Assassin's Creed 3 Remaster vs Original (2012 vs 2019) Comparison
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 фев 2025
- I compare the remaster of Assassin's Creed III with the original game from 2012. I use side-by-side comparisons, stills and the same sequences. Both are set to max quality settings on the same PC (my rig is: GTX 1070 8GB, Intel Xeon E3 1231 3.40GHz, 16GB DDR3, Samsung SSD 850 EVO). You can see that the remaster has serious problems with lighting that doesn't fit the old models. I did not change the brightness or the gamma values.
Become a channel member and receive exclusive benefits:
/ @gameintrosfinales
Follow me on Twitter (now X): / game_intros
#assassinscreed3 #assassinscreed3remastered
Ubisoft game developers:
Graphics ≠ Graphics
Graphics = Brightness
Karen you should complain to the CEO to make the game better
Why you took the kids
Its been a decade karen let me see my kids
In a few years Ubi launches the Watch Dogs without downgrade and will say that it is remaster
Clarity usually makes things look brighter.
How to remaster the game
Just turn the brightness to 10
I absolutely hate that.
Lulz
Add lens flares
just like checking post processing box and apply.
And smooth out all textures so it looks like plastic
HOW DOES THE REMASTER MANAGE TO LOOK WORSE.
Jesus Ubisoft.
It also happened to the ezio collection with the NPC's face looking awful.
And with the Prince of Persia
Yes
I think it really is case of style. They tried to go for a much more crisp and vibrant look than the original which (while limited in technology) went for a more realistic dull look in most places (that sea part with the ship sailing was fucking awful on the remasters part). It really does feel like they decided to be more cartoony with this, im sure the fact that they didn't update the models doesn't help much either
It actually looks better if you actually play it
Ubisoft: lower the graphics
Employee: why
Ubisoft: we need the extra room for extra brightness
Too true
Yep money dont grow on trees.
Bro what the graphics are way better than
Remaster is better
Ubisoft live in the futur. They released the remaster years ago, now they finally release the original game
Yep. The strategy of working backward
Lmao
They were already living in 2019 when it was released.
Lmao I was watching and mouthing to myself "what the fuck is this shit" pisses me off this game was tits
This video was kind of upsetting.
Ubisoft employees : What do you think?
Ubisoft manager with sunglasses on: It's to dark
Chris
Ubisoft Employees: What do you think?
Ubisoft Manager with sunglasses on: Its too bright
Ubisoft Employees: OH YEAH YEAH
😂😂😂🤣
*too
😂😂😂😂
Stevie Wonder is a manager at Ubisoft?
I'm so glad Ubisoft remembered to melt the faces of their characters to look like action figures for the remaster
Lmao I know!
looks like they didn't change anything just the lighting.
@@noelsoong777 and shadows
Moooooneeeeeyyyyyy
Making them look like action figures will make you want to buy more merch! Outstanding move Ubisoft!
@@noelsoong777 they look like mf plastic
Ubisoft employees: "Soo how bright do you want it to be?"
Ubisoft: "Yes"
Och, nicht du auch noch damit :D
Uff....
Selphius thank you for making my day 😂😂😂 i feel like i laughed way harder than i should have
Hmm stealing my comment I see mine was a day earlier before yours nah jp idc tbh 😂
Ubisoft:It just work
Turns out that removing shaders and increasing brightness is not a recipe for better looking visuals
Who would've thought
It doesn't make it worse either.
you don't know what shaders mean don't you?
What about The sea?
@@lampad4549 yes it does
Ubisoft was a bit early for April fools this year
Lol
even when they stop making New games they still suck... ......
*late
Dumbass
TwistedGale actually the remastered version was released on March 29, so yeah he was actually right.... dumbass
@@twistedgale dumbass
What’s a REMASTER for Ubisoft:
1)Let a 3 y o kid play with light settings
2)Graphic Downgraded
More like
1. Install new shaders
Done.
Gamer: So... You remastered Assassin's Creed III?
Ubisoft: Well yes, but actually no
Ubisoft loves their downgrade so much, they downgraded their "remastered" versions as well!
