And china defeated all western lies. germany and France are joining china now . , america has ruined Japan, EU and ussr economy but no change against china.
can you tell the audiences what is your purpose and why you care China more than your own country USA? or you are just the so called western media who always make fake news? mind your own country's business first! your country is in a big mess now
Ever since it was founded in 1983, the NED has been a tool for the US to safeguard its hegemony around the world. Whenever the US has a problem with some country or region, the NED is always there to find problems with its "democracy".
It should be noted that this ridiculous boundary, which is incomprehensible, was left by the British in order to use regional disputes to achieve their continental balance-of-power strategy in relation to British geopolitical tactics.
@@gingerbread_GB They don't own it though. They claim it but it's under the jurisdiction of the Bhutanese government. So yes what the OP said is correct because it is legally Bhutanese land.
Oh yeah, same story with the Philippines, first they built their so called "fisherman shelter" and then they reclaim the shoal then started to own the place.
@@徐行-z5x Those US military bases have the permission of the Philippine government and it's people. Meanwhile, China occupied those islands without the permission of the Philippines. Those two events are not equivalent whatsoever.
If they can't see what China is trying to do and taking no action, then it's natural selection at this point. It's the same strategy Russia uses - salami tactics
But it's being pressed down by India. A few years back, when there was a clash between Chinese and Indian armies in a disputed area between Bhutan and China. Chinese ask Indians "What are you doing here?" Chinese asked Bhutanese:"Did you invite them into your country?" Bhutanese didn't answer and say nothing. They were too afraid of Indians. The Indians run all over their country as though it's their own. If I were the Bhutanese, I would play them off each other and get the most benefits. Just like India being friends with Russia and the US, and buying Russian oil at a great discount and sell it at high profit to the Europeans.
Factually incorrect, and easily comparable. USA has similar landmass to China, at a quarter of the Chinese population. Yet they have several thousand (yes really) more military outposts around the world than china.
You are dealing with another sovereign nation, Bhutan is of course close to India and their are geopolitical challenges to their ambitions. But the decision to build anything on Bhutan soil remains entirely on the government. We can talk about it, have various assumptions regarding these settlements. But it's the government of Bhutan that have the last word.
Nah! Cure your ignorance and do a little research. The chinese have all settled its border disputes with all of the abutting nations except India and Bhutan, because India is a recalcitrant child and India holds the foreign policy of Bhutan. Nevertheless, Bhutan and China have a mutual understanding that is why they don't have any trouble.
@@rap3208 Reason for that is China has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the Tibetans don't want to be friends with them.
@@rap3208 Reason for that is Chin has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the their own province don't want to be friends with them.
@@calmbeast1329 do you know the length of indian missiles , from arunachal beijing is just 2000km our mid range missiles will reach beijing in minutes , all the industrial towns are within reach of arunachal pradesh, that is why beijing is nervous about arunachal pradesh, they already lost tawang in 1967
@@humbleindian6303 well India has no record of attacking any country first. Unless china doesn't do their usual shenanigans they shouldn't worry about any missiles🤷♂️
The only BORDER DISPUTE it has left is india and bhutan. It would have settled with Bhutan if India does not take care of its foreign policy. China settled with Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Myanmar, North Korea, Nepal, and Tajikistan. You encyclopedia wouldn't eve fill up a single page.
China has always done lowly things but taking advantage of such a country which doesn't even have an army and have always lived peacefully is a new level of low.
At least China didn't start WW1+2, didn't killed off the Native Americans or Aboriginals, didn't colonize and enslave half of the world's population, didn't steal tech of paper, didn't steal tech of locks, didn't steal tech of compass, didn't steal tech of money, & didn't commit the Holocaust. My apology for this lengthy comment, but kinda have to state the facts.
India is blackmailing Bhutan by threatening to cut off its energy supply. India is the country that has made incursions into Nepal. But I suppose that is ok.
At 0:59 India's eastern state arunachal pradesh is misrepresented as if not part of India. It's regretful to see such uninformed and unverified information put up by content creator
@@Physics_Lad "After Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visit to China in June 2003, a joint declaration was signed in which India recognised that "the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China" - Wikipedia
It's interesting to see a British expert explain the land disputes around Asia. They have some great insights, considering the British were the ones who drew up these borders on a whim 150 years ago.
Who cares? Im not British but do we always want to be stuck in the past? What does it matter what happend back then? Why don't we go back a couple of hundred years more when china invaded the place? Is that how we resolve the conflicts of today by going back further and further and saying "i can't belive this country would do what basically every other country did throughout history"?
@@TDurden527 It’s as if any of these conflicts didn’t exist in the prior borders before the British. The conflicts are made much more prominent because of technological and societal advancement and have nothing to do with any borders the British drew. This issue would likely exist regardless and it’s due to an imbalance of power and ideology between an incumbent power and its growing rival neighbour.
The most beautiful, peaceful, "gross national happiness-before-gross national product" kingdom in the world has to deal with this. Please take care of them India.
Those heartless Chinese don't have the right to claim over the Bhutanese territory.Bhutan will never be under them. One day or the other every Chinese citizen will bear the suffering of what they had caused to other. Remember there's no one who escape from cause and effect. It's time for govt to take action.
India was fighting on behalf of bhutan in doklam plateu so... Dont think bhutan is small country India's iranclad support for bhutan is what we stand for freedom and integrity
@@YessEthan that is not what the Indian troop captain said, he said India crossed into Chinese border side to cut off any access to the Chicken's neck, nothing to do with Bhutan. Indian media say it was helping but Bhutan did not say India was helping.
It's really not a funny mistake that China is taking what belongs to your country (Bhutan/India/Japan/Vietnam/South China Sea = East Asia Sea). Claiming Tibetan region, which was forcefully annexed by them. So no Claims has any basic requirement to fill the whole China is digging for the coffins of the future conflicts. India will stand with Bhutan and Bhutanese people will get the best version of Chinese love game no where before the disintegration of the Red colour (product).
However, India should make its voice heard more in those areas. In my neck of the woods they say appetite comes with eating. I would not want China to encroach too much in those areas. I prefer Bhutan protected by India than under Chinese control.
Hun Sen (Cambodia's dictator/leader), is former Khmer Rouge... which was backed by China. He relies on China's backing. Cambodia is basically a vassal state of China at this point. CCP can get what it wants from Hun Sen.
china has inter continental ballistic missiles = made from paper - untraceable and a rocket program of - sending missiles from TIBET TO ANY CAPITOL IN THE WORLD ! = just saying what i learnt 15 years ago !
Noooo! Bhutan is one of the sanest countries, if not THE sanest country in the world. Or at least it was under the late King, I read several years ago. He did some great things, my favourite being that he amended the Constitution so that a sizeable percentage of the country would never be developed at all for ANY human interests, profit, etc. Still a ways to go socially, especially for women, but he was thoughtfully leading the country forward and people's lives were improved. I don't know how the conversion from monarchy to democracy he instituted is going.... I'll have to update my reading. But the idea that China is grabbing land, and sending settlers there!!! How long before they start mining or whatever in Bhutan's constitutionally protected wild zones?? Forgive me, I am so sick of the already most powerful nations of the world always picking on, bullying smaller ones just to get more, always more...
on chinese state run media the government constantly talks about “lost ancestral lands” in kazakhstan, tajikistan, india, outer mongolia, russia, etc. haha
@@Kevin-fq3zh wth those lost ancestral lands, this is not qing dynasty. F*** lost ancestral lands, thats not justifiable to steal others country. That thing is expired, outdated and total BS if China would still believe in such fantasy.
Doklam crisis of 2017 resulted in India officially moving into Bhutanese territory to stop PLA. Stopping & physically phusing Chinese troop & construction worker out of the border as define by Bhutan & India.. though chinese did construct road upto their territory.. had US pushed PLAN & PLARF out of SCS.. CCP won't dare to do this.. anyways the way India is constructing road, bridges & military infra along LAC is good for power dynamics.. India recently move two offensive corps toward china beside defensive corps already takling PLA & giving golgappas to CCP's goons
This comment would be appropriate if it was about the China-Hong Kong conflict, since Hong Kong was a British colony, but Bhutan has never been colonized by the UK (nor by any other western nation for that matter) so it doesn't really apply here.
Why would you drag UK everywhere, it's not their fault. China just don't agree any borders they have issues with every neighbour India, bhutan,Nepal, Vietnam, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Russia,
Classic Indian, that after 70 years of independence still blames the British for Indias problems, hates the Tag Mahal because it was built by the Mughals 😅😅
China occupies Bhutanese land; Chinese Commenters: Bhutan's fault! Russia bombing Ukrainian houses; Russian Commenters: Ukraine's fault! Who are the one group who cries in pain as they strike you?
