I have the 35 f1.4 and still feel happy about that after seeing this video. The only things I prefer on the f1.8 is the weight and price. I love the Zeiss style rendering and it’s plenty sharp, especially for portraits. I like the aperture ring as I shoot in aperture priority.
Thank you so much for making these videos. Every time I convince myself I need a lens, I come search your videos for a comparison and usually see very quickly that a lot of times that the difference in quality isn't near as great and the difference in price. Thanks again!
I have the 1.4 but def thinking about the 1.8 for when I want to carry a lighter setup. Financially it's hard to justify for me, though, to have both. I love the 1.4
Thanks for this comparison. A couple things. 1. Others have mentioned this before comparing weights needs to be in the same system 2. If you hate the aperture ring, just get gaffer's tape and keep it at A and use the camera dials, or if you like shooting at a specific aperture, tape it at that setting.
I have the 35mm 1.8 as prime lens and the 18-135mm and those two cover 98% of what ever I need. I really value and like the small compact lenses Sony is offering, especially on the a6600 body.
Thank you so much for this comparison. I already preordered the 35/1.8 and can’t wish for it to arrive. I was always hesitant about getting the 35/1.4 due to its size and the wait for the 35/1.8 but it looks like me being patient finally paid off. You just helped me solidify my purchase. Thanks again!
Nice review but as a suggestion, why don’t you use gaffer tape to fix down the aperture ring? You could leave it at F1.4 or on A and change aperture in camera. Where bokeh is king, I’d pick the F1.4 still. Even if you don’t like it, I think having the aperture ring is a plus, especially for video.
Thanks, your review confirms my suspicions. I did pre-order the new 35mm 1.8 a week ago. I prefer prime lenses all the way and until now I didn't see ANY 35mm worth buying (either too big, too slow or too pricey)
Thank you Manny for the non-biased review. I'm still on the fence on this lens. I need a 35mm focal length. The 1.4 is a 50/50 with QC issues, the Sigma 1.4 is heavy, has focus hunting issues, and there's no 35mm G master! When you mentioned the low light AF was faster, I was like Yessss. And it's sharper despite the rendering not being as good as the 1.4.
Hello, I want to ask you something. if you could have chance to buy only one lens, Which one you choose ? 35mm f1.4 Zeiss or 55mm f1.8 ? And one more question, if you have a Zeiss 35mm 1.4za already, what would be your second lens ? 55mm 1.8 or Sony FE 85mm 1.8 ? I am really excited about what you think. Thank you
so glad to hear its a great lens I've sold my sigma 35mm f1.4 and have the new Sony 35mm f1.8 on pre order can't wait to try it out, great comparison video nicely done!
Hey Manny ! What do You think of the sony 35 mm 1.8 in comparison to the sigma 35mm 1.4??? Only problem with the sigma is the autofocus is off sometimes....
If you look at the leaves in the 1.8 pics, there appears to be worms in the patterns whereas the 1.4 is smooth as silk. I've noticed this with other cheaper lenses as well. I'm surprised that this isn't a deal breaker for anyone.
For size and weight the clear winner is the 35mm F1.8, but I believe the 35mm F1.4 outputs the better image. Sharpness isn't everything, but I would've compared both at f1.8. I'm sure the Zeiss at f1.8 would be as sharp or sharper than the new Sony 35mm 1.8 at 1.8. Because obviously f1.8 has more in focus than f1.4. The AF conclusion was a surprize to me as the Zeiss 35 f1.4 is one of the strongest AF lenses in my kit.
I own the 2.8 also but 2.8 isnt high enough aperture. Its an old lens ( the 1st they brought out for the a7 system ) this is a much better option. Plus you are paying for a Zeiss badge in my opinion.
I have the 35mm 2.8 too, for sure this newer 1.8 prime will have more improved bokeh, cleaner bokeh balls, and maybe less vignetting than the zeiss. I would probably trade the zeiss in for this new model based on my mentioned observations. The lens might have been cheaper too;$100-$200 off but due to increased tax on china goods we are left to this final price.
Manny Ortiz same, I have the Sigma + the MC-11 and I feel like I'm getting an arm workout with it lol. Very very very very tempted to get the Sony, but I have to sell my sigma first 😅
35mm 1.4 gives dreamy images. I would keep it if I had it or buy it used as there would be plenty available. If you can afford it I would keep both. One for the studio and the other for the street.
