The KJV is so archaic, don't we need an updated translation? - Bible Question 57

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
  • Michael Pearl answers a question from a viewer: You say the King James Bible is the best translation, but it is so archaic. Don't we need a more up to date version?
    Visit our website - nogreaterjoy.org
    Help us caption & translate this video!
    amara.org/v/C2...

Комментарии • 72

  • @randycrager4074
    @randycrager4074 Год назад +5

    Loved it! Thank you. Years ago I listened to others about how it was so much easier to understand an NIV compared to KJV so I bought one, payed $52 for it and I studied and studied until one day I was so troubled that I prayed and had a long talk with the LORD and He told me the NIV wasn't His Word. I tore every page out and threw it in the dumpster. Later God told me He wanted me to know why it wasn't his Word. What an amazing journey I took from that point forward. Now I know the How and the Why God told me this. I Praise you God for never leaving me nor forsaking me and for giving me a new life!

  • @betty91706
    @betty91706 3 года назад +20

    The KJV has such a beautiful rythum to it. It’s incomparable to other English versions. It’s beautifully written.

    • @newlifeinchrist313
      @newlifeinchrist313 3 года назад +3

      Its beautiful because it is Gods Word and the Holy Spirit bares witness with the truth. All other new age bibles have a deceptive spirit behind them with an agenda to deceive and lead astray. The King James Bible stands alone by itself just like our Lord Jesus Christ stands alone as the one and only true God Amen!

    • @ibperson7765
      @ibperson7765 2 года назад +1

      @@newlifeinchrist313 duoy rheims and nkjv arent bad. And, like kjv, they are not led astray by the fake sinaiticus manuscript. Can be good if kjv language confuses someone. And it can occasionally.

  • @austinhellier7667
    @austinhellier7667 5 лет назад +27

    I've read a KJV Bible for 38 out of the last 40 years and have no regrets. I believe that it is the most faithful English translation that we have today. It has served the body of Christ well for over 400 years and has been used of God in major revivals and awakenings. The texts behind it were providentially preserved by God. Elizabethan English can be difficult for beginners to come to grips with but the effort to do so is well worth it. The KJV was translated in prose style, making it easy to remember and easy to quote.

  • @davidbranco5139
    @davidbranco5139 4 года назад +19

    I'm Portuguese and I read the KJV just fine. Don't see the issue.

  • @spraguefamilyfarm
    @spraguefamilyfarm 5 лет назад +32

    I wonder if we should expect less archaic versions of Shakespeare classics while we're at it?

  • @igregmart
    @igregmart 3 года назад +8

    I'm an American and only recommend the King James Version for English speakers. Early in American history the KJV played a major role in education. Our culture has only declined since it was removed from the classroom.

  • @AirCargoHeavy
    @AirCargoHeavy 3 года назад +2

    Man, did Michael hit the spot when he said "...but that's just because we're messed up, that's all...we're just not very scientific (is) our problem. We're too much into into sentiment and emotion and not enough into reality".
    As for "updating", many mean that the Bible ought to reflect modern-day thought with regards to marriage, homosexuality, sexual identity (proponents of which haven't even figured THAT out yet, but they sure want YOU to believe it), and some other things.
    If they want to hate God, then fine. Hate Him. But praise God. His word will remain true and steadfast through the ages, forever and ever.

  • @jimlimbrock8103
    @jimlimbrock8103 3 года назад +6

    Excellent teaching!

  • @samuelclayton4405
    @samuelclayton4405 4 года назад +6

    Thank you Pastor Pearl for the teaching. I follow along with my KJV BIBLE. I trust nothing else.

  • @hbarwickjr
    @hbarwickjr 2 года назад +4

    Thank you for explaining this so well. I just knew it from my gut. ;)

  • @auntiemsplace
    @auntiemsplace 2 года назад +2

    I related to the bowel reference from the first time I ever read it - EVERYTHING hits me in the gut... Love your teaching - love what I heard Debi say about neuroplasticity - maybe I'll read her book someday - God willing!

  • @nigeldupaigel
    @nigeldupaigel 3 года назад +6

    Actually, the gut-liver-lung axis is most important in states that influence our day to day emotions.

    • @nigeldupaigel
      @nigeldupaigel 3 года назад +1

      Amen, about half in it and you talk about. Blessed. I'm a neuro-science graduate.

    • @canadiankewldude
      @canadiankewldude 3 года назад

      @@nigeldupaigel To many people are easily deceived by credentials from smooth talkers.
      My heart aches every time I see another Christian leave the KJV without understanding its true depth.
      God bless and thank you N VDL.

  • @JesusSavesandRomeEnslaves
    @JesusSavesandRomeEnslaves 3 года назад +4

    I believe the emotions do stem from the bowels. Just my Gut-feeling 😄
    God bless ✝️

  • @rorywynhoff1549
    @rorywynhoff1549 10 месяцев назад +1

    Textus Receptus - Text of the Reformation.
    Critical Text - Text of Ecumenism.

  • @janvannkandla3183
    @janvannkandla3183 4 года назад +35

    When you study in any field or do a trade, you are willing to learn the ''lingo'' of your study field but when it comes to God you want to be spoon fed with baby food? Stop being lazy and read the KJV

  • @robbieallen3568
    @robbieallen3568 2 года назад +3

    It's amazing to me that no one has tried to change Shakespeare that is studied in high schools and is considered literature, yet modern so-called "woke" pastors lean towards Bible "versions" that either add or subtract from the God-breathed text. Satan loves the CEV which changes him into the morning star (Isaiah 14:12) when Jesus plainly says HE is the bright and morning star (Revelation 22:16).