How come Bhutan can't settle a boundary disputes with China without India's permission? Isn't Bhutan a sovereign country? To me it looks like India is the one who's middling in Bhutan foreign policy not China.
Bhutan has treaties with India. Yes, India has good control over it and Bhutan should have its sovereignty to decide its international relations. However, being on the Indian side means that India pushes them to have their defined territories by international boundaries respected. China has a bunch of border issues with everyone else and definitely does not resolve them diplomatically, but by force as we have seen recently. Bhutan will be able to do nothing to prevent Chinese military from encroaching on their territory.
Bhutan doesn't even recognises or have any diplomatic relations with china. It fears chinas expansion, as we have seen in case of tibet. Bhutan have no other choice but to increase relationship with india to counter china, and not get merged with china.
You can claim it all you want but if china puts tank and guns on that land and plants a chinese flag on you are chit out of luck. This is what russia did with the crimea and this is why we canot allow communist nations and dictatorships to grab land whenever they want.
@Guesswhokk Lets indeed not forget that Tibet had always been part of Chinas sovereign territory long than USA has been a country. Just because they illegally wanted to be their own country, doesnt mean they can. Its equivalent of Texas and some southern states wanting to be their own country without the approval of USA. What do you think will happen?
@@yerri5567first of all ‘China’ didn’t exist when Tibet was under dynastic control, and the control was never continuous but on and off, and never imposing but equal..,
@@NarasimhaDiyasena First of all, "China" is what the West calls the Middle Kingdom. Its always existed since time immemorial. Secondly, we are talking about "sovereignty" here, not "control". China had sovereignty over Tibet for longer than USA has been a country, its set in stone, in black and white. There a legal documents to prove it. They allowed Tibet the authority to govern themselves, but make no mistake, sovereignty was still Chinas. Thats the difference between sovereignty and "control". And once the last Chinese Dynasty came to an end, there was an imperial edict (what we call treaty nowadays) that stated that sovereignty over Tibet was to be handed over to the next "China". Ie it was continuous. Everything was enshrined in law. That is why Tibet wanting to be their own little country was illegal. China rightfully took back control when they violated the law first.
@@yerri5567 China can bran wash their citizens and change the history book, but The Truth will always remain Truth......... Tibet was Never been part of China. In fact, our mighty King in the 7th Century once conquered China.
Same tactic China is using on South China Sea. I remembered a TV Series I watch when I was a kid where the lead character asked the Mongolian Khan, "Of all the expansion you are doing, how much land do you need to bury your corpse?" After 5000 years of history, China still has not learnt all. Look at the Roman, how great was it to have one man ruled all?
It seems to be a trend of China's massive militarisation. Almost every border of neighbours, even on the sea, Chinese military is rapidly militarising. The only neighbour it doesn't militarise... is Russia, but that wasn't a surprise given Russia's status as China's minor partner.
but even China and Russia have some territorial disputes. I have no idea why China would want to make all their neighbors, enemies for no apparent reason for some little land.
@@mohakjain5802 Russia is too weak to do anything now, and even if Russia managed to somehow subjugate Ukraine into its realm, it could not stand against China's demands since Chinese troops are far more modern, more capable and more advanced than Russian army. Pakistan is China's long time ally, so no reason to militarise. The rest? Their territories were parts of the Chinese Empire at some point under various dynasties, such as the Han, Tang, Yuan and Qing. That's why China want them back.
Two out of the best 3 space agencies of the World (Russia/USA/China) said India did not land on Moon's South Pole. 1) NASA specifically said "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 kilometers from the Moon’s South Pole.". This is just another diplomatic way of saying India did not land on Moon's South Pole. If India had landed on on Moon's South Pole, NASA would have simply said that "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located at the Moon’s South Pole" instead of "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 KILOMETERS FROM the Moon’s South Pole. 2) Dr Ouyang Ziyuan, lauded as the father of China’s lunar exploration programme, told the Chinese-language Science Times newspaper that the Chandrayaan-3 landing site, at 69 degrees south latitude, was nowhere close to the pole, defined as between 88.5 and 90 degrees.
Absolutely. There was only peace and interconnected before. Now, everywhere is becoming nightmare due to China influence. Nepal used to be safe heaven for Tibetans, not any more. 😢
Bhutan invited China to extend its trade and economy. Why do you accussed China Extend aggressively in Bhutan. You should ask the Government this question. Nevertheless, do you have real-time evidence to make such accussation.
Because that is well within the line of control, the de fatco border. WSJ just doesn't like the fact that China-India border area is too peacful last year, so they feel like stiring it up a little bit.
They are territorially aggressive since their own history begun. Starts with ancient feudalism and followed by thousand years with imperial expansion, they fought wherever they could and only stopped where they couldn't reach.
You can show disdain for a country's political and geographic agenda but do not make discriminatory remarks about their enthinicty/race. We're better than that.
In India we're currently busy with elections. We are currently using divide and rule policy and don't want our citizens to know what's really happening because it will hinder election results
That's news is 3-4 months old. Government already knows the issue that's why Modi visited Bhutan a month ago and Bhutan has become more concerned about India's concerns otherwise Bhutan was just ready to give up.
@@Mr.Atypical so what about china grabbing thousands of acres of land? why doesn't ModiXi say regarding that matter too? He just dares to speak against Muslims in India and doesn't dare to utter a word against china.
It seems that |ndia/|ndians have clearly forgotten that |ndia was the one who |nvaded Sikkim on year 1973 before annexing Sikkim to become one of |ndian states on year 1975. The last Chogyal king of Sikkim, Palden Thongdu Namygal, was placed under house arrest and was tortured by |ndia till he died in 1975. Miraculously, after making an example out of the Sikkim King, Sikkim became part of |ndia on year 1975 but not on 1973 when |ndia |nvaded Sikkim. If the sovereign country of Sikkim is willing to become one with |ndia, is an invasion necessary? Is a house arrest and the killing of the King of Sikkim necessary?
@@darkodonnie2729 says the 2.5 foot cur rimun cher. World Population Review says: Average height of Indian men (age 19) = 166.5 and the Average height of Chinese men (age 19) =175.66. 🤭
@@darkodonnie2729 Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice. 1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself. 2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis". 3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine). 4) Despite all these advantages, India lost. 5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
@@darkodonnie2729 China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
@@darkodonnie2729 Why do all military rankings rank China above India? 🤣🤭😂1962? Wait, didn't the Indians claimed that they had won in the 1967 "war"? The score should be even like China: 1 and India:1 on paper? Oh wait again, all historians said there is no war between China and India in 1967 but only a small 3 day skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 😅🤣😂Read article "How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)". I guess that is the reason why China > India. 🤭😂
When China does it it's called land grab. When Israel does it it's called land expropriation. Regarding accusations of land grab against Israel as "antisemitic" is not hypocritical AT ALL!
If an Indian couple migrated to Europe, and then, they give birth to children. Then, they decided to go back to India. So, when they go back to India, had they become European or are they still Indians.
@@thinkie12 Your example doesn't represent the reality and has nothing to do with the current state of Israel. A representative example is this: Can an Iranian decide to go to India and occupy some piece of land because it used to be a part of Persian Empire? and the answer is no. India belongs to Indians. The Iranian can apply as an immigrant to go and live in his/her supposedly ancestoral land in India but if the application is successful, he/she will be a citizen of Indian. India won't be turned into Persia unless it's occupied by a large number of Iranians through the use of force and genocide! Just because your ancestors used to live somewhere centuries ago (or worse, because your "God" told you so) some foreign land won't belong to you.
@@shibak4 You didn't really understand the land of Palestine. The land of Palestine consisted of Israel and Jordan. There have never been a Palestinian state. Can you name any Prime Minister of Palestinian state. None. There is region called Palestine but never a country called Palestine. Due to war in that region like the Babylonian War, Assyrian War, the Ottoman Empire, Roman Empire, so Jews were dispersed and flee from the war, but not all Jews left that region. There were many Jews that remained there. In 1947, the UN partitioned the land of Palestine into two. One piece for Israel, and one for the Arabs. So, back then, there were already a two state solution. The Jews got 23% of the land of Palestine and they called it Israel and the Arabs got 77% of the land of Palestine and it was called Transjordan. Today it is called Jordan. The so called Palestinian today were actually Arabs. There were Jordanians. Some are from Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. Israel is legit. The UN had voted on it in 1947, and it passed the resolution. ruclips.net/user/shortsWnGl-TFaiuM
it seems like Taiwan case is more aggressive, but actually not, like the cases with PHP, Vietnam, Burma, Japan, India, Bhutan caused by china is still going parallel. China is igniting the problems with all its neighbors
Nothing New all in the Public domain already. Bhutan King was in New Delhi a few months ago regarding this after visiting Beijing. WSJ come on don't lag 6month behind.
