I keep wishing for one of these witnesses to be asked "Why did Floyd say he can't breathe 7 times before Chauvin applied the knee restraint?" I really want to know an explanation. You can't blame the knee when the knee wasn't there yet.
Panic, hyperventilating? Freaking out? When you are really scared to death or very excited haven’t you ever said I couldn’t breathe? Plus being under the influence could have made him feel like that. You can’t use that to say he was lying or as a reason not to believe that the knee didn’t cause death.
@@lizziem6640 why is it that every single shitlib responds to that question the same way "Like haven't you ever had a panic attack?????" How is this an argument
On the one hand, I'm very impressed with the defense attorney. He obviously does not understand medical things, has obviously been studying and understanding a lot. He's obviously very smart and is working hard for his client. On the other hand, I wish he would stop all the effort to make it look like the experts are wrong when it's HE who doesn't understand. And there is no defense for what his client did, captured by many videos. It's like I want to respect him, except oh yeah, he's defending that murderer.
The problem with many of these witnesses is they have let their feelings cloud the facts. It's a simple natural human instinct, but it will inevitably have negative implications when under examination as demonstrated.
Can go both ways, with the defense witnesses when called, there will be feelings that could. Loud facts, its a matter of who the most correct answer to Floyds death.
Dr Thomas appears to dodge all defense question by saying "it could or "too many variables" but for prosecution she appears very confident with yes or no answers.
She answers differently because his questions are obviously trying to force an absurd answer or position, for example was he confused or it’s okay to put someone into a prone position These are half questions and vague
She's a hostile witness that's form a guilty opinion. Very quick and confident in her answers for the prosecution but unsure, and unwilling to answer the defense.
@@katemoon7476 you are not seeing this in a objective, impartial reference. I have been looking at all the evidence and the witnesses, as I will in the defenses turn. Its difficult when looking at the video coverage.
@@connielelle1861 It is fascinating isn't it? Watch the bodycam of the cops, it is here on RUclips and shows all 4 cameras. Floyd really did say he couldn't breathe 2 minutes before the knee.
@@katemoon7476 Even if he was completely lying about not being able to breathe before, that does not mean he was lying after he was on the floor. Those kind of arguments are never put forward in court because the defence knows they would be overruled for speculation. He could have been lying, or he could have been speaking the truth. Neither scenario rules out DC's culpability so there is no reason to even mention that in court.
Did he appear to be confused during the 9 minutes? WTAF? Stupidest questions I have ever heard from a lawyer and he is totally grasping at straws to confuse the jury with idiotic questions. Thank heavens the the attorney for the state brings it back to facts and common sense.
One of the rookie cops asked chauvin if they should let George up now and added he was concerned but chauvin said no. He should have moved his knee, George was not responding so why didn’t they get off him and check for a pulse. Not choke him for NINE minutes. Has the rookie cop been questioned yet?
The defence need to make up their minds - was it the unruly ‘mob’ that contributed to GF’s death, was it the drugs he ingested or was it his heart? Nelson needs to stop changing the focus, it makes it seem like he’s really reaching.
Make sure there are 3 people on various parts of the body, and make sure the skeptic is also handcuffed and against a 100% hard surface like a road (not a bed, which allows for chest expansion).
I would put as unlawful if all the evidence, expertise, assessments regarding a matter of such, points out to a clear guilty verdict. There shouldn't be "their job" of such way to contradict what already stands out as being clear. If I was a defence attorney, seeing this, I would wise and honest to quit dealing with it and put the man in jail.
@@AnaMaria-we6zs but, is it clear? We presume it is so, but, we only come to a conclusion because the experts put forward opinion, facts and show is what happened and then it’s cross-examined. That’s how is should be done, to ensure true justice is done for GF. We can’t cut corners.
@@AnaMaria-we6zs good thing you are not an attorney because it takes time and effort to be a great attorney. There's 3 sides to every story, yours, mine and the truth. For the outside world, there needs two sides so you can choose what you believe is true, not what your emotion says.