Other than the weight, do you think 24GM 1.4 is a better buy than 35 mm 1.8, if you're both a APSC and full-frame shooter? That 24mm is actually 35, 2.1 on A6xxx.
Too bad you didn't test the lenses for light transmission. Set it on fixed shutter and aperture and look at the iso on both photos to see how much light you really lose. Also, there's also the samyang 35 1.4 which doesn't have the aperture ring.
I own the 35 1.4 Zeiss.... But now that I'm doing overseas documentary work, I can't be stuffed carrying this massive lens anymore. Think you've helped me cross the line to get it.
So I got the Distigon 35/1.4 ZA used in mint condition and well centered copy for only $1000. Based on that price which would you choose? For me, different from you, I love having an aperture ring. Almost a must have so take that outa your comparison? What do you think?
After 4 years with top primes I decided to end my obsession with f 1,4 lenses - and this video helped me :-) 35/1,8 is gonna be a good solution! Thank you :-)
@@jxy5484 Because I came to the point when having 1.4 heavy expensive (and superb) primes didn't bring me pleasure anymore. I also started to do more videos than before and I needed lighter lenses for the gimball. And I also switched to Sony A7SIII (12 MPx) from A7RIII (42 MPx) - so I didn't need the extreme resolution of the lens.
I hate the aperture ring as well. Drives me nuts 99% of the time. I was shooting video at a wedding today, though, and it came in handy. But the non-linear digital focus ring made it super frustrating to use for video (but that’s the case with nearly all e-mount lenses). Pretty surprised that the 1.8 bested the 1.4 in AF. The 1.4 is one of the strongest Sony lenses I’ve tried for AF.
I own the 35 F1.4 and I love the aperture ring and never hit it by mistake and I do think that many people do appreciate this aperture ring a lot. I'm not doubting the qualities of the F1.8 lens at all, although I think you should have compared the sharpness of the two lenses at the same f-stop in order to get comparable results. Nevertheless thank you for making such an interesting video and its nice to see that Sony continues to anounce small lenses that deliver such an amazing quality at a lower price point and nearly the same aperture.
5 лет назад
How the result if you stop down the 1.4 to 1.8 and compare images quality again?
Manny, thanks. Is it possible for you to compare the Sony f1.8 to the older Zony f 2.8 lens? I am sure that many people would be interested if it is worthwhile to pick up the new lens if they already own the older, smaller lens in their kit.
Manny, I dropped my 50 zeiss and the same thing happened to the mount ring, it bent and it was really tight to fit on I finally ordered a brand new mount ring that was available through sony for $130 shipped and fix it myself.
Hi, Manny. I've bought 35mm 1.8 lens and noticed that the focus group, inside the lens is moving freely, when lens is not connected to the camera, or when the camera is turned off. Is this normal behavior of VCM, or should the focus group remain locked when not powered? I don't know any person who has this lens so I can't understand whether my lens is properly functioning. Please advise on that. Thank you!
I’m super interested in a comparison of the new Sony 35/1.8 vs Sony-Zeiss 35/2.8. How much of an advantage is the extra stop in the 1.8 really worth? How does focusing and ultimately IQ compare? Thx
Thanks for the video. I’ve owned both of these lenses but a while ago moved on to best in class 35/1.4 GM and I still have that. Problem is I now need a smaller lighter lens for my compact “C” bodies so I’m considering picking up a used FE 35/1.8. Is it still worth buying as a travel lens? I want something at least f/2 or f/1.8 so it can be used in lower light. Unlike you though I like an aperture ring but since they added the front dial on the A7CR I can live without it. Take care.
I loved to hear your opinion about the rendering. Lots of folks do the technical evaluations, and your subjective view is really where you add value. I've found the same thing about the SZ 35 1.4. It is magical sometimes. I'd love to see reviews where you talk mostly about the subjective aspects of lenses.
Do you think there is something wrong with your Sony 35mm F1.4? You said that it has a bent mount, and I remember you doing a comparison to the Canon RF 35mm, and saying the Sony Zeiss was out of focus.
I feel like a good 1.8 lens will usually beat a 1.4 lens in terms of focusing and size , weight , CA, and sharpness at its widest aperture though? Right ?
