Dictatorships like China always attack the weakest and most fragile. It is certain that soon it will say that Bhutan has been Chinese for centuries as it does for Tibet and Xinjiang. Thanks for sharing.
Big, big difference between Bhutan and India. Bhutanese will never sell their land and country to any foreign power. Bhutanese are certainly healthier and happier than Indians AND that Bhutanese are ranking at the TOP in the world in that case. And most importantly, Bhutanese Govt. and Leaders have excellent foresight, wisdom and national interest at heart. Bhutan is a DISCIPLINED nation. Not like Indian leaders and ministers......... who in the name of progress taking orders from THE foreign power and selfish interest are ruining the future of Motherland. DO NOT COMPARE India to Bhutan.
EDIT== Some people are getting offended, and I’m not sure why. I didn’t mean anything bad or to start any clashes.EDIT 2= My parents were Tibetan refugees, and the reason I'm mentioning this is because a random guy accused me of pretending not to be Indian, claiming that I'm lying. are my feelings invalid because I side with India I don't see a reason to take China's side when they took our land and our home?//: / I saw a guy commenting a lot of wrong information saying India’s land grabbing. I’m not Indian, but I know history because I’ve studied it. Here’s all the explanation so people don’t get caught in the lies of his :Hyderabad: The princely state of Hyderabad, under the Nizam, chose to remain independent after independence. But when the Nizam sought to join Pakistan and refused to integrate with India, it led to Operation Polo in 1948, which was a military action to maintain national unity. It wasn’t annexation-it was about ensuring the survival of a unified nation. Junagadh: This region was ruled by a Muslim Nawab who wanted to join Pakistan, despite the majority Hindu population wanting to stay with India. The people of Junagadh wanted to join India, so it was an integration of their will, not a forceful annexation. Manipur and Tripura: These states were never independent in any sense you’re suggesting. Like many other princely states, they were ruled by local monarchs who chose to join India after independence. The claim that the Nagas wanted independence is misleading-the vote in the 1951 plebiscite wasn’t representative of the entire Naga population, and India did not forcefully annex these regions. They joined India through a legal and democratic process. South Tibet: The region you’re referring to as "South Tibet" is Arunachal Pradesh, which has been part of India for centuries. The Chinese claim over it is a fabrication based on their expansionist agenda. India’s control over Arunachal Pradesh is legitimate and legal. Goa: The Portuguese had no business occupying Goa after India gained independence. The Goan people, who had been under Portuguese colonial rule for centuries, were fighting for their freedom. Operation Vijay in 1961 was not an annexation-it was a liberation of Goa from a colonial power that refused to leave. The locals overwhelmingly supported this move, and India was right to act in their best interest. Kalapani, Nepal: This is a misinterpretation of the boundary issue. Kalapani, located at the tri-junction of India, Nepal, and China, has been a disputed area. India’s administration of Kalapani is based on the agreement that the region lies within its borders, and this has been supported by historical treaties. Nepal’s recent claims are politically motivated and lack historical backing. China and Pakistan Aggression: You’re talking about “India's aggression” against China, but you ignore that in 1962, China launched an unprovoked attack on India, violating the borders. India was on the defensive. Similarly, India has been at the receiving end of aggression from Pakistan, especially in 1947 and 1965, when Pakistan attempted to destabilize India through military attacks. Turtuk, Pakistan: The claim that India “annexed” Turtuk is misleading. Turtuk was part of the region India controlled after the 1947 Partition and the subsequent wars with Pakistan. It was never Pakistan's territory to begin with. Tin Bigha, Bangladesh: This was a border demarcation issue between India and Bangladesh, not an annexation. In fact, India and Bangladesh exchanged territories to improve bilateral relations, not to expand territory. Sikkim: Sikkim was a protectorate of India, and its decision to merge with India was a democratic choice. The local population wanted to join India, and it was not an imposition by the Indian government. The people of Sikkim chose to become part of India through a referendum in 1975. Attempts at Mauritius, Bhutan, Myanmar: These claims about attempts to invade Mauritius, Bhutan, and Myanmar are not only false but utterly ridiculous. India has maintained friendly relations with these countries, and there is no historical evidence of any such attempts. You’re fabricating history without any factual backing. Now, let’s talk about his claim that India "gave land to China" and that Pakistan was somehow set up to destroy India. The truth is, India never gave up land to China willingly. China forcefully took control of Aksai Chin during the 1962 war. The claim about Pakistan is also a distortion of facts-India has consistently sought peace with Pakistan, but Pakistan's constant aggression and attempts to destabilize India through terror attacks are well documented. To sum it up, what he's calling “expansionism” is actually the process of integrating various territories into a unified country post-independence, in line with the will of the people, to prevent further fragmentation and to ensure national unity. He can twist history however he likes, but facts don’t change. India didn’t grab land-it consolidated regions that were already a part of its cultural and historical heritage. So, before he passes such sweeping judgments, it’s crucial to do some actual research instead of parroting baseless claims. His statements are based on a distorted understanding of history
SINCE you are not indian but donot speak lies. I donot know about your other facts. But regarding nepal, unfortunately kalapni has been forcefully admunistered by India. You can look sugauli treaty to confirm this.
The fact that India has no history of conflict with any of its smaller neighbours like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan or Myanmar is Proof that India has always beleived in co-exitence and Peace. My HIndu Ancestors always had everyrhing, They never beleived in invading other countries and stealing from them or expanding territory. This is not what a Civilization does,This is what Barbarians do.
@@PukarSapkota-ux9pmNepal army need to step up on modernizing or at least have a treaty with china on defense...that's the only way to deoccupy kalapani...
@@goblinterminator Why are you trying forcefully to create argument. Where did I say India is weak? Even USA also has similar threat, that doesn't mean USA is weak. Don't forget to your medications regularly. So you will not end up like this.
@@RamK-bd7sg the threat to India, us and Taiwan are the same? To us challenge no 1 in the world? Is that a threat? All bricks are growing themselves considered as threat to us. Taiwan is considered a part of China by UN and countries all over the world. So India is a province of china by UN? Same threat? Or only boarder issue?
@@RamK-bd7sg The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
Using the land of your neighbor for grazing and building roads of structures on it is like fishing or drilling for oil in your neighbors EEZ. Is Prof, Lui evading the obvious parallels that we see in the West Philippines Sea?
The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
@@goblinterminatorYes , Bhutan may be an ant but there is a tiger called India behind Butan . You mess with them china will have to face Indian Army and Dhoklam experience is not very good for PLA !!
@@ManojC-f6f yes Indian contriled the poor government and messed their diplomacy. You threatened like someone powerful. Please check how the two countries ranks in all areas in the world. I am afraid of the tiger. They even have a Careier. Oh my gosh. Hahahahhahahahah
The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
@@TheGreatVivek7 You always blame people from other provinces and call them names, I assumed you were some kind of tu k de vichardhara guy. But I'm surprised to see you here defending our Bhārata!