LOL, "Mr. Lincoln..." The defense's attempts to remove the relevant facts are wild; he's taking a great chance to suppose the stupidity of the jury. Jurors do not like that.
for someone who says she's appeared in many trials, she doesn't seem savvy to the ways of cross exam...just answer yes or no and wait for the prosecution to come back and clarify. To me she looked to be a weak witness for the prosecution.
@@TheMrRatzz You are right-it’s up to the jury. Imo she backed up what Dr. Tobin said, and his testimony was devastating. But you’re entitled to your own opinion. It does concern me that a murder can be caught on video and there is still a chance the killer will escape justice. Some people see police officers as above the law (and the lives of some people as dispensable.) If some of those people are on the jury, the evidence won’t even matter.
Dr. Thomas was great on direct but lost her composure and confidence on cross examination. I'm not sure why. Then the prosecutor was on the defensive as well. It wasn't necessary to call this type of attention to the jury.
They were in his rectal cavity. In the Keung video one officer asks, "You are foaming at the mouth. Are you on something?" Floyd answers, "I was hooping earlier". Hooping is when a Junkie Dope Fiend sticks drugs up his rear-end to get high. As far as I know, the coroner never opened up his butthole looking for drugs. But he probably didn't want to look there. I'd like to ask the coroner. What a stinky job, btw.
Average Person to Doctor: Should I take meth? Average Doctor : Nah man, thats crazy. Average Person to Doctor: I have a heart condition. Should I take meth? Average Doctor: Nah man that's crazy. Average Person to Dr. Lindsay: I have a heart condition. Should I take meth? Judge: Don't answer if you have no opinion. Dr Lindsay: I have no opinion. 😂😂😂
Could be could be could be can she not give a straight up answer when the lawyer brings up the other doctor she gets a little nervous you noticed that or is it just me?
The woman doctor had a clear bias and motive she, she sung like a canary for prosecution and when defence got her shouldnt wouldn't even agree what is commonly considered a over size heart like Floyd had, we'll in lab they say that but blah blah not in the real world la la. She loved saying “law enforcemenr restraint caused the death”,,then nelson got her to admit if Floyd died alone with the same conditions should would probably rule it was a heart condition that caused death! When the mentioned a study of deaths involving police she showed her motive for being there, yes isn't incredible how many people die at the hands of police!
Proving reasonable doubt, in this case, is telling the jury to not believe their eyes. Any juror knows, if their loved ones were treated as Floyd, their loved ones would perish. Additionally, if the defense is attempting "the crowd made me do it" defense...good luck.
@@1212CSmith My family members aren't career criminals, drug addicts, and respect police officers and wouldn't resist IF...BY SOME STRANGE OCCURRENCE be arrested. Floyd committed suicide and that's been clearly established.
It's very disingenuous to not say that the illegal drugs contributed to his death as well. That doesn't mean it still wasn't the knee to the neck that was the cause, but it makes all of these doctors look ridiculous. So many trying to act like illegal drugs are not so bad depending on how much you do when any doctor will tell you that no amount of illegal drugs are ok or safe. Even a small amount could wreak havoc on a healthy person and in any other trial this amount would be a serious concern. Just dishonest not to say that the drug use contributed to his response and panic at the very least.
Funny how she can tell how he died, although there's no evidence on his body, have all those answers but doesn't know if sitting on something hard would make a bruise.
the defense is alays trying to make thing unclear so the itness seems like they don't kno for unrealaed unimportant. this guy does this the hole trial, making people feel like they appea stuipd or unsure. the facts are there
....yes facts like your spelling. He is doing his job. What he is getting paid for. If you life was on the line, you would want this type of defense...
