Chief Inspector & Inspector - Armed Met Police @ North Woolwich Aviation HQ Section 43 Stop & Search
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- A must watch video.
This audit shows the abuse of Power from Senior ranking Police Officers Using section 43 without proper grounds or reasonable suspicion.
I am auditing North Woolwich Police Station and get stopped and questioned by Chief Inspector Mattock & an armed Inspector Routh.
I don't think they received the NPCC memo as Inspector Routh instigates a Section 43 Terrorism act search on me. Another unlawful search.
#pinac #policeaudit #armedpolice #epicfail #abuseofpowers #metpolice #section43 #chiefinspector #professionalstandards 
Развлечения
![KSI - Thick Of It (feat. Trippie Redd) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/At8v_Yc044Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Great audit , you did really well under the circumstances.
My advice to you is to never ever let them surround you
Thanks for this feedback AB much appreciated
Just watched one of yours where PC Redface and Little Boy tried to surround you AB. I think you should point out how weird and unusual it is that they don't stand together. It's like they aren't mates. 😂
It's so obviously what they are trained to do. Who approaches someone to talk to them and stands behind them ffs. First point of public interest would be the fact that they parked on a zebra crossing. They're proper scum tbh.
@@yardleyskiauditing Why do you allow this You are across the street to the police chiefs office..
Absolute thuggery, 6 armed police harassing a man with a camera whilst the chief inspector just stands there, they are classic examples of policing at its worst, no wonder there is no respect for these thugs.
I was reading of a Sgt who was on duty at COP26..owner upgraded his coffee to large from what had ordered and when officer thanked him, got applause from all in cafe
Oh it's a man with a camera. The way the pigs were acting I thought he must have had a fucking RPG on his shoulder. 🤔
Parking on the approach to a pedestrian crossing...totally illegal except in a dire emergency. The driver should be prosecuted.
Correct. Blatant disregard for public safety.
@@GRPLiningServices they only care about themselves...... They forgot a long time ago their there to serve the public and uphold the law!....... The problem is there is still so many who blindly back old bill and believe everything they say and do as they are "the police" they can't do wrong....... They get caught out so much now as people film it obviously but they still abuse their power knowing they are filmed so imagine their behaviour when not filmed....... Again the doo gooders watch stuff and still back the police and say if you got nothing to hide do as you're told and miss the point it's the police doing wrong not someone say for instance refusing to give their name when the law does not say they have to and in fact the old bill are unlawful!...... The sad thing is it won't ever change only starting to when on camera and even then they take liberty's
The fact that he immediately assumed you didn't speak English shows profiling in action.
Discrimination
YEP ASSUMPTION =, GUESS WORK, PERHAPS , POSSIBLY, MAYBE, COULD BE, ,MIGHT BE , MADE UP. HUNCH, = NOTHING TO JUSTIFY .
I believe he was profiling me..
I thought that absolute disgrace
@@outlaw6421 You mean like how they profiled miners in the 80s by doing random stops of potential picketing on major roads near collieries . Or how they stopped miners children / wives and searched them . DISCRIMINATION 😂🤣😅
If you put in a formal complaint, as a chief inspector was involved in the stop demand that your complaint is dealt with an officer that is senior to a chief inspector. That should cause some confusion
He couldn't demand that. Complaints investigation policy states the investigating officer must be at least 1 rank above. When you get nearer the top it becomes of equal rank if there is no one senior. I have complaints against a Chief Inspector and Sergeant. The Chief Inspector in the complaint is investigating the complaint against the Sergeant. I can guarantee the complaint won't be upheld. They'll want me to refer it to PIRC. I'll complain about the Inspector again. Sooner or later I hope to get one who has some form of professional, moral and ethical standards. Not going to hold my breath though.
@@thefoxhat6163 Oh ive been through the complaints procedure, and i know whats it's like. My point was not that it would happen, but that then they have to explain in writing why they wont do it - which may give more reason to take to the PIRC.
For example, I was told that requesting my Custody records would take time as she was "too busy" and it would "take some time until she was free to deal with my request". I then invited her to explain how being "too busy" and "take some time until she was free to deal with my request" was compatible with PACE which only defined the time as "reasonable".
