Reminder: The Republican and Democratic parties both technically had Progressives in their Parties. Republicans: Teddy Roosevelt Democrats: Franklin D Roosevelt. There are no good parties... only Good people.
@@Bergen98 Most Russians don't know how to live in democracy because most of the country's history has been one of severe totalitarianism and only a very small period in their history has been democratic. They will always seek for a father figure as a leader.
Parties may change in values across decades, but consistently voting against social reform and freedom seems almost irresponsible. Use your vote for good
It's kind of takes me back to history class it's just really fascinating how both parties changed throughout the years interviews and beliefs that people had versus what they believe in now
Love how they breezed over the 1990's and all the democratic laws that created the war on drugs. Joe Biden himself called black people "supercriminals". So yea, every time they breeze over a decade or 2 see what party starts putting forward laws that hurt African Americans. It's not as black and white as this video makes it, because you have to remember at the end of the day, white people make up the majority of the voter base so they will get priority no matter the party.
Yes. At the time, people didn't hold many of the values of racial equality that we do today(as a result of the civil rights movement). Most white Americans, republican or Democrat were white supremacist. They just disagreed on whether enslaving black people helped white people.
@@patricioiglesias5346 Not necessarily. Step 1, bring in a new voter demographic. Step 2, cater to that demographic in order to win their votes. More votes, more power, more money.
@@sudarshanrobot Woke means to be aware of something, often systemic injustices. The right took it and made it mean diversity for some reason. You are using the word wrong.
Ādams Vizulis because the majority of people in america agree with one of the 2 parties ideas. if people didn't agree with the 2 parties, there'd be more than 2
Many view a vote for a 3rd party a "waste of a vote." Therefore few are willing to vote for them for they think their vote no longer matters. That's not going to change anytime soon.
Johnny's Credit Card what is real media? Breitbart? This is documented fact. Literally go into any library or he’ll look it up on Wikipedia! It’s not partisan to say that the parties switched voter bases and their stances on issues! It’s just the truth.
Yes, that was the period the Democratic Party became openly pro-labor and pro-unions, mostly influenced by Northern big-city "machines" set by the Irish Catholics. That was the period that laid the ground for FDR.
Its funny that you bring this up, because in the video when they said fast forward to the...I thought WHAT? You're just going to omit a huge piece of history? I dont know anything about what happened then, but I was automatically suspicious when they skipped it
My thoughts exactly. This video should be at least 5 minutes longer. I thought for sure they'd mention the southern strategy, the emergence of jim crow and the role of the civil rights movement (and southern strategy) in motivating southern whites to migrate away from the Democratic party. The took it easy on the Republicans...
They also skipped the neocon era of the Republican Party, it would have been great if they covered how defense was so important that the Republicans became the party of big government for a while.
Race has always been political in the US. Most of our earliest politics were about slavery - including a lot of the constitution. It's probably one of the biggest underlying issues throughout American history (alongside the urban vs. rural divide).
@@camden7806 this is not disinfo only if ur a republican and don’t wanna admit you guys profit off slavery more than everyone else that’s why you guys wanted it no one else did
The video isn't a complete history, but it did note the Republicans became the party of big business in the 1920's. Theodore Roosevelt was president from 1901 to 1909. Still, a complete history of the party would be more interesting.
Pretty sure there was an ideological switch, because there where many more party changes then portrayed in the video. I'm pretty sure the modern democratic party wasn't even around back then with the whiggs.
@Dylan Campbell Sure public healthcare sounds good, but that's under the price of pharmaceutical innovations. Guess who's been the top pharmaceutical innovation country in the world? Yes America, not Britain, not China, not Sweden. America. I'm not saying that America doesn't need a healthcare reformation, but the solution is not gonna be public healthcare for all.
Best political internet interaction, paraphrased: “What if we don’t group a variety of unique ideals and suggestions into just two colours” “Sounds like something someone from the other colour would say. Get em boys”
It's all related to maturity, as the more mature you are the more likely you are to admit your wrong when necessary. Democrats tend to lean towards immaturity, while Conservatives lean towards simply taking facts, statistics, quotes out of their original context and being a tad bit slow. And that's why I'm not a Democrat, nor a Conservative. They're both awful, they're just arguing who's worse. Democrats have leaned towards communism, Conservatives have leaned towards having a more white base, BUT Libertarians have stood their ground. Libertarians aren't putting awful extremists up as their presidential candidates. THAT is the best political party, and I get that your skeptical, it's only natural. But, if you actually are a person that cares about facts and the prospering of our country, I would look into the Libertarian party.
@@larssrensen4353 he phrased that badly what he means is representing a white confederate, isn’t the best Look so in this case being white isn’t a good thing no. But he’s not saying that all white people are racist confederates, or that being white is bad. However I can’t read his mind so I won’t know for sure
Ya I feel like the government as a whole has just gone downhill overtime. There's gotta be an honest president that fights for our interests with kindness and wisdom.
I have a saying since I realized how much politics have changed in the USA (and also since I started showing interest in politics): NEVER look at a party and what they "represent". Always focus on the individual who wants to be at the top and treat every person as individual. Listen to what they say and compare it to what they do or what they have done. Only then will you realize who you are voting for.
Absolutely. You know, when people look at Presidential Candidates, they never seem to look at what they may have stood for say 20-30 years ago, and what they have done since then. Ive seen a-lot of videos of Political Candidates talking, Biden, Trump, Hillary. And how much they have changed to accommodate their campaign and win over voters today. And if people looked at that, they would realize who and what they are voting for, to a certain extent.
@@Tanner404can you explain this party shift to me? What happened they just one day said “hey switch teams after over a hundred years” stop believing everything you’re told without do research for yourself
@@noahh687 The whole point of the video is talking about the party switch. Think about it, Lincoln was a republican elected by northern states with a progressive agenda of not expanding slavery, opposed by the entire south. The exact opposite of how the republican party is today
@Snow Cone Well actually he fought against the current divisiveness that we see today between the Democrats and Republicans. As many democrats and republicans would agree today, too many people are partisan and would vote for their party regardless, instead of doing what George Washington proposed which is to remain individuals instead of joining parties. He knew people wouldn't listen to him, but wanted to state the fact anyways and hoped others would heed his warning. Not only did he know, but he mentioned that every government that has had them has said that political parties are the enemy of government and actually weakened the government. There are legitimate reasons why he said not to create or join in on the idea of political parties. He told everyone not to do it, not because he thought it would stop them, but because he hoped it would. People didn't listen to him and now we are currently experiencing the worst, most divided nation ever.
@Snow Cone Wow. You completely missed my point. I was saying he isn't being naive. He knew that saying it wouldn't prevent it from happening, but is saying nothing better? Speaking up is always the better option than being quiet, regardless of if it affects change. He wasn't being naive. Of course everyone has partisan leanings or falls under a group that they agree with more, but his point originally was to prevent divisiveness. This was prior to a party system, so it's different than people who say partisanship is bad today. He saw where the country was headed because during his first term and second term with the creation of political parties. You and I only disagree on the fact that speaking out is a better choice than letting sleeping dogs lie.
@Snow Cone I think coming up with more reasonable alternatives would have been more helpful, but that's also coming from much further in the future. Something like Italy's coalitions with a multi party system would at least be a little better, but now we need to focus on things that will improve our elections and decrease divisiveness. Since we're already in a two party system, full reform is very unlikely like you said. One example, preferential voting would help third parties actually stand a chance in elections, where as currently they do not. Alleviating the two party systems is definitely a goal I hope we'll fight for in the next few years.
Yes. Teddy pulled the Progressively out of the Republican party. When that election was over, many never went back. This was a major shirt that saw the Republican party owned more by corporate overlords and the Democratic party getting its first real injection of Progressives.
not only Roosevelt, he skipped about 25 other post-Lincoln presidents. Some of them were less influential, but it's clearly an oversimplified explanation. Still interesting even if very limited.
@ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ Definitely NOT saying LBJ wasn't a racist, however he did more for black people in America than any other president since Lincoln and FDR, so although he was a racist, I think there are other more valid reasons as to why he wasn't that great of a president (Heightening the Vietnam Conflict).
Honestly, I'm not sure that modern politics can work without political parties. As a former UK politician myself who has stood both as an independent and as a party candidate, it's very difficult to communicate your views and values to voters as an independent. People's time is increasingly limited, so very few people want to spend 20 minutes each learning about individual candidates. Party affiliation gives voters a handy shortcut - an affiliated candidate may be slightly to the left or to the right on a particular party's political spectrum, but as a voter you know roughly what you're getting. The most local level of government in my area essentially banned party affiliations about 10 years ago, and the result has ended up being far fewer candidates standing (to the point where the last election was uncontested) and voter turnout at far lower levels than councils at the same level of government but which do allow party affiliation.
@@stinkypoopybutt8303 If we're doing a full timeline of the democratic party then this is the only one that actually makes sense. We can't just stop at Clinton.
Black Classic Republican here. I believe we can be pro business, pro black, and pro america together. I'm not 100% opposed to the left as I do like some ideas they present. We should be willing to hear each other out. Peace everyone
Exactly! I’m a liberal, and lately I can barely have a normal conversation with my republican friends. The two party system was to have two sets of ideals, and still being able to work with the other side. I may not 100% agree with republicans, but I am able to live with them, like it should be.
Then why support a racist president? I'm not black, but if I were I'd definitely want some kind of representation. Where's the black representation in the republican party? In Trump's cabinet? Is Trump helping you guys out when he gives open commands to white supremacist groups on national TV? I just don't understand it...
@@mongorians22 that statement is one of the reasons why many black people refuse to align with Democrats. We don't need to see black faces in the administration as much as we need policy that champions black growth.
I'm a swing voter. I previously voted for Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, Trump, Biden. That's about as swing as you can get. The Republican party to me now has taken a drastic violent turn, which had some influence on the attack on our Capitol building. I'm not too thrilled with the job Biden is doing now. I do think he took Covid-19 much more serious than Trump. On the Republican side now, I will not support Trump again. I would support Mitt Romney, Liz Chaney. Of the Democrat's, I would support Stacey Abrams ( Georgia), Andy Brashear ( Ky.) I understand the political divide, to a degree it's good, but it is grown into hatred, and hate filled rage. We are all still American's.