Manny can you compare the 28mm f2 to the 35mm 1.8. I feel sold on the 35mm until I think of how much $$ I can save going with a used 28mm f2. In my mind the 28 f2 would basically do what the 35 f1.8 would do ...
Got the 35 Distagon 2 days ago. It's built like a tank, that aperture ring and the images it produces all add up to me being completely in awe of it. No regrets here, even with the 15ish percent discount Amazon have been offering on the 1.8.
@@cstone710 Not anymore there isn't. Amazon did indeed have it at a discounted price. Saw it myself on Amazon and here's how I found out about it: www.sonyalpharumors.com/for-eu-readers-first-100-euro-off-on-the-new-sony-35mm-f-1-8-fe-sold-by-amazon-uk/ Amazon also recently had a 10% off on the 24 GM for EU buyers. Not sure if that's still ongoing though, can't be bothered to check...guess that makes me like you. :)
Great video thank you. I use the sigma 35mm 1.4 after calibration from there dock on a Nikon d810 and it’s changed my wedding photography love it amazing. Also only £650. Taylor Jackson has started using the z6 and loves the Nikon s35 1.8 amazing quality
Niice video Manny. Thanks. I'm using the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 for that 35mm zone right now. Any idea how much improvement I would get upgrading to the 35mm 1.8? (besides the faster aperture). I work in video exclusively, mostly documentary and I already have teh 55mm f1.8 that I looooove for interviews and such.
One of the reasons I went for the Sigma ART lenses is that I hate the physical aperture ring. I would have appreciated it if Sony went for the Nikon AF-D lens approach, where the physical aperture ring could be locked for auto operations.
I had the sigma and just sold it to fund the new sony 1.8. I tried the sony and it's light and small. It's just a joy to use in comparison to the sigma. Both lenses are very sharp and perform well in general.
@@robertstevens455 thanks for answering, I hate to decide in these kind of situations as i hate to sell something I just bought, but it seems like I really should go for the sony.
@@oldtexasblues3605 You're welcome. I think it can be worth it to switch. In my case I enjoyed using the sony 1.8 much more because of the weight difference. I think it's important to not only enjoy the photos we take but the process of taking them and this new sony allows me to do that more.
Any thoughts on how the 28mm f2 compares to the 35mm 1.8?? I’ve always been a fan of the 28mm f2 and always planned to just to a 35mm 1.8 whenever it came out. Now that it’s out and it’s $750 I’m wondering how much different it actually is from the $350 28mm (have used the 35mm 1.4 Sigma and Zeiss but don’t want to spend that much and want something more compact)...
As a hobbyist photographer, I don't want to spend money on either those lenses. I have Yongnuo 35mm f/2 for about $80, Canon mount on my A7ii, and I love it. For video, you would probably want this new Sony 35mm f/1.8.
Thanks again for the test Manny. This lens is not yet available in The Netherlands so I tried the Samyang/Rokinon 35mm 1.4, and even though it is cheaper it was not extremely sharp and vignetting was a bit too much. Going to check the Sony 35 once it is available to compare
I will stick with my Samyang AF 35mm f/1.4. After the software update it got better than before on my A7 III. But that size and weight of the Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 does seem very appealing! Thanks for your insight.
Yes you can tell the difference. The f1.4 really comes into its own during low light when you want to keep the iso low to reduce noise but keep the shutter high to reduce motion blur, I believe the difference is about 33% light difference between the two stops. I love mine and would never sell it.
Which 35mm lens do you own now and what do you think of the 35mm 1.8 after seeing what it can do?
Heyyyy MANYYYYYY can u send me a lens please??? lol 😂🤔
I personally have the sigma 35 1.4 and love it. It's usually my go to for family portraits and such.
I'd like to see what it's like compared to the sigma 35mm 1.4 art because I nearly bought that the other week on the day of the Sony announcement.
Andy Smith I’m personally not a fan of the 35mm sigma. It’s just way to large for these camera bodies (for a 35)
I thought the Ziess was about the same size as the sigma.
1.4 pounds vs 284 grams. What wait? Use the same system, don't be switching Metric and Imperial like that!
FYI 1.4 pounds is 635 grams
That's true but it is virtually double the weight, so that is definately something to consider when buying.