The Indian debt/death trapping Nepal is unforgivable eg. 2015 Nepal blockade (please do some research). What is even more unforgivable is expansionist |ndia stealing lands and annexing Kalapani from Nepal on year 1962. |and grabbing |ndia has encroached Nepali land, and Nepal can do nothing about it. |ndia has paid off Nepali politicians, and they will keep their mouth shut. Kalapani was encroached from 1962 by |ndia using its military. In 1952, Nepal gave permission to temporarily place |ndian Armies in its Northern boundary foreseeing the dangers from the Chinese side. In the year of 1962, India made a bunker in Kalapani and placed its camp there, as the China-|ndia war broke out. At that time, the there were 18 |ndian camps including Kalapani, inside the Nepalese borders. After the war, when Nepal asked the |ndian side to remove its armies from all Nepalese regions, |ndia removed them from all the places except in Kalapani. And even till now, Kalapani is under the |ndian Military’s control. One step forward of the military encroachment, |ndia took a political step in encroachment as it added Kalapani to its border on the new map published by Survey of |ndia on November 2, 2019.
0:57 wrong map of India. AP is India. media shouldn't be scared to put fact, if they say claim truthful. China on other hand is hungry of land. They will even claim moon saying "it's part of Chinese territory from ancient times", once they put human there... 😂😂😂
I think Bhutan or Nepal foreign affair are controlled by India. In the past, they do not dare to restore ties with China because India control their foreign affairs nd there are no other countries that can rival the hegmon and India Then came China now with obor and developing countries are benefiting directly from the new infrastructures and trade that boom their economy. Bhutan or Nepal see their opportunities. After all these yrs, there is finally someone that can rival their so called ' master'. Thus the restoration of trade with China resume. Sri Lanka now wants India military to move out of their region and wanted good ties with China and wanted investment as China is the only country that help them with rising tides that have been rising due to global warming.No one helps them with investment and infrastructure build up to deal with global warming in the past. Now China can. Any good Nepalese ppl can correct me if i am wrong. I am always willing to learn facts.
Seems that Bhutan is not fully sovereign to make its own decisions. Why not a news story on a UN member nation not having full autonomy in foreign relations?
We cannot talk about Bhutan without talking about Sikkim. Like Bhutan, Sikkim was an independent Himalayan Buddhist kingdom many hundreds of years old and a neighbor of China. Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas during the 18th century. The Sikkim king fled to China and asked for help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition force to Sikkim and expelled the Gorkhas and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim was left unmolested for the rest of its history until it was gobbled up by the artificial country India in 1975. Chinese of older generations were taught that Sikkim was one of China's neighbors. Even student in Taiwan (Republic of China) were taught Sikkim was one of China's neighbors until a couple of decades ago. Bhutan is very similar to Sikkim in terms of ethnicity, language, religion and culture and history, only that it is bigger. Bhutan is in a precarious situation right now because it is the next low hanging fruit in India's expansionism and is currently militarily occupied by India. The reason I wrote this here is to educate the people in the world what is going on in that part of the world and stop indulging India, a country that is up to no good.
Why do you think Bhutan is occupied by Indian military. Bhutan doesn't have its military infrastructure India helps Bhutan to provide safety . India also include more than billion dollars aid from its budget to Bhutan it is highest among all the neighbours
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
Sikkim is doing just fine now. Being one of "China's neighbors" is scary, if they weren't part of India, you would be using your 18th century obscure politics as justification to destroy their culture and take over
Complete nonsense reporting. Bhutan has been isolated from the world by India, just like Sikkim before it, and it is undoubtedly true that India wants to annex it into India. India has already forced Bhutan to give up its sovereign rights to an independent foreign policy, and India doesn't allow Bhutan to have diplomatic relations with most nations (India is the only G20 nation that Bhutan is allowed to have diplomatic relations with). Bhutan is fighting back, however, and having unofficial diplomatic relations with China anyways. Also, Bhutanese government officials have been asked if these Chinese settlements are in Bhutan's territory or not, and they always answer that they are not. The only people claiming they are in Bhutanese territory are Indian and U.S. government officials.
Brother how did you came into the conclusion that india wants to annex Bhutan 😂😂. When was the last time india annexed a state and china did ?? Forgot history or what. Historical India never shared border with china, it was after annexation of tibet by china, that all this mess came into existence. Your ignorance is unbelievable.
@@rickgolder6818 India last annexed a state when they annexed Sikkim in 1975. They came up with this ridiculous story about how Sikkim desperately wanted to be annexed by India, seemingly for no reason. They first did it by taking control of Sikkim's foreign policy, then flooding the country with their troops, diplomatically isolating it, and eventually annexing it. Which is exactly what they are attempting to do with Bhutan. As for Tibet, it hasn't been an independent country for close to a thousand years. There are the obvious reasons for stating this: they have never had formal diplomatic relations with any other country, no other country has ever recognized their independence, etc. But also, whenever British India invaded Tibet throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s, they never negotiated with the Tibetan government. They would contact the Qing government in China and as they were the rightful rulers of Tibet, they paid the British Indian armies a bribe to leave Tibet. Your ignorance is unbelievable.
@@jasonjean2901 "they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok, this sentence is enough for me to know that, you have already made up your mind that all the things and incidents that happened in the past and officially written documents are completely false, and everything your master CCP said, even though CCP have no connection with Sikhim hence or forth is true. And you are talking about ignorance kiddo??? Heh, learn some history. Sikkhimise people were itself not very happy with the monarch, and they also many anti monarch protests were held in 1973. Also the fact that China annexed Tibet in 1949, and also nepal attached Tibet, was the main reason why The monarch needed a stronger force for security. They officially asked indian ti annex and make sikhim an indian state. I am nit going to write a full essay here, but you go and do some history reasearch kiddo. You are very bad at that no doubt.
@@jasonjean2901 "they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok kiddo, this is enough for me to know that you have already decided that all the past incidents and history that happened and official written documents are also false, and only what you master CCP said even though CCP have no relationship with tibet hence and forth, is true. nd you are talking about ignorance kiddo ??? First go and get your history lessons, then come and talk. The people were already not happy with the monarch and there were many anti monarch protests in 1973. Also the annexation of tibet, and there historically bad relationship with nepal was also a main reason why Sikhim decided they needed a strong force to counter china and not end up like tibet. Sikkhim officially asked india to annex and make sikkhim an indian state. I am not going to write a full essay here. Get your face straight kiddo.
@@jasonjean2901 they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok kiddo, this is enough for me to know that you have already decided that all the past incidents and history that happened and official written documents are also false, and only what you master CCP said even though CCP have no relationship with tibet hence and forth, is true. nd you are talking about ignorance kiddo ??? First go and get your history lessons, then come and talk. The people were already not happy with the monarch and there were many anti monarch protests in 1973. Also the annexation of tibet, and there historically bad relationship with nepal was also a main reason why Sikhim decided they needed a strong force to counter china and not end up like tibet. Sikkhim officially asked india to annex and make sikkhim an indian state. I am not going to write a full essay here. Get your face straight kiddo.
the Bhutanese government rejected a treaty with China where the Chinese would give a large portion of land in the other locations of the country for a small portion in the western part, the Bhutanese government still keeps the treaty with India and are true people
China has never succeeded in a war of conquest because it is already too big and populous and it's difficult to govern the whole country. Fighting in many fronts is also a sure way to lose. South China Sea, Spratly Islands, Uyghurs, Taiwan, India, Japan etc
So if a territory has never been settled, per the Prof., how doesn't it belong to whoever occupies it first? That's the logic that explains why there are European countries on four continents, no?
Yup. & India didn't even raise any question. The vid clearly said towards the end that India didn't want to comment on foreign affairs between Bhutan and China.
India didn't even comment on that, it was some youtuber news channels(10k-20k subscriber), who made report on that and WSJ post this video that Indian media is posting about that, it means Indian gov have problem
In 1975, Sikkim was annexed by India. Bhutan, as a neighboring country, is not stupid. The Bhutan are a country established by Tibetans after migration. Bhutan and Tibet have the same culture and ethnicity. Bhutan is very different from India, both in culture and ethnicity. Bhutan's diplomacy and military are controlled by India. The British Empire left Bhutan, but Bhutan have to meet the Indians who have no bottom line. The key is that the per capita GDP of Tibet is seven more times that of India. As a result, Indians covet the land of Tibet every day and say that they want to liberate Tibet. In the eyes of other countries, it is similar to North Korea saying that it wants to rescue Americans out of poverty.
