год назад +1

    "Push it to the Nimitz" (Nimiiiiiiiitz) ~Scarface

  • @brucelee5576
    @brucelee5576 Год назад

    “ the flight deck is the most dangerous place to work on earth “
    Alaskan Fishermen: “ hold my crab”

  • @Whateverwillbe2021
    @Whateverwillbe2021 Год назад

    20 years wow

  • @samerabdallah7596
    @samerabdallah7596 2 года назад +1

    The ark royal is not the first carrier :)

  • @boydridings9541
    @boydridings9541 2 месяца назад

    My stepdad took me on this magic ship it was unbelievable below deck everything those people were able to do all day every day I was 15 I never seen so many heroes all in one place thank you all from then until now heroes all of them

  • @neutralgod300
    @neutralgod300 Год назад

    wow! This is an old video!

  • @brianlehman1244
    @brianlehman1244 Год назад

    Always down to catch a wave