This bothered me as well. When doing a comparison KEEP IS COMPARABLE!
Could it be he's trying to sell it
Yeah this made no fucking sense to me - someone from the UK
or for us pound cakes: 1.4 pounds vs 0.6 pounds
I have the 35 f1.4 and still feel happy about that after seeing this video. The only things I prefer on the f1.8 is the weight and price. I love the Zeiss style rendering and it’s plenty sharp, especially for portraits. I like the aperture ring as I shoot in aperture priority.
Thank you so much for making these videos. Every time I convince myself I need a lens, I come search your videos for a comparison and usually see very quickly that a lot of times that the difference in quality isn't near as great and the difference in price.
Thanks again!
I have the 1.4 but def thinking about the 1.8 for when I want to carry a lighter setup. Financially it's hard to justify for me, though, to have both. I love the 1.4
Have the f1.4 since day 1. Still 1 of my favorite. Big n heavy. But im not switching to the 1.8
sgpork did you switch to the 1.8? what do you think?
Still waiting for a 35mm 1.4 gm version, but for now the new 1.8 will do it for me
Same... but it may never come!
@@cjloh1 👀👀
Thanks for this comparison. A couple things.
1. Others have mentioned this before comparing weights needs to be in the same system
2. If you hate the aperture ring, just get gaffer's tape and keep it at A and use the camera dials, or if you like shooting at a specific aperture, tape it at that setting.
I have the 35mm 1.8 as prime lens and the 18-135mm and those two cover 98% of what ever I need. I really value and like the small compact lenses Sony is offering, especially on the a6600 body.
What about sharpness of the 1.4 when stopped down to 1.8? Also would you compare it to the 35 f/2.8?
Thank you so much for this comparison. I already preordered the 35/1.8 and can’t wish for it to arrive. I was always hesitant about getting the 35/1.4 due to its size and the wait for the 35/1.8 but it looks like me being patient finally paid off. You just helped me solidify my purchase. Thanks again!
Nice review but as a suggestion, why don’t you use gaffer tape to fix down the aperture ring?
You could leave it at F1.4 or on A and change aperture in camera. Where bokeh is king, I’d pick the F1.4 still. Even if you don’t like it, I think having the aperture ring is a plus, especially for video.
Thanks, your review confirms my suspicions. I did pre-order the new 35mm 1.8 a week ago. I prefer prime lenses all the way and until now I didn't see ANY 35mm worth buying (either too big, too slow or too pricey)
Thanks for the video. Which do you prefer for general purpose photography the 35mm 1.8 or the 55 1.8?
Thank you Manny for the non-biased review. I'm still on the fence on this lens. I need a 35mm focal length. The 1.4 is a 50/50 with QC issues, the Sigma 1.4 is heavy, has focus hunting issues, and there's no 35mm G master! When you mentioned the low light AF was faster, I was like Yessss. And it's sharper despite the rendering not being as good as the 1.4.
Samyang?
Hello, I want to ask you something. if you could have chance to buy only one lens, Which one you choose ? 35mm f1.4 Zeiss or 55mm f1.8 ? And one more question, if you have a Zeiss 35mm 1.4za already, what would be your second lens ? 55mm 1.8 or Sony FE 85mm 1.8 ? I am really excited about what you think. Thank you
Thank you for review, OK, so my choice will be 1.8 👌 filter size is the same as 55 1.8?
Put a tiny bit of black electrical tape on your aperture ring on the 1.4 and you won’t accidentally bump it 👍
Use gaffers tape instead. Electrical tape will leave residue.
just black tape everything
so glad to hear its a great lens I've sold my sigma 35mm f1.4 and have the new Sony 35mm f1.8 on pre order can't wait to try it out, great comparison video nicely done!
How to sell your gear?
@@deelau2223 there's lots of companies that will buy your gear and give you a fair price for it, i use WEX photography!
adrian faulkner now that you used the Sony. Which 35 did you like the best sony or sigma?
Does it focusing manualy linear? Or it depends of speed, like some other wired rings?
Hey Manny ! What do You think of the sony 35 mm 1.8 in comparison to the sigma 35mm 1.4??? Only problem with the sigma is the autofocus is off sometimes....
