India recently bought these under the name K9 Vajra. About a 100 are in service and further 200 more are planned to be ordered. They are being made locally in India with some India specific upgrades.
Poland has already ordered 1,000. The first 100 or so are shipped from South Korea, while the rest are to be built in Poland, a joint venture between Poland and South Korea, so the units will more naturally fit Poland's specific needs. Poland also ordered American Abrams, but due to the limited supply and less willing to share technologies, by the Americans, Poland opted to diversify its top end military purchases. Also, from South Korea, Poland is likely buying the K239 (HIMARS made in South Korea, consulted with the Americans and companies involved in the buiding of HIMARS). Plus air force training planes. Point is, South Korea has not built itself into a global top end military powerhouse... with most of its most advanced weapons systems being compatible with NATO countries own weapons,
World-class performance Nearly half the price of the competition 5x faster production capacity than the competition Proven reliable in cold frozen Finland and hot desert Egypt Still haven't bought?
I remembered in the early 2000s Nkorea launched a sudden short bombardment of a Skorean border town. Reports that I heard that the K9s immediately responded as counter-battery. The NKoreans suspended almost just as quickly, with reports saying the K9s precision and SKorean obviously superior radar inflicting heavy casualties on the norther side.
Korean here. Our winters are Siberian cold. Our summers are Vietnam hot and wet. We can survive anywhere in the world. So can our weapons. Always built with extreme four seasons in mind.
With the exception of Germany and France, all countries prefer K9s. From this, it can be inferred that there is not much difference between the quality and price of self-propelled guns in European countries. If you want to play tanks, it is appropriate to buy German tanks, but if you want to win a war, you should buy Korean weapons.
S Korea has the largest modern artillery units in the world with 1040 K55, 1200 K9 and 850 K105A1 supported by 58 M270, 367 K239 and K136 MRL. S Korean army also has about 5,000 105/155mm towed artillery and 6,000 60/81/107/120mm mortars stocked with somewhere around 12-15 million rounds.
When you're living with nice neighbors like Putin and Kim, who could wine and dine with you on caviar one day, all smiling big fake smiles.... and bombard you the next day with high velocity shells & missiles, you have to be ready, with lots of options... Ukraine's problem was that even after Russia forcibly took Crimea, 2014, it didn't believe --- up until the last hour of the actual invasion --- that Russia was going to invade and try to decapitate Zelensky's Jewish "Nazi" government... and install a puppet who would just read a few lines from the teleprompter, written by Putin, about how they're both Slavic people and there's no need to join evil, aggressive NATO, the EU, etc.
Yep Us Vietnamese are relying mostly on Russian stuff due to how cheap it is compared to anything in the West But with Russia more and more fked, China can now actually force Russia inti doing what they wanted Imagine they telling Russia, Vietnam is our enemy who we are currently invading.....stop giving them stuff Then......we fked
Among the idiomatic expressions in Korea, there’s a saying, "Never be involved in others‘ house affair." Customer nation is literally just CUSTOMER. Give the goods and take money, that‘s it. Sellers don‘t need to know how or to whom customer gonna use the goods. None of their business. Such relationships are neat for each other.
Turkey is producing a version of this artillery under licence. Currently they are trying local power unit with additional electronics to increased firing speed and range.
Why many are buying K9s? Because Finns bought them first, and have been happy with them. Just used the option to full 96. We Finns are THE reference customer to have. Purchases are made tightly within budget. We buy only actually working weapon systems. Performance, price and supplier nation reliability within sphere of free world are our only criteria.
Also- bc Korea gets cold aas balls in the winter, especially within the mountain ranges on the eastern side of the peninsula (some winter days its as cold as Siberia) And bc also in the summer it gets hot and humid, it’s proven to work in cold and hot weather
@@dlev If not biggest, atleast overwhelmingly superior land army in Europe. Like 2 to 3 times stronger than anyone else. Polish have clearly decided that they aint never again going to be occupied by foreign power. All their aid to Ukraine nonwithstanding, they clearly measure their rearmament on worst case scenario where they are the main frontier country. In coming years countries like Poland, and my home country Finland, which are among few who are determined to take care of their own defence whatever the cost, asking allied support as second tier option, deserve much larger say over countries that only hesitate, dont get much of anything done, like Germany. NATO is military alliance, and capabilities must count. Even more should count blatant abandoment of maintaining defensive capability (especially at times of good economy), utter disregard of even basic realities of geopolitics = Germany again. With Finland joining NATO our Baltic neighbours breath more easily. There is now friendly heavyweight land power on BOTH ends of Baltic sea. We can always get fighter bombers doing sorties within NATO. Getting troops and tracks on the ground is much harder. Finns would take any Russian attempt to attack/threaten our blood relatives and little brother, Estonia, especially seriously.