I also have a GOP friend who is DONE WITH TRUMP. He predicts the GOP is gonna turn on him after the 2022 election. With whatʻs coming out of the Jan 6 Committee....that might be the smart move. Its gonna be so interesting to see who the GOP nominates in 2024, esp after Youngkin took VA.
This indeed is the logical conclusion. Both parties have good presidents, but both also have bad presidents. Democrats have Bill Clinton. Republicans have Reagan. Democrats have Woodrow Wilson. Republicans have Bush. There are freedom minded people on both sides, just like there are tyrants on both sides. The trouble is it is hard to separate the 2 until you see them in office.
henry morgan Why? Do you think libertarian stands for something besides minimum government? As far as recent presidents go, Reagan had the most minimalistic policies, Clinton was forced towards minimalistic policies because he couldn't pass the laws he wanted with a republican congress. On the other hand, Bush passed some very tyrannical laws such as the economic stimulus and the expansion of medicare. Woodrow Wilson was the most tyrannical democrat president that came to mind. Though honestly Obama passing Obamacare is pretty bad on the list too.
Being libertarian stands for individual freedoms above everything. It also stands for reaching a balanced budget. Also, not trying to be rude, but I don't see how listing presidents and how they were minimalistic or tyrannical contributes to your argument, which seems to be that libertarian stands for nothing but minimum government.
What’s often missed is that most districts outside of the city centers in every region North, South, East and West are predominantly Republican. Having been raised in an Illinois Republican family I will say that I never heard them praise the Confederacy growing up but a lot of love for figures like Lincoln instead. Though of course the South is a different matter and the one focused on most due to how the electoral college set up really boosts their significance on the national stage.
So every Republican you know is out there flying confederate flags? Both parties supported the Civil Rights Act. The democratic party becoming less racist and voting demographics changing in the south for a multitude of complex reasons doesn't constitute a "switch." There are racists individuals out there but just become some also support small government didn't make them that way.
@@Cameron-ki1qx actually, the Democrats filibustered for sixty days to attempt to stop the civil rights act from passing. The Republicans fought for it.
Mark Lanzarotta democracy is not what America is about. We were never supposed to be one because the founding fathers knew that democracy was basically mob rules.
No matter how you describe said shitshow, it's still got your attention. I am embarrassed to be a part of this drama. But every time we click on this monstrosity, its giving the monster power. Pay close attention to who you pay attention too. We pay no matter what. So guard your attention.
welp our party doesnt have super delegates...democrat voters votes did not even matter...Bernie had the votes from the people but not the corrupt uppers.
republican party is becoming a joke and will die out when more people realize it. Hopefully the libertarian party will take over the right wingers sooner than later.
How to make an argument: The [insert political party] are better than [insert opposing political party] and [insert opposing political party] is wrong because [insert stereotypical response]
The GOP became more right-wing during the 1910s, the Democrats became much more left-wing during the 1930s, blacks began to vote Democrat since 1936, Southern whites began to vote Republican since the late 1970s to the 1980s, yet we're supposed to believe the parties "switched" in the 1960s...
@@ramiere1412 joe biden is vastly underqualified for presiden, but he won the vote anyway because he was at least better than a raginig islamophobe who hates immigrants.
@@kemcolian2001 Biden isn’t vastly under qualified at all. He’s had plenty of experience in office it’s more is he still mentally fit for the job. Again the values of FDR to Biden aren’t so different is rather are the fit for president at the time.
@@bantxc5616 "mentally fit for the job" bro is 80 years old, crackhead son, raised gas prices, showered with his daughter. he is diffidently not fit for the president 😂
Honestly this was a very well made video on the history of the gop. It was actually (surprisingly) not super biased and entertaining to watch. I don't know why people complain in the comments it's very informative about how the party's changed their beliefs.
Jordan, you should know this video is actually quite biased against the Republican party :/. They make it look like it was the democrats in the 50s and 60s who pushed for civil rights when they were vigorously opposing and filibustering it. If you look at the author's twitter (Andrew Prokop) you will see tons of anti-trump tweets. He also skipped over the RE-segregation done by Woodrow Wilson (democrat).
Jordan, you should know that the author of this video (and Vox in general) is quite biased against the Republican party/ Trump. If you go to Andrew's twitter you'll see a bunch of anti-trump tweets etc. He skips over the RE-segregation done by Woodrow Wilson (democratic president) and makes it look like the democrats pushed for civil rights in the 60s, which they were actually opposed to and were filibustering.
Good point, I strongly oppose the modern GOP but he left out Woodrow Wilson and Teddy. Teddy was a Republican who was anti-big business and Woodrow Wilson was a Democrat who was a huge bigot.
***** It took a lot of ignorance and stuck on stupidity to type that comment. Trump's whole campaign is filled with racist rhetoric. He's said their needs to be a database for all Muslims, he tweeted fake crime stats to portray blacks as criminals, he attacks the Mexicans. Trump has been catering to the prejudices of white Americans and any intelligent person can see this.
@@bruhman5330 That has proven to be an overwhelmingly false claim by all accounts. The only "lawsuit" bid that Trump has been successful at in the midst of this election is that a Republican Observer was not allowed within 20 feet of the counting ballots Due to *covid restrictions in that state which applied to all observers*, after which the counting facility altered the rules so that the person could come within *6 feet*. All other Claims have been baseless, and furthermore, no evidence has been presented by Trump, his advisors, his supporters or his lawyers.
@@bruhman5330 The only reason why Trump is putting forth these claims is that he is attempting to undermine American Democracy. He doesn't like the fact that he's losing, and as such is crying that the rules are unfair - and by "unfair" I mean "doesn't guarantee his reelection by default". He is trying to muddy the waters and cast doubt on the most Fundamental thing that makes America, American: The Democratic Process, the system that ensures that the Head of State is elected By the People, For the People. He is literally attacking The American Way.
@@TheWulf899 not just that, 50 - 150,000 votes in key states are questionable, dead people voting etc, video evidence of votes arriving at 4am on several days etc, there's lots of evidence, just gota stop letting democrats brain wash you and actually do your own research
Whelp- too late now. It's funny how George Washington is one of the most respected presidents in American history, yet America still refuses to listen to his foreshadowing, warnings, and advice that he gave in his departure from office speech. We had to find out the hard way.
Democrats were the slave owners and the original KKK. It's only because they requested and signed off on the Civil Rights Act, that black people joined the Democratic Plantation en masse, and became the new slaves to the modern-day welfare state that destroyed the black family and black community.
+Abraham Mercado Your implication is that the Republicans of today have anything at all in common with the racist DemoKKKrats. Like everyone who claims this, you offer no proof- and in fact, there is proof AGAINST this, as literally every kkk member who has gone on to be a player in politics has been a Democrat, the most notable of course being Robert Byrd, who at one point (in this past decade no less) was third in line to succeed the president. This is of course to say nothing of all the times prominent Democrats have been caught expressing racist opinions or thoughts... And the complete lack therof with Republican politicians doing the same.
MasterFhyl I don't follow. Robert Byrd when elected in 1957 was a Southern Democrat and actually filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. He later denounced any involvement with the Klan and regretted filibustering. Again, context. He went from one extreme like segregation (So. Democrat views) to another, denouncing it (modern Democrat view). Had he sticked to his segregationist views and not changed, more than likely he'd be a Republican (look up the Southern Strategy, therein lies all the facts you need). I'm not saying all Dems are not racist. It exists, but to paint the brush of what the Dems did centuries ago and try to pass it as the party of inequality is just not true and very misleading.
Abraham Mercado Well that's circular logic if I've ever seen it. "He's not a racist because he stayed a Democrat, because if had switched to Republican then he'd be a racist." You are of course, showing no proof for any of this. I won't claim to know what was in Byrd's heart, but he was not just some rank and file KKK member, he was a leader, a recruiter even- you don't become a recruiter for anything unless you believe in it well enough to gain converts. It strikes me that it became politically advantageous for him to denounce the KKK, because you will find NO ONE on either side who officially supports the KKK. Hell.. in *one* of the parties, being a former Klansman is enough to get you blacklisted forever... But uh.. it isn't the Democrat party."
I do appreciate how you articulated Trump *did* appeal to an audience, and wasn’t just a hopeless nut job. I understand Vox demographics are increasingly liberal, but I was delighted by the lack of bias in this video.
_"Why do most black Americans vote Democratic?"_ *Here's an idea. Think of each political party (Democratic/ Republican) as a house. Now think of a political ideology (Liberal/Conservative) as the people who live in these two houses.* > Let's start around the Civil War era (1860's) and say most of the people who hated and despised you lived in one of those houses. *Let's say the blue Democratic house.* >And most of the people who treated you decently lived in the other house. *Let's say, the red Republican house.* >And for decades, the majority of people who hated and despised you lived in that blue Democratic house. ___ So naturally, you wanted nothing to do with that blue house. You preferred the people in that red house who were more inclined to treat you decently. *RESULT- For decades, (late 1800's- early 1900's), black Americans were loyal to the red Republican house. (Where Lincoln and the Abolitionists had resided.)* >Then as years passed, an interesting thing happened. You began to notice it was becoming harder to know which house to avoid. Gradually, some of those people who hated and despised you began showing up in the red "R" house. At the same time, more of those people who treated you decently began to show up in the blue "D" house. After a while, each house had some people who hated you and some people who treated you fairly. It was no longer so easy to know which house you should avoid as it had been in decades past. *RESULT- By the mid 1900's, (Civil Rights Movement) noting a definite trend, many black Americans left the red (R) house for the blue (D) house. But a minority still remained In the red (R) house.* >Then after a few more decades, it became clear that neither house had as many people who hated and despised you as they had in decades past. In both houses, the majority of the people in them now treated you decently and fairly. But what you DID notice, is as the trend continued, that the vast majority of those people who DID still hate and despise you NOW lived in the red "R" house. *RESULT- A notable majority of black Americans favor the blue "D" house even though it's not quite as clear-cut because the hateful people have less power and influence than they once did. (Unfortunately, their influence has still not been completely erased and is beginning to trend upward.)* *QUESTION: SHOULD BLACK AMERICANS AVOID THE BLUE HOUSE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO HATED AND DESPISED THEM **_,_** OR AVOID THE RED HOUSE WHERE MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO HATE AND DESPISE THEM **_?_** ...think about it.*
the two party system is as much a trap as a one party system. reform is needed, wider choice is needed. over 300 million Americans and you can't box them in to two categories
@@ahouiiouii5894 Yep - I cannot but think that represents Trump's biggest hope of re-election. The fact Joe Biden looks, and often sounds, like an old old man.