Its actually not a downgrade. They remastered the lighting and a lot of other stuff, but most of the models they have left the same, the new lighting and upgraded textures make those 2012 graphics of the models stand out like a sore thumb.
@@DennisTjhie Its their fault for not seeing how insufferably bad the character models look with new lightning.
@@General_Townes but as I said then technically it is not a downgrade. They never said they were going to completely rebuild the game from the ground up like Resident Evil 2, and it is at least a whole lot better than a shitty 'HD remaster'
@@DennisTjhie But the remaster still should look better than the original and not the other way around
@@uh3mt and it does in a lot of ways though. The textures of buildings, the lighting, the gameplay has been improved.
I’m not gonna lie...if the Original was Remastered and the Remastered was Original, THAT would’ve been a major upgrade
how come? they're almost the same lol
@@fantasmacstrp9239 You're blind "lol"
@@fantasmacstrp9239 are you colour blind or just stupid
@@brucewayne7323 why? they have the same graphics, one is brigther. that's all.
@@fantasmacstrp9239 uh no look at the shades and shadow lol
I don't think Ubisoft knows what remastered means.
Lmao this is worst than Black Flag and it's amazing glitches.
@@kingburtonhd
At least Black Flag was fun.
3 didn't have any of the revolution in the revolution. Just Indian drama.
named lamo I was saying Black Flag was amazing. The glitches make it even better. 😂😂
Ganderlow For them, it’s to just put a filter over it and overprice it.
Then you obviously don't know what a remaster is.
So it’s basically the original but with a Snapchat filter.
AK740 exactly
well ... it could have been the best remastered ever if they not changed the lighting system and left the textures as they were. Because they also made improvements that no one has ever done with remastered, which is improved polygons like Connor's head which is now no longer angular like the original and the face is much more like the cutscenes now. They have improved the mechanics of the gameplay that were not there before, but which now have also brought here, namely being able to whistle even in the bushes, double stealth kills with the blade hidden in low profile, being able to change weapons when you want and not go every time in the shops, improved some secondary objectives, in short they tried to make it look more modern, the only thing they didn't have to do I repeat, is the change of lighting that does not reflect well with the models of the characters, and the textures of all the characters, NPCs that used to really give the effect of fabric, now look like they are made of plastic except Connor's.
Ubisoft "Remaster"- lower textures + max out brightness
Well more like keep everything the same and change the lighting system but not updating any models and textures to accompany it. So it’s basically they designed the models in a way that the lighting hides the imperfections to cut down on effort but with the remaster it seems they forgot that the old lighting was hiding their laziness.
MONSIEUR MILLUER!!! And lower the frame rate somehow..
When Sue Old engine unable to compensate new lighting probably.
Every. Single. Time.
Ubisoft strategy:
Trailer best graphic
Original game downgrade
Remaster even worse downgrade
worse*
@ummm I love you.
Some random asshole I don’t
*sees original*
Ubisoft: No
*sees GTA Vice City graphics*
Ubisoft: Yes
Just An Edit I genuinely laughed out loud to the point to which my mom yelled at me bc of this
GTA V graphics
But Vice city looked better tho.
the """""remaster""""" looks more like some debug mode theyd use for very early alpha testing
That's cos they were living in the future. Released the developed version early and now they release the debugger version.
Who the gal in your profile pic?
@@mr.cuddlesworth3144 nanana ryuugajou
you are so right
Original at 50% brightness
Remaster 110% brightness repacked and sold to us again
No, they literally downgraded graphics also. Game is worth negative $
Imagine putting remaster on a high brightness.
@@V_Deity You get what you pay for am i right?
I agree with half of your comment. I won't buy that shite.
If the water is like that in the remastered game, I hope they will never touch AC IV
@Bumble Bee *Ubisoft, remember?*
Elzeta you can’t remaster what is already mastered
Ac 4 had the best looking water i've ever seen in a game
I was like, "Nah the remaster looks good on the boat scene." But I actually just confused the original for the remaster :D
Deja de aparecer en todos lados wn
Hey guys, if you don't like the remaster please don't give the video a dislike. Ask Ubisoft what they were thinking. And in case you wonder: Both games are set to max settings.
they didn't even bother to change the shader to match the updated lighting. that's probably the reason why they focus too much on the environment in the remaster trailer because they know the characters look bad in it.
