The two Tamrons are awesome! And definitely not only for "enthusiasts and advanced hobbyists" - they can easily be used for commercial work as well - that all depends on the person operating the camera!
I have the Tamron 17-28, 28-75, and the Sony 85 1.8 all for a nearly the same price as just the 16-35mm GM. If you're on a budget, all 3 of these lenses also use 67mm filters threads so it keeps your kit compact. I'd say win-win imo
Only thing I noticed from my testing is the 17-28mm does flair pretty heavy in direct sunlight (with the lens hood on). It ended up being artistic for the shots, but it could get annoying. Not sure if the 16-35mm is any better though
Tamron is great value for this money. I have my Sony 16-35 F 2.8 GM for almost 2 years (100% photography, no video, shot about 20.000 photos with it), it´s my main lense for landscape, architecture and astrophotography; at 35 mm also for street and wide angle portraits. I use the 35 mm a lot , I would miss it (if weight matters, I don´t need an extra 35 mm lens), the corner sharpness (I own a A7R III) is very important for me (large printings). Sunstars and flare resistence are also important topics. The AF/MF switch is very helpful also the programmable button. But on the other side, for this price you can´t do nothing wrong with the Tammy...
I would gladly take the Tamron if I didnt already start adding GM lens to my gear setup. (24-70mm & 70-200mm). Though one cant ignore the fact that having BOTH Tamron 17-28 & 28-75mm would still cost less than just 1 GM lens.
Great comparison Jason! Could you add "focus breathing test" to your list, at short and long focal length next time, please? Thank you for your work 👍 📷
I just bought my Sony 16-35gm. I considered the Tamron but chose Sony. I had the 16-35 F4 and sold it to help fund the purchase. I like the weight, the feel of quality, durability and the excellent image quality. I do use the focus hold button and manual focusing is easier with the switch. The money was a consideration and at more than half the price the Tamron was tempting. I just don't like settling for second best, if that.
I just jumped into Sony (thanks in no small part to your videos) and have been shooting with the kit lens. Trying to decide where to go from here, but the Tamrons are looking like a good option.
I purchased the 16-35 GM pre Tamron release. I LOVE the lens..I photograph mostly landscape..I am amazed at the sharpness..it does a great job at night and astrophotography as well. With that said, I do OWN the Tamron 28-75. which is awesome....if the 17-28 was around months back, I'd for sure have taken a look at it!! ANOTHER GREAT video..thank you Jason!!
My oh my! I went to Kyoto in April, and I thought given the tight spaces at the shrines, esp the very famous Fushimi Inari-taisha, bringing the 1635GM would only give me more flexibility versus the 2470GM...man was I wrong! The photos it took are just breath taking! And because it's shorter and lighter than the latter, in the end it became the only lens I used for the rest of my trip!
How in the hell didn't you find focus breathing? I have been using mine for 3 weeks, and shooting video, more noticeable so with very up close objects, it breads back and forth to acquire focus, almost like it's using contrast detection AF instead of the native on Sony a7m3, a6500 and a6400
I rented one last year and compared with 17-28 and 24GM on a7R2 & a73. Comparable with the Tamron in sharpness and most other aspects. Bokeh tho isn't smooth, and I would rate the Sigma 5/10 with significant outlining, the Tamron 6/10 with onion rings, and the GM 9/10. Autofocus is also a tad slower than the Tamron.
Bell Le that’s good to know. However, no one really get a wide angle lens for bokeh do they? The other thing is, if you’re using the tamron for architecture and real estate is it really wide enough? That’s where I think the sigma might have the advantage
@@matthoffman6962 17mm is definitely not wide enough for real estate. I would say go for the 14-24 or the Sony 12-24/4 if that's what you need. Otherwise, the Tamron do have front filters tho. I didn't have a chance to try out the Sigma rear filter during the rental (seems less convenient). Regarding bokeh - I regularly use the GM or the Tamron @ 28mm/2.8 for environmental portraits in addition to wide-angle landscapes. Thus bokeh quality is important to me, and also why I went back to this video about 16-35GM. The Tamron just isn't that great for this, while my other camera body is often occupied with 85mm and can't mount the GM. (The other option is to replace the 85mm with a standard F/2.8 zoom, but also some compromises to make) Admittedly, the Sigma is even less relevant.