@@drakebudasz8837 It was the conservative British that brought it into the US and the conservative Democrats that fought to keep it in the US. It was the progressives that fought and beat the conservatives in the Civil War.
A divide is a divide, that's all thank you. Progressive and Conservative, as applied to ideologies, an ideological simplicity. Roughly speaking, 70% of humans are Conservative. Roughly speaking, 30% of humans are free-floating or noncommittal without being inherently or necessarily flexible, liberal, moldable, etc. This 70/30 is human. We can expect that if you have two parties, both the 70 and the 30 are represented 50% in one party and 50% on the other party. So, 70% of Democrats and 70% of Republicans are Conservative, and 30% of Democrats and 30% of Republicans are Progressive. We can generally reason that concepts like bell or standard curves, regression to the mean, statistics, etc. would control or best explain divides than ideologies as self & other platforms or mantras or "history". P.S. Conservatives conserve, progressives discard. So, 70% on each party conserves, and 30% discards. Conservative does not mean that 70% of Democrats are God-fearing, nor does progressive have to mean that 30% of Republicans are godless.
@@algernonfriday4824 I see you whittled your reply down a lot from its origional. Did you do so because of how wrong it was in regards to my comment? *"A divide is a divide"* You have an astute grasp of the obvious. Good for you on that. It however, in no way refutes or belittles my statement. Nore does the rest of your reply. So, I must ask... Do you have a point?
Ifihada Hammer By that logic the conservative Democrats invented abortion and are trying to keep it in the United States (invented to keep the black population as low as possible) and the progressive republicans are trying to get rid of it because it’s the act of taking a life that has no voice. Much like slaves, fetus’ are seen as property and not considered life.
They have a video like that but using the words white supremacy instead. Both videos are worth watching imo. Just wish they went into more detail with the huge time span they fast forwarded through
dude they are like, "oh all the states are in the south, so racist!" DUDE THE DEMOCRATS LOVED SLAVERY! Most of the freaking states during the 2016 elections weren't entirely in the south! These guys just talk, and they have no dang evidence!
My name is Connor I'm the android sent by CyberLife Yeah it’s nonsense, they used no evidence for anything, and blabbed everything out... The party’s didn’t completely flip! Many republicans voted for that democrat who loved civil rights. Only the most racist states he didn’t win, Alabama, and this other one.
Y'all got it wrong the party went from Lincoln to Hayes. That's when the Republican party had nothing to do with Lincoln anymore. Lincoln was a Liberal. Then it went from Hayes to the party of Stron Thrumon and it never changed. Trump didn't make it racist it was always racist he just made it more radical.,
@Borat Sagdyev Sagdyev True - I was using that term (that I'd kind of invented myself) to to refer to the ones that *are* of Cuban descent. Sorry for the confusion!
That’s cause Cubans & Venezuela ppl believe in trumps ads & call it a day. They believe anything trump says “Biden is a socialist grrr” like no he is a centrist educate yourself 😭
@@raulespinoza8411 I think that probably oversimplifies it a bit. They came to America for a reason, and feel Trump best represents that reason (or at least that he has been able to show Biden as the opposite).
exactly, though i'm almost willing to bet on how many people don't understand this and are part of the republican base. =/ I honestly believe anti-intellectualism is what's killing this country more than anything.
Wow this is actually quite eye opening. From someone looking in on American politics this cool too see how the parties developed in to what they are today. You guys do an awesome job and make sure you keep pumping out these videos because i'm gonna watch every single one.
The Southern Strategy. Republicans were the progressive Party until Johnson passed the Civil Rights act of 1964 ending segregation. This enraged white southern racists who were then immediately courted by Richard Nixon, who began campaigning in southern states. This is how the Republican party became overwhelmingly white, while the Democratic party became much more diverse and progressive.
This video isn't bashing Trump. It's just explaining how the Republicans went from being the progressive party, to the uh....well, not so progressive party.
+Arbitrarily arbitrary A traditional conservative is and so is Donald Trump. Also just because he failed to mention something as irrelevant as why Lincoln disliked slavery doesn't mean it's not neutral.
It's weird watching this today in 2024 when a massive percent of Hispanic voters are now voting Republican. I think the democratic party embracing socialism amd communism has something to do with that.
I wish they were embracing socialism. In reality, democrats are beginning to embrace conservatism. I mean, Kamala Harris has repeatedly said that she wants a republican in her cabinet
George Washington did not want a two party system. In his final address he warned that the two party system would result in the country being torn apart based on differing opinions on the size and strength of government.
It was not Reagan’s bill, not his idea. Congress writes and passes laws. He signed it after being convinced by business groups in farming and construction and that it would help with the Hispanic vote in Texas, for example. Which it has.
To this day the largest business groups, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, support real immigration reform (not walls, and fear-mongering) because they see the value of immigrants to various essential industries. American business leaders are frustrated by the GOP using immigration to rile up its base for each election instead of legislating a longterm solution.
Which would've been great, because it would've shown that American politics in general have moved to the right. Reagan today would probably be seen as a neoliberal like Joe Biden. Now as the GOP has gone far right with Trump, the Democrats are trying mainly to appeal to moderate Republicans who hate Trump.
President Obama has executive power to allow anyone into the country and deport anyone he wishes. Search it up. For a "leader" that supports the law, how could he give special considerations to refugees (including health care and no documentation) that literally are treated better than the average citizen. Especially how he has endorsed and fallen behind a known criminal who is above the law that has put national security at risk. Vote out of the establishment. You cannot vote Clinton in, especially after it is known she rigged the electoral machines to favour her.
+yo dawg Newsflash- rigging elections to favor a candidate is no new thing. Its called gerrymandering. Look it up. It has been practiced by both republicans and democrats.
Marschall Vorwärts What about the slaughtering of Native Americans? Where do you include that part? America belonged to the Native AMERICANS just like England belongs to the ENGLISH. Stop trying to justify the GENOCIDE that illegal europeans committed towards NATIVE AMERICANS! THE TRUE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF THIS CONTINENT ARE NATIVE AMERICANS! To them ILLEGAL Europeans were TERRORIST! WHO BROUGHT SLAVERY AND DEATH TO THIS LAND!
Funny... Also, the native americans weren't a unified people. They fought against each other, killed each other, and took land from each other. When europeans came, they played by the same rule. They won. Fair enough
Kennedy would have supported Obama whole-heartedly, but Lincoln certainly would not have supported Trump. John Wilkes Booth would have supported Trump enthusiastically.
Both parties were "racist" in the past. Republican opposition to slavery was an economic issue, not a moral one. Even before the civil rights era most black already voted for the democrats because it was financially better for them, it started in the 1930s.
Yeah I know lol. Unless your actually southern, than it’s kinda just a status symbol. I don’t see it as racist I just see it as a short lived, fallen country.
George Washington: don’t make opposing political parties, it will destroy the sense of unity in this country Everyone else: How bout we do anyway UK, Russia, China, North Korea: write that down
what drugs are you on? This is an attack piece from the communists of the "liberal Democratic Party" who want to destroy America for the War Criminal George Soros ! Look him up he helped the Nazis plunder and KILL the Jews of Europe, and now bank rolls the storm troopers of the "Black Lies Matter " crowd!
They voted for Kennedy because Kennedy helped improve the country!they they voted for Obama because I thought there would be a change when they realize he spread hate they wanted more change! They voted for Trump because Trump changed the way things were ran. Now Biden just stole the election in all of America is in hate!
i never got that. your okay with immigration as long as the sign the book. no you guys are anti-immigration. i would like to "you guys" accepts all those refugees comming from the middle east.
You claim your against illegal immigration not legal immigration. Then why don't Republicans want to help modernize our immigration system to get rid of this illegal immigration problem?
why the hell would we take the refugees...we have enough problems here...why should we give housing to refugees when we have 30000+ veterans on the streets...yet our liberal government doesn't care about the vets they worry more about the immigrants they can get to vote to keep living off the government so they can keep power.
illegal immigration is immigration that is not rendered legal. Easy solution: make all immigration legal. You just eliminated 100% all of illegal immigration.
Let’s give some credit to the graphic designer.
I always give credit to the graphic designers in everything everyday, it’s everywhere
johnny harris the best.
Does Johnny Harris do all his own graphics?
Im laughing so much at this comment
its simple stuff
Reminder: The Republican and Democratic parties both technically had Progressives in their Parties.
Republicans: Teddy Roosevelt
Democrats: Franklin D Roosevelt.
There are no good parties... only Good people.
Apple Tree Didnt Woodrow Wilson create the Federal Reserve?
Hillary sucks
@@thebluegrat_8522 so does trump
Christian Mouser wait I thought Teddy Roosevelt was a Democrat
So
Russia: from Putin to Putin
From Yeltsin to Putin
Being part Russian, I can confirm this.
Russian here, it was mor elike Yeltsin - Putin - Putin - Medvedev (Putin was grey cardinal) - Putin - Putin - Pu...
@@Bergen98 Most Russians don't know how to live in democracy because most of the country's history has been one of severe totalitarianism and only a very small period in their history has been democratic. They will always seek for a father figure as a leader.
Democracy doesn’t work for everything. My papa said that he had more freedom in communism then he had in democracy.
This is why I will never judge a candidate by their party but their character. Happy to be unaffiliated with a party
Same! I’m a registered independent.
Parties may change in values across decades, but consistently voting against social reform and freedom seems almost irresponsible. Use your vote for good
I presume you prioritise policy over their charisma
@@harku123this is the way
@@Boomhauersdad Good! Since you judge a candidate by their "character", we don't have to worry about you voting for Donald Trump.
Come to China, and you'll never have to be worried about voting again.
-- this is just a joke guys, plz dont take it seriously
But I would be worried about smog
ruclips.net/video/4quwGch9jLg/видео.html
Alex Liu If you’re from china you shouldn’t be able to see this. 😂😂😂🤦♂️
*_BEHOLD THE POWER OF SOCIALISM_*
chinese gangs are fighting with big knifes there are too dangerous
North Korea: From Kim to Kim to Kim.
North kimchi
USA - From Reagan to Bush to Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump....all Coporatist neo-liberals .
Aidan Lille the dream team you mean
@@lebruh9603 They definitely were on the same team.
Aidan Lille I know I was joking
It happened quite suddenly, over the course of 150 years.