If you look at the leaves in the 1.8 pics, there appears to be worms in the patterns whereas the 1.4 is smooth as silk. I've noticed this with other cheaper lenses as well. I'm surprised that this isn't a deal breaker for anyone.
How do things compare when you have both lenses at f1.8 or f2.8?
For size and weight the clear winner is the 35mm F1.8, but I believe the 35mm F1.4 outputs the better image. Sharpness isn't everything, but I would've compared both at f1.8. I'm sure the Zeiss at f1.8 would be as sharp or sharper than the new Sony 35mm 1.8 at 1.8. Because obviously f1.8 has more in focus than f1.4. The AF conclusion was a surprize to me as the Zeiss 35 f1.4 is one of the strongest AF lenses in my kit.
Can you please do a comparison with Zeiss 35mm 2.8 as well?
Jax Pk I own it, I’d say it’s pretty darn good
I own the 2.8 also but 2.8 isnt high enough aperture. Its an old lens ( the 1st they brought out for the a7 system ) this is a much better option. Plus you are paying for a Zeiss badge in my opinion.
I have the 35mm 2.8 too, for sure this newer 1.8 prime will have more improved bokeh, cleaner bokeh balls, and maybe less vignetting than the zeiss. I would probably trade the zeiss in for this new model based on my mentioned observations. The lens might have been cheaper too;$100-$200 off but due to increased tax on china goods we are left to this final price.
Sony 35 1.8 vs. Sigma 1.4 would be dope 😁
Edit: just watched the part where you said you don't own it but a man can dream about a comparison video lol
Ram of the Rose Not A fan of Sigma 35mm on Sony bodies. Way too big
Manny Ortiz same, I have the Sigma + the MC-11 and I feel like I'm getting an arm workout with it lol. Very very very very tempted to get the Sony, but I have to sell my sigma first 😅
@@MannyOrtiz i will ship you mind to do a compare video on lol
I’m tempted to sell my Sigma 1.4, it’s a beautiful lens, but like Manny says, it’s really big on a Sony body.
Do you think that 35mm is a good focal length for group pictures?
35mm 1.4 gives dreamy images. I would keep it if I had it or buy it used as there would be plenty available. If you can afford it I would keep both. One for the studio and the other for the street.
Carl Zeiss has more dreamy look in to it.
no it doesnt. it does not.
@@jamskof It absolutely does ! I have both, sony for video + run and gun, zony for "special ocasions" :) Both are awesome , but a 1.4 is a 1.4 !
Could you compare this Sony 35mm f1.8 vs Rokinon/Samyang 35mm f1.4? should be closer in price.
I got the samyang. With the latest update. It’s a beast for the price.
@@ralphtime 35 1.4 is nice, but has problem that it freeze body sometimes :D
Yeah that would make sense 🤙
@@ralphtime shame its an extra £50 for the lens station rather than through camera updates
Cold Coffee Photography definitely sucks but still it’s a lot cheaper than any other 35mm and performs right with them with the update.
Other than the weight, do you think 24GM 1.4 is a better buy than 35 mm 1.8, if you're both a APSC and full-frame shooter? That 24mm is actually 35, 2.1 on A6xxx.
Yay, I was waiting on this seeing as I have pre ordered the Sony 35mm 1.8. I'll watch it when I get home 😄
Thanks a lot Manny, 35mm 1.8 is the one I’m gonna get, it’s small and fast in focus, and 1.8 is good enough for me.
Moos Wu Plenty good
get Sigma 30mm 1.4
Too bad you didn't test the lenses for light transmission. Set it on fixed shutter and aperture and look at the iso on both photos to see how much light you really lose. Also, there's also the samyang 35 1.4 which doesn't have the aperture ring.
I own the 35 1.4 Zeiss.... But now that I'm doing overseas documentary work, I can't be stuffed carrying this massive lens anymore. Think you've helped me cross the line to get it.
comparing lbs to grams? can you do them in the same unit please.
Hi!
How is IQ comparing to Zeiss 35 f2.8? Don't really care of bokeh, how is image overall - colors, microcontrast, rendering...
Thanks
So I got the Distigon 35/1.4 ZA used in mint condition and well centered copy for only $1000. Based on that price which would you choose? For me, different from you, I love having an aperture ring. Almost a must have so take that outa your comparison? What do you think?