China's land grab in Bhutan is the price the Bhutanese are now paying for not standing up to the Chinese bully. Despite the Bhutanese people having tremendous reverence for His Holiness the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan Nobel Peace Laureate, the leadership in Bhutan have never invited His Holiness to visit the Buddhist country even for purely religious purposes, for fear of offending the totalitarian Chinese regime. Bhutan also has sided with China when voting at the UN even on human rights issues relating to the suffering people in occupied Tibet. Unfortunately, all these China appeasing seems to have been in vain!
Please don’t say Bhutan China Bhutan. There was no China Bhutan border for thousands of years, it only happened only after the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950. The correct way to say would be China occupied Tibet border or Bhutan Tibet Border. You are just repeating the CCP dictates.
Roger disqualified himself whatever his insinuations. Taiwan (ROC) maintains claims based on the original map and controls the Dongsha (Pratas) Islands and Taiping (Itu Aba) Island, the largest feature in the Spratlys. Under Ma Ying-jeou, Taiwan actively promoted these claims, including through a 2015 exhibition and the publication Compilation of Historical Archives of the Southern Territories of the Republic of China.
Taiwan is Bhutanese best friend .we going to Taiwan and they coming in our country Bhutan.we love taiwanese.they are very highly developed country but they staying very humble ❤ Taiwan.
It's the time UN and other countries should think of the situation. How small and poor counties will survive, if powerful country threatening sovereign country.
Every country needs to save Bhutan of being a scapegoat for indian suppression. Bhutan should focus on developing robust infrastructure and improving road connectivity. A strong friendship between Bhutan and China, similar to the Nepal-China relationship, should be fostered. 🇨🇳🇧🇹
@@alonewarrior7612 China didn't grave Bhutans territory but Endia occupied Kashmir, Zangnan, Khalistan and Northeast union. They will be free soon from Endia. 🇮🇳
@@saanjanibaar8085 What are you smoking my man. The whole territory is named Indian subcontinent for a reason. From the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean everything in between is Indian territory. We don't need to annex any territory. It belongs to India and Indians live in these areas.
That’s good. We in Nepal prefer Chinese influence over Indian to be honest ! China never interfered with Nepali business but india played snake 🐍 with us.
I just don't get the obsession with being 3rd-4th largest country in area size (China) and still wanting more. That's sick man. I am Indian . And i have worked with many chinese , all wonderful people. But this kind of shit is not good. India is not building any kind of military base in Bhutan or Nepal for that matter. They know they can snub Bhutan , and they are doing exactly that. I am very sorry for people Bhutan or even china for that matter.
I'm not Indian but now how is it india's fault? As far as I know except few countries no one took India's side in terms of land occupied by China and areas they are clamming as theirs( sorry if I said something wrong ) and if India has failed as a neighbor , what bout china, and as far i saw on blogs and articles it was bhutan itself who negotiated with china, apart this I hope that something can be done to stop china,
Bhutan mustn't talk at all with china. They don't care about their own treaty & promises. Look , recent example Hong Kong. Where is the treaty between great Britain & china ? Tibet was illegally occupied due to corrupt kudaks ( aristocrats ) in Tibet. Kudaks enjoyed Tibetan tax for silk clothes & party. Even ccp soldiers reached chamdo ( near the border of ustang ) , and they ( kudaks ) were partying .
The current dispute between China and Bhutan should not be characterized as land grab by China. China and Bhutan are just resolving their territorial disputes. Actually, the land grab was done by British Raj and India inherited the ill-got gained territories, instead of giving them back to the rightful owners.
India was the first country to recognise PRC as a non-socialist bloc country. India is repaid with the Chinese style gratitude. Any dog is loyal and grateful, that’s why the Chinese despise dogs 😂
India did recognize the People's Republic of China (PRC) early on, but the relationship has been far from simple. While India extended diplomatic recognition, China's actions, especially after the 1962 war, have shown a different side of the relationship. It's important to separate political actions from national character-generalizing like this only stirs up unnecessary animosity. The key here is to focus on mutual respect and diplomacy, not resorting to derogatory comparisons.
@ So CCP’s China has explicitly broken all diplomacy you’re talking about by always being the perpetrators in breaking into territory 🤷🏻 2020,2021, 2022, and 2024 August. India is not behind a firewall and the federal government is not oblivious to facts. Beijing has been manufacturing anti-India narratives on the internet which was discovered by India’s foreign intelligence R&AW. People are not stupid to go along with this. Indian stock exchange, which is the first stock exchange in Asia, has been reporting average profits above 20% for Fdi since the inception of it. Numerous groups and countries will come together if China fires even a single bullet. Apart from the emotions: China never showed diplomacy, never tried to be a friend, never any gratitude. CCP’s China should be happy that India is not changing Free Tibet or Free HK every single day.
Bhutan revised the foreign affairs treaty with India and developed close ties with China so the Bhutanese are solely responsible for their own problem.
Well what are you supposed to do when you are landlocked between two super powers with nuclear powers and billions in arms, and both sides are posing treaties for their own benefits, pressurising our sovereignty
Isnt the buffer zone between China and India sadly fast disappering at this rate of rapid authorised expansion under the viel of bringing development in the buffer zones.
INDIA has most human resources which no other countries have.That is the greatest asset we have. In any major international platform we have our Indian spy or diplomat who recovers all information before in hand.
Why don’t interview leaders of Bhutan & China, rather than choosing Indian problem makers ? We Bhutanese can speak on our behalf, we don’t need someone shit talk on our behalf.
This is not the time to sleep. Or, neglect such issues. Or, only be dependent on our government and sainiks. Never trust china. With a group try, to donate atleast, *1rupee perday to our sainiks and farmers.* We, friends have donated rs.9 lakh 60 thousand rupees in the last 7 years. Jay hind 🙏💐🚩🇮🇳
So funny! You have not yet lensed through other window dude! A small alteration from Bhutan's side will bring a huge cost to Inda. Didn't you realize it? Bhutan is not a part of India! Listen carefully and analyze it why I'm stating this. Jaga Choe!
One dictator bullying another dictator. Bhutan is building a tourist city on the land where Nepali-speaking minorities were forcibly displaced deploying armies night after night three decades ago. What goes around comes around. Taiwan talk, please cover that topic of Bhutanese minorities displacement.
First, speak only if you know the real story, there are so many bhutan nepalis residing in Bhutan and they are very happy there, the ones that were chased away were the ones who went against Bhutan, and tried to be friends with alphabodo and capture Bhutan.
If India counter and expose China more aggressively then Bhutan, Arunachal will soon have a same fate as of Tibbet. If Chinese control the chicken neck then they will immediately enter their military in Arunachal and say India either give Arunachal or forget all the seven states including Arunachal.
Title suggest China moved the lines but in truth Bhutan and China had a diplomatic talk and both countries accepted. Similar to Alaska bought by USA from Russian Empire.