Yes Abe.
Four score and seven more.
Abe! I can’t believe you have youtube? Have you played among us?
@@matineeman3038 when John Wilkes Booth is sus
@Tyler Hodges Nope, it’s a human right to be free. Just because they’re taking down a statue of someone doesn’t mean they don’t deserve freedom.
It's kind of takes me back to history class it's just really fascinating how both parties changed throughout the years interviews and beliefs that people had versus what they believe in now
Love how they breezed over the 1990's and all the democratic laws that created the war on drugs. Joe Biden himself called black people "supercriminals".
So yea, every time they breeze over a decade or 2 see what party starts putting forward laws that hurt African Americans.
It's not as black and white as this video makes it, because you have to remember at the end of the day, white people make up the majority of the voter base so they will get priority no matter the party.
I am thinking the same.
Lol
I don't think it really changed that much the Dems have always been about race where repubs never really cared about race at all
@@KILLSWITCH14FP69 did you even watch the video?
@@KILLSWITCH14FP69 clearly you were homeschooled in the south 🤣
So let me get this straight, the majority of americans wanted to abolish slavery due to economical reason?
Yes. At the time, people didn't hold many of the values of racial equality that we do today(as a result of the civil rights movement). Most white Americans, republican or Democrat were white supremacist. They just disagreed on whether enslaving black people helped white people.
sounds about right. Remember, the American government and economy is based off of Capitalism, which means big businesses
Maybe that was one of the reasons, but then they gave black people the right to vote... that doesn't sound economical
@@patricioiglesias5346 Not necessarily. Step 1, bring in a new voter demographic. Step 2, cater to that demographic in order to win their votes. More votes, more power, more money.
economical reasons against white people*
England: From Elizabeth to Elizabeth
From Elizabeth... that’s it. She will live forever
@@advocatevarunrathi2831 I don't think gandhi was a prime minister or a president.
@@advocatevarunrathi2831 From Nehru to Modi
Why the reply above is India
@@haiki8955 idk
All I learned is that both parties fight for human rights only when it will give them political leverage.
How so? Lyndon b Johnson signing that bill lost them elections when it came in.
yep, basically :/
aka incentive.
@@Gleifel He won the black vote
And since pretty much all human rights gives democrats more support, it explains their fight for it.
I had no idea the republican party were the first to go woke.
What
Because they ended slavery?
@@Jarmariv Yes, check what 'woke' means.
based on today's republicans that is understandable
@@sudarshanrobot Woke means to be aware of something, often systemic injustices. The right took it and made it mean diversity for some reason. You are using the word wrong.
@@Freespazfreesumo I'm definitely using the right word. You just explained what I told OP to search, Thanks for that.
Why cant USA get out of its shell and stop voting for 2 parties only.
Ādams Vizulis because the majority of people in america agree with one of the 2 parties ideas. if people didn't agree with the 2 parties, there'd be more than 2
zester lester Yeah but there are many who voted for Hillary or Trump because they saw one of them as lesser evil.
Ādams Vizulis true
Many view a vote for a 3rd party a "waste of a vote." Therefore few are willing to vote for them for they think their vote no longer matters. That's not going to change anytime soon.
because the system can't support a third viable option
Whoever did the graphics for this video should feel proud. Well done.
Colin Watt but the information is totally false and debunked by realclear politics, this is an aweful video
@@futgamerretail202 NO ITS NOT
@@futgamerretail202 A source would be glady accepted. Or have we encountered a simple troll?
Futgamer Retail this comment is talking bout the graphics and I bet they did more research then u
Johnny's Credit Card what is real media? Breitbart? This is documented fact. Literally go into any library or he’ll look it up on Wikipedia! It’s not partisan to say that the parties switched voter bases and their stances on issues! It’s just the truth.
Ngl skipping the 1890s-1920s is a HUGE thing to just ignore, that’s when you transitions from reconstructing the south to labor laws and progressivism
Yes, that was the period the Democratic Party became openly pro-labor and pro-unions, mostly influenced by Northern big-city "machines" set by the Irish Catholics. That was the period that laid the ground for FDR.
this is offtopic but remember ronald regan on the boondocks "white heavon episode with uncle rukos ever since that i think hes rasict lol
Its funny that you bring this up, because in the video when they said fast forward to the...I thought WHAT? You're just going to omit a huge piece of history? I dont know anything about what happened then, but I was automatically suspicious when they skipped it
My thoughts exactly. This video should be at least 5 minutes longer. I thought for sure they'd mention the southern strategy, the emergence of jim crow and the role of the civil rights movement (and southern strategy) in motivating southern whites to migrate away from the Democratic party. The took it easy on the Republicans...
They also skipped the neocon era of the Republican Party, it would have been great if they covered how defense was so important that the Republicans became the party of big government for a while.
RUclips suggesting this Video on November 6 2024.... gotta love the algorythm
This made me realise how much did race become political in America.
Goodmorning
it really wasnt this is disinfo and highly exaggerated. Economy was the #1 factor
Race has always been political in the US. Most of our earliest politics were about slavery - including a lot of the constitution. It's probably one of the biggest underlying issues throughout American history (alongside the urban vs. rural divide).
@@camden7806 this is not disinfo only if ur a republican and don’t wanna admit you guys profit off slavery more than everyone else that’s why you guys wanted it no one else did
@@alexd9734 you do know the democrats were the confederates? Right?
Soooo we're just going to skip that whole Theodore Roosevelt section where he went against big business and tore down the monopolies?
Theodore Roosevelt is to too bad ass for this video. The produce couldn't handle him.
+Dave McCool no, Vox is all just Liberal Democrats. They wouldn't want to tarnish there views.
The video isn't a complete history, but it did note the Republicans became the party of big business in the 1920's. Theodore Roosevelt was president from 1901 to 1909. Still, a complete history of the party would be more interesting.
That bugged me, but the fact is, it was a passing aberration. Can't slide a credit card between Harrison/McKinley and Harding/Coolidge.
Roosevelt was antiestablishment, he only got VP slot so he wouldn't ever run against mckinnely
Democrats : WE LOVE SLAVERY!
Democrats 1 century later: uno reverse card
still enslaved by the government and welfare under democratic policies.
@Camden And is welfare a bad thing?
@@camden7806 Tables may have turned, but the south is mostly racist, that never changed. And, again, which party did most of the south vote for?
Pretty sure there was an ideological switch, because there where many more party changes then portrayed in the video. I'm pretty sure the modern democratic party wasn't even around back then with the whiggs.
@Dylan Campbell Sure public healthcare sounds good, but that's under the price of pharmaceutical innovations. Guess who's been the top pharmaceutical innovation country in the world? Yes America, not Britain, not China, not Sweden. America. I'm not saying that America doesn't need a healthcare reformation, but the solution is not gonna be public healthcare for all.
Best political internet interaction, paraphrased:
“What if we don’t group a variety of unique ideals and suggestions into just two colours”
“Sounds like something someone from the other colour would say. Get em boys”
“Fools multiply when wise men are silent.”
shi. Logic isn’t persuasive in arguments if that’s all you offer.
I have the same problems with this quote as with Idiocracy.
"Be a fool and on fools you'll convince! But be the devil... And all men stand down.
It's all related to maturity, as the more mature you are the more likely you are to admit your wrong when necessary. Democrats tend to lean towards immaturity, while Conservatives lean towards simply taking facts, statistics, quotes out of their original context and being a tad bit slow.
And that's why I'm not a Democrat, nor a Conservative. They're both awful, they're just arguing who's worse. Democrats have leaned towards communism, Conservatives have leaned towards having a more white base, BUT Libertarians have stood their ground. Libertarians aren't putting awful extremists up as their presidential candidates. THAT is the best political party, and I get that your skeptical, it's only natural. But, if you actually are a person that cares about facts and the prospering of our country, I would look into the Libertarian party.
Indeed. So thank goodness President Trump is in office.
All this to say....
Democrats: Racist
Republicans: Racist
You did it! You broke history down to its bare essentials!
Bingo
The republicans are just a lot more.
@@elijahtorres2688 please God do NOT bring Reagan back
So choose your poison
How gutted would you be if you agreed to pose for "angry white person" stock photos and then saw yourself in this video.
LMFAOAOAO
This made me realise how much did race become political in America.
@@larssrensen4353 not in your case
@@tomfitzgerald4760 What have I done to you man ?
@@larssrensen4353 he phrased that badly what he means is representing a white confederate, isn’t the best Look so in this case being white isn’t a good thing no. But he’s not saying that all white people are racist confederates, or that being white is bad.
However I can’t read his mind so I won’t know for sure
Now we need:
"How the Democratic Party went from Roosevelt to Biden"
Ya I feel like the government as a whole has just gone downhill overtime. There's gotta be an honest president that fights for our interests with kindness and wisdom.
That would be nice but that's simply not possible. I don't think there could ever be a president that appeases everyone.
Roosevelt was Republican, if i recall
And Biden is a shockingly good president. Leagues and miles better than Trump
They would never make that
@@Spidermanlover216 they made from Andrew Jackson to Obama (pretty much the same)
In America: people gives 4 years to their president
In Russia: Putin gives 4 more years to the people.
Wow, another unfunny and unclever degeneratic "joke" about Russia which don't apply to reality. Well done.
@@ПетрВрангель-т8п ❄️
A president should serve the people, should he not?
@@oblivion3067 Should "he" not? If he serves the people he will allow for "she" presidents.
@@capitalistball2924 Oh, I wasn‘t refering to Putin. I am saying this in general.
”My side is better than yours!”
- American politics
let an independent run the country for once. it's just four years im curious to see what happens
The south will rise again.
That's having freedom of speech unless you want 1 group people controlling you
@@IvanGoldBit you have poop in your buttwhole I can say nonsense too
@ spread those cheeks so they can slip it in.
I have a saying since I realized how much politics have changed in the USA (and also since I started showing interest in politics):
NEVER look at a party and what they "represent". Always focus on the individual who wants to be at the top and treat every person as individual. Listen to what they say and compare it to what they do or what they have done. Only then will you realize who you are voting for.
Absolutely. You know, when people look at Presidential Candidates, they never seem to look at what they may have stood for say 20-30 years ago, and what they have done since then. Ive seen a-lot of videos of Political Candidates talking, Biden, Trump, Hillary. And how much they have changed to accommodate their campaign and win over voters today. And if people looked at that, they would realize who and what they are voting for, to a certain extent.
that why i will always vote for Obama.