- I had an invitation to pick them up at a time of my choosing by end of day
Also, I was told that the custody officer was unavailable for interview over my PACE complaints as he had left the service. I once again invited them to explain in writing how - if there was a legal case - the custody officer would be available for witness statements, - but why not for a PACE complaint. Ya, the custody officer was suddenly interviewed.
Its about being relentless and not taking their excuses at face value but getting them to explain them. But in writing. They hate that
@@hannahalice1000 Nice going on the custody officer. I'm trying to get mine in court since the piggies complained about my lack of cooperation at the station in their witness statements. I repeatedly ask them to stop bullying and threatening me and start acting professionally then I'd cooperate. They threw me in the cell instead. It took the civilian all of 3 minutes in 2 conversations to gain my cooperation. All he did was treat me as a human and acted professionally.
Sec 43 is just because they can have THAT LITTLE BIT OF POWER over you and THEY ABUSE IT
Section 43 is the result of nearly ten years of state sponsored f a k e terrorism.
Chief Inspector & Inspector both happy to abuse Sect 43. Totally ignoring NPCC Guidelines. This is why the junior ranks abuse this power, they learn it from the Corrupt senior officers. Total Disgace
The problem lies in the term "Guidlines" not rules, implying that they may ignore it if they wish
Definitely mark.....my neck of woods
So much wrong with their behaviour from the moment they caused traffic disruption parking on zigzags to how, as a group, their abuse of you is allowed by the Chief Constable. How
those senior officers got to that level is unbelievable. Keep on exercising your rights and best wishes with suing them.
The first words out of his mouth were "Do you speak English" 🙄 that was racial profiling, pure and simple. "Your action here is not normal" well buddy, you'd better get used to it because the public want transparency. Thank goodness for auditors that have the courage to stand up to street bullying.
Thank you for picking up on this.. I was going to confront him with that scenario why wouldn't I be English speaking..
@@yardleyskiauditing - I think you can cut him some slack there Yardley. He is in London, where there is more foreigners than anywhere else in the UK. In addition, he is in Airport Police so probs meets more foreigners than other Met cops. - If you actually didn't speak English, Would you rather he yapped away for half an hour before he realised you didn't understand what he was saying? Perfectly reasonable Q, I thought.
@@topcat1358 it clearly is not a reasonable question to come out with as the first thing to ask. next you'll start letting them assume everyone pointing a camera at a police station is mentally ill...
You lot need to get a fucking grip
@@zcharged8294 - You see an assumption behind the question, whereas I see only a question.
On that basis, I would think it almost impossible to ask a question without an assumption behind it.
eg - If I asked your name, surely I would be assuming you had a name and also that you spoke English?
Police van parked on zig-zags obstructing the view of other drivers approaching a zebra crossing. Not a emergency. Driver should be fined and points on licence.
Andy - Yep, and the parking obstructed the free passage of a bus. The Bus Driver should have immediately intervened with these law-breaking morons disguised as police inspectors ....As per Met Police advice following the crimes of Wayne Couzens
That would have been the self entitled CHIEF INSPECTER DICKHEAD
Don't believe those two bum buddies had juris diction.
It was good of the copper to tell us there are guns stored here.
Yup, a total idiot couldn't detect horse sit if he stood in it
I wouldnt put nothing past these jokers, they cant even follow their own guidelines.
An inspector and chief inspector standby while an underling acts unlawfully for invoking Sect 43. They are are clueless as the specific requirement to invoke Sect 43!
Keep up the good work Yardley and put in a civil claim.
I don’t understand why people suggest such things! It’s the taxpayer that foots the bill for all these claims not the police. Pointless exercise imo and goes completely against what auditors stand for! They want to audit the police but then fine the taxpayer when things go wrong!! 🙄
£3k for the unlawful detainment.
@@scottchegg1355 Maybe if they made individual officers responsible and took it out of their paypackets then they wouldn't act as they do............ unfortunately the British police force are not what they where, even a lot of ex-police officers are disgusted by what they have become..........