My brain tells me: “sell the GM , it’s too expensive and heavy, and get the 17-28 and maybe another lens” but i’m struggling since my heart loves the GM,it’s the one lens that pretty much stays in my camera, love the 16-35mm versatility and the quality of the landscape,street, and portrait shots that i get out of it.
Did you sell it ?😅 I am thinking about buying a used one (1400€) since right now I am just using a Loxia 21. it is a great lense, but the versatility of the GM is so much better... . However, I am still concerned about the weight. And due to corona I cannot see it in real life
Basically: if the extra 7mm reach really, really matters, Sony. Or just crop. Seriously, you won’t get that much more background compression between 28mm and 35mm. Or take the $$$ savings and buy a nice 35mm.
I use a tamron 17-35 since 2013 and last month I finally got a 15-30 and at the widest end I love the extra field of view, but when there is room to walk backwards it's a tie between those 2.
GM stuff is great but third party lenses are great. On my A7riii I’ve ditched and sold on my Sony GM lenses and bought a combination of Tamron and Sigma. Just picked this lens up….with the subtle differences, you won’t really miss what you don’t have! Great vid, earned a sub! :)
The 16-35mm is actually on the compatibility list for the Ronin-SC with a * saying it needs a counterweight. I contacted DJI - a counterweight is coming. Smallrig just announced one too, coming 7th October
Hi Jason! Of course primes are way sharper... But how are you feeling about the tamron 17 28 and 28 75 compared to the batis line? I'm always switching between 18mm and 85mm but during weddings it's too tricky.. so I'm looking if the tamrons would be a great replacement or if I'll regret doing my batis lenses away. Thanks man, keep it up! 🙏🏼
I was very skeptical about tamron cause I wanted to keep all my lenses native sony, but I don’t shoot wide very often so bought this lens and I’m blown away how good it is for the price, got it for 895$ from Adorama , at the end you get 42 mm in crop mode which is perfect, don’t think a lot just buy it. Thank you for review Jason
It seems like a lot of people are jumping to the GM as the competition, but really I think the f4 is the true competition. Because yeah, the GM and the Tamron are both 2.8, but there's also like $1300 between them. There's compromises between the Tamron and the GM, but you do get more (if subtle) for your money. Between the f4 and the Tamron, though? Now that's a great win. For me, I'm *already* not willing to spend 2200 on the GM, so it's really like, well would I get the f4 Sony or the Tamron?
That onion-ring "bokeh" roughness on the Tamron glass is so frustrating... and IS getting to be an issue on my year old 28-75. :( a little more polishing would go a very long way Tamron!
I went into the store to pick up the Tamron 17-28 and the sales person kept pushing the GM lens on my. I ended up leaving without buying anything. I currently have the Tamron 28-200 on my Sony a7iv. Do you think the 17-28 would pair well with the lens I currently have, or would I be better suited getting something different? I travel on my motorcycle so size and weight are considerations, but not something I couldn't overlook. If I had the space, I'd just get 20, 35, 50, and 85 primes and call it a day haha.
No way unless you can get the GM for a cheaper price it makes no sense. I bought the GM recently for £1310 preowned and its £2099 on the sony website. Sold the Tamron for £530 so i get the GM for just over £800 so that's not too bad considering I bought the Tamron last year for £899
Sweet review Jason, loving the music and vibe in general. Im buying this lens. I just need to do another freelance job with my Tamron 28-75 and I’ll have the money to do so. Then I’ll have the perfect combo
Jason, your video is terrific, however let me make you question- This Christmas i will buy a Sony 7 RIII. What i want to ask you is- In next May 2020, i will go to NYC, and i don´t know if i buy Tamron 28-75 or Tamron 17-28 to take with me in the travel... What do you sugest? I want to take pictures to my wife and to the NYC landscapes (streets, skyline...). Thanks in advance!