@@EdA-bz3bu
Obama did more to stir up racism & division in America than any President in history. You think that's a GOOD thing?
If every voter in America did that; there would never again be a repugneton in the WH!!!!
fun thing: You don't have to think this if a country has more than 2 political parties which it should
You forget to mention how in 1890 the first black senator was elected and how it was a Republican
Okay so? The point is there was a party shift like 70 years after that why would that change anything
@@Tanner404 the 1st 23 were republicans… not democrats
@@Tanner404can you explain this party shift to me? What happened they just one day said “hey switch teams after over a hundred years” stop believing everything you’re told without do research for yourself
@@noahh687but the video already explained that or didn’t pay attention?
@@noahh687 The whole point of the video is talking about the party switch. Think about it, Lincoln was a republican elected by northern states with a progressive agenda of not expanding slavery, opposed by the entire south. The exact opposite of how the republican party is today
George Washington in his Farewell Address: _No political Parties_
America: *Yall Hurd suming*
It's not that we shouldn't have any parties, we just need more than two
And why doesn't VOX do how did the Democrat party go from Andrew Jackson to Ocasio-Cortez!??!
@Snow Cone Well actually he fought against the current divisiveness that we see today between the Democrats and Republicans. As many democrats and republicans would agree today, too many people are partisan and would vote for their party regardless, instead of doing what George Washington proposed which is to remain individuals instead of joining parties. He knew people wouldn't listen to him, but wanted to state the fact anyways and hoped others would heed his warning. Not only did he know, but he mentioned that every government that has had them has said that political parties are the enemy of government and actually weakened the government. There are legitimate reasons why he said not to create or join in on the idea of political parties. He told everyone not to do it, not because he thought it would stop them, but because he hoped it would. People didn't listen to him and now we are currently experiencing the worst, most divided nation ever.
@Snow Cone Wow. You completely missed my point. I was saying he isn't being naive. He knew that saying it wouldn't prevent it from happening, but is saying nothing better? Speaking up is always the better option than being quiet, regardless of if it affects change. He wasn't being naive. Of course everyone has partisan leanings or falls under a group that they agree with more, but his point originally was to prevent divisiveness. This was prior to a party system, so it's different than people who say partisanship is bad today. He saw where the country was headed because during his first term and second term with the creation of political parties. You and I only disagree on the fact that speaking out is a better choice than letting sleeping dogs lie.
@Snow Cone I think coming up with more reasonable alternatives would have been more helpful, but that's also coming from much further in the future. Something like Italy's coalitions with a multi party system would at least be a little better, but now we need to focus on things that will improve our elections and decrease divisiveness. Since we're already in a two party system, full reform is very unlikely like you said. One example, preferential voting would help third parties actually stand a chance in elections, where as currently they do not. Alleviating the two party systems is definitely a goal I hope we'll fight for in the next few years.
You skipped Teddy Roosevelt, A Republican who busted trusts and monopolies.
Yes. Teddy pulled the Progressively out of the Republican party. When that election was over, many never went back. This was a major shirt that saw the Republican party owned more by corporate overlords and the Democratic party getting its first real injection of Progressives.
Ah Teddy Roosevelt, a model PROGRESSIVE and LIBERAL.
not only Roosevelt, he skipped about 25 other post-Lincoln presidents. Some of them were less influential, but it's clearly an oversimplified explanation. Still interesting even if very limited.
Teddy Roosevelt and Eisenhower are 2 Republicans that should not be skipped over when talking about Republican trends, history, and importance.
***** because he was an important president who pushed through many reforms. He basically created the USDA after reading Upton Sinclair.
"How the democratic party went from Kennedy to Biden"
There's already a video on how the Democratic Party went from the party of slavery and white supremacy to the party that nominated Barack Obama.
Boomers
Jackson to biden.
@John mark Ogayon "I don't like people who get assassinated"
@ΓΡΗΓΟΡΗΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΠΟΥΛΟΣ Definitely NOT saying LBJ wasn't a racist, however he did more for black people in America than any other president since Lincoln and FDR, so although he was a racist, I think there are other more valid reasons as to why he wasn't that great of a president (Heightening the Vietnam Conflict).
I remember watching this video 8 years ago and the shift of parties is happening again.
No parties, just ideas. United we stand, divided we fall.
If only more people could get behind this idea.
It's a person's view not their party or affiliation.
ensayofr Democrats will listen better
We havent falled for 200 yr what to u mean
Honestly, I'm not sure that modern politics can work without political parties. As a former UK politician myself who has stood both as an independent and as a party candidate, it's very difficult to communicate your views and values to voters as an independent. People's time is increasingly limited, so very few people want to spend 20 minutes each learning about individual candidates. Party affiliation gives voters a handy shortcut - an affiliated candidate may be slightly to the left or to the right on a particular party's political spectrum, but as a voter you know roughly what you're getting.
The most local level of government in my area essentially banned party affiliations about 10 years ago, and the result has ended up being far fewer candidates standing (to the point where the last election was uncontested) and voter turnout at far lower levels than councils at the same level of government but which do allow party affiliation.
It's already happening, this country was doomed from the start :(
How the Democratic Party went from Kennedy to Clinton
Marcus Dye how the Democrats went from Jackson to Obama
Kennedy was always my favorite President, even when I was a republican.
Kennedy wasn't as progressive as people give him credit. More like from FDR to Clinton.
@@stinkypoopybutt8303 If we're doing a full timeline of the democratic party then this is the only one that actually makes sense. We can't just stop at Clinton.
@@khadijahmuhammad4771 I think they meant Hillary rather than Bill.
This video shows just how much everyone in America didn't pay attention in their US History class.
No it shows how you'd dumb
You should like spell check your statement calling someone dumb, before you post it ya dunce.
James Burgess your comment shows how stupid people can be
J67 JAG your comment shows how you ran out of insults
Make America Great Again Your comment shows how nobody pays attention in their English classes.
Hello friend scrolling through the newest comments, it’s pretty bad around here so I wish you the best my friend.
I likeeee this comment!
Thank youu ❤ sending you happy wishes back!
How did the democrats go from Jim Crow to AOC?
Is that even a big jump if we're being honest?
@@austinblackburn8095 LMFAO
Aliens ;-;
Party switch
@@austinblackburn8095 Yes? Jim Crow laws basically created segregation in the South, while AOC is a staunch-progressivist... and also a minority
Black Classic Republican here. I believe we can be pro business, pro black, and pro america together. I'm not 100% opposed to the left as I do like some ideas they present. We should be willing to hear each other out. Peace everyone
Exactly! I’m a liberal, and lately I can barely have a normal conversation with my republican friends. The two party system was to have two sets of ideals, and still being able to work with the other side. I may not 100% agree with republicans, but I am able to live with them, like it should be.
@@sophiademeas4410 yay
If you want that just don't support trump. Mitch McConnell is good
Then why support a racist president? I'm not black, but if I were I'd definitely want some kind of representation. Where's the black representation in the republican party? In Trump's cabinet? Is Trump helping you guys out when he gives open commands to white supremacist groups on national TV? I just don't understand it...
@@mongorians22 that statement is one of the reasons why many black people refuse to align with Democrats. We don't need to see black faces in the administration as much as we need policy that champions black growth.
I don't even want to look in the comment section because it's definitely cancer down there
But you're in the comment section
Yes, spare yourself. I truly don't know why I bother.
+
I almost became irrationally angry when I moved two comments below. Thanks for stopping me.
I did it lol, I shouldn't have lol,
I'm a swing voter. I previously voted for Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, Trump, Biden. That's about as swing as you can get.
The Republican party to me now has taken a drastic violent turn, which had some influence on the attack on our Capitol building. I'm not too thrilled with the job Biden is doing now. I do think he took Covid-19 much more serious than Trump. On the Republican side now, I will not support Trump again. I would support Mitt Romney, Liz Chaney. Of the Democrat's, I would support Stacey Abrams ( Georgia), Andy Brashear ( Ky.)
I understand the political divide, to a degree it's good, but it is grown into hatred, and hate filled rage. We are all still American's.
I also have a GOP friend who is DONE WITH TRUMP. He predicts the GOP is gonna turn on him after the 2022 election. With whatʻs coming out of the Jan 6 Committee....that might be the smart move.
Its gonna be so interesting to see who the GOP nominates in 2024, esp after Youngkin took VA.
Ok do one with how Democrats ended up with Hillary.
WHAT ABOUT HILLARY !!!!???
The video does kind of explain it when it mentions Johnson and then Obama
hillary is pretty average in the democrat party, she's a politician a very corrupt one.
they kinda did explain it
what? shes not corrupt,
People need to realize both parties are absolute trash.
This indeed is the logical conclusion. Both parties have good presidents, but both also have bad presidents. Democrats have Bill Clinton. Republicans have Reagan. Democrats have Woodrow Wilson. Republicans have Bush. There are freedom minded people on both sides, just like there are tyrants on both sides. The trouble is it is hard to separate the 2 until you see them in office.
Am I the only libertarian here?✋😂
henry morgan Why? Do you think libertarian stands for something besides minimum government? As far as recent presidents go, Reagan had the most minimalistic policies, Clinton was forced towards minimalistic policies because he couldn't pass the laws he wanted with a republican congress. On the other hand, Bush passed some very tyrannical laws such as the economic stimulus and the expansion of medicare. Woodrow Wilson was the most tyrannical democrat president that came to mind. Though honestly Obama passing Obamacare is pretty bad on the list too.
Being libertarian stands for individual freedoms above everything. It also stands for reaching a balanced budget. Also, not trying to be rude, but I don't see how listing presidents and how they were minimalistic or tyrannical contributes to your argument, which seems to be that libertarian stands for nothing but minimum government.
well we do have more parties jaja
To me this just shows that politicians just act in what ever way either makes them more money or gives them more power, very disturbing
Which was a mistake
Trump had know idea with what he was doing
Yeah that is what "politics" means. Politics = who is in charge--that is called "power." How do you fund power? Money.
That's how politicians get reelected, it's not surprising. They do what the people want, and some do what gets them money.
all politicians are corrupted
Who's here in '24 laughing at this video that didn't age well?
Pleasure to meet you all
Our election:
Donald Trump: Pros- Not Hillary, Cons- Donald
Hilary Clinton: Pros- Not Donald, Cons- Hillary
Halp.
well one wants to dramatically increase our debt by increasing tax cuts and inceeasing government spending. So...