Because Korea is one of the few countries in the arms market capable of building stuff in large numbers. Doesn't matter if western equivalents are better or not. They gutted their manufacturing abilities.
That is a very good reason. What does the best tank or howitzer or HIMARS or IFV brings, when you have to wait 6 years for it? It means you won't have it the next 6 years and when, then it is only the beginning. Before the full delivery is made, it may cost another 2 or 3 years, just because other customers want the same thing. I see nowadays Rheinmetall and BAE change their policy a little, wanting to build premises in other countries. Perhaps that has to do with the connections between Hanwha /Hyundai and Poland. Once a country chooses a particular system and it works well, then the competitors know they won't stand a chance with their systems in that country as long as they are not looking for newer or more. Also no revenues of aftersales or spare parts. Another thing is price policy. Army purchasers and fans of arms and ordnance can dream from the combination PZH 2000 and Exalibur shells. Reality however is that you will loose on persevance then. One can hit a target on 50 KM very precise , but for most targets it ain't neccesary. One can have the most expensive gun in the world, but then you miss money for ordnance and spares.
From David A. Wood: One should pay close attention when examining this admirably amazing, economic development. After the short, but brutally grinding Korean War (1950-1953), South Korea was a mortally depopulated, hugely damaged and mostly impoverished nation with very little heavy industry and only a meager amount of arable land, and as such, had to respectively import all of its military equipment and food supply from Western countries like the USA for decades. Now South Korea is not only the World's10th largest and thoroughly industrialized economy that is highly self-sufficient in supplying its national, nutrition needs, but the country is both comfortably affluent and extensively industrialized enough to do two things that are definite signs of an immensely wealthy and highly industrialized nation.That is, the South Koreans are alternately building home-made and first-rate military equipment for their vigilantly prepared and necessarily sizable armed forces on an appreciably large scale and actively selling the remainder, a lot of it, to friendly, foreign countries that are sufficiently able to pay for the South Korean-built, military equipment. This latter activity of bulk-sized, Military Arms Merchandising will eventually put fully-industrialized South Korea into direct competition with the hugely populated and monetarily wealthy country that is presently the World's No.#1 Arms Manufacturer/Arms Merchant, the USA, in the several years to come. Granted, it will be a long time from now, to be sure, but that time of the American Arms Industry having to ably compete with that of South Korea's is eventually going to come!
Wow that shot of field full of SPH blasting together would be hell for receiving end. That field full of guns are more than what many country has in their entire military and South Korea has 3000 of them. Jeez
@@Dryadlis Well, none of the major countries will, as they have their own domestic artillery systems. The greatest operator outside S. Korea is Turkey.
@@Dryadlis But they are increasing the size of their army. This by itself will increase the portion of the defense budget spent on wages and thus decrease the amount available to purchase new equipment.
turkey produced 460 t 155 storms under license ,and this year the new version of the storm 2 has started to enter the inventory and will most likely be produced until a total of 1000. Also, we used them actively in Syria, Iraq and Libya.
Is it really better with only 30km range? I do hope that the war in Ukrain has shown that 30km artillery is not enough anymore with the introduction of MLRS and HIMARS
Well, we finns have now about 49, propably more now those K9 Thunders, and our military is very pleased about those. And because insane leader behind our 1300 km border with russia...we need to to be ready if those idiots in russia starts attack our small country!! And because we were smart, we have now propably biggest artillery in the Europe...and it is very well trained! Wellcome to Finland you fooker russians!
K9 A4. Obüs yeni versiyon insansız yeni kulesini 155.52 kalibre edilmiş kulesini enterge ettim. Tamamen kendine hedef kere atış yapan özelliği. Ve etkili mevzil 100km azmi mevzil 150km hedef kere atış 13 mermi atış yapma özelliği var
Correcting incorrect information. The armament capabilities of the K9 are as follows: 18km(M107, HE) 30km(M549A1, HE-RAP) 36km(K310, DP-ICMBB) 40km(K307, HEBB) 55km(K315, HE-RAP) 100km(Gliding Guided Artillery Munition - GGAM In development, the prototype is completed, Similar to M982) The SPH, which has a distance of less than 40 km on the modern battlefield, is meaningless.
Poland give his version of K-9 to Ukraine and they liked.. service is easy and big repair ( exchange) of 52cal armat can be done in short time because of spears parts.👍👍 PzH2000 is problematic and Germany refused to do services 👎🇩🇪💩🇩🇪👎 If you not manufacturing company better not buy this from Deutschland 👎👎👎
The K9 is a great weapon but let's give credit where it's due. The powerpack is a German engine and American Allison transmission, which has a bulletproof reputation and are top notch. The K9 is an improved version of USA's M109 Paladin, which is also an excellent howitzer. In fact, before making the K9, Korea made a licensed M109 dubbed the K55 and there's still 1,000 of those K55 in service. What separates the K9 is that it's as good as or comparable to everything else out there, it's extremely reliable, and it costs 2x to 3x less.