@@tinamarie1948 you know what Tina, you’re absolutely right and just before I read your reply, I deleted the middle finger. I wasn’t thinking. I just thought that it was funny but it wasn’t and isn’t and I do have class 🤗 ❣️
A Dr that doesn't haver an opinion on if she would prescribe certain drugs to people with certain conditions that she's supposed to be an expert in... OK then... I wouldn't want this doctor advising me. Either way she clearly lied to me at the end there.
Dr. Thomas was often vague and imprecise when discussing medical physiological processes leaving one with the perception that she may be a less than optimal physician.
But she didn't say George Floyd had cirrhosis Did she .. isn't cirrhosis something To do with the liver And alcoholism yellowing of the skin and eyes ??
I love how you can tell she practiced her testimony with the prosecution but when it came to the defense she hardly could speak. It makes it seem like she doesn't know what she is talking about and her credibility is shot. Apparently she thinks Canada is another world as well. When will these witnesses realize that when they don't speak the same to the defense and prosecution it makes them seem completely bias.
No it doesn't. It makes it seem like the truth: she has not heard the defense questions before. She doesn't understand what he's asking half the time because HE doesn't fully understand what he's talking about. He uses words incorrectly and comes to illogical conclusions. He thinks things work differently than they do. HE does not understand. He is obviously very smart and has studied and understood a lot, but you can't just study complicated things that are new to you and fully grasp them. His questions don't make sense.
@@DashDriver-z1r It's absurd that the prosecution has so many vs defense only 1 so considering... Nelson is doing ok and there's plenty of reasonable doubt
@@DashDriver-z1r I don't dispute that he is a "good" orator because I believe he is. Although he is being overshadowed by the prosecution attorney Mr. Blackwell today admittedly. He is eating him up for lunch just as he did yesterday while cross examining Dr. Tobin.
@@ivanrivera6998 watch the full cross examination of tobin. At one point the prosecutor has tobin admit there was NO DEPRESSION whatsoever of Floyd's breathing lol
What happened to the defenses drug theory?????? he stopped on that one, didn't he Now he's on the heart story, no keep trying you want to get paid buddy, your client got 30 years! the crystal ball shows it!
🦧 Are all forensic pathologists so strange and weird? Maybe that's because they work alone, talk to corpses and eat their lunch next to the dead bodies! Who remembers the pathologist that testified at the OJ Simpson trial, now that was a weird one, I forgot his name.
What about him resisting arrest. That's what lead up to all of this. What if he just got in the car? That's right that would have left him still a live. How stupid is that?
You have more hypothetical scenarios taking out the police interactions and other pertinent details as it relates to this case than the Defense lawyer himself. Pathetic at best. How about you stop looking at things from a lens coated in hypotheticals n' from one actually coated in reality we're all living in?
Unfortunately if you resist arrest, you are placed on the ground and cuffed. But at no point should a knee be placed on your neck. It's not his fault that Chauvin's knee was placed on his neck. It's not his fault Chauvin applied extreme force to his neck. It's not his fault that he died because Chauvin was on his neck for NINE minutes. It's utterly immoral and if it was your father, brother, son, I think everybody would have a different understanding that this is clearly 2nd Degree Murder.
I heard him say ok let me count to 3 and im going. He was having a panic attack and ask the cop to wait and he pushed him. Im claustrophobic, and if im not ready to go, and you put force i would be acting the same way. I hate when people say he should have stop resisting... Come on, are you human...With this lack of empathy. I ll pray for your soul, cause yours is dark.
Do people with big hearts home invade woman and stick pistols to their abdomen while getting their friends to rummage through their house? I guess so in this case.
@@Swickful I prefer to see the best in people...and in any case, he didn’t deserve to die? He should’ve had a fair trial if he committed an offence. Just like Chauvin is getting a fair trial
What if George simply let go??... What if his mother came to him and said let go??? So he did and felt that he could...... Broken heart syndrome...maybe he loved his mother so much....