@@snowlee-ml7rr Sikkim monarch rebels voted to join India. The fact that you post such blatant misinformation shows that you have an agenda. China annexed Tibet by invading it and the Dalai Lama became a refugee in India. Now China is building villages in Bhutan, spraying water cannons at the Phillipines and always threatening to attack Taiwan. Everyone knows who the bully is. Go check Wikipedia and all these facts online for verification. India has received Tibetans with open arms because Tibetans have fled excess authoritarianism and cultural attacks by the communist Chinese governement. And also, Bhutan does not have an active military.
Western media is always underestimating the Nuclear Powered Nation called India. India has strongest and well trained all-weather army. At war times, India can also cross other Countries borders if REQUIRED. Not to forget, India has most powerful and lathel weapons in its armour.
This is game of football ...you cant just defend whole field which just few players . You have to attack also . So indians or bhutanese need to grab chinese land in return because you cant put soldier on 1000km long border with china which is situation in high mpuntains
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
The dark-horse alliance racing forward to take on China: on.wsj.com/3UvYbw0
And china defeated all western lies. germany and France are joining china now .
, america has ruined Japan, EU and ussr economy but no change against china.
😅
Please sir make a documentary about akhund varat
The Jew Street Journal will never report on how Israhell is expanding AND OCCUPYING Into PALESTINE So Aggressively
can you tell the audiences what is your purpose and why you care China more than your own country USA? or you are just the so called western media who always make fake news? mind your own country's business first! your country is in a big mess now
Now i understand why WSJ just decided to move its asia headquarter from Hong Kong to Singapore 🌝
Haha yep. The new anti-spy law would have fked WSJ up 🤣🤣
Based. They would have ended up in prison for telling the truth.
@@darthvadeth6290Let's ask ourselves what the relationship between the WSJ and the CIA as well as the NSA is.
Ever since it was founded in 1983, the NED has been a tool for the US to safeguard its hegemony around the world. Whenever the US has a problem with some country or region, the NED is always there to find problems with its "democracy".
@@thyristo probably the same type of relationship as American tech companies and NSA as revealed by Edward Snowden 😂
when the neighbouring country randomly starts building villages on your land.......
The reason why China can claim it is because no one lives on that part of the mountain
Except China claim those land too.
It should be noted that this ridiculous boundary, which is incomprehensible, was left by the British in order to use regional disputes to achieve their continental balance-of-power strategy in relation to British geopolitical tactics.
@@gingerbread_GB They don't own it though. They claim it but it's under the jurisdiction of the Bhutanese government. So yes what the OP said is correct because it is legally Bhutanese land.
@@gingerbread_GBDoean't matter. It is internationally recognized as Bhutan's land.
Oh yeah, same story with the Philippines, first they built their so called "fisherman shelter" and then they reclaim the shoal then started to own the place.
You mean what china is actually doing right now
@@Mk19-xc9bm didn't Philippines occupy the island first after a typhoon??
@@zkh173 didnt china build military bases inside the philippine's EEZ?
@@徐行-z5x Those US military bases have the permission of the Philippine government and it's people. Meanwhile, China occupied those islands without the permission of the Philippines. Those two events are not equivalent whatsoever.
@@zkh173it was ours, China doesnt belong in the South East Asian Region
Will China claim the moon when it lands there?
Yes. They play Go while others play chess. Occupying territory confers power. This is what they do.
Western narrative.
Well china actually claimed
yes
That i'm not sure, but the westerners landed in the Americas hundreds years ago, and claimed the indian's lands theirs. That's a fact!
"Gatekeep. Gaslight. Girlboss."
- old Chinese proverb
You mean old American proverb
Tell me how hawaii and california was stolen by usa again?
@@vishalgautamm it's "Live, laugh, love. Thank u, next."
@@agriffino keep typing where World have seen of America's hegemony and aggression
oh the irony
someone please save bhutan they are a beautiful country and dont deserve this
I agree
Bhutan is an ALLY of China
India says attacking Bhutan will be considered attacking India. We will not let them enter Doklam.
Bhutan saves itself by working with China
If they can't see what China is trying to do and taking no action, then it's natural selection at this point. It's the same strategy Russia uses - salami tactics
I like how all the bots deflect China's actions by saying another country is doing the same thing. China can never do bad huh.
Bhutanese stand up ⬆️✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻
Native Americans stand up 😂😂
@@kurtisbanner3965stop the whataboutism 😭. Classic Chinese bot response
@@LBLbLbbbbfunny how there's no Bhutanese in the comment section
But it's being pressed down by India. A few years back, when there was a clash between Chinese and Indian armies in a disputed area between Bhutan and China. Chinese ask Indians "What are you doing here?" Chinese asked Bhutanese:"Did you invite them into your country?" Bhutanese didn't answer and say nothing. They were too afraid of Indians. The Indians run all over their country as though it's their own. If I were the Bhutanese, I would play them off each other and get the most benefits. Just like India being friends with Russia and the US, and buying Russian oil at a great discount and sell it at high profit to the Europeans.
well I certainly am bhutanese
I will support Bhutan 🇧🇩❤️🇧🇹
the indians better move up there quick before china becomes a bigger issue for them lol
they are too busy building temples and going after peacefuls in their own country to realise what’s happening
have you banned tik tok yet?
We indians have learned our lesson in 1962. We dont want to lose another aksai chin. We surrender ✋🏿🤚🏿
@@Superpooper-2020 nice try winne the pooh bot
@@Superpooper-2020 Chinese learned their lesson in 1967 nathu la and from their friend Pakistan in 1971 in Bangladesh to surrender very quickly .
🇳🇵Nepal is really lucky to have the himalayas and sagarmatha (mt everest ) making china not be able expand .
chineese bots are activated very fast
troll dud here
More like americans always roasting their own country
but not faster than Indian ones.
china no. 1
What's interesting is that the "Chinese bots lol" comments both have EXACTLY the same number of likes 🤔
China's greed is on a different level. You'd think being one of the biggest country in the world will make them satisfied 😢
Not yet the biggest. More room to grow yet from expanding
Yes they’ re also doing the same in the philippines
Didn't stop Putin. But what do I know.
Factually incorrect, and easily comparable. USA has similar landmass to China, at a quarter of the Chinese population. Yet they have several thousand (yes really) more military outposts around the world than china.
@@athena5566 Philippines is different. It is not a normal country. Even though China is still the bully, nonetheless
Chinese paid keyboard warriors trying to damage control 😂
You are dealing with another sovereign nation, Bhutan is of course close to India and their are geopolitical challenges to their ambitions. But the decision to build anything on Bhutan soil remains entirely on the government. We can talk about it, have various assumptions regarding these settlements. But it's the government of Bhutan that have the last word.
When any opinion outside the established narrative is a bot, do you really have freedom of thought 🤔
good thing that the Chinese don't have access to youtube, otherwise comment sections will be drowned...
@@ylstorage7085 what makes you think Chinese have no access to youtube?
Tbh, I see more Indian keyboard warriors throughout the internet than I see Chinese lol.
China borders 14 countries and have border disputes with 17 countries (both land and sea) 😂
Nah! Cure your ignorance and do a little research. The chinese have all settled its border disputes with all of the abutting nations except India and Bhutan, because India is a recalcitrant child and India holds the foreign policy of Bhutan. Nevertheless, Bhutan and China have a mutual understanding that is why they don't have any trouble.
@@rap3208 China is acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums over desert lands just because tibetans don't want to be friends with them.
A fake news creator, the most ignorant bias I've ever heard.
@@rap3208 Reason for that is China has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the Tibetans don't want to be friends with them.
@@rap3208 Reason for that is Chin has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the their own province don't want to be friends with them.
Tibet is an independent and Sovereign nation like Taiwan.
❤🙏🌈
You sleeping for a thousand years?? Go ask UN, India, UK, etc
So is Kashmir
Never ever trust them. Never
Thats true. Never trust the browns.
@@jacobl5488 That's such a racist remark.
As a Nepali, you don't know but India is not better in land grabbing and stealing to political interference in Nepal.
With a name like jin Lee you say you are nepali😂😂.@@jinlee2617
150 nations have joined China's BRI, cry more buddy....😂🤣
CHINA claiming all 🤣🤣🤣
India can reach Beijing through Arunachal , CCPs pressure point is Arunachal , thats why it claims Arunachal
Tyrants will be defeated when the human race come together.