@@soaruk3697 maybe this maybe that… it doesn’t happen though. And whilst it doesn’t happen we pay for these guys claims! Who’s the winner? Certainly not us tax payers. We lose and people in the comments praise them ffs! This blame and claim culture that’s been created is sickening and those that stand up for it are also just as sickening.
@@scottchegg1355 Its because the police are unaccountable there police complaints system is not fit for purpose, police are covered for and protected till they commit a crime they have no choice but to do something about, murder, rape, child abuse, and that is the level it takes for something to be done. drunk driving pass, beating up wife pass, stealing from a crime scene pass
Outrageous
Kolee - You need to big up this auditor on your channel. He is very good and this was a TOP CLASS audit!
@@topcat1358 I will do it now
Awesome! Once again, you completely nailed it.
When these officers watch this video, I wonder if they will change their approach on the way they interact with the public!
I doubt it. As the saying goes "You can't educate pork"
Actually, these videos seem to make it clear that officers can carry on EXACTLY this way without any punishment. Why should they change their approach??
@@interestedparty00 - I disagree. There are a lot of cops now switched onto auditors and either avoid them or speak nicely. It's sad they can't do that all the time. Unfortunately there are many cops still need educated!
Well done 👍
The inspector did have attitude.
Parking on zigzags is a big safety issue, putting people’s lives at risk!!
If a Chief Inspector and Inspectors don't know the basic bread and butter laws, what hope have we that their underlings will. How on Earth did they get promoted to such ranks.
Marvellous police service. Station is closed ,no service given to the public, but they’ve got the resource to send six officers out on a public highway to wrongly arrest a citizen filming on a public highway. The police need retraining and reforming..
They all came scuttling out complete with guns . . . and not a clue about how a terrorist attack might be planned or carried out - surveillance of any kind to be used for nefarious purposes would NEVER be carried out in such an open manner as Inspector Plod implied - any useful reconnaissance would need to be done covertly and on that particular street there are at least half a dozen spots where such could be done without any dimwitted plod - PC or Chief Inspector being even remotely aware. From these sites every coming or going could be noted and for what good it would do, the reg numbers & makes of every vehicle & descriptions of vehicle occupants. In the past 48+ years no attacks have been carried out on police stations and there is not a single attack ever recorded where photographic or video resources have been observed. The terrorists that these armed thugs are so paranoid about these days invariably go for soft targets - civilians, young people, pubs concerts etc etc - occasionally police officers get caught up in things but never while cowering in numbers in safe & secure police stations.
@@trevorferguson6222 terrorist is term made up by Hollywood
@@DerekHundik Does that mean that the Terrorism Act should only apply in California and that these people who blow up civilians and anyone in sight are really only imaginary in films - the term actually came into existence, albeit in a slightly different form, in the late 18th century - long before Hollywood existed.
@@trevorferguson6222 ? It doesnt exist I dont know what is your sarcasm for
@@trevorferguson6222 and you are? MI5 or 21 or 23 squadron or maybe just an armchair spy?
Watched 100's of Audit video's, this is by far the best one yet, didn't lose your temper, kept cool, and put them in their place, Chief Inspector new they got owned, respect to you.✊
Thank you for this comment..
Great Audit put them to shame.
It should be pointed out to this Inspector, that parking within the confines of a pedestrian crossing is an offence and he is liable for 3 points on his licence. If a pedstrian was to be knocked down due to his actions, I would expect him to be severly dealt with, like any other motorist.
5:25 He asks why Yardley is recording people coming in and out of the police station when he saw none of that as they've just arrived. Shows he's following a training script and not using his brain cell.
Excellent audit, their demeanour changed when you said you were auditing them!
You are quite right, one of the so called Inspectors should have made that belligerent PC give his number.
Well handled Sir.
Thank you for that comment..
Thanks for the info that there are weapons stored in th building . Parked illegally on a Zebra crossing endangering pedestrians , all to illegally carry out a search of someone carrying out a lawful activity . The worry is you have two Inspectors and four so called police officers who do not understand PACE and they are armed , clueless and dangerous . Some retraining for all ranks would not go amiss . A worthwhile audit .
And driving off without wearing seat belts!
After Auditing Britain (AB) this got to be one of the best audits I've seen by far! It's all about educating them instead of a rants. Appsolute class! Well done and keep up the good work 👏🏼
Thank you for that comment..