Diversification of equipment between allied defense contractors is smart. BAE systems makes the new US version. Germany has a manufacturer for its mobile (long German name) howitzer and UK has another.
best base reliable model, can be added optional equipment design chage for the customers request. quick delivery, wide versatile, allowed local production. Cost? not really important. why don't you buy Chinese one?
The Thunder is a mobile Artillery platform for long range support fire with thin armor while a tank like the M1A1 or Leopard A7 etc. are better armored and more for suitable for close combat environments with a 105mm Gun and ranges of up to 5-10 km.
@@formacionG13 the thunder is basically an artillery platform that’s highly mobile, it’s gun traverse is a lot more than a tanks, and is designed for long range accurate fire missions that a tanks guns could never match
because S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s in Korea. It can be cheap. and "supply chain" isn't bad. K-9 bas been sold many to several countries. sum of them is around 1000. even include Poland. .. did I say S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s? oh yeah. I did. that's why K-9 can be cheap. it is sad fact. not proud. S.Korea has been still in the cold war but the others hasn't.
@@kimmoj2570 South Korea is still at war with North Korea. However, they signed a ceasefire in 1953, so there are no longer any attacks on each other. A lot of time has passed since then, so many foreigners are not aware of this. The Korean War was a truce, not an end
@@GoogIe_UK indeed. many people who doesn't hasn't read up on the Korean War thinks the war has ended when in actual fact both countries are technically still at war in the present.
@@youngmoon8762 Panther I was a highly mobile medium Tank. K9 is a Tank artillery. Big difference. K9 long reload time and not very mobile when compared to a Panther I. Would be similar to a real world modern version of the British FV215b 183. Except the 215b has a 183mm gun. It is a Tank destroyer. Also, Panther I was a Nazi German Tank not currently in use by any military. You can find them in museums. And no, on 1v1 scenarios, No medium tanks will come even close to “flip your tank like a Turtle” against it. In fact, it will get HE’d. Prediction, 1st shot miss (k9) and then boom! Just like the FV 215b 183
How is it that Korea is taking the lead in artillery and tank systems when we Americans spend trillions on defense? We are getting ripped off by US arms companies. Also we spent trillions defending Korea for 70 years while they saved money to do this. Time to leave Korea, they can defeat the north easily without us. Kudos to Korea for these brilliant systems.
1. US taxpayers are getting ripped off by arms companies 2. Korea pays the US for defense costs 3. Korea buys a bunch of USA made weapons 4. Korea supported USA in Vietnam, Iraq, and other places and projects
@@llIlIlllIllllIlIl Due to Korean topography even China couldn't due anything rapid. If they did killing a few thousand US soldiers won't matter. If Korea wants them to stay let then pay the cost in full, including pensions etc. We have propped up Korea for too long.
Whoa there, that's a lot of oversimplified Trumpist speak. There are lots of reasons for the things you're talking about. You're not wrong, you're just oversimplifying by a lot, and knowing some details could get you thinking deeper, whether or not you keep wanting the US military off Korea. Just read up, it's interesting. Anyways, the real money drain isn't stationing troops in Korea, it's all the free-world countries giving all their jobs to China. If it continues, we are all doomed. Think about it, we've all made China the Amazon/Walmart of the world and the rest of us are high-ticket specialty shops. Stupidest thing ever.
The archer is probably better for countries with more flatlands. Since its wheeled but for countries like korea which is around 70% mountainous terrain wheeled vehicles are inferior to tracked vehicles.
1 Archer with all auxilary systems would probably cost double the cost of a K9. The K9 is hands down the most common self-propelled howitzer on the planet. By now there's probably more of these operating in more militaries than Palladins.
Skip to the very end for only info that makes the most recent variant still in development game changing albeit at even more complexity, but as we have seen in Ukraine, it appears hi tech and complexity DOES out do quantity, so. Otherwise this is the worst mil tech review I've ever seen.
I'm so confused by these narrators... they have flawless American accents but they sound like they're reading really bad translations/ can't pronounce certain words... what's the deal?
ruclips.net/video/J7pZYGtFaB8/видео.html ► Why The 2S7M Malka Superheavy Self Propelled Is Most Feared
It's not scary at all. It's form over substance. As practical as German giant railroad guns.
Ii keeping o
King of Howitzers.
Korea has grown in to a powerhouse. I was stationed there in '85. I miss Korea.
@@김선우-s7r6i 85년이라고요.
Thank you for your service, sir.
Thank you for cherishing and loving Korea
I hope you are always healthy
It's time for a visit!
Thank you for your service. Next time plz visit anytime for travel. Proud of you ❤️👍🏻
Im amazed at the reload vehicle frankly
Egypt recently got a license to manufacture the K9 thunder, very impressive artillery system.