@@humbleindian6303not in a million years😂
@@calmbeast1329 do you know the length of indian missiles , from arunachal beijing is just 2000km our mid range missiles will reach beijing in minutes , all the industrial towns are within reach of arunachal pradesh, that is why beijing is nervous about arunachal pradesh, they already lost tawang in 1967
@@humbleindian6303 well India has no record of attacking any country first. Unless china doesn't do their usual shenanigans they shouldn't worry about any missiles🤷♂️
I plan to publish an Encyclopedia of Chinese Border Disputes and Claims if only I can get it down to 84 beautiful terabytes.
The only BORDER DISPUTE it has left is india and bhutan. It would have settled with Bhutan if India does not take care of its foreign policy. China settled with Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Myanmar, North Korea, Nepal, and Tajikistan. You encyclopedia wouldn't eve fill up a single page.
😂😂😂
Human greed at its finest
Arunachal pradesh is integral part of India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
It's integral part of China
China give u it as beg
Ys, ofcourse.. Jai Hind.❤
Silly....Tibetan department had been collecting taxes in this area up to Assam border....Go check archives in Murthy library in Delhi.
You will have to show real military strength, China is not impressed or disuades by Modi's speeches or rhetoric.
Top 3 most greedy nation on earth.
1. China
2. Russia
3. North Korea
Very True.
U forgot USA ?
You skipped USA ‘cos it is so way above these that there is no competition?
💯
China has always done lowly things but taking advantage of such a country which doesn't even have an army and have always lived peacefully is a new level of low.
Yes so bad, we only fund some advanced infrastructure project in return, which is useless compared to democracy 😂
Tibet? It's not new
At least China didn't start WW1+2, didn't killed off the Native Americans or Aboriginals, didn't colonize and enslave half of the world's population, didn't steal tech of paper, didn't steal tech of locks, didn't steal tech of compass, didn't steal tech of money, & didn't commit the Holocaust. My apology for this lengthy comment, but kinda have to state the facts.
@@rollbin It happened in Tibet, it’s happening in Bhutan.
@@rollbin Keep your money greedy person. Nobody asked for your infrastructure project.
Now I understand why India is supporting Southeast Asia esp. the Philippines when it comes to dealing with China's territorial agression.
India is blackmailing Bhutan by threatening to cut off its energy supply. India is the country that has made incursions into Nepal. But I suppose that is ok.
But India is BRICS.
Thats why we call XiJinping a thief!
Winnie the pooh needs to chill.
USA needs to chill.
@cathie3874 the same way they're kicked out of Clark and Subic, then China built artificial islands inside Philippines' EEZ years later.
Wumao trolls need to chill
@@QuakerOats1620 what's that? can't find in urban dictionary
@@zkh173 basically "paid trolls". Directly translated as "50 Cent Group" en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/50_Cent_Party
Likewise Tibbet, Bhutan and Nepal will also suffer hard.
At 0:59 India's eastern state arunachal pradesh is misrepresented as if not part of India. It's regretful to see such uninformed and unverified information put up by content creator
What r ya yapping about? The map is alright
Your comment establishes how these content creators misinform people
That's a disputed area, do you know what it means?
Similarly Tibet is also a disputed area, why not show that as well.
@@Physics_Lad "After Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visit to China in June 2003, a joint declaration was signed in which India recognised that "the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China" - Wikipedia
It's interesting to see a British expert explain the land disputes around Asia. They have some great insights, considering the British were the ones who drew up these borders on a whim 150 years ago.
It is impressive the number of places around the world that are in conflict now with borders that England created.
@@TDurden527 not as impressive as how many commie apologists blame the U.S. for what the British created conditions for.
Exhausting.
Who cares? Im not British but do we always want to be stuck in the past? What does it matter what happend back then? Why don't we go back a couple of hundred years more when china invaded the place? Is that how we resolve the conflicts of today by going back further and further and saying "i can't belive this country would do what basically every other country did throughout history"?
@@TDurden527 It’s as if any of these conflicts didn’t exist in the prior borders before the British. The conflicts are made much more prominent because of technological and societal advancement and have nothing to do with any borders the British drew. This issue would likely exist regardless and it’s due to an imbalance of power and ideology between an incumbent power and its growing rival neighbour.
The most beautiful, peaceful, "gross national happiness-before-gross national product" kingdom in the world has to deal with this.
Please take care of them India.
Those heartless Chinese don't have the right to claim over the Bhutanese territory.Bhutan will never be under them. One day or the other every Chinese citizen will bear the suffering of what they had caused to other. Remember there's no one who escape from cause and effect. It's time for govt to take action.
😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝
Chinese bots in full swing 😂
Seems like the bots took the day 😂😂😂
CIA liking machines on full power
Says the 100 SPAMBOTS saying the same thing.
CIA bots in full swing😂
@@torelloBank Wumao bots in full swing
It's alarming how fast China is expanding 🌏
as it should i think. India must expand too. Western hegemony in international matter is too high
its literally the slowest in 300 centuries
India was fighting on behalf of bhutan in doklam plateu so... Dont think bhutan is small country India's iranclad support for bhutan is what we stand for freedom and integrity
@@YessEthan Remember what India did to Nepal?
@@YessEthan that is not what the Indian troop captain said, he said India crossed into Chinese border side to cut off any access to the Chicken's neck, nothing to do with Bhutan. Indian media say it was helping but Bhutan did not say India was helping.
Today is Wednesday, keyword: threatens (Monday, Wednesday, Friday)
why is ameriKKKa so aggressively trying to control the nations of the world?
It's really not a funny mistake that China is taking what belongs to your country (Bhutan/India/Japan/Vietnam/South China Sea = East Asia Sea). Claiming Tibetan region, which was forcefully annexed by them. So no Claims has any basic requirement to fill the whole China is digging for the coffins of the future conflicts. India will stand with Bhutan and Bhutanese people will get the best version of Chinese love game no where before the disintegration of the Red colour (product).
However, India should make its voice heard more in those areas. In my neck of the woods they say appetite comes with eating. I would not want China to encroach too much in those areas. I prefer Bhutan protected by India than under Chinese control.
Lol we need to grow economically first we have two developed ENEMIES us and china.
Tiananmen Square and winnie the pooh
CLASSICBOOMER TAKE !!!
Now go back to sleep old man, its your bed time 😴😴😴
this triggers the bot
@@roguetrader33 meanwhile US is cracking down on anti-Israel protests lol
Keep your hyprocrisy, both US and China can defenitely play the same game
@@BlinkShadow US: Cracking down
China: Gunning down
NOT THE SAME
@@BlinkShadow You were only paid 2 cents for that post bot, go back to the factory
What about China’s new base in Sihanoukville, a port city in Cambodia on the Gulf of Thailand? China is everywhere.
China? last time I check it was another country that have military bases around the world
Hun Sen (Cambodia's dictator/leader), is former Khmer Rouge... which was backed by China. He relies on China's backing. Cambodia is basically a vassal state of China at this point. CCP can get what it wants from Hun Sen.
Us military base is everywhere
Global trading superpowers build navy bases to protect sea lanes. See Portuguese, Dutch, British and American history.
Just like a virus.. Oh wait..
Bhutanese ❤ from India.
Ha ha. Bhutanese are relatives of Tibetans. They don't look Indian.
It is hoped that Bhutan can gain independent sovereignty, especially diplomatic sovereignty. Avoid becoming the second Sikkim.
@@frownezhang1632same with Tibbet
@@raylee5030 Hahah Chinese BoT getting so predictable 😅 comeon atleast stand up to Xipingpong expectations.
@@frownezhang1632 india respects bhutans sovergnity better than china does
10yr old Chinese kid:- papa this whole world belongs to us..
Dad: how??
Kid:- i have seen world map in Chinese geography text book 📕
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why doesn't India sign a mutual defense pact with Bhutan? Or an agreement to build a base in Bhutan?
greedy Chinese.
china has inter continental ballistic missiles = made from paper - untraceable and a rocket program of - sending missiles from TIBET TO ANY CAPITOL IN THE WORLD ! = just saying what i learnt 15 years ago !
Noooo! Bhutan is one of the sanest countries, if not THE sanest country in the world. Or at least it was under the late King, I read several years ago. He did some great things, my favourite being that he amended the Constitution so that a sizeable percentage of the country would never be developed at all for ANY human interests, profit, etc. Still a ways to go socially, especially for women, but he was thoughtfully leading the country forward and people's lives were improved. I don't know how the conversion from monarchy to democracy he instituted is going.... I'll have to update my reading. But the idea that China is grabbing land, and sending settlers there!!! How long before they start mining or whatever in Bhutan's constitutionally protected wild zones??