@@yardleyskiauditing pleasure 🙏🏼. I guess you got a new subscriber ✌🏼
@@gooner2047 Thanks
I agree 😂😂😂😂🤣
The contempt on the faces of these costumed salary thieves for doing a lawful activity is all too apparent. All this because they are not in control, yet another example of the national disgrace.
Filming a Police station particularly one with an armoury is not what normal people do. I would have been hugely disappointed if they didn't stop.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 - No-one knew there was an armoury there till the morons said it.
You have to love the "it's VERY strange to be filming" comments that are always made when a person is surrounded by authoritarianism filming from every angle. The inference with this comment is to single out an individual and verbally lead them into a state of agreement that their behaviour warrants a form of guilt and therefore, they should bow down to the next course of action....detainment, search, arrest.... all for a legal activity? Poor professionalism, poor judgement.
One of the finest examples for the repealing of section 43.👍👍
Doesnt even need repealing just used properley. We all know what a terrorist looks like. To say we dont is disingenous at best.
If only they put that much effort in catching the grooming gangs.
Very surprised and worrying to know that. It would not be common knowledge. Hope no actual terrorists plan anything with that information coming from a Senior Police Man.
@@jimflynn978 after reading this comment I done some research and found this on the trusty old Internet.. lol
www.eliteukforces.info/police/SO18-Aviation-Security/
@@yardleyskiauditing The internet does not say which police station is a gun store. This is why he should have told not told a possible terrorist (as he had responsible cause according to the terriost act he suspected you were).
@@jimflynn978 yeah I hear yah..
Hope a civil suit was filed against these crooked cops
Filming a Police station is not what normal people do. I would have been disappointed if they hadn't stopped.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 well they better get used to it as they are going to be audited/filmed on a regular basis as they should be. Biggest gang in the country, Full of rapists and murderers and oath breakers. Grubberment service droids and should be treated as such.
"Have you got anything on you that's going to harm me or my colleagues"
My reply to that is usually "A Brain"
Ha ha ha ha..
😂👍🏻
🤣😂🤣😂
These are not just PC’s they Inspectors and Chief Inspector who should know better abusing section 43…🤦♂️
Exactly.. Thanks for the comment
I for one did not know that the station had an armory, nice one officer, all the internet knows now. When your claim pays out will it be higher due to the rank of the officers>?
Ur getting better bro I enjoyed this... I also really like the editing and graphics you you include in the video. It adds a nice twist. Keep doing ur ting big man
Cheers.. Couple of your Stations I'm looking to revisit..
He got a new sub put of me KB. Just one suggestion @Yardley Ski - when you put text on the screen, leave it there a bit longer so we don't have to go back and pause to read it, also if you put text over the video footage itself, put an outline on the text as it makes it easier to read over the video.
Loved the video though, senior officers too, absolutely belter! 👊🏼
@@ukrainewarroom I shall make the text more readable..
@@ukrainewarroom 🙏
I've yet to see an audit on
Wood Green Western Road N22
Tell them "I'm doing some thing legal and I will still be doing it when you leave"
I love how the inspectors wouldn't get their own hands dirty with searching you, and as soon as they find nothing the inspector doesn't want to see your NPCC memo which proves they've messed up.
They don’t understand the law but are given a loaded gun to walk round the streets with.
That's how you do an audit and (sadly for the Met) embarrass a Chief Inspector! I think this particular video has the potential to be used as a training tool for officers showing them how NOT to behave. As the Inspector failed to provide grounds for the S43 search (as laid down in law) not only was he in error, but the Chief Inspector was complicit in the act by failing to step in and stop the search. The CI failed in his supervisory role and that makes this whole incident both a disciplinary as well as legal matter. This was uncomfortable watching.
It will go further as I was unlawfully detained and searched.. If they need a copy for training purposes... I do not give my consent.. ha ha ha ha
Another good reason not to assist these conceited tyrants when they appeal to photographers following an incident.
Therein lies the problem. You can’t really can you?
A young girl has been raped and murdered and you have it on tape...