Jason Vong what would you do? My kids want to buy my next lens for my birthday. I have the Tamron 28- 70 and the 70 -180. They were getting me the 17-28. But i saw the 35 1.4 gm. I like the picture quality. We were getting the wide 17-28 for travel. I was thinking 35 is also wide.
Hi Jason. Sony have already redesigned and launched new GM zoom lenses 24-70 and 70-200. Do you think Sony have plan for 16-35 GM II in 2022. So they can complete the range of trinity.
Hi I’m new to photography and Sony user. I got the Sony a7r3 with Sony 85mm/FE 1.8 as my first set up. What do you recommend for a zoom lens for landscape and astrophotography? Or just a zoom lens since I have the 85mm. Also not so heavy on the wallet. Thanks for all your reviews and everything. I’m learning a lot from you.
Hi Jason. excellent video as usual. I have the A73 and the 28-75 and the 70-200. I also have the a 6400 with a 10-18. I was looking for another lens for my a6400. Should i get the 18-105 or the 17-28 and have the ability to use it on both cameras. How is the 17-28 on a crop cameras. Can you make a review on that topic?
What tripod or mount r u using where u had both cameras on at the same time. Anyone who wants to review 2 lenses that's def the best way to get a true side by side comparison
I shoot landscapes and some astro, and currently have the Zeiss 16-35 f4 and Samyang 14mm 2.8. Do you think it would make sense to swap both of these for the Tammy?
I wonder if Jason got a bad copy of the Tamron? His is the only video where the Tamron looks softer, and has worse auto focus walking towards the lens. Strange.
I think for the price the g master should blow away the tamron. The fact this is a comparison at this price point just proves the tamron is better. Aside from actual practicality which they’re very similar
Here’s my angle on the G Master series and other God-tier glass: If your income from a single photo, or photo shoot, could pay for Lens X, why do you care what anybody thinks about how you spend your money? If your income from a single photo or photo shoot *won’t* pay for Lens X, why the hell are you looking at Lens X?
@Zason Vong I plan to do mostly wedding and looking at the current 17-28 f2.8 and sony 16-35 f4 will be a good call to consider the sony at f4 or wait for the sigma 14-24 f2.8 for the comparision
I‘ve got the 17-28 tamron on a a7 iii and there‘s quite a lot fisheye style distortion for me but I don‘t see any in your video. Did you remove it in post?
The title of this video is basically “Do you want to get in an argument with your wife or have her divorce you?”
100%
🤣🤣🤣
The two Tamrons are awesome! And definitely not only for "enthusiasts and advanced hobbyists" - they can easily be used for commercial work as well - that all depends on the person operating the camera!
I have the Tamron 17-28, 28-75, and the Sony 85 1.8 all for a nearly the same price as just the 16-35mm GM. If you're on a budget, all 3 of these lenses also use 67mm filters threads so it keeps your kit compact. I'd say win-win imo
Only thing I noticed from my testing is the 17-28mm does flair pretty heavy in direct sunlight (with the lens hood on). It ended up being artistic for the shots, but it could get annoying. Not sure if the 16-35mm is any better though
Tamron is great value for this money.
I have my Sony 16-35 F 2.8 GM for almost 2 years (100% photography, no video, shot about 20.000 photos with it), it´s my main lense for landscape, architecture and astrophotography; at 35 mm also for street and wide angle portraits. I use the 35 mm a lot , I would miss it (if weight matters, I don´t need an extra 35 mm lens), the corner sharpness (I own a A7R III) is very important for me (large printings). Sunstars and flare resistence are also important topics. The AF/MF switch is very helpful also the programmable button.