Yeah, it is a very strange "remaster". The foliage may look better, but the outdoor lighting and shading doesn't match at all. And look at the clouds. Even the water is strange although Ubisoft is very good at simulating water (see other Creed titles and Far Cry).
@@GameIntrosFinales you are the only truthful comparison RUclipsr. Lemme guess, u played them both on PC. That's good, because all the other videos keep comparing Xbox 360 with like Xbox one x but if u play it on the same console the original actually looks better
Thank you , some things are better on the remaster but the original has most details
Why did they not bother delaying it?
If you switch the title between remastered and original, I would believe it.
"You guys want a remaster?"
Alright team, you know what to do. Turn the brightness up.
And remove lots of texture details, and all water animations and wave effects.
I was considering the Switch version, but I won't be buying it now since it's so inferior to the 7 year old original.
Why are you hating?
Its not like you can do any better.
Oh sorry guys i'm not talking to you I'm talking to Ubisoft
COMAA OF SOULSS
@@amoneilpendon123 but tbh they honestly could not ubisoft
So they increased the brightness overall and toyed a little with the shadows and called it a remaster...okay?
They just dead ass removed the shaders and fucking got the game back out at full price
Do note some engines of a game cannot simply retain the same lighting and shading process when being ported to a new system, sometimes it does work when the devs decide to implement or rework the source code or make a decision that will drastically change things overall. Sometimes it cant be helped
halo 2 still holds a true remaster
@@sourthecat Yeah but that doesn't justify that they call this a Remaster and also the full price
Yeah because dumb people will buy it no matter what
Wtf, This remaster looks like mobile graphics!
EVEN SOME FKING MOBILE GAME GRAPHICS ARE BETTER THAN THIS SHIT
EXACTLY!!!
It looks like d's graphics if anything
@André Santos BR estão em todos os lugares
Hey hey, dont u have guys a mObiLe PHonEs?
How is it possible the original look better than remaster
There is always news and fresh thing coming up until we die one day==tot
Ubisoft
I was thinking the same colors and Details look better in the original
Ubisoft changed the lighting system of AC3 Ultimately ruining the original Intended look of the game.
he shows a lot of scenes with faces, which actually look way worse, but in the open world it does look better
Am i who think the remastered only increase brightness but low the texture specs
Thought the same thing.
Yup
Yeah it’s what you thought. I’m glad I saw this comparison first, not worth the purchase.
Just spiked the hell out of the gamma....
Not completely true ive put 40 hours into it so far and The enviroment and most textures look way better but they pooched the faces and water up hard.
Ubisoft direction for remastering :
Put one generic filter in all scene > export file
Increase brightness +1
Remove shadow
1:52 look at the water detail on the original vs remaster
wtf u smoking ubisoft
Your profile pic goes perfectly with that comment lmao
For me it more the sky and clouds, less detail in the sails just in general less detail in the game...
This clouds...
I seas what yee mean.
Probably smoking your money
Quality vs quantity everyone.
This video speaks a thousand words about Ubisoft.
I can just imagine what skull and bones will look like then. Jesus H christ.
Well said sir
Just play old AC 3 with ur monitor brightness and contrast high..same experience + free
vikas p it’s funny cause Uplay and and steam don’t sell the original game anymore
But we can crouch now..
It is not the same, the old AC 3 have better grafics
Brad Harp and pay $60 for a worse looking game with lots more bugs and glitches I’d rather just go on Humble Bundle and spend $12 and get 6 games one of them being Assassin’s creed origins
Andreuss RIP I’m glade my girlfriend got it for me on Uplay before it was taken off for this broken mess
Original color palate is much better suited for assassins 3
The new ones looks like if someone remastered Runescape
The boat in the remaster is just sad. They made everything too bright
And look at the sea... omg what did they do
AuroraBorealis also what’s happened to the sea effects!? The graphics are a major downgrade!!