India is having more stake over Butan and Indian business people already have most of the business establishments like shops, big hotels, restaurants, .. and many Bihari, haryana, Gujarati, punjabi people living like Bhutanese and India is giving security assistance, strategy partnership, political security and associates to Butan, since Butan is not capable of having and handling these . Butan is more dependent of India. Indian Beurocrats and administrative services are playing high roles in Butan.
By the way, What did India do when China was building settlements in Bhutan? India is suppose to be the Big brother of Bhutan and now that 2 percent of Bhutan land is chinese territories .why did India not stop that settlements in Bhutan ?
We’re all seeing the mid-1930s imperial-Japan playbook being dusted off and employed all over again. this time by the Middle Kingdom. Do you all remember what happened in the course of the following decade? Is that what the world wants to see??
Total bs as a Sri Lankan ' seems China & India getting closer to each other .. how cosy .. for buiseness economic's culteral exchanges & Progressive success...' all these so called experts can't even pronounce the names of these areas em talking about ... bollocks ..
Why Indian speaking in Bhutan's stead; the very reflection of Bhutanese sovereignty is flaunted by India. Shoud have Bhutanese representatives to argue the diplomatic position .THIS IS IRONIC." GOOD TO GIVE UP SOVEREIGNTY TO INDIA RATHER THAN CHINA?"
What a fun ! Is there any Bhutanese guest present to talk about Bhutan? Fact is, bhutan cannot make any foreign relation without indian approval. Practically it's status is almost similar to any indian state. If u want to talk about Bhutanese sovereignty better talk about unlawful indian influence in Bhutan.
Even after having large landmass of their own chinese still want to expand their territories. Just wait for another 10 years max you will get to know this consequences.
Great coverage , can we do an episode on IndiaTaiwan defence cooperation current state , opportunities and specially Taiwan's dependence on USA and opportunity to diversify with India
The fact that India is not a permanent UNSC member is a blessing for the entire world. My condolences to all the victims who suffered and died because of the |ndian regime. Land grabbing and expansionist |ndia since 1947 independence. 1947 Annexation of Kashmir 1948 Annexation of Hyderabad 1948 Annexation of Junagadh 1949 Annexation of Manipur 1949 Annexation of Tripura 1951 Annexation of South Tibet 1951 Nagaland plebiscite - 99.9% of the Nagas wanted independence from India 1961 Annexation of Goa 1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal 1962 Aggression against China 1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan 1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh 1975 Annexation of Sikkim (the whole country) 1983 (Aborted) Attempted invasion of Mauritius 1990 (Failed) Attempted annexation of Bhutan 2006 Annexation of Duars, Bhutan 2013 Annexation of Moreh, Myanmar
Look, I’m not Indian, but I’ve got to call out the glaring inaccuracies in your statement. First off, to say that India is an "expansionist" state is laughable when you fail to understand the actual historical context behind each of these regions. You seem to have misunderstood or conveniently ignored key facts. Hyderabad: The princely state of Hyderabad, under the Nizam, chose to remain independent after independence. But when the Nizam sought to join Pakistan and refused to integrate with India, it led to Operation Polo in 1948, which was a military action to maintain national unity. It wasn’t annexation-it was about ensuring the survival of a unified nation. Junagadh: This region was ruled by a Muslim Nawab who wanted to join Pakistan, despite the majority Hindu population wanting to stay with India. The people of Junagadh wanted to join India, so it was an integration of their will, not a forceful annexation. Manipur and Tripura: These states were never independent in any sense you’re suggesting. Like many other princely states, they were ruled by local monarchs who chose to join India after independence. The claim that the Nagas wanted independence is misleading-the vote in the 1951 plebiscite wasn’t representative of the entire Naga population, and India did not forcefully annex these regions. They joined India through a legal and democratic process. South Tibet: The region you’re referring to as "South Tibet" is Arunachal Pradesh, which has been part of India for centuries. The Chinese claim over it is a fabrication based on their expansionist agenda. India’s control over Arunachal Pradesh is legitimate and legal. Goa: The Portuguese had no business occupying Goa after India gained independence. The Goan people, who had been under Portuguese colonial rule for centuries, were fighting for their freedom. Operation Vijay in 1961 was not an annexation-it was a liberation of Goa from a colonial power that refused to leave. The locals overwhelmingly supported this move, and India was right to act in their best interest. Kalapani, Nepal: This is a misinterpretation of the boundary issue. Kalapani, located at the tri-junction of India, Nepal, and China, has been a disputed area. India’s administration of Kalapani is based on the agreement that the region lies within its borders, and this has been supported by historical treaties. Nepal’s recent claims are politically motivated and lack historical backing. China and Pakistan Aggression: You’re talking about “India's aggression” against China, but you ignore that in 1962, China launched an unprovoked attack on India, violating the borders. India was on the defensive. Similarly, India has been at the receiving end of aggression from Pakistan, especially in 1947 and 1965, when Pakistan attempted to destabilize India through military attacks. Turtuk, Pakistan: The claim that India “annexed” Turtuk is misleading. Turtuk was part of the region India controlled after the 1947 Partition and the subsequent wars with Pakistan. It was never Pakistan's territory to begin with. Tin Bigha, Bangladesh: This was a border demarcation issue between India and Bangladesh, not an annexation. In fact, India and Bangladesh exchanged territories to improve bilateral relations, not to expand territory. Sikkim: Sikkim was a protectorate of India, and its decision to merge with India was a democratic choice. The local population wanted to join India, and it was not an imposition by the Indian government. The people of Sikkim chose to become part of India through a referendum in 1975. Attempts at Mauritius, Bhutan, Myanmar: These claims about attempts to invade Mauritius, Bhutan, and Myanmar are not only false but utterly ridiculous. India has maintained friendly relations with these countries, and there is no historical evidence of any such attempts. You’re fabricating history without any factual backing. Now, let’s talk about your claim that India "gave land to China" and that Pakistan was somehow set up to destroy India. The truth is, India never gave up land to China willingly. China forcefully took control of Aksai Chin during the 1962 war. The claim about Pakistan is also a distortion of facts-India has consistently sought peace with Pakistan, but Pakistan's constant aggression and attempts to destabilize India through terror attacks are well documented. To sum it up, what you're calling “expansionism” is actually the process of integrating various territories into a unified country post-independence, in line with the will of the people, to prevent further fragmentation and to ensure national unity. You can twist history however you like, but facts don’t change. India didn’t grab land-it consolidated regions that were already a part of its cultural and historical heritage. So, before you pass such sweeping judgments, it’s crucial to do some actual research instead of parroting baseless claims. Your statements are based on a distorted understanding of history
@@bloxpop5253 I randomly selected Manipur for a simple research. There was an alternative fact - On September 21, 1949, the Maharaja of Manipur was forced to sign the Manipur Merger Agreement with the Union of India. How can I trust the rest of your facts?