@@MrAndrewFarrow Think about what you just said you complete and utter wrong un 😕 what are you doing filming a "young girl" getting "raped and murdered"
@@Camberwell86 it’s complicated drawing comparisons and it might hurt your brain a bit at first, but those of us that can do complicated thinking manage it easily.
It’s not your fault you’re stupid, but don’t flaunt it. Think CCTV
@@MrAndrewFarrow now you're the one struggling to draw comparisons. Police don't harass CCTV cameras. We're on about public photographers. Actual people.
@@Camberwell86 the police appeal for ALL video after an incident, especially door bells.
This audit was extremely well done. Top stuff!
Thank you
@@yardleyskiauditing You are very welcome!
They really struggle to comprehend their jobs, "We're gonna search you under section 43 because of this list of legal things you're doing". When they left silently hanging their heads, they knew they had f'd up.
Surprise Surprise another abuse of section 43. How the hell did that inspector get that rank. What a complete numpty. Ego over common scence
A prime example of abuse of abusable powers.
Luckily the RPG was well hidden.
Excellent video as always. Wish that any monies paid out came from their pension fund and not from tax payers. These encounters would end within a day.
You would think at there level they would know the law before the search ,you mentioned the memo they all had about Auditors but I don`t think, as are the police as we see every day k these guys can read ,should have sent a video. The abuse of this section 43 is out of control.
"Account for your actions " is an odd and worrying request .
Excellent right the way through the look of shame was in their eyes well done you. 🔥👍💪🧐🍻
Thank you
Top class auditing. It really seems that you are considered a threat by any of the establishment if you don’t simply act like everyone else.
Thanks for the comment
Excellent video my friend, good to watch and you handled yourself extremely well, in a situation the police tried to make hostile with there numbers.
Thanks
The Inspectors always get the lower ranks to do the dirty work. If the section 43 search was legal and justified why would they not do it, they knew it was wrong and made sure they would not be in a position so and consequences would mainly be on the lower rank officers.
But they all be sighted in the claim so it does not really matter.
But you think the chief would know better and that who the younger ones learn from disgusting behaviour
Also the constables that had arrived on the scene hadn't witnessed as anything. They're supposed to act under *their own* reasonable suspicion.
Well done one of the best interactions I've seen yet. Unbelievable from a chief inspector. No wonder the rank and file act the way they do
Thank you
LOL, if that body language doesn't say that they fucked up, I don't know what does.
Agreed. BTW - Nice point you made about user names. I'm not very keen on them either
They certainly have
please please auditors go there and keep auditing please ,A CHIEF INSPECTOR THAT DONT KNOW THE LAW FFS EMBARRASSING
jam - Agreed. That cop shop definitely needs a LOT more visits from auditors. PINAC!
I love the way you talked over that waffling Inspector and let him know he was NOT the boss. Also, the way you failed to listen to their "advice" and instructions.
They should be paying you at the end for the wonderful education and training you provided them. You should consider charging them a fee for this the next time - Though I'm sure they'll end up paying you anyway, after your civil suit. Good luck with that and please keep us updated.
This was an excellent model for how Audits should be conducted! + bagging a brace of Inspectors - Icing on the cake.
Thank you for the comment. I don't take unlawful directive very well.. If I have committed No crime then I do Not have to listen, unless I choose to..
Yeah that was good because they always want to talk over you which gives them the upper hand or so they think
You should have walked away about 25 feet when they said you weren’t being destined. Give us an update on your civil complaint because it seems as if these officers are still confident in their actions.
I couldn't agree more!
👍👍
Parking on them zigzag lines near the zebra crossing puts pedestrians life's at risk & had it been a member of the public, they would have received 3 penalty points.....
Take them to court it's time the public started to push back against these tyrant's
Theres an armoury in there?? Thanks inspector🤣
😂
They're stupid stopping him because he's suspicious could be filming something sensitive proceeds to tell suspicious guy that there's an Armoury lol and they gave these divs firearms
@@Andre-kc9di That's the second time I've seen a fail like that in exactly the same matter. He grassed himself up to the world. He's the security risk! 😂😂😂
Thanks inspector.....an armoury you say..."doh!!!!"