We had 20 candidates to choose from and we got these 2.
Bernie. Pros- Not Hillary, or Donald.
Bernie. Cons- Not an option :/
Gary Johnson 2016
riddle me this: if the parties never switched, how can y’all be the party of Abraham Lincoln and also fly confederate flags?
What’s often missed is that most districts outside of the city centers in every region North, South, East and West are predominantly Republican. Having been raised in an Illinois Republican family I will say that I never heard them praise the Confederacy growing up but a lot of love for figures like Lincoln instead. Though of course the South is a different matter and the one focused on most due to how the electoral college set up really boosts their significance on the national stage.
I live in the south,Youd be hard pressed to find actual racism from a Republican I promise
So every Republican you know is out there flying confederate flags? Both parties supported the Civil Rights Act. The democratic party becoming less racist and voting demographics changing in the south for a multitude of complex reasons doesn't constitute a "switch." There are racists individuals out there but just become some also support small government didn't make them that way.
@@Cameron-ki1qx Uh,Only ~40%of house dems and like ~50 senate dems supported civil rights compared to 90% republican house and ~80% senate
@@Cameron-ki1qx actually, the Democrats filibustered for sixty days to attempt to stop the civil rights act from passing. The Republicans fought for it.
I don’t know what I’m doing here:
I live in Britain.
oh yeah, it’s a free comedy show
Edit:my notifications-
Innit
R S tommyinnit
@@CosmicMJ i found an inniter on a political video GG
Tommyinnit
where's the british version? how british rulership went from henry tudor to boris johnson?
So did the Republicans basically get the old Democrats and the Democrats got the old Republicans?
Pretty much
Precisely
definitely not true thats why thay can't name which republican became dems and vice versa
No. Voting trends changed only gradually due to economics and not racism. Read the books of Thomas Sowell to understand this.
Actually, the republicans have always been conservative, while the democrats have been liberal
The Republican party was the party of big business.....
Theodore Roosevelt Am I a joke to you?
I mean his foreign policy helped big business he just broke up monopolies
@@MajorMlgNoob it's what we should be doing now to amazon.
Taft too
@@kachao2113 but amazon isn't a monopoly..
Roosevelt is different, he may have been the coolest person to every live in this country
Funny thing is that the Democrats who made the confederate states had the first black president.
Time changes bruh.
He was a great salesman and tool for imperialism. Lol
_switching them positions for you_ 🎶🎵
@@Pink_pr1ncess hehe lol
Republicans also had several presidential candidates of color but they never made it far in the primaries.
Ben Carson did good in 2016 tho!
He said himself that he isn't black he's muslim
How the USSR went from me to Stalin.
Omg ur my hero
Jkjk
This made me LOL.
lenin to stalin and to Gorbachev. but sadly it ended
It just because you gave Stalin the secretary role
I m not white nor American, but I will always support republicans, trump or no trump
Even if its a bleeding shitshow, I do find American politics interesting and educational.
Mark Lanzarotta democracy is not what America is about. We were never supposed to be one because the founding fathers knew that democracy was basically mob rules.
No matter how you describe said shitshow, it's still got your attention. I am embarrassed to be a part of this drama. But every time we click on this monstrosity, its giving the monster power. Pay close attention to who you pay attention too. We pay no matter what. So guard your attention.
@@jacobbass6226 federalists
@@jacobbass6226 the all powerful and all knowing founding fathers
@@jacobbass6226 Heck, our founding fathers loathed the idea of parties to begin with
I'm a registered Republican, but I feel I've lost my party, we have nominated someone who does not represent my views at all. Its sad.
IK but it is what we got and the only other person i see is Gary Johnson because Clinton is even more different views than what i have.
I will have to take Gary Johnson over Trump.
welp our party doesnt have super delegates...democrat voters votes did not even matter...Bernie had the votes from the people but not the corrupt uppers.
republican party is becoming a joke and will die out when more people realize it. Hopefully the libertarian party will take over the right wingers sooner than later.
i would vote VERMIN SUPREME before Hillary...if i couldn't vote vermin i guess i would have to vote Libertarian.
How to make an argument:
The [insert political party] are better than [insert opposing political party] and [insert opposing political party] is wrong because [insert stereotypical response]
The GOP became more right-wing during the 1910s, the Democrats became much more left-wing during the 1930s, blacks began to vote Democrat since 1936, Southern whites began to vote Republican since the late 1970s to the 1980s, yet we're supposed to believe the parties "switched" in the 1960s...
Yup, thats the conservative strategy.
@@motinglu stop! That's too complicated. I need more generalizations that ignore important subtleties.
The same way Democratic party went from Franklin Roosevelt to Joe Biden
whats the difference they’re campaigning on pretty much the same thing
@@ramiere1412 joe biden is vastly underqualified for presiden, but he won the vote anyway because he was at least better than a raginig islamophobe who hates immigrants.
@@kemcolian2001 Biden isn’t vastly under qualified at all. He’s had plenty of experience in office it’s more is he still mentally fit for the job. Again the values of FDR to Biden aren’t so different is rather are the fit for president at the time.
@@bantxc5616 I think most democrats would rather have had another candidate other than biden but he’s so moderate that he was able to beat trump
@@bantxc5616 "mentally fit for the job" bro is 80 years old, crackhead son, raised gas prices, showered with his daughter. he is diffidently not fit for the president 😂
I wish i could witness Trump,Gordon Ramsay and simon Cowell have an argument
lol
Dude The Guy they would get along excellently 😂 they should start a judging show
@@xxmanusedtogame_9916 not when you like ketchup on steak
Faith Cathers you realize he changed that diet.... he eats healthy now
@Dalton K simon cowell
Honestly this was a very well made video on the history of the gop. It was actually (surprisingly) not super biased and entertaining to watch. I don't know why people complain in the comments it's very informative about how the party's changed their beliefs.
sold out for votes.
Jordan, you should know this video is actually quite biased against the Republican party :/. They make it look like it was the democrats in the 50s and 60s who pushed for civil rights when they were vigorously opposing and filibustering it. If you look at the author's twitter (Andrew Prokop) you will see tons of anti-trump tweets. He also skipped over the RE-segregation done by Woodrow Wilson (democrat).
Jordan, you should know that the author of this video (and Vox in general) is quite biased against the Republican party/ Trump. If you go to Andrew's twitter you'll see a bunch of anti-trump tweets etc. He skips over the RE-segregation done by Woodrow Wilson (democratic president) and makes it look like the democrats pushed for civil rights in the 60s, which they were actually opposed to and were filibustering.
Good point, I strongly oppose the modern GOP but he left out Woodrow Wilson and Teddy. Teddy was a Republican who was anti-big business and Woodrow Wilson was a Democrat who was a huge bigot.
*****
It took a lot of ignorance and stuck on stupidity to type that comment. Trump's whole campaign is filled with racist rhetoric. He's said their needs to be a database for all Muslims, he tweeted fake crime stats to portray blacks as criminals, he attacks the Mexicans. Trump has been catering to the prejudices of white Americans and any intelligent person can see this.
Me, just after Biden becomes President-Elect:
*INTERESTING.*
not quite
there MIGHT be voter fraud
@@bruhman5330 That has proven to be an overwhelmingly false claim by all accounts. The only "lawsuit" bid that Trump has been successful at in the midst of this election is that a Republican Observer was not allowed within 20 feet of the counting ballots Due to *covid restrictions in that state which applied to all observers*, after which the counting facility altered the rules so that the person could come within *6 feet*.
All other Claims have been baseless, and furthermore, no evidence has been presented by Trump, his advisors, his supporters or his lawyers.
@@bruhman5330 The only reason why Trump is putting forth these claims is that he is attempting to undermine American Democracy. He doesn't like the fact that he's losing, and as such is crying that the rules are unfair - and by "unfair" I mean "doesn't guarantee his reelection by default".
He is trying to muddy the waters and cast doubt on the most Fundamental thing that makes America, American: The Democratic Process, the system that ensures that the Head of State is elected By the People, For the People.
He is literally attacking The American Way.
@@TheWulf899 not just that, 50 - 150,000 votes in key states are questionable, dead people voting etc, video evidence of votes arriving at 4am on several days etc, there's lots of evidence, just gota stop letting democrats brain wash you and actually do your own research
Can we start to listen to George Washington when he told us to avoid political parties?
Whelp- too late now. It's funny how George Washington is one of the most respected presidents in American history, yet America still refuses to listen to his foreshadowing, warnings, and advice that he gave in his departure from office speech. We had to find out the hard way.
@@eventplanner461 one of the reasons I don't trust what George did was cause of how dark his life was
Well, Washington did own slaves so.......
@@gulpgo so
@@elitepapi9178 So his opinion on people who have a higher class because of theirnskin color is unconstitutional.
Lincoln is rolling and rolling in his grave.
Democrats were the slave owners and the original KKK. It's only because they requested and signed off on the Civil Rights Act, that black people joined the Democratic Plantation en masse, and became the new slaves to the modern-day welfare state that destroyed the black family and black community.
There is a staunch difference between Southern Democrats and modern day Democrats. Context, you obviously don't have it.
+Abraham Mercado Your implication is that the Republicans of today have anything at all in common with the racist DemoKKKrats. Like everyone who claims this, you offer no proof- and in fact, there is proof AGAINST this, as literally every kkk member who has gone on to be a player in politics has been a Democrat, the most notable of course being Robert Byrd, who at one point (in this past decade no less) was third in line to succeed the president. This is of course to say nothing of all the times prominent Democrats have been caught expressing racist opinions or thoughts... And the complete lack therof with Republican politicians doing the same.
MasterFhyl I don't follow. Robert Byrd when elected in 1957 was a Southern Democrat and actually filibustered against the Civil Rights Act. He later denounced any involvement with the Klan and regretted filibustering. Again, context. He went from one extreme like segregation (So. Democrat views) to another, denouncing it (modern Democrat view). Had he sticked to his segregationist views and not changed, more than likely he'd be a Republican (look up the Southern Strategy, therein lies all the facts you need). I'm not saying all Dems are not racist. It exists, but to paint the brush of what the Dems did centuries ago and try to pass it as the party of inequality is just not true and very misleading.
Abraham Mercado Well that's circular logic if I've ever seen it. "He's not a racist because he stayed a Democrat, because if had switched to Republican then he'd be a racist."