@@liarliar3412 The Maharaja of Manipur, Bodhachandra Singh, ruled a culturally rich kingdom and even established the Manipur State Constitution Act to modernize governance. After independence, he signed the Instrument of Accession in 1947, aligning with India for defense and foreign policy. By 1949, faced with political realities and the need for unity, he signed the Manipur Merger Agreement-not at gunpoint, but as part of the process to create a cohesive nation. Plenty of princely states ruled by royal families merged with India-Hyderabad, Junagadh, and Sikkim included. It’s called building a nation, not coercion. If you think “pressure” invalidates the decision, maybe research how the British pressured half the world into submission. History isn’t about cherry-picking narratives to fit your bias. Stop twisting facts
@@bloxpop5253 It's hard to conclude that the alternative facts were twisted, just like nobody knows if the sources where you pulled the facts from were accurate.
It’s IP is in England and if you watched there ceremony and the symbol and compare symbol you either think they’re competiting or it’s occult for them, both ways.
Wt.about India's strangle hold of the Bhutanese foreign policy since its inception?Woefully Bhutan deals literally with the rest of the wotld through India.
When I see such people interview I feel sorry because why there is always negative towards China be positive. But I like anchor how she talks with patient way.
why occupied Tibet by CCP China is not raised in this programme discussion, its so biased in today’s world. Despite everyone knows/every neigbouring countries around Tibet before 1960s. Well it does not matter if you guys not raise it. Facts remains the same and unbreakable history. We can not change the history. People should raise the every issue not only favouring to their own county. It’s all political game, nothing else.
Dictatorships like China always attack the weakest and most fragile. It is certain that soon it will say that Bhutan has been Chinese for centuries as it does for Tibet and Xinjiang. Thanks for sharing.
It shows who is the Alpha in the arena. Might is right. 🇨🇳🇨🇳💪
@@saanjanibaar8085 Are you pro-dictatorship?
@@saanjanibaar8085 Your brain is fried by the propaganda of your dictatorship. Go get yourself treated.
@@saanjanibaar8085If India shows might in Kashmir you guys start crying😂
@@alonewarrior7612 what might you are talking about Pjeeetman?
8:12 *Thanks 🙏 to Taiwan talks team for using "correct map 🗺️ of INDIA" sending love💕 from India🇮🇳💫*
This is another fake news. Bhutan is under control of india
its west strategy to show incorrect Indian map
@ankushzap *“I couldn't agree with you more”*
India , Bhutan, Tibet we are all one. We are not Chinese . Jay Hind 🇮🇳🙏
Comady
@@aslamvakathanam2383 says a Chinese puppy😂
@@A_T492 china is best than our india
Big, big difference between Bhutan and India. Bhutanese will never sell their land and country to any foreign power. Bhutanese are certainly healthier and happier than Indians AND that Bhutanese are ranking at the TOP in the world in that case. And most importantly, Bhutanese Govt. and Leaders have excellent foresight, wisdom and national interest at heart. Bhutan is a DISCIPLINED nation. Not like Indian leaders and ministers......... who in the name of progress taking orders from THE foreign power and selfish interest are ruining the future of Motherland. DO NOT COMPARE India to Bhutan.
you trying to say bhutan and tibet are indians?
EDIT== Some people are getting offended, and I’m not sure why. I didn’t mean anything bad or to start any clashes.EDIT 2= My parents were Tibetan refugees, and the reason I'm mentioning this is because a random guy accused me of pretending not to be Indian, claiming that I'm lying. are my feelings invalid because I side with India I don't see a reason to take China's side when they took our land and our home?//:
/ I saw a guy commenting a lot of wrong information saying India’s land grabbing. I’m not Indian, but I know history because I’ve studied it. Here’s all the explanation so people don’t get caught in the lies of his :Hyderabad: The princely state of Hyderabad, under the Nizam, chose to remain independent after independence. But when the Nizam sought to join Pakistan and refused to integrate with India, it led to Operation Polo in 1948, which was a military action to maintain national unity. It wasn’t annexation-it was about ensuring the survival of a unified nation.
Junagadh: This region was ruled by a Muslim Nawab who wanted to join Pakistan, despite the majority Hindu population wanting to stay with India. The people of Junagadh wanted to join India, so it was an integration of their will, not a forceful annexation.
Manipur and Tripura: These states were never independent in any sense you’re suggesting. Like many other princely states, they were ruled by local monarchs who chose to join India after independence. The claim that the Nagas wanted independence is misleading-the vote in the 1951 plebiscite wasn’t representative of the entire Naga population, and India did not forcefully annex these regions. They joined India through a legal and democratic process.
South Tibet: The region you’re referring to as "South Tibet" is Arunachal Pradesh, which has been part of India for centuries. The Chinese claim over it is a fabrication based on their expansionist agenda. India’s control over Arunachal Pradesh is legitimate and legal.
Goa: The Portuguese had no business occupying Goa after India gained independence. The Goan people, who had been under Portuguese colonial rule for centuries, were fighting for their freedom. Operation Vijay in 1961 was not an annexation-it was a liberation of Goa from a colonial power that refused to leave. The locals overwhelmingly supported this move, and India was right to act in their best interest.
Kalapani, Nepal: This is a misinterpretation of the boundary issue. Kalapani, located at the tri-junction of India, Nepal, and China, has been a disputed area. India’s administration of Kalapani is based on the agreement that the region lies within its borders, and this has been supported by historical treaties. Nepal’s recent claims are politically motivated and lack historical backing.
China and Pakistan Aggression: You’re talking about “India's aggression” against China, but you ignore that in 1962, China launched an unprovoked attack on India, violating the borders. India was on the defensive. Similarly, India has been at the receiving end of aggression from Pakistan, especially in 1947 and 1965, when Pakistan attempted to destabilize India through military attacks.
Turtuk, Pakistan: The claim that India “annexed” Turtuk is misleading. Turtuk was part of the region India controlled after the 1947 Partition and the subsequent wars with Pakistan. It was never Pakistan's territory to begin with.
Tin Bigha, Bangladesh: This was a border demarcation issue between India and Bangladesh, not an annexation. In fact, India and Bangladesh exchanged territories to improve bilateral relations, not to expand territory.
Sikkim: Sikkim was a protectorate of India, and its decision to merge with India was a democratic choice. The local population wanted to join India, and it was not an imposition by the Indian government. The people of Sikkim chose to become part of India through a referendum in 1975.
Attempts at Mauritius, Bhutan, Myanmar: These claims about attempts to invade Mauritius, Bhutan, and Myanmar are not only false but utterly ridiculous. India has maintained friendly relations with these countries, and there is no historical evidence of any such attempts. You’re fabricating history without any factual backing.