So.. In 2019 any games with high brightness is called "Remastered" ?
Okay I understand now.
Why are the comments all the same cant you write anything else about it
@@amoneilpendon123 There are tons of comments about the other problems.
Time to turn up the brightness in all my games, homemade remaster 😏
Ahhh. Gotta love Ubisoft and their graphics downgrades
🤣🤣🤣🤣
When I saw the water... My jaw dropped. I said WHAT!? how did this happen
abcdeisthekey PlayStation/PC I reminded that part of the video like 3 times trying to make sure I wasn’t seeing things wrong. That water in the “remaster” is horrendous
@@newdivide9882 it's some kind of sick joke
Yep the Ubisoft of now is greedy I want the old Ubisoft back :/
Fr it somehow looks even WORSE
This is the worst remaster I've ever seen. Glad I still have the original to play
Nothing says “Remaster” quite like replacing realistic human skin with a matte plastic that vaguely approximates human flesh
Annnnnd lighting, aaaaaand lighting, aaaand lighting, aaaaand did management ask for lighting or lighting, ok so lighting.
Omg why does the water look better in the original?
Ikr
GavTheCat10 omg i thought when they showed the remastered water that it was the original. This is shocking
Everything looks better in the original :(
The funny thing is Ubisoft gave away the original AC3 for free a few months ago. So why bother with the "remaster".
Adrian Trusca No it was Black flag baby!
The worse graphics add to the appeal of the game. Reminds me of PS2 days. We should call this Assassin's Creed 3: Demastered edition
Okay?
Demastered edition 😂😂😂
Guan Yu *unmastered
No, it should be called the Renoviced Edition because clearly it broke the rules of the creed and was demoted from remaster to renovice as a result.
I think the graphics reflect the state of the franchise, terrible.
"This is just my honest opinion- but the remaster looks so much better"
said no one ever
This is my honest opinion but the remaster looks so much better
Jacob Adams i like the coloration of the remaster as it allows you to see much more intricate details on characters like haytham that you don’t see in the original game
Let me get this straight both PC versions of the game both on ultra settings and the remaster looks like a half-assed bootleg graphics
Not gonna lie. You had me in the first half.
@@anya88101 please shut up
They improved lighting and dynamic lights .... but decreased reflections and the amount of smaller shadows on characters and objects... LOGIC
The lightning is worse. It's brighter but not better. Doesnt seem realistic
I remember the graphics of the GTA V in the trailers and all the characters had the skin and the clothes with reflexes (in the style GTA IV) but in the launching it did not have reflexes more
@@Zigeuninja It definitely looks worse, but that's because of the lack of reflections and shadows. They actually made much better light effects in the Remaster, but they are useless without the extras. Thats my point. A more realistic light has no impact when the reflection is missing.
@@Garother the original now looks better cus it has natural colors no filter and hasbetter looking ambient occlusion + no flickeringshadows
They made the lighting better but swapped out the face textures which had painted on shadows before. That's why it looks worse, they used current Gen textures on an outdated engine
The characters look like they were made from plastic
It looks like they just stripped away all the detail from them..
Woody looks better
I was REALLY hoping the thumbnail was gonna be clickbait 😭
It's like how fable anniversary looks worse than fable. Although fable's remaster lowered the brightness compared to the original ... obviously this remaster did the opposite lol
squeallymaniac now you dont know what you are talking bout, anniversary is better than first fable
Developers : “How bright do you want the remaster to be?”
Ubisoft : Yes
I think the original atmosphere and brightness suits the game better, assassin is dark side of life why should it seems so damn bright? It ruins the feelin
1:45 I'm sorry, I can't watch this any further, I feel physical pain.
Dude paused it after that and scrolled comments like "someone else has to be pissed right here"
Dude, they fucking gutted the water. I always like it when water has reflections but Ubi said nah
Who is the worst AAA Developer ...You guessed right .fk me
King Kb Soul this is shit but EA and Activision are definitely worst
Disappointment at its highest possible.