India recently bought these under the name K9 Vajra. About a 100 are in service and further 200 more are planned to be ordered. They are being made locally in India with some India specific upgrades.
Australia is doing the same and building them in Australia too.
K9 Vajra basically means Thunder in sankirit. Like the K9 Thunder.
Poland has already ordered 1,000. The first 100 or so are shipped from South Korea, while the rest are to be built in Poland, a joint venture between Poland and South Korea, so the units will more naturally fit Poland's specific needs. Poland also ordered American Abrams, but due to the limited supply and less willing to share technologies, by the Americans, Poland opted to diversify its top end military purchases.
Also, from South Korea, Poland is likely buying the K239 (HIMARS made in South Korea, consulted with the Americans and companies involved in the buiding of HIMARS). Plus air force training planes. Point is, South Korea has not built itself into a global top end military powerhouse... with most of its most advanced weapons systems being compatible with NATO countries own weapons,
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Poland also wants more of a defensive force so these are sort of more useful than the Abrams. stand off and demolish attackers.
the thumbnail is also from India also
World-class performance
Nearly half the price of the competition
5x faster production capacity than the competition
Proven reliable in cold frozen Finland
and hot desert Egypt
Still haven't bought?
It's not as good as western equipment though. Also we should always prefer European production.
@@zdravkodomic5029 2x expensive and 5x slow producing European ones? lol
I remembered in the early 2000s Nkorea launched a sudden short bombardment of a Skorean border town. Reports that I heard that the K9s immediately responded as counter-battery.
The NKoreans suspended almost just as quickly, with reports saying the K9s precision and SKorean obviously superior radar inflicting heavy casualties on the norther side.
음흉한 북한은 K9의 훈련사격이 끝나기를 기다렸다가 도발을 시작했다. K9의 탄이 모자라서 직접 옮겼음에도 상당히 빠르게 반격했고 대포병 레이더가 없었음에도 그 당시 사진을 보면 알수있지만 괜찮은 탄착군을 형성했다.
I believe this is the bombardement of Yeonpyeong?
Korean here. Our winters are Siberian cold. Our summers are Vietnam hot and wet. We can survive anywhere in the world. So can our weapons. Always built with extreme four seasons in mind.
With the exception of Germany and France, all countries prefer K9s. From this, it can be inferred that there is not much difference between the quality and price of self-propelled guns in European countries.
If you want to play tanks, it is appropriate to buy German tanks, but if you want to win a war, you should buy Korean weapons.
S Korea has the largest modern artillery units in the world with 1040 K55, 1200 K9 and 850 K105A1 supported by 58 M270, 367 K239 and K136 MRL. S Korean army also has about 5,000 105/155mm towed artillery and 6,000 60/81/107/120mm mortars stocked with somewhere around 12-15 million rounds.
When you're living with nice neighbors like Putin and Kim, who could wine and dine with you on caviar one day, all smiling big fake smiles.... and bombard you the next day with high velocity shells & missiles, you have to be ready, with lots of options...
Ukraine's problem was that even after Russia forcibly took Crimea, 2014, it didn't believe --- up until the last hour of the actual invasion --- that Russia was going to invade and try to decapitate Zelensky's Jewish "Nazi" government... and install a puppet who would just read a few lines from the teleprompter, written by Putin, about how they're both Slavic people and there's no need to join evil, aggressive NATO, the EU, etc.
What's the use, it's only enemy N. Korea talks with Atom bomb.
That's a lot of firepower.
Because of north korea
somehow has a bizzarly powerful army forces despite being a penisula nation...
South Korea also doesn’t involve themselves in the politics of the customer nation. One of the key reasons why India went for this machine.
Yep
Us Vietnamese are relying mostly on Russian stuff due to how cheap it is compared to anything in the West
But with Russia more and more fked, China can now actually force Russia inti doing what they wanted
Imagine they telling Russia, Vietnam is our enemy who we are currently invading.....stop giving them stuff
Then......we fked
Interesting point.
The K9 self-propelled Howitzers are serving India well in your border conflict with China
Among the idiomatic expressions in Korea, there’s a saying,
"Never be involved in others‘ house affair."
Customer nation is literally just CUSTOMER.
Give the goods and take money, that‘s it.
Sellers don‘t need to know how or to whom customer gonna use the goods.
None of their business.
Such relationships are neat for each other.
So practically, no political strings attached
L&T mnc company of India was also produced 100 k9 and delivered to Indian army, there is additional orders of 200 k9 in the pipeline
Turkey is producing a version of this artillery under licence. Currently they are trying local power unit with additional electronics to increased firing speed and range.
Maximum firing range 18 km (M107, HE)
30 km (M549A1, RAP/HE)
36 km (K310, BB/DP-ICM)
40 km (K307, BB/HE)
54 km (K315, BB+RAP/HE)
You must be in the service or an ex-army/gunner. Did you, bro?