You really need to follow up on this high rank officers behaving like that if section 43 is taken away because of abuse then the little blue line flag means nothing to them when terrorist kill more of their colleagues and they are too stupid to realise it
terrorists dont kill police here in the uk ..they go after easy targets such us public which is why the whole thing is a joke
Keep us updated on this mate just subbed, they trated you with utter contempt.
I will update and thanks for the Sub..
The first question to them would be why are you illegally parked and a hazard to members of the public and road users?
right on the zigzag. only people I see committing an offence are the police
Total abuse of power and a waste of resources with six or seven cops for one man with a camera. As for the so called officer who refused to identify, he shouldn't have been allowed to search as he was not a recognised PC without identifying.
Sue the CHIEF INSPECTOR FOR HIS PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY as he was responsible for all his CONSTABLES actions
That was marvelous , I enjoyed your audit , as an security guard we have to take notes of members of public using cameras ( because of terrorism) but if you're in a public place , you're not doing anything suspicious unless certain criteria meets what is "suspicious" . Good on you mate 👍
The basis of the search was that I saw Police 'going IN AND OUT of the station.. which was totally Not true.. The only van that came out was the one I filmed.. no one entered the building.. So I was not being suspicious I was in view of everyone clearly filming.. which is a legal activity..
@@yardleyskiauditing I totally agree with you , some officers abuse their powers , you was not doing anything suspicious other than auditing Police , which we have rights to do .
There has never been a terrorist threat to a police station in the UK Northern Ireland back in the late 80s early 90s maybe the only that there protecting is there own egos
10:05 So he knows videos such as this will go on social media - yet still carries on with the intimidation and threats. Totally and utterly stupid.
The only way that they will ever learn is when you hit them in their own pockets
Great audit
I’ve said this many times, section 43 should be renamed section search for ID !!! Well handled pal !!!!
Thank you
RESPECT👍👍👍👍
CHIEF INSPECTOR, INSPECTOR AND THEIR " FANNIES " ARE CLUELESS OF WHAT THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO DO .ABSOLUTELY ABUSING THE POWERS THAT WE HAVE GIVEN THEM.
WHEN WILL THEY EVER LEARN ???
POG MO THON !!!
CHERRIO CHERRIO XXC
This really was one of the best audits I've seen and I've watched most of the UK ones, from all the auditors. This deserves way more views. Please share this one people. Top job dude, really good and I love the reveal at the end just perfection and the look on that chief inspectors face was priceless, he new they messed up and he truly did look ashamed. ✌️
Thank you for your comment much appreciated
When he told you that the station was an armoury wasn't he in breach of the official secrets act? What is more, he has actually made the station a target by telling you that in public.
Ron - It wasn't his greatest hour I think! LOL
Not only were they abusing their power, they were also parked up on the zig-zag of a pedestrian crossing. Beggars belief. However, it is the uniform that is the problem, they are dressed up as gladiators, so their behaviour reflects a need to do battle, the uniform needs to change and then policing will improve. Good luck with your claim, however, it is costing tax-payers money - individual police officers that abuse their power should be held accountable for the expense that have caused the tax-payer, things might change if it hit their pay-packet. Well done for sharing. Btw - do you speak English - stereo-typing racism?
Completely AGREED with absolutely everything you have said Gary Edwards ..... Well said ;-) ;-)
So police are allowed to park illegally to talk to random people about something that personally interests them?
Damn, wish I could do that.
"Not normal behavior"
He actually thinks hes the judge of what "Normal" is?
There's literally hundreds of thousands of police audit video's on social media.
What isn't normal is for strangers to walk upto you and make you account for your actions when you're not doing anything wrong... That is not "Normal"
Great comment
Well done Yardley Ski!
Thank you
He didn't wear gloves for the search. His dirty smelly hands all over you. That's worth a sue.
Well the chief inspector and the inspector not worth their pay... Did not want to read your paper work.. As they knew they messed up.. Yes again a fail under S43
One of the searching officers did read the paperwork.. while searching me, but did not say anything or stop the search..
@@yardleyskiauditing hope you report them all that were there....
Unlawfully. Stopped.. Detained.. At least... For doing a lawfully activity by a member of the public
@@daipigeon7561 I will be taking it further..