This is the definition of a "cash grab" and ubisoft having a history of not knowing how to actually remaster something. Lol.
Well some people don't wanna pay a thousand fucking dollars for a PC, or make their own, and they wanna play on the modern consoles, so quit your bitching
@@GameStrikerX2 1000 $ PC for Assassins Creed 3? From 2012?
Well you hit your mark by like 750$
@@GameStrikerX2 don't talk shit without any knowledge .
@@IR4ndI0mIL0wIb0Ib Who actually builds a PC for one game. If I was a PC gamer I'd want multiple games and to be able to run them at MUCH higher specs than consoles... not worth it in my opinion, cheaper and more accessible to go with console
The remaster looks way better except in cutscenes. The actual game itself, the lighting, the textures, the foliage and the environments look way better. They just messed up the faces in cutscenes
Actually blown away by the sheer quality of the original
*FIXED Title*
Assassin's Creed III Mobile Vs Original
Lol
It's on switch so I guess that's true.
Modern mobile phones (iPhone 6s and better models) could handle the original
@@Str82DBank it cant, it really cant
Clay it could if it was ported. We already have games like PUBG, Vainglory or Fortnite running on mobile
"To be clear. I didn't confuse remaster and original" 😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I was thinking it was a mistake until the end hahaha
RPG Is Life cooool dude. You played AC3? That’s awesome. Very great.
Hey usibost,
Remaster your remastering skills.
Usibost
Usibost
Usibost
Ubibost
swenpai and do what, make them worse?
Remaster? This should be good...
Looks at Hatham's face - Oh god, where's the rewind button.
Anthony8851 his face looks like a gingerbread cookie
Ubisoft making the Remastered verison: What if we remade the orginal, but make them all look like playdoh?
So to get the same experience with the original I just have to increase my brightness all the way up?
And turn the textures all the way down
And turn the saturation up
And pour water on PC/console
Ohh my dear.... A beer for you sir
Or you can use a mod in the unremastered version
The lighting is definitely better, but OH GOD the original models are not adapting well to the modern light effects
I cant wrap my head around how this made the full release like its not even humanly. possible to see this and be like yeah this definitely looks better lets release it!
@@caprisces6139 I suppose it's for optimisation purposes, at least the original AS3 runed very poorly on my pc, but we all new that the remaster was going to be just a cash grab, no way that ubisoft would actually make new models
@@abdela593 It just bugs me that someone said the same thing for Fallout 76
That's what it is
What modern effects? Fullbright mode = 1?
I think the original looks way better. The lighting really commented the atmosphere.
I bought this game
It took me 50 min to refund it
The remaster was a flippin downgrade
How much does it cost?
@@masrendra8625 its 40 for if you dont have odyssey season pass i think
Ubisoft lazy I should try to step up their game and actually make a quality remaster not a shity half-assed brightened up remake
HendraSTK 86 Everything
Its not even a remaster. They just added filters to it.
When you install new lighting shaders in minecraft but have to lower your settings cuz they lag your pc
It literally looks that way I hope this is a ubisoft's April fools joke three days before April's fools. First time in my life I actually see why people hate on ubisoft so much.
The perfect explanation lol
Remaster team: alright so we got the foliage and lighting done, what do you think so far?
Ubisoft execs: looks great! Send it out!
Team: but sir, it's not done yet. We've only done these two things
Ubisoft: JUST GONNA SEND IT
Team: We were gonna increase the brightness a little bi-
Ubi: okay turn the brightness up to 100 and ship it!
I wonder if anyone gets it
@@tomusklepipieta1009 Im just gonna SEEEND IT
@@tomusklepipieta1009 Larry Enticer
That also EA motto " just send it"
Other company:
remastered a several gen old game with night and day (apple v Orange) visual, graphics, models, rendering, everything.
Ubisoft:
Make it brighter
Crisp water textures with perfect reflection vs Murky shite with a strange fog on the horizon
The Remaster kinda looks like Elder Scrolls: Oblivion Graphics.
NPC weirdo without an original thought, that’s surprising :^)
@@CPSPD Okay?