But on the other side, for this price you can´t do nothing wrong with the Tammy...
Tamron cuz it's amazing and affordable. #NotificationGang
Are you getting this lens?!
Jason Vong yes sir! I need to start shooting wider!
I would gladly take the Tamron if I didnt already start adding GM lens to my gear setup. (24-70mm & 70-200mm). Though one cant ignore the fact that having BOTH Tamron 17-28 & 28-75mm would still cost less than just 1 GM lens.
great video , I got the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 and I love it , I guess Tamron the very good alternative for sony lenses
I love my GM, but after traveling with it, I'd love to pick up that Tamron for its weight
Ralph Orencia u r so rich.
Great comparison Jason! Could you add "focus breathing test" to your list, at short and long focal length next time, please? Thank you for your work 👍 📷
Taking my 17-28 and 28-75 on a trip to Europe next month and can't wait to shoot with both!
How was it? What did you shoot with more?
I just bought my Sony 16-35gm. I considered the Tamron but chose Sony. I had the 16-35 F4 and sold it to help fund the purchase. I like the weight, the feel of quality, durability and the excellent image quality. I do use the focus hold button and manual focusing is easier with the switch. The money was a consideration and at more than half the price the Tamron was tempting. I just don't like settling for second best, if that.
Thanks for sharing your experience! Glad to know there are people out there putting that focus hold button to use!
I love that you include a comparison of the video capability (not only photography). its defnitely why i keep watching your videos. Thanks!
I just jumped into Sony (thanks in no small part to your videos) and have been shooting with the kit lens. Trying to decide where to go from here, but the Tamrons are looking like a good option.
I purchased the 16-35 GM pre Tamron release. I LOVE the lens..I photograph mostly landscape..I am amazed at the sharpness..it does a great job at night and astrophotography as well. With that said, I do OWN the Tamron 28-75. which is awesome....if the 17-28 was around months back, I'd for sure have taken a look at it!! ANOTHER GREAT video..thank you Jason!!
Thanks for sharing your experience! I love my 1635gm too! It's super solid! Loved it more than my 2470
I'll probably never buy any of these, the videos are just enjoyable to watch
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
My oh my! I went to Kyoto in April, and I thought given the tight spaces at the shrines, esp the very famous Fushimi Inari-taisha, bringing the 1635GM would only give me more flexibility versus the 2470GM...man was I wrong! The photos it took are just breath taking! And because it's shorter and lighter than the latter, in the end it became the only lens I used for the rest of my trip!
How in the hell didn't you find focus breathing? I have been using mine for 3 weeks, and shooting video, more noticeable so with very up close objects, it breads back and forth to acquire focus, almost like it's using contrast detection AF instead of the native on Sony a7m3, a6500 and a6400
sigma 14-24 f2.8 sony vs tamron 17-28 f2.8......do it!
Weight!
I’m waiting for this review too. Actually, I’ve already seen one. The tamron is a bit sharper in the middle but the sigma kills it in the corners.
I rented one last year and compared with 17-28 and 24GM on a7R2 & a73. Comparable with the Tamron in sharpness and most other aspects. Bokeh tho isn't smooth, and I would rate the Sigma 5/10 with significant outlining, the Tamron 6/10 with onion rings, and the GM 9/10. Autofocus is also a tad slower than the Tamron.
Bell Le that’s good to know. However, no one really get a wide angle lens for bokeh do they? The other thing is, if you’re using the tamron for architecture and real estate is it really wide enough? That’s where I think the sigma might have the advantage
@@matthoffman6962 17mm is definitely not wide enough for real estate. I would say go for the 14-24 or the Sony 12-24/4 if that's what you need. Otherwise, the Tamron do have front filters tho. I didn't have a chance to try out the Sigma rear filter during the rental (seems less convenient).