Forgive me, I am so sick of the already most powerful nations of the world always picking on, bullying smaller ones just to get more, always more...
Countries need to coordinate efforts to counter China's expansionist aggression.
Why Bhutan will give up land to get another piece of land what's the benefit Bhutan has in it .
因为印度不允许不丹和五常建交 不丹可怜啊！
Bhutan is constantly under threat from India's colonial control.
Thats china greed in all aspect
I suprise the chine Philosophy of capturing new lands of their neighbouring countries.
on chinese state run media the government constantly talks about “lost ancestral lands” in kazakhstan, tajikistan, india, outer mongolia, russia, etc. haha
Why? The entire history of China is filled with stealing whatever they could think to steal from neighbors.
@@Kevin-fq3zh wth those lost ancestral lands, this is not qing dynasty. F*** lost ancestral lands, thats not justifiable to steal others country. That thing is expired, outdated and total BS if China would still believe in such fantasy.
@@Kevin-fq3zh
Really? I only see Americans celebrating Thanksgiving and thanking the Indians for their land,lol~
@@李小白-x4v how is that a response. Omg such mediocre being stated😂😂😂😂
Doklam crisis of 2017 resulted in India officially moving into Bhutanese territory to stop PLA. Stopping & physically phusing Chinese troop & construction worker out of the border as define by Bhutan & India.. though chinese did construct road upto their territory.. had US pushed PLAN & PLARF out of SCS.. CCP won't dare to do this.. anyways the way India is constructing road, bridges & military infra along LAC is good for power dynamics.. India recently move two offensive corps toward china beside defensive corps already takling PLA & giving golgappas to CCP's goons
Fact is CCP would like to expand into everywhere as far as actions have shown.
Good-old British professor just can’t get over with the mess their empire left over everywhere.
This comment would be appropriate if it was about the China-Hong Kong conflict, since Hong Kong was a British colony, but Bhutan has never been colonized by the UK (nor by any other western nation for that matter) so it doesn't really apply here.
Why would you drag UK everywhere, it's not their fault.
China just don't agree any borders they have issues with every neighbour India, bhutan,Nepal, Vietnam, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Russia,
@@Xob_Driesestig Guess who drew the border for northeastern India?
Classic Indian, that after 70 years of independence still blames the British for Indias problems, hates the Tag Mahal because it was built by the Mughals 😅😅
8964
Bhutan's best bet is an explicit alliance with India
But don't rely on india fully because india has to protect its own border too
China occupies Bhutanese land; Chinese Commenters: Bhutan's fault!
Russia bombing Ukrainian houses; Russian Commenters: Ukraine's fault!
Who are the one group who cries in pain as they strike you?
notorious LAND-GRABBER anywhere in the world. SHAMELESS
chineese bots be crazy
How come Bhutan can't settle a boundary disputes with China without India's permission? Isn't Bhutan a sovereign country? To me it looks like India is the one who's middling in Bhutan foreign policy not China.
yes
Bhutan has been bullied by India all the time.
Bhutan has treaties with India. Yes, India has good control over it and Bhutan should have its sovereignty to decide its international relations. However, being on the Indian side means that India pushes them to have their defined territories by international boundaries respected. China has a bunch of border issues with everyone else and definitely does not resolve them diplomatically, but by force as we have seen recently. Bhutan will be able to do nothing to prevent Chinese military from encroaching on their territory.
Bhutan doesn't even recognises or have any diplomatic relations with china. It fears chinas expansion, as we have seen in case of tibet. Bhutan have no other choice but to increase relationship with india to counter china, and not get merged with china.
Yeah we who what happened to Tibet, Bhutan ain't fool, they know history and history repeats.
China may illegally occupy but Bhutan will never give up claim to that region🇮🇳❤️🇧🇹
You can claim it all you want but if china puts tank and guns on that land and plants a chinese flag on you are chit out of luck. This is what russia did with the crimea and this is why we canot allow communist nations and dictatorships to grab land whenever they want.
Yes, you are right! The thunder of land won't be back up 💪🇧🇹🇮🇳
If china really wants it will claim
Fact is they will be surrendered if india don't protect them
Let not forget how China take Tibet, if the nation refuses China's request.
@Guesswhokk Lets indeed not forget that Tibet had always been part of Chinas sovereign territory long than USA has been a country. Just because they illegally wanted to be their own country, doesnt mean they can. Its equivalent of Texas and some southern states wanting to be their own country without the approval of USA. What do you think will happen?
@@yerri5567first of all ‘China’ didn’t exist when Tibet was under dynastic control, and the control was never continuous but on and off, and never imposing but equal..,
@@NarasimhaDiyasena First of all, "China" is what the West calls the Middle Kingdom. Its always existed since time immemorial. Secondly, we are talking about "sovereignty" here, not "control". China had sovereignty over Tibet for longer than USA has been a country, its set in stone, in black and white. There a legal documents to prove it. They allowed Tibet the authority to govern themselves, but make no mistake, sovereignty was still Chinas. Thats the difference between sovereignty and "control".
And once the last Chinese Dynasty came to an end, there was an imperial edict (what we call treaty nowadays) that stated that sovereignty over Tibet was to be handed over to the next "China". Ie it was continuous. Everything was enshrined in law. That is why Tibet wanting to be their own little country was illegal. China rightfully took back control when they violated the law first.
@@yerri5567 China can bran wash their citizens and change the history book, but The Truth will always remain Truth......... Tibet was Never been part of China. In fact, our mighty King in the 7th Century once conquered China.
Same tactic China is using on South China Sea. I remembered a TV Series I watch when I was a kid where the lead character asked the Mongolian Khan, "Of all the expansion you are doing, how much land do you need to bury your corpse?" After 5000 years of history, China still has not learnt all. Look at the Roman, how great was it to have one man ruled all?
It seems to be a trend of China's massive militarisation. Almost every border of neighbours, even on the sea, Chinese military is rapidly militarising. The only neighbour it doesn't militarise... is Russia, but that wasn't a surprise given Russia's status as China's minor partner.
China is now making claims even on Russian territory. China is not a peaceful neighbor.
but even China and Russia have some territorial disputes. I have no idea why China would want to make all their neighbors, enemies for no apparent reason for some little land.
@@mohakjain5802 Russia is too weak to do anything now, and even if Russia managed to somehow subjugate Ukraine into its realm, it could not stand against China's demands since Chinese troops are far more modern, more capable and more advanced than Russian army. Pakistan is China's long time ally, so no reason to militarise.
The rest? Their territories were parts of the Chinese Empire at some point under various dynasties, such as the Han, Tang, Yuan and Qing. That's why China want them back.
@@mohakjain5802to “make China great again” ,my country is on chauvinism mode
@@luishernandezblondeRussia nuclear deterrence are for China 😂
Not to worry, Indian military has been present in the streets of butan for quite a while.
chinese bots everywhere😆😆😆
我只能看到达利特们自嗨🤣
@cathie3874 why would we cry, ur just chinese. HAHAHAHA, paper dragon
@@Youdontshushh India no.1
Wumao bots all over the place
@@aibuakyo9443 just like slave trade in qing dynasty
Two out of the best 3 space agencies of the World (Russia/USA/China) said India did not land on Moon's South Pole.
1) NASA specifically said "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 kilometers from the Moon’s South Pole.". This is just another diplomatic way of saying India did not land on Moon's South Pole. If India had landed on on Moon's South Pole, NASA would have simply said that "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located at the Moon’s South Pole" instead of "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 KILOMETERS FROM the Moon’s South Pole.
2) Dr Ouyang Ziyuan, lauded as the father of China’s lunar exploration programme, told the Chinese-language Science Times newspaper that the Chandrayaan-3 landing site, at 69 degrees south latitude, was nowhere close to the pole, defined as between 88.5 and 90 degrees.
How is China allowed to build on other countries???
Ask a thief.. they will also lie about it 😅
As long as India or world doesn't give Tibetan freedom this problem wil go on... Before there was no borders between Tibet.. India.. Bhutan
Absolutely. There was only peace and interconnected before. Now, everywhere is becoming nightmare due to China influence. Nepal used to be safe heaven for Tibetans, not any more. 😢
Shame on China grabbing land from Bhutan n Nepal like small country.
Bhutan invited China to extend its trade and economy. Why do you accussed China Extend aggressively in Bhutan. You should ask the Government this question. Nevertheless, do you have real-time evidence to make such accussation.
*NOTE: Many of the comments here are from Chinese government sponsored trollbots*
Why Bhutan leader were silence when construction going on
Because they need development to get out of poverty. They don't want to be stuck in the dark ages.