Now, let’s talk about his claim that India "gave land to China" and that Pakistan was somehow set up to destroy India. The truth is, India never gave up land to China willingly. China forcefully took control of Aksai Chin during the 1962 war. The claim about Pakistan is also a distortion of facts-India has consistently sought peace with Pakistan, but Pakistan's constant aggression and attempts to destabilize India through terror attacks are well documented.
To sum it up, what he's calling “expansionism” is actually the process of integrating various territories into a unified country post-independence, in line with the will of the people, to prevent further fragmentation and to ensure national unity. He can twist history however he likes, but facts don’t change. India didn’t grab land-it consolidated regions that were already a part of its cultural and historical heritage.
So, before he passes such sweeping judgments, it’s crucial to do some actual research instead of parroting baseless claims. His statements are based on a distorted understanding of history
Well kalapani has been always part of Nepal. BUT nepal can not do anything about it since nepal is very much dependent on INDIA
SINCE you are not indian but donot speak lies. I donot know about your other facts. But regarding nepal, unfortunately kalapni has been forcefully admunistered by India. You can look sugauli treaty to confirm this.
The fact that India has no history of conflict with any of its smaller neighbours like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan or Myanmar is Proof that India has always beleived in co-exitence and Peace. My HIndu Ancestors always had everyrhing, They never beleived in invading other countries and stealing from them or expanding territory. This is not what a Civilization does,This is what Barbarians do.
@@PukarSapkota-ux9pmNepal army need to step up on modernizing or at least have a treaty with china on defense...that's the only way to deoccupy kalapani...
@@BijayBaruwal-ck1tx China has already built villages on Nepali territory and taken over bordering villages inside Nepal. So good luck with that! Lol
I truly thanks to the Taiwan and their people. They really understand the Chinese threat to Taiwan and India also.
So you think India is weak as that island?
@@goblinterminator Why are you trying forcefully to create argument. Where did I say India is weak? Even USA also has similar threat, that doesn't mean USA is weak. Don't forget to your medications regularly. So you will not end up like this.
@@RamK-bd7sg the threat to India, us and Taiwan are the same?
To us challenge no 1 in the world? Is that a threat? All bricks are growing themselves considered as threat to us.
Taiwan is considered a part of China by UN and countries all over the world.
So India is a province of china by UN? Same threat? Or only boarder issue?
No thanks.
@@RamK-bd7sg The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
Using the land of your neighbor for grazing and building roads of structures on it is like fishing or drilling for oil in your neighbors EEZ. Is Prof, Lui evading the obvious parallels that we see in the West Philippines Sea?
I hope indian indian government look into these matters and save bhutan from chinese aggression 😮😮😮❤❤
Don't worry China will save Bhutan from Indian occupation.
The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
India mey first so many problems..is there political... financial... doesn't see
@@downtomars6268 who are Chinese communists with their short heights to save Bhutan?
@@downtomars6268 focus on consuming gutter oil
Insane! For the longest time Bhutan didn’t even recognize China as a country!
Yes, ants didn’t think elephant is an anymore
@@goblinterminatorYes , Bhutan may be an ant but there is a tiger called India behind Butan . You mess with them china will have to face Indian Army and Dhoklam experience is not very good for PLA !!
@@ManojC-f6f yes Indian contriled the poor government and messed their diplomacy.
You threatened like someone powerful. Please check how the two countries ranks in all areas in the world.
I am afraid of the tiger. They even have a Careier. Oh my gosh. Hahahahhahahahah
@@ManojC-f6f stop spreading hatred info in the channel, I am against fake news from Taiwan, not time to waste with your nonsense
@@ManojC-f6fReally...LOL...
Soon China will declare Bhutan as its territory since ancient times.
They’re notoriously known for that.
India claims Bhutan as a colony and claims Bhutan territory.
The history Bollywood won’t tell you:1. Around 1500 BC, the Aryans entered colonial India from the Khyber Pass and created the caste system; 2. At the end of the 6th century BC, the Persians defeated the Aryans and began to colonize India; 3. In 327 BC, the Macedonians Colonize India; 4. Beginning in the early 2nd century BC, Bactrian Greeks, Cypriots and Parthians invaded India; 5. In the 2nd century BC, the Yuezhi people who nomadically lived in the Hexi Corridor invaded India; 6. In the middle of the 1st century AD , the Kushan Xihou Tribe, one of the five Xihous of the Dayue clan, unified the five tribes and invaded India to establish the Kushan Empire; 7. In the 5th century AD, the descendants of the Central Asian Ser race and the Dayue clan of the Han Dynasty colonized India; 8 , from the 7th century AD, peoples dominated by Islamic culture began to invade India continuously; 9. In the 8th century AD, the Arab Empire occupied India; 10. In the 11th century AD, the Islamic Turks invaded India; 11. In 1526, the Mongols Colonized India and established the Mughal Empire; 12, the British...There is no India in the world, only colonies of the British Empire. India is the longest colonized region in the world, having been colonized for more than 2,800 years.Most Indians don’t even know where they are from when they look in the mirror.After the British left, they left behind beggars on the streets.
Nah as a indian it don't@@downtomars6268
@@downtomars6268The Indians tell so many lies and also said that China occupied a lot of their land
Don't worry, India has long long history. India in its place when history starts and will be when history ends. Om shanti
Well Bhutan did it to itself. Their last PM had close ties with China and this is how China treats its allies
Oh you are a rashtrawadi as well. Who would have thought!
@ Wdym
@@TheGreatVivek7 You don't know what rashtrawadi means?
@@varun2250 seedhi Baat kar, baat ko ghuma mat
@@TheGreatVivek7 You always blame people from other provinces and call them names, I assumed you were some kind of tu k de vichardhara guy.
But I'm surprised to see you here defending our Bhārata!
China's land grab in Bhutan is the price the Bhutanese are now paying for not standing up to the Chinese bully. Despite the Bhutanese people having tremendous reverence for His Holiness the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan Nobel Peace Laureate, the leadership in Bhutan have never invited His Holiness to visit the Buddhist country even for purely religious purposes, for fear of offending the totalitarian Chinese regime. Bhutan also has sided with China when voting at the UN even on human rights issues relating to the suffering people in occupied Tibet. Unfortunately, all these China appeasing seems to have been in vain!
Might be because of the fact that the Dalai Lama's supporters tried to assasinate the fourth King right after his coronation.
Why did you lose your country if you knew how to preach to us? Please question yourself before you point on us
Please don’t say Bhutan China Bhutan. There was no China Bhutan border for thousands of years, it only happened only after the Chinese occupation of Tibet in 1950. The correct way to say would be China occupied Tibet border or Bhutan Tibet Border. You are just repeating the CCP dictates.
India should have done something against this Salami Slicing policy of China.Since it is so well documented.
This is the cost of 75 years of socialism Bharat has to bear. But no worries the future seems to bright and capitalistic.
Save Hindus and minorities in Bangladesh
India's ill motive to grab Bangladesh's land and port by spreading false hindu muslim propaganda.