Regarding bokeh - I regularly use the GM or the Tamron @ 28mm/2.8 for environmental portraits in addition to wide-angle landscapes. Thus bokeh quality is important to me, and also why I went back to this video about 16-35GM. The Tamron just isn't that great for this, while my other camera body is often occupied with 85mm and can't mount the GM. (The other option is to replace the 85mm with a standard F/2.8 zoom, but also some compromises to make) Admittedly, the Sigma is even less relevant.
Super helpful! Thanks Jason!
My brain tells me: “sell the GM , it’s too expensive and heavy, and get the 17-28 and maybe another lens” but i’m struggling since my heart loves the GM,it’s the one lens that pretty much stays in my camera, love the 16-35mm versatility and the quality of the landscape,street, and portrait shots that i get out of it.
Did you sell it ?😅
I am thinking about buying a used one (1400€) since right now I am just using a Loxia 21. it is a great lense, but the versatility of the GM is so much better... .
However, I am still concerned about the weight. And due to corona I cannot see it in real life
The thing about the new sigma lens is the rear filter holder. I just don’t want to deal with it so I think I’m going Tamron.
Yeah it seems like such a waste of time. :/
Basically: if the extra 7mm reach really, really matters, Sony. Or just crop. Seriously, you won’t get that much more background compression between 28mm and 35mm. Or take the $$$ savings and buy a nice 35mm.
please make a comparasion with zeiss 16-35 f4 as their price are much closer. thanks!
tammy blows f4 out of the water
I like the GM because the extra millimeter on the wide end helps me catch 3% more cryptids in frame
I use a tamron 17-35 since 2013 and last month I finally got a 15-30 and at the widest end I love the extra field of view, but when there is room to walk backwards it's a tie between those 2.
GM stuff is great but third party lenses are great. On my A7riii I’ve ditched and sold on my Sony GM lenses and bought a combination of Tamron and Sigma. Just picked this lens up….with the subtle differences, you won’t really miss what you don’t have!
Great vid, earned a sub! :)
That lake image is gorgeous man!
The 16-35mm is actually on the compatibility list for the Ronin-SC with a * saying it needs a counterweight. I contacted DJI - a counterweight is coming. Smallrig just announced one too, coming 7th October
really? i have also the 16/35gm and the ronin SC!! if this is true i’m very happy!!!!! thanks!! sorry for my english!!
@@garrios1566 yes that's what DJI told me. Also Smallrig have one coming out on 7th October. Pre-orders are open
Just picked up the tamron 17-28 to pair with my 28-75 v2, amazing pair of lenses for both my a7iii and fx30
Hi Jason! Of course primes are way sharper... But how are you feeling about the tamron 17 28 and 28 75 compared to the batis line? I'm always switching between 18mm and 85mm but during weddings it's too tricky.. so I'm looking if the tamrons would be a great replacement or if I'll regret doing my batis lenses away. Thanks man, keep it up! 🙏🏼
Hey that’s the Big Bang street in Pasadena! Cool comparison
The auto focus switch is literally the only game changer for me.
Great informative video as always Jason! That little Tamron is a beast!
Tamron is killing it these days!
waiting for the Sigma vs Tammy :D
Clear simple and to the point. Thank you Jason.
I was very skeptical about tamron cause I wanted to keep all my lenses native sony, but I don’t shoot wide very often so bought this lens and I’m blown away how good it is for the price, got it for 895$ from Adorama , at the end you get 42 mm in crop mode which is perfect, don’t think a lot just buy it. Thank you for review Jason
It's nice to have an options! GMaster is too pricy :( Also... i think 16-35 f/4 is more versatile
This is making me re-think buying the Sony 16-35 f4 cus the tamron is still better priced then that one. Thanks for the review jason
It seems like a lot of people are jumping to the GM as the competition, but really I think the f4 is the true competition. Because yeah, the GM and the Tamron are both 2.8, but there's also like $1300 between them. There's compromises between the Tamron and the GM, but you do get more (if subtle) for your money. Between the f4 and the Tamron, though? Now that's a great win. For me, I'm *already* not willing to spend 2200 on the GM, so it's really like, well would I get the f4 Sony or the Tamron?
