1:07 Show beautiful photo of a nebula and immediately obscure it with text. Why??? We can hear you, and if we have hearing problems we can turn on CC. I want to see the photo!
I hadn't previously heard of the situation where a white dwarf is stealing mass from a stellar companion but won't eventually go supernova once it reaches the Chandrasekhar limit - the two stars together having less than half the required mass! But, thinking on it, this is probably a very common scenario as the vast majority of stars are small.
The scale of space and the cosmic wonders already messes with my head The most, biggest, least, fastest of ANY of them is only going to make my head spin like a top
So weird to think that the star we are looking at doesn't even exist anymore yet we can image it. Sort of like a stellar ghost story. I wonder what it looks like today, is there anything left of the nebula after all those years?
It proceeds normally as far as humans can sense. You could use atomic clocks to detect the tiny differences caused by the Earth’s spacetime distortion.
Normal stars? You get a bigger star that burns through its fuel faster. White Dwarfs? Supernova. Neutron Stars? Black hole & detectable gravitational waves. Black Holes? A bigger black hole and detectable gravitational waves.
We look for sun like stars not binary stars. What if a planet is tiddly locked but pass in between both suns and the second farther but brighter orange star gives light to the other Star
I'll make an assertion, you argue why it is wrong (or why it is right, if you choose to): Murphy's law extends to this situation in that the principle of "if something can go wrong, it will," given an infinite universe (observation of which is limited by perception of various possible temporal configurations), implies ALSO that there is always a "new record" that displaces every possible current "victor," (in the context of recent space observations), given enough time. GO! (Consider pinning to get a robust argument for fun!) If I see anyone making a heat death argument for something like the size of a star and there not being a future broken record I'll just laugh at you. :D
Just a tiny nitpick, but Earendel is pronounced with the first a making a separate sound. Ay-ah-ren-dil. It is rumored that the name of this star as written in an old English text, is what I soured Tolkien to begin to write his entire legendarium
@scishowspace what’s my number at the moment? I really want to know if anyone has openly said we can see a mirror of earth in the past to a much greater resolution. Like, I know what I do because of who I am. Who knew before me, like is 41 slow? Well tbh barely 42.
It takes months between each time I click one of these videos. And I'm directly reminded why I don't watch them. Don't cut your videos like a Phillip de Franco video
How is the cluster shown at 5:25 Not named the Smiley Face cluster?
Truely, some stellar superlatives.
"stay tuned for 2023" (barring unforeseen circumstances)
Coolest space show of 2022: you, guys. Thanks for everything.
Almost there... in 75 mil years. Sounds like my kid getting ready for school.
1:07 Show beautiful photo of a nebula and immediately obscure it with text. Why??? We can hear you, and if we have hearing problems we can turn on CC. I want to see the photo!
I hadn't previously heard of the situation where a white dwarf is stealing mass from a stellar companion but won't eventually go supernova once it reaches the Chandrasekhar limit - the two stars together having less than half the required mass! But, thinking on it, this is probably a very common scenario as the vast majority of stars are small.
The scale of space and the cosmic wonders already messes with my head
The most, biggest, least, fastest of ANY of them is only going to make my head spin like a top
Since the observable universe is a tiny fraction of the whole, the odds are that we will never see the most extreme anything.
Well shi
There's probably a 1000 earth mass rocky planet somewhere.
The observable universe is also fractal...
“That’s no star, that’s my dad!” -Elrond
No, but I'm not constipated!
Hi SciShow. Earendel was named so after Tolkien's Eärendil. As such, the "ea" are in hiatus, not a dipthong. It's not 'eh-rendel,' but 'ee-ay-rendel."
It's forgiveable to get it wrong but now they know.
Ee-arendel is best I can do.
Ee-ay-rendel is one step too far ;)
@@YeeSoest my best is worse than your worst. Pathetic. Haha /:
Earendel is Old English, Eärendil is based on it and was the reference but ultimately not where the word came from
@@YeeSoest I'm not at all convinced my phonetic spelling is the best, but it was the best I could come up with at the time.
Cool.
Could you guys please teach us about Phoenix A
0:49 Actually, they discovered Gordon Lunas
So weird to think that the star we are looking at doesn't even exist anymore yet we can image it. Sort of like a stellar ghost story. I wonder what it looks like today, is there anything left of the nebula after all those years?
What happens to time in the centre of the earth?
It proceeds normally as far as humans can sense.
You could use atomic clocks to detect the tiny differences caused by the Earth’s spacetime distortion.
Neato
what happens when stars collide?
Boom.
Normal stars? You get a bigger star that burns through its fuel faster.
White Dwarfs? Supernova.
Neutron Stars? Black hole & detectable gravitational waves.
Black Holes? A bigger black hole and detectable gravitational waves.
❤️❤️❤️❤️
We look for sun like stars not binary stars. What if a planet is tiddly locked but pass in between both suns and the second farther but brighter orange star gives light to the other Star
Awe man. I was hoping this video would tell me what "superlative" means.
I'll make an assertion, you argue why it is wrong (or why it is right, if you choose to): Murphy's law extends to this situation in that the principle of "if something can go wrong, it will," given an infinite universe (observation of which is limited by perception of various possible temporal configurations), implies ALSO that there is always a "new record" that displaces every possible current "victor," (in the context of recent space observations), given enough time.
GO! (Consider pinning to get a robust argument for fun!)
If I see anyone making a heat death argument for something like the size of a star and there not being a future broken record I'll just laugh at you. :D
Would have expected there'd be more.
I must be tired. I read the title as "Space Superlaxatives"
Just a tiny nitpick, but Earendel is pronounced with the first a making a separate sound. Ay-ah-ren-dil. It is rumored that the name of this star as written in an old English text, is what I soured Tolkien to begin to write his entire legendarium
Elëndil
Pronounce both the vowels at the beginning Earendel separately. A-air-en-del.
Am i crazy, or did this video premiere in the first hour with the title “Space SuperLaxitives”? Lol
Hype hype
@scishowspace what’s my number at the moment? I really want to know if anyone has openly said we can see a mirror of earth in the past to a much greater resolution.
Like, I know what I do because of who I am. Who knew before me, like is 41 slow? Well tbh barely 42.
97th
I am the walrus
Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes
Did anyone else read Superlative as Super-Laxative?
It takes months between each time I click one of these videos. And I'm directly reminded why I don't watch them. Don't cut your videos like a Phillip de Franco video