No
Long live indian indigenous communities. Indo European has been colonizing Indian indigenous
Dragon always creating problem against neighbhours with ill intention
The new China flag does not have dragon anymore, but Bhutan flag does have a dragon.
China 🐉⚡ super power
This is unacceptable. Nobody dare harm the peaceful paradise that is Bhutan. Im moving there after retirement.
Roger disqualified himself whatever his insinuations.
Taiwan (ROC) maintains claims based on the original map and controls the Dongsha (Pratas) Islands and Taiping (Itu Aba) Island, the largest feature in the Spratlys.
Under Ma Ying-jeou, Taiwan actively promoted these claims, including through a 2015 exhibition and the publication Compilation of Historical Archives of the Southern Territories of the Republic of China.
Taiwan is Bhutanese best friend .we going to Taiwan and they coming in our country Bhutan.we love taiwanese.they are very highly developed country but they staying very humble ❤ Taiwan.
hopping UN and nations around china taking actions about chinese expansion territory
@@mackelremz3330 what you mean, UNO is communist Chinese Puppet…..
It's the time UN and other countries should think of the situation. How small and poor counties will survive, if powerful country threatening sovereign country.
Every country needs to save Bhutan of being a scapegoat for indian suppression. Bhutan should focus on developing robust infrastructure and improving road connectivity. A strong friendship between Bhutan and China, similar to the Nepal-China relationship, should be fostered. 🇨🇳🇧🇹
Proactive boarder petroling, increase in border infra funding, increased defense expenses is the only option.
@@saanjanibaar8085 China is grabbing Bhutan's land but they need to be saved from India 😂
@@alonewarrior7612 China didn't grave Bhutans territory but Endia occupied Kashmir, Zangnan, Khalistan and Northeast union. They will be free soon from Endia. 🇮🇳
@@saanjanibaar8085 What are you smoking my man. The whole territory is named Indian subcontinent for a reason. From the Himalayas to the Indian Ocean everything in between is Indian territory. We don't need to annex any territory. It belongs to India and Indians live in these areas.
Just like sri lanka and china relation😂😂😂
That’s good. We in Nepal prefer Chinese influence over Indian to be honest ! China never interfered with Nepali business but india played snake 🐍 with us.
Any further occupation may lead Bhutan giving all strategic land in bhutan to India our true big brother.
No one can tack over the land of thunder dragon 🐉
Beautiful to see. Help build a better life for those people to live. Don't worry about haters they will always have negative things to say.
The lady Anchor from China Talks speaks very well.Her delivery of news is clear and understandable.
Her accent is very good.
There is no border in between China and Bhutan. Border in between Tibet and Bhutan, China occupied Tibet….
Namaste Taiwan
#SAVE_BANGLADESHI_HINDUS
The funny part is that you hear this from Taiwan, rather than Bhutan.
Complete fiction 🙂
Exactly
Very very important talks as world should be aware of this our small nation ( Bhutan)Northern boarder problems. Thanks to Taiwan talks
I just don't get the obsession with being 3rd-4th largest country in area size (China) and still wanting more. That's sick man. I am Indian . And i have worked with many chinese , all wonderful people. But this kind of shit is not good. India is not building any kind of military base in Bhutan or Nepal for that matter. They know they can snub Bhutan , and they are doing exactly that. I am very sorry for people Bhutan or even china for that matter.
There's a border agreement clause between India and China that settled civilian villages will not be disturbed. This is about that.
Indians as Neighbor had failed to defend bhutan against chinese aggression 🤦🏼
nah the bhutanese have given in to chinese hence the issue.
@ even the indians have given in to china
Then how a tiny bhutan can defend itself 🤦🏼
I'm not Indian but now how is it india's fault? As far as I know except few countries no one took India's side in terms of land occupied by China and areas they are clamming as theirs( sorry if I said something wrong ) and if India has failed as a neighbor , what bout china, and as far i saw on blogs and articles it was bhutan itself who negotiated with china, apart this I hope that something can be done to stop china,
@@bloxpop5253at last someone logical here !
india stole sikkim, bhutan knows who is the crook. China is a better friend. 😆
Great to see you 3 again. ❤❤❤
Bhutan mustn't talk at all with china. They don't care about their own treaty & promises. Look , recent example Hong Kong. Where is the treaty between great Britain & china ? Tibet was illegally occupied due to corrupt kudaks ( aristocrats ) in Tibet. Kudaks enjoyed Tibetan tax for silk clothes & party. Even ccp soldiers reached chamdo ( near the border of ustang ) , and they ( kudaks ) were partying .
The current dispute between China and Bhutan should not be characterized as land grab by China. China and Bhutan are just resolving their territorial disputes. Actually, the land grab was done by British Raj and India inherited the ill-got gained territories, instead of giving them back to the rightful owners.
China didn't even share the border with India Nepal or Bhutan until the CCP illegally captured Tibet..
PRC bot!
Haha actually it's opposite here in southasia India is always aggressors@@weaverlforest6454
You report is showing top of Indian map, China doesn’t belong to Tibet. Tibet has own map and separated country.
India was the first country to recognise PRC as a non-socialist bloc country. India is repaid with the Chinese style gratitude.
Any dog is loyal and grateful, that’s why the Chinese despise dogs 😂
India did recognize the People's Republic of China (PRC) early on, but the relationship has been far from simple. While India extended diplomatic recognition, China's actions, especially after the 1962 war, have shown a different side of the relationship. It's important to separate political actions from national character-generalizing like this only stirs up unnecessary animosity. The key here is to focus on mutual respect and diplomacy, not resorting to derogatory comparisons.
@ So CCP’s China has explicitly broken all diplomacy you’re talking about by always being the perpetrators in breaking into territory 🤷🏻 2020,2021, 2022, and 2024 August. India is not behind a firewall and the federal government is not oblivious to facts. Beijing has been manufacturing anti-India narratives on the internet which was discovered by India’s foreign intelligence R&AW. People are not stupid to go along with this. Indian stock exchange, which is the first stock exchange in Asia, has been reporting average profits above 20% for Fdi since the inception of it. Numerous groups and countries will come together if China fires even a single bullet. Apart from the emotions: China never showed diplomacy, never tried to be a friend, never any gratitude. CCP’s China should be happy that India is not changing Free Tibet or Free HK every single day.
Bhutan revised the foreign affairs treaty with India and developed close ties with China so the Bhutanese are solely responsible for their own problem.
Turns out it isn’t just Bhutan’s problem, well at least not the chicken neck.
Well what are you supposed to do when you are landlocked between two super powers with nuclear powers and billions in arms, and both sides are posing treaties for their own benefits, pressurising our sovereignty
@@Bay-tshugChina always back stabs, like 1962, tawang, 1967 tsarlangla, India doesent.
@@Bay-tshug India want bhutan soverignity.....can't see their land occupied...Save Bhutan
Taiwan doesn't accept Kashmir as Indian part.