When you go to court with this. Remember. The inspector Misfeasance in public office (is a cause of action in the civil courts of England and Wales and certain Commonwealth countries. It is an action against the holder of a public office, alleging in essence that the office-holder has misused or abused their power). All the others should be accountable under nonfeasance of public office: Nonfeasance is the failure to act where action is required - willfully or in neglect. By them failing to stop this rogue inspector, they are all culpable of this offence.
Malfeasance; tricky one this, nit sure is you could run with this one. As it only pertains to injury. Did they place you in tight cuffs?
Super video. Well played. Keep them on their toes. 10/10.
I Would put a full complaint in because they are using section 43 terrorism act to intimidate members of the public and if necessary I’ll be speaking to lawyers because that chief inspector knows exactly what was going off and knows that his offices were in the wrong but still stand by and allow that to happen I will go after his job
Amazing video! This is brilliant, thank you from a common law peace constable, which is what they need to be, protecting people's rights, not abusing them!
Thanks for the comment
Don't forget to FOI all the polices camera footage. In your letter of claim to the chief Constable to tell him/her that you are seeking unspecified damages with full costs and in the final sentence of the letter that you reserve all rights to this matter. And repeat that sentence in all letters, txts, emails, telephone calls, faxs. Enjoy the chief inspector sweat for failing to prevent the stop and search. Interesting about the stop slip "I don't have one on me so you can get it in 3 months time."
Its an SAR not FOI
BWV must state with time , date , place to use as towards the evidence , and
BWV CODE 1.2
This procedure does not deal with "covert" recording or "directed surveillance" which is coved by the "code of practice"
Regulated Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA)
RIPA ..where a superintendent needs to apply permission Home Secretary in "writing" 👀 (does not need to inform person/s of "covert" recording,
As BWV not informed of the "overt" then is "covert recording" recording Is not breach of PACE ,BUT,
BUT is breach of RIPA and a criminal offence"
and to finish
CODE 4:13:1 (c) of TACT states
Police have no power to prevent /stop filming /photograph of incidents or police personal ( breached their "code of practice" )
All officers here have breached their "code of practice here and need "reflective practice"
Police (conduct) Regulation 2020
PART 5
section 51/52/53/54/55 +
PS
who is chief inspector "line manger" ?
who is inspector "line manger" (chief Inspector)
who is PC "line manger" (sergeant not there)
@10:54 "his own detriment" (abuse of powers )carries a 14 years imprisonment ?
Yardley Ski did they "hold you " (use of unnecessary force = battery)
and fair play for holding your cool demeanor 👌👍
In Australia it is called FOI request
I don't know about Australia as this was in England, a FOI is freedom of Information, in which you can ask them how much they spend on cakes per year, a SAR is a subject access request in which they must provide all the information they have on you
Should have said to the 3rd , 4th ,5th ,6th police man that turned up "Why would I talk to the monkey when I can talk to the magician" , i.e. the chief inspector or the other officer
I love the way they parked on a white zig zig at a crossing, that would have been 3 point for any of us mere mortals 😝
Two high ranking officers, who will have public relations in their brief, miss the opportunity to demonstrate professionalism and high standards on film. They turn a blind eye to their subordinates lack of basic training and respect, and preside over a meaningless punishment search misusing s43. A chance missed for community bridge building. Hostile and full of entitlement.
Great comment.. Thank you
Section 43 needs to go in the bin they abuse it so much
Make a civil claim
Thanks to the Inspector everyone now knows there is an armoury based here.
They need to have personal liability insurance paid for out of their own pockets.
That might make them think twice before the abuse peoples rights.
Handled brilliantly by Yardley.
Thank you
This is the best audit I’ve ever seen, better than the legendary AB and Live Free.
Thanks .. I am a new auditor and obviously have learnt from AB and Live Free and Koleeberks and Marti and shout out to Gypsy Auditor UK and GB auditor... and all the more experienced auditors, who have given me knowledge and confidence to go out and audit.. So I'm cuffed with your comment.. Thanks for being a Subscriber to my channel
Live Free won't be do any auditing for a while.
@@stepbackandthink I know, shocking travesty, let’s hope he’s out for Christmas.