@@sabrehohoho7681 All Korean men go to the army 😅😅
@@유튜브_YT-g9k GOOD! That is one the main reason why they grow into excellent, and productive citizens.
Keeeeewl.... Base bleed is fun
@@2serveand2protect is this correct? 😢😢
Why many are buying K9s? Because Finns bought them first, and have been happy with them. Just used the option to full 96. We Finns are THE reference customer to have. Purchases are made tightly within budget. We buy only actually working weapon systems. Performance, price and supplier nation reliability within sphere of free world are our only criteria.
Poland has a huge order for 672 k9 thunders most to be made in Poland along with k2 black Panthers
@@0westdude I am told Poland is building the world’s largest army
Because it's the best in the market atm
Also- bc Korea gets cold aas balls in the winter, especially within the mountain ranges on the eastern side of the peninsula (some winter days its as cold as Siberia)
And bc also in the summer it gets hot and humid, it’s proven to work in cold and hot weather
@@dlev If not biggest, atleast overwhelmingly superior land army in Europe. Like 2 to 3 times stronger than anyone else. Polish have clearly decided that they aint never again going to be occupied by foreign power. All their aid to Ukraine nonwithstanding, they clearly measure their rearmament on worst case scenario where they are the main frontier country. In coming years countries like Poland, and my home country Finland, which are among few who are determined to take care of their own defence whatever the cost, asking allied support as second tier option, deserve much larger say over countries that only hesitate, dont get much of anything done, like Germany. NATO is military alliance, and capabilities must count. Even more should count blatant abandoment of maintaining defensive capability (especially at times of good economy), utter disregard of even basic realities of geopolitics = Germany again. With Finland joining NATO our Baltic neighbours breath more easily. There is now friendly heavyweight land power on BOTH ends of Baltic sea. We can always get fighter bombers doing sorties within NATO. Getting troops and tracks on the ground is much harder.
Finns would take any Russian attempt to attack/threaten our blood relatives and little brother, Estonia, especially seriously.
Because Korea is one of the few countries in the arms market capable of building stuff in large numbers. Doesn't matter if western equivalents are better or not. They gutted their manufacturing abilities.
That is a very good reason. What does the best tank or howitzer or HIMARS or IFV brings, when you have to wait 6 years for it? It means you won't have it the next 6 years and when, then it is only the beginning. Before the full delivery is made, it may cost another 2 or 3 years, just because other customers want the same thing. I see nowadays Rheinmetall and BAE change their policy a little, wanting to build premises in other countries. Perhaps that has to do with the connections between Hanwha /Hyundai and Poland. Once a country chooses a particular system and it works well, then the competitors know they won't stand a chance with their systems in that country as long as they are not looking for newer or more. Also no revenues of aftersales or spare parts.
Another thing is price policy. Army purchasers and fans of arms and ordnance can dream from the combination PZH 2000 and Exalibur shells. Reality however is that you will loose on persevance then. One can hit a target on 50 KM very precise , but for most targets it ain't neccesary. One can have the most expensive gun in the world, but then you miss money for ordnance and spares.
Forgot one important feature. Fully air conditioned.
Yes, but has it got a tea boiler for UK???
@@claudebylion9932 Turn off the A/C now everything boils 😂
The k9 also has a time-on target system(TOT). This is to fire three shots at different angles and drop three shots at the same time.
영어쓰면서 외국인인척 하지 말자 진짜 없어보이니까 ㅋㅋ
@@David-by4jf 외국인인척은 안했고 외국에서 오래 살고있는데 시비거는 이유가 뭐냐? 없어보일것도 없고,,;; 뭐 어쩌라고. 영어쓰면 안되? 니한테 내가 피해줬냐 진짜 ㅈㅂ신같네
@@Terry0129 외국인인척 영어 써서 마치 외국인들이 댓글 다는 것처럼 보이게 하는게 없어보인다고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@Terry0129 마치 외국인들도 좋아한다라는걸 보여주기 위해서 영어 쓰는거 진짜 없어보여 ㅎㅎ
@@David-by4jf 한국에서 나가본적이 없어서 잘 모를수도 있겠지만 나 구글 영국 계정이라 영국에서 달린 댓글이 더 먼저 떠 이 채널 한국껀지도 몰랐는데 왜 니가 쥐랄임? 뭐가 그렇게 불편함?