You are of course, showing no proof for any of this.
I won't claim to know what was in Byrd's heart, but he was not just some rank and file KKK member, he was a leader, a recruiter even- you don't become a recruiter for anything unless you believe in it well enough to gain converts.
It strikes me that it became politically advantageous for him to denounce the KKK, because you will find NO ONE on either side who officially supports the KKK. Hell.. in *one* of the parties, being a former Klansman is enough to get you blacklisted forever... But uh.. it isn't the Democrat party."
I just learned my last year's entire US History II class in about 5 minutes
Same!
yup
So true
Please don't get all of your information from this ultra-leftist outlet. Do some proper research yourself.
+
This was very informative, I've been confused about this parties and this has explained things a lot.
I do appreciate how you articulated Trump *did* appeal to an audience, and wasn’t just a hopeless nut job. I understand Vox demographics are increasingly liberal, but I was delighted by the lack of bias in this video.
that's what true mass media should be
@@layitupdown So true
Vox went way too easy on right wingers. They usually do. We need more socialist news.
@@shawn8847 vox goes way too easy on left wingers never tries to make its side look bad
@@washerwood8918 absolutely false. Vox is owned by Comcast. They never defend socialism.
most people just dont seem to understand the difference between legal and illegal immigrants.
Maj Ramm true
@dan james no illegal immigrants dont pay taxes there for they are illigal
@dan james if you ignore one law then you will ignore the rest of them
@@Indipuk Statiscally false?
Dalton K become a citizen then???
I wish GOP would stop saying they are "the party of Lincoln", because they are obviously nothing more than just have the same name.
To be fair, they have nothing else to offer. :-)
perhaps instead of calling names you should just prove them wrong.
Only difference is, until FDR, the Dems used to be anti-Black. Now, they're anti-White. Same racism, though.
+Julius Caesar so the GOP is anti anything that isn't white???
***** please prove the Democrats are anti white
_"Why do most black Americans vote Democratic?"_ *Here's an idea. Think of each political party (Democratic/ Republican) as a house. Now think of a political ideology (Liberal/Conservative) as the people who live in these two houses.*
> Let's start around the Civil War era (1860's) and say most of the people who hated and despised you lived in one of those houses. *Let's say the blue Democratic house.*
>And most of the people who treated you decently lived in the other house. *Let's say, the red Republican house.*
>And for decades, the majority of people who hated and despised you lived in that blue Democratic house. ___ So naturally, you wanted nothing to do with that blue house. You preferred the people in that red house who were more inclined to treat you decently.
*RESULT- For decades, (late 1800's- early 1900's), black Americans were loyal to the red Republican house. (Where Lincoln and the Abolitionists had resided.)*
>Then as years passed, an interesting thing happened. You began to notice it was becoming harder to know which house to avoid. Gradually, some of those people who hated and despised you began showing up in the red "R" house. At the same time, more of those people who treated you decently began to show up in the blue "D" house. After a while, each house had some people who hated you and some people who treated you fairly. It was no longer so easy to know which house you should avoid as it had been in decades past.
*RESULT- By the mid 1900's, (Civil Rights Movement) noting a definite trend, many black Americans left the red (R) house for the blue (D) house. But a minority still remained In the red (R) house.*
>Then after a few more decades, it became clear that neither house had as many people who hated and despised you as they had in decades past. In both houses, the majority of the people in them now treated you decently and fairly. But what you DID notice, is as the trend continued, that the vast majority of those people who DID still hate and despise you NOW lived in the red "R" house.
*RESULT- A notable majority of black Americans favor the blue "D" house even though it's not quite as clear-cut because the hateful people have less power and influence than they once did. (Unfortunately, their influence has still not been completely erased and is beginning to trend upward.)*
*QUESTION: SHOULD BLACK AMERICANS AVOID THE BLUE HOUSE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO HATED AND DESPISED THEM **_,_** OR AVOID THE RED HOUSE WHERE MOST OF THE PEOPLE WHO HATE AND DESPISE THEM **_?_** ...think about it.*
Well, the Red house is the house that currently cares about them so shouldn't that answer the question?
@@FrozenPantiezzz What is the Republican Party doing for black people?
Elaborate? For yhe record I stand of neither side, but if you're going to make a claim, back it up@FrozenPantiezzz
I’m black and voting Red it’s evident the blue certainly doesn’t care about black people I’ve been fooled for years
Great comment!
the two party system is as much a trap as a one party system.
reform is needed, wider choice is needed.
over 300 million Americans and you can't box them in to two categories
Exactly. So many of us are forced to vote for the “not as bad” candidate, or not vote at all
@@ahouiiouii5894 EXACTLY, thank you. The two choices are two extremes, no in between options that would be popular amongst many people.
@@ahouiiouii5894 Yep - I cannot but think that represents Trump's biggest hope of re-election. The fact Joe Biden looks, and often sounds, like an old old man.
Yeah, I think ranked voting would really help this
I would call myself a Republican but I have my own set of values that it should be a party. In modern times the parties are just way too polarized
Ya'll people be acting like voting doesn't exist. The Republican Party didn't go from Lincoln to Trump, the US did.
@@user-sr4nc4tc6f ya got an article for that? From what I know the iq increased
They were coned
Electoral College put Trump there, actually.
@@eldritchabomination0 Yikes, one of these people...
@@osuWhite What? Didn't Clinton win the popular vote?
The true divide has always been progressive versus conservative ideologies.
Slavery was progressive ideology ?
@@drakebudasz8837
It was the conservative British that brought it into the US and the conservative Democrats that fought to keep it in the US. It was the progressives that fought and beat the conservatives in the Civil War.
A divide is a divide, that's all thank you.
Progressive and Conservative, as applied to ideologies, an ideological simplicity.
Roughly speaking, 70% of humans are Conservative. Roughly speaking, 30% of humans are free-floating or noncommittal without being inherently or necessarily flexible, liberal, moldable, etc. This 70/30 is human.
We can expect that if you have two parties, both the 70 and the 30 are represented 50% in one party and 50% on the other party.
So, 70% of Democrats and 70% of Republicans are Conservative, and 30% of Democrats and 30% of Republicans are Progressive.
We can generally reason that concepts like bell or standard curves, regression to the mean, statistics, etc. would control or best explain divides than ideologies as self & other platforms or mantras or "history".
P.S.
Conservatives conserve, progressives discard.
So, 70% on each party conserves, and 30% discards.
Conservative does not mean that 70% of Democrats are God-fearing, nor does progressive have to mean that 30% of Republicans are godless.
@@algernonfriday4824
I see you whittled your reply down a lot from its origional. Did you do so because of how wrong it was in regards to my comment?
*"A divide is a divide"*
You have an astute grasp of the obvious. Good for you on that.
It however, in no way refutes or belittles my statement. Nore does the rest of your reply.
So, I must ask... Do you have a point?
Ifihada Hammer By that logic the conservative Democrats invented abortion and are trying to keep it in the United States (invented to keep the black population as low as possible) and the progressive republicans are trying to get rid of it because it’s the act of taking a life that has no voice. Much like slaves, fetus’ are seen as property and not considered life.
Very informative video ! I learned a lot.
How the DEMOCRATS went from KU KLUX CLAN to Obama
THAT'S a video worth watching!
it would be the same story but with more anecdotes on the democrats
They have a video like that but using the words white supremacy instead. Both videos are worth watching imo. Just wish they went into more detail with the huge time span they fast forwarded through
dude they are like, "oh all the states are in the south, so racist!" DUDE THE DEMOCRATS LOVED SLAVERY! Most of the freaking states during the 2016 elections weren't entirely in the south! These guys just talk, and they have no dang evidence!
@@campbellaviation7357 Yes, the democrats loved slavery. Did you watch the video?
My name is Connor I'm the android sent by CyberLife
Yeah it’s nonsense, they used no evidence for anything, and blabbed everything out... The party’s didn’t completely flip! Many republicans voted for that democrat who loved civil rights. Only the most racist states he didn’t win, Alabama, and this other one.
How the Democratic Party went from Roosevelt to Hillary
Eh, more like Jackson to Hillary.
Glitch Nuke, I don't think Mediocre to mediocre would be interesting
I AAA I'd say atrociously horrible to criminal
Sooo.. Basically how they went from bad to worse?
Obama to Hillary is literally more of the same- The same we've had for the past 15 years even.
Republicans: *Are strongest in the South.*
Georgia: "Is that so...."
I mean, Biden only won the state by 0.23%. Probably going back to the Republicans in 2024
@@sanctificate6285 same with Arizona.
@@sanctificate6285 idk Atlanta is strong democrat
@@janesalazarb.8013 And Rural areas are strong republicans
@@danirox4581 most Georgians are in Atlanta
Y'all got it wrong the party went from Lincoln to Hayes. That's when the Republican party had nothing to do with Lincoln anymore. Lincoln was a Liberal. Then it went from Hayes to the party of Stron Thrumon and it never changed. Trump didn't make it racist it was always racist he just made it more radical.,
Sooooooooo true
It went from Lincoln to Grant who became a Lincoln Republican.
'Republicans worry that they're losing too many Hispanic voters...'
*laughs in Cubano-Floridian*
@Borat Sagdyev Sagdyev True - I was using that term (that I'd kind of invented myself) to to refer to the ones that *are* of Cuban descent. Sorry for the confusion!
That might have just been an isolated incident of Trump preying on their socialism fear and Biden doing nothing to fight back against it.
That’s cause Cubans & Venezuela ppl believe in trumps ads & call it a day. They believe anything trump says “Biden is a socialist grrr” like no he is a centrist educate yourself 😭
@@raulespinoza8411 I think that probably oversimplifies it a bit. They came to America for a reason, and feel Trump best represents that reason (or at least that he has been able to show Biden as the opposite).
@@angusmayo4493 I don't think they're right in that assessment, but I see where you're coming from, and yeah, it was an oversimplification I think.
I don’t care about either party I care about the people in the party
Not how it works 10 year old.
Macsen Stavrakis: Say that to the 47 people that liked
You know the difference between Republicans and Democrats right???
exactly, though i'm almost willing to bet on how many people don't understand this and are part of the republican base. =/
I honestly believe anti-intellectualism is what's killing this country more than anything.
@@Takcci
When you become older, you and the people that agree with you will understand politics is more complex than you think.