Sony 35mm 1.8 or Sigma 24mm-70mm 2.8… which would you recommend?
After 4 years with top primes I decided to end my obsession with f 1,4 lenses - and this video helped me :-) 35/1,8 is gonna be a good solution! Thank you :-)
why?
@@jxy5484 Because I came to the point when having 1.4 heavy expensive (and superb) primes didn't bring me pleasure anymore. I also started to do more videos than before and I needed lighter lenses for the gimball. And I also switched to Sony A7SIII (12 MPx) from A7RIII (42 MPx) - so I didn't need the extreme resolution of the lens.
how is the manual focus of the 35mm 1.8? Is it focus by wire or linear? Does it have hard stops or some end points to it when you manual focus?
everything was straight to the point and perfectly executed. Thanks A LOT for this video! I'm getting the 35 1.8
I hate the aperture ring as well. Drives me nuts 99% of the time. I was shooting video at a wedding today, though, and it came in handy. But the non-linear digital focus ring made it super frustrating to use for video (but that’s the case with nearly all e-mount lenses). Pretty surprised that the 1.8 bested the 1.4 in AF. The 1.4 is one of the strongest Sony lenses I’ve tried for AF.
The 35 mm f/1.8 is a brilliant lens but I wish the price would have been around $600 rather than $750.
Just wait a few months and pick one for around 500$ on second market ;)
35mm f2.8 costs even more
@@TaanielMalleus That 35 mm f/2.8 is clearly overpriced. That lens should be no more than 500 bucks to be honest.
@@Awengtis By second market , you mean grey market ? I would prefer the warranty specially with these auto-focus' lenses.
@@sadenb No, I mean used gear. But actually, my experience with grey market items is also pretty good.
Great comparison. Your sympathetic tone and great pacing makes all the difference.
How about compared to the Sigma 1.2 and the Samyang 1.8?
I just bought Sony 35 1.8 . Have you noticed increased noise? Ive feeling like even ISO 1250 is too much for the lens on my A7RIII. Is that possible?
Does anyone use the a9 anymore? I feel like I don’t see anything mentioned about it ever.
Which of the two do you recommend more to video 55 1.8 or 35 1.8?
I own the 35 F1.4 and I love the aperture ring and never hit it by mistake and I do think that many people do appreciate this aperture ring a lot. I'm not doubting the qualities of the F1.8 lens at all, although I think you should have compared the sharpness of the two lenses at the same f-stop in order to get comparable results. Nevertheless thank you for making such an interesting video and its nice to see that Sony continues to anounce small lenses that deliver such an amazing quality at a lower price point and nearly the same aperture.
How the result if you stop down the 1.4 to 1.8 and compare images quality again?
Could you do a comparison of the Sony 85mm1.4, Samyang 85mm1.4 and the Sony 85mm 1.8?
Manny, thanks. Is it possible for you to compare the Sony f1.8 to the older Zony f 2.8 lens? I am sure that many people would be interested if it is worthwhile to pick up the new lens if they already own the older, smaller lens in their kit.
Manny I have a shoot coming up for a birthday party of 75. Do you think the 35 1.8 would be good for group shots. No more than 5 people at a time
Manny, I dropped my 50 zeiss and the same thing happened to the mount ring, it bent and it was really tight to fit on I finally ordered a brand new mount ring that was available through sony for $130 shipped and fix it myself.
Hi, Manny.
I've bought 35mm 1.8 lens and noticed that the focus group, inside the lens is moving freely, when lens is not connected to the camera, or when the camera is turned off.
Is this normal behavior of VCM, or should the focus group remain locked when not powered?
I don't know any person who has this lens so I can't understand whether my lens is properly functioning.
Please advise on that.
Thank you!
It is normal
I’m super interested in a comparison of the new Sony 35/1.8 vs Sony-Zeiss 35/2.8. How much of an advantage is the extra stop in the 1.8 really worth? How does focusing and ultimately IQ compare? Thx
Bro which one u recommend as first lens with sony a7iv, 35 1.4 zeiss or tamron 28-75mm g2. ? I m getting both at same price, please reply
Thanks for the video. I’ve owned both of these lenses but a while ago moved on to best in class 35/1.4 GM and I still have that. Problem is I now need a smaller lighter lens for my compact “C” bodies so I’m considering picking up a used FE 35/1.8. Is it still worth buying as a travel lens? I want something at least f/2 or f/1.8 so it can be used in lower light. Unlike you though I like an aperture ring but since they added the front dial on the A7CR I can live without it. Take care.