Even arunachal
Whatever resolution it may be should bring peace for whole world. Please always be right and remain peace
Isnt the buffer zone between China and India sadly fast disappering at this rate of rapid authorised expansion under the viel of bringing development in the buffer zones.
Taiwan never had good diplomatic relations between China and who is neighbours country but going after Bhutan China India. I am 😊😊😊😊😊
INDIA has most human resources which no other countries have.That is the greatest asset we have. In any major international platform we have our Indian spy or diplomat who recovers all information before in hand.
Why don’t interview leaders of Bhutan & China, rather than choosing Indian problem makers ?
We Bhutanese can speak on our behalf, we don’t need someone shit talk on our behalf.
This is not the time to sleep. Or, neglect such issues. Or, only be dependent on our government and sainiks. Never trust china.
With a group try, to donate atleast, *1rupee perday to our sainiks and farmers.* We, friends have donated rs.9 lakh 60 thousand rupees in the last 7 years.
Jay hind 🙏💐🚩🇮🇳
That is not disputed area, that land solely belong to Bhutan
In practical Bhutan is a part of India. Bhutan is totally controlled by India. Indian armies are in Bhutan territories to protect Bhutan.
tehy maybe there to protect, which is good thing if they are helping but I think its wrong to say bhutan is part of india
Indian protecting 😂😂😂 Bhutan
So funny! You have not yet lensed through other window dude! A small alteration from Bhutan's side will bring a huge cost to Inda. Didn't you realize it? Bhutan is not a part of India!
Listen carefully and analyze it why I'm stating this. Jaga Choe!
It would be beneficial for you to discuss India’s expansion in Sikkim in 1975, during which it captured land from China at the border.
One dictator bullying another dictator. Bhutan is building a tourist city on the land where Nepali-speaking minorities were forcibly displaced deploying armies night after night three decades ago. What goes around comes around. Taiwan talk, please cover that topic of Bhutanese minorities displacement.
China is great nation I have ever seen 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
Bhutan also expelled 100'000 Nepalese out n grabbed their land too..Karma
First, speak only if you know the real story, there are so many bhutan nepalis residing in Bhutan and they are very happy there, the ones that were chased away were the ones who went against Bhutan, and tried to be friends with alphabodo and capture Bhutan.
Haha true
Taiwan dont worry...you will have India come to your aid if China engages in any misadventure. ❤
If India counter and expose China more aggressively then Bhutan, Arunachal will soon have a same fate as of Tibbet.
If Chinese control the chicken neck then they will immediately enter their military in Arunachal and say India either give Arunachal or forget all the seven states including Arunachal.
Bhutan admire China's economic success and advocate for stronger ties.
You wish. We want nothing to do with China
Bull shit lol. China is a single thought dictatorship, no win/win. We obey or we disappear.
Generally, Bhutan seeks balance with its larger neighbors China and India in order to avoid dependency on either country.
@@johnny-ih5es Lol China is a single thought dictatorship, no win/win. We obey or we disappear.
@@johnny-ih5es Lol China is a single thought dictatorship, no win/win. We obey or we disappear.
CPP BOT HAS ALREADY ARRIVED ❤🎉🎉🎉
Title suggest China moved the lines but in truth Bhutan and China had a diplomatic talk and both countries accepted. Similar to Alaska bought by USA from Russian Empire.
Good channel. Smooth presentation and presenter.
Like in Doklam India should stop Chinese land grab in northern Bhutan
Support Bhutan,
India is having more stake over Butan and Indian business people already have most of the business establishments like shops, big hotels, restaurants, .. and many Bihari, haryana, Gujarati, punjabi people living like Bhutanese and India is giving security assistance, strategy partnership, political security and associates to Butan, since Butan is not capable of having and handling these . Butan is more dependent of India. Indian Beurocrats and administrative services are playing high roles in Butan.
China is so hungry that after eating all the insects and animals, they are now planning to eat the land too.😂😂😂😂
Reporter should be fare and honest and bring fact news. We are not under the Chinese
By the way, What did India do when China was building settlements in Bhutan? India is suppose to be the Big brother of Bhutan and now that 2 percent of Bhutan land is chinese territories .why did India not stop that settlements in Bhutan ?
We’re all seeing the mid-1930s imperial-Japan playbook being dusted off and employed all over again.
this time by the Middle Kingdom.
Do you all remember what happened in the course of the following decade?
Is that what the world wants to see??
imperial expansion
Namste 🙏🙏🙏 taiwan
Total bs as a Sri Lankan ' seems China & India getting closer to each other .. how cosy .. for buiseness economic's culteral exchanges & Progressive success...' all these so called experts can't even pronounce the names of these areas em talking about ... bollocks ..
Why Indian speaking in Bhutan's stead; the very reflection of Bhutanese sovereignty is flaunted by India. Shoud have Bhutanese representatives to argue the diplomatic position .THIS IS IRONIC." GOOD TO GIVE UP SOVEREIGNTY TO INDIA RATHER THAN CHINA?"
Why no Bhutanese in your panel?
What a fun ! Is there any Bhutanese guest present to talk about Bhutan? Fact is, bhutan cannot make any foreign relation without indian approval. Practically it's status is almost similar to any indian state. If u want to talk about Bhutanese sovereignty better talk about unlawful indian influence in Bhutan.
don't worry india always protect Bhutan. so china is never war with india, because business
Even after having large landmass of their own chinese still want to expand their territories. Just wait for another 10 years max you will get to know this consequences.
Great coverage , can we do an episode on IndiaTaiwan defence cooperation current state , opportunities and specially Taiwan's dependence on USA and opportunity to diversify with India
The fact that India is not a permanent UNSC member is a blessing for the entire world. My condolences to all the victims who suffered and died because of the |ndian regime.
Land grabbing and expansionist |ndia since 1947 independence.
1947 Annexation of Kashmir
1948 Annexation of Hyderabad
1948 Annexation of Junagadh
1949 Annexation of Manipur
1949 Annexation of Tripura
1951 Annexation of South Tibet
1951 Nagaland plebiscite - 99.9% of the Nagas wanted independence from India
1961 Annexation of Goa
1962 Annexation of Kalapani, Nepal
1962 Aggression against China
1971 Annexation of Turtuk, Pakistan
1972 Annexation of Tin Bigha, Bangladesh
1975 Annexation of Sikkim (the whole country)
1983 (Aborted) Attempted invasion of Mauritius
1990 (Failed) Attempted annexation of Bhutan
2006 Annexation of Duars, Bhutan
2013 Annexation of Moreh, Myanmar
Look, I’m not Indian, but I’ve got to call out the glaring inaccuracies in your statement. First off, to say that India is an "expansionist" state is laughable when you fail to understand the actual historical context behind each of these regions. You seem to have misunderstood or conveniently ignored key facts.