Have you heard of the high elves?
@@CPSPD Okay?
CPSPD okay?
Original: Better Faces
Remaster: Better environment, Bad faces
God so true
Remaster: butter faces
@@imadrabhi5991 *chinese
Water and ship environment got lot worse, but else is good 4 real
1:53 The ocean and sky looks better in the original.
The original literally looks better than the remaster. Pathetic.
No he make a mistake
over 5-year old Assassins creed game:
Ubisoft: REMASTERED
Fandom: WTF IT LOOKS WORSE
OwenEx ye they needed to downgrade it as usual...
they really have a thing or two to learn from Capcom
You literally just described the situation
Dear Ubisoft:
BRIGHTER DOES NOT MEAN CLEANER, CRISPER OR REMASTERED.
Thank you.
*sees amazing Halo 2 remaster
Ubi: ha! I can do that!... but that might require effort, hmmm.....
*removes shadows
Ubi: *beautiful*
Then the boss comes in: "this doesn't looks nearly good enough yet..."
*Gives Haytham a shitty face, somehow makes Desmond look even more lifeless, and against all odds, reasoning, and logic, makes the water look 6th gen*
Ubisoft boss: WE'VE STRUCK GOLD. SHIP IT
It helps if you adjust game brightness to 4 in the Options menu instead of the default 5. It doesn't fix it completely, of course, but trust me, IT DOES HELP!
It makes most cutscenes look less weird and makes the game look a little bit like a "remaster".
All things considered, I'm actually enjoying replaying it. 👍
Thank you for the suggestion, I'm playing the remaster rn
thanks for the tip mate!
Looks like Watch Dog’s graphics downgrade virus is still around lol
R.U.S.E had beautiful graphics back when it was in VIP beta (probs Closed beta) in 2009, Ubisoft fucked it up and downgraded it, probs one of its first victims.
edit: in VIP Beta you were able to zoom in to the ground to the point where can you see a whole tank in extreme detail, fires looked WAY BETTER in CB than in the RELEASE VERSION.
Just watch some VIP Beta videos of R.U.S.E then compare it with the release version.
There’s a theory that Ubisoft have been getting paid a lot of money because of the downgrades
It's probably because they assumed that watch dogs will never be playable enough for 90% of computers in our houses. They downgraded cuz hardware requirements was too big for most computers.
They downgraded it because M$ and Sony told them to so people wouldn’t realise how weak PS4 and XBO graphic power is compared to a gaming pc. You could actually change some settings in a confit file and it already looked much better. Not as good as the presentation and trailers but it was a strong improvement (game was still boring as heck though)
Haytham is looking considerably more Asian in the remaster.
Avocado English please.
Avocado
You are too sensitive
Sensitive people can be very exhausting
Hehe
I thought the thumbnail was trolling, but nope! The remastered looks like ps2 graphics
Dude same!!!!!!!
I was gon flag this for misrepresentation 😭
I think this is a pretty solid summary of the direction the gaming industry had been going for the last console generation
Remaster, more like washing out the environment with white light.
DaddyKitty04 The foliage and volumetrics in forests looks much better. Yeah and thats about it, everything else is a disaster lmao
ubi employee: we should make a good remastered version of ac3
Ubi boss: do it
ubi employee: it would cost a lot but will be worth
Ubi boss: just increases the brightness and sell it for 40$
That was their one job and somehow they screwed up the graphics like at 1:51
$80*
+IFWH Wait, is it really $80?
@@Kronos0999 last time I checked the Xbox store in Australia it was. Idk if it still is but tbh it wouldn't had changed
@@ifwhwhisper9861 Oh, *Australian* dollars? Ah, that's fine then.
the character skin xD. man it is like gta san andreas mobile version. plastic.
Higher texture makes it look plasticky... also, it's lacking shadows and reflections.
N Gin LOL, one more remastered version of assassins creed 3 remastered edition and their faces Will look like the doll version of the kids in pink Floyd - another brick in the Wall Music video
if the texture still the same, will u not complain?