So basically they both change and no one should be devout on their trust in the party. Got it 👍
Vote for who actually supports your values and will actually make the country better, not just who has a D or R next to their name
@@darthvader907 Truth to form.
Darth Vader Well put! If a Democrat starts pushing to lower taxes and decentralize power then they will have my vote.
It’s like a game of chess , you can’t stay in one place you need to move your piece and you can’t skip.
We need a new party both parties are bad at this point
Wow this is actually quite eye opening. From someone looking in on American politics this cool too see how the parties developed in to what they are today. You guys do an awesome job and make sure you keep pumping out these videos because i'm gonna watch every single one.
+Liam Browne thanks for the feedback! -Johnny
+
+
I agree. It was a great video. Very easy to understand and educational!
Great comment!
Agree 100%
Will you do a "How the Democratic Party went from Franklin Delano Roosevelt to Hillary Clinton?"
The Southern Strategy.
Republicans were the progressive Party until Johnson passed the Civil Rights act of 1964 ending segregation. This enraged white southern racists who were then immediately courted by Richard Nixon, who began campaigning in southern states. This is how the Republican party became overwhelmingly white, while the Democratic party became much more diverse and progressive.
vox supports Hillary they will never bash her
+Dennis Feng And this video is bashing Trump? not really
This video isn't bashing Trump. It's just explaining how the Republicans went from being the progressive party, to the uh....well, not so progressive party.
***** Uuuh....I answered above.
Informative, neutral, well made. This gets a like from me
+Arbitrarily arbitrary How was it not neutral?
+Arbitrarily arbitrary A traditional conservative is and so is Donald Trump. Also just because he failed to mention something as irrelevant as why Lincoln disliked slavery doesn't mean it's not neutral.
+
***** For a non american, it was neutral enough
+Arbitrarily arbitrary conservatives are anti immigration and dominantly white so how is this video wrong in any way
It's weird watching this today in 2024 when a massive percent of Hispanic voters are now voting Republican. I think the democratic party embracing socialism amd communism has something to do with that.
Hispanics still support Dems over Republicans. It's just that the numbers are growing closer.
I wish they were embracing socialism. In reality, democrats are beginning to embrace conservatism. I mean, Kamala Harris has repeatedly said that she wants a republican in her cabinet
Me: This is one party
G.Washington: *dear god*
Me: there's just one more
G.Washington: *no*
Ah, I see you are a TF2 fan aswell
I'm not getting your point?
@@jackopdenhoff5872 George Washington wanted multiparta system (2+)
@@kul3719 Spy crab intensifies*
George Washington did not want a two party system. In his final address he warned that the two party system would result in the country being torn apart based on differing opinions on the size and strength of government.
this is one of the best looking videos of seen done by you guys, budget boost?
I think it's the same. It depends on who in the team makes them.
+
yeah probably
well, that team better get some raise, or take over Vox, cuz that was pretty damn good!
+Brian Cruz wow you must get sick all the time then
So how come Ronald Regans amnesty bill didn’t get brought up in this video? He’s the reason all my family has citizenship right now
It was not Reagan’s bill, not his idea. Congress writes and passes laws. He signed it after being convinced by business groups in farming and construction and that it would help with the Hispanic vote in Texas, for example. Which it has.
To this day the largest business groups, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, support real immigration reform (not walls, and fear-mongering) because they see the value of immigrants to various essential industries. American business leaders are frustrated by the GOP using immigration to rile up its base for each election instead of legislating a longterm solution.
Which would've been great, because it would've shown that American politics in general have moved to the right. Reagan today would probably be seen as a neoliberal like Joe Biden. Now as the GOP has gone far right with Trump, the Democrats are trying mainly to appeal to moderate Republicans who hate Trump.
Steve Lewis they exclude a lot so they can build a narrative. There is a lot they didn’t include
William Rutherford It was actually democrats who filibustered the CRA of 1964 which eventually got passed anyways.
a country descended from European immigrants now complaints about immigrants
L̲e̲g̲a̲l̲ European Immigrants, can't leave that part out.
President Obama has executive power to allow anyone into the country and deport anyone he wishes. Search it up. For a "leader" that supports the law, how could he give special considerations to refugees (including health care and no documentation) that literally are treated better than the average citizen. Especially how he has endorsed and fallen behind a known criminal who is above the law that has put national security at risk. Vote out of the establishment. You cannot vote Clinton in, especially after it is known she rigged the electoral machines to favour her.
HackCentury legal by who's standard? definitely not the natives
+yo dawg Newsflash- rigging elections to favor a candidate is no new thing. Its called gerrymandering. Look it up. It has been practiced by both republicans and democrats.
Marschall Vorwärts What about the slaughtering of Native Americans? Where do you include that part? America belonged to the Native AMERICANS just like England belongs to the ENGLISH. Stop trying to justify the GENOCIDE that illegal europeans committed towards NATIVE AMERICANS! THE TRUE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF THIS CONTINENT ARE NATIVE AMERICANS! To them ILLEGAL Europeans were TERRORIST! WHO BROUGHT SLAVERY AND DEATH TO THIS LAND!
Trump : Immigration should be reduced
Native Americans : Trump, so when are you leaving US 🙄
Why do you feel that you need too speak for indigenous people ??
@@IncrediibleHauck he’s not speaking for them he’s just making a joke that includes them, I don’t think that he thinks that natives actually say that
Get finesse’d
Funny... Also, the native americans weren't a unified people. They fought against each other, killed each other, and took land from each other. When europeans came, they played by the same rule. They won. Fair enough
@Metsankaveliya Aztec Empire? Mexican city states? Tsenacommacah?
How the Republican went from Lincoln to Trump? Simple answer. People voted for it.
I’m glad they did
How insightful
@ralsterpage213 Progressivism? Collectivism? Sound singer free speech? Attack on the 2nd Amendment? Abortion? Telling jokes becoming frowned upon? Mob politics? Identity politics? Race tensions?
*Silencing free speech
People never voted for Bush
TRUMP 2024 🇺🇸💪🏼
Btw I’m black
@spawnerist don’t care
@@-Scrapper- 🤷🏻♂️🤣😂
How the democratic party went from Kennedy to Obama
why wouldn't you go with "how the democratic party went from George Wallace to Obama"; that would be the inverse of what the videos about,
Do one about how if the conservatives at the time of the American revolution (Tory's) had gotten their way, we'd still be a British colony today.
theos There both almost the same thing.
Kennedy would have supported Obama whole-heartedly, but Lincoln certainly would not have supported Trump. John Wilkes Booth would have supported Trump enthusiastically.
@@eatmylogic this is true
Every where els
Red means socialism
America:lol no
The political compass is exceptionally confusing now
Communism, actually.
Samuel Baird The US uses blue for liberal/left wing and sometimes socialism/social democracy, but communism is red
@J Calhoun Another useless comment, eh, Calhoun?
@bisquitnspanky Trump HATES anything or anyone who will TAKE his millions AWAY from him!
UK:
"it's always Queen Elizabeth II?"
*always has been*
Britain is the original white supremacist country. Social Darwinism idea came from Britain. But now they are more sophisticated in hiding their past.
How about the Romans, Macedonians or Mongolian empire?
"Life is temporary, Queen Elizabeth the II is eternal.©
Still, Queen Elizabeth doesn't even control England in any way
@@yusuf5753 🏦
Both parties were "racist" in the past.
Republican opposition to slavery was an economic issue, not a moral one.
Even before the civil rights era most black already voted for the democrats because it was financially better for them, it started in the 1930s.
It's funny when Republicans raise Confederate flags. The irony
Yeah I know lol. Unless your actually southern, than it’s kinda just a status symbol. I don’t see it as racist I just see it as a short lived, fallen country.
I don't get it either...it's like Russian people cling to a statue of Stalin.
@Alexandre Reed Died in a civil war being on the side of the pro slavery
Good grief learn the difference between a battle flag and a government state flag.
Funny because the South were Democrats during the Civil War.
George Washington: don’t make opposing political parties, it will destroy the sense of unity in this country
Everyone else: How bout we do anyway
UK, Russia, China, North Korea: write that down
You forgot China
The US is so divided that parties inform us who is the enemy and who is the friend
@@puljz8551 China actually has another party. they just don't get votes because if you vote for them you go for a really long vacation
@@puljz8551 Social credits
UK had the two party system before the US was even a thing.
This is an excellent video! Great editing, visually beautiful, and factual
what drugs are you on? This is an attack piece from the communists of the "liberal Democratic Party" who want to destroy America for the War Criminal George Soros ! Look him up he helped the Nazis plunder and KILL the Jews of Europe, and now bank rolls the storm troopers of the "Black Lies Matter " crowd!
+Dennis Dempsey
sir, I think you need to go back on your meds, or at least smoke a bowl and turn of info wars for a while, just a suggestion
It's so hard to detect sarcasm on the internet.
+Morgan Brooke-deBock
wait.... is it?
J Snow I honestly can't tell.
They switched sides 💀
Fast forward to 2020, both parties are now "big business" parties.
I mean...yeah, you right
every
Libretarian gang rise
_Always has been_
*business is boomin*
How the Democratic Party went from Kennedy to Biden
How the Republican Party went from Lincoln to Trump
From tho,as Jefferson to Biden
From Andrew Jackson to Biden I mean
@@animegmr697 your the only person who got it right lol
They voted for Kennedy because Kennedy helped improve the country
They voted for Kennedy because Kennedy helped improve the country!they they voted for Obama because I thought there would be a change when they realize he spread hate they wanted more change! They voted for Trump because Trump changed the way things were ran. Now Biden just stole the election in all of America is in hate!
"Anti-immigration" No, we're not ant-immigration, we're anti illegal immigration get it right Vox.
i never got that. your okay with immigration as long as the sign the book. no you guys are anti-immigration. i would like to "you guys" accepts all those refugees comming from the middle east.
You claim your against illegal immigration not legal immigration. Then why don't Republicans want to help modernize our immigration system to get rid of this illegal immigration problem?
Daniel Ramos there you go you are anti-immigrant both legal and not legal.
why the hell would we take the refugees...we have enough problems here...why should we give housing to refugees when we have 30000+ veterans on the streets...yet our liberal government doesn't care about the vets they worry more about the immigrants they can get to vote to keep living off the government so they can keep power.
illegal immigration is immigration that is not rendered legal.
Easy solution: make all immigration legal.
You just eliminated 100% all of illegal immigration.