Neither defense nor prosecution have brought up the subject of whether George Floyd's lips turned blue? Any medically qualified viewers care to comment? Thanks
Whatever the public thinks this man innocent or guilty or what have you one thing's for sure you can never be pronounce innocent nor should he sometimes filth where is many colors no matter what color it is we are all subjugated to all rules and regulations no matter who and what we are it should be interesting to see how many years he will get and how good his lawyer is what is not
All $ is not good $ I look at the defense table & I want a barf bag . Nelson is crafty & may be doing his job as counsel but not as a decent person with ethics . If he were my next door neighbor , I"d sell my house. His karma is bad😫😫
I keep wishing for one of these witnesses to be asked "Why did Floyd say he can't breathe 7 times before Chauvin applied the knee restraint?" I really want to know an explanation. You can't blame the knee when the knee wasn't there yet.
I suspect he was having a panic attack
Panic, hyperventilating? Freaking out? When you are really scared to death or very excited haven’t you ever said I couldn’t breathe? Plus being under the influence could have made him feel like that. You can’t use that to say he was lying or as a reason not to believe that the knee didn’t cause death.
objection, calls for speculation
Imagine skipping over the drug use and going for panic attack lol
@@lizziem6640 why is it that every single shitlib responds to that question the same way "Like haven't you ever had a panic attack?????" How is this an argument
On the one hand, I'm very impressed with the defense attorney. He obviously does not understand medical things, has obviously been studying and understanding a lot. He's obviously very smart and is working hard for his client.
On the other hand, I wish he would stop all the effort to make it look like the experts are wrong when it's HE who doesn't understand. And there is no defense for what his client did, captured by many videos.
It's like I want to respect him, except oh yeah, he's defending that murderer.
The problem with many of these witnesses is they have let their feelings cloud the facts.
It's a simple natural human instinct, but it will inevitably have negative implications when under examination as demonstrated.
You're wrong. Deal with it.
Can go both ways, with the defense witnesses when called, there will be feelings that could. Loud facts, its a matter of who the most correct answer to Floyds death.
Dr Thomas appears to dodge all defense question by saying "it could or "too many variables" but for prosecution she appears very confident with yes or no answers.
prbbably because she knows it was homicide and doesn't want to help the defense one iota.
Yeah she's hostile and extremely annoying at same time 😏
That's called "Justice in action."
You don't get to be a piece of s*** and think people are going to come to your defense.
Because she doesn't want to be misconstrued
She answers differently because his questions are obviously trying to force an absurd answer or position, for example was he confused or it’s okay to put someone into a prone position
These are half questions and vague
this boy guilty as sin
Dr Thomas an great doctor Mr nelson very rude to the woman. .would you agree?
She's a hostile witness that's form a guilty opinion. Very quick and confident in her answers for the prosecution but unsure, and unwilling to answer the defense.
She was far more neutral than that horrible Tubin guy. She didn't have much of an agenda. Remember the defence hasn't had their turn.
Not hostile at all, it’s just hard to answer word salads!
@@katemoon7476 you are not seeing this in a objective, impartial reference. I have been looking at all the evidence and the witnesses, as I will in the defenses turn. Its difficult when looking at the video coverage.
@@connielelle1861 It is fascinating isn't it? Watch the bodycam of the cops, it is here on RUclips and shows all 4 cameras. Floyd really did say he couldn't breathe 2 minutes before the knee.
@@katemoon7476 Even if he was completely lying about not being able to breathe before, that does not mean he was lying after he was on the floor. Those kind of arguments are never put forward in court because the defence knows they would be overruled for speculation. He could have been lying, or he could have been speaking the truth. Neither scenario rules out DC's culpability so there is no reason to even mention that in court.
Did he appear to be confused during the 9 minutes? WTAF? Stupidest questions I have ever heard from a lawyer and he is totally grasping at straws to confuse the jury with idiotic questions. Thank heavens the the attorney for the state brings it back to facts and common sense.