From David A. Wood: One should pay close attention when examining this admirably amazing, economic development. After the short, but brutally grinding Korean War (1950-1953), South Korea was a mortally depopulated, hugely damaged and mostly impoverished nation with very little heavy industry and only a meager amount of arable land, and as such, had to respectively import all of its military equipment and food supply from Western countries like the USA for decades. Now South Korea is not only the World's10th largest and thoroughly industrialized economy that is highly self-sufficient in supplying its national, nutrition needs, but the country is both comfortably affluent and extensively industrialized enough to do two things that are definite signs of an immensely wealthy and highly industrialized nation.That is, the South Koreans are alternately building home-made and first-rate military equipment for their vigilantly prepared and necessarily sizable armed forces on an appreciably large scale and actively selling the remainder, a lot of it, to friendly, foreign countries that are sufficiently able to pay for the South Korean-built, military equipment. This latter activity of bulk-sized, Military Arms Merchandising will eventually put fully-industrialized South Korea into direct competition with the hugely populated and monetarily wealthy country that is presently the World's No.#1 Arms Manufacturer/Arms Merchant, the USA, in the several years to come. Granted, it will be a long time from now, to be sure, but that time of the American Arms Industry having to ably compete with that of South Korea's is eventually going to come!
Wow that shot of field full of SPH blasting together would be hell for receiving end. That field full of guns are more than what many country has in their entire military and South Korea has 3000 of them. Jeez
Lol frfr
As the South Korea’s K9 Thunder bombards with shells & the K pop industry bombards with noise,we should surrender to South Korea.😁
It got thunder in it's name now feel the thunder
Two words: Price & performance.
An unbeatable combo.
Not only Britain is intrest in K9A2, the 212 K9A1 wich Poland just command will be modernise to this standard with an additional 440 K9A2.
Poland says a lot of things.
The real question is how they will afford all these new weapons?
@@user-od1yi5iq1k No it s not this. It s who will operate this wapoen.
@@Dryadlis Well, none of the major countries will, as they have their own domestic artillery systems.
The greatest operator outside S. Korea is Turkey.
@@user-od1yi5iq1k I m jusz saying that the biggest problem for Poland is the lak of personnel.
@@Dryadlis But they are increasing the size of their army.
This by itself will increase the portion of the defense budget spent on wages and thus decrease the amount available to purchase new equipment.
Ok i was feeling just aight about it but that automatic ammo transfer was actually very good ...
turkey produced 460 t 155 storms under license ,and this year the new version of the storm 2 has started to enter the inventory and will most likely be produced until a total of 1000. Also, we used them actively in Syria, Iraq and Libya.
Definitely an improvement over the US 155mm howitzer.
I mean, considering it's several decades younger than the US version, I would hope it's an improvement.
Is it really better with only 30km range? I do hope that the war in Ukrain has shown that 30km artillery is not enough anymore with the introduction of MLRS and HIMARS
@@yosmch At one time, it was 15km. Why do you 'hope' that that the war in the Ukraine is 'not enough'.
@@yosmch Excalibur dude, problem has been solved and is in use currently...
@@yosmch you are right also considering weight m777 is very effective but both are of different class now its time of guided rocket mbls.
The world's strongest self-propelled Howitzer that continues to be upgraded
k9 maximum range 54km(k315 shell)
Well, we finns have now about 49, propably more now those K9 Thunders, and our military is very pleased about those. And because insane leader behind our 1300 km border with russia...we need to to be ready if those idiots in russia starts attack our small country!! And because we were smart, we have now propably biggest artillery in the Europe...and it is very well trained! Wellcome to Finland you fooker russians!
Nd How will Finns protect their howitzer from Low cost Iranian made Russian kamikaze drones ?
@@tarunchem7021 the ones made with motorbike engines that you can detect from 40km away?
@@raysubsonic lol ikr
As a Korean, I know what it is like to have an unstable neighbor. Glad those guns are keeping you safe too.
@tarunchem7021 Typically howitzer aren't supposed to be targeted by drones. If they are, then there is something wrong about their placement.
I see what you did there, you said "finished" while there was a photo of a Finnish Army's K9 on screen 😀
K9 A4. Obüs yeni versiyon insansız yeni kulesini 155.52 kalibre edilmiş kulesini enterge ettim. Tamamen kendine hedef kere atış yapan özelliği. Ve etkili mevzil 100km azmi mevzil 150km hedef kere atış 13 mermi atış yapma özelliği var
Correcting incorrect information. The armament capabilities of the K9 are as follows:
18km(M107, HE)
30km(M549A1, HE-RAP)
36km(K310, DP-ICMBB)
40km(K307, HEBB)
55km(K315, HE-RAP)
100km(Gliding Guided Artillery Munition - GGAM In development, the prototype is completed, Similar to M982)
The SPH, which has a distance of less than 40 km on the modern battlefield, is meaningless.
100km?! That crazy, even futher than himars.
1 PzH2000 price = 4X K9 thunder + 1X K10 ARV
And there is an error.
All parts of K-9 and K-10's hull and turret armor is 35mm RHA minimum.
Impressive!
Poland give his version of K-9 to Ukraine and they liked.. service is easy and big repair ( exchange) of 52cal armat can be done in short time because of spears parts.👍👍
PzH2000 is problematic and Germany refused to do services 👎🇩🇪💩🇩🇪👎
If you not manufacturing company better not buy this from Deutschland 👎👎👎
틀린 정보가 있습니다.