It's total garbage , facial animation has ruin the full game
Even GTA 4 had better models than this remaster
Assassin's Creed: Dark
vs.
Assassin's Creed: Bright
I feel bad for anyone who bought AC3 Remastered....
Got mine for free tacked onto the season pass of odyssey so I can't complain
@ i heard from someone that you can refund if you havent played the game yet, but what the fuck is the point of it anymore if you dont know how the game plays for you? Fuck ubisoft
Naw don't be feel bad for me lm still enjoying it.
Jolley most people who own it got it for free from the season pass
Aaron Bolton no i’d say we still have a right to complain... it being included in the season pass probably raised the price/there were definitely people who were swayed to buying the pass by this game being included and now everyone’s disappointed
The new lighting just doesn’t work very well with the older models
Nothing works well here
Naapurin Jorma the lighting works great on the environment, except the water.
Ubisoft: let’s add a bit of yellow and let’s adjust the brightness. BOOM Remastered
This is what I imagined playing this game coming down off some LSD would look like
Why is 2:30 so shit? All if it is extra brightness, but the inside scenes look better tho with the candle lighting
Ikr.
@Albus Dumbledore no shit sherlock
Cyber Striker i farted
Probably cause the lighting on both the environment and Haytham make it look different or something
GamingPro1003 it’s was on ps3 the original one
Why the sea water in the original looks better?
art studio udara Because in the Original They Focused on the Surroundings and everything else because they created the game but the Remastered just only focused on the lighting which you can say ( You can’t beat the classics and it will always be like that )
Truth blind?
Or just blind
Why does the everything look better in the original
@Truth Yeah you are blind..
The water is way nicer in the original game..
Therapist: Asian Haytham doesn't exist, he can't hurt you...
Ubisoft: 2:30
+ Alas, that awful water belongs to the remastered, not the original. Can easily be missed, because why would you think it to be, until you remember it's Ubisoft...
LOL
Frick that is hecca funny
Pfft! Dude, this straight made me choke. LMAO!
Lol thats hits me as fuck hahahaaaa
Now I understand, they may have a problem understanding what are good graphics and that is the reason to do so much downgraded games.
Remaster in a nutshell: Brighter but the settings are always stuck on low
*very low
Sometimes the remaster looks like it came out of Gary’s mod
1 like = 1 prayer for the dudes who brought this remastred
🤝🙏
Lmfao!
Thanks
The older one looks so much more crisp and polished. That and eh lighting
The game is only 7 years old so doing a remaster already is the definition of a moneygrab.
Thomas Street Keep in mind it was one of the worst received AC games as well lol
the Last of Us got remastered within a year lol.
Stexor Technically it was a year and a month but either way that wasn’t needed lol
@@Efrenxrazor95 I would have been fine with it if it was simply a re-release, because that's what it was. Making a remaster after a year is ridiculous, especially when the only thing you improve is the resolution/frame rate lol.
@@TStef64 It was just a port. They slapped remaster on it for not reason.
messing around with gamma does not mean you remastered a game Ubisoft.
Original looks better
Agreed!
Characters..
Besides haythems face everything else looks better on the remaster
I totally agree
Only Ubisoft could manage a remaster worse than the original
1:46 they turned rtx off 💀
Congrats Ubisoft, you somehow make the remaster version worse than the original
Surprisingly, this means the switch version might be really good
Overly amped Lightning effects + low res textures. I dont think so.
@@markus9641 but the Switch version miiiight just be a port of the original, not the "remastered" version
@@jaredhoeft2832 Highly unlikely that they will take an old port that requires far more optimization and work and then convert it from x86 to switch's own architecture. But you may very Well be right. I am no expert on this topic.
They sacrificed textures for lighting? What?
Man...he original has much more grit. In a good way. The new ones just more saturated and contrasted. Which dont get me wrong, it helps but it also kinda seems like the grit was lost.
*looks at the thumbnail*
WHAT TF DID Y'ALL DO TO HIS FACE?
GunBunny JUNK he has changed to a nice person, just look at his innocent face
Same.... wtf did they do britnes 120%
GunBunny JUNK he is now a potato