@@yardleyskiauditing my pleasure. The only thing I think you could have done differently is if I was surrounded, I would have politely requested that I wasn’t. I think the tactic of surrounding people is despicable and would certainly cause me alarm, harassment and distress.
Travesty?!? Ffs 🤦🏽♂️ the guys a criminal!! He robbed a jewellers once!! He belongs behind bars! Good riddance to bad rubbish imo.
Well done, decent interaction.
Keep hearing plod say to you all "this is not normal" the next time that happens can you point out to them that its 2021 now and there are 10's of millions of people who choose to get there media fix now by other means than just watching TV!!. And i think you should carry some 'FAIL' cards with you next time, you can hand them out at the end of the interaction.
They give you a copy of there search document , you give them a fail card....
They will find them when searching me... great Idea ha ha ha ha
Brilliant idea Audit fail cards and the channel that goes public on that,
Well done The British Police Service - petty, bullying!
The "identify yourself" argument was so English, "I'm being polite and introducing myself, why don't you do the same" blah blah blah, quality mate, you owned their asses. Keep up the good work mucka.
Cheers @Spenny
@@yardleyskiauditing 👊🏽👊🏽😎
The boy inspector has let every potential terrorist or crook know that his police station is an armory. Great work.
Inspector, photography is not a crime.
You were proper calm in that unlawful detainment and ongoing abuse of sec43.
Oi Chief Inspector/Inspector trust you are going to put your hands in your own pockets to pay for the compensation and not expect it to come out of public funds?
Should have walked off when he tried to detain you illegally so that you could then have to defend yourself. If they forcibly tried to stop you would have added to the compensation that they now owe you when you take them to court.
" I would be very upset..." Feeling don't come in to it.
Did you see the Inspector's behaviour when I walked pass him at the beginning.. Sounded like he wanted to assault me at that point
The pig told him he was not detained anyway at the start, so he should have walked of then to see what happened, because he still eould have.
The whole scenario is subjective filming could be construed as hostile recon (police say) a filmmaker can't be blamed if someone watches their film and decides to go out in public and break the law ffs...that's like watching Miss Marple then going out to commit murder....its a bloody joke...
That inspector could not give a toss! He would if it came out of his pension????
13:33 "you've given no explanation".
You had explained it umpteen times up to this point, his problem is that he's deaf!
Ha ha ha ha, He just wouldn't accept I have rights... and they include filming in Public, Legally.
22:00 Drive of shame and they didn't use their seat belts. They really do think they are above the law.
WOW, a viewer left a comment on my video saying you had also encountered a bad inspector so I came over and subbed. What a great video. You know your stuff man! I also carry some paperwork with me, but am yet to have the chance to use it. My video today he just put hands on without a conversation. Great work :)
It seems like it's rotten all the way up.. I have also Subbed on your channel..
I had that paperwork in my bag since I audited Lewisham.. I Went there in support of Deanology who got some rough treatment.. I have used it a few time.. unfortunately ha ha ha ha
An INSPECTOR that is soooo ignorant of the law!
Filming a Police Station is not what normal people do. I would have been disappointed if they had stopped.
hadn't stopped !
A politician would say "I refer you to the answer I gave some moments ago"
Ha ha ha ha
At least these thugs look embarrassed.
Saying 'Thats absolutely fine' is not absolutely fine but condescending.
What a bunch of tyrants.
Take the inspector direct to court and prosecute him. The fine and costs should come direct from his pocket but sadly we know it wont.
Until it does, the abuse of power will continue.
Hope he's sacked or at least knocked down to PC
Absolutely AGREED Bill White. In my humble opinion, if possible the person being stopped and about to be searched, when informing them that a civil claim will be made against them, and they just shrug and say ''Thats fine'', then the detained person might want to seriously consider saying ''Is if fine because it WON'T come out of your miserable wages or pension??'' The tax payer will just HAVE to foot the bill ..... and your absolutely fine with that?? These are out of control highly toxic narc cowards, who feed on peoples lack of knowledge of their rights ...... utter cowardly worthless power tripping ego driven droids!!!
@@spectrumisgreen7252 absolutely...the question is...how are we going to revoke section 43..?