@@JustinDoesTriathlon depends. I am right now trying to buy a 16-35GM used. You can get it for like 1400€ which makes it quite attractive
I love your humor. You are one of my favorites on YT.
That onion-ring "bokeh" roughness on the Tamron glass is so frustrating... and IS getting to be an issue on my year old 28-75. :( a little more polishing would go a very long way Tamron!
Great Video! And Yes! Would really love to see you compare between the Sigma Art 14-24 & this Tammy 17-28mm!
Thanks
Thanks for the review. Great job showing the difference.
Jason, will you be doing the comparison video with the Sigma 14-24 DG DN? Looking forward to that, bro.
I have to say, when you say the color is the same, I am seeing completely different color out of these lenses.
Yea I was seeing slight differences in color too, but nothing substantially different that it’s an issue
I went into the store to pick up the Tamron 17-28 and the sales person kept pushing the GM lens on my. I ended up leaving without buying anything. I currently have the Tamron 28-200 on my Sony a7iv. Do you think the 17-28 would pair well with the lens I currently have, or would I be better suited getting something different? I travel on my motorcycle so size and weight are considerations, but not something I couldn't overlook. If I had the space, I'd just get 20, 35, 50, and 85 primes and call it a day haha.
there is no way anyone can look at both these lenses and think "yah, sony's is worth the extra 1300 bucks!"
No way unless you can get the GM for a cheaper price it makes no sense. I bought the GM recently for £1310 preowned and its £2099 on the sony website. Sold the Tamron for £530 so i get the GM for just over £800 so that's not too bad considering I bought the Tamron last year for £899
Thanks for this video Jason! Great job 👌
Sweet review Jason, loving the music and vibe in general. Im buying this lens. I just need to do another freelance job with my Tamron 28-75 and I’ll have the money to do so. Then I’ll have the perfect combo
Thanks for touching on the real estate part!
I gotchu you guys!
@@JasonVong you da real MVP! Greets from México.
Hello from Japan.
good video!!
Excellent review comparison!
That thumbs up at the end, thought it was potato jet for a sec lol
Hey Jason, any luck with getting the Sigma for comparison? Really hoping to see a comparison video against the Tamron.
I love my GM, buy either.
Great video, I’m thinking to get GM.
2:47 some tamrons tend to have 'onion rings' on the balls
Cool Video Jason!
Love your clips all throughout LA.
Man ohh man I want the Tammy. Great comparison, short and straight to the point. Great vid buddy.
Sony doesnt even have a lens factory....Tamron makes their lenses which could be why there so similar
If they cost the same $. No one would buy a Tamron. Ever. Good review video.
The best video ,ever! Thanks for sharing!
I'm not getting any money out of photography so after such a long time agonizing, I guess I will get both tamron zoom lenses.
Definitely interested in the sigma 14-24 review.
Hope your review is here soon
Is it worth getting the tamron 17-28 for video if you already have the Sony 24 GM? It would be mostly for vlogs and youtube work
Good question.
Absolutely. You can sell the GM!
Unless the 24GM isnt wide enough, I don’t think it’s too necessary to get the Tamron. I personally use the 25 Batis for RUclips!
Jason Vong good point! thank you 👌🏾
@@JasonVong i have a7iii and tamron 28-75. now, i need wide-angle for indoor shooting video. 17-28 or 16-35 f4, or 25 batis?))
Jason, your video is terrific, however let me make you question- This Christmas i will buy a Sony 7 RIII. What i want to ask you is- In next May 2020, i will go to NYC, and i don´t know if i buy Tamron 28-75 or Tamron 17-28 to take with me in the travel... What do you sugest? I want to take pictures to my wife and to the NYC landscapes (streets, skyline...). Thanks in advance!