I loved to hear your opinion about the rendering. Lots of folks do the technical evaluations, and your subjective view is really where you add value. I've found the same thing about the SZ 35 1.4. It is magical sometimes. I'd love to see reviews where you talk mostly about the subjective aspects of lenses.
Manny, would you recommend getting 35 1.8 or 18-35 1.8?
that's a crop sensor lens
@@Linkesch its an ef mount so wont it still work on a FF?
@@rcmjc9072 I mean it would work - but with heavy vignetting or in a crop mode - 12MPix only on A7III
Please compare this Sony 35 f/1.8 vs Samyang AF 35 f/1.4 FE
I may do this soon as I have the Samyang and I'm genuinely tempted to switch to the Sony as I *LOVE* small lenses.
@@JamesClark1991 Get the Sony lenses . They will last longer than the Rokinon lenses.
Check my test vids
how can you think the Samyang would have a chance?
@@kliaklia6391 do you own a Samyang 34 f/1.4?
Thanks man, that helps a lot getting an idea which to pick.
Do you think there is something wrong with your Sony 35mm F1.4? You said that it has a bent mount, and I remember you doing a comparison to the Canon RF 35mm, and saying the Sony Zeiss was out of focus.
This was absolutely perfect timing. I've been on the fence for about 2 weeks on which 35mm lands I was going to buy, now I know. Thank you
Which one did you end up getting?
@@jerrengrimes3708 the Sony 35mm 1.4 G Master
Manny, do you notice when the lens (fe 1.8) is not attached in the camera, something sliding inside the lens when you flip it up and down
Nice review Manny. Is there much difference in bokeh or out of focus area between the 1.4 and 1.8?
Hopefully I'll get mine in August.
He's shown that on the video, u can see it for yourself
I feel like a good 1.8 lens will usually beat a 1.4 lens in terms of focusing and size , weight , CA, and sharpness at its widest aperture though? Right ?
True but if both were shot at 1.8 i have no doubt that the 35 1.8 lens would be sharper!! That Zeiss is a dud of a lens
Hey manny, when turning the lens upright and upside down. Do you fell parts moving inside?
Manny can you compare the 28mm f2 to the 35mm 1.8. I feel sold on the 35mm until I think of how much $$ I can save going with a used 28mm f2. In my mind the 28 f2 would basically do what the 35 f1.8 would do ...
I can't wait for my pre-ordered one to come in the mail in August !!! Thanks for the video!
Aperture ring on Zeiss is a useful thing! I am using it all the time while shooting videos!
Got the 35 Distagon 2 days ago. It's built like a tank, that aperture ring and the images it produces all add up to me being completely in awe of it. No regrets here, even with the 15ish percent discount Amazon have been offering on the 1.8.
There's no discount on the 1.8 its not even out yet.
@@cstone710 Not anymore there isn't. Amazon did indeed have it at a discounted price. Saw it myself on Amazon and here's how I found out about it: www.sonyalpharumors.com/for-eu-readers-first-100-euro-off-on-the-new-sony-35mm-f-1-8-fe-sold-by-amazon-uk/
Amazon also recently had a 10% off on the 24 GM for EU buyers. Not sure if that's still ongoing though, can't be bothered to check...guess that makes me like you. :)
FE 35mm f1.8 is the proof that Sony can afford to get cocky since they are so far ahead in the mirrorless body race
Canon isn’t worried about Sony.
Teebiskit they should be. Just this quarter, canon’s DSLR sales dropped 20% lol.
付慧之 I think the 35 f/1.8 isn't cocky . It is a standard lens
@@sanchayansarkar2953 the price is
P
LLP p.o po pi pi po 0 has
Now that the new 35mm 2.8 Tamron is out. Would you do a comparison?
Awesome review Manny!! Just what I needed to make my decision on which one of these is right for me.
What camera are you using here?