연평도에서 전투를 치룬 것은 5사단이 아니라 해병대(MC) 입니다.
5사단은 내륙에 위치한 철원에 있습니다.
사망자는 병사 2명 민간인 2명입니다.
한국말로 하면 저 사람이 이해함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@@loveaintfree1409 유튜브 모바일에 번역기가 달려 있습니다...ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
What are the finance terms like for a K9 over 10 years?
Depends on your credit score and trade-in value. Which tank will you be trading in for the K9?
판매량이 말해준다
그리고 끊임없이 업그레이드 해준다
가성비로 따라올 무기가 없고 막굴려도 문제없이 할거 다 하니까
전세계 어딜가도 꿀릴거 없을 정도의 성능과 능력 만땅임.
많이 많이 사주세요~
At 3:55 OK, I'm sold!
Performance(S~A), Price (SS), AS(S), Compatibility with Nato and US army (S)
welcome to arsenal of free world
hanwha techwin made my security cameras lol
Taiwan need this
The K9 is a great weapon but let's give credit where it's due. The powerpack is a German engine and American Allison transmission, which has a bulletproof reputation and are top notch.
The K9 is an improved version of USA's M109 Paladin, which is also an excellent howitzer. In fact, before making the K9, Korea made a licensed M109 dubbed the K55 and there's still 1,000 of those K55 in service.
What separates the K9 is that it's as good as or comparable to everything else out there, it's extremely reliable, and it costs 2x to 3x less.
Diversification of equipment between allied defense contractors is smart. BAE systems makes the new US version. Germany has a manufacturer for its mobile (long German name) howitzer and UK has another.
Shoot and scoot capability.
Do these get latest Samsung One UI 5.0?
Must be cuz it made my Samsung
HE M107 18 KM range with a 52 caliber barrel is worse than the 39 caliber M777 and M198. I wonder why.
It's so good even North Korea is ordering it.
Samsung also makes refrigerators and vacuums!
best base reliable model, can be added optional equipment design chage for the customers request. quick delivery, wide versatile, allowed local production. Cost? not really important. why don't you buy Chinese one?
it's cheap and good :D
because its a sick system that is fine tune for one thing :)
Nice technology
Ultimately, the answer is simple: you can paint the border in a relatively short period of time!
my front gate install this things, now my neighbour built china wall
Still afraid of Nuke baby
India has K9 bro.......Cool
Love the name, K9……”Cry ‘Havoc’ and let slip the dogs of war..”
K9 was part of Samsung, look forward to buy Toyota or Nissan howitzer
Can you do a show on Russia's thermobaric munition, like the one they used in kherson this week?
TIL
South Korea has long range guided rocket with thermobaric warhead.
They can be launched from K239.
इन सबसे बेहतर है Long range MBRL ( Multi barrel Rocket Launcher)
Long range at a fraction of the cost of Euro options
I want these for my nation
Looks like the Swedish bandvagn 1
cost performance
suamsung cooked on that one
extreme
A $100 drone will wipe it out. Star Wars/Drone Wars, it's the future!
아마 전자동 기계식이라서 ?!
실제 폭탄 무개는 엉청나다 !
폭탄 무개 들어 올리는 순간, 뼈마디가 내려 앉는다. .
This howitzer is excellent at repelling Russian armed forces which wreac havoc around the world
I still dont understand the difference between this and a tank. Am military dumb
The Thunder is a mobile Artillery platform for long range support fire with thin armor while a tank like the M1A1 or Leopard A7 etc. are better armored and more for suitable for close combat environments with a 105mm Gun and ranges of up to 5-10 km.
@@ScorpionMinds ok. More like one is for range while the other for closed combat. Is that what your saying?
MBT (main battle tank) is for close fight, armor vs armor, while SPH (self-propelled howiter) is for indirect fire support.
@@ScorpionMinds you mean 120mm gun
@@formacionG13 the thunder is basically an artillery platform that’s highly mobile, it’s gun traverse is a lot more than a tanks, and is designed for long range accurate fire missions that a tanks guns could never match
millimeter / millimetre is not spelled millimiter
Here In Philippines..we have K10..
K10 or C10 short for
KAYETAN-10 LIBO..
Is Ukraine using this?
because S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s in Korea. It can be cheap. and "supply chain" isn't bad. K-9 bas been sold many to several countries. sum of them is around 1000. even include Poland. .. did I say S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s? oh yeah. I did. that's why K-9 can be cheap. it is sad fact. not proud. S.Korea has been still in the cold war but the others hasn't.
I didnt quite understand. Sad fact being South Korea has been still with Cold War? What that does mean?
@@kimmoj2570 South Korea is still at war with North Korea. However, they signed a ceasefire in 1953, so there are no longer any attacks on each other. A lot of time has passed since then, so many foreigners are not aware of this.