    • @colonyofcellsiamamachine6175
      @colonyofcellsiamamachine6175 2 года назад

      students now use modern translations of shakespeare, aside from annotated shakespeare to explain the archaic language.

    • @dominiclapinta8537
      @dominiclapinta8537 Год назад

      Probably also change the apostle Paul into a very conceited man and the thorn in the flesh to be sickness that God put on him. Whereas in the KJV, it was Satan that was sending persecution through people against Paul because the work that God was using him to do, was so important, that it makes up much of our new testament.
      I've talked to people outside of America, and they love the KJV. Whereas here in the west only, do we have this problem of the KJV being the only Bible viewed to have error in it. Actually, it's more of the fact that modern education passes anybody who can read a second grade level. Whereas, years back, everybody was able to read at the proper level and understanding.
      And so, they decided not to try and help people learn how to read and understand, but changed what the Bible said instead.

    • @GodisGracious1031Ministries
      @GodisGracious1031Ministries Месяц назад

      I never thought of that.

  • @justsayin9180
    @justsayin9180 5 лет назад +8

    Every modern counterfeit bible, in the new testament, uses the word slaves instead of the KJV servants. "Slaves, obey your masters" in Ephesians 6. Modern bibles support slavery? The KJV word for slave is bondman. Servant is a word for one who cheerfully obeys his master. All the old testament saints were called servants because they could not be sons until Christ made it possible by dying on the cross, followed immediately by retrieving the saints from Abraham's bosom.
    Now how many people have been repulsed by the lies in modern counterfeits?

  • @newlifeinchrist313
    @newlifeinchrist313 3 года назад

    Praise God! God bless you!

  • @Elconbrioso
    @Elconbrioso 3 года назад +2

    This is very interesting, even edifying - thank you Michael Pearl. I usually read my KJV side by side with my NIV study bible; the footnotes shed a lot of light on the text.

  • @emiljohann88
    @emiljohann88 9 месяцев назад +1

    I made a RUclips playlist called King James Version ( 209 videos )

  • @dhlong1697
    @dhlong1697 3 года назад +5

    Solution is simple. Just learn the English language rather than re-invent it.

  • @patriciasias2028
    @patriciasias2028 3 года назад +1

    I personally like the Geneva version

  • @jlove1983
    @jlove1983 3 года назад +2

    Easiest thing to do is get a concordance & go back to the original word if you are trying to figure out scripture but most ppl will not do that because it's too much work. That is lazy, we are called to be good bereans & study His word.

  • @jimharney1047
    @jimharney1047 3 года назад +1

    AMEN!!!

  • @chilbury
    @chilbury 3 года назад +2

    It’s the only book to read kjb

  • @eiou12345
    @eiou12345 5 лет назад +3

    Amen!

  • @judithsmith9319
    @judithsmith9319 Год назад

    Thank you. I love to hear truth~

  • @jacobthomas3180
    @jacobthomas3180 2 года назад

    In our language,it is translated as from inside of us.

  • @danielwarwick1039
    @danielwarwick1039 4 месяца назад +1

    If people would only trust the KJV happier they would be ❤

  • @ibperson7765
    @ibperson7765 2 года назад

    I think it’s ok to have a nkjv or duoy rheims on hand in cases where the kjv wording confuses you. (Like kjv, theyre not based on sinaiticus)

  • @Dar123abc
    @Dar123abc Год назад

    Excellent!

  • @dominiclapinta8537
    @dominiclapinta8537 Год назад

    I have a book that talks about how you feel with your organs.

  • @geraldreineke1348
    @geraldreineke1348 Год назад

    I have a gut feeling he is about the KJV Bible

  • @teresarudd4811
    @teresarudd4811 3 года назад +2

    just read what you and god are ok with. the version does'nt correlate with your salvation.

    • @newlifeinchrist313
      @newlifeinchrist313 3 года назад +1

      Yes it does. What bible you read will determine what spirit you receive. The jesus in the Alexandrian text of all the corrupt new age bibles is not the same Jesus that's in the King James Bible which comes straight from the Textus Receptus.

    • @SullysChannel7
      @SullysChannel7 2 года назад

      @@newlifeinchrist313 you realize that there's multiple textus receptus translations, right?

  • @ThetennisDr
    @ThetennisDr 2 года назад

    so if i read it in spanish >??

  • @thomaswells8566
    @thomaswells8566 Год назад

    For me when bowels are mention it's means it deep

  • @S3P7
    @S3P7 4 месяца назад

    NASB 1995 version is more accurate than KJV. KJV is not even the first English translation.

  • @ThetennisDr
    @ThetennisDr 2 года назад

    i do not reallly find it disturbing the nlt but yet kjv is good. but what if you only speak english

  • @lanbaode
    @lanbaode 6 месяцев назад

    Because my KJV Bible tells me so! When you read the KJV only you get to believe that "unicorns" exist as they are mentioned (that is, erroneously translated) in the KJV Bible! Read: Numbers 23:22; 24:8; Deuteronomy 33:17; Job 39:9-12; Psalms 22:21; and Isaiah 34:7.

    • @GodisGracious1031Ministries
      @GodisGracious1031Ministries Месяц назад

      Unicorns is latin for Rhinos and they did find ancient creatures that did look like unicorns.

  • @DaeJesusChrist
    @DaeJesusChrist 3 года назад

    I got it

  • @motley331
    @motley331 4 года назад +1

    I read the New King James version ... not willing to stray any further from the Word.

  • @Nordic_E.T.
    @Nordic_E.T. 3 года назад

    What's up with dude eyes?

  • @Mrm1985100
    @Mrm1985100 5 лет назад +10

    The KJV is far from 'perfect'. What a load of idolatry.

  • @Mrm1985100
    @Mrm1985100 5 лет назад +5

    Total nonsense.