Great video thank you. I use the sigma 35mm 1.4 after calibration from there dock on a Nikon d810 and it’s changed my wedding photography love it amazing. Also only £650. Taylor Jackson has started using the z6 and loves the Nikon s35 1.8 amazing quality
Niice video Manny. Thanks. I'm using the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 for that 35mm zone right now. Any idea how much improvement I would get upgrading to the 35mm 1.8? (besides the faster aperture). I work in video exclusively, mostly documentary and I already have teh 55mm f1.8 that I looooove for interviews and such.
Hey tamron 28-75 2.8 g2 or Sony 35mm 1.8 ? ( wedding day video )
The A7III/35mm f1,8 is just the perfect combo, even more perfect now with, I hope, soon upcoming A7IV.
Another very good video, thanks for your time making this Manny. Question, which A7 were you shooting with? Thanks again!
What's the difference between the 1.8 and the sigma 1.4 or 1.2
One of the reasons I went for the Sigma ART lenses is that I hate the physical aperture ring. I would have appreciated it if Sony went for the Nikon AF-D lens approach, where the physical aperture ring could be locked for auto operations.
Thanks for this excellent review. I did handle the 1.8 in-store recently and was impressed with both build quality and handling - a top lens.
Thanks. Saves me the trouble of renting and testing the Zeiss.
I have the SONY FE 35MM F/1.4 ZA ZEISS DISTAGON T* LENS worth upgrading and why ?
I love the format and the music. Your videos are great fun to watch
I use the sigma art 35 f.1.4 and I love it, but it's too big and too heavy, would you recommend me to switch to this sony 1.8?
I had the sigma and just sold it to fund the new sony 1.8. I tried the sony and it's light and small. It's just a joy to use in comparison to the sigma. Both lenses are very sharp and perform well in general.
@@robertstevens455 thanks for answering, I hate to decide in these kind of situations as i hate to sell something I just bought, but it seems like I really should go for the sony.
@@oldtexasblues3605 You're welcome. I think it can be worth it to switch. In my case I enjoyed using the sony 1.8 much more because of the weight difference. I think it's important to not only enjoy the photos we take but the process of taking them and this new sony allows me to do that more.
How do you compare the Samyang/Rokinon 35mm f/1,4 AF for Sony E mount with the new Sony? as the price is almost the same (even less the Samyang)?
Thanks Manny! Glad to hear your thoughts on this lens. I may have to pick it up
Any thoughts on how the 28mm f2 compares to the 35mm 1.8?? I’ve always been a fan of the 28mm f2 and always planned to just to a 35mm 1.8 whenever it came out. Now that it’s out and it’s $750 I’m wondering how much different it actually is from the $350 28mm (have used the 35mm 1.4 Sigma and Zeiss but don’t want to spend that much and want something more compact)...
As a hobbyist photographer, I don't want to spend money on either those lenses. I have Yongnuo 35mm f/2 for about $80, Canon mount on my A7ii, and I love it. For video, you would probably want this new Sony 35mm f/1.8.
Thanks again for the test Manny. This lens is not yet available in The Netherlands so I tried the Samyang/Rokinon 35mm 1.4, and even though it is cheaper it was not extremely sharp and vignetting was a bit too much. Going to check the Sony 35 once it is available to compare
You can put a tape on the aperture ring if you don't want to move it by accident
@Rich Clark Photography So you worry about what it looks rather than what gets the job done? Gears are tools, not peacock or decorative items!
Excellent video Manny! This lens will be a blockbuster for sure.
Thanks for the video. What's the camera you have used?
A7III
I will stick with my Samyang AF 35mm f/1.4. After the software update it got better than before on my A7 III. But that size and weight of the Sony FE 35mm f/1.8 does seem very appealing! Thanks for your insight.
Dennis van Tol I have the same lenses, is it easy to update?
@@IanMcCausland Yes very easy! You need a lens station though... Done within a few minutes.
Manny I need ur help Bro. Which lens is the Best for Portraits? For a Sony Alpha A7 ii?
@Foto4Max That's wassup. Any Brand, or just SONY Brand? With or without OSS option?
Great review Manny. I will definitely go with your choice of the 35 1.8 for my next lens.
Yes you can tell the difference. The f1.4 really comes into its own during low light when you want to keep the iso low to reduce noise but keep the shutter high to reduce motion blur, I believe the difference is about 33% light difference between the two stops. I love mine and would never sell it.