The defense has no defense because there is no defense for what chauvin and the others did. Yes, he's grasping at straws.
One of the rookie cops asked chauvin if they should let George up now and added he was concerned but chauvin said no. He should have moved his knee, George was not responding so why didn’t they get off him and check for a pulse. Not choke him for NINE minutes. Has the rookie cop been questioned yet?
I think their trial is in August
And believe they asked about pulse. It was checked and he had none.
Agreed but I think he froze and couldn't decided if that was safe with the hostile crowd. Notice he just watched them and said nothing.
I know because he was taught it. Chauvin wouldn't let that happen because he wanted to kill him.
@@enicknova225 in front of camera witnesses makes no sense, the prosecutor has offered no evidence of intent.
The defence need to make up their minds - was it the unruly ‘mob’ that contributed to GF’s death, was it the drugs he ingested or was it his heart? Nelson needs to stop changing the focus, it makes it seem like he’s really reaching.
He is reaching, he has to, or Chauvin will have no defense.
It will be interesting to see the prosecutions expert witnesses.
He *is* reaching.
Starts 19:58
Thank You👍
Simple test skeptics allow someone of the cops weight and height to press their knee on your neck for nearly 9 minutes
Make sure there are 3 people on various parts of the body, and make sure the skeptic is also handcuffed and against a 100% hard surface like a road (not a bed, which allows for chest expansion).
CROWDERBITS did a video on YT. Watch it. That is if YT didn't take it down
This argument doesn’t apply had the police not overreacted mr Floyd would still be alive
Reasonable doubt today
Not really. Just more hypotheticals.
That u have a brain
36:16
Isn’t that AMAZING!!!! Nelson wasn’t ready for that response!
Guilty of 2nd degree murder!!!
It's shameful how far the defense will go to try to twist the truth to fit their defense.... but I guess that's their job.
I would put as unlawful if all the evidence, expertise, assessments regarding a matter of such, points out to a clear guilty verdict.
There shouldn't be "their job" of such way to contradict what already stands out as being clear.
If I was a defence attorney, seeing this, I would wise and honest to quit dealing with it and put the man in jail.
@@AnaMaria-we6zs but, is it clear? We presume it is so, but, we only come to a conclusion because the experts put forward opinion, facts and show is what happened and then it’s cross-examined. That’s how is should be done, to ensure true justice is done for GF. We can’t cut corners.
@@AnaMaria-we6zs -Wondering if other defense attorneys turned this down.. Seems like Chauvin has only one attorney.......
@@thelmakitty11 makes sense why Chauvin takes so many notes. That explains why. Nelson could not cope up.
@@AnaMaria-we6zs good thing you are not an attorney because it takes time and effort to be a great attorney. There's 3 sides to every story, yours, mine and the truth. For the outside world, there needs two sides so you can choose what you believe is true, not what your emotion says.
LOL, "Mr. Lincoln..."
The defense's attempts to remove the relevant facts are wild; he's taking a great chance to suppose the stupidity of the jury. Jurors do not like that.
"Isn't it amazing..." She showed her true colors. Instantly became uncredible for me. Political hack.
Well no... because she said many medical examiners have instances of these kinds of death. Therefore she's questioning the legitimacy of this study.
for someone who says she's appeared in many trials, she doesn't seem savvy to the ways of cross exam...just answer yes or no and wait for the prosecution to come back and clarify. To me she looked to be a weak witness for the prosecution.
You’re wrong but yo are entitled to your pinions
@@billschofield4802 how gracious of you
Nelson KILLED it this round!!! Holy cow, he did am amazing job
Seriously? Nah
@@TheMrRatzz You are right-it’s up to the jury. Imo she backed up what Dr. Tobin said, and his testimony was devastating. But you’re entitled to your own opinion.
It does concern me that a murder can be caught on video and there is still a chance the killer will escape justice.