The Korean War was a truce, not an end
@@GoogIe_UK indeed. many people who doesn't hasn't read up on the Korean War thinks the war has ended when in actual fact both countries are technically still at war in the present.
RAJUMOHAN PRESS 💯💯💯💯🌍🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏👌👌👌👍👍
I hope Malaysia government would buy it.
Hope it's air-conditioned.
It is :)
Wow !!
What bizarre narration.
"against" "deserts"
Though the AI quality has only a few years left, maybe not even, until it's indistinguishable.
Agreed. The vast major of the narration is meaningless.
Suomi finland perkele
Atmos 2000 still the beast
가성비
Extrem pOwer - militaryTV, 1000bc, probably.
It's basically an updated PzH 2000 at 1/3 of the price.
PZH 2000 is still better stat-wise, just more expensive.
This is almost same as krab only difference is the chasis is of korean made but the turret design is british altered/ augmented by poland.
Samsung 💀
K9 Bajra
12123456 fire
Me, a World of Tanks blitz player : “oof! 19mm armour. HE rounds from the Panther I would pass through like butter.”
yeh..but 155mm can destroy you even it not hit you. it will flip your tank like a Turtle even it hit the ground near you.
@@youngmoon8762 Panther I was a highly mobile medium Tank. K9 is a Tank artillery. Big difference. K9 long reload time and not very mobile when compared to a Panther I.
Would be similar to a real world modern version of the British FV215b 183. Except the 215b has a 183mm gun. It is a Tank destroyer.
Also, Panther I was a Nazi German Tank not currently in use by any military. You can find them in museums.
And no, on 1v1 scenarios, No medium tanks will come even close to “flip your tank like a Turtle” against it. In fact, it will get HE’d. Prediction, 1st shot miss (k9) and then boom! Just like the FV 215b 183
The title question isn't even answered....waste of time...👎
How is it that Korea is taking the lead in artillery and tank systems when we Americans spend trillions on defense? We are getting ripped off by US arms companies. Also we spent trillions defending Korea for 70 years while they saved money to do this. Time to leave Korea, they can defeat the north easily without us. Kudos to Korea for these brilliant systems.
1. US taxpayers are getting ripped off by arms companies 2. Korea pays the US for defense costs 3. Korea buys a bunch of USA made weapons 4. Korea supported USA in Vietnam, Iraq, and other places and projects
The reason Americans are here is because of the China. The beggers in the cold fields are nothing.
@@llIlIlllIllllIlIl Due to Korean topography even China couldn't due anything rapid. If they did killing a few thousand US soldiers won't matter. If Korea wants them to stay let then pay the cost in full, including pensions etc. We have propped up Korea for too long.
If the U.S. gives up its check on China, it will be possible to withdraw U.S. troops from South Korea. But will the U.S. be just watching China grow?
Whoa there, that's a lot of oversimplified Trumpist speak. There are lots of reasons for the things you're talking about. You're not wrong, you're just oversimplifying by a lot, and knowing some details could get you thinking deeper, whether or not you keep wanting the US military off Korea. Just read up, it's interesting. Anyways, the real money drain isn't stationing troops in Korea, it's all the free-world countries giving all their jobs to China. If it continues, we are all doomed. Think about it, we've all made China the Amazon/Walmart of the world and the rest of us are high-ticket specialty shops. Stupidest thing ever.
It’s bad ass, but i would choose the Swedish Archer system from BAE. 7 rounds in 9 seconds and more agile.
Archer and K9 is different beast. Wheeled vs tracked. Many country prefer tracked vehicle for a reason.
7 rounds in 9 seconds only in ideal conditions.
The archer is probably better for countries with more flatlands. Since its wheeled but for countries like korea which is around 70% mountainous terrain wheeled vehicles are inferior to tracked vehicles.
1 Archer with all auxilary systems would probably cost double the cost of a K9. The K9 is hands down the most common self-propelled howitzer on the planet. By now there's probably more of these operating in more militaries than Palladins.
when i saw samsung....... it reminds me of my leaky washing machine ..... :-)
Skip to the very end for only info that makes the most recent variant still in development game changing albeit at even more complexity, but as we have seen in Ukraine, it appears hi tech and complexity DOES out do quantity, so. Otherwise this is the worst mil tech review I've ever seen.
Cheaper and western standard
I'm so confused by these narrators... they have flawless American accents but they sound like they're reading really bad translations/ can't pronounce certain words... what's the deal?
필요없음 안사면될거아냐!!!!! 한국의 주력 K9 욕하지말고 당신들나라에는 있는지나 확인해보쇼! 우린 자체개발한K9입나다.
Archer is better design
I was a k9 crew member... I hate this thing. Yeah it's cool... but you would also hate it if you've ever had to do maintenance on this monstrosity...