Because that is well within the line of control, the de fatco border. WSJ just doesn't like the fact that China-India border area is too peacful last year, so they feel like stiring it up a little bit.
It's amazing how dictators are incapable of not grabbing land that isn't theirs.
They are territorially aggressive since their own history begun. Starts with ancient feudalism and followed by thousand years with imperial expansion, they fought wherever they could and only stopped where they couldn't reach.
China 🇨🇳, they'll bring the world map and draw the dashes
I think that was the British.
US simply: All Mine~
Noo keep dreaming and coping 😂 USA should care about it's school first @@Im-mono
Ofcourse, China owns everything that those tiny eyes can reach. All hail Winnie Xi the overlord master of galaxy!
You can show disdain for a country's political and geographic agenda but do not make discriminatory remarks about their enthinicty/race. We're better than that.
Why be racist regarding a geopolitical issue?
@@danceoffAsh ok snowflakes!
@@JonJon-wc6pj 哥们眼睛贼大 但能看的更远还是能透视功能？哈哈 你这一骂 把印度北部的这些人都包括了！
@@danceoffAsh
Is it racist to call Winnie as Winnie? 😂😂
"that look like military installations" . . .
civillian-military fusion is part of china's gameplan. Its the same way they sell weapons to Russia.
What’s so surprising??
In India we're currently busy with elections. We are currently using divide and rule policy and don't want our citizens to know what's really happening because it will hinder election results
That's news is 3-4 months old. Government already knows the issue that's why Modi visited Bhutan a month ago and Bhutan has become more concerned about India's concerns otherwise Bhutan was just ready to give up.
@@Mr.Atypical so what about china grabbing thousands of acres of land? why doesn't ModiXi say regarding that matter too? He just dares to speak against Muslims in India and doesn't dare to utter a word against china.
It seems that |ndia/|ndians have clearly forgotten that |ndia was the one who |nvaded Sikkim on year 1973 before annexing Sikkim to become one of |ndian states on year 1975. The last Chogyal king of Sikkim, Palden Thongdu Namygal, was placed under house arrest and was tortured by |ndia till he died in 1975. Miraculously, after making an example out of the Sikkim King, Sikkim became part of |ndia on year 1975 but not on 1973 when |ndia |nvaded Sikkim. If the sovereign country of Sikkim is willing to become one with |ndia, is an invasion necessary? Is a house arrest and the killing of the King of Sikkim necessary?
Majority of sikkimese population is in Army, they don't even like Chinese, now cope 4 foot rice farmer.
@@darkodonnie2729 says the 2.5 foot cur rimun cher. World Population Review says: Average height of Indian men (age 19) = 166.5 and the Average height of Chinese men (age 19) =175.66. 🤭
@@darkodonnie2729 Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice.
1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself.
2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis".
3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine).
4) Despite all these advantages, India lost.
5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
@@darkodonnie2729
China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided
1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2"
2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962
3) Indian prisoners of war captured
India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided
1) No video proof
2) No territorial victory
3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured.
😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
@@darkodonnie2729 Why do all military rankings rank China above India? 🤣🤭😂1962? Wait, didn't the Indians claimed that they had won in the 1967 "war"? The score should be even like China: 1 and India:1 on paper? Oh wait again, all historians said there is no war between China and India in 1967 but only a small 3 day skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 😅🤣😂Read article "How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)". I guess that is the reason why China > India. 🤭😂
When China does it it's called land grab. When Israel does it it's called land expropriation. Regarding accusations of land grab against Israel as "antisemitic" is not hypocritical AT ALL!
Oh yes, china is israel 2.0 with gaslighting characteristics
There are 22 Arab nations, and only one tiny Israel. And that land also belongs to Israel. In fact, Ancient Israel is very much bigger than now.
If an Indian couple migrated to Europe, and then, they give birth to children. Then, they decided to go back to India. So, when they go back to India, had they become European or are they still Indians.
@@thinkie12 Your example doesn't represent the reality and has nothing to do with the current state of Israel. A representative example is this: Can an Iranian decide to go to India and occupy some piece of land because it used to be a part of Persian Empire? and the answer is no. India belongs to Indians. The Iranian can apply as an immigrant to go and live in his/her supposedly ancestoral land in India but if the application is successful, he/she will be a citizen of Indian. India won't be turned into Persia unless it's occupied by a large number of Iranians through the use of force and genocide! Just because your ancestors used to live somewhere centuries ago (or worse, because your "God" told you so) some foreign land won't belong to you.
@@shibak4 You didn't really understand the land of Palestine. The land of Palestine consisted of Israel and Jordan. There have never been a Palestinian state. Can you name any Prime Minister of Palestinian state. None. There is region called Palestine but never a country called Palestine. Due to war in that region like the Babylonian War, Assyrian War, the Ottoman Empire, Roman Empire, so Jews were dispersed and flee from the war, but not all Jews left that region. There were many Jews that remained there. In 1947, the UN partitioned the land of Palestine into two. One piece for Israel, and one for the Arabs. So, back then, there were already a two state solution. The Jews got 23% of the land of Palestine and they called it Israel and the Arabs got 77% of the land of Palestine and it was called Transjordan. Today it is called Jordan. The so called Palestinian today were actually Arabs. There were Jordanians. Some are from Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon.
Israel is legit. The UN had voted on it in 1947, and it passed the resolution.
ruclips.net/user/shortsWnGl-TFaiuM
Remember!! not just for India, the red China is issue for everyone.
TAIWAN!!! **cough** **cough**
India is keeping its taiwan card for the main event dont worry
@user-ii2lm6kg2g China is West taiwan there was never a china.😂
@user-ii2lm6kg2greally? Last time i checked Taiwan is a free democracy. Perhaps i need a refresher 😅
it seems like Taiwan case is more aggressive, but actually not, like the cases with PHP, Vietnam, Burma, Japan, India, Bhutan caused by china is still going parallel. China is igniting the problems with all its neighbors
@user-ii2lm6kg2g yes... one country under Taiwan, since they wrote it.😁😁😁
Nothing New all in the Public domain already. Bhutan King was in New Delhi a few months ago regarding this after visiting Beijing. WSJ come on don't lag 6month behind.
The Indian debt/death trapping Nepal is unforgivable eg. 2015 Nepal blockade (please do some research). What is even more unforgivable is expansionist |ndia stealing lands and annexing Kalapani from Nepal on year 1962. |and grabbing |ndia has encroached Nepali land, and Nepal can do nothing about it. |ndia has paid off Nepali politicians, and they will keep their mouth shut. Kalapani was encroached from 1962 by |ndia using its military. In 1952, Nepal gave permission to temporarily place |ndian Armies in its Northern boundary foreseeing the dangers from the Chinese side. In the year of 1962, India made a bunker in Kalapani and placed its camp there, as the China-|ndia war broke out. At that time, the there were 18 |ndian camps including Kalapani, inside the Nepalese borders. After the war, when Nepal asked the |ndian side to remove its armies from all Nepalese regions, |ndia removed them from all the places except in Kalapani. And even till now, Kalapani is under the |ndian Military’s control. One step forward of the military encroachment, |ndia took a political step in encroachment as it added Kalapani to its border on the new map published by Survey of |ndia on November 2, 2019.
India is Bhutan's best friend and nothing will happen to Bhutan despite India's presence.


Feedback
as long as *
0:57 wrong map of India. AP is India. media shouldn't be scared to put fact, if they say claim truthful.
China on other hand is hungry of land. They will even claim moon saying "it's part of Chinese territory from ancient times", once they put human there... 😂😂😂
We are also having problems with these land grabbing china. We understand & sympathize with Bhutan.
I think Bhutan or Nepal foreign affair are controlled by India. In the past, they do not dare to restore ties with China because India control their foreign affairs nd there are no other countries that can rival the hegmon and India Then came China now with obor and developing countries are benefiting directly from the new infrastructures and trade that boom their economy. Bhutan or Nepal see their opportunities. After all these yrs, there is finally someone that can rival their so called ' master'. Thus the restoration of trade with China resume. Sri Lanka now wants India military to move out of their region and wanted good ties with China and wanted investment as China is the only country that help them with rising tides that have been rising due to global warming.No one helps them with investment and infrastructure build up to deal with global warming in the past. Now China can. Any good Nepalese ppl can correct me if i am wrong. I am always willing to learn facts.
My God😢pls leave Bhutan alone
The thunder of land won't be back up brother 💪🇧🇹💀
Seems that Bhutan is not fully sovereign to make its own decisions. Why not a news story on a UN member nation not having full autonomy in foreign relations?