Some people see police officers as above the law (and the lives of some people as dispensable.) If some of those people are on the jury, the evidence won’t even matter.
Not many facts but many hypotheticals. Just stick to the medical facts.🇦🇺
@@foreverwander0320 Let’s pray that they are educated and just!🙏
Lmao... You should try watching the trial before you make dumbass comments like that.
Suddenly she is not smiling anymore
She is anti police she admitted her bias when he said about police deaths!
@@DashDriver-z1r when did that happen? Not the first biased witness either
I wonder why? 🤔
@@aintgotnoname6548 36.00 enjoy
@@DashDriver-z1r she's not biased, she was facts lol
Oh no! Don’t tell me criminals might be uncomfortable while they’re being subdued. We just can’t have that
Dr. Thomas was great on direct but lost her composure and confidence on cross examination. I'm not sure why. Then the prosecutor was on the defensive as well. It wasn't necessary to call this type of attention to the jury.
Yes just what I was thinking. Maybe good that she was'nt paid.
No pills in the stomach cavity.
They were in his rectal cavity. In the Keung video one officer asks, "You are foaming at the mouth. Are you on something?" Floyd answers, "I was hooping earlier". Hooping is when a Junkie Dope Fiend sticks drugs up his rear-end to get high.
As far as I know, the coroner never opened up his butthole looking for drugs. But he probably didn't want to look there. I'd like to ask the coroner. What a stinky job, btw.
@@katemoon7476 🤦
@@katemoon7476 or hooping means playing basketball 😂 y’all tried it though
Average Person to Doctor: Should I take meth?
Average Doctor : Nah man, thats crazy.
Average Person to Doctor: I have a heart condition. Should I take meth?
Average Doctor: Nah man that's crazy.
Average Person to Dr. Lindsay: I have a heart condition. Should I take meth?
Judge: Don't answer if you have no opinion.
Dr Lindsay: I have no opinion.
😂😂😂
Could be could be could be can she not give a straight up answer when the lawyer brings up the other doctor she gets a little nervous you noticed that or is it just me?
Rest in Peace George Floyd
The woman doctor had a clear bias and motive she, she sung like a canary for prosecution and when defence got her shouldnt wouldn't even agree what is commonly considered a over size heart like Floyd had, we'll in lab they say that but blah blah not in the real world la la. She loved saying “law enforcemenr restraint caused the death”,,then nelson got her to admit if Floyd died alone with the same conditions should would probably rule it was a heart condition that caused death! When the mentioned a study of deaths involving police she showed her motive for being there, yes isn't incredible how many people die at the hands of police!
She was not credible for me at all.
All the medical experts Agree....Chauvin is..... GUILTY OF MURDER....this is not Hypothetical
Nelson grasping at straws as he's falling off a clif
I'm 100% sure reasonable doubt has already set in. No bruising on the neck or back after 9 minutes...thats really damning for the prosecution.
bruising is not always present ?!
Proving reasonable doubt, in this case, is telling the jury to not believe their eyes. Any juror knows, if their loved ones were treated as Floyd, their loved ones would perish. Additionally, if the defense is attempting "the crowd made me do it" defense...good luck.
@@1212CSmith agree
To the Villain: I am an African-American person and if I press hard on my arm, a bruise does not show as it would in a light-skin person.
@@1212CSmith My family members aren't career criminals, drug addicts, and respect police officers and wouldn't resist IF...BY SOME STRANGE OCCURRENCE be arrested. Floyd committed suicide and that's been clearly established.
It's very disingenuous to not say that the illegal drugs contributed to his death as well. That doesn't mean it still wasn't the knee to the neck that was the cause, but it makes all of these doctors look ridiculous. So many trying to act like illegal drugs are not so bad depending on how much you do when any doctor will tell you that no amount of illegal drugs are ok or safe. Even a small amount could wreak havoc on a healthy person and in any other trial this amount would be a serious concern. Just dishonest not to say that the drug use contributed to his response and panic at the very least.