Jason Vong told me I, I was wrong for getting GM. V take over please can't take any more hits. lol
another great video. thanks potato jet!
Okay I like the comparison between the Tamron and the G master, how is it against the Sigma 18-35mm 1.4?
I think my real question is, the tamron or the sigma 14-24? The rear lens filters suck for me though “I can’t easily get them”
You r the gmaster. Love watching ur videos thanks..
Tamron is a clear winner for it's weight and size.
You have helped me finally make up my mind about this. Thank you! Tammy it is
Jason Vong what would you do? My kids want to buy my next lens for my birthday. I have the Tamron 28- 70 and the 70 -180. They were getting me the 17-28. But i saw the 35 1.4 gm. I like the picture quality.
We were getting the wide 17-28 for travel. I was thinking 35 is also wide.
Can you compare between and , THANK
Hi Jason. Sony have already redesigned and launched new GM zoom lenses 24-70 and 70-200. Do you think Sony have plan for 16-35 GM II in 2022. So they can complete the range of trinity.
Split the difference and get the Sigma 14-24 2.8, I did
Looks like a Good Lens
Hi I’m new to photography and Sony user. I got the Sony a7r3 with Sony 85mm/FE 1.8 as my first set up. What do you recommend for a zoom lens for landscape and astrophotography? Or just a zoom lens since I have the 85mm. Also not so heavy on the wallet. Thanks for all your reviews and everything. I’m learning a lot from you.
Hi Jason. excellent video as usual. I have the A73 and the 28-75 and the 70-200. I also have the a 6400 with a 10-18. I was looking for another lens for my a6400. Should i get the 18-105 or the 17-28 and have the ability to use it on both cameras. How is the 17-28 on a crop cameras. Can you make a review on that topic?
If I had the money, I would get the 16-35, otherwise I would just get the 17-28, simple as that...
What tripod or mount r u using where u had both cameras on at the same time. Anyone who wants to review 2 lenses that's def the best way to get a true side by side comparison
Sony look sharper.
For anyone curious about the Sigma 14-24 for e mount Jason mentioned I have a quick look on my channel.
I shoot landscapes and some astro, and currently have the Zeiss 16-35 f4 and Samyang 14mm 2.8. Do you think it would make sense to swap both of these for the Tammy?
Are you going to review/compare the sigma art 14-24 for Sony a7iii? Thanks a lot!
I can get the the G Master for 1600. In that case which would you guys choose?
I wonder if Jason got a bad copy of the Tamron? His is the only video where the Tamron looks softer, and has worse auto focus walking towards the lens. Strange.
How good is Tamron at 16mm and 29-35mm?
Please make a video comparison of sigma 14-24 f2.8 art lens and zeiss 16-35mm f4
I think for the price the g master should blow away the tamron. The fact this is a comparison at this price point just proves the tamron is better. Aside from actual practicality which they’re very similar
Notif squad wya
Here’s my angle on the G Master series and other God-tier glass: If your income from a single photo, or photo shoot, could pay for Lens X, why do you care what anybody thinks about how you spend your money? If your income from a single photo or photo shoot *won’t* pay for Lens X, why the hell are you looking at Lens X?
2:46 - So we're just going to let this comment go without any acknowledgement? Guess I'm the only one that lacks maturity. Carry on 😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
Any updates for the new sigma 24-70 f/2.8 lens?
I have that Loawa 10-18 on my dream board. JESUS! 5:22
shut up
@Zason Vong I plan to do mostly wedding and looking at the current 17-28 f2.8 and sony 16-35 f4 will be a good call to consider the sony at f4 or wait for the sigma 14-24 f2.8 for the comparision
I‘ve got the 17-28 tamron on a a7 iii and there‘s quite a lot fisheye style distortion for me but I don‘t see any in your video. Did you remove it in post?
Focus breathing is a 100 times worse on the Sony than the tamron