It is hoped that Bhutan can gain independent sovereignty, especially diplomatic sovereignty. Avoid becoming the second Sikkim.
India is controlling its foreign policy by threatening otherwise India will occupie Bhutan just like sikkim neighbour country of Bhutan.
@@frownezhang1632 Sikkim is happy to be under India
@@rangoman1815you sure about that we all know they are called chinki by your own Indian citizens
Chyna : mine mine mine mine
Not easy bruh, The thunder of land won't back up 💪💀
Bhutan should merge with Nepal to be Butty & Nepals 🤷♀️
Bhutan treated Nepalese refugees poorly
No, Thank you.
Nepal can't defend its territory from Chinese occupation so how can they defend Bhutan😅
Nepal should merge with Bhutan
Nepal is already a part of China.
I love WSJ, my favorite RUclips channel ❤
We cannot talk about Bhutan without talking about Sikkim. Like Bhutan, Sikkim was an independent Himalayan Buddhist kingdom many hundreds of years old and a neighbor of China. Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas during the 18th century. The Sikkim king fled to China and asked for help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition force to Sikkim and expelled the Gorkhas and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim was left unmolested for the rest of its history until it was gobbled up by the artificial country India in 1975. Chinese of older generations were taught that Sikkim was one of China's neighbors. Even student in Taiwan (Republic of China) were taught Sikkim was one of China's neighbors until a couple of decades ago. Bhutan is very similar to Sikkim in terms of ethnicity, language, religion and culture and history, only that it is bigger. Bhutan is in a precarious situation right now because it is the next low hanging fruit in India's expansionism and is currently militarily occupied by India. The reason I wrote this here is to educate the people in the world what is going on in that part of the world and stop indulging India, a country that is up to no good.
India is useful to the west so the media doesn't talk about India's expansionism AT ALL.
Why do you think Bhutan is occupied by Indian military.
Bhutan doesn't have its military infrastructure India helps Bhutan to provide safety . India also include more than billion dollars aid from its budget to Bhutan it is highest among all the neighbours
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
Sikkim is doing just fine now. Being one of "China's neighbors" is scary, if they weren't part of India, you would be using your 18th century obscure politics as justification to destroy their culture and take over
Complete nonsense reporting. Bhutan has been isolated from the world by India, just like Sikkim before it, and it is undoubtedly true that India wants to annex it into India. India has already forced Bhutan to give up its sovereign rights to an independent foreign policy, and India doesn't allow Bhutan to have diplomatic relations with most nations (India is the only G20 nation that Bhutan is allowed to have diplomatic relations with). Bhutan is fighting back, however, and having unofficial diplomatic relations with China anyways.
Also, Bhutanese government officials have been asked if these Chinese settlements are in Bhutan's territory or not, and they always answer that they are not. The only people claiming they are in Bhutanese territory are Indian and U.S. government officials.
Brother how did you came into the conclusion that india wants to annex Bhutan 😂😂. When was the last time india annexed a state and china did ?? Forgot history or what. Historical India never shared border with china, it was after annexation of tibet by china, that all this mess came into existence. Your ignorance is unbelievable.
@@rickgolder6818 India last annexed a state when they annexed Sikkim in 1975. They came up with this ridiculous story about how Sikkim desperately wanted to be annexed by India, seemingly for no reason. They first did it by taking control of Sikkim's foreign policy, then flooding the country with their troops, diplomatically isolating it, and eventually annexing it. Which is exactly what they are attempting to do with Bhutan.
As for Tibet, it hasn't been an independent country for close to a thousand years. There are the obvious reasons for stating this: they have never had formal diplomatic relations with any other country, no other country has ever recognized their independence, etc. But also, whenever British India invaded Tibet throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s, they never negotiated with the Tibetan government. They would contact the Qing government in China and as they were the rightful rulers of Tibet, they paid the British Indian armies a bribe to leave Tibet.
Your ignorance is unbelievable.
@@jasonjean2901 "they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok, this sentence is enough for me to know that, you have already made up your mind that all the things and incidents that happened in the past and officially written documents are completely false, and everything your master CCP said, even though CCP have no connection with Sikhim hence or forth is true. And you are talking about ignorance kiddo??? Heh, learn some history. Sikkhimise people were itself not very happy with the monarch, and they also many anti monarch protests were held in 1973. Also the fact that China annexed Tibet in 1949, and also nepal attached Tibet, was the main reason why The monarch needed a stronger force for security. They officially asked indian ti annex and make sikhim an indian state. I am nit going to write a full essay here, but you go and do some history reasearch kiddo. You are very bad at that no doubt.
@@jasonjean2901 "they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok kiddo, this is enough for me to know that you have already decided that all the past incidents and history that happened and official written documents are also false, and only what you master CCP said even though CCP have no relationship with tibet hence and forth, is true. nd you are talking about ignorance kiddo ??? First go and get your history lessons, then come and talk. The people were already not happy with the monarch and there were many anti monarch protests in 1973. Also the annexation of tibet, and there historically bad relationship with nepal was also a main reason why Sikhim decided they needed a strong force to counter china and not end up like tibet. Sikkhim officially asked india to annex and make sikkhim an indian state. I am not going to write a full essay here. Get your face straight kiddo.
@@jasonjean2901 they came up with this ridiculous story"....ok kiddo, this is enough for me to know that you have already decided that all the past incidents and history that happened and official written documents are also false, and only what you master CCP said even though CCP have no relationship with tibet hence and forth, is true. nd you are talking about ignorance kiddo ??? First go and get your history lessons, then come and talk. The people were already not happy with the monarch and there were many anti monarch protests in 1973. Also the annexation of tibet, and there historically bad relationship with nepal was also a main reason why Sikhim decided they needed a strong force to counter china and not end up like tibet. Sikkhim officially asked india to annex and make sikkhim an indian state. I am not going to write a full essay here. Get your face straight kiddo.
Hermits, Monks, & LLAMAS!!!
Oysters, clams and cockles !!!
The US should stop supporting Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan and begin spending for the border security and for own people.
the Bhutanese government rejected a treaty with China where the Chinese would give a large portion of land in the other locations of the country for a small portion in the western part, the Bhutanese government still keeps the treaty with India and are true people
China has never succeeded in a war of conquest because it is already too big and populous and it's difficult to govern the whole country. Fighting in many fronts is also a sure way to lose. South China Sea, Spratly Islands, Uyghurs, Taiwan, India, Japan etc
So if a territory has never been settled, per the Prof., how doesn't it belong to whoever occupies it first?
That's the logic that explains why there are European countries on four continents, no?
I thought the Bhutan government stated that China has not taken their territory and it was India who raised the question.
Yup. & India didn't even raise any question. The vid clearly said towards the end that India didn't want to comment on foreign affairs between Bhutan and China.
India didn't even comment on that, it was some youtuber news channels(10k-20k subscriber), who made report on that
and WSJ post this video that Indian media is posting about that, it means Indian gov have problem
In 1975, Sikkim was annexed by India. Bhutan, as a neighboring country, is not stupid. The Bhutan are a country established by Tibetans after migration. Bhutan and Tibet have the same culture and ethnicity. Bhutan is very different from India, both in culture and ethnicity. Bhutan's diplomacy and military are controlled by India. The British Empire left Bhutan, but Bhutan have to meet the Indians who have no bottom line. The key is that the per capita GDP of Tibet is seven more times that of India. As a result, Indians covet the land of Tibet every day and say that they want to liberate Tibet. In the eyes of other countries, it is similar to North Korea saying that it wants to rescue Americans out of poverty.
@@snowlee-ml7rr Sikkim monarch rebels voted to join India. The fact that you post such blatant misinformation shows that you have an agenda. China annexed Tibet by invading it and the Dalai Lama became a refugee in India. Now China is building villages in Bhutan, spraying water cannons at the Phillipines and always threatening to attack Taiwan. Everyone knows who the bully is. Go check Wikipedia and all these facts online for verification. India has received Tibetans with open arms because Tibetans have fled excess authoritarianism and cultural attacks by the communist Chinese governement. And also, Bhutan does not have an active military.
@@snowlee-ml7rr lol the Sikkim parliament himself sign on the proposal of annexation with India.
Western media is always underestimating the Nuclear Powered Nation called India.
India has strongest and well trained all-weather army.
At war times, India can also cross other Countries borders if REQUIRED.
Not to forget, India has most powerful and lathel weapons in its armour.
This is game of football ...you cant just defend whole field which just few players . You have to attack also .
So indians or bhutanese need to grab chinese land in return because you cant put soldier on 1000km long border with china which is situation in high mpuntains