Good Lord! And I’m not religious ha ha! I’m just using the explanation mark because I cannot believe that they are fishing for that!
Fishing for what?
@@berryreadable I'm with you, fishing for what?
What bout dat fish doe?
J Bird . Fishing for what?. Can you please explain? Thanks 🙏
Funny how she can tell how he died, although there's no evidence on his body, have all those answers but doesn't know if sitting on something hard would make a bruise.
Defense did a good job crossing this witness
36:00 lmao this defense is awful.
the defense is alays trying to make thing unclear so the itness seems like they don't kno for unrealaed unimportant. this guy does this the hole trial, making people feel like they appea stuipd or unsure. the facts are there
....yes facts like your spelling.
He is doing his job. What he is getting paid for. If you life was on the line, you would want this type of defense...
@@mbalmr111 i agree, Nelson is using all his strategies, as is the Prosecution, its what they are being paid for
Defense Attorney is a major league Rain Maker
Are we streaming live? And DO NOT think of me as an idiot!!! I’m Canadian living in Vietnam 🤷♀️
They will be live again in 25 mins but as of this moment no this is a replay of earlier
@J Bird is your middle finger really necessary
@@tinamarie1948 you know what Tina, you’re absolutely right and just before I read your reply, I deleted the middle finger. I wasn’t thinking. I just thought that it was funny but it wasn’t and isn’t and I do have class 🤗 ❣️
A Dr that doesn't haver an opinion on if she would prescribe certain drugs to people with certain conditions that she's supposed to be an expert in... OK then...
I wouldn't want this doctor advising me. Either way she clearly lied to me at the end there.
She doesn't treat patients, that is not her expertise. But you knew that already because you pay attention before you post comments.
Dr. Thomas was often vague and imprecise when discussing medical physiological processes leaving one with the perception that she may be a less than optimal physician.
BS‼️‼️‼️watch again‼️
I like how she Prefaces everything with an, “OOOOOhhh you know”....
she is obviously biased for the state
I'm hoping you be found guilty on all counts.for the way you police officers don't George Floyd. Justices should be serve.
She demonstrated some political bias.
☝️ I think she is wrong with regards to heart disease...you can have heart attack with mild cirrhosis..
But she didn't say George Floyd had cirrhosis Did she .. isn't cirrhosis something To do with the liver And alcoholism yellowing of the skin and eyes ??
Cirrhosis of the artery of heart. Was 75%, sadly you can have spontaneous heart attack from that
@@evelynrange7764 cirrhosis is in the liver. STENOSIS is in the heart. So many armchair doctors here getting the diagnoses mixed up.
I love how you can tell she practiced her testimony with the prosecution but when it came to the defense she hardly could speak. It makes it seem like she doesn't know what she is talking about and her credibility is shot. Apparently she thinks Canada is another world as well. When will these witnesses realize that when they don't speak the same to the defense and prosecution it makes them seem completely bias.
No it doesn't. It makes it seem like the truth: she has not heard the defense questions before. She doesn't understand what he's asking half the time because HE doesn't fully understand what he's talking about. He uses words incorrectly and comes to illogical conclusions. He thinks things work differently than they do. HE does not understand. He is obviously very smart and has studied and understood a lot, but you can't just study complicated things that are new to you and fully grasp them. His questions don't make sense.
The lawyer is the best orator I've heard , since Johnny Cochran.
Care to specify which one? You're statement is kind of vague seeing as there are number of lawyers on hand.
@@ivanrivera6998 Nelson he is fighting the cities 10 plus lawyers and he slowly fences the witness in and then he goes for the kill!
@@DashDriver-z1r It's absurd that the prosecution has so many vs defense only 1 so considering... Nelson is doing ok and there's plenty of reasonable doubt
@@DashDriver-z1r I don't dispute that he is a "good" orator because I believe he is. Although he is being overshadowed by the prosecution attorney Mr. Blackwell today admittedly. He is eating him up for lunch just as he did yesterday while cross examining Dr. Tobin.