Hyderabad: The princely state of Hyderabad, under the Nizam, chose to remain independent after independence. But when the Nizam sought to join Pakistan and refused to integrate with India, it led to Operation Polo in 1948, which was a military action to maintain national unity. It wasn’t annexation-it was about ensuring the survival of a unified nation.
Junagadh: This region was ruled by a Muslim Nawab who wanted to join Pakistan, despite the majority Hindu population wanting to stay with India. The people of Junagadh wanted to join India, so it was an integration of their will, not a forceful annexation.
Manipur and Tripura: These states were never independent in any sense you’re suggesting. Like many other princely states, they were ruled by local monarchs who chose to join India after independence. The claim that the Nagas wanted independence is misleading-the vote in the 1951 plebiscite wasn’t representative of the entire Naga population, and India did not forcefully annex these regions. They joined India through a legal and democratic process.
South Tibet: The region you’re referring to as "South Tibet" is Arunachal Pradesh, which has been part of India for centuries. The Chinese claim over it is a fabrication based on their expansionist agenda. India’s control over Arunachal Pradesh is legitimate and legal.
Goa: The Portuguese had no business occupying Goa after India gained independence. The Goan people, who had been under Portuguese colonial rule for centuries, were fighting for their freedom. Operation Vijay in 1961 was not an annexation-it was a liberation of Goa from a colonial power that refused to leave. The locals overwhelmingly supported this move, and India was right to act in their best interest.
Kalapani, Nepal: This is a misinterpretation of the boundary issue. Kalapani, located at the tri-junction of India, Nepal, and China, has been a disputed area. India’s administration of Kalapani is based on the agreement that the region lies within its borders, and this has been supported by historical treaties. Nepal’s recent claims are politically motivated and lack historical backing.
China and Pakistan Aggression: You’re talking about “India's aggression” against China, but you ignore that in 1962, China launched an unprovoked attack on India, violating the borders. India was on the defensive. Similarly, India has been at the receiving end of aggression from Pakistan, especially in 1947 and 1965, when Pakistan attempted to destabilize India through military attacks.
Turtuk, Pakistan: The claim that India “annexed” Turtuk is misleading. Turtuk was part of the region India controlled after the 1947 Partition and the subsequent wars with Pakistan. It was never Pakistan's territory to begin with.
Tin Bigha, Bangladesh: This was a border demarcation issue between India and Bangladesh, not an annexation. In fact, India and Bangladesh exchanged territories to improve bilateral relations, not to expand territory.
Sikkim: Sikkim was a protectorate of India, and its decision to merge with India was a democratic choice. The local population wanted to join India, and it was not an imposition by the Indian government. The people of Sikkim chose to become part of India through a referendum in 1975.
Attempts at Mauritius, Bhutan, Myanmar: These claims about attempts to invade Mauritius, Bhutan, and Myanmar are not only false but utterly ridiculous. India has maintained friendly relations with these countries, and there is no historical evidence of any such attempts. You’re fabricating history without any factual backing.
Now, let’s talk about your claim that India "gave land to China" and that Pakistan was somehow set up to destroy India. The truth is, India never gave up land to China willingly. China forcefully took control of Aksai Chin during the 1962 war. The claim about Pakistan is also a distortion of facts-India has consistently sought peace with Pakistan, but Pakistan's constant aggression and attempts to destabilize India through terror attacks are well documented.
To sum it up, what you're calling “expansionism” is actually the process of integrating various territories into a unified country post-independence, in line with the will of the people, to prevent further fragmentation and to ensure national unity. You can twist history however you like, but facts don’t change. India didn’t grab land-it consolidated regions that were already a part of its cultural and historical heritage.
So, before you pass such sweeping judgments, it’s crucial to do some actual research instead of parroting baseless claims. Your statements are based on a distorted understanding of history
@@bloxpop5253 I randomly selected Manipur for a simple research. There was an alternative fact - On September 21, 1949, the Maharaja of Manipur was forced to sign the Manipur Merger Agreement with the Union of India. How can I trust the rest of your facts?
@@liarliar3412 The Maharaja of Manipur, Bodhachandra Singh, ruled a culturally rich kingdom and even established the Manipur State Constitution Act to modernize governance. After independence, he signed the Instrument of Accession in 1947, aligning with India for defense and foreign policy. By 1949, faced with political realities and the need for unity, he signed the Manipur Merger Agreement-not at gunpoint, but as part of the process to create a cohesive nation.
Plenty of princely states ruled by royal families merged with India-Hyderabad, Junagadh, and Sikkim included. It’s called building a nation, not coercion. If you think “pressure” invalidates the decision, maybe research how the British pressured half the world into submission. History isn’t about cherry-picking narratives to fit your bias.
Stop twisting facts
@@bloxpop5253 It's hard to conclude that the alternative facts were twisted, just like nobody knows if the sources where you pulled the facts from were accurate.
And what is India doing??!! Snoring??!! While it's backyard gets encroached on... 😖😖
Hong Kong means the heater in your car in a pattern is money
There’s no way Bhutan is an Interpol honeypot, even I thought this.
Like imagine only Dizaster (the rapper) connects to Bhutan and me.
It’s IP is in England and if you watched there ceremony and the symbol and compare symbol you either think they’re competiting or it’s occult for them, both ways.
india should interfere this matter otherwise bhutan also become tibet
India has been interfering in Bhutan since it colonized Bhutan and is interfering now. Look it is Indian speaking here fear losing its colony.
@@downtomars6268 its not indias colony
This is obviously amislead8ng report !😊
Why is this news now been shown in bbs? That's a major issue
Wt.about India's strangle hold of the Bhutanese foreign policy since its inception?Woefully Bhutan deals literally with the rest of the wotld through India.
I see the problem here. It's India.
I mean bhutan at this point should join india or it seems like they will ended up become tibet
Why they are worried? Bhutan knows its own areas,
Bhutan Playing a Chicken Race with Big 2.
When I see such people interview I feel sorry because why there is always negative towards China be positive. But I like anchor how she talks with patient way.
Could anyone explain why Bhutan 🇧🇹 is allowing this to happen??
CHINA'S NEXT PROJECTS .......PACIFIC ISLANDS TERRITORIES PALAU...SAIPAN, .......MARSHALL NAURU SAMOA ETC
What I see why neighbours country not have good relationships. But always want to make far country friend.
Stupidity of taiwan talks inclusive of taiwan shameful
Currupt leader of Bhutan to be held accountable...
why occupied Tibet by CCP China is not raised in this programme discussion, its so biased in today’s world. Despite everyone knows/every neigbouring countries around Tibet before 1960s. Well it does not matter if you guys not raise it. Facts remains the same and unbreakable history. We can not change the history. People should raise the every issue not only favouring to their own county. It’s all political game, nothing else.
Between Tibet and India. Not China
Suggestion to this program why don't you bring more balance to this program by bringing different points of view.