@@ivanrivera6998 watch the full cross examination of tobin. At one point the prosecutor has tobin admit there was NO DEPRESSION whatsoever of Floyd's breathing lol
Someone needs to fix mic on this news
Completely different person being interviewed by defence. Just a confused sweet old lady with no real expertise here
Bingo.
What happened to the defenses drug theory?????? he stopped on that one, didn't he Now he's on the heart story, no keep trying you want to get paid buddy, your client got 30 years! the crystal ball shows it!
🦧 Are all forensic pathologists so strange and weird? Maybe that's because they work alone, talk to corpses and eat their lunch next to the dead bodies! Who remembers the pathologist that testified at the OJ Simpson trial, now that was a weird one, I forgot his name.
What about him resisting arrest. That's what lead up to all of this. What if he just got in the car? That's right that would have left him still a live. How stupid is that?
Exactly! All this could have been avoided. 🤦🏻♀️How hard is it to follow simple commands. I just don't get it.🤷🏻♀️
You have more hypothetical scenarios taking out the police interactions and other pertinent details as it relates to this case than the Defense lawyer himself. Pathetic at best. How about you stop looking at things from a lens coated in hypotheticals n' from one actually coated in reality we're all living in?
Unfortunately if you resist arrest, you are placed on the ground and cuffed. But at no point should a knee be placed on your neck. It's not his fault that Chauvin's knee was placed on his neck. It's not his fault Chauvin applied extreme force to his neck. It's not his fault that he died because Chauvin was on his neck for NINE minutes. It's utterly immoral and if it was your father, brother, son, I think everybody would have a different understanding that this is clearly 2nd Degree Murder.
If the officer followed his training and did not press his knee of Gorge neck he would be alive with us today.
I heard him say ok let me count to 3 and im going. He was having a panic attack and ask the cop to wait and he pushed him. Im claustrophobic, and if im not ready to go, and you put force i would be acting the same way. I hate when people say he should have stop resisting... Come on, are you human...With this lack of empathy. I ll pray for your soul, cause yours is dark.
Another biased witness.
So George Floyd had a big heart ❤️ 😔
Do people with big hearts home invade woman and stick pistols to their abdomen while getting their friends to rummage through their house? I guess so in this case.
@@Swickful I prefer to see the best in people...and in any case, he didn’t deserve to die? He should’ve had a fair trial if he committed an offence. Just like Chauvin is getting a fair trial
Enlarged some doctors would say it not this lady! Should count give a straight answer
Jesus lady 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
He wouid have had a fair trial had he gotten into the police vehicle without fighting it.
What if George simply let go??... What if his mother came to him and said let go??? So he did and felt that he could...... Broken heart syndrome...maybe he loved his mother so much....
She didn’t want to answer any of the defense questions. Her credibility has taken a massive shot and is a number zero.
I'm not sure you understand how this works.
Neither defense nor prosecution have brought up the subject of whether George Floyd's lips turned blue? Any medically qualified viewers care to comment? Thanks
Whatever the public thinks this man innocent or guilty or what have you one thing's for sure you can never be pronounce innocent nor should he sometimes filth where is many colors no matter what color it is we are all subjugated to all rules and regulations no matter who and what we are it should be interesting to see how many years he will get and how good his lawyer is what is not
59:37 ARGUMENTATIVE LOLOLOL LOLOL ITS ALL FEELINGS WITH THESE PEOPLE
All $ is not good $ I look at the defense table & I want a barf bag . Nelson is crafty & may be doing his job as counsel but not as a decent person with ethics . If he were my next door neighbor , I"d sell my house. His karma is bad😫😫
What a stupid comment
Try some chicken bone fortune telling to figure it out
YES... a murder would have a chance with Neilson as his attorney..
You have to own a home first